Macken St Bridge – Santiago Calatrava
- This topic has 348 replies, 89 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
Service charge.
- AuthorPosts
- March 9, 2009 at 12:25 pm #744407
GregF
ParticipantThe DDDA website says that it’s currently under construction……
http://www.dublindocklands.ie/index.jsp?p=327&n=514&a=1015
I’ve seen the pier in the river. It looks as if it might be the pivot on which the bridge will rotate to open and close.
March 9, 2009 at 4:08 pm #744408alonso
Participantah yes Greg, that makes more sense – it’s circular in shape
March 9, 2009 at 9:56 pm #744409Devin
ParticipantWas passing by tonight and they’ve lifted it into place!:

Just joking :D:D
March 10, 2009 at 5:51 am #744410marmajam
Participantoriginally delayed due to DCC reluctant to bear cost.
construction slow due to critical need for bridge pivot pier to be exactly right.April 5, 2009 at 1:04 pm #744411CraigFay
ParticipantPassed by yesterday and got a couple of pics
April 6, 2009 at 12:04 pm #744412SunnyDub
ParticipantIt’s great to finally see some progress, hopefully the next phase will be quicker and we’ll see a bridge span soon…
April 8, 2009 at 9:59 am #744413tomk
ParticipantLooks like there will be some visibly progressive work done over the next few weeks. Our workplace which is in the area got notification yesterday about the closure of the junction of the Northside quay and Guild St to facilitate major works for the bridge’s northern side (raising of road to meet bridge etc) over Easter weekend and subsequent weeks.
April 9, 2009 at 9:31 am #744414Rusty Cogs
Participant2011 folks, don’t throw your ferry tickets away just yet.
April 9, 2009 at 9:43 am #744415poukai
ParticipantWasn’t it 2010?
I’m also glad to see progress on this, and have also been eagerly watching the work on the small building on the south bank… Looks like a 50’s american trailer, without the chrome, and I like the copper roof. Wonder what it will be used for, is it some kind of control place for the bridge opening or something entirely different?April 9, 2009 at 10:31 am #744416GregF
ParticipantI suppose it’s a wonder they haven’t abandoned it given the present credit crunch and state of financial affairs.
April 9, 2009 at 12:12 pm #744417Rusty Cogs
ParticipantDespite sinage to the contrary it was always 2011. Whether engineering or cash flow has turned it into such a strung out project is another question.
April 9, 2009 at 3:50 pm #744418JoePublic
Participant@Rusty Cogs wrote:
Despite sinage to the contrary it was always 2011. Whether engineering or cash flow has turned it into such a strung out project is another question.
How could it possibly be 2011 :confused:.
I certainly appears that the work on quays and the support in the river are nearly finished, I can’t see how it could take until even the end of this year before the main bridge appears?
Where do you get your 2011 date Rusty?
April 9, 2009 at 6:33 pm #744419Rusty Cogs
Participant@JoePublic wrote:
How could it possibly be 2011 :confused:.
I certainly appears that the work on quays and the support in the river are nearly finished, I can’t see how it could take until even the end of this year before the main bridge appears?
Where do you get your 2011 date Rusty?
I asked Paul Maloney (DDDA Chief Executive)
April 24, 2009 at 1:18 pm #744420darkman
ParticipantOk, I can now present the visual evidence of the bridge under construction in Holland – it is to be transported over on the 2nd or 3rd of May according to local papers there and posters on a Dutch forum
Oh yeah it exists alright!



“- Transportation date on 2 or 3 May (from the yard)
– In May It will be placed on the concrete column in the river
– Completed in November 2009. Then it also gets its official name: Samuell Beckett Bridge”😀
April 24, 2009 at 1:40 pm #744421alonso
Participantis this for real? do you have a link?
April 24, 2009 at 2:01 pm #744422darkman
ParticipantCan’t post the link as it is a forum link. Trust me – that IS the bridge.
April 24, 2009 at 2:43 pm #744423pippin101
ParticipantSo we’re back to 2009. That makes sense if it shows up here in May – because then it could not possibly take until 2011 to finish.
April 24, 2009 at 3:36 pm #744424gunter
ParticipantAre they sure this is a Calatrava!
. . . . and they didn’t just buy it from some bloke at the airport
April 24, 2009 at 3:53 pm #744425ctesiphon
Participant
Given the current trend towards corporate sponsorship of new constructions (O2, Aviva), do you think Viagra would be interested in this one? Those cables could be a little tauter…
April 24, 2009 at 5:12 pm #744426cgcsb
Participantexcellent news. How tall is the bridge? will it be taller than the conference centre?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

