well what about the developments popping up in the shannonside ?
- This topic has 2,478 replies, 127 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
Griff.
- AuthorPosts
- June 17, 2006 at 5:47 pm #753698
Anonymous
InactiveThe start of a new Limerick Skyline -Clancy Strand-
14/06/2006
Permission is sought for the demolition of Strandville, Roseville and Curragour House, ancillary sheds and structures, at Clancy Strand, Limerick and permission to construct 49 no. apartments (14-3 bed, 34-2 bed and 1-1 bed) in a five storey building with 1.5 floors of basement carparking, site entrance, drainage, landscaping and ancillary works
Eileen McNamara Architects
These apartments would command a spectacular view of the river Shannon with the Kings island in the background. This location is second to none in Limerick and if the developer gets the design right it will probably kick start more developments towards the treaty stone.
I trust the city hall has a coherent skyline plan for Clancy Strand.
The first image is of Clancy Strand from King John’s Castle. The planning site is for the last 3 houses on the left?
The second image is of King John’s Castle taken from the from the Clancy Strand side of the river. Nice views for the apartments.
The third image is a zoomed view of Shannon rowing club with a cluttered high rise background. Taken from John’s Castle. The green office block has since been demolished and will be replaced by an even higher building.
Images found under following links:
June 18, 2006 at 2:27 am #753699Anonymous
InactiveLimerick’s O’Connell Street Skyline -AIB Office Block and Royal George Hotel-
Tuborg hi, I really enjoyed seeing the collection of photos covering the Todds fire and other O’Connell street locations. Yes Cannock’s building with it’s landmark clock was a gem. Your last image of the Aidan Brooks redevelopment of the Royal George Hotel brings home a missed opportunity of rectifying one of the two sins against the O’Connell Street Georgian skyline. The developer has achieved a lot within the block itself i.e. Lower Cecil Street / Henry Street / Shannon Street (see images two and three below). Could one imagine if he had been able to acquire the former Irish Permanent building or it’s owners had teamed up to integrate the buildings on the block together. For example the former hotel could have removed floors seven and eight. The sixth floor could been extended from the hotel to cover or replace the roof of the Georgian building on the corner (see first image with blue line). There is a good example of this in Lower Glentworth Street where a new office building was built along side a stand alone Georgian house. The roof-floor of both buildings are integrated. Sorry no image available. It’s frustrating to see in your posted image a for sale or to let sign on the corner building now. Alas too late!
Image of Cecil Street by Squid http://thelimerick.blogspot.com/2006/06/my-photos-of-limerick-taken-03062006_04.html
June 20, 2006 at 8:39 pm #753700Anonymous
InactiveOpposition to Limerick Docks proposals
20 June 2006 16:15
Opposition to proposals to sell off or close Limerick Docks has intensified, following a legal challenge by one of the biggest exporters based at the docks.The Shannon Foynes Port Company is currently examining tenders from a number of commercial interests who have ambitions to develop the 44-acre site.
The company wants to see what interest is in the market and will make a decision about its future by the end of September.
But there is considerable opposition among a number of commercial and community interests to any proposals to sell the docks.
Hegarty Metals, which has been exporting scrap metal from Limerick Docks for over 45 years, has lodged papers in the High Court to fight any plans to sell.
The port company says it will repel any move by what it describes as ‘vested interests’ to inhibit its right to determine the future of the docks.
Limerick City Council has also re-iterated its complete opposition to any proposals to sell or close the docks.
Any thoughts?
June 21, 2006 at 5:16 am #753701PoxyShamrok
ParticipantJust wondering did anyone ever hear anymore on the proposed development on the marshs along the Condell road?
June 21, 2006 at 1:39 pm #753702justnotbothered
Participant@PoxyShamrok wrote:
Just wondering did anyone ever hear anymore on the proposed development on the marshs along the Condell road?
You mean in the protected wetlands? No, not even a sniff of an actual concrete plan either. Wouldn’t trust these guys as far as they should be thrown.
June 21, 2006 at 2:07 pm #753703jimg
ParticipantThese apartments would command a spectacular view of the river Shannon with the Kings island in the background. This location is second to none in Limerick and if the developer gets the design right it will probably kick start more developments towards the treaty stone.
Ah no. If your assumption is right, I presume this development would involve knocking the Curragower pub (not sure of the spelling) which I’ve been in during my last couple visits to the city. Currently this spectacular view is available to the public from the first story roof “beer garden” while sipping a beer; definitely to be recommended during a visit to Limerick. Also, surely 5 stories would be way too much in this location. Even though separated by the river, it would adversely affect the setting of John’s castle (it would probably be much higher than the castle) and Thomond bridge. While trying to find a parking spot behind the pub, I ended up driving through a really interesting warren of medieval patterned little back streets; this is actually a very interesting part of town which would benefit from a less brutal approach to its development than knocking a great pub which draws people to the area and replacing it with a 5 story appartment block. It seems half of Limerick is full of appartments at this stage anyway so I don’t see that this as a positive development for the city.
June 21, 2006 at 5:26 pm #753704Anonymous
Inactivejimg wrote:Ah no. If your assumption is right, I presume this development would involve knocking the Curragower pub (not sure of the spelling) which I’ve been in during my last couple visits to the city. Currently this spectacular view is available to the public from the first story roof “beer garden” while sipping a beer]Permission is sought for the demolition of Strandville, Roseville and Curragour House, ancillary sheds and structures, at Clancy Strand, Limerick and permission to construct 49 no. apartments (14-3 bed, 34-2 bed and 1-1 bed) in a five storey building with 1.5 floors of basement carparking, site entrance, drainage, landscaping and ancillary works
If I’m right then it should be the three houses marked blue below that will be demolished and the Curragour Pub is marked red. Then the Pub would live to fight for another day!
June 22, 2006 at 1:13 am #753705Tuborg
Participant@Thomond Park wrote:
Opposition to Limerick Docks proposals
20 June 2006 16:15
Opposition to proposals to sell off or close Limerick Docks has intensified, following a legal challenge by one of the biggest exporters based at the docks.The Shannon Foynes Port Company is currently examining tenders from a number of commercial interests who have ambitions to develop the 44-acre site.
The company wants to see what interest is in the market and will make a decision about its future by the end of September.
But there is considerable opposition among a number of commercial and community interests to any proposals to sell the docks.
Hegarty Metals, which has been exporting scrap metal from Limerick Docks for over 45 years, has lodged papers in the High Court to fight any plans to sell.
The port company says it will repel any move by what it describes as ‘vested interests’ to inhibit its right to determine the future of the docks.
Limerick City Council has also re-iterated its complete opposition to any proposals to sell or close the docks.
As far as i know the Shannon Foynes port company’s original plan was to fill in the inner wet dock so as to make the area more attractive to developers!, their position seemed to change shortly afterwards and they declared that they wanted to see the docks kept open. They seem to have changed their mind yet again now and are taking a more aggressive stance on the matter saying that “its their land and they wont be told how best to use it” . One thing is for sure the docklands cant be left in their current state, the area is neglected, partly derelict and vastly underutilised. In fairness the docks do have their limitations: the channel is too narrow to allow many ships to turn and not deep enough for the larger vessels. The port company has major plans to upgrade foynes port and also plan a new deep water facility at ballylongford in Kerry, these developments surely put a large question mark over the future of the Limerick city docks!
It would be a shame though if the docks were closed completely especially as limerick has been a port city for hundreds of years, there is a huge amount of undeveloped land not only in the docklands but also in the wider dock road area, the city council has big plans to turn the dock road into a sort of boulevard, i know it seems unlikely at the moment but thats the long term plan, also major residential, commercial & leisure facilities are planned for the old greenpark racecourse so really there isnt any need to close the docks down!
June 22, 2006 at 1:35 am #753706Anonymous
Inactive@Thomond Park wrote:
Opposition to Limerick Docks proposals
Any thoughts?
Well why the expensive Tunnel? :confused:
Shannon Estuary Shipping Facilities
Kerry: Ballylongford planned gas terminal (Gas jetty) Deep water facility
Kerry: Tarbert E.S.B. Station (Oil jetty) 80,000 tons DWT
Clare: Moneypoint E.S.B. Station (Coal jetty) 220,000 tons DWT
Clare: Shannon airport (Oil Jetty) 6,500 tons DWT
Limerick: Foynes (Port) Deep water facility
Limerick: Aughinish Alumina (Bauxite Jetty) 80,000 tons DWT
Limerick: Limerick city (Docks) 5,500 tons DWTLimerick docks has only one advantage in that is situated 60 miles inland thus with small coastal shipping it can reduce the amount of bulk goods on the roads. Where as Foynes port has more to offer with Rail link to national railway network and 230 acres of serviced land. Enough room to grow.
In my opinion the facts above speak for Foynes Port.
http://www.sfpc.ie Shannon Foynes Port Company
http://www.shannon-dev.ie/NewsReleases/NewsReleases2006/Title,3705,en.html Shannon Development
Shannon Development welcomes Shannon Foynes Port Company initiative 🙂
Shannon Development welcomes the Shannon Foynes Port Company initiative of seeking expressions of interest from developers in the redevelopment of Limerick Docklands. The Limerick Docklands area has the potential to be one of the primary economic drivers for Limerick and the region, and Shannon Development has worked closely with Shannon Foynes Port Company and Limerick City Council to explore development opportunities for the Docklands area that would drive the economic regeneration of this important urban area in Limerick City.
Shannon Development would urge all stakeholders to engage in consultation to ensure the maximum economic potential of Limerick Docklands is realised for Limerick City and the Region.http://www.murrayolaoire.com/urban/projects/limerick_docks/index.html
RE-INVENTING LIMERICK DOCKLANDS COMPETITION 🙂
Client: Limerick City Council / Shannon Development / Shannon Foynes Port Company
In association with a team of economists, engineers, transport specialists and planners, Murray O’Laoire Architects prepared an approach to a strategic development plan for the Docklands area of Limerick City.
Limerick Docklands represents a key expansion area for Limerick City which necessitates a forward-thinking and co-ordinated development proposal to ensure a phased and regulated expansion approach. The Team proposed a knowledgeable yet innovative approach to advancing a strategic solution for the development of the Docklands.It detailed such issues as strategic site objectives, development guideline principles, linkage opportunities, public open space networks, infrastructure requirements, all of which would support and contribute to the proposed development. The approach adopted for the realisation of a strategic development plan promoted an overall Master Plan as an intrinsic element of the market analysis, reflecting and ordering the demand trends emerging from this analysis, promoting a well designed and economically viable extension to Limerick City.
Interesting this project, has been around for sometime. (Maybe even before the decision for the tunnel was made?????)
Meanwhile dark clouds are gathering further down river.
Construction on the fourth river crossing is to begin this year. The method of crossing is per Tunnel to be built under a PPP scheme. The tunnel option was solely to accommodate the city docks because of tidal constraints. I may assume that the Shannon Foynes Port Company lobbied for the tunnel option? If so why a tunnel, when moving to Foynes Port must have been a long foregone conclusion? Since it is more expensive to build a tunnel than a bridge, logically enough the toll-charges to be paid will be proportionately more. The tab will be paid mainly by commuters going to work and from public taxes. At least our wild-geese can fly into the fog banks without hitting any concrete obstacles during take-off. Even the odd navy visit or thoughts of cruise liners berthing along side the clarion hotel will justify the cost! :rolleyes:Stop the lights lets build a bridge instead? That would be now the worst scenario for Limerick city. It would put so many projects on hold. The pedestrianisation of the city streets can only take place when the NRA has no more Primary roads running through the city centre. The Dublin (N7), Waterford (N24), Cork (N20), Shannon Estuary (N69) and Shannon Airport / Galway (N18). Forty thousand vehicles! 😡
I believe strongly in the concept of the Atlantic corridor connecting Derry, Sligo, Galway, Limerick, Cork and Waterford to offset an imbalance of economic dominance between Belfast and Dublin. This fourth river crossing is part of this jigsaw.
See also
http://thelimerick.blogspot.com/2006/06/city-council-opposes-sale-of-limerick.html
Images #1 and #2 RE-INVENTING LIMERICK DOCKLANDS COMPETITION
Image #3 Ted Russell Docks
Image #4 Fourth River Crossing just below the docks.June 22, 2006 at 1:58 am #753707Tuborg
Participant@CologneMike wrote:
Limerick’s O’Connell Street Skyline -AIB Office Block and Royal George Hotel-
Below is a clearer photo of the former Royal George hotel dating from the mid 60s and gives a better comparison with the monster that exists now!, the vast majority of buildings on O Connell st are 4 storey over basement structures, how the the george and the AIB were allowed to demolish these buildings in the first place let alone totally distort the skyline i’ll never know!, it just goes to show how s*** the planning controls were in the 60s and 70s, what a disgrace! The bare white wall that towers above the timberland store is shocking!, just wait until the elements attack the cheap cladding and it starts to get discoloured, it’ll look nice then!
I think the hotel is reopening in september, the first 2 floors facing onto O Connell st are set aside for retail use with the hotel entrance on Shannon street!, anyone hear who might be moving in there?..
June 22, 2006 at 1:15 pm #753708mopeds
ParticipantI know everyone here loves the Limerick Post. But Look at this article. It a massive planned development. Dont know about losing the park though
New city centre
by Marie Hobbins
A DEVELOPER is poised to deliver a radical and unparalleled transformation to a Limerick city centre area of eight acres.Property developer, Michael Tiernan’s vision for a new and extended city centre involves the demolition of the block occupied by Roches Stores, Penneys and Burger King, the demolition of the block occupied by Arthur’s Quay Shopping Centre, demolition of the unoccupied premises on Liddy Street, the demolition of Dunnes Stores on Sarsfield Street and to the rear on Howley’s Quay and the possible demolition of the tourist office.
Central to the city centre regeneration plan would be the acquisition of the park at Arthur’s Quay.
Outlining his overall plan to the Limerick Post Mr Tiernan, who has submitted his company’s draft to Limerick City Council is emphatic that the development would satisfy the demand for the upmarket retail provision expected of a city centre.
The development would run a road underground from Lower Henry Street to Rutland Street to facilitate the pedestrianisation of Upper Patrick Street and Lower O’Connell Street, would include a major civic square as well as a number of civic spaces, a quayside boardwalk, new theatre/concert hall and the relocation of the city library from the Granary.
The redesigned area would also rehouse the newly rebuilt Roches Stores, Penneys etc and provide a link between the riverscape of Howley’s/Harvey’s quays and Arthur’s Quay and form a natural connection to the city’s medieval quarter.
“It would be hoped that our development would be the catalyst for an imaginative regeneration of Nicholas Street,†observed the developer.
With Roches Stores, Penneys, Dunnes, Tesco and Burger King fully in support of the redevelopment project, which Mr Tiernan stresses will not lead to job losses in the redevelopment period (but will create huge job increases after completion), a city centre regeneration project of this magnitude will, he says “present an historically unique opportunity to transform the centre of Limerick city and will enable it to become once again the civic and retail heartland of the entire region, particularly given the enthusiasm of the stakeholdersâ€.
Michael Tiernan, who built the Arthur’s Quay Shopping Centre in 1989 points out that the cycle for redevelopment has shrunk to today’s norm of 20 to 30 years.
“This is a one in a 200-year opportunity to completely transform, enhance and extend the city centre for the people of Limerick and the challenge is to empower the vision we have to make this possible. Our aim is to focus on what the people want and our ambition is to go to planning next year and with a phased development process, achieve completion by 2010.â€
Tiernan Properties have liaised closely with the developers of the Opera Centre, construction of which is due to commence in the Autumn.
While city manager, Tom Mackey is remaining tight-lipped on the project and refused to be drawn on the implications involved in a rezoning of Arthur’s Quay Park, which is leased to the Council by the Department of the Marine, it is generally accepted that some councillors may not be willing to surrender the park for development.
“There’s a fear that if we put it forward for rezoning for commercial development the port company would look for an arm and a leg in financial terms,†contends Cllr Michael Hourigan who is one hundred per cent in favour of the Tiernan regeneration project.
“As it is the park is under-utilised even though we are making much about being a riverside city. We should consider the bigger picture here and in tandem with the Opera Centre a complete redesign as envisioned by Michael Tiernan and the stakeholders would continue the city’s redevelopment process and would tie in with the Council’s city development plan,â€he said.
The Council’s senior planner, Dick Tobin told the Limerick Post that the project was presented to Limerick City Council in 2004 but that no firm decision on its future was arrived at. Cllr John Gilligan, however is emphatic that the councillors have not yet been acquainted with details of the project.
Mr Tobin said that as the area plan for the city centre is earmarked for detailed discussion later this year, in that context the Tiernan regeneration project will be fully examined.
June 23, 2006 at 12:12 am #753709Tuborg
ParticipantSeen this in the paper today, probably the most radical city centre proposal since edmund pery and his georgian newtown!
Undoubtedly many of the buildings mentioned for “demolition” would be no loss and arthurs quay sc was a poor and dissapointing development on an important site but the fact that its not even 20 years old and they’re talking about tearing it down is mental!, is this the lifespan of a building now: 17 years? I suppose the important point is that someone has finally taken notice of the kip that is Dunnes Stores sarsfield street and the vacant units on liddy street!, this area has massive potential!
Can anyone really see this going ahead? , if i could pick one block in Limerick for redevelopment, it would definately be the Brown Thomas one, what an embarressing eyesore!:o
June 23, 2006 at 2:16 pm #753710Anonymous
Inactive@Mopeds wrote:
I know everyone here loves the Limerick Post. But Look at this article. It a massive planned development. Dont know about losing the park though
New city centre
by Marie Hobbins
A DEVELOPER is poised to deliver a radical and unparalleled transformation to a Limerick city centre area of eight acres.@Tuborg wrote:
Seen this in the paper today, probably the most radical city centre proposal since edmund pery and his georgian newtown!
Can anyone really see this going ahead?,
Developer Michael Tiernan’]
It would include a major civic square as well as a number of civic spaces Question: How radical?
The redesigned area would also rehouse the newly rebuilt Roches Stores, Penneys etc Question: Same locations?
Any artist’s impression Michael?
Image below shows red marked zones for demolition.
(1) Dunnes Stores
(2) Roches Stores
(3) Penneys
(4) Arthur’s Quay Shopping Centre (Tescos)
(5) Arthur’s Quay Park & Tourist officeJune 23, 2006 at 11:36 pm #753711PoxyShamrok
ParticipantTo be honest i think its too much of a development and if it ever happens while the development is under construction it will be dreadful for the city! it will be just a huge building site!
June 24, 2006 at 12:02 am #753712dave123
Participant@PoxyShamrok wrote:
To be honest i think its too much of a development and if it ever happens while the development is under construction it will be dreadful for the city! it will be just a huge building site!
Sure isn’t that what Ireland is at the moment? Dublin Docklands? Port tunnel? etc..
I’d put up with it, It would finally put the final piece of the city centre’s jigsaw together. This part of the city is and has been crying out for revamp,and IMO being neglected. Brown Thomas will have no choice once the plan is drawn up and finshed, bear in Mind the opera centre will be here too, Limerick will be a truly modern, central,clean and european look.:) Brown thomas is too ugly to stay.
I’m going to keep an eye out on the plan. It’s remarkable given the amount of revitilsation that is going on in this city at the moment.
June 24, 2006 at 1:47 am #753713Limerick Guy
Participantthe limerick leader said that this could be completed by 2010….i think this is a bit soon! more like 2015!
June 24, 2006 at 2:31 am #753714Anonymous
Inactive@Limerick Guy wrote:
the limerick leader said that this could be completed by 2010….i think this is a bit soon! more like 2015!
The Limerick Leader
Limerick going underground in biggest ever scheme – By BARRY DUGGAN
THE city centre could be completely transformed in the space of four years with a massive €200m development which will include Limerick’s first underground street.
Property developer Michael Tiernan said the plans for Limerick would make a “much more exciting city centre”.
But Mr Tiernan denied reports that Roches Stores and Dunnes Stores have already been purchased as part of the plan which would see one side of Sarsfield Street being completely demolished.
“What is in agreement at the moment are future plans for the centre of Limerick. There is an understanding between the key stakeholders and all parties concerned to try and reach a satisfactory conclusion that will regenerate and make a much more exciting city centre,” said Mr Tiernan.
It is understood that the multi-million euro retail plan proposes to link Arthur’s Quay Shopping Centre, the block occupied by Roches Stores and Penneys, Dunnes Stores on Sarsfield Street and Arthur’s Quay park.
Pedestrianisation would be vastly improved to make the city centre more accessible.
Were the plans to go-ahead, traffic coming from Henry Street would go underground from Liddy Street, continue under the site of Arthur’s Quay park and emerge at Rutland Street.
“Traffic has to be accommodated and this is one of the options that may be availed. It would lead to improved pedestrianisation for everyone,” said Mr Tiernan.
The cost of the project is expected to exceed €200m and developers hope to have it completed by 2010.
“Hopefully we will make significant progress over the next six months. This is a very exciting project and there is a lot of goodwill towards what we are proposing. It will be compatible with the planned Opera Centre and we are working alongside them not in competition with them,” said Mr Tiernan.
Mr Tiernan of Tiernan Properties built Arthur’s Quay shopping centre in 1989.
Kieran Lehane, director of services at planning, said the local authority are “open and amenable” to discussing the mammoth project.
“We would be in favour of a large scale retail redevelopment but it is very early days yet. This is a major proposal and it is bigger than the Opera Centre,” said Mr Lehane.
No planning application has been received by Limerick City Council yet.
23 June 2006Limerick Leader Link http://www.limericktoday.com/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=3419&ArticleID=1585651
FOREIGN AFFAIRS FOR CITY BLOCK – By MAIREAD Ni CHAOIMH
IT LOOKS certain that Henry Street is to be the chosen location for the offices of over 120 employees of the Department of Foreign Affairs, who are due to relocate to Limerick next year.
It is understood that a multi-million euro deal between the developers and the Office of Public Works is imminent.
The OPW has been shopping around for suitable office accommodation in Limerick since the decentralisation plan was announced, and had considered a number of locations, including a site on Kings Island.
It now appears that they have settled on a new office development, which is currently being built on a large site opposite Mill House on Henry Street, and at the back of the County Council offices on O’Connell Street.
George Moore, a spokesman for the OPW, said the agency would not be publicly announcing which building they have secured until the deal had been finalised.
“Yes, we have identified a property and we are at an advanced stage of signing a lease for a building under construction,” said Mr Moore.
“We are going through the legalities at the moment, but are anxious to get it done as quickly as possible,” he added.
The decentralisation plan will see 124 employees of Irish Aid, the agency in charge of Ireland’s overseas aid development programme, relocate to Limerick from their office at Redmond Hill in Dublin 2.
Kieran Lehane, director of services in the City Council’s planning department, said the relocation of the agency is “a very good plus for the city to have a prestigious government department coming to Limerick”.
Developer Len Dineen is the man behind the new office and apartment complex at Henry Street.
Plans to decentralise Irish Aid, which was previously known as Development Cooperation Ireland, have been beset with controversy. There were widely publicised reports that not enough top civil servants were interested in the move. And Irish aid agencies are vehemently against the move, saying it will lead to a loss of staff expertise, and consequently would do harm to the country’s overseas aid programme.
23 June 2006Limerick Leader Link http://www.limericktoday.com/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=3419&ArticleID=1585653
June 24, 2006 at 5:03 pm #753715PoxyShamrok
ParticipantI have to admit I am quite fond of Arthurs Quay Shopping Centre and if they were to knock the Penneys Block they would be getting rid of Penneys Clock.
June 24, 2006 at 6:50 pm #753716dave123
Participant@PoxyShamrok wrote:
I have to admit I am quite fond of Arthurs Quay Shopping Centre and if they were to knock the Penneys Block they would be getting rid of Penneys Clock.
Ah why? Its not feasible or practical to keep it in it’s current state. I mean they would be better in the long run to knock and build a solid building with more spaces underground for car parking, thus with the demolition of the ugly Burger King too, this will allow a plaza or square this city has forever being wishing for! If this is the plan. There is a lot of unused space there including the opposite side at the tourist office area, it just not working anymore:(
If anything it should all get a total revamp and should be done to the highest standards, The building itself is just going to look out of place when the Opera centre comes on, so there is wise ideas coming through in this plan.
What does one think of a plaza at the type plan, at Arthurs quay centre, just big enough to fit the purpose and it wouldn’t need to be the size of Eyre square etc, just something distinctive and in charactor for this city? Great idea? This would be a diamond for this city, and give something that this city lacks a “centre” not on the edge where there is no footfall i e Arthur’s quay park.
I’m sure the developer would occaisonly browse these pages;)
June 24, 2006 at 7:49 pm #753717billy the squid
Participant@CologneMike wrote:
Developer Michael Tiernan’s City Centre Vision
It would include a major civic square as well as a number of civic spaces Question: How radical?
The redesigned area would also rehouse the newly rebuilt Roches Stores, Penneys etc Question: Same locations?
Any artist’s impression Michael?
Image below shows red marked zones for demolition.
(1) Dunnes Stores
(2) Roches Stores
(3) Penneys
(4) Arthur’s Quay Shopping Centre (Tescos)
(5) Arthur’s Quay Park & Tourist officeLimerick post survives demolition 🙁
Seriously though, I cannot see this happening by 2010. They would be lucky to execute Compulsary Purchase Orders by that time. It would be nice if it happened, however I doubt it will.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

