Luas Central – Which Route?
- This topic has 319 replies, 62 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 10 months ago by
Smithfield Resi.
- AuthorPosts
- March 27, 2007 at 12:57 pm #763615
Anonymous
InactiveRPA selects the worst option (IMO!)
Agency recommends Luas lines be linked at O’Connell Street
The Sunday Business Post
The two Luas lines should be linked in a single loop that would run up O’Connell Street and down Marlborough Street, according to the agency that runs the Dublin tram system. The Railway Procurement Agency (RPA) is in favour of a route linking the Sandyford and Tallaght lines along O’Connell Street in a loop that would run east along Cathal Brugha Street and south along Marlborough Street before crossing the Liffey over a new bridge. The agency wants a single track along the west side of O’Connell Street past the GPO, in a bid to reduce disruption in the city centre. A decision on the preferred route was taken at a meeting of the RPA board last week. Consultations are expected between the agency and the Minister for Transport, Martin Cullen, in light of the board’s decision.
The RPA have opted for an elaborate loop that will run the green line up o’connell street, turn right on to cathal brugha, back down marlborough street & across a new bridge over the liffey.
So now Dawson, Grafton, College Green, Westmoreland, O’Connell & Marlborough streets are to be plouged up while a new one way bridge across the liffey is also to be constructed which given its impact on the river & the vista from o’connell bridge, could only be justified, in my view, if it saved the disruption to o’connell st & college green.
The benefits of this link up are questionable on so many levels, clearly no consideration has been given to the impact on the cities streetscapes or how effectively luas can function passing through the major arteries of this city.
This is the wrong decision.
March 27, 2007 at 1:40 pm #763616notjim
ParticipantYes, I find this amazing, it seemed to me the central route and back of tcd up marlboro street routes both has strong arguements in their favour and this combination of the two has none of the advantages of either. It is completely perplexing.
March 27, 2007 at 2:20 pm #763617Paul Clerkin
KeymasterCouldn’t believe it when I read it on Sunday – a very strange route indeed – its like they decided “lets use the Luas to regenerate some streets – which ones?”
March 27, 2007 at 2:24 pm #763618jimg
ParticipantI’ve been a strong supporter of the link up on grounds of utility but if this is the final decision, then I would actually oppose it. This combines all the WORST aspects of EVERY single option offered to the public:
- A new bridge. 😡 😡
- Wires not only on College Green/Westmoreland Street/O’Connell St but also on five other streets. Basically double the amount of poles and wires without any corresponding increase in coverage.
- Disruption during construction not only on College Green/Westmoreland Street/O’Connell St but also on five other streets.
- A circuitous route somewhat away from the central axis without ANY increase in rail integration (for example by linking with Pearse or Tara St.)
- A configuration which will make it extremely difficult to continue the line to Phibsboro and Finglas as originally planned.
- Even more interruption to other forms of public transport, cyclists and pedestrians travelling the length O’Connell St. as it has to cross from the West side of O’Connell St. to Cathal Brugha St. “Cutting off” the top of the street.
- A confusing route for users – particular tourists with it’s separated “one way” coverage of different streets.
How the hell can they justify this route? What is the rationale? Because it has a bit of everything?
March 28, 2007 at 12:01 am #763619GrahamH
ParticipantNothing more to add. What a disasterous decision, especially on the environmental front 😡
March 28, 2007 at 8:34 pm #763620Anonymous
Inactive@GrahamH wrote:
Nothing more to add. What a disasterous decision, especially on the environmental front 😡
Any news on a timetable?
The clearest signal this sends out is that the timetable for metro is in serious trouble.
I really hope that this is an election stunt and that nothing is prepared before this can be seriously considered
March 28, 2007 at 11:25 pm #763621Morlan
ParticipantMy biggest concern is the proposed bridge across An Life. A cheapo Luas bridge will destroy the breezy view down the river from O’C bridge, and believe me, the bridge will be cheapo (see the Grand Canal bridge).
It’d be a damn shame to squander so much money on a bridge that will wreck part of the boardwalk when O’C bridge has plenty space for two tram tracks.
March 29, 2007 at 12:45 am #763622Anonymous
Inactivethis is the thing, a bridge at that point + the associated wires etc is really unfortunate … as i said the only way i think it could be justified is if it saved o’connell street & college green etc. and even at that a streamlined, well designed construction would be essential.
but no, its only a one way … the worst possible solution 😡
September 28, 2007 at 10:35 pm #763623Morlan
ParticipantOne step closer to line BX being scrapped altogether?
€100m Luas link derailed
Friday September 28 2007
THE long overdue link-up between the two existing Luas lines has been further delayed to avoid digging up Dublin streets and crippling motorists and businesses for longer than absolutely necessary.
The €100m project to connect the Tallaght and Sandyford lines at O’Connell St, Dublin, will not start now until 2009 at the earliest , the same time as the €5bn Metro.
The link-up from St Stephen’s Green to O’Connell Street will involve digging up much of the city centre around TCD and Westmoreland Street, while the Metro will roughly follow the same route underground.
Instead of digging up the streets for the Luas link-up, and later digging them up again for the Metro it is now expected that both projects will get underway at the same time.
The Railway Procurement Agency and Transport Minister Noel Dempsey yesterday unveiled two proposed routes for the new Luas line from Lucan to the the city centre.
The line will serve Ballyfermot, Liffey Valley and Lucan and is scheduled to be completed by 2013. It will carry up to 25m passengers every year, with a journey time of 42 minutes from Lucan to the city centre.
It will connect to the two existing lines, as well as the Irish Rail network and the proposed metro between the airport and the city centre.
The public is being asked to give its opinion on which route should be chosen, one of which is closer to Ballyfermot.
At a press conference to launch the Luas line, Frank Allen, chief executive of the Railway Procurement Agency (RPA), expressed disappointment that there had not been speedier progress on the city centre link-up.
“We had hoped to have achieved consensus on the route more quickly but that has not happened,” he said.
A new Luas bridge across the River Liffey is being designed to carry trams as part of the new agreed route which runs up O’Connell St and back down Marlborough St before crossing the river.
It is now expected that the link-up and the Metro will start together to avoid digging up streets for one project and then repeating the exercise later.
Mr Dempsey said it was more important to get the project right than doing it fast.
“There is no point in having to dig up the city centre for five or seven years if you can do this in a shorter timescale,” he added.
September 28, 2007 at 10:38 pm #763624Morlan
ParticipantNew Luas line set for launch
Thursday September 27 2007
A BRAND new Luas line from Lucan to Dublin city centre, capable of carrying 20 million passengers annually, will be unveiled today.
The F line is expected to be finished in 2013 and will serve Ballyfermot, Liffey Valley and Lucan.
It will open up a new tram corridor on the south inner city for areas that now have poor rail access.
The line will also connect to the existing Tallaght and Sandyford Luas lines, Irish rail commuter services and the proposed Metro North.

http://www.rpa.ie/upload/documents/Luas%20Line%20F%20Route%20Options%20Detailed%20Drawing.pdf
September 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm #763625PTB
ParticipantOh sweet Jesus Christ.
September 29, 2007 at 6:18 pm #763626Anonymous
Inactive@PTB wrote:
Oh sweet Jesus Christ.
My thoughts exactly.
Suggestion. Instead of spending 500m+ on the Lucan Luas which will snake in to town in a nauseating 42 minutes, aka. 55 minutes; why not create 2 QBC feeder routes through Lucan to Adamstown & Fonthill Dart stations, put the staggering savings towards the interconnector & get comuters to Stephen’s Green in half the time.
Never mind the added bonus of not ploughing up every shaggin main artery in this city.
September 29, 2007 at 6:49 pm #763627Anonymous
Inactive
You’re talking little more than a mile from the centre of the housing sprawl above to either adamstown or fonthill.
October 4, 2007 at 5:30 pm #763628Devin
Participant
The first piece of track has been laid on the Luas Docklands extension – good.
But all the other Luas news is BAD. Last Friday there was a piece in the paper saying the city-centre link won’t commence work until 2009, the same time as Metro North, because it would be practical to start them both together. That’s bollocks! The Luas link needs to start NOW. Never mind this metro bollocks. It’s too expensive and there isn’t the density in Dublin to justify it. Get the overground rail sorted out first.
The motor car has free run of almost every street in the city centre and it makes for an appalling environment of extremely low comfort levels which is off-putting to visitors and reduces quality of life for locals. The motor car needs to be ruthlessly suppressed in Dublin and trams are the thing to do it. You only have to go to Bordeaux to see this, a city which is quite comparable to Dublin in size.
November 7, 2007 at 1:04 pm #763629SeamusOG
ParticipantI hope the board will forgive me a bit of hubris in quoting one of my own posts.:o
It’s simply that, in the light of recent discussions (here and elsewhere) about the possibility of the city centre LUAS link-up being scrapped, I see this as a way of solving potential conflicts between buses and trams in the area south of College Green.
@Seamus O’G wrote:
Perhaps someone could help out here, as I can’t seem to copy the picture illustrating option E.
It’s just that a thought occurred to me over the weekend about this possibility, which is comfortably the least favoured option on this forum.
And it’s this. If the trams were to go South instead of North along Dawson Street, and North instead of South along Kildare Street, it might help to reduce the conflicts between the trams and buses in and around TCD. There could be a tram stop on the East side of Dawson Street (perhaps doubling with a station around the corner on the South side of Nassau Street), the West side of Kildare Street and the East side of Westmoreland Street; and bus stops on the West side of Dawson Street, the East side of Kildare Street, the North side of Nassau Street, Suffolk Street, the West side of Westmoreland Street, and College Street. In other words, all the bus stops which we currently have would remain, with the exception of the ones outside TCD on the bottom of Grafton Street.
What I’m trying to get at, this would reduce the amount of road space where buses and trams are actually sharing road space and also travelling in the same direction to perhaps a couple of hundred metres (between the bottom of Dawson Street and the stretch around the front of TCD), with the loss only of the stops at the front of TCD, the potential conflicts could be seriously reduced.
The same kind of thing could also be achieved by reversing the bus flows along Dawson Street and Kildare Street. With the current arrangements around St. Stephen’s Green, that might even be more favourable.
Anybody get what I’m on about?
It does not, I fully agree, deal with the issue of College Green itself, or Westmoreland Street or O`Connell Street.
I see no alternative to banning private vehicles from College Green if buses and trams are to live together efficiently in this area. With the current arrangement where so many buses pass through College Green, this would simply have to happen.
However, with four lanes of traffic currently passing between TCD and the BOI at College Green, it should be possible to convert this little stretch into two lanes for trams and two lanes for buses. (Even if TCD had to cede a couple of feet).
I don’t think the above arrangement would impinge on the plan to have the trams travel along Marlborough Street in one direction. I think that is a weird plan, but I don’t think the above proposal would impinge on it to any great extent.
(And apologies to GrahamH as, if implemented, it would in all likelihood involve overhead wires being present in College Green).
College Green does seem to be the real snag point. And there’s really only one solution for that, albeit one which users of private vehicles may see as a Domesday scenario. But if such a decision were to be taken, I’d suggest that the above solution about a variation on option E might be one which could make the link-up run quite efficiently as a whole.
Or is there some very obvious problem that I’ve missed?
Please help, as I quite like this one.:)
November 7, 2007 at 3:36 pm #763630-Donnacha-
ParticipantHas anyone ever consider putting the Luas into a tunnel under TCD as a solution. Perhaps it would have to go too deep and the risk of cracking would prevent this?
OR doing the unthinkable and put it actually through TCD, across the back of cricket grounds and rugby pitch and possibly through some of the crap old offices that TCD are planning to redevelop, or through the relatively recently social welfare offices.
An Taisce would no doubt love that idea!!
Gaudi
November 7, 2007 at 4:32 pm #763631notjim
ParticipantThe solution is, of course, to reverse the direction that traffic goes around tcd.
November 15, 2007 at 6:26 pm #763632shamrockmetro
Participanti have all the answers!!!!! not
i will post some ideas’s later.. they just came to me…
February 12, 2008 at 12:00 am #763633Anonymous
InactiveThe Irish Times wrote:New public transport bridge over Liffey agreed
Olivia KellyDublin City Council plans to build a new Luas and public transport bridge across the river Liffey from Marlborough Street to Hawkins Street, even though the Railway Procurement Agency (RPA) has yet to determine the route of the proposed Luas line.
The current city development plan allows for the construction of a footbridge at the site. South-east area councillors yesterday approved a council management proposal to seek a change to the development plan to allow the construction of the new bridge from Eden Quay to Burgh Quay.
The council is proposing to build a bridge to accommodate a southbound Luas line as well as two bus lanes, two cycle lanes and two footpaths, and hopes soon to seek tenders for its design. The council said it was seeking a “low-key design” to fit in with the surrounding architecture.
However, while the council is pressing ahead with its plans for the bridge, the RPA has yet to say whether this will be the route for the new Luas BX line, which will connect the Red and Green Luas lines across the city centre.
The RPA last year did identify its preferred option as a line from St Stephen’s Green to College Green, down Westmoreland Street and across O’Connell Bridge, down O’Connell Street and back up Marlborough Street to cross a new bridge]
“The council is proposing to build a bridge to accommodate a southbound Luas line as well as two bus lanes, two cycle lanes and two footpaths, and hopes soon to seek tenders for its design. The council said it was seeking a “low-key design” to fit in with the surrounding architecture.”
You’d want to make it feckin invisible lads. What kind of width are they talking here ? I’d just about accept a slender little job to facilitate luas (in a trade off to confine the damn thing to marlborough st. – even that presents serious design challenges) but this yoke sounds like its set to challenge O’Connell Bridge itself, essentially 4-5 lanes wide.
The rhythm & flow of the liffey’s bridges, fairly evenly spaced it has to be said, is to be botched up.
February 22, 2008 at 8:37 pm #763634rperse
ParticipantAfter seeing the irresponsible plans favoured for the luas connection route im now of the opinion that a complete rethink is needed. I was in favour of a westland row route but am now of the opinion that none of the listed routes best serve what is trying to be achieved.
The main reason for my change in view has come after seeing plans for the lucan luas line. Two termini are possible: either a bizarre loop around stephens green or an ugly pole heavy terminus in college green. Looking at the rpa map of the scheme you have the strong possibility of two luas lines (Green and Lucan) terminating within 600 yards of each other. My suggestion is to link these two lines.
Reasons being:1)Both metro and interconnector will link the green and red lines
2) A Bridge at hawkins street would be an irresponsible and arrogant decision
3) The practical alternative to hawkins is o’connell bridge/street causing major disruption
4) Due to the dimensions of both college green and wmorel st, i feel neither should be used
5) The one way marlborough system would be confusing and difficult for future integration and expansionSo heres my idea:
Continue Green Luas up Dawson Street, left onto Nassau St and continue up Suffolk St.
Then turning down church lane (if its wide enough, or trinity st) to dame street connecting with lucan line.
Stops at Dawson St, Suffolk St (again if wide enough) and College green/Bank.
This would of course mean Dublin Bus would have to stop using suffolk st/church lane but a useful link from dame st to stephens green is created without disruption to college green/lower grafton street - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


