well what about the developments popping up in the shannonside ?

Home Forums Ireland well what about the developments popping up in the shannonside ?

Viewing 20 posts - 361 through 380 (of 2,479 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #753418
    ShaneP
    Participant

    Well, as I said before, i wouldn’t give much credit to most government plans/ publications , however well intentioned or otherwise and the idle chit chat quoted above does nothing to change that view. The whole exercise in listing certain areas and excluding others is shown, in the article, to be nothing more than the product of a few hours tracing over random o.s. maps with a red marker, to fill a few pages of the development plan.
    to give an example – Crecora – a rural area 8 miles from Limerick City – there’s a nice notional red line drawn around what constitutes the village. There has been very few if any new houses built within that area in recent years. However if one looks to an area 2/3 km off that map it is possible to see that in one particular 500m stretch of road applications being processed/ granted for 5/6 one off houses in the last year. Seemingly Crecora is located in a planning pressure area, whatever that means, perhaps it is supposed to be more difficult to build in the area?

    http://www.limerickcoco.ie/planning/docs/cdp2005/cdpPlans2005/DEV23_24.pdf

    A map showing the location of some 3000 one off houses in County LImerick between 2001 and 2003 –
    http://www.limerickcoco.ie/planning/docs/cdp2005/cdpPlans2005/Map%203_1%20One%20Off%20Grants.pdf

    Again, any thoughts?

    #753419
    Tuborg
    Participant

    A CITY councillor is sticking to his conviction that the People’s Park is being interfered with in a way that is reducing its landscaped parkland.

    Cllr Jim Long told the Limerick Post that following his protestation against the sudden appearance last week of a new pathway in the park at the rear of new complex which is being built there, and his claim that “a cloud of silence” hung over the issue in City Hall, Limerick City Council director of services, Kieran Lehane has now agreed to an investigative meeting on site.

    The councillor, who sparked off a heated controversy that gathered momentum following his discovery some months ago that Limerick City Council had sold off 0.44 acres of parkland for 1.5million euro to facilitate the building of a mixed development, is now incensed that there has been a further intrusion into the public park which was bequeathed to the people of Limerick by the Earl of Limerick in 1876.

    City Hall confirmed that it had received a number of calls from members of the public, voicing their concern that yet more of the park has been eroded.

    However, City Council is emphatic that the construction of a ramp will allow Council workers access to a new depot located in the basement of the multi-storey apartment development.

    City Hall states that the ramp or new pathway was part of the planning development and is required to provide access to the park’s maintenance depot. The council stresses that there is no intention of providing a facility for vehicles to drive through the park.

    Unconvinced, Cllr Long said that having walked around a cordoned off area in the park, there is, in his opinion, ample room for a truck to drive through.

    “It is my belief that what we’re looking at here is a slip road,” he said.

    “I’ll be meeting with officials in the park – I want to show them where my concerns are and that not one more piece of the People’s Park is interfered with for building developments

    A pretty worrying precedent is being set here, was never much of a fan of this development in the first place, there was never any mention of this access point in the original application and the city council assured people that no part of the part other than the specified site itself would be lost, turns out most people were right to be suspicious!, limerick city council dont seem to have any problem in destroying the citys oldest and probably its best public park while doing absolutely nothing to at least improve or perhaps even dispose of the failure that is arthurs quay park, there is a pretty large area there if you include the dunnes site and the vacant shops to the rear of roches, and i cant understand why no action is being taken, there is surely some legislation to free up prime development sites, this is probably one of the last remaining prime sites by the riverfront and what we dont want here is another boring, bland apartment block, if ever this site became available, i think an international competition should be held and let planners and architects(the people who should know best) come up with ideas on how best to utilise this valuable site, i wouldnt like to see the job the city council would make out of it!

    #753420
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ShaneP wrote:

    A map showing the location of some 3000 one off houses in County LImerick between 2001 and 2003 –
    http://www.limerickcoco.ie/planning/docs/cdp2005/cdpPlans2005/Map%203_1%20One%20Off%20Grants.pdf

    Again, any thoughts?

    Best link I’ve seen in ages

    #753421
    J.P
    Participant

    Anyone know of any warehouse or similar developments for rent lease or buy around the Ennis Road area.

    #753422
    ShaneP
    Participant

    I might, but i’m not telling you. Better off trying an estate agents, instead an architecture discussion website.

    #753423
    J.P
    Participant

    Cheers Shane,it was just a simple question.
    I have read all of this thread since happening across this site and I have been very interested in it.
    Its great to see pride in our city again

    #753424
    Planogram
    Participant

    @ShaneP wrote:

    I might, but i’m not telling you. Better off trying an estate agents, instead an architecture discussion website.

    What a nasty reply.

    #753425
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have to say that having also read many contributions to this website that many of the remarks have a very cutting edge to them – the atmosphere seems to be one of putting people down rather than of discussing architecture/planning issues. Sorry, but it is an observation that I have noted to myself since joining and what is worse is that the atmosphere makes others joining the discussions extremely cyncial and aggressive.

    #753426
    asdasd
    Participant

    I see no evidence of that in most of the threads I read and subscribe to( generally the Dublin ones). In fact they are uniformly informative and polite.There is always vigorous debate on the internet, however.

    #753427
    ShaneP
    Participant

    Well J.P – your second posting seems to indicate that I should explain my hostile reaction to your first post. As you said – it was a simple question and it annoyed me because there are a good number of people who spend quite a bit of time searching out, photo’s, maps, plans etc or composing thoughts and arguements for this thread and i was a bit annoyed to see it being reduced to what appeared to be a property search engine ( whether that was your intention or not) It is good to hear, from your second post, that you find the thread, interesting (regardless of whether you include my contributions in that comment or not) and I kinda suspect that you might have some positive contributions to make yourself, which I and probably others would be very much like to hear.

    #753428
    ShaneP
    Participant

    A good no. of stories in the leader, this week concerning developments in Limerick for anyone who doesn’t have access –

    Saturday, September 17th, 2005
    Council ‘block’ home-makers

    By MARTIN BYRNES

    YOUNG home-makers are being blocked from building houses across 90 per cent of County Limerick because they “cannot demonstrate need” and much of the rest is out too because of an absence of sewerage facilities, a Dail candidate has claimed.

    Towns and villages have had their development frozen because no new houses can be built, he said.

    So now Cllr Niall Collins wants to tear out the part of this year’s County Development Plan (CDP) which requires planning applicants to demonstrate a housing need and has put the cat among the pigeons by tabling a motion to that effect.

    “Presently the County Development Plan, which is the primary reference document when planners are adjudicating on planning applications, does not contain a written working definition of housing need,” he told the Limerick Leader. “Therefore the policy is being applied by the planners based on their interpretation only.”

    The need requirement is contained in the plan for the area under strong urban influence, the so-called pressure area, and also the area with a strong agricultural base. Taken together, these amount to over 90 per cent of the land area of the county, Cllr Collins has calculated.

    “I had serious reservations when the CDP was being adopted in the first instance,” he said. “I felt that we were creating an undefined policy–however I choose to wait and see how this policy was being applied and interpreted. Having now seen and experienced how it has worked out, I know the public are completely frustrated and in the absence of a clear definition and criteria for ‘housing need’ I am seeking its complete deletion from the CDP.

    “As a public representative I find myself unable to advise any potential planning applicants whether their circumstances will satisfy the planners that they have a housing need.”

    “Should the Council produce a clear definition in time then I will be happy to write this into the CDP–however in the absence of this any reference to ‘need’ should be deleted.”

    “On top of all of this, we have residential zoned land across County Limerick, and other development lands surrounding our smaller towns and villages which is red-circled for development, awaiting servicing through the sewage scheme infrastructure.

    “Without this infrastructure these lands can not be developed but the proposed sewage schemes are still no nearer today that they were years ago when they were first announced. Locations like Athea, Shanagolden, Dromcollogher, Kilmallock, Adare and Patrickswell to name but a few are at a complete standstill in relation to residential development.”

    Chief planner, Jimmy Feane, is aware of Cllr Collins’ motion for the next meeting of the County Council.

    “The motion is the property of the elected members of the County Council, and I will not comment on it before they discuss it, but I will be making my opinion known to the members,” he said.

    Perhaps the County Council are trying to do something about Bungalow Bliss afterall, T.P.?

    #753429
    ShaneP
    Participant

    A bit more on the new centre in town –

    Saturday, September 17th, 2005
    City on course to house the biggest shop unit in Munster

    By JENNIFER O’CONNOR

    A PLANNING application for what has been dubbed “the biggest shopping centre in Munster” is to be made to City Council within a matter of weeks.

    The proposed development will take in the Michael Street / Rutland Street area of the city and will include the buy-out of a number of premises in the area.

    According to a source, business owners have already agreed to sell their properties subject to planning permission being granted.

    “It is targeted as the biggest shopping centre in Munster. It will cover about 300,000 square feet and the planning application is to go through in a matter of weeks,” he said.

    Up to 1,000 new jobs will be created should the development receive the go-ahead,” the source said.

    Meanwhile, the Limerick Leader has learned that Shannon Development are close to completing a deal worth over €1.5m which will see them dispose of their property in Michael Street.

    The company have owned the premises since 1980 and according to a spokesperson, the sale will “contribute to the regeneration of the area”.

    “Shannon Development are in the process of disposing of their property at Michael Street, Limerick. The company cannot comment further on the sale at this time. The property was placed on the open market and advertised through an agent.

    “The disposal of this property by Shannon Development provides an investment opportunity in the property market which can contribute to the regeneration of this inner city area,” the spokesperson said.

    Shannon Development, who also own a range of industrial estates in Limerick, including the Raheen Industrial Estate and the National Technology Park in Castletroy, have said that as far as they were concerned the tenants were just undergoing a change of landlord.

    They have dismissed rumours that tenants are to receive settlements in the region of €250,000 each once the sale goes through.

    The property was put on the open market earlier this year through Colliers Jackson-Stops International Property Consultants in Dublin and received huge interest from perspective developers because of its city centre location.

    The site covers approximately 0.33 acres and was advertised as producing €33,300 per annum, with the potential for more, in income for Shannon Development.

    #753430
    ShaneP
    Participant

    Saturday, September 17th, 2005
    Council faces gridlock over proposals for city bus lanes

    By MIKE DWANE

    COUNCILLORS look set to scrap proposed bus and cycle lanes on the Ballinacurra Road, O’Connell Avenue, Mulgrave Street / Roche’s Street and Bengal Terrace following a stormy meeting at City Hall this Wednesday.

    Around 30 residents from the affected neighbourhoods crowded into the public gallery where the contentious issue of green routes was debated by the transport and infrastructure strategic policy committee.

    Householders were irate over the recent erection of site notices on Mulgrave Street and beyond the Ballinacurra Creek outlining that Limerick City Council intended to seek funding for bus and cycle lanes there.

    This was despite the fact that councillors thought they had shelved these planned routes before the summer recess and agreed that the Council should proceed only with its plans for green routes on Ennis Road and Childers’ Road.

    “I’ve said it here time and again that the main Ballinacurra Road, O’Connell Avenue, Mulgrave Street and Roches Street are not suitable for bus and cycle lanes,” Cllr Pat Kennedy said.

    He put forward that the committee would reject any notion of bus lanes at the above locations and said he would be urging the full Council to formally rule them out at its next meeting.

    “We, the elected members, are the people who set policy here and I hope people in senior management here get that into their heads,” Cllr Kennedy said.

    Fine Gael’s Cllr Maria Byrne said that “prior to the summer recess, we had deleted all reference to these routes so I was alarmed to receive a phonecall from a member of the public regarding this sign that had been erected on Mulgrave Street.”

    She was further dismayed to learn that a sign regarding disputed city bus and cycle lanes had been put up on the far side of Ballinacurra Creek outside the city boundary.

    Cllr Byrne said she would be seconding Cllr Kennedy’s motion for the deletion of routes at Ballinacurra, O’Connell Avenue, Mulgrave and Roche’s Street.

    Her party colleague, Cllr Ger Fahy, said he was “appalled” to get calls from constituents on a site notice concerning a green route for Bengal Terrace, of which, he said, there had been previously been no mention.

    “Residents assumed that because the sign on Mulgrave Street was nowhere near them, it had nothing to do with Bengal Terrace. There was no public consultation and they are absolutely furious with the approach of Limerick City Council,” said Cllr Fahy, adding that 100 affected homeowners in the area were not prepared to build driveways at their own expense to take their cars off the road.

    Committee chairman Cllr Joe Leddin admitted he was similarly “annoyed” when he got the same phonecalls from residents in his ward.

    “Putting site notices outside the boundaries of the city, high up on poles or behind hedges, is simply unacceptable,” Cllr Leddin said.

    But director of services John Breen stressed that no routes for the areas concerned had been agreed and that they would all have to go through the planning process.

    “The decision rests with the elected members and the public through Part 8 of the planning process. We have received public submissions which we will be responding to but it’s quite clear there’s strong opposition,” Mr Breen said.

    #753431
    dave123
    Participant

    The city centre project
    Steps are moving in the right direction with the new major shopping complex at Rutland Street,
    Positive news for the Limerick as of present! 🙂

    I wonder what kind of plans is going into this multi million-euro development.
    300,000 sq feet is big stuff.
    With the right developers and planners this time around, we will see great stuff happening in this city once again! 🙂
    I see more local people are coming in this thread, which is good to see 🙂 A big welcome to you all
    I do hope Limerick people can pay a little contribution to this thread for its upkeep and fresh too

    As I live in Dublin, It’s good to see more local news from others who contribute their knowledge to this thread.

    I heard the IRFU?? The Thomond park stadium redevelopment. They are still trying to buy out the surrounding houses and land; this is still at loggerheads,
    Any update on this??? :confused:
    I believe the locals are asking more than they bargain for!

    I’m delighted the council scrapped the bus lane plan on O’Connell’s street, as most bus lanes don’t work in city centres.


    Cllr Long is happy that the Park road is only a path

    THEY headed for the People’s Park, Cllr Jim Long, City Hall officials, John Breen, director of services and Patricia Liddy of the parks and estates department, and all turned out to be well.

    The councillor, whose name has become associated with the People’s Park since he first sounded alarm bells regarding the hitherto undisclosed sale by Limerick City Council of 0.44 acres of parkland for 1.5million euro, recently drew attention to what he claimed was a further intrusion into the park, bequeathed to the people of Limerick by the Earl of Limerick in 1876.

    He contended that a new slip road that could accommodate vehicular traffic was being built by the Council in the park.

    The Council insisted however that while it had received a number of calls from members of the public voicing their concern, the construction of a ramp would allow Council workers access to a new depot located in the basement of the new multi-storey apartment development backing on to the park.

    Following their meeting, Cllr Long told the Limerick Post that the roadway has now been substantially reduced. “I’m now happy to see that it has been reduced to what is now a footpath that will be linked up to an old path in the park. Most importantly of all, there will be no vehicular access to the park now.”

    Ms Liddy said there had never been a road constructed in the park. “It was a pedestrian pathway which had to be reconstructed but which looked wider than it actually was. We will be reseeding and landscaping around it.”


    This is good to hear, after so much uproar and confusion concerning the parkland area at the People’s park
    Its finally been restored 🙂

    Here’s an interesting read for the social econmic breakdown of Limerick

    http://www.limerickcitydb.ie/CDBInfo/Main/CityProfile2005/Chapter3_Section3.10.pdf of Limerick

    #753432
    Amazotheamazing
    Participant

    Very interesting thread.

    Can anyone confirm that the Sarsfield Bar, Mid-Western Business Institute block and the old Qunns bar are not being knocked to facilitate the new shopping centre?

    #753433
    Tuborg
    Participant

    The more talk there is about this development the more it concerns me, nobody has come out and spoken about the precise area that is to be redeveloped, there seems to be a wall of silence surrounding the whole project and this dosent fill me with any kind of confidence,the city council have a habit of keeping people in the dark when they want to push things through, not one public representative has questioned what buildings are going to be lost, its pretty disgraceful to be honest!, i find inconceivable that the city council, civic trust or the public in general would stand by and let another historic area of the city be destroyed!. We’ve already made a great job of o connell street, contrast the pictures of the street from the 50s with what the street looks like now and you’ll see just how many attractive buildings have been lost,the street is in a fairly pathetic state now but it just shows how a wrong attitude cant scar a city so much, we could have a beautiful o connell street now if the city fathers of the past werent so narrowminded and shortsighted, the last thing we need now is another horrible plastic and glass structure right in the city centre!. I really thought we had learned our lesson by now, theres even been rumours that the granary could be sacrificed, hopefully its a load of bullshit, if that was the case they may as well knock king johns castle and st johns cathedral while they’re at it! 😡

    Just got this on the city coucil website, no mention of rutland street and patrick street here:

    Limerick’s Conservation Area is located within the Georgian Area of the city, also known as Newtown Pery. This area includes the blocks between Pery Square and Henry Street and from Barrington Street to Mallow Street.

    Most of the original street furniture and external features of the buildings still exist in Newtown Pery, although the original character of the interior has all too often been compromised.

    Here are some examples of the features left in their original condition:

    Remnants of old lamps remained in the form of lamp posts may be seen at the Pery Square / Hartstonge Street corner, outside the former house of Lord Limerick on Henry Street.
    Examples of coal cellar covers set in the pavements can be seen on Pery Square and Hartstonge Street.
    Gargoyles decorated with grotesque figures may be seen on the Leamy School building on Hartstonge Street.
    Some fire plates can be seen above the balconies of numbers 2 and 3 Pery Square.
    Ward boundary plates may be seen at O’Connell Street / Lower Mallow Street corner. These plates were erected around the mid 19th century to identify the constituencies for local government elections. They were made of cast iron by the Harrison Lee Foundry.
    Mews were at that time an integral part of the townhouse. Used for stabling horses, storing carriages, they were located at the rear of the terrace in a laneway. Most of them still exist but they have often been converted into workshops, garages. The most distinguishing features of mews were the arched entrances and the hay loft above. Examples of Georgian mews may be seen on Hartstonge Street, at the back of the Tontine buildings, and on Catherine Street.
    An interesting thing about Georgian buildings is the ironwork, found on balconies (mainly on the first floor) and railings, which still survive in good condition. Examples of these features can be seen on the buildings built after 1800. Excellent Victorian and Georgian style railings and gates may be seen on O’Connell Street. An example of a protective handrail can be seen on Hartstonge Street. While the balconies of the buildings on Pery Square are rather plain, those in other streets are more pleasingly decorative and they certainly help to soften the rigid lines of the terraces. This is the case on O’Connell Street, The Crescent and Mallow Street.
    The Neo-Classical influence on railings is also evident in the decorative Grecian urns, which are placed at the intervals along the railings. These are such an ubiquitous feature of Limerick’s streets that they often go unnoticed.
    Examples of bootscrappers may be seen on Barrington Street. A classical example of a bootscrapper in the shape of a Unicorn can be seen on Pery Square.
    The main focus of attention in a terrace is the door, which is always set to one side of the house. The typical Georgian doorway has a semi-circular, decorative fanlight over the entrance and Classical style wooden or stone columns framing the door. The Limerick doorways are wide, with columns merging into the brickwork, as can be seen on O’Connell Street and The Crescent.

    #753434
    ShaneP
    Participant

    Was there ever any further news about whether it was illegal for the council to sell the piece of land for the development at People’s Park in the first place, or has it been established once and for all that it was above board? Has anybody got photo’s of the yolk now? It will probably be a while before i can get to that part of town with a camera

    As for the new shopping centre down town, it seems a bit early to be talking about any hidden agendas in city hall to help push the project through. The only people who have mentioned the project so far are politicians with little else to be keeping them in the news during their long summer holidays and property correspondants whose job it is to find out what developments might be coming our way. Such a big development has probably involved a lot of pre-planning meetings, which is what is giving rise to all the speculation about what buildings will be knocked/sold etc. Although given the many nasty precedents set by large developer driven schemes dumped on the city in recent years, there is certainly cause for scepticism, it’s only fair that the project be given a fair hearing once it’s contents are published. I’ll certainly be keeping a close eye on the planning notices in the leader and elsewhere in the next few weeks .

    For any one unfamiliar with the planning process – current legislation gives rise to the following process in dealing with a planning application
    Notices must be placed on site and in specified newspapers by the applicant 2 weeks prior to the application being lodged with the local authority.
    Once the application has been submitted a decision must be made within 5 weeks during which time observations and objections can be made by interested parties, however it may not be possible to do this at the earlier stages of the process as drawings are being checked by the planning registrar to ensure the application has included all the necessary information and that it is correct.
    It is also necessary for a project of this scale in such a location to be accompanined by an environmental impact statement and it would seem likely that it will allso include traffic and building conservation studies among other items.
    The council may also ask the applicant for extra time to make a decision.
    If the council approves the application an appeal can be made to an Bord Pleanala within a specified timeframe provided the objector has has previously tried objecting to the local authority.

    So keep an eye out for planning notices. I can’t wait to see what it looks like. I gather it’s a Belfast developer who’s responsible for the scheme, but am not aware of any previous projects from them. Don’t know that Belfast’s set the world alight with any interesting shopping centre architecture in recent years though?

    Also saw that an appllication is to be lodged for the extension to the business school in U.L. – can’t find any images, any one else come accross any? And Virgin Megastores are recruiting for staff locally – no mention of the shop location, can’t help but think it’ll be in the revamped George on O’Connell St, please God don’t let it be the Crescent S.C.

    Regarding the conservation area Tuborg. True, it’s mostly around the Newtown Pery area, but the outline on the Development plan map (that I have anyway) shows a little bit extending along Patrick St./Rutland St. onto Charlotte Quay, and back down Michael St. which seems to cover some of the area being talked about for the new S.C. As ever, guess we’ll have to wait and see what’s to become of it all.

    #753435
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Jimmy Woulfe in yesterday’s Examiner has a piece about that funny little Toll House on Thomond Bridge: http://www.irishexaminer.com/pport/web/ireland/Full_Story/did-sgmV1S5vU72-6sgHuTLc4nqWo2.asp
    It seems typical of the City Council. They get handed restored places or buildings on a plate by John Hunt, the Limerick Civic Trust or another body and they can’t seem to maintain them.
    Here’s the Toll House: http://www.irish-architecture.com/buildings_ireland/limerick/limerick/tollbooth.html

    #753436
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I found the bit in the article about referring the issue to Limerick’s Roads Department quite humourous. It appears that the roads are to blame for vandalising the building. Damn roads tearing themselves up like that and throwing themselves at the building! What is to be done?

    #753437
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ShaneP wrote:

    Also saw that an appllication is to be lodged for the extension to the business school in U.L. – can’t find any images, any one else come accross any? .

    From what I can remember from my blissful years in UL, is that the business school building will be an extension of the current Schuman Building – same design. Could be wrong about this so don’t quote me, but there is a patch of land to one side of the Schuman which I think will be used for it. I have not seen any hard evidence to support this – just hearsay on the corridors of UL.

Viewing 20 posts - 361 through 380 (of 2,479 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.