ConK

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 41 through 53 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dublin’s Ugliest Building #713160
    ConK
    Participant

    this house.

    in reply to: National Wax Monstrosity #745681
    ConK
    Participant

    Has anybody been passing the Wax Museum upstairs on the number 10 . .. and seen the tantilising georgain ionic column bearly veiwable through the hole in the facade? I’d love to see it uncovered. is there any plans for this site?

    in reply to: roofing contractors #760371
    ConK
    Participant

    I can’t recommend one. But I can warn you Roofing contractors are completly untrustworthy. They are the worst of all the trades. I’ve just done up a geo. house in Dublin 1. My roof has 2 valleys carrying rain water over the house (worst design ever!)
    I had to replace the aluminum valley with a Copper one. and despite going for the “premuim” option the damn thng is still leaking !

    The first roofer I burn’t a hole in my neighbours breathable membrane & i’ve rang the second one every day for the last 6 weeks – he won’t return my call to fix the “guaranteed” works on the valley.

    It is not worth anything: but get references and ring them all. Try to physically oversee all their work.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729526
    ConK
    Participant

    I got the picture of the o’connel bridge (1928) in Closkys on Dominick Street. A really nice pub up at the Kings Inn end. Also the barman was adament that it was not the eucharist event in 1932 – which seems to have generated a different structure.

    I think it would be good if all the old Dublin Pictures from this thread were complied somewhere on the site.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729518
    ConK
    Participant

    This is a photo of a photo of O’Connel bridge from 1928 from “civil week” or something the barman was telling me – I took it the other night in a pub I was in. I haven’t seen this photo before on the thread. . .. the big construction on the median of the bridge looks bizarre. . . anybody got a better version?

    in reply to: Irish say no to PVC windows #744830
    ConK
    Participant

    At the time the original windows were installed the timber was slow grown pine. the fast grown pine available today would be too soft. . . . which is why you have to use a hardwood.

    I agree that I devalued the house. But only one of the houses on the street has sash windows, so I was just matching the rest of the street. – also I couldn’t afford the sash ones – as mentioned.

    in reply to: Irish say no to PVC windows #744828
    ConK
    Participant

    The real problem about PVC windows is the price. Nobody prefers them, but the price is so attractive . . . they are really cheap. I was pricing windows for my georgian house they are approx 1.7 metres tall * 1 metre wide. 1 over 1.

    For PVC they were EUR 200 each.
    For hardwood sash replacements they were EUR 950 each. 😮
    Also to get the old windows renovated and fixed up was around EUR 900 each also.

    So for my house it was 8k vrs. 1.6k (double glazed)

    I’m afraid I sold out – I’m not happy about it. It was a financial decision. Don’t hate us PVC people. 😉

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729243
    ConK
    Participant

    I was in Closkeys on Dominick St (nice old pub) at the weekend. There is a black and white picture of o’connell bridge with a big white building on the bridge. What is it. I hadn’t seen it before.

    in reply to: Georgian Doorways #756757
    ConK
    Participant

    mine. of course.
    it is on the list of things to do.
    from 1814.
    i’ve tried to attach it. . .

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #729077
    ConK
    Participant

    Anyone know where I could access Gardiners Dublin 1991, a 60 page pamhlet It was missing from 45 Merrion sq when I was there.

    in reply to: Basement floor replacement #753046
    ConK
    Participant

    The chemical treatment thing puts a layer of DPC into the walls to stop the damp rising. I imagine your basement is a random stone build and the upper floors are brick – so this is not an option in your house. the injected layer will only work on a brick construct – the people who install it are unaware of this. It is due to the way it seeps through the mortar layer. . . but there is no such layer with random stone.

    Is the flagstone floor causing a damp problem ? it shouldn’t coz the damp should be evaporating through the joints . .. is the place heated and ventilated?

    You should replace the timber floor with a new one. But you should not change it. I’d bet there are ventilation shafts to ventilate the underside of the timber floor if it is original. … but alas it is timber and will rot . . .lasted 200 years though . . .. .not bad.

    Conservation is about replacing like for like. The Concrete floor will drive the water up the walls and damage the building in the long run – but maybe not in your life time. I should say i’ve put a concrete floor into my geo. basement – there was only earth there before it and it wasn’t deep enough to be cross ventilated for a timber floor which would have beent he best option for the house.

    I’m renovating a geo house in D1. The basement at the back of the house had soil right up against it. this causes penatrating damp. So I dug a trench along the back of the house – I found a stone slab 4 feet under the surface, sloping away from the house, cusing rain to run into a cavity , the size of a coffin – this was part of the original build to deal with damp and keep the water away from the house. I think this is called a “french drain ” or a soak away.

    in reply to: O’ Connell Street, Dublin #728745
    ConK
    Participant

    what are these things?

    in reply to: corner of Townsend Street and Lombard Street? #751013
    ConK
    Participant

    it was a three story red brick, with very decorative detail,
    “importers of fine wines” was printed above the windows, on a grey granite imitation type banner
    It was sucessfully knocked around 2 months ago.
    It was derilict and rundown but by no means beyond retrieve.

Viewing 13 posts - 41 through 53 (of 53 total)