reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches

Home Forums Ireland reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches

Viewing 20 posts - 2,761 through 2,780 (of 7,927 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #769974
    Rhabanus
    Participant

    @Praxiteles wrote:

    Here is the Pastor of Liscarroll (the one in the middle).

    And who is the striking figure on the pastor’s right (viewer’s left)? The Lord High Executioner? The Lord Bishop? Or The Lord High Everything Else? Whoever he may be, the mobile telephone attached to his belt denotes a personage of high importance.

    Sicut invenitur in pagina sacra: “Ubicumque fuerit corpus, illuc congregabuntur aquilae.” (Mt 24:27)

    Looks like a meeting of the local Sanhedrin. Do they often meet like this in the wilderness?

    “When shall we three meet again
    In thunder, lightning, or in rain?”

    –From Macbeth (I, i, 1-2)

    #769975
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @Rhabanus wrote:

    And who is the striking figure on the pastor’s right (viewer’s left)? The Lord High Executioner? The Lord Bishop? Or The Lord High Everything Else? Whoever he may be, the mobile telephone attached to his belt denotes a personage of high importance.

    Sicut invenitur in pagina sacra: “Ubicumque fuerit corpus, illuc congregabuntur aquilae.” (Mt 24:27)

    Looks like a meeting of the local Sanhedrin. Do they often meet like this in the wilderness?

    “When shall we three meet again
    In thunder, lightning, or in rain?”

    –From Macbeth (I, i, 1-2)

    could be the curate?

    #769976
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Does anyone know anything about proposed works to the interior of St. Finbarr’s, Bantry, Co. Cork?

    #769977
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Talking of church restoration: here we have a case of church completion. St Lorenzo in Florence built by Brunelleschi between 1420-1440. The facade was never finished but plans had been drawn up as early as 1517 by Michaelangelo for the project. It now looks as though the Florentines are finally about to build the facade to the 1517 plans:

    #769978
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Just get a look at this mouthful of guff published by Paddy Jones on the webpage of the National Center for Liturgy.

    The extract is taken from the minutes of the 2006 meeting of the Liturgical Commission of the Irish Bishops Conference chaired by the bold bishop himself:

    “The decision of An Bord Pleanála to refuse planning permission for the liturgical reordering of St Colman’s Cathedral, Cobh is a matter of grave concern. However, it is noted that the process of applying for permission was carefully and professionally conducted by the bishop and diocese, including the involvement of the Historic Churches Advisory Committee and the following of Architectural Heritage Protection guidelines. It is also noted that the Board accepts the necessity of liturgical reordering of churches, though rejecting a particular design plan for this cathedral”.

    Here we have a good example interactive autoeroticism and the narcissistic assurance that everything is rosey in the garden no matter what!!

    It is a very strange thing that these minutes should say that the “bishop and diocese” had acted carefully and professionally when making the application to wreck Cobh Cathedral. If memory serves us correctly, neither the bishop nor the diocese applied for anything. The application to wreck Cobh Cathedral was made by the Trustees of Cobh Cathedral chief among them being Tom “Tidytowns” Cavanagh of Fermoy. And as far as the diocese of Cloyne is concerned, there seems to have been a certain amnesia about the 24,000 persons who signed a petition against the wreckage. Then of course there is the “professionalism” which was attached to the bold hishop being publicly caught out telling lies. As for the Cloyne HACK, that body is so gereatric that very cold winter could bring major changes to its composition!

    The full horror can be garnered from the following link:

    http://images.google.ie/imgres?imgurl=http://www.liturgy-ireland.ie/gradua1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.liturgy-ireland.ie/liturgy-newsandviews.html&h=1536&w=2048&sz=168&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=upbEycWjec7BMM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522%2BSean%2BTerry%2522%2Bliturgy%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN

    #769979
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    St. Joseph’s Cathedral, Dunedin, New Zeland

    St. Joesph’s was hacked to pieces in 1970 but a group of people saved the High Altar and had it installed in the local museum. The usual barbarity was done on the sancturay of the cathedral. A further renovation took place in 1990s which saw the return of the High Altar.

    The photographs below show St. Joseph’s before, after, and after the after.

    #769980
    ake
    Participant
    #769981
    Rhabanus
    Participant

    @Praxiteles wrote:

    Just get a look at this mouthful of guff published by Paddy Jones on the webpage of the National Center for Liturgy.

    The extract is taken from the minutes of the 2006 meeting of the Liturgical Commission of the Irish Bishops Conference chaired by the bold bishop himself:

    “The decision of An Bord Pleanála to refuse planning permission for the liturgical reordering of St Colman&#8217]http://images.google.ie/imgres?imgurl=http://www.liturgy-ireland.ie/gradua1.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.liturgy-ireland.ie/liturgy-newsandviews.html&h=1536&w=2048&sz=168&hl=en&start=1&um=1&tbnid=upbEycWjec7BMM:&tbnh=113&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522%2BSean%2BTerry%2522%2Bliturgy%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN[/url]

    Whoever is paying the Guffmeister to bray on as he does is not getting his money’s worth – unless of course he is loooking for cheap entertainment.

    Here is a striking example of the Guffer’s din: “The sanctuary designed in the 19th century is certainly inadequate.” By whose standard? The Guffster fails to point out exactly HOW the sanctuary of St Colman’s cathedral Cobh is “certainly inadequate” or by what criteria this charge is being made. Is the reader supposed to accept without question or comment this claim based, not on a well-reasoned argument invoking specific liturgical legislation or pointing to logistic inadequacies, but on the sole authority of Guffer Jones? Arguments based exclusively on authority are the weakest of all arguments. Interested readers would prefer an argument supported by facts, logic, and reason to the unsubstantiated claims of a surpliced Svengali.

    Let’s consider some serious liturgical reasons for wreckovating Cobh cathedral. Is the diocese pullulating with so many candidates for the priesthood that the sanctuary affords inadequate space for so many prostrate bodies? If this were a real concern, then the candidates could prostrate themselves in the sanctuary and down the main aisle, using the aisle parallel to the Communion rail (where visible) for the overflow number of ordinandi.
    Does liturgical legislation identify specific directions that leave Cobh cathedral in violation of liturgical law? Does the present arrangement prevent the sacraments and other spiritual goods of the Church being giving to the faithful? Just the facts, please.

    How, Paddy dear, is the sanctuary of Cobh cathedral CERTAINLY INADEQUATE for the liturgy of the Catholic Church today or tomorrow?

    And what prattle will he be uttering after the coming motu proprio will have been issued in May 2007? Perhaps on that ground alone, Cobh cathedral may be the only cathedral in Ireland NOT in need of any renovation whatsoever. Never mind the dangers threatened by the cold snap of a distant winter, Prax. The dotards comprising the HACK may not survive the Second Spring.

    Perhaps the Guffer agrees after all with Oscar Wilde’s Lady Bracknell: “I dislike arguments of any kind. They are always vulgar, and often convincing.”

    Direct me to the “No Guff” zone, please.

    #769982
    samuel j
    Participant

    Source Great Island Newsletter

    “LETTER TO THE EDITOR
    Concern over state of Cathedral
    “I would like to address our Bishop and his advisors, asking them when, if ever, they are going to begin the badly needed repairs and restoration still not attended to in our beloved Cathedral.
    In all my ninety years, born and reared in this town, never have I seen our Cathedral look so dilapidated and sad. It is an utter disgrace.
    The people of Cobh are all very concerned about this situation and would like an answer with regard to the bleached and peeling doors, holes in the beautiful mosaics, crumbling Baptistery walls, broken forecourt and railings etc., – I could go on.
    We ask you to please do something now. Monica Moynihan, Wilmount House, Cobh”

    I wonder will the bold Bishop reply…..

    #769983
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    The Crucifixion in the Spanish Chapel in Santa Maria Novela in Florence:

    #769984
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Some further views of the Spanish Chapel in Santa Maria Novella in Florence built by Fra Iacopo Talenti da Nipozzano between 1345 and 1355 and decorated by Andrea di Buonaiuto 1365-1367:

    1. The Left wall showing the glorification of St. Thomas Aquinas

    2. The Right wall showing St. Dominic and the work of the Dominican Order

    3. The vault of the Chapel

    4. A detail of the eorks of the Dominican Order: the black and white Domini-canes (The Hounds of the Lord) protect the sheep of the flock.

    #769985
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Some of the details from Andrea di Buonaiuto’s fresco in the Spanish Chapel of Santa Maria Novella in Florence from the mysteries of Christ’s Passion:

    1. The Carrying of the Cross

    2. The Crucifixion

    3. The Descent into Hell

    4. The Resurrection

    5. The Ascension

    #769986
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Andrea di Buonaiuto’s ceiling fresco of the calming of the Tempest on the vault of the Spanish Chapel in Santa Maria Novella in Florence.

    #769987
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Praxiteles now hears that the parish priest of Bantry intends to gut the interior of the Parish Church. One of the prime targets is the depiction of the Crucifixion over the present High ALtar. very efforts is being being made to denigrade the artistic qualities of the picture so as to enable its removal. However, I hops that someone out tere realizes that this picture -or perhaps its original version- was placed there whenthe church was built in the 1820s by Brother Michael Augustine O’Riordan. The picture is forms part of an sanctuary suite of pictures as can be seen from St Berrahane’s in Castlehaven and from the chapel of the Ursuline nuns in Blackrock. If it it needs restoration then please restore it. But, do not lets have the guff that it simply of no relevance.

    #769988
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Here we have three photographs of St. Finnbar’s in Bantry built 1837 by Brother O’Riordan

    1. Shows the original interior of the church.

    2. Shows the present interior of the church after a series of works carried out in the 1940s (which are unfortunate)

    3. The outside viw of the church.

    It would appear that the altar rails are also due for demolition in Bantry.

    #769989
    ake
    Participant

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/58086761@N00/474788951/in/set-72157600141174376/ Look here for an exampl e of remarkably fine plastering in a medieval church. The interior of the nave however is not plastered but in consolation the rubblework is about as attractive as could be.

    Speaking of ‘rubblework’ look at the masonry break in Clonamery church http://www.flickr.com/photos/58086761@N00/477261589/in/set-72157600157077521/ How infinitely superior the pre-norman tradition was aesthetically.

    #769990
    Rhabanus
    Participant

    @Praxiteles wrote:

    Here we have three photographs of St. Finnbar’s in Bantry built 1837 by Brother O’Riordan

    1. Shows the original interior of the church.

    2. Shows the present interior of the church after a series of works carried out in the 1940s (which are unfortunate)

    3. The outside viw of the church.

    It would appear that the altar rails are also due for demolition in Bantry.

    If only it could be restored to its pristine purity! The ceiling over the sanctuary seems odd, though, both in the original disposition and subsequently in the renovation of the 1940s. In fact, in the latter the ceiling, although arched, seems even lower than before. Had there been some kind of canopy or gallery over it in the original arrangement?

    I wonder what happened to the panels that flanked the sanctuary. They were replaced later by stations of the cross. The side altars installed later do little to enhance the sanctuary. Perhaps the pulpit may turn up in the basement or in a garage nearby. One can only hope.

    Can a moratorium on wreckovation of historic churches not be invoked?

    #769991
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    @Rhabanus wrote:

    If only it could be restored to its pristine purity! The ceiling over the sanctuary seems odd, though, both in the original disposition and subsequently in the renovation of the 1940s. In fact, in the latter the ceiling, although arched, seems even lower than before. Had there been some kind of canopy or gallery over it in the original arrangement?

    I wonder what happened to the panels that flanked the sanctuary. They were replaced later by stations of the cross. The side altars installed later do little to enhance the sanctuary. Perhaps the pulpit may turn up in the basement or in a garage nearby. One can only hope.

    Can a moratorium on wreckovation of historic churches not be invoked?

    That is what is hoped by insisting on the application of the Planning and Developemnt Act of 2000.

    In the case of Cobh, however, it is clear that the Urban District Council cannot be trusted to administer the Act. Its officials, as we have seen, are quite prepared to leave any old vandal enter the Cathedral at any time of the day or night and dig holes in the floor and they are not willing to do anything about it.

    #769992
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Kentstown, Co. Meath. The parish church was recently renovated without resort to the kind of wreckovation that is unfortunately all too common.

    #769993
    Praxiteles
    Participant

    Thanks Ake for the lovely shots of St. Mary’s Collegiate Church in Youghal, Co. Cork.

    The Chancel details are very interesting. The Chancel itself was rebuilt in the 19th century having been derelict for over a century. The Chancel arch was filled in and the window above opened.

    In the restored Chancel you still have the vestiges of the medieval arrangement:

    1. The Piscina for disposing of the water used for the wasing of the priest’s hands during Mass and Sedilia (arranged according to the Sarum use of the Cathedral of Salisbury i.e. Priest closest to the Altar, on lower level came the Deacon, and on a lower level -now missing- the Subdeacon). In the Roman usage, the Priest sits in the middle with the Deacon on his right and the Subdeacon on his left.

    2. The Easter Sephelcur, opposite the Sedilia, which was used as the Altar of Repose on Maundy Thursday and also contained a figure of the Dead Christ. The original Altar did not survive.

    3. At the Chancel arch, you can still see the stairway leading to the Rood Loft which originally closed off the sanctuary.

Viewing 20 posts - 2,761 through 2,780 (of 7,927 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.