garethace
Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
garethace
ParticipantOriginally posted by sw101
Ah brian. this sequential method is perfectly adequate for discussion. you’re just annoying people when you fuck around with itYou see SW, if like me you were a very experienced message board reader and poster on a regular basis, in a wide range of interests, like CG, Planning, Architecture and Computer Science…… then like me you would be more attuned to subtle differences in formats, which make all the difference.
Parallel discussion ability within within the same thread is essential to disect more complex issues – which are really a combination of subissues, rather than being one solid issue, with one right or wrong.
Why do you think the tribunals, and Dail proceedings take so long and all have to be recorded?
Parellel discussion formats in message boards are a blessing…… while sequential discussion formats are just shit.
Like the format we are using here. Ping-pong-ping-pong-ping-pong. I am sorry, but it is true.
Paul does a wonderful job, and is very professional….. but has only finite resources, too finite really….. to enable a proper ideal discussion format for the issues we are dealing with here.
One of the things they have learned from the Tribunals actually, is how many more of them could have gone on in parallel in one sitting of the judges/jury etc, instead of doing everything in sequences and costing a lot more – to get the witnesses to show up all at the same time etc, etc.
Just as well noone is paying us here, to do what we do eh? ๐ Or you would arrive very quickly at a strange looking sum. And that is what put an awful lot of ‘knowledge experts’ off posting their opinions at places like Archiseek I think, because it reminds them of some very long drawn out, over extended, mis-allocation of public funding like the format the tribunals took. Whereas, if you had parallel discussion format, you could get more done, and accomplish an awful lot more with just one single thread called, one particular heading.
The system breaks down here totally when you try to look at ‘big issues’ like cars and the environment, or roundabouts etc, etc, etc. Which are very multi-dimensional parallel-type of issues.
BTW, I have studied the science of knowledge management in great detail over the past couple of years, MicroSoft have invested megabucks in this particular area and published a lot of material on the subject, but so have many others…… so I am not just pulling things straight out of my own arse.
Brian O’ Hanlon.
garethace
ParticipantI am in the middle of using AutoCAD 2004 in a heavy, get-up-and-go plotted hard copy outputting environment. I.e. Organising information specifically so that it plots as you want, and conveys the message.
But usually I find myself working from the HP large format plotter back to my drawing. I find, then when I put my designer, architectural thinking cap on…… I am sketching etc, or making a card board model….. and I am thinking a lot more in the opposite direction.
I have a lot of respect for the people who use CAD and organise CAD data everyday of their lives. But they generally do have to be very sure about what their ultimate goals are. I hardly ever see a stage at which ‘design goals’ do become integrated with CAD goals. And I have looked at all the newest, latest softwares from AutoDesk etc out there.
It always boils back down to the same thing – a plotted hard copy drawing with proper dimensions, text, scalebars, linewidths, colours etc, etc, etc. I entertained myself with a bit of a speech to the nation over here: http://www.cgarchitect.com/vb/showthread.php?t=3826 If you are interested. ๐
garethace
ParticipantIt is not that Fin.
Have a look at the format of this forum:
http://www.aceshardware.com/forum
Three things in particular:
1. Message Board gets ‘flushed’ regularly. You cannot reply to an old thread, and promote it back up to the ‘top’ of the message board like you can here.
Possibly not relevant to Archiseek discussion content, but interesting as a concept nonetheless.
It makes for very quick, decisive type of discussion rather than the long drawn out, ‘holding a grudge’ for too long aspect that can develop here at Archiseek.
2. You can cut in anywhere in the thread. This means, that stray discussions, on sub-topics can be almost conducted without affecting too much, the nature of the discussion in the first place.
But here at Archiseek it is totally sequential, making it too easy for people to spam out a thread very quickly and mess it up totally.
It normally ends up in someone saying something about a political party and that is the end of the thread basically, as in my chit-chat with Helloinsane.
It would be fine if my chit-chat with Helloinsane just developed into a sub discussion, like you can do at Aceshardware forum.
Then I wouldn’t delete anything. I HATE the sequential, ping-pong nature of this boards format.
It pre-dictates and defines too much the way in which people here post, discuss and how they explore issues.
It is completely useless as far as I am concerned as a medium for meaningful discussion.
Of which I am very capable of, but I simply cannot do it, by using this format of message board here.
3. You can look at a thread from the outside first, without actually going into it. New posts made since your last visit are marked with a red NEW sign.
Posters have the ability to change the header of their posts, telling you exactly what they want to say in their posts.
Sometimes, all they post is the heading part, and put NT (no text) after it, and thereby manage to conduct brief one line replies.
There are a lot of things about Aceshardware which make sense, and work and make the Aceshardware forum the really educational site it is to visit.
Of course some of the quality of the posting is very good over there too, about computer hardware etc.
Notice in the general message board overall view too, how you can see exactly which board members conducted the discussion and who was doing most of the talking etc.
Which makes it very easy to pick out threads with posters whom you are interested in listening to.
Brian O’ Hanlon.
garethace
ParticipantI think we must be all ‘Temple-Bar-ed’ out at this stage! ๐
My impression of Temple Bar is really just one of cobbles with lots of shards of glass inbetween the cobbles.
garethace
ParticipantThis web site is increasingly beginning to remind me of geography and GIS rather than actual architecture.
I think to confuse the two to too much of an extent is a problem – expressed by the recent City Architect or City Geographer thread here at Archiseek.
At the end of the day, I know a very many architects nowadays are trying to be geographers and a very many geographers are trying to be architects.
It is a crazy and confused world we are growing up in people.
Very, very nice ESRI Volumes, tonnes of stuff.
GeographyรขโฌโCreating Communities
The maps in this volume show how GIS is cutting across disciplines, providing a common language for discussion, and bringing people together in the decision making process. GIS enables us to share data in different societal communities thereby creating a framework for this global information network.http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume16/index.html
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume17/index.html
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume18/index.html
garethace
ParticipantThis web site is increasingly beginning to remind me of geography and GIS rather than actual architecture.
I think to confuse the two to too much of an extent is a problem – expressed by the recent City Architect or City Geographer thread here at Archiseek.
At the end of the day, I know a very many architects nowadays are trying to be geographers and a very many geographers are trying to be architects.
It is a crazy and confused world we are growing up in people.
Very, very nice ESRI Volumes, tonnes of stuff.
GeographyรขโฌโCreating Communities
The maps in this volume show how GIS is cutting across disciplines, providing a common language for discussion, and bringing people together in the decision making process. GIS enables us to share data in different societal communities thereby creating a framework for this global information network.http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume16/index.html
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume17/index.html
http://www.esri.com/mapmuseum/mapbook_gallery/volume18/index.html
garethace
ParticipantPublic gatherings, isn’t there some strange law out there, that prevents people from gathering, due to causing riots or something.
The other thing, is that UCD was conceived at a time when student riots were big in this country.
In paris, marching and protesting still is a big part of the urban scene there.
It would be interesting to think about that in USA of nineteen sixties too. I think the notion of public space and public protesting became very much related in peoples minds in recent times.
Also the idea of cinema, people like Bernard Tschumi have argued that cinema, and for the first time actually seeing how people gather etc, in a space for a coup d’etat or something was something that affected how we now perceive space.
Most people experience urban space now, from movies etc.
I like playing a PC game software called Medieval Total War myself, which really does make you realise how medieval spaces/cities worked from the point of view of movement of large crowds/armies on foot/horse.
A lot of the best public spaces around the world date from these times. Much older times and different laws etc.
Again, my reply here to Pat;
https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2744&pagenumber=3
garethace
ParticipantOriginally posted by PatO’C
Im a BA student doing a project on the proposals for Carlisle Pier. I found some of your posts very interesting but I was wondering if any of you had any opinions on the use of public space in the proposed developments.Pat, just read this, it is the opposite to the concept of good exterior, open public space, Stillogan. You can extrapolate from there almost everything that is wrong about attitudes to open public space in this country I think, and begin to define how to improve things at all. I don’t think it is about searching out good open public spaces here in Ireland, as so much, just looking around you everyday and seeing the shere non existence of good open public space, which hasn’t been butchered to death by road planners etc, etc.
The best simple reference on this is Fluid Spaces published by UCD, available at 8 Merrion Sq in Dublin.
One of the best places I know, which explains this and you can experience it physically is Stillorgan centre and junction. It is just off the main Stillorgan dual carriageway and Kilmacud Road Upper comes into the junction, along with a couple of ‘overflows’ from the Stillorglan dual carriageway.
There is a couple of pubs, restaurants, banks, shops, cinema, shopping mall, surface car parking, Omni PLEX and so on. But the place is entirely useless because pedestrian were not anywhere considered in the whole equation. It is ALL 100 car in that case, how to drive your car, get out of it and shop.
It is easy to talk about density and ‘mothers walking’ to shops etc, but, it still doesn’t work when you have a mess of traffic like that. It is one of the few places I know in Dublin city, where the cars literally ‘keep driving’ even though the ‘green man’ is turned on!!!!! and old ladies are tried to cross the road.
It is just so much hassle to get from the Omni PLEX to the cinema, to the shopping mall!!! Across all the lanes and traffic going in all directions.
You see most of the Carlisle schems I think were about actually bringing people by cars onto the pier in terms of arrival. Parking the car, then going to some nice cultural experience, cafe, shopping area, hotel or otherwise. What was nice, was the way in which people could do this, that is, without having to go through the kind of hell that is Stillogan town centre.
garethace
ParticipantOriginally posted by Diaspora
Thats exactly why Irish soccer is in a mess, too much coaching at a very young age prevents kids from developing their creativity vs the local coaches idea as to what creativity may be.
Similarly in Architecture or any academic field if too much theory is crammed in we lose the message. Which as in soccer comes from yourself or doesn’t exist.
Diamonds in the rough.
I was watching a very good programme about diamonds last night, that is a classic example of where the market is heavily regulated by De Beers, and the programme was all to do with artificial diamonds coming in at the bottom end of the market for around รขโยฌ4000 compared to the high end diamonds worth many more thousands.
That eventually the artificial diamonds may equal in terms of quality and may even surpass that of the real thing.
I think that the Architectural profession is a bit like De Beer’s in this country, sure, they are entrusted with the care of the ‘concept’ of architecture, but do not think for even one second they are always, in every possible situation and in every individual case, going to be the best ‘parents’ of architecture.
De Beer’s put mega bucks into science to allow them to ‘verify a real diamond’. So as not to ‘flood’ the market with fake diamonds.
In the same way, that most of the resources for architectural education in this country are mainly devoted towards ‘verifying’ the existence of a ‘real architect’. As if you could just throw the average early 20 something into a litmus solution and watch the colour turn either oranage or blue.
That is what De Beer’s are reduced to doing now, and so is the architectural education system here in Ireland. Yes diamonds that occur in nature are amazing, and the natural real thing will always be more sought after. Coming about through an amazing process of time and pressure and all sorts of conditions.
But the market for cheaper, artificial diamonds is there waiting to be exploiting, a different market to the market for real diamonds. As yet, no one in this country has shown any interest in this new market, for cheaper architects.
Architecture itself is not ‘owned’ by any profession at all. The concept itself is independent, while it did seem for a while that Man U owned soccer, that is simple not the case, when you get to the core of it.
In fact, the modern game of soccer as we know it today was something born out of the slums in places like Rio De Janiero.
On the subject of cars and Irish Architecture.
One of the best places I know, which explains this and you can experience it physically is Stillorgan centre and junction. It is just off the main Stillorgan dual carriageway and Kilmacud Road Upper comes into the junction, along with a couple of ‘overflows’ from the Stillorglan dual carriageway.
There is a couple of pubs, restaurants, banks, shops, cinema, shopping mall, surface car parking, Omni PLEX and so on. But the place is entirely useless because pedestrian were not anywhere considered in the whole equation. It is ALL 100 car in that case, how to drive your car, get out of it and shop.
It is easy to talk about density and ‘mothers walking’ to shops etc, but, it still doesn’t work when you have a mess of traffic like that. It is one of the few places I know in Dublin city, where the cars literally ‘keep driving’ even though the ‘green man’ is turned on!!!!! and old ladies are tried to cross the road.
It is just so much hassle to get from the Omni PLEX to the cinema, to the shopping mall!!! Across all the lanes and traffic going in all directions.
garethace
ParticipantWell, it is an interesting debate – not too remote from the debate as to whether UCD should have remained into Dublin city centre or moved out to Belfield. From an architectural point of view etc, I love where the DIT institutions are situated – there is nothing quite like spending the time attending those colleges in Dublin’s city centre ever again, in many peoples’ lives – a lot of them may never really experience city centre working, living ever again.
Any student of architecture in my time observed continually a great amount of change in the city over time. I started architecture in 1992, when there were soccer fields around DIT institutions, and since then an awful lot has changed. But from a pragmatist’s point of viewing things – I have to present the advantages, which are not always highlighted enough, by UCD moving out to Belfield when it did. From economic and future expansion etc, points of view.
Not to mention the diversity and character it did manage to bring to an area, which otherwise might be just more and more rows of housing. Places like Clonskeagh, Roebuck, Botterstown, Fosters Ave, etc, etc. Similarly, is the case in DCU on north side of the city. If I had any criticism of UCD at all, it is that it is a little bit too secluded, a little bit too invisible while travelling out by the roads in that area.
The only indication one often has of UCD being there at all, is the large water tower feature our there, which serves as some kind of landmark.
garethace
ParticipantIs there someone else who you have to lobby to each year?
garethace
ParticipantA worst case scenario gallery over here at cyburbia, tells many stories I can tell you. And you do see this sort of stuff all over the country here in Ireland too:
http://www.cyburbia.org/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=8451&password=&sort=1&cat=504&page=1
http://www.cyburbia.org/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=8450&password=&sort=1&cat=504&page=1
Two of my favourite examples.
garethace
ParticipantThis is something I think, which may not be possible, but would offer a way more depth to discussions here: The ability to cut in anywhere on a discussion and reply directly to a specific user’s post.
Message board formats.
This is where I started off as an online message board contributor:
http://www.aceshardware.com/forum
It is a pretty radical approach to a message board design, and serves that online community of computer specialists surprisingly well indeed. Notice how you can cut in anywhere in the thread. Meaning you can have a number of parallel discussions on the same thread. The only way you know what is a new post, is by the red ‘new’ sign at the start of a new post.
Any threads you have looked at turn from blue to purple in the main message board list. The messages just move off the screen as each day goes by. You have to keep the links yourself somewhere, like in an email or somewhere, if you wish to re-visit an older thread from a month ago say.
This means the message board constantly gets flushed periodically rather like a toilet. Allowing discussion about new computer products, new articles, topics etc to take precedence all the time. I mean, I could keep adding some stupid comment to a thread of my own making every day for months to keep it at the top of this message board.
While this feature can be an advantage for some old threads like ‘The spike’ where some new piece of information breaks about it. I can see how it would ‘piss off’ regular posters a bit too, with guys like myself camping on the discussions I just wish to stay active.
garethace
ParticipantPaul, do the people who fund the running of Archiseek forum understand what it costs to provide this service?
I mean, with a decent amount of bandwidth, I imagine it would be possible to introduce more high resolution content, say for instance in a competition such as Carlisle Pier or something.
Apart from all of the work on your part required to upload all of that work etc, etc.
Perhaps even something like a user gallery, heavily controlled and moderated might even be possible? I.e. One could link to a decent size of image – say 800×600 and no more than 175KB Jpeg file, like on a lot of forums.
I am definitely not into Avitars as they soak up bandwidth good-o.
I mean, we tend to think so much about architectural space in terms of text here – the presence of some form of visual companion to that is obviously lacking badly.
garethace
ParticipantA good example of introducing talent from the bottom up, is possibly in the case of soccer and other sports. You do not find managers as such, going around telling very young players how to play better soccer.
garethace
ParticipantBut do they work, do they create a route through the interior retail space? I think that O’Connell Street became too much of a linear space in recent times too – hopefully this new re-surfacing can halt the rush of crowds up and down O’Connell Street, trying to get somewhere as fast as they possibly can, rather than dwelling in O’Connell Street at all.
All I know, is that Jervis Street entrance into the Jervis Street centre, albeit it is a secondary entrance, it was a master stroke in terms of retail design. The mere fact, it elevates you to a half level, from which point you can either go up or down, is interesting too – better than just the normal ground level tunnelling job that Dublin City Council normally aspire to.
garethace
ParticipantDid you witness that massive pedestrian choke point created on the route up from Hapenny bridge as far as Roches Stores during the xmas spending? Where about 40 thousand people were trying to squeeze into a space about the width of two people standing?
I think, half the crowd who wanted to go and shop in the Illac and Roches, Arnotts, Marks and Spencer, Jervis Street etc, must have just turned around completely and walked back over the Liffey again.
Mind you, the Jervis Street Shopping centre had the considerable foresight when designing their operation, to add that second crucial access point on a corner, on Jervis Street. While that entrance needed escalators, and considerable trouble to make it happen – it probably is worth a bomb in terms of increasing footfall through the Jervis Street centre.
Similarly with St. Stephen’s Green Shopping centre – the provision of multiple acess points really stands out in my mind, as being a sucess in terms of retail profitability.
Not all shopping centres etc, observe this crucial fact though, and many just fail, because they only have one access point. Thus many the creation of a pedestrian route through the centre impossible. Cleary’s shop in O’Connell Street is a clear example of that – with massive decay of shoppers moving through that shop in the past 10 years.
And it is not all down to the sucess of Henry Street either – rather it is the design of circulation in Clery’s doesn’t lend itself at all nowadays to the ‘browse and stroll’ attitude of todays ‘consumerism as a hobby/pastime’ market out there.
Scary things are happening to the Illac these days I think too, have any of you walked into the ‘Dunnes Stores’ in the Illac lately! ๐ I remember when that used to be a pretty decent shop space.
I think that Roches saw the opening, and invested wisely in their new premises. Between Arnotts and Roches now, and Jervis centre, the Illac doesn’t stand a chance. Except at the very, very, very bottom (scraping the bottom) end of the market.
garethace
ParticipantI hadn’t actually thought of take Pearse Street station route, you are referring to, and yes, that is a really busy route at rush hour.
Up on the north side, the route from O’Connell Street area as far as Connolly station etc, isn’t at all as tricky.
I haven’t any experience of rushing down to the station on the Quay though.
Anyone?
garethace
ParticipantTypical ‘less is more’, statement of pure facts in a computer rendering exercise:
http://www.cgarchitect.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=next_topic;f=5;t=000169;go=older
Not at all over the top, I would say I could live with ‘good design’ like that if I had to.
- AuthorPosts
