U2 studio entries

Home › Forums › Ireland › U2 studio entries

Viewing 14 posts - 261 through 274 (of 274 total)
1 2 3 … 12 13 14
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 3, 2003 at 7:56 pm #727253
    pepe
    Participant

    ok
    so now i should be able to get promoted from a junior member!
    coming of age

    October 3, 2003 at 9:34 pm #727254
    sw101
    Participant

    i
    am
    a
    senior
    member
    nah
    nah
    na
    naaaah
    na

    October 4, 2003 at 10:58 am #727255
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Just added some more entries this morning to the online gallery.

    I believe that The Sunday Times is publishing another piece tomorrow on the competition and the design which we think was the entry that the DDDA was trying to determine the authorship of.

    October 4, 2003 at 3:06 pm #727256
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    101 Entries Shortlisted for Exhibition

    October 4, 2003 at 3:35 pm #727257
    kefu
    Participant

    Whatever happened the Gehry submission?

    October 4, 2003 at 3:55 pm #727258
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    No idea, but if it was described as “experimental” they probably didn’t want it exhibited… or it was worse than 101 entries….

    edit – hadn’t read the list when i posted this….

    October 4, 2003 at 4:21 pm #727259
    pepe
    Participant

    Sounds like these guys are from/work for FOG???

    No. 168
    Edwin Chan & Graig Webb
    Gehry Partners, LLP
    Los Angeles
    U.S.A.

    Whats the deal with the missing box/entry. between no 57a and no 61. could be nothing. BUt it doesnt make sense that its there?

    How many of these entries do you have on line in the gallery?

    October 4, 2003 at 4:53 pm #727260
    b.ray
    Participant

    after seeing the commended designs……do i want to see the “mystery winner”? anyone who thinks they’ve seen
    it let me know what you think of it.

    October 4, 2003 at 4:59 pm #727261
    pepe
    Participant

    apparently its one of the ones that has been exhibited in the gallery!

    you will just have to wait for the times article tommorrow.

    or take your pick

    not sure if ithas taken it down though????

    it seems there should be something on the times website tommorow though

    October 4, 2003 at 5:12 pm #727262
    b.ray
    Participant

    can someone with access to the times give us less fortunate souls a taste of the article tomorrow….many thanks

    October 4, 2003 at 5:29 pm #727263
    pepe
    Participant

    patience is a virtue, and i think you will just have to wait.

    not sure if it comes online at midnight or in the early morning

    go do something esle for a couple of hours.

    play frisbee
    have dinner
    walk your dog

    October 6, 2003 at 10:04 am #727264
    GregF
    Participant

    Some really dire entries in there too…..some lost architects out there as well.
    Some presentations are really horrible with overly dramatic skies with acidic sunsets or stormy clouds, sail boats, seagulls and all sorts trying to add to or camouflage the basically shite designs.

    October 7, 2003 at 7:13 pm #727265
    pepe
    Participant

    https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2385

    October 23, 2003 at 5:21 pm #727266
    GregF
    Participant

    I’m getting used to looking at the winning entry…..however I wish that they remodel the roof and cap the building off more strikingly.
    I think it does n’t look good at the mo.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 14 posts - 261 through 274 (of 274 total)
1 2 3 … 12 13 14
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.