Stephenson – poacher turned gamekeeper?

Home › Forums › Ireland › Stephenson – poacher turned gamekeeper?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 74 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #711731
    GrahamH
    Participant

    It dosn’t matter in the slightest what type of modern building fills this in, by definition a modern building on this scale will change the character of the area from Georgian to – well, something else.
    Whether it is a sweeping glass clad structure or something clad in copper or polished granite, it matters not in the slightest if it is ‘sympathetic’ or not. If any modern building was to continue on this site, it should be the existing facade (which was designed not by Sam but by Arthur).
    It relates to the street excellently, as do the materials used (excluding the horrendous ground floor)

    Here comes the but.
    I think the house facades should be rebuilt.
    Why?
    For one reason only, to restore the unity of the area, and not just Fitzwilliam St, but the whole Georgian character of the area.
    I remember as clear as anything the first time I saw this building – it was the first time I walked around the Georgian city, an area completely alien to the rest of the generally shabby and incoherent Dublin.
    I was bowled over by the manner in which no matter where you looked, there were Georgian houses lining the streets, from Merrion Street to Merrion Square, to Mount Street and then – the ESB.
    And contrary to what someone mentioned earlier about the building acting as a good orientation point, I found it had the exact opposite – muddling – effect, it was like I had exited the historic area, the junction with Baggot St further confusing matters and the unity of the area was lost.
    When you come up from the Green through Baggot St, past all of it’s Georgians, you arrive at the junction. Look left – more Georgians. Look right – aggregate concrete. The area is destroyed.
    And the route from Merrion Square, also taking in the Mount St vista, through Fitzwilliam St to the magnificent Fitzwilliam Square and further on down to Leeson St is also wrecked – with the ESB plonked mid-way, disrupting the whole flow and ruining the continuity.

    The basic point is that Dublin’s Georgians rely on each other for effect, to create the ‘massing cliff’ formation. And each street relies on it’s neighbours to unify the character of the entire area.
    Rebuilding the facades (not interiors etc) restores this unity and character.
    At this stage its nothing to do with history, harking back, the British or anything else.
    It is about architecture, and the architecture of the area in my opinion would be greatly enhanced with the reconstruction of the 16 houses’ facades.
    If this Geogian core had been built 5 years ago, most people would see the logic in unifying the area.
    But most discussing this issue get what is essentially an architectural issue mixed up with the usual issues of being revisionist, harking back, colonialism, what is Irish etc etc

    #711732
    GrahamH
    Participant

    That’s not to say the history and age of the existing stock is not important.
    And the point I would make in response to the suggestion that rebuilding the houses would be an insult to the originals – I think building in a completely different manner is equally an insult, if not moreso, invading into what essentially is ‘their area’.

    #711733
    GregF
    Participant

    Is’nt the Peppercannister Church a great little focal point in this area too.

    #711734
    Rory W
    Participant

    Alan D – I agree there are some good new buildings – my point was that a lot of what was built here in Dublin from the late 50s onwards was dross that will never attain attractive building status – some great stand out work, but a lot of crap as well.

    And if I quote from my own posting “which we are only really starting to drag ourselves out of” – our buildings are definitely starting to improve – for example no-one will accept the early Zoe style development anymore.

    Fin – “irish slave labour”, please read Dublin 1660-1860 as to who built the Georgian buildings.

    #711735
    GregF
    Participant

    Aye ……there were some great Irish craftsmen who decorated these homes such as the Stapleton Brothers who were stuccadors (they were plasterers Fin)

    Graham Hickey conveyed much better what I was trying to say and Rory is correct by saying that there was mainly dross built here since we rightfully gained our independence with just the few exceptions.

    #711736
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Well hullo to you too Rory…….beginning to feel as welcome as a fart in a spacesuit, stuck out here in cyberspace with no response. However, I take your point.

    Every city though has a lot of crap, that’s what makes the good stuff stand out as good

    Anyway, the thing about Georgian architecture Graham is that it is simple, pared and clean like all good modernism should be. There is no reason why a new infill should conflict.

    #711737
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’ve just been showing a group of architects from Chicago around Glasgow, the most complete example of a Victorian City to be found anywhere in the world.

    A precious thing, or so you would think but before that it was a Georgian City, like Dublin and before that a medieval city.

    That’s the nature of cities they grow and develop and change over time…….. otherwise they stagnate and become like Edinburgh.

    #711738
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I’d settle for Edinburgh any day of the week

    #711739
    FIN
    Participant

    while quite nice in a backward kindq way it is very hard to get anything in the city…hence stagnate. it’s a bit late now to be saying this about dublin. it’s on the path to becoming a vibrant modern city so i still believe this and other thinkings along the same line will only have a detrimental effect on the city.

    #711740
    GregF
    Participant

    I was over in Glasgow last year AlanD for the Scotland V Ireland game and noticed that Glasgow is a charming city but it has got some awful high rise 60’s developments plonked in fine old uniform streets.
    What do you think of the newish Royal Concert Hall …..there’s a fine statue to Donald Dewar there….and the Buchannan Galleries.

    George Square looks great with it’s City Chambers and central column; vestiges of it’s Victorian past.

    #711741
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Jings Greg……now you’ve lit the blue touch paper.

    It’s my city and I love it and it has its good points and bad, like Dublin.

    The high rise developements as insensitive as they are to us now were to replace the overcrowded and decaying building stock left after the war.

    Kids were dying in the Gorbals where a family of ten lived in a single room or single end as we called it…… open plan high rise blocks on the outskirts of the city with access to fresh air seemd like a good idea at the time.

    Unfortunately the concert hall was built before the lottery so high cost public buildings could only be obtained by giving developers prime land to build their retail schemes and in return they provided the venue as a proportion of the scheme.

    So unfortunatly we have a massive retail outlet with a concert hall attached. It is also rather FASCIST because Lesley Martin died and it was left to lesser architects to complete the job.

    #711742
    d_d_dallas
    Participant

    Settle for Edinburgh… euuuuw!

    Stagnant stagnant stagnant. Lovely place to visit – in a theme park kind of way. Wouldn’t ever want to live there.

    Glasgow has so much more charm and life – it has a tale to tell with the scars to prove it.

    #711743
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    and they’ve just appointed Terry Farrell as their design Tsar………….really what more need be said?

    #711744
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Glasgow is very fine, from what I can recall from a fleeting visit many moons ago.

    I totally agree Alan about Georgian and streamlined modern working together, by their nature they are compatible.
    But my point is about the character and completeness of the area, no amount of ‘sympathy’ or cleaniness of modern design can contibute to this.
    In Dublin, this area is all we have of a distinctive complete set of historic buildings.
    It’s not as if Dublin is a museum city, or the Venice of northern Europe! This is a very small, compact area, and should be consolidated.

    #711745
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think you would find a lot of Irish people live in Edinburgh, either as students or work in the professions.

    Not having a go at Glasgow because it has progressed a lot, but it is not in the same league as Edinburgh.

    Very few cities were as unscathed by WW2 and Edinburgh was one of the first cities to cry halt to Appollo house type of architecture in the 1960’s.

    Now that modern architecture has progressed to a level of maturity and design is considered ‘good’ because it is good and not because it is new and shiny possibly Edinburgh should revisit its development policy.

    But to say that Edinburgh is bad becuase it prevented the ‘Lower Mount St’ phase that plagued Dublin is ridiculous.

    At least in Edinburgh you have good streetscapes within which to place sufficiently high quality contemporary buildings. 😉

    #711746
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Why does no one ever mention Bath?
    It’s always Edinburgh this, Edinburgh that…!

    We had a rather nasty handbrake incident on one of its notorious 90 degree hills – pretty scary.
    Anyway, when you see the likes of Bath or Edinburgh, you really do see how bone lazy they were in Dublin with regard to set pieces and unified facades.
    To a large part they couldn’t even be bothered to get parapet heights even, although the Gardiners made a good attempt later on.
    More Irish than the Irish themselves springs to mind.

    #711747
    shaun
    Participant

    alan d, first of all, greetings to our Scottish friend……So how complete a Victorian city would Dublin or Belfast be in comparison with Glasgow, seeing that all three are essentially British cities that grew up when the UK consisted of all of the British Isles. I’ve haven’t been to Glasgow yet, wouldn’t mind going just to have a look at the Rennie MackIntoshs’ art school.

    #711748
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I can only tell you as a visitor Graham…….I love Dublin for it’s “incompleteness”

    Sure a complete set of historic buildings are important to an extent but it’s diversity and vitality and an interest in its future that make a city great.

    All fur coat and no knickers, Diaspora. That’s Auld Reekie.

    #711749
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That is what I love about somewhere like St. Stephens Green. Although I hate the pastiche or the Stephens Green Centre on many levels I still love the way in which the whole green is such a hotch-botch of buildings. A jumble of styles which have built up over the years.

    #711750
    FIN
    Participant

    a tale for all seasons…

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 74 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.