andy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Underneath Dublin? #716320
    andy
    Participant

    a fully-integrated, cutting-edge underground rail system for the entire city? sigh….

    in reply to: your top 10 buildings 20th century (ireland) #716859
    andy
    Participant

    IFSC would have to figure in that poll for me

    andy
    Participant

    heh, no problem. maybe we’d all like to have some more impressive structures in dublin to be able to show off to our out-of-town friends.

    andy
    Participant

    reply to bunch:
    >”Andy, why should anyone from Dublin feel the need to ‘have’ a building to ‘outstrip Cork and Belfast in terms of “vitality, confidence and prosperity.” Honestly, the fact that those two cities contain buildings that are taller than any of the capitals should not generate a feverish attempt to throw something up.”

    …couldn’t agree more. i wouldn’t back the construction of a very tall building if it wasn’t interesting and didn’t use it’s height as a primary artistic tool.

    >”Does a city hold pride by having taller buildings, just for the sake of it…how about having buildings of high design quality, architectural merit, beauty, whether they be high or low?”

    ….again, i’m in agreement. for example, the river facade of the ifsc is one of my favourite things in dublin to look at. but here’s a half-assed analogy: i’m a musician. and i, like architects, enjoy variety in my chosen art form. if i decided to write ONLY 3-minute pop songs and nothing more, i’d surely be as boring as dublin’s skyline.

    >”I agree that Dublin probably should be witnessing the construction of much taller buildings, but for reasons aside from because the ‘regional’cities are embarrassing us etc.”

    ….fair point. yes, build them for the right reasons. my point really was that if Irish cities, Belfast in-particular (ok I know its the UK but it’s got a lot in common), have no problem with erecting tall structures in their city, then what’s our problem?

    >”Dublin’s tallest (Liberty hall)was an attempt to introduce height to the city for sake’s sake and I think it is one of the most boring buildings I have seen.”

    ….ok, but maybe if they reglazed those ‘rickety’-looking windows, it’d do the building the world of good.

    >”Dublin’s vitality and confidence will not emerge from it casting jealous eyes elsewhere or by half- hearted efforts to make statements that supposedly re-affirm its status.Nothing has to be “proven”, where is the insecurity comiong from?”

    ….maybe the insecurity comes from having a mother from London and seeing with my own eyes what TRUE confidence in a city looks like.

    andy

    in reply to: Contempoary Film Images #716006
    andy
    Participant

    check out the film “About Adam”, just on the tail-end of it’s cinema release. contemporary to a fault!

    andy

    in reply to: Our Criteria for “City” status?? #715415
    andy
    Participant

    Fair point, it’s not directly related. But having said that, maybe if a town is upgraded to a city then perhaps a different attitude to many things, not least architecture, in the area emerges..?

    in reply to: City of the Sacred Heart #734595
    andy
    Participant

    I think the man behind the idea has some sort of religious agenda behind the whole project. I mean who in their right mind would seriously consider “City of the Sacred Heart” as a possible name? And is it just me, or is there something a little sinister about that constant blue Mayo sky in the conceptual illustrations…..?

    in reply to: City of the Sacred Heart #734594
    andy
    Participant

    I think the man behind the idea has some sort of religious agenda behind the whole project. I mean who in their right mind would seriously consider “City of the Sacred Heart” as a possible name? Plus I don’t like the look of that constant blue sky over Mayo in the conceptual illustrations.. people might start smiling….

    in reply to: another new pedestrian bridge for dublin #715381
    andy
    Participant

    couldn’t agree more, Greg.

    in reply to: Spike & Kevin Myers #715402
    andy
    Participant

    Since when was the GPO the focal point of the street? Nelson’s Pillar was obviously the focal point, and since that was blown to bits there hasn’t been a proper one. How could the GPO be a focus when it’s not in the middle of the street but to the side?
    The spire would be on the same patch as Nelson was, and therefore be situated exactly where the focal point was originally intended!

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

Latest News