Barry

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: U2 studio entries #727175
    Barry
    Participant

    This entire debacle doesnt merit the debate of whether it has been an ideas or technically based “competition”.
    It has been a farcical excercise in incompetance from start to finish, and a humiliation for the DDDA, the architectural profession and its representatives in this country.
    There has been justifiable outrage amongst compeditors internationally to discover the “co incidental” Dunne/McGuinness connection, but this has been further exacerbated by the latest revelation that the REAL winner couldnt be traced because the DDDA had lost their details!
    This is becoming a very bad Irish joke……..

    in reply to: Eygptian Musem Competition #727523
    Barry
    Participant

    I’m surprised and impressed that a small practice woud invest the time and money in actually visiting the site for a competition with such huge odds. It obviously paid dividends as their entry is apparently the only shortlisted entry to actaully afford views of the pyramids from the internal exhibition space…seems an almost obvious solution that was missed by most. Well done H.P.

    in reply to: Roches Stores, Henry Street, Dublin #732119
    Barry
    Participant

    Its true!……windows ARE overrated…its a real pane…I think the profession should look into this…then upon reflection…maybe not…I’m just fenestrated with the whole idea. There’s just no clear rationale. The whole idea of windows should be planar and simple really…ope you agree?

    in reply to: Sir John Rogerson Qy #725228
    Barry
    Participant

    I thought the west elevation of the Zoe/Dunloe Ewart building implied some semblence of architectural form which would have been conducive to a landmark building, visually terminating the quay. The east elevation however reveals a confused hodge podge of forms and proportions. This, coupled with the stumpy “twisted torso” U2 “tower” at the quay edge merely demonstrate the incompetance of planners who have squandered 2 wonderful opportunities to develop a worthwhile building in this painfully conservative city…….Oh what they would have done in Paris!!

    in reply to: Roches Stores, Henry Street, Dublin #732117
    Barry
    Participant

    C’mon Graham…if Benson & Forsythe had designed it half the architects in the country would probably be raving about its understated minimalism and brave juxstaposition of platonic planar forms…its obviously a bottom line budget driven attempt on improving the previous facade….(sans glazing which no doubt was a client directive) Out of interest….what would you have proposed

    in reply to: Heuston Gateway #721315
    Barry
    Participant

    Disappointing that the private sector is being shafted yet again with significant portions of these large projects being handed to the OPW. What happened to competition and open tendering?

    in reply to: Cow Parade #734704
    Barry
    Participant

    Trace:
    I wouldnt publicise the fact that theres an art piece outside Patrick Guilbauds….Conrad Gallagher might get ideas

    in reply to: U2 studio entries #727103
    Barry
    Participant

    Its inevitable with Architectural & Beauty competitions that any winner will be subjected to criticism rather than praise….its the fragility of the egos involved I guess. What doesnt help at all in this particular scenario is the scent of possible nepotism involved in the process….it is all to familiar in our politics and the way we do things here. Enough!…if suggestions aired on this site pertaining to Mr. Dunne are true, the probability of co incidence is beyond credibility, and the process and result should be brought into question or defended with substantiation.
    It is a poor reflection on the lack of professionalism in this country that we cannot seem to progress any significant project without controversy, petty political manouevering or cronyism.

    in reply to: irish architectural students #719715
    Barry
    Participant

    Playing with Phi…..? Are you taking the phiss?

    in reply to: Gates to North Great Georges St. #714385
    Barry
    Participant

    IN response to Johns note date 27th March

    Why must gates be necessary to calm traffic. The proposal is for Gates 5 ft. in height. A simple change in level or numerous other traffic calming methods could be undertaken to solve any serious issues of joyriding, although I must refute Senator Norris’ claim of a joyriding problem. I have lived on North Great Georges Street for over two years and have never encountered such problems.

    The issue of alternative routing for traffic has not been considered. As was noted, the reported bus accident took place on Hill Street. The traffic buid up on this street would no doubt double as a result of the closure of North Great Georges Street. Having witnessed the many children using Hill street as a palyground the possibilty for further accidents would no doubt increase.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

Latest News