admin

It is clear that if the right to acquire the Fee Simple exists that a right of renewal also exists as renewal is a far less onerous status to attain.

It is clear that DCC will be entitled to compensation for any and all damages that the ground landlord or his agents inflict upon the tenants improvements which at this point would qualify as structures and as such bring the holding into the protection afforded to the tenants as a defined tenement.

Bob is right interpretation of the specific wording is at the nub of this;

my guess is that part-letting would be prohibited as the intention of the clause was probably to stop a seperate dwelling and access and parking requirement but that disposal of the entire would be permitted as there would be intensification as opposed to multiplication of effect. Then one provisio I would consider is if an argument was made for extenuating circumstances on the basis of a large family needing more space at a particular location and that a planner granted on this basis where a refusal may have otherwise resulted.

Any links to the source of these Business Improvement Districts

@RTE wrote:

Court orders halt to parking on Dublin square

05 September 2006 17:36
The High Court has ordered that Dartmouth Square in Ranelagh in south Dublin should not be used as a car park.

Dublin City Council took court proceedings after the owners of the park, Noel O’Gara and his company, Marble and Granite Tiles Ltd, refused to give an undertaking to stop using the square as a car park.

The barrister for the city council, Ms Carol O’Farrell, said using the square as a car park was a material change of use and needed planning permission.

Mr O’Gara told the court he could invite anyone he wanted on to the land.

There will be a full hearing of the case next Monday.

Landlord and Tenant law provides for the ‘quiet enjoyment’ of lands that are held with exclusive possession for a fixed term under a lease contract; the term is in force until formally terminated. I do not find commercial or any other car-parking to be compliant with quiet enjoyment without consent of the Lessee who having brought this challenge are unlikely to grant any such application for consent.

The cultural link between both groups is further strengthened by their bonds with the ultra independent National Trust of Scotland and semi-autonomous National Trust of Wales.

Scotland is interesting because a politically motivated manouver like Dick’s trick was tried in Scotland with the establishment of Historic or as Alan D would say Hysteric Scotland whose membership application of IUCN was rejected.

@Chuck E R Law wrote:

An Taisce is not the only trust recognised by IUCN.

Quite correct but other than NTNI it is the only one on the Island of Ireland recognised as a national trust.

@Chuck E R Law wrote:

An Taisce is just one of more than 700 environmental and conservation NGOs which are members of IUCN including the National Trusts of most of the Commonwealth countries.

Exactly and An Taisce are the sole ROI members in each regional grouping.

@Chuck E R Law wrote:

When An Taisce was founded everyone expected that it would perform the same role in the Republic that the National Trust does in the UK. Have a look at the pathetic property portfolio on the AT website. The jewel in the crown, Kanturk Castle, was actually a hand me down from the UK Trust.

The 1905 incarnation of the National Trust led by Yeats and Lady Gregory had exactly the same ideals as present day An Taisce and when the political context was right the UK National Trust were more than happy to return Kanturk Castle to the only custodians they trusted.

@Chuck E R Law wrote:

You are obviously not impressed by “what is currently being discussed” but at least somebody is trying to address this gross dereliction of a national duty.

I am very comfortable with what is being discussed but without knowing the facts I will not advise anyone one way or the other.

@Chuck E R Law wrote:

It is fair to say that theseThree Amigos thought they were setting up a National Trust for Ireland. We are still waiting for it 60 years later.

That quote sums you up quite nicely;

Sean MacBride; A legend in historical and political circles
O’Dailligh: The fifth President of Ireland and Supreme Court Judge responsible for many headline cases still headline cases 30 years later
Arthur Cox; founder of the most successful commercial legal practice in the history of Ireland

For your information An Taisce has been the only trust recognised by IUCN and has been for a very long time; if you think that what is currently being discussed will do anything more than gold plate 2 or 3 large houses then you are every bit as niave as your user name suggests.

The figures look poor i.e. a 1.25% annual return for the local economy with no indication of what operating revenues would be and with interest rates at 4-5% for this type of finance it doesn’t look particularly viable.

Is this another Vega City?

Pity there isn’t a carbon trust to get individuals like this to form into an orderly market with ancillary back up provided.

Strategy often forms part of getting what you want out of the planning system; the use of past precedents either for or against a particular proposal holds the key to influencing the outcome.