Mr Voting Machine’s Transport Plan
- This topic has 78 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 7 months ago by
alonso.
- AuthorPosts
- November 3, 2005 at 1:39 am #762867
dave123
ParticipantI’m not convinced with this new plan either, The Government’s perfect timing to relaunch Its annual Development plan only this time Its coming up to the elections, :rolleyes: Not perfect timing to get the Lot more to done!
A lot done more to do, oops we need to that again 😀I’m a little disappointed in the over hyped project, the Atlantic Corridor!
Its only dual lane from Limerick to Ennis, the rest will be 2+1, even most of the Busier Cork/Limerick sections of N20
From looking at the corridor it’s more shaped of foot rather than just following the Atlantic coast
I don’t see the logic of a person living in Malin head wanting to go via Mizen head En route to Waterford, is this Economic sense, a joke I’d say. Why not Use the N24 rather than the N25, The N24 should be as much as important as the N25.
Or, It should be just an Atlantic Corridor separate from the southeast should be another and both interlinked giving the N24 more importance.
. Any Irish person that will drive this Atlantic road corridor wouldn’t drive that entire length and follow it either, even with a very bad sense of direction would not take the option of the doing the length the entire country if one were travelling Letterkenny-Waterford.The new motorway plans isn’t exciting and surprising
Anyone with any good memory and common sense will know there is no chance in hell will the new Inter- urban motorway network be Finished by it’s given 2010 deadline, Its laughable, just ask anyone for Christ sakes. We’ve heard it over and over again dates such as 2004, 2005 2006 more all routes, this failed so >>, then back to the drawing board, out comes the new “New Development planâ€, Soon after that A “new†rehash sometime last year under Seamus Brennan. Yet again When Martin Cullen became the new minister for transport seems to have changed a few things by spell checkedunder this plan, would have all motorways completed by 2007,later postponed till a more realistic 2009 and now finally 2010 under the beefed up plan 😀
and get all the south east projects going, There is no need for a dual carriageway all the way to Waterford, Its totally unnecessary, some sections of that N9 road caries only 4,000 vehicles a day! Yet since he is in power, Waterford has got more attention than Limerick and Galway routes, which carry a lot more traffic than the Waterford route,Finally what about the Shannon Airport link, up to a few months ago was going to get a green light??
Is this now RIP???
I’m sure my children’s children’s will go on the new Atlantic coast Railway when its finally completed. I will have probably already used the new super duper fantastic trans Atlantic highway under the Ocean :rolleyes:I’m impressed with the new plans that spiral the country looks artistic don’t you think,
Better make fun to the bits there not doing 🙂November 3, 2005 at 2:09 am #762868ctesiphon
Participant@Frank Taylor wrote:
I saw a survey of New Yorkers where they were asked where they would go in New York to meet someone if both parties only knew the date and time of the appointment but not the location. Something like 50% of them chose the information office at Grand Central Station.
I think the date only was specified, and they chose that location at 12 midday.
Could it have been in James Surowiecki’s ‘The Wisdom of Crowds’ book?In Dublin, it would depend for me on who I was meeting (I know that’s not the thrust of the question), but Trinity Gates, Traitor’s Gate (Grafton corner of SSG) or the tree at Nassau St Trinity entrance are all contenders.
If someone wanted to find me, there are a couple of coffee shops that are homes from home, but that’s different altogether.
November 3, 2005 at 4:57 am #762869dowlingm
ParticipantThe problem with this whole plan is that it is literally as good as it gets. Olivia Mitchell has some decidely dubious notions about transport and has the Heuston-Spencer Dock interconnector in her sights. If there is a change of government a “review” (a delay) is certain.
November 3, 2005 at 9:20 am #762870aj
Participant@dowlingm wrote:
The problem with this whole plan is that it is literally as good as it gets. Olivia Mitchell has some decidely dubious notions about transport and has the Heuston-Spencer Dock interconnector in her sights. If there is a change of government a “review” (a delay) is certain.
maybe this is true but surely no new goverment would be so stupid… i think the goverment (despite the scepticism over whether or not they can deliver it) realises that the transport issue is a vote winner or loser!
November 3, 2005 at 10:31 am #762871dc3
ParticipantAirports / Western European Capitals without direct rail links.
Luxembourg (no rail), Luqa, Malta (no trains at all anywhere on Malta),
Prague (bus to metro link there, is this Western enough)Doubtless some of the Baltic States also, plus Lisbon, already mentioned.
November 3, 2005 at 10:50 am #762872Frank Taylor
Participant@notjim wrote:
i think the question re the green is not about the station but whether the tunnelling machine is being inserted there.
The RPA boss, Frank Allen, told the Dail transport committe last week that the metro tunneling machine would terminate in Stephens Green and not emerge. He even suggested that it could be turned on a few years later and pointed towards Kimmage. I guess there’ll be two of them given that it’s twin bore.
He stated that underground stations are far cheaper to build by excavation rather than being mined, so he would expect that stations like O’Connell Street would be built by surface excavation, so that no part of them was under a building.
The fact that Stephens Green will have two intersecting stacked underground lines, indicates to me that they are going to dig a huge pit. RPA has said that their platforms will be 90m long and IE want at least twice that length for interconnector platforms. Can you imagine the amount of digging and the amount of archaeological rubbish that will be unearthed? Given that the sides of the green are about 250m long, I’d expect all of Stephen’s Green to be dug up- to howls of protest.
It was Cowen who made a comparison with Grand Central and it reminds me that Grand Central has become a psychological centre point for New York.
November 3, 2005 at 11:03 am #762873hutton
Participant@dave123 wrote:
I’m sure my children’s children’s will go on the new Atlantic coast Railway when its finally completed. I will have probably already used the new super duper fantastic trans Atlantic highway under the Ocean :rolleyes:
Why wait til then? By all accounts it´ll be open in 2009 – See http://www.atlantictunnel.com/ for further info. At least now we know where Martin E got his advice 😉 , and theres probably as much chance of seeing one completed as there is the other 😀
November 3, 2005 at 11:30 am #762874hutton
ParticipantQuote:
@dowlingm wrote:The problem with this whole plan is that it is literally as good as it gets. Olivia Mitchell has some decidely dubious notions about transport and has the Heuston-Spencer Dock interconnector in her sights. If there is a change of government a “review” (a delay) is certain.
@aj wrote:
maybe this is true but surely no new goverment would be so stupid… i think the goverment (despite the scepticism over whether or not they can deliver it) realises that the transport issue is a vote winner or loser!
No unfortunately not. Over the summer, the FG wing of the new plotical party “Finegael-and-labour” ( 😉 )brought out a survey, taken in Nth Dublin & its environs, that showed the vast majority of persons surveyed would prefer to use public transport for commuting. After an initial release & one or twp interviews, Olivia Mitchell completely changed tack & started banging on about the quality of signage on the M50 SEM. Open goal, govt with its pants down in terms of presiding over the unused Dublin – Drogheda – Navan railway, and all O.M. can do is rant about an issue of far less strategic importance. At a recent talk, Frank Mc D referred to her in terms of (roughly) “ravings of a mad Sth Dublin housewife” – an assessment that I am inclined to share.
There are talented people in “Finegael-and-labour”, such as Richard Bruton, but I am not convinced that O.M. is one of them. It is a poor reflection on that party that she was appointed to front-bench on an issue of such importance.
Sorry folks, I too wish that at least one of the major parties would have a competent pair of hands on this area 🙁November 3, 2005 at 11:35 am #762875ctesiphon
Participant@hutton wrote:
At a recent talk, Frank Mc D referred to her in terms of (roughly) “ravings of a mad Sth Dublin housewife” – an assessment that I am inclined to share.
Frank McDonald was careful not to mention any names in connection with that characterisation. However, if that’s who you choose to see as being thus described… 😉
November 3, 2005 at 12:39 pm #762876hutton
ParticipantYou might have a point – on both accounts 😉 😉
November 3, 2005 at 12:41 pm #762877GregF
ParticipantAll this has a whiff of the ”Bertie Bowl” about it. I would’nt thrust that bloke Cullen after he squandered the 50 million on the unused electronic voting machines. The plan is ambitious and badly needed however.
November 3, 2005 at 1:39 pm #762878Saucy Jack
ParticipantMartin Cullen has been handed a “hospital” pass.
He won’t be able to deliver any of his aspirational plan on time or budget.
Bertie is the cleverest and most cunning of them all.November 3, 2005 at 7:13 pm #762879Anonymous
InactiveHa Ha
The opposition are going to have a field day; Martin’s motorway to Donegal to pick up Jim whilst his licence is suspended. 10 years for a little tunnel in Dublin and a phased metro.
I think it is time to emmigrate
November 3, 2005 at 8:38 pm #762880Sue
ParticipantRiddle me this – especially any engineers out there!
If they build a hole the size of Grand Central Station under Stephen’s Green, do they (a) take the soil out at the Green and take it away by lorry, presumably up Leeson Street or (b) start tunnelling at the airport and ship all the soil from under the Green all the way up the 18km tunnel and then take it away by lorry? :confused:
November 3, 2005 at 10:43 pm #762881dc3
ParticipantMight be an idea to look hard at the terms of the Guinness bequest of St Stephens Green to the State, and what it might have said about about future usage, if anything.
Well before all this winds up in the High Court, a la Carlton site, Carrickmines etc. Amazing that there is as yet no comments much on the impact of this plan on perhaps the finest square in Ireland.P.S. The Green park area is managed by OPW – and is in Parlon Country
– is this perhaps part of a plan to achieve decentralisation by making the St Stephens Green area a no go area?I’ll take a couple of trucks of topsoil from the flowerbeds
November 3, 2005 at 11:03 pm #762882anto
Participantwon’t this reenforce the drift of the city centre to the southside? Nobody will think of O Connell street as the city centre any more but Stephen’s green. A missed opportunity to extend the city centre a bit. I suppose stephen’s green is where everybody wants to go but by having Grand Central say in Parnell Square or somewhere like that we could get more footfall into other areas in the city centre.
November 3, 2005 at 11:10 pm #762883Anonymous
Inactivejust a thought… i find it quite odd the way we still keep our old train carriages. the amount of times i see a dart coming with 4 new carriages and 2 old ones attached or 6 new and 2 old… why can’t they just get rid of the old ones completely and have all new trains? it seems a bit silly. if a job is going to be done it should be done right. people could say that the old ones might be needed for capacity but they should have them all new in my opinion. otherwise what’s the point? just buy enough new carriages and dump the old…. :confused:
November 3, 2005 at 11:14 pm #762884Anonymous
Inactiveoh, i forgot to mention… i have seen a few darts that have all new carriages. i like them.
November 3, 2005 at 11:18 pm #762885notjim
ParticipantI think we are getting carried away with this grand central station, it will be an interchange of two underground lines and a luas. O’Connell Street, similarily, will have an interchange of two luases and a metro and generally the plan is pretty even handed between the north and the south and kinder to the northside universities: dcu and dit than to the southside one, ucd. in point of fact the geographical centre and population centre of dublin is probably somewhere south of the green and everyone knows the real centre of town is college green where i think there will be a luas, metro interchange.
November 3, 2005 at 11:45 pm #762886Frank Taylor
Participant@Sue wrote:
Riddle me this – especially any engineers out there!
If they build a hole the size of Grand Central Station under Stephen’s Green, do they (a) take the soil out at the Green and take it away by lorry, presumably up Leeson Street or (b) start tunnelling at the airport and ship all the soil from under the Green all the way up the 18km tunnel and then take it away by lorry? :confused:
Metro stations are dug out and constructed first. Tunnelling machine is then driven through them to connect them. So the spoil must be removed by road.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

