ew

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 164 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Santiago Calatrava #727419
    ew
    Participant

    It’s official name will be James Joyce Bridge – i think

    in reply to: Boardwalk Reloaded #726977
    ew
    Participant

    A spate of one?

    in reply to: Favourite Buildings #726929
    ew
    Participant

    Chimneys at pigeon house – they’re normally the first thing I see coming home. They make Dublin recognisable from the sea and air.

    in reply to: Removal of Street Furniture #726421
    ew
    Participant

    One of the main criticisms voiced by residents of Celebration, in a BBC documentary recently, was lack of public space for skating.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/factual/livingwithwalt.shtml

    It’s a very interesting listen anyway – paper autumn leaves anyone?

    in reply to: Bertie, Lord of the flies #726907
    ew
    Participant

    Is the scheme as a whole any good? If it was project managed properly and infrastructre put in first etc. would it be a good plan. Is the proposed finished product worth aiming for? The bit’s I’ve read about seem to be well planned and address a lot of my criticisms of much recent development. Has anyone looked into this in detail?

    in reply to: Dublin bridges #726676
    ew
    Participant

    Was the loop line not around that time?

    in reply to: Planning procedure #726823
    ew
    Participant

    Mostly ‘cos people make the public notice too small and it can’t be read, or else they let it get blown away or torn.

    in reply to: Blackhall Place Bridge #726799
    ew
    Participant

    I think it’s great and I love the way the footpath and cycle lane section is seperated by the construction from the traffic area. I like the way the path curves and I hope the glass bits are vandal proof.
    If you were to go off-white you could match the ha’penny bridge. I like the whitye at the moment though.

    in reply to: Royal Dublin Hotel #726517
    ew
    Participant

    What’s the story with the illuminated signage? I heard that there was a proposal to ban it on the street, but it seems to me that that would lead to the removal of the happy ring house sign and the baileys ad. I kinda like those.

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725835
    ew
    Participant

    The height problem could be got round by sinking the stadium into ground. Coul;d be a drainage disaster but I think it’s been done elsewhere.

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725831
    ew
    Participant

    All of the reasons given for Abbotstown are based on the ecconomic argument. Site being cheaper, also cheaper to get through planning etc. I personally think the argument is flawed and does not standup when total cost is considered.
    There is tons of info available explaining why there is a trend away from out of town stadia. A lot of this is based on ecconomics and if anyone has seen Stadium Australia recently you will know just how bleak a new stadium can look 99% of the time.

    But be that as it may, I wanted to know if anyone actually felt that the Abbotstown proposal would give the punter a better experience. Judged on this criteria Landsdown is streets ahead in my book but I wanted to know how in terms of use, a case could be made for Abbotstown. For example, in the US people have been known to throw parties in the parking lots on match day and people go there even without tickets. Or is there a unique and wonderful experience that will be provide by the architecture that could not be done on a tighter site?

    On a more gloomy note – what’s stopping IRFU from developing he landsdown site as high yield apartments, pocketing the cash, and moving out to a free stadium in abottstown at taxpayers expense?

    in reply to: Lansdowne Road Stadium #725828
    ew
    Participant

    Why the Abbotstown preference Niall? I never understood why anyone would want the stadium out there.

    in reply to: Stags Head Mosaic on Dame Street #725276
    ew
    Participant

    Best bit of happy news in ages! Look forward to seeing it back in place.

    in reply to: The Spike #722200
    ew
    Participant

    I’m sure it will all work out and I still look forward to seeing the full job completed. Meanwhile I enjoy the spire as it is and mostly it is an object of beauty and wonder. Check out the sunrise and sunset and it’ll cheer you up too.
    I’m taking a month off from being concerned about the ineptitude and the typicalness(?) of the delays and the shoddyness of the job half done. I’m hoping that in a month there’ll be nothing to complain about. Fingers crossed!

    in reply to: Tom de Paor #725382
    ew
    Participant

    Saw that site the other week – what’s the pumping station for and why should it be there?

    in reply to: Blackhall Place Bridge #726776
    ew
    Participant

    I’m surprised it looks so well with the low arches. I was down there during the week and I was very impressed – a great (unfinished) job.

    in reply to: Listed Buildings List #725554
    ew
    Participant

    Good work Graham, and it’s good to see that the building may be being looked after – but do we know yet if the house in question is legaly protected at the moment?
    It annoys me that it is always so hard to get a clear answer in what should be such a simple matter. Has the conservation office called you back yet?

    in reply to: Listed Buildings List #725544
    ew
    Participant

    If they are original slate they are worth a fair bit – could it be genuine theft?

    in reply to: Is silver the new brown? #725412
    ew
    Participant

    I blame the audi TT. Not only are they always silver but they are always parked in the computer mock ups of new developments to demonstrate that it is a cutting edge and aspirational bundle of shoe boxes.

    in reply to: Listed Buildings List #725536
    ew
    Participant

    I called Louth co-co planning for you (dull day) and list is indeed in the development plan. The current plan they are working with is the 1997 plan. The section you want is entitled “Buildings and Structures to be preserved”.
    Bad news is that it’s not published online. Copies available through public libraries.
    Good luck!

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 164 total)