no let/sublet clause in conditions of planning

Home Forums Ireland no let/sublet clause in conditions of planning

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #708890
      geooneill
      Participant

      built a new house and changed garage door to a door and window unit, converted garage to a room but still needed door for access and tool storage.
      One condition of the retension was that the door be blocked up and plastered over, other condition reads:-
      The house shall be used as a single dwellinghouse and no part of the dwellinghouse shall be let/sublet or otherwise disposed of as such.
      My problem with this is last month I had a 4 bed house that I could rent or sell to investor, this month cant rent or sell same 4 bed house to an investor. There was no occupancy clause in origonal planning.

    • #784388
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      2 things:

      1. The “Rent a room” scheme would not be covered as one is there on licence rather than by letting.
      2. “No part of the dwellinghouse” – I would query whether the whole house comes under “part of”. If this were a piece of Legislation, then you’d probably be allowed to let the whole house as legislation is interpreted strictly.
      Also under the mischief rule of statutory interpretation, (since the condition would appear to have been put in to prevent turning the garage into a separate flat) interpreting it to mean that “the whole house” is not “part of the dwellinghouse” would make sense.
      I’m not certain what rules of interpretation are applied to Planning conditions.

      Talk to a solicitor.

    • #784389
      admin
      Keymaster

      Bob is right interpretation of the specific wording is at the nub of this;

      my guess is that part-letting would be prohibited as the intention of the clause was probably to stop a seperate dwelling and access and parking requirement but that disposal of the entire would be permitted as there would be intensification as opposed to multiplication of effect. Then one provisio I would consider is if an argument was made for extenuating circumstances on the basis of a large family needing more space at a particular location and that a planner granted on this basis where a refusal may have otherwise resulted.

    • #784390
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      thanks for replies.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News