hutton
Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
hutton
ParticipantFOI list: new bodies
Full list of those now covered by the Freedom of Information Act.
The Veterinary Council; The Irish Horse Board Co-Operative Society Limited; The Aquaculture Licensing Appeals Board; The Marine Casualty Investigation Board; The Mining Board; The National Advisory Committee on Drugs; Coiste an Asgard; The Civil Defence Board; An Chomhairle um Oideachas Gaeltachta agus Gaelscolaiochta; The Advisory Council for English Language Schools; Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies; An Education Support Centre as provided for in section 37 of the Education Act 1998; The Further Education and Training Awards Council; Gaisce – Gradam an Uachtaráin; The Higher Education and Training Awards Council; Integrate Ireland Language and Training Limited; International Education Board of Ireland; Irish Research Council for Science Engineering and Technology; Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences; Léargas – The Exchange Bureau; The National Centre for Guidance in Education; The National Centre for Technology in Ireland; The National College of Ireland; The National Council for Special Education; The National Education Welfare Board; The National Qualifications Authority of Ireland; The National University of Ireland; The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland; The Royal Irish Academy; The Royal Irish Academy of Music; The Company Law Review Group; The Craft Council of Ireland; All County Enterprise Boards; The European Social Fund Financial Control Unit; Science Foundation Ireland; Skillnets Limited; The Affordable Homes Partnership; The Building Regulations Advisory Body; The Dublin Dockland Development Authority; The Local Government Management Services Board; The National Building Agency Limited; The Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland; The Valuation Tribunal; The Advisory Board to Irish Aid; An Bord Altranais; The Crisis Pregnancy Agency; The Dental Council; The Dental Health Foundation; The Drug Treatment Centre Board; The Health Insurance Authority; The Health Research Board; The Health Services Accreditation Board; The Medical Council; The Mental Health Commission; The National Breast Screening Board; The National Cancer Registry; The National Council for the Professional Development of Nursing and Midwifery; The National Treatment Purchase Fund; The Office of Tobacco Control; The Opticians Board; The Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland; The Pre-Hospital Emergency Care Council; The Special Residential Services Board; Censorship of Films Appeal Board; Censorship of Publications’ Appeal Board; The Criminal Injuries Compensation Tribunal; The Human Rights Commission; The Registration of Titles Rules Committee; The Family Support Agency; The Office of the Pensions Ombudsman; The Commission for Taxi Regulation; The Medical Bureau of Road Safety; The Institute of Public Administration.
© The Irish Times
hutton
Participant@a boyle wrote:
The widening of the footpath by one traffic lane (there is one spare lane that doesn’t serve any purpose , and i always get stuck in it! )
Spot on. At present the IT block primarily works as a trianglar roundabout for traffic, dating from thee days that it and O C st were the primary artery. Plenty of opportunity to do something now. Widening paths or putting down new ones would be a good start. And maybe likewise on Westmoreland also? Or whatabout wide medians in the middle of the two streets, planted up with trees?
hutton
Participant@Bren88 wrote:
Anyway my vote goes for the giant blocky mess on the corner of bolton street and henrietta st.
Exactly. This is the kind of vile shite that should make the list….So the Henrietta St Horror or the Capel St Cathastrophe…. Come on lads/ lassies, more suggestions needed! 😀
hutton
ParticipantA true great. His funeral was this morning. RIP.
Tributes paid to eminent architect Arthur Gibney
Ãine KerrTributes have been paid to the award-winning and renowned architect Dr Arthur Gibney, who has died at the age of 73 after a sudden illness.
The former president of the Royal Institute of Architects in Ireland (RIAI) and president of the Royal Hibernian Academy is survived by his wife Phyllis and son John.
RIAI director John Graby yesterday described Dr Gibney as one of the most significant Irish architects of the 20th century.
His technical and artistic ability added to his historical architecture research and conservation work made him worthy of the title of “complete architect”, according to Mr Graby.
“He is a great loss to us all. He has been one of the most important figures in Irish architecture and was both a charming and generous person.
“He was indeed a unique figure and will be missed both as an architect and as a person,” said Mr Graby.
In 1974, Dr Gibney received the RIAI Triennial Gold Medal, which is the premier award for architecture in Ireland, for his work on the Irish Management Institute.
Stephen McKenna of the Royal Hibernian Academy said that Dr Gibney was “a man of many parts” due to his work as architect, painter, sculptor, historian, academic and president of the Royal Hibernian Academy until October 2005.
“The academy owes him an incalculable debt. The nine years of his presidency saw the transformation of the institution from a quiet backwater to a vital part of the visual arts in Dublin,” said Mr McKenna.
He added: “It was his vision and perseverance which prepared the way for the planned refurbishment of the building and the re-opening of the academy school. He will be sorely missed by his friends and colleagues.”
© The Irish Times
hutton
Participant@Seamus O’G wrote:
Hmmmmmm.
This building is setting some kind of a record on this thread.
Yeah it must be… i dont suppose it could be any of the buildings in around the Kings Inns? just that bit too early I suppose:( ….Go on Graham, give us another clue 🙂
hutton
Participant@LOB wrote:
Seems to be the former hotel on North wall Quay
http://www.irish-architecture.com/buildings_ireland/dublin/northcity/quays/north_wall/british_rail_hotel_lge.htmlYep..Thats F…Well spotted….If you look at the distinctive chimneys, you could say that it all appears to, eh, “stack up” 😮
hutton
ParticipantDammit… Double posting…Ah well it is my 100 posting, so maybe such is okay 🙂
hutton
Participant@ctesiphon wrote:
(a) + (b) = …
Oohh yes… …”Pearce Place”!
And do I win an extra-prize for nominating it to be mentioned in a thread entitled “How well do you know your future Dublin?” :p
hutton
ParticipantFrom Village Magazine – http://www.villagemagazine.ie/article.asp?sid=1&sud=38&aid=1730
Greasy Till by Matt Cooper
by Matt Cooper
Thursday, May 4, 2006Winner alright
If there were to be a competition to name the builder most liked by Fianna Fáil’s senior politicians then it’s a fair bet that Sean Dunne would be the winner, despite a long list of contenders. Dunne is a regular at Fianna Fáil’s annual fundraiser at the Galway Races, like so many other multi-millionaire builders. However, he is seen regularly in the company of ministers at various functions, particularly the likes of Charlie McCreevy (whose palatial country house he built) and Brian Cowen.
When he married his second wife, journalist Gayle Killalea, in the summer of 2004 he hired the controversial Irish-owned tax-incentive yacht, the Christina O. According to the definitive report of the event – a full page by Anne Harris in the Sunday Independent – McCreevy offered his best wishes over a speakerphone for everyone to hear. Twenty minutes later the Taoiseach came on the line. “Dunner, you and I go back a long way. I wish I could be there,” Anne Harris reported Ahern as saying to the assembled audience. “I’m sorry I couldn’t come but I would have been more trouble to you than I’d be worth.”
Two years ago, Dunne was merely a highly successful builder of housing estates and apartment blocks. He prospered as the Fianna Fáil/Progressive Democrats government made little other than vague gestures towards somehow reining in the extraordinary house-price inflation that has characterised its nine years of rule.
Now, however, Dunne has gambled vast sums on a project of extraordinary ambition. Village readers are familiar with his land acquisitions in Ballsbridge in Dublin 4. He spent €380m on buying Jurys Hotel and the Berkeley Court, to give him less than seven acres of land on which to build, once those establishments are demolished. According to reports, he wants to buy the Hume House office development from Irish Life to add to the site and another Office of Public Works-owned property, the Faculty Building. His plan to buy all the land in this sector of Dublin 4 was thwarted by Ray Grehan’s purchase of the two-acre veterinary college site for the extraordinary price of €171m.
This monopoly-style game of land acquisition continued last week when he teamed up with Hibernian Insurance to buy AIB’s headquarters (opposite the RDS) for €378m. It is believed Dunne paid about €200m for four blocks of commercial space and 2.5 acres of vacant land, with Hibernian getting the other four blocks. It seems that, if planning permission is obtained, Dunne will demolish the existing buildings to build taller offices or apartments, or a combination of both.
Taller is the key word. To profit Dunne must build upwards. There is talk of Manhattan-style buildings in Dublin 4, to accommodate Knightsbridge-style levels of consumption. An elite playground for the wealthy of modern Ireland made up of luxury apartments, swish shops, expensive restaurants and five-star hotels.
Apparently, his plans for the hotel site will be revealed within the next month. A major, international, architectural competition is quietly under way to draw up financially suitable plans. The expectation is that they could propose apartment blocks as high as 32 storeys, the Berkeley Court is just nine storeys high. This may be just a softening up of expectations, but experts say it is hard to see anything working commercially at less than 20 storeys. There may also be a little matter of preservation orders over the trees that border the two hotels.
But what do the planning authorities make of all of this? Little is being said about the social and environmental consequences of these plans. Does Ireland want the construction of an elite enclave for the super-rich? (Or does it have that already in D4, making the nature of further development irrelevant?) Will there be social and affordable housing on 20 per cent of the land, for example, or will Dunne compensate Dublin City Council by building such accommodation for the riff-raff elsewhere? Maybe Dublin should be a high-rise city, but has anyone in authority made this decision? And if so, should such high-rise be restricted to areas like the docks, instead of being allowed in leafy suburbs already struggling to cope with traffic volumes, or to overlook existing houses?
Few of these questions have been asked as yet. It is as if everyone is in awe of the sums of money involved and fascinated by the scale of Dunne’s ambition. Clearly, Dunne has had many successes in the past, and has the money to use as downpayments on these investments and to attract banks to lend the balance (probably as much as 90 per cent, which reduces his risk). But past successes – in a booming market – do not guarantee future successes. What would the consequences for the banks and the heart of Dublin be if he fails? And what would happen to the character of Dublin if he succeeds?
Dunne is likely to lobby hard to get his way. He has to do that because the bet he has taken is enormous. As well as the cost of purchasing the land, he has to finance eventual construction costs and all other legal and technical fees associated with bringing the idea to fruition. But it has been estimated that he could spend €1.2bn in Dublin 4 over the next ten years before he generates real returns to repay the banks and reward himself. And he needs the property boom to continue if he is to sell lots of €1m plus apartments.
One wonders what Ahern, Cowen and other ministers make of their friend’s ambitious plans to reshape the landscape of Dublin 4. Will they support, object or affect neutrality, as if this is merely a commercial matter of no real interest to politicians? Will friendship with Dunne influence their thinking? Eventually, of course, it will come down to the planners, and what they think is in the best interests of the development of the city. And we can have every confidence that they’ll make the right decisions, oblivious to all factors of wealth, influence and begrudgery. Can’t we?
The Last Word with Matt Cooper is broadcast on Today FM, Monday to Friday, 4.30pm to 7pm
hutton
ParticipantBy the way all names featured are based on historical fact, although “Slutsend” was also known as “West Farm” at that time!
hutton
ParticipantDevelopers to be pursued over “misleading†place names
A new initiative has been launched following the discovery that builders are “culturally cleansing†the real identity of locations by re-naming them when marketing developments for sale.
A spokesperson for “Po-Face”, Placenames Originality – Foreign Allocations Can be Eliminated, said that in some cases the practise is to be reported to Advertising Standards Agency as well as to the Tribunal on Good Taste.
“Take for example ‘Fairveiw Strand’; it is remarkable that some builder has been allowed to get away with changing the name of an entire area from ‘Tra Baile Bocht’ – which means the ‘Poor Town Beach’ – to ‘Fairveiw’, which completely misleads. Seeing as no permission was sought when this happened in the 18th century, we will be pursuing the developers descendants for appropriate amends.â€
Other instances where this has happened include Glasnevin Cemetery. Municipal surveys from the 1920’s indicate that the area was marked as having “Slutsend†as its name – yet this was changed when the graveyard was extended. “Obviously ‘Slutsend’ is a far more appropriate name for a north-siders graveyard†the spokesperson commented.
Similarly the new developments along Misery Hill in Dublins South Docks are to be monitored. “Given the price that the apartments there will cost, we feel it is wholly appropriate that young home-owners can use this address, and so reflect the misery of a having had to take out a 40 year mortgageâ€
Leopardstown is also on the list to be targeted, as “it is an abomination of ‘Lepers Town’, when their was a lepers colony there; we feel the good inhabitants of that leafy suburb will be pleased when we succeed in having the real name put back”.
It is expected that the group will raise the matter with the City Council next week. However already differences are emerging as part of the group wants O’Connell Street named “Sackville Streetâ€, while another part insists that only “Drogheda Street†will suffice.
hutton
Participant@Graham Hickey wrote:
Himself will be on the Late Late tonight.
Anybody see it? I missed it as i had other commitments 🙁
hutton
ParticipantMr Clerkin, Thank you for re-opening this thread; it reflects well on you and the running of this site all the better to do so…even if it does aNoise Thomond Park 😀
hutton
ParticipantIE’s Barry Kenny was just on Newstalk. As Im sure a lot of people already know, the plan is essentially to run 2 Dart corridors from:
1: Bray/ Wicklow line – Pearse – Connolly – Maynooth
2: Howth/ Drogheda line – Docklands – Pearse – Heuston – Kildare line
Its certainly a step forward, but I cannot understand why the existing Phoenix Park tunnel isnt to be incorporated :confused:
Just think about it – if new junctions were put in at Heuston and Liffey Junction, you could have
1; A continious city-centre circle route, a la London or Paris. It being Ireland, lets call it “The Golden Circle” 😀
2: The routes crossing each other twice, ie;
A) Bray – Pearse – Connolly – Heuston – Kildare line
B) Howth – Docklands – Pearse – Heuston – Maynooth
Any thoughts?
Anyway –
http://www.irishrail.ie/news_centre/…iew&news_id=78
Work to commence on developing underground DART line by Corporate Communications
Iarnr
hutton
Participant@Thomond Park wrote:
For Historic ruins I would do the town of Athenry and for a ‘Great House’ I would do Belvedere House near Mullingar
Belvedere House with its Jealous Wall, The castle at Athlone, and then theres the castle at Portumna, Charleville Forest at Tullamore, and of course,
Clonmacnoisehutton
ParticipantAh well there goes my cosy little consensus…
Devin wrote:In situations like these you are not retaining the buildings as such]Aah but not quite – a closer examination of the railings shows that they are A) Brand new, B) of cheap quality 🙁
Still the concept here is really important. Its not so much the aesthetic specific to this scheme that I like but the concept; I really like the idea of going up on top of low-lying city centre buildings such as these.
Two other much earlier examples of this in Dublin include
A) The Irish Press building on the quays, which was a disaster (Graham, get out “Lost Dublin” there and we’ll have a weep!) and
B) That Georgian imposter besides and part of the Shelbourne Hotel, which is now 6 floors over basement – with the 2-floor ‘top-up’ onto the original Georgian house having happened in the late 19c, I think 😉
hutton
Participant@Thomond Park wrote:
. I would love to see the Jervis Centre offer some additional pedestrian flow besides the first floor circulation route.
Yeah – it lacks engagement with abbey and – ironically – Jervis St on ground levels. Still, not the self-evident failure that Wolfe Tone Square is, post “regeneration”.
Please DCC, admit the failure; re-enstate the walls, try for an Iveagh gardens type feel, and most importantly, please re-arrange the grave stones so they are not a foot path, as is now the case (last time I saw a treatment like that was on Schindlers List 😮 ) .
hutton
ParticipantUp with the top-ups so! 😀
- AuthorPosts