Planning Applications on Local Authority Land
- This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
April 27, 2007 at 4:26 pm #709348Barry HallParticipant
If a planning application includes land which is owned by a Local Authority – does a letter of consent from that L.A. have to be included with the application? Also can the Executive of a LA give such a consent without consulting with the Members or entering into a Part 8 process.
-
May 18, 2007 at 1:31 pm #788858AnonymousInactive
Is it a private, L.A. or PPP developer ?
-
May 18, 2007 at 1:49 pm #788859AnonymousInactive
The development in question includes two pieces of land in Public Ownership. One of them is currently an amenity walk on a redundant rail line. The establishment of this amenity walk was as a result of a Part VIII process. The Developer has indicated that the access to the development will be by a road which he intends to construct on this land – clearly a proposal that is at odds with the earlier Part VIII process. It is not clear if the land will be sold to the Developer or if the L.A. will develop the roadway. It is blatantly obvious in any case that the width of the amenity wall is not sufficient to allow a roadway that would comply with the LA ‘s own development standards to be built.
Since I posted my question I have become aware that a letter of consent from the LA has been included in the application.
Any thoughts on the propriety of this whole process? -
May 19, 2007 at 7:15 pm #788860AnonymousInactive
What aspects?
Developing the land at all, or doing so without the consent of the elected reps?
-
May 20, 2007 at 1:08 pm #788861AnonymousInactive
Both I guess really – the previous Part VIII process was drawn out and controversial – the Councillors did an excellent job in deflectinging huge opposition from vested interests (adjoinining landowners). Now in my opinion the exectuive is giving these interests a stick to beat the Council with and undermining the concept of an Amenity walk. The proposed development incidentally is a replica of a previous one that was refused Permission on appeal – again the Executive appear to be ‘bending over backwards’ to faciliate this development.
-
March 9, 2009 at 5:52 am #788862AnonymousInactive
“PFI has now descended into farce,†he said. “It has produced very poor results in terms of design, cost control and manageability, and now it can’t even finance itself.â€
http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=426&storycode=3135425&c=1&encCode=000000000192014c
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.