O’ Connell Street, Dublin
- This topic has 3,789 replies, 212 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by
urbanisto.
- AuthorPosts
- November 20, 2005 at 12:25 am #729807
aj
Participanthas anyone any views on how the spire is lit at night.. I thikn it would look much better if it was flood lit at along its length
November 24, 2005 at 10:01 pm #729808ihateawake
ParticipantI like the way it is lit now, but woud really like to see it flood lit.
Can i ask peoples opinions on television screens in the city center?
November 25, 2005 at 2:20 am #729809GrahamH
ParticipantThis project is rather bizarre:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/liverpool/content/articles/2004/07/31/bigscreendebut_feature.shtml
Can’t say I’d be a fan of big screens. They have a certain appeal when established for so long like in Piccadilly Circus in London where they’ve become part of the character of the area, but they would be very difficult to introduce in untouched territory, especially historic areas as the centre of cities inevitably are, let alone whole cities where the concept is completely alien as with Dublin (though yes the 40s did set a form of precedent).
Don’t know about others, but I find the appeal of urban areas is their being a form of television and advertising in themselves, with so much to watch, see and do – you go to these places to get away from such media distractions…Not to divert too much, but just some quick pics of the Upper street here. Most notably a single species of what seems to be ornamental ash is being used here in contrast to the mess of the Eason’s median – what a step forward.


So the original plan of having a mixture of 24 weeping birch and 38 ornamental ash down the centre seems to be dead – thank goodness! Having a single species is so much more ordered; they’re still being planted in groups of six though, presumably with the intention of providing views of the buildings in between. They will never have the impact that a linear planting scheme would have had though 🙁

Saying that, the planes along the side pavements are going to look fanatastic up here when finished.
The granite kerbstones of the side pavements being carefully stored:

And not quite architectural, but the underground ‘scene’ of the street is always interesting – here you can see the old iron water mains are being cleverly used as a route for modern plastic piping:
November 26, 2005 at 9:54 pm #729810ihateawake
ParticipantI think one would look welll on stephens green, it would blend well with Irelands new cosmopolitan corner and with the new status of importance and modernism the area would gain with the completion of the hub of the capitals new transport system. It would also cover up that nasty corner building(bus stop newsagents)
November 28, 2005 at 12:26 pm #729811Anonymous
Inactive@Graham Hickey wrote:
This project is rather bizarre:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/liverpool/content/articles/2004/07/31/bigscreendebut_feature.shtml
Can’t say I’d be a fan of big screens.
There was a very interesting report in the Sunday Times a year or so ago that focussed on the development of two large screens – one in Vienna and one London. The screens would be able to relay real time images and sounds from one city to the other – in short, you could walk up to the screen in Vienna and be seen on the screen in London at the exact same time thereby combining the two city streets in real time cyber space. The advantages and implications are quite amazing as you could effectively meet your friend in London while living in Vienna and have a normal conversation. Interesting development. Unfortunately, I have not seen any sign of it on my travels to Vienna and nor in London. In principle, however, it should work. Now there is a concept for a building (albeit very expensive). Cover the building is such screens (I am sure the technology will become cheaper and the screen material capable of covering larger expanses) and have real-time images of streets reflected through the screens. The skin of the building would become a panorma of world urbanism in real time. And who said that exciting things could not happen in Irish architecture – still hope for Dublin.
November 28, 2005 at 3:12 pm #729812Morlan
ParticipantSo what’s the ETA on completion of O’C upper? Obviously not before christmas anyway. Any hope of the street being finished by Paddy’s day? How are they getting on at the lower end of the street?
Also, is there any set date for the commencement of Parnell area revamp?
November 28, 2005 at 6:26 pm #729813ihateawake
ParticipantNow there is a concept for a building (albeit very expensive). Cover the building is such screens (I am sure the technology will become cheaper and the screen material capable of covering larger expanses) and have real-time images of streets reflected through the screens. The skin of the building would become a panorma of world urbanism in real time. And who said that exciting things could not happen in Irish architecture – still hope for Dublin.
this was imagined/planned for dublin?? very surprising
has there ever been any applications for a big screen in dublin?
November 28, 2005 at 7:45 pm #729814Morlan
Participant@PDLL wrote:
There was a very interesting report in the Sunday Times a year or so ago that focussed on the development of two large screens – one in Vienna and one London. The screens would be able to relay real time images and sounds from one city to the other – in short, you could walk up to the screen in Vienna and be seen on the screen in London at the exact same time thereby combining the two city streets in real time cyber space. The advantages and implications are quite amazing as you could effectively meet your friend in London while living in Vienna and have a normal conversation. Interesting development. Unfortunately, I have not seen any sign of it on my travels to Vienna and nor in London. In principle, however, it should work. Now there is a concept for a building (albeit very expensive). Cover the building is such screens (I am sure the technology will become cheaper and the screen material capable of covering larger expanses) and have real-time images of streets reflected through the screens. The skin of the building would become a panorma of world urbanism in real time. And who said that exciting things could not happen in Irish architecture – still hope for Dublin.
An IP camera, broadband connection, and a big ass video-wall in each city, job done. The only reall cost is the maintenance of the large screens. I’m sure this could be covered by advertisers.
It sounds interesting. I’ve never seen it in action myself.
I was trying to think which city Dublin could be paired with. Live broadcast Dublin-Barcelona? Dublin-Helsinki?
Now if every capital city in Europe had the same technolgy, you could rotate live broadcasts from city to city each day – I’m sure that would keep people interested.
November 28, 2005 at 10:01 pm #729815Morlan
Participant@Graham Hickey wrote:
Agreed the D’Olier St site was a fine location for a statue island – what a shame O’Brien was moved.
When was Willy O’Brien moved? Was this a 20th century criminal activity or earlier?
November 28, 2005 at 10:26 pm #729816Anonymous
Inactivethink somebody suggested on the site before that large screens could be used to cover the loopline looking to sea from o’connell bridge, seamless screens could replicate the view of customs house etc. that would be, if the loopline wasn’t there, and of course whatever else you fancy when required …
November 28, 2005 at 10:35 pm #729817ctesiphon
ParticipantI’ve heard that in South Korea there are television screens on the street that show Baduk games in real time, such is the country’s passion for the game (called Wei-chi in China, Igo in Japan, and Go internationally). Can’t think of an Irish equivalent. Maybe one of those reality tv shows?
November 28, 2005 at 11:04 pm #729818Anonymous
Inactive@ihateawake wrote:
this was imagined/planned for dublin?? very surprising
has there ever been any applications for a big screen in dublin?
No – should have been clearer in the way I phrased it. It is my suggestion – wouldn’t it be an innovative concept for a building – if, say, one side of it was covered in some form of screen-like skin upon which images of another building or streetscape could be projected in real time. In effect, a building in Dublin ‘could become’ another building. All very expensive I am sure, although technologically possible and, I am sure, will be affordable in perhaps 20-30 years time.
November 29, 2005 at 12:36 am #729819SeamusOG
Participant@Peter FitzPatrick wrote:
think somebody suggested on the site before that large screens could be used to cover the loopline looking to sea from o’connell bridge, seamless screens could replicate the view of customs house etc. that would be, if the loopline wasn’t there, and of course whatever else you fancy when required …
I’ve often wondered about that (and I don’t wish to take up too much space given that this is an O’Connell Street thread rather than a loop line bridge thread).
The television pictures used for Formula 1 are able to show different advertising on bridges over the racetrack depending on whether the country receiving the pictures has a ban on, say, tobacco advertising or not. i.e. even though the spectators at the Grand Prix are able to see cars speeding under a bridge with MARLBORO written on it, countries which have a ban would show cars speeding under a bridge with ORANGE on it, countries which do not have a ban would show cars speeding under a bridge with MARLBORO on it.
If you’ve ever watched premier league football in England you may have seen advertising which appears to be on the pitch beside the goal (e.g. flybe.com, which looks like it is actually printed on the pitch, in much the same way that some advertising is actually printed on the pitch, like Permanent TSB for rugby matches). If you look at the reverse angle, flybe.com isn’t there.
The architects who designed the millenium pedestrian bridge – I’m afraid I can’t remember their name – did a clever thing with the lights which are set into the bridge. Apparently, within the bridge, there is a light meter which measures the length of the day. There is a fibre optic system which lights up the lights along the bridge and some kind of a coloured wheel through which the light passes. Depending on the duration of nighttime, as measured by the light metre, the wheel moves at different speeds, so that the light along the bridge changes from white to blue to green and back to white between dusk and dawn. (It struck me as clever when I found out about it a few years ago, though it may have been quite commonplace).
Anyway, the point is this: the technology appears to exist to be able to not show us things which actually are present (e.g. cigarette advertising), and to show us things which are not present (e.g. advertising beside the goal in football). The technology also seems to exist to measure the length of the day and apply it to lighting of a bridge. Could it also be applied to taking a picture of the skyline, in real time (scurrying clouds, etc.), as we would see it if the loop line bridge were not there?
Now clearly the loop line bridge needs to exist as it is a vital transport link, but could a combination of the above technologies be used to show us, as we walk along Burgh Quay or Eden Quay, what our vista would be if the loop line bridge did not exist? I’d imagine this would have to be done with screens of some sort.
Even if it could be done, I’d acknowledge that the most obvious flaw with this arrangement is that it would discommode people who like the look of the loop line bridge.
November 29, 2005 at 3:53 am #729820asdasd
Participant“Live broadcast Dublin-Barcelona?”
Best excitement would be Dublin-Warsaw.
I notice the tree is up and lit in O’connell st. And the trees are lit, at least in the middle. Looks good – white christmas lights are the business.
November 30, 2005 at 3:29 am #729821GrahamH
ParticipantWell the GPO is currently being unwrapped like a giant Christmas present, and spot on schedule too. Just the frieze is peeking out at the minute and it looks magnificent.
Can’t wait to see the finished result – already the bone-white columns are glowing through the protective gauze.December 2, 2005 at 3:57 pm #729822Maskhadov
Participant@Graham Hickey wrote:
Well the GPO is currently being unwrapped like a giant Christmas present, and spot on schedule too. Just the frieze is peeking out at the minute and it looks magnificent.
Can’t wait to see the finished result – already the bone-white columns are glowing through the protective gauze.Anyone got any pictures ? maybe there are some examples on the net of what the columns will look like when its completed ?
December 4, 2005 at 8:37 pm #729823Daragh
ParticipantI have to say GregF I completely agree with you about the bins on Henry Street. They really don’t fit in with the ‘new’ look of the street. Does anyone have any idea why the Council got rid of the silver ones a few years back and replaced them with those awful, dirty black ones? It seems all the more surprising given that the Council has placed the new silver ones all along O’Connell Street. Furthermore, the paint or the iron or whatever it is on those black bins always seems to seep away after a few weeks and ruin the underneath paving surrounding the bins.
Having said that, I’m a huge fan of the new lights on Henry Street. Simple and reasonably elegant looking. I think the old ones were so tacky and cheap looking. An embarrassment really when one looks at the Christmas lighting erected in major cities like Paris, Strasbourg and even Oxford Street in London. What bugs me though is that the Council never seems to test the lights properly before they put them up each year. If you look at some of the Christmas lighting on Exchequer Street, George’s Street and even Grafton Street you’ll see that half the bulbs aren’t working on some of the decorations. It makes cheap and tacky lighting look even worse.p.s. I know this post doesn’t really concern O’Connell Street but I wanted to reply to Greg’s comments
December 4, 2005 at 8:50 pm #729824Pepsi
ParticipantI heard a while back that the Spire is due to be cleaned. When are they going to get a start on that?
December 5, 2005 at 1:15 am #729825anto
Participant@Daragh wrote:
I have to say GregF I completely agree with you about the bins on Henry Street. They really don’t fit in with the ‘new’ look of the street. Does anyone have any idea why the Council got rid of the silver ones a few years back and replaced them with those awful, dirty black ones? It seems all the more surprising given that the Council has placed the new silver ones all along O’Connell Street. Furthermore, the paint or the iron or whatever it is on those black bins always seems to seep away after a few weeks and ruin the underneath paving surrounding the bins.
Having said that, I’m a huge fan of the new lights on Henry Street. Simple and reasonably elegant looking. I think the old ones were so tacky and cheap looking. An embarrassment really when one looks at the Christmas lighting erected in major cities like Paris, Strasbourg and even Oxford Street in London. What bugs me though is that the Council never seems to test the lights properly before they put them up each year. If you look at some of the Christmas lighting on Exchequer Street, George’s Street and even Grafton Street you’ll see that half the bulbs aren’t working on some of the decorations. It makes cheap and tacky lighting look even worse.p.s. I know this post doesn’t really concern O’Connell Street but I wanted to reply to Greg’s comments
The black bins have a greater capacity I imagine
December 5, 2005 at 4:11 pm #729826Maskhadov
Participantwell why dont they get the council out to collect the rubbish more often with the smaller bins. Thats what they do in spain. THey collect the rubbish EVERY day and DONT leave it sitting for a week.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

