corcaighboy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 103 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Cork Transport #779623
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Another announcement by the gov on the Midleton line. Cullen must have a sore jaw from his serial announcements of the same thing!
    Meanwhile, I was in the city bus station recently and, having missed the bus to Little Island, I asked at the travel center when the Cobh train departed (which would allow me to alight at Little Island train station). I was not expecting to buy a ticket, but given that both Bus Eireann and Irish Rail are both part of CIE, I at least thought that they might have a timetable handy. Apparently not as I was informed that ‘we are totally different companies, so why would we have the the train timetable!’
    With an attitude like that, such advanced notions of integrated ticketing and providing a unified urban transport system are, sadly, distant dreams.

    in reply to: Cork Transport #779540
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    saw this in today’s Irish Independent….would obviously agree that some sort of tram system would be beneficial. But someone should tell him that his proposed Cork-Midleton rail link is in advanced planning.

    Cork needs LUAS system to combat congestion
    15:14 Monday December 11th 2006

    The Green Party today unveiled proposals for a new light tram system like the LUAS for Cork City.

    Green leader Trevor Sargent said badly needed transport projects like the Macroom by-pass have been ignored in Cork because they are not Transport 21 projects.

    He said Cork City needed a LUAS to combat traffic congestion.

    He also proposed a Cork Harbour water bus service and the re-opening of the Midleton to Cork railway line.

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #769084
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Fearg – I recall when the ‘alterations’ to Schull church were in progress (never remember a consultation period!) and even then (being a young lad) I was quite surprised. I did have the gumption to question someone in authority on it and I was told that the awful pebble-dash plaster job on the exterior of the church was necessary as the stonework was ‘porous’. Naturally, I assumed this to be the case, although I also recall asking why it was that all other churches of its ilk did not require the same treatment. Every time I pass that church, I cringe with regret given that it now resembles a pretty ordinary modern bungalow. It was a pretty imposing church, and viewable from almost anywhere in the harbour. Now it looks like a giant carbuncle.

    corcaighboy
    Participant

    @Tuborg wrote:

    Whatever about cosmetic surgery, i think that building(Hilton) is going to need some serious maintenance in the years ahead especially considering the speed of construction, which only started in December last year. The hotel is scheduled to open in January, after just over 1 year of construction! Im no expert but surely this cant be right for a project of this size!, obviously the Hilton group are mad to open up! Will it be a phased opening or will all the facilities open in January?.. i wonder did they originally target a Christmas opening?

    Jury’s hotel in Cork (basically an identical project) took 18 months to complete and they stumbled over the finishing line, 1 year seems crazy!

    Probably has to open by then to qualify for any tax incentives. Seems a tight enough schedule alright, but they may well only open a portion of it by then so as to meet any qualification deadlines imposed by the revenue.

    in reply to: Developments in Cork #781232
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Browser – I agree completely. The airport situation is sadly one hell of a mess. The DAA are none too pleased with Cork given that its fancy terminal is over budget and under-delivers. Given that the DAA are in effect the same organisation who approved and oversaw its construction and completion, this is somewhat ironic. God help Dublin if the same gang are allowed to oversee the new terminal there. The entire airports authority is a relic from times past – too much work-to-rule militant baloney amongst staff, no leadership from management of any sort, and absolutely no interest in delivering an effective service to its customers. Instead, they are an organisation riven by factionalism and one that manages to stagger from one crisis to the next with a complete disregard for the consequences. And no wonder, since the taxpayer is picking up the tab. And with our Minister for Transport leading from the front with his usual mix of bluster and serial announcements of rehashed projects, it is no wonder his foot-soldiers in Aer Rianta (and Irish Rail, Bus Eireann, Dublin Bus, etc) don’t give a damn. It never ceases to amaze me how after blowing 200m Euro in Cork that the user experience there is actually worse than it was before! Only in Ireland. Rant over.

    in reply to: Developments in Cork #781220
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Some news in the Irish Examiner today re new developments in the Cork area. May be of interest to some readers here. Does anyone know if the 6 storey motor tax office building next to County Hall was part of the original redevelopment plans?

    Green light for 204-house development

    By Sean O’Riordan
    PLANNING permission was granted yesterday by Cork County Council for a 204-house development in Crosshaven, while an application was received for an equally large development in Castlemartyr.

    O’Flynn Construction was given the green light for the mixed development at Knocknagore, Crosshaven. The company intends to construct 56 three-bed terraced homes, 59 two-bed terraced homes, 62 four-bed detached houses and 26 four-bed terraced homes.

    Limerick-based Chieftain Construction has lodged an application for 200 houses, a cr

    in reply to: Cork Transport #779508
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Our esteemed minister is up to his old tricks.


    Cullen challenged over ‘rehashed’ estimate

    Tim O’Brien, Irish Times, 18th November 2007

    Minister for Transport Martin Cullen has defended his Budget estimate against Opposition claims that he provided money for the same work on the same projects last year.

    At a press conference in Dublin yesterday, Mr Cullen said his record allocation in the 2007 Budget Estimates would cover issues such as the start of construction on the Luas extension to Cherrywood, and the expansion to four tracks of rail services to Co Kildare.

    Among other items which Mr Cullen said would be funded this year were the start of work on Cork commuter rail services as well as planning for the reopening of phase one of the Navan railway line.

    in reply to: New Public Space for Docklands #765291
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    This looks great. For once there is something that delivers on its early promise and resembles the architect’s renderings. Will definitely add a bit of light and colour to the docklands. 🙂

    in reply to: dublin airport terminal #717259
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    All I will say with regards to the new terminal at Dublin is beware! What you see is not neccessairly what you will get. The renderings of the Cork Terminal looked great but the over budget terminal, when finally delivered, was a disappointment in terms of design and user friendliness. In many respects, the old terminal was just as functional as the new one (even in terms of capacity). Interestingly, the new multi-storey carpark was not ditched, whereas the proposed parallel taxi-way, control tower, and air bridges were deemed not neccessary. Nevertheless, despite these parts being jettisoned, the bill for the airport was much higher than budgeted. No surprise there given our recent history of over budget infrastructure projects, but what galls me is that the final product is a huge disappointment. Dublin should get some good project manangers on board, as otherwise the airport there will experience the same problems as Cork.

    in reply to: Developments in Cork #781157
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    AIdan – You made some very good points, especially in relation to exchequer funding and public transport being the preserve of semi-state monopolies (monoliths!). One of the key problems for the City Council, and one which negatively impacts everything from planning to public transport, is the fact that city boundaries have not changed in decades and as a result many of the surburbs are now outside their remit and under the juristiction of the county council. This applies to all our cities (with Dublin having three councils to contend with). Leads to many instances of one hand not knowing what the other is doing.

    in reply to: Cork Transport #779480
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Jungle & The_Chris – Thanks for the info, and in particular the links about about the bridge and the Irish Rail documentation, which is very comprehensive. Having looked at the images of the proposed bridge, I can see that it is obviously not going to come cheap. I must agree with The_Chris though in that it looks pretty awful, almost like a giant carbuncle on the Tivoli road. I know they are tied for space and that there are very limited options re access, but surely they could have come up with something that lessens the impact of that big waterside wall of concrete. From the four images available (http://www.iarnrodeireann.ie/projects/RailwayOrderDocumentsCD/04_GMR_EIS/Volume_4_Appendices/Appendix_G_Landscape_and_Visual/Glanmire.pdf) I am not able to deduct whether the impact is lessened by stone facing similar to the stonework on the rest of the quay walls, or whether concrete slabs similar to the north ring road bypass bridge at nearby Tivoli will be used. Either way, its huge bulk makes it look very incongrous .

    in reply to: Cork Transport #779475
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    This is from today’s Examiner and it makes interesting reading for several reasons. Firstly, this E139m investment number is the first I have heard of it. It sounds impressive, but I would love to know what exactly it includes since the only major investment is the reopening of the Glounthaune to Midleton line. Surely the line reopening and ancillary works don’t add up to 139m. I know it includes work on other stations, but as far as I know, the railcars will be cast offs from the Arrow network.
    Secondly, what bridge built on stilts are they talking about?
    And thirdly, one has to love the part about the bees! Methinks the only bees who sting in Cork are the elected representatives…..

    Iarnród Éireann plans closure of three level crossings in rail plan

    By Seán O’Riordan
    CLOSURE of three level crossings and their replacement with a large bridge are planned by Iarnród Eireann under the company’s proposed €139 million new rail network for Cork.

    Day two of a the inquiry into the proposed Euro 139 commuter rail upgrade for Cork, heard Iarnród Eireann officials state they wanted to close the level crossings on the Lower Glanmire Road for safety reasons, especially as more trains will be using that section of track when the Midleton line reopens in July 2008.

    Objections have been made to the closures by residents in Myrtle Hill Terrace, Bellevue and Woodside Villas who use the crossings to access their homes. Their legal representatives are expected to outline their case tomorrow at the hearing which is taking place in Midleton ParkHotel.

    Conor McGuinness, a senior projects manager with Iarnród Eireann, provided the chairman of the inquiry, Pat Buckley SC, with a letter from Mary Molloy, principal inspector with the Railway Safety Commission, which suggested the three crossings be closed.

    Mark Kilcullen, a consultant engineer, showed the hearing computer-generated pictures of the steel-arched bridge which Iarnród Eireann is proposing to build across the railway line. Part of it will be pile-drived into the bed of the River Lee.

    Andrew Hinds, vice-president of Irish Planning Institute and a senior executive planner with Cork County Council, said the railway project would sustain major population growth.

    He said it was vital that part of the Midleton Northern Relief Road — from the Cork Road to Mill Road — be completed in advance of the reopening of the town’s railway station, otherwise serious traffic congestion could result for commuters.

    Mr Hinds added that a site had also been reserved for a second railway station to the western side of the town, near Waterrock, if it was needed in future years to serve land which had been zoned in that area for more than 2,500 houses.

    Michael Woulfe, who owns Railway House in Midleton, which is right next to the station, said he was in favour of its reopening, but expressed one rather unusual concern.

    As semi-commercial beekeeper, Mr Woulfe runs a honey extracting operation at his home and was worried that some bees could escape and sting commuters.

    He said he would be able to move his operation to another area, but requested some compensation from Iarnród Eireann for doing so.

    Blandcrest and Gable Holdings, which have planning permission for 1,600 houses in Carrigtwohill, expressed concern that Iarnród Eireann was seeking to take away some of their land for an access road. Brian Archer who was representing the developers said this would mean they would be unable to build 34 houses.

    Chris White an expert involved in station planning in the UK, who was acting on behalf of Blackpool Developments, claimed that the station in Midleton was being built in the wrong place. He said it should not be built on its former site east of Mill Road. He said the western side was a better option as that was where most of the new housing development would go.

    in reply to: Cork Transport #779464
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    The county council and the urban councils are nothing more than talking shops and tax generating vehicles. Boundaries are out of date and they are in no rush to change them and councillors are more worried about their pension entitlements than actually doing their job. They talk and scream about what the authorities should be doing and somehow forget that they are the ones who are empowered to do exactly that. Witness the recent Dartmouth Square like carry on in Mallow. Instead of doing their job years ago and securing the site, the councillors and officials are blaming Cromwell and suggesting we rise up in rebellion! Local government is an embarassment these days. And since this is a transport thread, why are so many roads in County Cork still using tar and chip surfacing? And what, praytell, is the logic of throwing lumps of tarmacadam into potholes full of water, only for the pothole to rise phoenix-like within a week. We should be world experts on potholes by now but we never seem to learn. Thankfully the national roads have improved, but Cork’s secondary roads are still pretty dire.

    in reply to: Developments in Cork #781052
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Somewhat off-topic, but I liked these shots of the Opera House and the new apartment development on the opposite quay (Camden Wharf I believe, but please correct me if wrong). I know we have discussed the apartment building in detail here before, but I thought this photo would put it in some context as to its architectural merits or otherwise. The Opera House facade is a significant improvement on what was there before.

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    And this photo shows the Opera House and behind it the Crawford Art Gallery & School of Art. One of my favourite buildings in Cork.

    in reply to: Irish say no to PVC windows #744947
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    I took this snap back in August in Cork and it is somewhat depressing. The building in question is the VEC building on Paul Street, across from St. Peter & Paul’s Chuch. The building obviously is quite beautiful but this awful PVC replacement job does it no favours. Looks both ugly and cheap.

    Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #730289
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Given that there has been much discussion in this thread about ‘temporary’ signage on shopfronts, I thought the following article might be of interest. At the very least, good to see the issue getting some publicity.

    The Sunday Times September 24, 2006

    An Taisce in war on lurid shopfronts
    Colin Coyle

    THEY style themselves as shops “designed for the way we live today” but An Taisce, the National Trust for Ireland, has claimed that the “increasingly brash and lurid” shopfronts of convenience stores are destroying the fabric of Dublin.
    The planning watchdog has filed documents with the city council claiming that Spar, Centra and Londis “are showing an increasing contempt and disregard for planning laws and requirements”, and that their obtrusive, gaudy facades are ruining the capital’s historic streetscapes.

    Kevin Duff, a spokesman for An Taisce, says Centra and Spar are the chief offenders. “These shops are openly flouting planning regulations and there is now a significant level of unauthorised development and non-compliance with planning authority decisions in Dublin, where a new convenience store seemingly opens on a weekly basis,” he said.

    “We’ve identified at least 20 examples of these stores disregarding planning regulations. The city council is reluctant to get tough with them and doesn’t want to get involved in messy legal battles, but the situation is getting out of hand. It’s only a matter of time before it spreads to other urban areas.”

    The city council has issued enforcement orders against a number of convenience stores in recent months and admits that there have been a growing number of complaints from the public about the visual impact of such shops.

    “We have taken action against several shops recently, forcing them to remove unauthorised signs,” said Rory O’Byrne, an enforcement officer. “We’re not actively targeting convenience stores, but we do investigate any reports of unauthorised development.”

    An Taisce claims that when convenience stores open, they sometimes use cheap plastic signage emblazoned with their logos and claim that it is a temporary arrangement.

    Duff said: “There is a Londis on O’Connell Street, right in the heart of an area with its own special planning controls, that has had a temporary sign outside it for almost 18 months. The policy appears to be to establish themselves visually with a big, bold sign and leave it in place for as long as possible.”

    Londis admitted that erecting a permanent sign on its O’Connell Street store was taking longer than expected.

    Spar has also been known to erect bold plastic “temporary” shopfronts, Duff claims. “The Spar on Patrick Street had ‘temporary’ signage for eight months. It has finally been removed and replaced with a stainless steel sign, but it’s completely different to what was agreed with the city council.”

    Spar, Duff said, has opened several shops without securing planning permission for their facades first.

    “Over the past year a significant proportion of their stores in the city centre have been fitted with an internally illuminated protruding plastic box fascia. These boxes have a cheap downmarket appearance and fly in the face of basic shopfront design principles,” he said.

    Spar claims that it has a strong tradition of working closely with local authorities in all large European cities and is happy with its relationship with Dublin city council. “Spar takes it responsibilities in relation to planning very seriously,” it said.

    “We are in continuous dialogue with the city council through our architects in relation to store frontage and signage.”

    Centra claims that although its stores are individually owned by independent retailers, “store fronts have to conform to an agreed brand identity and quality standard as well as conforming to the planning requirements of the relevant local authority”.

    Duff cites a Spar on Mayor Street and a Centra on Capel Street as two models of restraint in shopfront design. “Both of those stores have discreet, simple designs, but these constitute a minority,” he said.

    in reply to: dublin airport terminal #717249
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Did you not read the headline on the IT? Two hours to the K Club WITH A GARDA ESCORT!!

    Ryder Cup skipper Woosnam stymied by M50 traffic jam
    Alison Healy
    He may be the European Ryder Cup captain but not even Ian Woosnam could rise above an M50 traffic jam yesterday. Heavy rain, Monday traffic and M50 roadworks meant it took the golfer almost two hours to travel from Dublin airport to the K Club, despite having a Garda escort.

    ‘Tis getting as bad a Sneem of a Tuesday!

    At least our woeful transport system is democratic….roll up, roll up, delays for all:(

    in reply to: Developments in Cork #781003
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    @Pug wrote:

    New Park N Ride facility going in at the Dunkettle Roundabout in the North East corner on the land between the roundabout and the Ibis hotel. I don’t go that way in the morning but I thought it was fairly choked with traffic already. Presume they will have some sort of system so the cars queueing to get in wont block everyone else.

    Pug – I was under the impression that the park n ride was going in at North Esk (next to or on part of the railway owned land at their container terminal).
    The attached aerial picture gives an idea of the area concerned, and a busy spot it is too given that you have the entrance to the tunnel, the intersection of the busy Dublin and Waterford roads, and the Cobh & Midleton railway.

    Furthermore, Little Island industrial estate lies just to the east. To the north western corner, there are plans for several hundred houses in the grounds of Dunkatle House (not too sure what the status of that planning app is presently). If anyone is up to it, feel free to highlight the particular areas by highlighting the various elements in the photo.
    Incidentally, I have several more aerial photos of Cork Harbour and given the recent debate about this thread, I am not too sure whether to post them in this thread, the transport thread, or the Cork Harbour thread! The photos cover all aspects and thus would most likely be relevant to all of the above although they would probably be best grouped together IMO. Suggestions on a postcard please before I commit any cardinal sins and breach posting etiquette;)

    in reply to: Developments in Cork #780978
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    @kite wrote:

    🙁 After following the great “Dublin historic paving disbelief” thread, I feel it is sad that the historic paving in Cork is suffering a similar fate, replacing the paving outside Cork City Hall with Patrick Street leftovers instead of affecting a proper repair to what was there is sad.

    Kite – Have been following that threat as well and it is shocking to see what they are doing re the old paving in Dublin. Alas, Cork does not have much good quality paving at all, and what little granite paving we do have has been left to fall into disrepair. Having said that, although the Patrict’s street paving is not to everyone’s taste, I quite like it. Hopefully, it will be maintained and not be ruined by a combination of black chewing gum marks, or wilful destruction by the utility companies. Re the City Hall paving, here is a shot I took of the new paving they were laying in August. Is this granite quarried locally or is it what the Dublin thread was referring to as Chinese White Granite?

    in reply to: reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches #768557
    corcaighboy
    Participant

    Apologies in advance for this photo as it is more concerned with the exterior than the interior of St. Colmans. I took this in August and thought readers of this thread might find them interesting. The imposing sight of St. Colman’s is something that has to be seen to be believed. (Will add more shots later)

Viewing 20 posts - 21 through 40 (of 103 total)

Latest News