O’ Connell Street, Dublin
- This topic has 3,789 replies, 212 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by
urbanisto.
- AuthorPosts
- March 16, 2004 at 2:20 pm #728167
GrahamH
ParticipantOh – the trees in front of the GPO are going in now, and the uplighters between the trees on the Clerys side are being installed.
March 16, 2004 at 2:29 pm #728168urbanisto
ParticipantThey look great dont they. This section of the street is really starting to take shape. I did notice that the street-level bollards in front of the GPO have been taken away. The paving here is complete so it doesn’t look as if they will be reinstated. Its a small thing but as they are heritage items it would be a great shame if they were permanently lost.
March 16, 2004 at 2:36 pm #728169GrahamH
ParticipantAh they must be going back – sure they were listed. Definitely be following that up if they’re not reinstated.
The paving outside Easons is such a pleasure to walk on compared with what was there before – so even and smooth.March 16, 2004 at 2:40 pm #728170urbanisto
ParticipantThe large bollards are there and being set into paving but the areas set aside for the small ones have been paved over. Maybe they are being resited.
I was thinking that uplighters between the pillars of the GPO would have been very effective.
March 16, 2004 at 5:26 pm #728171Devin
ParticipantThat’s very serious if those iron bollards at the bases of the columns have been removed and paved over. I’m going down to check it out now. There’ll be hell to pay!
March 16, 2004 at 6:57 pm #728172Niall
ParticipantAnyone got any pics?
March 16, 2004 at 9:20 pm #728173Devin
ParticipantRelax people! I enquired on-site and the stumpy bollards will put back as they were. The authorities want to open that part of the paving around the portico for Paddy’s day and there wasn’t time to finish it with the bollards.
Still, I don’t approve of the way those bollards have been treated up to now. They are valuable items of early Dublin street furniture, but were just left lying randomly around the site – and left out at night with no protection against theft other than the wire hoarding which often has walk-in gaps anyway, inviting the civically-inconsiderate passer-by to nick one for their back garden!
The bollards don’t appear to have been numbered during removal either. Assuming they had been in-situ for a long period of time up to this, each one should – for the sake of histortic continuity – go back to its original column base.
March 17, 2004 at 3:41 pm #728174Paul Clerkin
KeymasterGo ahead for O’Connell St hotel revamp
The Irish IndependentA further key piece of the O’Connell St redevelopment jigsaw is now in place following the granting of planning permission by Dublin City Council for a major redevelopment of the landmark Royal Dublin Hotel. Proposed works by owner Ampleforth Ltd includes a complete refurbishment and remodelling of the interior of the hotel, together with two, new bedroom wings with frontage onto Parnell Street and Moore Lane. The proposed design by Dublin-based Ashlin Coleman Architects is part of the plan to create a new and enhanced image for the hotel. Planning permission has also been granted for a new facade for the hotel on O’Connell Street. This exciting facade – designed jointly by Ashlin Coleman with UK architectural practice MacCormac Jamieson Prichard – will complete the new look for the hotel
March 17, 2004 at 4:29 pm #728175GrahamH
ParticipantAre they the same Ashlin & Coleman of Clerys fame?
It’ll be interesting to see how this first major modern building in 30 years relates to the street.I just thought of the parade last night regarding the bollards, to cut the slabs into circles takes time & skill, so rather than rushing, quickly throwing down some slabs to accomodate the parade seemed the likely reason.
There was clearly a lot of work even in cutting slabs to fit around the two tall end bollards.I agree about the numbering, indeed it was a great shame that they had to be lifted at all – it’s like taking up the floorboards in a period house – immediatly you lose the history and connection with the past – the idea that a Georgian workman laid these bollards nearly 200 years ago is lost.
March 18, 2004 at 1:18 pm #728176urbanisto
ParticipantWhat did you thin of the new facade for the Royal Dublin. I think it look great. Very different and modern. My god the difference between now and then will be so dramatic.
The Indo also had details of a new retail development at the EBS building on Westmoreland St. The piece was suggesting that the building would be demolished apart from the centre section (which is protected) and a new facade consiting of multi coloured lit panels replace it. It looked great as well. There is also plans for a pedestrian link to Temple Bar via Fleet St, although it wasn’t clear what this entailed.
March 18, 2004 at 1:18 pm #728177urbanisto
ParticipantWhat did you thin of the new facade for the Royal Dublin. I think it look great. Very different and modern. My god the difference between now and then will be so dramatic.
The Indo also had details of a new retail development at the EBS building on Westmoreland St. The piece was suggesting that the building would be demolished apart from the centre section (which is protected) and a new facade consiting of multi coloured lit panels replace it. It looked great as well. There is also plans for a pedestrian link to Temple Bar via Fleet St, although it wasn’t clear what this entailed.
March 18, 2004 at 1:55 pm #728178GrahamH
ParticipantWas it in yesterdays Indo?
I’ve been looking for a picture for ages – can anyone put up the pic and/or article – the subscription Indo online is blocking it out.The RDH claim that they are based in Dublin’s oldest Georgian house (built in 1752) which sounds ludicrous at first. But when you think about it – aside from Leinster House, it possibly is. Even Molesworth st, as crumbly and baroque as it is, is a teeny bit later.
There must be some contenders on Stephen’s Green south though, and perhaps those running alonside the Central Bank.The ‘house’ is crucial, otherwise Joe Walsh tours on the same street – as undeserving as the store is – would beat it hands down.
March 18, 2004 at 2:00 pm #728179GrahamH
ParticipantInteresting about the EBS too – if anything goes ahead on this site, the minimum to be done is for the granite infill panels be replaced with glass.
Multi-coloured lit panels – sounds like a 1983 Latvian Eurovision set – very scary…March 18, 2004 at 4:49 pm #728180Rory W
ParticipantSurely Henrietta Street is the oldest?
March 18, 2004 at 4:58 pm #728181GrahamH
ParticipantExactly! – I came running back to pop it in before someone noticed – but you just always have to be that one step ahead Rory
🙂Going to e-mail them and tell them where to shove their spurious claim – just like their other assertion that the house they now extoll the virtues of, was structurally unsound and warranted demolition.
March 19, 2004 at 1:02 pm #728182Anonymous
InactiveRoyal Dublin …
March 19, 2004 at 1:03 pm #728183Anonymous
Inactiveand the EBS …
March 19, 2004 at 1:23 pm #728184GregF
ParticipantI saw them in the Indo on Wednesday….kind of a funky make over for the both, moreso the EBS. Better than the black glass I suppose and the end of Sam Stephenson’s mark.
March 19, 2004 at 4:39 pm #728185Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThe EBS development is terrible looking in that image.
March 19, 2004 at 4:44 pm #728186GregF
ParticipantPity that original Art Deco edifice was gutted
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

