Phoenix Park Tunnel Photos
- This topic has 46 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 9 months ago by
Dubliner.
- AuthorPosts
- October 9, 2004 at 11:46 am #727821
J. Seerski
ParticipantBecause this is Ireland.
October 9, 2004 at 12:54 pm #727822Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by Graham Hickey
Another ludicrous feature of Connolly is how you have to get off the Enterprise service at the far end of the station, walk the whole way down its massive platform, then all the way back up the other side to get the DART, also resulting in terrible congestion in the mornings.I’m surprised the Victorians never built a footbridge or underpass, God knows all the work THEY undertook is the only saving grace of our network 160 years later.
They did, there was a wooden bridge that ran from Platform 2 to Platform 5 as least as late as the 1980’s. I remember crossing it and the dirt of the glass I have never forgotten to this day, I would swear that it hadn’t been washed since the Steam Trains were replaced.
October 11, 2004 at 3:15 pm #727823GrahamH
ParticipantThanks for that – as it happens I was only in Greenes this morning and what did I see in a railway book for the very first time only a picture of that very bridge!
Presumably it was removed to allow the DART overhead lines to pass through. Where did it ‘land’ on the original rail-shed side?October 11, 2004 at 6:38 pm #727824Anonymous
InactiveIt ran from Platform 2 to Platform 5 with only access from either to each other.
It was a good quality painted timber structure with typical Victorian ‘neo gothic’ proportion and detailing such as champhered detailing around the panes.
It is the loss of minor features such as this that take the quality away from Stations. But given it disappeared in the late 80’s its hardly surprising, at least it didn’t make the early 90’s when it probably would have been replaced with a PVC structure!!
October 11, 2004 at 9:59 pm #727825Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by Diaspora
It was a good quality painted timber structure with typical Victorian ‘neo gothic’ proportion and detailing such as champhered detailing around the panes.It is the loss of minor features such as this that take the quality away from Stations. But given it disappeared in the late 80’s its hardly surprising, at least it didn’t make the early 90’s when it probably would have been replaced with a PVC structure!!
But if they rebuilt it in PVC it would have got you over the other tracks without doing a big U turn.
OK it wouldn’t have looked as good as the original dickied up, but sure isn’t half a loaf better than no bridge?
I can’t understand the attitude here to PVC
October 14, 2004 at 9:45 pm #727826Anonymous
InactiveEnough of that PVC king stick to selling windows you obviously do it very well,
BTW Serious transport issues,
Did anyone see the piece in the paper today about the ‘IFSC Business Association’ (Never heard of them before) stating that they don’t want Luas at any cost down on their patch?
I’m with the RPA on this on, the scale of Luas as a transport solution is ideally suited to this project.
I also feel that the RPA have probably learned a great deal from their Harcourt St nightmare. A few more penalty clauses ought to do the trick along with a few bonuses for early completion.
November 13, 2004 at 8:22 pm #727827Dubliner
ParticipantAll the talk of multibillion euro metros while there is homeless in the streets and a perfectly good link already there makes me sick
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

