ctesiphon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 461 through 480 (of 1,029 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: gouldings house, enniskerry #714238
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    @KerryBog2 wrote:

    The mag BTW is puff and guff, aimed at Pajeronistas (with apologies to ctesiphon), jackets at 2,600, belts for 400, etc.

    😀

    in reply to: Manor Park’s Digital Hub Plan #778062
    ctesiphon
    Participant
    hutton wrote:
    Course it came from MP Homes – they were the ones who stood to benefit most! Not that DBM have anything against towers – see Donnybrook scheme for instance –

    Mind you that scheme raises (no pun intended) other interesting issues]

    The Part V requirements (PDA 2000; PDAA 2002) apply to sites over 0.1 ha. or having more than 4 houses (house in this case = apartment too), so I’d imagine there would be no way of avoiding it. Though that’s not to say they’d have had to build the S&A housing. The 2002 Amendment to the 2000 Act saw to it that developers could buy their way out of the arrangement in a variety of ways.

    Re the other point-
    I was trying to say that the developers were being greedy and ignoring the professional advice of their consultants, just trying to say it subtly;) . This was prompted by Devin’s comment re the questionable justification for height at this location (not that you were claiming it was the consultants’ fault, Devin). Even though the EIS was written by the planning consultant and other technical experts, it doesn’t follow that they believe every word they say.
    It’s one of the things I don’t miss about working in a consultancy- having to advocate a scheme that one knows in one’s heart is a crock of shit. But he who pays the piper…

    in reply to: Manor Park’s Digital Hub Plan #778060
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    A little birdie told me that the pressure to go high on this site came from the developers rather than from the architects or the planning consultants, despite professional opinions expressed to them that height would not be permitted in this location.

    (Is someone finally starting to see through the indiscriminate use of the San Gimignano comparison?:rolleyes: )

    While their strategy of attempting to undermine the DEGW study seems to have failed in this case, I wouldn’t put it past someone to try it on again, mainly as the study is such a fudge on the issue of appropriate locations for height (yes, it says Docklands and Heuston alright, but hardly convincingly) that I could see a competent planning consultant with a persistent streak managing to word a submission carefully enough to appeal to a DC planner who’d rather not have the bother of arguing otherwise.

    We must remain vigilant, team.

    in reply to: Bridges & Boardwalks #734442
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Spot on, JJD. This from Onsite@Archiseek:

    https://archiseek.com/onsite/2006/07/dublin_fringe_festival_lantern_installation.html

    EDIT: Damn you, PC, with your superior keyboard skills!

    in reply to: Manor Park’s Digital Hub Plan #778056
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    @Devin wrote:

    It’s been refused

    Oh happy day!

    malec-
    Why did you think this would ‘sail through’? From the word go I thought this was an over-scaled insensitive proposal- glad to see some sense has prevailed (for now…).

    in reply to: The Opera Centre #780537
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Thanks, Paul.

    in reply to: The Opera Centre #780535
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    FUD?
    I’m not familiar with this acronym.:o

    in reply to: New building beside City Hall #724571
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    @Peter FitzPatrick wrote:

    could never understand why the building is set back from the street line when one of its main functions was to reinstate that line ?

    I have a hazy memory of John FitzGerald, Jim Barrett or Dick Gleeson (a very hazy memory:o ) saying in an interview that even though there was a consistent building line here originally, now that the corner of the bank is visible they wanted to keep it that way.
    I’m not agreeing, just explaining.;)

    in reply to: New building beside City Hall #724556
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Upstairs…

    …downstairs.

    in reply to: vitrolite shopfronts #757204
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Great! One of those ‘One day I’d like to…’ ideas that crossed my mind a while back. Glad to see someone’s already on it. Is it far advanced? Should we be reporting sightings of Vitrolite in out-of-the-way locations to her/you?:)

    in reply to: New building beside City Hall #724551
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Hold your horses there, big mon! You’ll spoil the surprise.:)

    I took some today- they’ll be uploaded when I get home.

    (Although ‘decent’? I’ll let ye be the judges of that.)

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766080
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    @jdivision wrote:

    I think 2 is chq basement

    Spot on. I thought this one might be trickier, damn you!:)

    @jdivision wrote:

    Is 3 somewhere in Ranelagh or maybe on the Richmond Road.

    Neither.

    @jdivision wrote:

    Number 4 I think is off Cork St and was linked to a timber merchant

    You’re probably right, though the timber merchant business is news to me. I’ll leave it open in case anyone else has a more accurate (not more correct, just more accurate;) ) guess.

    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Full PP, or can it still be appealed? Don’t want to rain on the parade, just looking for clarification.

    Congrats to GM+AD. I can hear the sigh of relief from here.

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766078
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Stephen (and others)-

    Agreed on F, G and H.

    But 2 and 3- alas, no.

    in reply to: Cycling in Irish Cities #761465
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Not only is someone using a camera in the IFSC, someone’s riding a bike!! Call the po-lice!!

    If this was in the ‘How well do you know Dublin?’ thread, I’d have the answer straight away. It’s part of my route home- N11 southbound, just past Donnybrook church. Often one of the residents of a nearby house parks right in the bike lane here, and mass traffic tends to block all the access points onto the bike lane on Saturday evenings and Sunday mornings, so a bin is mild. But I agree- it’s odd how most cyclists will cycle around an obstacle rather than move it out of the way. Though I wonder how many cyclists had passed it that day- the majority of cyclists go northbound in morning rush hour and the southbound traffic is fairly minimal here, afaik. And let’s not forget the role of the binmen in all of this and, by extension, the role of the city council.

    in reply to: How well do you know Dublin? #766074
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    A few more? Why not. These are just oldies from the archive (all within the canal ring)- I’m planning something far more dastardly if the opportunity to snap it presents itself.

    1:

    2:

    3:

    4:

    Graham- any chance you could give everyone else a head start of, say, 24 hours?:)

    in reply to: Cycling in Irish Cities #761463
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    While rummaging around on YouTube recently (can’t think why, Graham 😉 ) I came across this clip of activity from the recent Festival:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GhrNPpTVOw

    in reply to: Before posting – what a newbie should know. #778509
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Guy? What guy?! You mean there’s someone else?! 🙁
    So much for the subtle approach in matters of the heart. It seems I’m destined to spend the rest of my days casting about for meaningful human interaction on the internet. Oh woe is me!

    *hugs monitor*

    You won’t desert me will you, Inty?

    *********

    Back OT, briefly:

    burge_eye:
    I was brought up with the phrase ‘If you’ve nothing constructive to say, say nothing’, a subtle but important difference from ‘helpful’.
    As for this: ‘If you disagreee with new posts … then ignore it and go back to whatever it is you do.’??? You can’t be saying that sycophantic fawning and affirmation is the only commentary you’ll brook, can you? This is Archiseek, remember, not the AAI awards.

    in reply to: St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin #739812
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    That night-time render doesn’t show accurately the current view. As I passed it in the dark last night, I noticed that the building is lit up internally in green, except for the first floor which is purple.:confused:

    Also, you can be sure that any apparent transparency will quickly be blurred once tenants move in with net curtains, potted plants posters and Post-Its, so anyone wanting a look at the see-through beauty should move quickly.

    in reply to: Bridges & Boardwalks #734436
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Brazen drug dealers take over city tourist trail
    Drugs and money exchange hands on the Liffey Boardwalk at Eden Quay at lunchtime yesterday

    Thursday August 24th 2006
    Scourge moves into open in towns across the country

    DRUG dealers and addicts have turned one of Ireland’s main tourist thoroughfares into a virtual no-go area. An investigation by the Irish Independent shows dealers openly selling drugs on Dublin’s Liffey Boardwalk in broad daylight. And as our shocking pictures reveal, even the presence of active gardai in the area does not deter them. The blatant behaviour of the dealers in a main tourist area is the most high-profile example yet of how the scourge of drug abuse has moved into the open in towns across the country.
    It came as Ireland prepares to host the Ryder Cup – and just hours after Tourism Minister John O’Donoghue launched a multi-million euro campaign to promote Irish tourism. Dublin TDs last night called for a dedicated garda patrol unit to stamp out drug abuse in the area.
    Over the course of a two-day investigation, we photographed dealers and addicts exchanging money for drugs in broad daylight during the height of the busy summer tourist period.
    Our pictures clearly show:
    * Drugs being openly exchanged for money;
    * Women hiding drugs in their bras so gardai cannot find them;
    * Methadone being consumed in public;
    * Children accompanying their parents as drug deals take place;
    * Customers approaching dealers and asking for their drug of choice.
    Male and female dealers worked up and down the tourist attraction, hiding the drugs down the back of their trousers or in their bras. Others openly waved around small bags of pills in full view of the passing public. On Tuesday, two plain-clothes gardai stopped and searched a number of people who were loitering along the boardwalk. Yesterday, the officers were back – and the dealers were still in action. Our pictures show one dealer being surrounded by a group of around six people as soon as he arrived.
    “The guy came up and they all swarmed around him like the Pied Piper,” said one witness.
    Labour TD Joe Costello said the boardwalk was once a novelty for people to walk along when they visited Dublin. “It has become a no-go area because of the activities,” he said. “Instead of being an amenity for the citizens it is a focus for people who are involved in drug-pushing to congregate.” He called for a dedicated garda squad to patrol the area and deter such activity.
    Independent TD Tony Gregory also added his voice, saying the area was now a complete turn-off for tourists.
    A spokesman for Dublin City Council said it had a community officer to patrol the areas and report such activities to the gardai. However, he could not say if there was an officer on the boardwalk at all times. “We are working in conjunction with the gardai to alleviate the problem,” he said.
    Workers whose offices are alongside the boardwalk said they were too afraid to sit there to have their lunch. “There’s so many of them hanging around in big gangs,” said one young woman. “I wouldn’t go over there on my own and even in groups we can’t really relax and enjoy the sunshine. We have to constantly keep an eye on our bags.”

    Gardai were also seen arresting a number of men. They chased a young man on a bike who tried to run when he spotted them. After being searched he was cuffed and brought away.
    A family was forced to flee the area recently after a knife fight broke out between two drug addicts, while there are also concerns that immigrants who cannot find a job are sleeping rough beside the Liffey.
    Gardai said 404 people have been arrested in the area between April 3 and the end of June under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Of those, 26 were arrested and processed in the courts. A further 20 were arrested under public order legislatio.
    A spokesman said: “We monitor the area on an ongoing basis and any illegal activity which is reported or we come across receives our attention.” He said gardai were working with homeless agencies to help those sleeping rough in the area.
    Frank McGee of Dublin Tourism said the activity is not helping Ireland’s reputation abroad. “The problem is, what are the memories that tourists are taking back?” he asked.

    A day on the capital’s boardwalk of shame

    THE sun was out yesterday morning on one of Dublin’s main tourism thoroughfares.
    And it also brought the drug dealers out to play. From early morning drugs were bought and sold as openly as souvenirs along the Liffey Boardwalk, while tourists and children walked by.
    Two plain-clothes gardai were on the wooden walkway for most of the day but even they could not deal with the level of dealings along one small section between O’Connell Bridge and Butt Bridge.
    Groups congregated for several hours, greeting each other as familiarly as office workers who had donned their tracksuits for their day’s work.
    At around 11am a small wad of cash could clearly be seen being handed from a woman to a man, both of whom continued to loiter throughout the day. She could later be seen taking a bag of small white pills from her pocket and showing them to a friend.
    Shortly after 11, the gardai swung into action, catching a young man who was sitting on the wall close to Butt Bridge.

    Nervous
    While the gardai were dealing with their arrest, two men sitting on the bench were approached by a third. Smoking a cigarette and looking nervous, he bought some drugs from the two men before moving off.
    After midday a man in a red jumper appeared close to the busy bus stops. A group of seven people, who were there for most of the day, quickly swarmed around him and money was exchanged. The group blocked the entire footpath and elderly passersby were forced onto the road.
    The substances were openly exchanged in front of signs warning of €1,000 fines for anyone caught drinking on the boardwalk.
    Tourists passed just feet away, some gazing open-mouthed at the sweating dealers, others keeping their heads down and walking resolutely on.
    At around 12.20pm a woman approached a younger male, seen doing business with several individuals throughout the day.
    Our pictures clearly show cash being exchanged for a substance, which she then placed in her bra for safekeeping.
    This method was also used by a young woman – who appeared to be pregnant – who walked down the boardwalk with a minder after lunch.
    Her minder, holding a bulldog on a leash, watched over her as she sat on the bench to dole out the wares she had earlier stuffed up her t-shirt.
    A little earlier, a woman pushing a buggy gathered in the middle of another drug hustle. Standing close to her and witnessing the entire deal was her young son. Aged around four, and wearing a red Spiderman t-shirt, he watched as his mother and companions carried out in the drug deal. She was later stopped and searched by gardai but nothing was found.
    She sat on the boardwalk for hours – and just yards away from a woman who was brought a methadone fix by a friend.
    A male arrived at around 2.20pm with a flask and gave her methadone, which she knocked back with a grimace.
    The gardai maintained their presence throughout the day, with many of the deals happening as they brought yet another suspect to the local garda station.
    By late afternoon, many of the dealers and abusers had moved on, aware that they were now being watched.
    The ‘Beirut Boardwalk’ as it has come to be known, was supposed to help rejuvenate the city centre, giving the Liffey a Parisienne atmosphere.
    Instead it has attracted alcoholics, drugs dealers and abusers.
    The problem has now had a knock-on effect among city residents and led to protests from residents in Drumcondra about a proposed boardwalk along a section of the Tolka River.
    The activities on the Liffey Boardwalk have guaranteed that no one wants a boardwalk anywhere near their home.

    Edel Kennedy
    © Irish Independent
    http://www.unison.ie/irish_independent/ & http://www.unison.ie/

Viewing 20 posts - 461 through 480 (of 1,029 total)

Latest News