FIN
Forum Replies Created
- Posts
apologies bunch. good point. there is a large demand from those urbanites wanting to relocate however it benefits the smaller communities if they do. more people around then more money or so the economics say anyway. there is no real stragety which i guess this was trying to do before the elections next month. keep the local punters happy kinda thing.
the housing strageties for small towns for these particular urbanites is the only senisible answer but then again how does one distuinguish between them.>FOR SALE
>One chariot, (low-swinging, sweet type),in urgent need of repair (wheels
>have come off..again). One careless owner, details from Clive,
>Tel.Twickenham 20-14.
>
>FOR SALE
>100,000 Grand Slam t-shirts, ties & scarves – unused
>(choice of 1998/99, 1999/2000, 2000/2001and 2003/2004 ) Contact : RFU,
>Twickenham.
>
>
>LOST (on way to Twickenham) (i) Plan B (ii) Graciousness (iii) Bottle.
>Please contact : L. Daglalio, C. Woodward.
>
>MEN CHOKE IN FRONT OF LARGE CROWD 49,000 spectators watched helplessly
>yesterday as 15 sportsmen choked in front of them, apparently after
>being
>force-fed a large slice of humble pie. A doctor attending the scene said
>that the men had a medical history of this sort of thing: apparently it
>also
>happened in 2000 in Edinburgh, Wembley in 1999 and Landsdowne in 2001.
>
>IN MEMORIAM Slam, G : passed away, 7th Feb 2004. Sorely missed by Clive
>and
>the boys.Originally posted by bunch
.i believe that a person who lives in an urban settlement (the majority of the Irish population) have a right to be concerned about what happens to the irish countryside. i really can’t see why anyone can have a problem with that.how do you see this exactly. how does it affect those people who do live in urban ireland other than the view when the flash by in their cars to holiday retreats in rural ireland!
Originally posted by bunch
.
i think the problem is that many people living in the countryside now are concerned about the viability of rural communities and believe that housing is the solution. but its not, building houses in a free for all, the majority of which will have no contribution to rural communities as they are merely dormitories for towns and cities, will actually further contribute to rural decline.that point is valid if speaking of moving everyone into towns etc. i can’t see it working for people who work the land building on their land.
Originally posted by bunch
.rural areas are a resource as well as a place that people live in, however, no-one in the debate should be claiming ‘ownership’ of the countryside, or its values, meanings, importance etc. when will there be a rational approach to rural planning? anyone?
i’m sorry…no-one should be claiming ownership. do u own your own house? if u do then do you not claim ownership. why should it be any different . they own the land from actually paying for it. i know this whole notion of once you pay for something you own it may have some opposition in a communist society but we haven’t got that far yet.
i found euro-sports highlights to be rather one-sided. it seems it was a major shock that a nation from the six-nations championship had the gall to go there and win. of course there was reference to 1966(they seem to mention that at every available time even though different sports ) and the fact scotland beat england after that particular tournament win. de-facto world champions i think was the quote. and re scotland with the big 2 having lots of foreigners the scottish national side is reduced to picking from the others and the various english teams.
i think so alan. not about sinn fein but about the realities of one off housing cos we are classed as “from the country” no matter what from west brits so our opunion is completely differnent. people from dublin cannot visualise the problems as all they know is the urban existance they live in.
please stop “null” ing ur post cos it stops all arguments progressing and irrates everyone. if you are so ashamed of what you postesd then please don’t post
ahhhhh! it would be a sticky point. as i said before if u were selling it on then it becomes an issue or renting as this case is but if it’s ur private house then strictly speaking it doesn’t have to comply with part m. kinda like they can’t make u put a downstairs w/c in but it’s part of the regulations
ooops forgot to say.. possibly it may be an issue with insurances companies looking for architect’s certs and all that and certainly be an issue with the bank mortgage wise if u were building it that way as no certs = no money.
slightly. agree with some points ur making but if someone has the benefit of daddy owning farm land then it’s his/her right to build on it. of course not at the expense of others.
public space…i don’t know. if i was such a porsche driving individual and not using my horse and cart i wouldn’t want joe public shouting/pissing/breaking in distance from my new hi-tech pad.
personally i think those stair s look very nice and bugger the regulations. however there may be problems in certifying the building and in selling it off later. these are the thing u need to consider and an engineer should be able to considerably cheaper than that. good luck in that.
Originally posted by shaun
We all know this building. What do you think of it, and how does it compare with “Free state” architecture or projects of the period.indeed! “free state” architecture wasn’t supposed to instill fear and domination into a minority population.
