New street and redevelopment for Dublin ?

Home Forums Ireland New street and redevelopment for Dublin ?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 173 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #764540
    GrahamH
    Participant

    @jdivision wrote:

    I think that between where Princes Street meets red and green block it will turn right (completely my opinion). I have heard from a retail source who’s not involved that Arnotts will eventually only occupy the bottom left hand corner of that picture. That’s not been confirmed by the principles however.

    Agreed about what you say about capturing the footfall of eastern O’Connell Street before it reaches Henry St, but to make a right turn where Princes St ends below as you seem to suggest (may be wrong), is simply not possible given the fine terrace of protected buildings that would have to be swept away in part to allow the new street to break through:

    ..unless of course Arnotts propose demolition regardless…

    Alternatively, emerging through the 60s frontage on Henry St still brings the pedestrian out opposite the main doors of Roches, so that’s still an option.
    Dunnes Stores would not be pleased with that proposal though, with the potential for this new street to cut the footfall of eastern Henry St substantially, right outside their massive new store. Suppose it’s only a 30 second back-track though.

    #764541
    CTR
    Participant

    @jdivision wrote:

    Just to give an update, application now likely to be lodged before beginning of September and street will emerge between GPO Arcade and the River Island part of Arnotts. Contact wouldn’t be drawn on exactly where but “not as far up as River Island”.

    Anyone hear / see anything on this of late?

    #764542
    jdivision
    Participant

    Details have finally been released on Arnotts redevelopment:

    Arnotts today unveiled plans for a €700 million development based around its current department store in Dublin’s north city centre.

    The development known as the Northern Quarter will transform the area bounded by O’Connell Street, Abbey Street, Henry Street and Liffey Street into a new shopping and entertainment area.

    An artist’s impression of the aerial view of the proposed development
    The main aim of the proposal is to recreate Prince’s Street as a pedestrian thoroughfare connecting O’Connell Street to Henry Street with a public square at the heart of the development.

    Williams Lane will be repositioned and a second lane will be added from the square to create a new north-south pedestrian route from Henry Street to Middle Abbey Street.

    The scheme will feature 47 new shops, 189 apartments, a 152 bed four-star hotel and 17 new cafes restaurants and bars. Underground parking for over 700 vehicles with access via ramps on O’Connell Street has also been proposed.

    Subject to planning permission the development is expected to be completed by 2010.

    “The Northern Quarter will write the next chapter in the evolving history of Dublin City, retaining the charm of an open street environment but overlaying it with the dynamism and diversity of a modern European capital,” executive chairman of Arnotts Richard Nesbitt said at the launch in Dublin today.

    Mr Nesbitt said that the company would provide 80 per cent of the funding but that they are seeking strategic partners for the remainder.

    Arnotts will apply to Dublin City Council for planning permission this week.

    © 2006 ireland.com

    #764543
    JJD
    Participant

    @jdivision wrote:

    Details have finally been released on Arnotts redevelopment:

    Arnotts today unveiled plans for a €700 million development based around its current department store in Dublin’s north city centre…An artist’s impression of the aerial view of the proposed development…

    Here are those artist impression from the article above, looks quite impressive, although artist impressions usually do! At last it appears that the dead end nature and wasted use of Prince’s Street North will come to an end. Not sure what is gonna happen to The Adelphi facade on Middle Abbey Street, hard to make out from these images as well as other buildings in this re-development.

    #764544
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Thanks for the pics JJD.

    Well from what can be made out in the right-hand picture, Arnotts as we know it is has effectively vanished, especially with the new hotel and apartments which could be any number of those large bulkheads.

    Also it would appear that the new street punches through onto Henry Street via the 1960s extension, given the apparent new green facade depicted, and not directly behind the GPO – would this be the case? Perhaps not, as even the far side of the Victorian store appears to be missing! 😮 – so it could be anywhere really. Any chance of a larger image anyone – can’t find one anywhere!
    Also are we to assume that Arnotts have acquired the Penneys/BHS building on O’Connell Street? Major opportunities retail and architectural there if the case.

    The only thing is that Princes St is quite narrow and also quite dark, though I see an attempt has been made to widen it as soon as practical. I wonder therefore will it ever hold the appeal of Henry Street?
    It does have an identical orientation, but Henry St is a bit wider and lined with bright brick buildings – not dominated by the sombre deadpan granite facade of the GPO as with Princes St. Also the GPO facade will really have to be redeveloped into retail to make the street a success. At least this lovely side of the GPO will now garner a wider audience – it has a ‘wholesome’ charm to it and distinctive limestone dressings etc on the ground floor that rarely get seen.

    #764545
    BTH
    Participant

    Sorry to say but the image of the square looks a little bit like a 60’s shopping precinct in a British New Town like Stevenage or somewhere, just blown up to city scale. The Arnotts facade isn’t great, mainly because of the apartments overhead which break up the scale of the building far too much, but also because the blue element basically cheapens the whole look of the image. This elevation should really be much more monumental and capable of forming a strong vista stop to the Princes St. Route.
    Also, the only other example of an external escalator/travelator I can think of in Ireland is the one at the old Dundrum shopping centre, currently rusting away. I never saw it working and I can’t see the ones on the left of the image being hugely practical in our lovely wet climate!
    However, nit-picking aside I think the proposals are funndamentally sound based on the information here, and I’m hoping to have a closer look at the plans soon. The idea of a paralell shopping hub to Henry St, but feeding into it will give a fantastic critical commercial mass to this part of O’Connell St which can hopefully be replicated further up on the “Millennium Mall” site…
    I do wonder though, should they have bitten the bullet and proposed a roof over the square… I’m thinking Sony Centre in Berlin where the roof becomes an architectural and tourist sight in itself…
    Anyway, First impressions are reasonably good, let’s hope that it comes to fruition sooner than later!

    #764546
    aj
    Participant

    i hope they take the opportunity to restore the orginal facade and replace the dome that was removed

    #764547
    jdivision
    Participant

    @BTH wrote:

    The Arnotts facade isn’t great, mainly because of the apartments overhead which break up the scale of the building far too much, but also because the blue element basically cheapens the whole look of the image. This elevation should really be much more monumental and capable of forming a strong vista stop to the Princes St. Route.

    The Kelly family are involved in the redevelopment so I suspect that the purple element (I think it’ll be purple rather than blue) will be like the Clarion hotel at Liffey Valley (which the Kellys own). I hate that facade and don’t believe it’s appropriate for city centre.

    #764548
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    A fashion retailer that rarely makes any public utterances about its business, Penneys managing director Seamus Halford broke with convention yesterday to say that it will invest €45-€50 million to double the space of its current store to 100,000 square feet.

    #764549
    jdivision
    Participant

    @Paul Clerkin wrote:

    A fashion retailer that rarely makes any public utterances about its business, Penneys managing director Seamus Halford broke with convention yesterday to say that it will invest €45-€50 million to double the space of its current store to 100,000 square feet.

    Is that the Mary street outlet?

    #764550
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    No it’s the O’Connell Street outlet

    #764551
    -Donnacha-
    Participant
    Paul Clerkin wrote:
    A fashion retailer that rarely makes any public utterances about its business, Penneys managing director Seamus Halford broke with convention yesterday to say that it will invest &#8364]

    Thank god, the facade of that o connell st store is architectural puke. A nice modern all glass front could look great, and there is a big oportunity to make something of the corner across from the GPO. I just hope they stay away from a modern stone finish as they usually look out of place beside historic stone buildings.

    #764552
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Penneys first preposed a major revamp of this store at least two years ago from what I heard at the time – perhaps they were waiting for this Arnotts plan to get off the ground. Here’s hoping indeed that they invest a significant sum on their principal facade – I won’t stir it by suggesting what I’d put there 😉

    Overall the Arnotts square alas looks a complete mess of conflicting design concepts and building usage – and all worrying wallpaper-like, in a way that facades can be peeled off and replaced every decade or two. Maybe it’ll stand up better in other renderings. Agreed the store itself ought to be more ‘monumental’ if that’s the word – certainly more distinguishable and coherent anyway.

    Needless to say the 152 bedroom hotel is availing of the Independent Building according to yesterday’s IT, which is nicely appropriate. If this doesn’t set the Gresham’s and RDH’s refurb wheels in motion nothing will!
    I’m very curious to know exactly where this proposed car and service tunnel “at the junction of O’Connell Street and Middle Abbey Street” is going to go. Bulldozing through Manfield Chambers is hardly on the cards, and Eason’s wraps the whole way around this corner, meaning the entance will have to be substantially further down, maybe on the current small Penneys frontage?

    The full IT article:

    Arnotts seeks approval for €700m project
    Arthur Beesley, Senior Business Correspondent
    13/9/2006

    Department store company Arnotts is seeking planning permission for a massive redevelopment of its extensive properties behind Henry Street in Dublin, where it aims to create a new shopping, entertainment and residential zone akin to the fashionable SoHo district in New York.
    The €700 million Northern Quarter project, which is being led by Arnotts chairman Richard Nesbitt SC, includes proposals for a new central plaza between Henry Street and Middle Abbey Street.
    If planning approval is granted, construction work could continue for the remainder of the decade.
    The aim is to attract big-name mass market international retailers such as the fashion chains Abercrombie & Fitch and Armani Xchange and Apple Computer into the Henry Street zone, a retail hub which has largely stolen the march on Grafton Street in recent years.

    “We believe this project is exactly the kind of ambitious, visionary development the area needs. The Northern Quarter will write the next chapter in the evolving history of Dublin city, retaining the charm of an open-street environment by overlaying it with the dynamism and diversity of a modern European capital,” said Mr Nesbitt.
    In preparation for the scheme, Arnotts has spent some €100 million in the past two years buying up most of the buildings between Henry Street, the GPO Arcade, Middle Abbey Street and Liffey Street.

    The central plaza will comprise 47 new shop buildings, 17 cafes, restaurants, bars and 189 apartments. A 152-bedroom four-star hotel will be built behind the old Independent Newspapers building on Middle Abbey Street.
    The plaza will be connected to O’Connell Street through an extension from Princes’ Street, an underdeveloped thoroughfare which Arnotts hopes to revitalise as a pedestrianised central route into the plaza. Car-parking and service bays will be located in an underground complex, which will be accessed via a tunnel at the junction of O’Connell Street and Middle Abbey Street.
    In addition, Arnotts wants to build two new streets to connect the plaza with Henry Street and Middle Abbey Street. Princes’ Street North, off Henry Street, and Abbey Lane, off Middle Abbey Street, will be roughly parallel to Liffey Street.

    While Arnotts’ department store has been a central feature of the Henry Street scene for generations of shoppers, the plan will see the focus of its building moved southwest towards Liffey Street. Such a move will reduce its iconic shopfront on Henry Street, but it will provide frontage directly on to the plaza and increased frontage on Middle Abbey Street and Liffey Street.

    Mr Nesbitt, a barrister who led the takeover of Arnotts in June 2003, said the initiative will create a “renewed sense of pride” in the north city area. He suggested it could act as the catalyst for further development of the Lotts Street area next to the Liffey.
    A new pedestrian bridge over the river between O’Connell Bridge and the Ha’penny Bridge was also possible, Arnotts said.

    #764553
    GrahamH
    Participant

    5/10/2006

    I thought this would fit better on this thread if that’s okay.

    The new Arnotts 😮

    As Stephen says, the entire western wing is to be demolished to create the new street!

    However, because an extraordinary development, not all is quite as it seems. Obviously they’re not going to get away with demolishing part of a protected structure, let alone a prominent one, so what is proposed as far as I can gather both from the model and the site notices (didn’t have time to inspect app :() is that the deconstructed wing will be rebuilt on the new street, forming one of two facades of a new ‘Victorian building’ with corner tower!

    Will this also involve a new tower oriel window and other replicated features?!

    The frustratingly evasive nature of the planning application is telling. The existing store is referred to elsewhere on the document as Arnotts, but when it comes to the deconstruction of half of the principal building, it suddenly becomes “No’s 7-15 Henry Street”, even in spite of it being central to the current complex. It is not a secondary independent building like those of Abbey Street.
    And DCC can’t spell either: its not Penny’s (Pennys or Penney’s), nor Arnott’s :rolleyes:

    Not sure what to make of this – evidently they want to do it to 1) link in with Cole’s Lane across the road leading to the Ilac, Roches and new Dunnes, and 2) to bring the new street as far east away from Liffey Street as possible. It’s difficult to argue which would be better when considering the current castrated Victorian affair versus a signature corner building and invigorating new street, but comparing the new ‘building’ with a fully restored original design as almost currently stands is a different matter entirely. What appears to be proposed is meddling with history, but then again it is also very much compatible with the enterprising nature of Victorian business and engineering that originally brought Arnotts into being….

    It certainly appears to be causing waves within DCC – while I was there a couple of suits marched over with one almost whispering to the other “look what’s happening to Arnotts”, as if also told by someone else. Gasps and tut tutting ensued.

    The development as we know is huge:

    Down on O’Connell Street the new Penneys is crisp but ugly next to the GPO:

    Expansive glazing is a cheap and lazy way out of having to respect the solid to void ratio on the Lower street, and is a slap in the face to the post-1916 reconstruction efforts. What is the point of redeveloping an out of place building with an equally incongruous one? Penneys’ fashionability is not its greatest problem. Eason’s mansard roof is also being used as an excuse to further increase the height of this terrace – nowhere on the Lower street is this rule broken.

    Shimmering in the midst of O’Connell Street:

    It makes a mockery of the Georgian terrace-to-landmark concept – the GPO is now isolated.

    The extraordinary car access tunnel near the centre of O’Connell Street, reducing the pavement back down to single width on the busiest part of the street:

    Minus attendant railings, lighting and signage of course.

    #764554
    GrahamH
    Participant

    A massive new apartment development is planned to the south-western corner of the site, containing 97 apartments stacked like curious pods on top of the presumably retail element below, and rising to 12 storeys at the corner with Liffey and Abbey streets…

    …including a retained Chapters and the extensive late 1990s infill to the right:

    A further 51 apartments are going in behind the GPO that you can barely see sticking out there.
    Obviously most apartments are a few floors above ground level.

    The view of the new tower over the Ha’penny Bridge looking up Lower Liffey Street:

    The present hideous view:

    As seen rising over the north inner city from the Clarence perhaps:

    And the view from Lower Abbey Street with Manfield Chambers in the foreground:

    As Stephen noted, the entire hideous Henry/Liffey corner is remain intact:

    And the new streets punching through to Middle Abbey Street look decidedly narrow and dank. At least they’ll be south facing.

    The planning notice:

    #764555
    aj
    Participant

    I think the Arnotts facade is safe.. there isnt a snowballs chance in hell that DCC or the public will let the developers “reinvent” what is one of Dublins signture landmarks….do you think the developer is chancing his arm a bit?..

    #764556
    Devin
    Participant

    That new Penneys building is one of the most problematic parts of the proposal – especially its glass, canopied setback roof storeys. There are several montage views of it in the planning application, but, tellingly, there is no proper view of it seen with the GPO from the north – i.e. from the Nth. Earl Street junction area.

    The 12-storey tower at the corner of Abbey Street & Liffey Street is probably ok – an example of somewhere that could take such an addition.

    The jury is still out on the proposal for the main Henry Street Arnotts building (though the emoticon: 😮 is appropriate)

    #764557
    GrahamH
    Participant

    Yes agreed about the apartment element – for once it would appear that a decent architectural standard is to be set above the city’s five story parapet level instead of the north inner city’s ugly concoction of mansard roofs, multi-storey car parks, plant rooms and air conditioning units. Indeed their views of the Lotts or westwards over M&S/Jervis are not going to be pretty! Particularly the latter – frankly it’ll be terrible looking directly out on that first thing every morning.

    But the new view up Liffey St towards the tower looks impressive, and it is a suitable nodal point for such a structure too I think. The only concern is the increasingly tunnel-like street network being created here. Should M&S be developed soon, it no doubt is going to reach to 7-8 storeys on that side too, as well as the H. Samuel corner with Henry St. Setbacks should help though, as is planned with Arnotts:

    I also like the detached nature of the apartments in how they ‘float’ over the existing streetscape. Hopefully that will turn out as imaginative as it appears to look.
    Slight reservations about how the (excellent) 1990s facades are going to gel with the new infill – again it should be doable…

    Here’s the current disaster zone – squat 1900-1920 buildings, some seemingly older too, that no doubt would be charming if cleaned up, but are equally knockable, along with 80s rubbish on the corner:

    And the terrace to the other side, including one of the most remarkable structures in the city to term itself a building:

    It’s like a sophisticated cardboard box.

    All of the latter pic is going to go, sadly including this grand early Victorian building with original window to the top right (left seems to be later). Presumably the interesting glossy red brick is c.1900.

    Regarding the principal Arnotts fa

    #764558
    Maskhadov
    Participant

    why do those apartments stick up like that at the corner ? It should be all that height.. or one height.. it looks daft.

    The rest of the design looks bland boring and needs to go back to the drawing board. An arch like the one in Milan would be a great idea for the new street.

    #764559
    notjim
    Participant

    so the ramp on o’connell street: they can’t be serious can they? that is the worst idea ever, moving the facade, while regretable, can maybe be justified, but using o’connell street as a back lane?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 173 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.