GrahamH

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1,321 through 1,340 (of 3,577 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729725
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Ah – thanks. There were plans floating about for a hotel in the shell of this building about three years ago – don’t know if it was a concrete proposal or if it’s still alive…

    Isn’t one of the great sights of Dublin, and easily the best of O’Connell St itself the fantasy skyline of the Lower street?
    It’s so exciting approaching from College Green and Westmoreland St, with the imposing architecture, theatrical cupolas and the intimidating Clery’s with its proud array of flags standing upright along its heavy parapet all emerging in the distance πŸ™‚

    The theatre of light you constantly see here can be great to observe as the sun plays on the bold features with heavy dark clouds looming over the city:

    And Himself too:

    It’s such a crying shame the terraces abutting North Earl St weren’t redeveloped in such a grand fashion as the Abbey St junctions – they barely even acknowledge the corners at all, let alone feature any type of skyline interest. The drop from Clerys down to the Ann Summers terrace is also a shame, it lets the street down significanty when viewed from the south (though does exaggerate the scale of Clerys as some consolation).

    Likewise having such small four storey buildings in the centre of the city’s main street is disappointing.

    in reply to: glass windows in Ireland #762721
    GrahamH
    Participant

    How ridiculous πŸ˜€

    Strange how it covers two floors too – completely throws the scale of the building, almost like a bit of theme park eye-trickery!
    There must be a stairwell there – or maybe there is still a floor division at the base of the fanlight, like those in the White House? πŸ™‚

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #767231
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Sorry, I mean Carlow Cathedral – do you know what the Supreme Court ruling was from what seems to be 1998?

    in reply to: glass windows in Ireland #762719
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Yes, it’s an important point to make that there was a threshold of about 6-8 windows in a property in the 1800s anyway, only above which the tax was imposed.
    So in fact it wasn’t window tax that caused humble cottages to have such small windows, or for them to have so few, but rather the price of the glass itself which was the real cost. The fact that so many cottages only have two windows to the front and one or two to the rear, well below the limit, serves to demonstrate this.

    Glass was made in Ireland Garrett, but it seems the majority of it was imported from Britain – presumably economies of scale kicking in.
    Glass was always a prized commodity until about the 1770s when the large Georgian window became as common as muck really – seems to have lost its top-drawer appeal by then what with every Tom Dick and Harry having fashionably large windows installed πŸ™‚
    It seems to have been the first time that glass technology really changed architecture, in urban areas at least, and not the 1850s with plate glass as you’d tend to immediately assume.

    Though you would have to ask, why did such large crowns only come on stream in the 1770s? Why not much earlier considering that the same method (seems) to have been used for all that time? Did blowers just become more skilled and refine their practices?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #767229
    GrahamH
    Participant

    What came of the appeal to the Supreme Court do you know Praxiteles?

    GrahamH
    Participant

    I think it is a worthy notion to commemorate on a national level those who died in their attempts to establish this state. There’s FF’s Arbour Hill and Bodenstown events, and the annual remembrance of those who died in the WWs at the Royal Hospital, but is there anything that ‘covers’ the founders of the nation, whatever about 1916?
    Not being well enough versed on 1916 to comment on its ‘worthiness’ or otherwise, but at the very least there ought to be a national day of commemoration for all those who lost their lives in attempting to establish independence through the centuries.

    To swing this somewhat around to matters architectural, O’Connell Street is of course the perfect location on a host of levels for any such event.
    And never in a million years ought the GPO be converted for use as a 1916 museum – what a hokey concept. You can just see the wall-mounted boards stating how ‘this building’ used to be a ‘post office’ in the olden days – till we took it over of course, robbing it of its purpose and place in the city.
    There is nothing more civic, more publicly open and welcoming that a General Post Office. For it to be continuing in its same use as it has since 1818, and as in 1916, is the very thing that makes it special.
    The idea of the central building in our capital excluding its citizens on a daily basis in favour of drooling tourists is a notion too horrible to contemplate.

    As for a potential parade to commemorate 1916, the first thing that comes to mind is its clashing with the St Patrick’s Day Parade. It wouldn’t nearly have the same appeal a mere four weeks after the ‘Big One’, not to mention a festival week to boot…

    in reply to: South Great George’s Street #762266
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Yes it really ought to boost things on this side of the street, and the magnificent Victorian across the road on the junction with Stephen St is hopefully due a new lease of life soon too considering its recent sale.
    One of the finest Victorian commercial red bricks in the city I think with that deep-modelled facade – much of it is derelict at present:

    @hutton wrote:

    What thoughts anybody on the idea that the wonderful gothic brick block from Fade St to Exchequer St needs a plan to deliver on its own particular specific conservation/ usage needs?

    Was drooling over it only this morning :), especially the virtually ignored network of planned terraces to the rear. Some of them need ghaslty paint stripped off the brickwork of the upper floors, and the odd shopfront could do with renewal. Miraculously all the windows seem to be intact – in fact the only ones that were replaced if I remember correctly is three or six windows above Dunnes on the George’s St facade. Otherwise all of the tens and tens of originals in the Markets block and ancillary terraces are intact!

    The chimneys of the terrace to Drury St are a fine feature in particular. A decent floodlighting job of the George’s St facade wouldn’t go amiss – it could look spectacular.

    in reply to: British Symbolism on Buildings in Ireland #762089
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Hmmm interesting – never noticed them before either, just assuming them to be the marble baubles usually featured.
    The crowns seem to be mutlitonal too – though that could just be the dirt πŸ™‚

    Archiseek: “modelled on the London head office of Crown Life” – if that says anything…

    One of the magnificent heraldic sculptures of the Custom House:

    in reply to: New Aer Lingus HQ #762429
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Here’s an interesting article from the The Sunday Business Post, published exactly this time two years ago if that says anything about the current proposals…

    Aer Lingus may develop head office site
    Sunday, November 23, 2003

    By Neil Callanan

    Aer Lingus is understood to have invited submissions from a number of parties for a possible development of its head office site at Dublin Airport. The site, which measures just under 15 acres, would be suitable for a combination of offices, hotels and retail because of its proximity to the airport.

    “In line with our policy of examining every aspect of our business on an ongoing basis, Aer Lingus is currently reviewing strategic options for its property interests at Dublin Airport,” a spokesperson for the company said. “It is a significant asset and it is appropriate that we review it at this time.

    “The review is at an early stage and will look at all aspects of the property interests with particular emphasis on medium term strategic options.”

    No decision has yet been made on whether the project will go ahead.

    A number of sources said that the main building is beginning to show its age and that the airline would have faced a significant bill for refurbishing it and bringing it up to modern standards. Aer Rianta owns the site, but it is held by Aer Lingus on a 99- year lease which dates from the late 1960s. Aer Rianta would almost certainly have to approve any plans before any proposed development could go ahead.

    A high-density development on the site would cost at least Γ’β€šΒ¬250 million to build. However, putting an end va- lue on it would be more diffi- cult, because of the current weakness in the office market.

    The end value and the site’s attractiveness to office tenants, retailers and hotel operators would also b e dependent on whether the government proceeds with the planned metro scheme linking the airport with the city centre.

    Given the cost of the development, the company could opt to bring in a developer as a joint venture partner for any scheme that gets the go-ahead.

    Aer Lingus has been reviewing its property portfolio on an ongoing basis because its work force has fallen from 6,500 prior to September 11, 2001, to around 4,000 now.

    The planning department of Fingal County Council told The Sunday Business Post it has not had any talks at this stage with architects about the development.

    The local author ity is drawing up a new county development plan and is examining rezoning proposals in the county. It is due to be adopted in 2005.

    The airport is currently zoned Objective B under the county development plan “to protect and provide for the development of agriculture and rural amenity”. Aer Lingus does not appear to have made a submission asking for its site to be rezoned in the new country development plan.

    Since 2001, Aer Lingus has moved towards becoming a low cost airline. It has sold off its Dawson Street and O’Connell Street sales outlets, and moved towards selling more fares on its website. Much of the turnaround in the company’s fortunes is credited to chief executive and for mer pilot Willie Walsh.

    The news of Aer Lingus’s plans for its site comes less than a week after the Vega City consortium unveiled further details of its plans for a 2,500 acre holiday theme park destination close to Dublin Airport.

    Universal Entertainment Partners, which includes businessman Louis Maguire, developer Owen O’Callaghan and US company Oz- Central amongst its investors, plans to build and operate three international theme parks at the site.

    It also plans to build a new 22-kilometre monorail linking the park with the metro line.

    However, Fingal County Council’s planners strongly oppose the park on a number of grounds.

    © The Sunday Business Post

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729722
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Yep – they line all of Upper O’Cll St too. Presumably they’re all going into CC storage yards for reuse elsewhere.
    I wonder if they are original to the street, i.e. from the 19th century commercialisation of the thoroughfare, or if they were put down by the Corporation in the 70s or 80s having been dug up from elsewhere in the city?

    Good news about Fingal – have a feeling it just may have been sold off a few years ago, perhaps as part of the Carlton wrangling, with a lease-back arrangement – not sure though.

    GrahamH
    Participant

    @KerryBog2 wrote:

    or copied from the menu cover at the local Indian take-away.

    lol πŸ˜€

    We nearly crashed the car driving past it during the summer.
    It’s probably more Jacobean than Elizabethian – I’m sure there’s hoards of architectural historians swarming their way over as we speak to pick over the minutinae of its design.
    Either dynasty, they’d be rightly offended with that erected in their name.

    The 1916ers must be rolling in their graves with the resurrection of the oppressor’s aesthetic – the icing on the cake would’ve been if FF hired out its facilities πŸ™‚

    in reply to: vitrolite shopfronts #757166
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Oh dear – is there the faintest possibility though that the upper facade was removed just to allow for the installation of those I-beams?
    The green vitrolite may have worked quite well with Butlers – reminicent of minty chocolate…

    Clearly it doesn’t fit in with their sultry ‘traditonal’ image of black timber shopfronts πŸ™

    GrahamH
    Participant

    Did anyone find it ever so slightly nauseating that Bertie was proclaiming his party’s ‘true’ nationalist credentials, as being ‘true’ protectors of this island, in light of the damage being done through his planning policies?
    Indeed if the Ard Fheis’s host town was deliberately chosen as being what he deems suitably representative of this nation, I think it best we all get our coats.

    It’s strange you should mention the Elizabethians up north PDLL, they’re equally fond of them down south as it happens – indeed Bertie need only look out of his bedroom window at the latest fortified erection guarding the entrance to Killarney:

    Not being old enough to remember the last parade in 1969/70 (is anyone?:)), I’m in two minds about it. If nothing else a militaristic display in a modern, fairly homogenous Western society, along a commerical city street seems rather bizarre in 2005 – it’s so alien to us. And exactly what and whom is being celebrated/commemorated and for what reason is also something that needs clarifying in the public consciousness – i.e. 1916 needs clarifying.
    We’ve avoided it for the past 40 years.

    Might as well give the parade a lash at least, see how we react to it – we can always airbrush it out of history should it prove disasterous.
    We’re good at that.

    in reply to: Liam Lawlor #762578
    GrahamH
    Participant

    The news was shocking, as all car crash incidents are, but especially involving someone that is well known.

    Yes the impact of his loss on Mahon may well be significant, both in terms of his own potential contributions, and others’ ability to now hide behind his buried information.

    If there is one positive thing to be said about the man and his dealings with the Tribunal, it is his most amiable dealings with the media during his time there. Never one to dash into a blackened car, he seemed to almost enjoy the attention strolling across the Lower Yard every morning and evening, often replying to questions asked – likewise on various programmes.
    For all that can be said about Mr Lawlor, the sly CJ ducking and diving method just wasn’t his style – not outside the tribunal stand at least πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Palmerston Park (Grianblah) #762592
    GrahamH
    Participant

    There’s the most fantastic architecture round the Park (including the trees :)), but unfortunately unlike virtually every house within a squre mile of here, Grianblah (no 26) is not a Protected Structure…
    How do planing authorities handle cases of architectural merit that aren’t PSs I wonder?

    Have got got a picture altotude?

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729716
    GrahamH
    Participant

    These are from a few weeks ago. Quite a bit of progess has been made since as there’s a kerbline already in for some if not the whole length. Paving is now starting to be laid.

    Hopefully the grand pillar box in the first pic will go back in – restored.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #767220
    GrahamH
    Participant

    From the vague plans I’ve seen, the expansive altar interventions look like the flooring scheme of an 80s television chatshow – is it intended to cap it off with a salmon pink carpet?

    While it is easy to view the structure as a purely architectural entity, at the end of the day it is a working religious building and as such its use is as equally important as its fabric. Saying that, surely the proposed alterations are not necessary, or at least not on that scale?
    Whereas previous Vatican reforms were logical in altering the clearly skewed relationship between the celebrant and the congregation, the notion of ‘bringing the people closer’ in Cobh Cathedral – which by definition is going to have people somewhere in the building detached from the proceedings – seems to be founded in a vague symbolisim rather than practical concerns.
    It would be a great shame to see the interior so radically altered – especially having survived so long as it has intact.
    You’d think we’d be able to issue a sigh of relief by now having got through the 70s – clearly not.

    in reply to: Cycling in Irish Cities #761345
    GrahamH
    Participant

    :rolleyes:

    No doubt if you were wearing a novelty hat with a siren and flashing LEDs they wouldn’t have seen you.

    One thing that’s very noticable in Dublin is the level of Chinese people who cycle relative to the ‘natives’. I did a truly gruelling project a couple of years ago, involving standing about in the city centre for hours on end getting various opinions from cyclists. The amount of Chinese cycling was and is extraordinary – they accounted from what I experienced at the time (outside major rush hours) for about 40-50% of all cyclists!

    They come from a cycling culture, and evidently think nothing about cycling around Dublin upon arriving here – by contrast Dubliners just don’t do it! It served to demonstrate for me that while yes, there are impediments for many people to taking up the bike in Dublin, there clearly is a cultural issue too given the level of Chinese cycling in exactly the circumstances. We all live in the same city after all – they’re not experiencing anything different to ourselves!

    Of course one factor to take on board is that they are for the most part students, so naturally are more inclined to cycle, but even so they pull way above their weight in the cycling population. Even the other day I was watching all the cyclists pouring down from South Richmond St towards Portobello Bridge on the commute home – a considerable number were again Chinese.

    in reply to: Painting of Powerscourt House, Dublin??? #736324
    GrahamH
    Participant

    21st October 2005

    Powerscourt House is undergoing an impressive conservation or cleaning job at the minute – the adjustable scaffold unit is quite a sight!

    As tends to be the case with granite when cleaned, the difference really isn’t that noticable – to the extent that the rustic weathered look is nearly more preferable:

    A bit of dirt usually adds to the appeal of granite; it can take it, unlike the smooth even surfaces of Portland, lime or sand stones.

    The steps of Powerscourt are very dodgy at this stage, both in structural and weathering terms – they’ll probably need replacing soon, especially given the level of traffic they endure. Indeed so much of the Wicklow granite of the building is eroding rather fast. It’s one of the few major buildings in Dublin that still has all its original granite intact so it conveys very prominantly how the stone weathers – an indication of what Connolly Station may be like in 80 years time…

    It pains you to have to walk through the hallway too, as grand as it may be, but pedestrians’ shoes must absolutely destroy its beautiful stone floor, walking huge quantities of grit in off the street day in day out. It must be akin to scraping it with 100 scrubbing brushes and a couple of sacks of shattered glass πŸ™
    Always feel so guilty using it, but that hall’s just too tempting as a grand shortcut…

    The windows are also recieving attention.

    in reply to: York Street #762196
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Well given a third of the site is going to the RCSI, it’s unlikely the population will increase to any great extent, even with a higher density development…

    The Irish Architectural Archive has the most fascinating collection of photographs of ‘Old’ York Street from the 1960s.
    A lot were taken by the Dublin Corporation Dangerous Buildings Dept, some by Maurice Craig, and the majority not credited but clearly taken for archival purposes. Unfortunately from what I could make out, all of the pictures were of the northern terrace, i.e. the RSCI side rather than the 1940s terrace side.
    It seems all the pictures were taken in anticipation of the northern terrace being demolished c1964, as appreciation of Georgian stock was much greater by then than the 1940s when the southern block was swept away.

    The condition of some of the northern houses is truly shocking, but especially the notion that people were still living in these conditions in the 1960s in the very heart of the capital city. One dismal photo from 1962 showed a half landing with a magnificent timber window surround with fluted columns either side, and in front the most squalid conditions with a pail of water on the floor, a Belfast sink in the corner, what seemed to be some sort of wardrobe-like water closet squeezed onto the landing too, and of course all manner of filth and decay all about, with crumbling walls and plaster and the original arched window removed and a square sash put in its place.
    Another picture shows what seems to be an entrance hall, with the arch that divides the reception hall from the inner hall half-bricked up with concrete blocks.

    Outside the pictures taken by the Corpo were naturally of the worst parts, of barely-holding-together railing plinths and wonky railings, and other more significant structural issues.

    Above all though, you could make out what a fine street it once was, maybe as much as 100 years previously. The houses semed to be in the majority c1750-60 in character – the doorcases in particular would remind you of Parnell Sqaure and other Gardiner schemes of the mid-18th century, with a lot of doorcases like this but maybe smaller and bulkier in scale:

    Most interestingly though is that there were loads of doorcases as good as identical to those on the opposite side of the street today on these northern houses, the ones that seems to be of concrete:

    There were more elaborate versions of the corbelled doors, but definitely not the exact ones – so they seem to have originated on the southern terrace where they are now. What’s particularly sad to see is gothic timber panes in a few of the fanlights, and even in at least one of the half landing windows to the rear πŸ™

    Reading some bits and pieces from about the place it seems York St was one of the worst, if not the worst tenement area in Dublin in the 1940s, so it’s no wonder the Corpo wanted rid of the southern terrace at least. In one house there were no less than 24 families living in its rooms – and all sharing a single toilet. No doubt conditions improved somewhat by the 1960s, though judging by the half landing pic you’d think otherwise…
    There were new-fangled television aerials up on the chimneys anyway, so they had telly at least πŸ™‚

    It seems strange that the southern terrace was built to rehouse everyone c1950, yet it was another 12-14 years of utter squalor for the northern terrace before it was pulled down – why the delay?

    Does anyone know of the RCSI bought the terrace from the Corpo and then demolish, or did the Corpo clear it themselves with the intention of rebuilding but never realised their plans?

    Either way it’s become much clearer as to why the Corpor rebuilt the southern block in a Georgian style – simply because the northern Georgian terrace was to remain standing and in use as tenements for many years to come, hence the character of the street was maintained. Indeed in one pic of the northern terrace, you can just see the brand spanking new southern block in the background πŸ™‚

    Hope to go back and try to find some material relating to the all-important southern terrace – it’s due to disappear in a matter of days at this stage πŸ™

Viewing 20 posts - 1,321 through 1,340 (of 3,577 total)