Loop Line Bridge – specifically the ads…

Home Forums Ireland Loop Line Bridge – specifically the ads…

Viewing 166 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #705863
      fjp
      Participant

      Would it be possible to place an official planning objection against the Loop Line Bridge adverts??? There’s no way they’d be granted permission today, and it’s not like they’re a permanent fixture.

      Who actually owns the Bridge anyway??

      Just in case this was the easy way of making it look a lot less tacky. I know some people object to it being there at all, but even they must admit that it could only look better as a railway bridge than the City’s longest and most visible bill-board.

      Could this actually be accomplished?? Come on Paul, think of the publicity your site would get if archiseek and co managed to get them taken down. It would be nice to make serious enquiries about this one (as opposed to just bitching).

      FIGHT THE POWER!!! et cetera.

      fjp

    • #723088
      Starch
      Participant

      where do you start though?

    • #723089
      notjim
      Participant

      Count me in fjp. Lets make a list of people to write to and then divide it up and see where we get. I guess we should just start by writing to CIE and the DDDA and DubCC asking what plans they have for improving the appearance of the bridge and take it from there. Is there any society or body interested in Victorian industrial architecture?

    • #723090
      urbanisto
      Participant

      I would imagine CIE Holding own the bridge… or rather maintain it on behalf of their one shareholder, the Minister for Transport, who controls that share in the interests of the company’s owner the State! Anyway…count me in too. Shall we include the Amiens Street and Talbot Street sections as well

    • #723091
      rperse
      Participant

      Maybe those behind the design of the new Tara Street station should tackle the loopline bridge aswell. The obvious problem with doing anything with the bridge is the interuption to this critical transport route. If, however, the proposed new dart line further down the river goes ahead (ddda plans), couldnt something serious then be done with the loopline bridge. ie Remove it or replace it

    • #723092
      DARA H
      Participant

      I don’t see any real reason to replace the bridge as it is now – it got its own character and particular function and i especially think it shouldn;t be replaced just becuase its not new or fashionable i.e. i’d thnik it’d be even more boring to replace it with another (modern/ fasionable) white, concrete or metal – cable-stay or not bridge – a la ‘LUAS’ bridge, either of the calatrava bridges, the motor way one up in Drogheda and others around Europe etc etc.
      As for removing the signs – in a peverse way i kind of like them ‘changing with the city’!? And as they have been existing advertsing structures for years i seriously dougt anybody other than CIE can remove them. Seeing that the govt. has always made them impoverished and play second fiddle to roads i wouldn’t want to deny them a handy money earner.

    • #723093
      fjp
      Participant

      Well, in my opinion the best results might cascade in this order:

      1. No ads. Nice bridge with cool night lighting. But some people do like the ads, and they make lots of money – so on to number 2.
      2. Removal of small crappy side ads (Tilestyle, Pepsi etc), but the retention of the Guinness ad (and Heinekan ad on east side) and the substantial revenue derived. Contact Guinness/Heinekan and ask them to design ads that are created specifically to complement the bridge. This design would have to reduce the area of the centre span covered, and perhaps give the impression of being on the “real” surface of the bridge as opposed to being on giant boxes stuck to the side. Guinness etc might like this kind of thing, and it could probably get them on the news (again). Cool night lighting.
      3. There is no 3.

      Re replacing the Bridge – that’s way off in the future. This is something that could be done much, much faster, and still have a very good effect on the Bridge. I don’t want to wait four years because they might be taking the Bridge down (completely different discussion) and then find that it never happens.

      By the way – the size of the side ads (Tilestyle) has actually increased in the last year or two.

      If what I’ve said above interests people, the information that might be handy would be:

      1. Who owns the Bridge – exactly who.
      2. The chain of responsibility for the adverts (where the buck starts and ends)
      3. The revenue from the ads/the ad rates.
      4. DCC’s pov on the matter?? Is there a current strategy for this structure.
      5. When did advertising begin??
      6. The advertisers ideas on the matter (Guinness, Heinekan, Tilestyle, Pepsi, etc)

      fjp

      (ps – the Tilestyle ads would have to moved somewhere very local, as I reckon they’re the only ads that are geographically relevant)

    • #723094
      fjp
      Participant

      Images from Saturday:

      one
      two
      three

      fjp

    • #723095
      GregF
      Participant

      It’s an awful looking thing is’nt it ……..I used to give it credit as an example of Victorian railway engineering……but it is mediocre, purely functional and visually awful. I’m not going on about not being able to see the Custom House that shell of a building because of the obtrusiveness of the bridge but because the bridge is just bloody awful in itself as it spans the Liffey. A makeover is required ……aka wallpaper, something that will benefit the views from O’Connell bridge, an arch stretching into the sky or something, rather than that drab horizontal featueless feature. It is now nearly 2003 AD not quaint dear auld imperial Dublin.

    • #723096
      urbanisto
      Participant

      Should we call Christo?

    • #723097
      GregF
      Participant

      …na…… Calatrava

    • #723098
      fjp
      Participant

      Well then is there anyway that the ads could be used to better effect??? I’ll readily admit that it’s very “criss-crossy”, but what’s on it now still needs improvement.

      fjp

    • #723099
      GregF
      Participant

      Remove the ads, they’re tacky. I’m all for adverts….neon signs and the lot in a city scape, adds life and colour….but this bridge as bad as it is, is done no justice either by the cluttered effect hoardings. Remove them and remodel the bridge………..and light up the new bridge’s profile/outline as like what has been done abroad in other cities. Pure wallpaper, but effective and far more aesthetic.

    • #723100
      GregF
      Participant

      Don’t these look good ………could be Dublin, if planners, thinkers, developers and politicians got their fingers out.

    • #723101
      GregF
      Participant

      ….great eh!

    • #723102
      GrahamH
      Participant

      No way should the ads remain, all ads are naff regardless of their scale or whereabouts, The painting of the bridge alone, in a light grey/ white colour, or the same off-white as the
      Ha’ penny bridge would make for a major improvement and lessen its impact substantially. Its illumination at nightime would make for a dramatic feature, in what is a very dark and dingy area after 5 o’ clock, around Tara Street Station. However white light is needed, none of that crappy orange light that destroys every other building after dark, and illumination of the whole structure is needed with large beams of light, no miserable little uplighters lined along its base, half of which will be blown before the electrician gets off his ladder.

    • #723103
      GregF
      Participant

      This bridge was overlooked was’nt it when all the bridges were supposedly illuminated as part of the Millennnium celebrations 2 years ago. What a disasterous and unsuccessful project…..moreso a waste of taxpayers and European money.
      To think that this bridge has the most impact on the city too.

    • #723104
      GrahamH
      Participant

      It was very unsucessful. I’ve never come across anything more tacky than the use of gaudy green light to illuminate the arches and piers, and orange light for the balustrades. O’ Connell Bridge has been destroyed with cabling, connection boxes, brackets and clips. Are we supposed to see the cut stone features but not notice the crap tacked onto bridge? Look at the state of it the next time you pass. All of the city’s bridges should be lit in pure brilliant white light from the quay walls, and the balustrades lit with those discrete white strip lights, instead of the current orange. Dublin & the Liffey is very compact & intimate, with many bridges. Imagine how spectacular it could be at night, esp enhanced with lanterns at regular intervals the whole way along the quaysides, from the Custom House to James’s Gate, like along the Thames in London.

    • #723105
      fjp
      Participant

      Hmm. I thought the green lights looked ok, but I suppose the other ones could have looked better.

      Anyhow, the space is auctioned off by Irish Rail in three year leases to an independant Advertising company (that I know the name of). The course of action (it would seem) would be to contact any of a number of persons recommended to me in Irish Rail and find out whether or not they would be willing to attempt a change on their policies on this bridge from within the organisation.

      Unless there are other suggestions, but I’m thinking of the open and non-sneaky “hey there” approach. Currently I’m also thinking about the soft sell “sensible” reduction in adverts, with the retention but improvement of the center span money makers. I just think this is a more attainable goal than no adverts (which has been discussed in Irish Rail in the past, and obviously didn’t happened).

      fjp

    • #723106
      fjp
      Participant

      The “no-adverts” thiong would probably involve getting some much more heavy guns in. Somehow the Government/Council woud have to over-rule Irish Rail’s authority on this matter, and then perhaps be forced to compensate them for the loss in revenue. Unless Irish Rail just decided to take them all off…

      Advice welcomed.

      fjp

    • #723107
      MG
      Participant

      One way, get the government to gave funds to Dublin City Council to buy the ad space from CIE and then leave it blank. I think it generates areound 300k per year.

    • #723108
      fjp
      Participant

      The ad space is auctioned off publically, and it wouldn’t seem to make sense for DCC to have to go up against private companies on this matter. The Gov needs to say “no more advertising from here on in”, and either give them the money they’ll lose from their budget or not. 300k a year is a lot…

      Planning permission is the other doorway of hard knocks. As they’re presumably a “temporary” structure, would this permission ever need to be renewed??? Or would permission need to be sought if the ads were changed physically in terms of size…

      hmm

      fjp

      (any other thoughts on leaving the big ads in place but making them more “subtle”???)

    • #723109
      LOB
      Participant

      As far as I know the ads predate ’63 so planning permission would not have been saught.

      If it was proposed to change or replace them I would imagine it would be subject to planning.

      Not much of an incentive.

    • #723110
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Considering the fashionabilty of resurrecting old threads, thought I might as well for this picture I found. Never seen it before but it was taken just before the erection of the Loop Line Bridge between 1882-89 or so.
      See how the whole city centre opens up without the bridge, and the magnificent view of the Custom House, it becomes part of the city again. I’ve heard people comment before about how there was only a paltry view of it but I think this proves to the contrary, esp if you consider the view from the middle of O’Cll Bridge, or better still from the southern quays along here.

      Looking at the view this morning, it’s really surprising how much of the Docklands and the remainder of the Liffey can be seen as it goes out to sea. You can imagine the view with the few glimpses of the area through the bridge and piers. The removal of this bridge would have the single biggest impact on the city centre since the construction of Liberty Hall, only this time in a constructive way.

    • #723111
      Anonymous
      Participant

      The lack of clutter is refreshing,

      and as Dublin’s Docklands start to go up one must ask can we afford the loopline advertising hoarding?

    • #723112
      GregF
      Participant

      This bridge simply needs remodelling to enhance the environment and vistas……Ok, it functions grand but we need the dress designers in to tart it up.

    • #723113
      LGL
      Participant

      The Loop Line bridge is a similar structure to the Hungerford Railway bridge across the Thames in London. A design competition was set by the cross river partnership in 1996 to aestethically update the hungerford bridge & include pedestrian assess across the river.
      The winning entry made a huge improvement

      something similar could work for the Loop-Line

    • #723114
      J. Seerski
      Participant

      Idea – Remove Adverts and paint white – the Railway Bridge in Athlone is really nice as white – Loopline would look much better and unobtrusive.

    • #723115
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      That is a good photo Graham, and yes I agree with you that the view would have been great. I thought as part of the Tara Street station office development the loop line was to be changed?

    • #723116
      shadow
      Participant

      Originally posted by LGL
      The Loop Line bridge is a similar structure to the Hungerford Railway bridge across the Thames in London. A design competition was set by the cross river partnership in 1996 to aestethically update the hungerford bridge & include pedestrian assess across the river.
      The winning entry made a huge improvement

      something similar could work for the Loop-Line

      Not so long ago there was a competition for the replacement of the Loop Line bridge. I have no idea where it went but there was a winning scheme.

    • #723117
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I remember seeing an image – think it resembled the pedestrian overpass on Westland Row.

    • #723118
      notjim
      Participant

      regarding LGL’s post, the hungerford bridge improvement didn’t alter the original bridge, it added the rather cool new pedestrian walkways. Why would pedestrians want to use the loopline? I guess the view would be good but where would you get down?

    • #723119
      Anonymous
      Participant

      null

    • #723120
      Devin
      Participant

      That pre-1891 picture is good alright. I’ve used it too as a comparison with the present-day view of the same scene (pic in next post) to tryn get some action on the replacement bridge project (which was by the Institute of Engineers Ireland).

    • #723121
      Devin
      Participant

      “Advertising to Loop Line Bridge
      Letters from the public appearing in national dailies indicate the unpopularity of the advertising billboards that adorn the Loop Line rail bridge (illustration 92, below). The project for the replacement of the 1890s bridge with a modern, transparent bridge (as featured by Frank McDonald in The Irish Times of May 21, 1998) and consequent removal of advertising would constitute a huge urban design and visual amenity improvement for the city centre.”

    • #723122
      GrahamH
      Participant

      The recent scheme was similar to the Trinity bridge, there’s a pic of it to the back of The Construction of Dublin.
      Don’t know what happened to the plan.

      Obviously the Loop Line will never be removed unless as part of a greater transport or underground rail plan for the city, but considering anything like that would be at least 10 years away, it is well worth upgrading the bridge now, regardless of whether it will be affected. Painting it white would make such a difference, combined with the removal of the signs. The lattice-work is actually quite attractive, were it visible it could make a contribution to the area.
      The only possible problem with white is the streaks of sooty dirt that may flow down the sides from the tracks – one need only look at the filth of the inside of the side walls.

      The best option by far though would be to remove it – it’s interesting that everyone knows the views of the Liffey facing west with the Ha’penny etc, but no one even bothers looking east because of the Loop Line. It divides the city in two, even moreso now with the Docklands development. The contribution a couple of so-called landmark buildings could make to city centre when viewed from there would be huge, let alone the important aspect of integrating the Docklands into the city at large, helping to eliminate the feeling of it being a private outcrop for business types.

      The removal of the Loop Line itself would also restore two other views in the city, the view of the Custom House from Gardiner Street, and the other being where the railway shoots itself in the foot, the view of Connolly from Talbot St and Nth Earl St.

    • #723123
      Devin
      Participant

      The latter would also restore the view from Connolly to the Pillar, now Spire, which is the longest axial view to the Spire.

      I agree it’ll probably be a while before the Liffey bit of the Loop Line is considered for replacement with a more see-thru bridge, and complete removal of the line I can’t see ever happening, so the best thing for now would be to have the advertisements removed and paint the latticework off-white. It would be fairly lookable-at then.

      It’s such a pity though. In the pre-1891 photo you can really see Dublin’s Venetian quality; a sweep of grand architecture by the water. Now the Custom House is just an isolated pretty building on a pounding traffic island.

    • #723124
      notjim
      Participant

      there is no point in replacing the bridge, removing it is another matter and an impractical one at that, but the loop line bridge itself is great, big clunky victorian cast iron.

    • #723125
      LGL
      Participant

      following up on notjim’s post

      A high level pedestrian link along the loopline (similar in style to the Hungerford idea) would allow pedestrians easy acess from tara street station (hign level) across the liffey twords the IFSC without having to interact with the traffic below.

      The volume of pedestrian traffic in the tara street area is high & overloads the current foorpath arrangements along the quays.

      By the way I realise Conolloy station serves the IFSC.

    • #723126
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by LGL

      A high level pedestrian link along the loopline (similar in style to the Hungerford idea) would allow pedestrians easy acess from tara street station (hign level) across the liffey twords the IFSC without having to interact with the traffic below.

      The volume of pedestrian traffic in the tara street area is high & overloads the current foorpath arrangements along the quays.

      By the way I realise Conolloy station serves the IFSC.

      I think you have a point about the footpaths being a bit overloaded, but the solution would propably be to widen them (if possible). I wouldn’t think that a pedestrian addition to the loop line bridge would do too much, as I think most people who use Tara Street Station are coming from the south quays or else from the O’Connell Street area and have crossed over at either O’Connell Street or else Butt Bridge. Those coming from the IFSC would probably use The Talbot Bridge. Also, I would assume that the Council would prefer to maintain pedestrians using the streets of the city, and reduce vehicle traffic rather than vice-versa.

    • #723127
      notjim
      Participant

      if there was access from the street as well as from the station, it would get you across two busy roads and, if it would have spectacular views. the big difficulty would be building it with wheel chair access from the street.

    • #723128
      urbanisto
      Participant

      I wouldnt see any need for a pedestrian element to the Loop Line. Matt Talbot and the new pedestrian bridge at chq more than surfice.

      My dream solution would be to put the Dart line underground from the Tolka to beyond Pearse. Mainline and Dart services could be more efficently organised under the exisiting Connollly building linking up with Luas and an underground link to Busaras. Tara Street would again stay underground with office development above. Same for Pearse with the dual line re-emerging between it and Grand Canal. The amaount of land freed up for redevelopment would contribute to the cost of the scheme.

    • #723129
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I was just thinking about the views Notjim. You’re right, they would be great.

    • #723130
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Well current DART users get to see it anyway!
      IFSC people do use the Matt Talbot, although there would be a benefit to having an overhead bridge if it meant avoiding the Tara St junction with the quays, which is a nightmare – so dangerous.
      Overall though, widened pavements and ped crossings etc would be far preferable.
      It would be great to sink the DART alright – one day, one day…

      I don’t see a point to replacing the Loop Line Bridge with a slimmer version, either keep a big lump of Victoriana (which if elsewhere in the country people would be charmed by) or restore the uninterrupted view. The bend in the Liffey looks fanatastic without it. Liberty Hall should also be knocked if the bridge were to go to restore the dominance of the Custom House.

    • #723131
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Oh purleese! Did you just drop in that little trojan “knock Liberty Hall” hoping noone would notice…?!?

      One project at a time Graham!!! Loop Line Bridge first.

      (maybe if you could knock Liberty Hall when all those naysayers from SIPTU are inside…?)

    • #723132
      LGL
      Participant

      further to the above

      The AA & other motoring bodies may objet to widening the footpaths ( narrowing an already congested quay commeter road)

      A High level pedestrian access to tara street stn as described could contribute a significant benifit to pedestrians in this location at a reasonably favourable cost. ( while enhancing a functional structure )

      Disabled access can be provided as with any other pedestrian overbridge by use of ramps.

      Links can be made to the board-walk and promenade in front of the custom hse, linking and opening up a considerable and attractive pedestrian space to the location.

      Agreed Stack-A bridge & other bridges are all positive improvements linking the quays for pedestrians. However above suggestion is specifically targeted twords accessing Tara St Stn & associated pedestrian traffic overloading at commuter times.

    • #723133
      notjim
      Participant

      very hard to give ramp access to a high bridge in an urban location.

    • #723134
      LGL
      Participant

      disabled access

      ramp @ 4% gradient

      Ht. of loopline above quays 6m approx

      length of ramp required 150m approx

      length of loopline between custom hse quay and intersection with Beresford place rd – approx 80m

      ramp from custom hse quay to landing at beresford quay – 75m
      ramp from landing to high level bridge over liffey – 75m

      It looks feasable at first glance on paper althought this would require a more detailed survey to check headroom clearances, landtake, possible obstructions etc.

    • #723135
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Yikes – someones been doing the sums 🙂

      Reading back d d dallas is funny alright – I’ll chuck in a belated ‘it would be nice if’

    • #723136
      shadow
      Participant

      You know that there are inventions such as elevators

    • #723137
      LGL
      Participant

      elevators = additional construction cost, additional maintenance costs, may require opperator & more susceptible to vandalism.

      This one is nearly solved, we could go to tender next wk.

    • #723138
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Just on the theme of advertising hoardings on Victorian Bridges, has anyone ever noticed the one on the North Strand with the ‘Bud is King’ muck across it.

      I had a good look at it recently and it really is a fantastic piece of work, not as ornate as the Westland Row bridge but very much in the same style.

    • #723139
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I am all in favour of CIE getting a return on their properties and they really have done a World Class job with Both Busaras and Heuston. But these hoardings deliver a small return in proportion to the visual destruction that is generated.

    • #723140
      Anonymous
      Participant

      That Bridge at Westland Row is pure class, its amazing what a bit of paint can do. Does anyone know the history of it?

    • #723141
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Dates from 1890 or 91 – can’t remember what’s printed on the base of the columns! Pearse had to be altered to essentially have a railway burst through its facade to take the the new line.
      Presumably the facade there now dates from this time also – a weird piece of architecture – as is the colour.
      Unfortunately the bridge doesn’t look so classy now with huge canvas draped over it advertising IE’s Student Card.

    • #723142
      Sue
      Participant

      Last time I asked – and I think I put this on another thread – Iarnrod Eireann said they had five year deals with a lot of the advertisers, and need those contracts to expire in order to start their clean-up. So they promise great things in the near future.

      Stunning picture, though, Graham. Whoever approved the Loopline bridge was a moron. Obscuring the view of Custom House from O’Connell Bridge is one of the greatest sacrileges ever perpetrated in Dublin. The bridge should be ripped down and the trains put in a tunnel under the Liffey.

    • #723143
      Devin
      Participant

      I heard through the pipeline that DCC are trying to get IE to do a ‘site swap’ for the Loop Line advertising hoardings so they won’t lose valuable revenue (that the government should be giving them but give to roads instead!) if they’re removed. And painting the bridge pale grey is mooted.

    • #723144
      Anonymous
      Participant

      How long ago did you ask Sue as you know five years flies in.

    • #723145
      GregF
      Participant

      The South Ciders and North Ciders advert is good. Bit farfetched to say that the bridge should be ripped down and a tunnel built so as just to see the reconstructed shell that is the Custom House. Instead, get Calatrava or the like in to remodel this part of the bridge. Would look good with an arch or somethig and fairy lights at night…more practical solution. The Dublin quays from Hueston Station to the Docklands in any way are really mediocre and unimpressive….really bland in other words. Bad example set here for the rest of the country.

    • #723146
      CM00
      Participant

      I have a copy of the old/new? design, it was in the Dublin Millenium book of 1989. It was quite sexy, with transparent walls allowing you to see right through. It made the trains look like they were floating on air. And it did restore the grand sweeping view spoken about earlier. I don’t think the addition of an “arch” is constructive at all, All you’re doing is adding uneccesary materials and support. Why obstruct the view further? At the very least, the advertisement hoarding should be removed and the bridge painted white. At the moment it just looks dingy. Having said that, white is much harder to keep clean, and with all that traffic…..

    • #723147
      lostcarpark
      Participant

      As far as I know, the Loop bridge is a listed structure, though that doesn’t mean very much if the minister decrees it in the “national interest” to get rid of it.

      I do think that if the advertising were removed from the bridges crossing the Liffey, Beresford Place, Gardiner Street and Amiens Street, and suitable illumination added, the result could be amazing.

      But let’s face it, no-one alive has been around to witness the custom house from O’Connell Bridge, and the skyline has totally changed in the last hundred years with the SIPTU tower and the IFSC looming over it from all sides. If the loop line was removed, it still wouldn’t be that much of a view. I think the loop line is part of the city’s charm, and while a rail tunnel is proposed, it is to complement the loop line not replace it.

    • #723148
      Sue
      Participant

      “The Loop Line is part of the city’s charm”

      Suffering Mother of the Divinity, I’ve heard it all now 😀

    • #723149
      notjim
      Participant

      so come on sue, the loop line bridge blocks the view of the river and is covered in ads, apart from that, what’s wrong with it? i think its a fine handsome victorian bridge typical of the great age of railway engineering and as good as anything that could replace it.

    • #723150
      Sue
      Participant

      apart from that, what’s wrong with it? This is like the “what did the Romans ever do for us” Monty Python sketch.
      So, ok, apart from the fact that the bridge is an eyesore and in the wrong place, what’s wrong with it? Er, well, that’s about it actually. Oh and it’s a big hulk of horrible metal that is about as “designed” as a Bertie Ahern interview
      The point is, it shouldn’t be there. The shortest distance between Pearse Street and Connolly station is just below the Custom House. Then there’d be no Loop at all…

      good grief – look at the bridges in cities like San Francisco, New York, even Newcastle, we’ve to make do with the Loop Line and then we’re told, sure, it has its own charm. This is more nonsensical nostalgia – the only reason why people like it is because it’s been there so bloody long. 😡

    • #723151
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Sue wrote:

      apart from that, what’s wrong with it? This is like the “what did the Romans ever do for us” Monty Python sketch.
      So, ok, apart from the fact that the bridge is an eyesore and in the wrong place, what’s wrong with it? Er, well, that’s about it actually. Oh and it’s a big hulk of horrible metal that is about as “designed” as a Bertie Ahern interview
      The point is, it shouldn’t be there. The shortest distance between Pearse Street and Connolly station is just below the Custom House. Then there’d be no Loop at all…

      good grief – look at the bridges in cities like San Francisco, New York, even Newcastle, we’ve to make do with the Loop Line and then we’re told, sure, it has its own charm. This is more nonsensical nostalgia – the only reason why people like it is because it’s been there so bloody long. 😡

      Keeping approx. 40,000 private cars out of the city centre every rush hour is a very small price to pay for blocking the view of the customs house from the “An Lar” perspective.

      I agree it would look at lot better with the ads off and a lick of paint like the Westland Row bridge, but it can’t be replaced as the DART in the whole scheme of things is far more important to the city’s lifeblood than a single angle view of the Customs House being ruined.

      The only radical and expensive way out in future would be to build a new bridge which allows a better view of this very nice building, but I would wager that more tourists and everybody else in Dublin makes greater use of the DART, than gets depressed they cannot take a photo of the Customs House from the vantage point of a tacky amusement arcade.

      I would rather have 80,000 people every day viewing the CH as they get to work and home from a DART train, rather than viewing it from their private car windows on Butt and Matt Talbot Bridges. We have to make a compromise, and in order to keep most sucessful element of our public transport network running, a nice view of pretty building being ruined from one single angle is not such a bad compromise really.

      It looks fab from all the other angles and from the DART, BTW.

    • #723152
      notjim
      Participant

      you still haven’t explained what’s wrong with it. the loop line is not going to move, so we need a bridge there. the loop line bridge is made of metal, yes, but apart from that, what’s not to like? if we are to have new bridges, lets have new crossings.

    • #723153
      lostcarpark
      Participant

      As I say, there’s nobody alive who’s seen the Custom House without the Loop Bridge. It’s a part of our city’s landscape whether we like it or not. I think we all agree the ads are horrible and have to go, but once that’s done, there’s some pretty decent Victorian ironwork which, with a lick of paint and some nice lights could look spectacular.

      After that I’d look at whether anything can be done to make the overhead line supports fit in better with the burdge. I’ve sure the Victorians must have had some beautiful wrought iron tramline supports that could be copied.

      I disagree that it blocks the view of the river. I grew up with the DART, and for me the loop line is the view of the river. It is the best vantage most people get of the river, and can look fantastic from a train in the early evening sun.

    • #723154
      GrahamH
      Participant

      To say ‘just a single angle’ regarding the Custom House is not acknowledging the significance of it. It is the angle, the very view Gandon took into account when designing it. It’s that perfectly composed picture created, with the building at that raking angle sitting on the slight bend in the river that makes it so important, and makes the presence of the Loop Line so unfortunate, not to mention the open views lost out to the rest of the city and the sea – although admitedly the usually attractive IFSC does not look good piling up behind it.

      I doubt any bridge of that height, with piers can appropriately open up the city to the east and the view of the Custom House. What limited benefits that are dervived from a new bridge I think would equalled with the refurbishment of the existing bridge, which has the added benefit of being a fine bit of Victorian engineering – yes okay the charm of being old – or rather, being of its time.
      Either remove the bridge entirely or keep a restored Loop Line.

    • #723155
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Graham Hickey wrote:

      To say ‘just a single angle’ regarding the Custom House is not acknowledging the significance of it. It is the angle, the very view Gandon took into account when designing it. It’s that perfectly composed picture created, with the building at that raking angle sitting on the slight bend in the river that makes it so important, and makes the presence of the Loop Line so unfortunate, not to mention the open views lost out to the rest of the city and the sea – although admittedly the usually attractive IFSC does not look good piling up behind it..

      I can respect this, but how many Dubliners are losing sleep over this?

      The fact is that people need to get to work and the city’s need to move and create wealth takes precedence over any nice view of a building being ruined. Dublin is a living city, it needs to function as a city and work as a city first and foremost. If it can do this and be visually attractive at the same time this is great.

      But the loop line blocking the Customs House is not a major issue for Dubliners and nor should it be. Getting to work while preventing the city from having a Manila type traffic problem very much is a major issue in Dublin. Perhaps THE major issue in 21st Century Dublin so why get hung up on 18th Century aesthetics?

      The fact is (and I am not trying to be condescending here) but the Loop Line will be there long after we are all dead and buried. It’s far too important to Dublin.

      The 18th Century view of the Customs House being blocked from one angle is somewhat of a throw-back to a Dublin city which does not exsists anymore. Demanding the loop line being removed is akin to these people in East Wall who march around with “No Skyscrapers Here” placards. Have they really thought about the consequences and the reality.

      The city no longer revolves along the Parnell Street-Stephens Green axis with O’Connell Bridge being visited by every citizen during the course of their day and if anything the city is moving organically more towards the east of the Customs House. The visual obstruction caused by the Loop Line will not be a significant factor that it once was because east of Matt Talbot Bridge will/is now longer be warehouses and industrial wastelands.

      Dublin is a 21st City with 21st dynamics so why get hung up on 18th views. The loop line in the whole scheme of things is far more important to Dublin than the Customs House. The CH could be bulldozed tomorrow and the impact upon our city would be almost nothing. Take away the Loop Line and the city ceases to function. Altuistic leanings aside, Dublin need 21st transport much more than 18th Century vistas. I don’t see Peter Marks offering powdered wigs to their customers either.

      At the end of the day it comes down to making do the best we can and to be pragmatic as well as sensitive to the cityscape take down the ads on the Loop Line and paint up the iron work in a tastefull manner is the best we are going to get.

      We all want a beautiful city, but we need a functioning one more. But if we can find a compromise we can all live with then that’s the best we can hope for.

      respect,
      http://www.extendthedart.com

    • #723156
      notjim
      Participant

      P11 Comms, the people in East Wall were right, the proposed development for Spencer Dock was a dog, too bland, too ugly, too single use, too hard to service, not sustainable. The arguements they used were too blunt, they made it seem that they thought any skyscrapers in the area would be wrong, but the fact of the matter is, a better proposal, still containing high rise elements, would have provoced only a token objection.

      Of course, we have to balance function with other aspects of the city, we can’t sacrifice everything to finding a transport solution, nor can we ignore the transport needs of the city. Bulldoze the Customs House and the city becomes a less desirable place to live.

    • #723157
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @notjim wrote:

      Of course, we have to balance function with other aspects of the city, we can’t sacrifice everything to finding a transport solution, nor can we ignore the transport needs of the city. Bulldoze the Customs House and the city becomes a less desirable place to live.

      I entirely agree with notjim it is possible to have both transport and heritage, the sad fact is that both have been entirely neglected over the years.

    • #723158
      GrahamH
      Participant

      P11, I don’t think anyone’s proposing to knock the Loop Line and the two fingers to IE – rather if it is reasonably practical to do so in the greater scheme of things than so be it.
      I don’t understand your thinking regarding ‘an 18th entury view’, that’s like saying in 2100 we won’t care for ’20th or 21st century views’.
      A view is a view.

    • #723159
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Graham Hickey wrote:

      It’s that perfectly composed picture created, with the building at that raking angle sitting on the slight bend in the river that makes it so important, and makes the presence of the Loop Line so unfortunate,

      Don’t back down Graham, such truth hasn’t been heard in Abbeyleix in decades

    • #723160
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Hoardings to be cleared from the Loopline bridge
      The Sunday Business Post

      http://www.irish-architecture.com/news/2004/000261.html

    • #723161
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Although perhaps they’re an asset to the city – passing outside the Irish Life Centre today an American couple were taking a picture of themselves standing in front of the huge Bulmers sign there – notably not the Custom House behind it 🙂

    • #723162
      Sue
      Participant

      Americans, Graham? says it all

    • #723163
      vinnyfitz
      Participant

      Rumour has it that CIE have realised that the advertising hordings do need planning permission after all – that they have been illegal for years.
      It seems the SBP story is simply making the best of an obligation to remove them that is coming “down the tracks” anyway.

    • #723164
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Sadly the only change I have seen to the hoardings is a temporary sign put beside the ‘Right Price Tiles’ to announce seasonal discounts.

      Like so many other promises such as the Leinster House Front Lawn it would appear that the announcement was just a PR trick. It looks like the Ads are here to stay.

    • #723165
      SeamusOG
      Participant

      In case anyone thought the loop line bridge was ugly, have a look at this

      http://www.ksky.ne.jp/~hideki/keihin/nihombashi.htm

      http://askayama.net/machicard/tokyo23/chuo/nihombashi-bridge.html

      the bottom part is the original bridge in Tokyo, the top part is a freeway built over the original bridge in the 1960’s:eek:

    • #723166
      Anonymous
      Participant

      That bridge would require a lot more than a few ads removed to improve its appearance. The reason so many people wish to see the ads go from the loopline is that it would make a huge difference both to the appearance of the structure but also to the view of the Custom House.

    • #723167
      dodger
      Participant

      some brave soul should start a campaign to boycott product advertised on the bridge. If advertisers get a notion that they may be losing trade as a result of using the loop line as a clothes line for their wares then they’ll remove them pronto. This is the only way to get through the them.

    • #723168
      Devin
      Participant

      Some good news on the grapevine regarding the Loop Line advertising: A series of planning applications was lodged by CIE last year (Refs. 4368/05 to 4371/05) for the replacement of static adverts with tri-vision ones on a variety of their railway bridges and other property. As I understand it, the higher-grossing use of these sites is part of an arranged deal whereby the Loop Line advertising will be removed with no revenue loss.

      These have appeared before separately – here they are together:

    • #723169
      anto
      Participant

      I know Liberty Hall has a bad reputation that isn’t completely deserved but I don’t think it adds much to that vista.
      The IFSC looks well pity the subsequent buildings in the IFSC are so mediocre

    • #723170
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Thought at first there that new trivisions were planned for the bridge as the ‘good news’ 😮 🙂

      Great to hear, all we need know is a timescale….

      Yes when Liberty Hall and the Custom House are lined up together they do tend to look ridiculous, although they are an ‘item’ at this stage – how could we possibly break them up now? 🙂

      It’s interesting how to an outsider the position of Liberty Hall must be just as offensive as 1965, whilst for Dubliners the pair have entered a certain popular consciousness (okay, for some anyway :)), and acquired quite a different meaning.

      Really the setting of the Custom House is long gone anyway – for me it’s either a dominant role in that whole area for the building that is required, or else for it to take its place alongside everything else, which is what has happened. As successful as the IFSC is, it is equally damaging to views of the building from the west, piling up behind it. But in the context of just accepting a built up environment for the Custom House, it works as well as nearly anything could.

      The best view of Liberty Hall is definitely from the Ha’penny/Millenium Bridge area – a great feature on the skyline just as the quays begin to lower off into the distance on that bend.

      Going to miss this sign though 🙂

    • #723171
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      You just know that 90percent of those who see that every day don’t get the joke…

    • #723172
      Sue
      Participant

      The ads are coming down today.

      Get down to the bridge and check it out!!:)

    • #723173
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      is there anyway we can get rid of the loop line bridge altogether ? its ugly. The new advertisments wont make much of a difference

    • #723174
      Niall
      Participant

      🙂

    • #723175
      Niall
      Participant

      The Sunday Times – Ireland

      The Sunday Times January 08, 2006

      Loop line bridge is ad-free at last
      John Burns

      UGLY advertisements on Dublin’s Loop Line bridge, regarded as the one of the city’s worst eyesores, were removed yesterday after 40 years.
      Campaigners have long demanded that Iarnrod Eireann clean up the railway bridge across the Liffey, which infamously blocks the view of the 18th century Custom House from O’Connell bridge.

      But the company delayed removing the ads, which earn about €500,000 a year in revenue, until Dublin city council gave planning permission for 13 billboard sites elsewhere, in order to offset the loss of income. Iarnrod Eireann has now obtained permission for 13 “tri-vision” advertising sites, which have three constantly changing images on the same billboard.

      “We will do a major repainting of the bridge later this year,” said Barry Kenny, a spokesman for Iarnrod Eireann. “We are very happy that this is all resolved. All the ads are going, and the bridge is being restored to its former glory.”

      The Loop Line has caused controversy since its completion in 1891. It links the railway stations at Westland Row and Connolly, but instead of taking a direct route below the Gandon-designed Custom House, engineers decided to loop it above.

      Bad enough that the city’s finest building was obscured, but the view from O’Connell bridge was disimproved further in the early 1960s when tacky ads for biscuits and drinks were installed on its steel lattice by CIE.

      Due to growing protests, Iarnrod Eireann eventually agreed to discontinue ads on the Loop Line once its contract with advertisers expired at the end of 2005.

      The Loop Line could eventually be demolished, however, and be replaced by a tunnel under the Liffey. Under Transport 21, the government’s recently announced plan, an underground interconnector linking Heuston station with Connolly is proposed, and a spur from Connolly to Tara Street railways would be a logical addition.

    • #723176
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      The sooner they knock down that ugly bridge the better.

    • #723177
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Just realised – the clock in the middle must be gone too 😮
      Now that was a worthy feature: so very handy for Tara and Connolly users. It should definitely be replaced with a new, well-designed timepiece – it used to keep excellent time, along with O’Connell Bridge House’s clock.

      Brilliant news this – roll on the repainting, when was the last time it was done wonder – what period paint scheme is that dead grey and cream – 50s?
      (:))

    • #723178
      JJ
      Participant

      Walked past this afternoon and noted that the Clock is still there. The two panels on either side are bare with no adverts however the panels over the roadways on north and south quays are still in place including our friend above “Butty Bridge”
      JJ

    • #723179
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Phew! (joke)

      Still some way to go so. Strange they took down the most difficult ones first…

    • #723180
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Things aren’t quite as The Sunday Times might have us believe – as JJ says pretty much everything is still there. Just the central boards (not even their hoardings) are gone. Very eerie looking:

      So there’s work to go yet.

      Heineken is still to the east:

      …and these yokes of course to the west, on either side:

      The view from O’Connell Bridge on a miserable January morning:

      And just by chance I passed this on Tara St, so certainly the CC/I

    • #723181
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Anyone know if there was ever heraldic emblems in the crest shapes on the four river columns?

    • #723182
      Bren88
      Participant

      @The Sunday Times January 08, 2006 wrote:

      “We will do a major repainting of the bridge later this year,” said Barry Kenny, a spokesman for Iarnrod Eireann. “We are very happy that this is all resolved. All the ads are going, and the bridge is being restored to its former glory.”

      The Eiffel tower in Paris is painted every seven years. Quite alot of it, maintenance on the tower includes applying 50 metric tons of three graded tones of paint every 7 years to protect it from rust. On occasion, the colour of the paint is changed. On the first floor, there are interactive consoles hosting a poll for the colour to use for a future session of painting.

      I think that poll is a great idea and allow the colour scheme to change along with public opinion.

      What I would suggest is that a similar city wide poll be held here in Dublin with regards to the loop line bridge. It could easily be run room this location. If somebody cared enough to put in the work, photomontage type pictures could also be set up to allow a better idea of how it would fit in once painted.
      We could at least run a Poll here just for opinions sake.

    • #723183
      Rory W
      Participant

      Iarnrod Eireann Orange & Black anyone:D

    • #723184
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Okay suggest some colurs for the poll, and i’ll photoshop one of the photos to show all the options, and start a poll. Might get the site some publicity.

    • #723185
      SeamusOG
      Participant

      @Paul Clerkin wrote:

      Okay suggest some colurs for the poll

      If you could do a “Custom House cream” colour option that might be an interesting shade for the bridge. It might help it to blend in with the Custom House, and might generally make it less noticeable (e.g. cream against an often cloudy sky versus the current black against a cloudy sky).

    • #723186
      kefu
      Participant

      I would stick with something very similar to the existing scheme.
      Anything cream or white would get dirty very quickly and needless to say would not be cleaned.

    • #723187
      ctesiphon
      Participant

      Piers a similar colour to the existing, or even darker grey (maybe black?), carried all the way to the top. Lattice work a paler shade of grey than the existing / a bluish grey (seagull grey, might be called), to blend with our grey skies but also with our occasional blue ones too. Also, I like the pier details picked out in a brighter colour (say, the light grey) as they would get lost in a monochrome pier colour.

      Or maybe dark blue piers with pale blue lattice work? (For the Dubs, like.;) )

      Or a greenish colour- a blend of the CH dome and the IFSC glass? (Might clash horribly with the green Darts.:eek: )

    • #723188
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      of like the old Dublin Bus colours – dark blue and cream

    • #723189
      Bren88
      Participant

      Glad to see your taking on board my colour poll idea,

      I think we are all agreed that the best solution is a colour that “hides” the bridge as best as possible. Allowing for a much nicer view. I’d go for either a grey/green colour to blend the bridgeinto the buildings behind it. Or a dark blue colour

      In a perfect world an expert sky blue cover job would hide the bridge completely, but I doubt it would be pulled properly.

    • #723190
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      i’ll take care of this tonight and launch a poll and send out a release

    • #723191
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Unfortunately off-white/cream is just not an option – it’ll get absolutely filthy in a matter of weeks. Any regular Loop Line users will know only too well just how dirty the interior of the bridge is at close quarters. All that dirt will flow down the sides in the rain over time.

      The two-tone grey scheme is a nice idea, if not perhaps a bit too similar to what we already have – the light grey in particular would look very well on the latticework contrasting with the dark piers.

      However I propose a nice bottle green with the slightest of metallic sheens 🙂
      A classic colour that would match the IFSC very well – unfortunately the Custom House verdigris is just too gaudy a shade to be replicated!

      We all have something of an illusion as to how things were in the 19th century – with everything only either being black or white. So we paint all ironwork, street furniture and major pieces of infrastruture black, and paint all windows and Victorian interiors white – nothing could be further from how it was. The era was a riot of colour, albeit of a mildly depressing variety 🙂

      I think we ought to make a feature of the Loop Line, not hide it.

      Green for me, assuming it’s not going to be too much on those huge piers.

    • #723192
      Morlan
      Participant

      @kefu wrote:

      I would stick with something very similar to the existing scheme.
      Anything cream or white would get dirty very quickly and needless to say would not be cleaned.

      Agreed, I would like to see a very dark green. Isn’t this the colour it was originally?

      Check out the original signage with the old IE logo.

      Tada! Gone.

    • #723193
      fergalr
      Participant

      I haven’t seen the situation from the ground yet but I cross the bridge twice daily, and there’s so much lattice work that I can’t see it making a giant amount of diffence.
      I read about 5 years back that there were plans to completely rebuild the bridge and have a new low impact one in place of this…thing.

      Anyone know what happened to that plan? On of the most important in the city, I would wager.

    • #723194
      Morlan
      Participant

      What about flood lighting? Any thoughts? (not that CIE would pay for it)

    • #723195
      fergalr
      Participant

      I’d rather hide it, to be honest!!

    • #723196
      jamesmcbennett
      Participant

      The old photo before constuction of loopline is amazing! I really hope this bridge comes down, even though i know its unlikely as it is said to be a bit of a engineering masterpiece! but love the view where you can look right down the liffey from o’connel bridge, let’s hope for a tunnel!

    • #723197
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Without the hordings it would be relatively transparent. It’s a matrix of steel, so it should look quite ok and may have been intended by its original designer to look relatively low impact. The hordings certainly don’t look pretty.

      I’ve one suggestion…

      TV screens along the city side of it… cameras on the other side..
      Bridge becomes invisible 🙂

    • #723198
      lostcarpark
      Participant

      I may be the only one, but I love the engineering elegance of the lattice structure. There is talk of picing a colour to hide, but I suggest we should pick a colour (or colours) that shows it off at its best.

      I would love to see it the same colour as the Ha’penny bridge, but I take the point about dirt.

      Failing that, I would agree with subtle and muted colours, but not as an attempt to hide it, rather to bring out its beauty.

    • #723199
      Morlan
      Participant

      @Paul Clerkin wrote:

      i’ll take care of this tonight and launch a poll and send out a release

      Any luck with that poll Paul?

    • #723200
      SeamusOG
      Participant

      @MrX wrote:

      I’ve one suggestion…

      TV screens along the city side of it… cameras on the other side..
      Bridge becomes invisible 🙂

      And then you could have advertising every fifteen minutes like on a regular telly:)

    • #723201
      PTB
      Participant

      Are all of the hoardings completely gone at this stage? I know that tis a while ago but the pictures show the metal supports for the hoardings still in place.

    • #723202
      notjim
      Participant

      They were taking the metal supports off as I came into town just now, sunday.

    • #723203
      urbanisto
      Participant

      Henieken sign is still in place on the east side

    • #723204
      ctesiphon
      Participant

      Would that be because the ad reached a part of the bridge other ads could not reach?

    • #723205
      publicrealm
      Participant

      ctesiphon Would that be because the ad reached a part of the bridge other ads could not reach?

      ‘Probably…’:)

    • #723206
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      So is everything down yet i.e. supports and all ?

    • #723207
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Just about Caster – only these are remaining on the west side:

      All the supports from the central span are gone and the bridge looks great – it’s so refreshing to look down from O’Connell Bridge and not see all that clutter anymore. Looks so neat and tidy compared with the gaudy muck that predominated there. Painting it will make all the difference.

      It’ll be some job tackling these fellas:

    • #723208
      ctesiphon
      Participant

      It has just occurred to me looking at the first of Graham’s pictures: will the red and yellow (or are they yellow and black?- hard to tell) headroom stripes and the red and white sign have to stay? Could compromise whatever colour scheme is chosen- unless it’s going to be red and yellow stripes.

      Too late to add that one to the poll, Paul?:eek:

    • #723209
      aj
      Participant

      i think painting the bridge some neutral colour wont work for a number of reasons. Firstly any attempt to hide it wont work as it is simply to big and ugly. Secondly it would get dirty very quickly and look awful.

      The bridge is there, it spoils the view of the custom house no matter what way it is painted, so why not paint it in a strong colour, flood light it and make a feature of it as fine piece of Victorain engineering which despite all its faults is a pert of the streetscape now after 150 Years

    • #723210
      fergalr
      Participant

      Well..that’s a fair idea. Maybe red like the Forth Bridge in Scotland (I am not comparing architectural merit!).

    • #723211
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I note that there have been no further posts on this thread for almost two weeks; has the removal phase been completed yet?

      I have to say fair play to Barry Kenny of Irish Rail he has been as good as his word on this issue

    • #723212
      urbanisto
      Participant

      Yes all gone

    • #723213
      NeilA
      Participant

      @Niall wrote:

      The Sunday Times – Ireland

      “We will do a major repainting of the bridge later this year,” said Barry Kenny, a spokesman for Iarnrod Eireann. “We are very happy that this is all resolved. All the ads are going, and the bridge is being restored to its former glory.”

      Still no sign of the re-paint happening… Anyone heard anything about this?

    • #723214
      fergalr
      Participant

      Unless they do a “Golden Gate” job and make the structure stand out in its on right, then I fear it will continue to act as a wall between the city centre proper and its large extension down the quays.
      Real consideration needs to taken regarding scrapping it and either re-routing the DART or putting in a low-viz bridge in the current location, as was planned years and years back.

      But I won’t hold my breath.

    • #723215
      Anonymous
      Participant

      In fairness to Irish Rail they were asked to remove signage that they derived a lot of income from; this they did albeit a little slowly.
      Given the explosive growth in passenger numbers not being accompanied by a comensurate increase in funding one can see how this would not be at the top of their list of priorities.

      The establishement of a fund through the Department of Environment Heritage & Local Government for industrial heritage includuing railways would be most welcome.

      Whilst on this subject the ‘Low Bridge’ signage placed on the perfectly restored bridge on Westland Row turned my stomach it is just horrendous and must go on December 21

    • #723216
      hutton
      Participant
      PVC King wrote:
      In fairness to Irish Rail they were asked to remove signage that they derived a lot of income from]

      I wish :rolleyes: Ftr I understand they only removed that shiteage off the bridge most reluctantly, and arising out of court actions taken by a private citizen – a solicitor from either Waterford or Kilkenny from what I recall.

      Agree with the point re Westland Row, and also really like Fergairs idea – bring on the bling-bling bridge 🙂

    • #723217
      urbanisto
      Participant

      The observant of you will have noticed the Loop Line getting its long awaited overhaul. The first section of the Loop Line bridge has been repainted from Beresford Place to the Quay. Its the same colour…dark grey but looks all the better for a smartening up. The scaffolds are now being erected for the section at the Quay. I presume the exsiting colour scheme will remain in place there.

    • #723218
      Anonymous
      Participant

      We best get used to it, it certainly won’t be going anywhere now, the IE rail plan & interconnector reconfiguration will facilitate greater frrequency acros the loop line.

    • #723219
      fergalr
      Participant

      So that pipedream of a new bridge is gone then? 🙁

    • #723220
      PTB
      Participant

      @fergalr wrote:

      So that pipedream of a new bridge is gone then? 🙁

      Wonderful oxymoron:)

    • #723221
      GregF
      Participant

      Saw the bridge all covered up this morning…..Pity it’s gonna be painted the same drab gun metal grey.

    • #723222
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Saw from the DARTearlier in the year that they appeared to be testing different colours on small patches. Including a light silvery-grey that would have perfectly matched our Irish summer skies. Oh well, maybe the gunmetal is an undercoat…

    • #723223
      Morlan
      Participant

      They should paint a mural on it of the Custom House and the Liffey.

    • #723224
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Morlan wrote:

      They should paint a mural on it of the Custom House and the Liffey.

      I often wonder what people would make of this bridge if it made more of an architectural statement in and of itself? Would we still lament the loss of the view down the quays? Maybe if it was flanked by one or two pedestrian bridges like Hungerford Bridge in London is, we might take a different view of it?

      http://www.londonarchitecture.co.uk/Building/784/Hungerford_Bridges.php

    • #723225
      Seanselon
      Participant

      Can’t it go when the new interconnector and metro are in place? Otherwise we won’t be able to appreciate fully, the new giant Gormley when that emerges 🙂

      Dublin city centre would without a shadow of a doubt look better without it. It simply has to go.

    • #723226
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I think the Metro along its current alignment and the East West alignment selected for the interconnector has guaranteed the survival of the loop line for the next 20-50 years.

      I agree on the Hungerford Bridge it really softened the harsh engineering of the Charing Cross route out. I hate Charing Cross the underground walk takes 10 minutes in trainers! Bitch about Tara St all you want but at least it is user friendly and a walkway to Connolly would seriously ease the overcrowding at peak times with a car free route provided!

    • #723227
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Morlan wrote:

      They should paint a mural on it of the Custom House and the Liffey.

      I never presume a person’s age so Morlan your idea was first mooted by President Erskine Childers back in the early seventies. He probably got the idea from the ‘muriel’ panted in Johnny Mac’s in Leestown (aka Dunboyne) in The Riodan’s. Childers had been Minister for Post & Telegraphs with broadcasting under his mandate so I’m sure that someone with a slim black laptop case can get €80,000 to write a report as to how he came up with the thought. (You know the type of report, the health service is a mess (€126,000), the poor don’t like being poor (€105,000) or most people have ten toes, except those who had been in accidents resulting in injuries to their lower limbs (€63,000). The last one was particularly interesting reading.

    • #723228
      jimg
      Participant

      @Morlan wrote:

      They should paint a mural on it of the Custom House and the Liffey.

      @lunasa wrote:

      I never presume a person’s age so Morlan your idea was first mooted by President Erskine Childers back in the early seventies.

      Funny enough I independently had almost the same fanciful notion a few years ago. My idea was less expensive and less permenant than a paint job; I was thinking more along the lines of using that (pastic/canvas?) material they use to drape over scafolding to cover the side of the bridge. The idea was to create a large temporary trompe d’oeil to hide most of the bridge (I don’t think the supports could be hidden effectively this way). The perspective trick would only work from near one particular vantage point so the obvious candidate would be the center of O’Connell Bridge. I started some calculations to work out the limits of where the trick would be effective in terms of distance from the central vantage point.

      I didn’t have time to dedicate to the project and to be honest was a bit embarassed by the whimsical nature of the idea to research it properly. If I get a couple of hours I might try to dig out what I had done at the time. Maybe someone would give me €80k to properly spec. the idea 😀

    • #723229
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      the loop line is a scar on the capital.. its needs to be replaced by a tunnell from connolly to Peirce at least

    • #723230
      alonso
      Participant

      yep all we need is a few more billion to spend on what would be a vanity project. It would be cheaper to dismantle the Custom house brick by brick and move it to Eden Quay than to build another rail tunnel under the Liffey!

      Am I the only one not deeply offended by this bridge? I know it’s ugly but it fails to make my blood boil.

    • #723231
      Maskhadov
      Participant

      €1bn for a beautiful vista over the Quays… well worth it IMHO. Maybe not this decade but one to look out or in the next decade

    • #723232
      CM00
      Participant

      @alonso wrote:

      yep all we need is a few more billion to spend on what would be a vanity project. It would be cheaper to dismantle the Custom house brick by brick and move it to Eden Quay than to build another rail tunnel under the Liffey!

      Am I the only one not deeply offended by this bridge? I know it’s ugly but it fails to make my blood boil.

      Not at all, Alonso. I feel it’s pretty acceptable and is extremely essential. Even without these mitigating factors, can you imagine the difficulties in getting the dart to a safe depth under the river, given the elevation it rides at currently through the city centre?! That would be a HUGE job, for only a superficial visual improvement.

      I accept that it ruins a nice view, but I don’t really believe it is as big a factor in the division between the docklands and the city centre as, say, Pearse St or North Earl St/Talbot St are.

      Incidentally, here are a few shots from weeks ago of the repainting and sandblasting.

    • #723233
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Im afraid the loopline is going nowhere. 🙁

      The problem is that you cant move the line underground as Connolly station been deemed unsuitable for underground tunneling (which is why the Metro ‘Tram’ North and the Interconnector don’t go near Connolly). And even if you could, the tunnel would have to start all the way back near the Killester stop as the track is elevated above ground level shortly after Killester all the way into Connolly. The track doesn’t go to ground level until before Lansdowne Rd. So moving it underground would require a long tunnel which or course be VERY expensive. It is a pity as it would be ideal.

      For me, painting the bridge light grey would be a very good idea as it will look good and bright but it would help (in a small way) to not be as much as a eyesore to Customs Hse.

      There is another option (a very long longshot) which is replace it with a new, more slender bridge, possibly a suspension bridge with a single tower at Tara St station. :confused:

    • #723234
      urbanisto
      Participant

      Perhaps some cosmetic changes can be put in place. For example can the overhead wires be removed and replace with an electricity source at track level? And an imagnative lighting display could at least make more of a feature of the bridge.

      Im not sure the “Hungerford” idea is any use though as a predestrian route already exists between Tara and Connolly (Butt Bridge) and Pearse and Connolly (Shaw Bridge)

    • #723235
      shweeney
      Participant

      @StephenC wrote:

      Perhaps some cosmetic changes can be put in place. For example can the overhead wires be removed and replace with an electricity source at track level?

      retrofitting the entire DART fleet to be compatible with track power might be a tad pricey and disruptive.

    • #723236
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @StephenC wrote:

      Im not sure the “Hungerford” idea is any use though as a predestrian route already exists between Tara and Connolly (Butt Bridge) and Pearse and Connolly (Shaw Bridge)

      I actually didn’t really mean it as a connection to the train station when I suggested it. It was more of a way of getting people up above the city to see the view, without having as much of a visual impact as the proposed cable car would have on the city as a result.

    • #723237
      lostexpectation
      Participant

      @weehamster wrote:

      Im afraid the loopline is going nowhere. 🙁

      There is another option (a very long longshot) which is replace it with a new, more slender bridge, possibly a suspension bridge with a single tower at Tara St station. :confused:

      integrating the station into the bridge structure..where they want a high rise anyway,. i like it brilliant idea…

    • #723238
      JoePublic
      Participant

      @weehamster wrote:

      Im afraid the loopline is going nowhere. 🙁

      The problem is that you cant move the line underground as Connolly station been deemed unsuitable for underground tunneling (which is why the Metro ‘Tram’ North and the Interconnector don’t go near Connolly). And even if you could, the tunnel would have to start all the way back near the Killester stop as the track is elevated above ground level shortly after Killester all the way into Connolly. The track doesn’t go to ground level until before Lansdowne Rd. So moving it underground would require a long tunnel which or course be VERY expensive. It is a pity as it would be ideal.

      For me, painting the bridge light grey would be a very good idea as it will look good and bright but it would help (in a small way) to not be as much as a eyesore to Customs Hse.

      There is another option (a very long longshot) which is replace it with a new, more slender bridge, possibly a suspension bridge with a single tower at Tara St station. :confused:

      Why is moving from an elevated track down into a tunnel, say after Grand Canal Dock and before Pearse, a problem? Not enough room?

      If they did put the line underground it would release a large amount of prime city centre land that could be used to part finance it. For example if the Pearse stop was underground Pearse station could be sold on and redeveloped. As could Tara and all the track in between.

      They could also get rid of Tara street stop altogether in favour of looping a bit further up to a cross liffey station next to the metro north cross liffey station: so O’Connell bridge stop would be the transfer point for metro north, DART, luas red and green. The Lucan luas stop might be quite close as well.

    • #723239
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      @Maskhadov wrote:

      €1bn for a beautiful vista over the Quays… well worth it IMHO. Maybe not this decade but one to look out or in the next decade

      you forget the “art” that’s going to ruin the vista further down

    • #723240
      alonso
      Participant

      @JoePublic wrote:

      Why is moving from an elevated track down into a tunnel, say after Grand Canal Dock and before Pearse, a problem? Not enough room?

      If they did put the line underground it would release a large amount of prime city centre land that could be used to part finance it. For example if the Pearse stop was underground Pearse station could be sold on and redeveloped. As could Tara and all the track in between.

      They could also get rid of Tara street stop altogether in favour of looping a bit further up to a cross liffey station next to the metro north cross liffey station: so O’Connell bridge stop would be the transfer point for metro north, DART, luas red and green. The Lucan luas stop might be quite close as well.

      there’s already plans to develop the land over and around Tara and Pearse. Airspace is something IE have tragically failed to exploit up to now.

      The DART will connect with Metro North at stephens green anyway, What you’re proposing would effectively shut the DART for the best part of a decade. That’d be one hell of an EIS to write!

    • #723241
      GrahamH
      Participant

      I’m not 100% on the ‘swing’ required, but it’s a shame the opportunity wasn’t taken when the DART was being developed to investigate moving/replacing the Loop Line further to the east behind the Custom House. Perhaps doing away with Tara Street and taking advantage of the vast acres of derelict land north and south of the river, including the IFSC site for the new line. The new Platforms 5, 6 and 7 could have been purpose-built to the east of Connolly instead, with the current 1890’s platforms given over to further terminating space that Connolly has so desperately needed for the past decade.

      It would have created extra rail capacity, and improved the wider city, partially funded by selling off Loop Line sites. The Custom House Liffey vista would largely have been restored, as well as the Gardiner Street vista of same, and indeed ironically that of Connolly Station itself down Talbot Street.

    • #723242
      JoePublic
      Participant

      @alonso wrote:

      there’s already plans to develop the land over and around Tara and Pearse. Airspace is something IE have tragically failed to exploit up to now.

      The DART will connect with Metro North at stephens green anyway, What you’re proposing would effectively shut the DART for the best part of a decade. That’d be one hell of an EIS to write!

      There’s a lot of land between Pearse street and grand canal dock where trains are parked etc where perhaps a tunnel could be sunk without affecting the current line. I’m not familiar with the dart line north of Connolly. Obviously the current line would have to remain open until a tunnel was built. I’m not an engineer perhaps it can’t be done. Anywho, there’s no harm in tossing out ideas, just in case the money is still rolling post transport 21!

    • #723243
      Morlan
      Participant

      It’s just not going to happen. The whole point of the underground interconnector is to increase capacity on the loop line.

      Poor auld Custom House, sitting there ignored by the old city. Now we have the DDDA threatening to block its view from the east with some horrendous sculpture. I don’t care what the DDDA’s proposal is, leave the river alone.


      © Copyright hanscmueller

    • #723244
      Rory W
      Participant

      @JoePublic wrote:

      There’s a lot of land between Pearse street and grand canal dock where trains are parked etc where perhaps a tunnel could be sunk without affecting the current line. I’m not familiar with the dart line north of Connolly. Obviously the current line would have to remain open until a tunnel was built. I’m not an engineer perhaps it can’t be done. Anywho, there’s no harm in tossing out ideas, just in case the money is still rolling post transport 21!

      It’ certainly couldn’t be done, unless the dart was turned into a roller-coaster.:)

      No way on earth this is ever going to happen, and given that rail commuters were hacked off by the closure of the Dart line for the demolition of the West Stand at Lansdowne for a weekend there is bugger all chance of the busiest rail lines in the country being closed for such a long period of time just so a ‘nice view’ could be made available to the 50 or so people in Dublin who are interested!!!

    • #723245
      JoePublic
      Participant

      @Rory W wrote:

      It’ certainly couldn’t be done, unless the dart was turned into a roller-coaster.:)

      I’m sure you’re right and that you know what you’re talking about, but I don’t see why it is totally obvious that is impossible to build a tunnel next to an existing rail line while keeping the existing line open. I’m sure such a thing has never been accomplished anywhere in the world before. I look forward to seeing the roller coaster loop-the-loop at heuston station as the interconnector emerges next to/under/around the existing lines. 😀

      Anywho, I concede that it will never happen and there are many more important transport projects required for Dublin, but the original point I was making was that if they did do it it would release acres of city centre development land to part finance it.

    • #723246
      urbanisto
      Participant

      Have you spotted the new paint job yet….on the pillars. Ugggh

    • #723247
      GregF
      Participant

      Is it that beautiful ultra dull matt grey….I thought I saw from the distance?

    • #723248
      urbanisto
      Participant

      No that the black with peach detail. Its disgusting

    • #723249
      Rusty Cogs
      Participant

      I think the correct term is ‘Jaundiced Yellow’. Is it meant to ‘complement’ the yellow building beside Siptu ?

    • #723250
      urbanisto
      Participant

      Well I didnt want to be so blunt but yes I think that suits it. Why not just stick to the grey, And add lighting. Looks absolutely shite now.

    • #723251
      notjim
      Participant

      The yellow might be too strong, but the iron work looks fantastic, it is a fabulous job, bringing out the muscular elegance of the bridge structure.

    • #723252
      PTB
      Participant

      Bees!

      So utterly gaudy.

    • #723253
      kefu
      Participant

      Only brings Guinness to mind. I wonder is it an example of subliminal advertising in action cos Iarnrod Eireann couldn’t afford to forego all the advertising money.

Viewing 166 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News