GrahamH

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 521 through 540 (of 3,577 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763758
    GrahamH
    Participant

    As for St. Mary’s Church, as far as I know it’s protected and is probably the finest – and most bizarre – building in the area ๐Ÿ™‚

    It’s textbook ‘English’ 1930s isn’t it – you could tell it was a Protestant church a mile off.

    What a gem. Unfortunately some ugly boundary wall issues have emerged since these pictures were taken two years ago – they don’t look promising.

    The old, seemingly 18th century, St. Marys? next door is equally fascinating.

    And very sinister…

    ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    It’s wonderful that this layered, more organic built history survives beneath the processed development – now in itself of historical note – of the 1930’s Scheme.

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763757
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Indeed! Thanks for the clarifications and info. Of course now I remember the National School on St. Agnes Road – it’s an imposing stock brick affair with red brick dressings, dated 1916 or 1918, can’t remember which.
    Apologies for mixing up Road and Park – spend my life getting corrected on it :o. So do you mean that the church was actually built to align with the former Captain’s Lane, and not in fact St. Agnes Park which didn’t even exist at the time? As far as I know, its early red brick houses are post-war, c.1947-50, which would tie in with your thesis.

    Yes isn’t the old village of Crumlin just wonderful. It’s amazing the country character it still has. The part closest to the church is as you say the ‘modern’ village, essentially purpose-built roundabout 1950. Sounds like the residents of the Crumlin Scheme had to suffer with no facilities, just like today, for over a decade.

    Lovely crisp, simple lines.

    While the old village merges directly into it.

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763755
    GrahamH
    Participant

    It’s a good piece alright. The red brick girls school across the road is also an attractive collection of buildings – needless to say the girls, as usual, got the dressed, sensitive treatment, with a bombastic monolith reserved for boys…

    Looking down from the schools is the delightful St. Agnes Park, the main avenue leading down to the village and church (bizarrely built off-axis). Essentially it links the Crumlin Scheme to the existing old village.

    No doubt its trademark c.1950 concrete lampposts will get the chop before long ๐Ÿ™

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763753
    GrahamH
    Participant

    No Dave you’re probably right about the convent – I’ve always just assumed it was a school, but it’d make sense for it to be a convent, not least beacuse it looks like one, but also as there’d hardly be three primary schools clustered right beside each other. It seems the one behind on Captain’s Road is the post-war school – it has a later air to it. Yes I too have heard stories of what went on the the CBS on Armagh Road – apparently you could hear the roaring of brothers from passing outside on the street :eek:. Its columns are not unfinished though – they’re just modernist in style.

    Where was the school on St. Agnes Park do you know? On the site of the row of shops perhaps? This road has always fascinated me, because as you say you can see very clearly the interrruption of the War in terms of the style of house built. The transition from an essentially Edwardian design to much more modern house styles is clearly evident.

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763751
    GrahamH
    Participant

    ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    A few more views of two of the three schools on Armagh Road in the morning sun, all built around the late 1930s.

    This building probably has the greatest architectural ambition – the others are relatively predictable. Even this is no great shakes, but like its colleagues is well-proportioned and suitably imposing for what were some of the largest schools in the city. Such a shame all its original windows – probably of steel – have been lost.

    Lovely Mannerist entrance columns – always liked these.

    And a distinctive – if underwhelming – cupola perched on top.

    The adjacent school is more textbook watery neoclassical; it looks like a seaside Victorian convent in Dun Laoghaire.

    Sadly mauled with PVC a few years ago.

    Its austere chimneys and hipped roofs cut an imposing silhouette.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730608
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Yeiks – that miniature yellow statue looks like it was intended for a store further down the street…

    @Morlan wrote:

    Has anybody here sent a formal complaint to DCC regarding these ‘temporary’ signs?

    DCC are very aware of what’s going on Morlan. Some cases are being investigated, but nothing short of a wholescale crackdown is in order at this point. The message really needs to get out there.
    Essentially it’s only the banks and major stakeholders that do things by the book.

    As for the statue, Frank sums up all the pros very well. It’s a piece of urban street history that has a unique connection with the street (assuming it actually is the 1922 statue). Were it not a relic of that troubled time, or a freak, ad hoc development from a few decades ago when Ireland was a very different place, I’d say ditch it. But it is, and it is.
    Fair point kefu – only there’s commercial tat and social tat ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Indeed the statue looks so preposterous inside the sleek granite and glass case that it’s really quite funny – it looks like O’Connell Street has swallowed it: engulfed by the trademark ubiquity of the IAP refurbishment. So much so that it’s actually quite easy just to see the case and not the content itself, unless you want to go to the effort of seeing it. So top marks all round.

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766248
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Presumably the crypt of the Chapel?

    I do believe Morlan’s a/b/c heads are those of the distinguished Permanent TSB building on the corner of O’Connell Street and Lower Abbey Street – a rare example in the city of granite being used for such detailed carving. The beautifully serene ‘e’ is surely one of the Portland heads of Clerys, but I’m not sure as to the location of ‘d’…

    We also appear to have the Iveagh Markets and the Chapel Royal of the Castle in the mix there hutton. I think…

    in reply to: New Public Space for Docklands #765405
    GrahamH
    Participant

    There isn’t a raised eyebrow smiley is there?

    http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=xuAYG-DCRR0

    in reply to: Parnell Square redevelopment #751156
    GrahamH
    Participant

    It’s a concern most of us have I think. There was always something faintly sacrificial – not quite the word, but the right one’s just not coming at the minute – about there only being one way in and one way out. You had to make a commitment to entering the place; leave the outside world behind for a few moments. It’s just that bit more self-conscious now, more populist, more Celtic-Tigeresque – more bland.

    I do see the point of providing access north-south through the Garden: Parnell Square is soon to be revolutionised with a central garden surrounded by new four-storey Rotunda buildings – all linking into the Garden of Remembrance at the top.

    It’s just too tempting an opportunity not to do something on the new axis, but I can’t help thinking that something more discrete was in order as regards the design of the entrances.

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763748
    GrahamH
    Participant

    I can’t see it either lol. More a dagger perhaps? A slashhook maybe? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    Ah the schools – thanks for the pics Dave. Yes they’re three very interesting buildings – two stripped classical and one wine-bricked modernist, the latter finished in 1939 I think. Is either of the two former boys schools in use anymore? One is in pretty poor condition, with the other used by the health board I think – decked out in all-singing PVC a few years ago :rolleyes:. All combined, the schools form an oddly mounmental air to what is an otherwise modest residential suburb.

    I’d imagine the big corner houses with brick dressings are a little later than the stocky all-render houses, though it’s hard to say. I think there’s similar ones around Stannaway Avenue too, near the park. Lots of great front doors around here too, esp on private houses. If there’s a single good thing to be said about aluminium infill porches, it’s that they usually saved the front door itself from being replaced, so many have survived thus far. Alas the lure of the heritage stained glass brigade is proving increasingly strong of late. Hope to get some more pics soon.

    Agreed about Marino alonso. Generally nicer than Crumlin – it’s amazing what a few trees and more intimate road widths can achieve. There’s much more of a garden suburb feel there.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730577
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Heh heh.

    Alas it’s not the only thing that’s tacky. The street is clearly suffering from a systematic lack of resources being provided to Enforcement. This is the latest innovation to ‘beat the system’ – a typically Irish solution that of course means nothing if retailers bothered to read planning regs.

    *slaps knee* – oh but of course! They’re only temporary! That means they’re not really there! In fact, they’re completely invisible!

    Talk about a racket – this ‘Sign Design’ crowd must be raking it in.

    The same directly across the road.

    While Beshoff’s next door have also made their contribution.

    Around the corner on Henry Street – this part also in the IAP – we have another advertising banner.

    While down the road at the very entrance to the city’s main throughfare, Schuh clearly think they can get away with anything too. Unbelievable.

    Back up at the northern end, it’s business as usual with the aul favourites.

    I’ve lost count of the years at this stage.

    And all while DCC dabbles in the lucrative business itself. Truly truly shocking.

    They’re all over the street

    And none of this even remotely covers the countless other cases the entire length of the throughfare – virtually every week both temporary and permanent signage is being tacked on to property left right and centre. Especially those projecting signs that have such a nasty cumulative cluttering effect. And nearly every retail premises on the street has posters attached to its windows, some almost completely covered.

    It’s really unbelieveable what’s going on here – barely even the major cases are being tackled. Not to lay it all at the feet of DCC – at the end of the day it’s retailers who are shooting themselves in the foot – but it’s up to the planning authority to both lead the way and clean up the mess, and they’re failing miserably on both fronts.

    in reply to: Parnell Square redevelopment #751154
    GrahamH
    Participant

    10/9/2007

    Well the OPW interventions to the Garden of Remembrance are nearing completion.

    The crisp smooth granite does stand out against the rubble limestone finishes of the Garden – maybe it’ll tone down in time. Indeed it doesn’t seem to want to ape the character of the Garden at all.

    The lighting columns are crisp and modern – oddly like pieces of a television set.

    An element of the original 1960’s design has been incorporated into the pattern on the glazed blaustrading.

    Beautiful handrail detailing.

    Presumably all of this will be replicated on the other side of the Garden when the Rotunda’s newly opened grounds link directly into it.

    While we’re here, there’s a great installation in the entrance hall of the Hugh Lane at the minute.

    All pieces are individually suspended, making for a beautifully natural installation that’s freakily alive!

    Partially funded as it happens by the O’Connell Street IAP Community Gain Fund.

    Last year’s repainting is still as crisp and elegant as the day it was finished too.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730574
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Quite possible, given there was a little more air in there today.

    You can clearly see the solar panel on top there too.

    Also a close-up of the LEDs.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730566
    GrahamH
    Participant

    It’s weird in a quirky way – it’d remind you of Mr Burns’ body being preserved in that incubator, or Krang in the Turtles in his goldfish bowl…

    It’s symbolic really – the Church curbed by and subservient to modern Ireland.

    My, how the tables have turned since this was first erected.

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763740
    GrahamH
    Participant

    All of the cast iron rainwater goods survive.

    As do the faintly Art Nouveau boundary furnishings.

    Supported by elegantly profiled little feet atop a rendered concrete base.

    It’s sited as an (admittedly underwhelming) focal point on a green on Cashel Road.

    Such a shame the state it’s in. Given the abuse I got from a passing car while taking the pics, looks like it’ll probably stay that way too.

    There’s other examples of these well-designed public buildings in similar estates.

    in reply to: The Great 1930s Scheme #763739
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Hello Dave. I’ve enjoyed your posts, and your obvious passion for these houses! It’s great to see such commitment and interest in something that most people just turn a blind eye to.

    I’m very surprised the houses of Cashel Road were only built with an outside toilet as late as c. 1930 – presumably they had interior washrooms at least? I must check out the corner houses you refer to.

    Thanks for the link you posted in your other thread – fantastic interiors!

    Property websites are increasing helpful for allowing sneaky views of original interiors!

    There is such little appreciation for the original joinery in these sturdy little houses: simple, elegant and pleasing to the eye. I recently spent about eight hours stripping back years of paint from a 1950’s handrail similar to that above, and in spite of the gruelling process, it came up beaufifully once sanded and stained as original. The difference these small improvements can make is enromous – the same regarding Bakelite handles, light switches, architraving, steel windows etc.

    Unfortunately more of this is still happening as we speak.

    Surely works of this scale require planning permission, in which case why is DCC permitting such unashamedly insensitive and inappropriate alterations to residential stock? And the original boundary walls swept clean away – now what monstrous tack can we expect in their place?

    Contrast the lop-sided disaster on the above corner house with its colleague opposite.

    What even remote connection does tan brick have to 1930’s pebble-dashed housing?! This coloured material in particular is bizarrely popular in Crumlin, and is destroying the place by stealth. Obviously there’s no objection to people extending their homes, but the ham-fisted manner of the vast majority of jobs leaves a lot to be desired. Not even a more considerate wine brick is ever used to tie in with existing string courses and dressings.

    And speaking of wine brick (you probably know this one Dave), there is the most delightful little gem of a building on Cashel Road in Crumlin, a stone’s throw from the three-school ‘campus’ in the area. Seemingly once built as a health centre or community hall, today it stands apparently idle or at best underused as a modern-day health centre for the South Western Area Health Board (which unfortunatly on first glance somes across as SWAB)

    A delightful neo-Palladian design, it features little curved wings (seemingly since heightened to stop people sitting on them), an imposing Lutyens slated roof, and crowned with crisp and elegantly austere chimneys.

    As is typical, the only steel windows to survive are those not being used or otherwise inaccessible – in this case in the charming central gable.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730562
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Well all is finished.

    The latest addition to the monumental core of the street.

    A nice crisp case.

    With elegantly profiled base.

    Though ironically for a solar-powered monument, it’s suffering disastrous greenhouse effects. Was ventilation not considered?!

    Hence apologies for the quality of the interior pics – not that anything could really make them much worse…

    Were the winners of the egg-painting competition in the local primary commissioned to decorate it? You gotta love Catholic iconography in this country: display cases and mounts are usually of better quality than the sculpture itself.

    Note the four LEDs on the ceiling of the case: the solar panel is on the roof above. There’s no lighting in the floor. To be slightly cynical, one would have to wonder if the solar-powering is more to do with a DCC lack of foresight in making electrical provision on the median – as with the Christmas lights on the Plaza – that an effort to be environmentally friendly…
    We’ll give them the benefit of the doubt.

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766239
    GrahamH
    Participant

    It does indeed. Great pics hutton – all the aul favourites cropping up, incl Morlan ๐Ÿ™‚
    Although I cannot actually think where No. 13 is. Think I only recognise it from photographs.

    Well done Phil on Trinity: I suspected only you’d get that – as usual ๐Ÿ˜‰

    A virtually unknown tiny little commemorative – and indeed ash burial – plot to the rear of the chapel.

    And with the most spectacular crown glass looking down on it!

    Fantastic stuff.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730554
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Well the plinth has arrived. It’s located to the northern end of the taxi rank, at the junction with Cathal Brugha Street.

    Built of polished granite.

    Only screwholes on the surface: the absence of electrical provision suggesting this will indeed be an eco ecclesiastical erection, with solar panels atop.

    Also the new Granby sign.

    Looks like they just wandered about the city popping them up at will. And although a number of cases are under investigation, it has to be said the street is still awash with recent unauthorised banners, advertisments and shopfront concoctions.

    in reply to: Convention centre #713577
    GrahamH
    Participant

    31/8/2007

    Maybe this thread is more suited to the Convention Centre, given there’s quite a bit of venting on it…

    Can’t say I’ve ever been a fan myself of it, and I suspect the interiors especially are going to require – or have already undergone – substantial modification from the near decade-old plan.

    I managed to attend the bells-and-whistles launch of the NCC a number of weeks ago, and certainly the consortium who won the operating contract are very experienced internationally, the Birmingham ICC just one of their sites (albeit the smaller one), so it ought not to be National Aquatic Centre Round II.

    The building is divided up as:

    Basement: Parking and ancillary services.

    Ground Floor: The Forum – the largest on-the-level exhibition space, with 3000 theatre or 2000 banqueting capacities. There’s also a vast entrance lobby here. Indeed all the floors have atrium frontage.

    First Floor: The Liffey Suite – also on-the-level, this can accommodate 1800 theatre or 1100 banqueting, and also has 11 large meeting rooms and 4 boardrooms, with mezzanine.

    Second Floor: The Auditorium – this is three storeys high at the very top of the building, and holds 2000 in raked theatre seating as seen here.

    The whole complex is highly flexible as is to be expected, and seems to be very well adapted to creating different atmospheres too. For evening conferences the exhibition halls on the lower floors can be transformed for dining, with access to raking night-time views of the Liffey when taking a breather from the event.

    However the enormous atrium appears to be little more than a Tribute to the Slab, i.e. the Jervis Centre on steriods, with vast expanses of crisp plasterboard adorning every conceivable surface, which looks decidely unimaginative. Hopefully the video renderings are just vague impressions, with lots of tweaking to be done – but thus far it’s certainly not a breathtaking interior. Perhaps the view from the balconies is the main focus of attention.

    Some views of the model.

    Directly attached to the rear of the centre – as seen above and below – is a proposed hotel, the operator yet to be confirmed. The proposed twisty bridge will adjoin it, running over the canal.

    Some of this doesn’t seem that accurate – things have changed a little since the model was comissioned in 1947.

    Incidentally, on that day I encountered two very well-known journalists – who shall remain nameless – who approached the model after sitting through the video promo, full-on explanation and presentation, and laden with enough glossy literature to line the walls of the said centre, neither with so much as a bull’s clue as to where the place was, what it was to house, who designed it, or indeed even the chequered saga of the whole proposal. Indeed the NCC rep there didn’t seem to know very much either, and it ended up with myself and another chap explaining the scheme to them. Thought it summed up quite neatly the commitment to the built environment in the Irish media. The abiding memory of the day is: “oh – so this is the Liffey then?”

    *points*

Viewing 20 posts - 521 through 540 (of 3,577 total)