Luas, Metro and DART – Drawings and Photomontages
- This topic has 216 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- December 16, 2010 at 7:43 am #813284
admin
Keymasterhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5prJe0l7M64&feature=related
We now know where those printing plates from the French Central Bank went when they disapeared from Charles De Gaulle’s freight hall under suspicious circumstances.
December 16, 2010 at 11:32 pm #813285Anonymous
Inactive“ … to be user freindly… “
“…should the dominence of buses and cars …”
“DU will be grade seperated and have 4 directions into two routes i.e. 1:1 “
“.. 150m down an escalator….. (Pearse interchange)“
“ Stephens Green is the centre of the City; distances may for the pruposes of … “
“I think you will find electrificiation to Maynooth … “
“The N17 of Sawdoctor fame was actually Kilburn High Road … “
“ … when they disapeared from Charles … “and now for the punchline
“Some of us graduated from Kilburn … “December 17, 2010 at 9:23 am #813286admin
KeymasterBovered?
Stay on top; the design of Pearse underground is a level of perfection you will never reach.
December 17, 2010 at 9:24 am #813287Anonymous
InactiveA note of caution was sounded by Tim Brick, executive director of the Irish Academy of Engineering. He warned that public consultation by way of An Bord Pleanála and environmental assessments had failed to win public support in a wide range of projects from the Shell to Sea campaign to the Dublin Port Tunnel.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/innovation/2010/1217/1224285355107.html
If architecture doesn’t uplift our spirits has it failed?
December 17, 2010 at 9:31 am #813288admin
Keymaster“It is a natural corridor,” he points out.
Nope its a €3bn hole in the ground the IMF won’t sanction.
The Green Way was originally conceived in response to the 2009 report of the Government’s High-Level Action Group on Green Enterprise which stated that Ireland needed to “develop one or more green zones in order to create an environment that can support the development of green enterprise and be used to market Ireland overseas”.
Give Martin Naughton some cash and he will give you green jobs in Dunleer, so the locals don’t need to commute to Dublin; ABP recognised this when they prevented MN from even considering park n ride north of Swords. But for the fantasists this was disaster, almost 40% of projected peak ridership was conditioned out of the equation.
“We wish to create an internationally recognised green economic zone and position Ireland as a leader in the world’s most exciting and rapidly growing sector,” says Tony Boyle, chairman of the Steering Committee for An tSlí Ghlas. “The potential of this project, which builds on our existing assets and infrastructure, is that it can assist in the transformation of our economy.”
Problem solved; build it in Park West its already got a rail line….
December 19, 2010 at 1:14 pm #813289Anonymous
InactiveEven the video makes the walk from DART to DART in Pearse look very long.It’s a design flaw that should have been ironed out from the start, but it’s not that big a deal that the project shouldn’t go ahead..The part of the walkway that’s done in stone looks quite cool…
December 19, 2010 at 6:05 pm #813290admin
KeymasterIn an ideal World you would have two platforms backing on to each other or at right angles; in reality you have got to work with the plots that are available, working out where access is currently weak relative to existing access and delivering the project without considerable disturbance during the construction phase. Once built a 200m walk will take the average commuter 2 minutes a distance that probably seems longer watching youtube than dodging commuters when you’re on the move.
December 20, 2010 at 11:30 am #813291Anonymous
Inactive@EIA340600 wrote:
…It’s a design flaw that should have been ironed out from the start, but it’s not that big a deal that the project shouldn’t go ahead..
Unfortunately for CIE/IE it is a big deal as they would have to change the alignment of a large portion of the DU.
Phase1 of the Draft Dart Underground Railway Order (DU RO) decided on the alignment (with no consultation with the public … not even Dart Users) and from then they have all had “Tunnel Vision”.
While Pearse DU (as designed) is a fiasco, retaining some North/South service would alleviate the need to interchange at Pearse.
Imagine spending 2.5 billion, and CIE have admitted to not having done a count on the “Current Dart Users” affected or even a straw poll on the their likely shift to the car. CIE/IE have “Transport21” logo on all their documentation but refuse to contemplate retaining some service directly from North to South (as envisioned in Transport21) … as I said “Tunnel Vision”.December 21, 2010 at 6:39 pm #813292admin
Keymasterit is a big deal as they would have to change the alignment of a large portion of the DU.
Where would they have put the entrance then? Pearse as it stands is bursting at the seams in terms of its existing passenger load; are you suggesting that they should have funnelled the commuter load from West Dublin and Kildare into the same entrance?
even a straw poll on the their likely shift to the car.
A choice of an additional range of stations and routings and a better service on all lines due to elimination of the loopline capacity constraint; I wonder why they didn’t ask passengers why such an improvement would drive them into their cars…..
December 22, 2010 at 9:00 pm #813293Anonymous
Inactive@PVC King wrote:
Where would they have put the entrance then? Pearse as it stands is bursting at the seams in terms of its existing passenger load; are you suggesting that they should have funnelled the commuter load from West Dublin and Kildare into the same entrance
This is the last time I am going to answer ridiculous questions.
The entrances to DU as suggested are quite OK but the escalators should rise directly from DU up into Pearse mainline … no contention there as the Maynooth line as suggested in the DU RO goes through Pearse mainline .. and any interchanging passengers ( e.g. for St Stephens Green) go directly down escalators to the DU.A choice of an additional range of stations and routings and a better service on all lines due to elimination of the loopline capacity constraint; I wonder why they didn’t ask passengers why such an improvement would drive them into their cars…..
It is not a better service for a large number of “Current Dart Users”, hence it is not a better service on all lines
DU should enhance DART services for “Current Dart Users” not curtail their choice of direct destination or impose an ill thought out interchange .. the adverse effects of the poor design on “Current Dart Users” is so far not publicly estimated, not even by a published straw poll. To ask rail passengers if they would like a better service would be a ridiculous exercise.December 22, 2010 at 9:18 pm #813294admin
KeymasterThe entrances to DU as suggested are quite OK but the escalators should rise directly from DU up into Pearse mainline … no contention there as the Maynooth line as suggested in the DU RO goes through Pearse mainline .. and any interchanging passengers ( e.g. for St Stephens Green) go directly down escalators to the DU.
You overlook four key points
1. The space does not exist to get all passengers out of the existing and new routes; a new entrance was required.
2. No plot large enough to accomodate a new station entrance existed any closer that wasn’t a protected structure
3. No underground interchange is without underground passages
4. The existing station is on an elevated railway which increases the distance required to introduce a camber for.The distance including escalators is about 200m from platform to platform which is well within acceptable comparable standards; on balance the new station entrance location is the best acheivable.
I
t is not a better service for a large number of “Current Dart Users”, hence it is not a better service on all lines
DU should enhance DART services for “Current Dart Users” not curtail their choice of direct destination or impose an ill thought out interchange .As above 200m cannot be considered an ill thought out interchange, I would refer to Bank, Bond Street and Green Park in London and Gare Montparnasse in Paris as having far longer interchanges as does central in Hong Kong. I can see merit in all trains on Howth, Malahide, Drogheda & Dundalk stopping in Clontarf to create a more direct interchange for northciders using Tara St and Connolly Station but that would be an operational and not a physical infrastructure issue.
. the adverse effects of the poor design on “Current Dart Users” is so far not publicly estimated, not even by a published straw poll. To ask rail passengers if they would like a better service would be a ridiculous exercise.
Asserted poor design is not a generally held view; no doubt the DTO did significant research and I very much doubt that length of interchange scored highly in their research. The top 3 would have I would hazard a guess have been
1. More desinations
2. More frequency
3. New trainsDecember 23, 2010 at 9:56 pm #813295Anonymous
InactiveI have made and will continue to make one undeniable point … the designers of DU RO as drafted have missed the target of DU under Pearse mainline by a large distance. The station design where commuters are required, after rising to surface level, to go down and cross under Cumberland Street to get to Pearse mainline only exasperates the daft alignment, and is an insult to current DART users.
Arguing about entrances and keeping the station open cut no ice, and are shown to be only red herrings.
No point in bringing up other things like your bad maths and your failure to look at the DU RO Diagrams.
“DU will be grade seperated and have 4 directions into two routes i.e. 1:1 “
“.. 150m down an escalator….. (Pearse interchange)“
You are preventing real architectural discussion
December 24, 2010 at 7:46 am #813296admin
KeymasterReal architectural discussion would be discussing the finishes which are very good or the cool clean lines of the new station; although you did repeat ad nauseum that it was something like a loo at the bottom of your garden.
200m is not a long distance as International comparison has shown. You fail to see its wider context in planning, engineering and delivery terms. But again the 4 directions into 2 routes equation was too much for you, which I will rxplain one last time
The loopline is a problem precisely because the spur to Maynooth is no grade seperated and each South bound train fed into the loopline from Maynooth must cross the Northbound Howth/Drogheda path; this leads to delays on avery large basis as three directions do not go into 2 lines. As DU will see all north bound Darts surface from the Interconnector in grade seperated paths this cross over is eliminated in the case of the majority of movements; adding the Kildare direction of Dart moves the equation by adding an additional route. 4 directions, 4 tracks on two routing directions. 1:1
You need to remember your Shannon gaffe and plenty of others.
December 25, 2010 at 6:21 pm #813297Anonymous
Inactive@PVC King wrote:
Real architectural discussion would be discussing the finishes which are very good or the cool clean lines of the new station; although you did repeat ad nauseum that it was something like a loo at the bottom of your garden….
200m is not a long distance …Discussing the merits or otherwise of the above platform level station are pointless as long as the loo is at the bottom of the garden and you still have not viewed the draft DU RO for Pearse.
Don’t tell me you think Shannon is near Kilburn …. people in here can decide who made the gaffeDecember 26, 2010 at 6:59 pm #813298admin
KeymasterPosting on Christmas Day how sad; you should have been opening your second bottle of Dom 1990 by that stage of the day getting ready for a good armagnac.
cagey wrote:
Do you have to be told every little detail PVC …. find out for yourself.To interchange at Pearse You will have to go through two ticket barriers.
You keep refering to the plans but never post them other than those that don’t back up anything you say.
The words of the song mention turning left for Shannon … very difficult to do from Kilburn. (say sorry)
Do you ever look anything up???Don’t tell me you think Shannon is near Kilburn …. people in here can decide who made the gaffe
Lets look at the words of the song.
Well the ould fella left me to shannon
Was the last time I traveled that road
And as we turned left at claregalwayBehind all those muddled up problems
Of living on a foreign soil
I can still see the twists and the turns on the road
From the square to the town of the tribes,
The exact distance between Kilburn and Shannon is 60 mins airtime, 25 mins clearing the airport, 15 mins to Paddington on Heathrow Express and 9 mins on the Bakerloo line or about 109 mins from take off.
You fail to understand the context of anything, I bet the interchange from the Express to the Bakerloo which is also about 200m would be a problem for you as well.
December 28, 2010 at 1:50 pm #813299Anonymous
Inactive… the square to the town of the tribes
“The Town of the Tribes” is Galway and the N17 runs from Tuam to Galway ….. seems pointless telling you anything.
I am unable to post in here, so you need to look at “dartunderground RO” for yourself.
And DU Pearse is still a loo at the bottom of the garden.December 28, 2010 at 3:44 pm #813300admin
KeymasterSeeing as you add nothing to the discourse other than a loo; do you object to the 200m distance between the Heathrow Express and the Bakerloo line? which is the shortest of the Paddington interchanges.
January 2, 2011 at 7:12 am #813301Anonymous
InactivePlease quit with the red herrings … DU RO has only one underground.
The original alignment was for a station under Cumberland Street … that was when the loo was in the house … since then it has been downhill all the way for current DART users.
Docklands, St Stephen’s and Heuston interchange directly above. The mobility people have made a submission to return to the original alignment.
BTW I have the exact measurements for Pearse but insist you do your own homework.January 3, 2011 at 4:51 pm #813302admin
KeymasterCan you either post the drawings of the RO alignment and the alleged draft alignment; both in pdf form or specific weblinks to indiviudal drawings or withdraw your comments which are immature in the extreme and add nothing to the discussion.
January 7, 2011 at 5:29 am #813303Anonymous
Inactive@PVC King wrote:
… your comments which are immature in the extreme and add nothing to the discussion.
Precisely what you do … block those who might have an answer before it is too late, and never say sorry when you are wrong. Go do your own research. Maybe you should start with putting “Tuam N17” into Google.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

