The Opera Centre
- This topic has 168 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by
pigtown.
- AuthorPosts
- May 13, 2009 at 11:04 pm #780610
Tuborg
Participant@CologneMike wrote:
Personally I would expect the “same conditions†to be re-applied as in the first approval and similar protective conditions for the Quin building and the former Town Hall.
The Bank Place in layout is nothing but a throw back to the days where the city showed it’s arse to the river.
The entrance / exit for deliveries must be moved to Michael Street (i.e. Former Work Space Building).
Maybe they could instead move the entrance / exit for cars to the opposite side of Michael Street and access to the underground car park per tunnel.
Regeneration Developments would have us believe that Bank Place will be transformed into some sort of idyllic plaza area when in reality there will be a service road ploughing through it!
The internal configuration of the complex will also have to be improved. You simply cant have one of the “landmark entrances” opening onto some department store!
I believe the developers argument against using Michael Street for deliveries etc is that it is too narrow for large trucks and access to the basement via a ramp would be difficult.
Realistically though, if a proper delivery strategy could be agreed, traffic circulation on Michael Street could be managed effectively?
I also hope ABP lays down strict conditions in relation to the Granary as the proposed intervention seems pretty unsympathetic to me anyway!
Attached; Proposed Michael Street elevation.
May 14, 2009 at 1:01 am #780611jimg
ParticipantIf I were to be honest I’d have to admit that I hope that this project flounders. What is planned is possibly the worst imaginable. It would, if realised, add another zombie block of faceless dead streetscape to the core of Limerick just as Arthur’s Quay and Sarsfield Dunne’s have. Sorry, I can’t find a redeeming feature in those plans.
May 14, 2009 at 9:28 am #780612gunter
Participant@CologneMike wrote:
A decision on the revised plans is expected next month, after Regeneration Developments submitted revised drawings for the project two weeks ago.
Is there any way of finding out what these revised drawings show, is it a comprehensive re-design, or just a bit of tinkering around?
@Tuborg wrote:
I also hope ABP lays down strict conditions in relation to the Granary as the proposed intervention seems pretty unsympathetic to me anyway!
Completely agree with Tuborg, that was one of the more disappointing aspects of the proposal. The opportunity to integrate the retained street-front buildings on the perimeter of the block into the internal ‘streetscape’ / circulation routes of the shopping centre, as has been done to great effect elsewhere, was completely missed. This seems particularly unfortunate in the case of the Granary building.
@Tuborg wrote:
Id love to know what these “revised drawings” contain!
Again, there must be some way of finding this out, is there no public entitlement to see such a submission, even if there’s no ABP mechanism for further commenting on it?
May 15, 2009 at 8:31 pm #780613Anonymous
InactiveBank Place ~ Granary ~ Truck Service Yard Entrance
I would imagine the Architects got the remit from Regeneration Ltd. (Developer) to maximise floor space, car parking space etc, etc. Especially as the underground car parking decks (orange) and the truck service yard (blue) affect four floor levels.
But the solution to place the underground delivery entrance in front of the main opening of the Granary Warehouse is a very poor one.
In my opinion . . . .
- It disfigures the front façade of the Granary on Bank Place.
- It cuts off access to main entrance to the Granary Building.
- It would have a negative effect on Bank Place as a Plaza.
- Bank Place would have a “rear building†feel to it.
- It would discourage footfall developing here.
In my opinion by moving the delivery entrance next to the underground car park entrance on Michael Street would be a far better solution.
It is amazing that issues like the Granary are not raised by the city councillors into the public domain. 🙁
June 10, 2009 at 4:19 pm #780614jdivision
ParticipantThere’s a further information notice in on this in the Irish Times today. Seems a number of the buildings scheduled for demolition will be retained, or at least have their facades retained. Somebody more familiar with Limerick than I am will probably be able to say more on it.
June 10, 2009 at 6:58 pm #780615gunter
Participant@jdivision wrote:
There’s a further information notice in on this in the Irish Times today.
Well spotted jdivision.


On the face of it, this looks like a huge step in the right direction.
June 10, 2009 at 7:44 pm #780616Tuborg
ParticipantThanks for the scan gunter, I didnt see the Times today and couldn’t find it online either.
It looks like Regeneration Developments have finally come to their senses anyway. They’ve amended much of the elements we’ve been banging on about here for ages! Its pretty obvious now that ABP let it be known that the project wouldn’t have had much chance of proceeding in its previous form!
Looking at the details, the retention of additional buildings on Rutland Street/Patrick Street along with the salvation of Ellen Street, are massive improvements. The relocation of the service entrance from Bank Place to Michael Street is also a hugely positive move!
June 11, 2009 at 8:28 am #780617reddy
ParticipantGood stuff. God its refreshing to see the planning system have a positive impact on a development.
June 11, 2009 at 10:37 am #780618gunter
Participant@Tuborg wrote:
. . . Its pretty obvious now that ABP let it be known that the project wouldn’t have had much chance of proceeding in its previous form!
You sometimes suspect that this is what happens, but unless the Bord actually write to the applicants seeking specific further information, I thought they were precluded from giving tips and pointers!
This could be a genuine change of heart on the part of the developers, or more likely, a bit of belated sound advice from their architects (who are the architects now, do we know? wasn’t it originally Douglas Wallace?).
Anyway, top marks to whoever is responsible and, as reddy said, it’s nice to see the system working once in a while . . . and look! the sun has come out:)
June 11, 2009 at 10:38 am #780619KeepAnEyeOnBob
ParticipantGood news but I hope something is done soon – the buildings are getting worse by the week! Mind you they aren’t the only ones, even reasonably cleaned up looking Georgian buildings on the recently regenerated Thomas St. have ever-larger plants growing out of the brickwork – just noticed it recently. Surely even weedkiller might help (or would it eat away at the building?)
June 11, 2009 at 6:13 pm #780620Tuborg
Participant@gunter wrote:
You sometimes suspect that this is what happens, but unless the Bord actually write to the applicants seeking specific further information, I thought they were precluded from giving tips and pointers!
This could be a genuine change of heart on the part of the developers, or more likely, a bit of belated sound advice from their architects (who are the architects now, do we know? wasn’t it originally Douglas Wallace?).
Apparently the board expressed “serious concerns” about the project a couple of months back and requested “revised drawings”. Presumably this related to the loss of Georgian building stock and probably issues with the Granary aswell.
Its a joke that we cant find out for sure what ABP requested or the exact nature of the revisions. All this information should be available on their website but unfortunately its fairly hopeless!
June 11, 2009 at 10:51 pm #780621dave123
ParticipantFinally this is great stuff. When are they going to start building it. Could it be autumn. Its amazing how far it has come. If you think about it. What other Shopping centre’s could you compare this development to in this country. There is no shopping centre in Ireland that manages to to retain most of the old into the new in such an unique way. I think this is going to be very successful. Limerick will become a magnet for shoppers. This will bring much needed life into the heart of the city once again. this will attract other retailers to locate in the city rather than on the doughnut edges.
I’m proud that everyone is working together now, and it seems that people are communicating in the right way as we can now see.
June 12, 2009 at 9:04 am #780622KeepAnEyeOnBob
Participant@dave123 wrote:
What other Shopping centre’s could you compare this development to in this country. There is no shopping centre in Ireland that manages to to retain most of the old into the new in such an unique way.
I still think it’s just like a more modern and larger scale version of Arthur’s Quay. After all that development surrounds some old streetfront too.
I mean even the location means it’s very little differentiation in my mind – I can’t see it adding much more to the city either.
June 12, 2009 at 10:46 am #780623gunter
Participant@KeepAnEyeOnBob wrote:
I still think it’s just like a more modern and larger scale version of Arthur’s Quay. . . I can’t see it adding much more to the city either.
Surely it much more important than that!
The whole dilemma with this scheme was that people, who care about reinforcing the city centre, want to see uses like this located where they belong – in the city centre, but not at any cost, and certainly not at the cost of demolishing almost everything in sight.
The breakthrough with this revised scheme (as described in the text anyway) is that they appear to have found a way to accommodate, both a fancy new shopping centre, and a regeneration of the existing building stock, in the one scheme.
OK, there might still be a bit too much ‘facade retention’ as opposed to ‘building conservation’ in it and it could all turn into a Limerick version of Marks & Spencers’ Duke St. re-make, but it’s still a dramatic advance on what it was going to be.
Had the scheme been refused, due the carnage of historic structures and streetscapes, it would have reinforced the false perception that mega development, like fancy new shopping centres, are incompatible with city centre locations, and incompatible with conservation!
That could have been almost as devastating an outcome as permitting the development and bulldozing the block!
We don’t often get good news, can we not just enjoy it for a few days?
June 12, 2009 at 2:50 pm #780624vkid
Participant@dave123 wrote:
What other Shopping centre’s could you compare this development to in this country. e.
The only one that is slightly similar to me is The Eyre Square s.c in Galway…although lets hope it turns out better than that but the idea is similar. Couple of anchor tenants, lots of smaller units etc..
June 13, 2009 at 11:35 pm #780625dave123
Participant@vkid wrote:
The only one that is slightly similar to me is The Eyre Square s.c in Galway…although lets hope it turns out better than that but the idea is similar. Couple of anchor tenants, lots of smaller units etc..
Opera centre is like two or three times bigger and retains far more older architeture into the new Shopping mall. I’m not to sure if Eyre sq shopping centre retains this factor. Also I much prefer these type of inner city malls than out of town malls imo.
I’m not a shopper as such, but its seems more logical to have a shopping heart in the centre of the city rather than sprawling warehouses around the city, leaving the city like a ghostown.
June 14, 2009 at 12:18 am #780626rumpelstiltskin
Participant@dave123 wrote:
Opera centre is like two or three times bigger and retains far more older architeture into the new Shopping mall. I’m not to sure if Eyre sq shopping centre retains this factor. Also I much prefer these type of inner city malls than out of town malls imo.
I’m not a shopper as such, but its seems more logical to have a shopping heart in the centre of the city rather than sprawling warehouses around the city, leaving the city like a ghostown.
I don’t think you’re going to bring people into the city to go to a shopping centre, when there are already shopping centre all over the outskirts. That’s the big problem here, it’s being seen as a lynchpin of Limerick’s future success. But in order to be truly successful and vibrant, Limerick has to give people what they can’t get anywhere else. Yet the Crescent shopping centre opens on Thursday and Friday nights, and on Sundays which are among the busiest times for shopping, while the city becomes a ghost town.
Limerick needs to develop particular city centre attractions to thrive – like quality eateries, pubs, specialist shops, and of course extra-curricular activities. The very least it needs for starters is a cinema, which being in proximity to many pubs and restaurants would provide a unique appeal. And then it needs to expand opening hours. I think there’s nothing that would increase the buzz than changing general opening hours to 12pm-9pm every day, if not later. You’d be amazed how many people there are who’d like to be able to go to a coffee shop at 11pm.
June 18, 2009 at 4:31 am #780627dave123
Participant@rumpelstiltskin wrote:
I don’t think you’re going to bring people into the city to go to a shopping centre, when there are already shopping centre all over the outskirts. That’s the big problem here, it’s being seen as a lynchpin of Limerick’s future success. But in order to be truly successful and vibrant, Limerick has to give people what they can’t get anywhere else. Yet the Crescent shopping centre opens on Thursday and Friday nights, and on Sundays which are among the busiest times for shopping, while the city becomes a ghost town.
Limerick needs to develop particular city centre attractions to thrive – like quality eateries, pubs, specialist shops, and of course extra-curricular activities. The very least it needs for starters is a cinema, which being in proximity to many pubs and restaurants would provide a unique appeal. And then it needs to expand opening hours. I think there’s nothing that would increase the buzz than changing general opening hours to 12pm-9pm every day, if not later. You’d be amazed how many people there are who’d like to be able to go to a coffee shop at 11pm.
But the Opera will work like what Stephens green does for Dublin. It will pull footfall, and tourist no matter what day of the week. Also since I’m in the catchment of Limerick, I would rather use the Opera centre than use the sprawlling retaril houses. Because
[
- Pedestiran friendly
- all shoips under one roof
- underground car parking
- citry centre amenties close by
- restaurants close by
- greater variety of shops
- and its gives me the opportunity to shop more out of the city like going to other shops closeby
June 18, 2009 at 4:54 am #780628rumpelstiltskin
ParticipantOk, well that’s a point. But I think you could further stress its uniqueness by making it a less boring plan. We have all these Georgian buildings and historic laneways and the like; wouldn’t it be a lot better if they did a Powerscourt kind of thing where you stress the historical fabric, and you have a series of covered laneways and arcades giving the whole scheme a sense of being a little more upmarket?
I actually think one of the most important things they could do in Limerick to bring people into the city is to focus on aesthetic issues. I thought the city development plan was a great vision. Look how many more people frequent Thomas Street and Bedford Row now. If they focused on details like pavement, appropriate windows, lampposts, wires on buildings, and shopfronts, then Limerick could have a sense of quaintness which would draw people in. I mean it almost makes me cry to compare the potential of William Street with its reality. If you dealt with all the above issues on this street, you could have a completely unique and beautiful Georgian commercial street that people would specifically come to Limerick to visit.
June 18, 2009 at 8:32 am #780629KeepAnEyeOnBob
Participant@rumpelstiltskin wrote:
I actually think one of the most important things they could do in Limerick to bring people into the city is to focus on aesthetic issues. I thought the city development plan was a great vision. Look how many more people frequent Thomas Street and Bedford Row now. If they focused on details like pavement, appropriate windows, lampposts, wires on buildings, and shopfronts, then Limerick could have a sense of quaintness which would draw people in. I mean it almost makes me cry to compare the potential of William Street with its reality. If you dealt with all the above issues on this street, you could have a completely unique and beautiful Georgian commercial street that people would specifically come to Limerick to visit.
Politically unpopular, but I would suggest the most significant factor in Thomas St./Bedford Row isn’t the nice paving, lighting, trees or new developments – it’s scrapping traffic and on-street parking.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

