GrahamH

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1,821 through 1,840 (of 3,577 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bridges & Boardwalks #734403
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Ah – often wondered why that DART section of Connolly was closed…

    Unfortunately I’d have to agree about the new Boardwalk too – they’ve all just moved down from Custom House Quay and Butt Bridge, given a permanent home as it were.
    They’re all harmless enough, aside from the ‘odd’ bout of fighting, shouting and generally being agressive, but certainly they generate an intimidating environment when the Boardwalk is empty, which frankly is most of the time. The rubbish left behind is the worst aspect of their congregating – not to mention them making the area very hostile for families, or even sitting down for your lunch.

    Considering they always congregate in groups around this area, I don’t know what policing can do other than just move them on to somewhere else…

    in reply to: Modern Irish domestic architecture? #756337
    GrahamH
    Participant

    It’s a great shame how so many modernist houses, albethey not overly remarkable by international standards are left to crumble away, while older ‘heritage’ buildings are the only ones considerd worthy of restoration, or even just basic care and attention.
    As you say there’s some real gems out the Stillorgan way – always laughed at how more liberal the architecture becomes the closer you get to Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown 😀

    Geragh is a design classic.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729204
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Sorry for being smart Boyler, but come on – there’s 24 million pages of info here, even the odd one will give you what you need 🙂

    Lower O’Connell St is largely finished in terms of public domain paving works etc, while Upper O’Cll St is just being started – in every sense…

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729203
    GrahamH
    Participant

    I wouldn’t know, but I think there are a few people here that are interested so they may be able to help…

    Thanks for all that listing Thomond Park – the last posting of Section 84 in particular. It says it all.
    Obviously one cannot just say right City Council, off you go now with files in hand to every property on the street.

    But at this stage I do not think it is too much to ask that certain key properties are taken in hand by the CC considering how much time has passed with nothing happening. An obvious target is the Joe Walsh Tours and ‘Come in And Visit’ block of three forming the corner with Henry St.

    It has all five key elements in need of attention – appalling shopfronts, dilapidated upper floors – esp Joe Walsh, inappropriate signage, undesirable building uses, and protected structure status covering all buildings surprisingly with the exception of Joe Walsh Tours considering it is probably the oldest building surviving on the street.
    Delightful sign upstairs too :rolleyes:

    …in breach of the ACA and SPCS.
    It’s stuff like this that is so irritating – letting market forces improve things is one way of doing things, but seven years passing and no attempt made at all to improve basic problems with the very worst and most prominent properties is just not acceptable.
    To improve this block alone would make the world of difference to Upper O’Connell St. The view above is also that of the first view of the Street from North Earl St, especially for many people visiting from the North via Connolly.

    Saying this, I wouldn’t want a paintbrish to go near those facades unless a proper restoration was going to be carried out. An owner or occupier will quite likely hire out a firm to smother the facades, crumbling render and window reveals and all in sunset yellow, and leave it at that for another ten years to appease the CC. That is not not acceptable either. A full programme of works needs to be carried out, even the possibility of revealing Gardiner’s Georgian brick ought to be investigated with the help of the CC.

    Also Joe Walsh Tours needs to emphasise its corner positioning a lot more, with the possibility of creating a corner entrance like was there originally (pic soon), and decent frontage onto Henry St as well as O’Cll St.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729196
    GrahamH
    Participant

    That’s kinda key to it all right!

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729194
    GrahamH
    Participant

    The importance of O’Connell St being designated an ACA, just like so many other areas that have been designated as such, is that the character of the whole area is protected, regardless of whether certain buildings are protected structures or not.
    As the ACA points out: “Owners and occupiers of non-protected structures located within the O’Connell Street
    Architectural Conservation Area should note that the normal exemptions from seeking planning permission pertaining to certain type of developments under the Local Government (Planning and Development) Regulations 1994-1999 will no longer apply.”

    No doubt Thomond Park will bombard us with relevant Special Planning Control Scheme material :), so I won’t go into much other that it is defined as: ‘all or part of an Architectural Conservation Area that is of special importance to the civic life or the architectural, historical, cultural or social character of a city or town in which it is situated’.

    In the case of O’Connell St, it elaborates in great detail on the content of the ACA. In physical terms it also covers the same area as the ACA. As you’d expect it lists and defines many types of uses that are deemed inappropriate and will not be permitted on the street in the future, and many types of future development stipulations such as signage, entrances, uses above ground floors etc.
    But despite the pages and pages and pages of these very detailed (and of course important) stipulations, there is a single paragraph above all that really stands out as important given the current condition of O’Cll St, esp Upper O’Cll St. All of the planning content of the ACA and the SPCS refers to future development.
    But in terms of the existing inappropriate uses, architecture and features, this tiny little paragraph is crucial:

    “Where non-desirable uses continue to operate in a manner and form that detract
    from the quality and character of the street, the planning authority may seek to enter
    into negotiations with the relevant owner/occupier. In this regard and depending on
    the specific circumstances of each case, the planning authority may require the
    owners/occupiers to either implement a programme of works to eliminate the
    problems associated with such a use – or to cease operating the use.”

    Continues:

    The programme of works required by the City Council may include the following:
    . The remodelling and upgrading of shopfronts and associated signage
    . The provision of imaginative shopfront displays for all premises with a ground
    floor frontage onto the street. These displays should not be static or bland but
    should be designed to create a lively presence on the street, while still reflecting
    the character of the street. They should be subject to regular review.
    . The installation and upgrading of air-handling systems
    . The introduction of more effective and efficient litter and waste management
    systems
    . Strict compliance with Dublin City Council’s requirements for deliveries and
    collections within the prescribed hours and outside the core trading period 10.00
    a.m. to 4.00 p.m. within the O’Connell Street area.

    in reply to: Dun Laoghaire Baths #731913
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Here’s a quite interesting discussion on the issue between Eamonn Gilmore and Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown Senior Architect and Planner Dr Eugene Gibbons/Gribbons on Pat Kenny last Tuesday.
    Pat having an active interest in the topic (for obvious reasons :)) makes it that bit more interesting.

    Scroll to around 42 mins into the programme for the discussion:

    http://www.rte.ie/rams/radio/latest/Tue/rte-todaywithpatkenny.smil

    in reply to: Dublin: it isn’t that ugly #752111
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Nothing?

    Small peripheral countries tend to be influenced rather than influence others.

    in reply to: Wooden windows in Ireland #756296
    GrahamH
    Participant

    We don’t do timber windows in Ireland timmi 🙂

    Figures released by the Irish Home Builders Association about this time last year stated that an extraordinary 80% of new homes in Ireland are fitted with PVC (and we’re heading towards roughly 76,000 completions this year), while 90% of what is now a huge replacement industry is comprised of PVC.

    Things are beginning to improve though, as increasingly housing estates are being built with timber frames, but the vast majority are still PVC dominated.

    Isn’t it frankly pathetic that we have to talk about timber windows today in terms of heritage and conservation – as if it’s a thing of the past. Even your post there ctesiphon is dominated by it 🙂
    But yes, in terms of older windows Neassa Roche’s book is really excellent, though a bit more detail on glass development in Ireland would be welcome – she was probably constrained for space, or maybe there’s little material available.

    In terms of older windows timmi, the Northern European sash completely dominates in Ireland, whereas in modern timber windows the Continental casement model is very common:

    …along with (the nasty :)) top-hinged window (PVC version here):

    These were especially popular in timber in the 1960s and 1970s in Ireland, but have simply been replaced with PVC versions.

    in reply to: Edwardian Farmhouse #755942
    GrahamH
    Participant

    😀

    But it’s so true, anyone that suddenly becomes interested in windows for whatever reason just gets hooked on them!

    That’s brilliant news about the pantry window, sure you’re as good as done now!
    If the shutters have been removed from all the other windows it’d be great to be able to reinsert them – though money money money is always lurking in the background…

    If you do go for the timber sashes they’ll be worth every penny. As soon as they’re in you will cringe at yourself for ever even looking at anything else!
    There’s nothing more delightful than a brand new or restored perfectly operating hand-crafted sash window – without getting too hung up on it 😮 they are a pleasure to use, and offer so much flexibility in terms of how you want to air rooms etc.

    And the architectural contribution to the house will be substantial, both externally and internally, and no doubt will add a few bob to its value too…

    Anyway, the best of luck with your new windows (what a strange thing to say :o). If you could post a picture or two upon completion that would be great 🙂

    in reply to: Traffic lights-Jnct Fitzwillam St & Baggot St #756314
    GrahamH
    Participant

    I know these lights well – they’re a delightful feature! And isn’t there a lovely little silver column lamp on the central island between them?

    Often wondered when they date from – the 50s?
    They definitely ought to be preserved – they’re not listed in the current protected list, but it’d be well worth proposing to the City Council that they be added.

    in reply to: What is the most attractive bridge over the Liffey? #755837
    GrahamH
    Participant

    I’m sure there’s a witty response to that….

    Yes telephone kiosks would rate as street furniture in most people’s books, whereas such large scale structures restricted to use at only certain times generally are not. How can a closed up cube be called street furniture when it serves no function at all, not even decorative like lampposts can be?

    in reply to: What is the most attractive bridge over the Liffey? #755835
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Is there a definition of street furniture in the Dev Plan?

    I would consider them very much so to be retail units due to their sheer individual scale. They are too substantial in size to be considered furniture, and especially a grouping of four of them.
    A smaller unit, like the Boardwalk coffee outlet model would scrape it in as furniture, but not these.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729187
    GrahamH
    Participant

    😀

    Couldn’t believe the €700,000 price achieved – especially with one of the Proclamations not even reaching its reserve a few weeks ago.

    As Greg F mentioned earlier, the O’ Rahilly plaque erected off Moore St recently looks very well; the fluted scroll-and-ribbon detail very much so of its time.

    in reply to: What is the most attractive bridge over the Liffey? #755833
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Out of curiosity: even if these units did look right, how is it that the kiosks of O’Connell St are deserving of a decent wood-clad finish, but these even more prominent ones aren’t? Are the plasticy grey panels supposed to merge into the sky or something?!

    in reply to: Edwardian Farmhouse #755940
    GrahamH
    Participant

    That pantry window was a great find – always very exciting to find original features!
    This should act as a very good guide for the other sashes – especially the horn detail, if any, which could be copied exactly assuming it is original. Also the thickness of the timbers and the design of the overall frame etc could act as an excellent guide for your joiner.

    As for the ‘fittings’ you talk about, is it the windows themselves or the hardware such as catches and locks etc that you’ve been told are available in PVC?
    Either way, it is true that PVC is available for imitation timber sashes – indeed the poor horn picture posted last time is that of a PVC sash. To be truthful to you, PVC is becoming increasingly better at replicating traditional sash windows, as much as I’d like to say otherwise – from a short distance in fact some are simply indistinguishable from originals.
    Even so, up close you can always tell the difference – the corners are sharper and harsher, the joins are more evident, and the majority still tend to be clunky in design – like these ghastly yokes :rolleyes:

    Fundamentally though, can anyone say that they prefer what are at the end of the day plastic windows in favour of natural, sustainable, handcrafted, traditional timber?
    In my view at least there is simply no competition.

    As for the hardware of traditional sashes such as the catches to lock the sashes and pulleys or wheels, there are plastic versions available, especially for the pulleys which are hidden from view:

    But it is always best to go for brass where affordable as they’ll last forever save the odd bit of oiling, with little risk of ever breaking:

    Saying that, there are severe cost implications – on the internet the brass are about €10 each, while the plastic and steel ones are about €2 each!

    As for the window catches which are in view, it is a matter of personal taste really. Personally I think very bright modern brass versions like these are a bit much:

    …whereas toned down models like this Edwardian one can look very elegant:

    I’d guess that simple iron or brass ones similar to that above were common on most simple house sashes like yours.

    As for the pane layouts, it’s quite simple how windows developed ‘through the ages’.
    When sashes first came to Ireland (quite late by all accounts) in the mid-late 1600s, glass could only be made in very small panes, blown by hand. So to make up a large window, it had to be divided up into six or nine panes per sash. Though processes became more refined, this is how windows were made for the next two centuries or so in Ireland, until a new form of making glass made larger panes more affordable by 1850, resulting in two-over-two windows for about 15 years. By the 1860s, large one-over-one sashes became affordable, though still expensive until the 1870s, when they became standard in cities, but not until the 1880s before largely standard in all areas of the country.

    Even so, two-over-two design often remained in rural areas as did the Georgian sash design, which regardless made a comeback everywhere in the 1890s through to the 1930s, often seen in school and institutional buildings & railway stations etc. So rural houses like your own can never be guaranteed a certain style, unlike cities.
    As always, rural areas tend to have their own way of doing things 🙂

    There are loads of pictures on the internet via a Google image search if you want to print out better pics for the previous owner to look at.

    Be warned though, from now on you’re gonna become a window fanatic – everywhere you go you’ll be looking at windows and annoying everyone in the car everywhere you go 😀

    in reply to: What is the most attractive bridge over the Liffey? #755831
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Yes.

    Poor old Grattan Bridge, definitely in the top four for me anyway. The fridges certainly seem to have something to do with the result.

    I was sitting there recently with two other people and it was they who were pointing out how ridiculous everything was, the fact that you’re facing the fridges rather than a view of the Liffey, the fact that there’s little room for pedestrians to get by, the fact that you have to stand in a flippin drainage channel to be served at the stalls, the fact that three of the fridges were closed or vacant, and the poor timber finish of the brand new benches.

    The fridges ought to be removed and a pedestrian friendly scheme laid out to overturn the injustice done to the city’s most unusual bridge.

    in reply to: National Conference Centre Competition 2005 #756019
    GrahamH
    Participant

    On a related (okay not at all) issue – does anyone know what site it is that the DDDA offered to the Abbey two weeks ago?

    John O’Donoghue said it had a lead over other proposals being considered.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729184
    GrahamH
    Participant

    No.

    Was aware of the general content of the 2000 Act pertaining to protected strructures, and the establishment of the ACA concept, but that is all.

    in reply to: Edwardian Farmhouse #755937
    GrahamH
    Participant

    To be honest I haven’t had any experience of ordering new sashes myself, but even from looking through the Yellow Pages etc on previous occasions you can see the dedicated window and door joiners, and then those that make stairs and roof-joists etc with windows on the side. I presume it is the latter that tend to churn out the clunky yokes, but that is not to say that a good all-rounder local joiner isn’t more than capable and experienced to make wha tyou want.

    Definitely shop around – as with everything the cheapest price doesn’t necessarily get you the better deal, nor do more expensive joiners result in a better product. Looking at prvious jobs done is usually the best way to assess their work – look at samples at their workshop and ask for any buildings or houses nearby that they’ve worked on and have a look.

    Good on you for asking the previous owner, I would’ve found it most difficult without offending him deeply 🙂
    Certainly I’d chase him for a photograph – any pic at all that even has a bit of the house in the background is all you need, as long as some of the window is in shot. All you need to find out is whether each shas was a single pane of glass or divided into two panes, as pictured above.
    It’s very likely they were single panes, but if you can confirm this you’re flying.

    Also the horns of the sashes are very important. These are quite literally little horns that were added as part of the vertical timbers of sashes from the 1820s onwards to help strengthen the window with the newly invented heavy panes of glass installed. Originally they were largely decorative, but by the 1850s were quite important as a structural support. They survived ever since until the ousting of the sash altogether in the 1930s and are an importnet feature of most sash windows.

    Some modern joiners can make a complete muck of them, especially PVC sashes which just can’t seem to do them properly at all.
    This lovely very simple rounded horn is probably identical to the ones your house had – as seen on so many early 20th century windows:

    They’re sited on the outside of the window on the bottom of the upper sash, and mostly inside the window, though not always, at the top of the lower sash like that pictured.

    Horns to avoid by a mile are angular, overly decorative modern ones like these:

    Your windows probably wouldn’t have had decorative moulding around the edges of the main timbers like this either.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,821 through 1,840 (of 3,577 total)