reorganisation and destruction of irish catholic churches
- This topic has 7,926 replies, 103 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 6 months ago by
Praxiteles.
- AuthorPosts
- March 27, 2007 at 12:02 pm #769834
fergalr
ParticipantThe Abbey on Clare Island has to be seen to be believed. It’s a lovely little discovery. Pity it’s locked up. Or was when I was there 2 or so years back.
March 27, 2007 at 12:54 pm #769835ake
Participant@Praxiteles wrote:
Here we have a view of the interior of the cothic chapel at Kylemore Abbey andnwhat has happened to its interior:
AGGHHHHHHHHH! Surely this out of the way little chapel should have escaped their attentions! The bastards.
March 27, 2007 at 1:10 pm #769836Praxiteles
Participant@ake wrote:
AGGHHHHHHHHH! Surely this out of the way little chapel should have escaped their attentions! The bastards.
No such luck. And the chapel was restored from near collapse by very substantial grants from the Heritage Council -a body that I have come to the conclusion is worse than useless, and never liufted a finger to do anything to protect Cobh Cathedral from wreckage and REFUSED to fund a heritage impact study which nobody though of doing. The present Heritage Coucnil seems to be comprised of nothing but has-been-county-councillors and ministerial grey-hound-walkers. Just abolish it, and save the tax-payers a few shillings.
March 27, 2007 at 1:23 pm #769837Fearg
ParticipantKylemore.. Am I correct in thinking that this would originally have been a private Church of Ireland Chapel? I was there a couple of years ago and I do not remember those current fittings, although it did give off the impression that all the restoration funding went on the fabric, with nothing significant spent on the liturgical side. It is a little gem though!
March 27, 2007 at 1:33 pm #769838ake
ParticipantHow can such an important organisation as an bord pleannala have such an ancient piece of shit website!
March 27, 2007 at 1:38 pm #769839samuel j
Participant@Praxiteles wrote:
The present Heritage Coucnil seems to be comprised of nothing but has-been-county-councillors and ministerial grey-hound-walkers. Just abolish it, and save the tax-payers a few shillings.
You are so right, 101 papers, guidelines, you name it but to actually do something…oh no that would mean making a decision…..:mad:
March 27, 2007 at 2:57 pm #769840Rhabanus
Participant@Praxiteles wrote:
Here we have a view of the interior of the cothic chapel at Kylemore Abbey andnwhat has happened to its interior:
Re Kylemore in its present get-up:
Are visitors supposed to be impressed that the remodellers somehow like Victoriana? – note the potted palms arranged as though this were a neoGothic conservatory or solarium. The triptych missal stand could substitute as a music stand. Flute and cello duet, anyone,? Let me ring for Jeeves to fetch the tea and little cakes.
Oh Guinevere!!!
I think ake’s take on it says it all.
March 27, 2007 at 3:36 pm #769841Praxiteles
Participant@Fearg wrote:
Kylemore.. Am I correct in thinking that this would originally have been a private Church of Ireland Chapel? I was there a couple of years ago and I do not remember those current fittings, although it did give off the impression that all the restoration funding went on the fabric, with nothing significant spent on the liturgical side. It is a little gem though!
Quite correct Ferg! Here is the blurb from the Kylomore webpage re the chapel: “Mitchell Henry built the Gothic Church between 1877 and 1881 as a memorial to his wife, following her untimely death. The Church is a ‘]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitchell_Henry[/url]
The photographs below show the exterior and the full liturgical gothic-horrow that is the interior:
March 27, 2007 at 3:58 pm #769842Praxiteles
ParticipantSome more shots of the church at Kylmore buit by James Fuller:
March 27, 2007 at 6:10 pm #769843Fearg
Participant@Praxiteles wrote:
Some more shots of the church at Kylmore buit by James Fuller:
The second set are more like I remember it.. notice that there is a tabernacle and the crucific which obscurs the east window in the first photo is not there..
The benches don’t help the interior much.. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were not present in the original.
March 27, 2007 at 11:34 pm #769844Praxiteles
ParticipantHere is a picture of the interior of the Chapel at Loreto Abbey, Rathfarnham, Co. Dublin. It was built in 1839 to specifications by Patrick Byrne who had consulted A.W.N. Pugin on the design of the chapel. The High Altar encases a pietà by John Hogan and is flanked by two angels also by Hogan. Does anyone have any idea as to it present condition – if for no other reason than the fact that Mother Teresa of Calcutta began her religious life here in 1928.
March 28, 2007 at 2:47 pm #769845Rhabanus
Participant@Praxiteles wrote:
Here is a picture of the interior of the Chapel at Loreto Abbey, Rathfarnham, Co. Dublin. It was built in 1839 to specifications by Patrick Byrne who had consulted A.W.N. Pugin on the design of the chapel. The High Altar encases a pietà by John Hogan and is flanked by two angels also by Hogan. Does anyone have any idea as to it present condition – if for no other reason than the fact that Mother Teresa of Calcutta began her religious life here in 1928.
Were the statues of Our Lady Immaculate and St Joseph always in their present location? Would they not have had their own altars, perhaps in lateral chapels down the nave? The colours of the statues are gentle and subtle. Nevertheless, they seem to be slightly out of place in these corners.
The marble work in the sanctuary is admirable. The mosaic of the triumphal arch, too, frames the sanctuary quite handsomely.
The priedieux or prayer desks are an improvement over the pews in Kylemore.
Is that a carpet on the floor of the nave?
March 28, 2007 at 7:51 pm #769846Praxiteles
ParticipantThe Chapel of the Dominican nuns in Cabra, Dublin built in 1886 minimally refurbished in 1986 at which time it lost its altar rail and was given a new colour scheme.
March 28, 2007 at 11:32 pm #769847Praxiteles
ParticipantFrancis Goodwin’s church of St. Peter (1822-1824) at Ashto-under-Lyne near Manchester:
The foundation stone of this “Gothic edifice†was laid by Dr LAW, Bishop of Chester, on 24th October, 1821. It is one of the “Waterloo†churches. The Napoleonic Wars following the French Revolution had ended in 1815, and to show their gratitude for victory, the Parliamentary Commissioners voted one million pounds to the Church of England. Large, imposing churches were to be built with this money, so that English people might see how grateful the country was for peace at last.
St Peter’s received £12,000 from the Parliamentary Commissioners, leaving only £2,000 to be raised locally. A medal struck in 1821 states that “the area of the church will be 142 feet long by 65 feet wide and will be capable of containing 1,800 persons. The height of the tower will be 128 feet.â€March 29, 2007 at 10:35 am #769848Praxiteles
ParticipantFrancis Goodwin (1774-1835). Among his Irish commissions are Lissadel House and Markree Castle in Co. Sligo
March 29, 2007 at 10:55 am #769849Praxiteles
ParticipantThe Chapel in Markree Castle – which seems to have a new paint scheme.
March 29, 2007 at 2:46 pm #769850Rhabanus
Participant@Praxiteles wrote:
The Chapel in Markree Castle – which seems to have a new paint scheme.
I presume that the chapel is about to be the venue of someone’s wedding. Hence the choir cluttered with seats, each row marked by a white rose.
On the altar (covered with a vaguely ironed white horse-blanket rather than a frontal or antependium) stands the infamous “marriage candle” contraption. Having spotted, in an earlier photo, this johnny-come-lately incursion into the rite of matrimony, I had chosen the better part of valour and drew a discreet curtain of charity across it. Now that it has cropped up yet again 🙁 , however, I now feel duty-bound to denouce this bit of liturgical gimmickry.
The duffers and the guffers will wax on eloquently about the significance of this new-fangled contrivance. If this newly-minted “tradition” is followed to the letter, the mothers of the bride and of the groom are each supposed to place a lighted candle (taper) on the candelabra shortly after marching down the aisle before the pageant really gets off the ground by the entrance of the bride. The individual tapers blaze throughout the introductory rites, the liturgy of the Word, and the exchange of vows. Once the vows have been pronounced and the rings blessed and exchanged, the bride and groom are to approach the altar of sacrifice, take the candle placed there by their respective mothers and together light the central candle (usually a pillar candle) which is sometimes called the Christ-candle. They may either extinguish the tapers or replace them in their original position, pro opportunitate, depending on local custom, the liturgical season, the pronouncement of the national episcopal conference, the whim of the pastor, or the capacity of the bride and groom.
Quite apart from the mess made by all the wax drippings on the altar cloth, the frontal (or horse-blanket), the priestly vestments, the bridal gown, the sanctuary rug or floor, etc., this ‘little rite within the rite’ is expensive. The purveyors of ‘holy hardware’ sell this frippery for a pretty penny, and one can only just hear them snicker up their french cuffs when they see the pastor, or worse the bridal couple, turning up to cart off more pillar candles and tapers.
I am dismayed that there have not been more conflagrations caused by this device, given its proximity to veils and vestments no less than its natural proclivity to tip over from having been set nervously in place by the trembling hands of the bridal couple.
Whatever happened to REAL traditions in the marriage ritual? – such as the priest wrapping his stole round the hands of the couple after the vows, as he states “What God has joined, let no man put asunder” or having the bridegroom and bride set the ring first on their partner’s thumb until the words “In the name of the Father,” then move it along to the forefinger “and of the Son,” then the middle finger “and of the Holy Spirit” and then finally on the ring finger: “Amen.”
My theory is this: once the guffers strip away the truly symbolic elements of the rite, they feel the urge to fill the void with something else – usually something of their own contrivance, which causes more work and expense for others.
These types never seem able to work with an established “script” – they need to improvise, then they canonise their own aberrations and quirks.
“What a lot of nonsense!”
March 29, 2007 at 4:43 pm #769851Praxiteles
Participant@james1852 wrote:
This is the photo of youghal with the spire, also i include a photo of the sanctuary in youghal following decoration by us in 1925, and the same view today with the murals intact and restored but without the stencilwork. It is similar to many churches where the actuall paintings remained but the stencilwork was obliterated. It never looks right as they are left hanging in mid-air with no embellishments.
[ATTACH]4413[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]4414[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH]4415[/ATTACH]
James 1852 was asking about a spire on the tower of St. Mary’s Church in Youghal, Co. Cork. He is perfectly correct. the tower did have a copper spire which was removed in 1919 since it had become structurally dangerous. The tower and spire were built by Edward Fitzgerald, a local builder and architect, in 1841. The present High Altar in Youghal was erected in 1886 and was made by Pearse of Dublin. An account oft he event is to be found in the quondam Cork Examiner for 14 November 1886. The Telford organ was first played for High Mass celebrated by Bishop Keane on 23 May 1858.
March 29, 2007 at 5:11 pm #769852Praxiteles
ParticipantHere is an 1888 family picture of James Pearse, born in London on 8 December 1839, but originally from a Devonshire family. He did extensive work in the Dominican Church in Newrey; St. Saviour’s, Dominic Street; St Mary of the Angels, Church Street, Dublin; Sts. Augustine and John, Dublin; The Passionist Monastery, Harold’s Cross; St. Mary’s Cathedral, Limerick, Letterkenny Cathedral; Enniscorthy Cathedral; the Catholic churches in Inchicore, Trim, New Ross and St. Mary’s, Athlone. At this time, James Pearse lived and maintained a studio at 27 Great Brunswick Street, Dublin – from where his children were baptized in St. Andrew’s in Westland Row.
His son, WIllie Pearse (1881-1916), seen here on the right, did notable work in St. Andrew’s, Westland Row and is responsible for the Altar in the Mortuary Chapel in Cobh Cathedral.
March 29, 2007 at 7:10 pm #769853Praxiteles
ParticipantAnd here we have a portrait photograph of Willie Pearse and one of the Altar in the Mortuary Chapel in Cobh Cathedral, and one of the Pearse studio at 27 Great Brunswick Street, Dublin.
Since religion obviously holds little sway with the present custodians of Cobh Cathedral -which has deteriorated into a deplorable state – perhaps some vestige of national gratitude might move the present incumbent in Cobh to clean the rubbish out of the Mortuary Chapel and to wash it – especially as Easter is almost upon us.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

