New building beside City Hall

Home › Forums › Ireland › New building beside City Hall

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #724546
    -Donnacha-
    Participant

    This thing is shockingly bad. It wouldn’t look out of place among the rash of dreary odd-shaped buildings that have gone up at DCU over the last few years. If it was just dull that would be something, but everything about it makes you stand back, scratch your head and ask: “why?” Especially that pointless gantry thing. Or is it for something? Dame street has been defaced.

    #724547
    notjim
    Participant

    So after reading all of this I expected to hate this building, but not at all, I can see that it might of done more for its setting and the blank side elevation on the college green side looks poor against the bank when viewed from college green . . . but I love the drama of building, the way it fits so awkwardly into the site, the funny angles, the wierd half cupola and the odd slanted windows below and then the gantry. its like an explosion or a joke or something, kind of cool i thought.

    #724548
    LOB
    Participant

    Say this on Friday – Have to agree with AndrewP.
    Awful
    V. disappointing

    #724549
    Devin
    Participant

    I’d assumed it was going to meet the parapet height of the two remaining adjoining buildings on Palace Street, so as to reinforce the scale of this short street, but it’s rather bigger than that. Still, it is generally within the scale of the area, and it’s refreshing to see a new building that’s not trying to do the 7 storey trick in a 4 storey area!

    I’m not sure about the external finishes – they seem to be taken from the atrium of the Civic Offices.

    #724550
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Any decent photographs?

    #724551
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Hold your horses there, big mon! You’ll spoil the surprise.:)

    I took some today- they’ll be uploaded when I get home.

    (Although ‘decent’? I’ll let ye be the judges of that.)

    #724552
    Morlan
    Participant

    There’s this one taken by eo980

    #724553
    -Donnacha-
    Participant

    It looks far worse in daylight; the finishes are cheap and indeed civic office-like. Imagine it with a few years of rain and traffic grime! I’d had no major reservations with the plans, and its presence on the street before the scaffolding came down was modest. But the finished product is not up to scratch.
    The site deserves the very best and this aint it. This weird, second-rate building does not belong beside our city hall.:mad:

    #724554
    -Donnacha-
    Participant

    But that’s a pretty dramatic picture!

    #724555
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Oh that’s bad – and that’s being charitable. Both the gantry and the dome should be removed . And is the join to the Sick and Indigent Roomkeepers as crude as it looks?

    #724556
    ctesiphon
    Participant

    Upstairs…

    …downstairs.

    #724557
    GrahamH
    Participant

    My god I’ve only just realised that the gantry is just that, and not the construction crane I thought it was! It’s terrible! 😮

    Yes the overall form and cladding is oddly similar to the Civic Offices. The deeply modelled base is reminicent of something too but I can’t put my finger on it, other than the tapered edges of Civic Offices of course.
    It’s also strange when one considers this heavy base/pedestal in turn sits on top of the ground floor entrance void (though we can’t see it yet), which should make for an unusual state of affairs…

    The glazing is smart, and it looks cool at night, but the overall form particularly to Palace Street is cluttered and cumbersome, and those multiple voids to the side don’t even terminate in acknowledgement of the Roomkeepers’ parapet.. And the bluey grey part is an unnecessary contributor of clutter to the terrace, while the granite? -clad wall appears too severe and dated – hard to say without seeing it in the flesh.
    The height however seems okay in ctesiphon’s second pic there, whatever about ‘that’ dome…

    #724558
    LOB
    Participant

    @Paul Clerkin wrote:

    Oh that’s bad – and that’s being charitable. Both the gantry and the dome should be removed . And is the join to the Sick and Indigent Roomkeepers as crude as it looks?

    Yes

    #724559
    manifesta
    Participant

    I liked this street so much better with only one sick & indigent house on it.

    #724560
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    It’s just such a huge disappointment – a fabulous site surrounded by some great buildings, it screamed for lightness of touch but instead we have son of sam….

    #724561
    Devin
    Participant

    I think the join between it and the Sick & Indigent house is unfinished.

    Here is the new white granite being put down. As Stephen and Greg said, it’s going to sit uncomfortably next to the golden historic paving that runs around the perimeter of the site. St. Mary’s Church/Keating’s Pub managed to get a slightly yellowey granite for their paved area outside the pub, which looks good. Maybe something like that would have been more suitable here …

    #724562
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    could never understand why the building is set back from the street line when one of its main functions was to reinstate that line ?

    certainly looks like an odd concoction or to be blunt, pretty shit in that context. achieving nothing of what it set out to do.

    will have to wander down & take before dismissing it completely i suppose, but it doesn’t look good from the pics.

    #724563
    Lotts
    Participant

    Saw it for first time last night. It struck me that it Would have been a great site for a very high spec residential block. Using this for yet more offices seems a waste. Especially poor quality ones…

    The lights look well in a novelty kind of way. But they remind me of Marks and Spencer stores I’ve seen in the UK.

    It dosn’t intrude onto dame street as badly as I had expected. Which is about as much praise as I can muster.

    I cannot forgive the way it addresses the Sick and Indigent. It looks like a bodge job. You expect that in a couple of days we’ll see the top part filled in by a giant can of expanding filler foam cut back to fit with a rusty saw.

    How well can the S&I chimmneys draw now? Surely they’ll hardly work at all with that built up so close?

    #724564
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Lotts wrote:

    Saw it for first time last night. It struck me that it Would have been a great site for a very high spec residential block. Using this for yet more offices seems a waste. Especially poor quality ones…

    If it had been residential the city council would more than likely have had to sell the development. This way they can rent it. However, I agree that it is a waste being offices though. might have made a nice site for a library.

    #724565
    GregF
    Participant

    The more I see this new building …the more I view it as a ”quirky” new addition to the city. It looks so awkward and ”quirky” that it must be loved in a sympathetic and understanding way….just like an unwanted puppy or kitten that is the unattractive runt of the litter.

Viewing 20 posts - 61 through 80 (of 165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.