Look at de state of Cork, like!

Home Forums Ireland Look at de state of Cork, like!

Viewing 1,897 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #706309
      speakeasy
      Participant

      This is a great website, really interesting even for the non architect types like me. But whats with all the discussion about Dublin? Cork is Ireland’s second largest city and hardly gets a mention! Theres all sorts of bad stuff going on in this City which needs discussion. I strongly beleive that web sites like this do make a difference and are a great voice.

      Lots of new developments which seem to have escaped any public scrutiny at the planning stage (surprise surprise) are being thrown up in Cork. The City is losing its character, fast, because of cheap office blocks which are actually worse than the many mistakes built in the 1960’s.

      Take for example the new development on Lapps Quay opposite the beautiful City Hall and next to the even more aesthetically pleasing Cork Savings Bank (now AIB). This, you would think, should be an area to preserve. But sadly the hideous old Eircom building on the Quay is being made look even more awful and a huge area has also been cleared to make way for air raid shelter type apartments and offices. Up the road at Anglesea street, a nice little area with lots of old well preserved buildings, is a new office block, which looks like it was designed by the same people who came up with the EBS building on dame street Dublin. This thing is monstrous, it dwarfs an adjoining pub and looks totally out of character in this street. What is going on? Who designs these things? Does anyone notice how shocking they are? Does anyone care? Cmon you Dubs, Cork is a part of this nation too… pay us some attention! Ireland’s architects are going to get a bad name from all this rubbish being

    • #732263
      sw101
      Participant

      a lot of corks larger developments escape scrutiny in national circles because people are slow to publish them and show them off. For example in the recent aai awards only billy wilson and james leahy (to my knowledge) were recognised for their work. admittedly billys work is a bit dodge, still working off that expo he collaborated on, but surely cork is producing quality work that should be shown proudly on the national stage.

      rkd mccarthy lynch and riordan staehli, and also wain morehead, are doing great work, in housing, public projects, and a few good domestics too. i think the question of bad buildings being allowed permission is a matter to be addressed by people being more informed as to whats going on in their area. for example, the redevelopment of the douglas village shopping centre is being fiercely opposed because the local people take active interest in what is built around them, and it has to be said the proposals are pretty horrific, but at the other side of the city, the new blackpool shopping centre went ahead despite the fact that its a hulk, looks more like a defunct departures lounge than the giant tesco boat that it is.

      contrast that with dubliner’s attitudes to major projects, especially when they impact their lives through their scale and strategic importance. look at o’connell street. the spike was help up for years because of individuals who were clued in to what was being planned for their streets, but now patricks street is being ripped apart, beth galli’s monstrous lights are going up everywhere, and people are looking around wide-eyed wondering how all this came about.

      Its easy to understand at times why cork based architects are so slow to make efforts toward gaining recognition. With it comes exposure and from that publicity, which invites difficulties in planning and more scrutiny by locals, press and architectural buffs. Contrasting that with a quiet life and easier planning, its not incomprehensible. And anyway, why bother when everyone who cares is based in dublin. Cork people are personified by the likes of Neil Hegarty, recently retired as city architect. He’s a practical, straight down the middle stalwart of traditional approaches to change and development. What cork needs is a litte adventure. A daring new airport, a renewal of the bus and rail bases and the transport infrastructure, a little madness from the planners, and some crazy young architects given the chance to shine. And a big wrecking ball for that infernal county hall

    • #732264
      sw101
      Participant

      sorry, didint seem that long when i was writing it 🙂

    • #732265
      speakeasy
      Participant

      Thanks for taking the time to write such an informed and intelligent reply. Not so sure about Cork people not caring though. I think we do but we dont tell the right people. There really needs to be a system whereby people can easily see plans and give thier views at the planning stage, maybe something web based. I did write about the blackpool s/c and county hall but i lost all id written cos this site seems to go to sleep if you type for too long and then ask you for your password… resulting in the loss of all youve written… grr.

      The lack of national press coverage is also a major factor in cork’s decline in this regard. RTE news is almost a government information channel only giving quick snippets on the silly little regions. Not that Im bitter or anything…

    • #732266
      speakeasy
      Participant

      and yeah what is with those horrendous lights? I thought the flourecent bits (which light the pavements) were for builders while they were working but they are apparantly part of the design!

      There was a suggestion by a member of Cork City Council to put up some cast iron lamps instead… I shall say no more…

    • #732267
      ew
      Participant

      What was that story on the news last night about a fire in a listed building in Cork? One that as luck would have it was proposed to be re-developed as apartments….?

    • #732268
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      the good sheperd convent in sundays well was burned early yesterday morning. the two wings were ‘saved’, however, the more impressive central section is in very bad shape, the chapel at the rear is extremely poor. i got access up there yesterday, and fire brigade still attempting to put the fire out. there is little or no timber visible, all destroyed, roof is gone, brickwork and stained/decorative glass destroyed. the building was empty, recently sold by ucc, awaiting redevelopment……..protected structure! strange. and very sad

    • #732269
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Ugggggleee! It’s a little unfair to just sweep all new developments going on in the city as crap or ugly – O’Callaghans Dev on Lavitts Qy looks pretty cool. Although I must say the Anglesea St one and Eircom/Lapps Qy are crimes against built environment. The city core has had ONE new development in the time of the great property boom that gave the rest of urban Ireland a face lift (the Siemens building near the train station). So Cork is only getting started in the rebulding of the nasty derelict sites. Obviously the first built offices in these areas will come under much more scrutiny cos they’re the most prominent in a pock marked area. All this is a part of a much greater plan over many years. Take a look at the IFSC – there are loads of shite developments there, alone they’d stand out… but in the mass of the surroundings they get away with it. I think the ugly Lapps Qy redev wont seem so bad once the three adjoining dev’s of same height start to rise up, the foundations of those have only just begun.
      As for the Anglesea St block – all that area has been ear marked (from there to Albert Rd) as the Civic Gateway for the new docklands so I’d say you’ll probably be seeing more of the same in that general area (goodbye Market Tavern???). There’s talk for a high rise hotel on the An Post site behind the Garda Station so that would make the others newbie’s look timid!

    • #732270
      speakeasy
      Participant

      A terrible shame about the good shepherd convent. A really beautiful building sadly destroyed. The situation reminds me of rumours I had heard when I lived in Christchurch New Zealand. A very pretty city with lots of old colonial era buildings, which, like the Cork convent, were wanted for the land they were on by very keen developers.

      When I was in the city, there were quite a few fires which destroyed some of these listed buildings in ‘mysterious circumstances’.

      And of course again, while the story of this buildings tragic end facinated a lot of people, RTE just give a quick mention (newsreader reads live over pictures type thing). Like… “Dublin Dublin Dublin… and in other news something or other happened in Cork…”

      😛

    • #732271
      speakeasy
      Participant

      And would they ever return South Mall to it’s former glory… a fine street in it’s day, sadly plundered by the likes of whoever put up the Eagle Star and Bank of Ireland buildings…

      And as for south terrace… did Brooks Haughton think nobody would notice the sheer size of the sinage that dominates the whole street?! Surely the builders who buy stuff from there know where it is. after all its been there for about 150 years. Is there any limit to the size of sinage in this country?

      I think all you Dublin architects should have a big day trip to Cork and have debate on the place. Youd argue for days! CIE do good bus rates. Ye’d have a great time! Ive gotta post some pictures… this place is gas! Only in Cork could you get away with building a structure like the opera house… (which is actually worse than the abbey)

    • #732272
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The Opera House is SO MUCH better now than what it was – and with the introduction of the paving to Emmet Place that whole area has really come on. Johnson and Perrot are moving out to make way for some sort of new dev on that site, I think that whole area will really come up.
      As for restoring South Mall to “it’s former glory” well that’s kinda hard when most of the city was razed by de Brits in 1920 – u should be grateful for what’s been preserved/survived!
      South Mall is a fine fine street – The BOI building is vile, but Cork is hardly alone in having a monster office building next to more classically designed buildings (look most places in Dublin!). If you want to talk ugly – go look at Connolly Hall.

      Check out these images of the “extension” of South Mall – could be alot worse – revitalised boardwalk is a plus.

    • #732273
      corkdood
      Participant

      Cork seems to be going through a rapid phase of development of late (the push is on for the cultural capital 2005 celebrations) – lots of derelict sites being cleared. It remains to be seen what will replace them but surely anything is better than falling down buildings

    • #732274
      corkdood
      Participant

      Just seen the images above.
      Isn’t it about time that those terrible girders were removed from the bridge by City Hall (A legacy from the days when the centre span of the bridge could be opened to allow ships through.) It hasn’t been opened in decades and all the lifting machinery is long gone so why do these monstrosities remain?

    • #732275
      sw101
      Participant

      i think those girders are great. like the ones by the bus station. if they were cleaned up a bit and given a fresh coat they’d be an improvement. long live over sized simplistic trusses.

      btw, where did those images of the boardwalk come from? whos the architect?

    • #732276
      sw101
      Participant

      what does bug me however are those stupid canopies ove what looks like an eatery in the second photo

    • #732277
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The architect is STW (yawwwwwwwwn – is there any commission they DON’T get) and the developer is Howard Holdings.

      As for the girders – an absolute disgrace – and the purple and green “lighting” features installed for the millenium do nothing for them. The girders hardly add a Calatrava-esque flair to the rivers! Tear ’em down.

      Speaking of bridges – for a city with as much water as Cork it has never fared well on the bridge front. The new pedestrian bridge to go from Coal Quay to Shandon/Popes Qy area is due to begin construction in November… any ideas what this will look like? I suspect Cork City Council will do their usual concrete slab and utilitarian railings affair… sigh.

    • #732278
      corkdood
      Participant

      I saw an artists impression on the corkcity.ie website – part of the development plan i believe. There are also plans for a new bridge (footbridge I think) linking the new entrance for the railway station with the quays redevelopment. Its still all up in the air though.

    • #732279
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I think most of the images have no reflection on the actual plans – they’re just taken from other cities to give a kind of positive ambience to the document. Would be nice though!

    • #732280
      sw101
      Participant

      wheres that new entrance to the station going? if there was ever a place in need of a major revamp its that kip, and our stinky bus station too. cheapo version of busaras with half heartedly wavy canopy and a facade like a mules hide

    • #732281
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The revamped Kent station is going to be very much the focal point for the initial development of the docklands. There are negotiations at present with Treasury and Manor Homes with Cork CC who are developing ALL of Horgan’s Qy for CIE (ala Spencer Dock). There’s talk of gargantuan numbers of apartments plus “landmark” going in (some estimates mean that the single addition of this development will TRIPLE the number of apartments in the city centre!!!). I think they’re being careful about all this so as to pitch future development in the right light (i.e. right densities etc). So there will prob be little news on this till late winter – and the plans for the train station will tie in with this.

      In all fairness to the bus station – a true victim of CIE ineptitude – a prime city centre location and yet management couldn’t happily pick any developer partner for the site – what a farce! So so much time has slipped that the canopies are being thrown up as a measure for 2005 “cleanliness”.

    • #732282
      anto
      Participant

      Just heard that aer lingus are cancelling their daily flights between dublin & cork, another blow to the real capital. Maybe some other airline will take up the slack

    • #732283
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by sw101
      wheres that new entrance to the station going? if there was ever a place in need of a major revamp its that kip, and our stinky bus station too. cheapo version of busaras with half heartedly wavy canopy and a facade like a mules hide

      What are CIEs plans for the 1893 Kent Station?

    • #732284
      sw101
      Participant

      burn it!!!

    • #732285
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The building is going to be preserved and reused – the plans are vague but the word “cultural” crops up – not really sure… think Stack A in the IFSC.

      As for Aer Lingus pulling out of Dublin/Cork route… Aer Arran have a sharing agreement with them anyway – so there’s prob some arrangement there.

    • #732286
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The building is going to be preserved and reused – the plans are vague but the word “cultural” crops up – not really sure… think Stack A in the IFSC.

      As for Aer Lingus pulling out of Dublin/Cork route… Aer Arran have a sharing agreement with them anyway – so there’s prob some arrangement there.

    • #732287
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The building is going to be preserved and reused – the plans are vague but the word “cultural” crops up – not really sure… think Stack A in the IFSC.

      As for Aer Lingus pulling out of Dublin/Cork route… Aer Arran have a sharing agreement with them anyway – so there’s prob some arrangement there.

    • #732288
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by sw101
      burn it!!!

      That wouldn’t surprise me. Looking at what they did to the engine shed in Cobh (removed the roof and built a Garda station in it), anything goes where Irish Rail are concerned.

    • #732289
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Eh – not sure why that message appears three times! Apologies to all…

    • #732290
      sw101
      Participant

      Eh – not sure why that message appears three times! Apologies to all…

      Eh – not sure why that message appears three times! Apologies to all…

      Eh – not sure why that message appears three times! Apologies to all…

      Personally i think there should be put in place a comprehensive masterplan, following studies by external groups and/or a competition, for the whole shambles that is corks transport infrastructure. i mean look at the approaches from the west (where i have to drive in from). loop de loop round the station, go dockside for a bit then back up by the railway carpark and in another u-turn to get to the station. i’m pretty sure irish rail own all that land and its misuse is upsetting. surely all approach bus, rail and car transport could be accommodated on this vast site.

      and as an aside, what the hell is the story with the state of that road from silversprings up to the quays. bloody disgrace. remember they closed it for over 6 months for “improvements” and now its even worse.

      oh what i wouldnt do for a few billion euro and 3 years of calatravas time

    • #732291
      corkdood
      Participant

      What are they doing with bus station? Someone mentioned canapies. It needs more than that. It needs to be bulldozed and a fresh start made.
      Maybe they are actually proud of the reputation that the toilets on the first floor have!
      I suppose knowing CIE if they do anything whatsoever with the building the workers will be out on strike.

    • #732292
      crc
      Participant

      They should forget about the Parnell place site altogether and move the bus station to the railway station at the same time as they redevelop that.

      Of the small to medium sized cities (let’s face it, that’s what Cork is) that I’ve visited – the best combine their bus and rail stations.

      There’s lots of potetial for the land between kent station and the river – it could also help the dire access situation (what the hell they thought they were doing with the lwr glanmire rd is beyond me)!

    • #732293
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      What boy? Sure Cork is HUUUUUGE!

      Most of the badness about the Bus/Rail station can be directed towards CIE for it is they who have delayed for years the plans that were already decided upon. Yes – there were plans to move the bus station – but the slowness of CIE meant the boat had sailed, while the train station has been in development limbo (or hell!) for the past five years.

      Cork City Council are the ultimate at management speak – they use all the right buzz words “strategy” “study” “6/20 yr plan” and prepare these reports/plans with vigour – they have won believe it or not, international awards for their planning! But the true measure of management is delivery and the focus on delivery of results – which they probably fall down on (badly in the past – things seem to have changed).
      That said things like the Bus Station and Train Station were planned for in reports by CCC but when a loss-making sloth-like semi-state controls these, is the much a local authority can do other than formulate a strategy???

    • #732294
      corkdood
      Participant

      Speaking to CIE recently I’ve been told that they have got planning permission for the redevelopment of the PArnel Place bus station and the development is going ahead so the only question now is when?

    • #732295
      corkdood
      Participant

      As predicted nothing has happened with the bus or train station as yet. We are now 9 months from the start of 2005 which is the year Cork has been designated the European capital of culture. By the looks of it only St Patricks street will be completed in time. The tourists will however get to experience the culture of our dilapidated bus and rail stations amongst other things.

    • #732296
      sw101
      Participant

      seamas brennan was there to plug the fact that he’s throwing 4 million squids at the bus station for refurbishment. like throwing good cash on a bonfire.

    • #732297
      corkdood
      Participant

      And CIE will probably spend the money on meetings about how to do up the bus station rather than actually doing it. At any rate work won’t start until Jan 1st 2006.

    • #732298
      sw101
      Participant

      Saw in the echo the school of music will be given the go ahead by bertie in the run up to the elections. Tenders returned by Jarvis in 2001 of 58 million squid must now be whittled down to around 50 million. Tight bastards. 10 million less is small change but its going to reduce the potential of this building from world class to stripped out and budgeted

    • #732299
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I know that most people will disagree with me on this, but I must say I quite like the Bus Station in Cork. I think it needs some refurbishment, but overall I think it is a very under-rated building.

    • #732300
      sw101
      Participant

      Yes phil, you’re right. Most people will disagree with you. And on that count, they’re all right

    • #732301
      jupiter
      Participant

      yea, good god, have you ever had the unhappy chance to have to wait for a bus there, not to mention …use the toilets. Raze it.

    • #732302
      corkdood
      Participant

      The train station is also in need of attention.
      If only there was someone in charge at CIE who had the foresight and wisdom to develop an integrated bus/rail station on the existing Kent Station site with a new entrance on to patricks quay. Then we might have a public transport terminus worthy of the 21st century instead of the pitiful buildings we have now.

    • #732303
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      You mean the attractive, red brick station that befits Cork’s status as the second city? What’s wrong with it, other than Bus Eireann don’t use it and there is no political will to force CIE companies to share buildings?

    • #732304
      corkdood
      Participant

      Thats the one. Of course if you moved the bus station all the grannies would be complaining that they’d have to drag their shopping across the bridge to the new station. No pleasing everyone really is there!

    • #732305
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Yes Jupiter I have used it, but I cannot say that I have used the toilets (from other examples of CIE toilets I am sure they are a delight!). All I am saying is that people should take a closer look at the building. It has some attractive features such as the tiling on the outside. As I stated earlier, it does need some work. I am just trying to point out some of its positive aspects.

    • #732306
      sw101
      Participant

      It doenst need work. It needs a bulldozer. Its a poorly laid out badly designed building that doesnt maximise the potential of the site in the 21st century and which has fallen into chronic disrepair. The institutional lethargy of the staff and management there is something which is also protected by the continued use of this outdated atrocity of a bus station.

    • #732307
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by sw101
      “institutional lethargy”

      SW101, I must say that I really like that expression. It is the best description I have ever heard of some of the workforce that are encountered in those types of institutions. Don’t get me wrong about the bus station. I realise that it is not maximising its space and that it does not function well anymore, it is just one of those buildings that catches my eye when I am in Cork. For some reason I think it looks quite cool!

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #732308
      corkdood
      Participant

      For Phils (and anyone else who isn’t aware ) benefit I’ll let you know that the toilets in the bus station are well known as a meeting point for gay men. (think George Michael being arrested)

      For this reason alone (and there are many others) the building needs to be completely redesigned and preferably moved.

    • #732309
      sw101
      Participant

      Ok, i’m with you on it being unusual and somewhat eye-catching. if it was well maintained and tarted up like busaras (no, not you) it would be fine. But as it is its a waste, and throwing 4 million at it is a huge waste. Another few FF votes for berties continuing ride on the power wave methinks

    • #732310
      sw101
      Participant

      I knew that. Avoid like plague as the man said. The fucking timetable board has been moved now aswell and i cant find it. Good thing i know when all my busses go.

    • #732311
      Rjajc
      Participant

      Gay men?! In the toilets?! Meeting?!

      Well they should level the surrounding area just in case!

      What other tiresome stereotypes motivate you to consider the refurbishing of buildings corkdood? I mean its well known that ‘junkies’ meet outside the customs house; so I propose we completely redesign or better yet move the customs house; I mean if junkies can meet there next ‘gay men’ will and we’ll have fully fledged meeting of marginalised weirdos on the steps of one of our national treasures.

      I’ve also heard that moaney, second-city-issue-ridden Corkonians meet in Heuston station when they arrive in Dublin; so I propse we completely refurbish it or better yet move it to remove the ‘problem’.

      Or is that just another cliched lie?

    • #732312
      sw101
      Participant

      Idiot

    • #732313
      corkdood
      Participant

      Rjajc this conversation is clearly way over your head so I won’t attempt to explain it to you.

    • #732314
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally published by eircom.net
      €60m to fund new Cork School of Music premises
      From:ireland.com
      Thursday, 25th March, 2004

      A new building for the Cork School Of Music has been approved for constructio, bringing an end to a long-running saga which has seen students scattered to 17 locations across the city.

      The Minister for Education and Science, Mr Dempsey, today announced that just under €60 million will be provided for the building which will be constructed and operated as a Public Private Partnership (PPP).

      The Minister had been accused using EU budgetary regulations as an excuse for not providing funding for the project after the school was forced to leave its premises three years ago.

      But pressure began to build on the Minister after the regulations were relaxed last month and campaigners threatened to run candidates in the upcoming local elections.

      Making the announcement today, Mr Dempsey said he recognised the hardship caused to the 3,500 students and more than 65 staff students and tutors who had been forced to use a variety of premises including a disused hotel.

      “I am aware of the deep frustration and difficulties that the delay in progressing the project has caused the director, staff and students in the daily operation of the CSM since their move to the temporary accommodation.

      “The government was always committed to this important project but were faced with real difficulties, both national and European, in clearing the project and these have now been fully resolved,” Mr Dempsey said.

      However, the school is not due for completion until late 2006 and will not be operational in time for Cork celebrating its status as European city of culture next year.

      The project will be the first purpose-built school of music in the State and will be constructed and operated by Jarvis Projects on a 25-year lease on the Cork Institute of Technology (CIT) campus.

      CIT director Mr Pat Kelleher said the announcement was “a wonderful moment in history”.

      A grand building site for the European City of Culture’s year in the spotlight.

    • #732315
      corkdood
      Participant

      True enough – well we have so many tower cranes here already one more won’t make much difference.

    • #732316
      FIN
      Participant

      tower cranes are good though. it means that at least it’s developing. i must say i like cork. i found the whole driving experience down there quite strange but still. same here. lets hope that as city of culture it gets to do some nice public buildings like that music one.

    • #732317
      prc
      Participant

      its finally good to see people taking an interest in the built environment outside the pale, however looking through not only this forum, but others one gets a very negative attitude. while we need to be subjective about what is being built in our country, we also need to praise the work which merits it

      a comment was made about the opera house is cork, which is a result of the era it was built, not trying to defend the design if you can call a rectangular brick box a design, but this building was built in hard economic times on a shoestring budget, it s recent face lift and that of emmet plc has made the area less drab and with johhson and perrott moving to a new 4 million euro showroom in o callaghans mahon point, it leaves a valuable space for what we hope will be an exciting development in the heart of the city.

      the new murray o laoire bulding in ucc and the new school of music on the quays should also improve the citys image. a new apartment block on sawmill street across from st johns college , designed by jack coughlan architects (i think) is also a welcome addition to the city , situtated alongside the south terrace apartment complex , it looks like things have changed for the better

      anyway sorry for rambling on , just all this negative stuff is a bit much , lets hope one of the cranes from the extension to the south mall falls mysteriosly and takes the dreadful eicom building with it , yours prc 🙂

    • #732318
      T.G. Scott
      Participant

      cork is a great city but like a lot of the country has too many old relics from the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. bring on the new city hall refurb and the school of music. if it ever dawns on someone a new development at kent station with bus/rail services and access onto the quays would a great move. if the middleton line is ever reopened, it may someday even continue on to youghal and waterford . a new south-east coast line from cork to belfast via dublin i think however is a bridge way way too far…..
      by the way is mahon point actually going ahead and what about the sewage and water works in the city. surely those works must be nearly finished and finally what stage is the ballincollig by-pass at!!?!!

    • #732319
      dc3
      Participant

      I recently had northern European visitiors visit Cork.
      They were much struck by the prevalence of dereliction, next to development, in the main streets. Likewise the 60’s and 70’s tat was much noticed. While I would regard downtown Cork as more interesting than downtown Dublin, if a little rough around the edges, they did not have this view at all.

      They could not believe the incomprehensible down town traffic system, which is very poorly signed as usual in Ireland, and when I told them how long the Patrick Street road works had been continuing they thought I was telling lies.

      They also found prices very very expensive by the way, so will not be back for the City of Culchies in 2005.

    • #732320
      corkdood
      Participant

      Mahon Point is well advanced and will open next year with retailers like Debenhams B&Q and HMV all confirmed as tenants.

      After 5 years of disruption the sewage scheme is almost complete with the treatment plant working at 75% capacity at present making Cork harbour a healthier place. The Patrick street rejuvenation is also going well – should be completed by July. Works are also ongoing on Oliver Plunkett Street. I assume they will be finished by the end of the year.
      Meanwhile the new lights and bus stops on patrick street have already been vandalised and defaced with socialist workers party posters. Some things never change.
      Finally the Ballincollig bypass is well advanced and should open by the autumn.

      So its not all doom and gloom by the Lee.

    • #732321
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Hooray Cork! Finally pulled it’s socks up…

    • #732322
      Rjajc
      Participant

      How exactly does my comment display that a perfectly comprehensive and accessible discussion about architectural developments and their respective social and aesthetic merits is ‘clearly way over [my] head’ Corkdood?

      Do you think that my straying from the major thread topic shows this? Or is it just because you weren’t bothered giving any time to my (admittedly acerbic) comment and so flung me an adolescent ‘won’t attempt to explain it to you’ ?
      Always a thought provoking and truly mature response.

      What exactly won’t you attempt to explain? Because I really don’t feel a single comment in this thread is in anyway ‘above’ anyones ‘head’.

      I regularly visit Cork, and so took an interest in this thread.

      Lets be honest now; your comment was a way of quickly brushing off my point whilst maintaining a sense of superiority for yourself by implying that I simply don’t ‘get’ this ‘exclusive’ conversation.

      Pah!

    • #732323
      sw101
      Participant

      Uh-oh

    • #732324
      corkdood
      Participant

      Rjajc,

      This discussion has moved on in the 5 days since you last posted so perhaps you should do the same.
      Your comment was irrelevant and childish so I felt it didn’t warrant a response.
      I still feel that way.

    • #732325
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Relax a little lads. I really don’t think that Rjajcs original comments were at all childish. Although he said them in a slightly sarcastic way, I actually think he made a good point. Some times things are done in the built environment to erase a ‘problem’. The belief in the concept that we can change the way people act by good architecture is somewhat problematic as in most cases it just serves to hide reality even further.

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #732326
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      His original comments were very apt – junkies, custom house etc … but… “I’ve also heard that moaney, second-city-issue-ridden Corkonians meet in Heuston station when they arrive in Dublin; so I propse we completely refurbish it or better yet move it to remove the ‘problem’ “

      Ouch the poor Corkonians! Maybe the chip is infact on the other shoulder?!?

    • #732327
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      d_d, I thought he was only messing with that final comment. I did not take him seriously. However, maybe he was!?

    • #732328
      Rjajc
      Participant

      Yep, I was just messing with the last comment; being overly flippant to prove a point.

      Casual usage of social stereotypes infuriates me; particularly when used as a sole justification to pursue a course of action such as refurbishing/reconstructing a public space. If this is inherently ‘childish’ then so be it.

      I also don’t believe it is ‘irrelevant’ to challenge them in any circumstance Corkdood; on the contrary, it is wholly relevant.

      Anyway, no hard feelings, just needed to get it off my chest.

    • #732329
      anto
      Participant

      whatever happened to the the site oppossite the Bodega on the Coal Quay, planning for a hotel was refused there a few years ago? Any developments since? Knowing Cork probably not…………..

    • #732330
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      anto, the city council succeeded in persuading the developers behind the hotel application to re-submit and change course completely. An application went in before christmas for retail street connecting cormarket to paul st and approx. 80 apartments (no car parking)

    • #732331
      anto
      Participant

      sounds good. Things do seem to be happening in Cork alright. I remember living there 96-99 and not much seemed to be happening. Think that Celtic Kitten was a bit late arriving to Cork. Good to see the retail being expanded in the city centre. When Mahon point opens it might suck alot of punters away from the city centre.

    • #732332
      corkdood
      Participant

      You could be right about Mahon point. Although on the other side of town in Blackpool they opened a large shopping centre three years ago which is always busy. That must have hit the city centre too.
      Another major development in the city is that Examiner Publications have put their offices up for sale. Their offices take up a huge chunk of the city centre from Academy Street up to the savoy. They also have paper stores on half moon street. Johnson and Perrot on Emmet Place are also set to move opening up almost an entire block of retail space a stones throw from Patrick Street. I bet the Briitish retailers will be fighting for that one!

    • #732333
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Congrats to the city manager – forced an attitude change in landlords and massive amounts of retails space has been (will be) released coming on stream in the next few years. Too many of Cork’s inner city “prime” retails units are too small for suitable modern shops (think smaller units of grafton st). My only problem is that Owen O’Callaghan seems to have his fingers in almost all of the developments. The J+P building, the formers Guys site opposite the Bodega, (possibly) the Examiner site – AND Mahon Point… while he has proved his retail pedigree and ability to draw big names (check out lineup in Liffey Valley and Mahon Point) will he be happy to cannibalise one developments draw to suit another. Me thinks not.

    • #732334
      lexington
      Participant

      Hey lads! How’s it going? The Guy & Co site on Cornmarket Street is actually owned by the O’Donoghue/Ring families, they own the Munster Joinery in Ballydesmond near Mallow and a string of hotels in Killarney including the lovely Killarney Plaza. Money is no object! They applied for PP for 80 apartments and 7 retail units pretty much along the same design as the original hotel they’d planned 3 years ago. It’s a shame the hotel didn’t get the green-light – it was aesthetically beautiful and would be a far greater asset than more apartments to Cork.

    • #732335
      lexington
      Participant

      Also, Owen O’Callaghan has a deal with J+P with relation to their Emmet Place premises – they have a no-talks-with-the-press deal. But Owen O’C has in the meantime bought the site along the side-street adjacent to the Examiner premises on which the gay bar Taboo was situated at the former Vodafone store next to GQ on St. Patrick’s Street – so it’s not too hard to guess what he’s up to as he is one of the 3 tenders being reviewed by Thomas Crosbie Holdings for the Examiner site on Academy Street. There’s also a rumour Barters Travel Agency, the pharmacy and pub next to it on Paddy’s Street have entered deals with him to sell-up or relocated, free up a huge development quarter on Cork’s main shopping thoroughfare.

    • #732336
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Oh great… Merchants Qy MK2.

      So having inflicted a red brick carbuncle along an ENTIRE quay side – he’s now moving to infiltrate both Emmet Place and Patrick St.

      On the plus side – Cork City is in need of investment and this activity HAS to be a benefit.

    • #732337
      anto
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Hey lads! How’s it going? The Guy & Co site on Cornmarket Street is actually owned by the O’Donoghue/Ring families, they own the Munster Joinery in Ballydesmond near Mallow and a string of hotels in Killarney including the lovely Killarney Plaza. Money is no object! They applied for PP for 80 apartments and 7 retail units pretty much along the same design as the original hotel they’d planned 3 years ago. It’s a shame the hotel didn’t get the green-light – it was aesthetically beautiful and would be a far greater asset than more apartments to Cork.

      So why didn’t it get permission?

    • #732338
      lexington
      Participant

      Corporation Housing residents behind the Guy site objected to the scale of the project (at 6-storeys) and they were helped out by – who else? – An Taisce. The Bodega bar also objected. But the street is now worse off because of petty-short sightedness. 80 apartments has become the revised solution. Ugh! The hotel would have been SO much better. And of the Corp Housing residents? There is only one permanent resident remaining. Typical!

    • #732339
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by lexington
      And of the Corp Housing residents? There is only one permanent resident remaining. Typical!

      Have they been booted out so that the Corporation can make more money off the land?

    • #732340
      lexington
      Participant

      I don’t think so. A lot of the residents were OAPs – and they’d been there since the red-brick houses were built in the late 1950s/early 60s. As far as I know and don’t quote me on this, but a lot of the residents left either to move in with family or simply passed on. I understand the sentimental element to their objections but the developers had made generous incentives to the residents ( one of the residents themselves told me this, but refused to tell me what exactly it was) in order to compensate for construction disruption – but even those objections may have passed if it wasn’t for good ole An Taisce jumping on the bandwagon. I swear, I understand the relevance of An Taisce, but it seems they have nothing better to do with their excessive time than hold back the progress of our cities. Shouldn’t city planners worry about the appropriate development of our cities and not An Taisce? Let them raise appropriate arguments with relation to Protected Structures and leave it with City Planners to decide thereafter, not go running to An Bord Pleanale everytime a new development is proposed.

    • #732341
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      thank god that hotel proposal was rejected, it was TERRIBLE. it was something along the lines of a red-brick confusion of mock georgian and other bits thrown in, cheap, poorly designed. i saw the model in city council’s office a few years back and it was really poor and would have been a disrace if it were permitted. also, the site is more suitable for retail and residential, there are far better sites for quality hotels in the city. as far as i knew residents in the ‘old labourers dwellings’ as well as bodega people objected purely on the basis of loss of amenity i.e. light. in general, i think an taisce, and other residents are entitled to object, and by the way, it had significant local support from street traders etc. in the end, i believe cornmarket street has been ‘saved’ in this regard, and hopefully, the current application, due fairly soon, will represent a more attractive and interesting addition to the streetscape.

    • #732342
      lexington
      Participant

      Well the problem is, the Bodega predominantly operates at night – as it is a late night bar – so where is their problem with light? Their restaurant hadn’t come into operation at the time of objection. And also, the residents of the Corp Housing predominantly objected on the grounds that they would be adversely affected during construction at that the development would heed further large scale developments. The problem here is that, the residents were given binding assurances from Rockfell Investments and City Council that any disruption (ie. temp loss of water) would be rectified by alternative supply immediately and construction would be restricted to suitable hours in consultation with residents. On top of generous compensation agreements. Now that permanent residency of the area is significantly reduced it seems that the residents lost out in the long run. Cornmarket lost because instead of a much needed city centre hotel with able conference facilities AND adjoing retail mall, they are now faced with more overpriced apartments (80 in toll) that most normal people just can’t afford. The addition of 7 only retail units was thrown in by Rockfell to appear more agreeable to the City Council’s development strategy for the area which had earmarked the site for Higher-Order retail development. Instead, they are now getting a half-assed novelty attachment to facilitate the real monster, apartments. The building itself is an almost identical replica of the original hotel design. So all in all, I strongly disagree with you that the new development (based on residential purposes) is better. Its worse. There is now no hotel, no conference facilities, no parking and no retail centre. I am aware most traders (Con Dennehy notably) supported the original project but are now more weary of this new development.

    • #732343
      lexington
      Participant

      In addition, An Taisce has the primary purpose with relatin to planning, to raise awareness of the potential loss of what THEY deem architecturally significant buildings of a historic nature. Here’s my problem: John Mannix, whose Mannix and Culhane shop on 40-42 Washington Street, has proposed the development of a much needed over basement, office, parking, retail and apartment development measuring 6-storeys (similar to th height of the rest of Washington Street). Anyone who knows the shop knows that it is only a ground floor premises (completely out of sync with the rest of the street), [REMOVED IN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INAPPROPRIATE INFORMATION – MY MOST SINCERE APOLOGISES]. However An Taisce have objected, why? Because, the development would adversely affect the present structure (which does NOT exist, it collapsed and is now a horrid ground floor make-shift structure), because it is unsuited to the district (the building by Conveney & Assoc. has been designed in keeping with the red-brick style buildings of Washington Street) and because in is of inappropriate height overshadowing other significant buildings in the area (the building is of a similar height to its previous form and of surrounding structures). Tell me, is this fair? Free speech yes, but hindering progress. Cork has been riddled with more development stallments due to An Taisce, than almost any other Irish city. (that is a quote from Cork Business April 2004)

    • #732344
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      In addition, An Taisce has the primary purpose with relatin to planning, to raise awareness of the potential loss of what THEY deem architecturally significant buildings of a historic nature.

      An Taisce do not compile the list of protected structures this is the function of the Councils, however An Taisce has been known to draw the proposed elimination of protected structures to the attention of who ACTUALLY make the decisions on planning.

      Originally posted by lexington
      Here’s my problem: John Mannix, whose Mannix and Culhane shop on 40-42 Washington Street, has proposed the development of a much needed over basement, office, parking, retail and apartment development measuring 6-storeys
      (similar to th height of the rest of Washington Street).

      Office vacancy rates are 15% and there are massive developments in retail going up on Lee side, that argument is a crock

      Originally posted by lexington
      over basement, office, parking, retail and apartment development measuring 6-storeys
      (similar to th height of the rest of Washington Street).

      How many six storey modern spec buildings currently exist at this location?

      Originally posted by lexington
      Anyone who knows the shop knows that it is only a ground floor premises (completely out of sync with the rest of the street), this is because a few years back, the poorly maintained structure of the original 5 storey Mannix and Culhane building collapsed after intense bad weather killing a young Cork girl and paralysing her boyfriend.

      The Fenian St argument resurfaces yet again, the owners of that building should be facing corporate homicide charges, it simply isn’t acceptable to allow buildings deteriorate into a condition where they fall into the street.

      Originally posted by lexington
      In an attempt to replace it with decent building, John Mannix has issued this new development proposal. However An Taisce have objected, why? Because, the development would adversely affect the present structure (which does NOT exist, it collapsed and is now a horrid ground floor make-shift structure), because it is unsuited to the district

      The owners had the option to reconstitute the existing building line within two years of the ‘Collapse’ without requiring planning permission.

      Originally posted by lexington
      (the building by Conveney & Assoc. has been designed in keeping with the red-brick style buildings of Washington Street) and because in is of inappropriate height overshadowing other significant buildings in the area (the building is of a similar height to its previous form and of surrounding structures).

      The design obviously didn’t come off as anticipated, inappropriate height and over shadowing are valid arguments if they exist, make no mistake if the claims are bull An Bord Pleannala will dismiss them.

      Originally posted by lexington
      Tell me, is this fair? Free speech yes, but hindering progress. Cork has been riddled with more development stallments due to An Taisce, than almost any other Irish city. (that is a quote from Cork Business April 2004)

      Going by Liffey Valley Cork developers have about as much vision as Ben Dunne that is why developments have been red carded, if architectural standards rose to say Shay Cleary’s level you might get more quality buildings,

      Who are Cork Business?

    • #732345
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      lexington,

      i disagree that a residential/retail mix is less attractive than a hotel – , the proposal, as far as i know, does not include car parking facilities, which is pretty desirable in this central location. my point was that there are far better central locations than cornmaket street for a large scale hotel development with conference centre etc., in terms of accessibility etc. In addition, i dont think that the planners, in this case, can have regard to whether the apartments are overpriced or not, they will sell for what people are willing to pay for them surely. by the way, i have not seen the proposal so i have no idea about design issues and whether the scheme has progressed from the original, but from what you are saying i am not too optimistic. also, the bodega operates from 12.00 and does significant trading during daytime so i think thay would have had genuine concerns.

      in relation to what you have said about the mannix proposal, i completely agree, and in addition, as a prominent corner site, one would think that there is a need for a structure with a bit of height at that location.

    • #732346
      lexington
      Participant

      Just to reply to Dispora,

      Office vacancies in Dublin and Nationally are at 15% – the take up rate in Cork since 2002 has bucked this trend, with take-up in developments such as No.5 Lapps Quay, 21 Lavitts Quay and Howard Holdings 100Million Euro City Quarter project selling out within only a few months after their market launch. Generally in the vacancy rate in Cork, according to the Sunday Business Post property section only 4 weeks ago, was below 8% at a citywide level and that demand for new, high-quality open plan offices in the city centre was still in demand. But also the John Mannix project consists of other elements besides offices.

      The average building height along Washington Street is 5.23 storeys.

      The owners of the collapsed building were brought to court – the full details of which I am unclear of – but I do know new building quality requirements were introduced as a result of the tragedy by the then Cork Corporation.

      The design in my opinion of John Mannix’s project aren’t wildly imaginative but befitting to the area.

      There is, in the immediate vicinity of the proposed development on Washington Street, is only one new, 6-storey office development (right across the street actually).

      The location of the Mannix project is one in much need of development. Anyone familiar with the location will testify to this. Especially at such a prominent site.

      And although I agree Liffey Valley is externally rancid, Cork developers have become, at least in their own city, become increasingly aware of the pressure being enforced on them to come up with projects of a far greater architectural standard – advocated strongly by City Manager Joe Gavin, and influential media outlets such as the Evening Echo – 21 Lavitts Quay, John Hornibrook’s Camden Quay project, Frinailla’s Grand Parade Plaza, O’Flynn Construction’s forthcoming No. 6 Lapp’s Quay – and Paul Kenny’s revised South Main Street project – all reflect this.

    • #732347
      sw101
      Participant

      An Taisce do not compile the list of protected structures this is the function of the Councils, however An Taisce has been known to draw the proposed elimination of protected structures to the attention of who ACTUALLY make the decisions on planning.

      those who actually make the decision on planning in relation to protected structures are well aware as to their protected status…they do however have the oppurtunity to allow development or replacement of these structures where appropriate

      Office vacancy rates are 15% and there are massive developments in retail going up on Lee side, that argument is a crock

      15% vacancy(even though it’s not accurate) can never be a deciding factor in refusing permission for office development. modern attractive offices will attract 100% occupany and drag up the percentages in a general area. filling up a few more thousand square metres of rented floor space is much more achievable than ramming businesses into the vacant 15%, which is invariably the dregs of the available space.

      How many six storey modern spec buildings currently exist at this location?

      few…and it’s a poor reflection on the development plan and planning policies in the area that this is so. i assure you it’s not for the want of trying on the part of the developers/architects concerned

      Going by Liffey Valley Cork developers have about as much vision as Ben Dunne that is why developments have been red carded, if architectural standards rose to say Shay Cleary’s level you might get more quality buildings,

      “Cork developers” is such an idiotic generalisation that this comment deserves less than my derision.

      once again you’ve shown yourself to be a high-lighter of patently obvious and previously-discussed problems diaspora…one day i’m sure you’ll come through with the solution…but probably not in my lifetime

    • #732348
      GregF
      Participant

      Saw Corks skyscraper aka the seat of bureaucracy the other night on the news….looming in the background as the local FF candidate hung on for his life as he swung outta last years English Grand National Winner. …..jaypers, when is it ever gonna get that much needed makeover…..what a horrible building!

    • #732349
      prc
      Participant

      the much needed makeover is well under way, much of the building is now unoccupied with departments moving to different locations while a refit takes place, planning authority have gone to model farm road etc.



      the follow is from cork co co website

      An invited competition organised by the Royal Institute of Architects of Ireland and the Management Team at Cork County Council was held in September 1999 for the general refurbishment of the County Hall along with the provision of additional office accommodation. There were five architectural practices in the competition which was won by Shay Cleary Architects, Dublin.
      The winning scheme provides an innovative solution to the facade of the tower by introducing a skin of glass louvres which respond to differing climatic conditions and allow the tower to provide a high quality naturally ventilated working environment for the first time. It is further intended to fit out the existing building to present day office standards.

      A six storey extension will provide additional office space while a new concourse/foyer joins these two elements together and houses a new Council Chamber and elected members accommodation.

      A new multi-level carpark building will be constructed on the south western portion of the site, a part which is presently occupied by the temporary library building.

      A general rearrangement of the present on-site parking along with tree planting is also envisaged.

      The scheme was presented to the Council on 28th July, 2000 and at that meeting received the necessary approval to proceed with further design development with a view to lodging a full planning submission to Cork City Council.

      When complete, the finished project will provide high quality office accommodation for up to 600 people.

    • #732350
      prc
      Participant

    • #732351
      lexington
      Participant

      Don’t know if you heard the news, but a report in the Irish Examiner today by Tommy Barker, described the proposed 80 Million Euro Water Street Dockland project destined for Cork. The project is being launched today with planning permission being sought from this week on with Cork City Council. The project is being developed by Werdna Ltd owned by the Limerick based McMahon Family who own a large Building Supplies Group. Murray O’Laoire are the firm behind the design, Sean Kearns being principal architect.

      The development will consist of 400 residential units between 3 blocks, the centre of which is a tower over 19-storeys high, taller than Cork County Hall. The tower is proposed to provide a landark gateway into the city along the quays. The development also consists of an IT Centre, Restaurants, Creche, Cafes, Boardwalk, Private Dock Facility and recreational area.

      The designs are in the Irish Examiner today (26th May 2004). Undoubtedly there are going to be objections, it is Cork after all and Cork fears height, but if people have a bit of foresight, the project may get the go ahead, considering EIS and sustainability. It’s a nicely designed facility, but nothing we haven’t seen before. But it would be a striking addition to the Cork Docklands Development.

    • #732352
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by sw101

      those who actually make the decision on planning in relation to protected structures are well aware as to their protected status…they do however have the oppurtunity to allow development or replacement of these structures where appropriate

      No question there on appropriate being the opperative word, observation from all quarters is required.

      Originally posted by sw101
      15% vacancy(even though it’s not accurate) can never be a deciding factor in refusing permission for office development. modern attractive offices will attract 100% occupany and drag up the percentages in a general area. filling up a few more thousand square metres of rented floor space is much more achievable than ramming businesses into the vacant 15%, which is invariably the dregs of the available space.

      The point was made that offices were in under supply, the market is above equilibrium at present there fore that argument doesn’t exist. The opposite is also correct good planning and appropriate design is the decider in architecture and planning not market demand.

      Originally posted by sw101
      few…and it’s0 a poor reflection on the development plan and planning policies in the area that this is so. i assure you it’s not for the want of trying on the part of the developers/architects concerned

      I quite like that area of Cork it has its own identity. I am sure that improvements are possible, but how many developers are willing to bankroll high quality architectural projects?

      Originally posted by sw101
      “Cork developers” is such an idiotic generalisation that this comment deserves less than my derision.

      once again you’ve shown yourself to be a high-lighter of patently obvious and previously-discussed problems diaspora…one day i’m sure you’ll come through with the solution…but probably not in my lifetime

      You are right it is a hugely tiring argument new and shiny is beautiful and heritage is boring, and An Taisce killed the Celtic Tiger from the Ivory Towers (connected by rope bridge) in Christchurch and Dublin 4.

      There is no solution to planning simply an ongoing process of analysis and trade offs. Architectural standards are rising because any old crap won’t clear the planners like it once did.

      [/B][/QUOTE]

    • #732353
      lexington
      Participant

      http://www.unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=9&si=1188339&issue_id=10920

      That’s the link with pictures and the story on the new proposed Water Street development in Cork. Not very inspired but exciting nonetheless. And that 19-storey centre-piece building will provide a striking entrance to the city.

    • #732354
      Irishtown
      Participant

      Exciting, definately. I wish I could see a larger photo so we could see more detail, but that’ll come with time hopefully. I hope it gets permission.

    • #732355
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Do you understand the word “exciting”? 😉

    • #732356
      Andrew Duffy
      Participant

      It looks exactly the same as Spencer Dock. Is Murray O’Laoire turning into Scott Tallon & Walker?

    • #732357
      Irishtown
      Participant

      Originally posted by Paul Clerkin
      Do you understand the word “exciting”? 😉

      🙂 Haha, well it is exciting. I mean Cork may get another highrise. Thats something exciting.

    • #732358
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Where is Stira for this one?

    • #732359
      sw101
      Participant

      i’m hoping that was the dublin office of mola that came up with the “master” plan. cake anyone? yick…

      if they go ahead with producing such repetitive tat of the type found all over dublins river banks i might just have to leave

    • #732360
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah I know it’s very Spencer Dock-ish, but when you consider the location along the Cork Docklands, it would, in prespective look very well along the quays considering the other proposals for the Docklands – if they come to fruition.

      Some other projects for the Docklands I’ve been lucky enough to get access to, are genuinely exciting – architecturally and otherwise. One project, when it is, if it is, formally announced by its developer is going to have people talking big time. It’s of a similar height to the Water Street project by Werdna Ltd.

      MOLA have produced some nice work, like the new front elevation of the Cork Opera House – but it does seem to have the odd architectural sigh (ie. UCC Biosciences Building) and doesn’t the new Cork School of Music on Union Quay (also by MOLA) seem to resemble the Gate Multiplex on Bachelors Quay (designed by Derek “Snooze” Tynan, developed by Eymet)?

      I think this, Water Street, is a good MOLA and Werdna project though, I really hope it gets through the Planning Process positively.

      And on the subject of Scott Tallon & Walker, how do they keep getting work???

      (Although, I do have to say, their design for the 100million euro City Quarter by Howard Holdings on Lapps Quay – is turning out to be far more aesthetically pleasing in real-life than its design drawings. Credit where credit is due. )

    • #732361
      sw101
      Participant

      i thought it was MOLA that did the gate no? as far as i know they did the new facade anywho…might be wrong

    • #732362
      lexington
      Participant

      No – it was Derek Tynan. See his website http://www.dtarch.com

      I’m sorry but is it just me, or doesn’t Derek Tynan seem to aim for architectural beauty too often. In Cork, The Gate and the new Victoria Hall Student Complex at Victoria Cross (developed by Paul Montgomery and Edmund Kenneally) are proofs of this.

    • #732363
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster
    • #732364
      lexington
      Participant

      Some interesting pics of current Cork developments incl. 21 Lavitts Quay (the O’Callaghan Properties office development), No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay (office development by O’Flynn Construction)

      More soon!

    • #732365
      lexington
      Participant

      Sorry forgot 21 Lavitts Quay pic, here it is!

    • #732366
      lexington
      Participant

      http://www.murrayolaoire.com

      Check out articles on Water Street development.

      And any opinions on posted pictures above?

    • #732367
      lexington
      Participant

      Well it seems my earlier reports have borne fruit and Owen O’Callaghan has indeed been the successful bidder for the Irish Examiner’s Academy Street premises. Along with the Johnson and Perrot premises on Emmet Place, most of Faulkers Lane, and some of Bowling Green Street, O’Callaghan Properties now own 90% of this 1.5 acre block.

      Thomas Crosbie Holdings, owners of the Irish Examiner, Sunday Business Post, Evening Echo and 14 other titles – bagged 30 million euros for the sale and – the deal clincher – a 3.5 acre site at O’Callaghan’s Mahon Point complex in the suburbs alongside the South Ring Motorway.

      The 3.5 acre site will be leased to Webprint Concepts, a start-up printing company to which the Thomas Crosbie Holdings will outsource its printing.

      It is the Irish Examiner’s intention to relocate its non-printing operations (ie. editorial etc) from its Academy Street premises in 2006 to a newly built office building on a site it owns on Lavitts Quay, right next to O’Callaghan’s new 21 Lavitts Quay office building.

      O’Callaghan has proposed a new 6-storey retail and apartment development for the Academy Street/Emmet Place/Faulkner’s Lane area – with basement, ground, 1st, 2nd and 3rd floors dedicated to retail operations and 4th, 5th and 6th = apartments. (shudder!)

      Other bids I hear from good sources had been made by Howard Holdings, a company owned by Treasury Holdings, Lagan Developments and a consortium involving Cumor Construction, McCarthy Developments (indirectly), Brian McCarthy Construction and possibly P. Elliot Construction.

      O’Flynn Construction are focusing on their Ballincollig Town Centre Development and new retail/residential complex at Eglinton Street, Cork city centre.

    • #732368
      lexington
      Participant

      Just when people thought things were gonna level off, in the past 3 weeks alone, major planning applications and development plans have been laid out for Cork – coming into effect or fruition over the next few months/years.

      Some of these include the 500million euro Ballincollig Town Centre, the est. 60million euro Eglinton Street development, 12 million No.6 Lapps Quay (ALL O’Flynn Construction), 80 million docklands development at Water Street by Werdna (incl. 19-storey residential tower – designed by MOLA), new Howard Holdings Tech and Business Centre on Alfred Quay, 150million euro retail/apartment complex on Academy Street, New Cork School of Music (60million), 35million Rockfell Investments venture on Cornmarket Street and MANY MANY more to boot!

      That’s not incl. the plans for the Docklands – for which a new 25million euro tilting bridge is proposed at Water Street to Kennedy Quay and a new 20-storey hotel, 3,000 seat convention centre and offices (rumoured to be aimed 2 large German banks) on Kennedy Quay.

      What are your feelings on such? And please feel free to contribute any new but genuinely reliable information on such new developments.

    • #732369
      FIN
      Participant

      sounds good for cork. bout time

    • #732370
      Irishtown
      Participant

      I’m happy for Cork.

      I did not know of this “plans for the Docklands – for which a new 25million euro tilting bridge is proposed at Water Street to Kennedy Quay and a new 20-storey hotel, 3,000 seat convention centre and offices (rumoured to be aimed 2 large German banks) on Kennedy Quay.”

      Any pictures or additional information? Thanks mate.

    • #732371
      Irishtown
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington

      And any opinions on posted pictures above?

      lexington- thanks for posting those. Do you have details on the two projects?

    • #732372
      lexington
      Participant

      Will try and get some pics of the Water Street Bridge for ya, its a development on behalf of Cork City Council.

      The Hotel and Convention centre were proposed by an as yet undisclosed development group but there may be a spanner in the workers at the announcement of O’Callaghan Properties to develop their previously proposed convention centre at Mahon.

    • #732373
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Irishtown

      lexington- thanks for posting those. Do you have details on the two projects?

      Yeah – 21 Lavitts Quay was designed by Patrick Cashman and Associates, and will house the new headquarters of O’Callaghan properties on the top floors. The remaining elements of the building include offices on floors 1, 2 and 3, ground floor reception and retail area plus restaurant. In addition there are 44 apartments and private multi-storey car park at the rear (access via Lavitts Quay). It is due for completion by end of the summer/early autumn. Looking at it from the quays, already it looks very impressive. It’s the only O’Callaghan property that I can say has a genuinely attractive and innovative design. More like these O’Callaghan!

      No. 5 and No.6 Lapps Quay has been designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects (Cork) and developed by O’Flynn Construction. No.5 was a renovation of the old (gruesome) Eircom Building. The entire office building has been sold in floors (1 -> 5) already. Construction on the striking second phase, No.6 is due to begin by the end of the summer and will be complete by Autumn 2005. It will make a fine addition to Lapps Quay (already undergoing a huge development in the form of the City Quarter project). No.6 will consist of further offices over 5 floors and sell and approx. 1.6 million euros each.

    • #732374
      lexington
      Participant

      Further info on that conference centre, hotel Dockland proposal – the proposal is actually for Horgan’s Quay (adjacent to Water Street) and the developers are Manor Park Homes, CIE and Treasury Holdings.

      Negotiations are still on-going but the plan will incl. a 5000-seat convention centre (not a 3,000 seat), towers between 20 to 25 storeys, a new commercial quarter and new homes. (this is quoted in today’s (3rd June 2004) Commercial Property section of the Irish Examiner)

      Also, as reported in the Evening Echo today, the southern docks will be home to a new Sports Arena capable of hosting international events (incl. International Rugby matches), with tracks, swimming and other such facilities. This is part of the Cork Development Draft 2004 – 2009 so its nothing concrete at still up in the sky – interesting though.

    • #732375
      Irishtown
      Participant

      Wow, Cork could be alot different in the coming years.

    • #732376
      lexington
      Participant

      Work on the Cork Bus Station has fiiiiiiiiiiinally begun. Although the revised plans are more of a novelty refurbishment for Cork 2005, they’re still a helluva lot better than the derelict scrub that currently exists.

      Also, after the closure of 2 nightclubs in the past 6 months in Cork – for apartment developments – City Properties has announced its plans for a new club over the Classic Bar on South Main Street, where part of the Queen’s Old Castle (now Virgin Megastore and Argos) used to exist. Planning permission has just been sought.

      Also, Werdna Ltd. have officially applied for planning permission for their Water Street development (fingers crossed!).

    • #732377
      Irishtown
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Also, Werdna Ltd. have officially applied for planning permission for their Water Street development (fingers crossed!).

      Oooh! So exciting. When shall a decision be reached?

    • #732378
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Water st is a definite sign that all the “Cork is on the up” talk is finally coming to something. A bit of ambition killed noone either, and I’m glad the developers are trying to put this forward rather than resigning to the flat and safe densitites (IFSC cough).
      That said I wish the design wasn’t so damn homogenous – so much river front (i.e. Corks strong point) wasted on the same block repeated five times. sigh. Other comment bothers me: 66m same as County Hall…. to reflect as a gateway from other side of city. Is 66m going to become Corks version of the Dublin 60m???

      That said I was there for first time in ages during the long weekend and couldn’t believe the amount of activity going on down there. Go Cork!

    • #732379
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Decision? Well when it gets planning permission and An Taisce have a child and the usual appeal wranglings happen and some awful watered down proposal gets through – some disaster of compromise, we’ll all be sorry that we even were aware of what could have been.

      Interestingly enough under the development plan 2004-2009, all “major developments” must submit a “design statement” with the application. Hopefully this will spur developers/architects on to think a little harder about the overall design aswell as the finer and more subtle design elements of proposals.

    • #732380
      lexington
      Participant

      The Decision Date for Water Street is due on the 25/07/2004 but God knows it’ll probably be later than that knowing our lightning fast planning authorities. I’m expecting a request for Further Info and if and hopefully it does get FULL (not watered down) planning permission, I’m sure An Taisce and probably a few residents will run screaming to An Bord Pleanala. UGH!

      But ya never know, with John Hornibrook current development on Camden Quay, even though the Senior Planner and a few businesses nearby complained, Joe Gavin – the City Manager, stood in and pushed the project through – so miracles do happen!

    • #732381
      lexington
      Participant

      Cool images d_d_dallas! Where’d ya get them? Looking at them, homogeneous or not, ya can’t help getting excited. Plus, if I can, I’m gonna try and get my hands on a few JPEGs of future docklands projects I’ve viewed (but still haven’t been formally announced – incl. Eglinton Street and Horgan’s Quay).

      Cork is buzzing lately, it’s really encouraging to see.

    • #732382
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Pictures would be fab if you could get them. If Horgan’s Qy ever gets a move on that is…

      It’s exciting alright – compared to what’s there at present. However if two separate submissions are made by An T for that Mannix Culhane building on Washington St – imagine what this will attract.

      The ones above are from Murray O’Laoire’s own site.

      http://www.murrayolaoire.com

    • #732383
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah I saw the Planning Report, ugh – it’s so frustrating. The Mannix Culhane building is designed by Coveney & Assoc of Monkstown, Cork and has been designed in-line with the general style of the Washington Street area (with apparently a ‘modern twist’ – make of that what you will!) 4 submissions have already been made against the project – plus Further Info has been requested by Cork City Council. Fingers crossed!

      Also, Howard Holdings have made further steps on the Business Centre proposals adjacent to City Hall, while Cork City Council have made notices for their planned new Civic Building across the street, south of Angelesea Street Garda Station.

      O’Flynn Construction are expected to make an announcement regarding their Eglinton Street site within the next few weeks.

      (Come on Water Street!!!)

    • #732384
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      In relation to the Water St. Development Proposal – I am wondering whether An Taisce will object or not, I have a feeling (and I could be very wrong) that An Taisce will not object, although I am sure that neighbouring residents probably will. However, I do not expect or sense any discernible ‘ourage’ nor should there be.

      If An Taisce object, on what grounds would this objection be? Building Height ? – The Cork High Buildings Study identified this location as a candidate for high buildings, as did the Cork Docklands Development Strategy and the current Cork City Development Plan. It is a brownfield site on the waterfront, facing south over the city at a gateway location in terms of vehicular and maritime traffic. A high building is essential, appropriate and sustainable. If it were a four storey building, would An taisce object on the basis of it being too low, contrary to City planning Policy and govt guidelines on density and sustainable development?

      In terms of design, it, to me, seems quite attractive, although i agree that it can appear monotonous. However, as is often the case in docklands projects, the initial scheme often acts as a catalyst and compromises can be made – eg dublin docklands, canary, bristol. I really hope that CCC give it support because it will kickstart the north docks and the city cannot afford to wait for CIE or Treasury to move on Horgan’s Quay.

      I hope also that CCC do not take a number of floors off just to appease the inevitable gombeen local slopitician who is guaranteed to get involved and create pathetic references to Ballymun, the glen etc. Taking four or six floors off this will ruin the opportunity to set the tone for Corks new urban quarter, will institutionalise a conservative approach to design/height/architecture and would be irresponsible and, i believe, contrary to proper planning and sustainable development Cork should learn the lessons from the early approach to dublin docklands and see a project like this as a strategic opportunity to deliver positive developemtn for the entire city

      Also, I do not think the site includes or adjoins a protected structure, will not compromise neighbouring dwellings sun/day light. If An Taisce object, on what grounds will this be? By the way if they do object on sound planning grounds (although i cannot anticipate these), leave them, they are entitled, lets have no abuse.

    • #732385
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by bunch
      If it were a four storey building, would An taisce object on the basis of it being too low, contrary to City planning Policy and govt guidelines on density and sustainable development?

      No but no developer would ever for apply for permission for less than is attainable.

      Originally posted by bunch
      I hope also that CCC do not take a number of floors off just to appease the inevitable gombeen local slopitician who is guaranteed to get involved and create pathetic references to Ballymun, the glen etc.

      My first encounter with Royston Vessy Brady ( Brother of Fulton Brady) was at the Smithfield planning enquiry, his contribution was welcomed by no-one but himself.

      Originally posted by bunch
      Taking four or six floors off this will ruin the opportunity to set the tone for Corks new urban quarter, will institutionalise a conservative approach to

      One positive development in recent times has been the way that decisions are now delivered. Before a developer who wanted an eight storey building would need to apply for 14 story building, the Council would offer 10 and ABP would give them 8.

      The architects would design a 14 storey building which not only lost 6 floors but also all architectural quality in transition. Now you get a simple yes or no.

    • #732386
      lexington
      Participant

      Cleary Doyle Building and Civil Engineering Contractors have won the bid for contract of Cork City Council’s 32million euro extension of City Hall. The new building is designed by ABK Architects.

      Cleary Doyle are responsible for the 12million Euro new Cork VEC and 35million Altana Pharma plant in Cork also.

      Also CDA Assoc announced that O’Flynn Construction would begin starting construction of No.6 Lapps Quay as of this week.

    • #732387
      lexington
      Participant

      Anyone who’s followed my posts will know that I’m a strong advocate for the development of Cork city. I’m have strongly endorsed city projects such as Water Street, City Quarter, No.5 and No.6 Lapps and 21 Lavitt Quays, Paul Kenny’s South Main Street development, John Mannix’s Washington Street development and many more, both online and on the ground – however, I am deeply angered by the grant of permission to Grangefield Developments for the partial demolition of the Victoria-esque Arbutus Lodge Hotel in Montonotte, Cork and the construction of 2 apartment blocks ranging between 3, 5 and 6 storeys high.

      I recognise many changes have been made by Grangefield in order to gain planning permission, but the project still remains grossly out of place, unsuited and downright ugly in what is predominantly a leafy, residential housing suburb overlooking the city centre from the northern slopes.

      The project has little to no architectural merit (James Leahy & Assoc., Cork) and ruins what is an elegant former manor and hotel. The immediate access is poor and has traffic difficulties as it is. The immediate surrounding area is taken up by a pleasant leafy garden area and a number of unique one of houses overlooking the city. The construction of a 6 storey apartment block devastates resident privacy and brings to which has always traditionally been a nice owner-occupier housing area, the monstrosity of a development which will accomodate temporary residency in the majority – ruining the family centred quality of the area.

      2 crimes are being commited here – the devastation of a classic architectural structure which has been adequately retained, and the imposition of an oversized apartment development in an area completely unsuited to such a project.

      This is a further notch down for my believe in Cork’s planning authority. How is it that suited city centre projects such as Paul Kenny’s South Main Street office/retail/hotel project are refused (permission was only granted after appeal), and the partial demolition of a architecturally significant structure and erection of an apartment block in a leafy residential suburb gets the go ahead first round? It’s another example of an appalling planning system.

      I am an advocate for such large scale development in Cork, but where it is right and suited. This sort of project should be forwarded in a city centre location such as the former Irish Internation Trading Co. premises between Angelsea Street and South City Link, or docklands, or city quay areas, not in a green suburban area.

      This is a disheartening development, just when I thought they were copping themselves on.

      I only hope Water Street, Mannix project, Eglinton Street, South Main Street and other such projects are given rightful permission. It will help redeem my faith in CCC, but it may be too late for the Arbutus. Hmmm.

    • #732388
      lexington
      Participant

      More news on cool Cork projects at the thread entitled:

      Cork – New Developments

    • #732389
      lexington
      Participant


      No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay


      Picture of City Quarter development (with No.6 Lapps Quay to the west)


      Another pic of City Quarter from the east.


      21 Lavitts Quay


      New Irish Examiner HQ on Lavitts Quay (21 Lavitts Quay will be immediately to the left [or west] of the building)

      2 smaller pics of alternate Irish Examiner HQ view (incl. aspect to Cork Opera House)

    • #732390
      lexington
      Participant

      It has been announced the the new Irish Examiner HQ site has been attained by an undisclosed bidder and that the building will be complete for early 2007.

    • #732391
      Papworth
      Participant

      Cork City 3 Malmo ( the Swedish Champs ) 1 . A great development over the weekend.

    • #732392
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Badaboom!

      Lexington, is the Examiner building shown above the pre or post hobbling by An Bord P? It’s looks a story smaller in the 21 lavitts qy picture…

    • #732393
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally the building was designed at 7-storeys but I do know An BP in their report specified a ‘desirability’ to see a reduction of 1 floor to 6-storeys. However, as far as I know, the 21LQ pic incl’d the Irish Examiner building as a projection and comparison and incorporated an earlier design of the building than the one that then went for PP. So I’m not quite sure. If you look at the 21LQ pic, the design on the IE building is different to that of the O’Riordain Staehli pics.

      I do know, however the revised IE design is now 6-storeys.

      Any opinions on the other pics???

      I’ll have more up soon.

    • #732394
      Irishtown
      Participant

      Here are some other pictures of the Clarion/City Quarter developement I’ve found:

    • #732395
      lexington
      Participant
    • #732396
      Irishtown
      Participant

      SWEET!

    • #732397
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      any details of horgan quay…

      where’s eglinton street?

    • #732398
      GregF
      Participant

      Those images all look very nice ……..good renderings too

    • #732399
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Eglinton St is the side of the City Hall with the stacked portacabin-alike Main Garda Station.

    • #732400
      lexington
      Participant

      Horgan’s Quay has had a myriad of plans associated with it over the years – all of which have been squashed due to certain Fine Gael TDs and the slowness of CIE to utilise it’s properties in a profit-maximizing and efficient manner.

      However, the latest plans – which are driven be strong private backing and the phenomenal boom in the Cork city property development market – consist of a 5000 seat convention centre, up to 5000 residential units (which will probably be restricted due to the Cork City Development Plan 2004-2009 specificity with relation to Horgan’s Quay as a commercial zone), a new office, IT and associated commercial district backed by Manor Park Homes, Treasury Holdings and CIE (as well as a number of local provate investors). The total investment has been estimated by Cork City Council at a min. of 245million euro. No formal launch has been made as of yet – mostly due to CIE dragging its heels.

      *UPDATES:*

      O’Flynn Construction have announced the launch of No.6 Lapps Quay (see pic in prev. post) which has begun construction based on the huge demand associated with No.5 Lapps Quay. They are also behind the massive, announced retail and residential developed at former sorting office on Eglinton Street.

      Corbett Brothers Development have begun construction on a major commerical and residential development at Copley Street.

      Bride View Developments have sought planning for 193-apartments in a series of 5 storey blocks at Rochestown. (shudder!)

      Cumnor Construction have applied for permission for a 7-storey apartment building at Sunnyvale on Sunday’s Well overlooking city centre.

      Howard Holdings confirmed plans to begin construction on new 15 million euro Business/IT centre at Albert Quay.

      Work begins on 60-million euro Cork School of Music on Union Quay in July.

      And an unnamed investment group, whom I can’t as of yet reveal, have begun pre-planning for the purchase of the former Irish Distillers site on the North Mall (estimated to sell for 30-million for 14.4acres in city centre – rivalling a proposed bid by UCC) and development of a new low-rise, gated, pedestrian urban community with boardwalks, cafes, restaurants, theatres, helath centres, bars, clubs, duplexs, offices, shopping boulevard and college centres – est’d to be worth over 145 – 225 million euro. Please remember this is only a pre-planning proposal.

    • #732401
      T.G. Scott
      Participant

      any word on whether or not kent station is to be worked on. always figured it would make sense to reopen middleton line on to youghal and given a billion connect waterford to cork and dublin. It would be nice to have an east coast high speed line to dublin and belfast!!!

    • #732402
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      As seen in the Planning Applications section of the Irish Examiner 24th June 2004 – UCC have just applied for Planning Permission for a 35-million euro extension of the Boole Library (originally built in 1983) of over 5979 sq m. Whoa! The extension is needed – as any UCC student at exam time will tell you.

      The extension will be constructed on the southern elevation of the existing, huge Boole Library building and comprise of 5-storeys over basement. In addition, the existing Boole Library will be refurbished to meet the standards of the mammoth new extension.



      In reply to T.G. Scott – CIE have said that they will refurbish Cork’s Kent Station in-line with any development of Horgan’s Quay (see previous posts). The plan is the face the station out facing the quays and the new Cork Docklands Development, with dual-level departure and arrival points, extended platforms, new access rail-lines (w/ potential to allow a future link-up with the new Cork Metropolitan and Suburban Rail System [which has been greenlighted by Transport Minister Seamus Brennan – initially encompassing a new line to Midelton and new stations at Carrigtwohill, Dunkettle, Blarney and Blackpool]), extension and refurbishment of the existing rail terminal building and a multi-storey car-park in the current ground-level car-park off the Lower Glanmire Road. These plans can be viewed in basic form as part of the Cork Development Plan and CASP Strategies. Advanced designs can be obtained from CIE – at a cost!

    • #732403
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      thanks lexington.
      any reason as to why cie are dragging their heels?
      how soon would you expect an announcement on horgan’s quay to be made.
      how close are o’flynns to announcing plans for eglinton street (this is the an post site right?)? The eglinton street site would be perfect for an event centre btw.

      Are there any plans to develop river walkways in the city centre?
      The Lee is very underutilised (for obvious reasons for now).
      After so many years of watching Cork fall behind other Irish cities in terms of redevelopment, I must say I am extremely proud as an exiled Corkonian to see the city explode in this way. An announcement on transatlantic flights and these developments will see Cork emerge as a serious counter-pole to Dublin.

      Now let’s hope the planners and developers emerge with a vision of a beautiful city.

    • #732404
      lexington
      Participant

      HORGAN’S QUAY: ->

      CIE remain very tight-lipped on the whole scheme – they’ve made a commitment but have failed to make a formal public announcement on plans. My own personal belief is that they are having problems securing designated finance – after all it is still a public company ~ and many such companies have difficulty committing finance for stragic purposes because the lack the vision for long-term revenue strategies. Redeveloping Horgan’s Quay along with private investors like Treasury Holdings presents a spectacular investment opportunity and would see CIE maximizing its assets with a view to strategic returns.

      The Irish Examiner claims that Treasury and Manor Park are likely to make an announcement (pending successful proposals) ahead of CIE – effectively dragging the state company kicking and screaming into the project [for its own good I might add] – the annoncement is expected before year-end.

      EGLINTON STREET: ->

      The O’Flynn’s have erected a huge display banner on-site at Eglinton Street announcing the near announcement of a “Major Retail and Residential Complex Development”. The Irish Examiner and Irish Independent claim the O’Flynn’s have plans for a striking and modern high-rise development in the region of 60-million euros – however I’m not so sure of this from my personal inquiries with the company. A high-rise so close to City Hall is risky and the O’Flynn’s are aware of that. I am aware that they have 2 plans already designed and they are considering the most suitable. Either way, the site location and size mean the development is gonna be huge. A formal anouncement expected before end of July, early August. (It is expected Eglinton Street development will also cater for the parking needs – in undergound form – for the No.6 Lapps Quay office building currently under construction.

      CORK CITY GENERALLY: ->

      With the call by the Cork Business Association (CBA) today (28th July 2004) for a major events centre in Cork city. Plans for Sports Arena development (capable of hosting international sporting events – incl. rugby, soccer, athletics etc) along the docklands, and the development of quayside boardwalks (mostly by private investors as part of their individual projects – i.e. Howard Holdings = Lapps Quay, Werdna Ltd = Water Street, Victoria Hall Developments and UCC from Victoria Mills through UCC to Lancaster Quay – and the proposed Mardyke to North Mall boardwalk via Irish Distillers pre-planning development) Cork is gaining all the time.

      The city really is on the move – and as the Chief Economist at DTZ Sherry Fitzgearld recently announced – for investors, Cork city represents the most exciting development opportunities (especially commercial) anywhere in Ireland right now. The city has a catchment of 500,000 people with 365,000 in it’s immediate metropolitan area. Unemployment and crime are at their lowest levels in decades and discretionary income is at its highest. After Dublin, Cork is the 2nd largest urban area and 2nd most affluent population. Big developers have caught on this ie. O’Callaghan Properties, whose total current development spend in Cork is almost 700-million euros (Mahon Point, Lavitts Quay, Classis Lake, Academy Street, Ballinlough etc), O’Flynn Construction = 675-million euro (Ballincollig Town Centre, Lapps Quay, Dunkettle, Eglinton Street etc), Howard Holdings = 260million euros (Lapps Quay, Albert Quay, Docklands, Estuary Court, Angelsea Street etc) and many more incl. Shipton Group (120m), Frinailla Developments (130m), Werdna (80m), Sheehan Family, Hornibrook and Co., Treasury Holdings, OSB, Jarvis, Hanranka Ltd., Corbett Bros etc.

      Cork really is the place to invest right now and I only pray the planners don’t mess it up. And if things keep up (and they are projected to up to 2016), Cork really could become a major alternative to Dublin. It’s taken a long while, but as any economist or consumer will tell you, a little competition never hurt anyone. As market economies show, it can make you stronger. What’s good for Cork maybe good for Dublin and the rest of the country. Let’s just keep those fingers crossed!

    • #732405
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The former An Post sorting site is designated specifically to accommodate a “tall building” under some of the various plans to the city/docklands. I presume the idea is to form a southern gateway approaching from Douglas/Bishopstown on the South Link. So O’Flynn’s plans probably suit the city planners.
      Mind you – what constitutes “high-rise”… 9 stories???
      It is a shame that site is not proceeding as originally planned – i.e. the new busaras. Any moves on the “camoflage canopy” for the existing eyesore?

    • #732406
      corkdood
      Participant

      Work has begun on the existing bus station at parnell place. I don’t know what the plans are though. The work so far seems concentrated on the area behind the bus station where the buses used to park. No idea what they’re doing with the building – probably just painting it!

    • #732407
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork School of Music gets on a roll! (Construction starts July!)

      see -> Cork – New Developments

    • #732408
      lexington
      Participant

      CORK SCHOOL OF MUSIC

      Lift cranes and demolition equipment over the old Cork School of Music heed the commencement of construction of the new Cork School of Music!


      Primary construction is expected in mid-July.

      CORK BUS STATION

      Ridge Developments have begun construction of the refurbished Bus Station. The scaled back project will see complete terminal refurbishment, small extension to the rear and canvas canopies extend over quay-side bay area and smaller example to the rear.

    • #732409
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      “scaled back project” – at leats CIE are coherent in their approach to Cork!

    • #732410
      ISI
      Participant

      I was down in UCC the other day and the new art gallery is nearing completion. It looks really good.

      http://www.odonnell-tuomey.ie/webpage/ucc/ucc_cgi4.htm

      Any possibility of Pairc Ui Caoimh being redeveloped and opened up to other sports in the years to come, perhaps minor internationals, Ireland/Italy rugby, that sort of thing?

    • #732411
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah, the Lewis Glucksman Gallery in UCC is pretty cool – the problem with it is that it is completely pointless and a huge waste of resources that could have be channelled into relevant projects like the planned IT Centre along the Western Road. Converting the Glucksman Gallery into more (and needed) lecture theatres would be a far better alternative.

      *UPDATES*

      A Planning Application, as seen in today’s (29th June 2004) Evening Echo, by Kilquane Ltd (the company owned by Howard Holdings to develop the City Quarter project on Lapps Quay) has been lodged with Cork City Council to see the addition of a 6th floor on the offices currently under construction.

      The application for additional office space will see the office element of the City Quarter project equal the height of the adjoining Clarion Hotel and reflects a response to the demand for office space in the development. Scott Tallon Walker have said they will issue revised drawings of the project imminently – and as soon as they do, I’ll post them up so you can all see the new, bigger and taller office building.

    • #732412
      Irishtown
      Participant

      So is the Clarion Hotel only 6 stories? I thought it was 8.

      Or are they saying heightwise in metres and not stories? Because office floors are taller than hotel floors typically, so I guess they could be equal height and still be 8 and 6 floors.

    • #732413
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by bunch
      In relation to the Water St. Development Proposal – I am wondering whether An Taisce will object or not, I have a feeling (and I could be very wrong) that An Taisce will not object, although I am sure that neighbouring residents probably will. However, I do not expect or sense any discernible ‘ourage’ nor should there be.

      If An Taisce object, on what grounds would this objection be? Building Height ? – The Cork High Buildings Study identified this location as a candidate for high buildings, as did the Cork Docklands Development Strategy and the current Cork City Development Plan. It is a brownfield site on the waterfront, facing south over the city at a gateway location in terms of vehicular and maritime traffic. A high building is essential, appropriate and sustainable. If it were a four storey building, would An taisce object on the basis of it being too low, contrary to City planning Policy and govt guidelines on density and sustainable development?

      In terms of design, it, to me, seems quite attractive, although i agree that it can appear monotonous. However, as is often the case in docklands projects, the initial scheme often acts as a catalyst and compromises can be made – eg dublin docklands, canary, bristol. I really hope that CCC give it support because it will kickstart the north docks and the city cannot afford to wait for CIE or Treasury to move on Horgan’s Quay.

      I hope also that CCC do not take a number of floors off just to appease the inevitable gombeen local slopitician who is guaranteed to get involved and create pathetic references to Ballymun, the glen etc. Taking four or six floors off this will ruin the opportunity to set the tone for Corks new urban quarter, will institutionalise a conservative approach to design/height/architecture and would be irresponsible and, i believe, contrary to proper planning and sustainable development Cork should learn the lessons from the early approach to dublin docklands and see a project like this as a strategic opportunity to deliver positive developemtn for the entire city

      Also, I do not think the site includes or adjoins a protected structure, will not compromise neighbouring dwellings sun/day light. If An Taisce object, on what grounds will this be? By the way if they do object on sound planning grounds (although i cannot anticipate these), leave them, they are entitled, lets have no abuse.

      Well despite ALL that, An Taisce – the purveyors of evil, or as they seem to be better known, Campaigners for the Stone Age – have indeed objected to the Water Street development. Their submission was made on the final submissions day. They must have had itchy feet and been dying to mess up another project for Cork – well they finally gave into their temptation. But on what grounds? Conservation of a derelict site??? (Which is zoned for landmark development.) EVERY SINGLE major development proposed in Cork over the past 2 years has had an objection raised by An Taisce, if they had their way, mass unemployment and derelict sites would rule.

      Thanks a lot guys, you serve no purpose other than to hold dreams back. You are a pointless and dispicable organisation and you should be ashamed of the tripe you do called work!

    • #732414
      lexington
      Participant

      The office floors of the City Quarter development are higher than that of the hotel. Although the Clarion is 8-storeys, the “8th” floor is more of a novelty upper air than real floor. The 6th, additional office floor will thus equal the height of the Clarion.

      Anyone who strolls down Lapps Quay way recently will tell you that the project is pretty awesome and looks very very well.

    • #732415
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Objecting on the last day is a speciality of theirs… school of music anyone???

    • #732416
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Thanks a lot guys, you serve no purpose other than to hold dreams back. You are a pointless and dispicable organisation and you should be ashamed of the tripe you do called work!

      No Dougal you know there is a difference between dreams and reality.

      Dreams


      Reality
      Dreams


      Reality
      Dreams


      Reality

      Given with all the grace of Fr Jack on a bad day

    • #732417
      Torquemada
      Participant

      All of this development sounds great.I was wondering about the possible development of a building that I find the biggest eyesore in the city,the old millhouse along Fr. Matthew Quay.I think anyone who passes by Irish multichannel and crosses over towards the South Mall cannot miss it.I saw a planning application outside and some clearance work but unfortunately no progression since then.
      I think its a real shame especially with such a beautiful church so close by.

    • #732418
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      the redevelopment of the mill building on father mathew quay was about to commence until the applicant put in another application for a slightly modified design – i presume they encountered something unexpected and needed to deal with it

    • #732419
      lexington
      Participant

      Well Diaspora, you’ll have to pardon that initial outburst, but they are my dreams.

    • #732420
      Torquemada
      Participant

      thanks for the prompt reply bunch.Do you know if they are keeping the external facade of the building?Are there any drawings of the new development on the site?

    • #732421
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Jacobs mill – I think there will be a vertical slice taken out up to the roof where the door is at the moment with glass put in – which will compensate for the tiny windows.

    • #732422
      lexington
      Participant

      Where did the thread ‘Cork – New Developments’ go???

    • #732423
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      i merged it with this one as they seemed to be rehashing each other boy

    • #732424
      satanta99
      Participant

      I am so annoyed to hear An Taisce has thrown another spanner in de works for development in Cork City. Their objection to the the Water St. development is yet another delay in the creation of a vibrant sustainable new urban quarter in Cork City. I’m sick of living in a city full of run down reminants of its past. It needs to shake off the hangover caused by industrial decline and move foward as a modern European city with a built environment to reflect this!

    • #732425
      Irishtown
      Participant

      So is Water Street officially dead?

    • #732426
      lexington
      Participant

      No, it’s not dead thank God! The controversy is just about the fact that An Taisce have objected to the project on fecious grounds. Its just a spanner in the works that will delay the process – a spanner which the project really REALLY didn’t need or warrant.

      I just pray that the Cork City Planners have more sense and vision than to let such objection skew the outcome of the planning application for Water Street. Fingers crossed! Not simply for the sake of the developers, but Cork city as a whole. This may not be the biggest development in Cork at the moment, but it is one of the most important.

    • #732427
      satanta99
      Participant

      Luckly the snail pace of developement which persists in the city centre is not occuring in other areas of the county. For example O’ Flynn’s town centre development in Ballincollig is progressing at a swift pace, or at least it appears to be. The first tower crane went up today on the site. Already the steel framed construction of the shopping centre is visible from main street. Also, after visiting the information office located on site and viewing the plan, I got an impression that what is being created in Ballincollig will serve to better Ballincollig by creating a modern town centre in an area which before I would regard as nothing more than a glorified patch of linear sprawl development. I hope it will be a success and if it is, perhaps it will serve as an good step forward for the development of the cork metropolitan area as a whole. We must face the fact that despite attempts by planners, which in an Irish and generally European context have been stringent, our cities are becoming decentred settlements with many centres. Then I ask why we are not paying more attention to the development of these centres as viable sustainable areas, which can compliment the city centre. Death to the semi and all things suburbia!

    • #732428
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah – I often wonder if the City Planners are fully aware that their stringent planning in the past has led to cities such as Cork and Dublin, to become increasingly decentred. Commercially, I know Dublin has tried to fight back – Jervis Street SC and the refurbished Roches Stores have certainly brought life back to Henry Street at all levels, incl. street traders. Grafton Street has always had the same role of play as Patrick Street in Cork, and always remained a strong player.

      Intrestingly, it is clearly visible to see the increase in street activity of Patrick Street since its renewal. The whole city seems to have been given a fresh breath of life. Hopefully the oncoming Oliver Plunkett Street, Grand Parade and Cornmarket Street renewals will do the same. The two latter have HUGE commercial potential. With the advent of the colossal Mahon Point SC opening and the innovative Ballincollig Town Centre, the city is gonna have to pull its socks up again – I do think O’Callaghan Properties retail proposal on Academy Street was the planners big-gun for retention of the commercial core for Cork in light of these new threats – as well as Rockfell’s plan (though weak) for Cornmarket Street, Frinailla’s for Grand Parade. I only hope to God, O’Callaghan Properties don’t give us another Merchants Quay or Mahon Point on Academy Street – I’m seriously hoping 21 Lavitts Quay was an indication that the firm is becoming more design conscious.

    • #732429
      lexington
      Participant

      Oh – and I’ve just got wind that a major development announcement for the city centre is expected to be made soon (a pre-planning announcement). I can’t give away the details yet – but I can leave you a few clues and let you figure it out yourself – basically Ward Anderson own a premises in the city centre, a premises zoned for 30,000 sq ft of higher order retail development – and they intend to vacate this premises for a new own within Mahon Point SC. A private investment company is assessing potentials on this site at the moment – and based on their decision, will make an announcement.

    • #732430
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Can you give a few more clues… please??? Location (ball park).

      Lexington – you seem to be well up on things at proposal stage – are there any plans for the dreaded Capitol Cinema? It is my fantasy to see that razed. Approaching the city centre from Washington St, that carbuncle is something I’d like to see removed.

    • #732431
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      d_d_dallas

      i’d say you’ve already made a good guess on where lexington was referring to – capitol cinema grand parade by any chance?

    • #732432
      lexington
      Participant

      Well Ward Anderson only have one city centre premises that could cater for 30,000 sq ft – and since you’ve mentioned it, I don’t have to tell you.

      When Mahon Point SC opens next Feburary, Ward Anderson intend to transfer their operations from the Capitol to a new 11-screen multiplex at the SC, freeing up the Capitol on Grand Parade for retail space. (see City Manager Joe Gavin’s city report Nov 2003) And since I’ve already opened my yak, I may as well tell you the plan by the private investment firm will include a 6-storey over dual basement retail and leisure development w/ food-court, 20 – retail outlets, 3 late-bars and apparently 2 night-clubs – and depending on insurance, Cork’s 1st permanent ice-rink (OH YEAH!) at the upper basement level.

      Complimentary plans by the same firm incl. the pedestrianisation of Grand Parade/Washington Street junction (to facilitate increased pedestrian activity/passing volume – as experienced by Patrick Street renewal – and to fall in-line with current CCC development designed by Beth Gali, promoting a saving in public expenditure) and a short 4-lane underground tunnel for traffic off Washington Street to Grand Parade South and vice-versa – thus allowing for an extension of the Western Elevation of the development and facilitation of a 194-space underground car-park and delivery bay at the lower basement level.

      The estimated cost = 30-million euro. The design draws influence from that of a classic French Chateau – complimenting the nearby Heugenot Quarter, with a curved, sloping Mansard-style black-slate roof, two large stone colums extending 5-storeys to the ornate entrance facade (which makes reference the facade present on nearby Cornmarket Street for the Coal Quay Bar and Loft Carpet Store). A modern element is accomodated between the two front columns in the form of a curved, glass bay window extending 5-storeys also between the facade and roof.

      But I stress, these plans (as with the plans for Irish Distillers) are ONLY at a pre-planning/feasibility study stage – meaning they could either be just ideas, or could be seriously altered, abandoned, or never even get through planning process – but fingers crossed.

      _________________________________________________
      On a more active note, I took a trip out to Ballincollig Town Centre there yesterday and its really encouraging to see the pace of development there. Already a large number of houses are up, a brand-spanking new tower crane has been erected for the office element (as far as I know, this is O’Flynn Construction’s first such crane with 2 more planned, one for Eglinton Street and another for Lapps Quay No.6 I assume), and the Shopping Centre steel frame almost complete. The SC at BTC isn’t on the same scale as Mahon Point but will still be amongst Cork’s largest.

    • #732433
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      thanks for all the info lexington.

      which proposal do you find the most exciting in terms of putting Cork on the map?

    • #732434
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Subconscious… or just plain obvious?!?

      Galvin’s report from November and the fact I knew the Mahon Point cinema was linked to the Capitol… join… the… dots…

      Must pay more attention

    • #732435
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by mickeydocs
      thanks for all the info lexington.

      which proposal do you find the most exciting in terms of putting Cork on the map?

      Hey mickey! I think there are a lot of exciting projects in Cork city at the moment – many of which rival and even surpass that of anything in Dublin, or Europe for that matter – it’s a nice change. But I do think, and I will stress this relentlessly, the project for Water Street represents probably the single most important proposal for Cork in many many years.

      Anyone who knows me will tell you, I don’t have a great affliction for apartment developments, but Water Street is far more significant than just another apartment development – it not only represents a landmark project (the tallest building in Ireland – a title Cork has always held), not only does it represent the confidence investors have placed in the Cork city market, not only does it represent whether or not the city planners have the foresight they seem to have traditionally lack til that of recent years, but it represents the future for Cork city and the Cork Docklands. A refusal of permission will throw future investment (in the Cork Docklands), market confidence and further Docklands proposals into turmoil – this will offset the willigness of further projects, no indefinitely, but certain for a period of time. That’s not an exaggeration, trust me, I know – its a belief widely held throughout the Cork Business Community.

      Sean Kearns, architect with MOLA for Water Street, has informed me that he is almost certain now that CCC will request further info. He says they are prepared for that and also says that he understands and accepts concerns expressed by Lower Glanmore Road residents will relation to the project – saying that the project can be adjusted just enough to accomodate them, but says the big fear is that An Taisce will bring the project to ABP on appeal. However, he also says that MOLA are prepared for such an unfair and unwarranted possibility.

      -> that aside, some plans for the Docklands (if they go ahead) are very exciting eg. Treasury Holdings National Convention Centre on Horgan’s Quay.

      Also exciting -> O’Flynn Construction’s Retail/Residential development on Eglinton Street. O’C Properties Conference Centre at Mahon Point, 21 Lavitts Quay (one of my favourites), City Quarter and Teschem (Howard Holdings) new office building for Albert’s Quay and nreaby IT/Business Centre. Also John Mannix’s development is brilliant for Washington Street.

      Plus there are rumours that one of Cork’s major pharma giants w/ a plant at Cork Harbour, is looking into the possibility of constructing it’s European and Middle-Eastern HQ at a brand new, purpose built 90,000 sq ft office building in the Kennedy Quay region. However, I personally view this as unlikely, as most of these pharma companies have invested millions in office facilities at the current plant locations recently as it is, and have most other admin. work performed elsewhere. Nonetheless, it’s a nice idea.


      > and while we’re on the topic, the 1 new project that sparks zero excitement with me is the Cork City Hall Extension. The words ‘utterly’ and ‘dire’ spring to mind. Architects = ABK. If An Taisce want to object about something, let it be that, I’ll actually support them on the grounds of ‘defamation of an elegant, historical city building’. Ya know, for a council that has demanded such a high standard of design from new developments in the city, they could have led by example. For 32-million euro, they could get a lot more bang for their buck. If anyone has any pics of the extension, do post them, so everyone else can sigh.

    • #732436
      ISI
      Participant

      I’d love to see the FAS building on Sullivan’s Quay demolished and a new landmark city library built on the site. Short of that, could the OPW paint the thing in time for the year of culture?

    • #732437
      lexington
      Participant

      Had a free hand rendering of the Grand Parade/Washington Street junction retail development (on Capitol Cinema site) I under-handedly encountered in developers office and drew myself, but it is SO bad I have to delete it. Will endeavour to get a proper architect designed rendering or CGI if possible.

      Otherwise, ignore this post!

    • #732438
      lexington
      Participant

      Well Ward Anderson only have one city centre premises that could cater for 30,000 sq ft – and since you’ve mentioned it, I don’t have to tell you.

      When Mahon Point SC opens next Feburary, Ward Anderson intend to transfer their operations from the Capitol to a new 11-screen multiplex at the SC, freeing up the Capitol on Grand Parade for retail space. (see City Manager Joe Gavin’s city report Nov 2003) And since I’ve already opened my yak, I may as well tell you the plan by the private investment firm will include a 6-storey over dual basement retail and leisure development w/ food-court, 20 – retail outlets, 3 late-bars and apparently 2 night-clubs – and depending on insurance, Cork’s 1st permanent ice-rink (OH YEAH!) at the upper basement level.

      Complimentary plans by the same firm incl. the pedestrianisation of Grand Parade/Washington Street junction (to facilitate increased pedestrian activity/passing volume – as experienced by Patrick Street renewal – and to fall in-line with current CCC development designed by Beth Gali, promoting a saving in public expenditure) and a short 4-lane underground tunnel for traffic off Washington Street to Grand Parade South and vice-versa – thus allowing for an extension of the Western Elevation of the development and facilitation of a 194-space underground car-park and delivery bay at the lower basement level.

      The estimated cost = 30-million euro. The design draws influence from that of a classic French Chateau – complimenting the nearby Heugenot Quarter, with a curved, sloping Mansard-style black-slate roof, two large stone colums extending 5-storeys to the ornate entrance facade (which makes reference the facade present on nearby Cornmarket Street for the Coal Quay Bar and Loft Carpet Store). A modern element is accomodated between the two front columns in the form of a curved, glass bay window extending 5-storeys also between the facade and roof.

      But I stress, these plans (as with the plans for Irish Distillers) are ONLY at a pre-planning/feasibility study stage – meaning they could either be just ideas, or could be seriously altered, abandoned, or never even get through planning process – but fingers crossed.

      _________________________________________________
      On a more active note, I took a trip out to Ballincollig Town Centre there yesterday and its really encouraging to see the pace of development there. Already a large number of houses are up, a brand-spanking new tower crane has been erected for the office element (as far as I know, this is O’Flynn Construction’s first such crane with 2 more planned, one for Eglinton Street and another for Lapps Quay No.6 I assume), and the Shopping Centre steel frame almost complete. The SC at BTC isn’t on the same scale as Mahon Point but will still be amongst Cork’s largest.

    • #732439
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      A new Lidl discount foodstore for Churchfield, Cork has been refused planning permission on the grounds that it would be out of place in an area zone for Light Industrial Use – and also that it would affect the business of a nearby Centra.

      ….wait a second, whatever happened to competition??? Isn’t that what drives consumer quality and better pricing???

      That’s like the MW Health-Board objecting to a McDonald’s Restaurant in Ennis because it would adversely affect children’s healthy eating. WTF??? Has the whole world gone mad???

      -> Also, meeting An Taisce Corcaigh tomorrow. DENDENDUN!!!

    • #732440
      lexington
      Participant

    • #732441
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks as always for the insights Lexington.

      Also exciting -> O’Flynn Construction’s Retail/Residential development on Eglinton Street.

      — Don’t you think that this would also be a great site for an event centre.

      there are rumours that one of Cork’s major pharma giants w/ a plant at Cork Harbour, is looking into the possibility of constructing it’s European and Middle-Eastern HQ at a brand new, purpose built 90,000 sq ft office building in the Kennedy Quay region.

      — Haven’t Novartis had planning applications rejected – Johnson & Johnson have three separate sites in Ireland (Depuy, Alza & Janssen) and are looking at consolidation of their current activities, so I’m guessing it’s one of these.

      while we’re on the topic, the 1 new project that sparks zero excitement with me is the Cork City Hall Extension. The words ‘utterly’ and ‘dire’ spring to mind. Architects = ABK.

      — Do you have any images of this?

    • #732442
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I saw images in the Indo last week. Considering it will be next to the Fire and Garda stations it would hardly be difficult to stand out as quality – and yet from the images…

      I guess it might be one of those projects that MIGHT turn out better it the flesh. But for that price tag – I think something a bit better could have been rustled up.

    • #732443
      ISI
      Participant

      The Patrick Street renewal was mentioned. The Beth Gaili designed refurbishment of Patrick Street is nice, but there are problems with some of the street furniture, particularly the rubbish bins. They lack the capacity of the older bins and are almost always overflowing with rubbish. They also appear to be porous, so that whenever it rains, a horrible sort of rubbish juice pours onto the pathway. They’ve only been in place for a few weeks but already the area around the bins is covered in a brown sticky residue. The corporation should consider replacing them, as they are completely inadequate.

    • #732444
      satanta99
      Participant

      Its strange that another planning application lodged by lidl has been refused. They also applied for permission for a development in Ballincollig West ( across from the L+N or Super Valu as its now called) Is this a concentrated effort to keep Lidl from gaining a strong foothold in the Cork area or as I believe a testement to the poor quality of design which Lidl employs for its stores.

      Hopefully Local authorities are realising the impact these generic, utilitarian stores are having on towns throughout Ireland. Perhaps as a result Lidl will rethink their strategy and develop a higher quality mixed use development to serve as a sustainable neighbourhood centre. With such a strong name as an anchor in a scheme such as this I don’t see how such development would not yield a good investment return.
      Aldi have lodged planning permisson for such a development on the former John A. Woods site in Ballincollig. Why can’t Lidl do the same elsewhere?

    • #732445
      satanta99
      Participant

      Yea I noticed that digusting sticky brown residue on the ground too. U can also see it on the square stones to sit on? I’m not a geologist but might it be coming from the granite used?

    • #732446
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Looks like the musgrave chain are flexing their muscle.

    • #732447
      ISI
      Participant

      No the residue is coming from the bins, take a look at the bins that have been there the longest, the ones closest to Patrick’s bridge. Wait till we go through a winter. I’m sure you remember the older bins; they were large capacity pebble dashed affairs and inside was a removable metal bin. Why not revert to that, and encase the metal bin with the type of granite used in the street renewal. The bins in use at the moment are completely inadequate and very poorly designed.

    • #732448
      lexington
      Participant

      Well bins aside – the street looks incalcuably better. I actually feel proud strolling down the street in comparison to a few years ago. Grand Parade and Oliver Plunkett Street should follow suit.

      *UPDATES*

      -> The redevelopment of the notorious Blackpool flats by Murnane & O’Shea is taking on a remarkable shape alongside the Blackpool By-Pass, the development is striking in its scale (with 2 cranes [1 tower] on-site) and style. Across the road, construction of the new Glen Hall Luxury Apt Complex by John Paul Construction is at an advanced stage and already looks of a very high standard.

      -> Coleman Bros. Developments have erected crane over their new duplex development on the Commons Road – the project has taken a chunk out of the hillside and the development is flying up fast.

      -> Frank Sheehan’s office building between the Blackpool By-Pass and Assumption Road, designed by Jack Coughlan and Assoc. is taking up shape in an eye-catching form. 2 PJ Hegarty tower cranes gape over the circular shaped, red-brick office development.

      -> Also, PJ Hegarty Construction have erected another crane over the new 100m-euro Blackpool Retail Park and Multiplex development adjacent to the Blackpool SC (both developed by Blackpool Developments Ltd [Shipton Group owned by Clayton Love]) The developers were just this week granted permission to add an additional level to the multi-storey car-park to the rear of the main Retail Park building – but refused 2 amendments to warehousing units A and B.

      -> Still on the PJ Hegarty line – they are the main contractors behind the redevelopment of the AIB at 11 Patrick Street. I was surprised today when I saw the extent of the redevlopment – I had been unaware at how large scale it is. The entire AIB building except the facade has been demolished, along with adjoining buildings and properties bought up by AIB as part of the redevelopment. The branch is one of the banking groups most profitable and is in line to have the entire premises on Patrick Street the whole back to the new Penneys extension and across to Wintrhop Street redeveloped in a project estimated at 7m euros.
      _______________________________________________

      -> Frinailla Developments have erected a huge banner across the facade of the old Grand Parade Hotel announcing the real estate launch of the new Grand Parade Plaza apartment and retail centre. The rear grounds of the hotel and former nightclub have been completely demolished – Rainey Architects of Kinsale are responsible for design of the 30m euro, 7-storey project to include 50 apartments and a higher-order retail centre. John Paul Construction are the main contractors.

      -> Corbett Bros. Developments have been GRANTED permission for their office/residential/commercial development at Parnell Place. Originally a 5-storey over basement car-park development – a CCC condition for planning requires a reduction in one floor of apartments, reducing the original # of 18 to 15. The original facades on Parnell Place are to be refurbished and incorporated into the new development.

      -> Also, Corbett Bros. project at Copley Street is making rapid headway. Their new office/apartment and leisure building, 2 linked 5-storey blocks, is being constructed by Coffey Construction. Major drilling and excavation has commenced to cater for the 90-car space underground parking facility with lightning speed.

      -> Cumnor Construction’s 7-storey apt. building was due to be decided upon yesterday, but CCC has requested Further Info. Personally, I think Cumnor has made rapid growth of late – from small residential projects, the Blarney based company is now taking on huge developments such as that at Knapps Sq. for Hanranka Ltd. – but I think their energies would be better focused in a location more within the city centre than in Sundays Well. A 7-storey apt building there just doesn’t seem right. And I love large scale development – but even my developers conscience (and we do actually have them) is all Jimny Crickett on this one.

    • #732449
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      a 7 storey development in Sundays Well is criminal. This is one of the nicest areas of Cork City and should be preserved in its present shape. Road access is a nightmare at present, and this will make it worse.

    • #732450
      lexington
      Participant

      Yep – here is a CG picture of the soon to be refurbished Cork Bus Station. After months and years of negotiation, the build-up, the excitement, the possibilities – sigh…how very CIE.

    • #732451
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      As announced today in the Sunday Business Post (11/7/2004) – Hilton Hotels have signed on to operate the new 150-bedroom hotel at Mahon Point. The O’Callaghan Properties/McCarthy Developments project consists of a massive shopping centre (of which Debenhams, Tesco and Next are the main anchor tenants) which includes an 11-screen multiplex, a retail park (anchored by B&Q and Johnson & Perrott), convention centre, offices and publishing centre owned by Thomas Crosbie Holdings (leasing to Webprint Concepts).

      The Cork Hilton is the latest in a number of hotels under construction and/or operated by major international hotel chains in Cork city – others incl. Radisson SAS at Eastgate on Little Island, the Clarion on Lapps Quay and (rumour has it) Marriott at Ballincollig Town Centre.

    • #732452
      PaulC
      Participant

      Can someone possibly give me an update on how things are going with the Patrick Street redevelopment.. I am assuming work is near completion at this stage????

    • #732453
      lexington
      Participant

      Patrick’s Street is almost complete – bar a small section between River Island and 26 Patrick’s Street (AIB Redevelopment). This is scheduled to be complete by late next week.

      Meanwhile work on Oliver Plunkett Street is at an advanced stage (despite some whiney traders) – and work has begun on Grand Parade (from Daunt Square to the Capitol Cineplex).

    • #732454
      anto
      Participant

      any chance of some pics, Lexington?

    • #732455
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      have some images, but are about six weeks old, would need instructions on how to post them though

    • #732456
      lexington
      Participant

      Bunch,

      If the images are on your computer – you’ll have to upload them off your hard-drive. Click on ‘Post Reply’, when new page opens up, go to ‘Attach File’ and select the pic you wanna upload. But there is a limit on the size of the upload.

      If the images are on a website – get the full address of the picture – including all extensions and then go to Post Reply – select ‘IMG’ tool and enter the address.

    • #732457
      Torquemada
      Participant

      There was an article in the Sunday Tribune Business section yesterday explaining the financial difficulties that Jarvis are in and they also speculated that this could have a knock-on effect on the Cork School Of Music development which Jarvis are constucting as part of the PPP agreement with the Department of Education/CIT.Anyone heard anymore on this?Do you think this will delay or even worse (shudder to think) put some serious doubts about the project?

    • #732458
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      thanks lexington

      here are a few about 3 months old i’m afraid, i reduced image size for posting

    • #732459
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      woops

    • #732460
      lexington
      Participant

      &

      Although preliminnary work on the Cork School of Music has begun – the demolition of the existing building and construction of the new college building (which incorporates space provided by clearance of old building and adjacent car-parking area) has yet to go ahead. Jarvis Plc (who’s 1st PPP project outside the UK is the CSM) have stressed that the Cork project will be unaffected by its recent fiscal problems. CEO, Michael Hyde has pointed out that Jarvis is actively pursuing all its outstanding dues and has begun selling off certain assets it no longer views as core to its operations.

      “This is an extremely challenging time for the group and we are taking the necessary decisions and implementing them. We are collecting outstanding payments and have more to do. We are also taking very significant overhead cost out of the business. Considerable progress has been made, and further action is planned to ensure a leaner, sustainable core business for the future,” said Michael Hyde (02/07/2004)

      Hopefully these assurances will stand – but as Frinailla Developments learned with their An Caislean development in Ballincollig, despite the strongest assurances of the contractors, sometimes financal circumstances over-rule the strongest of commitments. Though Jarvis is in a seriously tricky corner – I think the CSM should be unaffected. I’ll keep an eye on this one – and let you know if the situation alters. Fingers crossed!
      ____________________________________________________

    • #732461
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Yep – here is a CG picture of the soon to be refurbished Cork Bus Station. After months and years of negotiation, the build-up, the excitement, the possibilities – sigh…how very CIE.

      This is a disgrace.
      A superb large city centre property with river frontage and this is what cie do to it… this is disgusting. No wonder this company are in financial dire straits. Off the cuff how much could they have realised by redeveloping this site with a private developer (for example O’Callaghans who could’ve connected the site to Merchants quay).

      Why do the local politicians just accept this crap from a semi-state? Why such slow progress on Horgan’s quay, where are the elected representatives???

    • #732462
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i agree – the bus station refurb is a joke – a half assed effort and it is a disgrace – however, i think that it is a short term effort to save face for the Capital of Culture – and nothing more. Its pathethic that neither CIE nor Bus Eireann can put their heads together and deliver an integrated public transport hub on horgans quay – as proposed many years ago – it just shows how these state bodies under perform and how completely incapable and unambitious they really are. its depressing.

    • #732463
      corkdood
      Participant

      Speaking of the an Caislean development in Ballincollig there seems to be little or no progress being made on the apartments. the tower crane has been on site for several months now but there is little to show for it. Also a lot of the residents who purchased houses in the estate are unhappy with the finish and several have sold the houses back to the developer – surely a bad sign!

    • #732464
      Torquemada
      Participant

      Hey All,has anyone got any photos or updated info on how the new terminal and associated works are going at Cork Airport?

    • #732465
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by corkdood
      Speaking of the an Caislean development in Ballincollig there seems to be little or no progress being made on the apartments. the tower crane has been on site for several months now but there is little to show for it. Also a lot of the residents who purchased houses in the estate are unhappy with the finish and several have sold the houses back to the developer – surely a bad sign!

      Yeah – the contractors awarded the project by Frinailla went into receivership halfway through the project, before they ever got to construct the apartment buildings (hence the tower crane). Frinailla are reportedly livid – but are seeking a new contractor to finish the development. They say that their Grand Parade Plaza development in the city centre is unaffected. John Paul Construction are the builders behind that project.
      __________________

      Also, I agree, the Bus Station is a pathetic effort by CIE in attempt to save face and quelm the angry voices coming from Cork. But this “refurbishment” won’t keep those voices quiet for long. The Bus Station site on Merchants Quay has huge potential. But this is typical of CIE – think Horgan’s Quay and Eglinton Street (which has since been acquired from An Post by O’Flynn Construction for a major retail/residential development). And furthermore, CIE won’t sell the site, which would be beautiful for a new commercial development – one proposal not so long ago incl. a 6-storey over basement commercial/retail development which would link to Merchants Quay SC and incorporated a brand-spanking new bus-station at basement, ground and 1st floor levels (w/ 3 bus park levels). CIE could then contribute or rent with funds received from the sale. Both both these options were unaccepted.

      _____________________

      Also, I’ll get Cork Airport pics up later tonight. The Airport Terminal will be the best in the country. Its already looking pretty good!

    • #732466
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Did Frinilla get planning permission for their proposed development for Watercourse Road?

      Have Howard Holdings released any info of their proposed Albert Quay development?

    • #732467
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      no decision from ABP yet on Frinailla’s Blackpool Development, although I expect a refusal on that one, have heard nothing on Albert Quay as yet

    • #732468
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by Torquemada
      Hey All,has anyone got any photos or updated info on how the new terminal and associated works are going at Cork Airport?

      They are just about to put the third layer of gold leaf onto it I believe.

      When completed it will be Irelands first decent terminal building since the original Collinstown Terminal, not that one can compare the needs of those days and these.

      Talking about all this transport just got this from http://www.platform11.org

      “Cork Rail Plan Gets the Go-Ahead.
      Proper Strategic Planning Wins the Day

      “I can assure you today that the decades of closures and the downgrading of lines and services can now be consigned to the past. The future of the railway is all about growth in customers and expansion of services.”
      Minister for Transport, Seamus Brennan
      – May, 2004

      “Among the domino effects of the Celtic Tiger, an explosion in car ownership has resulted in major traffic problems being tackled by a multi-billion euro network of ring roads, links, bypasses, flyovers and motorways. Besides bringing home the folly of shutting local railway lines, it also underlines the urgency of re-opening them.”

      In what is perhaps the most significant and positive development for Irish rail transport since the construction of the DART in the early 1980’s, the Government has approved the funding of Iarnród Eireann’s Cork Rail Plan, including the reopening of the Midleton branch, which Platform11 wholeheartedly supported since our inception.

      The Cork Rail Plan fits all the criteria for the successful cohesion between strategic land usage and reopening of closed rail lines. Platform11 hopes that other local authorities around the country will now follow Cork City and Council’s enlighten approach, and rezone land for development along existing and closed rail corridors. Congrats to all parties involved for this historic development.”

      A good decision thinks Diaspora, definitely to be welcomed

    • #732469
      lexington
      Participant

      Those Cork Airport pictures I promised -> it’s pretty impressive. Designed by HOK in conjunction with JACOBS.

      26,500 sq m, 4 air-bridges, 5 luggage belts, 32-check-in desks, shops, restaurants, private lounges, amenity areas, 1200 space multi-storey car-park with a further 600 spaces on the ground, two dual-carriageways, new cargo-bay (x2 larger than current cargo area), new taxiways – the works. Capable of catering 3-million a year comfortably – with provision for 5-million p.a. (which is probably going to be need a lot sooner than first thought).

      _______________________

      Originally posted by mickeydocs
      Did Frinilla get planning permission for their proposed development for Watercourse Road?

      Have Howard Holdings released any info of their proposed Albert Quay development?

      No, Frinailla are still in appeal with ABP. I too have a feeling that their plans for the Watercourse Road – a 70-million euro, 7 -> 9 storey residential, educational, medical and commerical development spanning almost half the length of the road – will face it tough on ABP’s decision. Although you never know with ABP sometimes. It would be good for this area of Blackpool undoubtedly, even residents have agreed with this, I think the reason for the refusal by CCC was the height of the development. I also feel there have been more inspired designs. Sometime like the other Frinailla project, the Grand Parade Plaza would have been welcomed easier I think.

      Also, Howard Holdings are preparing an application for permission with CCC under an undisclosed wholly-owned company name to develop a 5-storey over basement office building, incorporating Albert House (the current CCC Parking Fines Centre – shudder!!!) on Albert Quay. The site, facing out onto the quay, has been donated by CCC and was formally used as a rail-cargo storage facility, and more recently car-repair facilities and the like. The building is specifically designed to nurture upstart businesses and/or cater for new IT agencies and so on. Already, a vast quantity of foreign interest has been displayed for such a facility in Cork.

      O’Flynn Construction plan a major development to the rear of the Howard Holdings project on the former An Post Sorting Office – purchased for 10m euro in Feb.

    • #732470
      lexington
      Participant

      I’ve attained a list of tenants for the new 500m euro, 381,000sq ft (not incl. Debenhams and Tesco stores) Mahon Point SC in Cork – these tenants will be confirmed for definite in September (if not otherwise stated below) plus additional tenant names – this is only what I can reveal as of now.

      Retail Tenants:

      -> (C) = Confirmed Letting/Sale, (L) = Letting Agreed

      1. Debenhams (C), 2. Tesco (C) 3. Next (C) 4. Schuh (C) 5. Sam McCauley (C) 6. Pamela Scott (C) 7. Mango (C) 8. Zara (C) 9. Champion Sports (C) 10. River Island (C) 11. Sasha (C) 12. Easons (C) 13. Oasis (C) 14. Pull and Bear (C) 15. Clinton Cards (C) 16. HMV (L) 17. Barratts (C). 18. Vero Moda (L) 19. Jack & Jones (L) 20. fcuk (C) 21. 3G (L) 22. Topshop (L)* 23. Game (C) 24. Miss Selfridge (L) 25. Waterstones (L) 26. Monsoon (L) – many more to be confirmed.

      [*Arcadia has announced that it plans to limit its expansion plans for reasons of cost-cutting. Although its Irish stores remain among its most profitable. It is unknown as to how this may affect its Mahon Point store as no papers have yet been signed.]

      Food Court Tenants:
      1. McDonalds (C) 2. KFC (C) 3. Zumo Juice Bars (L) 4. Subway (L) – plus more to be confirmed.

      Retail Park Tenants:
      1. B&Q (C) 2. Johnson & Perrott (C). 3. Webprint Concepts (C)

      Multiplex Tenant:
      1. Ward Anderson (L) (*had contested with UCI)

      Hotel Operator:
      1. Hilton Hotels International (C)

      __________________________

      Just on this note:

      Wilton SC Extension:

      Confirmed Retail Tenants: 1. New Look 2. Specsavers 3. Brown Thomas (BT2) 4. Azal Properties (O’Brien’s Sandwich Bar) – more to be announced soon.

      Blackpool Retail Park: 1. Atlantic Homecare 2. BPD Leisure (Bowling Alley) 3. Reel Cinemas (Multiplex) – more to be announced soon.

      Eastgate, Little Island, Commercial Park: 1. PC World 2. Homebase – more to be announced soon.

      Ballincollig Town Centre SC: 1. Marks & Spencer (this is the rumoured tenant. No confirmations until end of July according to O’Flynn Construction)

    • #732471
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Goodbye Cork City Centre!!!
      That’s an impressive line up for Mahon Point Lexington.

    • #732472
      lexington
      Participant

      Well – in-line with my earlier reports, the Mercy University Hospital in Cork together with UCC have purchased the Irish Distillers site on the North Mall for 20m euro. The lands are to be split evenly between the 2 organisations.

      Now that the bidding is closed, I can tell you that a joint venture of bidders, one reportedly Hanranka Ltd. has bid also for the site, but withdrew due to undisclosed reasons. The private venture would have included a new urban quarter for Cork with offices, shopping boulevards, cafes, restaurants, residential units, boardwalks, nightclubs, bars, public amenity park, university buildings and a site that would have been offered to the Mercy Hospital anyway. It’s a shame this didn’t get through.

      The Mercy claim to have trouble financing their new A&E but have been able to splash out on this acquisition. UCC, also claiming financial restrictions, are completing their new 50m Medical Facility at Brookfield, have just received planning for a new 25m euro Pharmacy School on College Road, applied for planning for a new 35m euro Boole Library extension and are applying for a new 62m-euro IT centre on the former Greyhound Track along the Western Road. Hmmmm. Well I suppose congratulations are in order – I just hope they use the lands wisely.

    • #732473
      Leesider
      Participant

      firstly I was wondering is there any news on the proposed Cork to NY route that was mentioned somewhere at the start of this thread?

      Also lexington I thought that IT centre for UCC had got planning ages ago, thought they should have started construction well before now!!

      BTW good thread and the updates are excellent Lexington, keep us informed!!

    • #732474
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Leesider
      firstly I was wondering is there any news on the proposed Cork to NY route that was mentioned somewhere at the start of this thread?

      Also lexington I thought that IT centre for UCC had got planning ages ago, thought they should have started construction well before now!!

      BTW good thread and the updates are excellent Lexington, keep us informed!!

      Thanks man! I appreciate that seriously! 🙂



      The Cork – New York JFK route is to be run by Aer Lingus 3x a week at first – pending on the outcome of US-Ireland Bilateral Aviation Agreements. (Basically, it comes down to abolishing the Shannon Stop-over – at the moment, for every transatlantic flight from an Irish city besides Shannon, has to be met with the same number of flights to that transatlantic destination from Shannon – it’s a complete joke!)

      The negotiations are on-going. Willie Walsh, CEO of Aer Lingus said that in the long-run, it would make more economic sense to have more transatlantic passenger flights from Cork rather than Shannon – which he believes should become one of the Cargo Hubs of Europe. It does make sense – more jobs in the long-run. But he stresses the need for an extended runway and new taxiways. The new terminal development (see previous Cork Airport post) is already catering to new parking areas and air-bridges to facilitate such aircraft. This year, Cork will carry almost a third more passengers than Shannon. (projected 2.8 < million passengers)



      And no formal application for Planning has been submitted by UCC with relation to the IT Centre construction – but has been outlined as part of the UCC Development Plan. A sort of outline permission has been granted subject to conditions – by ‘outline’ I mean, support by CCC, but no formal planning.



      *UPDATES*

      The Dept. of Education have said that they intend to stand by Jarvis in the development of the CSM – but though some preliminary construction work has begun, no construction other than this will begin until at least June 2005 (a further push back along the time-line). This, it is claimed, is due to the fact that signatures are needed by all Jarvis’ financial backers to give them the go-ahead in lieu of the construction firm’s 230m euro debt.


    • #732475
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Transatlantic flights are crucial to our attempts to attract software and financial operations to the city, which is imperative if we are to seriously launch our city as a true business city.

      In a previous post Lexington mentioned German banks being interested in relocating Leeside, have you heard anything since?

    • #732476
      satanta99
      Participant

      Lexington, I hope what you heard about marks and spencer becoming an anchor in Ballincollig will become a reality. I heard rumours Tesco where in line for the food anchor. I’m all for competition in the retail sector but we need variety. tesco are represented in almost every major retail development at the moment e.g. Mahon point, Dundrum Town centre, Clare Hall, Redevelopment of Wilton. Please not another Tesco in Ballincollig!

    • #732477
      lexington
      Participant

      I agree that transatlantic flights are and will become ever more important to Cork – and by result, the whole Southern Region, a region of over 1.1m people.

      -> No news on the German bank for the docklands. There are many multimillion euro deals currently being organised within City Hall at the moment with relation to the docklands in Cork, one report (by Tommy Barker of Irish Examiner, Thurs 8th July 2004) is rumoured to be in excess of 200m euro. The German bank residency could depend on the outcome of any one of these deals.

      -> According to the PRO for O’Flynn Construction’s Ballincollig Town Centre project, a major food retail chain has been agreed to anchor the SC. Although Tesco is a name that has been put strongly up in the air, Tesco Ireland claim their main focus has been on Mahon Point and Wilton. This does not rule them out, but Marks & Spencer, who long ago where the front-runners to anchor the food store at Mahon Point and later pulled out, have been seeking a second property in Cork city (their current Cork store is the 4th most profitable in the entire network) and local real estate agents have hinted strongly that BTC is the best available location.

      However the decision has already been made and only time will reveal. Processes of elimination narrow the list of potentials, it won’t be SuperValu, they already have 2 stores in town and it would adversely affect these existing businesses. Dunnes are focusing on a new store in Carrigaline and Bishopstown Court nearby is ongoing expansion. It is too close to BTC to be viable. Tesco may, but their huge new 24hr Wilton SC store is still undergoing development and a new store at Mahon Point makes location to BTC unlikely – but still a possibility. That leaves Marks & Spencer, who have been seeking a new Cork property actively and would stand to benefit greatly from a new store here. Aldi and Lidl are pursuing their own seperate new stores in Ballincollig.

    • #732478
      satanta99
      Participant

      Yes I was thinking along the same lines, because I knew how Marks and Spencer had wanted to locate at Mahon Point. I was also thinking about Superquinn but I don’t think they have much intent on entering the Cork Market at the moment.

    • #732479
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Anybody got a link to this story? I couldn’t find it in the archives.

      -> No news on the German bank for the docklands. There are many multimillion euro deals currently being organised within City Hall at the moment with relation to the docklands in Cork, one report (by Tommy Barker of Irish Examiner, Thurs 8th July 2004) is rumoured to be in excess of 200m euro. The German bank residency could depend on the outcome of any one of these deals.

    • #732480
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The Examiner are terrible for putting their Commercial Property news online. Just the Residential Stuff.

    • #732481
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by mickeydocs
      Anybody got a link to this story? I couldn’t find it in the archives.

      I can’t find it in the TCM Archives either mickeydocs – but it was published on the 8th of July in the IE. It was related to the story on the acquistion of the Sextant Bar by Careys Tool Hire.


    • #732482
      lawyer
      Participant

      I think the proposals for the new bus station are terrible.
      How did the Cork City Council approve them?

    • #732483
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by lawyer
      I think the proposals for the new bus station are terrible.
      How did the Cork City Council approve them?

      Well the orginal plan saw the extension and partial demolition of existing bus station with a 360-degree ‘control tower’ erected on the roof and so on – this inadequate but substantially better plan was given approval originally, but Bus Eireann came back a few months later and amended their plans, cutting back on almost all major development elements bar the canopy erection. Pathetic!



      Meanwhile, Oliver Plunkett Street (OPS) is looking pretty good – though there’s clearly a long way to go yet, some of the first section of its new design has been unveiled and what an improvement it is!



      *UPDATES*

      Though its 2 years away yet, O’Callaghan Properties have put the bid out on designs for the Academy Street (Irish Examiner HQ) retail development – which will cost an est’d 150m euro to build. Deals have recently been completed with almost all the surrounding properties bar the AA Ireland Building. The design will by way of planning need to consider the AA Ireland Building and Le Cheateau public house on Patrick’s Street in its design as these are protected structures – and trust me – will be virtually impossible to get passed with relation to any development – and rightly so. They are important elements of Cork’s history and architecture.

      It is believed, the 6 storey over basement development of mixed retail and residential, will hark back to a post-modern design with consideration for its surroundings such as the Crawford Gallery, Patrick Street redevelopment, AA Ireland Building and Le Cheateau. I am informed that the developer is keen to provide a landmark development incorporating modern and old styles – an example of the Jervis Street Shopping Centre entrance on Henry Street in Dublin was given (a large peaked arch way and copper dome incorporating red-brick to blend with surrounding buildings of foregone eras.)

      O’Callaghan Properties, with the exception of 21 Lavitts Quay don’t have a good track record for design, so this project will be a HUGE test for them. Both planning authorities and the public are going to demand a superior standard of design for such a prestigious location and development. Here’s hoping!

    • #732484
      lexington
      Participant

      Its being a newsworthy day in the Cork development arena:

      *UPDATES*

      – Pierse Construction are to begin construction on the 20m-euro UCC School of Pharmacy, on College Road this August. (I will post a picture of the development on this post later on when I edit it).

      – Merchants Quay SC is scheduled to undergo a 7m euro facelift – in order to make the centre a more attractive place to shop running up to Cork 2005 and its 15-year anniversary. (Will post pic here later also). The design is subtle but exciting nonetheless.

      – Frinailla have gone to appeal on its project for 221 homes, 74 apartments, creche and after school-minding centre on a 21-acre site between Ballincollig and the city (east-side). The project was scheduled to commence this August.
      -> Frinailla seem to be getting a real tough time in the recent projects; their 70m high-rise residential project in Blackpool was refused by CCC, has since gone to ABP on appeal and waits decision – but the prospects are dim.; their 30m An Caislean project suffered as the building contractors assigned to the development went into liquidation half-way through the project (a lone tower crane still remains on a vacant site); their Grand Parade Plaza project has been held up due to archelogical excavations – which seem to never end; and now this project in Ballincollig’s east-side. Just hope their fortunes pick up. Roll on the Grand Parade Plaza!

    • #732485
      corkdood
      Participant

      Plans are also afoot to demolish Jurys Hotel on western road and build a new hotel complex plus a separate apartment and creche development plus a new bridge linking it with Lancaster Quay

    • #732486
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      The Munster Agricultural Show Society – owners of the Cork Showgrounds in the Docklands Area – confirmed today it is in the process of determining between 2 bids for the 22-acre site. One bid is being made by the GAA who own the adjacent Pairc Ui Chaoimh, the acquired site would allow for further development of the GAA Grounds. Another bid proposes a 5000 seat convention/conference centre and commercial area – rivalling a similar bid proposed on Horgan’s Quay by CIE/Treasury Holdings and Manor Park Homes.

      -> a 5m -euro plan to redeveloped Cornmarket Street is set to get the go-ahead by early next month – this would compliment the 30m euro residential and retail development by Rockfell Investments on the former Guy & Co site, which is still awaiting a planning decision.

      2 other large scale development projects are currently at pre-planning along Cornmarket Street and announcements are expected to be made on these in the near future.

      -> The Millenium Cornmarket Street Bridge, whose sections can be seen resting along Lavitts Quay, are being shift into place soon. CCC are funding the project, Ascon are the contractors. The bridge is expected to further compliment the pedestrian flow to the street – which is, in development terms, one of the most exciting and sought after streets in the country – as it is seen, along with Grand Parade as a natural extension of Patrick’s Street.

    • #732487
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by corkdood
      Plans are also afoot to demolish Jurys Hotel on western road and build a new hotel complex plus a separate apartment and creche development plus a new bridge linking it with Lancaster Quay

      Well, the plan includes a partial demolition to cater for refurbishment. The proposed development for Jurys on the Western Road includes a private multi-storey car-park, additional floor to cater for between 40 to 60 new rooms, extended conference facilities, internal refurbishment, external facade and structural adjustments to existing river-side hotel, possible additional fourth floor, new leisure facilities, adjusted amenity landscaping and demolition and relocation of new, wider bridge between new development and Lancaster Quay/Western Road.

      *UPDATES*

      -> Speaking of hotels, the Kingsley Hotel on the Carrigohane Straight Road, across the road from the 60m euro Cork County Hall extension and redevelopment, have just been greenlighted for a 50m euro extension, including construction of 10178 sq.m. of new hotel facilities, comprising 4674 sq.m. 82 bedroom extension in two new wings to the existing Kingsley Hotel, 818 sq.m. of conference facilities, 597 sq.m. of leisure and spa facilities, 500 sq.m. extended dining and kitchen facilities, and 3589 sq.m. 19 unit aparthotel and associated offices to the Western end of the existing hotel. 3. Two level basement carpark of 740 spaces to serve the two developments, and 102 surface spaces. 4. Formation of a new vehicular access to the centre of the site. And all other site development works including internal access roads, parking areas, and landscaping to facilitate the proposed development

      -> Right next to the Kingsley (and as part of the same application as the above) on site of a former Park and Ride facility, permission, after appeal, has been granted to Rathmelton Investments Ltd for construction of a new 14,068 sq.m. five storey student housing development, comprising 116 apartments, (514 student bedspaces) and to incorporate 840 sq.m. communal facilities including retail, restaurant, laundary, and other support facilities. Rathmelton is responsible for this development of both the Kingsley and Student accomodation.

      Construction begins soon.

      -> Meanwhile, just a few steps away from the Kingsley, Paul Montgomery and Edmund Kenneally’s 25m euro 9-storey student development, Victoria Hall, is seeing the scaffolding come gradually down on the main building, work is swiftly continuing on the Victoria Cross elevation. Anyway, the same developers are in appeal for a further student development on the site of the current Statoil station adjacent to Victoria Hall. Next to that, on the site of the former M&P O’Sullivan Cash & Carry, Fleming Construction are in appeal for a student development of 166 student apartments in 4 5-storey blocks.


      Some interesting construction pics of Victoria Hall.


      More recent pics of Victoria Hall.

      Visitt THIS link to see computer images of the finished product – both Phase One of Victoria Hall, and 2nd phase currently in appeal (former Statoil) ->

      -> In an answer to an e-mail enquiry for a forum member; the development at Camden Quay, across the road from John Hornibrook’s 20m-euro residential (58 apartments) and commercial (offices, 9 retail units and restaurant) development, is being developed by Neil O’Sullivan of OSB (O’Sullivan Bros.) DIY store in Hollyhill Industrial Estate, Cork. The current, first phase of development consists of demolition of existing industrial buildings, the construction of 40 No. apartments, incorporating 32 No. 2 bed and 8 No. 1 bed and ancillary site works and minor elevation alterations to the property at 4 Camden Quay (Protected Structure). Contractors are John Supple Ltd. However, the 2nd phase of the development is in appeal, thanks to ‘you know who’, it involves, the demolition of existing buildings, the construction of 55 no. apartments, incorporating 16 no. 1 bed and 39 no. 2 bed, the reconstruction of the Cork Arts Theatre and Pa Johnsons licensed premises and ancillary site works
      along 10 & 11 Devonshire Street, 4 – 7 Knapps Square, Camden Quay.

      The fact that this 2nd phase has gone to appeal is a great shame, this area is the last remaining negelected site along Camden Quay (which one must agree looks so much more cosmopolitan and impressive as a result of the many major developments here), and the design is in keeping with the area respective of adjacent developments. It would provide a badly needed new Cork Arts Theatre coming into Cork’s year as Capital of Culture and reconstruct Pa Johnson’s famous local bar, which is near ruin. James Leahy and Associates (not always my favourite architectural firm – but who have made a nice effort on this particular development) are the design time for this project. I have to say, it is by far one of Leahy’s better projects. A great pity, which was one of the conditions under which CCC granted the project, was the removal of a 6th floor roof garden, with playground and extensive vegetation and the works – it would have been a superb amenity element to the project for residents. It was conditionally removed on the grounds that it would be a visual impediment to Shandon Bells (don’t ask! – it ticked me off too trying to answer it, I mean, it was a garden – not an additional concrete floor!).



      PS. Not forgetting about pics of UCC School of Pharamacy – just having trouble posting them. Will so my best to get them up as soon as I can!

    • #732488
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lexington – is that part of Cork facing student accommodation overkill? It seems that end of UCC was bereft for years and suddenly everyone is jumping on the wagon. A student ghetto???

    • #732489
      anto
      Participant

      Hi Lex,

      Those lights on Pana don’t seem to be too popular! See O Connell street thread!

    • #732490
      Devin
      Participant

      nul

    • #732491
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Last time I was in Cork I noticed that work was being done on the Bus Station. Does anyone know exactly what is being done to it?

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #732492
      lexington
      Participant

      d_d_dallas
      Lexington – is that part of Cork facing student accommodation overkill? It seems that end of UCC was bereft for years and suddenly everyone is jumping on the wagon. A student ghetto???

      This is a sorta dodgy question. There’s a couple of things you have to realise – the current Cork City Development Plan has strongly emphasised its desire to reclaim city housing for owner-occupiers/families from investor activities related to student accomodation – most of which is centre along the College Road, Connaught Avenue area. Victoria Cross was earmarked as the preferred area for purpose built student accomodation to facilitate the expanding campus which stretches for the ERI on the Lee Road to the Distillery Fields on the North Mall. As the Cork County Hall area is also zoned for high-rise development, and the Section 50 tax designation, developers were approached by UCC who, in line with the development plan, decided to embark on student developments. You have to remember, almost all new student developments – Farranlea Hall, Victoria Lodge, the Spires and the project undertaken by Fleming Construction for the former M&P O’Sullivan Cash & Carry site, currently in appeal, were all undertaken by private developers on behalf of UCC for UCC requirements. Victoria Hall, the Kingsley/Rathmelton Investments development, Cregnane Hall and so on, were undertaken privately. If the development plan succeeds, a satisfactory demand will soak up all these current developments, but as it stands, UCC Accomodations Offices apparently had a hard time filling all these new developments last year. And now that, come this new academic year, bed numbers have doubled, and will triple with Rathmelton Investments and O’Shea Builders developments soon to begin construction. It’s a dodgy development area, but if cards are played right, it may just pay-off. But it’ll be tight. Not every UCC student or family can afford between 3000 and 6000 euros in accommodation every year.



      Hey Phil, details of the Bus Station are available in a previous page of this thread – with pictures. It’s nothing to get too excited about. Trust me. More pics available if ya want.

    • #732493
      ISI
      Participant

      Some of the local residents aren’t too happy about it. Didn’t someone run in the European elections on an anti high rise ticket? I went for a run past Victoria Cross a few nights ago. Passed a few local residents standing outside the Victoria Hall site entrance, they were having an animated conversation. Not exactly happy campers!

      Cork City FC 2- Nantes Atlantique FC 0

    • #732494
      lexington
      Participant

      As I figured, Frinailla have been refused planning by ABP w.r.t. their 70m euro, 9-storey development along Watercourse Road in Blackpool. Hopefully Frinailla will revise their development and reapproach Blackpool in the near future.

    • #732495
      Pana01
      Participant

      This is my first post – I stumbled across this forum, and find it very interesting. I have a keen interest in the development of Cork City. There are lots of positive things happening at the moment. Patrick Street looks impressive, but one or two questions – whay are loading bays in operation all day Saturday, up to 6pm? And whay are cars allowed to park there – they make the street look cluttered and untidy. There must be 4 new taxi ranks along Pana, when originally they were to locate to Academy street. Does anyone konw of that cccTV camera on a high pole outside BT (Maylor St side) is going to move??

      Fianlly, thanks to Lexington for all the insights – very helpful info.

      I just saw the following on the Examiners ‘breaking news’ web-page, looks exactly like Lexington’s recent report!!

      *******
      Top brand BT2 to open Wilton outlet
      24/07/2004 – 15:15:11

      Designer label store BT2, an offshoot of the popular Brown Thomas, will be drawing fashion-conscious shoppers to Wilton, Cork.

      The store is understood to have agreed a lease at Wilton Shopping Centre.

      The pricey clothes store features more casual gear than the clothes sold at the main Brown Thomas department store.

      Other tenants for the new €20m extension at Wilton Shopping Centre are believed to include clothes stores New Look and Specsavers.

      Meanwhile at Mahon Point Shopping Centre, a source has revealed that popular shoe store Schuh is to finalise a lease at the shopping centre.

      It has also been revealed that high-street fashion outlets River Island, Mango, Zara and Miss Selfridge have made letting or sale agreements at the 500 million Mahon Point complex.

      Already-named tenant stores are French Connection, Next, Principles, Pamela Scott, Easons, Sam McAuley chemists, Tesco, Debenhams and DIY retailers B&Q.

      Urban fashion store Topshop has also been linked to the Mahon complex but no papers have yet been signed because of its plans to cut costs.

      The shopping centre will also have three restaurants, a food court with six additional food outlets, an 11-screen cineplex and parking for 1,600 cars.

      It is believed that Ward Anderson, the largest cinema group in the country, won the multiplex contract over rivals UCI cinemas.

      The food court tenants expected to be announced shortly at Mahon are McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), Zumo Juice Bars and sandwich outlet Subway.

      Meanwhile, shoppers to the west of the city could be buying M&S clothes and household goods locally.

      A property source has also revealed that a possible tenant at the new Ballincollig Town Centre could be Marks and Spencer.

      *******

    • #732496
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes – the report in the Evening Echo, reported by Christina O’Rourke, has a question mark hanging over her ‘property source’. Particular informations supplied in her article are found exclusive to this forum, even the information orders mirror my post. As a consequence, I will investigate the background of the article and be in contact with the aforementioned reporter – and perhaps, based on my reply outcome, the Evening Echo editorial time, plus particular TCM managerial staff. I would hope, that such incidents – if proven to be taken from this forum – will not occur again without prior consent of resepective contributers. I have researched the legal aspects of these acts and they are all supportive of prior consentual initiatives from the primary source before secondary publication regardless of specific word arrangement.

      I encourage and willfully supply such information – but within context and based on consent. Media publication of such information at a mass level – jeporadise my ability to provide further, future information – as I am the one who hears all about it at the other end of an angry phone call. If Ms. O’Rourke is found to have adapted such primary source material from this forum and my post for her own benefit, it would paint a poor and unhealthy veil over the reliability and moral conduct of the associated media agency – and may see further announcements of major property developments purposely leaked to other media organisations before that of Ms. O’Rourke’s or other sources within the public domain. I certainly hope that this will not be the case.

      The unfortunate thing is, I would gladly inform Ms. O’Rourke of breaking deals and reliable exclusives within the world of Cork’s property market – in conjunction with this forum, if only consent was sought beforehand. What goes on the website and what goes in the press may seem like trivial matters to some – but unfortunately, this is not the view of those involved. As a result, what goes to press must be cautioned and cherry-picked in accordance with associative consequences.

    • #732497
      Devin
      Participant

      Speaking of Cork generally, is there any sign of the Merchant’s Quay Centre being redeveloped, or even refaced?

      That would be a coup, to get a good-looking replacement for one of the most prominent (but awful) buildings in Cork.

    • #732498
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah Devin, a 7m euro redevelopment of Merchants Quay SC has already begun and is expected to be complete in time for 2005. However, this redevelopment involves few external alterations and it is unlikely they will be substantial in scale to make the building look in anyway better.

    • #732499
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by lexington

      Hey Phil, details of the Bus Station are available in a previous page of this thread – with pictures. It’s nothing to get too excited about. Trust me. More pics available if ya want. [/B]

      Thanks for that. I should have looked more closely through the thread before asking about the bus station.

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #732500
      anto
      Participant

      was in Cork at the weekend and I like what I saw on Patrick’s Street. OK those lights are a bit curious ok, but the paving has a lovely finish. The bins are inadeqaute and I’ve always thought it, Cork must be one of the dirtiest towns in Ireland and last Saturday was no different.

      I see they’ve started on Oliver Plunkett street, should be good when it’s finished. Cork seems to be getting its act together but still has a way to go. Most obviously CornMarket street, and those Gaping holes on Washingto Street. Oh and a proper Litter management / flogging for the natives scheme!

    • #732501
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah anto, the Patrick’s Street lamps are a topic of some debate, but I think it’s hard to deny the fact, the city centre is looking way better. Oliver Plunkett Street, Grand Parade, Shandon Street, South Mall and soon to be refurbished Cornmarket Street are all going to add to this.

      I agree that Cork still has a long way to go, but it’s nice to see that it is on that way. Some major projects are nearing completion, coming on-line and/or are in planning for the city – its really encouraging.

      Fears that developments like Mahon Point, Ballincollig Town Centre and the redevelopment of Douglas Village SC would take away from the city centre, are being combat by projects such as the proposed 150m retail development on Academy Street by O’Callaghan Properties, the 60m retail/residential project at Eglinton Street by O’Flynn Construction, the Grand Parade Plaza by Frinailla, Cornmarket Street (Guy & Co. building) development by Rockfell and proposed 30m retail/leisure development at Grand Parade/Washington Street junction (no confirmation as of yet). As a result, there is a major influx of investment into the city centre, as well as suburbs. The Cork city office market is really coming into swing, with Howard Holdings 100m euro City Quarter office development, O’Callaghan Properties lavish 21 Lavitts Quay, O’Flynn Construction’s No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay, Corbett Bros. Copley Street office development and their other office development at Parnell Place/Beasley Street – as well as other such projects like Howard Holdings office building for Alberts Quay and the new Irish Examiner HQ on Lavitts Quay. In addition – the full potential of the Cork Docklands will be spectacular.

      The market is really treating these developments well – and it is a clear sign, as Howard Holdings always say that ‘Cork is on the up!’ If projects like these keep in motion (and there are many more projects yet to come into effect), Cork is truly getting its act together and will act as a major counter-balance.

      As for litter, believe it or not, Cork has actually got an awful lot better it’s refuse problems – but I agree, we really need to enforce more stringent laws against the shameful crime. Though I refuse to believe Cork is any worse than places like Dublin and Limerick, it doens’t mean we can slack off in our fight on litter. Cork should be a leading example.



      *UPDATES*

      In addition to Irish Examiner reports today (28th July 2004), I have been informed that Rockfell Investments look set to be grant permission for their major retail and residential development on Cornmarket Street. The development will include a 6-storey building with 7 retail units amounting to 120,000sq ft in retail space over 2 floors, with the remaining floors utilised as 80 apartments (it is likely this figure will be readdressed). The retail units will be configured to satisfy department store needs. A few big names have expressed interest in this development already, but I can’t reveal their identities without offical notice of planning permission grant. (also because some reporter may splash it all over a local tabloid).

      The development will revitalise the street, which it badly needs, and which is set to become a new retail and cultural quarter extending off Patrick’s Street (see previous reports).

      Originally, Rockfell had applied back in 1999 for a 9-storey, 408 bedroom hotel development with 1300 seat conference centre, leisure centre, superpub, 20 retail units and 172 space double basement car-park on the same site – but it was refused by ABP. This development was a great loss to Cork – probably one of its biggest in recent times – its design and utility would have revitalised the area much sooner and breathe new life into the street on all levels. It’s most recent incarnation is not up to the same scratch as the past proposal I feel, but it would be a positive step nonethless. I just hope ABP don’t have to get involved this time. An equivalent such loss nowadays would be Water Street, who’s decision has been pushed back until September – I just hope the same mistake isn’t made twice.

      Architect = Frank Ennis and Assoc.
      Developers = Rockfell Investments (headed by Michael O’Donoghue of the O’Donoghue/Ring Hotel Group and Munster Joinery)

    • #732502
      satanta99
      Participant

      ah can’t you give us just a hint of the names that you have heard that are looking at cornmarket st. A really subltle one that those “nice but dim” people in the local press won’t get and can’t write as their own.
      Please
      Just like to say that your insight into development in Cork City is greatly appreciated by information hungry people like myself.

    • #732503
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Over priced homewares perhaps?

    • #732504
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by satanta99
      ah can’t you give us just a hint of the names that you have heard that are looking at cornmarket st. A really subltle one that those “nice but dim” people in the local press won’t get and can’t write as their own.

      Sorry, but I can’t make the same mistakes twice. Rockfell’s development (though I wish it was their previous application on the Guy & Co site) is among the projects I rate most important to Cork’s development. It’s success will determine the tactical and strategic future of Cornmarket Street in a big way – almost more than any CCC investment in the area. Rockfell and CCC have been in long-term discussions with each other on the site, and it is suggested that CCC (especially Joe Gavin and Ronnie McDowell) seriously pursued the retail element of the project, a move a strongly support. Though the retail element is approx. 120,000 sq ft, I still believe it could have been more diverse. A major department store is the way to go on this one.

      The projects most important projects at planning stages now in Cork are undoubtedly as follows:

      1. Water Street
      2. Rockfell’s project on Cornmarket Street
      3. John Mannix’s Washington Street project
      4. O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street Project
      5. Howard Holding’s Albert Quay development
      6. Corbett Bros. Parnell Place development
      7. and pretty much any Cornmarket Street, Lavitts Quay, Docklands development in the process at the moment.

      These projects, in no particular order, are vital and I sincerely hope they succeed. However, there are many more, just as important projects in the works, and I will inform you of them when I am allowed to.



      *UPDATES*

      S. Meehan has just applied for a development of a 3 level multi-storey car park and additional commercial units at Grenville Place (end of Bachelor’s Quay – as par my previous post if anyone remembers).

    • #732505
      Pana01
      Participant

      Walking through Patrick Street on Saturday, I was shocked to see a big Portakabin outside Golden Discs/H Samuel, housing the contents of the former CIE shelter that used to be opposite Merchant’s Quay. Please tell me that this is a temporary arrangement.

      Was planning permission required for this cabin?
      There was a lot of debate when the original shelter was being removed. At the time a lot of people felt it was unsightly and unnecessary.

      What is it with CIE (Bus Eireann) and the taxi ranks? They seem hell-bent on cluttering up our new spacious main street.

      Beth Gali said her design was to give Patrick Street ‘back to the people’. It would be nice to think this concept could be put into practice. 😉

    • #732506
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      its true, the taxi situation needs to be contolled badly, they have ruined the space up by the statue. the city council seem to be afraid to take them on and shift their stand off the street, they are acting like pure bullyboys…and getting away with it. the taxi drivers believe that pana was refurbished to facilitate them and them only, its a pity really cause the street looks and feels remarkably well and is now a real pleasure to perambulate, and doing pana of an afternoon has been restored as an age old tradition in a street environment it deserves. ?

    • #732507
      Leesider
      Participant

      any news on that high rise apartment block down the docks Lexington?

      was home over the weekend and I thought Cork was looking alot cleaner than a few months ago, a slap of tarmac goes a long way, and at last that drainage system has been finished!!

    • #732508
      Torquemada
      Participant

      actually speaking of tarmac,does anyone know which streets in the city centre are going to be resurfaced over the coming months?Im thinking the South Mall and Parnell Place,they are both in a terrible condition.

    • #732509
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah Pana, that CIE Porta-cabin is only temporary (thank God!) and there was no planning permission required, it came as an incentive during works on Patrick’s Street – which is due to be entirely complete by the end of this week. Final bricks being laid outside Penneys (itself undergoing refurbishment and extension).

      As for taxis, I myself, along with all other traffic except for buses and emergency vehicles, think they should be banned for accessing Patrick’s Street and shifted back to Academy Street or kept down at Parnell Place next to the bus station. For a brief time, taxi ranks were shifted to Academy Street, but local vendors and the taxi-drivers themselves kicked up claiming the arrangement was losing them business. This is a fecious argument, if all taxis were legally required to have their main ranks at Parnell Place or Academy Street, the public, if they wanted the service, would have to walk to these streets. The problem with the former arrangement was poor planning, poor public knowledge, and quite frankly, a stubborn reluctance by plate holders (taxi-drivers). New by-laws, however are in the planning at CCC.

      And Torquemada, South Mall and Parnell Place are due a new layer of tarmac, but I can’t confirm dates yet. Already, the Western Road, Washington Street West, South Main Street, Grand Parade, Sheare’s Street, the Mardyke, Horgan’s Quay and Water Street have or are receiving new surfaces. The idea is to have all city arteries up to scratch before 2005. More streets, like
      Washington Street, North Mall and the remainder of the Western Road are in line for a refurbishment.

      Leesider, as for the 19-storey Water Street development, the decision date for planning was due on the 21st of July 2004, but has been pushed back until September. From what I hear, even the sceptics are having a tough time catching the development out – the planning application is pretty well covered. However, this doesn’t mean exclusion of the possibility for a negative outcome, nor the fact that Further Info will be requested, nor the fact the outcome could be brought to ABP. I hope planning is granted and third parties won’t bring it to Appeal, it really is a top-notch project. Fingers crossed!

    • #732510
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Oh oh – Heatons and Shaws are “department stores”… if they moved in to Guy’s that would cement Cornmarket St/North Main St area’s reputation as decidedly low rent.
      CCC need to be careful what kind of retail operator get’s in. High quality international tenants are required at that end of Pat St if the area is to stand a fighting chance. Insisting on “department store” might be unwise, as it’s Cork we’re talking about. Selfridges are hardly banging on the door!

    • #732511
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      weren’t debenhams interested before they chose mahon point?

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      Oh oh – Heatons and Shaws are “department stores”… if they moved in to Guy’s that would cement Cornmarket St/North Main St area’s reputation as decidedly low rent.
      CCC need to be careful what kind of retail operator get’s in. High quality international tenants are required at that end of Pat St if the area is to stand a fighting chance. Insisting on “department store” might be unwise, as it’s Cork we’re talking about. Selfridges are hardly banging on the door!

    • #732512
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hey Lexington have you seen the evening echo’s front page?

      http://www.eveningecho.ie/pdf/front.pdf

      This is going to be extremely important in the continued rise of Cork. Let’s hope they get the accoustics right.

    • #732513
      lexington
      Participant

      Well, one must remember that it is Michael O’Donoghue behind Rockfell Investments, and if anyone is familiar with his hotel business (and lifestyle) I think the idea of Shaws or Heatons locating in his Cornmarket Street business is slim to none. (I can verify that also from my involvement). -> the site is zoned for Higher Order Retail Development, so if a department store does secure the space, it will be of a high standard (one name interested has just moved into Dublin). But if it doesn’t go the direction of department store, the development has been designed as 7 retail units which may be divided between a selection of upmarket retaillers.

      I’ll try and do my best to get up CGIs of the Rockfell development on Cornmarket Street, and hopefully images of their previous proposal (so that we can sigh and long for what could have been). Their new proposal is essentially a scaled down version (3 floors less) of their last, but scaled down (in my opinion) in utility and prospect as well.



      *UPDATES*

      City Manager Joe Gavin has confirmed today that 3 sites have been designated for the development of a 6000 seat conference centre and event centre.

      The sites are located on Horgan’s Quay/Railway Street (as part of the CIE Development of the Northern Docklands [next to Water Street]- see previous post), The Cork Showgrounds (on the southern docklands) and the jutland along the Douglas River/Atlantic Pond at Mahon Point.

      It is clear that the CCC favour the Horgan’s Quay site, and have said they have no trouble finding investors for the development here. Treasury Holdings, Manor Park Homes and CIE have been the names behind Horgan’s Quay most prevailently. However, their intention is primarily focused on the development of a major retail, commercial and residential quarter for the site. The convention centre would be ancillary to this. CCC intend to thus put up a PPP bid on the convention centre project for one of the sites, to be decided upon within the next few months. It is their intention to have the centre up and running by 2007.

      The problem with the Showgrounds site, although nicely located on the southern docklands, is that the GAA are aggressively in pursuit of the site to provide new training facilities, an extended stadium at Pairc Ui Chaoimh and possibly a hotel and leisure centre. CCC are said to prefer this proposal (on the grounds PuC is to be redeveloped).

      O’Callaghan Properties, who are behind the Mahon Point Convention Centre proposal, say they have been intensively involved in a feasibility study for the past 4 months. Owen O’Callaghan is obliged to provide such a facility under a clause of the sale agreement in which he purchased the Mahon Point lands from CCC. Otherwise he may face a payment to the council of 6m euro. O’Callaghan has said he has no interest in pursuing such a development in the city centre, and wishes to focus on Mahon Point, he noted that viability would be an issue for more than 1 such centre, but said that he knew of a vast interest in such development by other investors.

      A landmark facility is, in my knowledge, probably most likely for Horgan’s Quay pending a move by O’Callaghan. CCC said they intend to purge ahead with the tender.

      The remaining Horgan’s Quay development proposals incl. a redeveloped rail terminal w/ multistorey car-park and ancillary works. Up to 5000 residential units (over stages), offices, retail centres, leisure amenities (clubs, pubs, gyms etc), a central, landmark plaza, boardwalks and many more. The area is zoned for high-rise development (one Irish Examiner report mentioned buildings scaling between 20 stories). However, no developers have made firm commitals due to the lacklustre of CIE organisational skills. Hmmm.

    • #732514
      lexington
      Participant

      Unfortunately, my spate with technology has ended in a stalemate, and I have been unable to post the images I attained from ABK Architects of the new 32m euro Cork City Hall Extension, contracted to Cleary Doyle.

      As a result, I’ve had to avail of press images (reluctantly) in order to fulfill my promises that I’d get images of the development on site for you as soon as possible. Construction of the extension begins in September.

      Once complete, the extension will stretch from Anglesea Street to Eglinton Street and be capable of facilitating ALL CCC departments. In addition, up to 400 car parking spaces will be catered for at basement and roof levels. A new internal pedestrian street will connect the 2 streets between which the development lies. The entire building is naturally ventilated, and although the design is clever, in my opinion, it is sub-par.



      Plus, this is for those of you who had requested a clearer image of the Mahon Point SC development.

    • #732515
      satanta99
      Participant

      Although I haven’t seen the proposed new development for the the Guy and Co. Site, I am aware of the incresed retail aspect in comparison with the previous proposal. I agree with the decison of CCC to reject the aplication for a hotel on the site. This site is instrumental in the revitalisation of the street and I think Higher order retail uses would bring a greater footfall than a hotel in the area.
      In the local press in the recent past, Habitat were said to be looking at a number of sites in the city, one in particular the old church site which is connected to the guy and co. site.
      Speaking of Heitons I don’t know why they haven’t located on North Main st. Like buy that awful Leaders shop. Its a disgrace that they can have two rundown shop fronts on such an important street. I really can’t inderstand it.
      If you think of the retailers which are currently expanding in Ireland you might be able to guess some of the names which could pop up on the Coalquay.
      House of Fraiser are opening in Dundrum, a similar sized store. Also when Arrnots was brought private there was talk about another store outside the capital, belfast or cork were mentioned.
      THen there is John Lewis which is opening soon in N. Ireland.
      Other retailer which I’m just guessing could be interested could be Tk Maxx (already located in Limerick) H+M, Zara and the other inditex chains.
      Also tHe carphone warehouse is going to stop trading out of its unit next to roches stores on Patrick street. Big name fashion retailers are rumoured to be looking at the site.

    • #732516
      lexington
      Participant

      Well first of all CCC didn’t reject the application for the hotel at the Guy & Co site, but it was ABP who made the refusal on a third party appeal by An Taisce and Corporation Housing Residents at the time.

      The original hotel plan include 20 retail units with a combined area similar to that of the new plan, so in terms of higher order retail space, the proposal worked in line with the later revised Development Plan – and due to the variety that came with numerous units, a greater retail pull would have ensued. However, a development is only as good as its tenants. If the new propsal manages to attract the significant tenants it requires, it may still do exceedingly well. Under the plans that I am aware of, this looks so pending the correct outcome. And, that ‘church site’ to the rear of the Guy & Co site is actually part of the development site of which Rockfell have been involved in since 1998.

      It would be highly unlikely that Zara would locate on Cornmarket Street (unless part of a department store concession) as they are opening their first stand alone store in Mahon Point in Feb 2005 (a Cornmarket Street location would depend highly on the success of their Mahon Point store – I’ve a feeling it will do well). Along with Pull and Bear and Mango (their 2nd Cork store). When Arnotts first issued authorised shares for capital, their expansion plans were limited to Dublin, and ever since, they have concentrated on developing their Henry Street premises, the most recent development being their purchase of the former Irish Independent Building. The particular market associated with Heitons or TK Maxx does not comply with Michael O’Donoghue’s intentions for his Cornmarket Street development – I would think along the lines of a more Brown Thomas-type market were a department store the successful outcome. Failing that, stores like Sisley, Espirit and so on, would be targeted for tenancy. At least, that is the plan – but at the end of the day, these retaillers pave the final decision based on their own plans. H&M would be a fabulous addition to the Irish and in particular, Cork market – but their expansion plans have only ever assessed Ireland, and never acted on them.



      I will provide interested party names when they become available to me, for the Carphone Warehouse premises near Merchants Quay. Nearby, Jump Juice Bars have opened their 2nd store at the Savoy Centre. A start-up Irish company, with their other store in Waterford, have also been trying to attain a Mahon Point outlet, but the SC is apparently fully let at this stage. Jump are based on the Zumo Juice Bars model – but instead of franchising, their growth thus far has been entirely organic (no pun intended).

    • #732517
      satanta99
      Participant

      I was unaware that the overall scale of the retail aspect was to have been the same in the previous proposal. Then I would have to agree with you that it would have been beneficial to the street. I just got the wrong impression from the original proposal that the retail aspect would give us something similar to the savoy centre, with small retail units. That was why I was happier to hear of the overall scale of the retail aspect. 120,000 sq ft I’m trying to picture this size and I think thats double the size of the new tesco store in Wilton. These larger floor plates are exactly what we need in Cork and the rest of the Irish cities to attract the big name retailers.
      H+M are opening a store in Dundrum town centre. So at least they are making their first inroads into the Irish market.

      On another note, work on Oliver Plunket street is progressing well. Passing through today I could already get a feel for what the street will be like when finished. In the design there was another interesting design for the street lighting. No progress has been made on this front but I am looking forward to seeing them. I just remember talk about them as being able to change colour and being vandle proof. I wonder will they cause as much controversy as the ones on patrick st. Prob not!

    • #732518
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      -> Aldi Stores (Ireland) Developments Ltd have lodged a planning application with Cork City Council (CCC) for the demolition of the existing structures on site at Heiton Buckley premises on Tory Top Rd & the construction of a mixed use development scheme with a total of 2083m2 gross retail floor space, a creche 201m2, play area & 48 no duplex apts. The single storey Aldi Discount Food Store will be complimented by the creche and roof-top play area with the addition of 48 duplexes in six 4-storey blocks. The application represents Aldi’s largest development investment in Ireland so far and represents its plan to fall in line with Council suggestions for increased mixed-use development. This element was previously lacking in many of their other proposals and since has lost both Aldi and Lidl successful planning grants in the past.

      Aldi have also lodged applications for 3 more stores in Cork city, besides this development.



      -> A number of high-profile developments in Cork have reached near ‘SOLD OUT’ status before they’ve even been completed, these include O’Callaghan Properties Office Development at 21 Lavitts Quay, John Hornibrook’s apartment development at Camden Quay (Camden Court) and Fleming Construction’s Trinity Court on George’s Quay.

      However, even more remarkable, Frinailla Developments project on Grand Parade, the Grand Parade Plaza, has sold almost all of its 50 apartments (starting at 390,000 euros each), with 80% of them going to owner-occupiers, and sold ALL of its underground car-parking spaces (between 70 and 90) at a price-tag of 80,000 euros each. A countrywide record. Furthermore, Atis Harrington-Bannon, estate agents for the retail element of the Plaza, have reported that almost all units have been let, sold or reserved already, all this before the project has even begun primary construction! Demolition activities have already taken place and archaelogical excavations are on-going (they seem to be on-going for months! [sigh]). However, John Paul Construction inform me, they intend to get to real work on the site in the next few weeks, possibly 2 weeks.

      The 100m euro City Quarter office development by Howard Holdings on Lapps Quay is currently waiting for a grant of planning by CCC on the addition of another floor to the office element, bringing the building to 6-floors, in line with the Clarion Hotel element next-door. The application has been based on the strong take up and demand for office space within the development. Both Howard Holdings, DTZ Sherry Fitzgearld and Cohalan Downing letting and sale agents for the project are said to be delighted with the response to City Quarter. Howard Holdings intend to make head-way on their Albert Quay office/IT development (just across the river from City Quarter) within the next few weeks.

      Just across Clontarf Street, at No.6 Lapps Quay, O’Flynn Construction are on-going with the development of their new office building, designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects of Washington Street. Foundations are currently being laid, and primary construction is imminent according to the company. Although Lisney and Hamilton Osbourne King (the designated agents for the project) won’t specify the details of sale and letting agreements; I am aware of at least 3 agreements – and I have been informed that the response has been as enthusiastic as that experienced with O’Flynn’s neighbouring office development, No.5 Lapps Quay. It’s an exceptionally positive and encouraging indicator of the Cork office market, which is continuing to buck the national trend. It is a further testament to the fact, the reason many firms and businesses have located to the suburbs and other regions in the past, rather than Cork city centre, has been a distinct availability lack of quality 3rd Generation, sufficiently large office space. This lack is gradually being rectified, and subsequently developers are reaping the rewards of this.

      No.6 Lapps Qy 21 Lavitts Qy

    • #732519
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      mickeydocs – what was on the front page of that classy “news”paper? The link changes everyday (i.e. the current front page)

    • #732520
      Leesider
      Participant

      dallas the echo had an article about the concert/coference venue planned for Cork. There are 3 options, 1 city centre (Horgan’s quay), 1 for the showgrounds, and 1 for Mahon Point. The CCC would prefer the city centre option, but it looks like O’Callaghan is going to push ahead with the Mahon one and there is no economic sense in having 2!

    • #732521
      Leesider
      Participant

      sorry forgot to mention it is supposed be along the same lines as The Point, 5,000 seater.

    • #732522
      anto
      Participant

      God I hope it’s in the city centre. Do Cork corporation want the whole feckin city to move out to Douglas/ Mahon are and be totally car dependent?

    • #732523
      Leesider
      Participant

      see the thing is anto as far as I know as part of planning getting approved for the Mahon project O’Callaghan had to build a conference centre along with it. Now he won’t invest in a city centre one as he understandably wants to protect his investment in Mahon. Supposedly plans are fairly advanced!

      IMO it might be the best option if we want one in the next 2/3 years. CIE seem to be holding up any development for Horgan’s key every chance they get and the GAA want to buy the Showgrounds so they can do up Pairc Ui Chaoimh, which is badly needed as well.

    • #732524
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      This is the same argument as Abbotstown – Lansdowne or Spencer Dock – Citiwest. It’s vital that if some form of conference centre is built in Cork it’s in the City Centre rather than in Mahon. Understandably Mr O’Callaghan wants to make the most out of his “mini-America” and make his hotel there more lucrative etc… but Horgans Qy or vicinity of Parc Ui C makes much more sense.

      Couldn’t CCC just get him to drop his plans in return for some apartments on the land or something (worst kind of planning I know, but…).

    • #732525
      lexington
      Participant

      CCC are advocating the Railway Street/Horgan’s Quay site for a new 6000 seat conference/convention centre – a shortlist of developers is currently being considered. I’ll name them as soon as I receive permission from the respective parties involved.

      O’Callaghan Properties have a clause in their sale agreement to integrate a convention centre into the Mahon Point development – the agreement knocked IR£4.3m off the sale price – which contested against a higher offer by MacDonald Properties of Scotland of IR£50m for the lands. O’Callaghan and McCarthy Developments paid £41m between them for the Mahon lands. Failure to develop the convention centre requires O’Callaghan Properties to return 6m euros to CCC. O’C Properties are stalling on this one a bit, for internal reasons rather than viability, this is causing some frustration and CCC are anxious to move forward with Railway Street. I’ll be interested to see how involved CIE get in this project – it will be a reflection of their commitment to continuing with Horgan’s Quay.



      Sisk Contractors have been chosen to construct the new Cork School of Music – with an initiation date of September. Although, I had reported this start date in a previous post, there had been some confusion in light of the financial problems experienced by PPP partners Jarvis Plc. It was expected at one point not to begin until Summer 2005, however now, it seems, the Dept. of Education and Jarvis are now both confident in proceeding with the project and will break ground this September. Some minor work has already commenced on the existing school (to face demolition), formal contracts are expected to be signed later this week.

    • #732526
      Leesider
      Participant

      anyone have any information on what the story is with the bank of ireland building that is at the back of the south mall?? saw plans for it ages ago but nothing seems to have happened yet, it has been derelict for years now. The plans looked good though!

    • #732527
      Pana01
      Participant

      That building has been derelict for an incredible 53 years, according to recent press reports. It really is an eyesore. If they can’t renovate it, they should at least paint it.

      Another point, Maylor Street is traffic-free between 11am-5pm on Saturdays. However, every Saturday, I can’t believe the number of taxis and cars bullying pedestrians out of the way, between those hours. Does anyone care – where are the traffic wardens/Gardai??

    • #732528
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes, the former mill to the rear of the Bank of Ireland, on Father Matthew Quay, has been purchased by Tumblegate Ltd. They also own the famour Jacobs On The Mall restaurant along South Mall. Tumblegate were granted permission for a mized retail, restaurant and residential development through renovation and extension of the existing mill but had been waiting on an amendment to the plan from CCC. They have recently received this permission and Joseph Lane Construction containers can been seen outside the premises ready to start construction. Some internal work is being completed first.



      And I agree, taxis and buses are acting unfairly and aggressively toward pedestrians, who have priority, on both Patrick’s Street and Maylor Street. It is a shame on the authorities for not pursuing the offenders for dangerous driving more vigourously.

    • #732529
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Lexingon, do you have any further info on Howard Holdings latest proposed development on Alfred Street… this should be a good indication as to what to expect in terms of the regeneration in the area?

      I was in the city at the weekend and I must say I am very impressed by the new art gallery in UCC, but very disappointed that this took priority over the greyhound track development. This site is now derelict for over six years. If I recall correctly this site sold for a huge sum. It’s typical of UCC. Their buildings on the Western Road and the Maltings are in very bad shape and at least in need of a lick of paint.

      What’s the story with the row of houses across the street from the greyhound track?

      Does anyone know what is being built on the Lee Road opposite the Lee Towers?

      Number 6 Lapps Quay looks great, and it seems as if it will also revive Clontarf street which is quickly becoming one of the most impressive streets in the city.

      On the subject of Taxi drivers in Cork, my impression is that in general (exceptions to every rule of course) they are a disgrace in the city. Their cabs are filthy and they can never seem to queue in any kind of order. They also believe that they can launch into conversations without invitation. CCC should have conditions attached to licensing.

      On another topic, Parking should be banned from Pana 24/7 asap.

      And I agree, taxis and buses are acting unfairly and aggressively toward pedestrians, who have priority, on both Patrick’s Street and Maylor Street. It is a shame on the authorities for not pursuing the offenders for dangerous driving more vigourously. [/B][/QUOTE]

    • #732530
      lexington
      Participant

      Howard Holdings have proposed to develop a 15m – 20m euro IT/Office building, 5-stories over basement on Albert Quay. They’ve no project planned for Alfred Street (by the Railway Station) that I am aware of. The Albert Quay office building is being constructed on a site, directly across the river from their City Quarter development, and will incorporate Albert House (the Parking Fines building).

      UCC have hired Cumnor Construction to refurbish their buildings at the Lee Maltings (a process in mid-swing). Work on their new 20m euro School of Pharmacy on College Road has begun, with initial clearing taking place currently. Pierse Construction begin primary work at the end of August, early September.

      On the Lee Road, UCC have hired Sisk Construction to build the new Environmental Research Institute. Designed by Bucholz McAvoy Architects. The 3-storey, “environmentally friendly” building is at an advance stage, as anyone passing the extensive construction site and tower crane will tell you. The site was donated by CCC.

      Work on a 62m euro UCC IT and Computer Centre at the former Greyhound Track on the Western Road is scheduled to begin at a preparitive stage come late 2005, depending on planning.

      The houses across the way from the Greyhound Track on the Western Road are mostly in private ownership, there is no real story with them. However the 6 terraced houses at Carmelite Place, which are currently boardered up, were scheduled to be demolished as part of a 4-storey over basement car-park development for 20 student apartments, however planning for this project was refused on grounds of scale and inappropriate use.

      No.6 Lapps Quay, along with No.5, City Quarter, the dismal but nonetheless refurbishment Bus Station, the Albert Quay office development, O’Flynn Construction’s major retail/residential development at Eglinton Street, 32m euro City Hall Extension, 60m Cork School of Music, Corbett Bros. Office Development at Copley Street, Howard Holdings’ Copley Hall, the South Infirmary’s new Breast Check Clinic at South Terrace and a number of other major development and rejuvenation projects are really gonna make this area of the city exceptionally attractive now and in the near future. Especially considering, all the above projects lay at the mouth of the new docklands development.

    • #732531
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks Lexingotn. So will we finally see the end of those hideous warehouses on Albert Quay?

      Any plans yet for the main docklands area next to the Grain Silos?

      It’s great that the stench is finally gone from the lee in this area of town. I read somewhere that the docklands area will be suitable for bathers in the next few years. This is hard to believe but fantastic news for this area of Cork.

      Has anyone heard anything about a proposed barge commuter service between city hall and Blackrock/Mahon?

      I must say that I was very impressed with the rejuvenated Hugeneot district.

      I’m also glad to hear that the former Methodist Church facing Waterstones is to get a new lease of life. This is a beautiful period building with immense potential.

      Originally posted by lexington
      Howard Holdings have proposed to develop a 15m – 20m euro IT/Office building, 5-stories over basement on Albert Quay. They’ve no project planned for Alfred Street (by the Railway Station) that I am aware of. The Albert Quay office building is being constructed on a site, directly across the river from their City Quarter development, and will incorporate Albert House (the Parking Fines building).

      UCC have hired Cumnor Construction to refurbish their buildings at the Lee Maltings (a process in mid-swing). Work on their new 20m euro School of Pharmacy on College Road has begun, with initial clearing taking place currently. Pierse Construction begin primary work at the end of August, early September.

      On the Lee Road, UCC have hired Sisk Construction to build the new Environmental Research Institute. Designed by Bucholz McAvoy Architects. The 3-storey, “environmentally friendly” building is at an advance stage, as anyone passing the extensive construction site and tower crane will tell you. The site was donated by CCC.

      Work on a 62m euro UCC IT and Computer Centre at the former Greyhound Track on the Western Road is scheduled to begin at a preparitive stage come late 2005, depending on planning.

      The houses across the way from the Greyhound Track on the Western Road are mostly in private ownership, there is no real story with them. However the 6 terraced houses at Carmelite Place, which are currently boardered up, were scheduled to be demolished as part of a 4-storey over basement car-park development for 20 student apartments, however planning for this project was refused on grounds of scale and inappropriate use.

      No.6 Lapps Quay, along with No.5, City Quarter, the dismal but nonetheless refurbishment Bus Station, the Albert Quay office development, O’Flynn Construction’s major retail/residential development at Eglinton Street, 32m euro City Hall Extension, 60m Cork School of Music, Corbett Bros. Office Development at Copley Street, Howard Holdings’ Copley Hall, the South Infirmary’s new Breast Check Clinic at South Terrace and a number of other major development and rejuvenation projects are really gonna make this area of the city exceptionally attractive now and in the near future. Especially considering, all the above projects lay at the mouth of the new docklands development.

    • #732532
      corkdood
      Participant

      Does anyone know what they have done to the river to make it smell better? I heard rumours months ago that they had done a cleanup on the lake by Park Ui Chaoimh and were doing the same to the river but never heard the details – something about friendly bacteria I think.

    • #732533
      prc
      Participant

      Originally posted by corkdood
      Does anyone know what they have done to the river to make it smell better? I heard rumours months ago that they had done a cleanup on the lake by Park Ui Chaoimh and were doing the same to the river but never heard the details – something about friendly bacteria I think.

      in case u you have nt noticed over the last couple of years the whole city has been up in a heap with roads being dug up and services been relaid esb, gas and also sewage drains, these drains would have orginially drained straight into the river, venice styleee, and thus the river lee like so many othere cities looked dirty and smelled quite bad

      see below and follow this link

      http://www.corkcorp.ie/maps/drainage.html

      Cork City’s waterways are one of its defining features. The River Lee separates into two channels to form the Central Island of the City. Since the foundation of the City, Cork’s sewage has discharged untreated into these channels. Each day 13 million gallons of raw sewage and polluted water flow into the River Lee and Lough Mahon, completely untreated. This is unacceptable for a modern City in the new millennium. Approximately £20 million has been spent on the City’s drainage system over a twenty year period prior to 1997, constructing sewers to intercept the numerous outfalls discharging to the river. This investment moved the point of discharge of the sewage downstream of the City centre. The City’s sewage now discharges through two main outfall points at Horgan’s Quay and Kennedy Quay.

    • #732534
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Sorry I have to laugh… hahahaha.

      That little Main Drainage thing…

      There seems to be a lot of activity in UCC. I remember plans being mentioned for the Boole – anyone got pics or specs? I really like the Boole as is – so imposing. Will the plans interfere, or are they conentrated within the quarry behind?

    • #732535
      corkdood
      Participant

      I’m well aware of the main drainage scheme but the river is dirty and smelly well above that sewage outfall point.

      I think the lake by Park Ui Chaoimh is called Lough Mahon – they’ve done a great job on that. i suppose its easier with a lake compared to a river.

    • #732536
      prc
      Participant

      two words corkdood:

      THE TIDE

    • #732537
      Craig Davis
      Participant

      I think the lake by Park Ui Chaoimh is called Lough Mahon

      It’s called Atlantic pond. That whole area, including the land on which Pairc Ui Chaoimh built, was a mud flat before being reclaimed from the River Lee when a dyke (now called The Marina road) was built sometime in the 19 century. It was a part of route for the old Cork, Blackrock & Passage Railway line.

      In the Cork City Council masterplan for the area there’s a proposal of developing the pond into a marina, and of

      harnessing opportunity for recreation and water activities through the introduction of a new internal dock and potential marina, and the establishment of an internal waterway corridor extending through the area towards Atlantic Pond

      I think this could be great for the area, as its so under-utilised at present.

    • #732538
      lexington
      Participant

      The value of the Cork Main Drainage Scheme is actually in excess of 100m euro. The stench eminated from raw waste being dumped into the Lee, this, as of from the end of this month will now all be treated by the 20m euro Sewerage Treatment Plant on Little Island – as well as certain explusions from harbour region industrial plants. This will bring the Lee to EU bathing standards. Any remaining dirt in the Lee is now ‘simply’ related to inconsiderate and careless individuals, river bed movement, upper stream contamination (which will now be service by a new treatment facility near the Shornaugh River mouth before it enters the city) and shopping trolleys it would seem.



      UCC have applied for a 5579m sq Boole Library extension to the southern elevation. The 5-storey extension will utilise the old quarry site at this elevation (currently a student recreation point and theatre entrance). The library will in the majority be designated for Postgraduate use. The main library will undergo an extensive refurbishment and modernisation in-line with the new building. The project, currently in planning, will cost an estimate 33.5m euros. The architects behind the development are Wilson Architecture of Cook Street, Cork.


    • #732539
      Craig Davis
      Participant

      UCC have applied for a 5902m sq Boole Library extension

      Any idea of who the architects are for this lexington?

    • #732540
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah Craig, Wilson Architecture. (I just edited that in up above – forgot it earlier.)



      *UPDATES*

      UCC are to apply to construct a new 7m euro National Microtechnology Research Centre.



      In addition ->

      Here’s an image of the new ERI building, currently under construction along the Lee Road. It’s not the best, so I’ll have more up in the future if possible.

      Anyone further interested in the Boole Library extension may find this link insightful -> http://www.sconul.ac.uk/pubs_stats/newsletter/30/5.RTF

    • #732541
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 A new Bowen Construction tower crane has been erected today over the No.6 Lapps Quay office development site. Construction has been sub-contracted to Bowen by O’Flynn Construction who will concentrate their construction resources primarily at the Ballincollig Town Centre site. The new crane adds another progressive puncture to Cork’s already dotted skyline and hearlds the beginning of primary construction on the No.6 Lapps Quay project.

      🙂 Howard Holdings have erected a large advertising banner on the river-side, southern elevation of their City Quarter office development. The sign reads “60,000sq ft to Let/for Sale”. Though this sign does not mean all that such space is available (and I am informed many deals have already been struck for the development tenancy), even if it did, it still means well over 1/2 of the entire development has been let or sold already. However the addition of a further office floor shows that Howard Holdings are already responding to the demand displayed for the project.

    • #732542
      asdasd
      Participant

      Sorry to hear about Sir Henry’s. I was in Cork for the first time in about 5 years some weeks ago, and did not notice a huge amount of different development – compared to Dublin – with the exception of Patrick Street which was then not finished, and had some construction work to be done. No cranes dotted the city. I did see the new building at UCC, the student’s uniion I think. ( i was in Cork for a day only, so I have have missed stuff)

      Reading this thread, it seems there is a lot of development to come. I am wondering, however, if this is not all a bit late in the day? The property boom cannot continue forever;property prices may crash and will certainly level, what then of the massive development planned for Cork?

      And why does Cork need all this retail and office development now, when there was no need for it at the height of the boom years? Is there really the increases in population we have seen in Dublin – most migration – internal within Ireland and external into Ireland – is to Dublin.

    • #732543
      T.G. Scott
      Participant

      Did the old railway from passage terminate at Kent or beforehand on the southern quays!?! a couple of years ago i was home and noticed on the ring road to the lee tunnel an old single track rail bridge. i took a look at a map and saw there is still most of the track bed intact. with all this development, you would think someone would realise the potential for trams like luas or light rail (arrow) between the city centre and suburbs.
      as for the development being too much too late, i would disagree. its good to see cork changing and i guess the boom is a memory so now it seems its just business and building!!! one thing to consider i guess is traffic and transportation needs to be addressed before cork wakes up to the nightmare that is dublin city traffic!!!
      cheers lexington for all the news – other side of the world and i couldnt ask for a better source … slan

    • #732544
      lexington
      Participant

      Posted by asdasd

      Sorry to hear about Sir Henry’s. I was in Cork for the first time in about 5 years some weeks ago, and did not notice a huge amount of different development – compared to Dublin – with the exception of Patrick Street which was then not finished, and had some construction work to be done. No cranes dotted the city. I did see the new building at UCC, the student’s uniion I think. ( i was in Cork for a day only, so I have have missed stuff)

      First of all, I personally was glad to see Henrys’ removal. Besides the appalling structural maintainence of the premises, poor management and nurture of a large proportion of the Cork rave drug scene – the nightclub was more legend than substance. Were the nightclub as great as its so called ‘die-hard’ fans claim – they would never have abandoned the club in light of its increasingly dilapidated premises, failure to modernize, contemporize and poor strategic handling evident in its organisation. The moaners and pallbearers who claim the club’s nirvanic past have more exaggerated nostalgia than clear cut memories. The fact is the club and Grand Parade Hotel had to abandon its operations due to poor fiscal return down to declining customer base. So, if the club was so great, it’s longing fans would have remained rigidly loyal in the first place. Their actions are the result of realisation with respect to a poor premises and longing for something better. The club’s closure is a direct reflection of this and it’s failure to adapt.

      Second, clearly asdasd you failed to look to far around you on your visit. That said, on my regular commutes to Dublin from Cork, I would fail to recognise many significant changes to the Dublin landscape bar say O’Connell Street or George’s Quay but for the fact I am already familiar with the Dublin landscape. The only other eye opener would be the presence of a tower crane for example. Similar, in Cork, the change is most prevailent with its dwellers who are clearly familiar with its landscape and more aware of what was, is and will be. However some changes are hard not to recognise – City Quarter for example, 21 Lavitts Quay, Blackpool Retail Centre and Park etc. And if you visited UCC, how could you fail to notice mammoth changes like the new Glucksman Gallery? Biosciences Building? Medical Building? Student Plaza???

      Reading this thread, it seems there is a lot of development to come. I am wondering, however, if this is not all a bit late in the day? The property boom cannot continue forever;property prices may crash and will certainly level, what then of the massive development planned for Cork?

      Unlike places like Dublin, Cork missed the main property wave – and is now riding it on it’s own terms. This is unique. The reason being that Cork has historically lacked the same investment evident in other Irish cities – this has created a huge backlog in demand. The reason Patrick’s Street rents equal those of Grafton Street (see Mango, Monsoon, Clinton Cards, TJS, River Island, Vero Moda etc) and the average Cork city centre private car parking space = 65000euro versus Dublin’s average of 45000euro is because demand has far exceeded supply. Developers first off the mark can take advantage of this demand before its caught up by supply. Remember, Cork’s metropolitan area homes 450,000 people and serves an additional 150,000. Were investment, sometimes in frustration with the lak of supply, traditionally went elsewhere, not all such investment is lured away for long due to the temptation of exploiting such huge market potential. With a current 3.1billion euros in private investment finding its way to Cork, a further 2.7billion euros at planning and much more on the way, supply is slowly freeing up to meet this demand.

      And why does Cork need all this retail and office development now, when there was no need for it at the height of the boom years? Is there really the increases in population we have seen in Dublin – most migration – internal within Ireland and external into Ireland – is to Dublin.

      As mentioned above, the historical lack of open-plan retail space has created a huge backlog in demand. The massive market potential has been realised at a national and international level – this may be verified by the fact that, for example, Debenhams chose to locate their 2nd Irish store in Cork over an additional store in Dublin. And why both B&Q and Zara signed papers for Cork locations before further deals were struck for increased store numbers in Dublin. The lack of retail space is gradually being rectified but there is still a massive demand for further retail space in the city centre. Remember, the city acts to serve up 550,000 people. The 2nd largest concentration in the country.
      The same rules apply to office space. The new supply has helped the Cork office take-up of 3rd generation facilities out-perform that of any other Irish city. In fact, as of Feb 2005 (the end of tax designation for IFSC), at least 3 companies in the IFSC and surrounding areas have quietly signed papers to open options on transferring their Irish operations to the Cork city region – most notably the Docklands area. This is attributable to the more affordable social, operational and economic costs in Cork of running these businesses.

      And why does Cork need all this retail and office development now, when there was no need for it at the height of the boom years? Is there really the increases in population we have seen in Dublin – most migration – internal within Ireland and external into Ireland – is to Dublin.

      Cork needs this development to cater to the demand back-log – its not so much that Cork ‘needs’ it, which it does, but more down to the fact that there is a huge market demand in the city from years of investment lack, and now developers are taking advantage of that. As mentioned, Cork has outperformed all other Irish cities in its take-up of 3rd generation offices over the past 12 months and this looks set to continue in light of a continuing demand locally and nationally. Especially as Dublin becomes increasingly expensive to operate within – undoubtedly a partial factor. Furthermore, the vast majority of population increases within the Pale Region have not been within Dublin but in fact it’s hinterland, such as Meath, Wicklow, Louth and Kildare. In fact, their has been outward migration from Dublin – though I acknowledge the fact that it is Dublin which is loci to these migrants’ activities. Though, due to lack of development, Cork city centre’s population declined – its hinterland population increased exponentially. The lack of supply made city centre living exceptionally expensive in Cork. Numerous new developments are helping see the in-flow of new residents back into the city centre once again, however metropolitan development and population growth remains strong at 10% p.a. growth. However, the development in Cork is more to do with demand rather than population. I believe you are forgetting the simple laws of economics.

      Lastly, as an individual with a strong personal and investment attachment to Dublin I can say with a clear conscience, that their is an unforgivable arrogance among many Dubliners that their Earth sees the Sun revolve around them. I highly resent that. Remember 39% of our GNP may be attributable to Dublin based economic activities, but 61% comes from the rest of the country. Considering Dublin’s population and administritive prowess, that is a huge figure and shows a huge dependence on the rest of the country’s economic well being. I think that is too often forgotten. My interest in Dublin is important to me, but as many developers like Howard Holdings, O’Flynn Construction, O’Callaghan Properties, Treasury Holdings and so on will tell you, their success in Cork for example has shown that the real smarts don’t follow the fattest rat. They follow the golden one. With returns nationally reaching an average of 40% versus Dublin’s ever declining marginal return average of 27% – I’d stick with the gold.

    • #732545
      asdasd
      Participant

      Thanks Lexington. You’ve convinced me that the late development in Cork makes sense, due to pent up demand.

      I understand Cork fairly well, having lived there – in the City centre – for 4 years. My visit to UCC was on business so I had no time to sight see.

      I still think that Dublin, during it first stage of it’s redevelopment boom, had made more progress, but it had more progress to make – much of it was derelict, before, while the City Centre in Cork was not. Remember Bachelor’s walk, and surrounding areas, and Temple bar before the redo. Gardiner street, the Docklands. I could go on.

      The centre of Cork never had these problems, with most of the social problems in the ‘burbs – Knocknaheeney, for instance – and even there, never as bad as Dublin at it’s worst.

      So I suppose it could not be changed as much. I would like to see more buildings on the quays, and that bus station redone. And I really dislke Merchants Quay and the way it ignores the river.

      Some development of the opposite side of the quays there would be nice, too.

    • #732546
      lexington
      Participant

      I do accept your point – I can remember a time when traversing Bachelor’s Walk was almost humiliating. It’s nice to see it move up and the boardwalk helps it no end. Street-scapes should open up as a positive public space and embrace pedestrian life and all its facets with a pleasant and comfortable environment.

      I completely agree also that Cork needs to utilise its quays a great deal more. There is so much more potential for it. However, I do think that’s the idea with more and more projects like 21 Lavitts Quay, Albert Quay Office Development and new Irish Examiner HQ. The good news is, there are many more plans for the Cork quays in the near future which I’ll post info on as soon as I’m permitted to. MQ is a very negatively shaped and designed construct indeed. It is currently undergoing a 7m euro refurbishment, but few of this contributes toward improving the Northern, Western and Eastern elevations. This is quite a shame because a little imagination could work wonders for the building. Positively however, the Bus Station is being redeveloped, with Ridge Developments currently on-site. Patrick’s Quay (opposite MQ), with the exception of the Metropole Multi-Storey, has seen little development of late, which is a great shame. But I am informed of a plan involving a major institution on MacCurtain Street which is at preplanning. The project will stem back onto Patrick’s Quay with a strong emphasis on the river and natural light – it will incorporate a new late-night lounge bar & restaurant overlooking the Lee from an elevatd position, extended seating, private venue room, quay-side retail units, offices and possibly a nightclub (but I assume this will be incorporated into the Lounge Bar). The project is being privately funded and will provide a new face for Patrick’s Quay. I’ve made no formal update for this as there are no formal plans or announcements – predominantly speculation in development circles. More on that as I get it.

    • #732547
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      These are images of the Phillisview Properties Ltd development at Washington Street West (at the corner of Sharman Crawford Bridge) overlooking the Lee. This small but pretty project incorporates 9 two-bedroom apartments and 2 retail/office units at ground floor. The design is by Curtin McGuinness and Grean (CMG) Architects, with Ridge Developments as the main contractor. I genuinely like this very pleasant project.



      Another design by CMG (HMG) Architects in Cork is that of the new development at George’s Quay by CNM Developments. The project, due for completion mid to late September, has been named Trinity Court and it incorporates 64 apartments, offices and a public house. Fleming Construction are main contractors.

    • #732548
      corkdood
      Participant

      Lexington. Not sure if you’ve covered this in earlier postings but do you know what plans there are for hotel developments in Ballincollig? I know there is a site earmarked for a hotel beside the O’Flynns town centre development and over the weekend I noticed major works are ongoing at Oriel House.

      There was also meant to be a hotel site opposite the White Horse Inn but that seems to be changed now as a sign indicates that the land is to be used for industrial units. However that being said the site was playing host to a circus at the weekend so they seem to be in no rush!

      Finally I heard many months ago that Ben Dunne was planning to open a chain of gyms/leisure centres around the country including a facility at Ballincollig. Any progress on this?

    • #732549
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I LOVE that development at Sharman Crawford Bridge! Mainly because I know that tiny site and am amazed and delighted something is being done there.
      Not sure about Trinity Court though…

    • #732550
      satanta99
      Participant

      I think the development at Sharman Crawford St is fantastic! From the renderings it looks as if it will make a great contribution to the aesthetic quality of the area. Also it takes advantage of its riverside location by providing open space in the form of a mini boardwalk.

      The work on the Oriel house hotel is due to be completed in 2005 and it will bring the hotel to a four star standard with a leisure centre part of the development.

      I think Lidl have been rejected for planning permission on the site you refered to, across from the White Horse. So the hotel plan is obviously gone out the window.

      The site that Ben Dunne wants to build his fitness centre is on the vacant site across from teh Flor Griffin Store. There were rumours that this site was originally supposed to play host to a childrens playground ( There currently isn’t any in the town with a pop. in excess of 16,000 people) But maybe the council thought Ben Dunnes proposal too good to refuse

    • #732551
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      *UPDATES*

      These are images of the Phillisview Properties Ltd development at Washington Street West (at the corner of Sharman Crawford Bridge) overlooking the Lee.

      Another design by CMG (HMG) Architects in Cork is that of the new development at George’s Quay by CNM Developments. The project, due for completion mid to late September, has been named Trinity Court and it incorporates 64 apartments, offices and a public house. Fleming Construction are main contractors.

      Both of those developments look good, the standard of the montages is also very good. I am sure they will be a commercial success although the Name Trinity Court puts me off, a certain facility on Dublins Pearse St has the same name. 😉

    • #732552
      Pana01
      Participant

      The 250 staff at Jutys hotel are to lose their jobs, as the hotel is to be demolished in February. A six-storey, 185 bedroom hotel will be built there by O’Callaghan properties, and leased back to Jurys. It will be ready in about 2 years.

    • #732553
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah, this is an accurate report – but it wasn’t supposed to be officially made until Wednesday. Nonetheless, as it is out now, you may as well know, Jury’s 4-acre hotel site was sold to O’Callaghan Properties for 30m euros almost 2 months ago. It is the company’s intention over the next 2 years (planning pending) to redevelop the site with a 185 bed hotel and conference centre, 300 apartments, 450 underground car parking spaces, and various ancillary services. Jury’s will lease back the new 4-star hotel over a 35 year lease agreement with an expected rent of over 2.1m a year. Though I was aware that this deal and development had taken place over the original plan (see previous posts), the loss of 250 jobs over the developments 2 year period is news to me. It had been my understanding that Jury’s intended to offer temporary posts to staff at other locations throughout the country or offer extended paid leave over successive periods. However, though it is always unpleasant to see job losses, if any consolation is to be taken by staff, it should be taken in the fact that a number of large scale hotel developments are now coming to fruition throughout the city and hotel service employment will be freely available – with the Hilton Hotel at Mahon Point, Clarion on Lapps Quay, Radisson Park Manor at Little Island, Marriott (rumoured) at Ballincollig Town Centre, Oriel also in Ballincollig, extended Maryborough House Hotel, and new 50m euro extension to the Kingsley Hotel at Victoria Cross. In addition, the new Jurys will create 300 new jobs (with 600+ more jobs created during construction of the new development which will be undertaken by Bowen Construction).



      Further to corkdood’s questions, O’Flynn Constrution have secured a tenant for their new hotel. The name will be released soon (although I may have just leaked it in the report above – clumsy! But remember, it is only a rumour I have heard. Other likely candidates are Lynch Hotels and O’Donoghue/Ring).

    • #732554
      corkdood
      Participant

      Thanks satanta99 & lexington for the information

    • #732555
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      This is a superb development site, and I hope the new building doesn’t obscure the view of St. Finbarr’s as much as the existing building.

      Are the plans tasteful in design?

      Any indication as to Fleming’s plans with the Tramore Road site (adjacent to Turner’s Cross)?

      Originally posted by lexington
      Yeah, this is an accurate report – but it wasn’t supposed to be officially made until Wednesday. Nonetheless, as it is out now, you may as well know, Jury’s Hotel site was sold to O’Callaghan Properties for 3m euros almost 2 months ago. It is the company’s intention over the next 2 years (planning pending) to redevelop the site with a 185 bed hotel and conference centre, 300 apartments, 450 underground car parking spaces, and various ancillary services. Jury’s will lease back the new 4-star hotel over a 35 year lease agreement with an expected rent of over 2.1m a year. Though I was aware of that this deal and development had taken in place over the original plan (see previous posts), the loss of 250 jobs over the developments 2 year period is news to me. It had been my understanding that Jury’s intended to offer temporary posts to staff at other locations throughout the country or offer extended paid leave over successive periods. However, this understanding would seem is inaccurate. I have to say that I am very disappointed with Jury’s strategy. This development could easily have continued without such substantial losses of employment. However, the construction of the project will create 400 temporary jobs and the new 6-storey hotel will facilitate a further 320 jobs in the long-run. A mixed day for Cork development.



      Further to corkdood’s questions, O’Flynn Constrution have secured a tenant for their new hotel. The name will be released soon.

    • #732556
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Hurrah! Good riddance to Jurys. The lingering smell of vomit in the function room will not be missed.

    • #732557
      corkdood
      Participant

      Not to mention their antiquated leisure centre with its swimming pool which was half indoor and half outdoor

    • #732558
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Jury’s used to be great for free parking in the city.

      QUOTE]Originally posted by corkdood
      Not to mention their antiquated leisure centre with its swimming pool which was half indoor and half outdoor [/QUOTE]

    • #732559
      lexington
      Participant

      A planning application for the Jury’s Hotel Site is expected to be lodged with CCC by the end of this week/early next week. I will provide a more accurate outline of the project when possible, will some images I intend to obtain. Bowen Group will provide construction, which, planning pending, is scheduled for Spring 2005. With first phase residential and hotel completion ready by Summer 2006. Est. value = 160m euros. I’ll announce the architects for this project a.s.a.p.

      Although the hotel and parking elements of this project are favourable, I remain mildly sceptical about the residential element of this project. Usually I get a lot more excited on these things, but something is just not sitting right with me about this. Hopefully this will be rectified on closer inspection.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Howard Holdings have been granted planning permission for the addition of a further floor on their City Quarter office development currently under construction at Lapps Quay.

    • #732560
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      Further to previous reports, Sean Meehan, a private developer, has applied for Outline Permission on the development of a 3-level multi-storey car-park, commercial units, vehicular bridge access and ancillary facilities at Grenville Place – a very prominent, river-side location at the western end of Bachelors Quay, beside the Mercy University Hospital – who have been given the go ahead for a new A&E department. It will be interesting to see how this permission turns out considering the location. The architect is John Paul Lennon.

    • #732561
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Today’s Irish Examiner has a nice photomontage of the proposed Jury’s mentioned above.

      Looks vastly better than what’s currently on site…

    • #732562
      Leesider
      Participant

      any chance of getting the picture on here??

    • #732563
      lexington
      Participant

      I obtained a set of CG images from both the developer, O’Callaghan Properties, and the project architect, Finghin Curraoin of Henry J. Lyons & Associates – but they are currently in a format I’m having trouble converting. So in the meantime, here is a press image of the 160m euro Jury’s Hotel site redevelopment on the Western Road/Lancaster Quay – which will consist of a 4-star 185 bedroom hotel with over 10,000sq ft conference facilities and leisure facilities, a public amenity plaza, riverside boardwalk, 300 luxury 1, 2 & 3-bedroom apartments, 2 new bridges (1 pedestrian, 1 vehicular) and 450 undergound car-parking spaces. Contractors will be Bowen Construction, and planning pending, the project is set to go for Spring 2005 with a Summer 2006 completion date.

      The design is tasteful, but nothing remarkable. It shows a continued trend with O’Callaghan Properties of late to work toward more tastefully designed projects. Though I still feel a little anxious about the residential element of the development, the design and application have allayed some of this anxiety.



      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes:ABP have granted permission following appeal for 2 student accomodation developments at Victoria Cross.

      The 1st is Paul Montgomery/Edmund Kenneally’s extension of their 59 apartment, 9-storey Victoria Hall designed by Derek Tynan and being constructed by the Bowen Group. The extension will create 60 additional bed spaces to the near complete main development – seeing the demolition of the existing petrol station and construction of a 4-storey over basement car-park building with ground floor commercial unit. (see previous posts)

      The 2nd is a student development designed by Bertie Pope and Associates and being developed by Fleming Construction on behalf of UCC. Permission was granted for the demolition of existing warehouses on site and the construction of 60 no. student apartments in five/six storey blocks consisting of 3/ 4 & 5 study bedrooms per apartments to accommodate 255 students,
      62 no. car parking spaces at basement level, Wardens Apartment, Management Suite containing Reception, Seminar Room and Offices, 200sq.m. café/shop & 3 no. Commercial/Retail units 200sq.m. in total, laundry and other ancillary facilities and full site development at the former M & P Cash & Carry premises on Victoria Road, Cork.

      Just nearby, Rathmelton Investments were set to begin on a colossal student project, in addition to the 82-bedroom and offices extension of their Kingsley Hotel, with 116 student apartments in a series of 5-storey interlinked blocks and a dual basement car-park with 740 spaces. Design is by Murray O’Laoire (see previous post) – it is believed now however that this student element will not proceed.


    • #732564
      satanta99
      Participant

      I noticed that the carphone warehouse outlet next to Roches stores has a deal agreed notice on it? I wonder who will take over the lease?
      I am happy to hear that the days of the present Jurys Hotel are numbered! It is horrible! Does anyone remember when it was painted pink?
      I’m really starting to get worried about that 9story block of student accomodation going up in Victoria mills! I think its goina look awful! Maybe when the scaffolding comes down and when we will be able to get a holistic vista it might be okay!

    • #732565
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Cork’s popular arthouse cinema, the Kino, has applied for permission to demolish its existing cinema on Washington Street and construct 3 new cinemas on seperate upper-storeys each and with a ground-floor restaurant. All the cinemas’ surrounding lanes will be adjusted to cater for this development. Architects are Dennehy + Dennehy.



      🙂 J.D. Hotels Ltd. have lodged an application to develop a 4 – 5 storey restaurant and bar w/ ancillary offices complex at 77/78 Grand Parade and 1 – 9 Tobin Street. The project will see the demolition of 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 & 9 Tobin Street, demolition of 78 Grand Parade and retention/refurbishment of 78 Grand Parade – which will be incorporated into the new building.



      :confused: For anyone interested in Sean Meehan’s parking and commercial development at Grenville Place, near the Mercy Hospital – believe it or not, the plan includes the construction of a vehicular access bridge off the Grenville Place Quay, which will then loop back into the quay wall into the development which is planned to be constructed 3-levels under the ground and river. Commercial units will also be part of the project composition. More on this development as soon as it is clarified by the developer. I will update accordingly.



      😡 And yes satanta – Victoria Mills is no pretty picture.


    • #732566
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 On an inspection today of both John Mannix’s 7-storey retail/office and residential development for 41-44 Washington Street (designed by Dermot Coveney of Coveney & Assoc.) I have to say, it is certainly curious. The design is initially unappealling. It resembles close to nothing on the street with a blend of dark, steely green, red, blue and white colourings. A huge 3 storey, rectangular bay window graces the highly prominent corner, from street level up, and the 5th and 6th floors are stepped back. Although I must say, the more one looks at the design, the more it grows on you. It has an arrogant beauty about it and is unashamedly loud. With the exception of the boxy roof (distasteful), one starts to think, this could be what Cork – and more notably, Washington Street, needs, a loud and proud design. In context, the corner bay windows would light up the street and give it a modern edge, but I really wish something would be done to amend the roof.

      By contrast, where the previous Rockfell proposal for Cornmarket Street had a sense of class and post-modern, symmetrical grace to it (designed by Frank Ennis & Assoc), the current proposal (though 6 storeys, is not short off the prev. proposal height of 9-storeys), the new proposal is a modern monstrosity of epic proportions, it is also, oddly, designed by Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis & Assoc. It is strange to think how such a monster could come from the same house as the previous classic. Though I support the development, Cork is truly getting a lesser option in comparison to the original. It is essentially a left-over and I rue the day ABP refused the original proposal. It is a true shame in the context of what is to come.



      Meanwhile, O’Callaghan Properties lodged their application (under the name Riga Ltd) for planning on the site of the Jurys Hotel along the Western Road. A correction to media reports, the apartment element ranges between 6 – 9 storeys high. And there will be 303 apartments and a 182 bedroom hotel. At least this 9-storey apartment building has an element of design to it, versus Victoria Hall. For design of the 160m euro project, see previous post.



      Finally, for those who requested images of the Grand Parade Plaza, retail and residential development by Frinailla. Here are 2. The first is the Grand Parade elevation, the second is the prespective from South Main Street. Design is by Richard Rainey & Assoc. Contractors are John Paul Construction.

    • #732567
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 After the recent, refusal for Lidl GmbH to construct new storesat Churchfield and Ballincollig in Cork, Aldi’s proposed store at Fitz’s Boreen in Blackpool, Cork comes as a further blow to the discount food merchants in the city. Aldi also had a refusal of a store in Ballincollig recently. There is clearly a ‘un-right’ in all of this that must be addressed. Aldi await the decision for the proposed mixed used 48-apartment, retail centre, creche, play facility and discount food store at Tory Top Road in Cork meanwhile.

    • #732568
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Can anyone list the proposed list of developments for Grand Parade and provide a little info into each.

      What’s happening with the redevelopment of the Parade?

    • #732569
      lexington
      Participant

      😉 A number of projects are taking place in and around Grand Parade at present and are planned for the future. Grand Parade has always been a traditionally important and vibrant Cork main street and has been earmarked as an important natural progression of the existing Patrick’s Street commerical core – along with Cornmarket Street.

      -> First, is the Grand Parade redevelopment, which has already begun its first phase, between Daunt Sqaure and Finns Corner, which is scheduled for a late September completion. The redevelopment has been designed by Beth Gali, who also designed the Patrick’s Street and Oliver Plunkett Street refurbishments and whom has been hired to begin design on the entire length of Grand Parade (schedule for initiation is as yet unknown).

      -> A number of commercial developments are embracing the Grand Parade area. Most notably the Grand Parade Plaza retail and residential development (see post above for images) on the site of the old Grand Parade Hotel linked to South Main Street. The project consists of a 7-storey over basement building designed by Richard Rainey – holding 50 apartments, incl. 3 roof-top penthouses, communal ‘sky-gardens’ throughout, a retail mall and underground car-parking. Almost ALL apartments (starting at 369,000 up) and ALL parking spaces (80,000 each) have been sold at this point.

      -> J.D. Hotels Ltd, have applied to demolish the buildings at Singers Corner (except number 77 which will be refurbished) and along 1 – 9 Tobin’s Lane with a view to constructing a 4-storey late-night bar and restaurant w/ ancillary offices (see prev. post for more details).

      -> The English Market is due for a renewal in the near future.

      -> Not far from Grand Parade, John Mannix is awaiting a decision on a 7-storey over basement residential, retail and office development at 40-42 Washington Street.

      -> At 50 Grand Parade, the Kenny Group is planning a mixed use, 7-storey development of 22-bedroom hotel, 35 duplexes, 141 multi-storey car-parking, retail centre, office development, cantiviliered boardwalk, 2 superpubs, restaurants and cafes – designed by RKD McCarthy and on the site of the former Citi Car Park (oddly re-opened for use not so long ago after a planning amendment to the project was withdrawn). I will update you on this when I can.

      -> On Tobin Lane, the Triskel Arts Centre is currently undergoing a renovation and expansion. Cumnor Construction are on site.

      -> But the ‘big-one’, is that which is in the pipeline for the 30,000 sq ft Capitol Cineplex site at the Grand Parade/Washington Street junction. (see previous post on this topic for more details). An announcement is expected on this site when Ward Anderson announce their relocation to the new 11-screen multiplex at the Mahon Point SC, late this September.



      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: CCC have today received the Further Information they requested from Rockfell Investments regarding the major Cornmarket Street department store/residential development. A decision is now expected within 1 month.

    • #732570
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks as always Lexington.

      The parade is my favourite street in Cork, and I believe it has incredible potential. This street could become our first boulevard if developed correctly (and the traffic redirected of course. The national monument, the english market, the peace park and the width of the street all add to the streets wonderful feel. Unfortunately it has been a wip for far too long.

      Singers Corner brings the whole street down and most would be glad to see this deconstructed and replaced (the georgian society will probably be up in arms again). Tobins Lane has also got great potential and I’m glad the Triskel are pumping some money into this site.

      On another topic, can we petition anyone to have that hideous portacabin removed from Patrick street.

      Originally posted by lexington
      😉 A number of projects are taking place in and around Grand Parade at present and are planned for the future. Grand Parade has always been a traditionally important and vibrant Cork main street and has been earmarked as an important natural progression of the existing Patrick’s Street commerical core – along with Cornmarket Street.

      -> First, is the Grand Parade redevelopment, which has already begun its first phase, between Daunt Sqaure and Finns Corner, which is scheduled for a late September completion. The redevelopment has been designed by Beth Gali, who also designed the Patrick’s Street and Oliver Plunkett Street refurbishments and whom has been hired to begin design on the entire length of Grand Parade (schedule for initiation is as yet unknown).

      -> A number of commercial developments are embracing the Grand Parade area. Most notably the Grand Parade Plaza retail and residential development (see post above for images) on the site of the old Grand Parade Hotel linked to South Main Street. The project consists of a 7-storey over basement building designed by Richard Rainey – holding 50 apartments, incl. 3 roof-top penthouses, communal ‘sky-gardens’ throughout, a retail mall and underground car-parking. Almost ALL apartments (starting at 369,000 up) and ALL parking spaces (80,000 each) have been sold at this point.

      -> J.D. Hotels Ltd, have applied to demolish the buildings at Singers Corner (except number 77 which will be refurbished) and along 1 – 9 Tobin’s Lane with a view to constructing a 4-storey late-night bar and restaurant w/ ancillary offices (see prev. post for more details).

      -> The English Market is due for a renewal in the near future.

      -> Not far from Grand Parade, John Mannix is awaiting a decision on a 7-storey over basement residential, retail and office development at 40-42 Washington Street.

      -> At 50 Grand Parade, the Kenny Group is planning a mixed use, 7-storey development of 22-bedroom hotel, 35 duplexes, 141 multi-storey car-parking, retail centre, office development, cantiviliered boardwalk, 2 superpubs, restaurants and cafes – designed by RKD McCarthy and on the site of the former Citi Car Park (oddly re-opened for use not so long ago after a planning amendment to the project was withdrawn). I will update you on this when I can.

      -> On Tobin Lane, the Triskel Arts Centre is currently undergoing a renovation and expansion. Cumnor Construction are on site.

      -> But the ‘big-one’, is that which is in the pipeline for the 30,000 sq ft Capitol Cineplex site at the Grand Parade/Washington Street junction. (see previous post on this topic for more details). An announcement is expected on this site when Ward Anderson announce their relocation to the new 11-screen multiplex at the Mahon Point SC, late this September.



      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: CCC have today received the Further Information they requested from Rockfell Investments regarding the major Cornmarket Street department store/residential development. A decision is now expected within 1 month.

    • #732571
      lexington
      Participant

      Yet another addition to the Section 50 market in Cork city – Frank Sheahan’s 15 apartment development on Lynch’s Street (just off Little Hanover Street and Sheare’s Street) has been officially launched. The new student accomodation building is being constructed by P.J. Hegarty’s and was designed by Jack Coughlan and Associates on the site of the former Club FX nightclub. Each apartment contains between 3 & 4 bedrooms, parking is provided at a basement level for vehicles and bicycles. The ground floor will act as a commercial facility in conjunction with a bar/nightclub extention.

      This development, and considering the history behind it’s incarnation, speaks little to me to say the least. Unimpressive as it may be, it still makes the Victoria Mills student development look like an accident.

      Frank Sheahan’s other large development at the moment, the Section 23 office development along the Blackpool By-pass, also designed by Jack Coughlan and constructed by P.J. Hegarty at least has a bit more panache to it.

    • #732572
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Regarding what area?

      Originally posted by lexington
      **BIG ANNOUNCEMENT TO BE MADE SOON!**

    • #732573
      Pana01
      Participant

      Hmmm – looking forward to that BIG announcement, Lexington.

      Regarding that vile Portakabin, I have a bad feeling that it will be there forever. Why can’t these guys just have a ‘base’ at the bus station and be done with it? They’ve had it cushy for far too long.

      I read on the Echo last night that the Taxi drivers were having a big meeting to discuss their problems, including the explosion in the numbers of Taxis in Cork – and – this is the best bit – their dissatisfaction at the way people were parking in the ‘new taxi ranks’ in Patrick Street, taking up their valuable rank space.

      They are cluttering up Pana – please oust them to another location.

    • #732574
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Agreed. All parking on Pana should be banned, with the exception of buses and delivery vehicles.

      Taxi drivers should be moved to Academy street

      Originally posted by Pana01
      Hmmm – looking forward to that BIG announcement, Lexington.

      Regarding that vile Portakabin, I have a bad feeling that it will be there forever. Why can’t these guys just have a ‘base’ at the bus station and be done with it? They’ve had it cushy for far too long.

      I read on the Echo last night that the Taxi drivers were having a big meeting to discuss their problems, including the explosion in the numbers of Taxis in Cork – and – this is the best bit – their dissatisfaction at the way people were parking in the ‘new taxi ranks’ in Patrick Street, taking up their valuable rank space.

      They are cluttering up Pana – please oust them to another location.

    • #732575
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Sorry, someone actually “designed” that student development on Lynch’s St? Think I preferred the dereliction and night clubs.

      Also – is anyone reminded of Smithfield Market when they look at the scan of Jurys – check out the lanterns and buildings…

    • #732576
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      Rockfell Investments have successfully returned their Further Information request to CCC in the form of a Significant Further Information Response. The response is a massive return of information in which the co-operation between CCC, the developer and architect (Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis & Assoc) is unmissable. I have to say, though I may be disappointed in the Rockfell proposal with respect to their previous development attempt on the Guy & Co Cornmarket Street site, I am very impressed at how the developer has worked closely with CCC. It is evident both parties want to see this project up and running. Rockfell have made some major adjustments to their initial proposal in response to CCC requests.

      -> The overall number of apartments is now to be reduced by 15 from 80 to 65.

      -> Height at the Cornmarket Street elevation is to be dropped by 6m to calm overshadowing fears.

      -> 66 dedicated underground parking facilities are now to be provided.

      -> an additional retail unit is to be added (from 7 to 8) as part of an extended department store element, which will be divided over basement, ground and first floor levels whilst retention of the Guy & Co facade is maintained.

      -> The ‘Noddy’s Building’ on Cornmarket Street and Dalton’s Avenue will now form a more independent structure with relation to the primary development.

      -> Various alterations have been made to the building facade in the interest of aesthetic quality and enhancement of the overall design.

      -> Plus many more.

      This is a positive, a far more desirable development – it also shows that a constructive positive relationship between developer and planners can exist to maintain desirability, progression and sustainability at all levels to ensure a positive development outcome.

    • #732577
      Torquemada
      Participant

      With all of the development and “resurfacing the island” it would be nice for the city of culture year if the council or someone could also look at painting the roadside poles and roadsigns,and cleaning the signs as well!

    • #732578
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lexington – I’m a little worried about the comment of alterations to the facade in the interest of “asthetic quality”… the CCC are hardly going to be the bastions of fine architectural taste. If their idea of positive intervention is that Frinailla dev on Grand Parade (yielding something so dull they might aswell retain the GP Hotel facade and noone would notice) then this could be an ominous sign. I know in this case (cormarket st) that the intial design for the hotel on site was a disaster so intervention is probably for the best here.

    • #732579
      dowlingm
      Participant

      banishing the portacabiners to the bus station will be a long walk once Parnell Place Stn closes, no?

    • #732580
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      I know in this case (cormarket st) that the intial design for the hotel on site was a disaster so intervention is probably for the best here.

      The current design for the Rockfell Investments project on Cornmarket Street is light-years from the original hotel design – and trust me, a little intervention was needed at the very least. Though the re-submission entails little facade alteration, it is alternations which are needed. However the Guy & Co building, red-brick facade is being retained, refurbished and incorporated as the department store entrance.

      With relation to tenants of the new department store, one of the anchors at Dundrum Town Centre (which is their 1st Irish store), I am told, have expressed an interest in at least one large, anchor unit within the department store – if not, all units with concession options. However no confirmation of this ‘rumour’ will be made until planning is granted and construction initiated. Furthermore, a major Swedish fashion retailler with ambitious Irish expansion plans (and whom is also opening a store at Dundrum) has indicated that either Cornmarket Street or Grand Parade would make desirable retail locations failing the ability to secure a sufficient premises on Patrick’s Street in Cork. By pure deduction, I am only assuming that Rockfell’s department store on Cornmarket Street or Frinailla’s Grand Parade Plaza would make suitable locations considering the large open-plan nature of their retail elements. However, as ATIS Harrington Bannon have indicated almost all units at the Grand Parade Plaza are Sale/Let/Terms Agreed, Rockfell’s Department Store would seem the more likely. However, this information is only an assumption made, based on received information.

    • #732581
      satanta99
      Participant

      The portacabin on patricks st. is supposed to be only a temporary measure. I heard that the old bus conductors cabin is being restored and will be repositioned on the street in the future.

      I’d make the same assumption about that swedish retailer locating in either of these sites but I am also interested in the properties which have become vacant on Patricks st. The lease is for sale in the old pound city store and the lease has been sold in the carphone warehouse outlet. Also the newsagents across from merchants quay “the Favourite” appears to undergoing extensive reconstruction. These units may not have a large enought floor plate for the retailer mentioned above but might we see more international chains getting onto Patricks st. I know footlocker anounced a major expansion into the Irish market and so too did Starbucks.

    • #732582
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Our chamber of commerce seems to be excellent at lobbying the government for investment into the city. Why doesn’t it apply the same pressure to IAWS and other property owners sitting on vast tracts of prime development land.

      And why hasn’t it spoken out against CIE’s inactivity in relation to Horgan’s Quay. Is anyone actively demanding activity in relation to this site? Are CIE holding out for a property down-turn? My impression was that this badly managed, appallingly run semi-state is in need of all the financial aid it can get its hands on. Surely the sale/redevelopment of Horgan’s quay will bring in mega-bucks… oh I forgot, the government will back them up financially regardless of their performance.

      Heuston Station has had two overhauls in the last ten years, while the CIE continue to drag their heels in relation to Cork. Where is our political will to make things happen? I admire the new City manager a great deal and would love to see him take on CIE in relation to this matter.

      BTW, here’s hoping that Aer Lingus will finally announce Transatlantic flights from Cork today 🙂

      Originally posted by satanta99
      The portacabin on patricks st. is supposed to be only a temporary measure. I heard that the old bus conductors cabin is being restored and will be repositioned on the street in the future.

      I’d make the same assumption about that swedish retailer locating in either of these sites but I am also interested in the properties which have become vacant on Patricks st. The lease is for sale in the old pound city store and the lease has been sold in the carphone warehouse outlet. Also the newsagents across from merchants quay “the Favourite” appears to undergoing extensive reconstruction. These units may not have a large enought floor plate for the retailer mentioned above but might we see more international chains getting onto Patricks st. I know footlocker anounced a major expansion into the Irish market and so too did Starbucks.

    • #732583
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      CIE are not only holding Horgan’s Qy back… Spencer Dock in Dublin is suffering of late too. Treasury went ahead and sold a whole tranche of apartments – confirmed a large anchor for offices (PWC) and began ground work on site. Now CIE it seems are relenting and throwing a serious spanner in the works for this project. If Spencer Dock cannot get a smooth ride from the CIE side of things – how on earth can Horgans Qy expect otherwise?

    • #732584
      lexington
      Participant

      Horgan’s Quay represents not only one of the biggest investment and development opportunities in Cork, but the entire country. Though ‘sketch’ plans have been drawn up by an investment company consisting of Treasury Holdings, Manor Park Homes, CIE and with input from CCC and various local developers – I agree that CIE have been the predominant culprit in holding back on this development. Sketch plans have proposed offices, commercial/retail quarter, a new grand plaza utilizing the river, boardwalks, new railway station development (drawings of which can be seen in the Cork Development Plan 2004 – 2009), a large new underground and multistorey parking facility to cater for public and private uses, a new 6000 seat convention centre, up to 5000 residential units, up to 5 high-rise office, residential and commercial buildings of ‘world-class’ proportions and quality reaching up to 20 – 25 storeys each. The potential is overwhelming, and could provide a substantial strategic income for the semi-state body over the next 25 years easily. Much of the company’s reluctance comes in the form of pure lack of foresight and real management strategy. CIE will be the lesser for not getting it’s act together.

      However, in fairness to Cork City Manager Joe Gavin, he has vehemently campaigned to get the CIE site at Horgan’s Quay/Railway Street up and running as a large-scale convention centre. This was reported in one of these posts a few weeks back. Mr. Gavin has already received a number of interested party proposals and it is his intention to push through with the project to have it up and running within 2 years pending the decision deadline given to O’Callaghan Properties regarding their proposed convention centre at Mahon Point.



      Also, it is true that Cork Airport are expected to make a major announcement today regarding a number of new routes, one of which is expected to be a new transatlantic route by a scheduled carrier, another relates to the expansion of services by a low-cost carrier at the airport, and another relating to a number of new European routes. It will be interesting to see which carriers and routes are announced. Cork Airport management have suggested that the announcement will be among the biggest made since confirmation of the new 140m euro terminal.

    • #732585
      Pana01
      Participant

      No major transatlantic news from the Cork Airport press conference today……
      >>>>>>
      Aer Lingus has announced plans to establish four new routes between Cork Airport and contintental Europe from next summer.

      The airline said it was planning to operate direct flights from Cork to Munich, Rome, Nice and Faro.

      Aer Lingus already flies from Cork to seven other destinations.
      >>>>>>>>>>>>>

    • #732586
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      at least it’s increasing the number or routes… still hard to understand why they got rid of the cork-dublin flight (supposedly their second most profitable route).

      Originally posted by Pana01
      No major transatlantic news from the Cork Airport press conference today……
      >>>>>>
      Aer Lingus has announced plans to establish four new routes between Cork Airport and contintental Europe from next summer.

      The airline said it was planning to operate direct flights from Cork to Munich, Rome, Nice and Faro.

      Aer Lingus already flies from Cork to seven other destinations.
      >>>>>>>>>>>>>

    • #732587
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork Airport is to receive 4 additional European routes with Aer Lingus, who will now base 3 Airbus A320s to serve Munich, Rome, Faro and Nice. In addition, Aer Lingus have announced they intend to increase frequencies and capacities on their existing European routes to Barcelona and Milan, as well as Amsterdam and London Heathrow. This is good news for Cork Airport who continues to see exceptional growth on all its continental European routes. Some people, remain a little disappointed about a failure to announce transatlantic intentions – but I believe this is partially due to the hype spurred up by the local media before the announcement was officially made.



      *UPDATES*

      Southlinch Theatres Ltd have received planning on appeal to re-open The Savoy Theatre as a nightclub. This is good news for Cork’s nightlife – as it has been a sorely missed venue among locals and will provide huge capacity for major entertainment events once again. 40 jobs are to be created as a result of this development.

      -> Also, development group Lyonshall Ltd have announced the imminent construction of their 200m residential, educational and commercial development at the Ursuline Convent in Blackrock.

    • #732588
      lexington
      Participant

      For those curious as to what exactly is happening with the former An Post Sorting Office Site on Eglinton Street which was purchased not so long ago by O’Flynn Construction – I managed to have a discussion with a certain director within the company. The site has a sign located on it which indicates clearly the intention of a ‘MAJOR RETAIL/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT’ – but O’Flynn Construction are remaining more tight-lipped on this project than any other. This is partially due to the fact that a certain Evening Echo reporter blurted out all over the local media that ‘Marks & Spencer’ were looking into locating at Ballincollig Town Centre – a report first posted on this forum, but which was taken from it without my prior consent. Now O’Flynn Construction are being a lot more cautious. However, the director did tell me that pre-planning discussions with Cork City Council had just been complete and that they would be lodging a large application with the Planning Department ( and it was said in these exact words) “pretty soon now, I can’t give you the specifics anymore, but the application will be lodge very shortly”.

      When it is, this forum will be the first to know about what is expected to be among the most exciting of the new docklands developments. Although I have some details already, hopefully I will be able to post them here, the day before the application is made formally. So you’ll all know, a day before everyone else does – that is, if they don’t pull an O’Callaghan Properties/Jurys Hotel announcement.



      *UPDATES*

      😉 Speculation within development circles continues to mount – though cautiously I might add – about a large-scale redevelopment, renovation and extention of an existing Cork cultural institution. The speculation continues after holding companies for a number of investors who had been attached to the redevelopment plans for the MacCurtain Street-based culture and arts facility, quietly purchased quayside properties adjoining the institution. Rumour has it, an on-going feasibility study is being conducted into a huge refurbishment and extension of the cultural property, extending from MacCurtain Street to Patrick’s Quay. The development will consist of underground parking, late-night bar and possibly nightclub, educational facility w/ film production school, new mezzanine, restaurant and cafe, adjoining commercial units and additional smaller arts theatres which will be able to facilitate medium to large scale lectures/conferences etc etc as well as plays/dramas and so on. The project is seen as a perfect opportunity to provide Cork with world class conference and cultural educational facilities (which will work in conjunction with both UCC and CIT), and which will compliment Cork’s European Capital of Culture status. The expected value of the project is in and around 40m euro. However this is project, may I please remind you, is only at the pre-planning stage and there is no guarantee of commencement.

    • #732589
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks as always for the info… is there any chance of information being sent to individual e-mails. Confidentiality will be guaranteed.

      Were you speaking to Michael then?

      Originally posted by lexington
      Cork Airport is to receive 4 additional European routes with Aer Lingus, who will now base 3 Airbus A320s to serve Munich, Rome, Faro and Nice. In addition, Aer Lingus have announced they intend to increase frequencies and capacities on their existing European routes to Barcelona and Milan, as well as Amsterdam and London Heathrow. This is good news for Cork Airport who continues to see exceptional growth on all its continental European routes. Some people, remain a little disappointed about a failure to announce transatlantic intentions – but I believe this is partially due to the hype spurred up by the local media before the announcement was officially made.



      *UPDATES*

      Southlinch Theatres Ltd have received planning on appeal to re-open The Savoy Theatre as a nightclub. This is good news for Cork’s nightlife – as it has been a sorely missed venue among locals and will provide huge capacity for major entertainment events once again. 40 jobs are to be created as a result of this development.

      -> Also, development group Lyonshall Ltd have announced the imminent construction of their 200m residential, educational and commercial development at the Ursuline Convent in Blackrock.

    • #732590
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      -> The Citi-West Statoil Service Station at Victoria Cross is being dismantled as we speak, this is to make way for Paul Montgomery and Edmund Kenneally’s Phase 2 of the Victoria Mills Student Accomodation development. The 1st Phase is nearing completion. The Phase 2 element will cater for 132 more bedspaces, underground parking and a 3000sq ft ground floor commercial unit. Planning was granted by ABP after Third Party appeal.

      -> John F. Supple Contractors have erected a crane over the old city Waterworks on the Lee Road. The builders were awarded the 5m euro contact for CCC as part of their plan to develop the site as a Sustainable City Campus Project.

      -> The final PJ Walls tower crane at CUH’s new 62m euro Maternity Wing has been dismantled. The new wing, designed by O’Riordan Staehli Architects, will open next year. Those in Bishopstown who were growing fond of the tower cranes which became almost a recognised element of the suburbs sky-line won’t have long to wait to see another 2 at least be erected over the new 85m Renal/Cardiac unit at CUH which was just given the financial and planning go-ahead. Construction starts next year and will take 2 years to complete with an opening date scheduled for early 2008.

      -> Meanwhile, closer to the city centre, The Mercy University Hospital, which recently purchased the Distillery Lee Fields adjacent to its main hospital building for 20m euro with UCC, has had plans drawn up for a new 6-level multi-storey car-park on their new land across the river. The drawings were provided by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects. However, developer Sean Meehan has recently applied for planning to construct a 3-level underground/under-river car-park at Grenville Place, designed by John Paul Lennon, right outside the door of the Mercy. Neither finance nor permission has yet been sought by the Mercy Hospital for their project, which will include a new footbridge, consultation rooms and urology unit. Sean Meehan’s project intends to incorporate a new vehicular access bridge off the quay side which then loops back into the quay wall and underground. The development will also provide commercial units and consultation rooms. Currently, the planning application is labelled incomplete, a re-issued application is expected soon.



      And to mickeydocs, can’t say who it was, but trust me – it’s very reliable as the director I was talking with is overseeing the Eglinton Street project.

    • #732591
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Has the O’Flynn project got you excited?

      Originally posted by lexington
      *UPDATES*

      -> The Citi-West Statoil Service Station at Victoria Cross is being dismantled as we speak, this is to make way for Paul Montgomery and Edmund Kenneally’s Phase 2 of the Victoria Mills Student Accomodation development. The 1st Phase is nearing completion. The Phase 2 element will cater for 132 more bedspaces, underground parking and a 3000sq ft ground floor commercial unit. Planning was granted by ABP after Third Party appeal.

      -> John F. Supple Contractors have erected a crane over the old city Waterworks on the Lee Road. The builders were awarded the 5m euro contact for CCC as part of their plan to develop the site as a Sustainable City Campus Project.

      -> The final PJ Walls tower crane at CUH’s new 62m euro Maternity Wing has been dismantled. The new wing, designed by O’Riordan Staehli Architects, will open next year. Those in Bishopstown who were growing fond of the tower cranes which became almost a recognised element of the suburbs sky-line won’t have long to wait to see another 2 at least be erected over the new 85m Renal/Cardiac unit at CUH which was just given the financial and planning go-ahead. Construction starts next year and will take 2 years to complete with an opening date scheduled for early 2008.

      -> Meanwhile, closer to the city centre, The Mercy University Hospital, which recently purchased the Distillery Lee Fields adjacent to its main hospital building for 20m euro with UCC, has had plans drawn up for a new 6-level multi-storey car-park on their new land across the river. The drawings were provided by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects. However, developer Sean Meehan has recently applied for planning to construct a 3-level underground/under-river car-park at Grenville Place, designed by John Paul Lennon, right outside the door of the Mercy. Neither finance nor permission has yet been sought by the Mercy Hospital for their project, which will include a new footbridge, consultation rooms and urology unit. Sean Meehan’s project intends to incorporate a new vehicular access bridge off the quay side which then loops back into the quay wall and underground. The development will also provide commercial units and consultation rooms. Currently, the planning application is labelled incomplete, a re-issued application is expected soon.



      And to mickeydocs, can’t say who it was, but trust me – it’s very reliable as the director I was talking with is overseeing the Eglinton Street project.

    • #732592
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Anyone know which architects (if any) Treasury used for the “sketch plans” for Horgan’s Quay?

    • #732593
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I managed to have a discussion with a certain director within the company. The site has a sign located on it which indicates clearly the intention of a ‘MAJOR RETAIL/RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT’ – but O’Flynn Construction are remaining more tight-lipped on this project than any other.



      *UPDATES*

      😉 Speculation within development circles continues to mount – though cautiously I might add – about a large-scale redevelopment, renovation and extention of an existing Cork cultural institution.

      Is this for everyman 😉

      [/B][/QUOTE]I’d be surprised if there is any retail element to this… surely office and appartments are more in keeping with this area…

    • #732594
      satanta99
      Participant

      Any development which occurs on Patricks Quay would be welcomed by me. At the moment it is nothing more than a “higgledy piggeldy” mess. The varied building heights fronting the quay look, to me, like someone who has had their 2 front teeth knocked out. Then there is the awful yellow block which is the metropole! Hopefully we will see something to redeem the area and revitalise the quay!

    • #732595
      lexington
      Participant

      A couple of newsworthy updates make the post today –

      🙂 Cornmarket Street is set for a 5m euro makeover, which is to also include 20 set market stalls with an emphasis on fresh foods and open-air food stands freshly served up, traditional crafts etc. The street will be lined with green-leaf trees and the road surface will be relayed with extended, blending pathways which strongly support pedestrian activity. The project will compliment the new Rockfell Department Store and Residential development (which is scheduled to complete around the same time as the street redevelopment) along with the new Cornmarket Street Footbridge.

      🙂 Beth Gali, the Spanish architect responsible for the designs of the Patrick Street, Grand Parade and Oliver Plunkett Street redevelopments – has also designed the impressive new Christmas lighting scheme for Patrick’s Street, set to debut this Christmas 2004. The CG images are pretty impressive – I’ll try and get them up for you as soon as I can. There is a great emphasis on style, to compliment the redevelopment, and gone are the rancid tacky creations of years past.

      🙂 Lidl GmbH have reapplied for permission of a store on their Churchfield site (formerly Ecco Shoes HQ), after a refusal on the original plan a few weeks ago. The new submission takes into account recommendations made by the CCC Planning Dept. and has a strong emphasis on ‘neighbourhood’ accomodation. The new plan sees 2 single storey pitched-roof buildings being constructed on-site. One with Lidl Supermarket, and the other with 3 smaller, complimentary retail units and 166 car-parking spaces. Design is by O’Shaugnessy & Co.

      🙂 Developer Tom Fitzgerald, owner of Athlone Leisure World, who has already received planning for a family recreational centre at Fitz’s Boreen in Blackpool, has announced his intention to commence construction of the development. This will include a 4-storey over basement building of 6203sq m, with 14 no. ten pin bowling lanes, childrens and toddlers play areas, café, kitchen and service/storage areas, toilets, club bar, games and circulation areas, all at ground floor level. At first floor level, the gross floor area will be approximately 1784 sq. metres accommodating pool and snooker room, electronic games rooms, administrative office, staff quarters and plants/machinery area. The remaining floors will house a day care centre, swimming pool, steam rooms and saunas, aerobics centre, gym and beauty treatment facility. Design is by Finola Deavey, of Deavey & Assoc.

      :rolleyes: Though Hamilton Osbourne King indicate the Thomas Crosbie Holdings site on Lavitts Quay (proposed new Irish Examiner HQ) is under ‘offer consideration’, directors at TCH are adament they intend to decide on the fate of this deal and their new city offices within the coming weeks.

      🙂 Blarney-based John Cleary Developments, who recently succeeded in gaining permission for 5 light industrial units at Kilnap Business Park in Blackpool, are lodging an application to construct 5 state-of-the-art car showrooms for varied dealerships adjacent to the new Johnson & Perrot showrooms, awaiting planning and designed by SDA O’Flynn, at Mahon Point. The development should create 200 jobs and will secure Mahon Point as one of the major dealership locations in the country.



      burge_eyeAnyone know which architects (if any) Treasury used for the “sketch plans” for Horgan’s Quay?

      It has all been very secretive burge_eye, but it is my understanding, more than one architectural firm has been employed on the project. Similar to the method adopted by O’Flynn Construction at their 500m euro Ballincollig Town Centre project. All I can say is that such a development as proposed for the Horgan’s Quay site must be an architects dream.

      mickeydocsIs this for everyman

      Once again, mickey I can’t say. But what I can say is that it is a project that hopefully every woman and Every man will benefit from. 😉

    • #732596
      lexington
      Participant

      A couple of newsworthy updates make the post today –

      🙂 Cornmarket Street is set for a 5m euro makeover, which is to also include 20 set market stalls with an emphasis on fresh foods and open-air food stands freshly served up, traditional crafts etc. The street will be lined with green-leaf trees and the road surface will be relayed with extended, blending pathways which strongly support pedestrian activity. The project will compliment the new Rockfell Department Store and Residential development (which is scheduled to complete around the same time as the street redevelopment) along with the new Cornmarket Street Footbridge.

      🙁 Neil O’Sullivan of OSB, is to lodge an application for the development of 94 residential units in Douglas, expected by the week end. The development is a mix of housing, duplexes and apartments – James Leahy & Assoc. are the architectural firm behind the design. Neil O’Sullivan’s other projects around the city include an apartment development at Camden Quay. The 1st phase of which is in mid-construction, by John F. Supple Ltd. The 2nd phase of the project is still in appeal to ABP, and will consist of a 6-storey building incorporating 55 residential units, an new Cork Arts Theatre and reconstructed public house. Both are also designed by James Leahy & Assoc.

      🙂 Beth Gali, the Spanish architect responsible for the designs of the Patrick Street, Grand Parade and Oliver Plunkett Street redevelopments – has also designed the impressive new Christmas lighting scheme for Patrick’s Street, set to debut this Christmas 2004. The CG images are pretty impressive – I’ll try and get them up for you as soon as I can. There is a great emphasis on style, to compliment the redevelopment, and gone are the rancid tacky creations of years past.

      🙂 Lidl GmbH have reapplied for permission of a store on their Churchfield site (formerly Ecco Shoes HQ), after a refusal on the original plan a few weeks ago. The new submission takes into account recommendations made by the CCC Planning Dept. and has a strong emphasis on ‘neighbourhood’ accomodation. The new plan sees 2 single storey pitched-roof buildings being constructed on-site. One with Lidl Supermarket, and the other with 3 smaller, complimentary retail units and 166 car-parking spaces. Design is by O’Shaugnessy & Co.

      🙂 Developer Tom Fitzgerald, owner of Athlone Leisure World, who has already received planning for a family recreational centre at Fitz’s Boreen in Blackpool, has announced his intention to commence construction of the development. This will include a 4-storey over basement building of 6203sq m, with 14 no. ten pin bowling lanes, childrens and toddlers play areas, café, kitchen and service/storage areas, toilets, club bar, games and circulation areas, all at ground floor level. At first floor level, the gross floor area will be approximately 1784 sq. metres accommodating pool and snooker room, electronic games rooms, administrative office, staff quarters and plants/machinery area. The remaining floors will house a day care centre, swimming pool, steam rooms and saunas, aerobics centre, gym and beauty treatment facility. Design is by Finola Deavey, of Deavey & Assoc.

      :rolleyes: Though Hamilton Osbourne King indicate the Thomas Crosbie Holdings site on Lavitts Quay (proposed new Irish Examiner HQ) is under ‘offer consideration’, directors at TCH are adament they intend to decide on the fate of this deal and their new city offices within the coming weeks.

      🙂 Blarney-based John Cleary Developments, who recently succeeded in gaining permission for 5 light industrial units at Kilnap Business Park in Blackpool, are lodging an application to construct 5 state-of-the-art car showrooms for varied dealerships adjacent to the new Johnson & Perrot showrooms, awaiting planning and designed by SDA O’Flynn, at Mahon Point. The development should create 200 jobs and will secure Mahon Point as one of the major dealership locations in the country.



      burge_eyeAnyone know which architects (if any) Treasury used for the “sketch plans” for Horgan’s Quay?

      It has all been very secretive burge_eye, but it is my understanding, more than one architectural firm has been employed on the project. Similar to the method adopted by O’Flynn Construction at their 500m euro Ballincollig Town Centre project. All I can say is that such a development as proposed for the Horgan’s Quay site must be an architects dream.

      mickeydocsIs this for everyman

      Once again, mickey I can’t say. But what I can say is that it is a project that hopefully every woman and Every man will benefit from. 😉

    • #732597
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Thanks anyway Lexington. Treasury aren’t normally so circumspect

      I see “Inside Cork” has taken up the anti-Jurys gauntlet. Seems inevitable an appeal will be made?

    • #732598
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      burge_eye, what’s the gist of the article? What possible grounds would they have for objection? The hotel as it is is an eyesore that is very much “isolated” in any case.

    • #732599
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Basically obscuration of St. Fin Barre’s. It mentions residents of Sunday’s Well but I would imagine that to be the least contentious view, given the height of it’s aspect. The Cathedral is really only visible from Lancaster Quay from the Jury’s bridge itself. Blowing smoke perhaps?

    • #732600
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Absolutely.

      You swear it was some majestic postcard view of the cathedral in any case (what with the half yellow half pink Jurys and the badly pruned trees as a foreground).

    • #732601
      lexington
      Participant

      I’m totally in favour of the redevelopment of the Jury’s site, and I do think O’Callaghan Properties proposal is of a satisfactory standard – but I have doubts on the viability of the residential element of the project. It also seems curious Jurys are optioning for a smaller capacity hotel with this project when their original plans involved a major expansion. The current Jurys has 185-bedrooms, the proposed O’CP one will have 182. Nevertheless, Inside Cork is a publication desperately trying to take an Evening Echo stance as ‘the voice of the common man’. Its campaign is just a short-sighted self-serving ego trip – in Cork, there will always be objections sadly, Inside Cork is just trying to tap into this. Pity. I would of thought real objections should be aimed at getting rid of the awful current Jurys and not opposing a stylish, complimentary new one. The proposed development will be aestheticaly beneficial to the area – St. Finbarres is so prominent it certainly won’t be obsecured, besides, its the other side of the development altogether, objection on these grounds don’t even make sense!



      Also, burge_eye, Treasury are only one of a number of parties involved and bidding for involvement at Horgan’s Quay, although they are among the most significantly involved. No disclosure of development can be issued until terms are firmly agreed.

    • #732602
      lexington
      Participant

      Here are just some interesting images of Howard Holdings City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. Unfortunately, these images don’t include the surrounding recent developments at No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay, nor the redeveloped Bus Station and plan for Custom House Quay. They also pre-date the addition of a 6th floor to the office element of the project, but they provide a good idea of what the completed project will look like.

    • #732603
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      A person on the know has told me that O’Callaghan’s have been guaranteed the new city centre event centre. Has anyone else heard anything in relation to this?

      Originally posted by lexington
      Here are just some interesting images of Howard Holdings City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. Unfortunately, these images don’t include the surrounding recent developments at No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay, nor the redeveloped Bus Station and plan for Custom House Quay. They also pre-date the addition of a 6th floor to the office element of the project, but they provide a good idea of what the completed project will look like.

    • #732604
      Pana01
      Participant

      With all the recent press about the wonderful new look Patrick Street, I couldn’t believe the headlines on todays news saying that Cork was the dirtiest city in Ireland, and that Pana was ‘filthy’.

      Bishop Lucey Park and Oliver Plunkett Street were also singled out for criticism. One good point was that the city council were told to get their act together – and not before time. They seem to have no pride in Cork at all.

      The level of chewing gum spat upon our streets is a disgrace, some people have total disregard for the area. Sorry to rant on again, but another reason Pana looks filthy is overflowing litter bins (Hello City Council – do you think you can EVER address this situation, it’s going on as long as I can remember – do you ever have meetings and put plans in place to address issues???)

      Also the 4 or 5 new taxi ranks clogging up the street, and allowing 20-30 car park spaces there is another joke. Oh, and while I’m at it, why are loading bays allowed to operate until 6pm on Saturdays, our busiest shopping days?? Crazy – and on Saturdays, 90% of the time they are occupied by abandoned vehicles anyway. Who really delivers on Saturday afternoons, clogging up the main street?

      Finally, as I walked along Maylor St on Saturday afternoon, I was bullied out of the way by a ‘people carrier’. I said to the driver ‘this is pedestrian only until 5pm’. I can’t repeat his reply here, but why is there never any Gardai stopping these people?

    • #732605
      lexington
      Participant

      Well although I take some of your points and completely agree with them – the title of ‘Dirtiest City’ I do think is undeserved. I disagree with this not purely because of my Leeside pride but because in genuine fairness, this title is far from the truth. Cork has made prudent and effective efforts in tidying up its image. I don’t want to name other cities and towns for fear of being condemningly accusative, but I can think of many other urban centres around Ireland that a disgracefully rubbished.

      It’s unfair to label streets like Patrick’s Street and Oliver Plunkett Street as being ‘dirty’ especially at a time of such dramatic redevelopment is like shooting fish in a barrell. Of course they’ll be unsightly during such construction work.

      However, I agree wholeheartedly about the inadequate bins on Patricks Street which CCC are now having to replace at a cost of 90,000 euros. They are too small, too difficult and as a result, cannot handle the appropriate volume of waste. This inadequacy is staining what has become a superb thoroughfare.

      Plans are in the motion to close of Patrick’s Street to public traffic, bar buses, emergency and goods vehicles – but this will not come into effect until all city centre resurfacing and development work has been complete.

      In addition, the Gardai have taken a lazy and inadequate stance on controlling the inner city pedestrian priority zones. It is a disgrace and has made what should be a pleasant shopping and walking district into a hostile one. Instead of campaigning against the condition of Beamish & Crawford premises, I think energy would be better invested in campaigning the Gardai and CCC to address this far more serious but neglected issue.

    • #732606
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Why don’t we start a petition
      a. to see the removal of the bus shelter from pana
      b. to encourage the ccc to powerhouse the renovated city centre at least once a month
      c. to remove the parking spaces from pana

      anyone got the technical skill to launch an on-line petition?

      Originally posted by Pana01
      With all the recent press about the wonderful new look Patrick Street, I couldn’t believe the headlines on todays news saying that Cork was the dirtiest city in Ireland, and that Pana was ‘filthy’.

      Bishop Lucey Park and Oliver Plunkett Street were also singled out for criticism. One good point was that the city council were told to get their act together – and not before time. They seem to have no pride in Cork at all.

      The level of chewing gum spat upon our streets is a disgrace, some people have total disregard for the area. Sorry to rant on again, but another reason Pana looks filthy is overflowing litter bins (Hello City Council – do you think you can EVER address this situation, it’s going on as long as I can remember – do you ever have meetings and put plans in place to address issues???)

      Also the 4 or 5 new taxi ranks clogging up the street, and allowing 20-30 car park spaces there is another joke. Oh, and while I’m at it, why are loading bays allowed to operate until 6pm on Saturdays, our busiest shopping days?? Crazy – and on Saturdays, 90% of the time they are occupied by abandoned vehicles anyway. Who really delivers on Saturday afternoons, clogging up the main street?

      Finally, as I walked along Maylor St on Saturday afternoon, I was bullied out of the way by a ‘people carrier’. I said to the driver ‘this is pedestrian only until 5pm’. I can’t repeat his reply here, but why is there never any Gardai stopping these people?

    • #732607
      asdasd
      Participant

      There was that guy who had the beamish protest!

      Let me say as a non-Corkonian who lived there for a time, that I am delighted to see the love Cork people on this site have for their city, and the proactive attitude to changing things for the better.

      It was always a beautiful city, but there was some of an attitude of “Era, sure it’ll do” back in the day.

      Move over boys; new generation in town.

    • #732608
      Niall
      Participant

      Filthy Cork

      Cork is Ireland’s dirtiest city: survey

      30 August 2004 13:33
      Cork has been branded the dirtiest city in the country just four months before it will become the European Capital of Culture.

      This is the second survey published this year by the Irish Business Against Litter alliance and, encouragingly, it shows major improvements in the state of many towns and cities.

      But IBAL Chairman Dr Tom Cavanagh slams the condition of Dublin city centre and Cork city centre which, he says, is the dirtiest in the country.

      Cork’s main street, Patrick Street, was described as being filthy, with large amounts of litter and not enough bins. Nearby Oliver Plunkett Street was said to have a serious litter problem too, while the approach roads to the city were branded blackspots which presented a terrible image to visitors.

      Cork City Council, which spends €5m per year on street cleaning, said it would not comment until it had studied the findings of the survey.

      Dublin city centre was similarly described as having a serious litter problem, while Tallaght and Tullamore were branded litter blackspots.

      Cavan is the country’s cleanest town while the survey’s authors said there had been a spectacular improvement in Galway city, which was litter free.

    • #732609
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by asdasd
      There was that guy who had the beamish protest!

      Let me say as a non-Corkonian who lived there for a time, that I am delighted to see the love Cork people on this site have for their city, and the proactive attitude to changing things for the better.

      It was always a beautiful city, but there was some of an attitude of “Era, sure it’ll do” back in the day.

      Move over boys; new generation in town.

      They’re very decent words asdasd, and I know they are very well appreciated. Thank you.



      Niall, the report more accurately mentioned Cork as being in the top 4 dirtiest urban areas. I title I dispute vehemently. I will be studying this report in detail. I agree Cork is no-where near an ideal, but it is also displaced of the this title the report has bestowed on it. Nonetheless, we must keep working hard at bringing our city to exemplary standards.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Tesco Ireland have lodged a planning application with CCC for the development of a Tesco Discount Petrol Station at its newly expanded Wilton Shopping Centre premises along the Sarsfield Road.



      🙂 Preliminary construction work is already beginning at the former Statoil at Victoria Cross as Bowen Construction proceed with Phase 2 of the Victoria Mills student development. Developers Paul Montgomery and Edmund Kenneally’s project Phase 2 will cater for an additional 31 apartments and 3000sq ft ground floor commercial unit.



      😡 Objections, seemingly as much of Cork’s way of life as calling someone a ‘langer’, have been lodged against Riga Ltd (O’Callaghan Properties) proposed 160m euro redevelopment of the Jury’s Hotel site on the Western Road/Lancaster Quay. The objections are based on fears that the project will obscure views of St. Finbars Cathedral from Sundays Well (15mins across the city from the proposed development on a hillside). Sigh. The objection is a little ridiculous as anyone familiar with the nature of the development and its lay-out will tell you, but so are some people.

    • #732610
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Well now!

      Didn’t you know that one house miles and miles away is entitled to hold up a much needed development – all because they might not have as much of Finbarres to enjoy from their back garden.
      Maybe Jurys should object to that lady’s tatty house that it spoils the people of Cork’s view of Sunday’s Well from Lancaster Qy…?

    • #732611
      Anonymous
      Participant

      After picking a full black sack of rubbish off a garden in High St Dublin 8 exactly 7 days after it was last cleaned I can say that Cork isn’t the only place in Ireland to suffer from mindless selfish behaviour.

      Four Months should be sufficient time to get extra bins and cleansing personnel before the year begins.

    • #732612
      corkdood
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington

      🙂 Preliminary construction work is already beginning at the former Statoil at Victoria Cross [/B]

      Lexington. Do you know if there are any development planned for the vacant cash and carry which is adjacent to the statoil garage? Its been empty for years now.

    • #732613
      Leesider
      Participant

      corkdood as far as know it is more student apartments, heard it is supposed to be starting soon enough. I am sure Lexington will have more info for you!

      On the subject of litter, I was home a few weeks ago and thought the place was beginning to look alot better, suppose with the amount of wrok going on in streets as Oliver Plunkett St, it is bound to create a bad initial impression!

    • #732614
      Leesider
      Participant

      corkdood as far as know it is more student apartments, heard it is supposed to be starting soon enough.

      On the subject of litter, I was home a few weeks ago and thought the place was beginning to look alot better, suppose with the amount of wrok going on in streets as Oliver Plunkett St, it is bound to create a bad initial impression!

    • #732615
      Leesider
      Participant

      corkdood as far as know it is more student apartments, heard it is supposed to be starting soon enough. I am sure Lexington will have more info for you!

      On the subject of litter, I was home a few weeks ago and thought the place was beginning to look alot better, suppose with the amount of wrok going on in streets as Oliver Plunkett St, it is bound to create a bad initial impression!

    • #732616
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      The highlighting of the litter issue will be a catalyst for improving on the litter problem. Patrick street needs to be cleaned during the day, and not just in the mornings and evenings.

      Originally posted by Leesider
      corkdood as far as know it is more student apartments, heard it is supposed to be starting soon enough. I am sure Lexington will have more info for you!

      On the subject of litter, I was home a few weeks ago and thought the place was beginning to look alot better, suppose with the amount of wrok going on in streets as Oliver Plunkett St, it is bound to create a bad initial impression!

    • #732617
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      It seems that the majority of the Docklands activity to date is centred around Horgan’s quay and areas either north or west of the docklands. Has anyone heard of any activity on the South side of the docks, for example centre parks road?

    • #732618
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      And what kind of plans are in place for the grain silos?

    • #732619
      satanta99
      Participant

      THe city council website is prob the best source for information regarding what is proposed for the centre park road area. If you go to the website you can look at the docklands development plan in adobe format. It provides an interesting view of the plans for this area in the future.

    • #732620
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks Satanta for the info, but I’m looking for actual developments taking place or in planning, rather than what the ccc would like to see happen. I’m looking for info really on projects that are close to realisation, projects such as the Howard Holdings/O’Flynns for Albert Quay/Eglinton Street.

      Centre Parks Road and the Marina have the advantage of a genuinely beautiful setting (if you ignore the actual architecture and concentrate on the leafy riverside setting). I really hope that the regeneration of this area will be realised, ’cause it needs redevelopment as much as Horgan quay.

    • #732621
      lexington
      Participant

      corkdood – Lexington. Do you know if there are any development planned for the vacant cash and carry which is adjacent to the statoil garage? Its been empty for years now.

      John J. Fleming Construction, on behalf of UCC, have been granted permission after appeal for the demolition of the existing warehouse structures at M&P O’Sullivan Cash & Carry, Victoria Cross and the development of 60 student apartments, catering for 255 students, 62 basement car parking spaces, commercial units at ground floor & laundry – all in 4 stepped back, 5-storey blocks. Construction will go-ahead on word for UCC Buildings & Estates Dept.



      To mickeydocs, besides the previously mentioned projects at Alberts Quay (Howard Holdings) and Eglinton Street (O’Flynn Construction) – Custom House Quay (warehousing to the rear of Custom House) has been already surveyed by a consortium of private developers (this I am aware of) however, there have been no further developments since this survey 4 months ago, or specific communication with CCC. However I am aware, that it was the initial intention for the developers to construct a landmark office building at the site, incorporating the attractive Custom House building. The building was suppose to offer a dramatic entrance to Cork city centre itself. But I have heard little of it since, I will let you know if anything crops up in the meantime.

      Rumours (as reported in one of my previous posts) of a German bank locating to a major, purpose built office facility along Kennedy Quay have aired in the past, but we will not know any more of this until Feb 2005 (the period of which Dublin’s IFSC tax designation runs out).

      CCC have pushed for the redevelopment of R&H Hall Grain Silos along Kennedy Quay (something in the vain of the Baltic Centre in Newcastle/Gateshead but for commercial use and with more extensive redevelopment). This earmark, has been much of the reason why CCC have not adopted a specific high-buildings policy within the docklands area, because the redevelopment would be anywhere between 12 to 15 storeys high. Also, the area is designated for high-density development (with a view to high-rise). The majority of land in this area is also privately owned, so the best CCC can do is encourage sale and relocation.

      However, Horgan’s Quay and Water Street remain the main movers in the Docklands development. Water Street, with a planning decision date due for 29th of September 2004, is the first development off the ranks so to speak. It is an impressive start (400 apartments in a series of waterside blocks ranging between 3 to 19 storeys high, and office/IT development and commercial boardwalk area) and we sincerely hope that this most vital project receives an unconditional go-ahead. Werdna Ltd are the developers behind this project.

      Horgan’s Quay has seen some movement with the Conference/Convention centre element at Railway Street, but nothing solid. The remainder of the proposed development sees a series of high-rise 20 – 25 storey, waterside commercial and residential buildings, new commercial/retail hub, redeveloped railway station and landmark plaza with recreational area. CIE, Treasury Holdings, Manor Park Homes and Howard Holdings are among the list of potential investors/developers.

      However, believe me that most of the major docklands developments focused on the southern docks will not be announced until the outcomes of the northern dock projects have been verified.

      The GAA are favourites to acquire the Cork Showgrounds near Pairc Ui Chaoimh (along the southern docks) – which it is proposed they will redevelop the stadium and construct new hotel and conference facilities, with additional training facilities also on-site.

      Of note, a large site (1.6 acres) sold by Lisney along the Centre Park Road went for 2m euro to a private developer (whom I am informed, intends to make a series of similar purchases nearby as part of a strategic, major commercial development).

    • #732622
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Thanks Lexington

    • #732623
      dowlingm
      Participant

      on the showgrounds site, access to there is quite iffy as matchgoers know, and the ability to do any better on the west side (i.e. from tunnel) is questionable given residential encroachment.

      hope any redevelopment takes this into account. also, it’s an odd place for a hotel as is kinda far from any commercial area (with industrial to east, power station to west and residential to south)

    • #732624
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      -> Cork City Library on 57-61 Grand Parade is scheduled to begin the process of a 8.5m to 9m euro redevelopment which will see the city centre facility double in size from over to 2,500sq m to just under 5,000sq m. The Library Manager has said they are reviewing plans and temporary commissioned designs for the library which will see the facility expand upwards and outwards. CCC are considering the option of opening up a design competition for the library with a decision date due in late December 2004 with construction work beginning mid-Janurary 2005. Failing this, CCC will utilise existing designs and commence construction early Janurary 2005.



      -> CCC have also announced their intention to construct 150 affordable housing units for private sale in the Centre Park Road area (near the southern docklands development zone). The project will consist of 100 social housing units and approx. 50 apartments – of a striking and contemporary design to compliment the new docklands area.

    • #732625
      lexington
      Participant

      One of the most overlooked but largest development projects currently at construction phase is Jacob’s Island – part of the Mahon Point lands (jointly bought from Cork Corp. by O’Callaghan Properties & McCarthy Developments. Whereas O’Callaghan Properties have developed the commercial element of the Mahon Point lands (44875sq m shopping centre, adjoining 11 screen multiplex, retail park, hotel and planned convention centre), McCarthy Developments have focused on the waterfront lands across the N25 for residential purposes, Jacob’s Island. Directly across the Douglas River and Atlantic Pond, on the Rochestown waterfront, McCarthy Developments are also developing the 160-unit, lavish Harty’s Quay.

      Ridge Developments (contractors to both Jacob’s Island and Harty’s Quay) today erected their first tower crane on site at Jacob’s Island as part of their commencement on the taller waterfront residential buildings. In total, the Jacob’s Island project consists of the construction of 431 residential units made up of; 160 houses and duplex units consisting of 15 no. five bedroom two and three storey detached houses; 7 no. four bedroom two storey detached houses; 16 no. four bedroom three storey semi/terraced houses; 26 no. three or four bedroom two storey semi detached houses; 18 no. two and three bedroom two storey terraced courtyard houses. Also the proposed residential development includes the construction of 78 no. duplex units in 6 no. blocks of three and four storey with; 46 no. two bedroom apartments; 32 no. three bedroom duplex town houses with surface carparking for 87 no. cars; and 271 residential apartments on 8 no. blocks in 4 four storey; 1 five storey and 3 six storey buildings comprising of; 50 no. one bedroom; 212 no. two bedroom; and 9 no. three bedroom apartments with basement car parking for 408 cars with ancillary bicycle/refuse storage facilities, boardwalks and extensive public amenity areas.

      Architects for Jacob’s Island are Project Architects, The Priory, John’s Street, Dublin 8. (the same architects responsible for Mahon Point Shopping Centre).


      Harty’s Quay images

    • #732626
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      These appear very similar to Harty’s Quay in design.

      Has there been any developments in relation to the Cornmarket Street Planning application.

      Originally posted by lexington
      One of the most overlooked but largest development projects currently at construction phase is Jacob’s Island – part of the Mahon Point lands (jointly bought from Cork Corp. by O’Callaghan Properties & McCarthy Developments. Whereas O’Callaghan Properties have developed the commercial element of the Mahon Point lands (44875sq m shopping centre, adjoining 11 screen multiplex, retail park, hotel and planned convention centre), McCarthy Developments have focused on the waterfront lands across the N25 for residential purposes, Jacob’s Island. Directly across the Douglas River and Atlantic Pond, on the Rochestown waterfront, McCarthy Developments are also developing the 160-unit, lavish Harty’s Quay.

      Ridge Developments (contractors to both Jacob’s Island and Harty’s Quay) today erected their first tower crane on site at Jacob’s Island as part of their commencement on the taller waterfront residential buildings. In total, the Jacob’s Island project consists of the construction of 431 residential units made up of; 160 houses and duplex units consisting of 15 no. five bedroom two and three storey detached houses; 7 no. four bedroom two storey detached houses; 16 no. four bedroom three storey semi/terraced houses; 26 no. three or four bedroom two storey semi detached houses; 18 no. two and three bedroom two storey terraced courtyard houses. Also the proposed residential development includes the construction of 78 no. duplex units in 6 no. blocks of three and four storey with; 46 no. two bedroom apartments; 32 no. three bedroom duplex town houses with surface carparking for 87 no. cars; and 271 residential apartments on 8 no. blocks in 4 four storey; 1 five storey and 3 six storey buildings comprising of; 50 no. one bedroom; 212 no. two bedroom; and 9 no. three bedroom apartments with basement car parking for 408 cars with ancillary bicycle/refuse storage facilities, boardwalks and extensive public amenity areas.

      Architects for Jacob’s Island are Project Architects, The Priory, John’s Street, Dublin 8. (the same architects responsible for Mahon Point Shopping Centre).


      Harty’s Quay images

    • #732627
      lexington
      Participant

      Sorry for the confusion mickeydocs, but those images are of Harty’s Quay – indicated bythe text beneath them. I probably should have made that more clear.

      -> The coming few weeks such prove highly news worthy for Cork property development circles – everything from the announcements of Eglinton Street by O’Flynn Construction to decisions on Werdna Ltd’s Water Street project (fingers majorly crossed! An Taisce have told both myself, CCC and MOLA they plan to bring the project to ABP if it receives grant – I just pray that they do not do this and Water Street is given the greenlight), the Rockfell Investments Cornmarket Street development, O’Callaghan Properties’ Jurys Hotel redevelopment, UCC’s Boole Library Extension (whose decision date has been pushed back despite no objections), John Mannix’s Washington Street development and many others are all expected. Other news will incl. the announcement of the full Mahon Point tenant list, a major announcement by Ward Anderson, decisions on major Kilbree Investments, Carroll’s Quay Development Company, Grangefield Developments and Cumnor Construction projects. As well as construction commencement on the CSM, Grand Parade Plaza, JD Hotels Singers Corner project and many more. Also O’Flynn Construction will be making a short-list of Ballincollig Town Centre tenants. CCC begin work on the Kinsale Road Roundabout Flyover and Ballincollig By-pass will open. There are many other major projects due to be announced but I can’t give anymore details as of yet.

      2005 is expected to be among the most active of all years for Cork in terms of development. Hopefully I’ll be able to announce to you some of the most exciting underwraps projects yet to be formally announced soon.

    • #732628
      lexington
      Participant

      For those curious about these projects – here are some images and information.

      Edenhall
      By far, one of Cork’s most (if not thee) impressive and stylish student developments. This huge 100m euro (in excess of) project by Cork-based Myraoak Ltd (Michael McCarthy developer and Brian McCarthy Construction) – has incorporated the former Tennis Village sports complex near CIT on the Model Farm Road and developed over 100 exceptionally luxurious S50 apartments of 3, 4 and 5 bedrooms each. The apartments rival even the best residential city centre, riverside development. As part of the complex, there are numerous indoor and outdoor tennis courts, riverside amenities, cafes, bars, themed restaurants, a conference centre, physio centre, sports clinic, retail outlets and so on. However for every Edenhall in Cork we seem to have a Victoria Mills (sigh).



      Ballincollig Town Centre
      There’s been much talk but few images of O’Flynn Construction’s 500m euro project at Ballincollig Town Centre. The development will among other things incl. A Shopping Centre with Supermarket, Grocery and Drapery Stores and 36 Retail Units
      Over 1000 car Spaces – Surface, Deck and Multi-Storey
      Town Centre Retailing with Showrooms, Restaurants and Pubs
      Town Centre Apartments nestling in private courtyards
      Own Door Offices and Modern Business Units
      Tourism Retail Centre
      Separate Office Campus
      Park Style Hotel
      Medical/Clinic Building
      Mixed residential Development of detached, semi-detached and village style homes as well as apartments and duplex units.

      I hope to get a better image up for you shortly.

    • #732629
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lexington – it was a given even before it was announced that Water St would be brought to ABP by certain obsessed unbalanced people.
      There no doubt, some horribly watered down version of the project will get put through – and miss the greatest opportunity to get the docklands off to a positive note. The submission to ABP has probably already been prepared, you know something to the effect “this important and popular area is a valued historical record of economic deprivation, crime and recession and the unremarkable, therefore it demands preservation”.

    • #732630
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      “this important and popular area is a valued historical record of economic deprivation, crime and recession and the unremarkable, therefore it demands preservation”. [/B][/QUOTE]

      Which really translates as “how dare this little village have the tenacity to try to create a commercial core to rival anything in our fine pale”. CCC seem to really be behind this, so let’s hope our local politicians put the foot down on this one.

      Strange to see that construction still hasn’t commenced on the School of Music, which seems to have gone all quiet now that there aren’t any elections looming… when is the by-election for Coveney’s seat due?

      I’m really looking forward to the Eglinton Road announcement, O’Flynns track record is quite good in terms of quality.

    • #732631
      lexington
      Participant

      😉 Fleming Construction have been refused planning by ABP for the development of 123 student apartments in 2 six-storey blocks which were to be situated on the hillside grounds of the former Our Lady’s Hospital off Shanakiel Hill. I have to say, I agree with this decision as the proposed development would not only be exceptionally out of character and totally detract from the magnificient Our Lady’s Hospital building, but in terms of market viability – it wouldn’t be the success it should be in light of recent student developments ar Victoria Cross (a far more suitable and convenient location to UCC) of which Rathmelton Investments plan for the Park & Ride site adjacent to the Kingsley Hotel is the largest.

      😉 Also on the site of Our Lady’s Hospital, ABP have refused Lance Investments their application for the redevelopment of the Eastern Wing of the former hospital to incorporate 192-apartments and a nearby 232-bedroom hotel. The location for the hotel would have provided spectacular city views but it, and the apartment development are distinctly unsuited to this particular, precious location. Once again, I support the ruling by ABP.

      – As anyone who knows me will tell you, I’m a strong advocate for large scale development in Cork, but the above projects should be more focused on city centre and docklands areas – or other locations within the city that don’t injure the few genuine architectural gems we have in Cork city. Cornmarket Street, the Coal Quay, lower Bachelors Quay or Copley Street would be far more suitable centre locations. Hopefully, both Fleming and Lance Investments will reconsider their options and focus their investment toward the city, in which, I wish them every success.


    • #732632
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      Lexington – it was a given even before it was announced that Water St would be brought to ABP by certain obsessed unbalanced people.
      There no doubt, some horribly watered down version of the project will get put through – and miss the greatest opportunity to get the docklands off to a positive note. The submission to ABP has probably already been prepared, you know something to the effect “this important and popular area is a valued historical record of economic deprivation, crime and recession and the unremarkable, therefore it demands preservation”.

      Originally posted by mickeydocs “this important and popular area is a valued historical record of economic deprivation, crime and recession and the unremarkable, therefore it demands preservation”.

      Interesting. I don’t believe most Dubliners feel like that toward Cork. I think the thought isn’t really ever on their minds – Corkonians probably exaggerate that ideology more than anyone else. From dealing with Dublin based developers, my general feeling is that they don’t really care where the development is as long as it’s profitable first and foremost. However, I do acknowledge that it is a mentality that nonetheless does exist in the minority. It’s a real shame. I think certain people forget that what’s good for Cork, is good for Ireland. Last time I checked, we were all in the same country.

      I have little to no respect for An Taisce – I genuinely can’t understand sometimes why they act the way they do toward Cork. It’s very frustrating and exceptionally unfair to not only developers, but the people of Cork. Their behaviour in Cork has made them gain little respect in Cork as a whole – this is true because a interest of mine has researched this and had it independently verified. An Taisce really are troublemakers in Cork at least.

      Cork is on the verge of creating a new dynamic commercial and business region in the docklands. Water Street is a vital element of this. As is City Quarter, No.6 and No.6 Lapps Quay, Albert Quay House development (Howard Holdings) and Eglinton Street. I don’t understand why people like An Taisce and CIE are holding something so incredible back. As Howard Holdings have said, Cork with the proper investment has the ability to become Europe’s best value and most dynamic international business city – as distinct from the administrative and national financial base that Dublin is for Ireland. Cork could be a stand alone international financial centre – this is what Howard Holdings among other developers are really pushing forward with. It’s a shame people like An Taisce can’t share and support this vision which will benefit ALL people.

    • #732633
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Cork is on the verge of creating a new dynamic commercial and business region in the docklands. Water Street is a vital element of this. As is City Quarter, No.6 and No.6 Lapps Quay, Albert Quay House development (Howard Holdings) and Eglinton Street. I don’t understand why people like An Taisce and CIE are holding something so incredible back. As Howard Holdings have said, Cork with the proper investment has the ability to become Europe’s best value and most dynamic international business city – as distinct from the administrative and national financial base that Dublin is for Ireland. Cork could be a stand alone international financial centre – this is what Howard Holdings among other developers are really pushing forward with. It’s a shame people like An Taisce can’t share and support this vision which will benefit ALL people.

      I quite like the Water St development, it has a lot of urban design quality for sure.

      Did An Taisce in Cork object to it?

      If so on what grounds?

      Contrary to what many of you think, An Taisce in Dublin has little input to the planning process in Cork, it is virtually all handled by the Cork association.

      The development of a vibrant urban quarter in Cork better than the first phases IFSC is in everyones interest nationally. I hope that you are able to learn from refinement that the DDDA has undergone in recent years.

    • #732634
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah Diaspora, An Taisce objected on the grounds that it would be an aesthetic eye-sore to the Port of Cork area, it would over-shadow existing warehousing on site. I have the submission here in front of me and for the life of me I don’t see exactly where their objection really is. The onsite warehousing, which is derelict, is at huge expense being retained, refurbished and redeveloped for office use. And if anyone is familiar with the Port of Cork, they will well know that if anything, Water Street would be an exceptionally welcome addition to the skyline there. It’s not a very strong argument.

      I know I bash An Taisce quite often, but I suppose one must really understand the extent and nature of their activity in Cork. You really do have to be here to realise the grief they cause. I can’t understand it. So, I’m not really knocking the organisation at a national level I suppose, it’s really the Cork branch (who aren’t even from Cork bar 2 members) that are nothing more than troublemakers. Trust me on this one.

      What I find remarkable is, that with a number of developments, An Taisce in Cork quite often submit not just one objection – but will submit an object per member on behalf of An Taisce Corcaigh, which truly is shameful. A number of applications receive up to 7 objections from individual members on behalf of their organisation. And if it’s not enough, the appeal to the National Trust in Dublin to lodge a further objection.

      Something really must be done about this, I hope the new changes at An Taisce as you’ve mentioned, will address this issue down South. It becomes very tiring and very frustrating.

      I too hope to contribute in the development of the Cork Docklands to attain a status such as that which you mentioned above. It will strengthen not only the city and the south at an internationally scale, but will strengthen the country. It inspires quite a lot of excitement among the people of Cork, developers and myself.

    • #732635
      asdasd
      Participant

      An Tasice are a reactionary body. I use that term for any group of people who fetishise the past regardless of the merit of past ideologies, or – in this case – buildings ; and always oppose the modern. There can be much to oppose in modern day architecture, but An Taisce opposes everything – it seems – with no regard to the merits of the new buildings, or the demerits of the old.

      As a reactionary body they tend to attract the most reactionary people in the State: Old Money. I suspect that is obvious from the membership of An Taisce in the Cork area ( who are I notice too busy objecting to everything to appear on this board to defend their actions in Cork – I suppose an Internet Bulletin board which attract people interested in architecture from Cork is too beneath them – even if they were, any of them, to own a computer). They are a totally unaccountable and unelected group, unaccountable even to popular discussion on this or any other forum where they could be challenged,, and given a soft ride by the local press which should name them. ( I talk now, in particular of the Cork branch).

      As for the preservation of the old buildings like the Warehouses ( or Stack A in Dublin) – it reminds me of a line from ChinaTown.

      Jack Nickolson accuses the corrupt politician John Hillerman of being “respectable”. Hillerman responds ( this is a paraphrase cos I’m lazy)

      ” Respectable. I suppose I am. Crooked politicians, whores, and old buildings all become respectable if they last long enough”

    • #732636
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Lexington I’ll send you a copy of the soon to be published ‘Dublin Inspirations’ report on the An Taisce view of contemporary design.

      I am sorry to hear that Water St was objected to on aesthetic grounds, I could not have reached that conclusion myself.

      The issue of Seven objections is a bit confusing, are all of these objections coming in on headed ‘An Taisce’ paper? or are they ‘personal objections’ on un-acredited paper?

      ASDASD, I really couldn’t be bothered trying to reason with such rant.

    • #732637
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I assume that the Odlums building and the R&H Hall buildings are protected structures! Does anyone know if they are and in what way are they to be incorporated into the docklands development?

      ASDASD,
      What you are talking about was discussed in a thread about 6 months ago, if you want to have a look:
      https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2686&perpage=25&pagenumber=1

    • #732638
      lexington
      Participant

      I was sorry too. I’d be interested to read the report – I’ll get back to you on that with third party contact information as I’m heading away for 7 days from tomorrow.

      The objections are lodged on behalf of organisation members under the An Taisce banner. For example (probably not the best, but an example nonetheless) is the John Mannix office, residential and retail development for Washington Street. -> An Taisce Corcaigh lodged 3 seperate objections ->

      CCC Application # 04/28202

      KEVIN HURLEY AN TAISCE CORCAIGH, 23/04/2004 23/04/2004
      ELAINE NI MUILLEOIR AN TAISCE CORCAIGH, 23/04/2004 26/04/2004
      MS. LUCY DAWE LANE AN TAISCE CORCAIGH, 23/04/2004 26/04/2003

      That is not fair practice. Shouldn’t the organisation lodge one inclusive and representative submission as oppose to many, if they must? (And I wish they didn’t full stop). But this is the nature of their behaviour in Cork and this is not the worst example of it. All of the above are individual submissions under An Taisce. That said, CCC should refuse to accept more than one submission from any one organisation.

      I don’t want to continue ranting on about An Taisce. I use this forum to inform people of Cork developments and I should continue to focus on that. However, sometimes An Taisce Corcaigh just make my blood boil and I need to outlet it. No offence intended to your work at all or to you personally Diaspora.



      A number of interesting developments are due to be announced shortly for Cork.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Rohcon Ltd erected a new tower crane over the site adjoining Hewitt Mills along the Blackpool By-pass yesterday. The site is owned and beind developed by Joe Carey and Frank Sheehan, who on a site right next door, are nearing completion on their development of 65 apartments in a semi-circular red-brick building of 7-storeys, designed by J.E. Keating & Assoc. This new development is one of further apartments, 44 (after CCC modification), in a line of between 4 and 5 storey blocks.

    • #732639
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington

      The objections are lodged on behalf of organisation members under the An Taisce banner. For example (probably not the best, but an example nonetheless) is the John Mannix office, residential and retail development for Washington Street. -> An Taisce Corcaigh lodged 3 seperate objections ->

      You are right there should never be more than one signatory to any observation.

      Enjoy your break

    • #732640
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      It’s lonely in here without Lexington 🙂

      I hope he’s back for the Water Street planning announcement, and the Eglinton Road announcement (although he already seems to know what’s gonna be built).

      Anyone seen yesterday’s echo in relation to the county council’s draft plan for the growth of the Cork metropolitan region? Is it all pie in the sky for now or is there any meat to it?

    • #732641
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Water St isn’t due till 19th of this month (I think) – but it hardly matters as I’d be surprised if it’s not something ABP will be looking at due to certain parties southern branch.

    • #732642
      Pana01
      Participant

      Yes, I saw that report in the Echo. A 13,000 population area near Blarney.

      I’d like to know when that proposed dual carriageway from Midleton to Youghal is going to happen. Whoever decided to put traffic lights in Castlemartyr?? The traffic is an absolute nightmare ever since, tailed back for miles on both sides.

    • #732643
      burge_eye
      Participant

      I was browsing the on-line planning section and noticed the 5 week period is up for Jurys and there were 21 submissions and 1 representation.

      http://planning.corkcity.ie/InternetEnquiry/rpt_ViewApplicDetails.asp?validFileNum=1&app_num_file=0428705

    • #732644
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Dan Boyle TD – is he a Green Party member? So… representation in this case is probably a fancier objection. Get in line with the rest of them!

    • #732645
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      Dan Boyle TD – is he a Green Party member? So… representation in this case is probably a fancier objection. Get in line with the rest of them!

      well he’s got to justify his outrageous expense account some how 🙂

    • #732646
      theblimp
      Participant

      Hi guys – been lurking on the periphery for a while but was hoping someone here may have a pointer or two. Simple scenario – major international entertainment company looking to open first Irish outlet in Cork. Require minimum of 25,000 square feet (up to 45,000). Need city centre (footfall) – could be standalone or as part of larger development. Any thoughts on a potential location?

    • #732647
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      would this, by any chance, be required for a UK based pub/restaurant operation? to hold circa 1200 people?

      Capitol Cinema site Grand Parade?
      Patrick’s Quay – somewhere?
      Loft building, Cornmarket Street?

    • #732648
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Upstairs in the Queens Old Castle/?

      BTW the Loft on the Coal Quay would be a fantastic site, and is already in a good area for bars/nightclubs and fits in with the regeneration of the area. Don’t know how happy J Bourke would be…

      Originally posted by bunch
      would this, by any chance, be required for a UK based pub/restaurant operation? to hold circa 1200 people?

      Capitol Cinema site Grand Parade?
      Patrick’s Quay – somewhere?
      Loft building, Cornmarket Street?

    • #732649
      theblimp
      Participant

      Nope guys – not a UK based co. – can’t say anymore though. We looked at Cineplex and were told that a deal was already done for there. Other two suggestions may be worth looking at though – thanks (and keep ’em coming!)

    • #732650
      theblimp
      Participant

      …meant to add that I don’t think the Bodega guys or any other ‘neighbours’ would have a problem with this – quite the opposite in fact. The ‘group’ involved have a very well respected history of working with ‘neighbours’ to improve the ‘lot ‘of all

    • #732651
      asdasd
      Participant

      Does the CoalQuay get that much day time foot traffic?

    • #732652
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      September 18 2004: A stroll down Cork’s Ramblas
      The Irish Times

      Where once pedestrians looked “bullied and harassed”, now they are “kings and queens of their own domain”. That’s the verdict of the director of the Crawford Gallery in Cork, Peter Murray, on the remaking of the city’s principal thoroughfare, St Patrick’s Street – or “Pana”, as local people call it. Designed by Catalan architect Beth Gali, the €13 million project boasts that it “brings Barcelona socialism to Cork” by creating a new public realm for everyone. And indeed it does. The footpaths are so broad in places that they qualify as plazas in their own right and the traffic has been reduced from four lanes to two. No wonder it is being officially opened next Wednesday to mark European Car-Free Day. For St Patrick’s Street is a much more lively place these days. Le Chateau, one of its oldest haunts, has outdoor tables – and not just for smokers. People want to be outside on sunny days enjoying the ambience of the street.

      http://www.irish-architecture.com/news/2004/000193.html

    • #732653
      theblimp
      Participant

      On the subject of a Cork ‘Point Depot’ I feel there may be a political game being played out in the media over recent months.

      Building such a structure at Mahon Point will be of significantly reduced benefit to the city compared to a city centre facility. The site in question is on the small side (never initially intended to be a concert venue – merely a ‘trade’ centre) and would be VERY close to new housing developments with just the one road in to the entire site. If I had just purchased a home down there I think I might well be inclined to object to such a development. However it’s in Mr. O’Cs interest to try and push others into showing their cards. If another group make a move he can reaffirm that ‘only one will be viable’ and can seek to work a new deal with CCC on his site.

      As for Horgans Quay my understanding is that the site is too narrow. Have you any idea what kind of a footprint a 5,000 – 6,000 seat venue requires? Unless you want to build something akin to a ‘corridor’ this location won’t do – and that’s before you consider the noise and vibration effects of a large diesel locomotive.

      My, reasonably informed, understanding of the Showgrounds proposal is that two structures are proposed. One is the main 6,500 capacity theatre (note I said theatre, not arena since the design shows a theatre-style layout which can be adjusted to allow C.100,000 sq. ft. of floorspace for exhibitions), plus a 2,000-plus seat equestrian/events arena for the Munster Agricultural Sociey. Both of these structures, including ancillary developments would occupy approx. 50% of the site, and a contingency for the GAA to re-develop PuC still leaves a considerable opp. for secondary development. I also believe that traffic management would ensure all access and egress is routed from and to the city thereby assisting the local residents and maximising the benefit to the city.

      Is it just me or does one site appear to stand out more than others?

      Finally bear in mind that such facilities are costly to build and, as such, are often funded by local government or similar (Odyssey Belfast, MEN Arena Manchester – not included Point here as it’s a private venue which is currently falling down – I believe they’re closing it down for a year). With no sign of CCC offering any financial assistance it will come down to a combination of two things – keeping the build-cost down and maximising the revenue from one of the global operating entities. These factors are the primary reasons why there isn’t such a facility in place already, and may ultimately be the reason why one is not constructed here in the immediate future.

    • #732654
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i agree blimp, i think the showgrounds would be the optimum location for a venue of this type, it is highly accessible in terms of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, provides sufficient space, and such a development would be entirely complementary to existing uses, and could incentivise the gaa to start thinking about p ui c before it crumbles into nothingness.

      to be honest, id be happy for a concert venue to go almost anywhere but mahon, owen o c can build his convention centre there, but should he really be allowed to drag this type of opportunity out of the city to MP? which is, by the way, beginning to look pretty poor from an aesthetic point of view. shed point more like it.

      more i think about it the loft building, would be an excellent location, have a look at the list of sites identified by cork city council in their draft area action plan cornmarket st, available on website, good, comprehensive piece of work here by the way, illustrates development potential of a number of sites in this area.

    • #732655
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      And surely the loft’s business is better suited to a retail park… this place is never busy and the majority of people just use it as a pathway between two streets. This venue would be excellent, and has close proximity to two multi-storey car-parks (Paul Street and North Main Street), so parking will not be an issue. Add this to the proposed regeneration of the market and the proposed park and the Coal Quay could become one of Cork’s most desirable locations.

      Come on the blimp, you know it makes sense 🙂

    • #732656
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      MP is shaping up to be one of the ugliest shopping centres in the country. Those bright blue corrugated parts! When viewed from Rochestown… it ain’t pretty.

      Is the loft building the actual “cornmarket” building of cornmarket st that extends all the way back to North Main St? (including that awful awful awful Coal Qy pub). For years I have thought that a perfect development opp. Can anyone confirm that a few years back Virgin Cinemas (RIP) wanted to put a cinema on that site but local authority told them where to go? Is there some dark secret about planning limitations for this site?

    • #732657
      lexington
      Participant

      Hello people,

      was on a short business/pleasure break. Back home now though.

      theblimp, the Loft is a nice venue but I believe its owners, who also own Square Deal on Lancaster Quay, have plans for this site – and may or may not relocate its carpeting business.

      Cornmarket Street is a fine location. Especially in light of on-coming developments of the area. Rockfell’s development will cater for up to 120,000 to 130,000sq ft of open plan retail space – with a view to a department store style venue. This is one possible location. Also, the structures at the corner of Kyle St and Cornmarket St are set to go for tender in the near future, this will provide a substantial development opportunity. If you are serious about locations in the city centre, I can discuss it with you at some level with a degree of personalised confidence, details pending. You may find it ‘helpful’.

      In addition, Docklands areas provide an exciting new location. Lisney are advertising 3 lots between 2.5acres to 1H along Centre Park Road (former Goldcrop premises). Many sites in this area are going up for private auction now amidst developer speculations. I’ll comment further on this in the future.



      In addition, I agree MP is an uninspired development from a design standpoint and a ‘Point’ style venue – though logistically sound in terms of traffic movement, would be less favourable on the undersized site proposed, plus it is far too close to major new residential developments like Jacob’s Island.

      The Showgrounds is good in theory, but the GAA already have their own ideas for this site – ideas which are backed strongly by CCC as they will contribute to the amenity element of the Docklands Development Area which the CCC are so keen to see put in place.

      The Railway Street site is the favoured premises and is actually far larger than even I had initially anticipated. One proposal sees a pedestrian bridge like Venue Block A on the Horgan’s Quay grounds, with Block B proposed for development after demolition of existing warehouse premises across Railway St – most of which are now up for tender.



      I’ll discuss this all soon in further detail later – but first I have to shake off this jet-lag. Goodnight!

    • #732658
      Nick
      Participant

      what is the vision for cork? what is the master plan long term goal of the city? how d want it be i 50 years time and beyond?
      Rapid growth and trying to meet a rediculus deadline for developement of the city of culture lark is short sited and ignorant and will only lead to poor shoddy architecture of style over substance that in 10years time will look equally as hidious as all the buildings mentioned above. Cork needs a long term vision, surely thats what we should be working on rather than a takey street by street approach that exists at the moment.

    • #732659
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Originally posted by Nick
      what is the vision for cork? what is the master plan long term goal of the city? how d want it be i 50 years time and beyond?
      Rapid growth and trying to meet a rediculus deadline for developement of the city of culture lark is short sited and ignorant and will only lead to poor shoddy architecture of style over substance that in 10years time will look equally as hidious as all the buildings mentioned above. Cork needs a long term vision, surely thats what we should be working on rather than a takey street by street approach that exists at the moment.

      The current strategy(s) for Cork are outlined in both the CASP and Cork Docklands Development Plan, both of which are outlined on the city council and county council websites (corkcorp.ie/corkcoco.ie. These strategies have been agreed by both councils and have also been accepted by the government as part of the National Spatial Strategy. They form a blueprint for the direction of the greater city for the next 20 years.

      The strategy in brief is to drive the development of Cork on a metropolitan area which includes all of the satellite towns and ring towns which incorporate greater Cork, an area with a population in excess of 300K.

      There is no drive to extend the city for the sake of it. Current development is not aimed at preparing the city for the city of culture, and the development plans mentioned above both have plans outlined for a 20 year period. The city of culture is seen as a catalyst for inviting influential guests to the city and as such the local government has spent money on improving the aesthetic of the city. The city of culture is not been seen by anyone as a means to an end.

      The Docklands is in dire need of attention but at the same time provides huge development opportunities. Lapps Quay is currently seeing the majority of developments, and these are the first major developments in the docklands overhaul. The only other city areas which will experience rapid development are the Blackpool and Mahon areas.

    • #732660
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lexington – you wrote
      “If you are serious about locations in the city centre, I can discuss it with you at some level with a degree of personalised confidence, details pending. You may find it ‘helpful’.”

      Any chance we could take this to somewhere private – tried the ‘contact adminstrator’ option on the messaging option on your profile but it just bounced back

    • #732661
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Nick – noone is trying to get the city redeveloped specifically in time for the Capital of Culture – but being conferred that status had certainly proved a catalyst for action.

    • #732662
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      -> Argos & Lifestyle Sports will join anchor tenant Atlantic Homecare at the new 100m euro Blackpool Retail Park being developed by the Shipton Group. The new Argos Extra store will measure 10,000sq ft – twice the size of their existing Grand Parade/Daunt Sq store in the city centre. Lifestyle will occupy a store of 6,000sq ft.

      In an unrelated announcement, Toni&Guy Hairdressers are to open a further store at Buckley’s Corner (former Carpet Store) on Washington Street.

      -> The Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade is being given a minor facelift, after coming under sharp criticism from CCC for its dire aesthetics. Ward Anderson had been reluctant to revamp the cineplex in light of future developments for the site. Ward Anderson plan to relocate their business to a new 11-screen multiplex at Mahon Point in Feburary 2005. One rumoured development for the site is a 6-storey over basement retail development with ground floor area of just under 40,000 sq ft – no further info has been received by me on this proposal so I can’t verify anything further.

      -> Beamish & Crawford’s HQ on South Main Street is due for a revamp after an application was lodged with CCC for new railing, roof, facade adjustments and paint improvements.

      -> Sherland Entertainments Ltd based in Dublin has been successful in their application for the redevelopment of the former Mercier Book Store on Academy Street as an Cafe Bar Deli brand coffeeshop & deli.

      -> 21 objections have been raised against Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties/Jurys Doyle Group) development plans for Jury’s Hotel site on the Western Road. Of course the usual suspects were involved, An Taisce. After reading some of the grounds for objections, I have to say, some are laughable, but either way, Riga is going to have a tough ride through the planning process. I hope the proposal is successful, although my unease remains with relation to the residential element of the project.

      -> For those of you anxious to know what it is O’Flynn Construction have planned for Eglinton Street, yet again, O’Flynn have said their announcement is imminent. And when it is made, if successful, it will be one of the largest construction projects in Cork next year. I have to say however, I would prefer a larger retail element – but last minute revisions may yet surprise me.



      Finally, to theblimp, if you have a public e-mail a/c you could post online, I will contact you thereafter as soon as I am available. Failing that, try setting up a web-based ‘rubbish’ a/c you don’t mind displaying online. I will have to ask you a few questions beforehand through e-mail as I’m sure you can understand (privacy reasons etc).



      P.S. Remember, Werdna Ltd’s plans for Water Street are expecting a decision this coming Wednesday (29th September 2004). The original decision date was scheduled for July, but CCC pushed the date back to September for further deliberation reasons. This is one of the most important planning decisions ever before Cork, let’s all just hope that the decision made will green-light the project. The countdown begins today. Here’s just a little reminder of what we should be hoping for ->


      Fingers crossed!

    • #732663
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Good man Lexington, it’s been quiet around here without your input.

      Originally posted by lexington
      *UPDATES*

      -> Argos & Lifestyle Sports will join anchor tenant Atlantic Homecare at the new 100m euro Blackpool Retail Park being developed by the Shipton Group. The new Argos Extra store will measure 10,000sq ft – twice the size of their existing Grand Parade/Daunt Sq store in the city centre. Lifestyle will occupy a store of 6,000sq ft.

      In an unrelated announcement, Toni&Guy Hairdressers are to open a further store at Buckley’s Corner (former Carpet Store) on Washington Street.

      -> The Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade is being given a minor facelift, after coming under sharp criticism from CCC for its dire aesthetics. Ward Anderson had been reluctant to revamp the cineplex in light of future developments for the site. Ward Anderson plan to relocate their business to a new 11-screen multiplex at Mahon Point in Feburary 2005. One rumoured development for the site is a 6-storey over basement retail development with ground floor area of just under 40,000 sq ft – no further info has been received by me on this proposal so I can’t verify anything further.

      -> Beamish & Crawford’s HQ on South Main Street is due for a revamp after an application was lodged with CCC for new railing, roof, facade adjustments and paint improvements.

      -> Sherland Entertainments Ltd based in Dublin has been successful in their application for the redevelopment of the former Mercier Book Store on Academy Street as an Insomnia brand coffeeshop & deli.

      -> 21 objections have been raised against Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties/Jurys Doyle Group) development plans for Jury’s Hotel site on the Western Road. Of course the usual suspects were involved, An Taisce. After reading some of the grounds for objections, I have to say, some are laughable, but either way, Riga is going to have a tough ride through the planning process. I hope the proposal is successful, although my unease remains with relation to the residential element of the project.

      -> For those of you anxious to know what it is O’Flynn Construction have planned for Eglinton Street, yet again, O’Flynn have said their announcement is imminent. And when it is made, if successful, it will be one of the largest construction projects in Cork next year. I have to say however, I would prefer a larger retail element – but last minute revisions may yet surprise me.



      Finally, to theblimp, if you have a public e-mail a/c you could post online, I will contact you thereafter as soon as I am available. Failing that, try setting up a web-based ‘rubbish’ a/c you don’t mind displaying online. I will have to ask you a few questions beforehand through e-mail as I’m sure you can understand (privacy reasons etc).



      P.S. Remember, Werdna Ltd’s plans for Water Street are expecting a decision this coming Wednesday (29th September 2004). The original decision date was scheduled for July, but CCC pushed the date back to September for further deliberation reasons. This is one of the most important planning decisions ever before Cork, let’s all just hope that the decision made will green-light the project. The countdown begins today. Here’s just a little reminder of what we should be hoping for ->


      Fingers crossed!

    • #732664
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Thanks mickeydocs! Still shaking off the jet-lag but I’ll try and get back on track proper soon! 😉

    • #732665
      theblimp
      Participant

      Hi Lexington – I’ve activated the e-mail feature on my ‘profile’ so if you wish to send something to me at that I’ll come right back to you. I’ll leave this option ‘active’ for a day or so.

    • #732666
      burge_eye
      Participant
      Quote:
      Originally posted by lexington
      *UPDATES*

      -> 21 objections have been raised against Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties/Jurys Doyle Group) development plans for Jury’s Hotel site on the Western Road. Of course the usual suspects were involved, An Taisce. After reading some of the grounds for objections, I have to say, some are laughable, but either way, Riga is going to have a tough ride through the planning process. I hope the proposal is successful, although my unease remains with relation to the residential element of the project.

      Burge_eye:

      ref my earlier mail on this issue: Lexington, is Dan Boyle’s representation along these lines?

      http://www.politics.ie/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6066

      Fair point?

    • #732667
      lexington
      Participant

      At the end of the day, were I to decide, I would most likely favour this development – for reasons of aesthetics, regeneration, jobs and in-line with some of the Cork City Development Plan principles – however (and I never ever thought I’d find myself in agreement with a Green Party TD), I have to say, I have an air of suspicion about this project. The current number of rooms in Jurys Hotel Cork is 185 (159 Standard, 23 Executive, 2 Junior Suites and 1 Presidential). The new development proposes a hotel of 182 bedrooms (3 fewer) and 303 luxury apartments. Though I deem the design of the project acceptable, the economics is curious. If Jurys had intended to extend its operations in Cork (as declared in Feburary 2004), why is it in fact reducing its own capacity? And furthermore, reducing its direct investment policy in the city? (Preferring a more removed lease basis at 2m euro p.a.). Furthermore, with 84% of all large scale construction in Cork related to apartments (currently almost 2,000 of which in planning or in mid-construction, are aimed squarely at the luxury market – i.e. 285,000euros and up) is the addition of a further 303 luxury end apartments at this location truly viable? Of the 325,000 metropolitan Cork and 498,000 greater Cork city area citizens, how many can afford in excess of 285,000euros each for over 2,000 current and an additional 2,500 projected luxury end apartments? Thats 4,500 city centre apartments spaces all in excess of 285,000 euros – and not including car parking spaces which range in Cork city anywhere between 25,000 to 80,000 euros. Residential Demand in Cork city remains above average, although the majority of this demand (65%) is among lower to middle income persons. A recent article in the Irish Examiner stated that waiting lists and demand as a whole had increased – this is true, but the main increase was among the aforementioned income groups, which found that new market supply was being provided at a sale price above their sustainable repayment levels. As prices continue to increase more and more persons find themselves applying for more affordable and often sub-standard accomodation. I support Riga Ltd’s proposal on the basis, that such a large-scale investment requires extensive market research and clearly, at some level, the market must be egging them on. Although my own research has found such a demand, it is a far more controlled demand than these large-scale developments seem to represent. I support any project that will bring greater residency back into the city, but to do this, building accomodation simply isn’t enough. A city has to entice people back into its realms by providing the services (retail, nightlife, sports & leisure, aesthetics, transport and unrivalled working environments) in order for people to have incentive to want to take up this accomodation. I believe we need greater services investment in the city to balance the supply of residential complexes. However, the Cork market currently seems to have an insatiable appetite for all things apartments – I just worry about its sustainability without further services investment. Mahon Point, Academy Street and Blackpool isn’t enough.

      Oddly, I feel the Water Street development (though accomodation based) will provide an incentive for further services investment with relation to the docklands, and this is what we need. However, I do believe the Jurys development, will be beneficial if it is successful (and it probably will, O’Callaghan rarely invest in something unless they’re gauranteed a return) because increased city centre residency should spur further services investment.

    • #732668
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Whilst I see Boyle’s point, I think it is perhaps niaive to expect a major company not to maximise the potential of any site it possesses. I’ve never stayed in Jurys but I’m told that it’s outdated and desperately in need of a face lift. It would seem inevitable that any large scale renovation would involve shuttin gthe hotel anyway. Perhaps a hotel in Cork is not viable with more than 180 bedrooms, perhaps it is but the fact is that, if you jump into bed with a developer of OCP’s reputation, you can guarantee that the final plot ratio is as close to a max as possible.

    • #732669
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      -> For those of you familiar with the classic Cork night-venue, the Maltings Emporium, Mardyke Tavern and Club FX complex, after 8 months on the marketplace and an initial tender price of 4m euro, the facility has been sold to UK (Newcastle) based Ultimate Leisure (Ireland) Ltd for 5m euros. Ultimate Leisure own 28 night-venues across the UK and 4 in Northern Ireland. They plan to exstensively renovate the complex before re-opening it early next year (subject to a possible planning application). Former owner, Frank Sheahan of FV Sheahan Auctioneers on Marlboro Street, had decided to sell the complex to focus on his property development career – which so far includes the Lancaster Hall student complex on Lynch Street (adjacent to the Maltings), and with Joe Carey (developer of the 100m euro Fota Island Retail Park and Business Complex), a number of large apartment and commercial buildings at Hewitt Mills along the Blackpool By-Pass.

      -> On a related note, rumour has it, that Frank Sheahan, who had been using the services of PJ Hegarty Contractors for his Lancaster Hall and Blackpool By-Pass/Assumption Road apartment development (designed by JE Keating in a 7-storey semi-circular, red-brick shape) has opted for Rohcon to develop the new row of apartment buildings adjacent to the JE Keating designed block. This is evident from the erection of the Rohcon tower crane on site earlier this month. The apparent reason is down to the fact that the developer had fallen out with PJ Hegarty after the firm failed to meet a completion deadline of September for the Lancaster Hall project, which was due to receive residents at the start of the university academic year. The project is yet to be complete and as a result, the developer will not be able to receive rents in full until the following academic year – unless students can be persuaded otherwise. Either way, it could be very difficult. Rohcon have begun the construction of 44 new apartments on the Hewitt Mills site, which will see a line of between 4 and 6 storey buildings erected.

      -> At Carroll’s Quay, OSB (Neil O’Sullivan) has been granted permission after ABP appeal for Phase 2 of his residential, theatre and licensed bar development. ABP granted permission for 49 of the proposed 55 apartments, along with new Cork Arts Theatre and Pa Johnsons pub. A suggestion was made by ABP to extend either the theatre or bar through the ommission of 3 ground floor apartments. The project, Phase 1 and Phase 2 are designed by James Leahy & Assoc.

      – for those of you who think I knock An Taisce Corcaigh too often and unfairly, the CCC and ABP reports on their objections to this OSB Phase 2 project offer very good justification for my complaining and clearly display their petty behaviour in Cork (although, and I can assure you, this report is one of their better ones. An Taisce objections are often far more ludicrous.) To read this very common sensical report by ABP and CCC. Follow this link -> http://planning.corkcity.ie/letters/upload/25092004-J69H-210333Tp27769.doc

      – a few years ago, a similar project was refused permission by ABP on this same site (at the time being developed by Carroll’s Quay Development Group). The architects were O’Riordan Staehli. Here’s an image of what could have gone up had there been no refusal. Note, the surroundings have VASTLY changed since with numerous office and apartment buildings having been erected in the immediate surrounding areas.

      The new OSB development greenlighted is noted in the report for its striking and likeable design.



      Just in response to burge_eye’s above remark -> Howard Holdings have developed a 200 bedroom hotel, operated by Choice Hotels under the Clarion brand, for Lapps Quay. Lance Investments have been recently refused planning by ABP for a 232-bedroom hotel on the Lee Road. Michael O’Donoghue (Rockfell Investments) were refused by ABP after grant from CCC for the development of a 9-storey 400 bedroom hotel on Cornmarket Street – and 2 other very prominent developments are considering the addition of 100 more bedrooms to their hotel elements (one being operated by Hilton) of 150 bedrooms each. I don’t think viability is the question – which makes the reduction in numbers at Jurys even more curious. However I do agree about the naivity of space maximisation by Dan Boyle – it makes logical sense for a developer to maximise it. However, his objection is related to traffic movements in the area – and I do take his point, the Western Road/Lancaster Quay/Washington Street is exceptionally congested even at the best of times. Riga Ltd will have to carefully consider its traffic management options for the Jurys site. 2 bridges will serve the development and the majority of parking will be residential, hopefully the city centre location will encourage public transport and walking means.


    • #732670
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Pierse Contractors today erected a tower crane over the UCC School of Pharmacy site on College Road, this marks the initiation of primary construction on the long awaited project. Completion of the 3-storey, 60,000sq ft development is due for late next year.

      🙂 One of the most exciting projects to get going near the docklands is making real headway. The Corbett Bros. office and residential development on Copley Street (just across Cotter Street from the new Howard Holdings development of offices (incl. Anglo Irish Bank’s new regional HQ) and residential units, designed by Scott Tallon Walker (who also have taken up offices in the development). The new Corbett Bros. development was designed by PRC Architects Ireland and is being built by Coffey Construction. The components of a new tower crane are on site ready for imminent erection – this will help complete the 2 new 5-storey office/residential blocks planned for the site, linked together over a central courtyard by a 5th storey physical link.

      🙁 On a slightly less inspiring note, CCC have pushed the decision date for Aldi Developments retail and 48 duplex development on Tory Top Road, Cork back until an unprecendented date of 20/6/2005!!! This is a very odd move by CCC – this will see the application in the planning process with CCC for almost a full year – and that’s before any possible ABP appeals!



      REMEMBER: 3 DAYS REMAIN UNTIL THE WATER STREET DEVELOPMENT’S DECISION DATE IS DUE FOR WERDNA LTD. Keep your fingers crossed this Wednesday!

    • #732671
      lexington
      Participant

      To the surprise of many, especially myself, the developers – Werdna Ltd – and architects of the Water Street project (Murray O’Laoire) withdrew their planning application for the landmark development with only a day before a decision was due.

      The application was launched to a fanfare almost 6 months ago and had been expected to receive a decision tomorrow (Wednesday 29th of September 2004). I have to say I’m very disappointed and will be in contact with the developers for an insight into such a move. I’ll keep you posted when I find out the entirety of the details involved.

      🙁

    • #732672
      corkdood
      Participant

      Very disappointing – perhaps they heard that there were a lot of objections.

    • #732673
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      It seems very strange to withdraw their application just before the decision was due. Maybe they had heard it was to be rejected and thought it would be better not to allow it to get to that point, with a view to resubmitting revised plans at a later stage?

    • #732674
      lexington
      Participant

      After a brief discussion with the developers and architects – it seems that the original Water Street plan rose a number of sticking points with which the Planning Authority could not find any reasonable compromise with the developer. The application was withdrawn as to avoid a possible refusal – as it is the intention of Werdna to resubmit a revised application in the very near future of a similar scale and design. The architect assures me that the unique features that were so central to the original submission (i.e. the 19-storey centrepiece tower) will remain incorporated into the new application. I’m anxious to view the new application and see where it differs. Watch this space.

      (and yes I am aware that is the worst subject heading ever – I shocked myself typing it!)

    • #732675
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      so they’ve been told what they need to do to get planning?

    • #732676
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I’d be curious to know which aspects of this proposal the local authority didn’t agree with.

    • #732677
      lexington
      Participant

      ”the project was withdrawn in order to submit a new scheme in the near future.
      We have been in a period of intense negotiation with the Planning Authority since it was lodged in May last. There were a number of aspects of the scheme that were particular sticking points that the Planning Authority felt that could not be dealt with by means of conditions or additional information, so therefore , we opted to withdraw the scheme and return with a new one rather than accept a refusal. The basic concept, design, scale of the development will be more or less the same, however, it is hoped that CCC will be in a better position to support the new scheme as we believe in going forward to An Bord Pleanala(which with a scheme of such a scale is almost inevitable)with a positive response from the local Authority.”

      – from Murray O’Laoire Architects



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Developers Barry Collins and Clayton Love’s company Piton Properties have announced their detailled plans for a 100m euro Carrigaline Town Centre project. The project will include a large multiplex, town square, shopping district, showrooms, public amenity area, bowling complex, offices, entertainment centre, 900 covered car parking spaces and riverside walk. The development will be constructed on the site of the former Carrigaline Pottery complex and a parcel of 26-acres adjoining. I’ll have images up soon.

      🙂 Coffey Construction have erected a tower crane on site over the Corbett Bros. large office and residential development on Copley Street signalling the commencement of primary construction. The development will consist of 75 basement car parking spaces (revised by CCC from 93 spaces), a ground floor commercial restaurant and gym, 5640sq m of office space and 38 apartments.

    • #732678
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by mickeydocs
      so they’ve been told what they need to do to get planning?

      I think from the posts after this Mickydocs that you have hit the nail on the head. I know people who object to projects get a really bad name as being begrudgers and of just slowing the planning process up, but in all fairness the system is fundamentally flawed in that the public have no real imput into the planning process bar making objections after months of consultation between the develpers and the council.

    • #732679
      lexington
      Participant

      Well today should have been the day we received word on the planning decision for Water Street – but as previously reported (and reported exclusively) – developers Werdna Ltd withdrew their application a day before the decision with an intention of resubmitting a similar proposal with a few amendments.

      I sincerely hope the 19-storey tower at the centre of the development isn’t sacrificed, it would provide an excellent eastern gateway into Cork city – as County Hall provides such a gateway to the west.

      But for those of you left disappointed about Water Street, I have some hopefully positive news about a potential development I reported on not so long ago for the site of the Capitol Cineplex on Washington Street/Grand Parade…

      …I am well informed that Ward Anderson are negotiating with developers the possibility of transforming the cineplex site into a first-rate shopping venue (see previous post). Initial reports indicated a 6-storey over basement retail centre with bars, nightclubs and basement ice-rink. Although some revisions have been made to these plans – the centre is to be aimed at the mid to upper retail market (e.g. a retailler like Sisley, H&M or Espirit and so on). The development will be designed to provide a landmark, world-class structure providing an impressive view when looked at down along Washington Street. Although nothing is yet set in stone – I thought it might be a source of cheering up after Water Street (at least until the new application is submitted). Other options being considered by Ward Anderson include simply selling the site altogether to a private developer and maintaining no involvement. 2 developers I am aware of have tried for the site (also with retail plans) but have been told they faced ‘Deal Agreed’. This status will remain until Ward Anderson confrim their intentions with the site. You won’t get this news anywhere else.

    • #732680
      lexington
      Participant

      As promised, I have here an image of the proposed 100m euro Carrigaline Town Centre project – which has just be lodged for permission with Cork County Council. The developers are Barry Collins and Clayton Love, through their company Piton Properties.
      http://corkdevelopments.bravehost.com/ppctc.jpg

      Also, below is an image of the OSB (Neil O’Sullivan of Aceville Construction/Investments) development on Carroll’s Quay/Camden Quay/Knapps Square. I have referred to this project in a prior post above. The 2nd Phase of this development was just greenlighted by ABP after objection from An Taisce. The 1st phase of the development is already under construction (Phase 1 is the lower level section to the right of the image). Architect is James Leahy & Assoc. Building Contractors are John F. Supple Ltd.
      http://corkdevelopments.bravehost.com/osbcqd.jpg

      :rolleyes: I apologise for the quality of these images, as my scanner is never up to much, even on a good day – and the graphics attained by me from the developers and architects are too large to load to any one server/host.

      The host of the development images is now refusing to permit remote links. To view the images, copy & paste the links into your address bar – then press enter.

    • #732681
      Leesider
      Participant

      sorry lexington can’t view the images, getting remote linking of images not allowed!!

      cheers for all the info though

    • #732682
      asdasd
      Participant

      Looks like an American mall, or indeed, an American “city centre”. Cupertino in Cork.

    • #732683
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The Carrigaline project has “Second Rate Clayton Love Bland” stamped all over it. Interesting to see “only” 900 car spaces for what is (according to CSO) the most car dependent community in Ireland.

      The Carroll’s Qy dev doesn’t look too bad at all. That area badly needs something interesting.

    • #732684
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 City Manager Joe Gavin has reportedly given the hint that Rockfell Investments Cornmarket Street Retail and Residential Development will be green-lighted. He sights the importance of the project and a hope that the project will come under construction as soon as possible. My own indications confirm that Rockfell is being championed by many at Navigation House (the Planning Dept) – although there are a number of conditions associated with the grant. I never get too confident about these things – but it is looking very favourable. The renewed design submitted in a Significant Further Information report to the CCC from Frank Ennis & Assoc on behalf of Rockfell Investments has won me over far more than the original plan. Although it could have been so much more.

      🙁 O’Callaghan Properties (Riga Limited) have seen the decision date on their application for a huge development at the Jurys Hotel site on the Western Road in Cork pushed back until the 16th December 2004. Such a move was pretty much expected. The original decision date was due for the 10th of October (next week). The application is having a bumpy ride through planning – but it seems to have its champions at City Hall. With the number of objections lodged against the project, a grant may see the development brought before ABP. Its a shame really, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

      :confused: Werdna Ltd and Murray O’Laoire have expressed their disappointed at having to withdraw their Water Street application – and have made an ever so slight critique of the planning process. However, they said their decision to withdraw rather than face refusal shows that they are committed to establishing such a landmark docklands development. Murray O’Laoire said that they intend to keep a landmark, highrise tower as part of the development – and also said both they and the developers will fight to maintain the same height of tower as in the original proposal. However other development aspects need to be addressed – in particular traffic management issues. This being so, Werdna do not expect to submit a new application until the start of next year, 2005.

      🙂 Frinailla Developments Ltd intend to re-submit a new application, albeit scale-down, for their Blackpool Residential and Commercial development on the Watercourse Road. The development will closely resemble their original plan but has a number of design alterations to reduce overall height – among the predominant reasons the application was originally refused by CCC and ABP.

    • #732685
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cain White Piling & Foundations Ltd have commenced preliminary work on-site at the Kingsley Hotel at Victoria Cross/Carrigrohane Straight Road. The work heralds the beginning of construction for the Rathmelton Investments 50m euro hotel, aparthotel and student accomodation development – designed by Murray O’Laoire.

      The development will provide one of the largest student developments in, not only Cork, but the country as a whole – with 116 apartments (515 bedrooms) in an arrangement of 5-storey buildings totalling 14068sq m (over 151,000sq ft), 840sq m (9,000sq ft) of retail, restaurant and laundry facilities, over 10,000sq m (101,000sq ft) of extension space for 82 additional bedrooms to the Kingsley Hotel, 10,000sq ft of new conference facilities, 6,000sq ft of additional leisure facilities, a new 19-unit aparthotel and a massive, 2-level basement for over 740 car-parking spaces. A riverside amenity walk and recreation area will also form part of the development.

      The first line of student residencies are expected to come on-stream for the UCC academic year 2005/6.



      😉 Meanwhile, directly across the road from the Kingsley Hotel, Michael & James O’Driscoll, owners of the Village Student Complex are pressing ahead with their 17 apartment extension to the existing facility.

    • #732686
      Leesider
      Participant

      2 things I have heard about in the press about a while back but haven’t heard anymore since, can someone please shed a bit of light on these?? the first one is the proposed new town on the Bandon Rd, has this been scrapped or is it still going ahead? the second is the development of a data warehouse in Cork, this is vital if we are to attract IT companies to Cork, anyone know when/if this is going to happen?

      thanks

    • #732687
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I believe the NSC in Mahon have a proposal to establish a data warehouse for the Cork region.

    • #732688
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      New Town on Bandon Road? Would that be the proposal by M O Flynn a number of years back, for a new town near Ovens? Was rejected as it went against the CASP principles and sustainable expansion of the city based on public transport corridors.

      City’s proposal for webworks/data centre on Albert Quay, are Howard Holdings developing that? anyone?

    • #732689
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Think so…

    • #732690
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Does anyone by any chance have any images of the newish development in Kinsale that replaced the old candle factory on the quay side? I would very much appreciate any image what so ever.

    • #732691
      Leesider
      Participant

      Originally posted by bunch
      New Town on Bandon Road? Would that be the proposal by M O Flynn a number of years back, for a new town near Ovens? Was rejected as it went against the CASP principles and sustainable expansion of the city based on public transport corridors.

      City’s proposal for webworks/data centre on Albert Quay, are Howard Holdings developing that? anyone?

      Hope that is true about the data warehouse!!

      The Bandon Rd development was supposed to be down by Crossbarry just past Halfway! It was announced the same time as the new town just north of Blarney, which is definitely going ahead.

    • #732692
      lexington
      Participant

      -> The NSC Campus at Mahon, of which stage one is complete, houses and nurtures a number of start-up and IT facilities. Howard Holdings also have plans drawn up for a 15m euro, 5-storey IT/Business Centre along Albert Quay (on a site donated by CCC) which will incorporate Albert House (parking fines centre). The centre is directly opposite Howard Holdings new City Quarter development. No formal application will be lodged in the immediate future however. Also UCC intend to construct a large, 3-storey IT facility on the site of the former Greyhound Track along the Western Road – there are suggestions that UCC may combine this facility with their proposed new Business Centre/School.

      NSC Campus, Phase 1 at Mahon, Cork city

      -> As for a new town along the Bandon Road – a large residential development had been proposed originally in 1996 for near Crossbarry by O’Brien & O’Flynn Homes, with over 300 units, commercial units (small retail centre) and amenity facilities. However this was refused by Cork County Council. Another residential proposal was made by the same firm in 1999, but it went no-where beyond a Further Info request that was never honoured. There was no proposal of a ‘town’ so to speak, but a large residential development.

      The Blarney proposal of up to 2,000 residential units was made by the Fleming Group – however no permission has yet been satisfactorily secured as of yet.

    • #732693
      lexington
      Participant

      In light of the many press articles and recent statistics – a number of Cork developers are apparently discussing options to invest in a landmark structure that will make Cork city centre stand-out at an international level and hopefully encourage tourist activity in the future. Though this is all pie-in-the-sky, one or two proposals centre around the construction of a landmark 40m high monument – most likely a statue commemorating Cork’s history and rebel spirit. A number of city centre sites have been sussed out but no proposals have yet been made to CCC. The monument, in the words of one developer, ”will have people laughing at the Spire in Dublin, walking away from the Eye in London and comparing it to that of the Statue of Liberty or Sydney Opera House”. (ahem!) The idea is that subsequent and related tourist and service activities will benefit strategically from this non-profit (direct profit) venture. It would be interesting to see how CCC react to such a proposal. I’ll wait anxiously to see some drawings – but it’s an interesting, if not, far-out idea. But maybe its that sort of thinking the city centre could do with more often.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 For those of you who have waited patiently on an announcement for Ballincollig Town Centre SC tenants (an original announcement was due in July 2004), fear not – O’Flynn Construction have confirmed an article in the Irish Independent that their 18,000sq m + shopping centre development at BTC, with 3 anchor store units, 13-street front stores and 23 internal store units – has secured anchors for the 2 larger units, plus a number of other exciting retaillers for smaller units. O’Flynn Construction said they will formally announced the main anchor tenant shortly, followed by the second anchor (after some conditions had been ironed out).

      🙂 After the announcement that Argos Extra, Atlantic Homecare and Lifestyle Sports would occupy the new Blackpool Park development – developers the Shipton Group, 2 further deals have been struck with major retaillers for 2 additional units. The details of these will be announced in the coming weeks also. Reel Cinemas are currently fitting out the 7-screen multiplex at Blackpool Park at a cost of 6m euro.

      🙂 The new EastGate Retail Park on Little Island, developed by O’Flynn Construction, has announced that its motor-mall element of 6 dealerships – will be anchored by a Renault Dealership.

    • #732694
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The CCC should have held firm and backed up Beth Gali’s original proposal to move Fr Mat Statue from it’s current location and put a new monument there. There a many suitable locations for the statue elsewhere.

      Using Statue of Liberty and Cork in the same sentence has to be taking the piss. I know these developers are only trying to hype their proposal, but…

    • #732695
      theblimp
      Participant

      40m landmark – the mind boggles!

      So now, within the city centre we will have the Butter Exchange, Shandon, City Gaol and a monument … oh, and a resurfaced main street with lights that look like they’re part of some huge kerplunk game – all for our wonderful tourists. Sure why would you bother going to Milan, Paris, Rome, New York, London, Bath, etc…….etc…?

      Guys, until we start to drag ourselves away from our merchant past and refocus to a future mix to include an actual tourism ‘offer’ , no amount of ‘monuments’ will make a difference. This year the Irish tourist activity in the UK was all focused on getting families over here. Do you think the addition of a monument will have them cancelling their week in Magaluf? Similarly ‘Bertie’s Erection’ in Dublin doesn’t bring in any tourists – it does however give them something while there are here (albeit after a few minutes you would wander off to find something else). To paraphrase – “it’s the offer, stupid”. Offer tourists something worthwhile and they will come (come and see all our lovely apartments!). Stick with the status quo or pay lip-service by way of a monument and we remain in the rut. If the grand fathers of city development really wish to increase the tourism appeal of our city there are a lot better places to start spending their money.

      Ok, rant over….carry on!

    • #732696
      lexington
      Participant

      For those of you shocked and/or laughing at the idea of a 40m monument dead-bang in the centre of Cork city – believe, crazier ideas have been through the planning process in Cork before. In comparison, the idea of a monument is far more believable than some of these beauties.

      First there is Sean Meehan’s plans for a 3-storey multi-storey car park with commercial units at Grenville Place (adjacent to the Mercy University Hospital and NMRC). Fine you may say – however, this development isn’t so normal when you consider the fact that it is to be built on stilts over a bend in the River Lee – with a vehicular access bridge linking it to the quays. Even more bizarre, the original proposal was for the car-park to be built under the river! A planning decision is due soon on the plans. The architect is John Paul Lennon – an architect linked to an even more bizarre proposal…

      …In 1998, an application was lodged with the then Cork Corporation for the construction of for a shopping arcade/mall and 48 apartments over 5-storeys in Cork city centre. The thing was that the plan was to build the complex on a bridge spanning the Lee from Patrick’s Quay to Anderson’s Quay (the Bus Station). Cork’s own Rialto – only bigger eh? The application was lodged under the name Maria Lennon, John Paul’s wife. It was ultimately refused.

      But my personal favourite, an unknown developer, devised plans for a 40-storey skyscraper along the Cork Docklands back in 1999. The proposal was to see a 6-storey commercial, retail and leisure facility from the basement to 5 floor. Offices from the 6 to 20th floor, a hotel from 21th to 30th floor, apartments 31 to 39th floor and a 40th storey 360 degree restaurant and cocktail bar. A public platform and ‘cocktail garden’ were proposed for the roof-top – on which also was found a search-light (reminiscent of a lighthouse [and based on the Transco Tower in Houston, TX] TO reflect Cork’s maritime history). Primitive drawings were made by an US-based architect – no formal application was ever filed, or developer revealed. But if I ever get the drawings, I’ll put them up someday.

      After all that, a monument doesn’t seem too bad. But I do agree with theblimp, in that we need to be focused on pull-factors for tourism – Cork has SO much unrealised potential and its a shame. A monument may be ‘pretty’ – but unless it is something truly exceptional, it’s not going to make Cork the tourist haven it dreams of being.

    • #732697
      asdasd
      Participant

      How about building boardwalks along the Lee? Start with the Quay oppposite the City hall ( name escapes me). By the way, I have to say the Less looks and smells better than before.

    • #732698
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Rockfell Investments (Micheal O’Donoghue of the Munster Joinery and O’Donoghue/Ring Hotels) have been granted planning permission for their apartment and retail/department store development at Cornmarket Street. The development will consist of 65 apartments and over 120,000sq ft of retail/department store space throughout a huge, 35m euro 6-storey building, over basement (with 65 car-parking spaces). Joe Gavin, City Manager has said he hopes construction on the project will get going straight away. Confirmation of this is expected by Rockfell within the next day.

      The development will be the first catalyst to a major rejuvenation of the famous but wore-down city centre street – and provide a major retail boost to this Western end of Patrick’s Street – as so much of the commercial activity is concentrated currently at the eastern end.

      This is great news for Cork – after the disappointment of Werdna’s Water Street withdrawl (though it will be resubmitted), and the delay in Further Information by John Mannix for his eagerly awaited Washington Street development. The next big retail development is expected to be formally announced soon by O’Flynn Construction for their Eglinton Street site.

      Let’s just all hope Rockfell get their project going soon – as no objections have been raised to the modifications made in the Significant Further Information submission. In fact, the Coal Quay Traders Association forwarded a supportive observation! I’ve read through the report and it looks very favourably on the whole project! Rockfell and Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis & Assoc have put an awful lot of work into getting this project right. Well done Rockfell!

    • #732699
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Well here you have it – after months of waiting, O’Flynn Construction have formally launched their development plans for Eglinton Street – next to City Hall (former An Post Sorting Office purchased last Feburary for 15m euro).

      The development will consist of a 17-storey, 70 metre southern gateway apartment building with 43 large and luxurious apartments. The 17-storey glass & copper coated building will be part of a larger 217-unit residential development, 42,000sq ft retail development, creche, gym, offices and 550 underground parking spaces over 2-levels (which will also serve No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay). Frank O’Mahony of Wilson Architecture is responsible for the design.

      The est’d cost of the development has been revised from 62m euros to just under 80m euros – despite certain media reports stating a higher value.

      O’Flynn Construction had been in intense negotiation with CCC about such a development – who agreed to the idea in theory. A planning application will be lodged before the week end.

      As I mentioned in an earlier post – I’m a little disappointed with the retail element of the development, I had been hoping and nagging O’Flynn Construction for a larger ‘shopping mall’ style retail element but in the end they settled for 32,000sq ft allocated to bulky retailling and 3 smaller units aimed at convenience style stores.

      I’ll try and get images up soon. The project will provide a southern gateway along the South City Link, as County Hall provides a Western gateway and Werdna’s Water Street will provide an Eastern gateway landmark building. All we need now is a northern gate!

      It’s an interesting project – and will provide a great entrance to the southern docklands area – which will be seeing a few more high-rise proposals in the near future. This area of the city – and entrance to the docklands is making great development headway – huge projects like this O’Flynn development, No.5 & No.6 Lapps Quay. Howard Holdings’ City Quarter, Copley Hall and Albert Quay developments, Corbett Bros. substantial office building on Copley Street and the new Cork School of Music (which has yet again been delayed in construction until at least Novemeber) and a number of other exciting pipeline projects waiting in the wings.



      More good news!

      🙂 It’s been a great day for Cork city development – with the grant of permission to Rockfell Investments large retail and residential development on Cornmarket Street and now the announcement of O’Flynn’s innovative 17-storey Gateway Project for Eglinton Street. The new 70 metre building will be taller than both County Hall and the Water Street development (which are 66metres and 69metres respectively) – when complete, it will be the tallest building in the country (assuming it is completed before the Heuston Gate building in Dublin). This will lead to Cork holding the title for Ireland’s 3 tallest buildings.

      🙂 And just a quick note on the Water Street development – I can now confirm to you that developers Werdna Ltd withdrew their application based on issues of density – not height. In an effort to allow for more open space and amenity areas within the development, architects Murray O’Laoire are now investigating increasing the height of main tower element of the project. Murray O’Laoire will address the fact that projects for Eglinton Street and Horgan’s Quay are both substantially taller than the Water Street proposal – and with proper consultation, plan to increase the tower height by anything up to 6 storeys – perhaps, as this has not been confirmed but is only at an investigative stage. Other options may see a reduction in the number of residential units from 400 to possibly 300 – in order to address density issues.

      *UPDATES*
      🙂 Ward Anderson as Omniplex Cork Ltd have lodged an application with CCC for the installation of external signage and associated multiplx fitouts at their new 11-screen multiplex at Mahon Point SC. This is full confirmation of my earlier posts a few months back that Ward Anderson had won the contract to operate the multiplex at the development.

    • #732700
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      There are some shots of the An Post Sorting site in todays Irish Examiner… Hmmm… only one angle from the south link??? I’d be curious to see it from the Qy side.

    • #732701
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      anyone got any links to the eglinton street or cornmarket street developments?

    • #732702
      corkdood
      Participant

      Has there been any progress on the vacant building on Fr Mathew Quay adjacent to Parliament Bridge (behind the Bank of Ireland)?
      I believe there were proposals to redevelop it. Its been empty for years and is a real eyesore when driving along Georges Quay into town.
      Forgive me if work has started on this project – I haven’t been in the area for a while.

    • #732703
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      saw the examiner too, and i think it looks quite good from south link, however, i would also like to see how the rest of the site is configured and some idea of the view from the quays.

      in general, i cant see any difficulty in principle with a medium rise building on that corner, i wonder where the objections will come from? because they will come….. potentially from Jewtown as they are the closest residential area, An Taisce may also but i see little opportunity for reasoned objection.

    • #732704
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      There are references to Jacob’s Mill much earlier in this thread.
      The owners of Jacobs on The Mall have a plan to turn this building into a food hall/food emporium. Planning permission was granted and work has started but there seems to be a flaw with the building that is holding up progress on the site.

      Originally posted by corkdood
      Has there been any progress on the vacant building on Fr Mathew Quay adjacent to Parliament Bridge (behind the Bank of Ireland)?
      I believe there were proposals to redevelop it. Its been empty for years and is a real eyesore when driving along Georges Quay into town.
      Forgive me if work has started on this project – I haven’t been in the area for a while.

    • #732705
      lexington
      Participant

      NOTE: To view this image of the development at Eglinton Street by O’Flynn Construction, highlight – cut – and paste the link into your address bar and press enter.
      http://www.corkdevelopments.bravehost.com/ofcesgp.jpg
      I intend to get more images of this development (incl. quayside aspect) soon. If possible – with Howard Holdings development included.

      The quayside aspect is most noticeable for its copper-tinged facade, especially facing City Hall – with which it is suppose to compliment the hall’s famous copper rotunda. Large windows stretch the height of the building facing out onto a new street-scape between the development and rear of new Howard Holdings IT/office building on Albert Quay, and Doyle Family warehouses (which have also been earmarked for a substantial docklands development).

      We can take it as a given that An Taisce will object – they will most probably cite overshadowing and ‘negative’ visual impact the O’Flynn proposal will have on City Hall due to it’s ‘excessive’ height. They may also claim it would be ‘damaging’ to the warehousing on Albert Quay (due for demolition anyway) which are among few reminiscents of Cork’s heritage associated with industry and rail. Albert Road’s former Railway Station will also probably be targeted.

      Nearby residents will cite visual intrusion due to excessive height – although I understand their concerns, the slender nature of the building minimises any visual disruption. The fact that Douglas Road and Jewtown residencies are predominantly road facing and thus face away from the project probably will fall on deaf resident ears.

      I think the height of the building is a non-issue in light of the fact that it is fitting to the area with respect to a strategic outlook. Its a landmark in the positive sense – not Victoria Mills sense (shudder!), and that it is not excessive but is slender.

      I hope it works out well!

      The next 2 big planning decision announcements are for the UCC Boole Library Extension and redevelopment of Kino Cinema on Washington Street.



      I don’t have any links for the Cornmarket Street development yet, but I’ll try and find some suitable images. I’ll be in contact with Rockfell soon and ask them or the architect (Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis and Assoc) to send me on some graphics.



      And yes, Tumblegate Ltd are proceeding with the Father Matthew Quay development – with Joseph Lane & Sons Ltd the main contractors – however before primary construction can begin, a number of structural reinforcement issues have to be resolved in the interests of safety at the old Mill Building. This is currently proceeding.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Frinailla Developments have applied for permission to demolish all existing buildings from 43 to 52 Watercourse Road and begin subsurface investigations. Frinailla plan during this work to resubmit a new, mildly adjusted application for a major community based residential and commercial development. The original proposal was refused by ABP. The estimated value of the development is 50m euro.

      🙂 Ward Anderson are expected to make an announcement soon with relation to their plans for the Capitol Cineplex site on Grand Parade – this comes after they lodged an application to CCC to begin fitting out their new 11-screen multiplex at Mahon Point SC – due to open Feb 2005. One of their plans was to develop a significant, landmark retail facility of 6-storeys over basement – however other options may yet be decided.

      What a day for Cork developments!

    • #732706
      corkdood
      Participant

      Thanks – reading this forum is always informative!

    • #732707
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lexington – don’t suppose there’s any chance you could convince O’Flynn’s to throw a panoramic restaurant up on the top of that? I know it’s not quite ‘windows on the world’ but I’ll bet the view up there would be pretty good all the same!

    • #732708
      lexington
      Participant

      A restaurant would be great up there – if only I could convince them. Suppose I’ll just have to save that idea for myself someday!!! Less competition that way! 🙂

    • #732709
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Great to see the end is finely in sight for the warehouses on Albert Quay.

      The whole area of City Hall/Albert Quay/Lapps Quay/Eglinton Road will look superb when finished (presuming planning is granted to O’Flynns and Howard Holdings).

    • #732710
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Ward Anderson have announced that they intend to maintain the Capitol Cineplex operation for the foreseeable – as a result of increased sales activity, and other issues. For the time being, the 50-year old cineplex will undergo a respectable refurbishment process.

      As previously reported, Ward Anderson had been investigating the redevelopment of the highly valuable site – in conjunction with private developers. A number of plans had been reviewed – among which incl. a substantial 6-storey over dual basement retail and leisure development w/ 25 large, open plan retail units, a possible ice-rink, bars and as many as 2 nightclubs. Another plan – which apparently was submitted for planning – included a large retail and office development over 5 and 1/2 floors – with a basement, ground, first and second floor retail centre and 3rd, 4th and 5th floor office area. A split level cafe opening out onto a rooftop garden was also proposed.

      So, unfortunately, no definite news is expected on this site for some time now. Although I am still informed that development proposals will continue to be assessed. In the meantime, Ward Anderson are forging ahead with their 11-screen Omniplex at Mahon Point SC.



      Here, below, is an image of Phase 1 of the Camden Court development by OSB on Carroll’s Quay. This image doesn’t do the entire development much justice (as anyone that viewed the image posted earlier of the entire development will tell you). Phase 2 – which will include 55 apartments, a new 110 seat arts theatre, Pa Johnsons Public House and dominating roof-top gardens and play-areas – was just recently greenlighted by ABP after appeal. Development of this 6-storey Phase 2 will begin in early November (subject to permission for an extended theatre from CCC).


      The huge extension to the Kingsley Hotel with adjoining aparthotel and 116-student apartment development by Rathmelton Investments, designed by Murray O’Laoire, is making serious headway. O’Flynn Building & Civil Engineering of Banteer, Cork (not to be confused with O’Flynn Construction) are the main building contractors. It seems like a very large development for such a small firm.


    • #732711
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Originally posted by lexington
      🙁 Ward Anderson have announced that they intend to maintain the Capitol Cineplex operation for the foreseeable – as a result of increased sales activity, and other issues. For the time being, the 50-year old cineplex will undergo a respectable refurbishment process.
      So, unfortunately, no definite news is expected on this site for some time now. Although I am still informed that development proposals will continue to be assessed. In the meantime, Ward Anderson are forging ahead with their 11-screen Omniplex at Mahon Point SC.

      Unfotunately? Surely a functioning cinema in the city centre is better than another office development? You don’t want the entire nightlive of the city centre to revolve around pubs – you need a variety of entertainment sources.

    • #732712
      theblimp
      Participant

      Agree with you Paul that we need more nightlife – but as Lexington has stated there was one proposal for an basement ice rink. I know also of another proposal which would have seen something equally exciting and novel on the site. There are 2 new cinema complexes opening in the next few months (Mahon & Blackpool), so I was really surprised to hear about Ward Anderson’s decision. I know the Capitol (what’s with the ‘o’ spelling anyway?) is the ‘favourite child’ of the W.A. group, but I feel (hope) its days are numbered!!

      On a totally unrelated topic – the proposed redevlopment of Jury’s Hotel – an interesting side-point. The current Opera House was originally designed to go on that site. The bare North Wall of same was to have been hidden behind trees along the river side. However the city fathers, in their wisdom, decreed that it should go on the site of the old Opera House … without any design alterations.

    • #732713
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Paul Clerkin

      Unfotunately? Surely a functioning cinema in the city centre is better than another office development? You don’t want the entire nightlive of the city centre to revolve around pubs – you need a variety of entertainment sources.

      I think why I said ‘unforntunately’ is due to the fact that one proposal would have opened up Grand Parade and the city centre to that variety of entertainment sources you indicated. The ice-rink was to be surround by an artificial street-scape on which a number of innovative food outlets/juice bars etc were earmarked. The upper levels would have housed a nightclub and unique theme-bars over looking the late-night rink. A London Trocadero centre style operation was hinted at. I just believed that this kind of facility would be far more attractive and imaginative than yet another cinema. Cinemas are often as imaginative as developers get when it comes to leisure and services. Plus, the city centre already has the Gate Multiplex and the Kino Cinema on Washington Street is set to triple in size through its reconstruction and addition of 3-further floors. The idea of a lively, pedestrian friendly city centre leisure and entertainment centre just appealed to me and its unfortunate to see such proposals lost. The Capitol ain’t pretty at the best of times and is seriously dated. The site is also zoned in the Cork City Development Plan 2004 for higher-order retail development. Joe Gavin (City Manager) has even expressed his disappointment at the Ward Anderson decision.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Cleary Doyle have begun preliminary construction work on the 32m euro Cork City Hall extension (see previous posts) – designed by ABK Architects.

    • #732714
      lexington
      Participant

      For those of you who unaware of the development at Tellengana Lodge, on the Blackrock Road, Cork – SHUL Developers are financing the development of a 4-storey 60,000sq ft office building on the grounds of Tellengana Lodge. Bowen Construction have erected a tower crane on site already and construction is making serious headway. The design is by Wilson Architecture – see below.

      Although I welcome such investment – my problem with this sort of development is that it’s another contemporary project that utilises the existing grounds of fabulous old-style houses and estates in and around Cork city. Though I’m sure it must make a wonderful working environment, I strongly dislike the idea of these big modern developments springing up on the grounds of fine old estates – especially in leafy residential suburbs, as Tellengana Lodge is a part of. We should be protecting and perserving these fine old estates – and maintaining these few remaining green areas. How come An Taisce Corcaigh didn’t object to this eh???

      Another such development is the one O’Flynn Construction have planned for Dunkettle Estate in the Glanmire suburban region. Now I’ve great time for O’Flynn Construction as generally they are one of the most architecturally and socially minded development companies around – and they display a strong standard in their projects – however, reaping fine leafy and green grass estate grounds in favour of a 300m euro project with 600 houses and apartment blocks and so on – in my opinion is shameful. The same applies to Sean Keohane (Grangefield Developments) plans for the Arbutus Lodge and Cumnor Construction’s plans for Sunday’s Well. I protest against such projects.

      Office buildings such as the one at Tellengana should be focused in the city centre and the spectacular opportunities offered by the Cork Docklands and surrounding areas. Just today I walked a number of development sites in this vicinity and it simply reinforced my belief in this. The area around Copley Street, Lapps Quay, Eglinton Street, Union Quay and Albert Quay will look amazing on the completion of developments by the likes of O’Flynn (at Lapps Qy & Eglinton St), Howard Holdings (Lapps Qy, Anglesea St & Albert Qy), Corbett Bros (Parnell Place & Copley St) & so on. Furthermore Lavitts Quay, the Coal Quay, Camden Quay and Carrolls Quay are emerging as faboulous office and residential development areas. Its a shame on CCC for its poor encouragement of developments in these areas (with some shoddy planning decisions) and a shame on An Taisce Corcaigh for finding problems with everything except where it matters.

      CCC need to support developments like Water Street, like 21 Lavitts Quay, like Eglinton Street and so on. These are developments of a high standard and architectural nature. I reject parts of the argument that its because of CCCs stringent planning laws that development standards in Cork have dramatically increased – in part this is true – but look at Victoria Mills, looks at their decision on the Arbutus Lodge, look at their own development works at The Glen and Barrack Street! Their own developments are of a dismal architectural standard – how can they demand so much of others when they can’t lead by example?

      In Cork, the height of buildings in areas such as Victoria Cross, the docklands and surroundings – should not be points of rejection as long as their standard is strong and purpose both useful and sustainable – like Eglinton Street, like Water Street, like Jurys, Lavitts Quay, Cornmarket Street and Washington Street. These are good projects – and most be encouraged to show developers the way to go in future. These areas are outside the city core centre – however this core I agree should not stem above a 9 storey max in Zone 2 [bounding Jurys, Cornmarket Street, Georges Quay, Lapps Quay and Patrick’s Quay] or a 6-storey max in Zone 1 [Patrick’s Street, South Mall, North Main Street, Oliver Plunkett Street and Parnell Place].

      Protect our few precious estates, protect our high-standard leafy resdiential suburbs and encourage further development in the city centre and docklands – even if that means building up to utilise the limited space. The standard of architecture should determine a development more than the argument of height.



      *UPDATES*
      🙂 UCC have indicated their intention to begin preliminary work soon on their Western Road (former Greyhound Track) IT Campus – already permitted. the 15,000sq m + development of 3-storeys will be one of the most advanced centres in Europe. In addition, extensive landscaping will be initiated with a focus on the river. This will include a continuation of the riverside walk and boardwalk as far as College Gates. It will link up with the amenity walk as part of the Victoria Mills, which links up with the amenity walk and bridge as part of the Rathmelton Investments development at the Kingsley Hotel, which in turn links up with the Lee Fields. At College Gates, Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties) Jury’s Hotel development will pick up the walk with their riverside boardwalk leading all the way into Lancaster Quay and Washington Street.

      -> Ultimately, the grand plan will see a riverside walk and boardwalk extending from Eden Hall student development, through to the Lee Fields, along the Curragheen River from the Kingsley to Victoria Mills, along the UCC IT Campus, through the main UCC Campus and Lewis Glucksman Art Gallery to the Jurys Hotel development and into Washington Street. It continues then from South Main Street as part of the boardwalk element to the Kenny Group development on the Citi-Car Park facility, along South Mall to Lapps Quay (the first half of which CCC are suppose to redevelop in the coming months), to the City Quarter end of Lapps Quay (compliments of Howard Holdings), and along Custom House Quay (in line for development plans). 2 new pedestrian bridges (1 to Horgans Quay, 1 to Albert Quay) will then link up with boardwalks on either of these quays. One the main docklands commercial centre, the other leading down to Werdna’s Water Street development boardwalk. In addition, a walk will also stem from the Kingsley, through along the Mardyke Walk, along Fitzgearld’s Park and from the Mardyke Fields, a new pedestrian bridge (currently under construction at Harland & Wolff shipyard in Belfast – installation by Fleming Construction at cost of 1m euro) will link across to a boardwalk along the Distillery Fields at the North Mall (recently purchased jointly by the Mercy University Hospital and UCC for development).

    • #732715
      lawyer
      Participant

      Lexington is a great source of information to those of us who are not on the ‘inside track’.
      Keep up the good work.

    • #732716
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      As a rebel overseas but obviously interested in developments back home, this thread is manna from heaven. To Lex in particular, mickey docs and all the other regular posters, keep up the good work. Unusual to get a reasoned and concise view of planning and development matters in Cork when in Asia, nevermind back home! Cheers and thanks again.

    • #732717
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hey Corcaighboy, how’s Hong Kong as a place to live?
      The architecture must be awe inspiring.

      Originally posted by corcaighboy
      As a rebel overseas but obviously interested in developments back home, this thread is manna from heaven. To Lex in particular, mickey docs and all the other regular posters, keep up the good work. Unusual to get a reasoned and concise view of planning and development matters in Cork when in Asia, nevermind back home! Cheers and thanks again.

    • #732718
      lexington
      Participant

      Thank you for your kind acknowledgements.

    • #732719
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Re Tellengana Lodge Development,

      Sorry to be so long getting back on this one but the posts are getting longer than anything ever offered by Garethace albiet similar in style.

      I can see why Kevin & co didn’t object, it appears to have adequate screening of existing mature trees.

    • #732720
      lexington
      Participant

      But now a beautiful estate and gardens have been replaced by an office block in an area completely inappropriate for such a development. The road, as anyone who knows Blackrock Road will tell you, is so narrow, traffic regularly has to pull into the side to allow on-coming traffic pass. The estate lodge was demolished, and existing structures to the rear of the development (which date back to 1890) are overshadowed by the office block. This CG image can input non-existing trees all it wants for the sake of presentation – they don’t exist, many have been removed for the development – furthermore, somethings are just not right. I suppose you have to be familiar with the lodge, estates and suburb to understand the entirity.


      🙂 On a far more positive note – for those interested in what the new Kino Cinema development for Washington Street is due to look like (planning pending – the decision is due on Thursday 14th of Oct 2004) – visit http://www.ddesign.ie/projects.htm -> then go to the 3rd button under the title ‘Community’ and click on Load Images.

      I have to say, the development looks superb. Considering the space the new development is due on, it has been well utilised – it falls in line with the same height as other buildings neighbouring it (instead of the existing ground floor only) and brings a dynamic swing to an area undergoing exciting development.

    • #732721
      Anonymous
      Participant

      It is not the function of the National Trust For Ireland (An Taisce) to object principally to any scheme on the basis of inadequate road access, it is relevant to cite it as ‘another reason’ in particular cases but it in isolation is not enough.

      The montage of the scheme you are ‘whinging’ about looks fine, but no montage takes account of more than one angle. But in from the angle it looks fine, there are no other structures in the montage, so I don’t see how anyone could complain relying on that image.

      Lexington has often made the point that An Taisce ‘object to everything’, as soon as they don’t……..

      This thread has entirely ignored the proposed Luas for Cork which would do more for Cork than every other project mentioned here as the solutions.

    • #732722
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Diaspora,

      the ‘Luas’ proposal was the result of a UCC study as far as I know and i think referred to a link between rail station and city centre, and im unsure of what benefit this short link would have.

      i do think that a dedicated tram system may be viable from CIT-Curraheen- Bishopstown-University Hos.-Wilton-UCC-Washington St-Bus Station-South Docks-Blackrock-Mahon.

      no need to physically cross the river just to hit the train station, kenneddy quay on the south docks would be sufficient if the 2 pedestrian bridges across custom hse qy were in place.

      you are right, this has been ignored, probably because it was an Echo Story and sometimes the Echo should be read with spoons of salt

    • #732723
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      That same echo story had a quote from the city manager in which he stated that a tram system was not on the current list of priorities, but may be consideredin the distant future. The City Council is currently investing alot of money on quality bus corridors which cost significantly less and carry just as many people. The other priority has been the park&ride scheme which is to be extended to all major approach routes. The park&ride scheme in conjunction with quality bus corridors will provide an excellent service in several directions at a fraction of the cost of a tram system. The costs incurred, and the safety implications of the existing tram system in Dublin are enough to make other solutions seem far more reasonable.

      Originally posted by Diaspora
      It is not the function of the National Trust For Ireland (An Taisce) to object principally to any scheme on the basis of inadequate road access, it is relevant to cite it as ‘another reason’ in particular cases but it in isolation is not enough.

      The montage of the scheme you are ‘whinging’ about looks fine, but no montage takes account of more than one angle. But in from the angle it looks fine, there are no other structures in the montage, so I don’t see how anyone could complain relying on that image.

      Lexington has often made the point that An Taisce ‘object to everything’, as soon as they don’t……..

      This thread has entirely ignored the proposed Luas for Cork which would do more for Cork than every other project mentioned here as the solutions.

    • #732724
      lexington
      Participant

      -> CG Images of development are designed to reflect a project in it’s best light – to make the development more attractive to both potential customers and planners in order to get the project up and running. The reason I rarely make comments on developments outside of Cork – other than the ones I may have some involvement in – is because I can’t comment on a project I know an insufficient amount on. I think to pass an ‘okay’ based on a montage that, anyone familiar with the development will tell you, is inaccurate with relation to its environment – is a little non-sensical. I thought An Taisce (and I think it must be remember I am referring to An Taisce Corcaigh here) are supposedly Champions for a Quality Life??? Then how come, they can find fault with a project they feel ‘overshadows a warehouse reflectant of Cork’s industrial heritage’, but not a project that detracts from Cork’s fading green areas and public space? And defaces a valuable and historical Cork structure (Tellengana Lodge?). Its completely contradictory! Now, I’m not advocating ‘overshadowing’ a valuable heritage reference – but then this is the inconsistency of the organisation in Cork. And I said, they ‘object to everything except where it matters’. (The Glen, Barrack Street, Tellengana, Dunkettle House, Brideview’s proposal for Rochestown etc) A link I posted a while back, showing how An Taisce brought OSB to appeal is a good example of their behaviour – but I can get some real beauties posted in addition to that one if requested also. (I don’t have them online as of yet – some are still in the Planning Process).



      Furthermore, there is no ‘Luas-style’ proposal currently on the cards – this was an article by 2 UCC lecturers in the Evening Echo and then subsequently the Irish Times about the advantages of extending the new rail-link to Midelton into Patrick’s Quay utilising existing corridors (hence a very small additional cost). I agree with them on this – I also believe provisions of space should be made on future road developments to allow the possibility of a suburban rail network – hence no need for expensive CPOs and later provision. I’ve always advocated the use of rail links over more urban motorways. We should be encouraging and investing in efficient and substantial rail or guided bus corridors in Cork.

      A proposal back in 1996 suggested a guided-bus corridor from Curraheen -> Bishopstown (via CIT) -> Western Road (former Greyhound Track via Victoria Cross) -> UCC Main Campus -> Washington Street -> South Mall -> City Hall (Eglinton Street) -> Kennedy Quay -> Blackrock -> Mahon Point (along existing former rail corridors). The CATS (Cork Area Transport System) was to be link-up with suburban rail services to Blarney, Blackpool, Cobh and Midelton – the plan is even referenced in the Cork City Development Plan 2004 – but so far, no-one has got the move on. CCC, being quite frank, like the idea but have no real interest in fetting involved in such a system for the time-being. That’s a real shame. A number of private investors are continuing to assess the idea – but a number of cost complications and pathetic restrictions have been laid-down by CCC (they should be supporting it – its not costing them anything and its giving Cork a decent off-the-road transport system). Issues of cost and return are the predominant delay factors.

    • #732725
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      *UPDATES*

      🙁 O’Callaghan Properties (Riga Limited) have seen the decision date on their application for a huge development at the Jurys Hotel site on the Western Road in Cork pushed back until the 16th December 2004. Such a move was pretty much expected. The original decision date was due for the 10th of October (next week). The application is having a bumpy ride through planning – but it seems to have its champions at City Hall. With the number of objections lodged against the project, a grant may see the development brought before ABP. Its a shame really, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

      Yeah, pretty much expected though a bit surprised that the decision was extended by 10 weeks – 2 weeks longer than the actual planning decision period itself. Have CCC imposed similar extensions on other major projects recently?

      Agree Kino cinema looks great. Roll on tomorrow, keep us informed Lexington!!

    • #732726
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: UCC have attained permission for their development of over 60,000 additional square footage to the existing Boole Library on the main campus. The extension is proposed to the east of the existing library and was initially refused by planners until Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell intervened following talks with UCC. A number of modifications have since been proposed to minimise visual and pedestrian disruption. Wilson Architecture are the design firm behind the huge development. I personally think extending to the southern sunk courtyard made more sense – but its good news for UCC and especially UCC Students.

      🙁 The Kino Cinema has had its decision date pushed back until early December – the redevelopment will see the existing single-storey cinema demolished and rebuilt over 4 floors – the upper 3 catering for 3 new cinemas. Dennehy Design are responsible for the architecture – and they’ve done a superb job. I sincerely hope this application is granted.

    • #732727
      sw101
      Participant

      lexington, is there a means of getting in touch with you through this site? your messaging and e-mail seem to be disabled.

    • #732728
      Torquemada
      Participant

      Some breaking news on the School of Music,what will this mean to the start date for construction?

      http://www.irishexaminer.com/breaking/2004/10/13/story170848.html

    • #732729
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      oh dear

    • #732730
      Leesider
      Participant

      Does anyone know what is planned for the row of houses on the road opposite the old greyhound track?? heard it was supposed to be turned into student accommodation but for months there has been nothing about it as far as I know. Anyone shed some light?

    • #732731
      Leesider
      Participant
    • #732732
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      -> CG Images of development are designed to reflect a project in it’s best light – to make the development more attractive to both potential customers and planners in order to get the project up and running. The reason I rarely make comments on developments outside of Cork – other than the ones I may have some involvement in – is because I can’t comment on a project I know an insufficient amount on. I think to pass an ‘okay’ based on a montage that, anyone familiar with the development will tell you, is inaccurate with relation to its environment – is a little non-sensical. I thought An Taisce (and I think it must be remember I am referring to An Taisce Corcaigh here) are supposedly Champions for a Quality Life??? Then how come, they can find fault with a project they feel ‘overshadows a warehouse reflectant of Cork’s industrial heritage’, but not a project that detracts from Cork’s fading green areas and public space? And defaces a valuable and historical Cork structure (Tellengana Lodge?). Its completely contradictory! Now, I’m not advocating ‘overshadowing’ a valuable heritage reference – but then this is the inconsistency of the organisation in Cork. And I said, they ‘object to everything except where it matters’. (The Glen, Barrack Street, Tellengana, Dunkettle House, Brideview’s proposal for Rochestown etc) A link I posted a while back, showing how An Taisce brought OSB to appeal is a good example of their behaviour – but I can get some real beauties posted in addition to that one if requested also. (I don’t have them online as of yet – some are still in the Planning Process).

      Sitting where I’m sitting, I cannot see any other building (good or bad) in the montage you supplied, all I can see is the subject proposal and a number of mature trees that will screen the subject building.

      I suspect that you either live across the road from this proposal or commute to work along this route and wanted An Taisce to do your Nimby work for you.

      The major case in Cork that I was involved in (in a very minor way) was Flatley at Castlehyde House, which you have not heard the last of.

      If AT Cork feel a heritage building will be overshadowed they should say so, it is ultimately the Local Authority and the Bord who actually decide whether the building is worthy of absolute protection or not.

      As for your assertion as to the disappearance of green space in Cork, it is obvious that you are being entirely selective as to one site. With absolutely no reference to the amount of green space being used by your favourite architectural gems such as the Watergold Building and Mahon Point as well as any other suburban retail warehousing park that has a tenant list.

    • #732733
      lexington
      Participant

      Reviewed the plans for Rockfell’s Cornmarket Street project, and I must say, it’s looking very well.



      Leesider – the row of houses at Carmelite Place (across the road from the former Greyhound Track) were due to be demolished a rebuilt in the form of 20 student apartments with basement car-parking under 2-storeys. Permission for this was refused. The developer is in negotiation with the nearby AIB in securing their premises to establish more space (with AIB leasing a new ground floor premises) for a new as yet undisclosed application.



      sw101 – I don’t usually issue contact via this website. If there is an issue you wish to discuss in particular, could you brief me on this forum or outline what business you may be interested in and I’ll issue you a reply (through your messaging service perhaps???).



      As for Diaspora – you make such relevant and good arguments when you do not resort to the tone and laughable assumptions that you do quite often – especially to me. I never attack you personally and I would assume that grown-ups on these forums could respect the opinions of others. And where they do not agree with such opinions – be tall enough to look beyond them.

      The montage I issued was the only one I had available to me at the time. Understand that I may in this instance have a greater insight into this project than you at this particular time and don’t make foolish assumptions.

      As for letting An Taisce CORCAIGH do my nimbly work for me – as you put it – I would never do such a thing, nor would I trust them to do so. I have always, at my own expense, issued an objection where I feel relevant. And observation where I also feel relevant. If I do not do it directly, I fund reports for others of a similar persuasion to do so.

      As for Tellengana House – I do not live or commute in the area of its construction (another assumption) – but as a city citizen I believe I am entitled to have an opinion as to how it is developed. As is anyone else – where logic and reason are paramount in such processes.

      Watergold was constructed on a brownfield site – Mahon Point in commercially zoned land. Amenity space was catered for in line with the development – sufficiently. I also have invested significantly in a number of amenity areas and greenfields for conservation purposes (particularly around the Metropolitan Green Belt) – so don’t start that route. It’s also the reason I so very much favour city centre and docklands developments – so as to continue such preservation work.

      Also, I’ve never favoured Mahon Point architecturally. Please Diaspora, do your research before you feel so confident as to slam others – and when you’ve calmed down, I look forward to hearing your relevant insights (which are always appreciated as they offer an alternate perspective) once again. Pity.


    • #732734
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Calm Down,

      You must be joking to think that I would lose my cool over someone who started a thread called ‘down with An Taisce’

      I ignore this thread as much as possible, wading through Jack Fagan style tenant lists is about as interesting the architecture that will contain most of them.

      I only enter this discussion when you cross the line on members of an organisation that I am an active volunteer member of.

      Only once have they got it wrong from the images you have presented in my opinion, that was Water St and unfortunately that one didn’t make it anyway.

      I can appreciate that Cork needs new projects, but just not all of the ones on this thread are particularly wonderful. With prime office rents of 23-27 per square foot it is hardly surprising, but competitively priced space and good architecture seldom go together.

      I suggest that you are more selective in what you hype.

    • #732735
      lexington
      Participant

      Thank you Diaspora – your true face shows. I don’t need to say anymore.

    • #732736
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Thank you Diaspora – your true face shows. I don’t need to say anymore.

      Meaning exactly what?

      I have never made any secret that I was a fan of An Taisce, I was honoured to consult to them, as soon as I concluded my work, I joined, I have no influence whatsoever over their planning monitoring. I work with historical properties in a hands on way.

      I have also never said anything other than high property values equate to good architecture, take New York and more laterly London. Scarcity of quality stock drives up prices in that sub-market which allow for better architecture as the higher returns justify it.

      So if pointing out that there is a link between low rental levels and moderate at best in some cases design quality I must not get the point.

    • #732737
      lexington
      Participant

      Please – if, as you point out above, you try to avoid this thread as much as possible ‘wading through Jack Fagan style tenant lists’ – then clearly, you should perhaps avoid it full-stop. This is a thread for those who have an interest in Cork developments – and for those who wish to input constructively about them, or express a view with relation to them. If you wish to knock the progress of Cork, because Dublin is so mighty, then your input is unappreciated by me for one.

      This forum does not need the personal insults of a cat in a corner – you have plenty of other threads in which you can express such opinions. And if you must insult me, because that makes you feel better, do so – but take it elsewhere and make sure you are correctly informed, correctly justified and correctly aware of who I am and what it is I do before you choose to do so. I will no longer continue to engage in a tennis match of personal attacks, or attacks on my home city.

      [And by ‘your true face shows’ – I wasn’t referring to your An Taisce leanings – I was referring to the nature of your attitudes and low-brow level of reply in order to justify your opinion. I have never insulted you directly in such a way – I find it disappointing you have felt this to be your only method of response.]

    • #732738
      Anonymous
      Participant

      This is not Dublin putting Cork down thing,

      Cork has the makings of a fine City it has a University that punches far above its population weight and probably the best pharma industry per capita globally.

      As I have said before you can say mass here if you want, but you will be inviting the presence of a ‘Desperado’ as you so diplomatically put it if you unjustly attack the local An Taisce association.
      Phillip Mullalley of that branch has done more across a wide range of built and natural environmental fields than anyone of his generation.

    • #732739
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Diaspora
      Calm Down,

      You must be joking to think that I would lose my cool over someone who started a thread called ‘down with An Taisce’

      I ignore this thread as much as possible, wading through Jack Fagan style tenant lists is about as interesting the architecture that will contain most of them.

      I only enter this discussion when you cross the line on members of an organisation that I am an active volunteer member of.

      Only once have they got it wrong from the images you have presented in my opinion, that was Water St and unfortunately that one didn’t make it anyway.

      I can appreciate that Cork needs new projects, but just not all of the ones on this thread are particularly wonderful. With prime office rents of 23-27 per square foot it is hardly surprising, but competitively priced space and good architecture seldom go together.

      I suggest that you are more selective in what you hype.

      Just for the record.

    • #732740
      theblimp
      Participant

      Diaspora – chill out man. I have to say I agree with Lexington here. The Blackrock Road is entirely residential with a reasonable amount of ‘grand old houses’. This isn’t Ballsbridge – it is a reasonably sleepy suburb with a small access road that is unsuited to widening. In such circumstances I would have to say that an office facility is wholly inappropriate. Similarly I’ve always felt that the office block alongside Ashton School was totally out of place. If the grounds of this old house need to be developed then why not with something more sympathetic such as low-density high-end housing? For myself and many others Lexington provides a remarkably comprehensive insight into what’s happening on the ground here in Cork – yes, he does bash An Taisce regularly, sometimes with good reason, sometimes possibly not. But don’t take it personally – until such time as your posts start heading the proactive route rather than your current reactive model, I would strongly suggest that you relax. This thread has made it to 20 pages with some great insights – criticise the message by all means, but for all our sakes leave the messenger out of it.

    • #732741
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i have to agree with diaspora on the tellenganna issue.

      The blackrock road is not a sleepy suburban avenue and an occasional (limited) small office development is not particularly harmful. there is a demand for urban offices outside the central island, not all office users want a south mall or lapps quay location, nor do they all want suburban ‘industrial’ locations. better here than little island or the airport i say.

      in terms of traffic, the impact of the tellenganna development pales in comparison to the Lyonshall development in blackrock village.

      in relation to visual impact, im unsure as the montage is just a single impression. i have no difficulty with placing a contemporary building in these grounds, as it doesnt represent a loss of green space per se, its not public land, and has no recreational value as an unused private garden space.

      using the large gardens of major institutional or residential buildings is a dilemma. sometimes, however these happen to be in very central locations, and are hugely important urban land resources, also permitting limited development on these lands can be part of a trade off – this usually helps fund restoration/conservation of existing structures, and i think this is acceptable; and preferable to letting them rot away.

      Diaspora, leaving aside the debate on this issue, re AT and Cork in general, i think it uneccesary that you undermine the nature of certain people’s contributions (ie tenant lists etc).

      This thread is important, useful and valued by many, and contributions do not always relate directly to architecture or design, but is extremely informative for many (not all i appreciate). As someone with a keen interest in the City’s built environment and development scene, it happens to provide a rare insight into what is happening ‘down here’.

      there is limited public discussion/debate on our built environment in this country, and in Cork, opportunities are very limited. Its good to have access to a source such as this and to be able to debate/discuss the city….at last.

    • #732742
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Lexington, there is alot of people who enjoy your posts so please continue to post.

      Diaspora, thanks for representing An Taisce. I believe the frustrations with the planning system in Cork should not always stop at the feet of national government. Local government have made some truly tragic decisions.

      The National government of which An Taisce is representative have not helped areas outside of Dublin to develop in competition with Dublin. The general tax amnesties granted to the IFSC should have been granted to all the major cities of Ireland. Cork airport should also have been allowed to develop Transatlantic routes at the same time Dublin Airport received this privilege.

      The major problems that blight Dublin are a result of these unequivocal privileges. Dublin is a small European city trying hard to market itself as a global centre which it is not. Development has taken place irrespective of infrastructure and Dublin has changed from being an exciting and friendly city to a city with a population approaching the neurotic. Yesterday evening I had a cyclist shout profanities at me as I walked to my car with my four year old son for reasons only known to the cyclist. The feeling in the city is now one of frustration and many of my colleagues are now looking to relocate to either the provinces or other countries.

      I really hope Cork does not make some of the mistakes Dublin has made. Lexington is absolutely right in objecting to the tellenganna development because it is not right for its location. Traffic in this area is already creating problems, especially because this area is close to Parc Ui Chaoimh and the Showgrounds and suffer occasional upsurges in traffic volumes.
      This development would be ideal for the docklands area and as such the CCC should be encouraging developments such as this in leafy suburbs. Mahon Point is no more than two miles from this location and is already zoned for such developments. The NSC is a similar development yet it is located next to the South Link and traffic access isn’t an issue.

      Anywho that’s my piece. This thread is not a Cork versus Dublin thread. It is a thread which is of great interest to those of us interested in seeing Cork city and Environs develop into an international class city. It is the opinion of the majority of the posters here that Cork has the hinterland, population base, intellectual structure and connections to be a truly successful international city, and the majority of us live away from the city and have high hopes of the City attracting the kind of employers that will allow us top pursue our career goals without having to live in Dublin or London.

      We have created a Pharma centre of excellence, and now we should have our eyes on creating a centre of excellence for finance and ict.

    • #732743
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I do not understand how quoting prime rents can be used to support a theory when a tenant list is used to deride. Office space and costs provide a very good indication as Diaspora pointed out, however tenant lists are equally as important as it demonstrates the types of companies willing of invest in an area and the overall quality of an end product.
      Does anyone think that the redeveloped ILAC will be a success unless it can attract A-list tenants rather than the decidely mostly F-list it currently has. Good development is founded on the promise of a financial return. Bid hitting retail outfits with large pockets to pay large rents make it worth while to invest in a shiny impressive premises. The same applies to the Cornmarket St development so championed by Lexington.

    • #732744
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      I do not understand how quoting prime rents can be used to support a theory when a tenant list is used to deride. Office space and costs provide a very good indication as Diaspora pointed out, however tenant lists are equally as important as it demonstrates the types of companies willing of invest in an area and the overall quality of an end product.

      I know exactly what your saying and of course the ‘anchor tenant’ will make or break a scheme. But listing non-anchors lengthens the posts.

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      Does anyone think that the redeveloped ILAC will be a success unless it can attract A-list tenants rather than the decidely mostly F-list it currently has. Good development is founded on the promise of a financial return. Bid hitting retail outfits with large pockets to pay large rents make it worth while to invest in a shiny impressive premises. The same applies to the Cornmarket St development so championed by Lexington.

      The ILAC suffered for three reasons, firstly the type of retailer in the Irish market now wasn’t here when it first opened. The biggest names back then were all domestic or minor UK like BHS there were no Zara or House of Frazier looking for space in Ireland.

      Secondly most of the action was in the suburban shopping centres such as Northside or Dunlaiore, inner city Dublin was not a pleasant experience back then.

      Thirdly most of the better occupiers of the Ilac centre left for the better Jervis Centre in 1995, and rightly so.

      The Jervis Centre can withstand the onslaught that will be Dundrum because it is a pleasant space to shop in.

      Can the Central Merchants (Quay?) centre in Cork survive O’Callaghans edge city super mall?

      Todays a-list tenants are not necessarily going to be so prime in 5-10 years time fashions change the architecture remains.

      A bit of tax designation for the Docklands wouldn’t be a bad idea, the IFSC model works economically if not architecturally. As rents rise occupiers expect a better looking building, that is why I am often jealous of projects in London such as the Gherkin or even the older LLyods building.

    • #732745
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by Diaspora

      The Jervis Centre can withstand the onslaught that will be Dundrum because it is a pleasant space to shop in.

      Do we still need to present our passports before entering Jervis Centre? 🙂

    • #732746
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by phil

      Do we still need to present our passports before entering Jervis Centre? 🙂

      Sorry to be discussing this on a Cork thread but the theme carries through on the impacts of O’Callaghans giant scheme as well.

      There is over a million square feet of retail in the Dundrum scheme, it also has better access to some of the most affluent areas in the Country outside of West Cork of course.

      Blanchardstown will be down a good bit, Liffey Valley will be slaughtered and Jervis Centre will be down a lot less because they put the money into its design and fitout.

    • #732747
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by Diaspora

      Sorry to be discussing this on a Cork thread but the theme carries through on the impacts of O’Callaghans giant scheme as well.

      Yeah, I was feeling a little cheeky after posting, but I suppose my post related to the fact that nearly all the shops in Jervis are English chain-stores, as with so many other shopping centres, so it does relate to Cork aswell. ie: to what extent are these centres going to be place specific? ie: Is there much of a difference between large scale centres in Cork and Dublin? (or any where else in the country for that matter)

    • #732748
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Diaspora
      The Jervis Centre can withstand the onslaught that will be Dundrum because it is a pleasant space to shop in.

      Can the Central Merchants (Quay?) centre in Cork survive O’Callaghans edge city super mall?

      Todays a-list tenants are not necessarily going to be so prime in 5-10 years time fashions change the architecture remains.

      A bit of tax designation for the Docklands wouldn’t be a bad idea, the IFSC model works economically if not architecturally. As rents rise occupiers expect a better looking building, that is why I am often jealous of projects in London such as the Gherkin or even the older LLyods building.

      I agree the Jervis Centre is a pleasant place to shop and Project Management did a lovely job on it – with a considerate approach to its surroundings. I only pray for such consideration in the other O’Callaghan Properties retail development for Academy Street (right off Patrick’s Street) in Cork. The 6-storey over basement development will consume the entire block – the former Examiner HQ, Johnson & Perrott, Grand Circle Lounge, Taboo, TJS, Ryans and so on – and cost 150m euro (est’d). I should only hope a Jervis Centre standard is enacted. I’ll have first drafts in early Jan 2005 hopefully.

      Merchants Quay was originally developed by O’Callaghan Properties, Heron Property (UK) and Treasury Holdings. It was sold a few years ago to a First Active Trust. Therefore, MQ is not O’Callaghan’s concern, Mahon Point SC (60,000sq m gross + retail park) is. And in a few years, The Academy Plaza will be his concern when CGNU or such funds buy into O’Callaghan’s stake in conjunction with Deka. The reason I list tenants, regardless of status (and I only did it once) is because it reflects the investment trends in Cork – and also displays the confidence various businesses install in the region. Even if an established retailler like Pull & Bear wish to open another store at MP, it shows the confidence they reflect in their business here.

      I agree trends come and go, architecture lasts – and that is why I have never been a fan of MP’s design (despite beliefs otherwise) and would be a fan of say, Cornmarket Street Development – it is a considerate design with respect to the city centre and existing historical structures.

      In addition, Ballincollig Town Centre, reflects another large scale retail SC (40,000sq m gross) and will house 3 large anchor stores in addition to 35 further retail units of varying sizes. A good tenant list has been composed.

      As for Docklands Tax Designation – this issue is something I am actively involved in and it is a work in progress. I just hope our efforts succeed.

    • #732749
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Tax breaks coupled with better transatlantic access are the catalysts needed to make the docklands project work.

      Seems to me that Michéal Martin has been appointed as the Minister for Enterprise at a very good moment in time for Cork 🙂

      Originally posted by lexington

      I agree the Jervis Centre is a pleasant place to shop and Project Management did a lovely job on it – with a considerate approach to its surroundings. I only pray for such consideration in the other O’Callaghan Properties retail development for Academy Street (right off Patrick’s Street) in Cork. The 6-storey over basement development will consume the entire block – the former Examiner HQ, Johnson & Perrott, Grand Circle Lounge, Taboo, TJS, Ryans and so on – and cost 150m euro (est’d). I should only hope a Jervis Centre standard is enacted. I’ll have first drafts in early Jan 2005 hopefully.

      Merchants Quay was originally developed by O’Callaghan Properties, Heron Property (UK) and Treasury Holdings. It was sold a few years ago to a First Active Trust. Therefore, MQ is not O’Callaghan’s concern, Mahon Point SC (60,000sq m gross + retail park) is. And in a few years, The Academy Plaza will be his concern when CGNU or such funds buy into O’Callaghan’s stake in conjunction with Deka. The reason I list tenants, regardless of status (and I only did it once) is because it reflects the investment trends in Cork – and also displays the confidence various businesses install in the region. Even if an established retailler like Pull & Bear wish to open another store at MP, it shows the confidence they reflect in their business here.

      I agree trends come and go, architecture lasts – and that is why I have never been a fan of MP’s design (despite beliefs otherwise) and would be a fan of say, Cornmarket Street Development – it is a considerate design with respect to the city centre and existing historical structures.

      In addition, Ballincollig Town Centre, reflects another large scale retail SC (40,000sq m gross) and will house 3 large anchor stores in addition to 35 further retail units of varying sizes. A good tenant list has been composed.

      As for Docklands Tax Designation – this issue is something I am actively involved in and it is a work in progress. I just hope our efforts succeed.

    • #732750
      satanta99
      Participant

      I do not think that the Mahon point scheme, which Diaspora refers to as “O’Callaghans edge city super mall” will have as strong an effect as he suggests. Although it is a large de-centred development, it will be strongly linked into the core, through a network of green bus routes and park and ride sites. It is my opinion that the local authorities in Cork have taken a wholistic approach to the retail strategy for the region. After the formation of three local authorites in Dublin, ( not sure of their respective titles Fingal, Dun Laoghaire Rathdown and South Dublin) each one acted in their own interest to allow retail schemes to go ahead in their area, perhaps the prospect of loosing out on the rates a liffey valley or Dundrum would bring to their budget, to another authority was too horrible to contemplate. So that is why I propose that Cork has developed a more balanced retail strategy for the Cork Metropolitan region through the cooperation of our 2 local authorities, which places Cork city centre firmly on the top of our retail hierachy.

    • #732751
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      No disrespect Diaspora, but inner-city Dublin is still not a pleasant experience (with the exception of Grafton Street).

      Having lived in Paris and Brussels I find our nations capital to be a dreadfully uninspiring place. I have lived here for quite a while now and will soon return to the continent.

      My long-term goal of course is to return to Cork, which is why I am so keen to see Cork establish itself in sectors other than the Pharma-Health Industry sphere. To date we have been at a disadvantage in attracting ICT and Financial operations due to the fact that both Limerick and Dublin can offer direct access to transatlantic flights, and both areas enjoy tax-free areas… which is clear and unambiguous proof that Cork has been at an unfair disadvantage due to central government policy for a very long period of time.

    • #732752
      satanta99
      Participant

      The World Economic forum has mentioned the central economic policies of Ireland as one of the factors which has kept Ireland from moving up the list of most competitive countries this year.
      Is this proof enough of the narrow vision which persists in the eyes of policymakers in this country? Do they live in a reality which doesn’t stretch beyond the Pale? Maybe when the whole East coast has become one large Technoburb of Dublin, in which people spend half their lives in their cars, they might de-centralise a few civil servants and sure the problem will instantly vanish.
      We need to implement proper spatial planning in this country and enable other centres of population to grow, at a sustainable level, as a serious counterpoint to Dublin.
      In Cork we have the oppurtunity to do this. The docklands, in my opinion, is not just vital for the City but also the whole country. It could provide a viable alternative to Dublin, which I think would be better for traffic on the M50 than any spagetti junction on the Red Cow Roundabout.

    • #732753
      lexington
      Participant

      Although much of the points above are entirely relevant and well-made -> I’m a little apprehensive on the formation of a ‘Cork vs Dublin’ attitude here. I think we need to adopt a proactive approach – we need to say yes, Cork has excellent potential, Cork has already many superb features – but we need to analyse the mistakes other cities have made at home and abroad and say, how do we avoid this in an effort to develop Cork as its own freestanding international centre of excellence? I admit Cork has been put at a disadvantage in many respects w.r.t. tax breaks and so forth – so our mission now should be to do something about it. I spend a lot of time going back and forth to Dublin, and it must be said that there can be a bit of a ‘there’s more than Dublin???’ attitude up sometimes – but proactive, well prepared, well supported and well presented cases speak louder than any other form of plea. Cork is my home, and I have a great confidence in the city – more than any other city in Ireland. Even standing outside Wilton Shopping Centre at 2am, with a near full car-park and Tesco full of shoppers – speaks volumes to me. It shows how affluent Cork has become and how positive the market here looks. Let’s get out there and so them all how its done!

    • #732754
      phatman
      Participant

      Does anyone know what’s going on at the william o brien site on bandon road? there’s been groundwork going on there for the last few weeks, are there any intentions of developing this site for commercial/retail purposes? I do remember hearing about ward anderson’s plans for a cinema there a few years back, but havent heard anything since. Further out the road there seems to be a large development in the works also, any info?What about the dockyard in passage west, i saw drawings for quite an attractive apartment scheme a few years back, coupled with marina i think, i havent heard anything though since, and there has been no activity down that way that i know of. quite a pity actually, it was aesthetically refreshing, and would have served a major improvement to the towns streetscape, aswell as an interesting feature on entering the upper harbour for boats.was this proposal turned down?for what reasons?any info appreciated

    • #732755
      anto
      Participant

      Originally posted by phatman
      Does anyone know what’s going on at the william o brien site on bandon road? there’s been groundwork going on there for the last few weeks, are there any intentions of developing this site for commercial/retail purposes? I do remember hearing about ward anderson’s plans for a cinema there a few years back, but havent heard anything since. Further out the road there seems to be a large development in the works also, any info?What about the dockyard in passage west, i saw drawings for quite an attractive apartment scheme a few years back, coupled with marina i think, i havent heard anything though since, and there has been no activity down that way that i know of. quite a pity actually, it was aesthetically refreshing, and would have served a major improvement to the towns streetscape, aswell as an interesting feature on entering the upper harbour for boats.was this proposal turned down?for what reasons?any info appreciated

      Passage West…. Couldn’t be built because of the Fertilizer plant across the way( danger of exploding) But since IFI has closed maybe we’ll see it again.

    • #732756
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 A plan has been launched to develop a new medical facility on the site of the former Bowen Construction HQ on the Lee Road. The 7m euro project will provide for 17 consultant suites and associated works. An application has be lodged with Cork County Council this week – construction is hoped to begin in mid-Jan 2005.

      🙁 Clinton Cards who had been paying prime Zone A rents on their 1,850sq ft premises on Patrick’s Street, Cork have Closed Down their store. The UK Cards Company had been paying 4273 euros per sq m! (or 508,000 euro p.a.)

      – The company cited intense competition from Hallmark, Thoughts, Porters and the many other card companies operating within the immediate area. In light of this competition plus rents (which were being reassessed and rounded up for 2005) – the company issued a statement saying competition in the city centre made for unviable sustainability for such a business. It said that it intends to forge ahead with its Mahon Point store due for a Feb 2005 launch – as this premises should allow for sole market access at this location. Clinton Cards, who are also experiencing financial turbulence at home in the UK, said that though the market was ripe in Cork for such services as they provide, it was a market that was dominated by established entities on Patrick’s Street and a market they could not successfully penetrate.

      Sad news, but already, another major international store operator has been cited for the Clinton premises. Monsoon (right next store) are also rumoured to be trying to expand their highly successful store – this may provide the perfect opportunity.

      🙂 JD Hotels are due to receive a decision on their plans for 77/78 Grand Parade tomorrow (Tues 19th Oct). The company plans to demolished 78 Grand Parade (retaining the facade of 77), 1,2,3,4,5,6 & 7 Tobin Street, and redeveloped the site in the form of a 4-storey restaurant and late-night bar with ancillary offices. The design is by Wilson Architecture.

    • #732757
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Many people suggested that the city centre was already well covered for such products. This area of the city is well-suited to a bistro type development. It’s a shame that the owners of the Victoria Hotel do not have the vision to invest in their hotel, including the establishment of a bistro at the clinton cards (Burgerland :)) site.

      🙁 Clinton Cards who had been paying prime Zone A rents on their 1,850sq ft premises on Patrick’s Street, Cork have Closed Down their store. The UK Cards Company had been paying 4273 euros per sq m! (or 508,000 euro p.a.)

    • #732758
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: O’Flynn Construction’s 7 year, 500m euro Ballincollig Town Centre development in the western suburbs of Cork city is seeing its firts 28 houses come on the market, with Sherry Fitzgerald handling enquiries. The houses on sale, part of the Old Quarter element, start at 355,000 euro for a 3 bedroom semi-detached. They will be the first batch of ultimately 791 units in all.

      Nearby at the Murphy’s Barracks Square, as part of the BTC development, over 120,000sq ft of office space is due to get under construction in the next few months.

      However, its news on the Ballincollig Town Centre Shopping Centre that people seem anxious about. The BTC SC will be 44,000sq m in gross space – internal space will be only 17,875sq m – with 3 anchor tenants and 35 smaller retail units. O’Flynn Construction have informed me they have a quality line-up under final negotiation – and according to Colliers Jackson-Stops and HOK, the units have attracted a lot of interest. In an early post I deducted that a possible tenant could be Marks & Spencers (although a certain Cork tabloid quoted me as saying [non-acknowledgedly] that it was a dead cert) – who had been actively pursuing an additional Cork city store – but due to financial troubles back home, had had their hands tied, and were unable to locate at Mahon Point – ultimately, Tesco stepped into that position. It seemed BTC was an ideal location – Dunnes Stores had 2 stores nearby at Bishopstown Court and Bishopstown SC (both which were undergoing expansion) – it would seem a poor strategic move to locate at BTC given the proximity of the other 2 stores. SuperValu already had 2 stores in Ballincollig. Superquinn had been quoted as saying it was enticing but not part of the strategic growth plan. Tesco were already investing heavily in Wilton and Mahon Point (Tesco bought Wilton SC for 80m euros from a trust fund and spent a further 12m renovating and extending it). So, with all the major players to one side, M&S seemed the ideal choice – given their history and earlier intentions. However, I am informed that Dunnes Stores have made a serious bid proposal to anchor the grocery element (and possible clothing anchor) at BTC. O’Flynn have told me that they are at least 1 of 3 bidders – but the favourite. I am aware of the other 2, but I’m not sure of the extent of their bids and negotiations. In a city saturated by Dunnes Stores already (who are reviewing expansion plans for their Patrick’s Street original store) – do we really need another one? A little choice would be nice. In Cork it’s either Tesco, Dunnes or SuperValu – M&S to a lesser extent. I, personally, would like to see a little variation. I’ll let you know further details soon.

      Apologises, but I have been advised to remove the BTC tenant list until a more appropriate time later this year, or earlier next year.

      The BTC SC is due to open October 2005.

    • #732759
      Pana01
      Participant

      Speaking of Clinton Cards closing down, I was speaking with an employee of that old Cork institution O’Donovans butchers on Princes St, which has been a hive of activity for many a long year.

      I was shocked when he informed me that they are closing down. The reason? Business is way down, and customer feedback indicates that lack of parking and cost of same is driving people out of the city.

      Will CCC do anything to help (apart from Park and Ride, which may not entice enough people)?

      Still on my rant – will that vile Portakabin outside H. Samuel ever go? It will look great under the new Christmas lights, I’m sure.

    • #732760
      theblimp
      Participant

      …speaking of Christmas lights – I recall that we were promised an amazing new display for this year. That message was put out over a year ago and I have heard nothing since. Anyone know if there are indeed plans for something new?

    • #732761
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Donovan’s stretched themselves by opening up an unsuccessful butchers in the blackpool shopping centre. They are also far more expensive than their English market neighbours and are finally losing the battle.

      The plans for the xmas lights are posted somewhere on this post.

      Originally posted by theblimp
      …speaking of Christmas lights – I recall that we were promised an amazing new display for this year. That message was put out over a year ago and I have heard nothing since. Anyone know if there are indeed plans for something new?

    • #732762
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah there are plans – I think I posted a CG image of the lights for this year in an earlier post. It looks very nice I must say – subtle but nice. Predominantly trees wrapped in white-light netting. Thank heavens – no more tacky red and yellow bands from the 1960s stringing across Patrick’s Street.



      *UPDATES*

      😡 JD Hotels have seen their planning decision for 77/78 Grand Parade pushed back until 3rd December this year. CCC are making an awful habit of such behaviour lately.

    • #732763
      lexington
      Participant

      Below is an image of the soon to be redeveloped Douglas Village Shopping Centre. The Centre is owned by Clayton Love (Shipton Group) also owners of the Blackpool SC and new Blackpool Retail Park (notice the similar logos). Design in by Wilson Architecture.

    • #732764
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lexington – I heard some time back of plans to re-develop the current Cinemaworld in Douglas. Story I heard was that a group had also an interest in the current Perm.TSB bank on main street and planned to run a very high-end small shopping mall between the main street around to the cinema site with a boutique hotel overhead. Initial rationale was that the cinema would cease to be profitable upon the opening of Ward Andersons new move in Mahon Point – have you heard anything on this? If it’s already been posted here then I apologise and will immediately take myself outside, grab a branch and flog myself thoroughly!!!

    • #732765
      sw101
      Participant

      lexington, international man of mysterious resourcefulness.

    • #732766
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      RE: Cinemaworld, I heard something similar, but then they went and renovated the facilty… so maybe a long term project. The Mahon Point Cinema will leave it in the dust though as this is an ageing inadequate place.

      RE: Douglas Shopping Centre – the only thing that interests me there is the new traffic lay out proposed – bye bye roundabout, hello bypass.

    • #732767
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes – development plans were in tow for Cinema World in Douglas, however, the plans have been put to one side. Cinema World will not be closing in the near future for the same reasons the Capitol Cineplex is not being redeveloped. Cinema numbers in Cork are up and ar record high-levels. Income at all of Cork’s cinemas has been substantially increased in the last few years – between 2003 and 2004 revenue increased by almost 48% (largely from increased lobby sales). The development plans for Cinema World originally did comprise of an expansion to the east (currently vacant greenfield) – it was their intention to add a further 6 screens and compete with the Omniplex at Mahon Point. These plans were abandoned fearing oversupply in the immediate area come 2005 – and subsequently, new plans were drawn up – of these I’m not clear, but I’ll look into it – however, an expansion may be yet again on the cards as a result of revised optimistic projections and rise in visit levels.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 31m euro has been allocated to the the first phase of the long awaited Knocknaheeny redevelopment project. CCC have received funding (predominantly from public sources, with some private input) to begin the project – it will take a total of 7 to 9 years depending on funding – to complete. The development consists of a number of local authority housing being substantially renovated and extended, up to 501 new residential units, new community facilities, medical facilities, educational developments, shopping facilities and a remodelling of existing amenity and commercial areas.

      For a more insightful visual of the plan for Knocknaheeny, visit the Urban Designers behind the project, Wain Morehead Architects, here -> http://www.wma.ie/default_files/slide0024.htm



      😡 ALSO, if you want to grind your teeth in absolute frustration – visit the following link to see what the Bus Station on Andersons Quay could have and should have been – before Bus Eireann (CIE) took their usual half-assed route and decided to provide a novelty paint-job to the existing station. -> http://www.wma.ie/default_files/slide0025.htm


    • #732768
      Lorcan
      Participant

      the picture on that is so small its hard to see what the ‘proposal’ is like. what happenend to the millenium clock by the way?

    • #732769
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Lorcan
      the picture on that is so small its hard to see what the ‘proposal’ is like. what happenend to the millenium clock by the way?

      It became a Millenium Bridge – which subsequently didn’t get constructed until this year!



      Sometimes I wonder if the Irish Examiner is with it at all – a frontpage article in today’s paper (21st Oct 2004) announced that Rockfell Investments had received planning permission for a ‘100m euro redevelopment of the Guy & Co building on Cornmarket Street’. No-one seems to have told them permission was granted almost 3 weeks ago (as posted here). Hmmm. And apparently now the cost is 100m euro – as opposed to the 35 – 45m (not incl. excavational work and preliminary works) indicated by the developer themselves. That’s good reporting for ya! 🙂



      Images of the new UCC Boole Library extension are on my hard-drive – I’ll try and have them up for you later today.



      Finally – though this has NOTHING to do with architecture or developments – I’d just like to wish a successful & safe trip to all those walkers travelling from Ireland to Vietnam with the Christina Noble Children’s Foundation today. The walkers are crossing the northern peaks of Vietnam to raise funds for the street children of Vietnam and Mongolia – as well as Ireland. Best of luck to all of them!;)

    • #732770
      anto
      Participant

      God, does any development in Douglas deserve to be on an Architeture web site. The place is an architectural waste land!!

    • #732771
      kesey
      Participant

      Lexington,

      Thanks for all the contributions. Superb info.

    • #732772
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Probe into how historic city church faced demolition

      ADVERTISEMENT

      A MAJOR investigation is underway in Cork into the partial demolition of an historic church associated with famous temperance campaigner Fr Mathew.

      Horrified locals contacted Cork City Council yesterday when they realised a demolition crew had begun dismantling the famous city centre church on Blackmore Lane, off Fr Mathew Quay.

      The church, which is understood to be almost 200 years old, had been in a near-derelict condition for some time.

      However, locals were adamant that they received no notification of its impending demolition – and that the structure’s historic nature should have ensured its preservation.

      Once alerted, the city council sent a planning enforcement inspector to the site – and he immediately ordered that all work be suspended.

      An investigation is now underway and a special meeting to discuss the demolition work will take place today. It was unclear last night what preservation status, if any, was attached to the old church structure.

      Arthur Leahy of the Quay Co-op said: “Surely it could have been saved or converted for some use”.

    • #732773
      Leesider
      Participant

      A few questions for those in the know!!

      what is to happen to the silos down the docks, are they still in use? presume they are going to be knocked at some stage?

      what exactly is going up on the old An Post site? anyone got pictures of what is planned? Has it started yet?

      any move yet on Horgan’s Quay??

      I know some of these have been dealt with before but any updates would be appreciated!

    • #732774
      lexington
      Participant

      -> R&H Hall Grain Silos – were to be developed a number of years ago, as apartments (after their demolition). Plans were later abandoned for this. The Cork City Development Plan 2004 and Docklands Development Plan 2003/4 outline the predominantly commercial usage allocated for the southern docklands – with the northern docklands (Horgan’s Quay) zoned for residential (in the majority) with associated commercial facilities. IAWS, owners of R&H Hall, are actively negotiating development plans for this site.

      -> An Post Sorting Office on Eglinton Street was purchased for 15m euro last Feb 2004 by O’Flynn Construction. They have lodged an application with CCC, for a mixed use development of 217 luxury apartments, offices, retail and leisure space – with a landmark 17-storey building in the south-western corner of the site. Images are posted in the previous page of this thread (as far as I remember).

      -> Though a number of plans have been drawn up for Horgan’s Quay – by persons including Treasury Holdings and Manor Park Homes – CIE have been dragging their heels on the process. Among the plans, one option includes up to 5000 residential units, a landmark civil amenity plaza (town square), offices, commercial (retail) street-scape/centre and new railway station. A number of high-rise (between 17 – 20-storey) landmark buildings were planned for the site. I just this morning heard that a number of private stakeholders in the development plans are drawing up an ultimatum for CIE on the site – failing which, they will be opting to focus their interests elsewhere. I don’t know how solid this information is – but I’ll get back to you if it’s not reliable. It’s about time someone dug their heels in and gave CIE a slap on the face.

    • #732775
      lexington
      Participant

      Last Saturday The Irish Examiner ran an article on a proposed 500m euro PPP Northern Loop/Ring road for Cork city. The proposed road would extend from the Ballincollig By-Pass Poulavane Roundabout – then continue on a 5km tunnel under the Lee Valley area resurfacing near Blarney – passed an interchange with the Mallow Dual-Carriageway linking up at the N8 intersection just north of Glanmire. This – combined with the Jack Lynch Tunnel and Southern Ring Road would create a full-loop dual-carriageway right around Cork city. Est.’d tunnel costs = 300m according to the article. Apparently plans have been lodged with the NRA – we’ll see. Although I welcome such progressive development news – is it really the right kind of progressive? I acknowledge Cork city traffic is desperately clogged on an almost continuous basis – but I’m still a firm believer in us investing in a better commuter and suburban rail system. We should be looking to remove cars from the streets full-stop – not just send them off in a different direction. Its a huge investment for a short-sighted solution.



      Also, a full-page spread appeared today in the Irish Examiner (25th Oct 2004) condemning O’Callaghan Properties Jurys Hotel development. The author, Ms Leland, is a typical example of the archaic and downright backward mentalities that can exist in Corkonian and Irish minds. I completely agree that St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral is a stunning architectural monument – and I whole-heartedly and passionately campaign to see it protected visual, structurally etc etc – but the visual impact of the proposed development is excessively dramatised. How is it that an architectural disgrace such as Victoria (shudder) Mills gets through planning without a whiff and something, even praised architecturally by An Taisce (but not too much, they still found fault with something), is facing unfair critiscism? I remain sceptical about the viability of the project but I support it as a progressive and architecturally/aesthetcially sound addition to the Cork cityscape. God knows, we need more projects of increased standard in the city centre. I view St Fin Barre’s everyday from on high heading into the city – I have seen the EIS and the impact studies, and if anything, the development positively contributes to the city skyline. St. Fin Barre’s, yes, is mildly obstructed, but only to a certain point – it in no-way takes away from its grandesque, outstanding form. Its a symbol of Cork and I would never wish to see it damaged – the development really does not do that. Its tallest building (9 storeys) is a slim profile, glazed block which lowers then to a height no more obtrusive than nearby Sharman Crawford Hall’s clock-tower.



      Another really irritating happening is that of the CAHRA (Community Anti High-Rise Association) – who, acting on Jackie Healy-Rae (of Kerry) & son’s advice, are seeking Section 140 intervention to over-ride any greenlighting for a project proposed by O’Shea Builders Ltd. on Farranlea Road (near Victoria Cross).

      A number of issues arise here – first of all, the proposed 81-unit development is divided over a number of buildings, the tallest equalling 5-storeys. (Anti High-Rise???!!! Last time I checked 14 stories up just about qualifies as HIGH-rise.) Second, the residents want the development – just not now because they’re sick of construction activity in the area. Third, enacting Section 140 is a costly (to tax-payers) strategy (just ask Kerry County Council!) and has wide-reaching consequences (negative) if proceeded with. Furthermore, such a labourious process can very readily be overturned on appeal to ABP by the developer.

      I’m completely respectful of residents objecting to a development on a relevant ground – it’s their democratic right. I’ve done it too when I believed it appropriate. But does anyone else see a problem with the above grounds adopted by CAHRA? 5 storeys (the area is already predominantly this height, with developments in Victoria Cross predominantly between 5 and 9 storeys)??? Anti High-Rise??? We want the develop, just not now??? We’ll waste tax-payers money on something that can easily be overturned??? Could the residents at the very least object as normal – and respect the decision of the LA. If they are displeased with the outcome, then approach ABP. Why undermine Local Government, rip-off the tax-payer and object against a project that doesn’t even qualify for grounds on which the objecting organisation is based? It’s a bad move for all concerned. If they’re grounds for objection are genuinely relevant and strong enough – this will be reflected in the planning decision.

    • #732776
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lexington – I do not know what that woman is on – she breates developers greed and the Jury’s development in general. Yet this is the same person who complains that the new (awesomely stunning) gallery in UCC wasn’t well received locally.
      I was on Lancaster Qy yesterday (down for de Jazz boy!) – there are essentially no views of Finbarres from there – that awful guest house next to Jurys totally blocks the view and two-storey Jury’s itself manages to block a good 4/5th’s as is. If people are going to argue about Jury’s, come up with a more relevant point. The impact on the local secondary school for example.

      As for Victoria Cross – where exactly is the development proposed? Victoria cross isn’t exactly a leafy suburban area. Also the locals should talk to their councillors about the “high rises”. That area is specifically marked as suitable for tall buildings in current dev plan for the city.

    • #732777
      orlz
      Participant

      I cant believe you would even begin to criticise Cork without mentioning the hideous stick-on extension to the Opera House and the frightening office building just down the quay from it currently under construction! Truly a nightmare addition to the city! But as for the “cheap office blocks” giving Irelands architects a bad name; maybe you should check if architects are involved in the design of these buildings at all – which mostly they are not!- before blaming them for something which (lets be honest here) they have no control over! And even though you correctly call Cork Irelands second largest city you are annoyed that “a nice little area” well within the city centre, is being urbanised. Cork cannot reach the significant status you think it deserves without some change! Cork turned its back on positive architectural and urban development when it allowed the freakishly bad Merchants Quay development to be built and the subsequent systematic destruction of its quayside architecture! Corks most valuable asset : the river and its wide quays, boulevard-like in some places, is consistently ignored by developers and now they have ruined Patrick St. too. We are blind to the urban planning and densification mistakes Dublin and even London have made and refuse to learn from it. When will we see that inappropriate housing estate sprawl and ugly office developments are not the way to improve Corks urban image?!?!

      Originally posted by speakeasy
      This is a great website, really interesting even for the non architect types like me. But whats with all the discussion about Dublin? Cork is Ireland’s second largest city and hardly gets a mention! Theres all sorts of bad stuff going on in this City which needs discussion. I strongly beleive that web sites like this do make a difference and are a great voice.

      Lots of new developments which seem to have escaped any public scrutiny at the planning stage (surprise surprise) are being thrown up in Cork. The City is losing its character, fast, because of cheap office blocks which are actually worse than the many mistakes built in the 1960’s.

      Take for example the new development on Lapps Quay opposite the beautiful City Hall and next to the even more aesthetically pleasing Cork Savings Bank (now AIB). This, you would think, should be an area to preserve. But sadly the hideous old Eircom building on the Quay is being made look even more awful and a huge area has also been cleared to make way for air raid shelter type apartments and offices. Up the road at Anglesea street, a nice little area with lots of old well preserved buildings, is a new office block, which looks like it was designed by the same people who came up with the EBS building on dame street Dublin. This thing is monstrous, it dwarfs an adjoining pub and looks totally out of character in this street. What is going on? Who designs these things? Does anyone notice how shocking they are? Does anyone care? Cmon you Dubs, Cork is a part of this nation too… pay us some attention! Ireland’s architects are going to get a bad name from all this rubbish being

    • #732778
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Against stiff opposition, Tesco Ireland have secured planning for a petrol station development as part of its redeveloped Wilton SC. Local petrol stations had complained against the development – which, as stations in Killarney and Dublin have shown, provide significantly reduced fuel prices – badly needed in today’s high-price fuel market. Fears by competitors should be met with a willingness to compete and find ways to reduce operational costs. This is competition sorely needed – and great news for motor fuel consumers.



      🙂 Dermot Coveney of Coveney & Associates has lodge the Further Info after a request made by CCC relating to John Mannix’s 40 – 42 Washington retail, office and residential development. The Further Info was lodged after 5 months – a decision date on the project is due on the 18 of November 2004, next month.

    • #732779
      lexington
      Participant

      One of the most frequently asked questions on this thread is that of ‘What’s happening with Horgan’s Quay?’ Well, I’ve been anxious to make available drawings on some of the masterplans for the quay – and now I can.

      The images you see below are those drawn up by a team led by Wilson Architecture for Horgan’s Quay and Kent Station. The team was commisiond by a leading development group in conjunction with Cork Corporation (at the time) and CIE. I can’t name the developers at the moment, but if you know, you know.

      This plan was one of 4 masterplans devised for the northern docklands. Wilson Architecture adopted a more low-rise approach to the redevelopment with a max. height of 6 – 7 storeys along Railway Street and up to 9 storeys facing onto the Lower Glanmire Road. The taller elements consisted of a multi-storey car-park for Kent Station (up to 800 parking spaces), a public multi-storey car-park (up to 1000+), offices and a retail development extending from the Lower Glanmire Road to Horgan’s Quay and opening out onto a central public amenity plaza. A new tilting pedestrian bridge extends from this new pedestrian plaza (which juts out over the river) across to Custom House Quay (a proposal that is now be seriously addressed by another development company as we speak).

      Kent Station faces out quayside with a new concourse and road-system.

      If you look to the left of the taller proposed retail centre – you will see a number of vacant warehousing and showroom facilities – as part of this masterplan, a developer had asked the design team to conduct a feasibility study into a multi-purpose concert and convention hall (championed by Joe Gavin – in fact this is where he got his initial idea for such a venue on Horgan’s Quay). Part of the retail element would be omitted on the Horgan’s Quay side and the facility would extend over Railway Street to a continued development to be built replacing these vacant warehouses and showrooms (circa. 175,000sq ft w/ a 6,000 seat capacity in theatre style, and large open area convention style floor in alternate use). The parking would be catered for in the public multi-storey facility and entrance to both retail/leisure and theatre venues would front out onto the plaza.

      The remainder of the redevelopment along Horgan’s Quay would consist of a number of offices and apartment facilities as far as Water Street – with public and residential amenities scattered throughout. A boardwalk, cafes and new docking area would be provided for visiting naval vessels.

      However, this masterplan, although still an option in some respects – has been kind of put to one side in favour of alternate options – these plans focus more on high-rise, with a view to increased public amenity space and a more ‘town centre’ style quality. A number of landmark towers are planned in one design (and I am told they are of exceptional international quality – with an as yet undisclosed international design team responsible for at least one of the buildings). If I can, at some point in the future – I’ll get my hands on these plans for you. But for now, here’s just a taste of what may or may not be yet to come. (Knowing CIE none of them will come – but hey, optimism!) 🙂

      Also, at the far end of the development, one can see the existing site for the Water Street development. MOLA tell me a new application is expected in either late December or early January 2005.

    • #732780
      Mob79
      Participant

      Thank God there was another paragraph beneath the photograph, my heart was sinking there.

    • #732781
      theblimp
      Participant

      I like the ‘plaza’ element (I assume it goes over the road?) and the link to Custom House Quay – apart from that….yawn!

    • #732782
      phatman
      Participant

      Well, good to see there is some serious attempt to the redevelopment of horgans quay, but im sure i speak for nearly everyone in saying this is a disappointing and uninspired proposal.it has no distinguishing features as such, save the curius plaza type thing, it really would be such a pity to waste such a valuable development site on a lowrise boring proposal like this, weve made too many mistakes like this in cork in the past, this really is an opportunity to put cork on the international architecture map, and create a vibrant new city quarter.This proposal doesnt complement the water street scheme at all, and would make the latters impact more severe, even though i am all for water street, dont get me wrong, but as part of an overall integrated docklands scheme.but as lexington put it, there are more propsals, more to most peoples ideas, which are more likely to be chosen over this one.

    • #732783
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Something tells me Lexington is only telling us a small portion of what he really knows. Thanks anywho Lex.

    • #732784
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Any news on Howard Holdings proposal for Albert Quay?
      What timescales have the ccc put on the O’Flynn planning process?

    • #732785
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by mickeydocs
      Any news on Howard Holdings proposal for Albert Quay?
      What timescales have the ccc put on the O’Flynn planning process?

      😎 Howard Holdings tell me that the most likely probability for any announcement relating to Albert Quay (now known as Terence McSweeney Quay as far as I know), will be made in early Spring 2005, when the City Quarter development on Lapps Quay is up and running. However, this may be subject to change.

      🙂 The decision due date for O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street Gateway development is the 2nd of December 2004 – expect CCC to request Further Info or extend the decision date (as is common CCC practice).

    • #732786
      lexington
      Participant

      Here’s just an interesting 3D-Graphic of the commercial element proposed for Ballincollig Town Centre. A number of revisions have since been made with a greater emphasis on space. The SC element was also revised – incorporating a public plaza and alternate layout. The density of this image does not reflect the final design.



      And about Horgan’s Quay – I’m looking into getting further images up soon. That previous post is uninspiring to say the least. But trust me, the other designs are much more encouraging.



      Also, relating to O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street project – I expect and am informed CCC will be requesting an EIS in the form of Further Info – which will clearly delay any planning decision date. I have closely observed the models and designs for the scheme and I have to say, it is very impressive.


    • #732787
      sw101
      Participant

      lexington,

      do you have any info (images or references) on proposed developments for R&H Hall and the surrounding plots?

    • #732788
      lexington
      Participant

      For R&H Hall specifically, I can’t comment on exact plans – however, a IAWS (owners of R&H Hall Weybridge along Kennedy Quay) have held discussions with a series of developers in the past – and some negotiations are on-going. There were rumours of an apartment development replacing the grain silos as far back as 1996 – however this was contravene to city development plans that wish to focus commercial activities exclusively in this area. CCC and IAWS are both very anxious to make sure the standard of development is first-class – as it represents the real entrance to the docklands – and what develops here will set the tone for the remainder of future developments along these quays. A strong emphasis has been put on high-rise developments (office buildings, hotels, leisure & retail facilities etc) as the grain silos average 13 to 14 storeys as is – and high-rise is oddly very important to Cork’s city-scape from this perspective traditionally. One proposal that was made, but subsequently withdrawn, proposed a BALTIC Centre style cultural venue through silo restoration. This was deemed unviable – and the grain silos are structurally incapable of catering to modern standard commercial usage. Furthermore, why do we have to copy everywhere else? Shouldn’t Cork be doing something unique? – let others copy from us. Even high-rise office buildings – but with a special, unique edge is a better way to go. Imagination should be let run wild – positively – here. I’ll give you more details when I can.

    • #732789
      GregF
      Participant

      Look at the state of Cork, like!…..it’s looking like Venice this morning!

    • #732790
      theblimp
      Participant

      One can only hope that the receeding floodwater on Patrick Street take the new bins and streetlighting with it. Failing that I guess they could always be used as moorings for gondolas.

    • #732791
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by GregF
      Look at the state of Cork, like!…..it’s looking like Venice this morning!

      On a serious note, wasn’t Cork renowned as the ‘Venice of the North’ at one stage in Europe?

    • #732792
      satanta99
      Participant

      I was on Patricks st about 5 to 6 yesterday and it was crazy! a big wave of water came up Wintrop St, about a foot high. Around this section, the new square blocks on the street, which people normally sit on, acted as platforms to keep your feet out of the water. It was like being on a beach when your realise you’ve stayed too long and the tide is coming in around you.

    • #732793
      sw101
      Participant

      thanks lexington.

      i’m doing my thesis on a docklands site, possibly the r&h hall plot. researching like mad at the moment. any info greatly appreciated.

    • #732794
      lexington
      Participant

      And yet there is something so romantic about all the chaos! I’m so tempted to find a beautiful Italian woman and raft her down Lavitts Quay to Patrick’s Street with a Edith Piaf playing on my turntable Player in the background. Classy!



      Yes, Cork was once known as ‘Venice of the North’ – a title historically evident in many of the city centre’s old buildings (especially along South Mall and Patrick’s Street) which have cobbled and stone stairways extending to the ground from the first floor. Places like South Mall, Coal Quay/Cornmarket Street, Academy Street and so on, used to be canal ways. Traders and merchants would ferry up the Lee to the city centre markets. I really wish Cork would use its waterways and rivers a lot more nowadays. River buses should be picking people up at the new Ballincollig Town Centre and dropping them off at the Mardyke or Grenville Place – no traffic, less pollution, time-saving!

    • #732795
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      There are people currently researching the possiblity of using the lee for tourism tours…. Lee Fields to Patrick Street is a great stretch in a boat btw.

      Originally posted by lexington
      And yet there is something so romantic about all the chaos! I’m so tempted to find a beautiful Italian woman and raft her down Lavitts Quay to Patrick’s Street with a Edith Piaf playing on my turntable Player in the background. Classy!



      Yes, Cork was once known as ‘Venice of the North’ – a title historically evident in many of the city centre’s old buildings (especially along South Mall and Patrick’s Street) which have cobbled and stone stairways extending to the ground from the first floor. Places like South Mall, Coal Quay/Cornmarket Street, Academy Street and so on, used to be canal ways. Traders and merchants would ferry up the Lee to the city centre markets. I really wish Cork would use its waterways and rivers a lot more nowadays. River buses should be picking people up at the new Ballincollig Town Centre and dropping them off at the Mardyke or Grenville Place – no traffic, less pollution, time-saving!

    • #732796
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      the grain silos average 13 to 14 storeys as is – and high-rise is oddly very important to Cork’s city-scape from this perspective traditionally. One proposal that was made, but subsequently withdrawn, proposed a BALTIC Centre style cultural venue through silo restoration. This was deemed unviable – and the grain silos are structurally incapable of catering to modern standard commercial usage.

      The Treasury Building in Lower Grnad Canal St completed in 1990 is a conversion of the old ‘Bolands Mills Grain Silos’ it was when built the highest specification building in Ireland and its tenants 14 years later include

      1. National Pensions Fund
      2. National Treasury Management Agency
      3. Merrill Lynch
      4. Whirlpool European Finance Centre
      5. Novel
      6. Treasury Holdings

      To state that the grain silos are ‘structurally incapable of conversion’ is factually wrong, grain silos by their definition are one of the most flexible types of structures to remodel as every second floor can be removed to allow for raised access floors, air conditioning ducting and other essential fourth generation service.

      The silos should be retained as there is little sense in demolished structurally sound flexible buildings and sending them to landfill only to produce buildings well below a specification that is possible.

      I will personally object on my own headed paper should any proposal for their demolition arise, objection will be leveled on a number of grounds not least of which is sustainability.

    • #732797
      theblimp
      Participant

      Diaspora, with the greatest of respect, simply because a building has a history should not exclusively mean that it must be retained. The grain silos in Cork were built for a purpose – one which they achieved very well. Under a scenario of a redeveloped docklands this purpose is removed. Yes, they possibly could be re-developed, but you must also open your mind to the possibility that something more aesthetically pleasing could replace them. There are many buildings in Cork that could be sustained, but the fact that they were cheap unsightly solutions at their outset deems them unattractive to retain. By proposing that you will object to any proposal for the demolition of the Cork silos (be it on your own ‘headed paper’ or not) without considering a possibly more attractive (and suitable) alternative lacks foresight and an appreciation of the mechanics involved in regenerating this region of the city.

    • #732798
      sw101
      Participant

      the planning officer for the area, the lord mayor, the planning policy makers for the docklands, all are in favour of demolition if the void was filled by high-quality buildings of the same scale or perhaps even taller to offset the effect of 5 or 6 storey buildings surrounding the existing stand-alone silos.

      when you object, please post a copy of the letter up here.

    • #732799
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Blind objections = extreme conservatism.

      Originally posted by theblimp
      Diaspora, with the greatest of respect, simply because a building has a history should not exclusively mean that it must be retained. The grain silos in Cork were built for a purpose – one which they achieved very well. Under a scenario of a redeveloped docklands this purpose is removed. Yes, they possibly could be re-developed, but you must also open your mind to the possibility that something more aesthetically pleasing could replace them. There are many buildings in Cork that could be sustained, but the fact that they were cheap unsightly solutions at their outset deems them unattractive to retain. By proposing that you will object to any proposal for the demolition of the Cork silos (be it on your own ‘headed paper’ or not) without considering a possibly more attractive (and suitable) alternative lacks foresight and an appreciation of the mechanics involved in regenerating this region of the city.

    • #732800
      flysrmd11
      Participant

      lexington, do you still have those images of the Boole Library extension?

    • #732801
      lexington
      Participant

      Okay, maybe when I have more time and energy, I will state what is wrong with Diaspora’s claims. I have a report here from Arup conducted on behalf of a private client, and another report by RPS, stating the unsuitability of the Cork R&H Hall grain silos for a number of commercial uses other than cultural (like I mentioned, the BALTIC Centre in Newcastle, UK). ‘Bolands Mills Grain Silos’ – I do agree were well converted, and I’m glad that they were, but there is a matter here of condition. IAWS have been itching themselves to demolish the silos – irresponsibly you may say, they invested little in maintaining their structural quality. Silos are indeed very structurally diverse, and I agree with you on that, but the issue with R&H Hall is that issues of foundation and a number of alternate use schemes have eroded the structural quality beyond that of most other facilities in the country. The reports won’t upload onto this forum because of their size, I will try and load it onto a web-based serve if I can. However, I acknowledge, the report does mention – some commercial uses may be attained from the silos within a limited capacity but at an extensive cost – which may make such projects unviable – and leaving the silos in a continued state of disrepair. And even if this wasn’t the case, what’s wrong with respectful progress? I accept the romantic view of the silos – I often think it would feel weird looking down the quays and not seeing them there – but why should we block ourselves from new possibilities that may provide a greater city-scape for all concerned?



      flysrmd11 – I do have images, but because they are of an odd format, I can’t upload them here. I’m trying to upload them to a web-based server, but I’m having trouble. I promise to let you know if I get them up – keep your eyes on this thread.


      *UPDATES*

      -> Rathmelton Investments (Joe McCarthy) have said they no longer plan to construct the student element of their Kingsley Hotel redevelopment (at least for now – which is odd because there is a 2006 S.50 deadline). However, construction is ongoing at the 82-bedroom extension on-site and 19-room apart-hotel.



      -> At a seminar last night in Cork, John Bowen, MD of The Bowen Group said he views Cork as being an untold ground for development potential. He said that currently Cork may be playing catch-up, come 2005 – he expects investment in the city centre to double, even triple. In anticipation he mentioned that his company is carefully catering for this influx into the Cork market. He said, though Dublin’s size keeps it going – property values will force it to slow down in the coming years and it’s extreme centralised position within the country was unsustainable. Cork, he mentioned, provide the country’s only real good alternative in terms of balance. Although Cork Metropolitan area provided only one-fifth of Dublin’s market – with the ongoing and cont’d investment/development of the city – Cork could see exponential population and market growth over the next 10 years – proper infastructure and planning pending. Cork was only embarking on its journey of realisation, he said. He remarked that he was confident in Cork, developers are confident in Cork and this air will soon extend to those further afield interested in getting involved in Cork’s future.

      – very encouraging opinion.

    • #732802
      GregF
      Participant

      With all this rain Cork will resemble Atlantis, let alone Venice, when European City of Culture comes around.

    • #732803
      sw101
      Participant

      Is it due to rain for the weekend?

    • #732804
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      R+H Hall silo is no Bolands Biscuit Mills. The redevelopment of that building should be the poster child for all future change of uses, but the building has to be suitable from day one. Bolands was phyiscally a much more beautiful structure which naturally lent itself to to coversion that we see today. R+H is more like the other Bolands (vacant) around the corner – grim grim grim.

    • #732805
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      R+H is more like the other Bolands (vacant) around the corner – grim grim grim.

      I love that other Bolands, as I do the R&H structures, but I must admit that in the reality of the market I cannot think of a viable use for the Bolands Concrete Structures (Which I think are protected Structures).

    • #732806
      lexington
      Participant

      Unfortunately, the only images I can get up for you at the moment are the following.

      The first is of the Boole Library extension (B&W) and the 2nd is a poor quality graphic of JD Hotels plan for 77/78 Grand Parade (B&W) – but at least you get the idea.

      Copy the appropriate URL and paste it into your address bar, then press ‘ENTER’ on your keyboard.

      UCC Boole Library Extension
      http://corkdevelopments.bravehost.com/uccbooleext.jpg

      JD Hotels Ltd Grand Parade Restaurant & Bar Development
      http://corkdevelopments.bravehost.com/jdhotelsgp.jpg

    • #732807
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by d_d_dallas
      R+H Hall silo is no Bolands Biscuit Mills. The redevelopment of that building should be the poster child for all future change of uses, but the building has to be suitable from day one. Bolands was phyiscally a much more beautiful structure which naturally lent itself to to coversion that we see today. R+H is more like the other Bolands (vacant) around the corner – grim grim grim.

      I am not proposing that these silos be left but rather that they are re-modelled and reclad in the latest and most advanced materials. Given the strength of the frames it would even be possible to add some space above what alreay exists to make a more daring form.

      I disagree Bolands mills was comparable before its remake, it was tired and shabby looking. The form of these buildings is quite attractive and with an imaginative cladding and some reworking of the form at the upper floors a World Class structure would emerge.

      I also hotly dispute that IAWS or any of their subsidiaries would allow rather structures to descend into a poor condition. That company is possibly the best managed of all the PLCs in this Country.

      It is also entirely inappropriate to compare these structures to some of the second generation crap that afflicts Central Cork with Eircom Building springing to mind. These Silos were once at the cutting edge a lot more than can be said for a lot of what followed and some buildings that are in the pipeline.

    • #732808
      lexington
      Participant

      For a Section 23 development of 12m euro, Frank Sheahan and Joe Carey, are aiming pretty high in the pricing arena for their new Blackpool Hewitt Mills development. The semi-circular, red-brick, 7-storey building designed by J.E. Keating & Associates – is selling 600sq ft 1-bedroom apartments starting at 325,000 euro. 2 bedroom 800sq ft apartments at 390,000 euro – and 3-bedroom, 1009sq ft apartments from 450,000 euros. There are 69 apartments as part of this first phase of development. 135 units will be built in total – the remainder in further blocks. In my own opinion, the development hardly or fairly reflects the asking price. If someone has a half-million to spend – it would be better spent on a selection of other Cork city developments of a better standard, location, space and at only half the price.

    • #732809
      Jack White
      Participant

      Originally posted by speakeasy
      This is a great website, really interesting even for the non architect types like me. But whats with all the discussion about Dublin? Cork is Ireland’s second largest city and hardly gets a mention! Theres all sorts of bad stuff going on in this City which needs discussion. I strongly beleive that web sites like this do make a difference and are a great voice.

      Lots of new developments which seem to have escaped any public scrutiny at the planning stage (surprise surprise) are being thrown up in Cork. The City is losing its character, fast, because of cheap office blocks which are actually worse than the many mistakes built in the 1960’s.

      Take for example the new development on Lapps Quay opposite the beautiful City Hall and next to the even more aesthetically pleasing Cork Savings Bank (now AIB). This, you would think, should be an area to preserve. But sadly the hideous old Eircom building on the Quay is being made look even more awful and a huge area has also been cleared to make way for air raid shelter type apartments and offices. Up the road at Anglesea street, a nice little area with lots of old well preserved buildings, is a new office block, which looks like it was designed by the same people who came up with the EBS building on dame street Dublin. This thing is monstrous, it dwarfs an adjoining pub and looks totally out of character in this street. What is going on? Who designs these things? Does anyone notice how shocking they are? Does anyone care? Cmon you Dubs, Cork is a part of this nation too… pay us some attention! Ireland’s architects are going to get a bad name from all this rubbish being

    • #732810
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 City Properties (Cork) Ltd have been granted permission for the development of a new nightclub premises over its existing Classic Bar on South Main Street. The club will be built in an area above the bar as part of the former Queens Old Castle SC.

      😡 Limerick-based Fabiolo Ltd. have been refused planning for their apartment/retail development on the former petrol station adjacent Kent Station along the Lower Glanmire Road. The small development was to consist of 9-spacious apartments and 2 retail units. Though CCC praised the fact that the 4-storey building provided a much needed infill in the street-scape – it based its refusal on a lack of parking facilities. The option of Further Information was considered but decided against.

    • #732811
      Jack White
      Participant

      Originally posted by speakeasy
      [B Theres all sorts of bad stuff going on in this City which needs discussion. I strongly beleive that web sites like this do make a difference and are a great voice.

      Lots of new developments which seem to have escaped any public scrutiny at the planning stage (surprise surprise) are being thrown up in Cork. The City is losing its character, fast, because of cheap office blocks which are actually worse than the many mistakes built in the 1960’s.

      Take for example the new development on Lapps Quay opposite the beautiful City Hall and next to the even more aesthetically pleasing Cork Savings Bank (now AIB). This, you would think, should be an area to preserve. But sadly the hideous old Eircom building on the Quay is being made look even more awful and a huge area has also been cleared to make way for air raid shelter type apartments and offices. Up the road at Anglesea street, a nice little area with lots of old well preserved buildings, is a new office block, which looks like it was designed by the same people who came up with the EBS building on dame street Dublin. This thing is monstrous, it dwarfs an adjoining pub and looks totally out of character in this street. What is going on? Who designs these things? Does anyone notice how shocking they are? Does anyone care? Cmon you Dubs, Cork is a part of this nation too… pay us some attention! Ireland’s architects are going to get a bad name from all this rubbish being [/B]

      Yes Discussion,

      Not free advertising for schemes of dubious quality, no response to the shameful demolition of Fr Mathews Hall only more updates with a mixture of smileys. It reminds me of a particular 1970’s chewing gum commercial.

    • #732812
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Originally posted by Jack White

      Yes Discussion,

      Not free advertising for schemes of dubious quality, no response to the shameful demolition of Fr Mathews Hall only more updates with a mixture of smileys. It reminds me of a particular 1970’s chewing gum commercial.

      I don’t see where the advertising comes into it?? This thread is, in part, an update of what’s going on in the planning and construction world of Cork. More generally, however, It gives ample opportunity for discussion and the odd rant (Diaspora(!)). Planning applications aren’t advertisements – they are aspirations – for either good or bad.

      Father Matthews is covered adequately in another thread. we don’t really need to digress here.

    • #732813
      lexington
      Participant

      Originally posted by Jack White

      Yes Discussion,

      Not free advertising for schemes of dubious quality, no response to the shameful demolition of Fr Mathews Hall only more updates with a mixture of smileys. It reminds me of a particular 1970’s chewing gum commercial.

      The thread title ‘Look at de state of Cork, like!’ in part refers to a belief held by many that for too long Cork was left behind in the Celtic Tiger – in terms of development. As Cork is now embracing its own development wave – I believe informing interested parties of the development which affects their city – aesthetically, economically and socially – has everything to do with the thread title. It will also allow persons to gauge the city’s progress since the thread was initiated. Furthermore, this thread is also an amalgamation of another thread called ‘Cork New Developments’ – it was merged by the site operators for matters of ease and convenience. That thread also continues here-in and is perfectly entitled to do so.

      For too long the people of Cork and those interested in its progress have been kept out of the loop. This is a well run website and this thread provides an excellent opportunity to inform those interested. Development is dictated by demand and supply which ties in with economics. Development has social, historical, economic and architectural consequences.

      Furthermore, I am not the only person utilising this forum – the debate on the issues you seem determined to address is open to all. So I’ll carry on doing my thing – you are perfectly entitled to make comments on such matters yourself – so why don’t you get actively involved and stop the critique of others wanting to make a contribution. The more input the better.

    • #732814
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by burge_eye

      More generally, however, It gives ample opportunity for discussion and the odd rant (Diaspora(!)). Planning applications aren’t advertisements – they are aspirations – for either good or bad.

      Father Matthews is covered adequately in another thread. we don’t really need to digress here.

      The only rant on this thread has been that directed against An Taisce, when particular individuals are asked to explain their views they simply reduce the argument to a level that deserves a heated response.

      The illegal demolition of Fr Mathew’s Hall was posted on this thread 2 full days before I started its own thread to attempt to stimulate some discussion on the topic.

      It is quite clear that some individuals on this thread have no interest in the quality architecture, any development constitutes good development. Once its new that is, anything or anyone who holds a differing opinion is either mad or rants.

      But my fundamental greivance hasn’t been addressed, the biggest loss to Cork’s historical building fabric in years Fr Mathew Hall.

      One good yardstick in life is always keep the question in focus, this hasn’t happened on this thread.

    • #732815
      lexington
      Participant

      Here we go again!

    • #732816
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Originally posted by lexington
      Here we go again!

      Just one comment on Fr Mathew’s Hall.

    • #732817
      lexington
      Participant

      I completely agree with those angered by the events at Fr. Matthew’s Hall – it was a careless, illegal and irresponsible act. I believe those responsible should be addressed in a most disciplinary manner. I personally didn’t comment on it because I was not informed well enough about the events at the time other than what I had heard from nearby residents and in the paper.

      My ‘Here we go again!’ remark refers to the subtle bashing of members.

      I don’t get it with the personal attacks – express opinion yes, personal insults?! No thanks.

      If a member has something to say about a development or event by all means say it – don’t be hanging around for others to comment. That’s like expecting others to give blood. It’s an open forum – we might not always agree with an opinion, but one is entitled to it nonetheless. That’s what’s so great about these forums.

    • #732818
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      diaspora

      i think there have been greater losses in terms of the city’s historical and physical fabric in the last 18 months alone. fr mathew hall was, for some reason, not listed, and its value has only been recognised when the developer ‘attacked’ it’. already, the city has lost 3 hugely significant structures to fire ! good sheperd convent (dodgy fire) sunbeam industrial centre (dodgy fire) and tivoli house (dodgy fire). perhaps mr tracy would have been better advised to use matches than a jcb.

      also,

      i really find it difficult to understand why individuals have a problem with the type of content posted here. whats the problem with presenting information to the forum for discussion?

    • #732819
      burge_eye
      Participant

      Originally posted by Diaspora

      The only rant on this thread has been that directed against An Taisce, when particular individuals are asked to explain their views they simply reduce the argument to a level that deserves a heated response.

      The illegal demolition of Fr Mathew’s Hall was posted on this thread 2 full days before I started its own thread to attempt to stimulate some discussion on the topic.

      It is quite clear that some individuals on this thread have no interest in the quality architecture, any development constitutes good development. Once its new that is, anything or anyone who holds a differing opinion is either mad or rants.

      But my fundamental greivance hasn’t been addressed, the biggest loss to Cork’s historical building fabric in years Fr Mathew Hall.

      One good yardstick in life is always keep the question in focus, this hasn’t happened on this thread.

      Diaspora, Diaspora, Diaspora. The reason I put (!) after your name was to inject a little light humour into the whole thing. Obviously missed. It was a reply to Jack White regarding his comments

      I think this thread does evoke comment on whether schemes are quality/crap or are good/bad development. There are so many schemes posted that one scheme cannot be covered in its entirety which is why it is good that Matthews hall has its own thread.

      Can we get back to review & comment and leave the slagging for the playground?

    • #732820
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally posted by burge_eye

      I think this thread does evoke comment on whether schemes are quality/crap or are good/bad development. There are so many schemes posted that one scheme cannot be covered in its entirety which is why it is good that Matthews hall has its own thread.

      Can we get back to review & comment and leave the slagging for the playground?

      I must say that I think this thread sometimes neglects what exists in cork and instead places too much focus on what might be built or what is about to be built. I think it is obviously good to discuss what is proposed to be built or what has just got planning, but – as I have stated before on the thread about the most beautiful building in cork- I think it is a pity that there is not more discussion given to existing buildings. I love Cork and would like to know more about peoples views on its various buildings.

    • #732821
      lexington
      Participant

      Sorry this reply is late, but some member had been looking to gain an image of the Shearwater residential development by Pierse Construction in Kinsale. Here it is. Design is by Wilson Architecture.

    • #732822
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Thanks for that Lexington. I must remember to take a photo of it the next time I am there. I must say I quite like it. I like the use of slate in Kinsale. I think it really distinguishes it from other towns in Cork.

    • #732823
      phatman
      Participant

      Here’s a photo of the shearwater development, can’t make it out in too much detail due to the boats in the foreground, but still enough to appreciate it’s positive addition to the quayside, fits in well with the architecture of the area i must say

      UCC’s new brookfield campus partially opened for use yesterday, had a look in, really impressive, much nicer internally than externally, theyve incorporated the old house itself very well into the development, some very nice lecture theatres too. a job very well done.

    • #732824
      phatman
      Participant

      Here it is
      Lexingotn, could you tell me how to actually make images appear in you post, as opposed to a link appearing?cheers

    • #732825
      theblimp
      Participant

      I see Mr. O’Callaghan is in the media again saying that he ‘might well’ develop a 6,000 seat arena at Mahon Point, but will need the full support of the city and tourism bodies. Yes, of course he will. Hakuna Matata about the access or the proximity of new residential neighbours to the site allocated!!! By any chance does Owen have a big project in planning at the moment that requires a bit of a push and a lot of spin ….. on the Western Road perhaps ….. ?

    • #732826
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Thanks for that Phatman. One thing I was thinking about with that development is that it does not seem to be very wheel chair accessable, but I must admit I did not really look at in massive detail, so it was just my first impression of it. As I stated earlier, though, I think it is an attractive design.

    • #732827
      lexington
      Participant

      There may be more to this particular announcement than meets the eye. I’m currently looking into it – I’ll get back to you on it.

    • #732828
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      -> Thomas Crosbie Holdings, owners of the Irish Examiner, Sunday Business Post and Evening Echo etc – have apparently reached an understanding with an as of yet, undisclosed developer, for their new proposed HQ along Lavitts Quay. HOK had said a deal was under consideration – I am informed however, talks have moved on to the next level and that an announcement was due soon. Construction was likely to begin immediately with a completion date due for mid-2006 ~ with the Irish Examiner relocating to the new premises before work on the new O’Callaghan Properties 150m, 6-storey, .6 acre retail and apartment development got underway in December 2006 (planning pending). I’ll let you know more when I hear it.



      -> O’Flynn Construction have been asked for Further Information on their Eglinton Street application – as expected. As part of the Further Info, an EIS has been requested. This may see any Further Info received by CCC, not due for at least 2 months. However Frank O’Mahony of Wilson Architecture has said, they were prepared for this and work will begin immediately.



      -> CCC have announced their intention to commence a 600m euro housing redevelopment and development scheme. The scheme is partially in response to the lack of socially affordable housing being made available in the Cork city market. CCC are endeavouring to cut the growing waiting lists (touching on 6,000) for such housing. The scheme will consist of new housing, apartments, duplexes and the repurchase and redevelopment of some housing. In addition, the effort will also provide quality facilities for the elderly and for the physically challenged. Clear plans will be released soon.




      After taking a more detailled look at the Corbett Bros office and residential development on Copley Street – currently under construction by Coffey Contractors, designed by PRC Architects – the best example I can give those of you who are unfamiliar with the design is; a 5-storey blend of Parchment Square along the Melbourne Road with the apartment development along South Terrace adjacent to the Jewish Centre. I’ll look into getting images for you.




      -> With relation to my earlier post on the Mahon Point Trade/Convention Centre – I looked into O’Callaghan Properties announcement yesterday that it was now ‘seriously confident’ their Centre would proceed, with a construction date set for late 2005, planning pending. I can tell you, that O’C P had been working with Project Architects (Dirk Luow) and SOM (Skidmore Owings & Merrill) on the original Trade Centre – and adjustments have been made to the original design in order to cater for a multi-purpose use centre (no longer strictly trade – as once envisioned). The original trade aspect was to be 50:50 funded between the ERDF and O’C P – and was to be linked with the Montreal World Trade Centre – however this has all changed, and O’C P had been withdrawing from the notion based on viability. However, new revisions allow the centre act as a trade centre, convention centre, expo centre and event centre – with many operations working together at the same time if needed. Viability of the centre given its location and proximity to housing – plus sufficient parking and access is up for debate.



      Ancillary to the above report, at least 2 developers who had been assessing the proposed expo/event centre site cited by CCC along Penrose Quay and Horgan’s Quay – have said they did not deem the site as being comfortably able to facilitate such a development.

      A very faint, and quite frankly, unreliable rumour suggested Cosby Homes of the UK had been glancing their eye over Cork’s docklands from a distance – interested in make a move on the Irish market with a Green-Quarter style development. See http://www.green-quarter.co.uk


    • #732829
      lexington
      Participant

      Just an image that may be of interested to some of you. The photo is looking west to east over the city centre of Cork with Cornmarket Street in the foreground, the northern channel of the Lee to the left and Patrick’s Street curving down the centre.

      1. The RED outline represents the site of Rockfell Investments Cornmarket Street 6-storey department store and apartment development – recently granted f.p.p.

      2. The TURQUOISE outline is of 21 Lavitts Quay office development – nearing completion.

      3. East of this, in PURPLE, between 21 Lavitts Quay and the Opera House, is the site of the soon to be developed, Irish Examiner HQ Building (see images in previous post).

      4. Crossing the river in LEMON, is the new Shandon Pedestrian Bridge.

      5. the YELLOW outline shows the site of Hanranka Ltd/Carrolls Quay Investment Co.’s 85 unit 6-storey apartment development. In mid-construction.

      6. WHITE outlines the OSB Camden Court apartment, theatre and super-pub development between 4 and 6 storeys – with extensive roof gardens and playgrounds. Phase 1 is nearing completion. Phase 2 is cited for development early next year. See images in a previous post.

      7. The BROWN outline shows Hornibrook Builders Camden Quay apartment and retail development. Between 4 and 6 storeys with 58-apartments and underground car-parking. Nearing completion.

      8. The GREEN line shows the site of the existing Dunnes Stores store on Patrick’s Street – the group’s original – which will soon see an application lodge for its redevelopment ~ doubling in-size with a number of ancillary retail units and cafes, at a cost of 30m euros.

      9. The NAVY line is of the new extensively redeveloped AIB Retail Flagship for Cork. Construction has begun on this surprisingly large-scale development.

      10. Finally the BLUE line, shows the city block housing the current Irish Examiner HQ as well as many other retail units and offices. All this is scheduled to be demolished – save Le Cheateau bar (being preserved for architectural and historical reasons) – and rebuilt in a massive 6-storey 150m euro retail precint and apartments by O’Callaghan Properties. Scheduled for construction by the Bowen Group in December 2006. An application will be lodged in mid to late 2005.

      Of course there are many many more developments ongoing or beginning in the area of this image – but I just thought it may be an interesting perspective on some of the more notable projects.

      I have an additional image showing sites primed for redevelopment, at preplanning or under negotiation in this area – but I’ll save that unless requested.

    • #732830
      Leesider
      Participant

      things are coming along nicely, when do you expect work to begin on Cornmarket St Lexington? This area is in dire need of its imminent makeover!!

    • #732831
      corkdood
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I have an additional image showing sites primed for redevelopment, at preplanning or under negotiation in this area – but I’ll save that unless requested.

      Please don’t keep it to yourself. I for one would like to see it. Its great to see so many sites in the city centre being redeveloped. Its long overdue!

    • #732832
      lexington
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Lexington, could you tell me how to actually make images appear in your post, as opposed to a link appearing?cheers

      If you have an image on your hard-drive, and want to display it on your post – you first must upload the image to a web-host (try ImageShack.us), then you have to hotlink the image to your post (click the ‘Insert Image’ icon and paste in the image URL).



      @Leesider wrote:

      things are coming along nicely, when do you expect work to begin on Cornmarket St Lexington? This area is in dire need of its imminent makeover!!

      The whole street is due for a 5m euro makeover – the Cornmarket Street Action Plan is currently being initiated. It is hoped, work on Cornmarket Street will begin when Oliver Plunkett Street and Grand Parade have their makeovers complete. The proposed new street-scape will be symathetic to pedestrians and ‘marketeers’ alike – in an effort to boost Cornmarket Street as the natural retail extension of Patrick’s Street (badly needed!). Widened foothpaths from the new Shandon Bridge will lead all the way up to Castle Street and Daunt Square – with semi-permanent street stalls put in place to cater for the city market on Saturdays and other event days.

      As for the Rockfell Investments development, although Joe Gavin is hopeful the project will get going straight away, Michael O’Donoghue has said that, as part of the conditions of planning, Rockfell must first conduct extensive archaelogical investigations on the site. UCC are being enlisted to assist. Demolition of some on-site warehousing and buildings should begin in December – but main construction isn’t due until mid-Janurary, early Feburary – excavations pending. Not far away, Frinailla Developments Grand Parade Plaza project has been undergoing excavations for almost 7 months now – interestingly, all but 4 apartments in the development have been sold. Hopefully, Rockfell won’t experience the same delays.



      corkdood – I’ll get that image up soon. It’s essentially the same image as posted in my last report, but with earmarked sites and proposed developments outlined instead of existing or formally planned developments. I have to clear some of the information with involved parties beforehand, as you can understand.



      *UPDATES*

      😉 Surprising both myself and many others, O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street project, now in Further Info, has received NO objections or observations whatsoever – submission dates have passed.

      🙂 I forgot to mention earlier also, Reid’s Furniture Stores will be opening their first Cork store at the new Blackpool Retail Park – joining Argos, Lifestyle Sports, Atlantic Homecare & Reel Cinemas. Reid’s will occupy a 10,000sq ft unit.

      🙂 Also, as predicted earlier, Monsoon will be extending into the recently vacated Clinton Cards premises on Patrick’s Street. This will extend the Monsoon premises by 3,000sq ft. Annual rent is set at a record 508,000 euros p.a.

      :rolleyes: And at the former Carphone Warehouse premises next to Mango on Patrick’s Street, an O2 Experience Store is to open. The existing O2 store across the street at the Savoy Centre, will be seize operations and converge with the new Experience store. A backlog of retaillers are set to fight it out for this newly vacated premises.

    • #732833
      phatman
      Participant

      This is an interesting photograph i came across, Shows some of the sites under development not included in lexington’s post above, Even though this image is several months old. Of particular notice is the eglinton street site, Actually more sizeable than it appears from the ground. Just imagine the same image including the water street development, redeveloped horgan quay, and o’ flynn’s eglinton street development, among others, what an impressive vista that would be, and hopefully will be. thanks for that web address lexington

    • #732834
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Cobh Marina Development Co. (Ascon Construction) have resubmitted a revised proposal for their extensive Cobh Marina development with Cobh Town Council. The project has been scaled down after a refusal issued by ABP to their previous application. Up to 135 new residential units, a hotel, moorings, cafes and cther commercial facilities facing out onto a boardwalk etc etc will be constructed if successful.

      🙂 John Cleary Developments has submitted an application with CCC to develop 17 business and light industrial units on lands adjoining the North Point Business Park at Kilnap (Blackpool). The development is primarily focused on nurturing start-up businesses and could provide up to 300 new jobs.

      🙂 The Board of the Mercy University Hospital at Grenville Place and Henry Street have applied to extend their theatre facilities by an additional floor as part of the Catherine MacCauley Block of the hospital. This will bring the structure to 5 storeys – and is designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects – who have also been working on a new 6-storey car-park, urology and minor-surgeries development plan for the newly purchased lands at the North Mall Distellery Fields. Also related to the MUH, Sean Meehan who applied for O.P.P. for a revised 3-deck multi-storey car-park and commercial units facility at Grenville Place (built on stilts over the River Lee – adjacent to MUH) is expecting a planning decision soon. The project could have a significant impact on the River Lee aesthetics at Grenville Place – and is sure to experience major unrest if F.P.P. is sought,



      And just a footnote about a prev. post I made – it seems now, that Diesel (the Cork-based men’s fashion store) have secured a short-term lease agreement on the former Clinton Cards premises on Patrick’s Street as long-term negotiations with Monsoon continue between the fashion chain and landlord, Joe Donnelly.



      Here’s a drawing of the proposed new ‘super-pub’ for Little Hanover Street to the rear of Galvin’s Off-Licence on Washington Street West. I suppose this is significant in the sense that the bar will be a further addition to an area that is experiencing a notable amount of high-quality, high-aesthetic development. In it’s immediate area Jurys Hotel site is to see a 130m redevelopment by O’Callaghan Properties & Jurys Doyle Hotel Group (Riga Ltd) (see prev. posts), The Kino Arthouse Cinema is currently in planning for a new 4-storey, 3-screen cineplex designed by Dennehy + Dennehy (see prev. posts), Phillisview Properties are nearing completion on a stunning new apartment and commercial development at the junction of Sharman Crawford Bridge & Washington Street West (designed by CMG) and Frank Sheahan is completing a new 6m euro student development just down the street (designed by Jack Coughlan & Assoc., also see prev. post).

    • #732835
      lexington
      Participant

      Was just driving passed the new Clarion Hotel on Lapps Quay, as part of Howard Holdings’ City Quarter development – and I have to say it looks far better in the flesh than it ever did in drawings or CG images. But teak? A number of new developments around Cork are sporting teak on their skin (most notably The Cornfields development in Bishopstown) – it may look good now, but what about the up-keep? The Cornfields isn’t long built, and already the development needs to give its teak a good coat of paint. That aside, the whole Lapps Quay area is looking well.

      I may have more details on the other Howard Holdings project for Albert Quay soon, but I’ll get back to you on that when I can.

    • #732836
      phatman
      Participant

      I actually drove past there yesterday evening too lexington, and i thought exactly the same thing as you, it really looked impressive from the city hall side. Its been a few weeks since i last drove this way, but even in that much time the difference is immense. Really promising.

    • #732837
      lexington
      Participant

      Here are just some images of the development proposal for Eglinton Street by O’Flynn Construction. Design is by Wilson Architecture. The planning application with CCC is currently in Further Information. Thankfully, no objections were received for this project.

      – I’ll have more nice images of other Cork projects up soon.

    • #732838
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      good images there lexington, although it would be interesting to see the monatges from the west and north as well – from the quays and from copley/cotter street area. its amazing that no submissions were received – did people miss out i wonder?

    • #732839
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      An Taisce on holidays :)???

      @bunch wrote:

      good images there lexington, although it would be interesting to see the monatges from the west and north as well – from the quays and from copley/cotter street area. its amazing that no submissions were received – did people miss out i wonder?

    • #732840
      lexington
      Participant

      Miss out? The project was given the same period for submissions as all other projects. I’m delighted no objections were lodged – it represents a number of issues – a.) the developers extensive consultation with CCC and residents has paid off along the first planning hurdle. b.) the significance of the project has been acknowledged by the community. c.) design was satisfactory d.) with relation to mickeydocs post, An Taisce had no reason to object – no overshadowing, no adverse affects on nearby structures, sufficient design. Whereas with Water Street they found the excuse of nearby warehousing, here, there exist no such structures – hence no excuses.

      I’ll try and get alternate perspectives up as soon as the EIS has been submitted in the Further Information.

      The development does not take away or adversely affect any surrounding buildings or residencies – it provides a fitting gateway to the southern docklands area and further compliments projects at Lapps Quay and Terence McSwiney (Albert) Quay. Its slender enough to reduce visual impediments from Jewstown and its south-western location minimises any negative impact on nearby City Hall when viewed from Lapps Quay and Parnell Place. I think it is a positive statement and addition to Cork – especially in light of many new high-rise proposals along the docklands (Water Street , Horgan’s Quay and Kennedy Quay). The tower I believe is quality – a fitting landmark signalling rebirth and growth at the mouth of the docklands and entrance to Cork city centre.

    • #732841
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      What’s happening on Kennedy quay?

    • #732842
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      lexington – i realise that the public was given adequate time – i was just surprised that no-one made a submission – it is highly unusual and i bet mr o flynn is surprised too

      anyway, i also agree about the copper element – otherwise, it looks fairly ok and harmless enough – fingers crossed

    • #732843
      lexington
      Participant

      IAWS are in talks with a number of parties for a substantial commercial (office, retail and business centre) development with hosting suites and a number of cafes and restaurants at R&H Hall along Kennedy Quay – this is only at preplanning and reflects the desire of IAWS for the site, not necessarily the developers, so it could change dramatically. There are no specific designs or projections yet devised – but the plan is to take advantage of the existing R&H Hall structural heights and construct a high-rise development.

      I can’t say anymore for the time being,

    • #732844
      Leesider
      Participant

      is the eglinton st development going to be taller than County Hall or roughly the same size?

    • #732845
      theblimp
      Participant

      With regard to Eglington Street, while in general I welcome the modernity of the development, I’m slightly surprised by the ‘slightness’ of the main tower. Perhaps it will look better in reality, but having viewed the visuals, I found it less substantial than expected. It appears very thin and overtly angular. Compare for example, with the Clarion in Limerick. While this high-rise is far from excellent, it does appear more modern and ‘substantial’ than the Eglington Street ‘gateway’ building. Speaking of Clarion, now that the veil has started to come off the Cork Clarion and the lady is beginning to show her face, I must say that she will make an attractive addition to the city. I also hope that they maintain their commitment to develop an active boardwalk area at the front of same.

    • #732846
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      The boardwalk will be the work of Howard Holdings as part of the city quarter and will go ahead.

      As usual I’ve got little to add but lots of questions:
      Any dates expected on their Albert Quay announcement. When will the redevelopment of city hall begin?
      Any links to the recent statements by O’C P in relation to the 6k seater event centre?
      Which hotel groups should we expect for Mahon Point and Ballincollig?
      Any progress with UCC’s new ICT Centre of Excellence at the old greyhound stadium?

      A mate of mine is working on the archaeological dig at the Frinilla site. Work is progressing nicely and there have been some excellent finds at this site which will go on view at the newly expanded museum. In my estimation these kind of artefacts should be exhibited at the Church (St. Peter’s?) on North Main Street. The museum should in Fitzgerald’s park should have a sister site in the city centre and this would be the perfect choice. Any opinions on the restoration job at this site??? In my opinion this site is totally underused.

      In relation to Cornmarket Street there have already been excavation works, and the finds have been excellent so we should expect a protracted dig at this site. I’m all for progress but archaeology is very important and these ventures should be given great respect.

      @theblimp wrote:

      With regard to Eglington Street, while in general I welcome the modernity of the development, I’m slightly surprised by the ‘slightness’ of the main tower. Perhaps it will look better in reality, but having viewed the visuals, I found it less substantial than expected. It appears very thin and overtly angular. Compare for example, with the Clarion in Limerick. While this high-rise is far from excellent, it does appear more modern and ‘substantial’ than the Eglington Street ‘gateway’ building. Speaking of Clarion, now that the veil has started to come off the Cork Clarion and the lady is beginning to show her face, I must say that she will make an attractive addition to the city. I also hope that they maintain their commitment to develop an active boardwalk area at the front of same.

    • #732847
      phatman
      Participant

      As regards the hotel at MP, Hilton Hotels were confirmed during the summer.Speculated tenants at Ballincollig were listed by lexington in an earlier post, I cant remember who exactly, but it was a well recognised chain.
      As for ucc the it campus cleared the planning several months ago, however, Im not sure if it’s development is a priority right now with the coolege, with the development of the new pharmacy building and the Brookfield campus. A recent publication regarding the future development needs of ucc didnt mention the immediate development of this site, which i found surprising, but that’s not to say it wont happen soon, im really not all that sure.I do know that there has been minor activity around the greyhound stadium, with minor clearing works, nothing substantial though.
      For anyone in the know, are there plans to develop Custom House Quay?Along what lines?The right development of this site would really create an impressive quayside from lapps quay.

    • #732848
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      The boardwalk will be the work of Howard Holdings as part of the city quarter and will go ahead.

      As usual I’ve got little to add but lots of questions:
      Any dates expected on their Albert Quay announcement. When will the redevelopment of city hall begin?
      Any links to the recent statements by O’C P in relation to the 6k seater event centre?
      Which hotel groups should we expect for Mahon Point and Ballincollig?
      Any progress with UCC’s new ICT Centre of Excellence at the old greyhound stadium?

      In relation to Cornmarket Street there have already been excavation works, and the finds have been excellent so we should expect a protracted dig at this site. I’m all for progress but archaeology is very important and these ventures should be given great respect.

      🙂 The Boardwalk at City Quarter is proceeding.

      – Albert Quay IT/Office development by Howard Holdings is not expected to receive an announcement until at least March 2005.

      – City Hall’s extension and refurbishment has begun, Cleary Doyle have been on-site for a month now. Main extension work is scheduled to begin end of December, early Janurary.

      – O’C P links – don’t have any links but a copy of the article can be attained from the Irish Examiner Info Desk on Academy Street,

      – Hilton Hotels have signed a lease agreement for the 150-bedroom hotel at Mahon Point. Marriott are understood to have commenced discussions with O’Flynn Construction for their 150-bedroom hotel at BTC (although Lynch and Ramada have also been in talks).

      – UCC’s 150,000sq ft, 3-storey IT Centre on the former Greyhound Stadium lands along the Western Road have seen preliminary ground work initiated, but no fixed date for primary construction is yet available.



      @phatman wrote:

      For anyone in the know, are there plans to develop Custom House Quay?Along what lines?

      There are 3 plans in tow for Custom House Quay – with talks between the Port of Cork and JW Green ongoing. No particular plan has been championed as of yet. One plan proposes refurbishing, extending and reutilising the existing warehousing on site as a mixed-use entertainment complex.

    • #732849
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties and Jurys Doyle Group) today submitted a Further Information and Development Revision application to CCC – even though no formal Further Info request was issued. This marks the third unsolicited submission of Further Info from Riga Ltd, but the most significant. The move is a further response by O’Callaghan Properties to ease some of the many troubles the application for Jurys has received – as reported in previous posts.

      The new revisions are being made to ease the concerns of many objectors. Among the revisions being made are: a reduction of apartment numbers from 303 to 277. The reduction in height of 3 blocks – two from 6 to 4 storeys and one from 6 to 3 storeys. And the movement of the Jurys Hotel element 6m south,

      The 9 storey block, height of Jurys Hotel (6 storeys), access bridges and height of 2 other blocks will remain. Though I acknowledge this move as one designed to address objection concerns – the revisions are another shiny example of how Cork will end up with a reduced quality of development based on petty local outlooks.

      The alterations will reduce the architectural consistency of the development – a point An Taisce even made,



      😡 The proprietors of the Maxol Petrol Station on the Glasheen Road (currently charging 99.9c a litre for regular unleaded) have lodged an appeal with ABP in protest to the grant of planning awarded by CCC to Tesco Ireland for the development of a petrol station at its Wilton SC premises. Tesco Petrol Stations are currently charging between 94.9 and 96.9 cents a litre at their Killarney Station for Reg. Unleaded). Maxol have cited ‘unfair competition’ as their predominant reason for objection. Greed versus consumer advantage???



      🙂 Dermot Coveney of Coveney & Assoc. has issued significant Further Info on behalf of John Mannix for his 7-storey retail, office and apartment development at Washington Street. The amendments to the development include a reduction of 1 floor (to a total of 6 floors – something I personally favour as it has eliminated an unsightly, boxy upper floor area) and a change to the South Main Street/Washington Street corner Bay Window (which looked very well) from pertruding out from the building, to a retraction in line with the rest of the building structure. I don’t agree with the latter decision, as the window offer a dramatic overlook onto Washington Street, and eye-catching addition to the streets architecture. However, most of the changes have been positive.

    • #732850
      sw101
      Participant

      i wonder if lexington is ever tempted to mock up a gherkin on a photo of patricks street and tell us all that blah blah architects will be receiving a descision on friday and no observations have been made. i’d probably believe him.

    • #732851
      lexington
      Participant

      Pardon my slow mind sw101 but, huh?

    • #732852
      Leesider
      Participant

      lexington can you let me know what height the eglington st development is going to be? will it be smaller or taller than the county hall?

    • #732853
      sw101
      Participant

      here ya go

    • #732854
      lexington
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      here ya go

      Location! Location! Location!

      But still I don’t get what ya mean??? Still the Swiss Re Building is a stunning piece of modern architecture – visually and mechanically. If we ever had something similar (albeit not as large-scale) down along the Cork Docklands – I would be standing nearby with a big smile on my face.



      And sorry Leesider for the delay in reply – The Eglinton Street Project will be 70m main structure, 80m if you include the spire. Cork County Hall is 66m at the moment, but will increase to 67m after its redevelopment. Water Street originally proposed a tower of 69m over 19-storeys – this may be subject to change in light of a new application currently under design.

    • #732855
      Leesider
      Participant

      no bother lexington, thanks for the answer!

    • #732856
      lexington
      Participant

      For those of you interested in the Water Street development – here is an extract from a brief e-mail I received from an involved party concerning the revisions to the development for a new application.

      ”We are currently looking at issues such as daylight and sunlight for surrounding properties and the development itself. We believe that the revised design will stand up to scrutiny in this area. The density of the scheme is an issue but not the tower itself, which paradoxically is not a dense element due to its slender profile.

      my own personal opinion is because this is the first scheme in the North Docks area that the concerns of the council is not about the development itself but about setting precendents with respect to setbacks, general heights(rather than one off towers) and density.

      We hope to lodge again in the Spring.”

    • #732857
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes I am ashamed to admit it, but here is a poorly scanned image of the Kenny Group’s development on South Main Street I know it’s not the best, but at least it gives some perspective. The development under the existing grant (by ABP) is for a 7-storey, 22-bedroom hotel, 38 apartments, 141 multi-storey carpark, superpub, retail centre, offices, restaurants, cafes and boardwalk. Paul Kenny has run this development through planning in various incarnations – the most recent being for extra S50 apartments – an application which was subsequently withdrawn. At the moment, both the Kenny Group and PRC inform me that their project is undergoing revisions and due to for reapplication with CCC come early 2005. A few changes will be made to the project – but its general height and design will remain.

      This image is taken from a South Main Street Bridge persepctive looking back down at South Main Street. The rear of Frinailla’s Grand Parade Plaza development can be seen behind the Kenny Group building. The Kenny development fronts out onto Grand Parade via an incorporated protected structure at 50 Grand Parade. The existing site is being used as a surface car-park. The whole street will look substantially rejuvenated with these 2 new developments in tow. Frinailla, who have made a number of substantial finds through excavation on there GP Plaza site, have earmarked late December, early Janurary as desirable construction start dates.

    • #732858
      kingcronin
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      Well Ward Anderson only have one city centre premises that could cater for 30,000 sq ft – and since you’ve mentioned it, I don’t have to tell you.

      When Mahon Point SC opens next Feburary, Ward Anderson intend to transfer their operations from the Capitol to a new 11-screen multiplex at the SC, freeing up the Capitol on Grand Parade for retail space. (see City Manager Joe Gavin’s city report Nov 2003) And since I’ve already opened my yak, I may as well tell you the plan by the private investment firm will include a 6-storey over dual basement retail and leisure development w/ food-court, 20 – retail outlets, 3 late-bars and apparently 2 night-clubs – and depending on insurance, Cork’s 1st permanent ice-rink (OH YEAH!) at the upper basement level.

      Hi Lexington….Ward Anderson have a few more premises in COrk City well over 30,000 sq ft suprisingly…. One of which is ,On Patrick ST , Tom Anderson from Ward Anderson Group owns the HMV building, Orignally the pavillion cinema,, Paviilion niteclub, Coopers Bar, restuarants, small shops and surrounding corner premises going all the way back down careys lane with many exits and laneways. Dont you think that there may be something in the planning in due course here?

      ?

    • #732859
      lexington
      Participant

      I suppose what I was trying to edge there at the time – in the context of what we were talking about – was that the Capitol Cineplex stood to be substantially redeveloped as a commercial facility, without mentioning in black and white ‘The Capitol Cineplex’. Ward Anderson, as an opearting entity, has its most prominent premises in that of the Capitol. Without delving into extravagant explanation – I believe it was more a matter of wording by implication. I am aware of Tom Anderson’s own other properties around Cork – but considering the continued lease agreement with HMV, I didn’t believe this would be clear to persons reading this forum as the obvious development location given the associated details I provided attached to the development proposals.

      Since then, the Capitol Cineplex management have announced at a public level, its intention to continue cinema operations for the foreseeable future, I am aware however of the deals and discussions that have taken place between Ward Anderson and developers – which from my information, suggests that development plans for the future have not been ruled out entirely.

    • #732860
      kingcronin
      Participant

      [thank you kindly…

      with the preserved ceilings (Listed building) in most of the sq footage in HMV and pavillion , would you think that this would be big turnoff to developers or is this issue not a problem ?? Hope im not picking your brains too much?

    • #732861
      lexington
      Participant

      Personally I think the current HMV building is a beautiful piece of architecture. From its ornate detailling to ‘Roman-esque’ columns, I believe it is a fine and sadly overlooked structure.

      In terms of development – the building I believe is an attractive investment opportunity, but not in terms of development. The floorspace of the building is still limited and expansion opportunities are confined. If an expansion – incorporating premises extending to a Carey’s Lane frontage – were available for development, for perhaps, a higher-order retail mall, I think this would increase the attractiveness of the premises from a developers point of view. However, as is, I believe the buildings current nature is best served as a store facility (like HMV). Personally, unless development plans were of an unparallelled aesthetic nature, I would object to any tampering with this fine specimen of architecture. Somethings are best left as they are. I believe the HMV building is such a structure.

      @kingcronin wrote:

      Hope im not picking your brains too much?

      Not much to pick at I’m afraid! 🙂

    • #732862
      lexington
      Participant

      As a continuation of my previous post –

      It strikes me, that too often developers and planners hear from retaillers that space in Cork city centre for retail development is far too limited – especially along Patrick’s Street. The backlog of retaillers vying for space is substantial – and quite often, when space does become available along the thoroughfare, it’s a blink or you’ll miss situation. Although I back developments like that proposed by O’Callaghan Properties for Academy Street, Rockfell on Cornmarket Street and Frinailla along Grand Parade – much needed projects – I still believe that retail space is not really in short supply as such, its just not being used efficiently.

      Patrick’s Street is lined with beautiful old department stores like Grants, Burtons, Munster Arcade, Roches Stores and Brown Thomas. Though BT, Roches and Munster Arcade (Penneys) may be excluded from this discussion – places like Grants and Burtons are often used at ground floor for retail and see their remaining floors for mere storage or run-down offices.

      I for one, believe that a substantial area of retail space may be allowed for in the refurbishment of these old department stores and reorganisation of internal layouts. By expanding upward, creating – for example – an open area centre surrounded by upper level balconies to cater for increased retail space – many of those retaillers who complain about the lack of space, may be afforded such gold-dust. Existing tenants stand to lose little if they simply adapt to reorganised layouts which will improve the visual and practical environments for businesses and consumers alike. One only has to look at the unflattering signage adorned on the former Burtons Department Store by Oasis for one to see how existing layouts are unsatisfactory. Grants Dept Store stands to benefit immensely from such redevelopment. Cork now has a world-class pedestrian friendly shopping street in that of Patrick’s Street – can we not afford to make simple alterations to our historical and eye-catching former department store buildings to boost this reputation further? Aesthetics improve, businesses benefit, consumers benefit – what’s there to lose?

      I think such redevelopment will compliment further the blend of old and new as Cork city is reborn in the wave of new investment and development.

    • #732863
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      You make some excellent points Lex, and these are your best to date 🙂

      @lexington wrote:

      As a continuation of my previous post –

      It strikes me, that too often developers and planners hear from retaillers that space in Cork city centre for retail development is far too limited – especially along Patrick’s Street. The backlog of retaillers vying for space is substantial – and quite often, when space does become available along the thoroughfare, it’s a blink or you’ll miss situation. Although I back developments like that proposed by O’Callaghan Properties for Academy Street, Rockfell on Cornmarket Street and Frinailla along Grand Parade – much needed projects – I still believe that retail space is not really in short supply as such, its just not being used efficiently.

      Patrick’s Street is lined with beautiful old department stores like Grants, Burtons, Munster Arcade, Roches Stores and Brown Thomas. Though BT, Roches and Munster Arcade (Penneys) may be excluded from this discussion – places like Grants and Burtons are often used at ground floor for retail and see their remaining floors for mere storage or run-down offices.

      I for one, believe that a substantial area of retail space may be allowed for in the refurbishment of these old department stores and reorganisation of internal layouts. By expanding upward, creating – for example – an open area centre surrounded by upper level balconies to cater for increased retail space – many of those retaillers who complain about the lack of space, may be afforded such gold-dust. Existing tenants stand to lose little if they simply adapt to reorganised layouts which will improve the visual and practical environments for businesses and consumers alike. One only has to look at the unflattering signage adorned on the former Burtons Department Store by Oasis for one to see how existing layouts are unsatisfactory. Grants Dept Store stands to benefit immensely from such redevelopment. Cork now has a world-class pedestrian friendly shopping street in that of Patrick’s Street – can we not afford to make simple alterations to our historical and eye-catching former department store buildings to boost this reputation further? Aesthetics improve, businesses benefit, consumers benefit – what’s there to lose?

      I think such redevelopment will compliment further the blend of old and new as Cork city is reborn in the wave of new investment and development.

    • #732864
      jungle
      Participant

      When I lived in Dublin there was a site at the junction of Capel St and Bolton St that was given planning permission as a new hotel. The original idea for the site had been for apartments. When it was built, the owner applied for a change of use and converted it into apartments. Is there any chance that this could be the thinking on the Jury’s site? Supposedly, it was easier to get planning permission for hotels than for apartments.

    • #732865
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      You make some excellent points Lex, and these are your best to date 🙂

      Thank you mickeydocs for your most generous words – they are very kind, I sincerely appreciate them.



      In response to jungle, a similar scenario occured in Cork not so long ago. Northgate Investments applied to develop a hostel adjacent to the Gate Multiplex and Apartments on Kyrls Quay. Permission was granted – within a few months of the development’s completion, entitled ‘Northgate House’, an application was submitted to Cork Corp. to change usage of the building from hostel to apartments. Permission was subsequently granted.

      With relation to O’Callaghan Properties development at Jurys Hotel – I don’t believe the hotel element is intended for apartment usage. A deeply critical cynic may say otherwise, but I believe the hotel element was a focus from day one – if only a focus to the side of a much larger apartment proposal. As part of the deal with Jurys Doyle Group – the hotel element was very much a concern, and subsequently an arrangement was signed to agree to lease back the hotel from O’Callaghan Properties for at least 25 years at 2m euro p.a. A full leisure centre and conference centre are incorporated into the hotel structure. I think the deal works nicely in the fact O’CP get their 277 apartments and a guaranteed annual return of 2m p.a. before even one apartment is sold. While Jurys gain an extra 26 rooms, a brand new hotel, decent parking, adequate conference facilities and 30m from the sale of land to boot. A return of 2m p.a. isn’t a bad deal either. The cost of redeveloping the hotel on their own would have been far more expensive – and probably would not have corresponded to the standard of what is being proposed.

    • #732866
      burge_eye
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :rolleyes: Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties and Jurys Doyle Group) today submitted a Further Information and Development Revision application to CCC – even though no formal Further Info request was issued. This marks the third unsolicited submission of Further Info from Riga Ltd, but the most significant. The move is a further response by O’Callaghan Properties to ease some of the many troubles the application for Jurys has received – as reported in previous posts.

      The new revisions are being made to ease the concerns of many objectors. Among the revisions being made are: a reduction of apartment numbers from 303 to 277. The reduction in height of 3 blocks – two from 6 to 4 storeys and one from 6 to 3 storeys. And the movement of the Jurys Hotel element 6m south,

      The 9 storey block, height of Jurys Hotel (6 storeys), access bridges and height of 2 other blocks will remain. Though I acknowledge this move as one designed to address objection concerns – the revisions are another shiny example of how Cork will end up with a reduced quality of development based on petty local outlooks.

      The alterations will reduce the architectural consistency of the development – a point An Taisce even made,

      .

      I had a look at the revised proposal and I suspect the height reductions were made for 3 reasons – to allow a view of the cathedral from 3 points that is at least as good as that at the moment, to reduce overlooking of St Aloysius and to improve the quantity of south light into the apartment courtyards. The hotel hasn’t physically moved, rather a 6m setback from the southern boundary has been requested. There are no “bridges” in the scheme. Although this scheme will undoubtedly still go to appeal, the revisions made are relatively minor given that they effect the “rear” of the development. The impact of the scheme to Lancaster quay remains undiminished. Whilst I share the disappointment that local denizens have effected the scheme, I feel confident that it still represents a strong statement.

    • #732867
      Rockflanders
      Participant

      where’s cork?

    • #732868
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      And the jacks say we’ve got a chip on the shoulder 😉

      @Rockflanders wrote:

      where’s cork?

    • #732869
      lexington
      Participant

      @Rockflanders wrote:

      where’s cork?

      Of course, how rude of us. Cork is that city in the South with a greater area home to a quarter-of-a-million people, hub to just under half-a-million people and regional capital to 1.3m people in Ireland. It’s resposnible directly for 72bn euros of Ireland’s 190bn euro economy. The centre of pharmaceautical excellence and development in Ireland. Home and/or birthplace to some of Ireland’s most prominent indigenous businesses (e.g. Musgraves, Roches Stores, Dunnes Stores, Horizon Technologies, Baltimore Technologies, O’Callaghan Properties, the Bowen Group, Dairygold, Golden Vale, etc etc) – and as a result, is responsible for the creation directly and indirectly of over 100,000 Dublin centred jobs (full and part-time).

      Even I, who originally hails from Dublin – laughs a Dublin’s inflated image of itself. Dublin based threads dominate this forum, so be it, I have no problem with it – but this is not a Cork versus Dublin thread, it is the one thread (I recognise the other related threads, not forgetting) that allows those with an interest in the progress of Cork as the nation’s second city (and mythical ‘Real Capital’ 🙂 ) discuss and receive information concerning the city. It doesn’t need low-brow cracks from condescending chin-ups staining its discussions. There are plenty of other threads on which to do so. If your comment has made you feel temporarily superior and smart for ‘getting one in’ – well done, but its not welcome here.

      I have never gone on a Dublin thread and knocked it for its faults – as the nation’s capital and my hometown I follow those threads with a quiet interest. Perhaps you should do the same – and if you have no interest, don’t insult those that do.

    • #732870
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Even I, who originally hails from Dublin

      good lord. i feel a little queasy.

    • #732871
      PaulC
      Participant

      Good one Lexington – very funny. I needed a good laugh.
      Please explain to me also how Cork is home to Dunnes Stores??????

    • #732872
      lexington
      Participant

      In 1944 Ben Dunne Sr, a Cork resident (though born in the North), set up the first Dunnes Stores on Patrick’s Street near Bowling Green Street after working with a number of other retaillers here and abroad The store is still in operation today, though expanded substantially. It is in line for a 35m euro redevelopment and expansion in the near future, If you have ever shopped in Dunnes and purchased one of their brown ‘bag for life’ shopping bags – an image of the original Cork store (Dunnes first) is printed on it. A number of other stores were later opened around Cork – subsequent to that, the business opened its first store in Dublin, where later Ben Dunne Sr. moved his family and a new HQ was established.

      ”Home and/or birthplace to some of Ireland’s most prominent indigenous businesses ” <- is actually how I phrased it more accurately. Don't believe me, check out the history on their website. http://www.dunnesstores.com/history_opening.ds

      See for Roches as well! http://www.roches-stores.ie/corpwww/history.html

      CSO projections for 2004 indicate that in dispersal of economic activity generation throughout the island of Ireland, 72bn of the 190bn euro economy can be attributed to activities in or associated with Cork – considering export values from the pharma sector estb’d in Cork Harbour region and city based IT. Indigeneous business activity. Tax receipts. Tourist value (incl. Cork/Kerry Region) – Cork city alone = 441m euro p.a. (based on static fig. carried over from year ended 2003 w/ 341,000 city visits – see CCC, Southwest (Cork/Kerry)Tourist Board and CSO). Development and Investment – (a better example of this is considering [in terms of development] that between the 3 largest Cork-based development companies (O’Flynn Construction, O’Callaghan Properties and Clayton Love – Howard Holdings to a lesser extent w/ offices only in Cork and official base in Dublin) – current development expenditure for Cork City = 500m BTC, 500m MP, 30m Lavitts Quay, 20m Boreenmanna Rd, 100m Blackpool Park, 100m City Quarter, 60m Douglas Village SC, 100m Eglinton Street, 150m Academy Street, 160m Jurys, 300m Dunkettle = 2bn (excess) alone) excl. projects by Treasury, OSB, Corbett, Hanranka, SHUL, Frinailla, Rockfell, Mannix, Victoria Hall, Rathmelton. etc etc and small investors).

      If you’re interested in a clearer breakdown of figures, just ask! I’ve about 12 books full of statistics and would be happy to forward you the appropriate addresses where you can attain such briefs for yourself. They on average cost 20euros each except one from CCC (the Development Plan 2004) for which a paperback copy costs 50euros.

      Thanks for your interest PaulC.

      (P.S. If you want more Cork originated or based company histories – there’s plenty more where that came from. I’d be more than happy to oblige).

    • #732873
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Are Hegartys originally from Cork?

      @lexington wrote:

      In 1944 Ben Dunne Sr, a Cork resident (though born in the North), set up the first Dunnes Stores on Patrick’s Street near Bowling Green Street after working with a number of other retaillers here and abroad The store is still in operation today, though expanded substantially. It is in line for a 35m euro redevelopment and expansion in the near future, If you have ever shopped in Dunnes and purchased one of their brown ‘bag for life’ shopping bags – an image of the original Cork store (Dunnes first) is printed on it. A number of other stores were later opened around Cork – subsequent to that, the business opened its first store in Dublin, where later Ben Dunne Sr. moved his family and a new HQ was established.

      ”Home and/or birthplace to some of Ireland’s most prominent indigenous businesses ” <- is actually how I phrased it more accurately. Don't believe me, check out the history on their website. http://www.dunnesstores.com/history_opening.ds

      See for Roches as well! http://www.roches-stores.ie/corpwww/history.html

      CSO projections for 2004 indicate that in dispersal of economic activity generation throughout the island of Ireland, 72bn of the 190bn euro economy can be attributed to activities in or associated with Cork – considering export values from the pharma sector estb’d in Cork Harbour region and city based IT. Indigeneous business activity. Tax receipts. Tourist value (incl. Cork/Kerry Region) – Cork city alone = 441m euro p.a. (based on static fig. carried over from year ended 2003 w/ 341,000 city visits – see CCC, Southwest (Cork/Kerry)Tourist Board and CSO). Development and Investment – (a better example of this is considering [in terms of development] that between the 3 largest Cork-based development companies (O’Flynn Construction, O’Callaghan Properties and Clayton Love – Howard Holdings to a lesser extent w/ offices only in Cork and official base in Dublin) – current development expenditure for Cork City = 500m BTC, 500m MP, 30m Lavitts Quay, 20m Boreenmanna Rd, 100m Blackpool Park, 100m City Quarter, 60m Douglas Village SC, 100m Eglinton Street, 150m Academy Street, 160m Jurys, 300m Dunkettle = 2bn (excess) alone) excl. projects by Treasury, OSB, Corbett, Hanranka, SHUL, Frinailla, Rockfell, Mannix, Victoria Hall, Rathmelton. etc etc and small investors).

      If you’re interested in a clearer breakdown of figures, just ask! I’ve about 12 books full of statistics and would be happy to forward you the appropriate addresses where you can attain such briefs for yourself. They on average cost 20euros each except one from CCC (the Development Plan 2004) for which a paperback copy costs 50euros.

      Thanks for your interest PaulC.

      (P.S. If you want more Cork originated or based company histories – there’s plenty more where that came from. I’d be more than happy to oblige).

    • #732874
      kingcronin
      Participant

      Hi ya Lexington…( Knowledgeable One) !!

      Regarding the capitol cinema on the grand parade:

      Do you know who bought Central Shoes Stores ?? ….I think the same group/person purchased the Oster Bar also, behind the Capitol, for almost twice its value … (Oster was bought by scribben group 2years ago for 3.2 million and recently purchased for a whopping 6 million by someone!!? ) Thus, would you think the purchasing of the surrounding property around the Capitol Cinema means only one thing for the Capitol, the Grand Parade and Cork City.? Any drawings for plans on the grand parade.

      Cheers

    • #732875
      Leesider
      Participant

      just saw this in breakingnews http://www.breakingnews.ie/2004/11/15/story175995.html

      Patrick St the best shopping street in the country?? thought that would have gone to Grafton St, good to see though! anyone have any info on this new landmark or even better still any images??

    • #732876
      crc
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      …Cork as the nation’s second city (and mythical ‘Real Capital’ 🙂 ) …

      Lets get something straight here: Cork may be the second largest city in the state, but it is only the third largest city in the nation!!!!

    • #732877
      theblimp
      Participant

      CRC – without wishing to sound pedantic –

      “Nation: A relatively large group of people organized under a single, usually independent government; a country.The territory occupied by such a group of people.The government of a sovereign state.”

      Under the above definition Cork is indeed the second largest city in the nation. More importantly it is ‘de real capital’.

      …can we get back to the real purpose of the thread now?

    • #732878
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      just saw this in breakingnews http://www.breakingnews.ie/2004/11/15/story175995.html

      Patrick St the best shopping street in the country?? thought that would have gone to Grafton St, good to see though! anyone have any info on this new landmark or even better still any images??

      Leesider, if you remember in a post I made a good couple of weeks ago – I mentioned that a number of developers were looking at erecting a statue or monument in the middle of Cork city – well, this is the fruition of those intentions. The developers being Howard Holdings, the middle of Cork city being Lapps Quay and the height (though the original talk was for a 40m statue [as reported initially], this was later proved excessive and unsuitable – the statue is now to be a little over 50ft.)

      Greg Coughlan, originally of Ballydehob and CEO of Howard Holdings, is the man pushing this statue. A local Cork artist was commissioned to design the 500,000 euro project – which will be located at the City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. Howard Holdings also confirmed their intention to open 2 more hotels in Cork (in addition to the Clarion at City Quarter) – 1 in Kinsale and 1 in West Cork. On that note, Greg Coughlan is moving back to Cork city after spending a number of years developing Howard Holdings interests in London. Howard Holdings are making this move as a gesture of their confidence in Cork city as a development location – and besides City Quarter and Albert Quay developments – I can tell you, Howard Holdings have a number of large-scale and very intriguing projects in planning for Cork for over the next 10 years. Predominantly focused on the Docklands Area. One gentleman with the company has told me, Howard intend to continue working in the UK and Dublin markets, but have decided the main strategic interests are more suited to being focussed on Cape Town & SA (through Eurocape Investments) and Cork city (as Howard Holdings). It’s a nice boost of confidence for Cork.

      Over 70% of the City Quarter office development has been sold and/or pre-let. Howard’s other nearby office development at Anglesea Street (Copley Hall), has seen its remaining office unit come under ‘Deal Agreed’ status – marking a continued up-surge in the Cork office market.

      I’ll look into getting images of that statue soon.



      John Mannix’s Washington Street project is due it’s decision date this Thursday.

    • #732879
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: Thomas Crosbie Holdings have received permission from CCC to forward with the construction of their new printing press facility at Mahon Point – a facility that will be leased out to newly formed company Webprint Concepts – who subsequently will publish all Thomas Crosbie Holdings titles bar the London-centred Irish Post.

      The development essentially consists of a new manufacturing building comprising a press hall of 19.5m in height, mail room, newspaper reel storage, ink storage, plate making, control room, maintenance rooms, plant rooms, external plant enclosures, storage areas, offices, staff amenities, lunch room & sprinkler tank pumphouse, all of a total floor area of 4,075 sq. m. and associated development including site roadway, vehicle manoeuvring areas, delivery and dispatch areas, car parking, sprinkler tank, emergency generators, waste compaction and storage, site fencing, gates and vehicle barriers. Site services including water, electrical, gas and telecoms supply, connection to foul sewer and storm water discharge, site lighting, CCTV cameras, site works and mounding, landscaping all on a site of 1.42 hectares.

      Design is by RKD McCarthy Lynch.

      -> Meanwhile the other prominent TCH development site at 16 Lavitts Quay (new HQ) – though ‘officially’ under offer – has moved on to advanced stages of agreement. A ‘Sale Agreed’ status is expected to be confirmed soon.



      :confused: Old Friary Place Developments Ltd. of Blarney have been refused permission to redevelopment a derelict site off Shadon Street. The proposed development consisted of 2 No. 3 storey blocks incorporating ground floor 5 no. one bedroom apartments, first floor 5 no. two bedroom duplex units with 4 no. car parking spaces, turning area and all associated site works at Old Friary Place. CCC Planners cited inappropriate development and reasons contrary to sustainable development of the area for the refusal. They also noted the poor quality and standard of design – the REAL reason for refusal. Although I’m disappointed in seeing development lost to an area so badly needing of it – I have to agree with CCC on this one. Hopefully Old Friary will revise their plans and come back with something of a higher quality. Architects = DFOD Consultants.



      😡 And in conflict to my report earlier today, CCC have just this evening requested ‘Clarification’ on John Mannix’s Washington Street development (Further Info was requested in May and received in October) – the decision due date of Nov 18th 2004 will now undoubtedly be pushed back again.


    • #732880
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Lexington,
      I would just like to defend the Planning Dept. decision on Old Friary Place Development.
      Here are one or two of the points of objection:

      The Drawings submitted were inaccurate and contradictory.

      The proposed car parking was incorrect and could not hold the amount of car parking spaces indicated, which was in any case too few for the proposed development.

      The development proposed to build 3 storey buildings on its boundary wall with the neighbouring properties – they proposed to build a wall approx. 6m above the finished floor level of the houses to the rear, on the boundary wall between the properties – between 1.5 and 5m away from the rear of these houses.

      The developer also sought to unlawfully interefere with a number of easements on site – 2 rights to light (one rendering a house uninhabitable) and a Public Right of Way (though this technically is a legal, not planning issue).

      If you would like, I can email you a copy of the objection submission.

    • #732881
      lexington
      Participant

      Bob (Republican supporter???),

      I have objection copies and the full planning report thank you. In the above post, it is unreasonable for me to include full details of the planning report as it takes up a considerable amount of space – which is highly inappropriate, hence, I pick out some main points and post them.

      If you read the above post you’ll see I agree with the CCC [Cork City Council] decision too. ( Quote: lexington – “Although I’m disappointed in seeing development lost to an area so badly needing of it – I have to agree with CCC on this one. Hopefully Old Friary will revise their plans and come back with something of a higher quality. ” )

      I read the report and had a chat with an individual from Castle Close and I totally agree with the decisions taken. When I cited my disappointment – it’s a disappointment that a potential rejuvenating development for Shadon Street Area has been lost, but clearly, a development such as this under the circumstances it stirred is unacceptable. I would be anxious to see a standard of development at this location which compliments the new renewal of Shadon Street and works well with its fine residents. Hence why I hope Old Friary pull up their socks and get to work on a project of a greater suitability with concern to neighbouring residents and the historic Shandon Street area as a whole. So, there’s no real argument here – I’m 100% behind you on this one.

      [P.S. When I refer to quality, I don’t specifically refer to aesthetics – it’s inclusive of how the project affects its neighbours, the quality of life it supports to its residents (of which this project was lacking to say the least) and the quality of the surrounding environment resultant of the development (e.g. traffic management, refuse etc).]

    • #732882
      lexington
      Participant

      @kingcronin wrote:

      Hi ya Lexington…( Knowledgeable One) !!

      Regarding the capitol cinema on the grand parade:

      Do you know who bought Central Shoes Stores ?? ….I think the same group/person purchased the Oster Bar also, behind the Capitol, for almost twice its value … (Oster was bought by scribben group 2years ago for 3.2 million and recently purchased for a whopping 6 million by someone!!? ) Thus, would you think the purchasing of the surrounding property around the Capitol Cinema means only one thing for the Capitol, the Grand Parade and Cork City.? Any drawings for plans on the grand parade.

      Cheers

      Hi kingcronin,

      there’s no question about the Capitol Cineplex being redeveloped – it will be happening, take it from me. Ward Anderson’s decision to keep the cineplex in business for the foreseeable is more based on ‘concerns’ raised by the public (aka being dogged by the Evening Echo for a story and responding with a ‘get off our back’ answer) rather than providing a definitive position on its intentions for the site. Yes the cinema business is doing well in Cork at the moment, a trend Ward Anderson are hoping to soak up – the Capitol being currently its only real city centre presence in cinema activities. When the Omniplex opens at Mahon Point in Feburary 2005 – Ward Anderson may be willing to discuss more openly its intentions for the Capitol.

      In part, one of the reasons the Cineplex hasn’t been redeveloped as of yet, has got to do with a myriad of complications mostly associated with O’Callaghan Properties – stemming back to Ward Anderson’s first talks with the company relating to Mahon Point. O’Callaghan Properties had been seeking to gain a stronger presence in the city centre especially for purposes of retail. The Capitol provided a unique development opportunity and was part of discussions between the 2 companies when brokering a deal. Though ‘officially’ this can’t be verified, it was very clear, O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) had been drawing up plans for quite sometime w.r.t. the Capitol. Moves were taken to guarantee the site – and this was instrumental in Ward Anderson gaining its presence at the 11-screen multiplex in Mahon Point, despite strong competition from UCI and Ster Century (see previous Mahon Point tenant list post I made a few months back). However, when Thomas Crosbie Holdings drew up their intentions for Lavitts Quay and Academy Street back in 2000 (MP had been in the works since [officially] 1996), an opportunity arose for OCP to gain a substantially larger city centre site in a prime location. Since then, deals were brokered with Johnson and Perrot (now with a new 8m euro premises intended for MP – decision due on 18th Nov), Taboo & associated retail premises fronting Patrick’s Street, ESB, Grand Circle Lounge, Barter Travel and Ryan’s Pharmacy – among others. This gave OCP a .6acre city centre block with far greater development potential. The Irish Examiner HQ sold for 30m – after OCP presented its plans to TCH. Clearly, OCP’s intentions lay with the 150m Academy Street development after all this – a rival retail project at the Capitol would damage this. However, such a valuable premises in the shape of the Capitol would be one foolish to let go. Persons in the know – made a number of moves to buy up surrounding properties they believed necessary to support any Capitol development (I do have names but would rather not dispense them as of yet – maybe closer to any development move). It is my current understanding that after consultation with OCP, Ward Anderson continued to operate the Capitol business – which suited well in light of the aforementioned business environment. However, the scenario with the Capitol has not put off other developers from approaching Ward Anderson with proposals – some of which I outlined in previous posts. I today received more information on ownership issues relating to the Capitol and its surrounds (hence the delay in my reply) – however as you can understand, I’ve to keep my mouth closed for a while. I will let you and everyone else interested know when I can ~ I always do, but for now, that’s pretty much the story.

    • #732883
      Pug
      Participant

      Hi all
      have been watching this site from afar for a while and am stunned at the amount of info available on Cork, please keep it up and especially Lex the Champion! Saw in a previous thread that someone called Douglas an architectural wasteland and they’d be dead right. For such a big suburb and all the changes to the ‘village’ we now have unbelievable poor traffic (they had all summer and starting rebuilding the ‘green route; the week after the schools came back – CLEVER!!)and rows and rows of houses. Enough of those lamentations, Cork will be amazing in short time, grand parade and kenny group devt, Examiner offices new retail, over by the Capitol retail as well. Could seriously do with a few proper night clubs and big entertainment venues. All we need to do now is do up the South Mall. (slightly dubious also about Pana getting ‘best shopping street’!!!!) – anyone got an opinion on Centre park road and all that area? are there plans afoot or is it anticipated that the riverside will be done first and then a natural move in ?

    • #732884
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Frinailla Developments today outlined their intentions for their sites on the Watercourse Road, Blackpool in the local media. As mentioned in one of my previous posts – Frinailla have dramatically scaled back their project – which in its original 7-storey, 70m euro incarnation was refused by both CCC and ABP. The new proposal cites a development of 153 residential units, with a landmark library, new Garda Station, medical centre, new retail units, supermarket, creche etc. The development will be predominantly 3-storeys in height and provide 100 underground parking spaces. Global Properties and FML will handle sales. John Paul Construction are signed to be main contractors. An application will be lodged soon with CCC. Depending on a decision due date – completion of the project will take 2 years. A decision is currently in the waiting for Frinailla to demolish the existing structures on site and commence sub-surface investigations – something which has proven rewarding for the development company at their Grand Parade Plaza development site. These excavations may affect the development commencement date also.


    • #732885
      lexington
      Participant

      IRISH EXAMINER OFFICES AT CITY QUARTER

      😉 FINALLY…something I’ve been itching to let known since last July, and now I can. The Irish Examiner are to relocate their non-printing operations to 30,000sq ft of offices at Howard Holdings new City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. The top 2 floors of the City Quarter office building and 2,000sq ft on the ground floor will house the new Irish Examiner HQ. If you remember my posts back in August that Kilquane Ltd (Howard Holdings) were seeking permission (which was eventually granted) for an additional floor of office space to their office building at City Quarter – this was a result of talks with Thomas Crosbie Holdings (the Irish Examiner’s parent holding company). You may remember my recent post stating that 70% per cent of the City Quarter offices had been sold or prelet – this was predominantly due to the Irish Examiner’s interest. It’s a move that makes sense.

      Also, you may remember that I posted a ‘Deal Agreed’ status was held on the Examiner’s Lavitts Quay site – this was part of the deal with TCH. Howard Holdings will now take possession of the Lavitts Quay site and develop a 120-bedroom budget hotel w/ 2 floors of retail space & basement parking for 50 cars. An application will be lodged in December – design is by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli (who had originally designed the Irish Examiner HQ building for the site). Construction will begin immediately on grant. PJ Hegarty will be main contractors. This also allows Howard Holdings complete an intention they had been investigating through Carlton Investments for a similar hotel on Lavitts Quay back in 2000 – the site was later purchased by O’Callaghan Properties and incorporated into their 21 Lavitts Quay development.



      CAPITOL CINEPLEX

      :p In a recent post, I outlined the history associated with the redevelopment of the Capitol Cineplex – and the history stemming from that between Ward Anderson and O’Callaghan Properties. Although up until recently, OCP had been keeping an interest on such a valuable site (they have now indicated their intention to focus primarily on their Academy Street block), you may remember that I announced in that post I came to knowledge of ownership issues concerning the site. I can confirm to you now that Ward Anderson have indeed retained ownership of the Capitol and are now, as prev. mentioned, assessing development options – in conjunction with CCC.

      Designs I had outlined previously involved a number of developers who had approached Ward Anderson about the site, namely Limerick-based John Costelloe. Robert Butler was also a name mentioned.

      Though Ward Anderson admit they will see the site developed, they are leaning predominantly toward attaining FPP and then putting the site to auction.



      CITY PROPERTIES LTD BRING CAPTAIN AMERICAS TO CORK

      🙂 City Properties Ltd (owners of the Queen’s Old Castle, Savoy, Classic Bar etc) and who recently were granted planning to redevelop the rear of the Queen’s Old Castle (along South Main Street) for purposes of a restaurant w/ roof garden and nightclub – have announced that they intend to bring the Captain America’s Restaurant Brand (of Grafton Street fame) to Cork at this development. The restaurant will be spread over 2 floors. Wagamama – the international noodle house will also be located at the development. Ridge Developments are the main contractors and are on site already. Design is by Kiosk Architects.

    • #732886
      jungle
      Participant

      Do you think that any cinema element will be included in the Capitol development? If the Capitol closes there will be a woeful lack of cinema screens in Cork city centre – even allowing for the Kino expansion.

      I would imagine that Mahon Point will draw most of its customers from Douglas, which I expect to close, from customer’s who don’t currently go to the cinema and to a lesser extent from Midleton. I don’t know how significant the impact on city centre cinemas will be.

      If the cinema element is to be taken out of the Capitol, are there any other city centre sites that are suitable for cinema development?

    • #732887
      lexington
      Participant

      I can’t speak for what Ward Anderson themselves have planned – as they are only beginning their own investigations. But previous plans by developers sought to aim predominantly towards retail, office and residential activities. The site has been earmarked by the City Manager for higher-order retail use. Offices and residential would not be favourable at this location – but I suppose it all depends on the plans. However, there is a new plan in the works – which it is hoped will be put to Ward Anderson over the coming weeks.

    • #732888
      phatman
      Participant

      Lexington, as regards the change of plans for lavitts quay etc: I understand that the examiner would obviously not have moved operations to the lavitts quay site until the development there was complete, realistically this would have been sometime around 2006/2007. But seeing as the city quarter development has an expected completion date of next march, they will be able to make their move a lot sooner than originally anticipated. How does all this affect Owen O’ Callaghan’s plans for the academy street site??This would not have begun construction until the Examiner had made their move, upon the completion of the lavitts quay develpoment, originally, but can we expect progress in the nearer future as a result?

    • #732889
      lexington
      Participant

      The Irish Examiner have indicated that they intend only to make their move to City Quarter in mid-to-late 2006. The City Quarter Development would be complete a year before Examiner operations transfer. O’Callaghan Properties have said they don’t plan to begin construction on Academy Street until late-2006. It’ll probably take until then for the planning application to get through the process – which will undoubtedly be one that involves ABP somewhere along the way. It doesn’t make clear sense to me to leave 32,000sq ft of office space vacant for a year – but that’s what The Irish Examiner seem to have opted for. However, plans may yet change. OCP won’t be lodging any application for Academy Street until at least mid-2005 (and that’s just guess work on my behalf). I know the primary plans are drawn up – but I don’t have any fixed application dates. When I do, I’ll let you know.

      Howard Holdings on the other hand, are due to lodge their application for 16 Lavitts Quay this coming December for a 120-bedroom budget hotel, with 2 floors of retail space and 50 undergound parking spaces. It is rumoured – and I’m not 100% on this yet, that R. Arthur’s corner former ‘Balloon Surprise’ shop may have been purchased by Howard Holdings to incorporate into their development. The store was not part of the Irish Examiner office building development. Hopefully, it’ll give the quay a more organised appearance. The actions by Howard Holdings also mark the beginning of a more aggressive expansion into Cork development – as posted earlier.

    • #732890
      phatman
      Participant

      Thanks for that, Lexington, you’re right, it does seem strange to leave so much space vacant for so long, just proves your earlier point about the alleged floorspace ‘crisis’ in the city-centre, again down to inefficiency and poor planning. Will be interesting to see how all this turns out. I must say the aerial shot of lapp’s quay in the examiner today was pretty breath-taking, It really is shaping up to be something special, the recently commisioned sculpture should look great. Im curious as to how o’flynn (or is it Bowen doing the actual construction?) are constructing no.6, they seem to be leaving the corner section out for the time being, and focusing on the end nearer the bus station. Should look great when finished though. Im gonna pick your brains again lexington, this time as regards that triangular lot just by the bus station, which sold for a hefty sum recently, I saw the report on last weeks commercial property section of the examiner, in which it suggested that a c.9 storey building was being considered.Do you have any further info?This is actually a tiny site, but could really accomodate a quality landmark building, adding to the now flourishing lower city centre area, im hopeful that something will come of this…

    • #732891
      Leesider
      Participant

      can anyone get the aerial shot from the examiner up here?

      also was wondering has Carey’s tool hire been sold and if so what is planned for there and when?

    • #732892
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i understood that careys recently purchased the sextant bar on the corner of albert quay, and i do not know whether carey’s is being put on the market but i assume they will sell at some stage – and will definitely receive a substantial price for this important site

    • #732893
      phatman
      Participant

      I don’t have a scanner Leesider, in response to that request for the image of Lapp’s Quay, maybe somebody else does. If you really want to see it, you could always grab a backcopy of the Examiner in the city Library!Not quite worth that I’d say, as impressive as it is.
      Anyone know about the Bandon Road roundabout, as regards construction of a flover? I know originally it was intended to build the Kinsale interchange first, and then to commence on Sarsfield and Bandon, due in part to minimising disruption during construction, but mainly due to funding, but i have noticed that the completion date of the second phase of the Ballincollig bypass has been pushed back by several months to next spring, to accomodate revised plans for the roundabout. Does this mean they’re actually going to do the smart thing and build the flyover in conjunction with the bypass?Unfortunately i fear not, that they’re merely adjusting the current situation to ease construction when they eventually do decide to do the full job, but i may be wrong, would appreciate any info.

    • #732894
      Camus
      Participant

      Lexington,

      The building you refer to did not collapse and kill a girl. That happened a block up the street. It was not bad weather that caused the accident. If you can find the inquest into her death then, well, you’re a better connected responsible citizen than I am. But, I guess, if you knew what you were talking about and realised the weight of responsibility attendant on such certainty you surely wouldn’t be posting on such an insecure site.

    • #732895
      theblimp
      Participant

      Phatman – I was speaking to an engineer connected to the project a few weeks back and he told me that the Kinsale Road roundabout will see work commence on its flyover early in the new year. On completion they expect to move on to the Sarsfield Road roundabout and finally the Bandon Road roundabout. The remainder of the Ballincollig By-Pass (into the Bandon Road roundabout) will be open before Christmas and not next Spring. The work being undertaken at present is indeed to facilitate the new flyover when they eventually get to it (….in about 30 years!). While I appreciate that they are now commited to doing this work, I dread to thing what those three roundabouts are going to be like over the next few years!!! :rolleyes:

    • #732896
      phatman
      Participant

      Just as i feared. Good to know the bypass will be done by Christmas though. Thanks blimp

    • #732897
      lexington
      Participant

      Camus – this is a very serious issue as you are well aware. In the interest of clarity – the word ‘collapsed’ is not accurate I admit, and I wholly apologise for its use, as in actuality, fragments of the upper roof structure – which had been subject to dereliction, and aided by the memorable ill weather Cork experienced that tragic week – broke away and fell to street level. However, a young lady from the Blarney area was sadly DOA at the Mercy Hospital that night and her boyfriend was left without use of his lower limbs. It’s a very sensitive and very sad situation which I think is still present in the minds of many Cork persons. I personally knew those involved. I have no reports or inquiries into this particular tragedy at my immediate disposal (however, it can be sought and I have seen it – though admittedly, not in the complete detail I would usually assess such things, as it was in years before I became fully involved in the work I do now) – but I do not think the conclusions are deniable regardless. It is a legal issue that I believe has since been rectified. The remaining upper-floor structures of the building were renovated in the interests of public safety. So I apologise for use of the word ‘collapsed’. I am very aware of the public nature of this forum – incidents with TCH have highlighted this to me personally, so I am cautious about what I post w.r.t. accuracy. Any information that I do not have personal involvement in, or personal responsibility in retrieving myself (which is the vast majority), I receive from reputable or informed sources (which I also refer to by way of liability issues – something TCH tend not to do). I am fully aware of the responsibilities with which such statements are made – more aware than you may realise – and I always back up such statements were possible and when requested. If there is ever a scenario in which I cannot for whichever reasons may there-arise, I will always retract my statement and offer my apologises w/ an acknowledgement of my fault until I can wholly proof it otherwise. At this stage, I would then expect my accusors to accept their own misjudgements. Thank you for pointing this issue out Camus, you are correct that the mentioned building was indeed not the source of this tragedy – and it was further up the street. I would never consciously or purposely misinform members – so far, I can say with my hand on my heart, I never have.



      Leesider – I may have a copy of the Irish Examiner lying about and I’ll try and get that image up for you – it’s a nice shot indeed.

      Also, w.r.t. Carey’s Tool Hire – there is a myriad of rumours in circulation regarding their premises on Albert (Terence McSwiney) Quay. Subsequent to the purchase of the Sextant Bar, lands facing Albert Road and in light of the situation that arose involving O’Briens Office Supplies & Howard Holdings on Clontraf Street – Carey’s are said to be looking into drawing up plans for a substantial commercial and office complex/building on these lands. In light of this, it is believed they intend to relocate to a more accessible and suitable premises for further, future business growth and development. It remains most likely, they will sell (if the above rings true) their premises w/ FPP. Initial reports cite a 6-storey, contemporary structure fronting Albert Quay and Old Station Road, gradually stepping back to 4-storeys at Albert Road (in respect of nearby residential units). Watch this space!


      phatman – although I am aware of the site in question, and the recent ownership issues surrounding it – I can’t say I read last Thurs week’s Irish Examiner concerning the site’s development. I know it is being assessed, but not aware of what exactly is being assessed. I would agree that it is ideal for a landmark office development – and, though small as it is, has beautiful potential. I’m now curious myself and will look into it come next week. I’ll let you know more if I can when info becomes available. Clearly, in order to max. such a small compact space, building up is the most sensible option. Though 9-storeys may be a little excessive – 7 perhaps given the height of nearby No.6 and City Quarter – would seem more ideal, but I suppose it all depends on the design as well.

      -> Bowen Construction were contracted by O’Flynn Construction to develop No.6 Lapps Quay – the building is interesting in that it is more 2-buildings than 1 single building. The Oliver Plunkett Street elevation is being complete first structurally (this elevation steps back to 4 1/2 storeys, stepping to 6 at the Lapps Quay elevation.) This section will be complete as part of Phase 2 in construction to minimise disturbance to existing businesses in neighbouring No.5 Lapps Quay of which No.6 is a 60,000sq ft extension.

    • #732898
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Johnson & Perrott Ltd have been granted planning for their 8m euro new dealership at Mahon Point. The development will house 3 J&P dealerships (Volvo, Honda & Opel) under the one roof of the SDA O’Flynn designed, 8,000sq ft building. The 10.29 metre high facility will not only house the dealerships, repair workshops and customer areas – but an internet cafe, kindergarten and well-being area. The development is part of a deal negotiated between J&P and O’Callaghan Properties – with the latter acquiring J&P’s existing showroom premises on Emmet Place. The city centre site will be incorporated into OCP’s plans for a 6-storey, 150m euro retail quarter and apartment development due for construction come December 2006.



      😮 Coveney and Associates have submitted additional Significant Further Information to CCC w.r.t. John Mannix’s 6-storey retail, office and residential development at 40 – 42 Washington Street. A number of alterations have been made to the project incl. a reduction in the number of apartments, a reduced floor and layout alterations. CCC have req’d Further Info for the project twice – a decision date was due for Nov 18th this month, but will be significantly put back as a result of this move.


    • #732899
      lexington
      Participant

      -> Frinailla Developments Ltd have lodged 2 applications for their Watercourse Road, Blackpool development project. After their previous proposal for the 2 sites was refused by both CCC and ABP. This new proposal consists of 2 lots – of which the first site at Coral Seafood Ltd, and Kelly’s Garage, 44 – 47 Watercourse Rd, Hillgrove Lane consists of the demolition of all existing structures to facilitate a mixed use residential, office and commercial development. The proposed development will range in height from 1 – 5 storeys and will consist of 57 no. residential units including 8 no. 1 bedroom apartments, 2 no. 1 bedroom duplex units, 27 no. 2 bedroom apartments, 10 no. 2 bedroom duplex units, 3 no. 3 bedroom houses, 4 no. 3 bedroom duplex units and 3 no. 3 bedroom apartments. The proposed development also includes 1 no 510 m2 office, 267 m2 back, 2 no. retail units with net retail area of 63.5 m2 and 78 m2. Parking for the development will be provided in a basement car park which will continue under Hillgrove Lane and join with the underground car park proposed on the adjacent site.

      This adjacent site (Joe McSweeney shop, frmr John Denny & Son bld, 147 snooker club,2nd hand, store+48-52Watercourse Rd) will see the demolition of all existing structures to facilitate a mixed use residential, community facilities and comm. dev. The prop dev will range in height from 2–5 storeys consisting of 96 no. residential units incl. 17 no. 1 bedroom apts, 40 no. 2 bedroom apts, 20 no. 2 bedroom duplex units, 2 no. 3 bedroom houses, 9 no. 3 bedroom duplex units and 8 no. 3 bedroom apts. The prop dev also incl. a public library of 966 m2, a 504 m2 creche, a first floor med centre of 282 m2, a convenience retail unit of 529 m2, 5 no. retail units with net retail areas of 105 m2, 83 m2, 71 m2, 74 m2, 77 m2 and an 84 m2 café/rest. Parking for the dev will be provided in a basement car park which extends under Allinet’s Lane and cont. under Hillgrove Lane to join with the other underground car park prop at adjacent site. The prop dev incl provision for a public plaza to Watercourse Road, the upper of Allinet’s Hill and Hillgrove Lane, inclg amendment to the width of the latter and all assoc. site dev works.

      McCutheon Mulcahy are the planning consultants. John Paul Construction will be the main contractors. A decision due date is pending.



      And just on the note of Frinailla, those of you familiar with the design for their Grand Parade Plaza project (scheduled for primary construction this comining Janurary – after an extensive and long excavation period) – and for those of you who complain about Richard Rainey’s so-so design ~ all I can say is, be thankful the original plan for the site didn’t make the final cut. See below.

      Here (below) is an image of what IS going ahead. Note the MILD improvement. (Cough cough)



      Below, find an image from the Ballincollig Main Street perspective looking across to O’Flynn Construction’s new Ballincollig Town Centre development – under construction. The CG Image shows a pedestrian walkway leading into the new commercial centre which will contain 100,000sq ft of offices within the former military barracks square – and a new Shopping Centre development nearby (to be anchored by Dunnes Stores).

    • #732900
      sw101
      Participant

      lexington,

      can you recommend somebody in the IAWS (development officer/designer/anyone really) who might be able to help me get survey drawings or other info on the R&H Hall silo on kennedy quay? i’m doing my thesis on redeveloping it as a design institute and any help would be appreciated.

      thanks

    • #732901
      phatman
      Participant

      So Lexington, Dunnes have won the bid for the centre? What a pity, was hoping marks & sparks would come good. That must be 9 or 10 stores they have in the city alone now, a bit excessive, eh? Could really do with some competition. Any other confirmed tenants?

    • #732902
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      M+S in Ballincollig?!? Not exactly target audience.

    • #732903
      lexington
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      lexington,

      can you recommend somebody in the IAWS (development officer/designer/anyone really) who might be able to help me get survey drawings or other info on the R&H Hall silo on kennedy quay? i’m doing my thesis on redeveloping it as a design institute and any help would be appreciated.

      thanks

      I’ll look into it for you – I’ll try and have details for you tomorrow as I’ll be away for the rest of the week.



      @phatman wrote:

      So Lexington, Dunnes have won the bid for the centre? What a pity, was hoping marks & sparks would come good. That must be 9 or 10 stores they have in the city alone now, a bit excessive, eh? Could really do with some competition. Any other confirmed tenants?

      It would seem that way – I can confirm that M&S were in talks with O’Flynn Construction – but it seems Dunnes put forward the best offer and that won the day. It’s a shame really – that’s 2 developments M&S seem to have lost out on (the other being Mahon Point – which Tesco ultimately took). I would like to see some diversity too – the city is saturated with Dunnes, which in my own personal opinion – offer little by way of individuality or speciality. They stock and provide the same old same old as everything like SuperValu, Tesco, Superquinn (who were interestingly also in talks with O’Flynn Construction about BTC) etc etc. At least M&S bring a little diversity. Their Irish stores are well recognised as being its most profitable. However, there is a mild rumour, M&S have not yet wholly withdrawn from talks, and may be contemplating a smaller unit for its Simply Food brand. We’ll have to wait and see.

    • #732904
      Leesider
      Participant

      Lexington, I was wondering would you be able to help me with a little bit of career advice?? I know you don’t normally allow people to contact you directly so I was wondering could you send me a pm and then I could ask you a question or 2!! I know this is a bit unorthodox, but you appear to be a man in the know and as I am abroad at the moment I don’t have many contacts at home. If you can provide any help it would be greatly appreciated!

      Thanks,
      Leesider

    • #732905
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      Just while we’re talking about all these stores and such, as reported by Neil Callahan in the Sunday Business Post (21st November 2004) and I can confirm this also, the UK Department Store chain John Lewis have been seeking to locate a premises in ‘southern Ireland’. By southern, I don’t mean the Republic, I’m referring to the Munster region – and I am told, to be more specific, southern Ireland means Cork. I have also heard Michael O’Donoghue has been having talks with a number of possible tenants for his Cornmarket Street (Rockfell) Department Store and Apartment Development – I just wonder (cough cough) if John Lewis was among one of them???

    • #732906
      lawyer
      Participant

      I understand that a bid has been accepted by the reciever for the IFI site at Marino Point, It is said that the Port of Cork Company was not successful.
      Has anyone heard who the successful bidder was?

    • #732907
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      John Lewis. Very interesting! “Never knowingly oversold” and all that. I wonder why they would choose Cork first though? If they are indeed considering a move into Cornmarket St, then that is a very positive move for that area. They are the type of tenant that developement has to attract to succeed.

    • #732908
      jungle
      Participant

      John Lewis. Very interesting! “Never knowingly oversold” and all that. I wonder why they would choose Cork first though? If

      Possible because Dublin already has 3 significant department stores – BT, Arnott’s and Clery’s. Cork only has BT, which is a small number for a city of its size.

      Re: The IFI site. I have no idea who bought it. It’s a pity that the Port of Cork didn’t get it. The cost of establishing an alternative dockside site with rail access from scratch will be heavy.

    • #732909
      satanta99
      Participant

      Don’t forget Roches Stores, that is the most significant department store in Cork City centre. John Lewis would be a brillant scoop for the development. Personally I was of the opinion that a letting to multiple tenants would be a better direction for the street, given the lack of large units for the major multiple such as H+M and Zara, but the advent of such a major name in retail would be a fantastic anchor for the area.

    • #732910
      jungle
      Participant

      It’s true that Roches is the most significant department store as it is one of the most significant in Dublin. I was thinking along the lines of destination stores.

      Its role as a destination store is what is so exciting about John Lewis. It would attract people who might normally shop in Limerick, Waterford or even Dublin.

      [Editted because it didn’t make sense as originally written]

    • #732911
      theblimp
      Participant

      anyone notice any similarities between the building on the cover of this week’s Sunday Times ‘Home’ supplement (Tall Tower in Dublin) and the planned ‘landmark’ building for the old Sorting Office site on Eglington Street? If I get a chance I’ll post a pic of each later today

    • #732912
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes, theblimp, I just came home today and briefly saw the article. If you have a copy, do you think you could upload the comparitive drawing on the bottom of the article page – the one that includes Cork County Hall.

      The design is similar, but I am sure it is predominantly mere coincidence. So far, the high-rise planned for Cork seem of a relatively quality standard – but none of them really rise much above that at County Hall as is. Cork County Hall reaches 66m in its current form (will be mildly higher come renovation completion), Water Street (in it’s original form) reached 69m and Eglinton Street will reach 70m (80m at spire). However, there is a small possibiIity the Water Street Tower may be increased in height ever so slightly – depending on the final decision of options presented by MOLA. In addition, the high-rise proposals for Horgan’s Quay are expected to top 70m (w/ one of the buildings at least) – while a pre-planning proposal for a Kennedy Quay development may yet incorporate a centre-piece building of 25-storeys.

      But we’ll just have to wait and see. I just hope the standard is up to scratch on all the proposals.

    • #732913
      lexington
      Participant

      -> Justin Canty has sold his site along the Victoria Cross Road for an undisclosed sum (in excess of 1.5m euro). The site had F.P.P. for a 5-storey student apartment building with 24 apartments (73 individual rooms), underground car-park, laundry, 3 medical units, security office and other ancillary facilities. The building, designed by O’Shea Leader, boasts extensive roof-top gardens also. A S50 development, the building will most likely head for immediate construction to meet the 2006 deadline – that’s if the un-named buyer avails of the planning permission.


      -> Sean Meehan has withdrawn his application for Outline Permission of a 3-storey, multi-level car-park and commercial units development over the River Lee (on stilts!!!) at Grenville Place (adjacent to the Mercy University Hospital). The application faced a horrid ride through planning – co-developer and engineer John Paul Lennon cites that it was better withdrawn than refused. Mr. Lennon is apparently back at the drawing-board for another application later next year.



      -> P&A Herlihy have sold their premises, ‘The Loft’ on Cornmarket Street to a private developer. The furniture operation will however remain in place for a time-being.



      -> John Mannix’s expectant 40-42 Washington Street retail, office and residential development has issued its second bash of Further Info (requested 16th Nov 2004 and received 23rd Nov 2004). A number of amendments have been again made to the development – including a reduction in apartment numbers, layouts and office space. I agree with the initial alteration of reducing the 7th-storey (which was boxy and unsightly) amended in the first Further Info request, but I’m not quite sure if these new alterations will benefit the development much. A decision date is now set for the 20th December 2004. (4 days after another landmark decision date for O’Callaghan Properties’ Jurys Development on the 16th.) I hope a positive outcome is found for both projects.



      2005 Development Outlook

      A number of ‘carry-over’ projects are scheduled for 2005 – including the construction of Rockfell’s exciting and long-awaited department store and apartment development on Cornmarket Street, the construction of Frinailla’s Grand Parade Plaza (FINALLY!!!), the will it ever happen Cork School of Music, Cork City Hall’s 32m, 90,000sq ft extension (already under construction), Fleming Construction’s student development at Victoria Cross, UCC’s 150,000sq ft IT Centre at the former Western Road Greyhound Stadium and hopefully O’Callaghan Properties’ Jurys Hotel development and John Mannix’s Washington Street development (see above).

      Decisions due will include Frinailla’s Watercourse Road development, the Kino Cinema redevelopment, Howard Holdings’ Hotel and Retail Development for Lavitts Quay (due to be lodged in mid-December), O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street development – plus a number of other projects scheduled to be lodged before the year end.

      Projects due to be lodged for 2005 – are expected to include, Howard Holdings’ Albert Quay office building, Werdna Ltd’s amended Water Street development, a new application by the Kenny Group for 50 Grand Parade (South Main Street Car Park), plans for the Capitol Cineplex by Ward Anderson – a number of exciting quayside/docklands proposals – plus whatever plans developers have in store for the city. A major anticipated deal, is expected for the Brooks Haughton site bordered by Copley Street, South Terrace and Union Quay, as well as an announcement for the Careys Tool Hire facility on Terence McSwiney Quay and Albert Road.

      2005, Cork’s year as Capital of Culture, should reign in a number of new investment projects – a myriad of demographics are working in favour for Cork over the coming years. Expect 2003, 2004 and 2005 to only mark the tip of the ice-berg for what may be yet to come. A particular focus is expected on the docklands – perhaps some movement on Horgan’s Quay? Only time will reveal that one.

      There are a number of other exciting projects in the pipeline but unfortunately, I can’t discuss all of those as of yet, but when I can, you’ll undoubtedly hear about it first.


    • #732914
      jungle
      Participant

      Are there any plans for the site of what was The Liberty? For those who don’t remember the pub, it’s the derelict site opposite the back of the Queens Old Castle.

    • #732915
      lexington
      Participant

      With the announcement that the Shandon Bridge, connecting Pope’s Quay with Cornmarket Street, will finally be opened next week, it would seem engineer and developer John Paul Lennon (also behind Sean Meehan’s withdrawm application for an over-river multi-storey car-park at Grenville Place) is back at it again!

      Mr. Lennon has employed architect Sam Stephenson (of Central Bank and AIB HQ fame) to design a new proposal for a 30m euro retail and residential development…on a bridge, spanning Anderson’s Quay and St. Patrick’s Quay. This is Mr. Lennon’s second attempt at building a residential bridge at this location over the Lee. His previous application, back in 1998, consisted of a 5-storey structure over a specially constructed 73-metre bridge w/ 48 apartments and a commercial arcade. The application was refused – among the many reasons cited, it was stated the development would have constituted a major intervention on an unprecedented scale, which would irrevocably alter the spatial characteristics and dynamics of the city centre. One of the visual and architectural characteristics of the city is the openess of the quayside areas with views upstream and downstream giving a distinctive city image that would be significantly altered by the proposed development. The proposed development was claimed to be functionally isolated and not relating to either existing nor proposed pedestrian routes in the city.

      Inspired by trips to Venice (Ponte de Rialto), Prague (Charles Bridge) and Florence (Ponte Vecchio), Mr. Lennon will now lodged an application for his development in Janurary of next year (2005). The new proposal would see a western bridge elevation used as an open pedestrian walkway, with the eastern elevation catering for an extensive shopping arcade. 12 apartments would be developed above these shops, ranging up to 3-storeys high – with 6 penthouses above this again. Mr. Lennon projects a 2-year construction period, hoping to see the proposal up and running by Christmas 2007.

      Besides the fact that the sums don’t add up on this one, novelty aside, this would be a woeful addition to the city – especially at this location. Even were it to be built on a less imposing site, say somewhere back along the South Channel, I wouldn’t have such a problem with this – but I am confident CCC will cite the same reasons as before in its refusal.



      *UPDATES*

      -> Now this one is a corker (no pun intended)! Frinailla Developments Ltd applied to demolish the existing structures on their Watercourse Road sites (that of the 40m euro residential development fame) and conduct subsurface investigations. A few weeks later, in 3 seperate applications, Frinailla lodged their development intentions for a new 5-storey residential and community services development (see previous posts). When the planning decision came about earlier today fort he first batch of applications (related to excavations) – CCC refused grant based on the fact that no development proposal was attached to the applications, and therefore it could not justify a grant where such demolition and excavation would create an unsightly street-scape and cause a resident nuisance (i.e. asbestos etc). So, perhaps if Frinailla had just lodged their development intentions at the same time as part of a single application (in which excavation work was sought alongside the development proposal) – planning may perhaps have been granted. It all sounds a bit arse-ways to be honest. But I kind of see where CCC are coming from on this one. Frinailla just caused themselves more grief in a move they probably thought was smarter than it actually was. Hopefully their residential plan will get through this time at least.

      – However, I’m sure Frinailla will be delighted by the fact that they were today granted planning by ABP for a 70m 206 unit residential development near Ballincollig and Carrigrohane today. Among the conditions of grant was a point citing Frinailla must allocate a proportion of their development to Cork County Coucil’s affordable housing scheme. Kieran Conway of Frinailla didn’t seem to unhappy about the condition.

    • #732916
      lexington
      Participant

      Here are just some better images, long overdue I know, of the proposed Cork City Hall extension – designed by ABK, currently under First Phase preliminary construction by Cleary Doyle. The new 32m euro 4-storey extension will provide over 90,000sq ft of office space – to cater for the majority of CCC departments – in excess of 300 parking spaces underground and at roof level, and incorporate the latest environmentally friendly capabilities. To be honest with you, the external structure does little to inspire – but I have to say, the internal pedestrian walkway and office areas look closer to the money.

    • #732917
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      That looks like the European Parliament buildings in Brussels. Only smaller, obviously.

      I know the funding has been granted, but is there any news on the Midleton railway line? When is work due to start?

    • #732918
      Pug
      Participant

      does anyone have an idea of the rental costs of retail space in Mahon Point?

    • #732919
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      what’s the building in front of the fire station?

      @lexington wrote:

      Here are just some better images, long overdue I know, of the proposed Cork City Hall extension – designed by ABK, currently under First Phase preliminary construction by Cleary Doyle. The new 32m euro 4-storey extension will provide over 90,000sq ft of office space – to cater for the majority of CCC departments – in excess of 300 parking spaces underground and at roof level, and incorporate the latest environmentally friendly capabilities. To be honest with you, the external structure does little to inspire – but I have to say, the internal pedestrian walkway and office areas look closer to the money.

    • #732920
      Pug
      Participant

      any thoughts (ideas / speculation) as to who the developer is that is looking to buy Douglas Golf Club and put houses on it? There was rumours of a land swap deal for a course in Carrs Hill as well. any thoughts?

    • #732921
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      who has serious land holdings in Carrs Hill to do a swap? O Flynn, O Brien & O Flynn? I wonder…

    • #732922
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      any thoughts (ideas / speculation) as to who the developer is that is looking to buy Douglas Golf Club and put houses on it? There was rumours of a land swap deal for a course in Carrs Hill as well. any thoughts?

      There are 2 names I’m aware of. In the Irish Examiner, there was a report today of a bidder willing to offer up to 110m euro for the course. I can’t say who that bidder is because frankly, I’m not aware of anyone offering that amount. Its a pretty dramatic offer. When I know, I’ll let you know.



      @mickeydocs wrote:

      what’s the building in front of the fire station?

      I assume you mean the new City Hall extension???



      @Pug wrote:

      does anyone have an idea of the rental costs of retail space in Mahon Point?

      Unit pending, rates were averaging in the mid-hundreds per sq m p.m.


    • #732923
      anto
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      what’s the building in front of the fire station?

      300 car parking spaces, that sounds very environmentally friendly, isn’t there already a multi storey beside it

    • #732924
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah – I was thinking that myself. You think they could have saved the space and allowed greater amenity or office area available by offering a bus service to go around a collect its suburban employees in the morning and drop them home at night – but hey, that’s modern Ireland. Environmentally conscious as long as I can use my car. 😉

      (And yeah, there’s a multi-storey w/ 600 spaces right next to it and a new 550 space underground parking facility currently in planning as part of a new high-rise residential development across the street.)

    • #732925
      sw101
      Participant

      that glass section is hideous methinks

    • #732926
      Pug
      Participant

      Wasnt the decision on the O Flynn Eglinton St site due today? wonder if the city fathers gave it their blessing…

    • #732927
      lexington
      Participant


      Well here you have it – the latest and most up-to-date tenant confirmations for Mahon Point – more are yet to come!

      Main Shopping Centre –

      1.Debenhams 2.Tesco 3.Next 4.River Island 5. Sam McCauley 6. Lacoste 7. Jack & Jones 8. Zara 9.Monsoon 10.Gasoline 11.Oasis 12.La Senza 13.Morgan 14.Principles 15.Ladybird 16.FCUK 17.Adams 18.Champion Sports 19.The Jean Scene 20.Bershka 21.Pamela Scott 22.Best 23.Sasha 24.A-Wear 25.Suits You 26.Jane Norman 27.Carraig Donn 28.Accersorize 29.Swamp 30.Peter Mark 31.Game 32.Easons 33.First Choice 34.Golden Discs 35.Clarks 36.Ecco 37.Barratts 38.Vodafone 39.Nature’s Way 40. Perfume

      – names in the wings for the 2nd Phase of unit releases incl. 1. Pull&Bear (as part of Inditex’s other stores Zara and Bershka – however such an additional store may conflict with the ‘hip’ target market of Bershka) 2.HMV 3. Mango 4.Vero Moda 5. Bennetton/Sisley 6.Schuh 7.3G 8.Gloria Jeans

      [more soon]

      (*not guaranteed – but confirmed under negotiation)

      Food Stores & Food Court Tenants –

      1. McDonalds 2. KFC 3.O’Briens Sandwich Bars 4.The Bagel Bar 5.Eddie Rockets 6.Pizza Hut 7.Bennigans 8.Sweets

      13-Screen Multiplex –

      1. Omniplex (Ward Anderson)

      Retail Park –

      1. B&Q 2.Hickeys 3.Johnson & Perrott [more soon – see Retail Park Images below]

      Hotel & Leisure Centre (for 2006) –

      1. Hilton Hotels International


      :confused: Tesco have announced their intention to sell Wilton Shopping Centre in Bishopstown. One of the country’s oldest ‘modern style shopping centres’ and one of it’s most profitable will have a 100m euro asking price. DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald will handle the sale. Only 2 years ago, Tesco paid 80m for the centre – buying it from the Irish Fund Property Unit. Since then, the UK multiple has substantially redeveloped and extended the centre – adding 11 new units and a 50,000sq ft 24-hr Tesco grocery store (of which they will retain ownership, along with their new parking areas and planned petrol station). Tesco stands to gain a 15m euro profit from a successful transaction.

      😉 on a quiet side-note, plans had been formulated in the background by Roches Stores to substantially redevelop their anchor store at Wilton Shopping Centre prior to the 2002 sale. The plan saw the retailler doubling its retail space by adding an additional floor overhead and thus providing a more extensive department store capability with concessions similar to that of its flagship St. Patrick’s Street store and innovative Henry Street store in Dublin. Architects Newenhan Mulligan were commissioned originally for the project – which proposed a new main retail area and foyer, in-house restaurant and cafe, extensive natural light capability, new loading areas, multiple concessions over 2-floors. Although I am not aware of their current position on the project – in light of Tesco’s actions, this may present an attractive opportunity to forward with the development.



      :rolleyes: Also I forgot to mention sooner – ABP refused appeal (subsequent of Cork County Council refusal) to grant McCarthy Developments Ltd permission to redevelop the former Cork City FAI Soccer grounds at Curraheen as a 150-apartment, parkland student campus. Refusal was based on isolated nature of the development and inadequate infastructural connections between the development and nearby CIT campus etc etc.



      😡 And as for Bishopstown, CAHRA (Cork Anti High-Rise Association – classy!) have vowed to fight the decision to grant developer Mark Kelleher permission for his residential development of 70 apartments and 27 houses near Hawkes/Curraheen Road. Good ole councillor Jerry Buttimer has joined the campaign. The objectors are furious over the high-rise nature (5-storeys at its apex) of the development – citing they are fed up with the high-rise developments “staining” Bishopstown and its surrounds of late. Among the objectors (those involved in CAHRA) are the same groups of individuals that sought legal action against the City Council after the grew wary of a possible grant for another 5-storey development by O’Shea Builders Ltd near Carriglea.

      -> a number of issues arise here:

      First of all, Victoria Cross is the only area that can claim ‘high-rise’ to a degree with the 9-storey Victoria Mills (where were CAHRA then eh? It’s awful!) project.
      Second, buildings in Victoria Cross and Victoria Cross Road leading to Bishopstown average between 4 and 5-storeys anyway (considering new developments at M&P O’Sullivan Cash&Carry by the Fleming Group and plans for the J&P Honda dealership inclusive).
      Third, have these people even been to Frankfurt??? Do they know what ‘high-rise’ is???
      Fourth, with the exception of Victoria Mills (fair enough, I accept V.M. is like one of those mean street-corner hustlers who reads to children at the orphanage on weekends – unsightly to look at but pretty on the inside), the standard of these so-called ‘high-rise’ has been relatively good and has not detracted from the sky-line in any negative way – nor residential amenity and privacy (which many residents now reluctantly acknowledge) – the city planners have, in fairness, been very careful and considerate about this issue.


    • #732928
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Though I had heard the rumours (which you may remember I posted some time ago), I finally received word from a member of the Deloitte & Touche organisation, confirming that the company was actively looking into vertically extending their historical premises on Lapps Quay (between Connolly Hall and No.5 Lapps Quay). These premises are listed structures. I have been asked not to post the name of the Cork-based architectural firm behind the design – but was told by D&T, if they decide to proceed with their plans – and after further CCC talks, intend to lodge an application for the development mid to late 2005 (design pending). The project should bring the firm increased, high-standard office space and afford a greater sense of uniformity along these rapidly developing quays.


      (Deloitte & Touche offices can be seen to the left of No.5 Lapps Quay)



      😎 PJ Walls today took down their final tower crane remaining on-site at Brookfield – construction has been on-going for over a year on UCC’s new 50m euro Medical & Nursing Centre (designed by RKD McCarthy Lynch). Remaining construction and fit-outs will continue on until summer 2005 – with the centre scheduled to be taking its first students for October 2005.



      😀 Ridge Developments Ltd are finishing up construction work on Philisview Properties No.16 Washington Street West development. The small 9x 2-bedroom apartment and ground-floor commercial development was designed by CMG Architects and overlooks a pleasant wier facing Sharman Crawford Quay and Bridge. With the scaffolding down now – all I can say is, she’s a looker!


    • #732929
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      I’ve a question for other viewers of the thread from Cork: personally I find Victoria Mills above average, and I approve of the density for the site. I am much more offended by buildings such as that ugly hotel across the from the County Hall, and “pseudo architecture” like that Philisview Properties Building on Washington St. – it’s a project that would barely scrape a 4 in 2nd year, and looks like someone asked for an “architectural” design from someone clearly incapable of it. What I find sad about a building like this is that the client obviously would have paid for actual architecture, and instead was landed with this flabby “ah sure, a bit a’timber, some sticky out bits and some curved roofs’ll make it architecture alright” rubbish.

      I’m just wondering what other people’s thoughts are – especially those who are architects and those who are not. Does being an architect colour one’s view of such things?

      (I’m an architect)

    • #732930
      phatman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Fourth, with the exception of Victoria Mills (fair enough, I accept V.M. is like one of those mean street-corner hustlers who reads to children at the orphanage on weekends – unsightly to look at but pretty on the inside), the standard of these so-called ‘high-rise’ has been relatively good and has not detracted from the sky-line in any negative way – nor residential amenity and privacy (which many residents now reluctantly acknowledge) – the city planners have, in fairness, been very careful and considerate about this issue.

      Lexington, i do appreciate your annoyance with the sentiments of this group, who, like an taisce, seem to have it in their intent to stifle any decent development proposals, but the fact is that Bishopstown is, on the whole, a predominantly low-rise, low density residential suburb. Thus i feel that any development contravening this fact should be curbed, or at least be very carefully considered, and be restricted to the main arteries of Model Farm Road etc, and around Vitoria Cross. As regards the impact on the skyline, i have to disagree with you, in that i consider UCC’s Victoria Lodge development to have quite a negative impression, especially when travelling west along Western Road, by the clinic. The flat unimaginative roofs are quite obtrusive on the skyline, especially in the evening – this coupled with Victoria Mills really doesn’t lead me to agree with you about the city planners being ‘careful and considerate’ about this issue. To add to this, i find it unfortunate the impact CUH has, viewed from surrounding areas, due to it’s elevated situation, and while it does act somewhat as a ‘gateway’ from the western suburbs to the inner ones, the effect is, in my opinion, just too profound, and would question the condoning of furhter ‘high-rise’ in this area. But seeing as we dont live in a perfect world, it could be worse, and I’ll conclude that maybe we just need to be more selective and demanding as to the quality of these schemes, I’m all for building upwards if the situation is right, and if the intent is to mix aesthetics with economy of acreage, so maybe we”ll learn from Vitoria Mills, eh?!

      In response to Bob Dole, well i have to agree about the Kingsley, the hotel you refer to across from the county hall, this building does sadden me everytime i look at it, it really could have and should have been so much more, considering it’s delicate situation along the Lee, and it’s being directly across from the council offices! Maybe the new extension will improve things a bit, but from any angle i have viewed the building I have not been pleased. As for Victoria Mills, I can’t say I see any merit in it’s design, akin to a duplo house, and the fact that an identical, but lower-rise, block is currently under construction next to it on the former petrol-station site adds insult to injury, but all this aside I think it does add to the area somewhat, could have been alot better though.
      The new building by Sharman Crawford bridge that you mentioned; well it is an improvement on the streetscape, and is certainly of an ‘interesting’ design, but does seem to be muddled up somewhat, and im not sure about the section protruding towards UCC, at street level, I must inspect it in person more closely, however i am quite pleased with what i have seen so far, and I don’t think it’s quite so bad as you make out – what exactly displeases you so much about it, and what would you personally have deemed more adequate for the site in question?

    • #732931
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      In response to Phatman:
      While the materials to the Philisview Building are appropriate, there is no rigour or logic to the architectural forms used. None of the shapes used are not properly expressed and do not properly “follow through”.
      To see buildings which properly use a similar language and palate to see how it’s actually done, with proper logic and expression – look at the scheme by Creedon Magee off North Main St. and again their scheme at Coppinger’s Court, both of which have won awards.

      (I’m not from that office, btw).

      I would agree that if Victoria Mills is extended to the petrol station it would be too large, and I would have preferred if the bit at the back were 2 storeys lower.

    • #732932
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      this whole antihigh rise thing in bishopstown is pathetic – there are no high rise buildings in bishopstown! not one, jerry buttimer is beginning to make a fool of himself on this issue – and looked particularly silly on the failed section 4 attempt recently. bishopstown is admittedly predominantly low rise but we shouldnt be encouraging unsustainable and uninspiring designs just because that is what is there already. bishopstown, like any other established suburb in the city should not have high rise buildings inserted – but 4 and 5 and 6 storeys are appropriate if designed tastefully and sensitively – this is a city after all – the anti high rise people need to be told that they have nothing to be afraid of as there are no plans for high rise in bishopstown and that 4 storeys is not high rise – or even medium rise

      i actually like victoria mills, it does not have a negative visual impact from any approach, doesn’t overlook, it is simple and unpretentious, AND BRAVE, looks very well at night. i have heard people whinge about this building as soon as they heard 9 storeys mentioned, before the structure was even being put in place. i honestly think that if that site instead had been developed as a cheap three storey red brick mock georgian confused looking building with 2 foot balconies that discolour before the contractor has left the site, people would not have uttered a thing –

      we have worse buildings than this in the city that we should be talking about

    • #732933
      theblimp
      Participant

      off-thread here a little, but anyone have any thoughts on the festive lights in ‘Pana’ – perhaps it’s just me but they only seem to add to the bloody confusion and mess of Beth Gali’s kerrplunk sticks. Any chance, when we’re opening the (yawn) 2005 celebrations we could attach most of the fireworks to these ‘lights’ and replace them with something more in keeping with our primary street. Back to the Christmas lights – anyone involved with this project have any creativity?

    • #732934
      lexington
      Participant

      @Bob Dole wrote:

      …personally I find Victoria Mills above average, and I approve of the density for the site. I am much more offended by buildings such as that ugly hotel across the from the County Hall, and “pseudo architecture” like that Philisview Properties Building on Washington St. – it’s a project that would barely scrape a 4 in 2nd year, and looks like someone asked for an “architectural” design from someone clearly incapable of it. What I find sad about a building like this is that the client obviously would have paid for actual architecture, and instead was landed with this flabby “ah sure, a bit a’timber, some sticky out bits and some curved roofs’ll make it architecture alright” rubbish…

      Bob, almost 90% of all architects I’ve talked to look at Victoria Mills with a smile. Whereas the general public by and large seem to disapprove. Similarly, ask the guy on the street what he thinks of 16 Washington Street West (Philisview Properties development) – generally he approves, whereas the architects I’ve questioned gasp in horror.

      I suppose its the same way a hair-dresser can look at a clients hair and note the standard of a previous hairdressers technique – whereas the average customer may actually be quite unaware of such a technique, they’re happy as long as they think their hair looks okay.

      I am aware of the architectural dynamics of Victoria Mills – even its innovations in terms of natural light accomodation, structural layout etc etc – but quite frankly, it is bland and uninspired from an aesthetics perspective. Personally, I am a fan of ye olde architecture (and I’m not talking about half-arsed copies – e.g. The Kingsley) – what I mean is, I love when a building displays a sense of flair. Where detail and aspect display the care and time that went into the formation of a building – as a positive and amenable contribution to a city-scape. I understand the economics and time constraints of modern property development quite well – but I still don’t see why such constraints need to offer us bland architecture. While architects may throw their noses up 16 Washington Street West because it does not represent their empirical modern view of ‘good’ design – the fact is, the building stands out, it’s something different – indeed a throwback – but at least it shows that the architect wasn’t afraid to conform to the standard red-brick, vertical lines, novelty balconies and monotonous style. And in fact, get your hands on the ‘blueprints’ – you’ll find yourself the internal and structural design of the building is actually quite clever itself.

      I suppose, quite often, it comes down to a matter of opinion. There are those that cite Mahon Point as a quality architectural design. I don’t think so, but then that’s my opinion. Perhaps it is uniquely innovative (cough cough) it’s own right and in a way I may be unaware.

      Further to that however, Magee Creedon have indeed produced some high-quality stuff – their Griffith Street and Coppinger Court designs are highly noted in my book.

      -> Phatman, about Victoria Lodge, I agree – it ain’t the Lourve but it is relatively well shaded by trees and surrounding developments. But 5-storeys, high-rise???



      *UPDATES*

      😉 O’Flynn Construction 2003 Operational Profits record an increase of just over 10m euros @ 31.4m euros from 19.9m in 2002.


    • #732935
      phatman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      -> Phatman, about Victoria Lodge, I agree – it ain’t the Lourve but it is relatively well shaded by trees and surrounding developments. But 5-storeys, high-rise???

      I am definitely of the opinion that 5 storeys is anything but high-rise, maybe you picked me up wrong Lexington, i thought i placed inverted commas around the phrase anytime i did use it. I was using Victoria Lodge just as an example, to highlight the impact higher buildings could have in the wrong location, but i must re-iterate i am not opposed to hgih-rise in itself, but just in the wrong location, just as i would be opposed to any architectural design that does not complement it’s surroundings. It is a delicate issue in Cork due to the nature of the topography, but in the right locations and allowing for a variety of critical aspects such buildings could look very well.

    • #732936
      lexington
      Participant

      Merely a matter of bad phrasing phatman – that question at the end of my last quote was not actually directed at you – it was more me asking generally I suppose (in disbelief), how can people consider 5-storeys high-rise in the true sense of the word?



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Quality Healthcare Ltd, the Isle of Man based Medical Care Firm, who recently purchased Shankiel Hospital – have today lodged an application for the premises w/ a development consisting of the retention of a two storey extension of 52 sq. metres providing more efficient hospital outpatient facilities; b) the construction of a single storey 125 sq. metre extension within the courtyard of the Annexe for use as a new operating theatre suite c) the demolition of an existing link building and the erection of a new single storey structure to accommodate a trolley lift shaft linking the main hospital building to the Annexe and d) Minor changes to window opes, a new water tank and ancillary site development works.

      :rolleyes: Lance Investments have applied for the increase in apartments for their 2nd Phase Atkins Hall development at the former Our Lady’s Hospital on the Lee Road. The increase is to provide 98 apartments in this phase up from 82. The move comes in light of CCC’s refusal for Lance Investments proposed 232-bedroom, six-storey hotel on the site,

    • #732937
      Pug
      Participant

      just back from berlin, 5 storeys sure aint high rise!! i thought the whole 3-4 storey tall thin apartment buildings were great, and while there is still derelict buildings in the East of Berlin, still looks better than rows and rows of housing estates!! anyway, the bright side is that at least now we have some designs to argue about, not too long ago, Cork wasnt getting hardly new developments. Roll on O flynns tall towers (no rumour on that yet, sounds like it didnt get blessing!!) and the docklands.

    • #732938
      lexington
      Participant

      Pug – the Eglinton Street Tower is in Further Information. CCC are currently awaiting an EIS from Wilson Architecture. No objections to the development were lodged.

    • #732939
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Pug – the Eglinton Street Tower is in Further Information. CCC are currently awaiting an EIS from Wilson Architecture. No objections to the development were lodged.

      any chance someone can post a pic of the patrick street lights for those in exile?
      is that hideous portacabin still in place on pana?
      any construction/demolition date for the coal quai project

    • #732940
      Pug
      Participant

      by the way, what was the info on that tiny site over by the bus station? i was away for the last while and someone tells me that 3000 sq ft went for some exorbitant sum of money? presumably the buyer is building something on it to recoup his money, whats the story? :confused:

    • #732941
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      any chance someone can post a pic of the patrick street lights for those in exile?
      is that hideous portacabin still in place on pana?
      any construction/demolition date for the coal quai project

      – Afraid I don’t have any images available of Christmas lights did have one but I think I have since deleted it.
      – And I’m even more afraid to tell you that yes, the Portacabin is still there – but thankfully it will be history come the end of this month w/ all Bus Eireann ‘operations’ moving to the refurbished bus station.
      – As mentioned in a previous post, no work will get going on the Cornmarket Street/Rockfell Investments department store and apartments project until Janurary at the earliest – excavation work will be performed first.



      @Pug wrote:

      by the way, what was the info on that tiny site over by the bus station? i was away for the last while and someone tells me that 3000 sq ft went for some exorbitant sum of money? presumably the buyer is building something on it to recoup his money, whats the story?

      Yeah I’ve been looking into that one since it was mentioned – I haven’t been able to get much information on it, which is strange – its either very heavily shrowded in secrecy or fantasmagorical. I’ll keep my eye open and my ear tuned (freak accident, long story 🙂 ) – and let you know if I find out anything. This area is fast becoming the new ‘office’ district for Cork – along w/ the South Mall and in the future, the southern docklands – an office development, albeit small, would seem best suited and probably the most logical use for this site. With a bit of imagination, it could have excellent landmark potential. In order to get the maximum return for this site, clearly building up is the primary option – and w/ nearby building heights at City Quarter and Lapps Quay, it should fit right in.



      *UPDATES*

      😎 Omniplex (Cork) Limited received the go-ahead for their Mahon Point S.C. Multiplex signage today – paving the way for the completion of the 13-screen cinema fit-out. Scheduled to open 1st Feb 2005.

      :p Also River Island received permission for mezzanine alterations and construction to their sizeable Mahon Point store.


    • #732942
      jungle
      Participant

      And I’m even more afraid to tell you that yes, the Portacabin is still there – but thankfully it will be history come the end of this month w/ all Bus Eireann ‘operations’ moving to the refurbished bus station

      I got to use the ‘new’ bus station for the first time last weekend. I have to say, having been skeptical at first, it is a hell of an improvement on what was there.

    • #732943
      Pug
      Participant

      perchance they refurbished all the staffs attitude problems in the bus station as well……

    • #732944
      sw101
      Participant

      it’s not a problem, it’s an epidemic.

    • #732945
      Torquemada
      Participant

      It would have been even nicer in my opinion if they could have continued that canopy effect on the front of the building (the new arrivals area) to the rear of the bus station from where buses are departing from at the moment.

    • #732946
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Torquemada wrote:

      It would have been even nicer in my opinion if they could have continued that canopy effect on the front of the building (the new arrivals area) to the rear of the bus station from where buses are departing from at the moment.

      that is the plan… there is a scanned image somewhere in this thread

    • #732947
      sw101
      Participant

      can’t imagine them doing much more than they have already with the paltry budget they received.

    • #732948
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: I’ve been following up the news that Scotts Bar (owned by Paul Montgomery of Reardens & Victoria Mills and Edmund Keneally of Scotts & Victoria Mills) of Caroline and Oliver Plunkett Street was sold to neighbouring Brown Thomas – and though nothing is clear yet (Scotts MD still references Paul and Edmund as proprietors) – there are reports that this is not entirely accurate. It may all be urban legend.



      😮 After reviewing Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties)’s revised proposals for Jurys Hotel on Lancaster Quay (decision due 16th December 2004) – it still seems to me that the apartment buildings most objectors were getting hot and heavy about are by far the least disruptive or aesthetically displeasing elements of the project. They display more merit than say the hotel element – which to me seems pretty bland by comparison. After assessing the V.I.S. repeatedly, considering aspects from Blarney Street, Sunday’s Well and so on – St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral is still well visible – w/ little to no blockage of the view-path. From Lancaster Quay/Western Road elevation, the hotel block is pretty dominating, but under the new revisions (w/ reduced level blocks to the rear of the development) – a new space has been created offering considerably better aspects of St Fin Barre’s. It’s a tough call on trying to predict a decision – the project offers a much needed redevelopment aspect. The apartment elements seem up to scratch in terms of design and aesthetics. The boardwalk adds well to the development. However the Jury’s Hotel element is only so-so ~ but undoubtedly will find favour w/ planners due to its usage nature. I’ll provide a better forecast come nearer to the decision date.

      – on a semi-related note; John Mannix’s development for Washington Street – decision due 20th December 2004 – is set, I am very cautiously told by a CCC employee – to receive permission subject to a number of conditions and in light of the revisions made. 😉



      🙁 Frank Sheahan, of F&V Sheahan Auctioneers – and developer of 135 apartments at Hewitt Mills (Blackpool By-Pass) and 15-Student Residencies at Lynch’s Street (near Washington Street West) – has applied to amend his over-scheduled Lynch Street project (Lancaster Hall) in changing ground-floor usage from night-club and late-night bar to commercial usage including medical/financial/IT etc. The underground parking element will be adjusted to cater for this. Designed by Jack Coughlan & Assoc. Constructed by PJ Hegarty & Sons – all I can say is ‘YAWN!’


    • #732949
      satanta99
      Participant

      If rumours are true and Brown Thomas have become the new owners of Scotts, it would be kinda strange. I am of the opinion that the building couldn’t be used to extend into. The building where the furniture department is housed is separated from Scotts from what I think is a large ESB substation.

    • #732950
      Pug
      Participant

      its getting more mental, Declan O Mahony of Brideview has paid €2m for an acre site in Carrigaline. If this keeps up, what kind of prices will all the centre park road and the docklands developments tipped for next year fetch?

    • #732951
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Douglas Central Properties Limited have lodged plans with Cork County Council (yup it’s still consider County Council terroritory even if it is in the city – sigh) to develop an 8-storey mixed-use building on the site of the former TSB Building (to be demolished), Cinema World grounds (which may be incorporated into the facility) and the vacant ‘greenfield’ site to the east of Cinema World. The development will compose of a 60,000sq ft 124-bedroom hotel, bars, restaurants, commercial/retail units, meeting centre and 65 parking spaces.The building when complete would be the tallest building in Douglas.


      🙂 Also, at Cork Airport, an application for a brand new 150-bedroom hotel adjacent to the new 160m euro, 25,500sq m terminal is due to be lodged next week. Details remain sketchy at this stage – will let you know more when I get the info. Marriott, a tenant of the nearby and highly successful Cork Airport Business Park (currently undergoing a further expansion), is rumoured to be involved with the project in some-way. This brings the number of hotels at Cork Airport to 2 – incl. the Great Southern Hotel.



      :rolleyes: O’Flynn Construction can now proceed with the continuation of their Ballincollig Town Centre Shopping Complex development – to be anchored by Dunnes Stores and 2 other, un-named tenants (rumours are flying!) – after an appeal to ABP was lodged by O’Flynn Construction regarding Fire & Safety conditions was withdrawn. The 200,000sq ft, 3 anchor tenant stores and 35 additional retail units shopping centre is scheduled for opening next October (2005).



      :rolleyes: Corbett Bros. have applied to CCC seeking allowance for alterations to their 60,000sq ft office development and 38-unit residential development at Copley Street (originally designed by PRC Architects) – currently under construction by Coffey Construction. Among the alterations – an increase of just under 14,000sq ft is sought to cater for the provision of 8 student apartments, an extention to the permitted ground-floor commercial facility, an additional retail unit, a new office unit and an increase in basement size by over 1200sq ft (new additions and alterations are designed by James Leahy & Assoc.)



      🙂 And for those wondering what exactly is happening with Monsoon on Patrick’s Street – I can confirm that they have successfully negotiate a lease agreement w/ Joe Donnelly for the former Clinton Cards store (an additional 2,000sq ft of retail space). Monsoon will occupy the expanded store as soon as the short-term lease agreed with Diesel expires early next year. Monsoon Accessorize Ltd have already applied for planning to extend and modify their highly successful Patrick’s Street store and erect new signage. The lease is rumoured to be on par w/ the highest Zone A rents – think Grafton Street!


    • #732952
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Oh the locals will be delighted – not since the fabled battle to stop Lidl or bring down the shiny Douglas Court Clock has anything of planning interest arisen worthy of a good fight. Going on Cork County Council’s track record (you know – Douglas it doesn’t exist, and we dont care, but my – those commercial rates are handy!) it will sail through especially if it’s 8 storeys, inappropriate, will be to the detriment of already out of control traffic, oh and really ugly…

      I’m afraid to ask… but are there any images of this proposed monster?

    • #732953
      sw101
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      I’m afraid to ask… but are there any images of this proposed monster?

      it’s not as unasailably awful as it might be. several architects are involved, and the varied design aesthetics create diversity and contrast which takes away from the overall mass of it.

    • #732954
      lexington
      Participant

      Although I’ve only seen preliminary (early stage) CG images – I have yet to see the finalised drawings of the project. I expect to receive them within the next few days – but from what I have heard, the design isn’t too shabby at all.

      And d_d_dallas I would have thought the redevelopment of Douglas Village Shopping Centre would have been considered a major ’cause for fight’ in recent times too. So far, local councillors are praising the project – I assume that is until the residents start kicking-up. Sigh.

      Below is an image of the 60m euro redevelopment scheduled for Douglas Village Shopping Centre – but it offers a good view (in part) of the proposed Douglas Central Properties Ltd development to the east. The image gives a good sense of the vast size of the project.

    • #732955
      Pug
      Participant

      8 storey building in douglas? not a hope. I live further up but I know the residents the douglas have been objecting to nightclub licences etc for years . There is NO way the roads could take the traffic, it cannot cope as it is, especially given the fact that they pulled up all the road in grange and the hill going up from the village, only to replace it with???? exactly the same thing. 2 million that idiocy cost apparently. 8 storeys is a bit much in fairness.

    • #732956
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      who are Douglas Central Properties?

      are they who i think they are? you know who?

    • #732957
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      8 storeys is not a bit much!

      its facing south ring road i expect, no overlooking or overshadowing, no adjacent dwellings.

      but still expect appropriate levels of traditional douglas outrage from the douglas click who still thinj they live in a village

    • #732958
      jungle
      Participant

      I live in Douglas and don’t have any objections in principle to the development. If anywhere in Douglas is suitable for development of taller buildings, it’s this site. It doesn’t overlook any houses and is central to the commercial district of Douglas.

      The traffic congestion problem in Douglas is almost entirely down to lack of coordination between the city and county councils. All that is needed is all the roundabouts replaced with linked traffic lights and a clampdown on illegal parking and the traffic flows can be handled.

      The roundabout seems to be gone in the Douglas Shopping Centre image. Hopefully, this is a good sign.

    • #732959
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      btw, i hear that there are now 2 submissions on Wilson’s Application for An Post site! how is that? i thought the time was up – was this because of the further information request?

    • #732960
      lexington
      Participant

      I’d have to agree with jungle on that one – I believe that if there is any site in Douglas suitable for taller buildings, this one would seem the best. Extensive talks with county planners took place before Douglas Central Properties decided to lodge their application. As for traffic issues – the proposed new road as part of the redeveloped Douglas Village Shopping Centre (or Douglas Central as it’s being now called by its owners and developers the Shipton Group [Clayton Love] – *for bunch = hint #1) – would certainly aid the congestion by redirecting it away from the village centre toward the main roads parallel and to the exit onto the South Ring. It’s a matter of bad management and poor existing infastructure. It will be important to see the Douglas Village SC redevelopment get a move on in that respect.

      And here’s hint #2 – Douglas Central Properties are registered in Drumcondra, Dublin at the same address as Blackpool Developments Ltd – the SPV registered by the Shipton Group (Clayton Love). Cough cough.

    • #732961
      sw101
      Participant

      lexington, where are you getting these images? have you seen the ORSA design fronting hte main road? this project is to be phased in design, planning and implementation as i understand it. i’ve seen it piece-meal.

    • #732962
      Pug
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      I live in Douglas and don’t have any objections in principle to the development. If anywhere in Douglas is suitable for development of taller buildings, it’s this site. It doesn’t overlook any houses and is central to the commercial district of Douglas.

      The traffic congestion problem in Douglas is almost entirely down to lack of coordination between the city and county councils. All that is needed is all the roundabouts replaced with linked traffic lights and a clampdown on illegal parking and the traffic flows can be handled.

      The roundabout seems to be gone in the Douglas Shopping Centre image. Hopefully, this is a good sign.

      hey JUNGLE, I live in douglas too and have no objection myself, place could do with a jolt, only hope that the roads are dragged along with it. Clayton love indeed seems to be the guy for this and sure why not have a skywalk altogether and link from his existing shopping centre over to the other side? Cinema was being threatened anyway with mahon point so they might head off. i suspect that it would be brought up to the flyover level but thats hardly 8 storeys is it?

    • #732963
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      I think that was the big carrot dangled to ease planning for the redevelopment of “old” Douglas Shopping Centre – there would be a bypass built parallel to the link road the length of the car park and the roundabout would be no more. Can anyone confirm this?

      Also Clayton Love owns “old” Douglas S.C. and the TSB land so safe to say he is behind this?

      Quote: “but still expect appropriate levels of traditional douglas outrage from the douglas click who still thinj they live in a village” LOL! So true… something to ponder in their SUV while stuck in traffic!

      I think this developement has huge potential if done right – it could bring a cohesion to the entire area and bring back some sense of “village” to the place – linking Douglas with Douglas Court and back to East Village. I await the Evening Echo article decrying “skyscrapers in Douglas”!!!

    • #732964
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      also noticed today that cork city council have published pre-qualification notices for companies interested in tendering for works relating to grand parade! good news – finishing off beth gali scheme up there soon hopefully

    • #732965
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah bunch – just saw that there earlier today, there are 3 submissions now lodged against the Eglinton Street project – all from locals – and all made at least 2 weeks after the requested Further Information date. Still looking into it – that ain’t good. If that’s the case – there should be no reasonable refusal for any positive observations to be made. Hmmm. Going to make a quick call – I’ll get back to you with the result.



      sw101 – can’t go telling that sort of info. But hopefully if I receive a compliant format – (but will probably a gigantic 2MB or 3MB JPEG) – I’ll post an authorised image. You work in a school house?


    • #732966
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      sw101 – You work in a school house?-

      a metallic aqueous structure nearby. used to anyway.

    • #732967
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      I think this developement has huge potential if done right – it could bring a cohesion to the entire area and bring back some sense of “village” to the place – linking Douglas with Douglas Court and back to East Village. I await the Evening Echo article decrying “skyscrapers in Douglas”!!!

      I would agree – like I said I have yet to see the final design – but I suspect, and hope, a nice transition will be provided linking the two big commercial areas of Douglas (the ‘village’ and the East Douglas area) together with a consistent flow. Personally, I don’t think height should be of concern when done well. But as mentioned in the quote above – undoubtedly the Evening Echo – ‘the voice of the honest, everyday man on Corkonian streets’ – will be right in there, arm around the people, joining right in with their tears and wailing – supporting their fears and nodding in condolence as another nail is driven through the coffin of their wee village – not another ‘high-rise’ they’ll sigh. Have they driven, or tried to drive, through Douglas anytime in the last 10 years? Where’s the village??? The Evening Echo is following the anti high-rise campaign out in Bishopstown religiously – cries from councillors and residents alike are mirrored in their pages against the frightful saturation of high-rise in Bishopstown – especiially against Mark Kelleher’s 5-storey residential development. [Sorry, that was a bit dramatic – been reading too much Shakespeare lately. 🙂 )

    • #732968
      Lorcan
      Participant

      Any one see the culture show on BBC2? had a thing on cork 2005 capital of culture, and gave peoples views on patrick street.
      ‘the people of cork think the lamposts belong in an industrial estate’

    • #732969
      Mob79
      Participant

      @Lorcan wrote:

      Any one see the culture show on BBC2? had a thing on cork 2005 capital of culture, and gave peoples views on patrick street.
      ‘the people of cork think the lamposts belong in an industrial estate’

      not to sure about them myself, i think thry’re pretty nasty, would’ve expected more for a much touted barcelona architect.

    • #732970
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Tesco have successfully sold Wilton Shopping Centre for a massive 126m euro to developers Howard Holdings and Joe O’Donovan – only 2 years after Tesco purchased the centre for 83m from the Irish Property Trust Unit. Although Tesco have invested an est’d 11m euros in extending and redeveloping the centre, incl. their own new 52,000sq ft 24-hour grocery store (which was not part of the sale) – the retailler has made in and around 32m profit, more likely 20 to 25m real. DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald handled the deal.

      The purchased shows a continuing trend by developers Howard Holdings in their new, ‘more aggressive’ approach to the Cork property market. As previously mentioned – Greg Coughlan, CEO of Howard Holdings, has made the move back to living in Cork after a number of years in the UK. He has continually mentioned that the company now intends to focus its operations predominantly on the Cork and Cape Town markets (through subsidary Eurocape Investments). Since that time, Howard Holdings have initated a number of major deals – incl. the purchase of Wilton S.C. (which may yet see a joint redevelopment & extension favoured by Roches Stores – see prev. post regarding their expansion at the centre), attaining a deal w/ Thomas Crosbie Holdings to house the Irish Examiner’s new offices over 32,000sq ft at HH’s City Quarter development, the acquisition of 16 Lavitts Quay for development of a 120-bedroom budget hotel over a 2-storey retail centre (due to be lodged with CCC this month – designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects), the development of a 5-storey IT/Office development at Albert Quay (due to be lodged mid-2005), the development of a 5-star hotel in Kinsale and a number of substantial city docklands property purchases in line for substantial commercial redevelopment.

      Wilton Shopping Centre currently has an est’d rental income of 6.5m euro p.a.

    • #732971
      lexington
      Participant

      It would seem there’s trouble regarding O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street project – and it’s related to objections. Despite the fact the closing date for submissions was a few weeks ago – CCC have accepted 3 objections to the development while the project is in Further Information. CCC claim they requested Further Info before the closing date – they requested an EIS – and due to this, decided the show a little slack to objectors – although they now claim they are not accepting anymore. During that same period, CCC refused to accept positive observations. After a discussion I had over the phone with a certain director of O’Flynn Construction today, it would seem the developers were led to believe that the objections would not be validated. However, the objections have indeed been made valid. Can anyone else see here a problem?

      I’ll be talking with O’Flynn Construction again later on and w/ CCC so I’ll keep you posted on what goes on – this scenario is of concern to me as it should the wider development community as it shows a distinct and unfair bias in the planning process which could be detrimental to future development projects in Cork city, this can’t go on.

    • #732972
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      SW101 … metallic aqueous structure!!! You are living Lexington’s dream!!!

    • #732973
      sw101
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      SW101 … metallic aqueous structure!!! You are living Lexington’s dream!!!

      ssshhh!!!

      stress the “used to”.

    • #732974
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      SW101 … metallic aqueous structure!!! You are living Lexington’s dream!!!

      Le Grand Palais, Paris – that’s my dream! 😀

    • #732975
      sw101
      Participant

      this’ll do ya.

    • #732976
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      submissions on a planning application may be made within 5 weeks of the validation of the planning application – is it the cas ethat these submissions were received after the 5 weeks? Whether there was a Further Information requested or not, any submissions after the 5 weeks should (under the Planning and Development Act) be returned to the sender and not be accepted!

    • #732977
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      submissions on a planning application may be made within 5 weeks of the validation of the planning application – is it the cas ethat these submissions were received after the 5 weeks? Whether there was a Further Information requested or not, any submissions after the 5 weeks should (under the Planning and Development Act) be returned to the sender and not be accepted!

      The submissions were made well passed the final submission date – the CCC claim to have adopted ‘a sympathetic stance regarding objectors’ due to the exceptional nature of the development. Utter tripe. Indeed the submissions should have been refused – by law.



      @sw101 wrote:

      this’ll do ya

      It’s a classic! (Cough cough) – I’m not that archaic – throw in a few PVC windows and we’re ready to go! (Joe King!) 😀

      I just have a preference for detailled design – there’s nothing that says contemporary architecture can’t be innovative for modernity and yet still hark back to the elaborate and intricate design details of the past. I suppose ‘postmodern’ is the phrase – but I’ve not once, ever seen a post-modern building that fuses the modern and the past in the way I would see as innovative, striking and complimentary. But that’s me, I’m just a demanding bugger.



      *UPDATES*

      :confused: A design team is rumoured to have ALREADY been commissioned with regard to Wilton Shopping Centre – as regards what, I’m not sure, it could be something as simply as a new cleaners office – but perhaps Howard Holdings could be up to a little more. I’ll get back to you.


    • #732978
      burge_eye
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The submissions were made well passed the final submission date – the CCC claim to have adopted ‘a sympathetic stance regarding objectors’ due to the exceptional nature of the development. Utter tripe. Indeed the submissions should have been refused – by law.


      They’ve listed additional submissions on OCP’s Jurys too

      http://planning.corkcity.ie/InternetEnquiry/rpt_ViewApplicDetails.asp?validFileNum=1&app_num_file=0428705

    • #732979
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah burge_eye – I’ve just seen that -> 7 additional objections have been accepted dated for November 2004. Initially 21 objections were lodged. However, because O’Callaghan Properties lodged Significant Further Information (w/ design alterations) – a period of submission acceptance was open in light of this change. This is perfectly acceptable. Only 7 objections were lodged against this, as oppose to the original 21. That’s mixed news – as oppose to bad news.

      Though I had my initial doubts too, the more I have read through the detail of this project since it was lodged, the greater favour I find with it. The least favourable aspect is the hotel design, but beyond this, I feel the loss of this project is to the detriment of Cork. There is a lot of small mindedness involved with some of these objections. It’s a pity.

      I genuinely hope next Thursday finds favour with this troubled (planning wise) project – if it does, we’re almost certain to see ABP become involved. Shame.

      -> the diff. w/ Eglinton Street is that CCC allowed objections to be validated passed the closing submission date. No just cause was cited. And the developer was given misinformation concerning this. It was very poorly managed by CCC. I only hope it is rectified – further to that, I hope such actions are acknowledged and recompensed come planning decision time.

    • #732980
      Pug
      Participant

      Eglinton street delayed? late objections accepted? very poor. back to the cork dark ages so with egos as high as the suggested 17 storey tower and a slap down to developers who obviously rub some people up the wrong way. This country would drive you to drink (if it wasnt so expensive). Come on lex, cheer us up with news of other new developments in cork, Eglinton street will have us waiting a while yet by the sounds of it.

    • #732981
      Pug
      Participant

      any know what the development currently being built on copley street will be? i assume its apartments but will there be mixed development i.e. retail as well? I see M&K Corbett in the planning lists to change Stable Lane next to Copley street to mixed development, is it all linked in?

      and whats the story with the Brooks Haughton site. Is that whole site up for sale due to their recent merging with the English building company?

    • #732982
      lexington
      Participant

      Pug – the development currently under construction at Copley Street is by M&K Corbett (Corbett Bros.) – it’s a 5-storey, 60,000sq ft office development designed by PRC Architects – this will adjoin 38 apartments over 5 floors also. 90 undergound car parking spaces are to be provided as part of the development, with ground floor gym, restaurant and retail units. The amendments applied for there recently relate to an elevational treatment which will cater for an additional 8-student apartments as part of the residential element and expanded commercial element on the basement and ground-floors.



      As for the Brooks Haughton site at Copley Street – this premises has been subject to much speculation and interest over the years. Word has it that the company in its new form will seek to maximise its potential through valuable land sales and relocate to a site of greater general access in the suburban regions.



      *UPDATES*

      :confused: The long delayed development at George’s Mill (the derelict mill building fronting Fr. Matthew Quay, to the rear of the Bank of Ireland on South Mall) by Tumblegate Ltd – has taken another odd turn. For months Joseph Lane & Son Ltd Contractors had seen their site offices stacked up on the quayside beside the site – a period of structural security was undertaken – but now it would seem that O’Flynn Contractors of Banteer (also main contractors for the Kingsley Hotel expansion), are taking over building activities on the project. I’ll let you know more soon.



      😮 And this week will see a decision made regarding 2 of the most high-profile developments in Cork this year (w/ another high-profile and LONG-awaited development decision – for John Mannix – due next week). On the 16th December (this Thurs), Riga Ltd (O’Callaghan Properties) will hear their planning decision on the controversial Jurys redevelopment – designed by Henry J. Lyons & Assoc. Fingers crossed on this one!

      Also, on the Fri (the 17th), JD Hotels Ltd will hear their decision on the redevelopment of Singers Corner and Tobin Lane/Street as a 4-storey New York-style restaurant and late-night bar – designed by Wilson Architecture.



      :confused: I received word over the weekend that indeed Scotts of Caroline Street has been sold for an udisclosed sum, to an ‘undisclosed’ buyer – most probably, I am informed, Brown Thomas nearby.


    • #732983
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I was in Cork at the weekend and was surprised that work had already started on the liberty street nightclub/restaurant development that Lexington mentioned a while back.

      The city was buzzing at the weekend. There is a real feel-good factor in the city at the moment. Let’s hope the ccc don’t continue this recent trend of conservatism in relation to property development, there is great momentum and the last thing we need are moving goalposts. The city needs assured direction from its paid advisors.

    • #732984
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 In a development summed at around 53m euros – the existing St. Patrick’s (Marymount) Hospice at Military Hill/Wellington Road – is to make a move to a brand-new facility on a greenfield site along the Bandon road.

      No concise date has yet been set – but a design for the new hospice is expected to be made known in the near future.

      More details as they come.

    • #732985
      Pug
      Participant

      oh ho lex, have yours sources let you down? big denial today by Scotts re the sale to Brown Thomas.

    • #732986
      lexington
      Participant

      I wouldn’t pay too much attention to that – there’s more to that than you may think. I was talking with a certain Ballincollig dentist today who denies a sale with Brown Thomas (as I said it was most probable at the time – but I never confirmed it because I was unsure – the rumour was started by staff who had been let go from Scotts) – but does mention a management and ‘investor’ restructuring with relation to the bar. Paul and Edmund may still be behind it chiefly but their share in the bar has been reduced via sale – this has probably raised some of the capital toward their new refurbishment plan. There are also more details in the text but I’m told they will be made known at some stage in the future – I’ll let you know when I can, or when/if it is made public. (Just remember, the Irish Examiner don’t exactly have a great track record on these things either – I refer you to the Mahon Point/Evening Echo incident of many posts ago).



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 XCES Developments Ltd are scheduled to lodge an application with Cork County Council by the end of the week for a 200m euro Kinsale Golf Resort development over a 620-acre site. Hyatt will operate a 200-bedroom hotel, which will compliment an 18-hole golf course, 500 seat event hall and associated works. The development will take 3 years to complete subject to planning.



      🙂 Kilquane Ltd (Howard Holdings) have lodged an application with CCC for the placement of a 12m sculpture on Lapps Quay as part of their City Quarter development. The sculpture will be placed outside the Clarion Hotel – (see previous related posts).



      🙂 The Southern Health Board (SHB) have lodged an amendment to their planned, 6-storey, 75m euro cardiac /renal facility planned for CUH – the amendments predominantly concern cladding issues.



      😮 Jurys Redevelopment decision due tomorrow – fingers crossed!

    • #732987
      burge_eye
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Jurys Redevelopment decision due tomorrow – fingers crossed!

      Conditional permission granted. Any idea what the conditions are??

      http://planning.corkcity.ie/InternetEnquiry/rpt_ViewApplicDetails.asp?validFileNum=1&app_num_file=0428705

    • #732988
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      “the hotel and apartment block A be granted permission and that the remaining apartment blocks as per the drawings of 09/11/04 be further modified as follows:-
      – Apartment Block C be reduced from 6/7 storeys to 5 storeys
      – 7 storeyed N-S apartment Blocks B and D be reduced to 5 storeys.
      – Apartment Block E be reduced to 2 storeys.2

    • #732989
      Pug
      Participant

      jurys? :confused: will the city have a nice new chunky development?

    • #732990
      Pug
      Participant

      sorry folks, i obviously emailed the same time as bunch and burge eye. See Esso are selling the Muskerry filling station next to Jurys on the western road, could be an interesting buy!

    • #732991
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 O’Callaghan Properties have been granted their redevelopment proposal for the Jurys Hotel site at Lancaster Quay. However, the development was granted by CCC subject to 20 conditions – among these a further reduction in apartment block heights (in addition to reductions proposed in a Significant Further Information submission made [unsolicited] by O’Callaghn Properties and architects, Henry J. Lyons & Partners).

      Although the dominant factors of the development will remain, i.e. Block A (9-storeys), Jurys Hotel (6-Storeys) and the main apartment blocks fronting the east quayside – the conditional reductions will see apartment numbers reduced to 250 (from an original number of 300 and revised number of 277). A positive adjustment I believe, proposed by CCC, was that which will see a minor facade improvement to the hotel frontage on the Western Road elevation.

      Unfortunately, despite the many compromises made by the developers and the conditions imposed by CCC – a number of objectors will still be bringing the development to ABP on appeal. I find this very frustrating.

      I do not approve of all the CCC conditions, but I should hope the project is unaffected negatively by the appeal. Initially, the project was set to be developed in 3 Phases:

      – Phase 1: 80 apartments, basement car-parking and hotel (Autumn 2006)
      – Phase 2: 110 apartments (Autumn 2007)
      – Phase 3: 110 apartments (Autumn 2008)

      -> the appeal will perhaps delay this.


      🙂 John Mannix has received the green-light by ABP for his 40 – 42 Washington Street duplex, retail and office development. The revised 6-storey design was praised by CCC who remarked that it would be a contemporary departure from existing architecture in the area – but would provide a unique gateway to South Main Street and Grand Parade. The building, designed by Dermot Coveney of Coveney & Assoc., will comprise of a basement car-park, ground and 1st floor retail, 2nd floor offices, 3rd and 4th floor duplex apartments and 5th floor penthouses.



      🙂 JD Hotels Ltd have received a planning grant to proceed with their 4-storey restaurant and bar development at 77/78 Grand Parade and Tobin Lane. Design is by Wilson Architecture.



      🙂 X-CES Projects Ltd have lodged their application with Cork County Council for their 200m euro Kinsale development (as earlier reported) on 199 hectares between Kinsale Harbour and Oysterhaven. The massive development will take 3-years to complete and comprise of a 3-storey, 218-bedroom 5-star Hyatt Hotel; leisure centre incl. 20m swimming pool; 18-hole golf course; international indoor equestrian centre; 210 resort lodges; 38-duplex apartments and 57 2-bedroom apartments; 500 seat event centre. Project design is by Henry J. Lyons & Partners.



      🙂 Pitwood Ltd. have applied for the development of an 8098sq m development at Beasely Street and Parnell Place (yes, the Corbett site!) which will comprise of 121-bedrooms over 5-storeys, health club and spa, basement car-park, restaurant and bar. The development will incorporate the protected facades at 17 & 18 Parnell Place.



      :rolleyes: And yet ANOTHER, in what seems to be an endless list of hotel developments in Cork city of late, Heiton Holdings Group PLC have sought permission for the development of their Bandon Road Roundabout warehousing facility (along the South Ring Road N25 and new Ballincollig By-Pass) as a 4-storey, 96-bedroom, 8,248sq m hotel with function centre, conference centre, leisure centre w/ swimming pool, gym and a 218-space multi-storey car-park.



      :confused: Another hotel development anyone? Sure why not! B.F.T.A. Ltd are applying for the construction of a 101-bedroom hotel and parking at Church Road, Carrigaline.


      – as if that all wasn’t enough, there’s more on the way!!! Watch this space!



      :rolleyes: Bowen Construction have commenced work on the 31-apartment (130 further bed-spaces), 4/5 storey extension to Victoria Mills student development at Victoria Cross on the site of the former Statoil Petrol Station – designed by Derek Tynan and Assoc.



      😮 BrideView Developments are seeking permission to develop 30 high-density apartments on a 1-acre site site near Cogan’s Garage in Carrigaline, they recently purchased for a whopping 2m euro. Locals, of course, are up in arms.


      Cork has seen a number of hotel developments of late – incl. Howard Holdings 120-bedroom Lavitts Quay hotel, the Hilton at Mahon Point, Douglas Central Properties 8-storey hotel development in Douglas, Pitwood’s 121-bedroom development at Parnell Place, Heiton’s 96-bedroom (see above), Jurys redeveloped 182-bedroom (see above), 120-bedroom Park Manor (Radisson) at Little Island, the new 200-bedroom Clarion on Lapps Quay – opening tomorrow, the 217-bedroom Hyatt in Kinsale, 150-bedroom Marriott (hinted as) for Cork Airport – as well as expanded Hayfield Manor, Kingsley (82-bedroom extension) and Great Southern Cork Airport Hotel. Whoever complains of a shortage in hotels now needs their head-checked! 😀



      Apologises for the late post – I’d been trying to access Archiseek.com since 7am w/ news of Jurys but couldn’t access site.

    • #732992
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: As mentioned in one of my previous posts, well in advance, O’Flynn Construction have confirmed that Dunnes Stores are indeed to anchor the Ballincollig Town Centre SC. They will provide tenant for one of the 3 main anchor stores of 60,000sq ft.

      Also, as I mentioned, it was again confirmed today that Marks & Spencers AND Superquinn had been in talks with the development company about tenancy.

      Yep….sigh. 🙁

    • #732993
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Yes indeed – Werdna Ltd (McMahon Builders Providers) will be lodging a revised application for their Water Street project early next year. Sean Kearns of Murray O’Laoire (MOLA) has indicated a reduction in height of the main central tower by 2-storeys however to 17-storeys – he said that height was not so much a matter, but in light of the reductions (due to excessive density issues associated with the previous Water Street application) with the rest of the project, it was a matter of proportion. The new project is expected to maintain the same general layout and style as the original, but w/ apartment numbers reduced to in and around 300 from 400.



      😀 Ellesmere Properties Ltd (Howard Holdings) have lodged an application (as previously indicated here) with CCC for a 7-storey, 125-bedroom hotel, office and retail development over basement car-park at 16 Lavitts Quay (former designated Irish Examiner HQ). The design is by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects. Planning pending, construction on the project is due Summer 2005. PJ Hegarty will be main contractors.



      🙂 Charles and Helen McCarthy, owners of the Mill Business Centre, Crosses Green (across the river from the rear of Beamish & Crawford Brewery), have applied for the development of their business centre as a 3-storey to 7-storey, 64-bedroom hotel and business development centre w/ ancillary facilities and riverside boardwalk. Derek Tynan & Associates will provide the design. CCC must be delighted! 😉



      🙂 John Sisk & Sons Building Contractors have lodged an application with Cork County Council for the development of a 6-storey, 96-bedroom hotel, spa and leisure centre at a site south of their offices on the Kinsale Road (near the infamous roundabout). It’s one of another in a really long line of recent hotel development applications for Cork city in the last few days.



      🙂 Work on Jacob’s Mill (Father Matthew Quay – rear of Bank of Ireland on South Mall) will finally get going next week before Christmas now that developers Tumblegate Ltd have allocated O’Flynn of Banteer Builders as new contractors replacing Joseph Lane & Son Ltd (they are also working on Tom McCarthy’s other project at the Kingsley Hotel – which has also lodged for a number of alterations to its hotel extension and aparthotel development under construction).


      😀 Michael O’Donoghue of Rockfell Investments has announced that work will commence on the highly anticpated department store and apartment development at the former Guy & Co. premises on Cornmarket Street come Janurary to early Feburary (as previously reported here).



      – a number of other major developments due for Cork city are expected to be made known after Christmas! Cork is on the up and up!!! 🙂

    • #732994
      theblimp
      Participant

      … a bit off-topic but does anyone know the story behind the ‘Crows Nest’ at Victoria Cross? Fire was quite some time back and with all of the ‘stooodent’ development in the area I would have thought a quick resolution would have been sought to tap this market. Still, it’s just sitting there with a patched-up roof and scaffolding. Anyone know the b/round?

    • #732995
      lexington
      Participant

      The rumour going around was that Paul Montgomery was looking to buy it – it would certainly make sense given that a sizeable proportion of the student development in Victoria Cross (“Student Central”) is his. Also, it would seem like a throw-back to his Western Star days. Furthermore, it would give Paul Montgomery a direct input into the student pub market which his Reardens Complex does not facilitate (other that the Rafertz nightclub element) and which he hasn’t really had since he made his ‘fortune phase 1’ at “the Star”. It makes sense – offer a rival to the Western Star right in the centre of all the new student activity, then ship them all down to Rafterz after-hours.

    • #732996
      phatman
      Participant

      Ok, so Cork is undergoing alot of development right now, and will be alot more in the near future. But walking through town yesterday, it struck me just how much potential there is for our city (those of us from cork), and how it will be quite a long time before it will be fully rejuvenated, and cured of the post 1930’s ‘architecture’ that plagues this town. Looking at Limerick, it has taken them a few short years to expoit the potential of their riverbanks, even though they have done a good job. But here in Cork we have so much more to work with, 2 channels, as yet virtually undeveloped. And if i had the money and the power i would change ALOT. For instance, looking across from Merchants’s Quay to the opposite bank, as far as Water Street, there is not one building i would consider to add to the quay side as a whole, and even though im sure half of them are for no reason listed, it really is not an impressive vista. Upstream from Patrick’s Bridge there is undoubtedly a wealth of fine buildings, but i would really like to see the aforementioned redeveloped, tastefully of course, and a general improvement of the quaysides encouraged. How can it be that for a city so tied to the water and river, that the attention has thus far been diverted away from the lee towards the island within? Not wanting to ramble aimlessly, but the lee does hold so much potenial , and im not just talking about the docklands. Any opinions, comments?

    • #732997
      theblimp
      Participant

      Phatman – been to Bristol recently? Now, there’s how a lesson in how to re-develop your city centre while taking advantage of your riverside setting.

    • #732998
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      phatman, i agree about the north quays east & downriver from Patrick’s bridge – its a complete mess as is merchants quay + andersons quay also. i also agree that the riverside potential will take a long time to be realised – that is because there is so much quayside within the city (even excluding docklands).

      but the city has traditionally ignored + abused the riverside context – one way traffic systems for example – eg popes quay is almost destroyed – its a broad quay and effectively has 2 lane road activity in one direction – compare it with what is one of the city’s most attractive and succesful quaysides – the north mall – narrow quayside with 2 way traffic – no problem.

      some new developments of late are beginning to re-address the quays and about time – lavitts quay, lapps quay for eg, but there should be a very focussed planning framework for the river – a quayside or river action plan or design ‘guide’.

      also, i wouldnt be too keen on using limerick’s riverside developments as a model – its very poor in my opinion – all that red brick should be thrown in the shannon

    • #732999
      phatman
      Participant

      Bunch – I agree, I have no desire for Cork’s quaysides to turn out like Limericks have, ie. with no character whatsoever. They have done a good job in transforming it from what it was, but like you say, there is too much use of red brick, flat roofs etc., buildings characteristic of the early, rushed stages of the celtic tiger, basically where any change was good, which in the future we will look back on with the same disdain we have for 1970’s architecture, I’m afraid. That is why I consider Cork’s late blossoming in terms of deveopment as being a blessing in disguise, we have the chance to learn from past mistakes, and to better realise what will stand the test of time, and add to the city now and in the future. We have undoubtedly been guilty of these mistakes in Cork too, I look around at so many buildings of the last 10-15 years which i would tear down without a second thought, merchant’s quay like you say, and it just seems like such a waste of time, resources, and development potential to waste. Another concern of mine, is the role the city council take in the quayside redevelopment – it’s fine for the developers to put in place modern new buildings which look great – but what about the actual quays themselves? They are crumbling and decaying, and totally neglected, despite being our most vital asset. They really are in disgraceful repair, and it is about time that a plan is put in place to integrate their renewal with the renewal of the inlying preoperties. Shandon street bridge is perhaps a start, even though i have my doubts about the haphazard entrance from the coal quay. What howard holdings are undertaking should be encouraged on a more general scale, this being their development of riverside boardwalk etc, and i do note several other proposals which contain similar plans, but as there is SO much quayside we can’t rely on random piecemeal refurbishments to suffice. Now that Patrick Street and the city centre have had their facelifts, I am hoping something significant will be done to reclaim the quays.

    • #733000
      planningdept
      Participant

      does anyone know why o’flynn construction has a planning notice in todays examiner for there
      an post site.isn’t this in planning stage already?

    • #733001
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      im assuming o flynn’s have submitted the eis as a response to the request for further information, and this ad refers to that? or maybe there is actually a new application + eis

      phatman – agree about the quays generally – good point about need to integrate quaysides with the quayfront buildings – howard hodlings have certainly lead the way with lapps quay. how about an amendment to cork city councils planning contribution sceme? cork city could include a Special Quayside Levy as a ‘Special Contribution’ on to certain waterfront developments – they would have to identify a need and a scheme that that funding would be directed towrads (or ringfenced) and develop an actual programme – i am sure developers wiould gladly contribute to such a fund as their developments would benefit from a river renewal programme – but i do think that reversing the one way system on remaining quays is the first step – because the quays are effectively a barrier to north south pedestrian movement due to traffic conditions – btw – i think that the south channel of the lee is largely ok – its the north channel that requires particular attention

    • #733002
      anto
      Participant

      Maybe when the Main drainage scheme is finished (when?) the Lee will become more attractive, it won’t be the open sewer it was heretofore. No wonder Cork turned its back on the river!

      It’s true that money needs to be spent on the Quays, look at the Campshire in Dublin for example. There was some plan for a wallk to link the quays to Fitzgerald park at one stage. Unfortunately some of the heavisest traffic goes along the Quays, probably worse since some was taken off Patricks street. I wonder has the amount of traffic coming into the city fallen since the tunnel was built, as was promised and no doubt those pushing the new orbital route are promising the same. Some how i doubt it. Probaly more suburbanites driving in.

      Cork needs to spend more upgrading the quays and putting in more cycle lanes. There wasn’t many of these when i lived there (2000)a ny more since? But does it have the money?

    • #733003
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hey Anto, CCC are currently working on a river/quayside walk that will link the city centre to the lee fields.

      There are also plans in progress to develop cycle paths all along the quays.

      @anto wrote:

      Maybe when the Main drainage scheme is finished (when?) the Lee will become more attractive, it won’t be the open sewer it was heretofore. No wonder Cork turned its back on the river!

      It’s true that money needs to be spent on the Quays, look at the Campshire in Dublin for example. There was some plan for a wallk to link the quays to Fitzgerald park at one stage. Unfortunately some of the heavisest traffic goes along the Quays, probably worse since some was taken off Patricks street. I wonder has the amount of traffic coming into the city fallen since the tunnel was built, as was promised and no doubt those pushing the new orbital route are promising the same. Some how i doubt it. Probaly more suburbanites driving in.

      Cork needs to spend more upgrading the quays and putting in more cycle lanes. There wasn’t many of these when i lived there (2000)a ny more since? But does it have the money?

    • #733004
      anto
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Hey Anto, CCC are currently working on a river/quayside walk that will link the city centre to the lee fields.

      There are also plans in progress to develop cycle paths all along the quays.

      Sounds good, Lee fields is fantastic green lung that almost comes into the city. Are they pinching some land off Pres, the Criket club, the Mardyke etc. Or a kinda boardwalk along side them? Good to hear they’re investing in cycle lanes too. Cork will be like Amsterdam, has the water, bridges all it’s missing is the bucycles and the Coffee shops

    • #733005
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      some of the walkway will be through the irish distillers site on the north mall with a bridge connecting with the land adjacent to the cricket grounds. There will be a boardwalk but only in the city centre.
      BTW, a competition was recently launced to find a winning design for Kyrls quay. It is probably best to put a catalan flag with your entry 😉

      Any one see the article in last fridays examiner in relation to the government looking for a new site in Cork… the article mentioned that the government is looking to relocate to a 100,000 sq ft. office development, preferrably in the docklands. Any proposed deal will probably include the existing offices on sullivans quay… surely someone in here knows more… lex???

      @anto wrote:

      Sounds good, Lee fields is fantastic green lung that almost comes into the city. Are they pinching some land off Pres, the Criket club, the Mardyke etc. Or a kinda boardwalk along side them? Good to hear they’re investing in cycle lanes too. Cork will be like Amsterdam, has the water, bridges all it’s missing is the bucycles and the Coffee shops

    • #733006
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Isn’t Sullivan’s Qy structurally unsound – or something equally dodgy? Which would be why the government want to quietly move office space and throw the existing site into the bargain. If they do move Eastwards hopefully it will be a bit more pleasing than their current home!

    • #733007
      corkdood
      Participant

      Has anyone noticed an improvement in water quality in the Lee or the Harbour area since the main drainage scheme was finished? It looks (and smells) the same to me!

    • #733008
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      What’s the story with the Village Inn in Sunday’s Well, it was supposed to have gone for a second planning application but it’s still standing getting uglier and probably more dangerous by the day.
      Also, anyone know what Mr Hegarty is doing with the Good Shepherd’s now?

    • #733009
      St Luke
      Participant

      Hey Corkdude- regarding water quality: recent tests suggest the water coming out of the new treatment plant in Little Island is cleaner than the water upstream before it comes into the city: the color of the water is related to agricultural pollution and not to sewage. So blame the farmers I say!
      Its obvious now that plans do need to be put into place to build public better access to the river: for a start, the city could extend the possiblities of cafe-culture from the recently renovated pavements by renting out river barges to local pubs and restaurents – such as at the North Mall – a strategy used very successfully in many European cities.

    • #733010
      theblimp
      Participant

      I’ve always found that the tidal nature of the Lee has a negative impact on utilising the quays. However this could be easily overcome by putting some kind of ‘weir’ (automated or otherwise), say, under the last two bridges before the two channels become one again. Just a thought – feel free to ridicule….!

    • #733011
      phatman
      Participant

      As regards the effectiveness of the Main Drainage scheme, while there is undoubtedly a marked improvement in the quality of the river water, it will take some time for the river to regenerate itself, and for the visual effects to become apparent. Note that the scheme is simply processing the water itself, while the sludge and grime etc will have to be discharged naturally, over a gradual period, so don’t despair those of you who think it’s been a waste of 200 million squid.

      As for your proposal blimp, it’s certainly an idea, one which wouldnt by any means break the corporation bank. Would be down more to environmental issues if it were ever to be considered, methinks. But I’m glad to see people are so enthusiastic about refocusing our attention on the river, such a so-far untapped resource, could be the making of the city. With proper planning and integrated schemes, as opposed to random non-complementing ones, there is a wealth of quay-side at our disposal. In particular the north quays downstream from Patrick’s Bridge, but as regards more extending the city-centre in terms of restaurants, shops and cafes etc, the whole quayside from Lavitts Quay as far as the Gate Cinema holds great potential.

      Also, in response to Bunch, I would have to agree with you as regards the one-way nature of the quays, but perhaps more emphasis should be placed on pedestrian movement in the future, as im sure it will. The South Channel is largely ok, like you say, nothing spectacular, but does hold a certain charm, with the exception of the afforementioned fas building, which by the way, it is rumoured is to be demolished to make way for further development, should be interesting if anything comes of this.

    • #733012
      lexington
      Participant

      Hello – sorry for not getting back sooner – but I was in Dublin the past 2 days at one or two meetings – and a spot of the ever stressful, last minute Christmas shopping. Big mistake! 😉

      mickeydocs – the OPW plan to move the Revenue Commissioners to a city docklands site – they are looking for a long-term lease/sale for 80,000sq ft of office space and additional parking for up to 600 employees. Any deal, will in part include, the exchange of the 3/4 acre Sullivans Quay Government Buildings which also house FAS, Coillte and Dept of Marine offices – these departments will also be up for negotiation for an additional 20,000sq ft to 30,000sq ft. The existing Sullivans Quay buildings are structurally inadequate, at renovating the 100,000sq ft building would be exceptionally expensive. The site is valued at between 10m to 14m euros.



      🙂 O’Flynn Construction have resubmitted their planning application for Eglinton Street to include an EIS – as requested. No changes have been made to the development.

      – in related O’Flynn Construction news, the company has sought planning to construct a new retail restaurant at it’s Eastgate Retail Park, next to KFC, for MBCC (Ireland) Ltd, – which will trade under the ‘Pizza Hut’ brand (who are also opening an outlet at Mahon Point in Feb 2005).



      😮 O’Callaghan Properties have been teasing the Evening Echo w/ an insight to their planned 6-storey Academy Street retail and residential block. In article, Owen O’Callaghan apparently speaks of the 150m Academy Street development as fulfilling the commitment he made to CCC when he purchased the Mahon Point lands to reinvest back into the city centre. :rolleyes: (MacDonald Properties of Scotland had a rival bid of IR£50m on the site for which they planned a 500,000sq ft retail development versus the joint O’Callaghan Properties/McCarthy Developments bid of IR£42m) …anyway, O’Callaghan goes on to say how the design will be of a superior nature and host approx. 200,000sq ft of retail space, between 30 and 40 units of strictly international and national fashion brands (apparently, “allowing Cork rival the any of the best fashion retail districts of Europe”) with 80 apartments overhead. The article mentions the design stages are at an early stage with a collabrative host of European design firms (however, a preliminary “visionary” design has already been drawn up and seen by some), and a finalised design is expected mid to late 2005. Uhmmm. 😉


    • #733013
      anto
      Participant

      often thought a bit more tree planting on the quays in Cork might be in order. Not great big Plane trees but something more suitable. Might be useful to hide stuff like Merchants Quay. Speaking of the Quays, the Gate Cinema was quite good but the apartments just above them are pretty dissapointing

    • #733014
      sw101
      Participant

      lexington, do you have any idea of the price on the site for sale by cohalan downing beside the beamish and crawford units on the quays? beside the old ford plant, i mean

    • #733015
      lexington
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      often thought a bit more tree planting on the quays in Cork might be in order. Not great big Plane trees but something more suitable. Might be useful to hide stuff like Merchants Quay. Speaking of the Quays, the Gate Cinema was quite good but the apartments just above them are pretty dissapointing

      I very much agree – the quays should be tree-lined more in Cork, it’s a small but powerful addition to any city-scape. Merchants Quay most especially could do with it. However, I do know strategic plans for the MQ/St Patrick’s Quay area are in line for major redevelopment (St. Patrick’s Quay has for some time been due redevelopment for the St. Patrick’s Quay frontage of the Everyman Palace – plans are in the drawing room) and riverside walkways. A new pedestrian bridge is planned between MQ and St. Patrick’s Quay as part of the City Development Plan 2004. A boardwalk will extend along both quays – one of the plan aims includes ‘complimentary tree-linining additions’.

      – As for the apartments over the Gate Multiplex, ‘box central’ – how utterly distasteful. I’ve always maintained my opinion of their unsightly nature – and its far from favourable.



      sw101 – I assume that’s the 80,000sq ft Kennedy Quay site you’re referring to??? If so, offers in excessive of 4m euro were being heard on initial offering. My understanding is that this has been dramatically readjusted upward. I expect a final sale prices in or excess of 6m euros – but I could be wrong, I can’t really predict how bidders will go. :confused:


    • #733016
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Merry Christmas and the best of the season to all the contributors who make this particular thread such a special read, and especially to Lexington, Phatman, Dr_Dallas, Burge_eye, the blimp, etc… you guys know who you are 🙂

    • #733017
      theblimp
      Participant

      Echoing the sentiments of mickeydocs. I came kind’a late to the forum but have find it really enlightening over these past few months. Looking forward to more of the same for 2005 …….. fingers crossed may even be able to announce one or two projects personal to me early in the New Year!!! Happy Christmas y’all

    • #733018
      lexington
      Participant

      Indeed – belated as this is, Merry Christmas to everyone – contributors and observers alike! I hope it is a warm, progressive and peaceful one – and with it, a prosperous New Year! I look forward to a prosperous 2005 for all of you and for Cork – let’s top 2004 and come out better than ever!!! 🙂



      theblimp – interesting cover story on the small paper today (23rd December). 😉

    • #733019
      phatman
      Participant

      Yep, wishing everyone a very Happy christmas and New Year, and saying thanks for keeping this thread alive! Here’s to a prosperous new year for all of us, and to the redevelopment of Cork.

    • #733020
      theblimp
      Participant

      Thanks Lex, that article certainly raised a few smiles around these parts!!! To be fair to Joe I think he’s getting as frustrated as the rest of us at the Cork2005 scenario, and when you add into the mix the growing number of people who are now starting to do some big things themselves – while at the same time clearly stating that their work is NOT associated with the Cork2005 offices – he had to come out with something. Kudos to him for trying to be proactive – however, 3,000 capacity is not a ‘giant tent’ – one of our specialist designers has designed and constructed marquees that will take capacities anywhere from 8,000 to 22,000 ….. now they’re giant tents!!!

    • #733021
      dowlingm
      Participant

      having worked in the Marina Comm Park adjacent to the Beamish site on Kennedy quay, if the surface there is anything like in the CommPk it might need some serious work subsurface. I believe there are some underground rivers in the area. In the comm park the road surfaces are like crazy paving, plus they take quite a pounding from trucks etc.

    • #733022
      sw101
      Participant

      i hear they’re putting some sort of design institute and museum down there by beamish.

    • #733023
      satanta99
      Participant

      Happy Christmas and a peaceful new year to all contributors to this thread. Lets hope 2005 is another great year, in terms of developments in Cork!

    • #733024
      phatman
      Participant

      Well, saw the thread was slipping down the list a bit , can’t have that now can we. Anyone see the supplement on the Sunday Tribune about Cork, Capital of Culture? In a feature on Mr. O’Callaghan’s interests in Cork, it listed the current and future elements of Mahon Point, among which was a 5,000 seater events centre. No ‘proposed’ in sight. So have the corporation granted him his wish? I doubt it , as i havent heard anything to indicate this as yet, or is this an indication that they intend to do so?

    • #733025
      soundzcape
      Participant

      Hi,
      I’m a musician,teacher and music facilitater (run courses etc.to promote music), and hope that someone out there can possibly help me.
      I’m looking for a vacant space,warehouse,building,in which to use throughout the year for various music,youth & arts projects.
      I have, in the past consulted with the Cork Arts Council with regard to running and managing a space for them -a rehearsal room for musicians,of all ages.this is badly needed as there is a hugh struggling music in cork at the moment and as the privately financed rehearsal space in blackpool (sunbeam) burnt down.the CAC wasted about 9 months of my time only to U-turn on their own project saying that to pay money on a rental space was a waste of money.2005plc. have also been inundated with proposals for a multi-tasking space to nurture and promote inovation in art – their stance on this was to brush it off stating that it’s not their job to do such (even though they commissioned someone to audit every potential space as one of their first jobs,a document that as far as I know is not in the public domain!)
      So,why am I here…
      feeling disinfranchised by those who have the power to at least facilitate the finding of a suitable building (etc.),I’m hopeing that if not just for the year thats in it,we can make it happen ourselves.Who’s “we” you may ask? …well anyone who would like to be help with a sugestion,to get involved,who’d like there to be somewhere for their children to learn,play /practise /listen to live music,(adults also welcome!)If you havn’t heard yet the “WE” is getting bigger and WE’re getting organised- check out http://www.wheresmeculture.com
      …and what am I looking for …
      to start with,just suggestions on where to look,who to talk to,maybe you know of idle buildings waiting for planning etc.
      Ideally a building/warehouse near the city center,low rental/lease,available for at least 9 months (all we need is to prove it can work,so we can look for grants,sponsorship and private investment),we will cover insurance,no structural alterations will be needed.
      in case you think I’m a chancer,yes I am!but I’ve a history in academics and management in london and this needs to happen !
      thanks to theblimp for suggesting this thread
      please post to http://www.wheresmeculture.com/bb/index.php
      thanks

    • #733026
      lexington
      Participant

      Having resubmitted their application (through Further Info incl. EIS) – O’Flynn Construction are now scheduled to receive a decision on their highly anticipated Eglinton Street development. The project will incl. mixed use res. office & retail devt generally comprising of 6-8 storeys above street level apart from the landmark bldg in the sw corner of the site which is 17 storeys above street level excl. rooftop plant encl,feature spire & aviation light.553 carpark spaces provided mainly at basement & also at grd level within the bldg.Devt will be carried out at former An Post site 1.24ha/3.06acres.Retail floorspace will be provided in 5 separate units of 3.624m2total.U’s1,3&4-convenience retail/sandwich bars/restaurants assoc. with local need,U2–h/hold goods & U5-furniture &/or bulky consumer durables.7 office units total 1989m2.Assoc. facilities comprise a creche &a gym.217 res. apts will comprise 6x1bed,164x2bed,27x3bed.Security station, 2ESB substns, anc. services, stores&yard with assoc. landscaping, site works & services.Vehic. access for the devt will be via 2 new vehic. entr/exit pts onto Eglinton St apart from the service yard for del. vehicles which will be located on Albert St.

      The decision due date is set for the 25th Feburary 2005.

      (now off I go to return to my Christmas holidays – which are less holidays and seem to be more intensive work days!)

    • #733027
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 CCC announced formally today (31st December 2004) along w/ Enterprise Ireland and Howard Holdings, the long-awaited ‘Webworks’ development for Albert House (along Albert Quay – now known as Terence McSwiney Quay). The development is designed by Scott Tallon Walker, will be developed by Howard Holdings and constructed by PJ Hegarty Contractors.

      Quite frankly, I’m a little bit disappointed with the design – it could have been far more radical and utilised the quayside far more effectively and…actually, it could have used the quayside full stop! The circa. 55,000sq ft, 4 storey (5-storey apex) over 62 car-parking space basement development is to be built to the rear of Albert House (on site of former Railway Station platform area) and connects with Albert House – which will see its ground floor area converted to restaurant use, and upper floors for office use. Access will be provide to the Webworks from Eglinton Street and a new road planned as part of the Eglinton Street development by O’Flynn Construction between Eglinton Street and Albert Road.

      The development will be open to submission until Feb 16th 2005 – will then go for council vote (which will almost certainly pass) and is planned to have a crane over the site for April 2005.



      😀 After receiving a copy of the EIS for O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street project (as part of their project resubmission – see previous post) – I have to say, if I liked the project before, I REALLY like the project now. Inspecting the various visual aspects of the project in better detail than basic design images I was afforded earlier on in the year, I have to say, the project says ‘WATCH OUT DOCKLANDS!!!’ with a bang. It provides a magnificient entry point into an area undergoing rapid current and future development. The VIS doesn’t incl. outlines for the Albert Quay projects and City Hall development – but when pictured in your head, you can imagine how fabulous the development will be. It utilises copper, sandstone and glass heavily, but blends just well. Yes it is tall, yes it is dramatic – but is a REAL city’s project and I think it’s high time Cork flaired a little pride and confidence in its morale and aesthetics. It’s a leap, but it’s a mature one and it’s something I hope is embraced.

      All going well, I’ll have an exclusive (for want of a better word) Lapps Quay & South Mall perspective image of the development – which includes City Hall – for next Tues or Wednesday.



      🙁 And sorry to butt in this downer – but Charles & Helen McCarthy’s hotel development planned at Crosses Green on the site of their former Mill Business Centre, for want of better phrasing, is shockingly awful. It’s another Derek Tynan-makes-me-want-to-cry (the bad kind!) architectural catastrophe. Why is Mr. Tynan spreading an architectural disease over our city??? The design is quite literally a 7-storey brick (Victoria Mills: The Sequel) in an area surrounded by 2 and 3-storey small houses, cottages and the Dean’s Hall complex. Sure I like the boardwalk element and I like the fact that it’s a development in an area that could use it – with beautiful water frontage – but NOT THIS development. The 7-storeys could be quite passable and in fact, complimentary had any effort, thought and/ore imagination gone into the design. A truly hideous project. I would wholly support this project, even at that height, if it had any form of half-decent design to it.



      🙂 I couldn’t end the final day of 2004 with that depressing note – so here are some things to keep an eye on for 2005 ->

      1. A planned project (next to the Albert House Webworks) for Albert Quay
      2. A vertical extension at the Deloitte & Touche offices on Lapps Quay (a glass frame enclosing the existing PS and floor provision above)
      3. A resubmission of the Water Street project
      4. Another major office development in the docklands confines.
      5. Movement on Horgan’s Quay (so the CCC claim)
      6. Plus a number of other exciting large scale developments YET to be announced – but I will soon, I promise!

      HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! 😀

    • #733028
      lexington
      Participant

      A few people have asked about that ‘large red-brick circle thing’ along the Blackpool By-pass -> well that’s the Sean Mhuileann Section 23 development by Frank Sheahan and Joe Carey I had been talking about in previous posts. I still believe that guide prices are ridiculous – but if people are that mad enough and willing to pay that sort of money for that sort of development, then soak it up I say. From a consumer perspective, all I can say is, there are far better developments than this for better money. From a developer’s perspective all I can say is ‘HAHA!’ – or something to that effect.

      For a 600sq ft 1-bedroom apartment, prices start at 325,000 euros. 375,000 euros for a 800sq ft 2 bedroom and 425,000 euros for a 3-bedroom 1,200sq ft apartment.

      The image below is in reverse, the larger, semi-circular element (already complete by PJ Hegarty Contractors) is located to the North. The 3 remaining blocks are currently under construction by Ascon. Design for the 139-unit apartment development is by J.E. Keating & Associates.



      Also, here’s a small image of the new UCC School of Medicine and Nursing Studies – due to open for October 2005. The 45m euro project was designed by RKD McCarthy Lynch and built by PJ Walls Building Contractors.

      …and on the subject of UCC, here’s a sneak peek at the design for new student accomodation of the site of the former M&P O’Sullivan Cash & Carry at Victoria Cross (next to Victoria Mills – Phase 2 now under contruction by Bowen Construction). Fleming Group will act as developers and building contractors on behalf of UCC. In line with student population projects and accomodation requirements – construction is not scheduled to begin until mid to late 2005, ready for the new Academic Year in Sept 2006 (the project is not S.50 and thus free of associative conditions). Design is by Bertie Pope & Associates (whose previous projects incl. North Main Street/Kyrls Quay Multi-Storey Car Park and Shopping Centre – I’ll let that work speak for itself). The image is small I know, but as of now, it was the only one allowed for use (made available in this case through PMG).

    • #733029
      Lorcan
      Participant

      i read in the echo the other day that the Kent Station development isn’t going ahead or something? or it was being delayed by CIE? this right?

    • #733030
      Leesider
      Participant

      city hall are trying to exert a bit of pressure to get the thing off the ground, supposedly they have been in contact with the minister for transport to get CIE to get the thumb out! It’s a shame they are draggin their heels so much on this project.

    • #733031
      lexington
      Participant

      No – I think what you read was Noel O’Flynn giving out that Cork was being treated 2nd best yet again by CIE as Heuston and Connolly Stations up in Dublin were getting the full treatment. It fairness, Connolly and Heuston have higher volumes of traffic movement so its no surprise that they have had and needed to receive revamps – but CIE have treated Cork appallingly over Kent Station and Horgan’s Quay redevelopment. Treasury Holdings and Manor Park Homes have apparently threatened to withdraw their proposals as a result – I’m not quite so sure that’s accurate as Treasury and Manor Park were only a number of developer names in the barrel. Joe Gavin, Billy Kelleher, John Minihan and Noel O’Flynn have pledged to push for a firm application regarding Horgan’s Quay for 2005 from CIE – but at the end of the day, they can only do so much. A number of plans have been drawn up regarding Horgan’s Quay ever since Owen O’Callaghan proposed to construct an IT and Business Park on the site many years ago – which was famously boycotted by the then Minister Michael Lowry and Bernard Allen (it was a Fine Gael vs Fianna Fail cock-up that cost Cork up to 600 jobs). You may remember I post one Horgan’s Quay masterplan image a few pages back – but developers involved have also funded a number of other design proposals, most of which include high-rise buildings of varying scale and design quality to accomodate the expected 5000 or so residential units ear-marked for the site. These buildings are generally slender in their east-west profile as to minimise visual disruption from northern valley slope residencies. 2 plans in particular have particular appeal to me – they both facilitate an extensive commercial/retail/leisure and social ‘town centre’-style area along the quay with a central public plaza; above this 3 attractive high-rise residential buildings stand (east, centre, west – 20, 25, 20 storeys resepectively) with interconnecting lower level residential and commercial levels. An extensive reworking of the quayside is proposed to maximise the waterfront area which is to include a boardwalk (with docking accommodation) from Railway Street to Water Street. Pedestrian access is provided by a number of safe crossings and one over-road pedestrian walkway/bridge which extends from the base of the central high-rise. Kent Station in both these plans, as with almost all of the other masterplans for the quay, is altered to face the waterfront with access roads linking into a new arrivals and departure hall – this then faces onto the quay to the south and central public plaza to the east. A new 900-space multistorey car-park is provided to the rear of the existing terminal, fronting the Lower Glanmire Road. Many of the masterplans overlap in certain areas but I’m sceptical over whether such plans (even half of such plans) will make the final cut if CIE does finally commit to its long long overdue promises. My fear now is a substandard ‘Cork Bus Station scenario’ where a novelty, second-rate proposal is implemented consequent of mounting public and political pressures. In fairness to Joe Gavin, he has said, we want movement – but we will not sacrifice the immense potential of the quay to a second-rate proposal. 2005 may be the year – we wait anxiously.

    • #733032
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Yes, more student accomodation for UCC and CIT, this time – I have to agree the location is pretty sweet as it is slap-bang in the middle between both the main UCC and CIT campuses.

      The former petrol station, repair shop and existing licensed bar at Dennehy’s Cross on the junction of the Model Farm Road and Wilton Road looks scheduled to be redeveloped as student accomodation (in the form of apartments). It is presumed the buildings will range from 3 to 5 storeys and accomodate up to 200 to 250 bedspaces. The apartments are expected to be designed and built to a very high standard – perhaps due to future market considerations??? After all, it won’t have the same restrictions. No firm application date has yet been set – and I’m afraid I can’t leech any further information about the development for now. But this, it would seem, is what is in the works for this highly prominent and sought after site.

    • #733033
      lexington
      Participant


      🙂 In addition to plans for a new 150-bedroom hotel at Cork Airport, Great Southern Hotels have lodged their application for a 53-bedroom extension onto their existing 83-bedroom hotel at the fast growing airport.



      🙂 O’Flynn Construction have sought permission to proceed with the construction of 2 planning permitted hotels as part of their 500m euro Ballincollig Town Centre project.

      – the first hotel is 100-bedroom 4 storey over basement development, while the 2nd is a 5-storey 138-bedroom over basement development (Marriott have been a named mentioned to operate the hotel – however, reports are now sceptical over this in light of ‘recent developments’). Both hotels incl. all appropriate ancillary services and facilities.

      – Also, I hope to have that exclusive Eglinton Street Development picture by Thurs, as I will be away tomorrow.



      :p Pitwood Ltd’s proposed 121-bedroom, 5-storey, 80,000sq ft hotel development over dual-basement is looking pretty nice. I was taking a brief look over the plans recently and forgot to mention it – the facades of 91 South Mall and the 2 protected facades at Parnell Place are to be refurbished and incorporated into the development, giving it an air of class about it. Above the Parnell Place facades, a tasteful, black slate pitched roof will form the 5-storey. My only grievance relates to how the height of the project, as viewed from South Mall, may mildly affect the grandesque of 93 South Mall (Thomas Crosbie Holdings HQ) – but the developers assure me the materials used will minimise this effect dramatically. It looks good though. Michael & Kevin Corbett will retain ownership of the site however.



      :rolleyes: Cumnor Construction finally provided Further Info to CCC regarding their 7-storey apartment development at Sunday’s Well/Winter’s Hill – a decision due date is set for the 28th of Jan 2005 (this month). Jack Coughlan & Assoc are behind the design. I remain sceptical about this project – in my opinion, it’s a bad place to put a 7-storey block – considering its position overlooking a number of private residencies surrounding (the tallest of which being 3-storeys with pitched roof). This is a highly prominent, sloped location and the development far from suits it.


    • #733034
      Pug
      Participant

      lex and others

      re the georges mills development, clydagh developments are doing it but Murray O’ Laoire are the architects. Any chance of getting a photo / artists impression of what it will look like when finished? Due for completion of work in Sep 05.

    • #733035
      lexington
      Participant

      Well here it is – an exclusive image of O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street development – decision due Feb 25th 2005. A total of 5 objections have been lodged against the development – a shame really. The project will consist of 217-residential units, 7 large office units and 5 convenience and bulky goods retail units. 550 parking spaces will be provided a dual basement level. The project hosts a landmark 17-storey, 70m residential tower in the south-western corner of the former An Post Sorting Office site (which was sold last year to O’Flynn Construction for 15m euro) and average between 7 and 9 storeys for the remainder of the development. It would provide a stunning entrance into the new docklands development zone – I sincerely hope it gains approval.

      Apologises for the poor image quality – my scanner is second rate. The viewpoint is taken from a South Mall perspective looking south east to City Hall. Yes, the Eglinton Street development is imposing, but it places City Hall at the centre of a transition between old and new – creating a unique and clear divide, enhancing the history of older Cork and the positivity and confidence of the new city quarter. Design is by Frank O’Mahony of Wilson Architecture. For other images, see previous posts.



      😎 McCarthy Developments have emerged as the successful buyer of the former Goldcrop site along Centre Park Road in the southern docklands. The site adjoins Centre Park House, already owned by McCarthy Developments, who have cited to develop a major office development at the location. The deal is est’d to have = up to 2m euros per acre.



      😎 An undisclosed buyer is rumoured to have successfully purchased the 80,000sq ft Marina Park storage site near Kennedy Quay. The ‘corporate’ buyer is said to have purchased the waterfront site for an est’d 8m + euros from auctioneers Cohalan Downing. A major commercial development is said to be in preplanning for this location which will take full advantage of the proposed 25m euro Water Street bridge.

      The above deals represent strong headway in the development of the Cork City Docklands.

    • #733036
      jungle
      Participant

      St Finbarr’s Hospital

      St Finbarr’s Hospital is housed on a huge, underused site. With the loss of its maternity department to CUH and the neighbouring development on the Nemo Rangers grounds, are there any plans to sell off/develop any of its lands?

    • #733037
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lex, generally speaking I would welcome that Eglinton Street development. However I have to say that it looks just a little isolated. I would have thought that one or two other buildings in that development not of the same height but of a more complmentary nature to the feature building would have been more appropriate.

    • #733038
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 An undisclosed buyer is rumoured to have successfully purchased the 80,000sq ft Marina Park storage site near Kennedy Quay. The ‘corporate’ buyer is said to have purchased the waterfront site for an est’d 8m + euros from auctioneers Cohalan Downing. A major commercial development is said to be in preplanning for this location which will take full advantage of the proposed 25m euro Water Street bridge.

      The above deals represent strong headway in the development of the Cork City Docklands.

      is there anyone here who might be able to help me track down survey drawings of this site. cohalan downing have been no help, and i’m presuming an architect/surveyor must have been involved at some stage if the site was being sold. any idea who might be able to help? purely educational use. thanks.

    • #733039
      lexington
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Lex, generally speaking I would welcome that Eglinton Street development. However I have to say that it looks just a little isolated. I would have thought that one or two other buildings in that development not of the same height but of a more complmentary nature to the feature building would have been more appropriate.

      Plans are in tow for the Careys Tool Hire site across Albert Road and at the IAWS R&H Hall site that will also consist of ‘high-rise’ developments – though I do acknowledge the Eglinton Street Tower ‘stands out’, thankfully the design isn’t all that bad and it should look better in the light of these other new developments, as well as future developments down along the docklands in the years to come. I think it’s important to remember this development is only representative of the so-called ‘first step’ and it has to be perceived with a view to the entirety of the docklands regeneration process. Were this a stand alone development, I would probably have to agree with you.



      @Pug wrote:

      lex and others

      re the georges mills development, clydagh developments are doing it but Murray O’ Laoire are the architects. Any chance of getting a photo / artists impression of what it will look like when finished? Due for completion of work in Sep 05.

      Tom McCarthy, of the Kingsley Hotel among other developments, is developing George’s Mill – according to Joe Gavin, scafforlding was due on site before Christmas, but I am told this won’t happen until at least mid-Jan. I’ll look into getting more images of the development for you soon.



      @jungle wrote:

      St Finbarr’s Hospital

      St Finbarr’s Hospital is housed on a huge, underused site. With the loss of its maternity department to CUH and the neighbouring development on the Nemo Rangers grounds, are there any plans to sell off/develop any of its lands?

      The SHB have plans for the hospital down along the road, but it will remain primarily hospital and associated medical usage. Some lands may be sold off for private development.



      sw101 – have you checked with OSI? Although I do have drawings, I’m afraid they incl. development proposals and I am not at liberty to distribute, sorry. But OSI or CCC should have something.


      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: The IRFU are to see off a parcel of ‘excess’ land at their Musgrave Park grounds for apartment development (circa. 50 units) and some commercial uses – to be developed by Bowen Construction (on behalf……). I was keeping this ‘dun suas’ – but John Bowen and the Irish Examiner were talking so I said I might as well let the forum know also. theblimp?

    • #733040
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The taller part of the Eglinton development doesn’t bother as much as the 8 storey element. It seems like it will envelop City Hall.

    • #733041
      lexington
      Participant

      After assessing the full design elements of the project, I was surprised at how sympathetic the ‘lower’ element of the development actually is to City Hall – I totally accept the image I posted doesn’t particularly convey that however. You have to consider City Hall’s own 32m euro development on its Southern elevation – there is somewhat of a consistency between the 2 projects when viewed side-to-side.

    • #733042
      lexington
      Participant

      Just thought I’d mention a project that is rarely brought to attention – Fleming Construction’s 50m euro Market Square development in Mallow – effectively a town-centre redevelopment. Fleming Construction, who generally stick to residential development, are embarking on this, their first REAL commercial development project in Mallow – a town which has become an increasingly vibrant commuter and feeder town to Cork city and one embracing the results of pitching itself as such a town successfully.

      Below are a few images of the Market Square development. In the end, the project will comprise of a new multiplex, shopping centre, residential units, offices and 456 underground parking spaces which will span beneath the entire development




      And on the subject of Fleming Construction, here’s an image of their recently completed 61-apartment, 6-storey George’s Quay development which includes a few retail units, a restaurant and licensed premises. The original design was by CMG Architects but was later developed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects (of No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay fame). The development is surprisingly large to the rear – its quay frontage is relatively narrow. Extensive courtyards and gardens, over a basement carpark, are provided to the rear of this frontage.



      🙂 I can’t remember who asked this question a while back, but Harbour Point Golf Course was purchased for 11m euros by the owners of Cork’s 5-Star Hayfield Manor Hotel and the Royal Hotel, Killarney.



      *UPDATES*

      😉 Werdna Ltd. through Murray O’Laoire Architects are expected to submit their revised application for Water Street in the next few weeks, assuming all goes according to plan. The new application will retain the central landmark tower, although it has now been reduced by 2-floors to 17-storeys (so I’m told, I haven’t actually seen the drawings yet so I can’t confirm that for absolute sure but the tower will remain). The tower height will not actually be altered much, I was so told, as the ground commercial units will now have a raised ceiling height. Minor elevational and layout changes have been made to the project plus a reduction in units numbers from an original figure of 400 to in and around 300. The boardwalk, business centre, underground car-parking and waterfront commercial units are all expected to be retained. But like I said, that’s what I got from a brief 2-minute conversation. I’ll get a hold of the drawings soon and confirm the definite spec. for you then. It’s a great project and I sincerely hope it gets the full-steam-ahead – as I do Eglinton Street.



      😎 The Kilbree Investment Company are due a decision on their much needed 22-unit, 4-storey apartment development for the Lower Glanmire Road this Monday. The site is adjacent to Kent Station and is designed by Jack Coughlan & Associates.



      I expect to be able to make a number of interesting announcements come the next few weeks – so fingers crossed!

    • #733043
      Pug
      Participant

      Ladies and Gents
      Any info or drawings on Clayton Loves plans for Carrigaline Town Centre? I know they are doing Douglas as well, any time line on either of them as to when they will be done?

      (this is purely selfish reasons, I just bought a house there and am looking to find out what developments are happening apart from Brideviews apartments near the Cogan garage!!)
      cheers

    • #733044
      corkdood
      Participant

      Lexington (or any others who are in the know) Do you know if there are any residential developments on the horizon in Cloheen. I understand that one or two large land holdings have been sold in the area recently. Any ideas on what if anything is planned for this area?

    • #733045
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      Ladies and Gents
      Any info or drawings on Clayton Loves plans for Carrigaline Town Centre? I know they are doing Douglas as well, any time line on either of them as to when they will be done?

      (this is purely selfish reasons, I just bought a house there and am looking to find out what developments are happening apart from Brideviews apartments near the Cogan garage!!)
      cheers

      I posted images of the Piton Properties Ltd (Clayton Love and Barry Collins) plans for Carrigaline Town Centre a few pages back.



      I’ll have to get back to you on that one corkdood!

    • #733046
      phatman
      Participant

      Report on Cork in today’s Irish Times quotes Habitat as being the anchor for the Cornmarket Street Development.
      I hadn’t realized there has been any decision/statement. Anyone know if this is true, or if there have been any other tenants confirmed?

    • #733047
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Although I have a lot of respect for the work Howard Holdings has and continues (even more so these past few months) to achieve in Cork – after a close inspection of their plans for a 7-storey, 125-bedroom hotel and retail and office development at Lavitts Quay – I have to issue a sigh of disappointment. Reddy O’Riordan Staehli have produced what is quite an awful awful building. Height is not an issue – and I have to say, the internal layout and basement parking provisions are thoughtful – but the general design is among thee most hideous to arrive at Naviagtion House.

      Howard Holdings acquired the 16 Lavitts Quay lands in a deal with Thomas Crosbie Holdings – the land went in part payment for 30,000sq ft of new Irish Examiner and Evening Echo office space at Howard Holdings’ City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. TCH had previously attained planning for a 7-storey office building (which was initially to provide the new Irish Examiner HQ before the move to City Quarter) designed by O’Riordan Staehli for 16 Lavitts Quay – it wasn’t pretty, but it wasn’t ugly either. Just a little lazy. Though I had been aware of the Howard Holdings/TCH deal since early last year, and learned of Howard Holdings plans for Lavitts Quay – I never actually got around to viewing the early drawings of their hotel development. O’Riordan Staehli had been retained by HH from their deal with TCH.

      What the hotel design effectively amounts to is this: similar to the Irish Examiner HQ, the building fronts onto Lavitts Quay at numbers 17 & 18 (16 is retained and incorporated) with a contemporary element of the building 3-storeys high. Basement parking is provided off Lavitts Quay at this point – and in fairness the frontage along the quay isn’t actually all that bad. Trouble starts as the buidling steps back to a plain white wall seven storeys high. At the 5th and 6th storeys a square teak box with seemingly the only 4 windows on the frontage, projects approx. 3-feet out, retracting to allow the 7th storey provide more plain white wall. It squares off like a huge brick. R. Arthur (Electricians/former Balloon Surprise premises) who refused to sell his property to TCH originally, has forced the buidling to cut an angular edge in it’s structure before fronting to the east on Half Moon Street – this elevation is pretty acceptable also. However, the jutted angle has no more than 6 box windows and is essentially a continuance of the plain white 7-storey frontage. Just 2 boxes, no design. If this is contemporary architecture – its very bad contemporary architecture. If it’s meant to be cutting edge, the edge is bleeding to death. The building looks utterly out of place with 16 Lavitts Quay (which is being retained) and even O’Callaghan Properties far more elegant and thoughtfully designed 21 Lavitts Quay (Patrick Cashman & Associates). The building may perhaps be acceptable were it to have an actually deisgn – or even if the Lavitts Quay frontage on the first 3 floors continued upward, incorporating more windows to take advanage of the beautiful water-frontage, and were the 7th floor now simply a square box, but perhaps a copper roof rounded back at it’s summit. The only other building that almost suits being alongside this disaster is the North Wall of the Opera House (before Murray O’Laoire updated it). On viewing the HH hotel development for Lavitts Quay, I only wish I had availed to view it earlier when asked – as the VIS passed before sight-line recently, I can only describe my facial reaction as the following -> 😮



      🙂 On a lighter brighter note, the Further Information submitted by Cumnor Construction regarding its Sundays Well project has certainly changed mind on the project. Although initially I was oppose to the 7-storey apartment block, I have to say, Jack Coughlan & Associates have provided what is, in effect, one of their better designs of recent times. The building has been altered mildly but effectively – visual intrusion and spoil to the surrounding areas has been minimised signifcantly and through clever angular changes, structural rearrangements and innoative additions. The resident amenity area and gardens – with water landscaping is utterly charming, yet very contemporary. The balconies are designed to match the wooden decking that surrounds the building – and the red-brick former shop and bar fronting Sundays Well Road has been tastefully incorporated into the overall development. Its clear now why Further Information took so long to be submitted by Cumnor and JCA. It has won me over despite my original distaste for the project. 😀



      phatman – regarding Habitat, Michael O’Donoghue (through a certain agent – affliated with Knight Frank, among others) had been in discussions with UK Department Chain John Lewis – as posted previously. Although I am aware discussions with Habitat, H&M and Zara (as well as others) had also taken place. John Lewis had been seeking a suitable southern Ireland location for a new department store. To the best of my knowledge, talks were still on-going with a number of tenants – however as Habitat having been strongly pushing for space in the development, it is no surprise that Rockfell Investments (Michael O’Donoghue) may indeed be looking to use his 9 retail units (= 120,000sq ft) for individual tenants as oppose to a department store entirely. That is not to say he may yet offer remaining units for such a use. CCC has however been anxiously trying to push bulky goods retail out of the city centre. I can know for sure by tonight if you want. Depending, I may also be able to get you a few other names. I’ll get back to you on it.

    • #733048
      phatman
      Participant

      Would appreciate any info possible Lexington.
      Thanks for that

    • #733049
      lexington
      Participant

      I was having a brief talk with a gentleman earlier about a number of things, one of which involved the Cornmarket Street development by Rockfell Investments. Habitat have issued a Declaration of Intent to the development company regarding the Cornmarket Street development and have been thus allocated a sizeable unit. I was also given a list of other tenants/possible tenants but was asked kindly not to distribute these until later on in the year when a public announcement is more likely. The list I received comprises of those in talks and those agreed – it was not specified other than Habitat, who has and has not committed, but Habitat will not be the only ‘anchor’ store. It is stressed that all units are considered ‘anchor’ given their considerable size. The Habitat store will be Ireland’s 4th store after Galway – units already exist in Dublin and Belfast (an additional store in Dublin may open before completion of the Cornmarket Street development in Cork).

    • #733050
      satanta99
      Participant

      I remember a newspaper article some time back concerning Habitat’s expansion in Ireland and the Church site which is connected to the Cornmarket street development was mooted as the location they would choose in Cork. I’m just putting two and two together in saying this.
      Also I think it would be better for the street if it was let to a number of “anchor tenants” instead of one large department store.

    • #733051
      lexington
      Participant

      I have to say I liked the idea of a department store at the development – Academy Street/Emmet Place retail development, the Capitol Cineplex and a number of docklands plans will bring plenty of ‘anchor’ tenants – but all the same, Rockfell’s Cornmarket Street development is a pretty nice one. Construction is due to begin late-January, early Feburary. A number of extensive subsurface excavations will be initiated beforehand, subject to this, main work is due for March/April.

    • #733052
      lexington
      Participant

      @corkdood wrote:

      Lexington (or any others who are in the know) Do you know if there are any residential developments on the horizon in Cloheen. I understand that one or two large land holdings have been sold in the area recently. Any ideas on what if anything is planned for this area?

      Do you mean Clogheen? North of the city?

      The 2 large land holdings I believe you may be discussing are the 36.8 acres on the Kerry Pike Road before Mackey’s Cross at Mount Desert, sold by Global Properties. That land was sold as ‘agricultural’ and is zoned within a strictly guarded Green Belt by Cork County Council. It won’t be possible to develop anything other than a possible owner-occupier single dwelling on the site unless the land is rezoned. The proposed new 500m euro North Ring Motorway is proposed to run nearby at Kerry Pike – so unless this alters the zoning of the area, no developments are planned, certainly not in the immediate future. The land had a guide price of 500,000 euros and sold for 608,000 euros.

      The other land holding is the 70 acres nearby the aforementioned, sold by CCM Property. This too is agricultural land, and no plans exist for the site – other than a letting to a local farmer for rent of 5,000euros p.m. The land went for in excess of 850,000euros.

      – another site, near Clogheen Church, managed spectacularly to gain planning for a small, low-key dwelling (apartment) development, however the site comes within a residential cluster area – and it was successfully argued that it does not strictly conform to Green Belt zoning conditions. This scenario certainly could not be debated for the other 2 sites already mentioned.

    • #733053
      corkdood
      Participant

      Thanks Lexington. You’re a mine of useful information as always. Was just curious as I had seen the for sale signs and there were some site clearance works going on so I assumed something big was on the cards.

    • #733054
      jungle
      Participant

      I don’t think Clogheen is on main sewerage yet. Kerry Pike certainly isn’t. Until it is installed, I can’t see any great development going on in the area.

    • #733055
      phatman
      Participant

      Here’s the Mahon Point website for anyone interested:
      http://www.mahonpointsc.ie

    • #733056
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Although at this point and time I can’t comment on the finer details, I’ll just let you know (and trust me, it’s well before anyone else) that a MAJOR healthcare development is currently being planned for Cork city centre. The development is being co-ordinated with a local healthcare institution and is estimated to be worth in and around the 50m+ euro mark. The site for the development has already been acquired and is a location of excellent waterfront prominence. The backers of the development are well established with such development and not local (with the exception of the healthcare institution). I must inform you that this project is in pre-planning and that a formal announcement may not be due until late this year – but you heard it hear first. I’ll let you know more when and if I can.

      This project is in addition to proposals for a 500m euro medical campus, which funnily enough contravenes with Cork County Council’s development plan, proposed by the Beacon Court Group at the Bandon Road Roundabout (along N25 – South Ring), on the outskirts of the city (near the Bishopstown Court SC Dunnes Stores).

    • #733057
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      bupa or the bon secours (or both) to build a new private clinic on the south channel of the docklands???
      close to a proposed bridge???

    • #733058
      lexington
      Participant

      Afraid not mickeydocs – but sure it was worth the shot! 😀 It’s not a docklands site or BUPA or Bon Secours – so I’ll just leave it at that!



      Geoff Butler of RORSA (Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects) is the man responsible for the monstrosity proposed by Howard Holdings for Lavitts Quay. Geoff was also involved with the far more pleasant St. John’s College building near Rutland Street. I have an image of the Lavitts Quay proposal – but am having difficulty posting it! Watch this space – I may get lucky!



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 The Kilbree Investment Company have been granted planning for the development of a 22-unit apartment building with basement car-parking along the Lower Glanmire Road – across from Kent Station – subject to 20 conditions and despite 20 objections. The 4-storey building was reduced in height among other things in the grant. Appeals have 4 weeks – hopefully, failing that, construction will begin March 2005.

    • #733059
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 I approach this with cautious optimism, but CIE Chairman John Lynch has confirmed that work will begin this year on the 25m euro redevelopment of Cork’s Kent Station. Local T.D. Deputy Noel O’Flynn has also confirmed this announcement, citing work is scheduled to be complete at the station for 2007.

      The redevelopment will see the terminal and it’s platforms now face onto the waterfront along Horgan’s Quay, with new access roads for departure and arrivals. The platforms themselves will be completely refurbished and the extended terminal facilities will incorporate a variety of updated and new services. The plan, I am told, is to make Kent Station a vibrant centre that will remain consistently active throughout each day providing services not only to passengers, but nearby businesses and residents. New landscaping and groundwork will be provided along the new quay frontage and a large multi-storey car-park is proposed on the site of the existing terminal parking area. A new freight terminal will form part of the redevelopment as well as updated and improved maintenance facilities. The existing terminal will be completely refurbished inside and out, with a new roof covering supposedly proposed for the ‘dome-like’ canopy running along overhead of the main platforms.

      However, despite this positive news (and I sincerely hope this doesn’t turn into another Bus Station scenario thanks to CIE), no indictaion has been given by CIE regarding their intentions for the larger redevelopment of the Horgan’s Quay site.



    • #733060
      jungle
      Participant

      Are there any plans to extend the 2, 7A, 10 or 19 buses to Mahon Point, or is this to be a totally car-centric development?

    • #733061
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: With the long-overdue advent of Kent Station being redeveloped – as announced by CIE Chairman John Lynch – further pressure has been put on the State-owned company to make a committed proposal for the remainder of Horgan’s Quay, inclusive of a development schedule.

      I’ve posted a number of reports on the development situations regarding Horgan’s Quay – incl. outlines of certain proposals. I have also incl. a CG Image of one masterplan proposal commissioned by certain parties, among which was CCC, by Wilson Architecture. CIE had originally commissioned architects O’Mahony Pike to draw up their masterplan for the site – but no information has been ever clearly made public regarding this plan. However, some bits and pieces did filter out, incl. that which was interpreted as a recommendation toward high-rise structures on the site to accomodate the high-density accommodations required to fulfill Development Plan guidelines, maximising the return on the site and its investment etc etc On the back of that, other development companies attached to the project in conjunction with CIE commissioned their own design-proposals based on the OMP Masterplan and apparently one other report. In these proposals, a number of alteratives were devised – incl. one I mentioned regarding 3 residential towers. The position on that proposal is unclear – however, other derivations also incl. high-rise.

      Pressure really needs to be pushed to get a firm commitment and schedule on a high-quality development programme for the quay. If Joe Gavin is still oodling the idea of a ‘Point-venue’ here, which is suggested (in the media at least) to be a cause of a stalemate between CCC and CIE – though it’s a nice idea – he should really leave it rest and he should know that. The reality of such a facility being built will be focussed elsewhere. It’s time to get this show on the road.



      :p For those confused about the design team behind Douglas Central Properties Ltd proposal for an 8-storey hotel and commercial facility in Douglas – though it was sugg’d a number of architectural firms were behind the design (and my understand is that there were) – the chief design team is being led by The Hyde Partnership – yes indeed, my old buddies of the Watergold Building (see below) fame!!! HA!!! 😉

      Feel free to scream! Hehe.



      😀 More drawings of the Eglinton Street development on the way soon!

    • #733062
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Mother of God… nooooooo!

    • #733063
      sw101
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      :p For those confused about the design team behind Douglas Central Properties Ltd proposal for an 8-storey hotel and commercial facility in Douglas – though it was sugg’d a number of architectural firms were behind the design (and my understand is that there were) – the chief design team is being led by The Hyde Partnership – yes indeed, my old buddies of the Watergold Building (see below) fame!!! HA!!! ]

      not true. source?

    • #733064
      Pug
      Participant

      lex

      dont think anyone will disagree with you about Horgans Quay, why they made an announcement about the 25m kent station and not say anything about horgans quay is ridiculous. I mean, if they are going to the trouble of changing the station around to front on to the quay and then not bother to sort out the rest, its just plain silly. Someone cynical like myself would wonder why a semi state has such power and are the unions causing grief, again.

      The photo of the previous design anyway didnt look great to me to be honest, the high rise would surely be more vibrant if its not just a rown of tall buildings.

      fingers crossed. 😎

    • #733065
      GrahamH
      Participant

      It’s so all-singing it looks like it’s been Photoshopped

    • #733066
      lexington
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      not true. source?

      Application: 049110
      Applicant Name: Douglas Central Properties Ltd.
      Correspondence Address: c/o The Hyde Partnership, Watergold, Douglas, Cork
      Development Description Construction of mixed use building consisting of hotel, lobby on ground floor, restaurant, bar, 2 no. meeting rooms and ancillary rooms on first floor and 124 no. bedrooms in eight storey building, including basement car park, bar and restaurant and 2 no. commercial/retail units on ground floor, demolition of on-site bld., closure of both entrances to north of site and provision of new entrance.

      Registered Address:
      DOUGLAS CENTRAL PROPERTIES LIMITED
      48 UPR. DRUMCONDRA ROAD
      DUBLIN 9

      Design Team: The Hyde Partnership, Watergold, Douglas, Cork
      see also: Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects, The Schoolhouse, Douglas, Cork
      see also: ******** ****** ********** ***

      Primary Contractor: PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd. (???)

      Planning Due: 12/2/2005

      Can’t name sources sw101 – but it was confirmed by Cork County Council Planning Department & The Hyde Partnership also. This is a project I am very interested in, but I have only seen drawings dated October 2004 (the month in which I was informed of the project). I know RORSA have involvement – I can’t remember the ‘interesting’ design element on the site of the existing TSB you noted, but I haven’t paid as much attention to this project since it has been lodged. I should really, and will be getting ahold of the application’s attached V.I.S. soon to review it. If you have any information otherwise, please share it – like I said, I haven’t been on top of this development as much as others and totally welcome and seek any up-to-date accurate info you can provide. 🙂



      Another hotel proposal I am very interested in is the 6-storey, 93-bedroom hotel w/ conference facilities designed (?) by Tom Phillips & Assoc. (Lower Baggot Street, Dublin) and to be developed by John Sisk & Sons Ltd. on a Kinsale Road site just south of their Cork HQ. I’ll look into getting images up on this one. Planning is due on the 19th Feb 2005.

      – further along the N25, Heiton Holdings PLC have sought planning for a 96-bedroom hotel, 4-storeys with conference centre, leisure centre and multi-storey car-park on their Bandon Road Roundabout/Ballincollig By-Pass interchange. Design is by Ashlin Colman Architects. A decision due date is set for 25/02/2005.

    • #733067
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      and totally welcome and seek any up-to-date accurate info you can provide. 🙂

      can’t really say much.

    • #733068
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😎 Jurys Hotel on the Western Road has given itself a closing date of Feb 28th 2005. Up to 110 jobs at the hotel will be lost or relocated as a result – however, with the opening of the Clarion on Lapps Quay, Radisson (Park Manor) in Little Island, Kingsley Hotel extension and up to 11 other hotel projects in and around Cork city under development – many of these staff have found or will find similar employment relatively easily. Early signs for this have been indicated by recruitment agencies Le Creme and Adecco.

      – 😡 In related news, an appeal with ABP has been lodged by the residents of Sundays Well against O’Callaghan Properties redevelopment of the Jurys Hotel site which was, after substantial revision, granted planning by CCC. The residents argue that the development will ruin their vista of St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral and destroy their children’s heritage – in protest, the residents have put their children’s allowances toward the finance of the appeal. This despite the numerous revisions enacted by O’Callaghan Propoerties to rectify the original objection concerns. To be honest with you, if the residents are able to fling their children’s allowances around like that so casually – their allowance should perhaps be reviewed. That money is provided for concerned support of children in their upbringing – uses such as clothing, food, schoolbooks etc etc should in my own view receive priority, or if not needed now, saved for a later stage when such requirements become more fiscally stressful. This appeal has a lot more to do w/ egos and ‘rigid mindsets than children’s heritage. What about their future? Appeals such as this, should be financed personally or collectively, not using a children’s allowance – and worse, blatantly promoting the fact. I will actively seek appropiate V.I.S. images from a Sunday’s Well persepctive to show how the development and development revisions have a minimal effect on any disruption to the St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral vista. I treasure this view too, as I see it every morning when I travel into the city, it’s important to me also and I am wholly satisfied with the development skyline.
      Work was due to commence on the project in March, this may be delayed further now until late-June(?). It’s a foolish move by the Sunday’s Well residents who now expose themselves to the possibility of the whole original project layout being greenlit – and not the revisions that were granted them by the developers to ease their concerns (case in pt. Kenny Group’s original 2000 South Main Street application). If so, nearby St. Al’s Girl School could stand to lose the benefits it gained in the revisions. It’s a selfish tactic (although I believe OCP will keep the revisions made to address the school’s concerns in any event – it remains the principle rather than the point).

    • #733069
      lexington
      Participant

      Just thought I’d post a new image of the redevelopment of Cork County Hall – main contractors Ascon Ltd, Design by Shay Cleary. The 60m euro redevelopment is due to be complete on schedule and within budget this November 2005. The project provides a new 700-space multistorey car-park. A 6-storey extension to the main County Hall tower providing an extra 40,000sq ft of office space (bringing it to a total of 75,000sq ft), new council chambers, heightened roof-top – to incl. a new hospitality suite with panoramic 360 degree views, provision of a naturally ventilated heating and cooling system through the installation of a glass-panel exoskeleton around the exterior oof the tower. Plus all landscaping, access road and refurbishment ancillary efforts.



      Those Eglinton Street drawings will be posted soon.



      *UPDATES*

      😮 As prev. reported, Beacon Court Group (i.e. Paddy Shovlin, Michael Cullen and Mark Redmond) will be lodging their application for a 500m euro medical campus and residential development earmarked for a 60-acre site near Bandon Road Roundabout within the next week to 2 weeks w/ Cork County Council.

      The development will consist of a new private hospital, hospice, physio-centre, up to 300 houses (over 16 acres), amenity areas, park & ride facility, health centre and more, yet to be clarified.


    • #733070
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      The project provides a new 700-space multistorey car-park. A 6-storey extension to the main County Hall tower providing an extra 40,000sq ft of office space (bringing it to a total of 75,000sq ft),




      Good to see that the planners are leading by example in encouraging sustainable transport modes in Cork, 700 spaces on 7,000 sq m is excessive by any standard.

    • #733071
      burge_eye
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      *UPDATES*

      😎 Jurys Hotel on the Western Road has given itself a closing date of Feb 28th 2005. Up to 110 jobs at the hotel will be lost or relocated as a result – however, with the opening of the Clarion on Lapps Quay, Radisson (Park Manor) in Little Island, Kingsley Hotel extension and up to 11 other hotel projects in and around Cork city under development – many of these staff have found or will find similar employment relatively easily. Early signs for this have been indicated by recruitment agencies Le Creme and Adecco.

      – 😡 In related news, an appeal with ABP has been lodged by the residents of Sundays Well against O’Callaghan Properties redevelopment of the Jurys Hotel site which was, after substantial revision, granted planning by CCC. The residents argue that the development will ruin their vista of St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral and destroy their children’s heritage – in protest, the residents have put their children’s allowances toward the finance of the appeal. This despite the numerous revisions enacted by O’Callaghan Propoerties to rectify the original objection concerns. To be honest with you, if the residents are able to fling their children’s allowances around like that so casually – their allowance should perhaps be reviewed. That money is provided for concerned support of children in their upbringing – uses such as clothing, food, schoolbooks etc etc should in my own view receive priority, or if not needed now, saved for a later stage when such requirements become more fiscally stressful. This appeal has a lot more to do w/ egos and ‘rigid mindsets than children’s heritage. What about their future? Appeals such as this, should be financed personally or collectively, not using a children’s allowance – and worse, blatantly promoting the fact. I will actively seek appropiate V.I.S. images from a Sunday’s Well persepctive to show how the development and development revisions have a minimal effect on any disruption to the St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral vista. I treasure this view too, as I see it every morning when I travel into the city, it’s important to me also and I am wholly satisfied with the development skyline.
      Work was due to commence on the project in March, this may be delayed further now until late-April. It’s a foolish move by the Sunday’s Well residents who now expose themselves to the possibility of the whole original project layout being greenlit – and not the revisions that were granted them by the developers to ease their concerns (case in pt. Kenny Group’s original 2000 South Main Street application). If so, nearby St. Al’s Girl School could stand to lose the benefits it gained in the revisions. It’s a selfish tactic (although I am assured by OCP that the revisions made to address the school’s concerns will be maintained in any event – it remains the principle rather than the point).

      I agree, it is a pathetic display of emotional blackmail. Presumably OCP will lodge a first party appeal to gain back some of their concessions? I look forward to seeing the VIS images

    • #733072
      lexington
      Participant

      I look forward to being able to provide them – I suppose what irritates me most about this appeal is the arrogance associated with it and the insult it generates to those who so genuinely depend on their Children’s Allowance to support their children. Just because the country is doing so exceptionally nowadays, doesn’t mean we can forget that not every member of our society has so richly benefited from it. This appeal is a disgusting act routed in a angered response to a planning decision made in the interests of our city.

      – also, in reference to the point made regarding Cork County Council’s multi-storey facility, I have to say I agree, the 2 councils (Cork City and Cork County) have both for so long advocated and promoted the increased use of public transport, and invested heavily in them (Cork Suburban Rail System – allocated 90m for its prospective Midelton Line, the Cork City Green Routes, Park & Ride Facilities at Black Ash, Banduff and proposed Blarney Railway Station) and yet both their own projects at Cork County Hall and the new Cork City Hall 32m euro extension all facilitate high-volume in house parking (700 and 435 respectively) effectively encouraging employees to drive to work. Cork County Hall will facilitate its 600 employees (in and around 450 car per day) and Cork City Hall will facilitate its 400 employees (perhaps 200 cars per day) into the city. Hypocrisy???

    • #733073
      Frank Taylor
      Participant

      @Diaspora wrote:

      Good to see that the planners are leading by example in encouraging sustainable transport modes in Cork, 700 spaces on 7,000 sq m is excessive by any standard.

      By comparison, Citigroup IFSC, 35,000 square metres, 1,200 employees, approx. 100 parking places. Local government employees are human and by ensuring that all of them can drive to work, the car dependent mindset will spill over into their public policies.

    • #733074
      anto
      Participant

      Is the area well served by public transport?

    • #733075
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      Is the area well served by public transport?

      Three separate city bus routes pass this way.

    • #733076
      jungle
      Participant

      Which? I thought only the 8/8A passed by county hall.

      They may be allowing for a lot of non-staff parking because of the motor tax and driving licence centres being there.

    • #733077
      Frank Taylor
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      They may be allowing for a lot of non-staff parking because of the motor tax and driving licence centres being there.

      Motor tax and driving licences are just forms like income tax or TV licence and there’s no reason to provide parking merely because the forms concern motor vehicles. I doubt it ever occurred to anyone to provide public parking in Dublin 7 for motor tax renewals. These services are increasingly handled by post or internet. Dublin City Council runs a few shops in suburban estates that just process these forms so you can park in Nutgrove shopping centre for example. No need to build 700 parking places for your staff at public expense and come up with such a crap cover story.

      Dublin City Council also provided themselves with extensive underground parking under the Civic Offices in Wood Quay, next to Temple Bar. Thus indicating that they believe public transport is a great thing and that everyone else should use it so that they can drive to work more quickly. Could Cork County Council not place their offices next to one of the planned commuter rail stations on the Midleton line?

    • #733078
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork County Hall is a symbol of Cork and the Council more specifically. It encompasses vast land holdings and is established along a major suburban corridor in the form of Carrigrohane Straight – it wouldn’t have made economic sense to relocate to a new location along the Midelton Corridor. Plus, at the time of planning, the Midelton Railway hadn’t been greenlit and the Council couldn’t wait around for a grant to be finally funded while their offices were wasting away. Cork County Hall is well served by public transport and easily accessible on most major routes (South Ring N25, Carrigrohane Straight, Ballincollig By-Pass, Western Road etc) – the Council should promote increase public transport along among its employees and ‘visitors’ – a dedicated green-route has been recently established nearby.

    • #733079
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Here is a drawing prepared by architects Frank O’Mahony and Glen Barry of Wilson Architecture for O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street Tower development. Decision due 25th Feb 2005. The 80m euro + development will consist of 217 residential units (in predominantly 8-storey blocks), 40 of which will be located within a landmark 17-storey tower in the south-west corner – averaging a generous 1,900sq ft, 7 own door office suites and 5 large retail units, 550 underground car-parking spaces over 2 levels, a new civic amenity area, new pedestrian routeway and road connecting Eglinton Street with Albert Road – which will also aid the new ‘Webworks’ to be developed by Howard Holdings at Albert House, along Albert Quay.

      This drawing provides a perspective from the Eglinton Street/western elevation – provided by Wilson Architectire, O’Flynn Construction through Cork 2005 and the RIAI.

      *see prev. posts for additional images*



      😉 And with less the 2 weeks to go before its grand opening, work at Mahon Point is going full-steam with some jobs on-going 24hrs a day…speaking of which, Tesco’s new grocery store at the massive shopping centre will be it’s 2nd permanent 24hr store in Cork following the unprecedented success of its flagship store in Cork at Wilton SC.

      – and in related news…

      :confused: …the German investment funds group, Deka Immobilien (which is currently in a spot of trouble regarding its own finances) which saw its first Irish project take shape in the form of Mahon Point along with O’Callaghan Properties is rumoured (and I stress RUMOUR) to be discussing the purchase of 10,000sq ft of office space at the 21 Lavitts Quay office development in Cork city centre – also being developed by OCP (which will also house the new O’Callaghan Properties HQ on the upper floors). I haven’t heard anything of it other than the rumour so I can substantiate it yet – but it would make sense considering Deka’s intentions on expanding into the Irish market and its relationship with OCP. The office will be designated as Deka’s chief Irish operations office.


    • #733080
      lexington
      Participant

      Just on a note of interest – a few posts up is an image of what Cork County Hall’s redevelopment will look like when complete (as designed by Shay Cleary) but, during the competition, Cork County Council also considered a number of other proposals, among them – one by de Blacam & Meagher Architects…it’s interesting, personally I think the winning design was perhaps the best, however I really like the upward extension and parallel external elevators of the north-and-south elevations of the deBM design. It’s up for debate, but just interesting to note and compare.

    • #733081
      sw101
      Participant

      could we get some of those schemes up on the unbuilt ireland section? it’d be interesting to see the approaches adopted by various irish practices.

    • #733082
      lexington
      Participant

      By the way sw101 – I was chatting to a director w/ Clayton Love when viewing the designs for the Douglas Central Properties Ltd 8-storey hotel to the south of Cinema World and North of East Douglas Village – and he confirmed it also that the Hyde Partnership were indeed the main design team behind the scheme. RORSA had only be consulted at the initial design stages – the final design is all Hyde.

      Its a very narrow building east-to-west, stepped from 6 to 8 storeys along this aspect also. The north and south elevations are pleasant, nothing noteworthy – white walls, with extensive utilisation of glass, the ‘trendy’ timber cladding and zinc cladding. Basement parking is accessed from the west from the former TSB premises. Its a nice design but nothing to write home about. Those worried about a Watergold Building Pt. II – rest assured, it doesn’t go there even a little. It does look a little over-dominating when viewed from an East Douglas Village perspective, but in its entire setting perspective, it actually looks fine. So far, I am only aware of 1 objection. It’s no harm for Douglas to get something noteworthy like this building – however in my own opinion, its only real distinction is its height. I suppose the trick was in the thinking, ‘don’t design anything too exciting, keep it nice and ordinary and contemporary so people won’t get too huffed up about it’. Yet my only concern relates to traffic management in the area – officially designated in Ireland’s Top 10 Traffic Blackspots.



      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: CIE Chairman John Lynch will be in Cork next Monday to meet City Manager Joe Gavin, planners and other councillors regarding the exhaustingly overdue 500m euro redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay. Fine Gael Councillor and former Lord Mayor Colm Burke has proposed that the City Council enact a Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) on the site as a means of finally getting the project moving after 7 years of arsing around by CIE. The plan would see CIE lease back all the required rail activities will the remaining 10 acres would be allocated to the successful developer/developers (in a joint co-ordinated strategy) to redevelop the quay. Joe Gavin, who often refers to the failure to redeveloped the quay as ‘his greatest regret’ as City Manager, has vowed to have a firm commitment and actual movement on the project by Summer 2005 from CIE or otherwise alternative action will be taken – a planning application deadline has been earmarked for no later than Feb 2006. The Department of Finance, Transport and Environment have been approached for consultative purposes by CCC. John Lynch was scheduled also to be in the city next Monday to launch the 25m euro redevelopment of Kent Station.



      😡 As of today, the Sunday’s Well Residents Group have officially lodged their appeal with ABP against the decision taken to grant permission for the redevelopment of Jurys Hotel on the Western Road by O’Callaghan Properties. (Temperature rising, vision blurring, rage taking over…)

    • #733083
      sw101
      Participant

      i’m aware, i designed it in the early stages. haven’t seen anything on it since september though. anything you can release yet or will i have to demand it from the big man in HPA?

    • #733084
      lexington
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      i’m aware, i designed it in the early stages. haven’t seen anything on it since september though. anything you can release yet or will i have to demand it from the big man in HPA?

      I have drawings of the all 4 elevations – but I’m afraid I can’t post them yet (also, not even my sometimes reliable scanner could fit the drawings adequately). If you give PH a shout he may make them available for viewing, but then again, you could always stop by the Model Farm Road – they have a viewing counter I’m sure.



      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: FINALLY, work has got a move on at Tom McCarthy’s (Tumblegate Ltd) Jacob’s Mill redevelopment along Father Matthew Quay – O’Flynn of Banteer have commenced gutting the insides of the former Mill after 50 years of neglect. Work by Joseph Lane & Son Ltd who HAD been designated as original contractor, was apparently left incomplete – so, yet again internal structural work must first begin before scaffolding scales its weary walls.

    • #733085
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Another one – before Christmas we saw a flurry of hotel development applications for Cork city, now it seems, its private hospitals.

      Fleming Construction intend to part finance the development of a new 130m euro 100-bed private hospital as part of its 2214-unit residential development north of Blarney. The hospital will be based on the Galway and Blackrock Clinics (developed by the Sheehan Bros. among others). It is expected to have 5 state-of-the-art operating theatres, a full physiotherapy suite, consultant suites, outpatients facilities, day-surgery etc.

      – this comes after the recent revelation of plans for 3 other private hospitals for Cork, among them solicitor James G. O’Mahony intends to lodge an application with Cork County Council for a 500m euro medical campus and residential development on the city fringe at the Bandon Road Roundabout, along the N25. That development is expected to be overseen by the Beacon Court Group (who currently have a facility in operation at Sandyford, Dublin). Another plan is earmarked for a superb 7.5 acre city centre site in conjunction with an existing Cork health institution.

      If all 4 applications make the cut – that could mean that an extra 400 private beds will be made available to the city and county.

    • #733086
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      how many beds at present in the bon secours?

    • #733087
      lexington
      Participant

      343 beds, 18,200 admissions, 29,000 outpatients p.a.

    • #733088
      lexington
      Participant

      Global Properties are handling enquiries on the Section 50 development planned for the recently sold site at Victoria Cross/Wilton Road to an anonymour buyer by Irish & European (for an est’d 1.2m euros on an area of 8,000sq ft). Though rumours persist about the buyers identity, none have been verified – Frinailla Developments was mentioned (or was that the site across the road???), so was Tom McCarthy and Tim McNamara of Aras Developments – but nothing solid. I have an image of the development, but I’m afraid its not complient with my PC for some reason. Construction is due to commence early Feb(?) with German firm Heberger Construction.

    • #733089
      burge_eye
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      *UPDATES*

      an appeal with ABP has been lodged by the residents of Sundays Well against O’Callaghan Properties redevelopment of the Jurys Hotel site which was, after substantial revision, granted planning by CCCQUOTE]

      reading ABP’s web site, there’s 4 appeals in now. Do you know if there was a1st party appeal lodged by OCP?

    • #733090
      lexington
      Participant

      I genuinely hope OCP trump this one.

      Bridget Healy has appealed on behalf of the Sunday’s Well Group (the ‘children’s allowance’ crowd), however, a member of that group (wink wink) also happens to be chair of the Lancaster Quay Business Association, for which she plans to lodge another appeal. This is a seperate private appeal. The Dept. of Archaelogy at UCC who are appealling, then also the Dean of St. Fin Barre’s is opposed because he believes the development will detract from the Lancaster Quay -> St. Fin Barre’s vista. I’ve no problem with genuine appeal – if a resident across the street is being messed by a developer, they have every right to appeal, but I dunno about the validity of some of these appeal grounds…

      OCP will be contesting.

    • #733091
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      time for Mr. O’Callaghan to bring in his heavies 🙂

    • #733092
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      time for Mr. O’Callaghan to bring in his heavies 🙂

      Frank Dunlop has retired

    • #733093
      anto
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Its utterly disgraceful – I genuinely genuinely hope OCP trump this one.

      Bridget Healy has appealed on behalf of the Sunday’s Well Group (the ‘children’s allowance’ crowd), however, a member of that group also happens to be chair of the Lancaster Quay Business Association, for which she plans to lodge another appeal. The is a seperate private appeal. The Dept. of Archaelogy at UCC who are appealling – which has a lot more to do with a disgruntled response to OCP than genuine opposition to the development (long storey – OCP decided if any, they wanted private archaelogical assessments of ‘a’ particular development site, and UCC got miffed), then the Dean of St. Fin Barre’s is opposed because he believes the development will detract from the Lancaster Quay -> St. Fin Barre’s vista (what vista??? But either way, OCP designed the project so that the buildings were positioned to allow unobstructed views (granted between buildings) from Lancaster Quay -which will in effect create a better view than what is currently in existence). I’ve no problem with genuine appeal – if a resident across the street is being messed by a developer, they have every right to appeal. But what gets me on this one is these appeals (with the exception of 1) are all motive driven and petty.

      OCP will be contesting.

      It’s called democracy I suppose. Maybe it will detract from the view of St. Fin Barre’s. Let the experts decide! (ABP).
      Anyway you seem very gung ho about all the development in Cork, even Mahon Point which I doubt has much in the way of architectural merit. My point is not all development is necessarily a good ting in itself. If the scheme is wrong maybe it’s better it gets knocked back, the next one that comes along may be better.

    • #733094
      lexington
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      It’s called democracy I suppose. Maybe it will detract from the view of St. Fin Barre’s. Let the experts decide! (ABP).
      Anyway you seem very gung ho about all the development in Cork, even Mahon Point which I doubt has much in the way of architectural merit. My point is not all development is necessarily a good ting in itself. If the scheme is wrong maybe it’s better it gets knocked back, the next one that comes along may be better.

      anto, I understand the principles of democracy – and you’re right, not all development is positive, because I mention it (by way of informing people) doesn’t necessarily mean I endorse it. I have raised my concerns with projects like that as Grangefield Developments Arbutus Lodge project (in which I assisted some residents in the area – with perfectly valid reasons for objection – with their appeal), Cumnor Construction’s original plan for Sunday’s Well (which I’m glad to say has been revised and improved satisfactorily) and Howard Holdings project at 16 Lavitts Quay which is a rather horrible design benefitting nothing positive to the city’s aesthetics whatsoever (7-storey hotel designed by RORSA) – I have also raised my concerns regarding plans for another 7-storey city hotel at Crosses Green and Victoria Mills development. Just because its investment, doesn’t necessarily mean its good investment. I know this.

      In reference to Mahon Point, if you have ever followed my posts regarding the development over the months, you see that I have criticised the project on many occassions for its bland and boxy form – its shopping centre element provides nothing more than dismal architectural scribbles. Due to the scale of the development, and its effects to surrounding areas, it is hard to avoid comment every-so-often – but this does not advocate support for its design. However, a project such as this must also be weighed up for its positive effects (the creation of 3,000 jobs, an increased diversity of services to the community, the improvements associated with local infastructure – see N25 Overhead bridge extensions etc).

      The Jurys Development has been granted by the local authority as it views it as making a valuable contribution to the regeneration of the city centre. Even An Taisce commented on its architectural merit – something you don’t see too often. Reductions in height, apartment numbers, repositioning of buildings etc etc all were made by the developer and as outlined by planning conditions. However, the SWRG are objecting from 2 miles away – and a member of that group is also using a city centre business front she represents to contribute a 2nd appeal (but from the same person). Other appeals are based on a disgruntled response to the developer based on ‘other’ issues – which one individual very blatantly boasted to me in a private conversation before he realised my own position on the development. True colours were shown. However, one appeal is quite genuine and I have no issue with it being raised – it is their perfect entitlement to do so if they remain unhappy with a planning decision. My angst regarding this scenario is centred in the fact that I believe one should object to a development based on valid grounds – which include objection based on issues directly related to a development as a stand-alone project and not due to some past related issue (its simply destructive behaviour). I am also further appalled at the use of the aforementioned ‘childrens allowance’ scenario which is being used to financed the appeals (see previous posts).

      Gung-ho? Perhaps regarding some developments – but I’d rather the expression, enthusiastic. I don’t readily and blindly support every project proposed, I don’t see many of these projects contributing positively economically, logistically or aesthetically to the city – and in such cases, I seek adjustment or other appropriate action. So yes, let democracy take its course – I agree, but don’t block the benefit of others based on selfish cause. Thats not democratic, thats plain old greed.


    • #733095
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Howard Holdings’ City Quarter development on Lapps Quay saw today the first installation of its boardwalk facility. It will provide what is essentially the city centre’s first REAL boardwalk facility – and will form part of what ultimately is CCC’s plan to develop a city-wide riverside amenity walk (inclusive of specialised waterside pathways and extensive timber boardwalks).



      😮 And although, as above, I’ve stated my personal feelings regarding Mahon Point’s design – I have to say that it is taking a form mildly more pleasant in reality than what appears in many CGI Images and drawings. The addition of a number of ‘beacons’ across the roof of the main shopping centre building illuminate at night like bright violet nodes at night. The completed cladding and addition of a MP spire on the western elevation have helped improve what is generally an unimaginative structure. Design by Dirk Luow @ Project Architects, Dublin.



      :rolleyes: I was interested to read an article in the Irish Examiner about developers O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd regarding the 15-storey tower proposal for Tivoli along the Lower Glanmire Road. The article mentioned that the developers were still awaiting an appeal decision. Just to update them, the apartment tower (designed by Dennehy & Dennehy) was actually refused grant on appeal – despite the recommedations of the Inspector (Bernard Dee). It was refused back in August 2004 – and was part of an overall 205 units development near the Silversprings Hotel. The building was actually 13-storeys over a 2-storey basement car-park. O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd are apparently weighing up whether or not to give the project another shot or continue with the residual grant of the project (which includes all other elements other than the tower). After inspecting the VIS – the project would actually have contributed nicely to what is otherwise a dull skyline – however, the issues regarding the site’s elevated visual prominence are entirely accepted. I do believe however, this could easily have been rectified by a minor reduction in height – perhaps 1 or 2 storeys?


    • #733096
      sw101
      Participant

      the an post sorting office just off the main road near little island is a fantastic building at night. not sure who the architect was but the engineers at horgan lynch did a great job in sorting hte roof services. it looks like a funnelled ship lit up from below.

    • #733097
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah, I had been thinking, for an ‘industrial’ style building, it has a bit of distinction to it which is a pleasant change for the usual conformist drab. Coming east-to-west into the city at night it looks pretty eye-catching in what is otherwise a sea of grey and steel boxes. Architects are Kavanagh Tuite. Contractors = Joseph Lane & Son Ltd.

    • #733098
      lexington
      Participant

      Anyone who has been walking around the North Main Street/Paradise Place/Liberty Street area will have notice Ridge Developments working away on reconstructing the facade of what was once the rear of the former Queen’s Old Castle (now Virgin Megastore and Argos). The property is still owned by City Properties Ltd – who have decided to utilise the available space to the rear and redevelop it as a new restaurant house, in addition to extending the existing ‘Classic Bar’ premises and constructing a new nightclub overhead. The new restaurant house (at the junction of North Main Street, Liberty Street and South Main Street) will be anchored by Captain Americas (of Grafton Street fame) and international noodle-house Wagamama (as previously reported way back on this thread). The bar and nightclub extensions will commence later this year – in the meantime, here’s what the restaurant house will look like come completion. The restaurants, who are currently recruiting, are expected to be open late-Feb/early March. Dan Mulvihill acted as consulting engineer on the project.

    • #733099
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      international noodle-house Wagamama

      can i just say…YESS!!!!

      been to the dublin and sydney ones, and now cork!! excellent.

    • #733100
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah I’ve heard Wagamama is suppose to be pretty nice – never myself been to one, but if the rumours are true -it will make a nice little addition to the city’s culinary scene.



      The above is a pretty unflattering CG Image of the new Radisson SAS Hotel (122 bedrooms) at Ditchley House, Little Island (part of the new O’Flynn Construction ‘EastGate Park’). The hotel is due to open Summer 2005 and was designed by Dennehy + Dennehy Designs with construction by John Sisk & Sons Ltd. It stands out far better in reality than in the above image.




      Although Frinailla Ltd received their planning decision for their latest Watercourse Road development in Blackpool on Saturday (?!) from CCC, I have to admit, I never got a chance to hear the verdict. A gentleman at McCutcheon Mulcahy I was talking to this morning about a sepearte project informed me, to the best of his knowledge the project would probably be greenlit – but I’ll know tomorrow morning for sure. If so, Frinailla will have finally received the go-ahead after a pretty unpleasant record of applications for the extensive site. Their original plan for a 9-storey (over basement) 70m euro residential and commercial/community development was refused by CCC and ABP back in 2003, early 2004. Their application to conduct subsurface investigations on the site (given the success of their Grand Parade development site) was refused by CCC and now in appeal. So hopefully this, their latest application for a residential and commercial development of 153 residential units, retail, medical, creche and community related units, underground car-parking, a library and so on will have made the cut. It’s a marked improvement on their previous attempts and vitally needed in the area, among Cork’s most unpleasantly derelict. John Paul Construction will be contractors.

    • #733101
      lexington
      Participant

      Well surprise surprise, the Watercourse Road project by Frinailla has gone into Further Information. McCutcheon Mulcahy have indicated that they had been prepared for this based on their previous experiences and hoped to have it submitted as soon as possible. We’ll just have to keep waiting then I suppose – sigh.



      :confused: And while we’re talking about Frinailla, the company has indicated that further excavation issues arising with regards their Grand Parade Plaza development will yet again delay their planned construction schedule. Construction of the project is now not expected to commence until late Summer 2005 – with availability being made for early 2007. The second phase of the development is being released soon – the first phase successfully sold out with over 80% of buyers in the owner-occupier category. 2-bedroom apartment and duplex prices started at 369,000euros per unit.



      Regular auctioneering partners with Frinailla, Global Properties, recently sold a high-density residential development site to the development company at Springmount, Glanmire (10 mins from the city centre). The development, for 65 residential units, has been lodged with Cork County Council and is currently in Further Information. For an image of the rather interesting design by Kiosk Architects – follow the below link ->

      http://www.frinailla.com/residential_4.php?id=4

      See links below for their developmens at Midelton and An Caislean in Ballincollig ->

      Cois na hAbhainn
      http://www.frinailla.com/residential_2.php?id=3

      An Caisleán Apartments
      http://www.frinailla.com/residential_2.php?id=1

    • #733102
      Torquemada
      Participant

      Whats this I hear about the axing of airbridges at the new terminal for Cork Airport?This seems an absolutely scandalous decision having spent over 100 million euro on the development.Surely if they need to cut back on costs on the project,then I am sure there are other parts to the development that can be scaled down or delayed rather than this vital part of the new terminal.It would mean certainly no transatlantic flights for the foreseeable future also.I wonder who is behind all this though?It smacks of the vested interests of the Shannon lobby to me.

    • #733103
      kefu
      Participant

      Anybody got any pictures of developed Bus Station. And by way of a PS, Wagamama really isn’t that nice – harmless enough fare but not the tastiest food in the world.

      Cullen opens €4m Government investment in Cork Bus Station
      Minister for Transport, Martin Cullen today (24th January 2005) officially opened the newly refurbished Parnell Place Bus Station in Cork. The €4m redevelopment of one of Cork’s landmark buildings will provide new improved facilities for the station’s three million annual customers.
      Speaking at the opening, Minister Cullen said the new Memoranda of Understanding between CIE and the Department of Transport is contributing to an improved and consistent quality of service for CIE passengers.
      A key part of the Memorandum is a Service Level Agreement which details the quantity and quality of service provided the three CIE companies on the back of Government investment. Arrangements have been put in place to monitor the delivery of these targets with results reviewed each year.
      Minister Cullen said: “Like the 42 Service Indicators I introduced to monitor Local Government performance, the CIE service level agreement ensures the public sees where their money is going and the results this investment is producing. It is also a useful tool for Government in identifying where deficiencies might exist so they can be tackled. It is an arrangement that works for passengers, CIE and Government.”
      Commenting on the new €4m development of Parnell Bus Station, the Minister welcomed the completion of the project ahead of schedule to coincide with the European Capital of Culture.
      A complete internal re-furbishment of the two storey building has taken place with a re-designed passenger concourse, an improved bus marshalling area, nine new bus bays, a complete upgrade of all passenger facilities and new passenger information systems. A striking feature of the design is the new tensile fabric canopy at the front of the station.
      Minister Cullen welcomed the significantly improved accessibility of the station for people with disabilities. €1.1 million of the capital costs were directed at improving access and comfort for those with disability and for the elderly. New accessibility features include a lift, automatic doors, improved signage and audio communications.
      The Minister said the redevelopment brings to €24m the level of Government investment in Cork Bus Eireann services in the past five years.
      He said: “Government investment has brought about a significant improvement in services, including the addition on new routes and increased frequency of services. City bus service departures have increased by 35%. The addition of northern and southern city orbital routes has attracted thousands of new customers. 109 new buses have been provided with 92% of buses wheelchair accessible.
      “In addition to the improvements on Cork City services, there has also been significant frequency improvements on all Expressway departures from Cork with hourly services to Limerick, Galway, Waterford and Tralee, 6 daily services to and from Dublin and numerous services daily to places such as Athlone, Clonmel, Kilkenny and Rosslare Harbour.
      “All of this means better services, increased customer numbers, improved working standards and a better return for taxpayers”, he said.
      The Minister also announced the extension of the No.5 bus route to Kent Station in the coming months to facilitate commuters going to U.C.C., C.I.T., and FAS offices. “This will provide a quick, reliable journey time for people on the western suburbs of the City”, he said.

    • #733104
      sw101
      Participant

      @kefu wrote:

      Anybody got any pictures of developed Bus Station. And by way of a PS, Wagamama really isn’t that nice – harmless enough fare but not the tastiest food in the world.

      stopped reading right there. sorry. you sir, are a cad.

    • #733105
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Torquemada wrote:

      Whats this I hear about the axing of airbridges at the new terminal for Cork Airport?This seems an absolutely scandalous decision having spent over 100 million euro on the development.Surely if they need to cut back on costs on the project,then I am sure there are other parts to the development that can be scaled down or delayed rather than this vital part of the new terminal.It would mean certainly no transatlantic flights for the foreseeable future also.I wonder who is behind all this though?It smacks of the vested interests of the Shannon lobby to me.

      Surely this isn’t true.
      In relation to Shannon… why does the government continue to subsidise this region to the detriment of the greater cork region… what ever happenend to free market policies?
      Privatise the airport and let it develop its own services.

    • #733106
      lexington
      Participant

      I have to agree with Torquemada – even the idea of axing the air-bridges for the Cork Aiport Terminal development is an utter outrage and is not short of disgusting! Anyone who regularly uses the airport, especially business travellers, the elderly and families with you children will tell you that having to run across a mile of concrete in rainy or stormy weather just to board an aircraft in this day and age at the airport is disgraceful – especially given Cork Airport’s geography. Unlike Dublin where buses are provided or the aircraft is simply a few steps away (like at Pier A) – to board an aircraft at Cork usually requires a hefty hike.

      For a project that is costing in the region of 156m euros (16m euros over-bidget so far) – to axe the air-bridges (among the most central aspects behind the development) and the removal of the covered walkway between the new multi-storey and terminal is inexcusable. If the DAA (who still control the purse strings for the time being) need to penny pinch like that – there are a million and one other options available. Removing the air-bridges will reduce the project costs by only 1.3m euros. Bigger savings can be made elsewhere – incl. Shannon. If the air-bridges don’t arrive with this development – it will be many years, if at all, before they ever do. I would call on the people and business leaders of Cork to stand-up to this – what is in effect, yet again, another blatant side-lining of development from Cork by the Government. Furthermore, Cork Airport now carries more passengers p.a. than Shannon, and will exceed its passenger volume by up to 500,000 this year (according to CAA projections). It’s all well and good to promise this and that – or even provide an element of finance so far – but when you make a promise you must keep to it and see it through. An utter disgrace.

    • #733107
      jungle
      Participant

      Airlines pay more to use airbridges. Even assuming that only Aer Lingus and Czech Airlines opt to use them, you’re still lookng at 800,000 pax per annum. At 50c per passenger charge, and allowing for generous operating expenses of E200K per annum, they’d still have paid for themselves in under 7 years. There may be a case for reducing the number, but even the business case isn’t there for removing them.

    • #733108
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      Airlines pay more to use airbridges. Even assuming that only Aer Lingus and Czech Airlines opt to use them, you’re still lookng at 800,000 pax per annum. At 50c per passenger charge, and allowing for generous operating expenses of E200K per annum, they’d still have paid for themselves in under 7 years. There may be a case for reducing the number, but even the business case isn’t there for removing them.

      another question in relation to the airport… how come Ryanair only operate one route from Cork airport?

    • #733109
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Horgan’s Quay doesn’t seem to be at the top of CIE’s to do list: http://www.eveningecho.ie/pdf/front.pdf

    • #733110
      lexington
      Participant

      Well I did promise you VIS images of the Jurys Hotel redevelopment by O’Callaghan Properties. However, I was able to print a number of other images (these unfortunately are in black & white and to top it all off, my scanner is useless as most of you probably already know! I’m getting a new one, I promise) – and do not convey the development adequately), but better than nothing, at least for now. I’ll keep sussing the formats out.


      The redeveloped site from a east-west bird’s eye perspective.


      A before and after picture of the development (east to west) along Lancaster Quay.

      – once again my apologises for the poor quality, but I’ll work on it to rectify that soon.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Rosridge Limited (James G. O’Mahony & Beacon Court Group), Enable Ireland and St. Patrick’s Hospice lodged their outline planning application with Cork County Council for a 500m euro medical campus on the fringe of the city’s Western suburbs at the Bandon Round Roundabout (as prev. posted). The development will include a 100-bedroom privaet hospital w/ full facilities, a 100-bed hospice (for St. Patricks), private 43-bed facility for Enable Ireland, park & ride, associated medical accommodation, consultant suites etc. Consulting Engineers are Malachy Walsh & Partners.



      😡 And regarding Horgan’s Quay, CIE Chairman John Lynch has stated (yesterday at the official opening of the refurbished Cork Bus Station) that the development of Horgan’s Quay is not a priority of the company for the time being. However, the previously mentioned redevelopment of Kent Station is due to see an application lodged with CCC mid-2005, with the station ready for 2007. Under CIE reigns it will be at least then before Horgan’s Quay sees any movement, lest something remarkable happens, according to Mr. Lynch.

      Also at the opening of the Bus Station, Minister Martin Cullen refused to answer questions regarding the supposed removal of air-bridges at Cork Airport’s new terminal. Why is that Minister?



      -> A “record” 147 seperate objections have been lodged against Mark Kelleher’s 92-unit residential development near Westend in Bishopstown (That’s 2940 euros worth of objection). It’s pretty excessive – undoubtedly my friends at CAHRA were out there rallying support. But whatever about lodging objections based on reasonable argument – objection because of high-rise factors??? People, it has 4 floors (5 storeys). Mr. Kelleher hasn’t exactly had a healthy relationship when its come to gaining planning grants – so it will be really interesting to see how this one turns out.



      mickeydocs – as regards Ryanair, pure and simple – they’re playing hard to get. The don’t want to pay the fees! But my inkling is that Ryanair aren’t really suped up with plans for Cork (yet) even if fees were lowerd.

    • #733111
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Horgan’s Qy… CPO the bastards

    • #733112
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 You’ve a beautiful way with words d_d_dallas! 😉

    • #733113
      dowlingm
      Participant

      And if Aer Lingus decline airbridges in their new pennypinching regime, how are the airbridges to be financed?

      Regrettably, the “low cost revolution” combined with the high number of regional aircraft means airbridge use is destined to be for a smaller than hitherto expected proportion of movements at ORK.

    • #733114
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lexington, if only… although based on CCC’s solution to very similar antics from the Courts Services – it could be a viable solution. If anyone has the ear of a local councillor, let the case for CPO be made! How depressing to see this kind of behaviour from yet another arm of the public service towards the South. If it’s beyond Citiwest or the N11, it doesn’t matter.
      Mind you, judging from Treasury with major problems, delays/stalling etc with Spencer Dock (an undeniable cash cow for CIE) one could hardly expect better treatment for Horgans Qy.
      It seems land is becoming increasingly unlocked on the South Docks. This could potentially give rise to all investment going only on one side of the river and by the time Horgans Qy EVENTUALLY becomes available interest is lost and a great opportunity is wasted.
      That’s it decided, next time I head South it will be by CAR!

    • #733115
      jungle
      Participant

      Well, as airbridges would be used by Boeing 737s and A320/321s, the potential market for air-bridges is Aer Lingus (10 fpd), BMI Baby (6 fpd – although 4 fpd as the aircraft currently used on Cardiff flights are not suitable), Ryanair (5 fpd), EasyJet (2 fpd) and Czech Airlines (1 fpd). Add to these, charter flights which range from an average of 6 fpd in summer to 1 fpd in winter. This is a potential market of 25-30 fpd before growth is accounted for.

      However, Ryanair currently have a policy of avoiding using them if possible.

      With every business venture, there is an element of risk, but these figures would suggest current demans for at least 2 air-bridges (based on 6-10 slots being sold).

      Incidentally, Ryanair are introducing a new route from Cork to Liverpool in April. I think this was primarily because EasyJet were rumoured to be eyeing the route. Supposedly, EasyJet are also considering Cork-Newcastle, so it will be interesting to see if Ryanair do anything there.

    • #733116
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Horgan’s Qy… CPO the bastards

      I’ll second that… cpo the government full stop

    • #733117
      theblimp
      Participant

      …with regard to the airbridges at Cork Airport – a little birdy told me very recently that Aer Lingus spoke with the airport and told them that they wouldn’t need them (cost-cutting). I don’t think Aer Arann can use them, and Ryanair avoid them like the plague. That just leaves a small few others, and the holiday charters who work to a budget anyway. Looks like that tradition of getting soaked going to and from planes is going to continue ….. !!! Not long now before we enter the 20th century, eh?

    • #733118
      satanta99
      Participant

      its an absolute disgrace to hear that such an integral part of the airport development may be shelved, and I don’t even want to get started on the Horgans Quay site because its a disgrace! I hate CIE, they already have such a hold over my life at the moment because I have no choice but to rely on their chronic services every day to get me around. Thats not bad enough without hearing that they have put the redevelopment of this site back to at least 2007. I want them to move now not later. Get up off their pampered public sector asses and open this site for development. It has the potential to create a high density urban quarter in the city that is not totally car dependant! a CPO would be music to my ears and it would be a great coo for the council and overall the peoples republic! Let the revolution begin

    • #733119
      lexington
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      …with regard to the airbridges at Cork Airport – a little birdy told me very recently that Aer Lingus spoke with the airport and told them that they wouldn’t need them (cost-cutting). I don’t think Aer Arann can use them, and Ryanair avoid them like the plague. That just leaves a small few others, and the holiday charters who work to a budget anyway. Looks like that tradition of getting soaked going to and from planes is going to continue ….. !!! Not long now before we enter the 20th century, eh?

      I was told the same…but I still want them! 😀



      Well on a brighter note, the Indo had a nice little feature on the Cork Office Market today – vacancies rates are among the lowest in the country and the take-up rate has again perked up with a particular emphasis regarding new and much wanted 3rd Generation office accommodation. The city centre has again become the favoured destination for office location – but it is feared that the suburbs may come back to haunt the city centre unless further new supply continues to be generated. Developments at Blackrock (Tellengana = 60,000sq ft), Ballincollig (Ballincollig Town Centre = 130,000sq ft) and Blackpool (Blackpool Retail Park = 40,000sq ft – tax designated) all pose attractive threats – with the only substantial new city centre office developments coming on stream this year at Copley Street (60,000sq ft – Corbett Bros.) and No.6 Lapp Quay (60,000sq ft). Developments at City Quarter & 21 Lavitts Quay are now almost entirely let or sold. Only 1 small unit remains at Copley Hall (Howard Holdings other office development on Anglesea Street – its restrictive size has made it somewhat of a less attractive option apparently, but I’ve heard that a Dublin-based architectural firm having been eyeing it up in an expansion move into Cork).

      However, I am aware of at least 3 other planned office developments for the city centre – hopefully to be announced later this year – 2 along the docklands area (Clontarf and Deane Streets?). Other developments such as Water Street and Eglinton Street will offer limited office space. A few other developments are also in the works. It is doubtful any of these will come on-stream before 2006 however.

      Still, a confident boost for Cork office developers!

    • #733120
      planningdept
      Participant

      Ref : 97 unit development in Bishopstown by Mark Kelleher TP04/29094
      Looking at this on CCC’s web page there’s 156 submissions and a heavy
      petition lodged by the miilitant OAP’s in Bishopstown.For too long these heavies
      have stopped development of this area ,and let Douglas ,Mahon and Blackpool (even!)
      forge ahead with cinemas ,restaurants and other well desiged res schemes.
      Is this another scheme to regenerate Bishopstown, and not student driven
      to be thrown aside????

    • #733121
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @planningdept wrote:

      there’s 156 submissions and a heavy
      petition lodged by the miilitant OAP’s in Bishopstown.For too long these heavies
      have stopped development of this area

      You’d better take there pensions off them, it wasn’t designed for such frivolous use

      Do you ever listen to what you are actually saying?

    • #733122
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      The “Walk of Shame” at Cork Airport! 😮

      Interesting thread on the PPrune network (about aircraft, airlines, etc) re the proposed (or lack of) airbridges at Cork Airport. What amazes me is the crazy cost of the new terminal in the first place…seems like the Aside from that, if cost of airbridge use for the airlines is an issue, then at least have a canopy covered walkway set back from the apron and parallel the terminal building and out to the remote aircraft stands. That way, the walk of shame is limited to 40 or 50 feet max. A cold shower seems to be one of the free ‘side benefits’ when disembarking in ORK.

      Link below:
      http://www.pprune.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=160692

    • #733123
      Leesider
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      I’ll second that… cpo the government full stop

      can they do something under the derelict sites act or whatever it is called??

      As for the air bridges!!!!! 😡

      no wonder Cork people have a “supposed” chip on their shoulders, if you ask me it is a well entitled side effect of our beloved centralised Ireland!

    • #733124
      Pug
      Participant

      air bridges sacrificed? thats nuts. perhaps if the costs wee closely examined, perhaps those huge beams that they used may not have to be used after all. That project is spiralling out of control at the airport which usually means someone is making money!

      as for CIE, the chairman apparently wants to concentrate on passenger development but this musnt include the cork to dublin service which is a disgrace to humanity.

      anyway, good to see another of the docklands sites at monahan road and the doyles warehouse at albert quay going under the hammer. :rolleyes:

    • #733125
      lexington
      Participant

      Speaking of Mark Kelleher’s large 92-unit development at Westend, Bishopstown – I availed of the opportunity provided to walk the development site with another gentleman. There is something eerie about the site – it resembles an accumulation of overgrown grass patches, briars, fencing, old sheds and hedges. It seems completely out of sync with the rest of the surrounding areas. I have seen the plans for the site, and personally I feel that the site and area could very much stand to benefit from the development. Many of the objections are exceptionally over-the-top, repetitive and quite frankly, stupid. Jerry Buttimer, local councillor, applauds the objectors for their use of ‘democracy’ by objecting, but there is nothing democratic about the same people lodging more than one objection under different guises – i.e. The Rise Residents Association, then a list of Rise Residents independently objecting, then different members of the same household objecting…that’s a little excessive, and to be honest, unfair. Although I do think the development is warranted – I completely agree with concerns relating to traffic management in the area. Yes, the area is heavily congested, the roads in the area handle in excess of 100,000 traffic movements per day and they are inadequately designed for such a volume. Some objectors have raised this point and it is completely valid – however, I would like to see the developer work with the residents and CCC on how best to combat this problem, perhaps by privately funding feeder road-upgrades as part of the development??? I also acknowledge that some areas of the development do mildly overlook 3 or 4 residencies, the developer could easily adjust this by ‘stepping’ the apartment block more carefully. I don’t have a problem with these valid points – it’s the stupid ones that bug me. Some objections are basically just saying, ‘I’m sick of high-rise’. I remind them, it’s 5-storeys, not 17.



      😀 O’Callaghan Properties 10-year Retail Plan

      -> Mahon Point SC (20m visitors p.a. expected – same as Liffey Valley)
      -> Lodge Application for Academy Street mid-to-late 2005 (200,000sq ft of ‘fashion’ based retail – between 30 – 40 units over 6-storeys (+ basement) and with over 80 to 100 apartment units, 30,000sq ft of offices (?)) – OCP are promising something very special on this one. Let’s hope they deliver – early suggest, they MAY hit a high-note with a Danish design firm working with a Dublin-based practice – Project?
      -> Begin construction (Bowen Construction again) on Academy Street late-2006.
      -> Possible projects on the South Docklands?- We’ll just have to wait and see!
      -> Development at Academy Street opens late-2007, early 2008.
      -> Possible Mahon Point SC extension (further 150,000 to 200,000sq ft to the northern elevation).

      The above is just a whimsical representation to some of OCP’s proposed plans, nothing in stone. Don’t take it too seriously. However, the time-frame for Academy Street has been laid out by OCP already, as well as the Mahon Point SC extension – which is already in pre-planning. Dirk Luow of Project Architects has already assessed this option. The centre was designed to accommodate such an extension.

      -> OCP are to relocate to their new HQ at 21 Lavitts Quay come April/Summer 2005. They are currently based in temporary facilities (a series of interconnecting cabins) on the Mahon Point lands at Ballinure, Mahon. Once relocated, the land for a new Hilton Hotel and Leisure Centre will be freed up. Construction on the 200-bedroom hotel is planned to be complete by late 2006/early 2007?. The technology and business parks (once planned long ago for Horgan’s Quay) and up to 100,000sq ft of office space are due to be complete for 2008.

      -> As for the 6,000-seat convention/event centre, though scepticism remains over this project, with a project development cost of 30m euro, I have been informed that, since mid-2004, a series of construction options have been discussed with between the design team, construction team and a number of Irish, UK and US consultants with regards reducing construction costs and availing of new strategies to provide a less expensive build, hopefully making the centre more viable. Though it is highly publicised, the logistics of the project still don’t add up, I suspect that the project may not be realised – although this latest information is curious.


    • #733126
      Pug
      Participant

      quick ques fro you lot out there, could someone list me the top CORK architects? being creative people i know thats very subjective but I was looking for those who say do commercial/retail property, maybe residential as well, couple of projects I might need help on. Thanks a mill. 😎

    • #733127
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      quick ques fro you lot out there, could someone list me the top CORK architects? being creative people i know thats very subjective but I was looking for those who say do commercial/retail property, maybe residential as well, couple of projects I might need help on. Thanks a mill. 😎

      Well what are you looking for? Design oriented? Or just slabs? 😉

      I have my own opinion on the better architectural firms in Cork – but that’s just me. If you new a few contact names – let me know.

    • #733128
      Pug
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      Well what are you looking for? Design oriented? Or just slabs? ]

      what about your top ten then? as for slabs or design , suspect its a bit of both, client I have will explain what they need, architect will design a nice building and go back to client, client will recoil in horror at cost and after a bit of to-ing and fro-ing all will be happy!! Seriously, your opinion on the top ten would be appreciated Lex. I’ll get back to you on the contact names, this thing I have is just kicking off so i’d like to see what other stuff the architects on the list have done before I go meet people. Thanks a mill for the offer though. 😎

    • #733129
      lexington
      Participant

      There was a post here but now its gone (to a land far away)

    • #733130
      lexington
      Participant

      Cork City Council today officially launched the ‘Outside the Box’ competition for the design of a redeveloped quay-front along Kyrls Quay – marking a further step in the set-up of the Cornmarket Street and Coal Quay regeneration efforts.

      The details from the website are as follows:

      Kyrl’s Quay Architectural Design Competition
      Cork City Council is holding a Design Ideas Competition for a prominent group of city centre waterfront sites as part of the Cork 2005 (Capital of Culture) Programme. The competition site will provide the catalyst for the renewal of a wider area in the Cornmarket Street / Historic Centre areas of the City Centre.

      The main aims of the competition are to:

      1. Identify creative options for the redevelopment of this group of sites
      fronting onto the River Lee; and

      2. To promote high quality urban design and architecture in Cork City.

      Designers are invited to register for the competition from 1st February 2005. Closing date for entries is 20th April 2005. Entry details and the competition brief are available from the Jill Jacob of the RIAI at: 8 Merrion Square, Dublin 2.

      email: jjacob@riai.ie

      Tel: 01-676-1703 / 01-669-1463. Fax: 01-676-9510

      Competition Jury:

      • Piers Gough, Architect, CZWG Architects
      • Jim Barrett, City Architect, Dublin City Council
      • Tom De Paor, Architect, De Paor Architects
      • Kelvin Campbell, Urban Designer,Urban Initiatives
      • TG Mitchell, Architect, Mitchell + Associates
      • Ann Bogan, Senior Planner, Cork City Council

      Prize:

      First prize €5,000 other prizes to a total value of €5000 will be awarded at the discretion of the Judges.

      see -> http://www.corkcity.ie/news/latest/kyrls_quay.shtml for more details.



      The project will seek at least 2 significant mixed-use waterfront developments for the area facing the river on a series of existing derelict sites. All developments must take note and include the old city wall. The height of the projects should be significant enough as to mask the Dunnes Stores Kyrls Quay Multistorey and Shopping Centre. More later.

    • #733131
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      The project will seek at least 2 significant mixed-use waterfront developments for the area facing the river on a series of existing derelict sites. All developments must take note and include the old city wall. The height of the projects should be significant enough as to mask the Dunnes Stores Kyrls Quay Multistorey and Shopping Centre. More later.[/QUOTE]

      How that m/s carpark got past planning is surely a tribunal matter 🙂
      Anything would improve on the negative impact this building has on the quay.
      Btw, which derelict buildings are being destroyed???

    • #733132
      phatman
      Participant

      Well this is great news, truly an awful area of the riverbank, can’t wait to hear more.

    • #733133
      lexington
      Participant

      Here’s an inside view of the central atrium of the new Clarion Hotel on Lapps Quay as part of Howard Holdings’ new City Quarter development. The hotel will open its doors on Feb 11th while the new office development as part of the project will be completed come late March/early April.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 O’Callaghan Properties have confirmed that they are scheduled to lodge their application for Academy Street/Emmet Place this Summer (2005) – a little earlier than originally planned, with construction hoped to be for October 2006. OCP have put this down to the fact that they are very happy with the way Mahon Point has progressed and continues to progress – the retail park (phase 1) is now let and all units at the Shopping Centre are filling up gradually (they have been since launch – however incidents such as the Clinton Cards fall, all provided temporary vacanies which were quickly filled). There now remains a backlog of international tenants, many of which OCP are hoping to see take up units at the Academy Street development. The 6-storey over dual-basement development will see a lower basement parking and goods delivery level, basement retail, ground floor retail, 1st floor retail, 2nd floor retail, 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th floor residential. Bowen Construction will be contractors. The design team has been for the time being, asked, not to be revealed – but consists of a respected European-based firm (think Scandanavia) and a Dublin practice (who has worked with OCP on large retail projects before). The retail element will be strictly fashion.

      – OCP satisfied with Mahon Point, will now be focussing their attention on the Jurys redevelopment and Academy Street projects (+ 1 other proposed ‘surprise’ – an enhanced retail aspect?). The Hilton Hotel, Office Development, Industrial Park and 2nd Phase Retail Park (scheduled for August 2005) will all proceed ahead at MP under the supervision from OCPs new Lavitts Quay HQ. The development company have lodged a 1st Party Appeal in contest to the CCC planning decision regarding its Jurys Hotel redevelopment – it claims the reductions made by the company in apartment numbers to satisfy planners and objectors was highly sufficient and the further reduction in planning conditions was unfair. I have to agree with them on this one. A substantial brief has been lodged contesting objectors from Sundays Well who argue the redevelopment would ‘destroy their children’s heritage’. I sincerely hope the project is greenlit the whole way.



      😉 For anyone interested in entering the Kyrls Quay Architectural Design Competition held by CCC (1 of 2 competitions held by the council, the other being the 15m euro City Library redevelopment competition), here are a few genuine and important (insider) hints for design consideration that should be taken aware of:

      A. At least 2 seperate developments envisaged – the design should be distinctive and of a high aesthetical quality.

      B. The height of design fronting Kyrls Quay, should be significant enough to mask the existing Kyrls Quay multi-storey and shopping centre – but not over-dominating as to detract from other nearby buildings of important historical reference.

      C. Full consideration for the development’s waterfront location should be incorporated.

      D. It is preferred, though not obligatory, that the project be of a commercial and/or cultural nature – this is to reflect the history of the Cornmarket Street and Coal Quay areas as important historical trading areas, and to enhance the regeneration efforts which focus on the important, extended CCA (Core Commercial Area) and CCRA (City Centre Retail Area) nature of the area.

      E. The project must consider an extension to the quayside road’s width for better traffic management in the area (but with a strategic view to pedestrian adjustment).

      F. Public amenity capabilities must be incorporated into the design (e.g. boardwalks [favoured], green areas, timber decking etc)

      G. It is preferred, though not obligatory, that any building designs facing the Kyrls Quay waterfront, avail of the curved nature of the quayside/river – within minimal ‘boxy’ features, and a greater emphasis on the sleek.

      H. The project overall must be commercially attractive.

      I. Consideration will be given to projects wishing to utilise the quay-wall area – where full consideration is given to pedestrian thoroughfares at ground level and sufficient traffic management (e.g. an arched form over quayside road and pathways) – however, the implications and riverside impacts must be documented and justified.

      J. The waterfront building(s) should act, in conjunction with the new Shandon Bridge, as a landmark gateway into the renewed Cornmarket Street area – which should be viewed as a major and important commercial thoroughfare for Cork city centre. (I recommend noting the original ‘tower of light’ structure originally proposed as part of the Gate Multiplex building on North Gate Bridge. )

      – Thats all I have for now, and they are in my own words, not listed details as I received them through talks with certain persons – but the hints were on those precise lines.


    • #733134
      Pug
      Participant

      sorry Lex, could I trouble you again for your exoert opinion on a list of decent architects of commercial/retail type space? I think you posted it but it seems to have hopped off the website somewhere. Would really appreciate it, cheers 😎

    • #733135
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      Well Pug, in the absence of word from the oracular Lexington, here’s a list to stimulate some outraged responses from those left-out. You can’t avoid Wilson Architecture and Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects; these are the big boys, and both have done high-quality work. Other competent mid-sizers include RKD McCarthy Lynch, Coughlan DeKeyser Associates, Hudson Associates, Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan, Magee Creedon, SDA O’Flynn, Wain Morehead and Jack Coughlan Associates.

    • #733136
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah, sorry – I deleted it because I didn’t want it to seem like I was knocking the many talented architects I am unaware of, also it was kind of like an advertising banner – so if you just take the list based on my own personal tastes and based on those that I can think of off-hand or am aware of.

      No particular order –

      1. CMG Architects (Cork)
      2. John Duffy Design Group (Dublin w/ extensive work in Cork)
      3. Frank Ennis & Associates (Blackrock, Dublin w/ extensive work in Cork)
      4. Patrick A. Cashman & Associates (Cork)
      5. Dennehy + Dennehy (Cork)
      6. Coughlan de Keyser (Cork)
      7. Wilson Architecture (Cork)
      8. Murray O’Laoire (Cork, Limerick, Dublin)
      9. Burke Kennedy Doyle (Dublin)
      10. The Hyde Partnership (Cork)

      1 = Washington Street West & Trinity Court
      2 = Barrys of Douglas, Silversprings Hotel redevelopment
      3 = Cornmarket Street/Rockfell Investments development, Killarney Plaza Hotel, Eden Hall
      4 = 21 Lavitts Quay
      5 = Kino Cinema redevelopment, O’Brien & O’Flynn residential tower at Silversprings, Castlelakes Development
      6 = No.5 & No.6 Lapps Quay, revisions to Trinity Court
      7 = Eglinton Street development, UCC Boole Library extension, Ballincollig Town Centre, Mardyke Arena
      8 = Water Street development, Cork Opera House facade, Cork School of Music
      9 = Stack A, IFSC; Dundrum Town Centre, Dublin
      10 = Watergold Building, Douglas; Douglas Central Properties Hotel

    • #733137
      Pug
      Participant

      thanks Lex,and redabbeyredux that is VERY much appreciated – I am sure no one will take it as an advertising banner, in fact, given that its a forum, anyone else is more than welcome to give me their input/suggestions if they are not on the list above! 🙂 Thanks again.

    • #733138
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      8 = Water Street development, Cork Opera House facade, Cork School of Music

      BTW, has there been any movement in relation to this or are the government waiting to roll this out during the by-election as they have done for the past two elections?

      Has anyone heard of the possibility of a rail connection between Cork and Belfast, and Cork – Sligo???

    • #733139
      Pug
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Has anyone heard of the possibility of a rail connection between Cork and Belfast, and Cork – Sligo???

      jaysus, they cant manage the cork-dublin one, let alone any new ones….

    • #733140
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      8 = Water Street development, Cork Opera House facade, Cork School of Music

      BTW, has there been any movement in relation to this or are the government waiting to roll this out during the by-election as they have done for the past two elections?

      Has anyone heard of the possibility of a rail connection between Cork and Belfast, and Cork – Sligo???

      German PPP and Construction group Hochtief are now in control of Jarvis’ PPP wing – it is re-evaluating Jarvis’ assets and project agenda. A decision was due this month (Jan) but nothing looks set now until at least the end of Feb, perhaps later. It is an utter disaster of a project which should have seen its reigns seized long-ago and re-tendered for immediate construction or funded full-stop by the Dept. of Education. An utter joke!

      Cork – Belfast line? Cork – Sligo line? Highly unlikely – although there has been consideration for a Cork -> Limerick -> Galway line, something which I would very much support. It should help deentralised the rail network a little in what is an extremely incovenient and unbalanced network.

    • #733141
      lexington
      Participant


      The highly anticipated and long awaited Mahon Point SC opens today – 1st Feb 2005.

      75% of stores will be open at 10:30am, with Zara and Next opening by next Saturday. The 13-screen Omniplex will open along with the 1st Phase of the Retail Park in March (where B&Q, Hickeys and Tile King will be anchors). The 2nd Phase opens in August (with J&P among others). The Hilton Hotel, Industrial and Office Parks will follows thereafter.

    • #733142
      lexington
      Participant

      CUH plan to begin construction on their 75m euro, 6-storey Cardiac & Renal Facility mid-2005. Though the development has already been granted permission, a further application reassessing the cladding and materials on the building is currently in the planning process with a decision due mid-Feb.

      The development is to be located on the western elevation of the hospital – between the existing main reception and the car-parking areas. Watkins Gray International are the architects behind the scheme – and here is a sneak peek of the development below:


      West looking East – notice the new ORSA design maternity wing to the right (background).


      Approaching the new development’s southern elevation.

    • #733143
      jungle
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Has anyone heard of the possibility of a rail connection between Cork and Belfast, and Cork – Sligo???

      I can’t see Cork-Sligo happening, although as lexington said Cork-Galway is possible as it just means reopening a stretch of line from Ennis to Athenry.

      Cork-Belfast has been awarded funding by the EU. It’ll basically mean Cork-Dublin-Belfast on the existing line with trains scheduled to run through the Phoenix Park tunnel.

      jaysus, they cant manage the cork-dublin one, let alone any new ones….

      From 2006, new trains will operate Cork-Dublin with a train every hour.

    • #733144
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Doesn’t the proposed OCP Academy street development site include a significant number of listed buildings?

    • #733145
      lexington
      Participant

      Yup, but if the earlier drawings are anything to go by, some of these are incorporated into the project with relative taste. As for the others, well…

    • #733146
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Is Le Chateau listed? Have they agreed to sell? If so do you think the license will be retained by OCP.
      The aa building is definitely listed (beautiful building imo).

      @lexington wrote:

      Yup, but if the earlier drawings are anything to go by, some of these are incorporated into the project with relative taste. As for the others, well…

    • #733147
      lexington
      Participant

      Is Le Chateau listed? Have they agreed to sell? If so do you think the license will be retained by OCP.The aa building is definitely listed (beautiful building imo).

      Agreed – it’s one of my favourite buildings in the city centre, it has a stand alone classic grace – as far as I’m aware it’s not in the deal.

      Le Cheateau has not as yet been sold to OCP but a leasehold deal of sorts is being put in place, I’m not clear on it. The building is vitally significant from a historical perspective – in the drawings I saw, the building was not incorporated, and if it was, it was done so very discreetly with the St. Patrick’s Street facade (and those all important steps!) remaining untouched.



      😉 Mahon Point, as predicted, was utterly packed today, all day, for its opening. Although a number of stores, such as Zara, Next, Lacoste, River Island and Morgan de Toi, were not open (all scheduled to open this w/e or next week), the place was buzzing. I have to say, though it remains far from the most attractive architectural feat on the outside, it has been finely tailored on the inside. The finishing standard is of a high material and architectural standard. The building as a whole looks far far better in the finished flesh.

      – On that note, though it was confirmed talks with Clear Channel had been in motion, very secretly, a report was released stating that the existing proposal would not be financially viable. This report was released officially on Monday 31st, but I am informed it was compiled over 7 to 8 months ago – it would seem, as posted long long ago, to be the first formal step down of OCP regarding the development of the proposed Convention Centre. It is thought, that OCP will sell this area of land off to McCarthy Developments (co-purchasers of the Mahon Point lands, and developers of neigbouring Jacob’s Island) and possibly recoup the majority of the financial sum due to CCC, as written in the sale agreement regarding the MP lands. McCarthy would seek to development extended units and facilities for it huge residential development on this land (but this is still all pie in the sky, I was just a suggestion made by a prominent insider). Now with MP flying, the retail park and multiplex opening soon, construction beginning on the Webprint Concepts facility (by PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd) nearby and Jurys cleared by CCC in planning, OCP have a lot less to worry about – and thus a lot less to uphold. OCP will hope to see ABP pass Jurys now in its appeal, and any whinging by CCC regarding the covention centre will be swiftly silenced when OCP lodge their Academy Street Development application this summer. CCC are itching to see this development get on the road – and reinvigorate the city centre’s shopping dominance (along w/ the Cornmarket Street and Grand Parade plans).

      – OCP’s other project of 75 residential units along the Old Blackrock Road (designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, constructed by John Paul Construction) is progressing well. I managed to sneak in a quick tour of the site this evening, so far, its looking pretty nice.



      😉 Projects due for application or development in Cork for 2005 (of what I can tell you) –

      – Jurys Hotel Redevelopment + 300 apartments (ABP pending; fingers crossed!)
      – revised Water Street Development application (for this March/April)
      – Eglinton Street (planning pending – MAJOR fingers crossed!)
      – Cornmarket Street Rockfell Investments project (construction due mid-to-late Feb – mostly excavation work)
      – Pitwood Ltd’s 121-bedroom Parnell Place Hotel (planning pending)
      – Grand Parade Plaza (summer 2005 construction start date due)
      – 2nd Phase Victoria Mills (primary construction due mid-to-late Feb)
      – Victoria Station development (late-Feb/early March construction)
      – 98 units at Farranlea Road by O’Sheas Builders Ltd (appeal pending)
      – 125 bedroom, 7 storey hotel for Lavitts Quay by Howard Holdings (planning pending)
      – 64-bedroom 7-storey hotel for Crosses Green (planning pending)
      – Capitol Cineplex announcement (due for Spring/Summer 2005 – but not definte)
      – Kyrls Quay redevelopment plan (May 2005)
      – WebWorks Albert House development by CCC and Howard Holdings (Spring 2005 construction due)
      – Albert Quay announcement (possible Autumn 2005)
      – Academy Street Development application by OCP (Summer 2005)
      – Kennedy Quay area announcement (Spring 2005 – possibly later)
      – Cork School of Music (who knows?!)

    • #733148
      burge_eye
      Participant

      There’s an aerial photo of the Ballincollig Town Centre dev. in today’s Times (sorry, I don’t have access to a scanner). I guess it’s an old photo, as the centre is due to open in October, but it gives a good idea of its scale.

    • #733149
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 A city based developer has applied with CCC for the development of a 39-unit, 9-storey apartment building at the site of the quarry at Rockboro (next to the Temple Hill Cork Constitution rugby grounds) along the Boreenmanna Road in Blackrock. The building will comprise of a arrangement of apartment types, topped by a 2-storey 3 bedroom penthouse and extensive private roof-garden (grass, trees, hedges – the works!). The application came under the name Mary Collins. More soon.



      🙂 Architects Patrick Cashman & Associates (of 21 Lavitts Quay fame), Midelton, have commenced the development of the former Lough Rovers Club Building on the Bandon Road (near UCC) as 11 new 5-bedroom apartments and 1 3-bedroom apartment over 3-storeys for Student Accommodation. The development is scheduled to be complete by Oct 2005 and forms an extension of the UCC Student Accommodation to it’s rear, The Spires.

    • #733150
      sw101
      Participant

      is anyone aware of other buildings by Patrick A. Cashman of midleton? he’s off the google radar.

    • #733151
      lexington
      Participant

      Farranlea Hall Student Accommodation (72 units), Wilton Road; The Spires (24 units) Student Accommodation, Bandon Road; 21 Lavitts Quay – I’ve more on the list, but let me get back to you on them if I can. All Cashman & Assoc. designs.

    • #733152
      lisam
      Participant

      Midleton Park Hotel, Brehon Hotel, Killarney

    • #733153
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hey Lex, can you give us any more info on what we can expect on Kennedy quay?

      Thanks in advance.

      – Kennedy Quay area announcement (Spring 2005 – possibly later)

    • #733154
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Hey Lex, can you give us any more info on what we can expect on Kennedy quay?

      Thanks in advance.

      – Kennedy Quay area announcement (Spring 2005 – possibly later)

      IAWS have drawn up plans for R&H Hall Weybridge Grain Silos on Kennedy Quay – to be honest, I don’t know which plan they intend to go with – although I was told of 2. Things may since have changed. I was also told that IAWS intend to make an announcement this year (either Spring or Summer – though you never know, it could be even later) regarding their plans for the site. One involves the sale of the site to a private developer, then using the capital gained to develop a new facility in the Cork Harbour area or further down the Port. The other envisions a joint development. Either way, the schedule of events will be extended – numerous moves will have to be made on the part of IAWS. Their intentions, I presume, would take course over a period of a few years. R&H Hall is a massive site – any private developer to take it on-board would have to be one or two of the big boys – or a collective of medium sized developers. The rewards however could be outstanding – but that depends on how the silos are utilised (whether they be redeveloped, or demolished to make way for new landmark structures). IAWS plans cater for both – but they are not the be-all, a third party may wish to pursue an alternate approach.

    • #733155
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Lexington,

      would appreciate any further info on the Temple Hill proj. Have been recalling the site as I saw it last – seems a challenging project to me!

    • #733156
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Lexington,

      would appreciate any further info on the Temple Hill proj. Have been recalling the site as I saw it last – seems a challenging project to me!

    • #733157
      lexington
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      Lexington,

      would appreciate any further info on the Temple Hill proj. Have been recalling the site as I saw it last – seems a challenging project to me!

      I’ll have so more info on the project early next week.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Ascon Ltd have begun the preliminary work (roads, piping, deconstruction of the College Road Boole Gateway – a PS – due to be be reconstructed after completion of the Boole etc) on the University College Cork, 60,000sq ft, 32m euro Boole Library extension. Although, I have no confirmation whether Ascon are the main contractors on the project yet. Primary construction has been earmarked for June 2005 with a completion date set for late 2007.



      Correction and UPDATE

      Based on info I secured for a prominent Cohlan Downing associate, I believe I may have reported that City Quarter had been 100% sold, let or reserved – evidence provided by Howard Holdings today has said that this info was based on a ‘pre-empted deal’ and in fact 90% had been to-date successfully sold, let or reserved. 1 floor (3/4) only remains – w/ 4 offers standing. Howard Holdings today erected a large banner across their City Quarter office development to promote the fact – in an effort they hope will fuel record sale or letting rates within the development. My apologises for the inaccuracy.


      City Quarter, Lapps Quay

      – However, indeed, 60% of neighbouring office development, No.6 Lapps Quay by O’Flynn Construction (in advanced construction stages) has been sold, let or reserved already. No.5 Lapps Quay adjoining, which was sold on a floor by floor basis, has been completely sold out.


      No.5 & No.6 Lapps Quay



      😎 It seems that both O’Flynn Construction & O’Callaghan Properties are in the Favourite 4 of the OPW’s books for providing the new 80,000sq ft of office space required by the Revenue Commissioners in Cork.

      Although CCC were anxious to see the requirement spur a further docklands development – and it was certainly an ideal candidate – approaches by the 2 developers, promoting their Ballicollig Town Centre Office Campus and Mahon Point Office ‘Arena’ respectively.

      Other runners who have approached the OPW have included SHUL, Corbett Bros., the Kenny Group and others. However, the OPW had been issued specific guidelines, which required them to seek office space (city centre) currently under development or in planning. Final offers are due March 24th 2005. With City Quarter already full, No.6 Lapps Quay more than half sold or let, no other city centre office development currently in planning or under construction is suitable to OPW requirements (Corbett Bros. Copley Street office development measures only 60,000sq ft, SHUL’s Tellenganna Lodge development = 60,000sq ft, The Kenny Group have only site offerings) – only O’Flynn’s 130,000sq ft office development at BTC, and OCP’s 130,000sq ft office campus at Mahon Point have planning in place. The problem is, neither of the developments are in the city centre or within the 2km radius of Kent Station, as required. It is viewed the OPW may overlook this, with O’Flynn Construction possibly offering a concessional public office at its No.6 Lapps Quay office development in the city centre, while the bulk of the Revenue Commissioners space remains at BTC. Similarly, OCP may offer a concessional city centre space to the RC at 21 Lavitts Quay office development, at the bulk of the RC space at Mahon Point. O’Flynn Construction project that they will have the majority of office space at BTC available for Spring/Summer 2006, while OCP project that they could speed up development of their office element for completion in Summer/Autumn 2006 also.

      Though other offers will undoubtedly be made by other developers, and perhaps the RC will remain in the city – I just thought I’d let you know the perspective of the above developers. The OPW may for example, be so attracted to a site like the one offer by the Kenny Group at 50 Grand Parade (right across the bridge from their existing Sullivans Quay office building), they may be willing to wait while the project runs through planning again and is constructed thereafter. Who knows?! It’ll all depend on the offers – but consider the advantages of BTC and MP – low rates, free abundant parking, a myriad of staff facilities, easy access. Hmmmm. It would be nice to see such a large development stay in the city centre however.

      Both OCP and O’Flynn Construction (OFC) are just itching to get another presence like that which Sullivans Quay offers in the city centre however. A few subsidence issues rectified and the site could allow for a whopping development!!!

    • #733158
      lexington
      Participant

      An interesting Breakfast Briefing held last Thursday in the Imperial Hotel by Hamilton Osbourne King, Cork – at which director Peter O’Meara outlined in his vision for Cork 2020 based on the statistics, trends and facts. He outlined an interesting and somewhat exciting view. In attendance were members of the CBA, Chamber of Commerce, City Council, Developers (incl. Owen O’Callaghan, Michael O’Flynn et al), Architects and other prominent figures in the development community in Cork.

      Those this may be somewhat of a ‘utopian’ outline – this is how I would like to see Cork develop of the next 16 years, and how I think, with proper planning and investment, it could very well achieve. (Consider the fact that at a p.a. population growth rate of 65,000+, Ireland’s projected population will reach 5m by 2015).

      CORK 2020

      Metropolitan Cork
      Cork city will be the commercial centre serving a catchment population of 600,000+, with 330,000 situated in the greater Cork city area. Planning restrictions as laid out in the former and current forms will have seen the city boundaries only extend enough to incorporate areas like Douglas, Rochestown, Curraheen, Little Island – Glanmire and Ballincollig[???] (effectively they are suburbs, but would Cork CoCo ever acknowledge this? Or are they too valuable income earners???). The city will have a series of large feeder towns such as Midelton, Macroom, Mallow, Kinsale, Bandon, Cobh – all served by an efficient City Commuter Rail Network, complimenting the newly established Intersububran Rail Network (CATS – Cork Area Transport System ~ something strategically and importantly needed, may even be worthy of a private investment). In addition to the aforementioned, Cork Airport, Blarney, Blackpool, the Docklands, Mahon Point, Bishopstown, Ballincollig and Carrigaline (via Grange/Frankfield & Black Ash) would all be served by rail.

      The Commuter Towns may perhaps in some cases measure populations of up to 20,000 to 30,000 (in Ballincollig’s case, 42,000).

      Commuter Cars will be significantly reduced, and perhaps, discouraged from travelling into the city.

      A full ring-road loop would serve the Cork Metro region (in the form of the proposed Northern Ring Road linked to the N8 and N25). Some sporadic development along this motorway will inevitably form but will be highly restricted in the interest of protecting the scenic Cork Green Belt.

      Cork City & Docklands

      The city centre will finally be pedestrianised. City centre living will have become more popular in light of the increased amenity, safety and accommodation of the area. The increased national population brings Cork’s city centre population back on form. Developments providing more family-friendly sized apartment units (indicated by such developments as the Eglinton Street proposal by OFC [1,900sq ft 3-bedroom apartment ~ encouraging owner-occupiers] and Camden Court by OSB) with extensive communal gardens and play-areas, integrated creche facilities and so on.

      As most office activities in the city centre will shift eastwards toward the southern Docklands area, South Mall will open up to pleasant boutique style retail units and some office retail. The street will become an ‘internal community’ of sorts. Retail space, even now in such high demand for city centre space, will be assisted by extensions of the CCRA at Grand Parade, Cornmarket Street, South Main Street, South Mall and Sullivans Quay/Georges Quay (plans are already kicking into effect at Grand Parade and Cornmarket Street). The city centre’s historical value will be protected, new buildings will be permitted, but remain no taller than 7 to 9 storeys at a max. Increased medical and residential facilities will be provided along Bachelor’s Quay/Henry Street/Grattan Street area. Pedestrianism will rule the day. Some prominent city centre walkways will have retractable canopies over main pathways to allow uninterupted pedestrian and bicycle journeys around the city centre even in poor weather. An extensive network of boardwalks will provide enhanced amenity value for residents and visitors alike. Increased public art should be promoted. Increased green areas (something Cork city centre highly lacks) will be promoted, perhaps, as suggested in areas such as the roof of existing multi-storey car-parks. The city centre core area will shift east slightly, over Parnell Place, Lower Oliver Plunkett Street (trust me, Howard Holdings knew what they were doing when the took on City Quarter). A Water-Bus network will be in effect linking the city centre with Ballincollig Town Centre, Victoria Cross, UCC, the Docklands office and university districts, Tivoli and so on.

      The southern Docklands (Kennedy Quay), will become the new office district of Cork – the city must and hopefully will not simply promote itself as a prime office destination of Munster, or Ireland for that matter, but as Howard Holdings suggest, at an international level – not playing 2nd fiddle to Dublin, but as its own distinct, stand-alone centre of excellence. The city also needs to promote itself as a c.o.e. for R&D in Europe and the world. In doing so, demand for office space in the docklands will be prime – it is achievable. High-rise office, commercial, retail and some, though few, residential, buildings will line the southern docklands as far as Marina Point (which will become a new world-class University Campus – in conjunction with UCC & CIT among others, with extensive student, service, leisure and amenity facilities). Given Cork’s pharmaceutical strength and medical institutions, the city should build on that to develop an international centre of R&D and treatment excellence – in conjunction with e.g. CUH, UCC, Pfizers, MUH etc etc. The high-rise buildings will be of the utmost taste and quality – becoming an exciting area in which architects can explore new opportunities and standards in aesthetics. The high-rise nature of the area will give over more green-space – the area will link up with the city centre’s boardwalk network, lined with cafes, restaurants, bars, play-areas, boutiques etc etc. It will also allow for enough area in which a large, internalised marina facility will be provided allowing Cork and international boat-owners dock their vessels and availing of the nearby harbour area. It will also look good when entertaining corporate clients or visitors. Large public areas could be facilitated by this high-rise district. Kennedy Quay and Centre Park Road/Monahan Road will be the main development area here.

      The Water Street Bridge and new pedestrian bridges linking Kennedy Quay with Horgan’s Quay & Water Street will allow excellent pedestrian and rail access between the newly developed Horgan’s Quay residential quarter and railway station. Horgan’s Quay will have some limited high-rise, but not to the same extent as Kennedy Quay. All buildings will be slender in their east-west perspective as to minimise disruptive views from the northern hillsides. Up to 5000 residencies will occupy the Northern Docklands. Waterfront perspectives will be utilised to the maximum. The standard of living will be superior, but not necessarily exclusive.

      A new event centre will be in place at the former Munster Showgrounds (and will be considering a possible extension, as the strategic investment pays off pretty nice). The overall improvement in Cork as a whole, plus increased population and increased corporate presence of an international nature along the docklands, will attracted many a convention and many a first preference event. 😀

      Cork’s sporting grounds at Musgrave, Turners Cross, Temple Hill and Pairc Ui Chaoimh will be fully redeveloped and among Ireland’s finest – hosting regular international events and some large-scale concerts.

      …on a less realistic note….

      No potholes on the roads.

      All the above is projected on fact and intention, it is realistic, but only with the proper planning, marketing and investment. Cork could indeed, become an excellent living, working and tourist environment, more-so than is, but it will need an open-mind and hard-work.


      CCC’s vision – I believe things will (if following growth, plan, statistics and trends) be a little more exciting – a little more radical and better for all concerned.

    • #733159
      lexington
      Participant

      😮
      Bowen Construction have finally removed the tower crane from over 21 Lavitts Quay – the 24m(thereabouts) euro office and residential development along Cork city island’s northern quays – beside the Opera House. Although much of the building remains shrouded in scaffolding, when up and running, the O’Callaghan Properties development will house 44 luxury apartments overlooking the river and Shandon Bells, over 35,000sq ft of office space – of which the 5th and 6th floors will house the new O’Callaghan Properties HQ, a private multi-storey car-park, retail facilities and a restaurant at ground-floor level. The building was designed by Patrick A. Cashman & Associates, and in my opinion, is one of the finer looking office developments in the city centre of recent years.



      🙂 Though Mahon Point is up and running, the demand by retaillers for Cork city centre space is still overwhelming – demand far outstrips supply. OCP must be licking their lips at the prospects this poses for their Academy Street development – but I’ve heard that both Frinailla (through Atis Harrington Bannon) have had very avid approaches for the retail space at their soon to be constructed Grand Parade Plaza development, so too, Michael O’Donoghue (Rockfell Investments) has been able to cherry-pick interested parties for his 170,000sq m department store/retail mall development along Cornmarket Street (also soon to be constructed – following subsurface investigations). H&M, TK Maxx, Habitat (confirmed for Cornmarket Street), Dixons, Esprit among others have all approached the aforementioned developments – but I can’t confirm any at this point in time (unless otherwise stated). Zara and other Inditex stores have been reviewing other premises throughout the city also in addition to their existing Pull & Bear, Bershka and Zara stores.

      But more still, I can confirm – John Lewis, Harvey Nichols and House of Fraser have all be scouting locations in Cork city centre ~ we may have to wait until Academy Street is up and running before they attain the desired space, but you never know – something ‘else’ may crop up in the meantime. ( 😉 )

      This comes on the back also, that Debenhams in Mahon Point have recorded trading levels only succeeded by their Oxford Street store (this is probably the initial rush syndrome – but trading levels would not be expected to vary too much in the strategic run).


    • #733160
      lexington
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      Lexington,

      would appreciate any further info on the Temple Hill proj. Have been recalling the site as I saw it last – seems a challenging project to me!

      The application, lodged by Mary Collins (supported by an un-named developer), for the quarry site along the Boreenmanna Road at Rockboro, Blackrock – consists of the following: a nine storey 39 No. apartment development comprising of a lower ground floor 16 car spaces and storage 518sq.m with 7 car on site car-spaces, upper ground floor 5 No. 2-Bed and 1 No. 1-Bed 503sq.m., First, second, third, fourth and fifth floors each with 6 No.2-Bed apartments area of each floor 503sq.m., sixth floor, 1 No. 1-Bed, 1 No. 2-Bed and 1 No.2 Storey 3-Bed area 215sq.m and seventh floor shared roof garden with upper floor of former apartment area 78sq.m. Decision due from CCC on 31st March 2005.

      The design team is Coveney & Associates of Monkstown, the same architects behind John Mannix’s Washington Street development (apparently earmarked for construction Summer 2005 though I’m not clear on that, but if otherwise, I’ll let you know).

    • #733161
      Pug
      Participant

      did i see that Murnanes had planning in for a new business park up by the airport? any more info on that?

    • #733162
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      did i see that Murnanes had planning in for a new business park up by the airport? any more info on that?

      No, they plan a 25m euro business park for Bantry – based on the 80m + Cork Airport Business Park. Murnane & O’Shea are looking to grab some names in their hometown – however it is most likely the majority of businesses will be local or nearby. Should be good for the town.

    • #733163
      St Luke
      Participant

      Lexington

      I enjoyed your vision of Cork, but it is remarkably exlusionary. In it you say nothing about how you might imagine how new developments and urban policy over the next 10-20 years might deal with the persistent levels of urban inequality which are part of the current economic and social fabric of the city. By envisioning the city-island as a pleasuredome for wealthy middle class families in upmarket appartments, and populating the river bank with cafes and marinas to entertain corportate clients, its a little difficult see a future for Cork which ensures equality and inclusion for all its inhabitants….

    • #733164
      lexington
      Participant

      @St Luke wrote:

      Lexington

      I enjoyed your vision of Cork, but it is remarkably exlusionary. In it you say nothing about how you might imagine how new developments and urban policy over the next 10-20 years might deal with the persistent levels of urban inequality which are part of the current economic and social fabric of the city. By envisioning the city-island as a pleasuredome for wealthy middle class families in upmarket appartments, and populating the river bank with cafes and marinas to entertain corportate clients, its a little difficult see a future for Cork which ensures equality and inclusion for all its inhabitants….

      I’m glad you brought this up…

      …if you remember, I did refer to docklands living, as I hope it would be, to be ‘superior, but not necessarily exclusive’. Indeed, I recognise that my portrayl depicts something of a middle-to-upper class utopia, but it would be my hope that this regeneration would be devised to the benefit of all Cork’s citizens. Most developers, when creating residential developments, would generally hope to aim at the middle to upper markets, as these markets have greater resources and allow the developer maximise his return to investment ratio. Evidently, 70% of all Cork’s current apartment developments is aimed at these markets. In their position, if you stake your money on an investment project, you will clearly wish to maximise your benefit return also. It may not be an ideal circumstance, but it is a reality. Quite often, affordable housing schemes are left to local authorities to provide alone, or in a joint initiative with which a private developer can depend on the authority to help reduce his/her risk. I do acknowledge some private developers have embarked on such affordable developments at their own initiative e.g. McInerney. The lack of private investment in affordable housing has led local authorities to introduce new measures in order to attain social housing units (for example, a new O’Brien & O’Flynn housing development near Douglas was granted planning on the condition that it provided 20 units to the local authority for affordable housing purposes – something OB&OF tried vehemently to recompense, offering money instead of housing units. Their efforts were unsuccessful).

      A fact of reality is that the economy is driven predominantly by the so-called middle to upper income earners, a fact stated by the Government and CSO (http://www.irlgov.ie) – but this doesn’t mean we should overlook other classes of income which provide an important percentage in their economic contribution. Nor does it mean we should create a scenario by which members of such categories (an unfortunate phrase) should be denied the ability to ascend into alternate brackets. The current rise in housing prices, I do believe, is driving such blocks to this – and while developers are profiting healthily from it, the other end of the sepctrum is finding it increasingly difficult to keep its head above the water. I should hope that there is a levelling in housing prices (as indicated by recent BoI and ESRI stats) inflation over the coming months. Hopefully, as the population continues to grow (approaching the 5m mark – projected – for 2018), a greater wealth base will afford the continuation of such existing developments, whilst creating a more sustainable affordable housing market with greater private participation.

      The docklands I envision will indeed probably be driven by the mid-to-upper market categories – as I said, this is where investment predominantly follows. Furthermore, members of such markets are in the majority associated, participating members of the operations, businesses and development which such investment brings. It may not be a liked picture, but it is a reality. The development processes and associated investment bring with them a greater dispersion of wealth (though this may not be even, it remains evident). I highlight the effects which Mahon Point has brought to what was considered an unemployment blackspot of Cork – the joint public-private funded training programmes have created 1,200 jobs for residents of the region within the shopping centre alone, this will rise to (projected) 6,000 in 2009. The increased level of construction activity around the city has generated employment activities among those who may not have had but sought work – accepted that some of this work is only temporary, the fact is however, that it provides the skills, money and incentive among these workers to allow them pursue and attain future employment elsewhere. It is a consequence, that though the tide rises higher in some places than others, the water level rises generally throughout.

      The Cork I envision – and, believe it or not, it may indeed by where it is heading strategically, is an inclusive one. I do not pretend to believe every single individual will benefit unequivocally, nor do I state that the benefits will be entirely balanced – but I do state, that Cork will benefit at large. Look what has happened already; the increased prosperity of the region, fuelled by investment and development and so on, has raised the average weighted income across the Cork city area. This has seen families who had never left their neighbourhood before enjoy the ability to take a summer holiday abroad (I recognise the Ryanair-factor in that too!); allowed projects like Mahon Point become not simply viable, but unprecedented successes; houses in even the most unexpected areas revamp, extend and renew; and so on and so on.

      In my envisionment, I did not have the opportunity (for spatial reasons) to outline how I would wish to see the socio-economic fabric of Cork city develop alongside this new regeneration. Nor was I able to outline how I wish to achieve them. I could gladly do so if you wish – but this is not the forum to do so. I think in outlining how I would like to see, and may well see, the city develop – it is a little unfair to assume so much of my opinion for these aspects of society without a clear chance to reference them. Is it not a little stereotypical to associate cafe culture to one faction of society – like the corporate? Who says they all have to be Canary Wharf? I would certainly never imply that this was so – and in my depiction, if that was the led conclusion, may I now clarify that this is the intention. Paintings on a gallery wall are open to an observers interpretation, but it isn’t always what the artist had in mind I suppose.

    • #733165
      dowlingm
      Participant

      thanks for the update on Temple Hill Lexington.

    • #733166
      sw101
      Participant

      any docklands residential development would be subject to he 20% social and affordable bit wouldn’t it? so long as this is enforced it will be quite democratic and diverse in it’s make-up.

    • #733167
      lexington
      Participant

      CCC have already designated an area further east of the Marina Point area (which has plans to redevelop as a new University Campus and Student Town Centre) to focus on affordable housing. CCC already have 50m euro plans to construct a mix of apartments, houses and duplexes for such use at this location. Construction work is planned for late 2005.

    • #733168
      sw101
      Participant

      sounds like the problem of affordable housing is being left to the fringes. i would be of the opinion that an integrated system like that at clarion quay would be better.

    • #733169
      lawyer
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      CCC have already designated an area further east of the Marina Point area (which has plans to redevelop as a new University Campus and Student Town Centre) to focus on affordable housing. CCC already have 50m euro plans to construct a mix of apartments, houses and duplexes for such use at this location. Construction work is planned for late 2005.

      Where is the Marina Point area to which you refer?

    • #733170
      sw101
      Participant

      on the south of the river past the power station (innit?)

    • #733171
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes – around and to the east of the ESB Power Station.

      I think the social housing location is more to do with the availability of land in the docklands with respect to maintaining a distinctive commercial quarter further west along the quays – as set out in the Cork City Development Plan 2004. It will still compose an integral part of the overall Cork City Docklands Redevelopment.

    • #733172
      lawyer
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Yes – around and to the east of the ESB Power Station.

      I think the social housing location is more to do with the availability of land in the docklands with respect to maintaining a distinctive commercial quarter further west along the quays – as set out in the Cork City Development Plan 2004. It will still compose a integral part of the overall Cork City Docklands Redevelopment.

      Is it the triangular plot of land bounded by the Power Station, the Centre Park Road and the Marina, right at the end of the C.P.Road?

    • #733173
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 A newspaper article appearing in today’s Irish Examiner (8th Feb 2005) highlighted the ‘turmoil’ being faced by the residents of Dennehy’s Cross and the Model Farm Road – many among them members of CAHRA. The residents are up in arms about the development proposed by Richard Walsh & Dick Kiely (of Walsh Consulting) of 22 no. residential units comprising 6 no. 1 bedroomed apartments, 11 no. 2 bedroom duplex units, 2 no. 3 bedroomed apartments and 3 no. 2 bedroomed detached town houses; 2) 1 no. 175m2 cafe/restaurant and 1 no. 99m2 retail unit; 3) a 33 no. space basement car park with access from Victoria Cross Road. Yet again, the majority senior citizens are protesting at the high-rise nature of the development (between 2 and 4 storeys :confused: ). They complain of being tired of development in their area. One of the 22 objectors, Ms. Helen O’Hea (70) laments for the loss of the local chemist, butcher and post office which she claims once left the residents, ‘spoilt for choice’ – she implies that this is due to development in the area and further complains that the area is turning into a ‘ghetto’.

      – these residents, in the form of CAHRA, make me laugh and become highly frustrated in equal measure. They reflect on the area’s past with rose-tinted glasses and fail to recognise development is not the cause for the loss of their local butcher – markets change, shift, people age and move on. The development in this area has been very respectable in most cases and few have had any direct effect whatsoever on any residencies. Moreover, objecting to such development isn’t going to bring back the ‘good old days’ or local services – if anything, the provision of such development will bring these services back into the area once again to meet increased demand (the above application brings a new restaurant and retail unit back into the community). Once again, the residents are showing a questionable sentiment regarding this ‘high-rise’ development – excuse me but many houses in the area range taller than the 2 to 4 storeys they are protesting. 4 storeys isn’t high-rise by even a long-shot. [a comment here at this exact point has been purposely removed until such a time that situations regarding it can be resolved. I will happily reissue this line on request following the outcome]



      🙂 Frinailla Developments have acquired the Dennehys Cross Garage premises with adjoining shop & bar. Originally earmarked for a student development, the site now looks set to see a new residential and commercial proposal. Of course CAHRA and the residents will be fuming – but new local services they complain of being ‘destroyed’ by development, will in fact be provided in this new venture. McCutcheon Mulcahy will be employed by Frinailla on the development – with John Paul Construction most likely as main contractors. An application should be lodged for early to mid Summer.



      – and to lawyer , Marina Point is considered the whole area from the ESB Power Station east to the Ford Motor Co. premises toward Blackrock direction.

    • #733174
      lexington
      Participant

      Mark Kelleher’s controversial development for Westend (Bishopstown/Curraheen) of 97 residential units (mostly apartments in a 5-storey block) which has received 156 objections (mostly from CAHRA members) has seen its decision due date extended by 6 months!!! A decision is now not expected until August. The project is designed by Frank Ennis & Associates.

      – 6 months though, isn’t that a bit, o.t.t.??? Same scenario has hit Mick Hannigan’s Kino redevelopment and Aldi Developments retail and 46-residential duplex development on Tory Top Road.

    • #733175
      planningdept
      Participant

      At least the scheme wasn’t refused ,as many in Bishopstown had hoped for.
      Do the people of the western suburbs realise they can not have rural life styles in
      urban settings.
      The local councilors are only delaying the city manager and planners (by using so call democratic rights in objecting ) in allowiing Bishopstown grow. Lets hope the developer and ccc come back with this before 6 MONTHS !

    • #733176
      planningdept
      Participant

      By the way what news on the old post office site at dennehys cross (decision due yesterday?)

    • #733177
      Leesider
      Participant

      was just wondering about the Kino, has that actually received that many objections?? Personally I thought it would clean up that area alot!

    • #733178
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Objections from the houses of “ill-repute” on nearby streets afraid of some gentrification…?!?

    • #733179
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      In fairness to the people of Dennehys Cross you cant really blame them for being a bit nervous after seeing that appalling building on Victoria cross nearby.
      I’m totally in favour of tall buildings in that area but that took the biscuit.
      Also, i think people in Dennehy’s cross have a point…the loss of a post office and most of the little corner shops is a bad thing for ANY community, rural or urban. Its a bad day when thay have to walk to town or Wilton to buy a bottle of milk and a stamp.

    • #733180
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 A decision to grant Richard Walsh & Dick Kiely’s proposal for Dennehy’s Cross has been made 2 days ahead of the original due date. The project, which was subject to the unfair ‘outbursts’ of CAHRA and residents, will see a) the demolition of the dwelling house Grianbru and the former post office; b) the modification of existing ground levels, c) the construction of a mixed use residential and commercial development ranging in height from two to four storeys to include: 1) 22 no. residential units comprising 6 no. 1 bedroomed apartments, 11 no. 2 bedroom duplex units, 2 no. 3 bedroomed apartments and 3 no. 2 bedroomed detached town houses; 2) 1 no. 175m2 cafe/restaurant and 1 no. 99m2 retail unit; 3) a 33 no. space basement car park with access from Victoria Cross Road and 4) all associated site development works. It is a positive move for the area – unfortunately (sigh) knowing the objectors to this project, ABP will be hearing from them in the near future. However, on this note, I must in this instance acknowledge the very practical and diplomatic approach adopted by the planner in charge. His report was well put together and realistic.



      🙂 McCarthy Developments Ltd have applied to CCC to increase the height on 2 of its apartment blocks under construction at Jacob Island (Mahon Point). The extension will bring the 2 blocks to an increased height of 6-storeys (from 4) and in line with the neighbouring structures. Increased parking will be also accommodated. McCarthy Developments have based this on what they claim as strong interest and market demand for their project.



      🙂 OSB Group, whose 1st Phase of Camden Court (along Carrolls Quay/Camden Quay and Knapps Square) has sold strongly, will commence works on the 2nd Phase of the development in the coming weeks. Corks Art Theatre on Knapps Square have begun vacating their premises and Pa Johnsons Pub is scheduled to close within the next 2 weeks. John F. Supple are main contractors and James Leahy & Associates are the design team for the interesting project which will provide among the most extensive and detailled roof-gardens in Ireland for its residents. The 2nd phase of the project will see 55 apartments constructed over 6-storeys, with a new Cork Arts Theatre development and new Pa Johnsons premises incoporated also. The project is scheduled for completion by July 2006.


      Phase One displayed only

      – Camden Court and neighbouring Camden Wharf (developed by Hornibrook Builders, constructed by PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd and designed by J.E. Keating & Associates) are making quite a stir within their area. The deisgn quality and construction standards have been superior. They developments, along with Hanranka Ltd’s Knapps Square development, have added immensely to an area which so badly needed development. Even from Emmet Place, the developments combined look pretty impressive. They provide positive examples of how good projects can contribute superbly to Cork’s cityscape.



      🙁 On a slightly sour note, by and far the single worst project to be present to Cork in many a year is in the realms of planning – Charles & Helen McCarthy’s plan for a 64-bedroom, 7-storey hotel at Crosses Green, designed by Derek Tynan & Associates. I received a copy of the VIS today – though I had seen the drawings, the VIS only added to my worst fears. I don’t regard the height as an issue – frankly, if the design is good, such height doesn’t really adversely affect an area, but the pure arrogance of the project design in this instance is gut-wrenching. The hotel is planned on the site of the existing Mill Business Centre – a tall, rectangular brick will arise therefrom cladding in Black Limestone. The design closely resembles Victoria Mills, just black. Balconies have been removed from earlier design outlines – adding to the blandness. It really does look like a huge black wall with no features other than a few windows square windows (such as Victoria Mills). I have never seen a building look so out of place in an area, or even a city like Cork. Truly a horrible, horrible project.



      😡 Grind your teeth now to save time later!!! Minister for Transport Martin Cullen has formally announced in the Dail, in response to a local Cork TDs questions, that Cork Airport’s new 140m terminal will NOT incorporate any new air-bridges. I don’t need to say anymore. But while your blood boils – consider this also -> The Governments Track Record on Cork so far….

      a.) cut-back, novelty Bus Station redevelopment
      b.) No Cork School of Music still
      c.) Refusal to move on promises made regarding Horgan’s Quay redevelopment
      d.) Exclusion of airbridges from new Cork Airport Terminal

      – all the above constitute broken promises!!! Frankly, I’m fed up of it.



      But not to end all gloom and doom, I amazingly have found common ground with An Taisce, regarding the Ellesmere Properties (Howard Holdings) Lavitts Quay hotel proposal – their submission has mirrored my sentiment closely (with the exception of the height issue) – neither of us object to the project, in fact, we encourage it – but we both have raised concerns about the design requesting only minor alterations to the facade in the interests of visual amenity and continuity. I know! I felt awkward too. But sure, enjoy it while it lasts I say! We’re still divided on practically every other development issue in Cork! 😀

    • #733181
      planningdept
      Participant

      Dennehy’s cross have a point…the loss of a post office and most of the little corner shops is a bad thing for ANY community, rural or urban. Its a bad day when thay have to walk to town or Wilton to buy a bottle of milk and a stamp.

      How can any small business survive in a market place where wage levels , rates and insurance are the highest in e.u.
      The little shop or post office (and now the local pub!) has being dying in surban and rural ireland for years.We want a better range of products
      at good pricing levels and this cannot be achieved in small local shops (unless you want to pay !!!) .The celtic tiger has
      made great changes to our social enviroment for better or worst ?

    • #733182
      lexington
      Participant

      I agree that it is unfortunate to see the loss of small local services – but this is not the fault of the type of development in the Victoria Cross/Dennehys Cross area – it is due to market forces, sustainability and people’s progression in life. Certainly objecting to these developments will not restore the loss of such amenity, if anything, such development will help restore through increased prospect of sustainability these provisions. Already, the granted proposal for Grianbru by Richard Walsh and Dick Kiely will provide a new retail and restaurant service for the area. Furthermore, the plans by Frinailla for their recently purchased Dennehys Cross Garage premises will I am told will aim to restore the lost facilities in some form as part of their large commercial and residential development. A new community store (with butcher!) and possible new post office facility will be included in plans – it will depend. CAHRA and the objecting residents intend to bring the new apartment development by Walsh & Kiely to ABP.

    • #733183
      Pug
      Participant

      [ I amazingly have found common ground with An Taisce, regarding the Ellesmere Properties (Howard Holdings) Lavitts Quay hotel proposal – [/QUOTE]

      is there pictures available of the design? I know the pictures of the previous office that was to be on Lavitts Quay were on this website but is it radically changed from that? :confused:

    • #733184
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anybody have any details on Frinailla’s plans for their “Lady’s Well” development on Watercourse Road, Blackpool?
      Also, anybody know what the new Cork City Archive in Blackpool is going to look like?

    • #733185
      Pug
      Participant

      Lex, this is why I was asking were Murnanes doing a business park up by the airport, I believe they have applied for an Airport Logistic Business Park with office, warehousing, commercial units at Farmers Cross 😉

    • #733186
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      radioactiveman

      frinailla’s ladyswell development is in planning as far as i know – it is a mixed use retail-residential-community-office development up to five storeys – vast improvement on th eprevious application, it integrates far better into streetscape, has variety in form -materials and the massing is much more sensitive – also an element of civic space.

    • #733187
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Cumnor Construction Ltd have been granted permission for their apartment and commercial development near Sunday’s Well 5-days in advance of the due date.

      The development originally sought to construct a 7-storey 22 unit apartment development on the old quarry site near North Mall, bounded by Winter’s Hill and Sunday’s Well Road. I wasn’t too favourable on the original – but revised plans reduced the development by 2-apartments in the original new build and relocated them by refurbishing and redeveloping the existing buildings on-site fronting Sunday’s Well Road, thus allowing for a reduction in height to 6-storeys. In addition, after initial property rights confusion, Cumnor will also redevelop an area east of the new-build development for a public recreation and amenity area – providing a pleasant nicely added ‘green’ feature. The project was designed by Jack Coughlan and Associates – one of the firm’s better recent projects w/ extensive timber-decking, communal facilities and water features to boot! Development and construction will be by Cumnor Construction subject to appeal.



      @Pug wrote:

      Lex, this is why I was asking were Murnanes doing a business park up by the airport, I believe they have applied for an Airport Logistic Business Park with office, warehousing, commercial units at Farmers Cross

      I think I misread your original question – for you see, Murnane & O’Shea Ltd are planning a ‘Cork Airport Business Park’ style facility for Bantry, perhaps this is where I got lost. But yes, they have have also sought Outline Planning Permission for Development of an Airport Logistic Business Park comprising of office, warehousing, commercial units and logistical support units associated with the operation and future expansion of airport and conversion of dwellinghouse to office use and 2 no. new vehicular entrances. Project Architects new Cork office is handling the design and PM.

      @Pug wrote:

      is there pictures available of the design? I know the pictures of the previous office that was to be on Lavitts Quay were on this website but is it radically changed from that?

      I do have images from the small VIS by RORSA, also submitted in their planning application, but I need a special file translator to cater to for the file format – I won’t have one until late next week I’m afraid. Its on order. But when I do and if I do, I’ll of course try to post the image online. The design differs indeed from the TCH office building. It rises 7-storeys (which is quite acceptable given the pattern of development along Lavitts Quay), No.16 is being retained and incoporated into the hotel (as a cafe). Similarly to the original TCH proposal, Lavitts Quay frontage is found in a 3-storey build at No.17 and 18 Lavitts Quay (w/ entrance to the basement car-park from here also). R. Arthur’s building at No.15 is unfortunately still not incorporated. The main building is set back and is a sort of L-Shaped zig-zag reflect the nature of the site. The northern-most Lavitts Quay elevation of the main building has a total of 20 square and featureless windows, a white wall continues to a protruding square teak-box home to 12 of the windows, it cuts off at the 6th floor where a continued boxy white wall squares off to the roof. The retracted northern elevation of the main building is nothing more than a bland, featureless 7-storey white wall that dominates the quayside approaching east-to-west along the northern quays – it is quite frankly horrid and seems a white continuation of the northern Opear House wall before its revamp. Yes there are 8 box windows at this elevation, which remind one of the horrid boxy windoes protruding from the north-eastern corner of Northgate House at the North Gate Bridge, but the expanse and extent of the bland wall nature along this elevation is powerfully dominating and highly distasteful. Geoff Butler of Reddy O’Riordan Staehli is chief architect on the project. It is hoped that the project will not be refused because of its design, but will instead be offered the condition to revised its design aspects to increase the quality of its aesthetics – something cater for by CCC with John Mannix’s Washington Street project and Rockfell’s Cornmarket Street project (although they initiated much of this on their own).



      @Leesider wrote:

      was just wondering about the Kino, has that actually received that many objections?? Personally I thought it would clean up that area alot!

      No objections were raised against the Kino Redevelopment – it’s a wonderful development and will contribute very positively to the Washington Street street-scape. The project’s planning application decision was pushed back dramatically until April 2005 – reasons unknown. It is sincerely hoped that it gets the all-clear. Dennehy + Dennehy are the design team. Visit http://www.ddesign.ie/projects.htm -> go to ‘Community’ section, the Kino design is the 3rd icon, click on it and wait for it too load.



      Frinailla’s Ladyswell project along the Watercourse Road is currently in Further Information at the moment. Its a highly positive and substantial development – but of course, as always, Kathleen Lynch (Labour) et al are throwing objections up like a bat on laxatives. Purely political of course.

    • #733188
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 And I forgot to mention, not only has Riga Ltd (O’Callaghan Properites) Jurys Redevelopment been taken to ABP – but also John Mannix’s Washington Street redevelopment project (appellant = Arthur Leahy w/ NLCC Solictors on North Main Street) – even after all those revisions??? Some people!!! The Kilbree Investment Company has seen its apartment development for the Lower Glanmire Road taken to ABP also. What is with this city??? Can no project just go through the Local Authority? Perhaps there should simply be ABP – it would certainly save a lot more time and money. I appreciate the appeal system for objectors – but what does the current trend say about people’s respect for Local Authority decisions? Not much. Then again, if certain projects hadn’t been able to appeal (like Mahon Point for example) the city would have suffered from such L.A. produced problems. Also. Eglinton Street may still depend on ABP yet!

      I sincerely hope Jurys, Mannix’s project and Kilbree work out positively – they’re good projects and Cork could do with more of such.

      :rolleyes: The Jurys Redevelopment has been given ‘Special Priority’ status with ABP and is scheduled for a due date of May 17th 2005 – the appeal will be rushed through a.s.a.p. but due to the scale of the site, the due date could go either way.

      :rolleyes: John Mannix’s development has a due date of May 25th 2004 – I would also hope this date comes sooner rather than later and like Jurys, will hopefully get the greenlight.

    • #733189
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Blackpool Bowling & Leisure Ltd’s 70,000sq ft, 4-storey leisure development at Fitz’s Boreen in Blackpool is taking shape at its site adjacent to the old Mallow Road. The development will include 14 ten-pin bowling lanes, restaurant, 20m swimming pool, children’s swim area, a leisure pool, well-being centre, a large fitness and gym centre, some retail and ancillary offices. It’s a real positive investment for the area and will provide this area of the city with top-of-the-range amenities that isn’t retail or cinemas or the like – its a nice alternative. Deavey Design of Dublin are the architects for the project with Fleming Construction as main contractors.

    • #733190
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      “Can no project just go through the Local Authority? “
      “people’s respect for Local Authority decisions?”

      Lexington, you and i both know that CCC have made some disasterous cock-ups over the years. We’ll all be thankful to ABP when CCC drops the ball again.

      “Frinailla’s Ladyswell project along the Watercourse Road is currently in Further Information at the moment. Its a highly positive and substantial development – but of course, as always, Kathleen Lynch (Labour) et al are throwing objections up like a bat on laxatives. Purely political of course.”
      In fairness to Kathleen Lynch et al, who i’ve dealt with once or twice, the first proposal for this site scared the crap out of local residents, Frinailla brought this trouble on themselves by pushing too hard. The residents are a hell of a lot more suspicious now.
      And even you have to admit, that Frinailla’s first offer at this site was diabolical.
      Lexington, since you seem to know a scary amount about the planning process, do you have any info on what the new Archives building in Blackpool will look like? I’ve tried CCC for info, to no avail. Can you help? Thanks, keep up the good work.

    • #733191
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      In fairness to Kathleen Lynch et al, who i’ve dealt with once or twice, the first proposal for this site scared the crap out of local residents, Frinailla brought this trouble on themselves by pushing too hard. The residents are a hell of a lot more suspicious now.
      And even you have to admit, that Frinailla’s first offer at this site was diabolical.
      Lexington, since you seem to know a scary amount about the planning process, do you have any info on what the new Archives building in Blackpool will look like? I’ve tried CCC for info, to no avail. Can you help? Thanks, keep up the good work.

      I appreciate concerns on the original proposal – I suppose my gripe is that many of these objections are lodged without reading the planning proposals (which are available for public viewing). It’s scary to see, and I have seen, people casually enter a planning office, call out a planning number and lodge an objection. Out of mere curiousity, I once approached a lady in Navigation House (who did similar to aforementioned) and asked her why she was objecting. When she explained to me, it was clear that she really only knew what had been written on the site notice. I requested the planning application and showed her through the EIS and VIS – she admitted she had been unaware of the development form but still wished to object because she though the project was too high (4-storeys) in an area averaging 4-storeys. Now granted concerns may be legitimate but I would ask persons to at the very least consult with the application before deciding to blindly object.

      Frinailla have made a dramatic change to their project and pretty much done everything local residents and planners have asked of them in their new Ladyswell project. If you remember, Kathleen Lynch did state she would have favoured the original project or alternative if it were 4-storeys reduced – so here we are, 4-storeys reduced and more community provisions – and still, objections from KL. I dunno. 🙁

      -> As for the new Archive Building in Blackpool, Des Berkley is the man behind the new building in Cork City Council. It is currently under construction on Great William O’Brien Street, designed by Des. As for images, the City Architect Department are looking into providing me with a few images sometime later this week. No promises as it depends on them to supply the drawings.


    • #733192
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I totally agree with you Lexington. Anyone objecting without consulting the file needs to be locked up!
      On the issue of Ladyswell, I hear Frinailla plan to provide space for a Library here. I’m no expert, but how can they do this if the Central Library has no intention of moving the library at the Cathedral to this ‘new’ location (I have been in contact with the Library on this matter).
      Isn’t Frinailla just trying to butter-up residents with the promise pf something which may never materialise, with the ‘library’ eventually being converted to office space??

      I’ll look forward to those pictures if you can get them. Thanks
      Radioactiveman!!!

    • #733193
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 For anyone who remembers my post following the sale of Wilton S.C. to Howard Holdings & Joe O’Donovan last year (for 110m euro!), you will probably recall how I mentioned the rumour that Roches Stores had consulted NMA about possibly revamping their department store at the centre – well, scratch that because I have got wind of even bigger plans a-foot, but at this point, I can’t confirm this 100% – as its still a little up in the air – but…

      …a new SPV by Howard Holdings and Joe O’Donovan may be looking into redeveloping the Wilton S.C. as a whole. It follows that, the enormous sale price of the highly successful suburban retail centre is mostly accounted for the highly desirable and accessible location of the centre, plus its ample grounds (which allow for development). The rental income from the centre, though healthy, does not include that of Tesco or its new associated outlets (which Tesco remains in ownership of) and only somewhat satisfies the purchase price (and associated repayments). If Howard Holdings and JOD even spent 80m on redeveloping the centre, they could very well double, even triple their rental income with new spacious retail accommodation (which would be a very attractive opportunity for the backlog of national and international retaillers who would just lovely a decent sized bite of the S.C. consumer base). Currently, few retaillers are willing to settle for the small, cramped units available at the centre. The possible addition of a 2nd floor and extensions over the car-parks could provide up to between 150,000 to 200,000sq ft of additional retail space. Roches Stores would see its store redeveloped and vertically extended – which the company would then lease back for a ‘reasonable’ rate. Underground parking and over-ground parking facilities would also be accommodated, allowing for increased parking capacity. Sizeable units, as sought by the likes of Inditex, H&M and others may be provided on the upper floor. The facility would amount to what is perhaps, Cork’s largest shopping centre (in excess of 350,000sq ft) – but it may not even go that large. It would provide a western balance to Mahon Point – a few kilometres east along the South Ring nearby. Oh, and I don’t know that this has been looked into, or that it continues to be looked into 😉 . So, if you’re asking why 110m euros was paid for the centre – think this, location and expansion opportunities – Wilton has got grade excellent on both. One of Ireland’s oldest S.C. could become one of its biggest. It would also go well with Howard’s current expansion hunger. Furthermore, when you pay big in property, sometimes, to justify your costs, you have to go bigger again for greater returns. OCP may not rule retail supreme for long. 😎



      🙂 2 highly desirable property locations have come on the market in Cork city (as mentioned they would be way back when) – CBRE Gunne are handling the sale of 2 prominent Esso Stations (as part of a property reorganisation strategy) at Muskerry Service Station (Wester Road) and Bishopstown – both operated by the same owners. Though both locations offer MASSIVE potential for redevelopment – the Muskerry Station is particularly attractive as it is within 5 mins walk of Patrick’s Street, adjacent to both UCC and the new Jurys Hotel redevelopment. The .7 acre site is sure to see some high bids but offers major residential, commercial, medical or office development potential. Probably one of the best development opportunities to come on the public market in Cork in years.


    • #733194
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      There are major traffic issues with Wilton S.C. as it stands – and that is after the upgrade of Sarsfield Rd. The thoughts of attracting more to the area should be resisted. True that any redevelopment could act as a counter balance to Mahon Point – but allowing the site to be expanded would further undermine the city centre’s position and further suburbanise Cork as a shopping destination.

    • #733195
      phatman
      Participant

      Agreed Dallas, redevelopment to a scale which would sigfnificantly increase numbers of shoppers really is not a sustainable option, the retail situation is fragile in the city at the moment, pretty much at saturation point in the suburbs. Bishopstown/Wilton could not accomodate an increased traffic volume, and i dont think the city centre could withstand the combined force of a redeveloped wilton sc, mahon point, ballincollig and carrigaline town centres. Perhaps an upgrade of the centre, but i dont see this being feasible without an increase in floor space.

    • #733196
      lexington
      Participant

      You have to keep in mind that Academy Street will bring 200,000sq ft to 240,000sq ft of extra retail space to the city centre come 2007/8, Cornmarket Street will bring 170,000sq ft come 2006, possible redevelopments at the Coal Quay, St. Patrick’s Quay, Grand Parade (not incl. the 33,000sq ft at Grand Parade Plaza due 2006), Sullivans Quay and Merchants Quay will all add significant retail ability to the city centre.

      If Wilton S.C. does go for the expansion, planning will take at least a year and the development will take a further 2 years – I wouldn’t expect the project to be online before 2009 – at which point, the city centre (planning pending) should be in a healthy position. But I totally agree the traffic issues in Bishopstown/Wilton are woeful as is – even the new Sarsfield Road Dual-Carriageway is finding it tough to cope and plans for further lanes along the South Ring probably won’t help much either.

    • #733197
      jungle
      Participant

      Does anyone else think that pedestrian access to suburban shopping centres is woeful? In Cork maybe only Douglas SC is even approaching pedestrian friendly. How hard can it be to put the entrance directly on to the street/pavement and put the car park around the back. With the number of new apartments in the Wilton area, there is a huge number of people who could practically get there on foot.

    • #733198
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 2 prominent Esso Stations (as part of a property reorganisation strategy) at Muskerry Service Station (Wester Road) and Bishopstown – both operated by the same owners.


      sorry to doubt you lex, but i thought it was the muskerry and dunmahon station(douglas) that were being sold. :confused:

    • #733199
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Re. The Academy Street/Patrick Street shopping centre proposed by O’Callaghan. Is he going to knock the St. Patrick Street facade of the block? I fear another Merchants Quay is on the way.
      How much of the block is going to be knocked?

    • #733200
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      sorry to doubt you lex, but i thought it was the muskerry and dunmahon station(douglas) that were being sold. :confused:

      Well I was out at the 2 statios today w/ another gentlemen – and unless the big for sale signs are wrong, you could be right!!! ]Re. The Academy Street/Patrick Street shopping centre proposed by O’Callaghan. Is he going to knock the St. Patrick Street facade of the block? I fear another Merchants Quay is on the way.[/QUOTE]

      The design thankfully isn’t another Merchants Quay – it reflects a trend OCP have been reflecting more and more so recently, i.e. quality design (re: 21 Lavitts Quay, Jurys Redevelopment and Blackrock Road etc) – can’t give architect details yet but the design team is of an international source. Initial drawings seem fairly positive – however a number of adjustments will yet be required in my opinion. I look forward to viewing the final design. An application is due this summer. As for the St. Patrick’s Street facade, I would be utterly adamant to see Le Cheateau in particular remains unaffected by the development as it is a vital and unquestionably important historical building with essential links to Cork’s history. From what I saw, it is protected, the former Ryan’s Pharmacy building facade was also retained. Another important structure is the building adjacent the AA Insurnace centre on Emmet Place – but as best I’m aware, it is one of the few buildings in the block unowned by OCP.

    • #733201
      jungle
      Participant

      I’m a bit confused about how the Johnson & Perrott building fits into the Academy St development. There is a street (Faulkner’s Lane???) between it and the Examiner offices. Is the street in between going to be removed? Or is the J&P premises not part of this development?

    • #733202
      lexington
      Participant

      Revised post below.

    • #733203
      lexington
      Participant

      J&P closed a deal with OCP whereby they would be offered a new car-showroom site at Mahon Point (ready to commence construction) in part-exchange for their premises at Emmet Place. The Grand Circle, Taboo Bar (across Bowling Green Street) and the current The Jean Scene store on Patrick’s Street (also across BGS) – are also included in the properties possessed by OCP for the Academy Street development block. As far as my understanding goes, Faulkner’s Lane will be built over (OCP and Heron Property did something similar when they were building Merchants Quay) – though as I’ve said, I have not seen the final drawings – BGS may see arch-links over the street with street level access by escalators and stairs, as well as some ground floor/street retail units. The plus on all this is that these lanes that link Patrick’s Street with Drawbridge Street and Emmet Place will at long last be deservedly revamped. It always strikes me how such lanes in the proximity which they are to Cork’s main street are shamefully delapidated and neglected. I’ve always wished to see them perhaps serve a pedestrianised cafe and boutique zones – not dis-similar to French Church Street and Carey’s Lane nearby. Or better still, like the revamped boutique lanes off Grant Avenue in San Francisco.

    • #733204
      phatman
      Participant

      I share your sentiments as regards those lanes Lexington, such a shame they havent been put to good use as yet, I’m aware of the Grant Avenue area in San Fran, really something to aspire to. Seeing as the trend for development seems to be shifting in this direction anyway, it’s probably just a matter of time before plans are hatched for them, maybe the proposed Dunnes Stores revamp/extension will serve as a kickstart.

    • #733205
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah Dunnes have plans to redevelop their original store along Patrick’s Street at the cost of in and around 30m euro. The store will act as their Cork flagship and contain additional retail units besides Dunnes Stores itself – I haven’t seen any drawings or plans here yet, so I’m only going by word from a gentleman within the company. An application is expected this year, if not, early 2006 (?). The plans will hopefully include a redevelopment of these side-streets in line with the Academy Street development.

    • #733206
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      You’re right Lexington, what with the rents being paid on St. Patrick Street and the success of Frech Church Street, etc it seems silly to leave these areas go to waste. Hadn’t heard about the Dunnes Stores plan. At the moment, the top floors of those buildings are going to waste.
      Speaking of Dunnes Stores.. I wonder wether we might hear something soon about Ballyvolane shopping centre. What with the continued growth of Blackpool SC and retail Park, something is bound to happen out there.

    • #733207
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      in cork city council’s development brief for the patrick st/academy st site, it was clear that they are eager to retain the laneways – faulkners + bowling green and it is proposed that any development would use the lanes as an integral part of a scheme – it also suggests widening of faulkners to make an attractive pedestrian thoroughfare

    • #733208
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      in cork city council’s development brief for the patrick st/academy st site, it was clear that they are eager to retain the laneways – faulkners + bowling green and it is proposed that any development would use the lanes as an integral part of a scheme – it also suggests widening of faulkners to make an attractive pedestrian thoroughfare

      Though this is true, it does not necessarily imply that Faulkner’s Lane for example will be retained. When MQ was proposed way back when, planners were initially steadfast in their wish to retain a number of laneways and streets which would be affected by the development. However in the end, it was agreed that in the interests of the development – exceptions would be made given the context.

      Like I said, I have yet to view final drawings so I can’t give you a definite on Faulkner’s Lane at this point.



      *UPDATES*

      :rolleyes: John Cleary Developments have been refused planning for 17 light industrial units and 11 incubator units which would have create up to 320 permanent jobs on lands adjoining the existing Northpoint Business Park at Kilnap, Blackpool. Although I still believe the development in principle – which adheres perfectly to existing zoning and planning regulations regarding use – would have been highly beneficial, I’ll have to go with the planners on this one. The development in its design was insufficient – even after Further Info requests and outlines. Hopefully JCD will come back with a more suitable but similar use development in the near future.

      – meanwhile, the interesting Motor Mall development planned by JCD for Mahon Point (on former Sifco site) is due a decision date come the 31st March 2005.



      🙂 Michael O’Driscoll has been granted planning for the refurbishment and extension of renovation and extension of his office building at 81 South Mall. The building will be of particular note for those interested in period architecture along South Mall. Edel O’Regan and Associates were responsible for design.



      🙁 Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) have applies to Cork County Council for further reductions and alterations to the Cork Airport new Terminal development (SIGH!) – first airbridges, now this.

    • #733209
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      So we can see where that clown cullen will be finding the 6 billion he is proposing to spend on that world city (LOL) Dublin.

      Time to tell the government where to go with itself. When is the bi-election to replace Coveney going to happen???

      🙁 Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) have applies to Cork County Council for further reductions and alterations to the Cork Airport new Terminal development (SIGH!) – first airbridges, now this.[/QUOTE]

    • #733210
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone have a picture of the old swimming baths (recently demolished) behind city hall they could let me have?

    • #733211
      Leesider
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      So we can see where that clown cullen will be finding the 6 billion he is proposing to spend on that world city (LOL) Dublin.

      Time to tell the government where to go with itself. When is the bi-election to replace Coveney going to happen???

      🙁 Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) have applies to Cork County Council for further reductions and alterations to the Cork Airport new Terminal development (SIGH!) – first airbridges, now this.

      [/QUOTE]

      ah come now……wasn’t it our esteemed Taoiseach who said just last week that he can’t help it if most people want to live in the greater dublin area! it has to be true if it came from Bertie!

      that Bus Eireann ad in the examiner yesterday was also fairly pathetic!!

    • #733212
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      check out the ida website and specifically the investment announcements…
      over 50% are for jobs in the greater dublin region!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      anything with finance is automatically directed towards dublin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      I live in Dublin but do not want to live here… and I think I speak for at least half of the ‘culchies’ living in Dublin (in fact I shall soon be relocating to Paris :)) why would anyone want to live in Dublin. the place is a hole and I for one am counting the days until I leave the place.

      @Leesider wrote:

      ah come now……wasn’t it our esteemed Taoiseach who said just last week that he can’t help it if most people want to live in the greater dublin area! it has to be true if it came from Bertie!

      that Bus Eireann ad in the examiner yesterday was also fairly pathetic!![/QUOTE]

    • #733213
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      Have you any details on the airport mods they are proposing?

    • #733214
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 I forgot to mention, CCC will be soon proceeding with the development of 150 social housing units along their 5-acre Boreenmanna Road site. The site will comprise of a mix of houses, apartments and duplexes over a number of blocks. As housing prices continue to grow exponentially within the city, the waiting list for affordable housing in Cork now stands at 5,600 (est.). CCC are also looking at developing a further 150 affordable units in the future near Marina Point.



      🙂 Howard Holdings are to lodge an application soon with Cork County Council for an exclusive housing development (in the air of its Estuary Court development) on the former convent site at Passage West – which it purchased 6 years ago. The grounds of the site will accommodate 36 detached houses, with the main convent building being retained, refurbished and extended to form 8 own-door housing units.

      – Howard Holdings other Cork developments at present include: 1.) the completion of City Quarter 2.) 7-storey, 125-bedroom hotel at Lavitts Quay [planning due next week] 3.) 121-bedroom hotel at Kinsale 4.) new Webworks Building at Albert Quay in conjunction with Enterprise Ireland and CCC – due for greenlight within the next few weeks. 5.) plus a number of housing developments in and around the city ~ plans are also afoot for another high-profile city centre/docklands development.


    • #733215
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      anything with finance is automatically directed towards dublin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      With good reason the funds industry or as you put it Finance needs serious professional support services, Dublin and Luxembourg are the two exceptions to the rule, i.e. they don’t have populations in excess of 3 million. If Dublin wins an investment it is not at the expense of Cork, it is at the expense of Paris, London or Frankfurt, I hope that reassures your persecution complex

    • #733216
      raster
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      I’ve always found that the tidal nature of the Lee has a negative impact on utilising the quays. However this could be easily overcome by putting some kind of ‘weir’ (automated or otherwise), say, under the last two bridges before the two channels become one again. Just a thought – feel free to ridicule….!

      a thames barrier? well with rising sea levels this may become financially desirable in the nexy 40 years.

    • #733217
      raster
      Participant

      Would anyone care to speculate?
      will this remain as a service station if sold, I suspect not, but whatever development takes place will likely house delicatessen takeaway, my sources tell me this sector is the most profitable at that location currently

    • #733218
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hi Thomond Pk. I don’t have a persecution complex, the facts speak for themselves that once again regional development is being made secondary to the drive to centralise everything in Dublin.

      Dublin competes against Frankfurt and London because of the tax free status enjoyed by the IFSC. Luxemburg is also a tax free destination. Do you see a pattern?

      If this tax free status was extended to other cities such as Cork and Galway I am quite certain that Dublin would have serious competition internally. Let’s create a level playing field in terms of regional development and we’ll see how successful Dublin will be at attracting inward investment. BTW, professional services are not as static as they were due to the improvement in comms infrastructure.

      BTW all of my family work in the financial sector so I am speaking with authority as I know for fact that there are several investment companies looking to move to Ireland but would prefer a location outside of Dublin.

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      With good reason the funds industry or as you put it Finance needs serious professional support services, Dublin and Luxembourg are the two exceptions to the rule, i.e. they don’t have populations in excess of 3 million. If Dublin wins an investment it is not at the expense of Cork, it is at the expense of Paris, London or Frankfurt, I hope that reassures your persecution complex

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      With good reason the funds industry or as you put it Finance needs serious professional support services, Dublin and Luxembourg are the two exceptions to the rule, i.e. they don’t have populations in excess of 3 million. If Dublin wins an investment it is not at the expense of Cork, it is at the expense of Paris, London or Frankfurt, I hope that reassures your persecution complex

    • #733219
      lexington
      Participant

      I thought Archiseek.com was never coming back… 😉

      *UPDATES*

      I have so many updates I can’t even remember most of them, but I’ll try!

      🙂 Kilquane Ltd (Howard Holdings) have been greenlit to erect the 12m quill-like sculpture along Lapps Quay, at the entrance to the Clarion Hotel element of their new City Quarter development.



      🙂 Isle of Man-based Quality Healthcare Ltd have been granted permission for the redevelopment of the former Shankiel Hospital as a new private healthcare facility.



      🙂 Tedcastles Ltd – owners of the 18-acre docklands site near Marina Point have revealed one of their masterplans for the prime docklands development area. Although the plan revealed is a majority residential – which will require rezoning from CCC – the plan includes a number of residential blocks ranging from 3 to 8 storeys in an extensive ‘woodland/park’ style setting. The project would include a number of own-housing units also, with an extensive commercial zone (office buildings will be located to the west of the site nearer to the Power Station) and educational facility (significantly reduced in this plan in response to UCC and CIT’s desire to develop an extended campus to the west of the city – but it’s early days yet). Tedcastles who have extensive property development activities in the USA – may seek to develop the site themselves. In all, an estimated 500 to 600 residenetial units may be provided. The project would have an approximate value in excess of 350m euros – if not more. But I must remind you that this plan is not scheduled for any clear application that I am aware of, and is only 1 of 3 plans already devised by the company. I will post images of this plan later.



      🙂 Hungarian national carrier, Malev, has announced that it will begin scheduled flights between Cork and Budapest this coming April.



      @Angry Rebel wrote:

      Have you any details on the airport mods they are proposing?

      Various reductions and modifications including the removal of covered canpoy between the new multi-storey car-park and terminal building – but to name a few.



      With response to mickeydocs and Thomond Park – I love Cork, I’m very proud of my adopted home, but it does have a high-opinion of itself sometimes. That said, I believe the city has been unfairly and inappropriately treated by the Government and its agencies at large, in terms of funding, development etc etc. The treatment and attitudes of CIE (Horgan’s Quay, Bus Station, Eglinton Street etc) has been 2nd rate and quite frankly insulting. The DAA is pulling petty purse-strings regarding Cork Airport. Our road funding is among the lowest, given the population, traffic volumes and longest road network in the country. Where’s the School of Music??? The list goes on. Further, I believe the rest of the country couldn’t give 2 tosses about all that half the time either – but do you know what, the Cork market is strong (if a little tricky at times) and we have ability. Cork is great for whingeing – even Cork 2005 made a big issue of the ‘whinge’ nature of Cork culture – but Cork is even greater when it gets up of its arse and does something about a situation itself. The recent revival of the city has been in the majority spurred by Cork based private investment (OCP, OFC, Frinailla, Howard Holdings, and the many other private investment groups) – and one must recognised input from outside the city and county. Cork must carve itself its own future – that doens’t mean letting up on broken Government promises (i.e. School of Music and Horgan’s Quay) – but it does mean a proactive approach to Cork’s own future. Why should we waste the energy dropping our jaws in horror everytime Dublin gets that new MNC HQ??? We should be out there competeing, not complaining. Now, the Gov have a responsibility to ensure a proper approach to the NSS – something it has been quite lacking – the country is becoming too centralised, and the Gov need to deliever on that. A counter-balance to Dublin is needed for the country’s sake, Dubliners incl’d. Cork offers the best opportunity (as a focus) to provide this – and in my opinion, is a wonderful location – it just needs the right tweaking. I have a lot of confidence in the city – so let’s get out there and bring the city into the light it deserves, The docklands offers such a gleaming opportunity to make Cork a highly attractive, and relatively more affordable, HQ and large business destination. In economics it’s always said that a company’s greatest asset can quite often be it’s distinction, so let’s ride with that – we don’t need to go a copycat route. If Dublin wants to follow it and it works for them, so be it. To do this, Cork needs to reform it attutudes toward large development and investment projects. It needs to display its unique flair that always seems to be just beneath the surface and never on top – so come on, let it all out. If Cork focusses, the Gov get their act together and we keep thinking on the up – Cork will truly be able to boast about itself more so in the future, without a shadow of a doubt to contradict it. I believe in Cork, I believe in it’s future – so let’s encourage investment in – to do this, we have to create the right accommodative environment.

    • #733220
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I couldn’t have said it better myself Lexington.
      If we want to really make docklands work (and soon) shouldn’t we be thinking of setting up some sort of team to spearhead the campaign. Could be made up of CIty Management, Developers, existing landlords, International and local designers and planners… I know, i know, it could end up just as a talking shop, but at least we’d be talking about getting the job done right (and within all our lifetimes).

      On another topic, any sign of those images of the new Archive Building for Blackpool Lexington?

      Radioactiveman!!!

    • #733221
      theblimp
      Participant

      Lex, if the Tedcastles masterplan you’ve seen is the same as the one I’ve seen then I hope they adopt something else! From memory it looked like a Russian Social Housing project (think Victoria Mills ‘boxes’, but lots of ’em!) – besides would you really wish to leave alongside a power plant?

      I know the site quite well and strongly feel that this is the wrong location for housing. Commerce and/or leisure would be far more suitable, but then I’m not Mr. Tedcastles so what do I know?

    • #733222
      Torquemada
      Participant

      I see that plans are to be announced shortly for a second terminal at Dublin Airport.I wonder if the Dublin Airport Authority and Minister Cullen will have any problems there with cutting airbridges from their proposals?..I sincerely doubt it

    • #733223
      Pug
      Participant

      an impassioned and honestly raw opinion there Lex, and you are 100% right but its frustrating as hell to see what COULD be done as opposed to what WILL be done and more importantly, what bureaucracy is preventing. Local cutting edge newspaper The Echo is today stating that the €25m announced by CIE for development of Kent station now has no definite timeline (secret code for Cork aint getting it) and further on in the article says the €25m now depends on CIE’s profits from sale of the 17 acre site of Horgans Quay?? It seems to be that there will be some action on it by the end of the year and Joe Gavin is either very much in favour of getting the thing moving or is doing wonderful PR Spin.

      There is a long list of woes as to what Cork is missing out on. I argee that we have to get on and see the positives and do something about it but the only way politicians etc take notice is by endangering their votes and swaying public opinion. Get a website going to register peoples names and opinions, send it in to County Hall and more importantly, get it out to the media. A general election aint that far away. 😎

    • #733224
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I thought Archiseek.com was never coming back… ]*UPDATES*[/B]

      I have so many updates I can’t even remember most of them, but I’ll try!

      🙂 Kilquane Ltd (Howard Holdings) have been greenlit to erect the 12m quill-like sculpture along Lapps Quay, at the entrance to the Clarion Hotel element of their new City Quarter development.



      🙂 Isle of Man-based Quality Healthcare Ltd have been granted permission for the redevelopment of the former Shankiel Hospital as a new private healthcare facility.



      🙂 Tedcastles Ltd – owners of the 7-acre docklands site near Marina Point have revealed one of their masterplans for the prime docklands development area. Although the plan revealed is a majority residential – which will require rezoning from CCC – the plan includes a number of residential blocks ranging from 3 to 8 storeys in an extensive ‘woodland/park’ style setting. The project would include a number of own-housing units also, with an extensive commercial zone and educational facility (significantly reduced in this plan in response to UCC and CIT’s desire to develop an extended campus to the west of the city – but it’s early days yet). Tedcastles who have extensive property development activities in the USA – may seek to develop the site themselves. In all, an estimated 500 to 600 residenetial units may be provided. The project would have an approximate value in excess of 250m euros – if not more. But I must remind you that this plan is not scheduled for any clear application that I am aware of, and is only 1 of 3 plans already devised by the company. I will post images of this plan later.



      🙂 Hungarian national carrier, Malev, has announced that it will begin scheduled flights between Cork and Budapest this coming April.


      Various reductions and modifications including the removal of covered canpoy between the new multi-storey car-park and terminal building – but to name a few.



      With response to mickeydocs and Thomond Park – I love Cork, I’m very proud of my adopted home, but it does have a high-opinion of itself sometimes. That said, I believe the city has been unfairly and inappropriately treated by the Government and its agencies at large, it terms of funding, development etc etc. The treatment and attitudes of CIE (Horgan’s Quay, Bus Station, Eglinton Street etc) has been 2nd rate and quite frankly insulting. The DAA is pulling petty purse-strings regarding Cork Airport. Our road funding is among the lowest, given the population, traffic volumes and longest road network in the country. Where’s the School of Music??? The list goes on. Further, I believe the rest of the country couldn’t give 2 tosses about all that half the time either – but do you know what, the Cork market is strong (if a little tricky at times) and we have ability. Cork is great for whingeing – even Cork 2005 made a big issue of the ‘whinge’ nature of Cork culture – but Cork is even greater when it gets up of its arse and does something about a situation itself. The recent rivival of the city has been in the majority spurred by Cork based private investment (OCP, OFC, Frinailla, Howard Holdings, and the many other private investment groups) – and one must recognised input from outside the city and county. Cork must carve itself its own future – that doens’t mean letting up on broken Government promises (i.e. School of Music and Horgan’s Quay) – but it does mean a proactive approach to Cork’s own future. Why should we waste the energy dropping our jaws in horror everytime Dublin gets that new MNC HQ??? We should be out there competeing, now complaining. Now, the Gov have a responsibility to ensure a proper approach to the NSS – something it has been quite lacking – the country is becoming too centralised, and the Gov need to deliever on that. A counter-balance to Dublin is needed for the country’s sake, Dubliners incl’d. Cork offers the best opportunity (as a focus) to provide this – and in my opinion, is a wonderful location – it just needs the right tweaking. I have a lot of confidence in the city – so let’s get out there and bring the city into the light it deserves, The docklands offers such a gleaming opportunity to make Cork a highly attractive, and relatively more affordable, HQ and large business destination. In economics it’s always said that a company’s greatest asset can quite often be it’s distinction, so let’s ride with that – we don’t need to go a copycat route. If Dublin wants to follow it and it works for them, so be it. To do this, Cork needs to reform it attutudes toward large development and invsetment projects. It needs to display its unique flair that always seems to be just beneath the surface and never on top – so come on, let it all out. If Cork focusses, the Gov get their act together and we keep thinking on the up – Cork will truly be able to boast about itself more so, without a shadow of a doubt to contradict it. I believe in Cork, I believe in it’s future – so let’s encourage investment in – to do this, we have to create the right accommodative environment.

      Lexington, The best thing I have read in a long time, President Kennedy” not what Dublin can do for Cork, it’s what Cork can do for Cork.

      What about tax breaks for the docklands? Money makes the world go round, and things happen faster.

    • #733225
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Lexington, The best thing I have read in a long time, President Kennedy” not what Dublin can do for Cork, it’s what Cork can do for Cork.

      What about tax breaks for the docklands? Money makes the world go round, and things happen faster.

      Shrink2cork

    • #733226
      lexington
      Participant

      Thanks for your words – pity about mine! Damn grammatical errors! 😀



      @theblimp wrote:

      Lex, if the Tedcastles masterplan you’ve seen is the same as the one I’ve seen then I hope they adopt something else! From memory it looked like a Russian Social Housing project (think Victoria Mills ‘boxes’, but lots of ’em!) – besides would you really wish to leave alongside a power plant?

      Yeah, there’s a reason this is zoned Commercial/Office etc. Personally I know I wouldn’t like an apartment a stone’s throw away from a big brick like power station – and the ESB have no intentions of going anywhere for a long-time yet (at least that I’m aware of). But I remember you telling me about Tedcastles before – since then I’ve seen one other plan and now this. Although I like the greenspace, the residential units have a lot to be desired. Tedcastles have gone residential because, I assume, they’re playing what they would consider a safe, profit-maximizing card – but it just doesn’t sit right. In fairness to CCC, any approach by Tedcastles, is going to really put them between a rock and a hard place because they’re so anxious to see real movement in the docklands area and this represents one of the biggest solid moves so far, beyond Werdna’s Water Street and the activity around Lapps/Albert Quays (although Careys Tool Hire and IAWS are working on their own plans – commercial). Its a fabulous site spatially, and with a nice waterfront proximity – you’d think Tedcastles could put a little bit more imagination into such a large development. There’s much more scope and potential for commercial projects at this site in my opinion. Leave residential to the North Docklands (like Water Street and Horgan’s Quay – + this development could make Horgan’s Quay’s redevelopment even more questionable.)

      Here are a few images of the plan below – apologises for the quality, like I said before, I will invest in a new scanner – just as soon as I get over my fear of electronic stores (Electroshopophobia) – or alternatively, when I remember. ]1.[/B]
      Bird’s Eye view of the site – with CG Images marking out the development. Note ESB Marina Point to left (west). P.S. This is a big image – hence the thumbnail. Link to full images here -> http://img219.exs.cx/img219/6122/tcmp13xg.jpg

      2.
      West to East perspective, the rim of Pairc Ui Chaoimh can be seen in the background – office facilities can be seen in the foreground.



      UCC School of Pharmacy

      Long long ago, I promised an image of the new UCC School of Pharmacy (under advanced construction by Pierse Contracting) along College Road, designed by STW. Well, here’s a College Road perspective at long last. Notice the Bon Secours Hospital to the left (west).



      [quote-Pug]Local cutting edge newspaper The Echo is today stating that the €25m announced by CIE for development of Kent station now has no definite timeline (secret code for Cork aint getting it) and further on in the article says the €25m now depends on CIE’s profits from sale of the 17 acre site of Horgans Quay?? It seems to be that there will be some action on it by the end of the year and Joe Gavin is either very much in favour of getting the thing moving or is doing wonderful PR Spin.[/QUOTE]

      Yeah, so I hear, but can you really say you’re surprised? This is more of it. CIE announced, when John Lynch came to town, that an application would be lodged this Summer and work would be completed by 2007. Now CIE and the Government say there’s no funding available – well, not for Cork. The idea apparently is to use profits from Horgan’s Quay to fund the redevelopment of Kent Station – which Dr. Lynch says won’t get started until 2007 at the very least, and will take 3 years minimum to complete – so I’m figuring, come 2011 we may hear something about Kent getting new platform tiles, but let’s not get too optimistic!

      I wish we had a bi-election too – but it would probably amount to another Midelton Line promise – all bubble no squeak. Dept. of Transport say that funding is currently being reassessed for that project.

      It’s all a load of ___________! (fill in the blank – and make sure to use your imagination).

      But it’s true, you can be sure there won’t even be a single question mark over the DAA’s Terminal 2 airbridges.



      Regarding Tax Breaks for the Docklands in Cork -> trust me on this one, and you can take it I have a good insight on this one – the idea is fantasmagorical if anything. Even Joe Gavin seems to have tilted against the prospects I’m afraid. If it’s going to be done in Cork, it’s going to be all private and dirt & bones. Perhaps that may stand strategically, who knows?! But unless something dramatic happens (and M.I.R.A.C.L.E.S. do happen) – Cork’s Docklands won’t be seeing tax breaks in the immediate outlook.

    • #733227
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      On another topic, any sign of those images of the new Archive Building for Blackpool Lexington?

      I’ll be completely honest with you RM, I didn’t get a chance all week to meet with Des, but when I do I’ll let you know. Keep in mind, they may not have images available I can post, but I will at the very least outline the design best I can. I’m not forgetting, but don’t hold your breath – life’s a little hectic at the moment! :rolleyes:

    • #733228
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Dublin competes against Frankfurt and London because of the tax free status enjoyed by the IFSC. Luxemburg is also a tax free destination. Do you see a pattern?

      If this tax free status was extended to other cities such as Cork and Galway I am quite certain that Dublin would have serious competition internally are several investment companies looking to move to Ireland but would prefer a location outside of Dublin.

      The location based tax breaks went from the IFSC in 2000, all tax free deals went in 2000 also so any company locating in Dublin pays the same rate of Corporation tax as any where else (except special tax areas such as Udaras areas)

      This has had two effects, firstly many IFSC companies downsized their operations and many others relocated, such as Deutsche Bank to Kilkenny and PPFC to Wexford. Those that stayed in Dublin were either lease bound to the IFSC or migrated to Dublin 2/4 or Central Park etc. The reason they stayed was because they couldn’t get very specialised acturial, regulatory services in Manchester or Lyon let alone another Irish City such as Cork or Belfast.

    • #733229
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A few more images of the tedcastles plan can be found in todays Inside Cork – a very decent newspaper actually!
      Thanks for the other thing Lex, I know you’ll do your best.

    • #733230
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      The location based tax breaks went from the IFSC in 2000, all tax free deals went in 2000 also so any company locating in Dublin pays the same rate of Corporation tax as any where else (except special tax areas such as Udaras areas)

      This has had two effects, firstly many IFSC companies downsized their operations and many others relocated, such as Deutsche Bank to Kilkenny and PPFC to Wexford. Those that stayed in Dublin were either lease bound to the IFSC or migrated to Dublin 2/4 or Central Park etc. The reason they stayed was because they couldn’t get very specialised acturial, regulatory services in Manchester or Lyon let alone another Irish City such as Cork or Belfast.

      Specialised services have very little to do with it. Telecommunications, vpn’s/wans mean that it doesn’t matter where you are.

    • #733231
      lexington
      Participant

      I’d an interesting post there earlier today, but as soon as I’d complete it and went to post it properly, the website seemed to freeze and I lost the text – by that stage, I had neither the time nor energy to re-type it, but it regarded the planning decisions due on a number of significant projects around Cork.



      :rolleyes: Pitwood Ltd, the Monaghan-based company, behind the proposed attractive 80,000sq ft, 5-storey over dual basement, 121-bedroom, 4-star hotel at the Corbett Bros. owned site at Beasely Street and Parnell Place – has had Further Information requested of it. A decision was due today. The hotel seeks to tastefully incorporated the protected facades at 17 & 18 Parnell Place as part of the development. The site badly needs to be redeveloped and the facades are in dire need of refurbishment as time is taking its toll on them in a bad way. The project, which incorporates a luxury underground spa and basement car-parking, is a solid one and I should sincerely hope it gets the greenlight once Further Info has been received. Previous planning applications for the site have included a planned office development and some residential units – which was to be developed by Corbett Bros.

      – 🙂 meanwhile, Corbett Bros. have been granted an extension onto their 60,000sq ft office development and 38 unit residential development at Copley Street – currently under advanced construction by Coffey Construction, designed by PRC Architects. The extension, designed by James Leahy & Associates, will see additional ground floor commercial space, extended basement and 8-student accommodation units over 4-floors overhead.



      😮 Andrew O’Connor’s plans for the derelict warehouse at the southwest corner of the Wellington Road and York Street junction have been refused. The developer sought to develop 24 apartments/duplexes and some office facilities around a landscaped courtyard in a building between 3 to 6 storeys high, which would be spread over a basement car-park along the steeply inclined site. I believe that this site is in major need of redevelopment, but perhaps not in this incarnation. Still… Design was by MV Cullinan of Dublin.



      A number of developments are due planning decisions in the coming days – among them…

      – John Sisk & Sons Ltd’s 101-room, 6-storey hotel and conference facility on their site, adjacent their Cork HQ, along the Airport Road.

      – Ellesmere Properties (Howard Holdings) 7-storey, 125-bedroom hotel and retail development along Lavitts Quay, designed by RORSA. Although I suspect that this will have Further Information requested of it.

      – Charles & Helen McCarthy’s truly horrid 7-storey, 64-bedroom hotel for Crosses Green, designed by Derek Tynan & Associates. This project is undoubtedly the single WORST project planned for Cork in many years. For all the concern about OCP’s Jurys redevelopment harming St. Fin Barre’s views, there should have been more focus on this abomination. I do not believe height is an issue, frankly, if the 7-storeys were well designed it would be no problem, but this project is nothing more than a 7-storey black wall – nothing more. No distinguishing features, curves, glass features – nothing! Approaching Crosses Green and St. Fin Barre’s east to west along Sullivans Quay and South Gate Bridge, one is greeted with a towering black blank wall sticking out like a sore thumb in a predominantly low-rise area. It looks like Victoria Mills only black and uglier. I should hope that this project is refused in its current form, although I encourage redevelopment of this area of Crosses Green. However, I would be a lot more confident of refusal, did I not have awareness of the staff graffiti along the walls of Navigation House, which crudely spray-painted letters spell “Cork City Council + Derek Tynan 4 eva!” 😉 Anyway, decision date is scheduled for the 23rd Feb 2005 – I should expect either Further Info, or perhaps refusal??? Please?

      – Eglinton Street’s decision is due 25th Feb 2005 – this is the big one! And perhaps the most important for Cork and OFC in the long-run. Fingers most sincerely crossed!!!

    • #733232
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 McCarthy Developments, despite working on an extensive residential development project at Jacob’s Island near Mahon Point, have decided to extend their Harty’s Quay development across the estuary, with 2 new blocks applied for containing 25 apartments each (50 in total). McCarthy Developments have put this down to the demand generated by Hartys Quay’s existing units and those currently under construction – by Ridge Developments.



      So, now that Mahon Point is up and running (a few more units set to open in the coming weeks) – what of Cork’s other big retail development? That at O’Flynn Construction’s Ballincollig Town Centre, opening for October 2005, which will provide a futher 230,000sq ft of retail environment – what and more importantly, who, can we expect to see here? Well the tenant list is vigorously guarded, and I have been asked not to name a few tenants – but I can tell you that so far, the mix of tenants is looking pretty okay…

      Dunnes Stores will anchor 2 units, food and clothing, encompassing an area total of 60,000sq ft. Easons will house a sizeable store, with mezzanine cafe; Sasha are said to be assessing a unit also. However, all the interesting names remain under wraps. Negotiations have, however, been engaged with NoName, Cummins Sports, Bagel Bar, Dublin-chain Hickeys Pharmacy and others – however, none of the aforementioned have been confirmed. I will be able to provide a better list in the coming months.



      I can tell you however, that a number of names have already signed on for the yet to be launched Academy Street development by OCP. Gasoline, with stores in Mahon Point and Merchants Quay, already have their name seeking for a place at the new development [with a view to relocating their MQ store to a larger unit at this facility]; Zara, Massi Dutti, Esprit, Tommy Hilfiger, Sisley, La Senza, TopShop/TopMan, Selfridges and many more are all on the names which will likely seek a footing at the centre. I’ll be sussing out more names – however, Gasoline and Zara have been confirmed by their respective management as ‘actively seeking’.

      – also, Marks & Spencers may seek discussions about a possible store at an extended Mahon Point, as part of an overall expansion plan for Ireland (M&S will take over operations of Roches Stores food divisions in Galway and Blackrock, Dublin as part of this plan).

    • #733233
      satanta99
      Participant

      Its good to hear mention of some familar names. I was questioning the viability of the centre if it did not attract any reputable tenants. What the town needs are strong anchors to ensure the success of this development. This is the development which excites me most in the area at the moment. I live in the town so i am probably biased, but its an interesting oportunity to create an urban environment in a suburban setting. I can’t wait to actually see if it is a success and if the new streets and town centre, in conjunction with the shopping centre will turn the town into a vibrant centre for commerce and leisure.

    • #733234
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      any word from O’flynns ahead of the decision… are they prepared for delays?

    • #733235
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      any word from O’flynns ahead of the decision… are they prepared for delays?

      Nervously optimistic – I think that best describes the outlook. They have a good idea of how it’s going to go, after all they did conduct extensive pre-planning talks with the City Council. Nonetheless, planner Evelyn Mitchell, could go either way on this one – I’m not sure exactly how it will go down myself. OFC are preparing already to appeal (given their own assumptions of what could be expected) – but nonetheless, a certain director says they’ll remain optimistic until they have official confirmation.

      This is the one project I feel could go either way, to be honest, I’m nervous myself – I just hope it gets the greenlight.



      Also, Howard Holdings are expecting a decision tomorrow on their Lavitts Quay hotel development – it may go to Further Info, but Michael Lynch (the planner involved) since he’s joined Navigation House, has shown a fairly ‘no messing’ policy based on his previous assessments of other projects. So far, they seem fair, but we’ll see. Tomorrow will be a big test.

      I’m awaiting a call from John Sisk & Sons Ltd regarding their 6-storey, 93-bedroom hotel and conference development along the Airport Road – which was due on Saturday. No word yet though. I’ll let you know when I do.

    • #733236
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Brown Thomas – Cork

      I was in Brown Thomas for the first time in several months recently and noticed that the store looks really worn out. I assume it’s about to get a minor “facelift” in the next few months?

      It seemed to be suffering from the ravages of very very heavy after – christmas sales.

    • #733237
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Lex,
      I hope Eglinton st. gets the green light this week. I notice there are a lot of submissions in. Notable from Irish aviation authority and An TAisce. I presume they were cribbing about the height? DO you know what was the overall tone of the submissions? I presume it was the height that brought out most of the moaners.
      Fingers crossed for Friday……

    • #733238
      lexington
      Participant

      Overshadowing, out of character and height were issues raised – although the IAA were exactly objecting, rather making an observation. If any building poses an issue for approaching aircraft, surely it would be County Hall as it is right on Runway 17-35 flightpath.

      People are cribbing about its scale – and its isolated nature, but the fact is, besides all that ‘Cork needs a confident statement’ lark (and there is something to be said for that too), every tall building proposed is going to be isolated if none other is given the go ahead! You have to start somewhere. Water Street (due for a new application in the coming weeks) and Eglinton Street have got the right ideas – tall buildings focussed on the docklands where they can be accommodated, protecting the city centre (as is), and maybe helping alleviate urban sprawl pressures. Furthermore, property prices in the area have risen so dramatically in anticipation of the docklands redevelopment, for issues of commercial viability, a little height is needed as an incentive and encouragement for future docklands development. The trick is to maintain the quality of design and location. So far, Cork has got lucky with Water Street and Eglinton Street, but in order to promote this standard, we need to show encouragement – I really hope the planning decision works out well for OFC.



      *UPDATES*

      😎 As predicted, Howard Holdings have been requested Further Info regarding their Lavitts Quay hotel and retail development.



      😎 Charles & Helen’s McCarthy’s godforesaken Crosses Green hotel development has seen its due date extended by CCC until the 20th of May 2005 – just 3 days after the supposed decision date for ABP’s Jurys redevelopment by OCP. Hmmmm.

    • #733239
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Cork and Dublin should really get over themselves when it comes to “high rise” when it’s done well it can look absolutely spectacular.

      Have a look at something like the John Hancock tower in Boston from Copley Plaza.. old city scape and a huge glass tower looking really well together.

    • #733240
      lexington
      Participant

      I’m surprised at how little attention this project has received, but the new Mardyke Pedestrian Bridge has been set in place over the w/e by Fleming Construction. The 1m euro bridge spans the northern River Lee channel between the Mardyke and the Distillery Fields (which leads out onto North Mall) at it’s eastern end. The bridge is far more dynamic looking than the much hyped Shadon Bridge further down the river, and in my opinion, rather attractive. I’ll try and get pictures up soon.



      One of the biggest and most important planning decisions of the year is due this Friday, the 25th of February 2005. O’Flynn Construction’s 60m euro + Eglinton Street development of 217 generous residential units, 550 underground parking spaces over dual basement, a 17-storey 70m landmark tower, offices, retail, a new street, amenity area and landscaping. Designed by Frank O’Mahony of Wilson Architecture. The project has been through Further Information (although clarification issues may yet be requested!) and if granted this Friday, will represent a new beginning for Cork and its docklands rejuvenation. The 1.5acre former An Post site was sold to OFC for 15m euros in early 2004. Not only does the project inject another vital boost of confidence in the docklands, but Cork as a whole, leading a new standard and level of development within the city – and providing a new landmark mirroring Cork’s confidence in itself for the future. Fingers tightly crossed – if the greenlight flashes, this could well represent a new and enlightened approach of city planners. Let’s just hope.

    • #733241
      planningdept
      Participant

      Could someone please provide me with a few names and no’s of persons / companies doing 3D / Visaul impact assessments . Thanks

    • #733242
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Property-owner J. Daly has applied for the development of 16 apartments over retail area at 96 – 98 Lower Glanmire Road – adjacent to Kent Station. The proposal represents one of many recent development proposals for this area – predominantly apartment schemes. Another prominent development being that proposed by the Kilbree Investment Company, which is currently in appeal for a 4-storey, 22-unit apartment development over ground-floor car-parking.



      🙁 Paul Montgomery, developer behind Victoria Mills Student Accommodation and owner of the Reardens complex on Washington Street, has sought permission to operate the large, 9-storey student development on a short-term letting basis outside the academic year and beyond holiday accommodation. If you know, I’ll say no more. 😉



      🙂 Kilquane Ltd (Howard Holdings) have been greenlit for the installation of a glass lift from Lapps Quay into the basement car-park and provision of the mooring pontoon leading off the 2.5m (width) boardwalk alongside it’s new City Quarter development. The 12.6m scultpture recently permitted is due to be erected within the coming 2 and half weeks.



      🙂 The Country Club Inn in Montenotte and Imperial Hotel on South Mall have also been greenlit for substantial expansion and redevelopments.



      😮 I’m told the decision on the important Eglinton Street development by O’Flynn Construction may possibly be released tomorrow, 1 day ahead of schedule – this is just an internal word of mouth. However, planners may yet hang on until the set date and I wouldn’t be surprised if they do. I won’t get too expectant just yet. MAJOR FINGERS CROSSED!


    • #733243
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’ve attached a recent picture of the Mardyke pedestrian bridge (hopefully we’ll get a better name than that) under construction at the Mardyke. As has been pointed out, it will link Dyke Parade (at a point directly opposite the main UCC Gates) to Distillery Field.
      The Distilery Field site has recently been purchased from Irish Distillers by UCC and Mercy Hospital. I believe a master plan is in preperation for the area. This is the most important expansion point for UCC at present. Mercy plan to use some of the site for parking.
      At the moment, the only complete department on site is Dept. Plant Science ( in a purpose built building). This follows the demolition (why, oh why were UCC allowed to get away with it????) of the Honan Biological building on campus. Parts of the Zoology dept, Pharmacy, and Phsicology are also temporarily based here.
      Work is planned on the listed cooperage building to make it suitable for the remainder of Zoology dept. who will vacate their space in the Lee Maltings building (beside Mercy). This space is being given over to NMRC (renamed The Tyndal Centre).
      This bridge looks fabulous and should inspire UCC/Mercy/CCC to develop the rest of Distillery Field to equally high standards. At the same time, the site does contain a number of important features architectural and environmental which should be protected.

      Radioactiveman!!!

    • #733244
      lexington
      Participant

      O’Flynn Construction’s highly anticipated Eglinton Street development has seen CCC request a Clarification on Further Information and project details – requested issued yesterday, OFC say they hope to clear up the issue within a few days and expect a decision soon after. The nail biter continues. 😮



      Thanks for the image of Mardyke Bridge RM! I was looking for a semi-decent one.



      Rest of my updates will be posted later – w/ news on Frinailla, THAT Portacabin on Patrick Street and other details.

    • #733245
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      In addition to my previous post:
      UCC today submitted plans for an’outreach building’ containing lecture theatre, cafe, exhibition space at Mardyke Gardens. This is to the south of the aforementioned Mardyke Bridge. Permission to demolish the existing farmhouse on the site has already been secured.
      I’ve seen no plans/images of the proposed building yet. This is a hugely impressive site and desrves something outstanding, at least on a par with the Glucksman.

      Radioactiveman!!!

    • #733246
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 If you remember back a few pages, I posted a report noting that Frinailla Developments had purchased the lands at Dennehy’s Cross (those of the 2-acre Dennehy’s Ford Garage facility), well, yesterday, both companies officially revealed this to be true.
      Although I am aware the Irish Examiner have indicated the deal is worth in and around 30m euros, I have been told it has worked out well below this figure, with Dennehy’s moving their dealership to new lands near the Ballincollig By-pass and withing easy distance of the new 500m euro Ballincollig Town Centre development by O’Flynn Construction. A move not dis-similar to J&P’s Mahon Point shift.
      As also reported, Frinailla will be planning a substantial apartment development at the Dennehy’s Cross location, with “family-sized” luxury apartments – picking up on a growing trend, as displayed by OFC’s Eglinton Street development – with 3-bedroom apartments reaching 1,900sq ft.
      An application is due to be lodged Summer 2005.

      – and on a related note, I also reported that the .22 acre site along the Wilton Road/Victoria Cross owned by Justin Canty, which was sold by Irish & European earlier this year with F.P.P. for 24 student apartments, was also purchased by Frinailla, well, my own fault but not far wrong, the site in question is the former plumbing supplies site directly across thr road. Frinailla reportedly have purchased this .4 acre site for just under 3m euros. In line with Frinailla development preferences, this site, is earmarked for residential usage also. This marks a substantial purchased and development trend by Frinailla in the area of late.
      The former Justin Canty site was purchased by Tim McNamara of Aras Developments, for 2m euro (via Global Properties), and is scheduled to be developed this April w/ completion due in and around Oct 2005. The ground floor medical units have already been sold or pre-let. Parking spaces as part of the development have been sold out at 35,000euros a-piece.

      I have a colour image of the latter development, but may have to post a black & white CGI as I can’t translate the colour image. Design, as previously mentioned, is by O’Shea Leader Design.



      🙁 John Sisk & Sons Ltd have seen their 6-storey, 94-bedroom hotel and conference facility, earmarked for the Kinsale/Airport Road (just east of the company’s Cork HQ), have its planning due date pushed by 6 MONTHS(!) by Cork County Council until the 18th of August 2005.



      😉 The highly desirable Esso Station site at Muskerry Service Station along the Western Road, between UCC and the new Jurys Redevelopment, has been issued a guide price of 1.65m for its 2 acres. The site has whopping development potential and is already receiving some MAJOR interest among Cork developers and businesses. CBRE Gunne are handling the sale.



      😀 And many and most of you will be delighted to hear that FINALLY, Bus Eireann, CCC and Cork Business Association have agreed to remove the Portacabin on Patrick’s Street currently serving as the Inspector’s/Information Station for local bus routes. A new purpose-built street kiosk in-keeping with the new street-scape is to be provided as a tasteful replacement. The location along Patrick’s Street has yet to be determined.



      🙂 Also, though it hasn’t been officiated yet, Ascon are to be main contractors with regard to the Kinsale Road Rounabout Flyover – construction is set to being in mid-March and will take 2 years to complete.

    • #733247
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Bring back the old ‘fireman’s rest’ bus kiosk!!!
      Where’s that gone by the way? anybody know?

    • #733248
      lexington
      Participant

      As reported, the 7-storey, 125-bedroom hotel and retail development proposed for 16, 17 and 18 Lavitts Quay by Howard Holdings (Ellesmere Properties Ltd) has seen Further Information requested by the CCC planner Michael Lynch.

      The details of the Further Information are, in summary, the following:

      1. The VIS submitted was considered insufficient – and did not provide adequate angles of persepctive regarding the proposed development. (I whole-heartedly agree).

      2. The VIS did not cater for revised design options incl. height reductions/alterations and mass issues.

      3. The design of the and massing (notably the 6th floor and roof borders) are inadequate in their current form.

      4. A detailled archeaological assessment regarding the site is requested.

      5. A revised design via Significant Further Information is requested – as the current development proposal is inadequate in its existing form.

      I would agree with the planners 100% on this one – the design is unacceptable. I should hope Howard Holdings and RORSA resubmit a more pleasingly designed project in the future – however, given the extent of the requests made of the developers, undoubtedly, it will be a few months at least until a revised scheme is submitted. Although I agree with the principle of the development, the design is exceptionally bland and downright ugly. (Though not as ugly as the Derek Tynan abomination at Crosses Green!!!)

    • #733249
      Pana01
      Participant

      >>>>And many and most of you will be delighted to hear that FINALLY, Bus Eireann, CCC and Cork Business Association have agreed to remove the Portacabin on Patrick’s Street currently serving as the Inspector’s/Information Station for local bus routes. A new purpose-built street kiosk in-keeping with the new street-scape is to be provided as a tasteful replacement. The location along Patrick’s Street has yet to be determined.<<<<

      Good Lord – why are taxis and that vile bus-hut allowed to dominate Patrick Street? The taxis were offloaded to Academy St but refused to stay there. The number of new taxi ranks on Pana is unreal, they are an eyesore and should be limited.

      As for the bus hut, wasn’t that due to be housed in the refurbished bus station? That means we still have to look at them boiling their plastic kettle in the middle of our state-of-the-art main street.

      Sorry for ranting, but they seem to have a divine right to Pana.

      On another note, the revamped Emmet Place – there is a ‘no parking at any time’ sign outside ‘Marble & Lemon’, but there is ALWAYS at least 2 cars there. Does anyone care?

      Lex, any potential timeframe for MP extension to include M&S? Thanks for your regular inputs, very informative.

    • #733250
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pana01 wrote:

      Lex, any potential timeframe for MP extension to include M&S? Thanks for your regular inputs, very informative.

      The MP extension won’t really get a move on til post-Academy Street development completion. I’m guessing 2009 – at least I’m told that. But if things are reasonably positive, there may be movement even sooner. Still it’s a little bit out in the distance yet.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 As predicted, another Choice Hotel – this time in the shape of a Comfort Inn is set to provide tenancy to Howard Holdings’ proposed 7-storey Lavitts Quay hotel, with 125 bedrooms. The proposal, currently in planning and designed by RORSA, has had Significant Further Information requested of it w/ a strong emphasis on design revisions. The deal is an extension of the relationship HH have established with Choice Hotels since their agreement concerning the Clarion Hotel at Howard Holdings’ City Quarter development on Lapps Quay.



      😮 If you remember a while back I posted information on a proposed 100m euro city centre private medical facility – well, it seems now that a more accurately revised cost is just in excess of 45m – 50m euros – this is due to certain facility revisions, but nonethelss, the development will continue to occupy a prime city centre location near the waterfront.



      🙂 McCarthy Developments Ltd have lodged another application regarding their Jacob’s Island development on the waterfront near Mahon Point. Only a week after lodging an application to raise 2 of their 4-storey apartment blocks by 2 additional storeys (an increase of 25 more units), the development company have now lodged to add a further 2-storeys to their 6-storey blocks, Block 5 & 6, bringing them to 8-storeys each. The revised buildings would be just short of the 9-storey block as part of O’Callaghan Propoerties Jurys Redevelopment and provide an extra 28-units.

      – McCarthy Developments also this week applied to develop 2 additional blocks at it’s nearby Harty’s Quay development, adding an extra 50 units of the large and highly successful waterfront apartments. McCD have cited their reasons as being the buoyant Cork market and high levels of demand.



      🙂 Interesting to note the article in yesterday’s Evening Echo concerning the donation of 285-acres of amenity land (adjacent to the Carrigrohane Straight) to Cork City by the MD of John A. Woods – to provide a Phoneix Park-esque facility (on the condition the NRA do not route their proposed 500m euro North Ring Motorway nearby the land). It’s a fabulous opportunity for the city – the question is, when do they get it? However, as the city grows, this land will become ever more precious and Cork’s lacks sufficient public green-space for a city of its size.

    • #733251
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 JD Hotels have begun construction of their 4-storey bar and restaurant development on Grand Parade – Loftus Demolition have clear the site near Singer’s Corner and demolished 1 – 7 Tobins Lane to make way for the sizeable development to follow. Design is by Wilson Architecture. Good to see the project get a move on.

      🙂 Also, after a brief lay-over, Bowen Construction have began preliminary construction work on the 5-storey Victoria Mills extension (Phase 2) on the site of the former Statoil Station at Victoria Cross. The development will provide another 31 student apartments and large retail unit at ground floor, over basement.

    • #733252
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Some quite interesting stuff in the pipeline then!

      Really glad ot see the end of that horrendous prefab thing on Patrick’s Street! What exactly does it do? Is it some sort of club house for bored CIE drivers?
      Surely they should provide these facilities at the bus station?

      Also regarding the taxi ranks: I don’t think they’re an eye sore they’re part of any urban street scape. It’d be nice to see an improvement in terms of the standards of taxis though. They should offer tax breaks for them to upgrade to standardised cars fit for public service. The current fleet are mostly quite OK cars, but they’re not designed to work as taxis. i.e. non-washable seats etc..

      And while on a bit of a rant about public transport. Isn’t it about time that Bus Eireann in the Cork City and commuter belt area is seperated off into an independent entity with its own identity? Ala Dublin Bus. I get the impression that Bus Eireann management doesn’t really understand what’s going on in Cork and sit in Bus Aras looking at 1950s maps of the city. The Cork bus system doesn’t hold a candle to the Dublin network yet given the size of Cork, the fact that it’s better planned and less sprawling and has a road infrastructure that actually works it amazes me that we don’t have an efficient and flexible bus system. E.g. try getting a bus to from Glamire, Middleton, Blarney, Carrigaline .. and then compare that journey to a Dublin area of equivilant size and location.. It’s like night and day! Also the complete lack of any form of Nitelink service is nuts. And we’ve no electronic ticketing, no easy to use monthly, weekly, daily tickets etc etc.. it all adds up to making the bus system user unfriendly.

      I know that’s slightly off-topic but I do consider public transport as an integral part of city planning and thus relevent to architecture.

    • #733253
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      To be honest, I’m sure u will all agree that CCC request for further information with regard to the Eglinton Street development is a joke. I really believe that because of their lack of ability to see a worthwhile project, it is costing Cork numerous development opportunities.

      Poor form on CCC 😡

    • #733254
      sw101
      Participant

      i’d rather they took an extra month to consider the project and requested clarity on certain issues than simply dismiss it out of hand.

    • #733255
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i think that between extensive pre-planning, the well-established status of the site in relation to Docklands Strategy, the CCC’s Development Brief, and the Further Information request, the Council have had plenty of time and opportunity to consider the application. It is not, in my opinion, very even-handed – there is something else going on here – I expect they will give a permission – but this type of approach by CCC to what is a high quality and strategic project which goes a long way to advancing Docklands aspirations is very unhelpful – and is being noted im sure by major developers curently looking at the city and who wonder whether the city’s reputation as ‘anti-development + politically-dominated in planning terms’ is true or not.

    • #733256
      lexington
      Participant

      As far as I am aware, the Further Info (2nd such Further Info) regarding Eglinton Street is just an issue of Clarification which Wilson Architecture are currently looking into and it shouldn’t hold back the application too much longer. But in line with sentiments already expressed, CCC have a genuinely terrible attitude toward investment in their city – it really is dominated by an ‘old boys’ network and politics. Now as I’ve said a million times, not ALL development is A+ grade, but CCC don’t seem to recognise such a grade when it comes their way. Granted, I would rather see Eglinton Street delayed another month and get full permission than see it refused – but the fact is, O’Flynn Construction (OFC) spent an EXTENSIVE amount of time in prelanning discussions with CCC Planners about the Eglinton Street site – they consider many options and at one point consulted with CIE about provide an integrated transport hub in line with City Development Plans. CIE rejected the approach. So OFC decided to go ahead and concentrate on developing the site as best they saw it – CCC knew well in advance of the application that the development was to be high-rise and even agreed to a height in principle (which was actually even higher than the 70m current proposal). CCC have really messed OFC about on this application – from requesting Further Info before submission closing dates, to accepting objections beyond closing dates, to Joe Gavin turning around half-way through the planning process and saying he has now changed his mind and would rather see a commercial development utilise the site and on and on – and now the current Further Info issue. To be honest with you – it’s not good form. CCC are itching to get the docklands moving – but when a proposal does come along they hymn and haw about it – it’s pathetic. And as mentioned above, other developers note such behaviour. Eglinton Street is a solid and high-quality development and I do believe Cork deserves such a project. Rumour has it IAWS are now revising their high-rise option for Kennedy Quay in light of CCC’s approach to OFC and Werdna (Water Street) – what will get, again, is another substandard underwhelming project because of petty and short-sighted ignorance.

      I sincerely hope OFC get an unequivocal greenlight for Eglinton Street – OFC deserve it, the docklands deserves a little inspiration, the ‘old boys’ need a wake up call and most important, Cork deserves it. I’ll let you know what happens as it does happen. Fingers crossed!

      Note that OCP only got the greenlight for Jurys after CCC knocked another 20 apartments off the development in addition to the 30 OCP obliged to reduce during planning. Then CCC claim that they can’t be criticised for not greenlighting major development projects – ridicuolous! The project that was proposed had 50 more apartments and a couple of more floors – what we were given was a half-assed result. The architectural standard and layout of the project was significantly reduced as a result. Grow up CCC! I also hope OCP find some juctice with ABP.

      On that note… it is worth noting that today (Mon 28th Feb 2005) sees the final day of operation for the existing Jurys Cork Hotel along the Western Road. The hotel won’t be open until late Summer 2005 again in it’s new incarnation – which, unfortunately (thanks to some small-minded people) is still pending with ABP. May 17th 2005 = due date (all though the application has been given ‘PRIORITY STATUS’.



      On the note of planning, it’s interesting to note that 70% of all planner Noel Riordan’s application (northside) in the past 2 months have been refused – I agree with some decisions indeed, but a figure that high should be looked at.


      🙁 😮 PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd removed their final tower crane from over Howard Holdings’ 100m euro City Quarter development along Lapps Quay. The project consisted of developing a 200-bedroom 7-storey Clarion Hotel and Leisure Centre, 265 space basement car-parking facility over 2 levels, retail and cafe units, a new pedestrianised quayside with boardwalk, pontoon and docking area, 80,000sq ft of office space (now fully let and/or sold) + the new Irish Examiner/Evening Echo HQ over 2 floors and a 12.9m quayside sculpture.

    • #733257
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I hear Frinailla have submitted further info. for their Lady’s Well/Watercourse Road development. Anybody know what the further info. contains?
      Also, LEX, any news on those pics/discription of the new Archive building in Blackpool?


      The new Mardyke Bridge is being lowered into place today (Monday).

    • #733258
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Yes indeed!!! Werdna Ltd today submitted a fresh new application for their highly anticipated Water Street development! After months of revisions by Murray O’Laoire, who withdrew the original planning application last year – due to disagreement with CCC about density issues, the McMahon Building Supplies Group development wing have re-applied with a new application which this time they hope will do the trick! Excellent news. You heard it here before anywhere else!

      May I usher a quiet – woohoo! 😀

      Planning is due the 24/04/2005.

      If CCC cock this one up – I’ll be down to Navigation House with a pitch-fork! 😉

    • #733259
      mickeydocs
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😀 Yes indeed!!! Werdna Ltd today submitted a fresh new application for their highly anticipated Water Street development! After months of revisions by Murray O’Laoire, who withdrew the original planning application last year – due to disagreement with CCC about density issues, the McMahon Building Supplies Group development wing have re-applied with a new application which this time they hope will do the trick! Excellent news. You heard it here before anywhere else!

      I’ll have all the details of the new development tomorrow – or later on this week, depending on word from Werdna and MOLA.

      May I usher a quiet – woohoo! 😀

      Planning is due the 24/04/2005.

      If CCC cock this one up – I’ll be down to Navigation House with a pitch-fork! ]

      you won’t be alone 🙂

    • #733260
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 McCarthy Developments Ltd have been very active in Cork lately, with over 60 apartment additions to their Jacobs Island waterfront development, 50 new apartments in 2 blocks at their Hartys Quay development and now, today, they have announced the development of a brand-new 8-storey, 120,000sq ft office building over 221 space basement car park on the site of their recently purchased former Goldcrop premises (which they purchased for approx. 2m euros – see prev. reports) along the Centre Park Road in the centre of the southern docklands. Design is by Murray O’Laoire. (I’ve received word from inside the OPW that McCarthy Developments have been having ‘active’ discussions regarding the provision of a possible new premises for the Revenue Commissioners – hmmm, but they are only 1 in a number of other serious contenders). The new development will be located beside the development company’s HQ in Centre Park House. The large development comes only a day after Werdna Ltd submitted a new application for their Water Street development on the Northern Docklands. CCC must have been foaming at the mouth with the news of these 2 developments adding a huge boost to the regeneration of the docklands – and I’m told, that’s not the only big news we can expect to hear regarding the docklands – more good news is on the way.



      😀 As promised, here are the details of the revised Water Street development proposed by Werdna Ltd, as previously reported, the scheme has been reduced in some areas to rectify CCC density concerns.

      The new Murray O’Laoire designed project will include the following:

      The construction of a new residential & comm devt comprising of 33042m2 of devt incl the provision of 304 apts in bldg ranging from 3-17 storeys in height;the provision of ground floor comm/retail space of 380m2;reuse & incorporation of an existing office bldg of 242m2(former Port of Cork Offices) into the proposed devt;provision of a creche;conversion of the former Port of Cork workshop adjoining Lower Glanmire Rd to a Business Centre;provision of gate lodge adj to Water St;devt of a quayside amenity area;refurbishment of existing patent slip & its incorporation into proposed landscaped plaza;provision of landscaped gardens & assoc. landscaping of public areas;provision of internal rds & footpaths;ancillary site devt works;formation of replacement vehicular access off Water St; waste management provisions; basement car parking of 12,117m2 in 2 separate basement car parks providing a total of 404 car parking spaces;provision of 17 surface car parking spaces.

      It’s a great week so far for the Cork city docklands – let’s keep those fingers crossed! 🙂

    • #733261
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      With regard to Ascon being apparently awarded the tender for the Kinsale Road Roundabout, that was known well before Christmas. Apparently Gama were shocked at this revelation, which I’m not suprised to hear, cos their tender was apparently meant to have been quite low??? Could be wrong though. But I’m sure you would all agree that Gama did a FANTASTIC job of the Ballincollig Bypass and completed it well ahead of schedule. So I wonder, why weren’t they awarded the tender, since they are fantastic are constructing bridges, they have the equipment required to construct the bridge from the Ballincollig Bypass, and their labour is quite cheap.
      Also, when are the works starting on the roundabout??
      Was also wondering, does any1 have any progress photos of Ballincollig Town Centre to hand?? :rolleyes:

    • #733262
      Pug
      Participant

      Lex, just to clarify re the ESSO stations for sale, the one in Douglas called Dunmahon is definetely for sale with CRBE Gunne, i sawa the signs up this morning

      rock on the docklands news, fingers and toes crossed for the O Flynns tower now, and whatever further good news you’re hinting at

    • #733263
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lexington, regarding the Water St dev – visually, is it merely a slimmed down version of the original proposal?

    • #733264
      lexington
      Participant

      The revised proposal isn’t far removed from the original – I’ve only seen drawings (2 months old), I am awaiting a copy of the EIS (with attached VIS) for later this week, early next week. But if I get images sooner, I’ll post them. From my understanding, a number of aspects have since been adjusted – I was only kept updated on the statistics of the project since I first saw those drawings – so I am myself interested to see how exactly the end product now looks.

      The tower element has been reduced by 2 floors (for issues of ‘balance’) but it’s height has not altered much (58m), it has more to do with a reduction in apartment numbers which have in total been cut by 96 units (satisfying density qualms by CCC), the wing elements either side are reduced in height on some elevations as a comparison to the original – and more emphasis has been placed on public space – a more detailled internal road system has also been adopted. Some general design changes have been made but I don’t want to jump the gun and try to detail the specifics based on my standing knowledge – I’ll wait for the VIS and let you see for yourself when I can.

    • #733265
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As reported earlier, Cork’s newest landmark- the pedestrian bridge at the Mardyke was slotted into place on Monday evening. I’ve attached a picture. Many more images of the bridge can be found at http://www.environmentireland.com


      With regard to the Water Street development: It looks identical to the original which frankly I could take our leave. It just doesnt grab me.

    • #733266
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

    • #733267
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 I received a call today outlining the Further Information request regarding Eglinton Street – as it also happens, the Irish Examiner also had an article based on similar information.

      The exaggerated headline in the Irish Examiner read; “Council rejects tower!” a mild overstatement… :rolleyes:

      Originally I was told that the issue was somewhat rectifiable – that was the opinion of CCC. However O’Flynn Construction (OFC) would not be in agreeance. The second Further Info request is now seeking to reduce basement car-parking from 553 spaces to about 127 (1.5:1 to .53:1) – which quite frankly is utterly ridiculous. Planner Evelyn Mitchell states the parking numbers are in contravene to the City Development Plan – that’s not entirely true. Also, a worry was expressed about teh scale of the development (not including the tower element which seems to have escaped so far the brunt of any disagreement). Michael O’Flynn is now seeking a meeting with Joe Gavin (City Manager) to rectify the situation – he is understandbly upset. OFC spent the good part of a year working with CCC Planners on the details of the project – everything was discussed from the height, scalem density and parking – all issues, after strenuous negotiation were agreed upon – and now, CCC seem to be taking a bit of a U-turn. The City Development Plan seeks to limit the number of short-term parking numbers in the city centre by use of car-parks (multi-storey and basement) with the CCA (Core Commercial Area) of which Eglinton Street is a part. However, the majority of occupancy in the development will be long-term residency parking – OFC note the importance of saleability (and thus viability) such provision allows. Furthermore, because the area around the former An Post site is heavily trafficked and the development also proposes retail and office uses – short-term parking is almost impossible in the immediate surrounding areas, plus, any such parking there available would prove a potential safety hazard given the lack of pedestrian provision and intensity of traffic flows in the area. By incorporating the parking facility within the development, OFC are providing a ‘safety island’ in which shoppers, gym go-ers and office employees can safely avail of the facilities. Parking provision is further being made for employees of nearby No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay which has no existing parking allowance, unlike nearby City Quarter. Eglinton Street is falling in-line with CCC Development Policy in make a quantity of such provision available to service the nearby developments. Also, the retail facilities included in the Eglinton Street development are being earmarked for heavy bulky retail goods – at CCCs request, which is anxious to see such retailling moved from the city centre (and heavy goods vehicles by extension) to areas such as Eglinton Street which does not penetrate the city centre retail area and facilitates traffic well. The parking is essential for consumer welfare in loading and offloading such bulky goods (e.g. furniture) – as well as allowing for proper servicing of such facilities. CCC don’t seem to be understanding the issues here clearly – and are completely ignoring the passing-trade element of the project in retail and offices which is specified as the required ground-floor use in new developments within the CCA – that’s stated by CCC in their Development Plan 2004 itself! By disbanding such facilities to compensate for reduced parking and development scale, OFC would then in fact be conflicting with Development Plan guidelines. Can anyone see the problem here??? It’s absurd planning on behalf of CCC – they are holding back a decent project which will dramatically help further the aesthetics, economy and development of Cork into a modern, confident city.

      I really hope OFC are vindicated on this one (they’ve been treated poorly and carelessly since the get-go on this one) – but then again, they’re meeting with Joe Gavin – the man who decided half-way through he’d rather an office development on the site. Not good enough CCC.

      I really don’t think planners are aware of the brilliant opportunity their messing about with here. This may be a first-party ABP job here – that is if OFC don’t withdraw the application fearing a negative outcome and/or list of conditions. I hope City Manager talks resolve this a.s.a.p.

      IF and hopefully WHEN the project does get the go-ahead, the development will be constructed in 2 phases (after initial phase basement preparations) with 2 very tall tower cranes erected on site – the tower and western elevation will be completed first, and soon after, the southern and eastern phases will be later complete. The more I assess this project, the more impressed I am with it.



      And furthermore, CCC are now up in arms about the lack of a Skateboard Park being provided for Cork’s many young skaterboarding fanatics. In fairness to Joe Gavin, he did his best on this one – a park was earmarked for Kennedy Park but subsequently shot-down by an almost 2 to 1 vote by city councillors against such a project. Now, the very same people are fuming and complaining that there is no park in place!!! The ineptitude of Cork City Council grows ever frustrating! 😡

    • #733268
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lex, who does the PR for CCC? All this talk about Cork pulling it’s socks up and renewing etc has created a sentiment that things have changed within the planners office. Certainly at management level. But it seems that more and more NOTHING HAS CHANGED. I hope I’m wrong, but I’m starting to get the impression that the Cork of 2015 will strongly resemble the Cork of 1995.

    • #733269
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Lex, who does the PR for CCC? All this talk about Cork pulling it’s socks up and renewing etc has created a sentiment that things have changed within the planners office. Certainly at management level. But it seems that more and more NOTHING HAS CHANGED. I hope I’m wrong, but I’m starting to get the impression that the Cork of 2015 will strongly resemble the Cork of 1995.

      I don’t know who steers the PR for CCC. Cork has made substantial development progress – and for a while, it really did seem as though the Planners had made such progress too. Joe Gavin, when he first came, in conjunction with Ronnie McDowell (Senior Planner), seemed to help bring a breath of fresh air to the city’s development scene – but now things have seemed to slip back into the ‘old ways’ yet again. The exception to all this seems so far to be that of new planner Michael Lynch who has in his short-time made some very forward thinking and fair planning decisions – I hope he doesn’t get caught down in the new office. If CCC are going to fall back into old habits, then Cork’s bright future may be a lot harder to make shine. 🙁

    • #733270
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Personally, I think the Irish planning process is a complete joke. As a member of the public, I am generally left completely in the dark about these projects, their implications and the possibilities or problems they will create for the city.

      Surely city planning should be a very open and public process that engages the population with the development plan. It seems that these planners operate in isolation and impose decisions from upon high almost like some sort of Soviet style design bureau.

      As for the track record of planning departments. CCC’s planning department seem to have drastically held up development for no good reason while at the same time have granted permission to some hideous and totally inappropriate developments over the years.

      The whole process needs to be opened up and made much more public.

      Thanks to all the corruption in the Dublin area leading to the various tribunals our elected representatives seem to be largly shut out of the planning process or afraid to get involved too.

      New developments of this scale should be highly publicised, models put on display, articles published in the papers etc etc…

      It seems it only happens after the decisions are made.

    • #733271
      lexington
      Participant

      Unfortunately, I haven’t got the VIS of the revised Water Street scheme by Werdna Ltd, so I have here a press image giving a south-to-north perspective of the development across the Lee. The images here display pretty much the same as the drawings I attained a few months ago. The only difference however is the set-back of the development from the water-front by approx. 6 metres (north) and the tower has been shift east to alleviate over-shadowing concerns of Lower Glanmire Road residents. The layout is now a little more uneven – with blocks of 3 to 8/9 storeys now in the formation 1,2,3, Tower, 5 as oppose to the more balanced 1,2, Tower, 4, 5. The changes were made to ease LGR concerns. It’s a pity really because the symmetry was nice in the original – but there you have it, CCC making another cock-up and Cork being left with a less-superior project (though it’s still one of my favourite).

      Compare this to the original (below)

      There is less massing at the base of the tower, which gave the building a more even-handed quality look – and the tower was position to the west of the patented slipway. The revised tower looks ‘skinnier’ and seems to have less strength in its form. The dis-balance in layout is less pleasant also. A new riverside walkway replaces the much more pleasing boardwalk, which took greater advantage of the riverside, as proposed by the original.

    • #733272
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Must say Lexington, they both look as unimaginative as each other from those photomontages. Although in fairness it is always hard to tell what a development will look like from images like those. Any details on materials to be used etc etc?

      Thanks,

      Phil

    • #733273
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😡

      And furthermore, CCC are now up in arms about the lack of a Skateboard Park being provided for Cork’s many young skaterboarding fanatics. In fairness to Joe Gavin, he did his best on this one – a park was earmarked for Kennedy Park but subsequently shot-down by an almost 2 to 1 vote by city councillors against such a project. Now, the very same people are fuming and complaining that there is no park in place!!! The ineptitude of Cork City Council grows ever frustrating! 😡

      As i pointed out a few weeks ago, there is now no access to the Courthouse on Washington Street through the main doors (i.e. up the steps) this has left the steps useless and empty,. Hence, skateboarders have taken over and CC Councillors get their knickers in a twist. Open up those doors again and use the steps for what they were build for!
      I don’t want to sound like a grumpy old man…. but, it would be fine if the skateboarders just did a bit of skating, but they have covered the outer wall of the Crawford art Gallery in Graffiti and part of the Opera House Facade. Doesnt really get people on their side when it comes to building skate parks.

    • #733274
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      AIB have submitted plans to demolish their existing branch on Watercourse Road, Blackpool. They plan to construct a two storey bank building, move atm facility and provide staff car parking at the rear.
      At the same time, Frinailla ltd. have submitted further info. for their Lady’s Well development also on Watercourse Road, Blackpool. Haven’t seen this yet. Anybody got any info. on it?
      Close by., a number of large apartment/Office buildings are taking shape on the Blackpool Bypass. More are planned.
      Also, the new archive building is taking shape on Gt. William Obrien St., Still haven’t found a proper image of this 😡
      Looks like the old heart of Blackpool is finally being paid attention to. Too much focus has been placed on the “new town centre”, leaving the rest of the area to become run down. I notice Dundrum are also suffering from the “new town centre” syndrome this week :confused:
      It reminds me of the Simpson’s episode where Homer becomes sanitation officer and fills the town with illegally dumped rubbish. The City Council call a meeting and decide to use PLAN B. Whats plan B?? Pick up the town and move it a couple of miles down the road….. sound familiar?

    • #733275
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Also, the new archive building is taking shape on Gt. William Obrien St., Still haven’t found a proper image of this 😡

      Better late than never getting back to you on this one – but I genuinely have been keeping pretty busy of late. After meeting and viewing the designs for the Archives Building (which, on a point of interest, way back when, was originally proposed for a redeveloped R&H Hall along Kennedy Quay) – the City Architects office didn’t have any compatible image format to post online and the drawings were too big to scan – but the building itself is only so-so. Neither stunning nor bland – nonetheless, it will add to Great William O’Brien Street in some capacity. C.A. is getting onto imaging about e-mailling me out a compressed .jpeg for the forum – so sorry about the wait, but I can’t get it to viewing any sooner than the speed at which they can deliver the image. I haven’t been down to see the building yet myself – but I’m told it’s at a ‘progressive stage’ in its construction so it may be worth popping down that region for a look yourself. But I wasn’t forgetting RM. 😮

    • #733276
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Well done Lexington kep up the good work 🙂

    • #733277
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      I really don’t think planners are aware of the brilliant opportunity their messing about with here. This may be a first-party ABP job here – that is if OFC don’t withdraw the application fearing a negative outcome and/or list of conditions. I hope City Manager talks resolve this a.s.a.p.

      I doubt OFC will withdraw their application to be honest Lexington.. Especially since they’ve put so much time and effort into the whole project. Lets hope the city planners come to their senses. Every appartment needs at least one car space, not a half 😡

      I’d say if OFC aren’t successful with CCC, we could see them going to An Bord Pleanála.. Which would be a real pity and so time consuming.. Lets hope they do’t have to go down this road 🙂

    • #733278
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Is the “Water Street” development where the builders supply yard and Harbour Commissioners area used to be – i.e. across Water Street from Horgan’s Quay?

      Looking at a map of Cork Water Street has no quayside which is why I asked.

      I used to wonder about running the Cobh-Midleton line at grade with an LC across Water Street, through that area and along a slightly elevated line along the river bank, reclaiming land beyond the end of the quay where the pub is to make a smooth riverfront, through the Tivoli gardens and rejoining the Midleton line at a new Tivoli suburban station. This would have eliminated the need for the railway bridge on the Lower Glanmire at Water Street and the horrible skew bridge at Tivoli. Of course if I had that kind of power 😀 I would have removed McCormick McNaughton from opposite Silversprings and eliminated the bottleneck at the end of the Dual Carriageway, and extending the DC or used a tidal flow 2+1 system to terminate at Water Street.

    • #733279
      lexington
      Participant

      Today I received an EIS, VIS, Design Outline and Proposal Details in full regarding the revised Water Street development by Werdna, designed by Murray O’Laoire. I’ve read through the development thoroughly, besides the fact that the application is presented excellently – I have to say, though my first preference would be with the original application, this revised proposal is still really good stuff. Even assessing the VIS, one can see how valuably the development would contribute to the docklands and Cork city as a whole. Approaching the development from Dunkettle and along the Lower Glanmire Road, the development looks nothing short of eye-catching. I should sincerely hope the project gets the greenlight unequivocally.

      Unfortunately, for the time being, I have been asked that no VIS graphics be displayed on this forum. So this will be respected for the moment.



      @dowlingm wrote:

      Is the “Water Street” development where the builders supply yard and Harbour Commissioners area used to be – i.e. across Water Street from Horgan’s Quay?

      Indeed it is. The development will construct a public quayside amenity facility as part of the whole package.



      *UPDATES*

      😡 I can’t get my head around Cork City Council’s Planning Department lately – some of its decisions have been nothing short of utterly pathetic and disgraceful.

      Note the decision made today by CCC regarding O’Shea Builders Ltd plans to redevelop its former storage site on Farranlea Road near Victoria Cross. The development originally proposed the following:

      demolition of existng single storey workshop & adjoining store & construct a mixed res. development of 86 dwlngs comprising 28 1-bed apts, 44 2-bed apts, 6 3-bed penthouse apts, 6 3-bed duplexes & 2 4-bed duplexes & associated site development works. Blocks A,B & C located towards the northern side of the site to be linked bldgs 5 storeys high over a basement carpark & to contain 54 apts. Block D located on the western side of the site & to be a 4 storey high bldg over the basement carpark & contain 16 apts. Block E located on the eastern side of the site will be three storey high & contain 6 ground floor apts & 6 duplex apts over; Block F located on the n-western side of the site & to be a 3 storey high bldg containing 2 apts on the ground floor & 2 duplex apts over; a basement car park containing 80 spaces; surface parking for 33 cars,cycle store,2 bin stores,site road,paths & landscaping, a 2.4m high palisade fencing to part of the eastern boundary a new low masonry wall with railings. Designed by RKD McCarthy Lynch.

      Now, I accept the scale of the development – it pretty much falls in line with a number of recent surrounding projects in the area. I would have accepted certain adjustments indeed – but instead, CCC, after requesting Further Info and seeing a developer proposed reduction of approx 6 units to comply with CCC demands – CCC then decided to eliminate certain blocks and aspects of the development to reduced the development by a further 20 units. The project has been dramatically scaled back to the point of questionable viability – so say O’Sheas. An appeal will undoubtedly follow. These decisions were made despite 7 months of pre-planning negotations with planners.

      – another irritating CCC decision regards the Custom House Street elevation of the City Quarter office block on Lapps Quay by Howard Holdings and designed by STW. If anyone who looks up at the 2 upper ‘set-back’ floors can see, the stupid CCC imposed condition has mutated the building at the elevation into an uneven and imbalanced farse. And for what cause? Overshadowing? Where??? Excessive height? With respect to what??? The width of the street ensures a sizeable gap and vacancy between the development and Custom House. It’s a pointless alteration by a cocky planning department who don’t seem to know a good thing when they see it. But it’s stupid me ranting on in this mood – just take a look at the building for yourself at this elevation and cringe.

    • #733280
      lexington
      Participant

      Just by way of interest – here are a few names that have passed by Rockfell Investments Cornmarket Street Retail Development – only Habitat has been confirmed as is, but other names involved (though not certainties) are: Habitat, Dixons, H&M, Boots (they’re seeking a store similar in size to their Liffey Valley outlet for the city centre) & Esprit.

      Just interesting to note the type of tenants expected.

      Construction has been pushed back and is not set to begin now until mid-April.



      Something interesting things are scheduled to happen over the coming years on the Cork city centre retail scene, not least the many new retail developments – but even things like retail space availabilities, for example:

      Depending, if Boots successfully gain their space at the Cornmarket Street development, they intend to vacate their current Patrick’s Street premises near Mothercare – freeing up an attractive main street location for prospective retaillers.

      Also the Inditex stores of Zara, Pull&Bear, Bershka and Massi Dutti all have their names down for Academy Street with a preference for side-by-side units. Pull&Bear say however they still intend to keep their Roches Stores concession on Patrick’s Street.

      New Look also have their name in waiting for a unit at Academy Street – they’re seeking a city centre store to complement their 2 existing suburban stores at Wilton and Blackpool S.C.



      The prospect of a rejuvenation of Merchants Quay S.C. means the city centre is due for a windfall of prospective retail developments incl. Cornmarket Street, Academy Street and possibly Grand Parade (Capitol Cineplex, among others).



      🙂 McCarthy Developments Ltd will also be sponsoring and arranging the Cork 2005 Live in the Marquee concert ‘extravaganza’ at the Showgrounds – the development company, who is very aggressively upping the ante on it’s development initiatives in Cork (note their additions to Jacob’s Island, Harty’s Quay, Centre Park Road office development + at least 2 other pre-planning large-scale city developments), will in conjunction w/ Aiken Promotions bring the likes of artists like Christy Moore, Brian McFadden, Ronan Keating, Tommy Tiernan, Van Morrisson and others over a number of dates in July to Cork in a large, temporary marquee erected on the famed Munster Agricultural Showgrounds near the Docklands.

    • #733281
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Aldi Developments (Ireland) Ltd have been granted permission for the construction of a ‘town centre’ addition development near the WestPark Hotel in Ballincollig (just off Main Street). The development will see a former, and quite derelict, warehouse demolished and the construction of an Aldi Discount Foodstore, with 12 additional retail units, over head offices and a number of apartments – on what will be an extensively landscaped site adjoining O’Flynn Construction’s 500m euro Ballincollig Town Centre development.



      🙂 Great Southern Hotels Ltd have been granted permission for a 57-bedroom, 3 storey extension to their existing and highly popular Great Southern Hotel Cork Airport. The development is a vote of confidence for the rapidly expanding airport which will also see an additional hotel developed near the new terminal by Brooklyn Properties Ltd. This new hotel will house 137-bedrooms & 12 suites over basement car-park, a full conference centre, leisure centre with swimming pool, coack-parking and extensive landscaping. The project is currently in Further Information with Cork County Council.

    • #733282
      Pug
      Participant

      anyone know about the following:

      a) who is behind the development going on in douglas, opposite dailys shop, ridge developments are the builders

      b) there is a swathe of land in passage, opposite the car showrooms of jerry collins ( who has since moved back to enniskeane leaving the site available i imagine) – supposed to be a fair few houses going in on the land opposite these showrooms, any info?

    • #733283
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Interesting article in the Examiner today (7/3/05) about the land which Richard Wood has proposed to donate to Cork City Council at an unspecified date in the future.
      The land consists of 285 acres around the Carrigrohane road. The land could be used for “As many activities as possible that are consistent with the land’s character” according to Mr. Wood.
      However, if the NRA decides to put the North Ring Road through the site, the offer will be withdrawn.
      Interestingly, Mr. Wood said that he offered the land to the city because it would benefit City dwellers more than those in the county. Also, he is said to be unhappy with the way Cork COUNTY Council managed the Fota Hourse restoration project – a project which he led for many years.
      I think the NRA should know the importance of this offer before they make any decision on the new road. There are currently three routes to choose from and a decision is due in September.
      I doubt if the land itself would ever be rezoned due to its position as a green belt between City (Western suburbs) and County (Ballincollig). Neverthless, it is a hugely generous offer. There are a few more developers in Cork who could adopt a similarly civic minded attitude as Mr. Wood.

      RM

    • #733284
      lexington
      Participant

      It’s a nice deal indeed – but consider Mr. Woods land offer and the legal issue regarding Bula and his offer becomes a little bit more complicated. Nonetheless it would be a nice public amenity addition – I only hope it would be max’d to its full potential with increased tree cover, open green spaces (like Sheep’s Meadow in Central Park), water features, rentable horse treks etc etc. God knows the city needs green-space.



      Regarding the Northern Ring Road for Cork – I’ve good word that the favoured route would see the NRA utilise the existing dual-carriageway slip-road off the Ballincollig By-Pass to round-about near the Carrigrohane Straight – then head off north via Kerry Pike to Monard and off then to a point passed Glanmire linking up with a rejuvenated N8 – which will in turn link up with the Jack Lynch Tunnel and South Ring as it already does. But we’ll see.



      Pug – don’t know what location in Douglas you’re referring to. More detail???

    • #733285
      keeneye
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      anyone know about the following:

      a) who is behind the development going on in douglas, opposite dailys shop, ridge developments are the builders

      b) there is a swathe of land in passage, opposite the car showrooms of jerry collins ( who has since moved back to enniskeane leaving the site available i imagine) – supposed to be a fair few houses going in on the land opposite these showrooms, any info?

      Hey Pug, With regards to Developments ACROSS from the old “Dailys Shop” (Which is now the ” CENTRE ” shop) in Douglas village (near Douglas GAA Club for whomevers lost ) is owned by Mr Monte himself (Paul Montgomery of Reardens Bar). I’ve always loved that large house hidden away behind the ivy-grown large stone wall, if its the one i think youve mentioned. Thus , a while back i saw planning to develop it into apartments and was dissappointed.. 🙁 .. I did not see the plans/ drawings for it though ,so even though the dream little hideaway will be no more, i cannot say if its going to be GOOD or BAD. But im sure one or two of you may come back with nearby information. 🙂

      Regards…

    • #733286
      keeneye
      Participant

      Lexington,

      Do you know if there is any plans in the pipeline to “do up” the last untouched hugenot burial ground in Cork City ,on careys lane.. There was plans to develop on it but objections came in, in the hundred even from afar.. I heard that there is money set aside by the cork corporation to make it an tourist attraction but ..?? Monica Johns clothing shop currently owns it ( Located on French Church St. opposite) but can do ZERO with it because it is listed.. see some old photos from 1920s i think..

      http://www.askaboutireland.ie/show_narrative_page_by_place.do?page_id=2636

      http://www.askaboutireland.ie/show_narrative_page_by_place.do?page_id=2637

      🙂 You would think with Cork 2005 City of Culture, they might of used the money avaiable to make it an attraction..

    • #733287
      keeneye
      Participant

      has anyone got information & a copy of the plans/drawings for the train station/docklands area.. When is this development due to take place ?? I have the plans for the apartments been bult by Bride View Developments (where the old petrol station was) if any one would like a copy.. Seems to be tying in with the Siemans building with regards to Plate Glass as a visable feature.. Regards

    • #733288
      keeneye
      Participant

      Paul Montgomery development of 2 houses and 11 apartments…

      http://www.pleanala.ie/allnew130204.html

    • #733289
      anto
      Participant

      @keeneye wrote:

      Lexington,

      Do you know if there is any plans in the pipeline to “do up” the last untouched hugenot burial ground in Cork City ,on careys lane.. There was plans to develop on it but objections came in, in the hundred even from afar.. I heard that there is money set aside by the cork corporation to make it an tourist attraction but ..?? Monica Johns clothing shop currently owns it ( Located on French Church St. opposite) but can do ZERO with it because it is listed.. see some old photos from 1920s i think..

      http://www.askaboutireland.ie/show_narrative_page_by_place.do?page_id=2636

      http://www.askaboutireland.ie/show_narrative_page_by_place.do?page_id=2637

      🙂 You would think with Cork 2005 City of Culture, they might of used the money avaiable to make it an attraction..

      God, turning a grave yard into a tourist attraction doesn’t seem very dignified. Maybe you just have an awkward turn of phrase. The one in Dublin has been restored and I’m sure it’s an interesting place to visit esp. for people of huegenot descent. If it is to be restored can we not just do it because its the right thing to do and not because we need to commodify another part of our heritage. Rant over.

    • #733290
      lexington
      Participant

      @keeneye wrote:

      has anyone got information & a copy of the plans/drawings for the train station/docklands area.. When is this development due to take place ?? I have the plans for the apartments been bult by Bride View Developments (where the old petrol station was) if any one would like a copy.. Seems to be tying in with the Siemans building with regards to Plate Glass as a visable feature.. Regards

      Whoa! A lot of questions there – well, regarding the Horgan’s Quay docklands – the most movement we have seen on this front (the north docklands) has come from Werdna with the Water Street development which is currently in planning. However, CIE formed an agreement with Manor Park Homes way-back-when to develop a new residential and commercial quarter on the 17 available acres at Horgan’s Quay – based on plans devised by O’Mahony Pike Architects in Dublin. Commitments were made 7 years ago at this stage – but CIE have made failed promise after failed promise since. It’s disgraceful. Treasury Holdings were also brought on board at one stage, but their involvement is questionable at this stage thanks to CIE’s procrastination. 3 other Cork-based developers are rumoured to have been involved in some capacity at different stages – although one of those developers may no longer be as interested now that they recently acquired themselves a nice little docklands waterfront site east (cough cough). In addition to O’Mahony Pike, Wilson Architecture, 2 other Cork and 2 other Dublin firms were also involved in masterplans for the quay. If you look back through the thread you’ll see I posted a CG Image of one of these masterplans. Among the plans, 2 or 3 of these contained high-rise developments (one of which = had 3 buildings of 20, 25 and 20 storeys, in that order). The plans were to include as many as 5,000 new residential units over a commercial quarter, public plaza and redeveloped quayside with cafe stalls, boardwalks etc etc. The project wouuld be developed over 5 to 6 years. As part of the redevelopment, a new road infastructure and replensihed railway station were earmarked. Even though CIE Chairman John Lynch promised to redeveloped the train station this year, with completion due in 2007 at at a cost of 25m euro, note I said PROMISED, he has pulled out of this promise yet again. It is now said, CIE is not interested in developing Horgan’s Quay until after Kent Station has been redeveloped – but with no sign of that happening anytime soon – we could be waiting many years still. John Lynch recently said, believe it or not, “Cork is not a priority for CIE.” Well thats been made pretty clear.


      – BrideView who purchased the former Unity Petrol Station along the Lower Glanmire Road for 600,000euros are using the F.P.P. that came therewith to develop apartments over a commercial unit in a 4-storey building. The development company has recently applied to extend the penthouse apartment.

      – I like that Siemens building, developed by Jack Lynch – designed by Oppermann in Dublin.

    • #733291
      lisam
      Participant

      @keeneye wrote:

      Hey Pug, With regards to Developments ACROSS from the old “Dailys Shop” (Which is now the ” CENTRE ” shop) in Douglas village (near Douglas GAA Club for whomevers lost ) is owned by Mr Monte himself (Paul Montgomery of Reardens Bar). I’ve always loved that large house hidden away behind the ivy-grown large stone wall, if its the one i think youve mentioned. Thus , a while back i saw planning to develop it into apartments and was dissappointed.. 🙁 .. I did not see the plans/ drawings for it though ,so even though the dream little hideaway will be no more, i cannot say if its going to be GOOD or BAD. But im sure one or two of you may come back with nearby information. 🙂

      Regards…

      Have seen the plans for the Paul Montgomery Site in Douglas, Architects are CMG, Nothing special but nothing too garish either. (ie. His Victoria Mills Development )

    • #733292
      Pug
      Participant

      alright keeneye and lex

      cheers for the info re douglas

      any links you have to

      a) the drawings of the apartments in douglas
      b) the pictures ofr what the brideview apts by the siemens building

      would be appreciated
      cheers

      Be interesting to see if those apartments in douglas will add to the chaos that is the traffic situation there. Who designs these road systems?

    • #733293
      lisam
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      alright keeneye and lex

      cheers for the info re douglas

      any links you have to

      a) the drawings of the apartments in douglas
      b) the pictures ofr what the brideview apts by the siemens building

      would be appreciated
      cheers

      Be interesting to see if those apartments in douglas will add to the chaos that is the traffic situation there. Who designs these road systems?

      I dont think this little development will make much of a difference!!!

      Aa regards the traffic in Cork I think they just pick any old system and if it works fair enough and if it doesnt work they dont give a toss

    • #733294
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      Be interesting to see if those apartments in douglas will add to the chaos that is the traffic situation there. Who designs these road systems?

      Yeah I can’t see 11 apartments and 2 town-houses really adding to the Douglas traffic fiasco. The new Clayton Love developed 8-storey hotel may have more of a substantial impact. The proposed road as part of the 60m euro redeveloped Douglas Village S.C. by Canmount Investments (Clayton Love again) and designed by Wilson Architecture is a much need addition to traffic management in the suburb.


      – redeveloped Shopping Centre proposal for Douglas Village

      Clayton Love was holding back on this development to assess the impact of Mahon Point S.C. nearby – however, traders at Douglas Court S.C. are reporting that MP has had little effect on business, as the majority of trade is local in and around Douglas, Rochestown, Passage West, Grange and Donnybrook etc.

      Permission is in place for the redevelopment – perhaps this news will encourage Canmount to proceed with the shopping centre plans. However I am told that the hotel is for the time being, their priority, in Douglas.


    • #733295
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Wow, the images of Horgan’s Quay look great (understandably a bit vague, but it just shows the sheer opportunity there is on site!). I suppose some of us might even live to see something happen there 🙂
      The shopping centre in Douglas is very depressing. It reminds me of a fancy shoe box. Most of that structure appears to be carpark. Pretty soon all of Douglas will be either shopping centre or carpark attached to shopping centre. What an exciting prospect for the people of Douglas 🙁
      p.s. I think whoever did up those Horgan’s Quay images slightly overexaggerated the size of the Irish Navy 🙂

    • #733296
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Wow, the images of Horgan’s Quay look great (understandably a bit vague, but it just shows the sheer opportunity there is on site!). I suppose some of us might even live to see something happen there 🙂
      The shopping centre in Douglas is very depressing. It reminds me of a fancy shoe box. Most of that structure appears to be carpark. Pretty soon all of Douglas will be either shopping centre or carpark attached to shopping centre. What an exciting prospect for the people of Douglas 🙁
      p.s. I think whoever did up those Horgan’s Quay images slightly overexaggerated the size of the Irish Navy 🙂

      The picture was taken in 1996 during the Maritime Celebrations in Cork – most of the vessels in the image are foreign. God, Haulbowline wishes that was the Navy!!!

      This proposal was abandoned – it was forwarded by Wilson Architecture – and to be honest with you, in my opinion, is not particularly enticing. More can be done – the other proposals designed are a bit more interesting, a bit more risque is some cases. From what I have seen of those however, I still think an opportunity like Horgan’s Quay should be maximised to the full, let imagination and innovation run wild(!), the proposals produced do not do this.

    • #733297
      lexington
      Participant

      This is just an extract of an e-mail I was sent by Sean Kearns, chief-architect with Murray O’Laoire, for the Water Street project.

      …the application was lodged on the 28th February and it is now reduced from 304 apartments from 400. the Tower has changed location from the west side to the east side of the plaza and is 18 stories high. The buidings have been set back from the neighbouring properties and stepped back to allow for greater dalight and sunlight penetration for these properties and the development itself. There is a signicant increase in public open space and the 10 m quayside promenade is provided without cantilevered sections over.

      We responded to all of the concerns raised by the planning Authority and ad(d)ressed them in turn resulting in a 25% reduction in the scheme.

      This however, does not mean that they will accept it now and we are sure that they are trying to find other impediments to granting permission as we speak.

      It’s that last comment that troubles me – no planner has been publicly assigned to the application yet. I believe it will probably be a toss-up between Evelyn Mitchell or Ronnie McDowell (if he decides to take on more applications again after his break from doing so). If CCC are foolish enough to botch this project up, they really should be taken outside and repeatedly trashed with a wet fish! One by one. :rolleyes:

    • #733298
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 1 month before the extended decision due date – Michael Hannigan of the Kino Art Cinema on Washington Street has been given the go-ahead to demolish the existing cinema and construct a 4-storey, 3 cinema and cafe development, designed by Dennehy Designs.

      The development is attractive in its design and will add significantly not only to Washington Street’s architecture, but also its culture. A positive step.

      See the design at http://www.ddesign.ie Under Projects, and 3rd selection under ‘Community’.

    • #733299
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone know who BCG architects are?
      Do they have a website address?

    • #733300
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Does anyone know who BCG architects are?
      Do they have a website address?

      Regarding the AIB Blackpool application? BCG = Building Consultancy Group – they of the Ballymun SC.

      Building Consultancy Group
      9F Eastgate Ave, Eastgate Business Park,
      Little Island, Co. Cork.
      Tel: 021 4524824 Fax: 021 4524824
      Email: info@buidingconsultancygroup.com

      Building Consultancy Group (BCG)
      No. 16 St. Stephen’s Green,
      Dublin 2
      Tel: 01703 8256
      Fax: 01 703 8083
      http://www.buildingconsultancygroup.com

    • #733301
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Yip, fraid so… i’m obsessed 🙂
      Any idea what it looks like?

      That web address appears to be wrong – no such site

    • #733302
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      CCC have applied a Compulsory Purchase Order to no.’s 67-68 Shandon Street. They’re the two buildings immediately to the right of O’Connors Bros. Funeral Home as you look from the Gate Cinema.
      They’re a complete eyesore and have been virtually derelict for many years.
      Rumour has it (although I wont name him here) that the buildings are owned by a controversial local politician and that it is a dispute with a leaseholder which is resulting in a lack of movement to refurbish the properties.
      This brings us to the issue of derelict buildings… god knows Cork has it’s fair share. More CPO’s should be used. If you’re not gonna tidy up your property it should be done for you!!
      As we’re on Shandon Street, next time you’re up there, take a look at the totally half-arsed job being done on the road surfaces/footpaths, etc. The company employed to do the job (again i dont think its fair to name them) must employ the worst stonemasons/builders in the city. The work is very very low grade. They’ve failed to reduce the number of manholes (i know thats a job for the service providers too); they’ve used very very cheap looking materials– look at the cheapo railings near Blarney st. The stone work is dreadful and the job has so many snags left to finish its embarasing.

      Radioactiveman!!

    • #733303
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John (Jack!) Hornibrook/Hornibrook Holdings 58-unit residential development over basement car-park and retail and restaurant units along Carrolls Quay and Camden Quay is coming to completion. The project was one of the first to get going in the rejuvenation of this area but has been snagged with numerous construction problems along the way. The project has been on site for near on 2 years w/ PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd as the main contractor. Deisgn is by J.E. Keating and Associates – also the firm behind East Douglas Village and Seanna Mhuilleann along the Blackpool By-pass (see post a few pages back for image). Here’s a look at the final design – it’s a whopper of an image so forgiveness please!



      😉 I’ve been told that the tenders received for the Doyle Family warehousing along Albert Quay (across the river from City Quarter and No.5 & 6 Lapps Quay – and adjacent to the Eglinton Street and WebWorks development) ranged from between 5 and 7.5m euros for approx. 14 offers. DTZ Sherry FitzGerald secretly have pretty much closed the deal – but it has not been made public or officiated yet. I am aware that Howard Holdings, O’Flynn Construction & apparently O’Brien & O’Flynn (oddly!) were among the initial bidders – however I haven’t managed to find out the final successful bidder. But I am looking into it. The development potential for this excellently located site is sky-high – although the chances are that it will go the office route in line with the rest of the area (which has become Cork’s most sought after office district).



      – it was interesting to see the Evening Echo led with the McCarthy Developments’ 100,000sq ft, 8-storey office development for Centre Park Road (as mentioned last week on this thread) – the article quotes Tom McCarthy apparently indicating the 25m euro MOLA designed project could create up to 1,000 jobs. I wonder.



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      CCC have applied a Compulsory Purchase Order to no.’s 67-68 Shandon Street. They’re the two buildings immediately to the right of O’Connors Bros. Funeral Home as you look from the Gate Cinema.

      Funny, they just came on the market with Christy’s sibling, Andy Moore handling joint sale. Agreed though, they’re an eyesore. That’s a problem with Cork, it has all these derelict buildings but 95% of them are all protected and CCC won’t let a finger touch them. Then it gives out about them being derelict. Cork logic.

    • #733304
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      The brick colour and the top of this image reminded me of the old Eircom building that is about to be replaced on South King Street in Dublin. When I scrolled down it obviously looked different.

    • #733305
      lexington
      Participant

      Huh! Such a thought! 😉

      This image makes the brick to be far darker than it is in reality. To be honest with you – it brightens up the quay for what it is, but it’s pretty ordinary by most standards. I wouldn’t be out to praise it too fast – however, anyone who has seen this building next to Camden Court (by OSB Group, designed by James Leahy & Associates, constructed by John Supple Contractors Ltd) will have to admit they work well together, even if Camden Court is far more imaginative – on that note, Phase 2 of Camden Court is to proceed within the next few weeks with initial demolition work first.

    • #733306
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Lexington,
      I believe for once you’re wrong (shocking I know 🙂 ). The two buildings which are for sale on Shandon Street are next to the two buildings for which the CPO has been issued.
      Infairness, I could have the numbers wrong so will recheck them for you.

      UPDATE The two buildings for sale are no.’s 69 and 70. The two buildings with a CPO are no’s 67 and 68. UPDATE


      I like most of the work going on around Christy Ring Bridge at the moment. The only thing that would bother me is the two very large developments opposite each other on Lower John Street. Balconies on both buildings, im sure if you tried hard enough you could jump across the street from balcony to balcony- cant be much privacy in that side of the developments.


      Frinailla’s ‘plans’ for a library in their Lady’s Well development have been withdrawn, In further information they plan replace the ‘library’ with retail and gym. I’m confident that there was never serious plans for a library. Good PR for Frinailla though!

    • #733307
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Following the news that Starbucks will have its first stand-alone unit in Dublin city centre opening in the near future – I can also tell you that the Seattle-based coffee chain have also assessed 3 possible units in Cork city centre (where Gloria Jeans is the main coffee-specialist chain existing at the present) for their first store in the city. 2 of the units are on or along near Patrick’s Street and 1 is supposedly located on one of the side-streets off the main thoroughfaure (Princes Street[?]). However, other suitable units are still be weighed up. When open, the unit will create up to 20 jobs and should heat up the competition nicely. No confirmation or specific date has been allocated for the time being however,



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Lexington,
      I believe for once you’re wrong (shocking I know 🙂 ). The two buildings which are for sale on Shandon Street are next to the two buildings for which the CPO has been issued.
      Infairness, I could have the numbers wrong so will recheck them for you.

      Fair enough, I was thinking it would have been a little weird for those 2 buildings to be up for a CPO so soon after the sale sign went up – I heard about that CPO but hadn’t looked into it, but hey, only 1 number off in each case. I think all 4 of those buildings are hideously neglected.

    • #733308
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Following the news that Starbucks will have its first stand-alone unit in Dublin city centre opening in the near future – I can also tell you that the Seattle-based coffee chain have also assessed 3 possible units in Cork city centre (where Gloria Jeans is the main coffee-specialist chain existing at the present) for their first store in the city. 2 of the units are on or along near Patrick’s Street and 1 is supposedly located on one of the side-streets off the main thoroughfaure (Princes Street[?]). However, other suitable units are still be weighed up. When open, the unit will create up to 20 jobs and should heat up the competition nicely. No confirmation or specific date has been allocated for the time being however,

      Unitl some of the more traditional spots in Dublin and Cork are forced to close due to Starbucks invade and conquer policy. For example, whilst people seem to welcome McCafe’s there is uproar when Bewleys closes! Is there a link? I am not sure, but I think there must be.

    • #733309
      lexington
      Participant

      It’s a funny aspect of the Irish psyche – it’s almost like a ‘I want everything’ attitude. We want all this new input and yet we don’t seem to show a care for the established until it’s threatened or gone. Of course then we protest. It reminds me in some ways how in 1997 after Princess Diana was killed in Paris, the public were screaming for the heads of the paparazzi and yet they were then the very same people that went out buying the tabloid magazines and papers that printed the pictures taken by the so-called ‘enemy’.

    • #733310
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I remember recalling the irony of that aswell. I think you are right about wanting everything attitude: Tradition, modernity, globalisation all rolled into one!

    • #733311
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Howard Holdings have earmarked mid-April for a commencement of construction at Albert House (along Albert Quay) of the new 4-storey (5-storey if you include the apex) WebWorks Business & Technology incubation centre. The building is designed by Scott Tallon Walker and will be constructed by PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd. The building is a joint venture between Howard Holdings, Cork City Council (who donated the site) and Enterprise Ireland and will be located in Cork’s newest and fastest growing office district. The development will first dismantle the former railway station platform to the rear of Albert House ( 🙁 which I believe is really a great shame as I see it as a true reflection of Cork history – rather than the rubbish some individuals and organisations find justified in objecting too), the excavation of the site, provision of basement car-parking (66 spaces) and then primary construction of the building overhead. The new development will be linked to Albert House, which will see its upper floors converted to office use and ground-floor area utilised as a new restaurant.



      🙂 Next-door along Albert Quay, the Doyle Family Group have agreed terms of sale (apparently) through DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald) for their Cork Warehousing Co. warehouse on a prime corner location between Albert Quay and Albert Road. The site is flanked by the Howard Holdings WebWorks development to its west and O’Flynn Construction’s massive Eglinton Street development to its south. Although I can’t name the prime suspects at this point, one of them claims that they will, if successful, seek to purchase the small warehousing block between the Doyle warehouse and Albert House first before proceeding with any development – as they wish to maximise available space and provide a sense of continuity to the quay and their development. A mixed-use office and retail development of approx. 7-storeys over basement car-park is envisioned by one of the developers in the running. Agreement was reached based on rates of approx. 7 to 7.5m euros (apparently), its original guide price was 5m euros. However I can tell you now, I would be most surprised if the final sale price exceeds 7m euros. My understanding is, it won’t – contrary to some newspaper articles.



      🙂 Another development scheduled for April is that of Victoria Station by Aras Developments. As reported here a few posts back, the site gained planning for a 24-unit Student Apartment development over medical services facility (all units have been pre-let or sold) and parking (1/2 of all spaces available have also been pre-sold) by former site owner Justin Canty. The design of the development was devised by consulting engineers O’Shea Leader and consists of a 4/5-storey building with roof-top gardens. Mr. McNamara of Aras Developments acquired the site via Global Properties (who will be sole selling agents) from Irish & European for approx. 2m euros.



      🙂 Just across the road, at the former Plumbing Utilities store, also acquired by Global Properties, this time for Frinailla Developments, is to soon seen planning sought by the development company for a medium-sized residential development, over commercial units.

      – Frinailla’s other big development is planned for the Dennehy’s Garage site just up the road at Dennehy’s Cross. The developers purchased the site for approx. 20m euros early in Feburary – the site is in 2 lots, one at the south-western side of the cross junction (the showrooms), the other is at the norther-eastern corner (the garage and service yards – with the excpetion of the Dennehy’s Bar). Frinailla have also bought up surrounding properties. They plan a large luxury residential development with local service facilities incorporated – incl. post office, hmmm).



    • #733312
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 With so much going on lately, I forgot to mention that Jeremiah Lynch’s 123-unit residential development for Riversdale, Bishopstown (just north of the new Ballincollig By-pass, across the road from the University College Cork Technology & Business Centre and Curraheen Greyhound Stadium) designed by Murray O’Laoire, was given the greenlight there recently following an appeal to ABP. Cork County Council had initially granted permission. The development for the 6-acre site has seen some alterations over the planning process.



      🙂 Just on a note of interest, Cork’s newest (and God knows much needed!) nightclub currently being developed by Newcastle-based, Ultimate Leisure UK Ltd at the premises of the former Maltings Bar on Lynch Street, is to be entitled “Blue Bamboo” and will be scheduled for an April opening.

      – Cork’s other new nightclub is under construction by Ridge Developments on South Main Street, over the former Classic Bar. The nightclub, being developed by City Properties, will adjoin the soon-to-be-opened restaurant complex (also owned by City Properties) hosting international noodle-house Wagamama and the first Captain Americas outside Dublin.

    • #733313
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Just a few questions for everyone which have been bugging me for a while….
      Q What kind of progress (if any) has been made on the redevelopment of the riverside of the Everyman Theatre?
      Q Have the Revenue Commisioners decided where they are moving to yet? Will that eyesore on Sullivan’s Quay finally be demolished?
      Q Any news on the IAWS/ R&H Hall development plans?

      Radioactiveman

    • #733314
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      The nightclub, being developed by City Properties, will adjoin the soon-to-be-opened restaurant complex (also owned by City Properties) hosting international noodle-house Wagamama and the first Captain Americas outside Grafton Street in Dublin.

      There used to be a Captain Americas in Dun Laoghaire. It closed about 12 years ago though.

    • #733315
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      There used to be a Captain Americas in Dun Laoghaire. It closed about 12 years ago though.

      My mistake – that’s actually correct I remember even visiting that way back when. Sorry about that.



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Just a few questions for everyone which have been bugging me for a while….
      Q What kind of progress (if any) has been made on the redevelopment of the riverside of the Everyman Theatre?
      Q Have the Revenue Commisioners decided where they are moving to yet? Will that eyesore on Sullivan’s Quay finally be demolished?
      Q Any news on the IAWS/ R&H Hall development plans?

      Radioactiveman

      1. A plan was drawn up by 2 developers with the Everyman Palace – which would see the quayside fronting St. Patrick’s Quay redeveloped as a 5-storey mixed-use development spanning the area between the Metropole Hotel Leisure Centre to the Sporting Club near Bridge Street. The development was scheduled to include lecture theatres, film development centre, training facilities, a conference centre, nightclub and roof-top cocktail lounge, restaurant, some retail, office units and basement car-parking all incorporated into the Everyman Palace. I’m not fully aware of how the status regarding the buy-up of appropriate lands has progressed. A prominent Cork-based architectural firm were enlisted to design the project – however, as best I am aware, these plans have been scrapped. There is a possibility a future proposal will be reimagined – this time including a well-known department store, however I have heard nothing solid of this as yet.



      2. The deadline for final proposal submissions has been extended for March 24th 2005 until April 29th 2005 – as predicted. This is to allow some developers who approached the OPW get their projects into planning. This could mean a few new large-scale proposals headed for Navigation House in the coming weeks – but I can’t say. McCarthy Developments, O’Callaghan Properties and O’Flynn Construction have all approached the OPW and been approached in return. I am also told a very prime city centre site – the subject of many former planning applications – is also set to see a new application placed on it by its developer/owner. It possesses a very attractive location from the Revenue Commissioners perspective. The Sullivans Quay building will be set for either redevelopment or refurbishment – although the latter seems improbable given the substantial subsidence issues related to the current structure.



      3. IAWS have assessed plans for the R&H Hall site along Kennedy Quay – though no date has been specified for an announcement, some believe it could be this year. IAWS have consulted with some developers related to the sale of the site or joint development. CCC is pushing a cultural or historical use to the site with some commercial elements – they favour the retention of the silos. One developer I’m aware of views this as unfeasible – so its still all up in the air.

    • #733316
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Thanks Lex,
      One more thing, a few months back you mentioned something about a beam of light (or something like that anyway) which had previously been planned for the Gate Cinema. Anymore details/images? Or maybe it was all a dream i had 🙂

    • #733317
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Thanks Lex,
      One more thing, a few months back you mentioned something about a beam of light (or something like that anyway) which had previously been planned for the Gate Cinema. Anymore details/images? Or maybe it was all a dream i had 🙂

      I think your referring to the glass tower planned from the front entrance of the existing Gate Multiplex. The hollow, internally illuminated tower was part of the original drawings for the development but was subsequently removed – for some stupid reason, the structure would have added some desperately needed design to the building.

    • #733318
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As people might know, CCC are currently “upgrading the public realm” (i.e. fixing the footpaths) along Watercourse Road in Blackpool. There is an interesting little piece of street furniture outside AIB on the street in the form of an old stone horse trough. Or there was up to a few days ago!! 😡
      As far as I can tell the construction company removed it on Saturday and I’ve been unable to find out where it is or whether it is going to be returned (or even if its still in one piece).
      The trough is identical to that located near Flor Griffins on Parnell Place. I think these were the only two left in the city- although i could be corrected on that.
      Anybody got an ideas on how i can locate this item?

    • #733319
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I really hate when things like that happen. Even if they are replaced later on, there is still something taken away by it being tampered with like that. I am afraid I can be of no help though. Sorry.

    • #733320
      GrahamH
      Participant

      The upper part of this building is remarkably similar to the residential element of the Swan Centre in Dublin – clearly going for that 80s Hanging Gardens of Camden Quay look 🙂

      But I think brick is seriously underrated as a building material, having earned a bad name through inappropriate and banal use, and being associated with the very worst forms of urban renewal.
      But a sophisticated use of brick combined with a good quality version of the material can produce very striking results.
      The colour is so important – too often we’re lumped with horrible dusty pinky-red, while that deep wine/plum red that seems to be in use in this scheme is so rarely used: it can look fantastic.

    • #733321
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The image above is much darker than the brick actually being used. One major problem i have with brick is the white deposit which seems to form on it as if the mortar is leaking all over it.

    • #733322
      Lincoln
      Participant

      the white deposit is efflourescence – it is a salt that appears when brickwork is newly laid and will eventually wash out over time- it is a natural process and should be gone in a year.

      as for the general use of brickwork it has become an increasingly unpopular material choice due to the difficulty contractors have with brick and block layers -a lot of contractors now will not tender for jobs if there is a lot of brickwork-this building will be probably the last brick building you will see for the foreseeable future.

    • #733323
      lexington
      Participant

      The architects for this project are J.E. Keating & Associates – the firm seems to be a big fan of brick-work such as Camden Wharf. It’s other projects such as East Douglas Village also uses this form of brick-work to an exceptionally high aesthetic standard, also, the other big J.E. Keating project under development (and only a stone’s throw away from Camden Wharf) is Sean Mhuileann (see image below), A 169-unit apartment development backed by auctioneer/developers Frank Sheahan and Joe Carey. The development is a highly imposing set of structures near Hewitt Mills along the Blackpool By-pass. Phase 1 (that large stepped 8-storey semi-circular building) was completed by PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd earlier this year, with Phase 2 (the 3 stand-alone blocks) are currently under construction by Ascon Ltd.


      Note: This image is a mirror-reversal -> the main semi-circular structure is actually to the north (left-hand-side)

    • #733324
      Doug C
      Participant

      2 images found floating around the web. The research centre may be (probably is) just a project.

      Further info on the lighting in the Photonics lab would be appreciated.

      Also can anyone suggest very good examples of single houses (old or new) in Cork City or environs.

    • #733325
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Haven’t a clue about that research centre. The Photonics lab is located in the recently rebuilt portion of the Lee Maltings (protected building). I’ve no information on the lighting – they are nice though.

    • #733326
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Have a look at this site I found. I think it captures the utter contempt CIE have for their customers, in this case it’s Cork customers. We give out about ‘Dublin’ keeping all the money for itself and not providing for refurbishment of the Train Station etc., but if this is what we’re going to do to it when its renovated, do we really deserve it?
      We often praise Cork CIE staff for bravely ‘battling on’ in the face of Government pennypinching and inaction but really, How much is a mop and bucket? The laziness of these people must be a new low. Shame on them. Shame on us!!
      http://www.kellstransportmuseum.com/DirtAug04.html

      Perhaps a new thread: Shamefully neglected architecture of Ireland?

    • #733327
      lexington
      Participant

      @Doug C wrote:

      Also can anyone suggest very good examples of single houses (old or new) in Cork City or environs.

      Probably not the best example but this is No.1 Annaville along the Western Road, Cork – built in a private, gated cul-de-sac with 5 other similar but non-identical residencies accompanying it. The houses (valued at 950,000euros + each) are built in an American Colonial-type fashion with delicate copper finishings to boot! This image doesn’t do the house or houses any justice, but to see them hand-up in real life, they’re oddly drawing. 6 bedrooms and what a location! Built in the 1930s.

    • #733328
      sw101
      Participant

      there’s a grey stone gatehouse to a graveyard up around wilton somewhere that i adore. i’ll try and track down a foto

    • #733329
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😡 CCC, who at their meeting last night (Monday 14th March 2005), were set to vote on allowing Howard WebWorks Ltd (a company owned by Howard Holdings) possess the Albert Quay site on a 700 year lease from the City Council to develop a 4-storey WebWorks development designed by STW, have voted against such a permission being granted. They claim that a number of councillors are worried about passing over a public building such as Albert House over to a private developer. By a margin of just 2 votes, the motion failed to pass. Joe Gavin is said to be majorly ticked off – and who could blame him. The centre would have been the first of its kind – and was designed in conjunction with CCC. Enterprise Ireland have already begun marketing the project, which they will lease from, to provide start-up businesses with an incubation style setting. Issues concerning the project will be deferred to the next meeting were it is hoped another meeting will take place.



      😡 And on another delightful note, Fine Gael councillor Colm Burke (former Lord Mayor) proposed to City Manager Joe Gavin that CIE be threatened with a CPO regarding Horgan’s Quay after 7 years of blatant lies, insults and broken promises on its redevelopment. John Lynch, Chair of CIE, has basically given another 2-fingers to Cork in another recent CIE-issued statement were he said that the promised Urban Rail network (which would have included stations at Blarney, Blackpool and so on) was no longer a CIE concern for the time-being. Joe Gavin said a CPO was unfeasible at this time.


      :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

    • #733330
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      *UPDATES*

      😡 CCC, who at their meeting last night (Monday 14th March 2005), were set to vote on allowing Howard WebWorks Ltd (a company owned by Howard Holdings) possess the Albert Quay site on a 700 year lease from the City Council to develop a 4-storey WebWorks development designed by STW, have voted against such a permission being granted. Hmmm – because they’re thick? Probably, but they claim that a number of councillors are worried about passing over a public building such as Albert House over to a private developer. Yes, they are thick. By a margin of just 2 votes, the motion failed to pass. Joe Gavin is said to be majorly pi**ed off – and who could blame him. The centre would have been the first of its kind – and was designed in conjunction with CCC. Enterprise Ireland have already begun marketing the project, which they will lease from, to provide start-up businesses with an incubation style setting. Issues concerning the project will be deferred to the next meeting were it is hoped another meeting will take place.

      Well done you tw*ts!

      Lexington, what is the present use of the site you are referring to?

    • #733331
      lexington
      Participant

      The current use of Albert House is nothing – it was once a pleasant former train station building, most recently it has been used a CCC Parking Fines Centre and centre for the Traffic Division, but since early this year has been vacant awaiting its refurbishment and development of the WebWorks to the rear. The new development will allocate the top floor of Albert House for Traffic Division usage once again when complete.

    • #733332
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      What exactly is WebWorks? Is there no other pubic use it could be put to?

    • #733333
      lexington
      Participant

      The WebWorks will be a 40,000sq ft office-type building which will house units to be let by Enterprise Ireland. These units will be allocated to start-up IT and Finance businesses in an effort to help them develop into successful enterprises. As part of the development, a variety of services will be available throughout the building to assist the businesses in various ways. R&D will be heavily supported at the centre. It will be used as a showcase for up-and-coming technologies developed by local businesses. The centre will create up to 300 jobs when complete.

    • #733334
      Anonymous
      Participant

      How can you say that a 40,000 sq foot building that has just been voted down by CCC will be built?

    • #733335
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      2. The deadline for final proposal submissions has been extended for March 24th 2005 until April 29th 2005 – as predicted. This is to allow some developers who approached the OPW get their projects into planning. This could mean a few new large-scale proposals headed for Navigation House in the coming weeks – but I can’t say. McCarthy Developments, O’Callaghan Properties and O’Flynn Construction have all approached the OPW and been approached in return. I am also told a very prime city centre site – the subject of many former planning applications – is also set to see a new application placed on it by its developer/owner. It possesses a very attractive location from the Revenue Commissioners perspective. The Sullivans Quay building will be set for either redevelopment or refurbishment – although the latter seems improbable given the substantial subsidence issues related to the current structure.

      Thanks a lot for the information, I’ve lived near that ugly monstrosity for a long while now, would be great to see it replaced by something better. Only stumbled across this site around a week ago, took a long time to get through this thread!

    • #733336
      lexington
      Participant

      Funnily enough opus , the OPW had actually assessed a number of options regarding the redevelopment of Sullivans Quay themselves before deciding to land-swap the building for new office premises. A number of options were looked at. I actually have drawings on the proposed alterations – I’ll try and put them up soon so watch this space! Demolition it would seem is perhaps the only real issue given the existensive structural issues. However, I am told by one developer who has been keen on the Sullivans Quay lot, that if successful, his company will be seeking to develop a similar height structure with mixed retail, leisure and residential uses – after appropriate treatment of the foundations, which may yet judge the project’s viability. However, the race is way to soon to call at this stage.

    • #733337
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      How can you say that a 40,000 sq foot building that has just been voted down by CCC will be built?

      Because of the narrow margin of votes on the ‘dispensing’ of the site to Howard Holdings was so close, CCC have opted to defer a vote on the actual project itself until their next meeting so that in between they may address issues concerning the site – which will be subject to a obligatory repeat vote if favour of the project itself is passed.

    • #733338
      lexington
      Participant

      Doug C – I’m aware of a few proposals at this particular site, some not unlike the image displayed below, but I can’t say I’ve ever seen this particular graphic before. This is for a site along the southern docklands near Kennedy Quay/Marina Point (note Pairc Ui Caoimh outlined in the background), right? Is this the educational institute proposal? On what site did you attain this image?

      sw101, you have any info on this particular image?

    • #733339
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I think it would benefit the city as a whole (in more ways than one) if Government Offices on Sullivan’s Quay subsided into the River and floated out the harbour. Its a fabulous site and would act as a great bookend to ‘Sraid an Capaill Bui’ if it was developed into retail/entertainment/residential use.
      Lex, can you give us a hint as to where OPW plan to move? 😉

      On the subject of Grand Parade, I know City Library are running a design competition for a new city Library. Are there any real concrete plans to use any of those designs? Surely they’d never get away with knocking any of the current building.

      With the movement of City Archives to Blackpool, Christ Church on South Main Street will be available to add to this ‘cultural quarter’ – including City Library, Bisop Lucey Park. What are CCC’s plans (if any) for Christ Church?

    • #733340
      Doug C
      Participant

      Lexington ,

      As requested:

      http://archinect.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=search&type=full&search=cork

      It is a great site in itself with good interviews, features and excellent Current On Site Photos of interesting projects around the world.

    • #733341
      lexington
      Participant

      This isn’t really an update as such – just more of the same. Below find 2 images of the redeveloped Jurys Hotel site along the Western Road. The scheme is a 130m euro redevelopment project being undertaken by O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) under the SPV Riga Ltd. The planning application is currently the subject of appeal, but has been prioritised with a due date set for May 17th. The development will be conducted over 3 Phases, with Phase 1 scheduled for Summer 2005 – it will consist of 100 apartments + the 182-bedroom redeveloped Jurys Hotel and 450 space basement car-park. The second phase will see the addition of a further 110 apartments, and Phase 3, the remaining 93 (this will depend on the outcome of the appeal – with consideration for conditions imposed by CCC in its grant). The project is designed by Henry J. Lyons and Partners and will be constructed by Bowen Construction.

      One image has been seen before, the other is a more specific image of the actual Jurys Hotel element. Further images can be found back throughout this thread.


      I sincerely hope the full original application sees a grant from ABP.



      As regards Academy Street – the 150m euro retail and residential development by OCP will see between 200,000sq ft and 240,000sq ft of retail space over approx. 40 units (all fashion based) on 3 floor + basement, with the top 3 floors dedicated to 80 luxury residential apartment units.

      I hope to be able to reveal the international architectural team behind the design in the coming weeks/months (depending) – will have to see. In the meantime, the image below outlines the current area allocated to this new development (with some minor inaccuracies not adjusted for due to inadequate current information regarding the final design).



      And as the scaffolding continues to descend off the Patrick A. Cashman & Associates designed, 21 Lavitts Quay, the reality confirms what I had expected. The new OCP HQ and residential development (44 apartment units) is one of the best contemporary additions to Cork’s reshaping cityscape. Imposing yet graceful, the building sets a precedent for development yet to follow along and near Lavitts Quay. Cohalan Downing Associates report that office space at the development has almost all been pre-let or sold and apartment interest has been high with a substantial number of sales already achieved.

    • #733342
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      The WebWorks will be a 40,000sq ft office-type building which will house units to be let by Enterprise Ireland. These units will be allocated to start-up IT and Finance businesses in an effort to help them develop into successful enterprises. As part of the development, a variety of services will be available throughout the building to assist the businesses in various ways. R&D will be heavily supported at the centre. It will be used as a showcase for up-and-coming technologies developed by local businesses. The centre will create up to 300 jobs when complete.

      Thanks Lexington. Would Enterprise Ireland then be leasing the space they use from Howard Holdings?

    • #733343
      lexington
      Participant

      I just don’t understand some of the people in this city at all…

      😡 The following have been brought to appeal despite all and many concessions made during CCC planning…

      1. Cumnor Construction’s highly attractive Sunday’s Well development
      2. Dick Walsh & Declan Kiely’s Grianbru/Dennehy’s Cross development (by CAHRA – shudder!!! People it’s 4-storeys not 40!!!! How can you say this is high-rise? Most buildings in the area are taller.)
      3. The Victoria Hotel has brought Monsoon Accessorize to ABP about it’s new signage.
      4. And EVEN Howard Holdings have been brought to appeal regarding the erection of the 12 metre quill sculpture for outside the Clarion Hotel!!! Are people thick??? The sculpture was presented to the people of Cork as a gift – and to add to its lacking street art. The eejit from An Taisce is objecting because he feels the quayside would be more suited to a water-scuplture given its proximity to the river! Grow up! You can pick, choose and tailor the gifts you receive. This is utterly atrocious behaviour!

      I’m so tired of these small minded individuals – Cork doesn’t know a good thing when it gets it and then complains about it to everyone when its not there. If Cork shoots itself in the foot, any bets it’ll be whining to Dublin about how it never gets anything? Here is Cork trying to take care of itself and it’s being prevented from doing so by its very own people.

      Tripe!



      Doug C – thanks for that! 😉



      opus – the OPW approached consulting engineers, the David Kelly Partnership in 2002 about assessing redevelopment options for Sullivans Quay before ultimately deciding to relocate full-stop. A number of options were presented to the OPW about remodelling the Sullivans Quay Government Buildings, before it became clear structural and foundation issues would be too expensive and difficult to correct. I have a file load of drawings and reports made regarding the building’s redesign but I’ll only post one (below) for the time being due to the limited space. Click on the thumbnail for a fuller image.



      phil – that’s the general idea. It’s a clever and progressive idea, one badly needed for Cork city centre, and the location is unmatched! Let’s just hope the councillors get off their high horse and start getting priorities right – if they turn this beauty down, they are effectively turning down 300 jobs, untold investment and a quality addition to the docklands over a worry that the lease-term is too long. It will still be CCC property, just on an extended lease to Howard Holdings. HH will pay CCC an initial down-payment of 2m euros for the site with an annual rent thereafter of 2 euros. However, the benefits to the Cork region have vast potential.

    • #733344
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 If you throw your minds back to a few pages ago in this thread, you may remember a mention regarding the sale of the small 2,025sq ft triangular site on Clontarf Street (to the east of the Bus Station, and to the rear of No.5 & No.6 Lapps Quay). Well, the site was sold last year for 1m euros to a developer who, for now I can’t name, however, what I can tell you is that planning permission will very shortly be sought for a 12-storey office building over commercial unit on this tiny, landmark site. The building will approx. 22,000sq ft of office space, plus commercial unit and provide a slender, landmark tower in the heart of this fast emerging office district of Cork. More details as they come.



      🙂 Also, nearby, you may also remember that I informed you that Deloitte & Touche had be assessing a vertical extension to their offices on Lapps Quay (between No.5 Lapps Quay and Connolly Hall). Coughlan de Keyser Architects had been approached to part-assist in the design of this new extension, however, I have been now recently told that Deloitte may abandon this option for space at (so it is rumoured) nearby No.6 Lapps Quay, under construction by Bowen Construction, developed by O’Flynn Construction. It is assumed that Deloitte may option their existing offices on the market, including some space to it’s rear. It is not clear yet whether Deloitte will option their offices as is, or seek planning for the vertical extension and sell it off to a developer. The latter option may be appealing to OFC themselves – with a possible land-for-offices swap(??? – I’m just speculating on that point.)


      No.6 Lapps Quay – under construction



      🙂 Thankfully, OFC have scheduled a meeting with City Manager Joe Gavin for next week to help rectify the stale-mate reached between the developers and planners regarding car-parking at their Eglinton Street development. OFC propose 553 underground parking spaces as part of their massive, high-rise development, but Planner Evelyn Mitchell has conditioned that only .5 of this total space be made available. It seems a little idiotic to be honest with you, CCC didn’t have a problem issuing OCP with 450 underground parking spaces for a development not far removed from this one along the Western Road. Proper order too. See prev. post re: the OFC/CCC deadlock.



      :rolleyes: I’m convinced a certain Irish Examiner property journalist reads this thread! Some of his reports display an uncanny resemblance to exactly the same information I have posted on this thread going back along. Hmmm – the Irish Examiner basically confirmed interested tenants for OCP’s Academy Street development as I had mentioned previously (i.e. Zara, Pull&Bear, Bershka etc etc – and its true, they are on ‘the list’.)



      🙂 Rumour has it, in addition to Academy Street and a possible, but uncertain involvement with the Capitol Cineplex redevelopment, O’Callaghan Properties are actively developing plans for along Cornmarket Street. The plans are supposedly designed to compliment the large-scale retail and resdential development being undertaken by Rockfell Investments at the former Guy & Co. building (which now has confirmed tenants in Habitat, and definite ‘enquiries’ from the likes of H&M, Dixons and passing enquiries from Arnotts and John Lewis [however I hear, another city centre location may be more favourable to them]). Though I’m not clear on the exact details of the OCP Cornmarket Street involvement – it is thought to most likely have a large retail element to it, with extensive street/pedestrian access. However, if anything is pursued, it will not likely take form until after Academy Street is nearing completion or up and running.



      🙂 Just regarding the Capitol Cineplex’s redevelopment, Ward Anderson (the facility’s owners) have been in discussions with city planners about the site’s redevelopment. Ward Anderson are hoping to seek planning permission before selling off the site – however, a number of developers (including one prominent Limerick-based developer, mentioned previously in this thread) have been pushing the entertainment operators to sell the premises ‘as is’ so that they can seek a specified planning application sooner and in line with many properties bought up surrounding the cineplex itself. Many of these properties have beenn purchased with great expense over the past year to 2 years.



      Also, check out the website launched by developer/auctioneer Joe Carey and Dan Mulvihill for their large Fota Retail Park development in Carrigtwohill, at the site of the former Youghal Carpets Factory. Even if you’ve no interest in the development itself, it’s got some nice photos of the who Dalmatian Style Harbour area leading into the eastern suburbs and Little Island (like the image below!).

      http://www.fotaretailpark.com



      Oh, and HAPPY SAINT PATRICK’S DAY 2005!!!

    • #733345
      dowlingm
      Participant

      good to see the reopening of Cork-Midleton rail is generating growth along the line!

    • #733346
      lexington
      Participant

      SN Brussels Airlines, the national carrier of Belguim, has announced 2 weekly flights between Cork and Brussels commencing this summer (July) – depending on the popularity of the route, the airline has said it will consider year round flights. This additional service now adds to the growing list of scheduled European services to Cork which now includes Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Barcelona, Malaga, Alicante, Rome, Munich, Malta, Nice, Prague, Budapest + many others.

      For more info. on the Brussels route, see the SN Brussels Airlines website

      Also, I have it on good word that a notable US Airline is currently in talks with the airport about commencing a scheduled, year-round Cork to New York JFK service (which will operate between 3 and 4 times weekly) – however, this will be subject to further negotiations and the outcome of US-Ireland Bilateral Aviation Agreement discussions. Aer Lingus have also expressed an interest in commencing a Cork – US service subject to the successful outcome of the same negotiations, New York JFK is also their preferred destination.

    • #733347
      jungle
      Participant

      Another flight which will be starting is between Cork and Brest by French LoCo FlyWest http://www.flywest.fr . It will start up in June as once weekly on a Sunday.

    • #733348
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Is this the Cork Tourist Board? 😀

    • #733349
      dermo
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      good to see the reopening of Cork-Midleton rail is generating growth along the line!

      Surely the growth is being generated along the dual carraigeway!

    • #733350
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @dermo wrote:

      Surely the growth is being generated along the dual carraigeway!

      I agree with Dermo retail warehousing and trains don’t have a great linkage now dual carriageways are a different story and I’m sure that the midleton rail line will generate a lot of new housing.

    • #733351
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Hard to see, because it is out of shot, but it is also possible that the existence of the railway line will restrict the expansion of this warehousing, keeping it between the dual carraigeway and the track.

    • #733352
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Ann Clifford, proprietor of Clifford Stores next to UCC, has after many attempts, managed to attain planning on the redevelopment of her store, home and neighbouring houses. A small but noteworthy development given its important crossroads location along College Road. The development will see the demolition of existing structures, construction of 4 new 2 storey houses, extension to existing shop and provision of 4 apartments (for student use) over 3 floors.



      😮 Cleary Doyle have set the first section of the tower crane in place ahead of Sunday week for the 32m euro Cork City Hall extension. The 90,000sq ft +, 4-storey administrations building was designed by ABK Architects (selected after competition) and will be connected to the main City Hall building via a series of links. The building is designed to be ‘eco-friendly’.



      😮 Lyonshall Ltd, the part-development company headed by Kieran Coughlan & Claire Riordan, have struck a deal with Pierse Contracting and Firestone Developments (the John McCarthy, Vincent Regan and John Keating enterprise) to part develop their 200m euro project earmarked for the lands of the former Ursuline Convent and adjoining girls secondary-school. Lyonshall received planning for approx. 500 residential units, commercial and educational units about a year ago (you may remember the post long ago) on lands they purchased for 13m euros. The company decided to develop the complex themselves, but I think may have been a little overwhelmed at the scale they proposed themselves when it came to tender. Pierse and Firestone will come on-board to co-operatively develop approx. 200 of the residential units proposed. Lyonshall will then negotiate the remaining elements subject to progress. Kick-off on the development is now set for May. Project design is by O’Mahony Pike.

      NOTE: Just on that point, and something which may be of interest to some of you, O’Mahony Pike are seeking Architects and Technicians for their new Cork office. OMP have decided to open a Cork office given the considerable business lined up for the firm over the coming months/years. I can tell you, whoever gets the job will be kept busy, between the huge Lyonshall project in Blackrock, and one other substantial Docklands project which may be seeking a revisal over the coming months.


      😉 An recent report in the Irish Examiner commented on the prominent interest being shown in the Parnell Place area of the city – especially regarding large commercial developments. Well, in addition to the info provided in that article, it may be worth noting that a quiet deal is being closed (so the story goes) regarding the purchase and redevelopment of the D.F. Doyle & Co. showroom and workshop site to the rear of No.5 Lapps Quay and to the rear and west of No.6 Lapps Quay, the 2 large office developments being completed by O’Flynn Construction. Whether or not OFC are the deal-makers, I can’t as yet say, however it would make perfect sense given that their current Lapps Quay developments envelope the site and it would provide a natural and sensical area for extension, especially to No.5. We’ll just have to wait and see.

      – also, across the road, Deloitte’s offices (if you read back a few posts, you’ll remember I commented on the possibility of their sale of the building – which had been subject to vertical extension assessments before deciding on possibly moving to No.6 Lapps Quay) – which may see the listed building up for sale in the near future, could well be sold with planning for the aforementioned vertical extension (designed by Coughlan de Keyser) and may well include the Parnell Electrical premises to its rear. This is still up in the air to say the least, especially considering planning has yet to be sought (if that is the decided path taken).



      😉 Also regarding the tiny triangular site bounded by Clontarf, Deane and Oliver Plunkett Streets – the subject of a soon to be sought 12-storey office development, I am expecting some more details on this project in the coming days. Cohalan Downing Associates are currently handling term car-parking space lettings on the site – however, these lettings are subject to time restrictions given the advent of the development. CDA are also expected to handle any sale of lettings of the proposed 22,000sq ft development. It almost seems surreal for such a building to be constructed on such a tiny site (just a little over 2,000sq ft) – but we’ll see how it plans out.



      @dowlingm wrote:

      good to see the reopening of Cork-Midleton rail is generating growth along the line!

      I think this development has predominantly earmarked the dual-carriageway as its traffic source – however, you are right that when (‘IF’ knowing CIE) the Midelton line is up and running, it will certainly be an attractive sales pitch.

    • #733353
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙁 I’ve never been a strong supporter of this project – Grangefield Developments (Mr. Keohane et al) has been approved by ABP following appeal to partially demolish the Arbutus Lodge and construct apartment blocks, now reduced to 4-storeys, encompassing 30 apartments. This is a great shame as it represents a further loss for Cork’s fading grand residencies to apartments. The location is entirely unsuitable from an aesthetic, amenity and traffic management perspective and is a further blow to Cork’s already inadequate, tithering green-space.

    • #733354
      opus
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      opus – the OPW approached consulting engineers, the David Kelly Partnership in 2002 about assessing redevelopment options for Sullivans Quay before ultimately deciding to relocate full-stop. A number of options were presented to the OPW about remodelling the Sullivans Quay Government Buildings, before it became clear structural and foundation issues would be too expensive and difficult to correct. I have a file load of drawings and reports made regarding the building’s redesign but I’ll only post one (below) for the time being due to the limited space. Click on the thumbnail for a fuller image.



      Thanks again for the news. Think it would be better if it was redeveloped as something other than an office block, the current setup attacts a lot of street drinking by night so imagine a residential development would be better. Well hopefully anyway.
    • #733355
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The ‘eejit’ from an taisce has really sunk to a desperate new low. Objecting to a GIFT from Howard Holdings to the people of Cork City just because he thinks some vague nautical notion would be slightly better than the excellent design currently proposed is just very very sad.
      I think this person would not be happy unless all planning applications were ‘run’ passed him before they even got to Navigation House. It makes me sick and further tarnishes An taisce- which, in theory is a good idea.
      This person surely knows he hasnt a snowballs chance of winning an appeal to ABP. Why is he doing it? So, he gets his name in the paper by delaying a public amenity… well, if thats how he gets his kicks 🙁

    • #733356
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The ‘eejit’ from an taisce has really sunk to a desperate new low. Objecting to a GIFT from Howard Holdings to the people of Cork City just because he thinks some vague nautical notion would be slightly better than the excellent design currently proposed is just very very sad.
      I think this person would not be happy unless all planning applications were ‘run’ passed him before they even got to Navigation House. It makes me sick and further tarnishes An taisce- which, in theory is a good idea.
      This person surely knows he hasnt a snowballs chance of winning an appeal to ABP. Why is he doing it? So, he gets his name in the paper by delaying a public amenity… well, if thats how he gets his kicks 🙁

      Over 90% of An Taisce appeals to ABP are upheld that is because they are grounded in fact and unlike the above post they are neither frivilous nor vexatious. Grow up and keep away from the personal stuff

    • #733357
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The ‘eejit’ from an taisce has really sunk to a desperate new low. Objecting to a GIFT from Howard Holdings to the people of Cork City just because he thinks some vague nautical notion would be slightly better than the excellent design currently proposed is just very very sad.

      Can you elaborate on this a bit more? To what extent was it to be a gift? What was the Nautical Notion? I apolagise if this is further back in this thread, but I dont recall it and there is so much on this thread that it would be difficult to find.

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #733358
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Diaspora, it’s An Taisce Corcaigh we’re talking about here. They do not have a great track record and have built up quite a bad reputation locally.

    • #733359
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Diaspora, I stand by my above comments 100%. To bring an appeal against a piece of public art because the appeallant has a different artistic vision than the artist or the benefactor is entirely frivalous.
      By making such an objection, the An Taisce member in question made this appeal very personal in nature. This appeal is made because of personal taste in art rather than any planning legislations/guidlines or development plans.
      This is not what ABP is designed for

    • #733360
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Diaspora, I stand by my above comments 100%. To bring an appeal against a piece of public art because the appeallant has a different artistic vision than the artist or the benefactor is entirely frivalous.

      I think you are jumping the gun here entirely, the multi-coloured fountain that was put onto O’Connell St was a piece of art that was inserted entirely into the wrong place, it lasted a few short years in a streetscape and was promptly dispatched to Herbert Park. A sculpture like a building has to be assessed under a number of criteria not least its compatibility with what is already insitu. If An Taisce Cork have concerns they are quite correct to raise these, ultimately ABP will rule on the matter and their decision will be final. Remember that Cork City Council planners have referred this to An Taisce for their opinion which has been given.

    • #733361
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Ok, thats a fair point. However, with a building, for example, there are ways to establish its suitability for an area- height, use, density, parking, etc.
      With an art work like this, isn’t it a bit rich of AnTaisce to try to influence what sort of inspiration the artist has- suggesting that a nautical/marine theme would have been better?
      Prospective benefactors must look at this and say- is it really worth the bother.?
      In order to try to calm nerves here I’ll say this. Much of the objections brought by An Taisce are reasonable and of course deserve to be taken into account when making planning decisions. Some however, including this one I believe, are entirely unreasonable. I guess ABP will ultimately decide on the validity of any objections raised. We’ll wait and see.

    • #733362
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      Can you elaborate on this a bit more? To what extent was it to be a gift? What was the Nautical Notion? I apolagise if this is further back in this thread, but I dont recall it and there is so much on this thread that it would be difficult to find.

      Thanks

      Phil

      Yeah Phil, while providing the finishing touches to their 100m euro City Quarter development on Lapps Quay (which = 190 bedroom Clarion Hotel, 80,000sq ft + offices, 17,000sq ft retail, leisure centre, 265-space underground car-park, reconstructed quayside and promenade, boardwalk, docking pontoon, cafes etc etc), Howard Holdings decided to contribute a specially commissioned sculpture, 12.9m high, of a quill which was to be located outside the Clarion’s front entrance. The sculpture, 500,000euros worth (and not in the original plans), allowed the developers utilise a Cork City Development Plan 2004 policy which promotes contributions to public art. Greg Coughlan, CEO of Howard Holdings is originally from Cork, and since he moved back to Cork from the UK (to concentrate on Howard Holdings’ new focus on Cork city developments), he decided to add the sculpture – presenting it as a gift to the people of Cork, and hoping it would spur similar efforts from other developers in the city (Mr. Coughlan apparently has a penchant for art). The sculpture was highly welcomed by CCC and got the all clear after planning. Mr. O’Scannlain of An Taisce, and who is based in Bishopstown, sent a single-page submission to CCC, in which he documented his preference for a water feature on the quayside. CCC noted the submission, but also noted that the sculpture was not only ‘highly tasteful’, but had been already commissioned and said it was not in a position ‘to dictate the nature of contributions to public art, as such features are presented in good faith to people of Cork city. They should be valued additionally for generosity. The existing application would contribute positively to public amenity and reflects Cork’s history as originally a marsh settlement’. CCC did note however, they would not grant such contributions if they were grossly out of place and disproportionate to a proposed location, or if they contributed negatively to the public realm. On grant of the sculpture, Mr. Scannlain threatened the developers with appeal, unless the reconsidered their proposal. Howard Holdings vowed to continue with their plans, and subsequently, Mr. Scannlain used organisation money to lodge the 630euro appeal. Now, I am aware that CCC had run the sculpture by An Taisce for its comments – these were supposedly to be included in the submission, so it would be a documented public file, however, such a move was made on a consultation basis. Following this, CCC still concluded that the sculpture was acceptable. The appeal was externally warranted.



      Diaspora – I know you and me haven’t agreed on many issues related to An Taisce, but I have very often found much favour with many of your comments beyond that. I do not wish for this to be a nit-picking issue – but I would simply ask you to consider whether or not you a familiar with the details of this particular incident, and furthermore, the 90% rate of An Taisce appeals upheld by ABP is not accurate according to the Bord themselves. The thumbnail below is a chart from ABP – I think also included in their Annual Report (Statistics) available on Paper-back Copy from the Bord (website may also have details???), regarding the number of appeals upheld as a % of the total lodged. The thumbnail in this case represents the % of appeals by An Taisce which were up-held for the year ended 2003. I don’t have figures anymore up-to-date, so unless they have jump 43% in the last year, I don’t know (?)

      Anyway, it’s not a dig, just a clarity issue. I have actually found myself in agreeance with Mr. Hurley down here on a number of projects (i.e. Howard Holdings’ Lavitts Quay development and the Arbutus Lodge development – which was subsequently granted permission following a joint An Taisce and Residents appeal) – something I never thought would happen. But it still doesn’t take away from the fact that their Cork track record is not a positive one. That said, may be this year, they’ll turn a corner. I hope so for the sake of Cork’s progress and the reputation of the organisation itself this end of the country. There’s no knocking in this post, so PEACE people! 🙂

    • #733363
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I find it amusing that the An Taisce member would be looking for a water feature on the quayside. Is the river not big enough?

    • #733364
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Thanks for that Lexington. 12.9 Metres is pretty high isn’t it? That policy sounds like a ‘percent for art scheme’. It will be interesting to see peoples reaction to it when it is put in place. That is when any real controversy is likely to break out. Is is an abstract piece or is it going to be simply a giant Quill? There was an example in Dun Laoghaire where the developers of the Pavillion complex gave a gift of a Michael Warren Sculpture (The Gateway) to the people of Dun Laoghaire. It was not within the planning of the original structure, and therefore should probably not be there in the technical sense. Interestingly those against it managed to get the Councillors to vote on its removal (which was meant to happen), but as soon as this happened those in support of the sculpture started making their voice heard through newpaper articles etc etc. I personally like it and would be disappointed to see it go. Pieces such as this are good in that they get people thinking about the public realm, whether they like the sculpture or not.

    • #733365
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      Pieces such as this are good in that they get people thinking about the public realm, whether they like the sculpture or not.

      Agreed. Hey, in Brussels they have a young boy pee-ing in the middle of a street!!! All we have to contend with is a Quill!!! 😀


      Moooooooooooooooving along…

      …I hope to bring some good news this week, (fingers crossed!), if not, next week (depending on how the developers work it out).

    • #733366
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Lexington I couldn’t find the above image in the report although I did find out that 72.7% of all appeals taken in Cork are upheld or varied regardless of who brought them.

    • #733367
      lexington
      Participant

      Yeah that sounds like Cork alright!!! I’ll take your word for it – must take a good read through that thing again sometime. It’s the perfect cure for my insomnia. 😉

    • #733368
      Papworth
      Participant

      Must be a dire lack of venues in Cork if a marquee / tent !! has to be erected as a venue for Cork 2005

    • #733369
      lexington
      Participant

      There are – but that could all change soon. The city is inappropriately under-supplied with decent sized available multi-purpose venues.

    • #733370
      theblimp
      Participant

      Papworth – you’re correct in regard to the lack of venues. You need, though, to bear in mind that, traditionally, large venues DO NOT make huge profits, so are therefore not particularly attractive to developers. However they are of immense value to both the social fabric and the economic well-being of their immediate city. Lots of ‘media-speak’ about a large venue for Cork in the past month but nothing so far …… but all that could change very soon!

    • #733371
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @theblimp wrote:

      Papworth – you’re correct in regard to the lack of venues. You need, though, to bear in mind that, traditionally, large venues DO NOT make huge profits, so are therefore not particularly attractive to developers. However they are of immense value to both the social fabric and the economic well-being of their immediate city. Lots of ‘media-speak’ about a large venue for Cork in the past month but nothing so far …… but all that could change very soon!

      Is Cork too developer driven? I know that most Western Cities are, but surely given the year in it something could have been built instead of a tent!

    • #733372
      theblimp
      Participant

      ..indeed it could …… .and should …… and just might be

    • #733373
      lisam
      Participant

      any idea where?

    • #733374
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @theblimp wrote:

      ..indeed it could …… .and should …… and just might be

      That would be good. A positive step. You obviously know something that you are keeping up your sleeve. Make sure to post it here once you can release details. 🙂

    • #733375
      theblimp
      Participant

      yup

      …sorry about that!

      I can’t say where at present for a number of reasons. But look at it this way, Mahon Point was proposed as a ‘preferred’ site – I mentioned some time back that I didn’t see it as being suitable for a number of reasons (too ‘out of town’ to be of benefit to city business, 1 road in 1 road out, tight site, etc.) Now anyone that has gone near MP in the past month will know that traffic there is chaotic a lot of the time. Add 5,000-6,000 people heading to a concert into that mix and you have mayhem.

      Another suggested site was the back of the railway station. Aside from the fact that the site is too tight (narrow) and diesel locos are fairly loud and heavy (= vibrations), CIE have made it pretty clear just how important developing this site is in terms of their current priorities.

      So, I can’t tell you where (yet), but hopefully the above will tell you where not!

    • #733376
      lisam
      Participant

      anything to do with a site owned by a certain Mr Montgomery

    • #733377
      theblimp
      Participant

      nope – my understanding is that Paul had looked at something like this some time back (rumour has it that he was also asked by a certain large local developer if he’d be interested in running his ‘out-of-town’ arena if it were built) but nothing seems to have come of it. Again, it’s a difficult one to justify from a normal developers point of view.

      I could of course be wrong, lisam, as it has been known to happen in the past!! However the above is the most recent info I have Mr. M’s interest in a local concert arena. By the way, go on, give us a hint, where is Paul’s site to which you refer?

    • #733378
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      in relation to earlier posts about the An Taisce objection on the Lapp’s Quay Sculpture – according to an bord pleanala’s website, the objection is invalid – no copy of the acknowledgement of planning submission! very surprising methinks.

    • #733379
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: After a deferred vote was taken last night by CCC, Howard Holdings have been given the go-ahead to develop the 15m euro WebWorks at Albert Quay. The development will comprise of in excess of 45,000sq ft of IT/Business office space which will be then leased to Enterprise Ireland, who will in turn provide the space to fledgling IT and Financial Businesses – with a special preference for locally based industries. The development will also include an underground car-park of 65 spaces. The vote was deferred last week after councillors objected to Howard Holdings being issued a 700 year lease on Albert House which CCC acquired in the early 1990s. The revised deal will see Howard Holdings take possession of the 2,600sq m to the rear of Albert House for 2.25m euros with an annual rent thereafter of 10 euros. Albert House will remain in CCC hands unequivocally, although now, a question mark is being raised over how the mansion will be incorporated into the new facility in the long-term, but it is unlikely much will change – Howard Holdings will lease the ground floor of Albert House for 2 years to develop a restaurant facility on the premises, with it reverting back to CCC ownership term-end. This month (April) is cited as the start date for the project. 300 jobs will be created once the WebWorks is up and running. John Paul Construction will be main contractors.



      😮 Fleming Construction have announced today that they plan a joint 100m euro social-affordable housing scheme with CCC on their lands surrounding the former Our Lady’s Hospital, off Shanakiel Hill. Fleming Construction had original sought to develop a 6-storey student development on the site but were refused on both by both CCC and ABP. The new plans will see 405 houses constructed on the site with 80% of the houses falling into the social-affordable category (a mix of 2 and 3-bedroom detached, semi-deatched & townhouses). I knew plans had been afoot here – but did not know that these were the final plans made. Hmmm.


    • #733380
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Speaking about that side of the city, does anybody know the current state of play with the Good Shepherd’s Convent up in Sunday’s Well? Is there a development planned there? Is the church, which was ‘accidentally’ burned down going to be reinstated?

      🙂 Good news on Albert House.
      Wagamama looks great on South Main Street. Also, Mahers on Maylor Street is looking good these days.

    • #733381
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      🙂 Good news on Albert House.
      Wagamama looks great on South Main Street.

      The portions are something unnatural. Nice venue – and good to see Cork benefiting from an ever expanding variety of such facilities. Captain America’s is due to open upstairs in April.

      – Albert House WebWorks is good news for all really – for CCC, for Cork, Cork business, jobs, Enterprise Ireland, Howard Holdings. It’s one of those win-win things.

    • #733382
      Dubliner
      Participant

      HSA orders work to cease on Cork sites

      22 March 2005 15:11
      The Health and Safety Authority has ordered work to cease at 19 building sites and a quarry in Cork over the past month during a planned campaign by the authority on workplace safety in the county.

      The crackdown followed the deaths of four people in workplace accidents in Cork in January, more than the total number of fatalities there in the whole of 2004.

      Two men died at Tivoli docks. Both deaths involved accidents with trucks. Another man died when he fell off scaffolding on a building site at Blackrock in Cork city, and a woman died in a farm accident at Cloyne in east Cork.

      In response, the Health and Safety Authority announced a planned campaign of inspections by its staff of building sites and farms and on the manufacturing and transport sectors.

      The HSA carried out more than 430 inspections in Cork over the past month and it issued the results of those inspections today.

      The authority reveals that:

      * Work at 19 building sites and one quarry was halted because inspectors felt there was a risk of serious personal injury to the people working there

      * A further 12 improvement notices were issued directing the owners of four quarries, three farms, three transport and two engineering companies to remedy safety breaches in their operations

      * Seven transport companies were fined around €2,000 each for carrying dangerous goods by road without the proper documentation.

    • #733383
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Lexington I have now traced your image the correct title of which is ‘Third Party only Appeals as a % of Appeals Formally Decided’ at no stage whatsoever is reference made to An Taisce. The image is found at http://www.pleanala.ie/third.doc

      or can be accessed from http://www.pleanala.ie/anhigh2003.html under the heading third party

      I am sure that you have also noted the my previous comments in relation to the decision overturn/varience rate of in excess of 72% in the Cork City area as a proportion of all third party appeals taken by citizens, business groups and ngo’s alike.

      Finally I feel that it is important for you to acknowledge the article immediately preceding this post regarding the 19 sites closed by the HSA. And you might as well have a comment on the Good Shepard’s convent while your at it.

    • #733384
      lexington
      Participant

      @Diaspora wrote:

      Lexington I have now traced your image the correct title of which is ‘Third Party only Appeals as a % of Appeals Formally Decided’ at no stage whatsoever is reference made to An Taisce. The image is found at http://www.pleanala.ie/third.doc

      Hey, indeed you’re right – and I will rectify that as soon as I can. All my image files are divided among folders with some particular vague headings e.g. abata.jpg (=An Bord Pleanala An Taisce Appeals = abata.jpg) Clearly this is incorrect, and when I locate the correct graph I will post it. My first guess was that the Third Party Appeals graph was then instead the An Taisce graph, however this isn’t the case it would seem. So give me a few days and I’ll get back to you on it. The graph I have was requested by me from the Bord specifically, it took a few weeks to come back – my assumption was that such statistics would be included in the report (hence why I say in my post, I assume its in the report and on website), clearly that’s not so. It’s much more general. However I do know, that the 90% figure is inaccurate from the report I received from ABP. In fact, as it is now 2005, I should only guess that they will have 2004 figures to hand, I’ll issue a fresh request when I can and post the results when I receive them. Fair enough?

      Hey when I make a mistake I’ll accept it, but when I’m right, I’ll do my best to prove it. I’m sure you’d do no less.

      And of course I noted your post regarding 72% Appeal Rate for Cork, read beneath it. I don’t have any specific figures on Cork, but like I said, could well be true. It’s ridiculous in Cork. I must get onto ABP too to see if I can get some new figures on that as well…when in Rome…

      @Diaspora wrote:

      Finally I feel that it is important for you to acknowledge the article immediately preceding this post regarding the 19 sites closed by the HSA. And you might as well have a comment on the Good Shepard’s convent while your at it.

      Why?

      I almost always reply to posts directed at me. There are more on this forum than I. I’m just a cog in this wheel like yourself. 😉

      So D2 or D9???

    • #733385
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      Any news on OCP plans for acedemy st. I belive that the owners of the chateaux have not even been approached by OCP
      Although the development should not effect the front and thoose famous steps the back of that pub runs behind both the pharmacy and sasha shop next door. Can’t see how development could go without OCP accuring at least the back part of that property.
      :confused:

    • #733386
      lexington
      Participant

      @tomthevet2003 wrote:

      Any news on OCP plans for acedemy st. I belive that the owners of the chateaux have not even been approached by OCP
      Although the development should not effect the front and thoose famous steps the back of that pub runs behind both the pharmacy and sasha shop next door. Can’t see how development could go without OCP accuring at least the back part of that property.
      :confused:

      You’re right, a few posts back I have an outline posted of, apparent, properties around the block controlled by OCP. Le Cheateau is not included. There is no way OCP would be given grant to demolish those historic waterway steps – and quite right too – they are an irreplaceable and integral part of the city’s history. The concern will really centre on the effects of the development to the facade and steps of the building on the south-west corner of the block – with steps on both Academy Street and Patrick’s Street. I am told that this is being very carefully and sensitively noted in the design (internal, external, structural) of the project – and the effects of construction. Regarding Ryan’s Pharmacy – OCP does control this building – drawing options attained by me showed one option retaining the building’s facade with a small step-back and vertical extension to its rear. With planning being sought this Summer – I can’t see the final plans altering the Patrick’s Street facade all that much. I think the most noticeable change will be to the Taboo Bar and present The Jean Scene store across Faulkner’s Lane, fronting Patrick’s Street.


    • #733387
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      Lexington

      thanks for the reply – i have just seen the plan on the previous post however my point is that the chateau is very much L shaped and the bar extends behind the chemists which ocp own and behind the sasha shop with another enterance on to the dividing street – surely ocp would have to acquire at least the back part of the bar

    • #733388
      lexington
      Participant

      I believe that’s why acquiring Taboo and the TJS Building were so important for OCP I suppose. Consider the configuration of the site.

      It seems a far more practical option to not include Ryans Pharmacy and TJS, and simply utilise the Examiner premises straight across, but a Patrick’s Street frontage is important as this is where the highest volume of passing trade will be attained. Given the structural layout of the block, rather than cut through Le Cheateau, go around it (as noted in the image below – this by the way, is only my own possible layout option). That way, you have a street frontage and adequate avaialble space to link up with the main body of the development. So it is do-able, but like I said, I haven’t seen the final plans yet and can’t comment. When I do, I will let you know.

    • #733389
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Let’s hope they select an architecture that compliments the fine buildings present in Emmet Place, one of my favourite areas of the city.

      @lexington wrote:

      I believe that’s why acquiring Taboo and the TJS Building were so important for OCP I suppose. Consider the configuration of the site.

      It seems a far more practical option to not include Ryans Pharmacy and TJS, and simply utilise the Examiner premises straight across, but a Patrick’s Street frontage is important as this is where the highest volume of passing trade will be attained. Given the structural layout of the block, rather than cut through Le Cheateau, go around it (as noted in the image below – this by the way, is only my own possible layout option). That way, you have a street frontage and adequate avaialble space to link up with the main body of the development. So it is do-able, but like I said, I haven’t seen the final plans yet and can’t comment. When I do, I will let you know.

    • #733390
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I think Emmet place is being overlooked in this discussion. There are a number of buildings I would not like to see changed on this side of the development. eg AA building. Even the front portion of the Examiner Office is an excellent example of 19th Century architecture and should be maintained, I hope we don’t see a blanket demolition job here.


      Recently saw the plan for the new AIB development on Watercourse Road. Its a significant improvement on whats currently there. It’s a sleek, modern design of two storeys. The building will extend out to the same extent as the adjacent pub which will mean a severe loss of foothpath and green area at the front, but I think the impressive design makes up for that.


      Meanwhile, across the road a site at 7-11 Watercourse road is being cleared for the construction of 17 no. apartments, comprising of 3 no. linked blocks of 3,4 and 5 storeys with covered ground floor parking, retail space and ancillary accommodation. The developer is Sidney McElhinney.
      A subsequent application sought “the provision of a new northern facade with electronic signage “. Now I’ve only flicked through the current Cork City Development Plan, but It clearly states that no new advertising hoardings of any type will be permitted in the Blackpool area. Of course the application for the ‘electronic signage’ was refused. In fact, the developers were told that in its place thay had to put a piece of contemporary public art- How i laughed, HAHAHA 😀
      This all begs the question, do developers actually read the Development Plans? I wonder did the above developers think they could slip that through unnoticed. All’s well that ends well I suppose!

    • #733391
      charlies angel
      Participant

      Who designed the large apartment scheme for Frinailla in Dennehy’s Cross?
      I hear the planners love it???????
      The planners are promoting it as a prototype for Cork?

    • #733392
      lisam
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I think Emmet place is being overlooked in this discussion. There are a number of buildings I would not like to see changed on this side of the development. eg AA building. Even the front portion of the Examiner Office is an excellent example of 19th Century architecture and should be maintained, I hope we don’t see a blanket demolition job here.


      Recently saw the plan for the new AIB development on Watercourse Road. Its a significant improvement on whats currently there. It’s a sleek, modern design of two storeys. The building will extend out to the same extent as the adjacent pub which will mean a severe loss of foothpath and green area at the front, but I think the impressive design makes up for that.


      Meanwhile, across the road a site at 7-11 Watercourse road is being cleared for the construction of 17 no. apartments, comprising of 3 no. linked blocks of 3,4 and 5 storeys with covered ground floor parking, retail space and ancillary accommodation. The developer is Sidney McElhinney.
      A subsequent application sought “the provision of a new northern facade with electronic signage “. Now I’ve only flicked through the current Cork City Development Plan, but It clearly states that no new advertising hoardings of any type will be permitted in the Blackpool area. Of course the application for the ‘electronic signage’ was refused. In fact, the developers were told that in its place thay had to put a piece of contemporary public art- How i laughed, HAHAHA 😀
      This all begs the question, do developers actually read the Development Plans? I wonder did the above developers think they could slip that through unnoticed. All’s well that ends well I suppose!

      From what i have seen on the Academy Street Development they seem to be retaining the Academy St facade of the examiner office

    • #733393
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I think Emmet place is being overlooked in this discussion. There are a number of buildings I would not like to see changed on this side of the development. eg AA building. Even the front portion of the Examiner Office is an excellent example of 19th Century architecture and should be maintained, I hope we don’t see a blanket demolition job here.

      The AA Building is a stone little office to the west of the Insurances House, the 2 buildings are commonly mistaken for one another. If it’s the house you’re referring to, I agree, it is out and out one of my favourite buildings not only in Emmet Place, but all of Cork. It’s a simple, delicate elegance in a crowd of mix-and-match – its also listed, and thankfully, is not part of the OCP Academy Street plans, so it’s safe. Will try and get an image up of that house if I can, but if anyone has one in the meantime, throw it up on this thread – I’d love to see it shared with the members of this forum.

      Also, the Irish Examiner facades on Academy Street are indeed unique designs in their own right. I don’t particularly like them, but I recognise how they may be so appealing. I think you’ll be relatively satisfied with the Academy Street development plans outcome in this respect.



      @charlie’s angel wrote:

      Who designed the large apartment scheme for Frinailla in Dennehy’s Cross? I hear the planners love it??????? The planners are promoting it as a prototype for Cork?

      Is that a question or a statement? :confused: Where did you hear that comment anyway? I don’t know how planners have reacted to it (officially) – but pre-planning talks seem to be progressive. But then again, so were OFC’s talks on Eglinton Street.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 RKD McCarthy Lynch are currently working on a revision of Paul Kenny’s 50 Grand Parade site. A new application is being touted for the near future. Architects and engineers have been revising elements to the plan ahead of the application. The Kenny Group are expected to issue a statement soon. I’ll have more specific details on that later. It will be interesting 😉 (!!!)



      🙂 You’ll remember way back, I outlined a proposal for the Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade as proposed by a certain developer which saw the premises being revised for retail usage – well, I can tell you, in addition to Ward Anderson’s own talks, third-party talks have also been on-going with planners. Ward Anderson have been maintaining dialogue with a development group – the process has been such that preliminary designs have even been assessed (preliminary as in pre-planning). The design promoted by the group moves to take full advantage of the highly prominent position occupied by the Capitol. It will provide, apparently ‘a landmark’ (what building isn’t these days?! ;)) structure which will compliment the powerful angle of vision afforded by the length of Washington Street. Oh yes, and in line with my earlier posts, the project will still be predominantly retail.



      🙂 Planning is being sought for a 10m euro leisure development along the Link Road in Ballincollig by Wythall Ltd. The project will consist of a full leisure centre, 10-lane bowling alley, 8 five-aside pitches, a gym, treatment rooms, creche, restaurant, cafe and associated facilities.




      Also I was looking through plans of Aldi Stores Developments Ltd project proposed for the Heiton Buckley facility on Tory Top Road – I was never a big fan of Carew Kelly Architects, but it’s such a neat little development. I really like it – even the detail applied to the retail units and curves of the duplex blocks, all add to the project really well. I’m surprised at the thought put into it. CCC extended the due date on the project last year until the 20th of June 2005 ( a whopping extension by any accounts). I think the proposal will add very nicely to the area.

      The details of which are: demolition of the existing structures on site & the construction of a mixed use devt. scheme with a total of 2083m2 gross retail floor space, a creche 201m2, play area & 48 no duplex apts comprising: A single storey Aldi Discount Foodstore, max. height 7.25m with a gross floor area of 1560m2, net retail floor area 1075m2;2 no split level 2 storey blocks, approx 9.5m in height comprising a total of 7 no retail units, 523m2 total floor area & a creche, 201m2 total floor area with a roof play area; The development also includes the provision of 148 no carpark spaces for the commercial element, a gable sign on the Aldi Store, a double sided pole mounted sign at the entrance to the car pk & the replacement of the existing entrance onto Tory Top Rd with a new vehicular entrance; 48 no 2 bedroom duplex units arranged in 6 no 4 storey blocks, with a height of 11.03m & 61 no. res. carpk spaces;all associated landscaping & site dev. works .



      Today I received a copy of some CG Images of the 100,000sq ft, 8-storey office development on Centre Park Road by McCarthy Developments Ltd. The project is designed by Oisin Creagh of Murray O’Laoire and adjoins Centre Park House (6-storeys) already in ownership of the developers (their current HQ). The design is inoffensive and is perhaps nothing unique in structure, but it would add positivelly to the area for sure. The project blends a nice mix of materials from Portuguese Limestone Cladding to Zinc elements etc.

    • #733394
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 I said I’d get back with some information regarding the supposed plan for a 12-storey building on the small, triangular site bordered by Dean Street, Oliver Plunkett Street and Clontarf Street – and the latest is that the site is at leats 12-months away from construction (possibly moe planning pending). An application will be sought in the near future for the unique development – and when it is, I’ll let you know all the details. As it stands, the site will be let by Cohalan Downing for car-parking spaces until that time.

      If say, the application is sought sometime in the next month – that knocks 1 months off already, plus the standard 8 weeks planning (2 months), with possible Further Information, due date extensions and appeals all for consideration. The developer is considering all these factors in informing with the clearance, prepartion and primary construction dates.

    • #733395
      lexington
      Participant

      Well, Pa Johnson’s legendary public house was finally demolished today after 150 years in business – but it won’t be long before a new and improved Pa Johnson’s is back in place, at the very same location, only this time, it will form part of a larger complex being developed by OSB Group. The development wing of O’Sullivan Bros. DIY and Builders Retailling (among other things) is forwarding with Phase 2 of its Camden Court project. This phase will incorporate 50 apartments (on top of the 40 or so as part of Phase 1), a brand new and state-of-the-art Cork Arts Theatre and large, brand new Pa Johnsons public house. The project is designed by James Leahy & Associates, and is being constructed by John F. Supple Contractors.

      Here’s an old press image of how the whole project will look (Phase 1 – the lower section to the left, and Phase 2, the bulkier section to the right) in about 15 months. I unfortunately do not have an adequate CG Images from the architect which I can post for the time being.

      The project is actually a very striking structure along Carrolls Quay – the first Phase has already gained praise from citizens. I accept this image does the project zero justice, but hey! Copper and limestone cladding is used extensively throughout.



      😉 Also, on the sale of the former Doyle-family owned Cork Warehousing Co. facility on Albert Quay – contrary to some media reports, the sale price offers pitched at 7.75m for the 20,000sq ft site. O’Flynn Construction, Howard Holdings and 2 other prominent names are in the mix. However, it would certainly make major sense for OFC to nab this one – as the site would provide an excellent waterfrontage onto Albert Quay for their Eglinton Street development to the rear and may, through an application, provide for additional parking spaces to Eglinton Street – whcih had become a planning sore-point at the moment (with CCC wanting a substantially reduced basement car-park at Eglinton Street – in context, a stupid planning request on CCC’s behalf). Albert Quay could provide the additionally spaces need to assist Eglinton Street sales pitches, while allowing CCC some satisfaction by reducing parking. Who knows?! Either way, Albert Quay will have to be within the commercial/office usage category. Another developer in the running is hoping to provide a 7 to 8 storey office building with retail centre and basement parking.

    • #733396
      helloinsane
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I accept this image does the project zero justice, but hey! Copper and limestone cladding is used extensively throughout.

      You just broke my ironyometer.

      I’m not sure any image could do that project justice, if the schizophrenic massing is retained.

    • #733397
      lexington
      Participant

      Believe it or not helloinsane it’s actually not a bad project – but you really do have to see it in real life. Yes it is a bit mad but I suppose that’s why its fun. I know this will receive many members frowns – these things usually do – but all I’ll say is wait to see the done deal in actuality.



      Well the Irish Examiner have borrowed again from one of my posts, but hey! In an article by me…sorry, Eoin English (Joe King Eoin! 😉 ), regarding the appeal by Tomas O’Scannlainn of An Taisce brought against Howard Holdings’ sculpture gift to the Cork people he reported the Greg Coughlan (Howard Holdings CEO) said that perhaps the developers should

      seek a more appreciative city to develop and with which to gift such sculptures

      . I had a natter with an individual – and quite frankly, Howard Holdings are ticked off, yes, and I 100% agree with them. Perhaps the comment, as reported (but I didn’t hear about personally) was made in the heat of the moment, but I really think the appeal is a low down tactic (this isn’t an attack on An Taisce before anyone screams – its on Mr. Scannlainn). If this is how the city reacts to something as simple and generous (I mean, it was something the could have saved the developers near on 500,000euros) as this sculpture, then maybe I’d agree with Mr. Coughlan.

      Not a political favourite of mine, Charlie Haughey, had a great phrase:

      “How can I soar like an eagle when I’m surrounded by turkeys?”

      Sure, he meant it in a very different way, but it sums up my belief about Cork – how can it soar when it’s surrounded by turkeys? (e.g. CAHRA, SOME not ALL An Taisce objections, Lower Glanmire Roads Residents Association etc)

    • #733398
      helloinsane
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Believe it or not helloinsane it’s actually not a bad project – but you really do have to see it in real life.

      I do? Ah, bollix.

    • #733399
      A-ha
      Participant

      Hey, anyone able to tell me what the full renovations to the county hall consist of??

      Please and thx.

    • #733400
      Pana01
      Participant

      Walking down Patrick St on Saturday, I saw that the martyr of a portakabin is still alive and kicking!
      Two CIE men were laughing and making cups of tea inside.
      A few weeks ago, ‘Inside Cork’ had a cover story on this ‘eyesore’, and how nobody from CIE was available for comment. I feel like dismantling it myself – any volunteers, let me know.

      Lex – I thought it was agreed that this thing was to go recently??

      Rant over……..

    • #733401
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pana01 wrote:

      Walking down Patrick St on Saturday, I saw that the martyr of a portakabin is still alive and kicking!
      Two CIE men were laughing and making cups of tea inside.
      A few weeks ago, ‘Inside Cork’ had a cover story on this ‘eyesore’, and how nobody from CIE was available for comment. I feel like dismantling it myself – any volunteers, let me know.

      Lex – I thought it was agreed that this thing was to go recently??

      Rant over……..

      It is due to be remove – CCC and CIE reached an agreement to construct a new Controllers Office along Patrick’s Street in keeping with the street’s renewal – but CIE are fidgeting AGAIN. It’s just more of the same old crap from a small-minded State dinosaur. I’m not quite sure on the details of the problems though.



      @Ah-a wrote:

      Hey, anyone able to tell me what the full renovations to the county hall consist of??

      Follow this link -> http://www.corkcoco.ie/co/web/Cork%20County%20Council/About%20Us/County%20Hall


    • #733402
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I’ve got a can of petrol… meet you guys in Cor k for lunch and a good ole bonfire?

      @Pana01 wrote:

      Walking down Patrick St on Saturday, I saw that the martyr of a portakabin is still alive and kicking!
      Two CIE men were laughing and making cups of tea inside.
      A few weeks ago, ‘Inside Cork’ had a cover story on this ‘eyesore’, and how nobody from CIE was available for comment. I feel like dismantling it myself – any volunteers, let me know.

      Lex – I thought it was agreed that this thing was to go recently??

      Rant over……..

    • #733403
      lisam
      Participant

      @helloinsane wrote:

      You just broke my ironyometer.

      I’m not sure any image could do that project justice, if the schizophrenic massing is retained.

      :rolleyes: Have you seen what was there before? A total eyesore, a much needed improvement to that area, thumbs up to more developments along there!!!

    • #733404
      lexington
      Participant

      This is just another image of the Camden Court development by OSB. Designed by James Leahy & Associates, constructed by John F. Supple Contractors. It’s not any better really, but at least its in colour. Sort of…

      I agree lisam, its a significant improvement on what was there. Which was basically ruin and tin-roof.

    • #733405
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      This is just another image of the Camden Court development by OSB. Designed by James Leahy & Associates, constructed by John F. Supple Contractors. It’s not any better really, but at least its in colour. Sort of…

      I agree lisam, its a significant improvement on what was there. Which was basically ruin and tin-roof.

      Thats hardly an excuse this building is low on architectural merit full stop

    • #733406
      lisam
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      Thats hardly an excuse this building is low on architectural merit full stop

      😀 Its not the worst design in the world , its interesting

    • #733407
      lexington
      Participant

      Well like I said, this image does not justify the building whatsoever – I don’t know how, but they managed to create a model and image that even made me go ‘Dear God!’, I had been bracing myself, but since the scaffolding was removed off Phase 1, I was pleasantly surprised. It’s a funny fish alright – and going by the image, I would agree with you – but that’s all I have for the time being. I may attain some first-hand photos soon, see how you feel then.

      Below is an image of 1 of a number of other alternate proposals for the same site – as proposed by many other developers and previous owners. This ugly and boring design is by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli, the CG Image is quite old, given that all the surrounding buildings have been redeveloped or reconstructed.


      Given the choice…well…

    • #733408
      Anonymous
      Participant

      That latest image is even worse, so while we are on that subject I think I will introduce this as being about an equal level of design quality

      http://www.hkr.ie/proj_corkstpge1.htm

      Whilst these are interesting

      http://www.irish-architecture.com/buildings_ireland/cork/cork/glucksman/index.html

      https://archiseek.com/content/attachment.php?attachmentid=595

      Or even this

      http://scotland.archiseek.com/news/2005/000054/1_lge.html

      But certainly not this

      https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=3165&highlight=lexington+watergold

    • #733409
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 KC Kilmore Ltd have been refused retention of their Subway restaurant premises (former barbershop). This is where the ineptitude of CCC reveals itself. During conversion to the restaurant, CCC enacted new legislation which claimed that for such usage conversion, planning was necessary to be sought. KC Kilmore were informed of this following completion of their conversion, and subsequently sought planning (during which, the business continued to operate), CCC today refused them permission and have not made the reasoning public. Does anyone else see the problem here?

    • #733410
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      C’mon – it’s not THAT bad. Superior to the other new apartment development nearby. Camden Wharf.

      ick.

    • #733411
      lisam
      Participant

      Dont think any of the councils know what they’re doing. The left hand doesnt know what the right hand is doing!

    • #733412
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      C’mon – it’s not THAT bad. Superior to the other new apartment development nearby. Camden Wharf. ick.

      Its probably a nano degree less odious but it is industry grade stuff that brings in fees for architectural practices and not something that any decent practice would ever put on their home page. Surely you would hate to think that someone researching Cork architecture would think that this was being promoted as architecture worthy of notice. Only auctioneers get excited by that type of building in my experience and their excitement seldom has anything to do with urban design quality in my experience.

    • #733413
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Agreed, however in terms of city present centre activity this is probably about as exciting as it gets (can someone comfirm/deny)

    • #733414
      lexington
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      Agreed, however in terms of city present centre activity this is probably about as exciting as it gets (can someone comfirm/deny)

      I would have said 21 Lavitts Quay is a far superior building – I don’t know why, but it speaks ‘Millbank’ (i.e. MI5 HQ, London) to me at some curious level. I have a few smashing images of 21 Lavitts Quay as it nears completion (however I need a new cable link with USB extension) and I really feel it sets a precendent along the quay.

      Also, competition designs for Kyrls Quay are shaping up nicely (I’ve seen 2 early drawings for 2 different entrants) and they’re interesting.

      Also Rockfell’s Cornmarket Street development by Frank Ennis and Associates as well as John Mannix’s Washington Street development by Dermot Coveney & Associates are interesting designs too.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd have erected a new tower crane over Blackpool Developments site for a new office and residential scheme at Blackpool Retail Park (Phase 2) – however, Blackpool Developments have recently lodged plans to convert the building to 70,000sq ft + of open plan office space with ground floor retail – this follows their success in tenants at the existing park office space and subsequent demand.

    • #733415
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      For some reason 21 Lavitts Qy just washes over me. It might aswell be the flytower of the opera house. It doesn’t interest me all that much. It’s obvious money was spent on the exterior but in my opinion to no great effect.

    • #733416
      lisam
      Participant

      🙂 PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd have erected a new tower crane over Blackpool Developments site for a new 5-storey 150-bedroom hotel at Blackpool Retail Park – however, Blackpool Developments have recently lodged plans to convert the building to 70,000sq ft + of office space with ground floor retail – this follows their success in tenants at the existing park office space and subsequent demand.[/QUOTE]

      A much better Retail Park than mahon and traffic is a lot better. For once the Northside has gotten something better than the Southside

    • #733417
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John Cleary Developments Ltd have been granted planning to develop a 5-showroom MotorMall near Mahon Point on the former Sifco plant in Ballinure/Mahon. The plan will create upwards of 150 jobs and provide for a unique one-stop motor services facility.

      – nearby Johnson & Perrott are developing a 7m euro MotorMall also at Mahon Point for 3 of their 4 Cork dealerships. Design is by SDA O’Flynn and will be occupied by December 2005.

      – O’Flynn Construction have applied for a MotorMall development at their EastGate development on Little Island.


    • #733418
      lisam
      Participant

      😀 If only I had the money to buy a new car from all these new car showrooms!!!

    • #733419
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A decision is due tomorrow from CCC on Frinailla ltd.’s proposals for a large retail/residential development on a significant site at Watercourse Road, Blackpool.

    • #733420
      lexington
      Participant


      😮 Well, one of many, but after the applications, the talks, the Further Info – Frinailla’s revised development for Ladyswell (Watercourse Road, Blackpool) is due tomorrow. The project has been significantly revised and scaled down, but still remains on a very large scale with in excess of 150 residential units, basement car-parking, commercial facilities, public facilities etc etc. Fingers crossed – it’s a good project for an area much in need of one.

      – on that note, I probably didn’t mention this, but Frinailla has hired Pat O’Brien Developments as private contractor for its An Caislean development in Ballincollig after the previous contractor went into liquidation mid-construction. Construction is now well under way with a tower crane having been erected a few weeks ago.



      😮 Also tomorrow, though there is still a possible Further Information request due, Mary Collin’s 9-storey apartment development at Roxboro Quarry on the Boreenmanna Road is also due a decision. I won’t hold my breath until I hear a result tomorrow – but the 39-unit development is designed by Dermot Coveney & Associates. It isn’t an exciting departure, but is inoffensive and pretty much standard issue. The quarry needs some redevelopment, at this project will add sufficiently. The actual height of the project has less impact than one would imagine given the varying gradient of the quarry site.



      😮 O’Flynn Construction directors have met with Joe Gavin, City Manager and officials, regarding the problematic issue of basement parking associated with their Eglinton Street development. The issue has proven a sore point between planners and the developers – with OFC claiming the parking space number is key to the sales pitch of the development. In this case, I very much agree with the developers – the CCC argument really is non-sensical and short-sighted. Another meeting is scheduled soon – I’ll let you know the outcome when I can.



      Also, anyone know a good freeware image compression programme? It would allow me load up some very interesting and high-quality development images to the forum – some of which have not yet been released to the public. I am having trouble compressing images (JPEG) of 4MB and 5MB to under or at 1MB.

    • #733421
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Also, anyone know a good freeware image compression programme? It would allow me load up some very interesting and high-quality development images to the forum – some of which have not yet been released to the public. I am having trouble compressing images (JPEG) of 4MB and 5MB to under or at 1MB.

      I use this one, it’s pretty good IrfanView .

    • #733422
      Pug
      Participant

      Everyone note the plans in the Examiner for the Capitol Cineplex in town? looks impressive and with the Oyster bar and various units in behind being sold, between that and the Grand Parade, the city will be flying!

      anyone know whats happening with the buiilding on the left on the corner with south mall as you go over the bridge from georges quay?

      cheers

    • #733423
      lexington
      Participant

      Well there you have it – it’s official!

      You may remember that way back I reported that a Limerick-based developer had been in talks with Ward Anderson about purchasing the Capitol Cineplex for a retail development, well now it’s public and Mount Kennett Investments (John Costello and Paul O’Brien) are the buyers indeed.

      Ward Anderson had been maintaining talks with CCC about seeking planning permission on a redevelopment of the site – which they then would sell with F.P.P. ~ however Mr. Costello’s persistence evidently paid off. Although I was aware that the deal had been struck, I was unaware until last night that planning would be sought so soon. And yes, planning is being sought.

      The development is scaled down from original plans by the developer (other developers, 1 other Limerick-based group ~ I may have mentioned much earlier, had very exciting plans for the site, but eventually dropped out of the run). The development will now see the Capitol demolished and redeveloped as a 33,000sq ft department store with 18 overhead apartments (I don’t like the idea of apartments at this location!) . The design is by Sabine Wittman of Dungarvan practice e-Project ~ and quite frankly, the application design is sub-par and undeserving of the superb location. I’m disappointed at the lazy route taken by the developers and design team in the end. The boxy and incoherrent roof-line is ugly and unkempt. It reminds me of the St. Patrick’s Quay frontage of the Metropole Hotel (that horrible lemon box with even uglier roof-top box). Some of the other competing proposals (OCP for the record pulled out of talks in late 2004) had a far greater degree of panache – this is a very poor effort. But I’ll let you decide – I don’t have any clear images of the final design yet, so in fairness to Tommy Barker, well done for getting this image. I should have better images come a couple of weeks.



      Also, today is a big decision day for some major Cork projects – fingers crossed for Frinailla and Mary Collins’ projects!


    • #733424
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Ewwww, I think i’m going to be sick 😮

    • #733425
      lisam
      Participant

      😮 Obviously it was a question of money rather than taste

    • #733426
      lexington
      Participant

      You say that lisam as though there was money spent on it.

      Buildings like these make baby Jesus cry. 🙁

    • #733427
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Mary Collins’ has seen her proposal of a 9-storey, 39-unit apartment building for the Roxboro Quarry on the Boreenmanna Road refused planning. Among the reasons cited by planners were ill traffic management, over development and lack of amenity spaces (other than a roof-garden). The jury is still out on my opinion of the report – although I’m disappointed to see the project refused, I still believe the developer should have more carefully addressed particular issues. I would advise her not to seek permission via ABP and perhaps revise spatial and access elements to the project, then simply reapply to CCC. I would be very confident ABP would refuse any 1st party appeal on similar grounds.



      :confused: Although a decision is due today – CCC have not yet got back with a firm decision on Frinailla’s Watercourse Road (Ladyswell) project. An individual at McCutcheon Mulcahy said she can’t say anything as of yet, but will let me know when possible. So, you’ll hear it around the same time too. Taking a guess, I’d probably say ‘Conditional’, but who knows?! I could be wrong.

    • #733428
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      :confused: The mystery deepens over lady”s well


      Those anyone know who owns The Loft- stretching from North Main Street to Coal Quay? What with the impending development in the area, this site must be in line for development in the near future.


      In the same area, there is an old warehouse on Grattan Street (opposite Henry Grattan Pub) which would look great converted to entertainment or office use.


      Someone sent me a great image of a fantastic proposed development in the City yesterday. I’ll try to put it on here today or tomorrow. Its really really exciting!!

    • #733429
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Ann O’Donovan has applied for a development of 25 apartments, a gym and 26 space basement car-park along Cotter Street – an area subject to much development of recent times, such as Howard Holding’s Copley Hall and Corbet Bros. Copley Street/Stable Lane office and residential development (which is coming along nicely).



      Just with reference to the Capitol Cineplex redevelopment – it’s a sad affair that the project has instilled so little excitment. For a site that was heralded as being among the most highly anticipated redevelopment opportunities in Cork – it says little of the design or developers that the project has promoted practically no excitement at all. This was an opportunity to create something really appealing – but instead its just a boring, boxy mass. I can see straight away this project going into Further Information – and perhaps the top 3-bedroom apartment being removed by condition or revision in order to reduce the boxy roof-line. It would be nice to see the developers and architects add, at the very least, a bit of flair to the stepped back upper floors that are no more than simply squared off levels.



      Frinailla’s Ladyswell decision will be available tomorrow morning. I’ll keep you posted.

    • #733430
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:


      Those anyone know who owns The Loft- stretching from North Main Street to Coal Quay? What with the impending development in the area, this site must be in line for development in the near future.


      In the same area, there is an old warehouse on Grattan Street (opposite Henry Grattan Pub) which would look great converted to entertainment or office use.


      Someone sent me a great image of a fantastic proposed development in the City yesterday. I’ll try to put it on here today or tomorrow. Its really really exciting!!

      1. The Loft was owned by P&A Herilhy (owners also of Square Deal), but was sold last year for a handsome sum to a private developer. Plans are being formulated but I’m afraid I’m not at liberty to say what…yet.

      2. That warehouse was due to be developed by NorthGate Investments but it never took off. It’s a great premises I agree. The problem with the location however in terms of entertainment usage is the proximity to nearby residencies – believe you me, I checked this one out and the possibilities for entertainment are slim at best, but who knows, planners work in mysterious ways.

      3. RM , would be interested to see those images – what location?



      opus thanks for the link – still finding it tough to minimise the images sufficiently to upload. I’ve some excellent and exclusive images of the revised Water Street development but I fear you may never get to see them if I can’t compress them enough. Oh dear!

    • #733431
      brainscan
      Participant

      opus thanks for the link – still finding it tough to minimise the images sufficiently to upload. I’ve some excellent and exclusive images of the revised Water Street development but I fear you may never get to see them if I can’t compress them enough. Oh dear!

      IrfanView is an excellent program and should allow you reduce the size of your images dramatically. To reduce the file size you must Resample the image at a lower resolution (72dpi is sufficient for web) and select an image width of about 800 pixels.
      Also when you go to save the newly resized image you can select a lower Jpeg quality factor eg 50% to reduce the filesize even more.

      Hopefully this works for you as I cant wait to some interesting images rather than that pathetic looking offering for the Capitol Ciniplex. 🙁

    • #733432
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As promised yesterday, here’s a few images of a development which is about to be submitted for planning in the next few weeks.
      Its located on UCC owned ground at Mardyke Walk – most recently used as a GAA pitch by the college. The site is adjacent to Fitzgerald park (Seperated by Ferry Walk) and links up with Daly’s Bridge (Shakey Bridge) with access to the Northside.
      The development will consist of 5-6 story glass and steal structure in three blocks. The buildings will house 5 large lecture theatres (at least as large as those in the Boole Basement) and a number of departments will be housed there- specifically Law and Celtic Studies.
      The development will also house the proposed new Wrixon Advanced Management Institute. Architects are AFD Architects

    • #733433
      lawyer
      Participant

      I think UCC should be prohibited from any further development in the area around the College.
      They have suceeded in reducing Western Road, College Road and other adjacent areas from vibrant places where families lived to a mass of ‘outbuildings’, now dead once the College closes.
      I know there are one or two exceptional developments over the past few years but these do not outweigh the damage, I think, they have done.

    • #733434
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Just to allay any fears, i was taking the p*** with my last text- it is April 1st after all! 😀

      Any news on Ladyswell?

    • #733435
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      so radioactiveman – AFD Architects are at it again – April Fool’s Day Architects?

    • #733436
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I thought as much… UCC are still suffering from complaints in relation to the Mardyke sports centre

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Just to allay any fears, i was taking the p*** with my last text- it is April 1st after all! 😀

      Any news on Ladyswell?

    • #733437
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Hehehe..


      Back to serious matters…. According to CCC website, Frinailla’s Ladyswell has been given conditional planning permission. But, in the report (also online) it recomends refusal. Anybody know whats going on? I’m confused (as usual)

    • #733438
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 On Frinailla’s Ladyswell Development – as suspected, it has received the go-ahead with conditions but only after the Senior Planner (Ronnie McDowell) and City Manager (Joe Gavin) intervened. The planner in question has displayed, a quite frankly, ill record in planning. After the original 2003 Frinailla application on the site issued for a development of 9-stories w/ over 200 units, the same planner refused permission on the basis of excessive height and negative impact on the sky-line – he remarked that a 3 to 4 storey reduction would have more than likely seen th application succeed with some other minor alterations. Now, in this application, after Frinailla reduced the scheme by 4 stories (the development averages from 2 to 5-storeys at its apex), the planner after recognising all the positive changes to the scheme, then decided at the very last minute to refuse planning based on excessive height and massing, as well as overshadowing of the central courtyard during Spring and Autumn Equinoxes. Boulderdash! The reason the decision wasn’t made known as scheduled yesterday was on account of last minute intervention by the City Manager, who, when reading the report blasted it for being grossly unfair. In consultation with the Senior Planner, the City Manager requested the Planner in question to draw up appropriate conditions associated with a Grant – however, the 5-storey block fronting Watercourse Road has been reduced to 4-storeys through condition (something I don’t particularly agree with – as it contradicts original planning talks and retracts negatively from the overall consistency of the project – the additional storey detracts no-more from the area than 4-storeys and is a pointless, perhaps petty bitter condition, a chance to get one final kick in).

      The planner in question has a poor record for planning decisions, in my opinion, – this stems from his most unfair decisions on the Silversprings’ schemes by O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd., Joe O’Donovan’s redevelopment of the cinema site on Watercourse Road and redevelopment plans at York Hill. I very glad at the decision made by the City Manager – Joe Gavin and Ronnie McDowell have had to do this before with a planner (a different planner) on the scheme that has now become Camden Wharf (by Hornibrook Holdings). It would seem, regardless of recognising that Frinailla’s Ladyswell site was much in need of redevelopment, The Planner in question would not have granted planning here unless it was for a series of bungalows.

      (sorry for not posting this info sooner, but had a busy busy morning!!!)



      @RM wrote:

      i was taking the p*** with my last text- it is April 1st after all!

      I thought as much – I hadn’t heard anything about such a project at that location. Plus ‘Wrixon Advanced Management Institute’ – I very much doubt it. :p


    • #733439
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 PJ Walls Ltd are on-site at Sunbeam Industrial Park – which so famously was destroyed by fire those many months ago. Robert McGrattan is developing 10 number, 2-storey light industrial units on the site to replace and hopefully restore the historic industrial park. Design is by J.E. Keating & Associates.



      :confused: Although construction work had not been offically cited until later, it would seem Fleming Construction are readying the former M&P O’Sullivan Cash&Carry facility at Victoria Cross for demolition and construction of the new UCC Student Accommodation facility at the site. The development is designed by Bertie Pope & Associates. Fencing has been erected around the site. As far as I am aware, it is planned that the accommodation will be in co-ordination with the time-frame for the already progressing Phase 2 to Victoria Mills next-door, this is to minimise construction disturbances to residents and students alike in the area. I’ll get back when I know for sure what the full-story is on this.


    • #733440
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂
      I thought as much – I hadn’t heard anything about such a project at that location. Plus ‘Wrixon Advanced Management Institute’ – I very much doubt it. :p


      I just forwarded that post on to some friends in UCC & I’d be willing to bet they will believe that name for the Management Institute 🙂

    • #733441
      keeneye
      Participant

      QUOTE : Ward Anderson had been maintaining talks with CCC about seeking planning permission on a redevelopment of the site – which they then would sell with F.P.P. ~ however Mr. Costello’s persistence evidently paid off. Although I was aware that the deal had been struck, I was unaware until last night that planning would be sought so soon. And yes, planning is being sought.

      With regards to the long- awaited development at the Capitol Cinplex , the sale of the Capitol to Mr. John Costello and co. is ALL subject to planning granted to WardAnderson by CCC..I have been speaking to a senior partner in WardAnderson over the weekend and have been informed that they expect to get “MANY” objections for various reasons that will delay the whole process considerably. Same ‘ol Same ‘ol no doubt. Ive no doubt that there will be a few suprises yet with this site ! :rolleyes: Also, another Cinema planned in the city centre maybe . !!? 😉 Will know more soon.

      *********************************************************************************************************************************

    • #733442
      lexington
      Participant

      @keeneye wrote:

      With regards to the long- awaited development at the Capitol Cinplex , the sale of the Capitol to Mr. John Costello and co. is ALL subject to planning granted to WardAnderson by CCC..I have been speaking to a senior partner in WardAnderson over the weekend and have been informed that they expect to get “MANY” objections for various reasons that will delay the whole process considerably.

      Sorry, just to clarify something – are you saying that the project as presented is a result of planning negotiations by Ward Anderson with CCC via The e-Project??? Or are you saying that the site will only be sold subject to a grant of planning to Mount Kennett? Just didn’t follow that post clearly.

      The latter is similar to my understanding – but not quite.

      And on the subject of objections – I too expect a series of objections to the project as well. This is going to be one of those year-long planning procedures. I am aware of objections associated with design, bulk and height which will be submitted post-prevalidation.

    • #733443
      lexington
      Participant

      As promised, and I finally figured how to compress the images I have (quiet Hurrah!), here are those exclusive images of the new, revised application for Werdna Developments’ Water Street project.

      Hope to have more interesting images up soon now that I know how to get somewhere with them!

      And this is my 500th Post – I don’t know whether that’s good or very very sad. Oh well.


    • #733444
      Lincoln
      Participant

      Lexington, thanks for the water street images , they look great-a slimmed down version of the original planning application last year.-i think what will make the difference here with respect to the general public is the quality of and access to the waterfront areas.- is there public access to the waters edge or is for the residents only?

    • #733445
      lexington
      Participant

      @Lincoln wrote:

      is there public access to the waters edge or is for the residents only?

      It’s open to the public – it’s a great waterfront recreational area surrounded by retail/commercial and leisure functions as well as a large landscaped central plaza for both residents, visitors and established locals. The aim is to breathe life into this long forgotten district and create a hub of activity for all concerned. Really is quality stuff. Unfortunately, the residents (despite the immense changes) have issued 2 seperate objections (each crissed-crossed with identical names on their respective petitions), an observation has been made by the Fisheries Dept (just basically requesting conditions on the development of the waterfront so as not to disrupt marine life etc etc), 1 supportive observation and 1 objection/observation from An Taisce (of course).

    • #733446
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Lexington, do you have a map of where this is, or have you posted one before?

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #733447
      sw101
      Participant

      tis here

    • #733448
      sw101
      Participant

      here, even

    • #733449
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Thanks SW. Now I can visualise it.

    • #733450
      lexington
      Participant

      Just keep in mind that the map is pre-dated to the previous application and hence the building arrangements and bulk, internal roads, boardwalk etc have all been amended.



      :confused: Seems the Mount Kennett Investments application for the Capitol Cineplex redevelopment is ‘INCOMPLETE’ – hmmm, we’ll be waiting another day or 2 so before a fully complete application is resubmit.



      That over-head image of the docklands, out of date as it may be, could do nicely in visually outlining some of the big projects planned, in planning or pre-planning for the docklands. I won’t be able to highlight them all due to confidentiality issues – but I’ll highlight the ones I can and give a little background on each. I’ll get to that sometime this week.

    • #733451
      GrahamH
      Participant

      What a lovely location – and a well-designed scheme too, very attractive.

    • #733452
      Lincoln
      Participant

      thanks Lexington &Shaggy,-it seems to me that this WaterStreet development is just what Cork Docklands needs- it certainly sets a good precendent for any other developments, particularly for public access to the water, new public spaces in what is currently private property that currently cuts off access to the waters edge.(like so many sites in Docklands)
      I sincerely hope that CCC see sense here and realise that support for this kind of development is a good thing-particulary when you realise how little public open space there is in Cork City.

    • #733453
      Pug
      Participant

      howdy

      water street looks imprseeive there, well done on the photos lads

      maybe i missed it in a previous thread but anyone any info on what they are doing to the building on the left, as you go over the bridge from georges quay and turn left on to south mall??

      ta

    • #733454
      lexington
      Participant

      Pug – not quite sure what building you are talking about there. Is it the former Mill building to the rear of the Bank of Ireland on the right as you go across Parliament Bridge? Or the corner building turning left onto South Mall and heading west toward Grand Parade??? THAT corner building isn’t seeing much action at the present but is scheduled for a refurbishment. The former Mill building is owned by Tumblegate Ltd (Tom McCarthy of Jacobs on the Mall Restaurant/Kingsley/McDev fame) – and was scheduled to commence a long-delayed redevelopment at the beginning of this year – contrators have switched from Joseph Lane & Son Ltd to O’Flynn of Banteer, however, still no progress seems to have being made – even after a promise to the City Manager and a number of structural reinforcements. Murray O’Laoire are the architects for what, some day, will become an extended restaurant at ground-floor (Jacobs), some retail, parking and over-head apartments.

    • #733455
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      As promised, and I finally figured how to compress the images I have (quiet Hurrah!), here are those exclusive images of the new, revised application for Werdna Developments’ Water Street project.

      Hope to have more interesting images up soon now that I know how to get somewhere with them!

      And this is my 500th Post – I don’t know whether that’s good or very very sad. Oh well.


      Must say it looks very good. Around time that Cork got something like this. Stayed in a high up flat in the US on holidays last year and have a hankering to live somewhere similar. Probably well beyond my means though 🙁

      Please keep up the good work, it’s great to see what’s coming down the road development-wise in the city.

    • #733456
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Pug – the corner building turning left onto South Mall and heading west toward Grand Parade??? THAT corner building isn’t seeing much action at the present but is scheduled for a refurbishment. .

      thats the one – i was just curious, they are working away on it, seems more than a refurb though given that it was in awful condition

      cheers

    • #733457
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Having withdrawn his previous application for Westend in Bishopstown only last month, Mark Kelleher has resubmitted a fresh application for the site in the hope that this revised proposal won’t meet the overwhelming, but quite frankly unwarranted, opposition posed by residents. Well over 100 objections were lodged against the proposal showing the small-minded can’t do attitude the residents of CAHRA having ably displayed over the months. In fairness, some objections were perfectly acceptable and quite right too – but the majority of ‘anti-highrise’ objections (the project was 5-storeys at its most) were quite frankly tripe!

      But, let by-gones be by-gones, the new application is sought on the same site for a considerably more modest development consisting of 73 residential units made up of:4 No. Blocks of new townhouses comprising as follows; a)Block A- 6 no. Tce Hses, 2 storey with mansard roof, comprising 2 no. 4 bed and 4 no. 2 bed units b)Block B- 6 no. tce hses, 2 storey with mansard roof, comprising 1 no. 4 bed and 5 no. 3 bed units c)Block C- 20 no. units in 2 storey with mansard roof and 3 storey with mansard roof townhouses comprising 9 no. 3 bed duplexes, 10 no. 2 bed and 1 no. 1 bed units d)Block D- 11 no. 2 bed tce hses, 2 storey with mansard roof e)Block E- 4 no. tce hses 2 storey and 2 storey with mansard roof comprising 2 no. 4 bed, 1 no. 3 bed and 1 no. 2 bed units. With associated 36 no. grade level resident and visitors car parking. New 3 storey with mansard level apt devt over basement car park. The ground, 1st, 2nd & mansard floors will consist of a total of 26 no. apts comprising 8 no. 1 bed,17 no. 2 bed & 1 no. 3 bed units.The basement will comprise of 56 no. car parking bays.

      Design is by Frank Ennis & Associates (whom I hear, on a side note, are investigating the possibility of following STW, O’Mahony Pike and others to Cork with a brand-new practice located in the city. However, it isn’t confirmed as of yet).



      😮 The Moran Family are awaiting a decision on their development in Deanrock, Togher of 71 residential units; consisting of 54 no. 3 bedroom houses, 7 no. 2 bedroom houses, 2 no. 4 bedroom house, 1 no. 3 bedroom apartment, 6 no. 2 bedroom apartments and 1 no. 1 bedroom apartment. Permission is also sought for 89 no. car parking spaces, the relocation of the existing site entrance, for roads, footpaths, lighting and all site development works.

      The application was submitted last October (2004) and was subject to extensive Further Information, with a number of small changes having been made. The locals took full advantage of the objection system, but the project will bring a new lease of life to an otherwise run-down area of the city. Design Strategies provided the architectural service on this one. A decision is due the 11th April 2005.


    • #733458
      lexington
      Participant

      The image below is taken from a graphic posted by sw101 earlier on up this page – the original graphic outlines the Water Street development area (as shaded in red). I said, however, that I would use the image to outline SOME but not all of the projects proposed in and around the docklands. The good news, this is not the sum of all docklands projects being either investigated, at pre-planning, in planning or under construction – but represents what I can tell you for the time being. I will of course update you when allowed or able to. For the time being, it may provide some of you with an interesting insight.

      Though all the above projects are a reality in some shape, I cannot outline the details of all sufficiently due to issues of confidentiality. But here’s what I can –

      The YELLOW outline represents the site owned by Tedcastles Ltd – east of Marina Point. One plan for the site proposes a substantial residential development with adjoining parks (private and public), some educational facilities and a number of office spaces. An ‘impression’ of the development was posted a few pages back. However, the usage contravenes Development Plan guidelines, with cites that the southern docklands are the preserve of predominatly commercial activities. The North Docklands will serve residential usage in the main. Tedcastles are currently exploring other options – and may seek to develop the site themselves. An announcement could be due in the near future (as in this year!)

      The LIGHT BROWN outline to the very bottom of the image is the site of the former Goldcrop premises and Centre Park House. McCarthy Developments are currently in planning with this nice 100,000sq ft, 8-storey office development. Murray O’Laoire are architects. The development will adjoin Centre Park House (to be refurbished).

      The BLUE above the aforementioned site is an 80,000sq ft site purchased late last year for a handsome sum by Cohlan Downing Associates. I can’t specify the details here – but a number of foundation assessments are supposedly earmarked to address subsidence issues. However, the new owner has not been foiled in devising some large-scale plans for the site – and plans to perservere with an application following verification from engineers, or following treatments, at some point in the future. A date has not been earmarked. Designs are on-going. No news may be made public for quite some time.

      The RED outlines the famous IAWS controlled site of R&H Hall Weybridge. A number of plans have been devised for the site. Some were formulated back in 1999 – but were dismissed by planners in early talks. New plans will comprise of mixed-usage with commercial (and possibly, just possibly, a fine cultural element to it. This again, is unlikely to be made public for anytime within the immediate future. I can say, at this point in time. I have no real inclination regarding time-frames etc etc – but I’ll find out.

      The PURPLE is another hush-hush project, the site is owned by Careys Tool Hire Ltd, who have been quietly buying up the properties surrounding their facility at Albert Quay/Road. The most high-profile purchase being that of the Sextant Public House on the north-western corner. CTH have been assessing development plans with a commercial twist – but again, no timeframe is set clearly. CTH have been eyeing to move their business to a more accessible and spacious premises.

      The LIGHT GREEN = the Doyle Family Warehousing premises with which terms were recently agreed on sale. The figure is estimated in and around 7m euros by the press but I’ve heard conflicting statements. The owners will likely make an offer to the adjoining warehouse facility between the newly purchased site and Albert House.

      The BOTTLE BLUE is Albert House, Howard Holdings will redevelop lands to its rear (former rail terminus) as a new WebWorks (Business and IT facility) to be let to Enterprise Ireland.

      The WHITE encroaching at the bottom is some of the O’Flynn Construction Eglinton Street development site. The 17-storey tower and 217 residential units over retail, office and 550 basement parking spaces – hit a planning snag regarding parking issues. 2 meetings have since been held between CCC and OFC, with a twist in the tale coming up soon I believe.

      The NAVY = OFC’s nice No.5 and No.6 Lapps Quay office developments.

      The TURQUOISE = Howard Holdings nearing completion City Quarter development with Clarion Hotel, Office Building, Boardwalk, Retail, Leisure, Parking etc all on site. A winner!

      The BROWN triangle behind City Quarter is the tiny site of a proposed 12-storey office building of only 20,000sq ft. Though planning was set to be sought soon – I believe a number of issues are being first addressed. Still being kept quiet.

      The BOTTLE GREEN feature the Reliance Building fronting Anderson’s Quay. It and adjoing buildings to the rear are being ‘assessed’.

      And FINALLY, the GREEN = the infamous Horgan’s Quay redevelopment. CIE have said they don’t plan to move their behinds til 2007 – but we’ll see. Manor Park Homes + others are in on the plans. O’Mahony Pike were approached to formulate a masterplan – but others have also been contacted with 2 other plans devised, and from what I was told recently, have since been asked to be revised (good news???). It’s CIE, I won’t hold my breath. What could be there? Up to 5,000 residential units in 3 phases, a new commercial plaza, landmark highrise, quayside amenities, new road network, redevelopment train-station, multi-storey car-park (questionable now though), hotel and a few other nice surprises.

    • #733459
      lexington
      Participant

      A 1.9 acre site immediately adjacent to the Dunnes Stores anchored and controlled Ballyvolane Shopping Centre (along the North Ring Road) has been purchased for a pricey 4m euros through selling agents DTZ Sherry Fitzgerald. The site had been put on the market by owners AIB (which they bought a few years back for 100,000 euros!) and had seen something of a bidding rivalry between German discounters Aldi (predominantly) and Lidl. Fearing a possible damaging impact from the opening of a Aldi or Lidl store right next to it, Dunnes Stores decided to move in and roll out the big bucks to protects its interests. The site is now being considered as part of an extension to the existing shopping centre which Dunnes hope will allow it secure its dominance in thre region. They also anchor the nearby Blackpool S.C. and will be anchoring 2 huge anchor units at O’Flynn Construction’s Ballincollig Town Centre, scheduled to open in October 2005.

    • #733460
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 Clayton Love Jnr’s Douglas Central Properties have seen their plans for an 8-storey, 124 bedroom hotel in the heart of Douglas refused planning. The building, designed by the Hyde Partnership, was to have seen the development of the hotel facility on lands between Cinema World and the East Douglas Village – with east-west frontages facing Douglas Court S.C. and Douglas Village S.C. respectively. Mr. Love expressed his disappointment at the decision taken by Cork County Council planners.

      Considerations are now under assessment as to whether or not the developer will appeal or revised the proposal and resubmit a fresh application.

      Reasons regarding height, spatial issues, overshadowing and overdevelopment were all cited as purposes behind the refusal.

    • #733461
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😡 Clayton Love Jnr’s Douglas Central Properties have seen their plans for an 8-storey, 124 bedroom hotel in the heart of Douglas refused planning. The building, designed by the Hyde Partnership, was to have seen the development of the hotel facility on lands between Cinema World and the East Douglas Village – with east-west frontages facing Douglas Court S.C. and Douglas Village S.C. respectively. Mr. Love expressed his disappointment at the decision taken by Cork County Council planners.

      Considerations are now under assessment as to whether or not the developer will appeal or revised the proposal and resubmit a fresh application.

      Reasons regarding height, spatial issues, overshadowing and overdevelopment were all cited as purposes behind the refusal.

      crap. ………………….

    • #733462
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂

      Expansion hungry Frinailla Developments – controlled by the Conway Family – have purchased the infamous 10-acre site that is the Good Shepherd Convent in Sunday’s Well from PJ Hegarty & Sons Ltd for a figure estimated, but not confirmed, at approx. 20m euros. PJ Hegarty had a number of applications hanging on the site – but due to a number of problematic planning issues, decided against developing the highly valuable site.

      Frinailla plans to redevelop the site to include 250 new homes (that figure is not according to my source, but a third-party source), with a number of large, luxurious 2,500sq ft houses as part of the development. These houses will be aimed at the top end of the market. Also as part of the development, the Good Shepherd Convent building, which was ravished by fire last year, will be restored to its former glory – in what will most likely be a number of apartments. The project is being designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects and plans to create an exclsuive residential quarter in one of Cork’s most scenic and sought-after districts.

      This project represents another large-scale investment by the group over the past number of months. Recently, Frinailla received a greenlight (after successive attempts) at redeveloping their large Watercourse Road (Ladyswell) site in Blackpool – which will see approx. 100 new residential units (after conditions) developed. The Grand Parade Plaza is now scheduled to commence construction after subsurface investigations spanning nearly over 1-year. Late-April is the earmarked date of construction.

      Also, Frinailla have begun work on their An Caislean development in Ballincollig, with another 70m euro residential develop on the eastern end of Ballincollig perpartory gear.

      Frinailla also recently purchased Dennehy’s Cross Garage and lands for approx. 20m-euro, which is scheduled to see a large-scale (but apparently ‘community friendly’) development of apartments in planning within the coming future. They also purchased a site just down the Wilton Road (a former Plumbing Supplies Centre) which is also scheduled for a formal proposal. And that’s just to name a few!



      :p Howard Holdings are certainly lapping (no pun intended) the praise for their Lapps Quay development, City Quarter. The development is officially opened tonight at 6:30pm in a ceremony officiated by Michael Martin, Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment. Greg Coughlan and Frank Gormley are being praised for the expense and chance they displayed on City Quarter, which has paid off with superb effect. Howard Holdings also have another docklands project under review at the moment – however, its certainty is being kept under wraps for the time being. I’ll let you know more when things start becoming a little more official.

    • #733463
      indubitably
      Participant

      Lexington,
      have Frinailla admitted they are going ahead with that deal?

    • #733464
      lisam
      Participant

      Its on the front page of the echo

    • #733465
      indubitably
      Participant

      But that is according to sources according to the guy who wrote it. There is nothing from the company itself apart from a no comment

    • #733466
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Lexington

      re: your overview of docklands developments – a lot of work there, thanks.

      Re the site north of the Goldcrop building (have been in the Gcrop building, glad something is being done to make it habitable) – pretty much any site in that area will have subsidence issues. The Marina Commercial Park next door is basically concrete paved over whatever topography was handy, and what’s there now is all sorts of levels and cracking, especially with 40ft trailers crashing over it.

      The entire docklands area is challenging with oil tanks, gas lines, power lines etc. Would like to see Ford “encouraged” to build a multistorey car park to house their vehicles, preferably somewhere near the ring road – say in Tivoli? – to free up the large tarmac area south of Tedcastles for development.

    • #733467
      lexington
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      Lexington

      Would like to see Ford “encouraged” to build a multistorey car park to house their vehicles, preferably somewhere near the ring road – say in Tivoli? – to free up the large tarmac area south of Tedcastles for development.

      Well I don’t know about the multi-storey car-park idea – but you can take it that Ford are one step ahead on that site already. ]Lexington,
      have Frinailla admitted they are going ahead with that deal?[/QUOTE]

      That’s the Stephen Rogers report you’re referring to? The plan he outlined in his report has not been solidified – no, not that I’m aware of. On news that that report was made public – the info I had been made aware of, I felt was somewhat in the public domain and thus issued it on the forum,

      However, Frinailla will seek to develop a residential proposal for the site not far-off, if not, along the lines already mentioned. Kieran Conway, as I am aware, has said nothing yet – presumably down to the fact that he doesn’t want to formalise something without being 100% that it’s the plan Frinailla can go-ahead with. As best I’m aware, Mr. Rogers based his report on third-party info – correct me if I’m wrong on that. The housing number figure is not based on my info, I have corrected that in the post above for issues of clarity. If I attain more specific details (if at all) I will post them to keep you inform and clear on the issue.

    • #733468
      rodger
      Participant

      Hello and good evening to one and all this is my 1st post on this very well worded and informed public forum.
      Frinila seem to be the flavour of the day,has any one noticed the councils refusal for their propsed development 04/5355 in Glanmire their is a bit of a hum off the file.Any comments?

    • #733469
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John Paul Construction are on site already at Albert House, Albert Quay marking the commencement of the development of the Cork’s first WebWorks by Howard Holdings. The 13m euro project, designed by Scott Tallon Walker, will be constructed on land to the rear of Albert House and connected with the CCC property; units will then be leased out to designated Enterprise Ireland associated start-ups based around IT and Business practices.

      More details will be soon available at -> http://www.corkwebworks.com



      :confused: Apparently, media reports are suggesting that O’Callaghan Properties are in communicado with Michael O’Donoghue of Rockfell Investments about a partnership related to his Cornmarket Street development which received a grant last year for 65 apartments and up to 170,000sq ft of retail space. This would explain my earlier reports about hearing something re: OCP on a possible retail development at Cornmarket Street. Don’t have any clearer details right now – but I’ll keep you posted. O’Callaghan apparently says that the best deal for all concerned would see a link up with his nearby Paul Street S.C. (???)

      – on that note, OCP moved into their new 5,000sq ft HQ along the top floors of the 30m euro 21 Lavitts Quay development, designed by Patrick A. Cashman and Associates, & constructed by Bowen Construction. Structural Engineering was provided by Niall Fitzsimons & Associates. 11,000sq ft of office space at the development has also been negotiated for tenancy by a noteworthy semi-state division.

      – also regarding OCP’s Academy Street development, OCP have apparently struck a deal with the Reidy-family (owners of Le Cheateau bar) whereby the bar will be retained in its current usage as is, but which will allow OCP utilise its valuable layout to able its Academy Street development further. See previous posts.



      An announcement re: Albert Quay warehousing sale is expected either by this week’s end or early next week. Will have to see.




      I was lucky enough to have been in attendance at the launch of City Quarter on Lapps Quay last evening – and besides some dodgy weather, the launch was quite a taking event. The development really is first rate and a credit to Howard Holdings – who launched the development in nothing short of panache – from Sushi Stands, a beautiful water-display on a river float, carnival, acrobats and performers, “U2”, “Elvis” and even “James Brown” showed up. Greg Coughlan, Howard Holdings CEO, receive a large round of applause after stating in his speech that “this (City Quarter) must only be the beginning”, he expressed his desire to make Cork “the envy of Europe”, but it needed the infastructure, foresight, co-operation and more new, world-class buildings. It really was pride inspiring stuff and made many, myself included, all that more enthusiastic about the prospects for Cork. On talking to persons afterwards, I am told (as reported) that indeed Howard are assessing a further standout Docklands project – besides Albert House.

      – Cafe Gusto, a local coffee house enterprise, will set-up a new branch on the City Quarter boardwalk and waterfront. The firm also operates a prime Washington Street location.

    • #733470
      gos24
      Participant

      Lexington,

      Nice work on keeping everyone upto date with all the latest developments in the city & beyond. 😎 On a point of interest if you take a look at the Kerry County Council website http://www.kerrycoco.ie and hit the search planning tab a similar page to that on the Cork City Council website appears, whereby you can enter the name or planning number of the application you wish to look up. However on the Kerry website you can view PDF files of all the drawings, submissions etc on the file and I was just wondering if all the planning authorities will follow suit or is there any obligation to do so? Cheers 🙂

    • #733471
      lexington
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Hello and good evening to one and all this is my 1st post on this very well worded and informed public forum. Frinila seem to be the flavour of the day,has any one noticed the councils refusal for their propsed development 04/5355 in Glanmire their is a bit of a hum off the file.Any comments?

      That’s right, their 121-unit development at Church Hill didn’t work out to nice for them. CorkCoCo shot the project down on a number of issues incl. traffic etc. Though they did receive a grant on their Ladyswell project (only just!), they received a a twist of lemon with the permission in that they’ve had to reduce the height, and subsquent units as a result of the conditions. I’ve seen the plans numerously and in detail, and to be honest, I think the logic regarding the reduction in height (again!) is pretty farsical.


      @gos24 wrote:

      Lexington,
      On a point of interest if you take a look at the Kerry County Council website http://www.kerrycoco.ie and hit the search planning tab a similar page to that on the Cork City Council website appears, whereby you can enter the name or planning number of the application you wish to look up. However on the Kerry website you can view PDF files of all the drawings, submissions etc on the file and I was just wondering if all the planning authorities will follow suit or is there any obligation to do so? Cheers 🙂

      To be honest with you – I don’t really know. As far as I know its a discretionary preference – but I am familiar with the Kerry CoCo system in that regard (in other regards I’d rather not discuss it! :rolleyes: ) and it is useful and informative. I would like to think a similar system would be made available in Cork as it may, to some, extent, reduce the numbers of publuc misinformation regarding certain developments. So, who knows?! Perhaps Cork City Council will have better answers for you. http://www.corkcity.ie I’m sorry I can’t be of much help on that particular topic.

    • #733472
      lexington
      Participant

      After pressing a prominent CCC member last night, I managed to juice out a comment regarding O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street development. He implied that talks between the developers and Planners and the City Manager’s office had been ‘positive’. But just to make sure, someone closely attached to the project, this morning informed me also, that the meetings held between CCC and OFC had been ‘constructive’. Wilson Architecture (design team behind the project – Chief Architect being Frank O’Mahony, the firm’s MD) are in conjunction with the developers and in consultation with CCC in addressing a number of ‘deadlocking’ issues. These issues concern in the most part the parking space to unit/residence ratio, sunlighting and glazing effects with consideration to the tower element and potential hazards on approaching traffic – among others. A report is due into Navigation House in the coming days re: the latter issue. Parking space numbers at the development are likely to be dropped, but to a renegotiated ratio with which OFC say they can work with.

      I assume the unconfirmed, but possible, sale of the Doyle Family Cork Warehousing Co. site on Albert Quay to OFC (if sold to them), may offer a potential solution in rectifying parking numbers come the strategic run – but this cannot be considered at this stage until any sale is announced publicly. However, there are 2 other likely buyers which await confirmation – one of which is stated to be Howard Holdings (if so, this would give them dominance of the waterfront along this stretch of both Albert Quay and Lapps Quay).

      It’s all pie-in-the-sky right now – but could be considered a very cautious source of optimism for this outstanding development opportunity in Cork.

    • #733473
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      After pressing a prominent CCC member last night, I managed to juice out a comment regarding O’Flynn Construction’s Eglinton Street development. He implied that talks between the developers and Planners and the City Manager’s office had been ‘positive’. But just to make sure, someone closely attached to the project, this morning informed me also, that the meetings held between CCC and OFC had been ‘constructive’. Wilson Architecture (design team behind the project – Chief Architect being Frank O’Mahony, the firm’s MD) are in conjunction with the developers and in consultation with CCC in addressing a number of ‘deadlocking’ issues. These issues concern in the most part the parking space to unit/residence ratio, sunlighting and glazing effects with consideration to the tower element and potential hazards on approaching traffic – among others. A report is due into Navigation House re: the latter issue. Parking space numbers at the development are likely to be dropped, but to a renegotiated ratio with which OFC say they can work with.

      I assume the unconfirmed, but possible, sale of the Doyle Family Cork Warehousing Co. site on Albert Quay to OFC (if sold to them), may offer a potential solution in rectifying parking numbers come the strategic run – but this cannot be considered at this stage until any sale is announced publicly. However, there are 2 other likely buyers which await confirmation – one of which is stated to be Howard Holdings (if so, this would give them dominance of the waterfront along this stretch of both Albert Quay and Lapps Quay).

      It’s all pie-in-the-sky right now – but could be considered a very cautious source of optimism for this outstanding development opportunity in Cork.

      So when are you expecting a decision?

    • #733474
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      So when are you expecting a decision?

      It will depend on when the ‘Clarification’ requested by CCC is satisfactorily met by OFC and Wilson Architecture. I believe this will be provided within the next 2 weeks, but don’t quote me on that time-frame, as that is simply based on the collected information I received. Fingers crossed anyway!

    • #733475
      rodger
      Participant

      Could not agree more, this development will get the creative juices of desiginers going not to mention fueling the egos of our developers this is progress,any one hear about the John Barley corn inn.

    • #733476
      charlies angel
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      That’s right, their 121-unit development at Church Hill didn’t work out to nice for them. CorkCoCo shot the project down on a number of issues incl. traffic etc. Though they did receive a grant on their Ladyswell project (only just!), they received a a twist of lemon with the permission in that they’ve had to reduce the height, a subsquent units as a result of conditions. I’ve seen the plans numerously and in detail, and to be honest, I think the logic regarding the reduction is height (again!) is pretty farsical.


      To be honest with you – I don’t really know. As far as I know its a discretionary preference – but I am familiar with the Kerry CoCo system in that regard (in other regards I’d rather not discuss it! :rolleyes: ) and it is useful and informative. I would like to think a similar system would be made available in Cork as it may, to some, extent, reduce the numbers of publuc misinformation regarding certain developments. So, who knows?! Perhaps Cork City Council will have better answers for you. http://www.corkcity.ie I’m sorry I can’t be of much help on that particular topic.

      The apartment scheme in Glanmire was contemporary, looked good on paper,
      sure the detail would be lost in construction and
      would end up lookIng like concrete bunker knowing frinailla’s history
      The scheme was too dense on such a prominent and steep site.

    • #733477
      Pana01
      Participant

      On today’s Neil Prendeville show on 96FM, it was announced that Patrick Street will have to be dug up to repair ‘faulty drains’. There was total disbelief about this, but City Hall refused to comment on the scale of the digging.

      They also hightlighted the ‘farce’ of the roadworks between Grand Parade and Pana – will it ever be sorted? How long is it going on? Why can they always repair roads much quicker in other countries?
      I despair. The shop owners on Patrick St are wondering why business is down. Impossible parking coupled with farcical road digging – that’s why. And (here I go again), will they ever remove that vile Portakabin??

      Lex – any contacts to get this moved??

    • #733478
      rodger
      Participant

      @charlie’s angel wrote:

      The apartment scheme in Glanmire was contemporary, looked good on paper,
      sure the detail would be lost in construction and
      would end up lookIng like concrete bunker knowing frinailla’s history
      The scheme was too dense on such a prominent and steep site.

      I am not aware of this scheme I thougt that company had received a refusal for low density housing in Glanmire?I suppose paper will always take ink , however good design does merit positive consideration.

    • #733479
      lexington
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Could not agree more, this development will get the creative juices of desiginers going not to mention fueling the egos of our developers this is progress

      Regarding what? Eglinton Street? :confused:



      @charlie’s angel wrote:

      The apartment scheme in Glanmire was contemporary, looked good on paper, sure the detail would be lost in construction and would end up lookIng like concrete bunker knowing frinailla’s history
      The scheme was too dense on such a prominent and steep site.

      😮 I think you may have the 2 schemes mixed-up, Frinailla were refused a scheme in the Church Hill/Poulacarry area of Glanmire for 105 houses and 16 service sites (121) over approx. 31 acres – low density scheme. The apartment scheme is at Springmount, across the road from Hazelwood on a steep sloping, narrow site. That application is due on the 18th April 2005. Details and images of that, the Springmount project, can be found at -> http://www.frinailla.ie/residential_4.php?id=4 The jury is still out on the design.

      Also, check out the dedicated page for Frinailla’s Dennehy’s Cross development at -> http://www.frinailla.ie/residential_4.php?id=7 The design isn’t public yet, but it’s an interesting aerial shot. Grianbru can be seen in the image – the site of Walsh Consulting’s 22-apartment development, in appeal.



      @Pana01 wrote:

      And (here I go again), will they ever remove that vile Portakabin??

      Funny you should mention that – though it seems to be your pet hate (understatement???) :p You may remember me posting that CIE and CCC were intending to install a new permanent facility along Patrick’s Street – befitting of the new streetscape – well I also posted there was some sort of hold-up, turns out that hold-up was in part due to the proposal to bring back the old green-hut (once located beside Father Matthew Statue) – I can’t remember what they called that, was it the Station Master’s Hut or something? I haven’t really being keeping an eye on the whole scenario so I don’t know how firm a proposal that is. But it is widely agreed, except probably CIE, that the Portacabin has to go.

      @Pana01 wrote:

      They also hightlighted the ‘farce’ of the roadworks between Grand Parade and Pana – will it ever be sorted?

      McGinty & O’Shea are the main contractors on that project. Yes it is on-going or rather, long-going, but I believe it is related to structural issues regarding the old city sewers/waterways. E.G. Pettit & Co. are the Structural Engineers involved. But whether or not this helps you sigh relief, here’s a image of what Grand Parade should eventually look like when all the works are complete (below). Once again, Beth Gali Studio are responsible for the streets new design.


    • #733480
      lisam
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      any one hear about the John Barley corn inn.

      Last I heard the sale of the site had fallen through but there is hope of another one coming through. The site has full planning for a new hotel and leisure centre designed by Cashman & Associates of Lavitts Quay fame

    • #733481
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Lexington, the green hut is called the fireman’s hut since it was originally where a fireman kept a watch in case there was a fire on patrick street. Quite what he was supposed to do in case of fire, I don’t know 🙂


      Now, radioactiveman likes a bit of CULTURE. So the other day I headed off to Caroline Street to visit the APE OPERA HOUSE! Its located in the old ESB power house on the street (turn onto Maylor st. from Patrick Street and take your first right- i.e. behind Cash’s/Brown Thomas).
      I’d urge everyone to take a look at this exhibition- not only for the art- which is a kind of a cross between Planet of the Apes and a night at the opera with lots of plaster! but the building itself is amazing.
      It’s a three storey building, originally constructed by Siemens as the power house for the whole city. Its dusty and in need of a clean up but is just crying out to be used as a pemanent exhibition space or museum type affair. The remnants of its industrial past are everywhere and the building is wonderfully lit by nice large windows. Im told, that on the top floor (which is not open to the public) contains the old switchboards for the old electric trams which once traversed the city. It is, i’m told of major historical importance!
      This building has stood empty and abandoned for many years. The ESB seem to have no use for it. It is of major historical importance to the city and is a great example of the beauty of functionality in architecture. This is a building built to do a job- no more, no less. That is where its architectural value lies. I’d urge everyone to go to the exhibition- see http://www.cork2005.ie for details and take a look. The artist and indeed Cork2005 deserve high praise- not only for the artistic merit of the work, but for re-introducing us to a gem of a building- just off Patrick st, which i’d forgotten had even existed – NOW THAT’S CULTURE!

    • #733482
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Hi all,
      Fascinating thread, especially for someone in exile. Fantastic work by Lexington and others in keeping everyone up to date.

      I have no background in architecture etc. However, would it not be hugely beneficial to a city like Cork if there were more buildings like the Crawford Gallery extension. It would be great if the powers-that-be were more controversial than conservative. Build a whole tourism industry around the architecture of the city. This would draw in huge numbers of toursits and investors. Instead, every scheme seems to be reigned back by mediocrity. Anybody familiar with the Ray Stata building in MIT in Boston?
      http://web.mit.edu/buildings/statacenter/
      Imagine something like that on one of the quays in Cork, or as the new school of music.The madder the better, I reckon. If it was up to me, there wouldnt be a square building in the city.

      I know that narrow mided residents’ objections are to blame for alot of the mediocrity we see. But how big a factor is cost in all of these things?

    • #733483
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Fleming Construction have begun development of 203 bedspaces of student accommodation over 45 apartments in a series of 4 to 5 storey blocks. The project is to be located on the former M&P O’Sullivan Warehousing site at Victoria Cross, right beside Phase 2 of Victoria Mills (also beginning development). The development is being undertaken by Fleming Construction on behalf of UCC. The deconstruction and removal of the existing warehouses has revealed a surprisingly large site. The project was designed by Bertie Pope & Associates. Issues regarding the proposals finish were raised in planning but have apparently been rectified to an acceptable standard.

    • #733484
      A-ha
      Participant

      Has anyone a proper update on the airport??? Why havent we low cost fligts across Europe like Shannon! And the excuse about the airport charges being too high is so old at this stage. Ryanair starts a new route to Liverpool in 2 weeks, wooop dee f**king dooo! The least the penny-pinching airline could do is start routes to places like Malaga or Stockholm, somewhere that would be different to London. Even Kerry has Frankfurt. Likewise to easyJet and bmiBaby. We dont need more flights to London or Nottingham, a bit of variety would do Cork good. Espically the business it would do for the area, having direct flights to financial hubs around Europe. Come on, Cork has an airprt too!

    • #733485
      theblimp
      Participant

      Finally got round to taking a close look at HH’s ‘City Quarter’ over the weekend and must say that I was very impressed. Especially liked the atrium in the Clarion Hotel and the public space / boardwalk outside. It kind of reminded me of the many occasions where I’ve been abroad, seen something nice and questioned why we don’t have something like this at home. This in itself is something of a reflection of other city developments in that most would leave me cold at worst and unengaged in remaining instances. But, credit where it’s due to HH. It’s a shame that so many of our primary transport routes through the city are quay-based since an expansion of this boardwalk concept would be most welcome and would totally change the dynamic within the city. I’m aware that there are strong plans to increase boardwalk areas along the quays but, I assume, in many case the waterfront will be shared with the inevitable motorised traffic.

    • #733486
      lexington
      Participant

      I agree – HowardHoldings really did go all out on City Quarter. Would you believe that in original talks CCC wanted to maintain a motor-accessible quay front??? So in fairness the Howard, they really did pick the penny on this one. As Greg Coughlan said, there is the general perception that all developers are simply ‘here to destroy what is there and leave with a profit at a community’s expense’. Yes it is important to profit, if there is no profit, there is no project in the first place – but City Quarter is a good and leading example of how a development can benefit not only a community, but a city. It’s an example adopted now by Werdna at Water Street and even OCP with the Jurys redevelopment – as they are providing a public amenity space and riverside walk/boardwalk along their Lancaster Quay/Washington Street West waterfront. I like the pedestrian friendly element to the City Quarter quayside – and agree similar initiatives should be encouraged.

    • #733487
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I don’t agree that too much boardwalk will be good for the quays. Looking at dublin’s quays they look cluttered with this thing grafted onto them. In fairness the boardwalk at CIty Quarter looks fine but to overdo this all over the city quay walls would be a big mistake. Below City Quarter would be fine but we should not repeat the mistake of dublin.

    • #733488
      jungle
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Has anyone a proper update on the airport??? Why havent we low cost fligts across Europe like Shannon! And the excuse about the airport charges being too high is so old at this stage. Ryanair starts a new route to Liverpool in 2 weeks, wooop dee f**king dooo! The least the penny-pinching airline could do is start routes to places like Malaga or Stockholm, somewhere that would be different to London. Even Kerry has Frankfurt. Likewise to easyJet and bmiBaby. We dont need more flights to London or Nottingham, a bit of variety would do Cork good. Espically the business it would do for the area, having direct flights to financial hubs around Europe. Come on, Cork has an airprt too!

      A-ha, Cork Airport launches direct flights to Brest, Brusssels, Budapest, Faro, Munich, Nice, Rome this summer. There will also be direct services to Liverpool and Durham/Middlesbrough, but I guess those ones don’t interest you 😉

      IMO the policy of Cork airport is more beneficial to the long-term development of the airport than Shannon’s. At Cork the largest airline will be Aer Lingus who will control slightly in excess of 30% of the seats. At Shannon Ryanair will control around 50% of the seats. When Michael O’Leary says jump Shannon will have to jump.

    • #733489
      tomthevet2003
      Participant

      – also regarding OCP’s Academy Street development, OCP have apparently struck a deal with the Reidy-family (owners of Le Cheateau bar) whereby the bar will be retained in its current usage as is, but which will allow OCP utilise its valuable layout to able its Academy Street development further. See previous posts.

      There is no deal – and no discussions i have heard

    • #733490
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I don’t agree that too much boardwalk will be good for the quays. Looking at dublin’s quays they look cluttered with this thing grafted onto them. In fairness the boardwalk at CIty Quarter looks fine but to overdo this all over the city quay walls would be a big mistake. Below City Quarter would be fine but we should not repeat the mistake of dublin.

      Radioactiveman, from a purely aesthetic perspective the things I dont particularly like about the boardwalk are the way in which it makes the quays look a little unbalanced and that it is broken up by the bridges. However, there was no way that anyone in their right mind was going alter any of the bridges through which it passes, and when you are actually on it, it is quite a nice and relaxing place to be.

    • #733491
      rodger
      Participant

      Good morning I was just wondering if any one had seen propsals for the Capitol cinema I think you would all agree that this is the most high profile junction in the city.Lets hope they spend a few quid.
      On the issue of the boardwalks I believe they could work from the Clarion up into Docks, however I think they would look totaly out of character in the rest of the “old”city.

    • #733492
      lexington
      Participant

      @tomthevet2003 wrote:

      There is no deal – and no discussions i have heard

      Well I did say ‘apparently’ ]Good morning I was just wondering if any one had seen propsals for the Capitol cinema I think you would all agree that this is the most high profile junction in the city.Lets hope they spend a few quid.[/QUOTE]

      An image of the Mount Kennett proposal is posted (I think) 2 pages back in thumbnail form. The project is valued at 30m euro and is designed by Sabine Wittman of Dungarvan practice, The e-Project. I wouldn’t be getting too excited. I’ll have more info on that particular development later this week.

    • #733493
      rodger
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Well there you have it – it’s official!

      You may remember that way back I reported that a Limerick-based developer had been in talks with Ward Anderson about purchasing the Capitol Cineplex for a retail development, well now it’s public and Mount Kennett Investments (John Costello and Paul O’Brien) are the buyers indeed.

      Ward Anderson had been maintaining talks with CCC about seeking planning permission on a redevelopment of the site – which they then would sell with F.P.P. ~ however Mr. Costello’s persistence evidently paid off. Although I was aware that the deal had been struck, I was unaware until last night that planning would be sought so soon. And yes, planning is being sought.

      The development is scaled down from original plans by the developer (other developers, 1 other Limerick-based group ~ I may have mentioned much earlier, had very exciting plans for the site, but eventually dropped out of the run). The development will now see the Capitol demolished and redeveloped as a 33,000sq ft department store with 18 overhead apartments (I don’t like the idea of apartments at this location!) . The design is by Sabine Wittman of Dungarvan practice e-Project ~ and quite frankly, the application design is sub-par and undeserving of the superb location. I’m disappointed at the lazy route taken by the developers and design team in the end. The boxy and incoherrent roof-line is ugly and unkempt. It reminds me of the St. Patrick’s Quay frontage of the Metropole Hotel (that horrible lemon box with even uglier roof-top box). Some of the other competing proposals (OCP for the record pulled out of talks in late 2004) had a far greater degree of panache – this is a very poor effort. But I’ll let you decide – I don’t have any clear images of the final design yet, so in fairness to Tommy Barker, well done for getting this image. I should have better images come a couple of weeks.



      Also, today is a big decision day for some major Cork projects – fingers crossed for Frinailla and Mary Collins’ projects!


      Bargain basement!

    • #733494
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Cumnor Construction have seen the appeal lodged against their 22-unit apartment development for Sunday’s Well, designed by Jack Coughlan Associates, withdrawn. A private deal was struck, of which the details are as yet unclear, between the developers and resident Brian O’Sullivan (I believe it was concerning property claims – though I’m open for correction). Cumnor made notable rearrangements to their development at CCC level in order to appease concerns, nonetheless, an appeal was brought against them in early March. Its good to see that a compromise has been worked out. Construction is set for early Summer.



      🙂 John Cleary Developments have submitted a newly revised plan for their lands adjoining Kilnap’s North Point Business Park near Blackpool. Earlier this year JCD where refused planning by CCC for 17 light industrial units which, if had been granted, were earmarked to create 300 new jobs in the North Cork Area. JCD have gone back to the drawing board with engineers Niall Fitzsimons Ltd rather than appeal (a sensible move in my opinion) and now have presented CCC with a revised application – still incorporating 17 light industrial units, only this time, they comprise part of a new building measuring some 47,000sq ft +. The revisions should hopefully allay concerns raised by CCC, which ultimately led to the project’s refusal, related to negative skyline disruption, poor access, traffic management etc. The new plan still aims to create a similar, if not, equal number of new jobs for Blackpool and the surrounding areas of North Cork.


      🙂 Aras Developments have begun work on its Victoria Station student accommodation development of 24 apartments, medical units and parking at the former Canty Family owned site along the Wilton Road. It will be constructed around the same time-frame as 2 other student developments nearby at the former M&P O’Sullivan site (being developed by Fleming Construction on behalf of UCC), and Phase 2 of Paul Montgomery and Edmund Kenneally’s Victoria Mills.

      – speaking of Montogomery-Kenneally projects, they are awaiting an approval tonight by CCC to joint-purchase a nice area of land along the Boreenmanna Road (Rose Cottage proximity) along with Barry Supple of John F. Supple Contractors. The land could net approx. 7m euros for CCC and will be developed under the condition that 40 or so of the 150+ units planned for the site are handed over to social-affordable use.



      I take it you like the Capitol Cineplex plans then rodger ? 😉


    • #733495
      rodger
      Participant

      Yes just what we need another space ship landing in the city,whats their looks better!Although the property represents a great opportunity for Pana n GParade.Good quality design pays off in the longterm.

    • #733496
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Hi Lex… just wondered if you have any updates on Water St./Eglinton St?

      Does anyone know the time frame for Jacob’s Mill? Are they still considering a food hall?
      I had heard they were inviting people to approach them in relation to running food counters on site, if so does anyone have any contact details (more gastronomical than architectural of course).

      What’s your opinion on the refurbished courthouse… was it worth the incredibly long wait?

      Will the Mannix development on Washington Street be going ahead this year?

      What is being developed on the site of Doyles on Grand Parade?

      Many questions… thanks in advance 🙂

    • #733497
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The lighting job on the courthouse is one of the best I’ve ever seen (in this country)

    • #733498
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Hi Lex… just wondered if you have any updates on Water St./Eglinton St?

      Water Street saw its final submission date last Monday week – 12 submissions were received by CCC. Same number as the previous incarnation of the development. Not all however are objections. Of course An Taisce are in there also – but the general drift of the objections are height, over-development, devaluation of property etc. One submission is an indenticate of the submission handed in to CCC from the last Water Street submission (referencing the 400 apartments and all!) Goes to show you the level of attention people pay to projects like these before objecting. A farse! Early indications suggest planners are pleased with the changes but will undoubtedly still find a picking point.

      Eglinton Street – may get a move back on track with the next 2 weeks. O’Flynn Construction (OFC) have held meetings with Joe Gavin (City Manager), the Director of Planning (Mr. O’D) and Senior Planner. The talks have apparently been constructive. Expect some alterations to be made concerning the prime disputing ground – basement car-parking.

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Does anyone know the time frame for Jacob’s Mill? Are they still considering a food hall?
      I had heard they were inviting people to approach them in relation to running food counters on site, if so does anyone have any contact details (more gastronomical than architectural of course).:)

      This has been an ongoing source of confusion. Tom McCarthy had this placed earmarked for redevelopment with Joseph Lane and Sons Ltd as main contractors for late last year. Then there was a change of contractor to O’Flynn of Banteer (also working on Mr. McCarthy’s Kingsley Hotel extension) – with progress promised for early Jan 2005. Then Joe Gavin publicly announced that he’d received word scaffolding would be erected by mid to late Jan 2005. But besides a little movement within the Mill, nothing has happened properly yet. MOLA are architects for the project.

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      What’s your opinion on the refurbished courthouse… was it worth the incredibly long wait?

      Over-run and over-priced I suppose – but then again Ascon had their work cut out for them too. I’m really just glad its done and in fairness, the Courthouse looks great. Especially by night.

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Will the Mannix development on Washington Street be going ahead this year??

      Currently, Mr. Mannix has seen his project brought to appeal. A decision is due for May. It would be a grossly unfair twist were the project, after so many changes and alterations to allay CCC concerns, to be refused on appeal. The street and site are in need of an improvement to fill that unsightly gap in the streetscape. The design is a departure yes, (Dermot Coveney & Associates of Monkstown), but it’s an interesting departure. I’m glad the unsightly box-like, roof-top apartments were removed – there is a great sense of coherency to the street scape now. But the appeal may all change that! 🙁 Whether or not this project gets the go-ahead will all depend on the appeal outcome.

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      What is being developed on the site of Doyles on Grand Parade?

      JD Hotels (of the East Douglas Village Hotel) are redeveloping a new Manhattan-style bar/restaurant and ancilllary offices over 4-floors at this location. Wilson Architecture are responsible for the design. It was also offer a new ‘Gateway’ entrance to Tobin Lane.



      I see Viva Cork are awaiting a decision on whether U2 will or will not play Cork in August? If they are, front row centre!!!

    • #733499
      Lincoln
      Participant

      i had a look at the waterstreet file in CCC last week- the objections are your usual run of the mill- one of the submissions is a 5 page hymn of praise for the development ( a lot of which i would agree with- it is refreshing to see people putting in positive comments for a change)- the An Taisce submission was quite surprising- other than a reference to the “Sore Thumb” syndrome it was in support of the scheme in general (except some minor caveats) and even went so far as to say that the design is worthy of the docklands and will be a good demonstration of high density city living!

      well,consisdering the CCC expressed importance of Docklands development and considering the great lenghts the applicant has gone through to accomodate the neighbours, andconsidering that broadly An Taisce are for it, how can CCC do anything other than grant this application? i will wait with bated breadth

    • #733500
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Lincoln wrote:

      the An Taisce submission was quite surprising- other than a reference to the “Sore Thumb” syndrome it was in support of the scheme in general (except some minor caveats) and even went so far as to say that the design is worthy of the docklands and will be a good demonstration of high density city living!

      I don’t know why you find this surprising, it appears from the images posted here to be a good development and An Taisce as much as anyone else like to see positive design precedents as it raises the bar to an acceptable design standard which is at the end of the day what is best for Cork.

    • #733501
      lisam
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      This has been an ongoing source of confusion. Tom McCarthy had this placed earmarked for redevelopment with Joseph Lane and Sons Ltd as main contractors for late last year. Then there was a change of contractor to O’Flynn of Banteer (also working on Mr. McCarthy’s Kingsley Hotel extension) – with progress promised for early Jan 2005. Then Joe Gavin publicly announced that he’d received word scaffolding would be erected by mid to late Jan 2005. But besides a little movement within the Mill, nothing has happened properly yet. MOLA are architects for the project.

      They are most likely waiting for the Kingsley Job to be completed before they start on this site.

    • #733502
      lexington
      Participant

      @Lincoln wrote:

      i had a look at the waterstreet file in CCC last week- the An Taisce submission was quite surprising- other than a reference to the “Sore Thumb” syndrome it was in support of the scheme in general (except some minor caveats) and even went so far as to say that the design is worthy of the docklands and will be a good demonstration of high density city living!

      I give out about them more than anyone – but in fairness to Kevin Hurley, he’s not really oppose to the development as such. He’s had a few chit-chats with Sean Kearns on the project – his collegaue, Tomas O’Scannlain is more likely to appeal than anyone (which I hope he doesn’t), In this instance, I believe the residents are the biggest obstacle. I utterly empathise with logical and reasonable concerns residents raise concerning planning issues – it’s their entitlement as occupiers of an area, but to be fair, the objections regarding Water Street in this case are utterly disappointing and imbalanced. Water Street is a great development which opens up a bright light into the docklands. But you never know, CCC have their awkward ways about them!


    • #733503
      lexington
      Participant

      That’s right – although I’m a little late getting to this on the forum, Aer Arann MD Peadar Ó Ceidigh announced that he is planning to inaugurated a non-stop transatlantic service between Cork to New York and possibly Boston. The flights will most likely be destined for the city’s JFK Airport. Aer Arann plans to begin the service within an 18-month timeframe and talks have been ongoing with ILFSC (Aircraft Leasing Agency) about obtaining what will most likely be 4 ETOPS (Extended Twin-Engine Operations) aircraft such as the Airbus A330-200 (232 seat capacity – an aircraft similar to that in use by Aer Lingus on its Dublin – Los Angeles route) – however such details are only at a speculation stage considering Mr. O’Ceidigh did say that the route would require a 30m euro investment and that the airline was actively looking for investors or an investor to help finance what he believes to be a route would huge potential. Demand is just ‘crying out’ for the route apparently. The routes, if and when operational, will entail a higher frequency in the Spring/Summer months, with reduced activity in the Autumn and Winter seasons.

      – in other Aer Arann related news, the airline has also announced its intention to increase Cork-Dublin route frequences bringing total Aer Arann flight numbers for Cork from 172 a week to 212 per week starting as of May. Aer Arann has carried just over 100,000 passengers on its Cork-Dublin route already this year – an increase of 8% on figures for this time last year. The airline will seek to base a further aircraft at Cork this summer to cope with demand.

      – Cork Airport Authority have announced that traffic at the airport has increased 17% on the first quarter (in comparison to the same period this time last year). The newly formed Authority says Cork is on target to hit passenger movements of 2.7m for 2005, but may even succeed those figures. That’s a big job for a terminal only designed to cater for 1.5m passengers. The new 280,000sq ft terminal under construction, with an operations date set for November 2005, is designed to facilitate up to 3.3m passengers – with room for expansion subject to demand. It would seem that expansion may be needed sooner that even Aer Rianta (in it’s studies) had predicted.

    • #733504
      rodger
      Participant

      Re:Development at Water St.Very impressive design and the developers in this instance have the cash to spec it properly. I have a previous knowledge of this property it has character,sunshine and waterfrontage which in conjunction with the interesting design by maol will set another important milestone in corks design progress.
      It’s just a shame that the powers that be are ending the Urban Renewal schemes when the tide is rising in cork.
      Any news on the city car park i.e Kennys.Nice site.

    • #733505
      lexington
      Participant

      I assume you’re referring to the Kenny site at 50 Grand Parade??? Or the Patrick’s Quay site???

      Well I can tell you PRC Architects are working on a revised scheme for the 50 Grand Parade site – the details can’t be made public yet, but an application is expected in the not to distant future. It will represent a flagship project for the Kenny Group in Cork.

    • #733506
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone know what kind of objections/submissions were lodged against the AIB’s proposals for Watercourse Road?

    • #733507
      lexington
      Participant

      Something I’m quite delighted about, FINALLY (FINALLY!!!) CCC have resurfaced the mine-field left-over that is Grattan Street. I almost started crying with happiness being able to drive from Bachelor’s Quay to Washington Street without having my suspension brutally abused, or having to rescue injured foreigners whose tour buses disappeared down vast potholes. Long long overdue! But it’s here now, so that’s good!

    • #733508
      lisam
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Something I’m quite delighted about, FINALLY (FINALLY!!!) CCC have resurfaced the mine-field left-over that is Grattan Street. I almost started crying with happiness being able to drive from Bachelor’s Quay to Washington Street without having my suspension brutally abused, or having to rescue injured foreigners whose tour buses disappeared down vast potholes. Long long overdue! But it’s here now, so that’s good!

      I have to agree with you on that point, it certainly was a joy to drive along there last night.

    • #733509
      john bedford
      Participant

      would anyone have a pic of cork from overhead. i have seen many of dublin but cant seem to find one for cork

      thanks

    • #733510
      sw101
      Participant

      here’s an aerial

    • #733511
      john bedford
      Participant

      thank you sw101 that was quick

    • #733512
      sw101
      Participant

      i’m nothing if not resourceful. anything else i have is pretty strictly copyrighted. try google.ie and just lash in “cork aerial”, “cork city aerial”, and other combinations.

      also, go to “search by map” on http://www.myhome.ie and if you zoom in far enough to cork you can see aerial views of the city out as far as glounthane.

    • #733513
      phatman
      Participant

      Here ya go http://irelandphotography.com/aerial/index.html
      Dont forget to check page 2

    • #733514
      Anonymous
      Participant

      That is a great resource, it is amazing the different perspectives you get from a birds eye view. The guy responsible is clever enough the way he stuck a part logo into the images. 😉

    • #733515
      Leesider
      Participant

      on a development related subject, I see Shannon is getting the first data centre outside of Dublin. Does anyone know if there are any plans to set one up in Cork or the general area?

      I was also wondering has there been any move on what is to happen with the showgrounds?

    • #733516
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The DAA have seemingly granted requests by the CAA and others to provide air-bridges at Cork’s new airport terminal. The bridges had been cast in doubt after penny-pinching exercises by the DAA and Dept. of Transport. However only 2 of the originally planned 3 bridges will be provided – allowing for a saving of just under 400,000euro (wow! :rolleyes: ) Provision was made in the airport design to facilitate a northern extension (pier) home to 3 additional bridges subject to demand and airport capacities – but this Phase 2 element is not on the cards for the forseeable future. The 2 bridges will be secured for the interm, with an option by CAA to purchase the 3rd bridge at a future point from its own funding. Though it’s not what was promised, its a small victory, and it represents what was undoubtedly an uphill struggle for CAA Chairman Joe Gantly, so well done sir.



      😮 Paul Montgomery has been granted his application to let apartments at his Victoria Mills development on a short-term summer residiency basis. Each apartment will be let individually. Phase 2 of Victoria Mills will commence primary construction in late May/early June – after UCC Summer Exams.



      And I know I promised some info and images on the Capitol Cineplex’s redevelopment – but I’m dying sick at the moment and will get around to it as soon as I’m able. Curse the flu virus! I dunno how I got it, I haven’t been hanging around any WHO supported labs. 😀

    • #733517
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Lexington, Has planning been granted in Beasly Street, Parnell Place, South Mall, for a Hotel etc?

    • #733518
      Anonymous
      Participant

      €400,000 saving on a €140,000,000 project.

      The mind boggles

    • #733519
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      It’s the kind of cost shaving that comes back to haunt us on most of our infrastructural projects. For the sake of 400k now – 400m down the line!

    • #733520
      lisam
      Participant

      @shrink2cork wrote:

      Lexington, Has planning been granted in Beasly Street, Parnell Place, South Mall, for a Hotel etc?

      The application consists of: A new five storey, 121 bedroom hotel of 8098 sq. m with ground floor hotel bar, dining area and function room, basement with associated spa and health club, with car parking at basement level and lower basement level at Beasley Street, Cork.

      There was an RFI made on the 17th February.

    • #733521
      lexington
      Participant

      As lisam said, Pitwood Ltd are currently compiling the necessary Further Info requested by CCC.



      Just on the Capitol Cineplex redevelopment by Mount Kennett Investments and Mr. Costello – it represents, undoubtedly, one of ugliest and laziest designs to have been proposed for Cork in many a year. It is nothing more that a zinc-cladded box, with more boxes on top and an unsightly railing. I have a couple of VIS images from a Grand Parade, Daunt Square and Washington Street persepctive – but it will be a while before I can post them. It is nothing more than a grey, dire brick with a glass frontage. Really ugly ugly stuff and completely undeserving of such an important and dramatic location. The set back upper levels actually add to the ugliness of the development rather than minimise impact. A poor effort by the developers and Sabine Wittman of The e-Project (http://www.the-eproject.com)

    • #733522
      rodger
      Participant

      Exactly as I suspected if its good enough for Limerick its good enough for cork.Enter R Mc D hopefully!Here comes the pain,lets hope the master referee sorts this out as I have said before this is a very important point in corks historic core.

    • #733523
      rodger
      Participant
    • #733524
      lexington
      Participant


      Michael O’Donoghue of Rockfell Investments

      You may remember a few months ago that I post Rockfell Investments (a development SPV set up by Michael O’Donoghue of the O’Donoghue/Ring Hotel Group and Munster Joinery) based at Lacka Cross intended to start work on their Cornmarket Street development for April. The development which received the greenlight in October 2004 was subject to substantial revisions by architect Niall Coffey (w/ Frank Ennis & Associates) and in the end was approved with 65 apartments, 66 basement parking spaces and over 120,000sq ft of retail over 9 units at the former Musgrave (Guy & Co.) building, Noddy’s Toystore and former Paul Street church – however things have been stalled ever since the developer was approached by O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) MD Owen O’Callaghan. It would seem, OCP are very protective of their retail provision dominance in the Cork city area. Besides OCP, the only real threat to this crown is from the Shipton Group (Clayton Love Jnr’s vehicle) and to a lesser extent, O’Flynn Construction. Talks were initiated about a possible joint venture in the Cornmarket Street development – despite OCP having its own ambitions set on the 150m euro retail/residential building planned for a 0.6acre block at Academy Street (an application is still set for this summer). There remains a projected demand of some 400,000sq ft of city centre retail space in Cork – Academy Street would bring around 200,000sq ft of that space between 30/40 units across its lower levels. The negotiation stage is still unclear, but it looks as though OCP would be anxious for the Rockfell development to link across into its aging Paul Street S.C. – which would in turn be revamped to the standards provided by the Cornmarket Street project. Tesco would remain anchor tenant for Paul Street. The link-up would also provide Rockfell’s project with direct access to the public multi-storey car-park as it has no such facilities of its own (with the 66 basement spaces designated for resident use only). As for a further link-up to Academy Street nearby, I find it unlikely and have not heard of anything as of yet. Academy Street will primarily avail of pedestrian-based trade given its accessibility and access onto Patrick’s Street – remember, the street sees approx. half-a-million pedestrian movements per week, that’s a lot of trade – it is also a reason OCP were so anxious to have a frontage onto the street by acquiring the Taboo bar and current The Jean Scene building (notably, The Jean Scene have applied for a unit at the Academy Street facility along with Gasoline – who will seek to transfer their business to the centre from Merchants Quay S.C.). Rumours persist that OCP have since managed to strike a deal with the Reidy family regarding their Le Cheateau bar – but the deal entails that the licensed premises will still remain on completion of the development.

      A clear position will be made known soon regarding Cornmarket Street – whether Mr. O’Donoghue accepts the offer with OCP or not, it’s clear that the offer could be an attractive one to him. Nothing has been set in stone yet – but its nice to know what’s going on in the background. I really like the Rockfell project. Nonetheless, a target has been set for clearance and excavation works to commence for this summer, with some tenancy agreements having already been accorded for the development – including a large unit for furniture retailler Habitat. Other rumours include a unit for Dixons and Boots (who are expected will transfer from Patrick’s Street to avail of a larger city centre unit with greater presence – no confirmation has yet been solidified).

      I have to say, I admire Mr. O’Donoghue’s motto toward business, it’s quoted as being “The best is only barely good enough for me!”

      😎 I hope to reveal the architects behind Academy Street soon – its all pending – but if anyone is wise to this, some members of the Academy Street design team were present on invitation by Mr. O’Callaghan to the opening of Mahon Point S.C.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Lidl have acquired a site along the Ballyhooly Road in Ballyvolane for which they intend to develop a discount food store (and possibly additional retail units) – no application has been made yet, so the specifics are not yet clear. It seems Dunnes Stores is still not safe even despite outbidding the Germal retaillers for a 1.9 acre site near its Ballyvolane S.C.

      😎 O’Flynn Construction have applied to make a number of finishing alterations to their Ballincollig Town Centre shopping centre facility and adjoining multi-storey car-park. Were once, the northern elevation of the S.C. and part of the Western elevation of the car-park were set to be finished with timber cladding, this will now be omitted in favour of a less maintenance heavy finish of metal sheet cladding. Dunnes Stores will anchor 2 of the main anchor units (grocery and clothing), providing a combined area of approx. 60,000sq ft, with the 3rd anchor tenant set to be announced shortly, with a 30,000sq ft unit. Easons are already taking up a units 10 & 11 with a newsagents and cafe. Vero Moda are also supposedly looking at a unit but I haven’t heard anything of this other than 3rd party info. The S.C. is scheduled for opening in October 2005.


      Ballincollig Town Centre S.C.

    • #733525
      lexington
      Participant

      Well there seems to be a lot of talk about roundabouts in another thread on this forum – so I said I may as well update this thread w.r.t. the progress being made on the Kinsale Road Roundabout Flyover. This long overdue and it’s highly inflated budget (upwards of 42m euro) are now scheduled to get a move on this June, with Ascon as contractors. This is following a further delay which without, would have seen the project rolling 2 months ago.

      Here’s a little bird’s eye view of the flyover – what it will look like when complete. Arup are the consultants for the project.

    • #733526
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I was curious as to what they had planned to do with the tree in the middle of the roundabout.

      @lexington wrote:

      Well there seems to be a lot of talk about roundabouts in another thread on this forum – so I said I may as well update this thread w.r.t. the progress being made on the Kinsale Road Roundabout Flyover. This long overdue and it’s highly inflated budget (upwards of 42m euro) are now scheduled to get a move on this June, with Ascon as contractors. This is following a further delay which without, would have seen the project rolling 2 months ago.

      Here’s a little bird’s eye view of the flyover – what it will look like when complete. Arup are the consultants for the project.

    • #733527
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Saw this aerial image of Cork Airport on that John Herriott Photography website. Great pic showing the latest construction. See following link:
      http://www.irelandphotography.com/johnherriott/aerial/cair.jpg

    • #733528
      lexington
      Participant

      Tom McCarthy’s development vehicle, McCarthy Developments – who are continuing work on their Hartys Quay and Jacobs Island developments (both awaiting planning decisions for extensions on each) and are also in planning for a superb 100,000sq ft, 8-storey technology and business centre along Centre Park Road – will again shortly be seeking a revised proposal for their Curraheen residential development (which was refused planning on appeal due to what was stated as being a ‘premature application’ – considering the Ballincollig By-pass had not been completed at the time). Originally the development sought to accommodate up to 500 students across a series of blocks on what were once the football grounds of Cork City FC.

      McCarthy Developments will be seeking a revised application in the coming months – with a number of alterations made. The original plan was granted by Cork County Council – and it is hoped that the renewed application will also meet approval. It is suspected that the fresh proposal will have a reduced student element, if at all. The site is also in very close proximity to Jermiah Lynch’s site which recently attained planning, following appeal, for 123 residential units – as designed by Murray O’Laoire: that site is now up for sale through Irish & European with a guide price of approx. 10m euros. Design on the McCarthy Developments application will again be by Project Architects. The adjacent sports pitches, as visible in the image below, have been assessed by UCC and CIT for a joint student campus facility. Similar to the McCarthy Developments project, a link would be provided to CIT.

    • #733529
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 After a series of apparent weather disruptions (including the flooding of the site), Cleary Doyle Contractors have finally got around to erecting the 1st of 2 tower cranes over the site of Cork City Hall’s 32m euro extension, designed by ABK Architects. Construction is expected to take approx. 18 months with an official opening set for Autumn 2006.



      🙂 The new Cork Airport terminal development is coming along very well and looks attractive even at this mid-construction stage. The multi-storey car-park is nearing completion. The new terminal is still on schedule for a Novemeber 2005 opening.



      😎 The company jointly owned by Owen O’Callaghan, Elendale Group, has seen its value rise by almost 400% following a revaluation of its assets. The value now stands at approximately 204m euros, and increase of 160m euros (up from 44m euros). The revaluation growth is largely thanks to land value increases subsequent oof developments at Mahon Point, Lavitts Quay and on performances contributed by Barkhill, the Liffey Valley ddevelopment wing Mr. O’Callaghan owns 50/50 with the Duke of Westminster’s Grosvenor Group. O’Callaghan Properties (OCP) also have substantial developments in the wings earmarked for the former Jurys Hotel site along the Western Road (a 3 Phase project estimated to have a value of approx. 130m euros), Academy Street (a new 200,000sq ft retail quarter with 80 overhead apartments – valued at around 150m euros) plus a number of other Cork-based projects under assessment. It is believed these projects, in addition to on-going projects along the Old Blackrock Road, Classes near Ovens and at Mahon Point, with a possible joint-venture regarding Cornmarket Street and Paul Street S.C. – will all further boosts values for the company into the future. Through Barkhill, OCP and Grosvenor Group are also planning a new town development with numerous offices, leisure and retail facilities in addition to 5000 potential new homes at Liffey Valley.



      😎 It’s interesting to see how the Bandon Road Roundabout section of the 120m euro Ballincollig By-Pass (where it meets with the South Ring Road) – constructed by Gama Tubin Construction – has already made the preparations for the prospective new fly-over at the junction. The flyover will be part of a 2 phase development, with another flyover being constructed at Sarsfield Roundabout further east along the South Ring. The 2 projects combined will costs an estimated 75m euros – and are seperate to the 42m euro Kinsale Road Roundabout (see posts above for image). The Bandon and Sarsfield fly-overs were cleared by ABP following appeal, the funding is in place, and a projected commencement date has been set for late Summer 2005 (but I’ll believe when I see it). 😉



      -> and just a minor correction regarding something I posted many many moons ago in which I said Pat O’Brien Developments had erected a tower crane over Frinailla’s An Caislean development in Ballincollig, well, the crane is actually that of Murnane & O’Shea over their The Maltings development nearby in Ballincollig. That development consists of 29 dwellinghouses, 76 apartments, 32 duplexes and 13 sheltered housing units. Just said I’d make it clear.

    • #733530
      lexington
      Participant

      Many of you have asked how come no images of Victoria Mills, developed by Paul Montgomery & Edmund Kenneally, designed by Derek Tynan & Associates, constructed by Bowen Construction, have been posted on this thread considering all the talk about it. Although I have provided links, here’s an image, finally! Hmmm. Phase 2 begins late May.

    • #733531
      A-ha
      Participant

      Does anyone know if the existing building of the airport will be kept or will it be demolished when the new terminal opens? If it is kept, what use will it be put to, offices??

    • #733532
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Lexington re: Bandon Rd flyover

      might be some disruption to this given the current uproar about Gama?

    • #733533
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Does anyone know if the existing building of the airport will be kept or will it be demolished when the new terminal opens? If it is kept, what use will it be put to, offices??

      Ya they are planning to keep the building alright. It will be used for offices primarily but it may be used to facilitate peak airport traffic in case the new terminal won’t be able to cope with passanger numbers in the future. But that’s unlikely to happen for a good while. Lets just hope the Airport Authority build the four airbridges, and that it is compulsory for the airlines to use them. Forget about shorter turn around times, this is the year 2005, they should concentrate on passenger well being. And air bridges, from a security perspective, are a lot safer.

    • #733534
      dowlingm
      Participant

      ilovecork2 and your “compulsory” airbridges

      it is not “compulsory” for airlines to serve Cork either.

      You can make it as compulsory as you like in fact but that won’t make it possible to attach an airbridge to an ATR42.

    • #733535
      lexington
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      Lexington re: Bandon Rd flyover

      might be some disruption to this given the current uproar about Gama?

      Gama won’t be the main contractors on the project. Their element of the flyover work has already been complete.



      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      Ya they are planning to keep the building alright. It will be used for offices primarily but it may be used to facilitate peak airport traffic in case the new terminal won’t be able to cope with passanger numbers in the future. But that’s unlikely to happen for a good while. Lets just hope the Airport Authority build the four airbridges, and that it is compulsory for the airlines to use them. Forget about shorter turn around times, this is the year 2005, they should concentrate on passenger well being. And air bridges, from a security perspective, are a lot safer.

      As said, the existing terminal will be retained – but as for the airbridges iloveCORK2, only 2 airbridges will be secured for sure. The other options will be allocated at the discretion of the CAA once they become independent of the DAA. CAA have already been discussing ‘sponsoring’ activities regarding further airbridges with a number of local businesses but it is unlikely any such venture will take place in the forseeable future.
      Air-bridges are also utilised only at the discretion of the air-service provider – take Ryanair in Dublin for example.



      A report in the Irish Examiner today mentioned how the likes of Owen O’Callaghan, Howard Holdings and Paul Montgomery were in the mix for the development of a multi-purpose event centre -> 😮 I’ll provide you with an up-to-date insight into that particular issue over the coming 2 weeks. It may clear up some hazy perceptions on the proposals.

    • #733536
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      That McCarthy Development’s Student Accomodation at Bishopstown looks like some terrible planning. It’s analagous to the inspired decision to build student accomodation at the train station. The train station!!!! thats pretty much as far as you can be away from UCC/CIT and still be in Cork CIty.
      Plus, building over Sports facilities is pretty dodgy territory.
      _______________________________________________________________________________________

      Does anyone know what Leaders on North Main Street are up to? They seem to be fitting out that long vacant shop close to their larger store. All property owned by the company on the street is in need of a facelift. Lets hope thats what they are up to.
      _______________________________________________________________________________________

      There was an interesting article on the Evening Echo on Saturday talking about a lifting bridge at Water Street area. Apparently CCC are in the very early stages of assessing its viability. They had an interesting image of what it might look like. Not sure of the source of the image. Any details?
      On a related topic, Werdna’s Water street project will be given the thumbs up/down next Monday.
      _______________________________________________________________________________________

      I have heard on the grapevine that Frinailla’s development on Watercourse road (Ladys Well), which was granted permission after a long, drawn out planning process by CCC, will almost definately be appealled to ABP. This will further lengthen the already elongated process.
      _______________________________________________________________________________________

      Next Wednesday (20th) is the closing date for entries to the Kyrls Quay Architectural Design Competition run by CCC/CORK2005/RIAI.
      I’ve been lucky enough to view a number of the entries and there is some excellent work there. I think, most importantly, that the general public, will be more than happy with the designs and most will also please the architecture critics 🙂
      Expect the results to be made available sometime in late May.

    • #733537
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Anna O’Connor (Sandymount, Dublin) has reapplied to CCC for permission to redevelop her site at the corner of York Street/Hill and Wellington Road. Her previous application was refused on grounds of height and overdevelopment – it included, a 6-storey building over basement carpark w/ 24 apartments and 800sq ft of office accommodation on the ground floor – all built around a courtyard area. The new application is significantly toned down with a generally 4-storey (max’ing at 5-storeys south along York Hill) building containing 17 apartments, all with balconies, landscaped courtyard and basement parking. The site is in much need of development – but it is located within a highly sensitive area. MV Cullinan Architects are responsible for the design. A decision is due on the 9th June 2005.



      🙂 Blakeshaw Ltd have been granted permission to change usage of the former church at Our Lady’s Hospital along the Lee Road, to a new restaurant and bar facility. The church will be fully renovated and its surrounding gardens landscaped, with ancillary parking provided for. The new facility has promised to provide a high-standard in ‘dining’ for Cork. The grant comes despite an objection from Councillor Michael O’Connell, who feared the provision of a bar in the area would lead to unwelcome late night activities in the area. :rolleyes:


    • #733538
      pier39
      Participant

      would sum1 ever shut mary leland up – re: her article on cork2005 in todays IT. and every other article dat woman has ever wrote. what a nag.

    • #733539
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Many of you have asked how come no images of Victoria Mills, developed by Paul Montgomery & Edmund Kenneally, designed by Derek Tynan & Associates, constructed by Bowen Construction, have been posted on this thread considering all the talk about it. Although I have provided links, here’s an image, finally! Hmmm. Phase 2 begins late May.

      Pretty much everyone I know thinks this building is a blot on the landscape of the city, and given that I go past it every evening coming from work I would have to agree that it’s pretty ugly.

      Is the new development going up beside it going to be of a similiar ilk?

    • #733540
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i really don’t understand people’s reactions to this building – is it because it is contemporary, striking, slightly different to nearby buildings – some comments have been a bit hysterical in my opinion – and when we have far worse new buildings being built everywhere in the city no-one seems to care for eg does anyone know the Bridgeholm (or something like that) apartment scheme being built above Commons Road – now thats bad – cheap looking early 1990’s tax incentive effect to the utmost.

    • #733541
      pier39
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      i really don’t understand people’s reactions to this building – is it because it is contemporary, striking, slightly different to nearby buildings – some comments have been a bit hysterical in my opinion – and when we have far worse new buildings being built everywhere in the city no-one seems to care for eg does anyone know the Bridgeholm (or something like that) apartment scheme being built above Commons Road – now thats bad – cheap looking early 1990’s tax incentive effect to the utmost.

      yeh – that commons rd building ain’t fair pretty at all. yer entitled to your opinion like, but i still think the victoria cross student building is just boring. i though contemp. meant inspired and new. theres no definition to it at all like. but like i say everyones entitled to there opinion.

      hey lex, fair job on the forum! what do you think are the 5 most importent projects in cork at the mo? the 1s in planning or not built yet.? got any pics?

    • #733542
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: Paul Montgomery/Edmund Kenneally’s next venture – this time with Barry Supple (John F. Supple Contractors) – along the Boreenmanna Road (see previous posts) – has seen Mr. Montgomery return to architect Derek Tynan & Associates (sigh) for the design on the new housing project at Cogan’s Field (near Rose Cottage) – a 5.5acre site. The development will consist of 50 social housing units, 52 market (private) houses, and 55 apartments in one, 3/4 storey apartment building – comprising a total of 157 units.

      For images of the ugliness, see -> http://www.dtarch.com/04bmr.html


      @opus wrote:

      Is the new development going up beside it going to be of a similiar ilk?

      Pretty much identical in design only with a brown-brick finish. However, Phase 2 will peak at 5-storeys over basement car-park. See -> http://www.dtarch.com/04vc2.html



      -> As for 5 most important Cork projects in planning or appeal (I assume you mean) pier39: 1. Eglinton Street, 2. Water Street, 3.Jurys Redevelopment – are 3 of the most important in my opinion anyway, but I’ll get back to you on it. I’ll try and have some images of them up later this evening.

    • #733543
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The most crucial development Cork needs at this time is a 5,000/6,000 seater arena for conferences/concerts, etc.
      Its pretty appallling that KIllarney and Kilkenny can hold annual concert series (even without an arena) and Cork (the second city) can barely stretch to a few concerts for CORK2005.
      The arena should- OF COURSE be located in the docklands. Any other location (especially Mahon Point) is ridiculous. A Docklands arean would allow visitors and corkonians alike to walk from the city to the arena instead of everyone getting in there car and blocking up the whole of Mahon.
      When can we expect an announcement from CCC in this regard?

    • #733544
      lexington
      Participant

      Well obviously the multi-purpose event centre is a crucial development factor – I am hoping to have a sort of ‘Report’ on the centre and the people behind it (in light of recent media flurry) for some time over the next 2 weeks – incl. Paul Montgomery’s ‘adventures’ at Black Ash and Horgan’s Quay, OCP’s proposal – and it’s on again/off again status (as well as the Mahon Point’s link to Mr. Montgomery), why another group has been actively concentrating on a prominent site within the vicinity of the docklands etc etc. There are also issues of Government support in the mix and the contents of the next Finance Bill publication – but the report will depend greatly on the co-operation of certain ‘sources’.

      My response earlier to pier39 , was based on the projects that have been actively applied for. I’ll get back to this at a later stage – this evening probably.



      Any opinions of the images of Montomery/Kenneally/Supple proposal for the Boreenmanna Road? (See link in my prev. post).

    • #733545
      lisam
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Any opinions of the images of Montomery/Kenneally/Supple proposal for the Boreenmanna Road? (See link in my prev. post).

      YUK SPRINGS TO MIND

    • #733546
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      My response earlier to pier39 , was based on the projects that have been actively applied for. I’ll get back to this at a later stage – this evening probably.



      Any opinions of the images of Montomery/Kenneally/Supple proposal for the Boreenmanna Road? (See link in my prev. post).

      Lexington: I didn’t mean to suggest that your previous response was anything but excellent- i was just getting my oar in!

      With regard to Boreenmanna rd, notice all the lovely trees– I think it was Frank Lloyd Wright who said that an artist can paint over his mistakes, an architect can just advise the client to plant ivy. 🙂

    • #733547
      A-ha
      Participant

      I heard that there is talks for a trolley bus to be put into the city centre. Does anyone know if this is true or is it just word of mouth??

    • #733548
      lexington
      Participant

      As requested –

      images from 3 of what I believe to be Cork’s most important developments in planning or appeal.

      1. Eglinton Street

      Thumbnail Image (541KB)

      2. Water Street

      3. Jurys Redevelopment

      Thumbnail (276KB)



      Also check out the images of Frinailla’s recently granted, but now appealed (buggers!), Ladyswell development along the Watercourse Road at -> http://www.frinailla.ie/residential_4.php?id=6

      It’s interesting to note that Frinailla’s Dennehy’s Cross project will also contain a large commercial element to it, in conjunction with the mixed-residential unit types. Among the commercial units provisioned for are a postal facility and butchers (however that usage will ultimately depend on the tenant’s goals). The planning application will note these under ‘community service facilities’.


    • #733549
      rodger
      Participant

      well as Joe Gavin said heres to Demolition.

    • #733550
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Paul Kenny (Kenny Group) is to apply for the demolition and redevelopment of his car-park facility, surrounding retail and office buildings in a block bordered by St. Patrick’s Quay, Brian Boru Street, Ship Street and the Lower Glanmire Road. The redevelopment will consist of a 4 – 5 storey office building of some 83,000sq ft fronting onto St. Patrick’s Quay, Ship Street and Brian Boru Street; w/ a 6/7 storey mixed-use building providing retail usage of 15,000sq ft on the ground floor and with further office usage on all upper floors, measuring some 54,000sq ft – this building will front the Lower Glanmire Road, Brian Boru Street and Ship Street. 2 basement levels will provide 235 parking spaces, accessed from Ship Street. The Protected Structure facades fronting St. Patrick’s Quay will be retained and incorporated into the project. Design is by Wilson Architecture. The extended closing date for the Revenue Commissioners new office accommodation submissions is April 24th 2005 – Mr. Kenny has thrown his application in just before time, no doubt the prospects of a tenant like the Revenue Commissioners was an influencing factor (considering its proximity to Kent Station, an OPW requirement in new RC offices. Mr. Kenny had presented this site and the one at 50 Grand Parade to the OPW). In total, the 2 linked buildings will provide approx. 137,000sq ft (gross) of office space.

      Prior to this application, Mr. Kenny had sought the development of a multi-storey car-park for this location (back in 1998), albeit on a smaller site – encompassing only the car-park element of the block. That application was refused by the then Cork Corporation – in what is widely believed to have been an issue of ‘favouritism’ for the Metropole Multi-storey Car Park a little further west along St. Patrick’s Quay.

      The Kenny Group is also expected to indicate the future of its 50 Grand Parade site in the coming, near future.

    • #733551
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’d be interested to know what people think of Frinailla’s Ladyswell development: good/bad/ugly?
      the link is located 3 messages up.

    • #733552
      rodger
      Participant

      Well the 1st appeal to Frinaillas Ladies Well project is in from Mary Dunne whom it appears is pro development however she is concerned about the “Diminution” of the value of property in the area??? 😡

    • #733553
      rodger
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’d be interested to know what people think of Frinailla’s Ladyswell development: good/bad/ugly?
      the link is located 3 messages up.

      I have viewed this proposal in detail incl.images from 8 different locations.I think Kiosk have carried out a great piece of work so GOOD is my verdict.What is your opinion Radioactiveman?

    • #733554
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 McCarthy Developments plans to extend blocks 5 & 6 at their Jacobs Island development near Mahon Point have see their decision pushed back by a full month until 19th May 2005. The plan was to add a further 2 floors and 28 apartments to the blocks, bringing each to 8 storeys. McCarthy Developments other Jacob’s Island extension, at Blocks 1 & 2, which will bring the granted 4-storey blocks to 6-storeys, will see a decision on the 26th April 2005, after it also having been pushed back.

      – also on Tom McCarthy related issues, his Rathmelton Investments vehicle is scheduled for a decision tomorrow (21st April 2005) on the numerous alterations planned for the on-going Kingsley Hotel extension, designed by Murray O’Laoire, constructed by O’Flynn of Banteer. Among the changes: reduction in bedroom extension numbers; extension of leisure facilities; construction of a link-tunnel between leisure centre and basement car-park; alterations to the 19-unit apart-hotel on the site’s western fringes.



      😎 The tower crane over No.6 Lapps Quay has been dismantled to allow the finishing touches be applied to the 60,000sq ft office building developed by O’Flynn Construction, designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects. This phase will complete the No.5/No.6 Lapps Quay office complex altogether. Although there are distant rumours OFC may be looking to acquire a site to the rear of No.5 (a former car-showroom and engineers shed) to extended No.5 at some point in the long run. Nothing has yet been solidified. No.6 has seen over 75% of all its space either sold or pre-let already. OFC are said to be very pleased with the response they’ve had, noting that the quality on show at No.5 had led that building’s tenants promote the fact to prospective tenants at No.6 (?). The ground floor of No.6 will be allocated for retail banking usage – a deal is apparently being finalised for its tenant by the developer.

      The completion of No.6 Lapps Quay adds another jewel in the regenerative crown of the quayside – the next supposed move for this quay frontage will be the redevelopment (vertical extension) of the Deloitte premises next-door, however no timeframe has been established for this project as of yet.



      😮 I hope (I emphasise the ‘hope’) to have some inside news on how things are going with Werdna’s new Water Street application from within the planning authority realms, before the ‘provisional’ due date – which is the 24th April 2005, next Monday.



      -> Paul Kenny’s large office development (one of Cork’s largest ever single office developments) for St. Patrick’s Quay (see post further up this thread), should make for an interesting contribution to the quayside. It’s a borderline docklands development, with a number of adjoining properties set for marked investment over the coming years. It will also have, hopefully, an effect on generating redevelopment for the rest of St. Patrick’s Quay – much needed! I hope to have images soon enough.

    • #733555
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      I have viewed this proposal in detail incl.images from 8 different locations.I think Kiosk have carried out a great piece of work so GOOD is my verdict.What is your opinion Radioactiveman?

      I’ve seen all the plans & images for this scheme.
      I think its very average. Id like to see something much better and more suitable but i’m aware that this has gone on for too long already.
      Height/ density i really dont think was a problem with the objectors. It seemed to be about finishing and a facade on Watercourse Road more in keeping with the size of the street. I guess its up to ABP now.

      RM

    • #733556
      rodger
      Participant

      RM. I think on this occasion the architects in question should take that as a compliment.

    • #733557
      rodger
      Participant

      Has any one images of the development on the lower road opposite the siemens building being developed by Bride View Developments hopefully it will be to the same high standard as their apartment development on the site of the old arcadia ball room.Simple but tasty!

    • #733558
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Aldi Stores Developments Ltd have been granted permission by ABP for the development of a new discount food store on the former Kearys Toyota dealership in Grange, near Douglas. This is the 2nd batch of good news for Aldi after another recent grant for a ‘town centre’ development along Ballincollig Main Street. Aldi’s have also purchased a large site along the Ballyhooly Road in Ballyvolane for a prospective store development.

      – just on that note, related to Kearys, it may be interesting to note, Bill Keary has (in conjunction w/ his development partner Liam O’Callaghan) been granted permission by Cork County Council for the development of 71 residential units (55 houses, 8 duplexes and 8 apartments) at Curragh, Kanturk.



      😡 In addition to the Ladyswell project by Frinailla been taken to ABP, so too has Ann Clifford’s Westbourne project, along College Road. Not a big project by any means, but a very strategically located one opposite the gates of UCC.



      Mark Kelleher recently resubmitted his application for his Westend site near Bishopstown/Curraheen – the details of which are outlined on this thread in an earlier post. The project has been considerably scaled back and altered – now peaking at a height 4-storeys for the apartment building element – and yet again, the residents are up in arms about this ‘high rise’ development. What the…??? If this is highrise, then so too are all those houses along the Western Road, the Mardyke, some parts of the Model Farm Road and so on. I entirely accept the right of some of these residents to object, as I’ve said before – they have valid grounds for concern, and understand that dialogue and planning authority decisions can be made in their favour – but some of the rubbish these objectors are generating is appauling. Jerry Buttimer is now pushing for objection fees (20euros each) to be refunded by CCC to all the residents who objected to the original application, because Mr. Kelleher withdrew it to revise his plans with consideration to the concerns raised. That’s utter populist rubbish Councillor and you know it!


      @rodger wrote:

      Has any one images of the development on the lower road opposite the siemens building being developed by Bride View Developments hopefully it will be to the same high standard as their apartment development on the site of the old arcadia ball room.Simple but tasty!

      BrideView Developments actually purchased that site, the former Unity Garage Petrol Station, for 600,000euros last year from former owner Sean McCarthy. Mr. McCarthy had applied for F.P.P. on his garage site before the sale – it included 5 apartments over 2 ground-floor retail units. BrideView have applied and been granted as far as I’m aware, for some minor extensions to Apartment No.5. CCC made a big deal about the prominence of the site before planning was granted and requested the design be of a complimentary nature. It’s a minor development, but BrideView are pitching it big under the title ‘Unity House’. Completion is expected for the Summer, with units for viewing in the Autumn according to BrideView.

    • #733559
      pier39
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😮 Paul Kenny (Kenny Group) is to apply for the demolition and redevelopment of his car-park facility, surrounding retail and office buildings in a block bordered by St. Patrick’s Quay, Brian Boru Street, Ship Street and the Lower Glanmire Road. The redevelopment will consist of a 4 – 5 storey office building of some 83,000sq ft fronting onto St. Patrick’s Quay, Ship Street and Brian Boru Street]

      cool! roll on the docklands. should get things movin this side of the northern dock quays like the way water st is doing it on the east side. nice to see this sort of buildings featuring more in cork.

    • #733560
      macai
      Participant

      [font=Comic Sans MS:1xxibb7t]Seem O'Flynn's are after starting work on the old mill building just off parliament bridge/fr. matthew quay seemed to be pouring a lot of concrete in there yesterday as if about to start on the structural work, really is about time as this has to be one of the more unsightly buildings in the city centre[/font:1xxibb7t]

    • #733561
      lexington
      Participant

      Yes, it’s true… Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell is likely to recommend ‘refusal’ for the Water Street tower element come decision day. Even considering the extensive pre-planning talks between developer Mark McMahon’s Werdna Ltd, architects Murray O’Laoire and city planners on the revised plan for Water Street – which saw considerable 25% reductions in residential unit numbers, reductions in height, increased commercial provision etc etc – issues regarding height, density, overshadowing, traffic management, among others – have prompted CCC not to find favour with the entire project – rather, imposing excessively restrictive conditions that will likely feature a removal of the tower element. In my opinion, this represents a mistake. I am told from the inner realms that Werdna will seek to appeal this case should such a final decision be made.

      This is a blow to the Cork Docklands development flow and to Werdna. I can only hope that ABP have a better sense about the project on appeal.

      Clearer details will be made as time progresses.


      I really can’t sum up my disappointment at this decision. The 2 genetlemen I attained this info from earlier this week were equally angered and saddened. The news was confirmed again today by a further source.

      In my view it’s not a very positive step in Cork’s regeneration.

    • #733562
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Intensive talks were apparently ongoing between architects Murray O’Laoire and senior planners at CCC about possible rectifications to the apparent prospective refusal of the plan. The design team noted that they withdrew their original application in fear of a planning refusal .

      I believe the Irish Examiner will have an article with Sean Kearns, chief Water Street architect, in it tomorrow.



      😮 And in all this horribly dreary news, there may be some light for the docklands with developer Gerry Barrett’s Edward Holdings recently making a curious glance over Cork’s potential. More on that when and if I can – if anything emerges at all.


    • #733563
      rodger
      Participant

      A bright light of hope extinguished for a very dull but potentially beutiful part of cork city.I have often felt that Dublin got where it is becase it is the capital and in turn the political powerhouse of Ireland.We have the talent but we do not have the clout.

      Cork needs new blood in the city and county if this does not happen durring the current economic environment nothing will happen in Cork however the capital will continue to prosper.

      In one word disgraceful!

      Lets hope Ronnie Mcdowell uses his incredible powers of COMPROMISE!

    • #733564
      theblimp
      Participant

      I’m as saddened and amazed as everyone else by this pending decision. “Density and Traffic Management” (among others) … come on!!! It’s obvious that extensive discussions took place with the planners about the density issue so it would strike as extremely odd that an agreement on this matter wasn’t settled. As for ‘traffic management’, I’m sure the architects have sufficient accommodation on site for it’s own traffic so it must be an issue concerning the impact on local traffic – two items shout out here. The first is that the Jack Lynch Tunnel has removed a lot of traffic from that area – the second (and most important) is that the city itself is committed to a long-term docklands development strategy – surely they have accounted for the associated increases in dockland-area traffic!!??? Perhaps they expect people to swim into the city centre? Bad, bad news and equally bad, bad policy if they persist with this rejection. A bigger concern is the message it sends out to other developers with equally large docklands plans. Good work Lex (as always) on highlighting this.

    • #733565
      rodger
      Participant

      One thing that has struck me in my short particapation on this forum is the well balanced and narrated attitudes of the forum members.

      Is this a site where people discuss opinions with each other or do we feel strongly enough to make our opinions heard?

      At local level objections or appeals are always anti development and can make a difference and it must be said sometimes deservedly so.

      Through our informal chair Lexington may I suggest that we make submissions on developments that we feel may have a positive impact on our City?

      I am not talking about a new pro highrise group,rather people that voice their opinions on projects like Water st.Eglinton st.

      One person doing something is a lot better than ten thousand talking about it.

    • #733566
      keeneye
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Has any one images of the development on the lower road opposite the siemens building being developed by Bride View Developments hopefully it will be to the same high standard as their apartment development on the site of the old arcadia ball room.Simple but tasty!

      I have been informed by BVD that a few groups have made offers to purchase Unity House COMPLETELY.. One group offered to purchase the site in its current status (stop work) so they can change it to offices, pending planning been granted, but BVD has rejected this offer.

      Another offer is from a separate group who has made an offer (around 3 million euros approx) to purchase the complete building once construction is completed. This is close to been finalised so keep and eye on this one.

      Hmmm , that penthouse apartment looked quiet good on the plans with its roof garden (400sq ft approx.). BVD had planned to furnish these apartments to a high spec (similar to there current apartments been built by them in Douglas) . Will keep you informed in due course. I have drawings and floor layouts that i have scanned in. exterior plans and top floor plan.. Lower floors are just as nice with plate glass surrounding part of building. Hope they are ok .! 🙂

      .

    • #733567
      keeneye
      Participant

      Sorry …Having trouble with drawings that i scanned.. Will post proper ones ( Exterior Looks etc) when i get a chance.. thx :confused: problems with my scanner i think..

      .

    • #733568
      keeneye
      Participant

      Exterior Views on BVD’s Unity House by the train station.. Notice the glass frontage to some of the apartments.. 🙂

      .

    • #733569
      lexington
      Participant

      😡 In actuality, CCC have only granted permission for under half of the 304 residential units proposed by Werdna’s Water Street project.

      The 17-storey, 58m tower had been specifically shift east at the request of planners in the extensive pre-planning dialogue between the developer, Murray O’Laoire and CCC – but in the final decision, has been entirely ruled out. The remaining apartment blocks – which averaged 9 stories were cut back to 5 stories. Jim O’Donovan (Director of Planning) said, contrary to the words of Mark McMahon (developer) and Sean Kearns (architect), that ‘height was always a factor in discussions’. Planning consultant John Crean of Cunnan Stratton Reynolds has vehemently argued this.

      Sean Kearns has said that this sends all the wrong signals for the quality development of Cork’s Docklands. By granting permission for 150 apartments, it’s almost mocking Werdna’s intentions – almost saying, we want the public plazas etc, but move off with the development. Werdna were hardly ever going to proceed w/ such a half-realised format of their project. It stands that Cork has possibly lost one of the best examples of quayside and docklands development anywhere in Ireland (in my opinion). As said by John Crean, “We have never had an experience like this anywhere in Ireland.”

      I would like to see the development vindicated on appeal.

    • #733570
      lexington
      Participant

      Letter outlining a prospective developer’s (returned from UK) response to CCC’s Water Street decision. It’s not pretty. Removed at the developer’s request.

    • #733571
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Yes, it’s true… Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell is likely to recommend refusal come next Monday’s decision date for the superb Water Street development. Even considering the extensive pre-planning talks between developer Mark McMahon’s Werdna Ltd, architects Murray O’Laoire and city planners on the revised plan for Water Street – which saw considerable 25% reductions in residential unit numbers, reductions in height, increased commercial provision etc etc – issues regarding height, density, overshadowing, traffic management, among others – have prompted CCC not to find favour with the project. In my opinion, this represents the biggest mistake CCC have made so far this year. I am told from the inner realms that Werdna will seek to appeal this case should a final refusal decision be made.

      This is devastating blow to the Cork Docklands development flow and to Werdna who spent so much time, money and effort trying to get this right. I can only hope that ABP have more sense about them on appeal.

      Clearer details will be made as time progresses.


      I really can’t sum up my disappointment at this decision. The 2 genetlemen I attained this info from earlier this week were equally angered and saddened – and rightly so! The news was confirmed again today by a further source.

      It’s a sad step in Cork’s regeneration.

      this is an utter outrage and a complete disgrace, the council should be boxed for this stupid stupid decision.

    • #733572
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      seems like a very bizarre decision – no acknowledgement from CCC of their own Development Objectives for the Docklands in terms of scale, density and the strategic nature of the site- the site was specifically identified in the Docklands Strategy for a landmark/gateway development – density + traffic should not have been reasons for refusal – they are issues that pre-planning should have addressed and if CCC did not inform Werdna at an early stage of the serious obstacles that these presented it is grossly unfair

      it seems that some people are keen to ensure that Cork’s less than desirable reputation as the anti-development centre of ireland will continue and be sure of one thing – others are watching – and taking note

    • #733573
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      so much for the regeneration of the docklands

      this is a sad day for this project!

    • #733574
      lisam
      Participant

      Tragic!!!

      A positive decision for Eglinton St seems unlikely now

    • #733575
      Pug
      Participant

      lex

      re the werdna refusal, never seen your words so animated, just shows how ticked off you are It’s a bizarre situation to have talks all the way along with the developers and then sort of kind of half-refuse, it seems to be pure politics. . Its like they seem to think that they have to be seen to refuse, then they pretend to make a fuss about it and eventually will grant permission after people point out how stupid their decisions are. Its about time the whole planning process was utterly revamped although with Dick Roche as minister, there isnt a hope in hell of a logical decision happening. Then you have Frinailla getting refused planning in Watercourse Rd but Joe Gavin can step in then and single handedly sort it for them.

      I was in talks with a planner about a site and made all the required changes and then when i put in the application with all the changes that had been discussed with the planner to my utter astonishment it was refused. What was the point in my investing time money and energy and all I was doing was keeping the planner happy? I got the permission after logging and diarising the meetings and proving I had made the changes AT THEIR REQUEST. Idiotic.

      Whats frustrating is that Cork is of a size that has SO much potential, We need a concert venue, the showgrounds needs a revamp and the fact that you STILL cant get public transport after 11.15 at night is hilarious.

    • #733576
      Leesider
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      the fact that you STILL cant get public transport after 11.15 at night is hilarious.

      cher we use outdoor tables and chairs as weapons…….just imagine what we’d do to buses!! :rolleyes:

      What annoys me about the Water St. development’s refusal is that only a matter of weeks ago Joe Gavin was complaining about the lack of foresight being shown by CIE with Horgan’s Quay, maybe he should start looking a bit closer to home first!! 😡

    • #733577
      Pug
      Participant

      whats the word on the €180m Dunkathel house devt?

    • #733578
      satanta99
      Participant

      I hope the developers appeal this decision and fire it back in the faces of the city council planning authority. How can they be respected as a credible authority with such incredible flip flopping! I get the impression that they do not know their ass from their elbow and have cut off their nose to spite their face! The reality is, this site is one of the best locations for such a high denisty residential development in the city, These are some or the reasons why:

      1. Its proximety to the train and bus station. It is located as close to any sort of intergrated transport system, that exists in the south of the country. If there is a problem about traffic management in this place well, how can it be said to be less of a problem in other locations in the city, which do not enjoy such a variety of transport options. In theory a high density residential city developement will be far less car dependent than a low density, sprawling one! Why don’t we just go out and condemn the whole of Douglas because it was developed without adequete consideration of the traffic volumes it would generate.

      2. The Docklands Development Strategy sets out a vision for the development of this area.
      [font=Times New Roman:3v49z2pb]Approximately 6,000 new homes, including higher density apartments, student accommodation and family units concentrated on Horgan's Quay, in the central south docks area and along Monahan's road[/font:3v49z2pb] (source: Overview, signed by J. Galvin,http://www.corkcity.ie/docklands/) Water St. is practically Horgans quay like. From my interpretation, this decision contravines the strategy devised by the council itself. Joe Galvin appeared concerned that O’Flynns Eglington St. dev. was bringing residential development to an area designated for commercial, but they appear to have overcome this in some respect. I don’t see any reason to reject this re-submitted dev. for 305 units!

      3. This sends out a very bad signal to other prospective developers in the docklands area. Would you consider taking a chance on an investiment in an area which is controlled by an authority that seems intent on giving you the run-around and constantly changing their minds!

      Overall this has pushed my regard for the Irish Planning system over the edge! First Cullen and Roche’s Free-for all for ‘Bungalow Bliss’ in a decentred sprawling morphology! Now this, a downright kick in the teeth to high density residential living! I think my faith is irredeemable, i’m going to become a recluse and find any patch of land left as soon as I can afford any sort in the country ( prob in about 20 years time!) I will retreat from society and build my own eco-friendly community retreat, which will be built half underground, with help from those Doozers from Fraggle rock, with a grass roof and hope no1 evey finds me!

    • #733579
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i reckon that an appeal of the water street decision could be a wise choice – very strong planning + development basis for appeal i think – does anyone know the size of the site – out of interest??

    • #733580
      indubitably
      Participant

      Dunkathel has been delayed yet further with a request for further information yesterday.

    • #733581
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      i reckon that an appeal of the water street decision could be a wise choice – very strong planning + development basis for appeal i think – does anyone know the size of the site – out of interest??

      4 acres on the button.

      The case for appeal is very strong. A previous application for high-rise on the eastern front (this time at Silversprings) was lodged 2 years ago by O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd for a 15-storey residential tower, designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, and which was pitched on top of the slope in Tivoli not far from the Moran Silversprings Hotel. Though the tower was removed by CCC condition, on appeal, ABP inspector Bernard Dee stated that Cork needed some skyline distinction on the eastern front – providing a nice urban balance with consideration to County Hall in the west. The board over-ruled the planning inspector’s recommendation of grant stating that although they agreed Cork needed some aerial distinction in this regard, the tower was located in an unsuitable area and would be better located closer to the city centre (i.e. north-east docklands). This gives Water Street a very strong position in that sense as it provides for a tower in a location noted by ABP themselves.

      The loss of privacy issue is farsical considering that most Lower Glanmire Road residencies are sheltered by the warehousing to the north of the Water Street site and that the tower was relocated east (at the planner’s request!) minimising disruption, which it most certainly does. Further, the profile of the tower is compliant with CCC Development Plan regulations – slender on the north-south axis – and is thus not a valid source of refusal.



      @lisam wrote:

      A positive decision for Eglinton St. seems unlikely now!

      I’m a little more optimistic – but it will depend on the details of the Further Info submitted and how CCC react to that. OFC say they are close to getting this together soon now.



      Should have some cheerier news later today – all going well.

    • #733582
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Mr. Gavin has been quite outspoken in his support for both Water Street and Eglinton Street. Would be very surprised if he doesn’t get involved.

      @lexington wrote:

      4 acres on the button.

      The case for appeal is very strong. A previous application for high-rise on the eastern front (this time at Silversprings) was lodged 2 years ago by O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd for a 15-storey residential tower, designed by Dennehy + Dennehy, and which was pitched on top of the slope in Tivoli not far from the Moran Silversprings Hotel. Though the tower was removed by CCC condition, on appeal, ABP inspector Bernard Dee stated that Cork needed some skyline distinction on the eastern front – providing a nice urban balance with consideration to County Hall in the west. The board over-ruled the planning inspector’s recommendation of grant stating that although they agreed Cork needed some aerial distinction in this regard, the tower was located in an unsuitable area and would be better located closer to the city centre (i.e. north-east docklands). This gives Water Street a very strong position in that sense as it provides for a tower in a location noted by ABP themselves.

      The loss of privacy issue is farsical considering that most Lower Glanmire Road residencies are sheltered by the warehousing to the north of the Water Street site and that the tower was relocated east (at the planner’s request!) minimising disruption, which it most certainly does. Further, the profile of the tower is compliant with CCC Development Plan regulations – slender on the north-south axis – and is thus not a valid source of refusal.


      I’m a little more optimistic – but it will depend on the details of the Further Info submitted and how CCC react to that. OFC say they are close to getting this together soon now.



      Should have some cheerier news later today – all going well.

    • #733583
      rodger
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      lex

      re the werdna refusal, never seen your words so animated, just shows how ticked off you are It’s a bizarre situation to have talks all the way along with the developers and then sort of kind of half-refuse, it seems to be pure politics. . Its like they seem to think that they have to be seen to refuse, then they pretend to make a fuss about it and eventually will grant permission after people point out how stupid their decisions are. Its about time the whole planning process was utterly revamped although with Dick Roche as minister, there isnt a hope in hell of a logical decision happening. Then you have Frinailla getting refused planning in Watercourse Rd but Joe Gavin can step in then and single handedly sort it for them.

      I was in talks with a planner about a site and made all the required changes and then when i put in the application with all the changes that had been discussed with the planner to my utter astonishment it was refused. What was the point in my investing time money and energy and all I was doing was keeping the planner happy? I got the permission after logging and diarising the meetings and proving I had made the changes AT THEIR REQUEST. Idiotic.

      Whats frustrating is that Cork is of a size that has SO much potential, We need a concert venue, the showgrounds needs a revamp and the fact that you STILL cant get public transport after 11.15 at night is hilarious.

      Frinailla have been granted a permission on Watercourse Rd.by way of condition .The planner recommended refusal,however rather than refusing the descision Jim o Donavan recommended a grant allowing for reductions in numbers as indicated by Fiona McSharry.The Frinailla application is a completely different situation to water st,and pug lest we forget they too started out with 300 units and ended up with 147.

    • #733584
      Pug
      Participant

      anyone hear anything about the IFI site?

    • #733585
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Rathmelton Investments have received their grant for alterations in their extended development of the Kingsley Hotel. The development will see 336m2 reduc bedrm extn-nth façade,reduc no.rms frm 82-79.164m2 reduc confer faclts.95m2 incr. Leis.&spa faclts.227m2 incr. kitch&dining faclts,incl. new storage faclts.202m2 reduc aparthtl blk w/assoc. offices&pkg to west of site.Addn of mezz level&o/side smoking areas at rest.,lounge&lounge bar extns.Aparthtl 4thflr apt incr. 74m2.Intl flr areas to reconfig.Htl bldg:Ents to spa&leis. areas modified.Spa&leis. area to incl tunnel link to b/ment pkng area.Kitch extn on grd flr reduced&used as storage.1st–3rdflr mtg rm&bedrm extns over storage area omitted,rest.,lnge&lnge bar extns reconfig&incl mezz level&extl smoking areas,confer area&related fctns reconfig,glazed cover canopy frm extg entr-new luggage storage area&confer area,2 addl lift shafts add to east wing extn.,escp stairs to both bedrm wing extns modified,minor adjustments to extl drs&wins.Aparthtl:incr.4thflr apt by 74m2,create roof tce&access to tce frm top flr,alter loc.&ht of bldg,minor adjusts to locations of extl wins&drs.

      O’Flynn of Banteer are the main contractors; w/ Murray O’Laoire responsible for design.



      🙂 John F. Supple Ltd have erected a new tower crane over Cathedral Avenue near Shandon Street. The crane represents the initiation of primary construction on an extensive social housing scheme and special needs facility (also w/ some retail provision) funded by Cork City Council.



      The IFI site sold for 20m and will be used as an industrial/warehousing facility – more details in the coming days.



      Check out Cork’s newest nightclub at ->

      BluBambu

    • #733586
      lexington
      Participant

      Although it is well known that I support the Water Street development – even from a non-bias perspective, I would have to agree that the report is, when compared to many other reports, a tad unfair and nit-picks. When a developer spends so much time in preplanning talks, as with Water Street, and when pointers have been taken and noted so extensively, planners thereafter should be disallowed from initiating a refusal – save for a completely altered agreement on preplanning consultations.

      @Water Street Planner wrote:

      …it is critical that the site is developed to a high standard in all aspects particularly as it will serve as a benchmark for other potential schemes in the Docklands…

      the basic building blocks are oriented on a north-south basis as identified in the Docklands Strategy so as to enable visibility through the site from higher land to the rear

      In my opinion the maximum heights for the north-south spine blocks should be 5 storeys with up to
      2 storeys more set back

      An academic argument can be made advocating a high building on this site so as to act as a gateway upon arrival into the City at the start of the Docklands, to give legibility to the townscape and to act as a visual counterbalance to the 30 metre high ESB generating station on the opposite side of the River. The Docklands Strategy identified the Water Street site as a suitable location for a landmark building on the eastern side of the slipway

      the design of the tall building requires to be assessed in its own right given the City Plan Objective to create a landmark building in this area and its wide visual prominence. It is submitted that the design of the tower building is not acceptable for the following reasons:-

      • it is an unduly bulky building.
      • it is not a distinctive, stand alone building and takes on the articulation of the general buildings being proposed adjacent rather than having a unique, “landmark” treatment.

      fundamental reconsideration requires to be given to the architectural form if a tall building is to work successfully anywhere on this site.

      The spine which ranges from 6 storeys at the rear to 9 storeys at the front and which is at a higher ground level is located some 24 metres from the back walls of 1-3 Castleview Terrace and would visually dominate, overshadow and seriously overlook same

      – might I add untrue.

      • the tower is relocated to the east of the Plaza reducing the impact on evening sunshine available to the public space.

      leaving aside issues of impact on sunlight/daylight the design of the tower is unacceptable in its own right and does not satisfy the requirements for a landmark building. In addition further consideration is required as to its impact on the views of the Montenotte Ridge.

      Obviously I can’t give the full report – but the above are some of the highlights.

      You decide.





      What Water Street would look like under the conditions imposed (consider also the western blocks height reduction by 3 to 4 storeys)

    • #733587
      PTB
      Participant

      Dat fella is entirely contradicting himself.He appeared to want a tall high rise of a high quality,yet said he did’nt, got one and turned it down.This dockland thing is becoming a joke, no tax incentives, beautiful buildings but no planning permision and CIE’s failure to start up Horgans key. We’ll end up with a load of 5-7 storey buildings sprawling across the docklands in a decades time.

    • #733588
      opus
      Participant

      Indeed a very disappointing outcome 🙁 Do you think there is anything people on this forum could do to complain about the decision? Email someone in CC etc?

    • #733589
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Blackpool Developments, the Shipton Group SPV controlled by Clayton Love Jnr., has applied for a further alteration to the next phase of its Polefield development at Blackpool. The 100m euro development saw completion of the 1st face last November (2004) with the opening of what has become one of Cork’s best retail parks (incl.’ing 7 large ground floor retail units – the most recent tenant being Land of Leather, filling the final retail unit) and multi-storey car-park facilities. Late this March, Blackpool Developments applied for a considerable alteration to a new 90,000sq ft office building (with ground floor retail) it is to begin construction, and now, it has applied to make changes on the new 8-storey (7 floor) mixed-use building, near the amenity park and hotel site. The building will contain 8 showrooms, a restaurant, 55,000sq ft of office space over 5 levels, and 28 apartments over the remaining area. The alterations applied for include a minor increase in height to facilitate a mezzanine structure in each 7th floor apartment – which will allow for a further bedroom, ensuite bathroom, and increased balcony area per apartment. These apartments will be pitched as the development penthouses and will be ‘family-sized’ in nature which falls in line with CCC plans to attract more inner-city living by providing new residential space large enough to accommodate young families etc.

      – the other project designed with this ideology in mind is O’Flynn Construction (OFC)’s Eglinton Street development, with some apartments extending to a very generous 1,900sq ft. OFC have indicated that they are near some form of resolution on the issues dogging their fantastic project w.r.t. basement car-parking and glazing/light reflection issues from the tower element to approaching traffic on the South City Link. A study embarked upon by OFC and Wilson Architecture is to address this issue for CCC.



      :rolleyes: Although I didn’t hear this myself, Tommy Barker had a small piece in the Irish Examiner today about how Joe Gavin was not oppose to a 17-storey tower at the Water Street site – but that it could be addressed in a further application. We’ll have to see about that, Mr. McMahon is not a happy camper at the moment following the decision made by CCC. An appeal is likely but I’ll have confirmation on that for Monday (maybe sooner). What has been worth noting is the general outrage and anger expressed toward the Council following their ruling on Water Street – not just by the developer, design team, business leaders or members of this forum, but even the general outrage of aware people on the streets of Cork. Few developments ‘refused’ in this way have stirred persons at a public level as the Water Street issue – interesting.

      -> also, in response to rodger and opus regarding what can people on this forum do to help make a stand against such a poor planning move and for once, stand-up against the antidevelopment campaigners – I’m looking into a possible manner of contribution for concerned citizens on how this decision has frustrated them and affected prospective development in Cork. Leave it with me – it will obviously be a free method of contribution, and will most likely only entail a ‘petition’ of sorts, with persons affording only their name and perhaps e-mail address/address in utter confidence to an appellant source involved in the development first-hand. It may not be feasible as I do not want persons to feel a loss of privacy, and further, the developer may rather against ‘petition’ style lobbies – I know, personally, I would, but like I said, work in progress.

    • #733590
      Anonymous
      Participant

      It does appear a little unfortunate that Water St was given the thumbs down, although from the issues discussed above it would appear that neither the design nor the density were the problem areas. I think that this refusal/conditional permission high-lihts a much broader issue, namely traffic generation and the public transport deficit faced not only in this prime site in Cork but accross the Country. It ultimately hig-lights that no matter how hard you try and how much progress you make with a scheme there will always be one or two variables outside your control as a property developer, most typically transport related and something that this current government has failed miserably upon. If this type of development is turned down, we are in worse trouble than I thought. Rant over off to the jungle….

    • #733591
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The final tower crane by Cleary Doyle was erected over the site to the rear of Cork City Hall. The site will take a new form over the next 18 months in the shape of a new 90,000sq ft extension, housing all Cork City Council departments, designed by ABK Architects.



    • #733592
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The refusal of the Water Street development is nothing short of criminal. That’s for sure. However, it raises the question: what is a landmark building?
      It seems to me the tower was refused bcause it looked too much like the rest of the development to be considered ‘landmark’, i’d kind of agree with this definition- i mean, whats the point in having a landmark building if it just looks the same as the rest of it- just bigger. i.e. bigger does not make it ‘landmark’.
      That being said, landmark or not, this was an excellent development which has been pissed away by some backward planners in CCC.
      Fingers crossed for some sort of intervention.


      Anyone been able to lay their hands on images of the new archives in Blackpool?

    • #733593
      pier39
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The refusal of the Water Street development is nothing short of criminal. That’s for sure. However, it raises the question: what is a landmark building?
      It seems to me the tower was refused bcause it looked too much like the rest of the development to be considered ‘landmark’, i’d kind of agree with this definition- i mean, whats the point in having a landmark building if it just looks the same as the rest of it- just bigger. i.e. bigger does not make it ‘landmark’.

      i think its wot you make it. and with water st – its unfair to dismiss it cos of one persons opinion but also in the first plan, the tower brought a sense of symmetry to the scheme cos it was right in the middle, from what i read here it was moved east at the request of the planners. so thats kind of unfair that it was refused on that basis. also the towers height alone woulda made it a landmark in cork like county hall is. the tower was like the peak of the development and brought a sense of unifrmity to the whole thing.a completely difrent building in the middle of it all woulda looked stupid.

    • #733594
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Blackpool Developments have been granted permisison to alter Block D of their Blackpool Retail Park Phase 2 development. The proposal will see an increase in the space of the office block , as well as an increased ground floor retail area of approx. 10,000sq ft.



      🙂 Lidl GmbH have applied for permission with Cork County Council to develop a new foodstore with 118 car-parking spaces along the Crosshaven Road, Carrigaline.



      More interesting(er) news hopefully late this evening.

    • #733595
      rodger
      Participant

      Good evening all, I recently noticed a site of almost sixteen acres on the outskirts of the city lota more House.While the site is restricted for residential use there is scope for intensification of current commercial use which is hotel use.This property is on the eastern corridor to Cork City although in the county and restricted by servaso due to Flo Gas in the Tivoli Docks.I think this could be a very interesting proposition tender date is april 29th,I think.
      Has any got details on the development on Copley St.under contruction by Coffey looks interesting?

    • #733596
      Pana01
      Participant

      Hi all,
      any updates from last night’s meeting at City Hall where the contentious issue of the portakabin on Patrick Street was being discussed?

      I was surprised to see it feature on the Sunday Independent, along with full colour photo. Maybe they’ll sit up and listen now.

    • #733597
      lexington
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Has any got details on the development on Copley St.under contruction by Coffey looks interesting?

      The Copley Street project is being developed by Corbett Bros (Michael & Kevin), designed by PRC Architects, Structural Engineers are Niall Fitzsimons and constructed by Coffey Construction. It’s a actually quite a nice development with 60,000sq ft of offices over 5 floors, ground floor commercial units (restaurant, gym and retail), 8 student apartments, 38 residential apartments and 90 basement car-parking and 50 bicycle parking spaces. I quite like the circular link between the building sections on the Copley Street elevation. I hope the recently applied for and granted ‘elevational treatments’ don’t mess up the original design by tarting it with cheap finishes.



      😮 McCarthy Developments Ltd are expecting a decision today (lest we see Further Information) on their 100,000sq ft, 8-storey, 25meuro business and IT office development for Centre Park Road. Design is by Murray O’Laoire. I can tell you in advance, its pretty positive.


    • #733598
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 McCarthy Developments Ltd have been granted planning for their 8-storey, 110,000sq ft office development on the former Goldcrop premises along Centre Park Road in the southern docklands area.

      The development will consist of 7-floors, with a reduced footprint 8th storey providing over 110,000sq ft of office space for business and technology uses. The new building, designed by Oisin Creagh of Murray O’Laoire Architects, will be constructed over a dual-basement car-parking facility of 211 spaces. The building will link with McCarthy Developments HQ building, Centre Park House, next door – which will be scheduled for a refurbishment to coincide with the project.

      The project has also been displayed to the OPW regarding a new home for the Revenue Commissioners, but it is not known how far such talks have advanced. Paul Kenny’s recently lodged plans for St. Patrick’s Quay will undoubtedly offer a very attractive option for the OPW.

      McCarthy Developments purchased the former Goldcrop site of 2.2 acres for an estimated 2m euros from agents Lisney earlier this year.


      Centre Park House which will adjoin the new development


      The development site as it stands.

      19 conditions were imposed on the planning, but thankfully it was just the standard requests such as contribution fees, finishings etc. Evelyn Mitchell was the planner involved (also handling Eglinton Street).

    • #733599
      lexington
      Participant

      After almost 28 months on site, PJ Hegarty & Son Ltd removed their tower crane from over Hornibrook Holdings’ (John Hornibook) Camden Wharf development of 58 apartments, 56 basement car-parking spaces and 9 commercial units incl. restaurant. The project was one of the first redevelopment projects on this side of the Lee to get moving – in that time, numerous other projects have started and completed, including Hanranka’s large 90-unit development along Lower John Street and Phase 1 of Sean Mhuileann (also designed by J.E. Keating & Associates) by Joe Carey and Frank Sheahan. Units at Camden Wharf have sold out in the first phase of sales, with prices starting from 295,000euros for the smaller of the 3, 2-bedroom apartment types. Phase 2 sales have begun with Frank V. Murphy Auctioneers and Adriana Hegarty Real Estate handling enquiries. Parking spaces are sold out a 50,000euros a go.

      Across the road, OSB Group’s Camden Court development has seen strong sales for Phase 1 of its development, with John F. Supple Contractors beginning preliminary work on Phase 2 – this will see the addition of 55 further apartments, a new Cork Arts Theatre and new Pa Johnsons Bar. The development, designed by James Leahy & Associates, will also house extensive roof-top gardens and amenity facilities.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 The 2nd largest global coffee chain, UK-based Costa Coffee, is to open its first 2 Irish stores in Cork over the coming weeks. The stores will be based at Blackpool S.C. and Douglas Court S.C. with plans on a city centre store pending on performance. The stores will be opened by Tuli Holdings, the Scottish-registered holdings group, already owners of the master-franchises in Ireland for Pizza Hut, KFC and fashion-stores, The Jean Scene. Starbucks, the world’s largest coffee brand operator, which is scheduled to open its flagship store in Dublin’s College Green over the coming weeks, have also been assessing a possible city centre store in Cork. Though I can’t indicate the location as of yet for privacy reasons, 2 locations on 😉 /in/around Patrick’s Street have already been discussed. I have it on good word that Starbucks will most likely open a store based on performances of its 3 prospective Dublin units – and their market research in Cork has been generally for approximations, with a possible opening come Autumn/Winter 2005 – pending. Stores are also planned by Starbucks for Galway, Limerick and Waterford later this year. The Cork market is already well served by coffee chains Gloria Jeans, BB’s, Cafe Gusto (opening a further unit along the boardwalk at City Quarter on Lapps Quay soon) and now Costa, among others.

      This news will be formally announced tomorrow morning.

    • #733600
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Brooklyn Properties Ltd (Gerry Wycherley’s Omnistone) have been greenlit by Cork County Council for the development of a 137-bedroom hotel at Cork Airport Business Park, the highly successful office and services venture now under its 2nd phase of construction, developed by Brooklyn Properties and built by Michael McNamara & Co. Construction. The 1st phase of the development, which included 18 sepearte office buildings, was constructed by Bowen Construction at a value of 64m euros – this new phase is estimated at a value of 50m euros and will consist of 10 further office blocks (with a completion date set for May 2007).

      The new 137-bedroom hotel will be built over a basement car-park and will consist of a restaurant, bar, 9 meeting rooms, seperate function room, an indoor leisure centre with fitness area and swimming pool. Rumours endure that Brooklyn have been holding talks with Marriott Hotels & Resorts to operate the hotel premises, coincidentally, Marriott are among the major tenants of the 1st Phase of the business park. However, no confirmation has yet been served – as other talks have also been on-going with a number of other potential operators. Brooklyn Properties have also assessed the possibility of operating the hotel itself. An announcement is expected within the coming weeks where confusion will be hopefully clarified.

      This development comes on the back of a recent grant afforded the existing 75-bedroom Great Southern Hotel Cork Airport for a new, 3-storey, 57-bedroom extension onto their premises. The GSH Cork Airport is one of the few profitable venues within the loss-making enterprise – the current subject of privatisation speculation (as a sell off of the DAA).

      The new 137-bedroom hotel will serve the new terminal ably and will earmark families as well as business travellers ~ GSH is already an established business hotel hub.


      A Cork Airport Business Park building – part of Phase 1

    • #733601
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Well its official now, Aer Lingus have ruled out any operations for Cork – USA transatlantic flights – despite the promises made of former CEO Willie Walsh and even though existing regulations permit it to do so.

      The airline said that it wishes now to focus on developing its Cork – Continental Europe flights, which this summer will see a 50% capacity increase afforded these operations w/ new routes to Munich, Rome, Milan, Nice, Barcelona among others. Increased capacities will also be available on existing routes such as Paris, Amesterdam, Alicante and Malaga.

      Aer Arann say they’re talks with investors regarding a Cork – New York JFK route are still ongoing, as well as discussions with the ILFSC (aircraft leasing company) for what is believed to be a number of Airbus A330-200 aircraft with a 232-seat configuration. The company says they need an estimated 30m euros in additional investment to finance the service – one which is not expected to begin within the next 18 months.

      However, a perhaps, thin sheet of light is coming from US-side, with an established US airline looking to commence flights between Cork – New York (possibly Newark), however talks have yet to be set officially between Irish-based directors of the airline and the CAA.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Atlas Developments are to apply for permission to develop a 20-unit, 3-storey 25,000sq ft over basement car-park light-industrial/technology and business centre along the Old Mallow Road near Blackpool. It is hoped that the project could create up to 100 new jobs in the area.

    • #733602
      phatman
      Participant

      Check out this site again, some great updates of aerial shots of the city
      http://www.irelandphotography.com/aerial/i003.html

    • #733603
      jungle
      Participant

      I’m not greatly surprised Aer Lingus aren’t looking at transatlantic out of Cork. There would be some overhead for them in using an A330 out of Cork as they currently do not have any planes of that type based here.

      If you look at the UK, BA only have long-haul planes operating out of London and Manchester despite the obvious demand for service in places like Birmingham and Glasgow, they leave these to the US carriers because it’s not worth their while basing planes in these locations.

      Personally, I’m hoping that we see a US airline operating the route offering interlining at whatever destination they fly to in the US. As I understand it, Aer Arann are proposing a charter service, Also, given my experiences flying to Dublin with Aer Arann (hours of delays), I’m not sure I’d want to go transatlantic with them.

    • #733604
      pier39
      Participant

      i heard continental airlines were lookin at using a 757 outta cork to newark – 3 times a week, but wanted to see how these ireland/us talks went first so they could get out of the whole shannon stopover thing and just have dublin and cork routes. it makes more economic sense i suppose. but dont think shannon will be too happy bout that considering their awful financial results there yesterday. only cork and dublin seem to be making any money.

    • #733605
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      my preference is to fly bmi to the uk and get a transatlantic service from Manchester… always alot cheaper than aer cunny 🙂

      @jungle wrote:

      I’m not greatly surprised Aer Lingus aren’t looking at transatlantic out of Cork. There would be some overhead for them in using an A330 out of Cork as they currently do not have any planes of that type based here.

      If you look at the UK, BA only have long-haul planes operating out of London and Manchester despite the obvious demand for service in places like Birmingham and Glasgow, they leave these to the US carriers because it’s not worth their while basing planes in these locations.

      Personally, I’m hoping that we see a US airline operating the route offering interlining at whatever destination they fly to in the US. As I understand it, Aer Arann are proposing a charter service, Also, given my experiences flying to Dublin with Aer Arann (hours of delays), I’m not sure I’d want to go transatlantic with them.

    • #733606
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Does anyone know whats going on at the Glucksman Gallery, UCC these days? Two floors have been closed for the past while for “construction”.

    • #733607
      lexington
      Participant

      Hope to have insightful news on Eglinton Street over the coming days.

    • #733608
      sw101
      Participant

      i must be losing it.

    • #733609
      devries
      Participant
      Radioactiveman wrote:
      The refusal of the Water Street development is nothing short of criminal. That’s for sure. However, it raises the question: what is a landmark building?
      It seems to me the tower was refused bcause it looked too much like the rest of the development to be considered ‘landmark’, i’d kind of agree with this definition- i mean, whats the point in having a landmark building if it just looks the same as the rest of it- just bigger. i.e. bigger does not make it ‘landmark’.
      That being said, landmark or not, this was an excellent development which has been pissed away by some backward planners in CCC.
      Fingers crossed for some sort of intervention.


      I understand the disastrously wrong message that this planning decision is sending out to developers in Cork and that this decision makes a mockery of the councils planning system. However ,speaking purely on the architectural merit of this project and tower in particular, am I the only architect that breathes a sigh of relief that this tower is not to go ahead in its present form. Comments on the architectural merits ( or lack of ) of the tower are valid .The buildings form should be much better as a landmark building, unique and identifiable with cork. A separate planning application might achieve this.

      What do ye think!!!!

    • #733610
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      devries,

      i would certainly agree that the proposal at Water Street could have been better – and in particular, the way the tower element was articulated as a ‘landmark’ left a lot to be desired – it did seem somewhat lost on the ground plane…amongst the other elements.

      however, i think the council have a lot to answer in terms of how this application was handled – the tower element should have been a fundamental point of discussion through pre-planning and further information – its design, articulation and form should have generally been agreed before it got to a decision stage – i believe the applicant is right to be upset at the way the proposal was handled – if there were serious and principled objections to the scheme’s fundamental designs on the council’s behalf, it should have been clearly represented from the outset.

      i think that ther decision is not the most disappointing thing here – it is the reluctance on behalf of ccc to move beyond the traditional confrontationalist style of planning and a fear of engaging on a level with developers. i just fear that the city’s anti-development reputation will continue to hold the city back and sends all the wrong signals to prospective docklands’ developers. if pre-planning and the whole application process had been handled correctly, we could have had a decision 6 months ago – one which both Werdna and CCC would have been entirely satisfied with.

      also – incredibly – the decision appears to suggest that 5 storeys (and 2 ‘set back’) should be the limit on prominent docklands’ sites! that’s the most worrying aspect in my opinion.

    • #733611
      lexington
      Participant

      @devries wrote:

      I understand the disastrously wrong message that this planning decision is sending out to developers in Cork and that this decision makes a mockery of the councils planning system. However ,speaking purely on the architectural merit of this project and tower in particular, am I the only architect that breathes a sigh of relief that this tower is not to go ahead in its present form. Comments on the architectural merits ( or lack of ) of the tower are valid .The buildings form should be much better as a landmark building, unique and identifiable with cork. A separate planning application might achieve this.

      What do ye think!!!!

      I suppose you have to look at it in a number of ways, first: What defines landmark? Among the official designations, it is stated that: a landmark is –

      1. a prominent identifying feature of a landscape.
      2 : an event or development that marks a turning point or stage
      3 : a structure (as a building) of unusual historical or aesthetic interest]a.)[/B] an identifying feature (located on the Eastern Gateway approach entrance to the city centre), b.) a development that marked a turning point (the initiation of the redevelopment of the northern dockland quays), c.) a structure of aesthetic interest (weigh this up against a number of developments like Victoria Mills, County Hall, Treasury’s Barrow Street project etc – I believe the aesthetic quality far outweighs the aforementioned).

      The tower acted like a gateway into the docklands from the east, as Eglinton Street does from the south, the way County Hall acts an entrance to the city from the west, and the way plans for a landmark development in Blackpool does to the North. It provided a sense of urban balance. Furthermore, the tower provided what was the pinnacle of the development and brought with it a sense of symmetry from a design perspective. An alternate design in the middle of this project would have looked grossly out of place and negatively impact on the visual amenity of the area – now I do know that is design pending, however, would you not concede that a glass tower 17 storeys high would look out of character with the remaining development? I suppose thats an issue to complex to answer given, a design would have to be seen first.

      A sad side of the council’s decision however is the way in which the developers were clearly mislead throughout the planning process; the negative impact on possible investment – the message sent to prospective investment, and the nature of the conditions imposed by way of reducing viability full-stop. Are we going to have a docklands full of landmark 5-storey apartment and office blocks???



      sw101 – why are you losing it?

    • #733612
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      devries,

      however, i think the council have a lot to answer in terms of how this application was handled – the tower element should have been a fundamental point of discussion through pre-planning and further information – its design, articulation and form should have generally been agreed before it got to a decision stage – i believe the applicant is right to be upset at the way the proposal was handled – if there were serious and principled objections to the scheme’s fundamental designs on the council’s behalf, it should have been clearly represented from the outset.

      i think that ther decision is not the most disappointing thing here – it is the reluctance on behalf of ccc to move beyond the traditional confrontationalist style of planning and a fear of engaging on a level with developers. i just fear that the city’s anti-development reputation will continue to hold the city back and sends all the wrong signals to prospective docklands’ developers. if pre-planning and the whole application process had been handled correctly, we could have had a decision 6 months ago – one which both Werdna and CCC would have been entirely satisfied with.

      also – incredibly – the decision appears to suggest that 5 storeys (and 2 ‘set back’) should be the limit on prominent docklands’ sites! that’s the most worrying aspect in my opinion.

      Totally agreed.

    • #733613
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      I agree with Bunch, but where do we go from here?

    • #733614
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Any word on an appeal to ABP by the developers of Water Street? Seems like with all the wasted time and effort they spent jumping through the hoops Cork Corporation put up for them, and since the project was always likely to go to ABP whatever happened they might as well try their luck with an appeal. They have a decent enough case and I’m confident they’d get a better outcome.

      As for the Eglinton Street project, I get the bad feeling that the Corporation will give it the go ahead but with the tower element dropped and a floor or two removed from the rest just for the sake of it. Seems to be a lack of ambition on the part of the powers that be in Cork at the moment. Judging from what they were prepared to allow at Water Street they have about as much ambition as their equivalents in the Dublin docklands. And thats definitely not a good thing.

    • #733615
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Hi guys,

      i’ve been a long time visitor at this website but decided to register to post some news. I attended a presentation today in UCC with Frank O’mahony of Wilson architects talking about the new library extension. Really interesting stuff. I got to grab a word with him after the presentation, building on the library will begin in 28 of May and builders have not been chosen yet he says. I also asked him about the OFlynn building on the old Post site and he said it looked pretty good so far, so good news I guess.

      By the way lexington he’s asking who you are!!!! 😀 By the way lex – interesting contributions. keep up the good work.

      Thanks

    • #733616
      pier39
      Participant

      @Pana01 wrote:

      Hi all,
      any updates from last night’s meeting at City Hall where the contentious issue of the portakabin on Patrick Street was being discussed?

      I was surprised to see it feature on the Sunday Independent, along with full colour photo. Maybe they’ll sit up and listen now.

      that boz is rotten. totally destroys the street. anyone know when their sending back to the flames of hell whence it came???!

      also wotz the news ur talkin on eg st lex??? is it headed water st way>

    • #733617
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Lexington,
      Whats your news on Eglington Street?
      Im glad I might have started a bit of a debate on the issue of LANDMARK buildings. In my view, although Water Street was good and handled very badly by the planning authority, the ‘landmark’ tower was simple not landmark. I take your point that something alien to the overall design would have looked out of place but the tower itself simple gets lost in the overall development.

      Lex, u mentioned “and the way plans for a landmark development in Blackpool does to the North.” are you talking about an existing, planned or aspirational development?

    • #733618
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Lexington,
      Im glad I might have started a bit of a debate on the issue of LANDMARK buildings. In my view, although Water Street was good and handled very badly by the planning authority, the ‘landmark’ tower was simple not landmark. I take your point that something alien to the overall design would have looked out of place but the tower itself simple gets lost in the overall development.

      Lex, u mentioned “and the way plans for a landmark development in Blackpool does to the North.” are you talking about an existing, planned or aspirational development?

      An aspirational development RM. It has been looked at by some developers, including a plan for a 14-storey residential tower (I think!) planned for a site along the Commons Road on the approach to Blackpool (haven’t seen any plans, just talk) – but I can’t see that progressing anytime soon. The area for a start is zoned light industrial/commercial usage. But who knows?!

      As for Eglinton Street , still awaiting certain details on that. But if ewankennedy was talking to the Chief Architect behind it, and he says its good – well, that’s a nice sign. My info is pretty much the same really and I’ll get back to you when I know more.

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      By the way lexington he’s asking who you are!!!!

      I take that as a compliment. 😉

    • #733619
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      An aspirational development RM. It has been looked at by some developers, including a plan for a 14-storey residential tower (I think!) planned for a site along the Commons Road on the approach to Blackpool (haven’t seen any plans, just talk) – but I can’t see that progressing anytime soon. The area for a start is zoned light industrial/commercial usage. But who knows?!

      Are we talking about the ICI site? Go on you can tell me…. 😎

    • #733620
      sw101
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      sw101 – why are you losing it?

      alcohol-induced brain shrinkage probably.

      i thought i saw a big post but when i returned to the page to read it twas all gone. i’m either mad or you’re messing with my head. well? well?

    • #733621
      lexington
      Participant

      Regarding Eglinton Street –

      though I’m still awaiting further details (which I may have to keep quiet for a little while longer it would now seem); the word from OFC is that the Eglinton Street project is looking very positive – both with the developer, the planners and from what ewankennedy posted earlier, the architects it would seem. A few changes are set to be implemented in the Further Information lodgement, but these in the most will not affect issues such as the tower element, commercial or office elements. The FI is scheduled to reach Navigation House within the next 2 to 3 weeks according to OFC.

      Like I said, the info is coming late and I still have to await more details, but so far, so good. I’ll let you know more when I can.



      @sw101 wrote:

      alcohol-induced brain shrinkage probably.

      i thought i saw a big post but when i returned to the page to read it twas all gone. i’m either mad or you’re messing with my head. well? well?

      A little from column A, and a little from column B. 😀

    • #733622
      lexington
      Participant

      The proposed redevelopment of the Capitol Cineplex by John Costello and Mount Kennett Investments is being met with a mix of frowns and haws at Navigation House.

      My personal feeling on the project is that it is sub-par externally. The internal ‘tear-drop’ shaped aspects of the project seem to be pretty good, however, for such a landmark site, I do not believe the project is worthy enough in its current form. Its massing and external finishings aren’t up to scratch. The design is by Sabine Wittman of Dungarvan-based The e-Project. I believe the stepping-back of the upper levels in this case detracts from the potential of the development and does not aid its appearance in this instance (although CCC have an affinity for this sort of layout it would seem), furthermore, there are many unpleasant touches like the roof-top railings, apartment and elevator plants that remind one of the ugly St. Patrick’s Quay elevation of the Metropole Hotel.


      Looking at the project south-to-north along Grand Parade


      North-to-South from Daunt Square, provides a better picture of the project’s massing.

      (Also, at long last, I’ve discovered a software that enables me to change and compress original image formats – however, the quality of this is somewhat depleted in the process. Excuse any impurities – the 2nd image required a scan, then compression.)



      Howard Holdings’ Lavitts Quay/Comfort Inn Development

      And while the software is working out (until I can upgrade it), I had promised an image of Howard Holdings’ Lavitts Quay Comfort Inn development of 125-bedrooms over 7-storeys and basement car-parking w/ retail and some office space. The development was designed by Reddy O’Riordan Staehli Architects, part-and-parcel, of the land-swap deal undertaken between Howard Holdings and Thomas Crosbie Holdings allowing the Irish Examiner/Evening Echo avail of top-floor office space (approx. 27,000sq ft +) at City Quarter (see previous posts). The project was met by a degree of criticism from planner Michael Lynch who requested Significant Further Information on the project. RORSA are currently touching up alterations to the design of the project in order to succeed in their planning efforts. I’ll bring details of those changes later on. You can see now perhaps, the problems had with the design. The development will be located between Cork Opera House and 21 Lavitts Quay (seen under construction to the right – I’ll bring a more up-to-date image of that project next week).


      Again, this image had to be compressed, printed, re-scanned and further compressed with new software – hence quality. Apologises.



      😀 ‘Flemingos’, Mr Barker???!!! That is probably the worst pun I’ve ever heard, and hence, one of the best! Well done, sir, I’m impressed. 😉 Too much time on your hands.

    • #733623
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Yeah I’d seen pics of the Capital development before alright and its no pretty beast. The coloration is so dull & lifeless. If this one gets passed I’ll hang me shoes up.

      Glad the Howard holdings thing has been givn the chance to redeem itself. really boring design – is that teak i spy??? No RORSA, no!

    • #733624
      A-ha
      Participant

      :confused: Does anyone have any pics. of what the Radisson Hotel will look like when completed in Little Island? Also, the Capitol Cineplex building will look like a prison if the plans go ahead! I mean, what the f**k were they thinking?!?!?!

    • #733625
      lexington
      Participant

      As promised, here’s a more up-to-date image of 21 Lavitts Quay – nearing completion, although this image is a few weeks old. It has been significantly added to since. The development will provide 30,000sq ft of office accommodation (5,000sq ft = OCP’s new HQ, 15,000sq ft has been reserved by a semi-state body), 44 luxury apartments (selling fast), a private multistorey, ground-floor retail and restaurant. Design is by Patrick A. Cashman & Associates. Building Contractors were Bowen Construction.


      Notice how the original OCP building facade has been neatly incorporated into the new structure. Also, one can see the Howard Holdings Lavitts Quay development site (former of TCH) to the left, see prev. post.



      ewankennedy , yes that is teak, give that a month and it’ll look awful. Also the roof and quayside/northern elevation, especially to the east is utterly bland and distasteful. Changes are on-going for the Significant Further Information submit.



      A-ha, an image of the new Radisson is posted earlier on in this thread. Design is by Dennehy + Dennehy, construction by Sisk. Here’s a part image -> Radisson SAS Cork



      Cork: Has it’s time come? – a microscopic report I’ve been sketching, may be of interest to some of you – just outlines some trends of late, plus prospects and a number of moves made by developers, architects and construction firms alike over the past few months. Hope to have it up sometime this week.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 By the way, did I mention that AIB have been granted their plan to redevelop their premises along the Watercourse Road in Blackpool? Well, they have. The Building Consultancy Group are responsible for the new design which will see the existing single-storey premises demolished and rebuilt over 2-storeys w/ new ATM, staff parking (17 spaces) and all associated ancillary works. Reading the planner’s report, 2 words spring to mind regarding the design, “ringing” and “endorsement”.

    • #733626
      lexington
      Participant

      Anxious to get a look inside the new 170,000sq ft Ballincollig Town Centre Shopping Centre before it opens in October 2005? Well, here you go! Click the thumbnail below and check it out for yourself.

      The S.C. is the first Phase of a possible 2, with a site to the west of the S.C. zoned for a possible future extension – depending on the need/demand etc. The centre provides a significant retail element to the 500m euro development by O’Flynn Construction. A team of different architectural firms like Wilson Architecture and Reddy O’Riordain Staehli, were employed in the design of the town centre which will incorporate a variety of residential, office and retail provisions in the fast growing suburb. The development is taking shape on the former Murphy’s Barracks as we speak – bought by OFC in 1999 from the Dept. of Defence for an est’d 39m.

      Below is a thumbnail of the S.C. lay-out. Dunnes and Easons (Units 10/11 on layout map) are among the tenants, with more to be announced soon. I’ll try and get a heads-up on that when I can. Enjoy!

      Just a word, unlike the so-called Dundrum ‘Town Centre’ – which is really just a large shopping centre, the OFC project in Ballincollig can rightfully be called so, as it really is the construction of a new town centre (substantial addition to existing town).

    • #733627
      rodger
      Participant

      I think it would be interesting to see the exact level of development either underconstruction in planning or about to be lodged in cork city.Any one interested?
      I can just see the Head Line 3bn investment for cork city,That may even make the front page of The Times…

    • #733628
      lexington
      Participant

      Well for a start just add Mahon Point + Ballincollig Town Centre + em…say, Ladyswell together, and there’s your first billion already.

    • #733629
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Anybody know what use (if any) Hegarty’s are going to make of their long disused site adjacent to their head office on Leitrim Street. This is a very well positioned site with views of Shandon and Cathedral and opposite the old brewery buildings at Ladys Well. What with all the work going on in the immediate vivcinity, I think it shouldn’t be long before we hear something from Hegarty’s.


      Work seems to be zooming along at the Webworks site adjacent to City Hall. Does anybody have an image of what this will actually look like?


      I’m delighted to see that AIB have been given the green light for their new Watercourse Road Branch- the building itself will be fine addition to the street. Frinailla propose a bank in their LadysWell development down the Street. I’m not sure how this will work out though. Incidently, both parts of that development has been appealled by local residents to An Bord Pleanala.


      An application for planning has recently been submitted for 6 houses in O’Connell Place, off Watercourse Road. This is becoming an interesting trend in the area recently- old, long vacant ‘brownfield sites are being turned into new residential schemes to “beat the band”.
      O’Donoughues Coal Yard, Bleasby Street, Off Shandon St, etc. Anybody with a small Workshop/ yard in the area could make a killing!
      On that topic, there is a large site on Watercourse Road (on the Church side of T&A Builders Providers). Those anybody know who owns same? Seems like some prime real estate.


    • #733630
      pier39
      Participant

      the capitol thing looks rotten! grey ugly and what were they thinking??? a prison is a good description of it yeah.

      Ballincollig looks ok but is just another shopping centre isnt it really, small enough too, same size as wilton isnt it?

    • #733631
      rodger
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Well for a start just add Mahon Point + Ballincollig Town Centre + em…say, Ladyswell together, and there’s your first billion already.

      Yes that is a great start but Ballincollig is in the county.So what do you think should we calculate the total level of investment in Cork City?

    • #733632
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 OFC have been granted planning by Cork County Council to develop a new 4 to 6 storey apartment building with 45 units over basement car-park along Maryborough Hill, near Douglas. 29 new detached, semi-detached and terrace houses will also be constructed at the site adjoining Rochestown Rise. Hogan Associates of Proby’s Quay handled the design of the development.

      🙂 And an interesting little development I’ve been watching for Rathcormac’s Main Street – a 5-unit office block, 4 retail units, 17 houses and 5 apartments, designed by Fermoy-based David Mulcahy Concepts, being developed by Dublin-based Sean O’hAinle – has been also greenlit.

      :rolleyes: Also, Mallow GAA have the 207 houses plan for their lands lodged, while Bernie O’Mahony’s plans for Innishannon have been shot down – ouch!

      If the Mallow GAA are successful, you can be sure, following the tasty sale cheque – the U-13s will be enjoying many a pleasant changing room for years to come. 😀



      Regarding the report Cork: Has it’s time come? , I won’t be posting it (or perhaps a link to it) until I receive a reply from 3 other developers regarding the plans and interests in Cork. I want it to be pretty up-to-date – and I will not be able to reference all prospective or preplanning projects in the interest of privacy (well, maybe a few! 😉 )

      😮 Should have some interesting news either late tonight, early tomorrow. And may (MAY – I say!) have some OCP news. 😉


      @rodger wrote:

      Yes that is a great start but Ballincollig is in the county.So what do you think should we calculate the total level of investment in Cork City?

      Well I would consider Ballincollig a suburb, as do OFC who are pitching BTC as a development in Cork’s fastest growing suburb. If we go by disputed city/county lines we may as well count out Douglas, Glanmire, parts of Bishopstown and half the northside. But within existing city boundaries –

      recent, current and prospective – I would earmarked it in around a comfortable 2.3bn euros

      That’s a very loose calculation of developments within the city limits + Douglas by major private developers only. It doesn’t include a number of projects like the Kingsley, Victoria Mills, Westend etc – or many suburban/city limit projects. Just think of what that would total adding all those other investments.

    • #733633
      rodger
      Participant

      I think if one was to allow for the definate IAWs n Horgan Quay properties you are probably closer to 6bn but then again if my aunt had balls she would be my uncle.
      2 things, there seems to be a lot of activity around the Sun Beam site CO Richard Rainey, :confused: n CAN SOME ONE PLEASE TELL ME WHO BOUGHT THE TESCOS SITE IN MIDLETON!

    • #733634
      lexington
      Participant

      If you cast your minds back to page 48 of this thread, you may remember an image I posted highlighting some future dockland development sites – one of those included the 0.4acre Reliance Site along Andersons Quay (see below) –


      (Pardon the crudeness, just a quick job I threw together heading out the door, will top it up better later.)

      – well, it would seem that the site is now up for sale through HOK with a guide of in and around €5m (notice how I used a euro sign! 😀 ). Invites are open for joint development proposals or purchase offers. One of the nautically adventurous directors was already approached in the past (exact dates unknown) with a development offer involving a 6/7 storey office development – however the offer made was below that of the current guide and I’m not quite sure of the status of the proposal at this stage. It remains likely that any future proposal for the waterfront site will be of a predominantly office based nature, though its all up in the air at this stage. Another interesting proposal on Clontarf Street is expected to be lodged by the week-end (formal announcement soon.)

      Any development will face across the northern channel of the Lee to view Paul Kenny’s Revenue tailored office development across the water (assuming it gets the go-ahead and consequent RC deal). The Sullivans Quay Government buildings have already been assessed and proposals are under consideration with at least 2 of the bidders for the RC’s new premises.



      Also, just while the docklands image is up, there may be announcement to be made regarding one of the docklands sites not highlighted soon. I haven’t been given a timeframe – but if I hear it first, you’ll know first.

    • #733635
      lisam
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Also, just while the docklands image is up, there may be announcement to be made regarding one of the docklands sites not highlighted soon. I haven’t been given a timeframe – but if I hear it first, you’ll know first.

      Thats a lot of good news – i’ll be kept busy

    • #733636
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Blackpool Developments, the subsidary of Clayton Love Jnr et al’s Shipton Group, have been granted planning for the development of a childcare centre and overhead 3-bedroom apartment at 45/46 Dublin Street in Blackpool, near Blackpool S.C. It is the 2nd application for the development, designed by Kelly Barry O’Brien Whelan, with the previous submit refused. Initially, planner Fiona McSharry, also refused this new application but the decision was overturned by the Director of Planning, Jim O’Donovan.



      🙂 Also, nearby, as stated earlier in a previous post, Atlas Developments (a Noel O’Flynn enterprise) has losged for the development of 30,000sq ft, 3-storey, 21unit business & technology centre along the Old Mallow Road – which hopes will create up to 150 new jobs in the area.



      No lisam , its not related to OCP – that’s an announcement for another day. 😉


    • #733637
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Blackpool Developments have been granted planning for the development of a childcare centre and overhead 3-bedroom apartment at 45/46 Dublin Street in Blackpool, near Blackpool S.C…… Initially, planner Fiona McSharry, also refused this new application but the decision was overturned by the Director of Planning, Jim O’Donovan.

      This is the second time the Director of Planning has intervened in a decision for the Blackpool area lately (Frinailla’s Ladyswell development was also passed despite CCC report reccomending refusal). Is such intervention usual? How often does it happen?
      Maybe these interventions represent a concerted effort by the powers that be to give development along the Dublin Street/Watercourse Road spine a well deserved kick up the arse. :rolleyes:
      Also, id be interested if someone in the know could write a few lines here about the decision making process inside Navigation House (no jokes please!!). Once an application drops on the mat, who sees it? where does the City Manager and Director of Planning fit into the process. I’m sure everyone has a vague idea of what happens but I’d appreciate if someone could let me know the full story. 🙂


      Also of note in the Blackpool area, John Hogan has been refused permission for retention of a 3-storey + converted attic (5 Apartment) development on Upper John Street. The site also has a detached two storey building built in what was the rear garden!
      The main 3 storey building has NO internal stairs. An exterior stairs on the rear of the building is the means of access to the upper floors.
      No parking is provided for the development and no reasonable open space. The CCC report has rightly labelled it an overdevelopment. This must be one of the most flagrant breaches of planning law i’ve seen in a long number of years. I presume it will be appealled to ABP.

    • #733638
      Hoborg
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      C’mon – it’s not THAT bad. Superior to the other new apartment development nearby. Camden Wharf.

      ick.

      It’s not that bad outside, agreed, a bit schizophrenic but still it’s a matter of taste. Some two years ago I’ve done all working drawings for both phases, basing on extremely sketchy drawings by Mr. Leahy. The real problems are actually inside, and however frustrating it was, I was unable to correct it without changing the architecture outside, and there was no consent of the author to do it.
      There are some bedrooms without windows or with windows facing the internal corridors, which provide no light or proper ventilation. To enter the house one must pass through a real maze of corridor. The first floor apartments face heavy traffic – trucks pass next to the windows at distance smaller than 3 m. Front groundfloor windows take in the smell from the open sewer running paralell to the elevation.
      Overall – it might look attractive, but it will be one hell to live in.

    • #733639
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😎 Clayton Love’s Douglas Central Properties have lodged a 1st party appeal for their 124-bedroom, 8-storey hotel on a site between Cinema World and the East Douglas Village complex in Douglas, which was refused last month by Cork County Council. See previous posts. A little late though it would seem.

      – also as previously reported, Frinailla have lodged a 1st party appeal against the conditions imposed on them by CCC re: their Ladyswell. There are also a number of 3rd party appeals by Kathleen Lynch and Co.



      😮 Murphy Construction Ltd have been given the go-ahead by ABP for their plans to develop 244 new homes and adjoining creche facilities at Ballinglanna in Glanmire.



      😮 Some reports are mixed here at the current moment regarding ‘detail’ – however, what I can tell you, is that OCP are actively working on proposals for a docklands project. I’ve no idea yet on the exact timeframe of when they expect to announce their intentions (or whether they find the project feasible enough to do so in the interm) – but I can tell you, a source with a generally good track record, has confirmed OCP are very much pursuing a landmark, waterfront project. A further source ( 😉 ) confirmed the project today again also, but with some conflicting details to the other source. Some of the ins-and-outs don’t quite yet add up – but when I work the details out I’ll come back to you. I don’t want to elaborate anymore until I get a positive on the existing details – and even then, will perhaps hold back (depending) on any further announcements until OCP decide to publicly put their cards on the table.

      – Also, on the topic of OCP, the ABP inspector’s report (so far) regarding their Jurys Redevelopment seems a mixed affair. I have yet to see the ‘print’ as it were, but word says, it will likely recommend a conditioned approval (no details on that yet). This of course will be subject to a final Bord order – and that’s anyone’s guess really. A decision is due on May 17th 2005 (Thursday week). With any of these things, its really a case of, ‘I don’t believe it until I see it’, but I’m hoping the rumour is true. I thought I’d let you know what I was hearing – hopefully I’ll be able to give you a better picture closer to the due date.



      Keep your eyes peeled. 😉


      @Hoborg wrote:

      It’s not that bad outside, agreed, a bit schizophrenic but still it’s a matter of taste. Some two years ago I’ve done all working drawings for both phases, basing on extremely sketchy drawings by Mr. Leahy. The real problems are actually inside, and however frustrating it was, I was unable to correct it without changing the architecture outside, and there was no consent of the author to do it.
      There are some bedrooms without windows or with windows facing the internal corridors, which provide no light or proper ventilation. To enter the house one must pass through a real maze of corridor. The first floor apartments face heavy traffic – trucks pass next to the windows at distance smaller than 3 m. Front groundfloor windows take in the smell from the open sewer running paralell to the elevation.
      Overall – it might look attractive, but it will be one hell to live in.

      A ringing endorsement if there ever was one –

      – funnily the sales have been pretty good. Neil seems happy anyway. I take it you don’t do much work for Mr. Leahy anymore then eh? 😀


    • #733640
      Hoborg
      Participant

      No, I dont. It makes me much healthier. Mentally,

    • #733641
      Hoborg
      Participant

      No, I dont. It makes me much healthier. Mentally,

    • #733642
      Hoborg
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      *UPDATES*

      Keep your eyes peeled. ]

      No, I dont. It makes me much healthier. Mentally 😉

    • #733643
      lexington
      Participant

      I’ll be honest with you, for over a week now, on and off, I’ve been trying to ‘dignify’ the images I have of Paul Kenny’s proposed Revenue Commissioners offices along St. Patrick’s Quay/Lower Glanmire Road. The 130,000sq ft + development ranges between 4 and 7 storeys in 2 seperate buildings linked together by bridges and was designed by Paud O’Mahony et al at Wilson Architecture. 235 underground spaces for parking will be provided on 2 levels (see details of development in prev. posts). My new software program seems continually to deplete the quality of the images and often require scans, distortions and so on – simply to make them visible. I’ve sent a complaint to the Finnish-manufacturers and am awaiting an updated program. Rant aside, I will post up images (the best of a bad lot) of the development’s quayside elevation later tonight for your approving eyes. I have to say, this project is undoubtedly (in my eyes) on of the best projects Wilson Architecture have produced. Paul Kenny clearly went into the race for the Revenue Commissioners to win it and the design relfects that. It will provide a landmark building along the quays – and with a proximity so close to Kent Station – the development really caps the bag.

      I was talking to an involved party with the OPW not so long ago, who stated that they had been very impressed by the proposal and was in ‘the top 3’ (?!). In my opinion, the only thing that stands in Mr. Kenny’s way, is the probable length of the planning process. The application was lodged tight against the deadline. McCarthy Developments, who also made a presentation, have the advantage of planning attained. While OFC have proposed BTC’s office campus with some exceptionally attractive rates, however, the distance from the city centre dampers their prospects somewhat. The OPW did say however, they would seek the best offer and the best scenario thats suits them. BTC will become highly accessible with the opening of the Ballincollig By-Pass. However, the Kenny development represents perhaps, one of the best office developments proposed for Cork in some time (my guess is, they’ve probably got it! But then again I could be disproved). Well done to all involved. Judge for yourself later tonight (9pm-ish), til then, I’ll keep working on these blasted images!!! :rolleyes:


      *UPDATES*

      Clontarf Street ‘Tower’ to be lodged
      😀 DAT Partnerships are to apply for the development of a 9-storey office building of approx. 31,000sq ft at the small, triangular shaped site bordered by Clontarf Street, Oliver Plunkett Street Lower and Deane Street (to the north of No.5 & No.6 Lapps Quay). The plan previously reported in one of my earlier posts, which constituted a larger 12-storey building, was revised down to its current height following pre-planning talks with CCC planners who advised the reduction. Coughlan de Keyser are the architects and Cohlan Downing Associates are expected to be the letting/sale agents when the project is complete – work on the new landmark building (which will provide another unique addition to this fast expanding area of commercial development) will not commence (subject to planning) for about 10months. The lot is currently being let for car-parking purposes. The new development will represent a new landmark building (in the proper sense) come completion. A ‘flame’ like structure.

      🙂 The first sections of a tower crane have arrived at the Albert Quay site for Howard Holdings’ WebWorks development. Design is by Scott Tallon Walker. Contractors are John Paul Construction. The crane should be erected within the coming month progress pending.

    • #733644
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Paul Kenny’s proposed Revenue Commissioners offices along St. Patrick’s Quay/Lower Glanmire Road… I have to say, this project is undoubtedly (in my eyes) on of the best projects Wilson Architecture have produced. Paul Kenny clearly went into the race for the Revenue Commissioners to win it and teh design relfects that. It will provide a landmark building along the quays – and with a proximity so close to Kent Station – the development really caps the bag.

      😀 DAT Partnerships are to apply for the development of a 9-storey office building of approx. 31,000sq ft at the small, triangular shaped site bordered by Clontarf Street, Oliver Plunkett Street Lower and Deane Street (to the north of No.5 & No.6 Lapps Quay). The plan previously reported in one of my earlier posts, which constituted a larger 12-storey building, was revised down to its current height following pre-planning talks with CCC planners who advised the reduction. Cohlan Downing Associates are expected to be the letting/sale agents when the project is complete – work on the new landmark building (which will provide another unique addition to this fast expanding area of commercial development) will not commence (subject to planning) for about 10months. The lot is currently being let for car-parking purposes.

      yeah I’ve seen Paul kenny’s building for the Rev comms and i agree its something special. One of the best developments i’ve seen for Cork in ages. Finally something with REAL architectural flair. I think people are really gonna like it, cant wait to see the pic tonight.

      That Clontarf street building sounds very very interesting. I’ve been hearing all about it – any pics Lex?

    • #733645
      lexington
      Participant

      Here’s the image!

      Try as I might, I’m afraid this is as clear as it gets. It was printed, then captured on a WebCam – hence the elemental blur. But the important thing is it provides a visual on the development. I personally believe it to be one of Wilson Architecture’s nicer efforts. The facades on the western side are being incorporated as protected structures. One may argue that it provides a sense of imbalance, perhaps, the ideal would be to centred the facades were they to be incorporated. But given their status – that’s hardly feasible. In the end, one may argue their incorporation perhaps adds ‘character’ to the quayside elevation. The only real shame about this project is the refusal by both McLaughlins (Vet & Animal Care produce) and Bell Scott, both on Ship Street, to sell up and allow for a greater continuity to the project along that elevation. Perhaps, perhaps – they may go the way of O’Brien Office Supplies w.r.t. City Quarter – and decide better halfway through development. Donal F. O’Donovan (DFOD Consultants/DL Safety) and his Clyde House however, on Brian Boru Street, I hear through the grapevine – may be looking to sell or redevelop their premises in the near future. Comments have been made to the ‘nautical’ evocation of the Kenny Development design – opinions?



      ewankennedy – I’ll try and get an image on the Clontarf Street ‘tower’ up for late next week.



      Leesider – with the image up now, hope you can sleep well tonight! 😀

    • #733646
      Leesider
      Participant

      looks very well and a lot more daring than anything I have seen for Cork in a long time. Should help to rejuvenate that area no end. Here’s hoping it get’s over planning hurdles quickly and isn’t watered down. Don’t see how it could though with no problem with residents in that area and height wouldn’t be a problem either!

      Cheers for the image Lexington……waited all night for that! 😉

    • #733647
      rodger
      Participant

      wow!what the Kennys want the Kennys get.

    • #733648
      pier39
      Participant

      thats friggin amazing!!! knew it was gonna be good but thats top rate stuff. more of this please. well done kennys. the council would be mad to find odds with this 1. finally a landmark building on this side of the river. kinda gehry, look at the walls.

      cant wait to see the clontarf tower – 9 storeys a tower???!!!! – i hope its not a brick massacre and uses glass to take advantage of its interestin spot. a flatiron only glass.

      wats the ocallaghan docklands plan lex??? highrise im guessin???

    • #733649
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Yeah, have to say I think it (the kenny development) would do wonders for the quays along this area. Its very near Horgans quay too which i hear Martin Cullen siad was closing in our agreement between the Cork Corp, cie and a private developer.

      Is anyone else hoping that Treasury holdings are not going to be involved in Horgans quays redevelopment??? Their track record and recent developments in the Dublin docklands are so ugly boring and downright lazy, we could do with less of that down here. I know Manor Park were involved too at one stage and their not much better.

    • #733650
      satanta99
      Participant

      looking at the 3D rendering above gives the impression that we could see something special emerge from this site… fingers crossed. Does the glass facade extend over the original building on the south western side of the development, have to say I’m really impressed. But I’m really looking forward to seeing what is planned for the clontarf street site. It could be so good on such an interesting site!

    • #733651
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @satanta99 wrote:

      looking at the 3D rendering above gives the impression that we could see something special emerge from this site… fingers crossed. Does the glass facade extend over the original building on the south western side of the development, have to say I’m really impressed. But I’m really looking forward to seeing what is planned for the clontarf street site. It could be so good on such an interesting site!

      Yeah I agree with ya on both those things. Its funny cos I wasnt expecting much on the kenny development but when I saw it i had to take a step back and say whoa! And with the Clontarf street building i have huge expectations. It mightnt be the biggest development in Cork but it is surely one of the most interesting, how they get a building like their proposing on a site that small and with such a unique shape in such a unique place is gonna be something to see. i REALLY hope i’m not let down on this one, its gonna have to be good architecture speaking to make it work on that site. No doubt Lex will have something up on it soon. Bring it on!!!

    • #733652
      keeneye
      Participant

      Hey Guys,
      Does anyone have info on a new late night venue on North Main Street? I’m not wondering about the Gaffney Group premises currently been built on the former Classic Bar site, but on the corner building known as the Young Boys Catholic Association building. I heard that Joe Donovan (who bought the Oyster Bar, etc) owns it and has planning for a late night theatre venue (I’m sure it will be a nightclub though 😉 ) that can hold up to 1200 people approx!!. This is a very large site.If im correct..

      Don’t yee think between newly owed Redz (holds 700 people), Gaffney Group new venue (900 people approx) and this purposed venue by Joe Donovan (1200 person’s approx), all 30 meters from each other, will create havoc on any given busy night. THATS 2800 people approx on lets say Saturday night pouring onto North Main street & Liberty St. at 2.30am. !!! Pity the residents.
      The other 2500 approx coming from Cubins, Reardens & Havana Browns Night club must also have an impact to MANY POTENTIAL PROBLEMS that may arise in the future. The issues of different clientel coming from the various venues, mixing on the streets with drink on board is always a major factor to the source of trouble that could lay ahead.

      Don’t get me wrong, it is excellent with money been largely invested still into bars & late night venues (BluBamoo on Sheares St., holds 1200 persons, 6.5 million invested by Ultimate Leisure PLC) with the uncertainty in the Licenced trade today ….. but common sense must prevail.!
      I’ve seen it before in certain area’s -Residents/ Hospitals/ Motorists/ Neil Prendaville (HAHA:)) C.C.C (street litter etc)ALL COME AT ONCE, looking for the source of the various problems. But most of all the Gardai. These premises are all under the the durastriction of The Bridewell Garda Station, which is badly in need of extra resources already. All you need is to PEEE OFF one or two Sergeants and need i say more….
      These premises are all expected to be open for the new student season in September when the students come back from hols. I think this area will be in my eyes, Corks Temple Bar… Good Luck and weldone to the publicans there but just be cautious. 🙂

    • #733653
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: It seems that John McCarthy Motorpoint (SAAB dealership) in the Railway/Alfred Street vicinity (next to Kent Station) may be seeking to shift premises over the coming months – freeing up a vital and strategically important site for redevelopment within the north docklands of the city. The site is located adjacent to the Long-Term parking facility of Kent Station, which, is supposedly subject to a 25m euro redevelopment (although, again, CIE seem to have put this on the back-burner for a small while, contrary to promises made by Chairman Dr. John Lynch). The Motorpoint site is located near the Kenny Group redevelopment of its Patrick’s Quay premises for new purpose designed Revenue Commissioners office space (currently in planning) and a small but noteworthy development at the former Unity Garage along the Lower Glanmire Road (see keeneye posts with drawings) by BrideView Developments. A recently sold 18,000sq ft warehousing premises also along Alfred/Railway Street fetched a supposed 4m euros through agents Dominic Daly – plans are being worked for that particular site, which will form part of a site accumulation, however, there is no timeframe available for . It’s not clear what the future intentions of the dealership are, but, its guessed that they may choose to relocate to new purpose built premises as part of a MotorMall by either John Cleary Developments (recently greenlit) at Mahon Point (on the former Sifco premises) or at EastGate MotorMall currently under construction by OFC.

      MotorPoint are not confirming any rumours and in some cases denying it, but involved sources say not to be put off by that. One source said, “It makes sense, their premises are currently too restrictive to allow any business related development. The docklands is taking off with a number of projects like McCarthy Developments office block, Kenny’s office development, Werdna’s proposals, O’Callaghan’s plans…MotorPoint’s sale will bag McCarthy’s a tidy sum and allow them relocate to new, stylish and accessible accommodation. It’s probably a few months away, but it is on the cards.” (edited for coherency) That particular source is acting as a consultant for one interested party looking at options on the site.

      I look forward, as I’m sure you all will, to see if anything comes of it. 😮



      🙂 I tried posting details on one of the 2 docklands highrise proposals (not inclusive of any Horgan’s Quay plans) at preplanning yesterday – but both times my posts failed and I had to keep rewriting them. I finally supposed that it wasn’t meant to be. But the good news is that a 3rd project is now under asssessment by one of Cork’s premier development companies. Consulting engineers are assessing prospects for a new mixed commercial and part (possible) residential development at a landmark docklands, waterfront site. I’m afraid I cant, for the time being comment any further. But I promise I will bring the details when I have them.



      I’m coming to the conclusion my report on Cork: Has it’s time come? would be far too long winded and complex to post up here. What I might do is give a small, edited version of it on this thread – with the full thing hyperlinked some time in the future.



      keeneye – regarding the Christian Youth Boys Centre at Paradise Place (junction at North Main Street, Liberty Street, South Main Street and Castle Street), it had a guide of 975,000euros through Dominic Daly Auctioneers, but sold for 2.2m euros. The centre itself is approx. 8,000sq ft – with the premises now occupied by Blu Bambu extending to 13,000sq ft. Indeed BluBambu has a 1,200 (give or take) capacity cert, so I find it difficult to see how the Paradise Place premises is excess of that. Regarding Joe O’Donovan’s involvement, he is a name and plans are rumoured to be afoot to convert the place to a late-night (nightclub) venue, but nothing has been cemented yet (including Mr. O’Donovan’s prospective involvement). As for the City Properties nightclub next-door, it’s market is being targeted at the Havana Brown’s clientele. 21yrs +, however its capacity is somewhat smaller – a stricter entry policy will be engaged. I’ll get back to you at some stage on the other elements of your post.

    • #733654
      lexington
      Participant

      Currently 3 fully fledged department stores (possibly 4 if you include Roches Stores at Wilton), operate in Cork city – Brown Thomas, Roches Stores and Debenhams. However that may all soon change…

      …many moons ago, you may remember I indicated the UK-firm, the John Lewis Partnership, had been assessing options for a store opening in the south of Ireland (it is not known as of yet to the extent of their assessment). I had speculated that Rockfell’s Cornmarket Street development may provide an option – as talks had been addressed, however, it would now seem that the Cornmarket Street project has gone the way of unit lettings (w/ Habitat, Dixons and Boots all having held discussions – Habitat remain the only confirmed tenant for the time being). John Lewis have still indicated an interest in Cork – confirmed as of today. Furthermore, Arnotts are also assessing possibilities for Cork city.

      The first thought that springs to mind is the Capitol Cineplex redevelopment by John Costello and Mount Kennett Investments. Submissions for the project are closed as of today (with 5 recorded – including submissions from Pat Dwyer, the Vineyard Bar, the Post Master [Noelle Moriarty] of the adjoining Post Office, Kevin Hurley of An Taisce and Vision Cork – a new, independent development standards assessment group). The planner is Michael Lynch. I would expect Further Info to be called on the project – perhaps Significant. The development is to consist of a medium sized department store, which may provide an attractive option for the aforementioned names. I may have some more info on that come the next few weeks.



      Aldi Stores Development @ Tory Top Road

      Here’s a long awaited image of the Aldi Stores Development for the Heiton Buckley site along Tory Top Road, adjacent to Musgrave Park. The development which was lodged in July of 2004 had its due date pushed back almost a full-year(!) to June 20th 2005 – and was designed by Carew Kelly Architects. The development will include a discount Aldi Store, creche w/ rooftop play area, additional retail units (7) and 48 2-bedroom duplex apartments arranged over 6 4-storey blocks. Its actually quite a pleasant development – but unfortunately this image does not convey it as so, unfortunately, it was WebCam-ed from a copy of the planning application attained by a source with the development wing of Aldi.

    • #733655
      Pug
      Participant

      any ideas or firm speculation on who bought the tesco site in midleton?

    • #733656
      pier39
      Participant

      it would seem someone loaded anyway pug. what did it go for again??? 5 mil was it? i’d guess Cork Marts.

    • #733657
      Pug
      Participant

      yeah, 5.1 million, got way more than they bargained for. Not bad considering the guide price was 3.2 mill.

    • #733658
      rodger
      Participant

      I think its a good property although restricted to comparison retail by covenent.The site backs onto the town carpark and this is where I would see the real value.

    • #733659
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      rodger,

      what do you mean ‘restricted to comparison retail by covenant’ – does it not have a Town Centre Zoning? – including convenience?

    • #733660
      rodger
      Participant

      Bunch, I understand that as part of the sale the buyer or tennant cannot operate a business which deals in the sale of food or drink unless a bar or restaurant,Tescos probably did not want Superquinn or similar setting up nearby.

    • #733661
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Google maps launched their Ireland / England site last week.
      http://www.google.co.uk/maps

      Still lacking alot of detail, especially outside the major cities.
      No satellite imagery available yet either (the US one does)

      But handy for Cork City.

    • #733662
      lexington
      Participant

      I’m sure the WMC crowd won’t mind this little plug in their favour – but the new Where’s Me Culture? Magazine is due for publication this Wednesday (11th) so I’m told, so I’m guessing it should be available later this week, early next week??? Correct me on that if I’m wrong. :confused: Either way, I know some of you are involved with WMC in some form or shape (albeit the WMC forum or badge wear-ers!!!), so it may be worth keeping an eye out for it.

      Anyone interested in an alternative perspective on the Capital of Culture take should visit -> Where’s Me Culture?

      Whether your interest is architectural, artistic, music etc etc. Its a nice insight.

    • #733663
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      I have two questions, 1. Does any one know if planning is going to be granted for a hotel on Parnell Place Beasly St, South Mall?
      2. What is the plan for the building on the corner of Caroline St, Oliver Plunket st. opp Scotts Bar????

    • #733664
      lexington
      Participant

      @shrink2cork wrote:

      I have two questions, 1. Does any one know if planning is going to be granted for a hotel on Parnell Place Beasly St, South Mall?
      2. What is the plan for the building on the corner of Caroline St, Oliver Plunket st. opp Scotts Bar????

      No, the plans for a 121 bedroom, 80,000sq ft hotel with underground car-parking and spa facility by Monoghan-based Pitwood Ltd, is still currently in Further Information. Niall Fitzsimons are the consulting engineers. CCC are still awaiting the details back – but I’m informed, there is no real problem with the plans other than a few issues regarding the Parnell Street frontage (2 PS facades) and traffic management. I think there may have also been worries about the southern elevation’s height facing back onto Beasley Street and its effect on 93 South Mall (TCH HQ). I have to say, I like the plans and think it would be a great addition to a long-overdue redevelopment site. Parnell Place will be subject to a lot more action in the future as well.

      As for the old Spanish restaurant on Oliver Plunkett Street, I’m afraid I don’t know! :confused: 😀

    • #733665
      Pug
      Participant

      any more comment on Daniel Libeskind last week? massive mix of people at the lecture, architects, developers and the arty folk. I’d like peoples odds on whether any Cork developer would commission Libeskind for a landmark building? (notwithstanding he probably charges squillions to design something now!).

    • #733666
      rodger
      Participant

      Well one and all,after many months of pullin n dragin it looks like our schitzophrenic City Council are going to grant planning for Eglinton St.ITS A BIG STEP FORWARD.OFC will have the biggest errection in Cork (for a while at least).
      The development will lead to a lot of building envy,so it looks like Cork City Council will indeed be the much needed Viagra of Cork development.

    • #733667
      lexington
      Participant

      Pug – one developer managed to catch a quick discussion with Libeskind after his presentation in Cork Opera House (I’m told), don’t know the details of what was said, but if one were to speculate, one’s head might dizzy. I don’t see Cork homing a Libeskind design anytime in the near future – well, other than 18 Turns. 😉



      rodger – the mood is favourable indeed regarding Eglinton Street, Wilson Architecture will be lodging the required ‘Clarification/Further Info’ imminently. The word is good, but I like to see final reports just to be sure. Then there’s always the threat of ABP, but I think relative compromise has been attained on most sides. There’ll always be those difficult individuals though. Construction, I was told, was originally slated for late-Summer/Autumn (subject to appeal), however, it may be pushed back to early 2006 subsequent of an arrangement. Funnily enough, regarding its height – at 70m, it may be the tallest building in Ireland (assuming Paul Keogh’s design doesn’t commence beforehand), but its still shorter than the wingspan of the new Airbus A380 or even the fuselage of the same aircraft (at 73m). However, if you include the spire, Eglinton Street may just top it. 😮 Apparently spires are included in a building’s height, not aerials – don’t know when that rule was decided, perhaps since the Petronas Towers/Sears Tower debate. Frankly, I think spires are cheating. :p

      What brings you you’re news my man?

    • #733668
      rodger
      Participant

      Lexington ,in answer to your question a dodgy bloke down the pub told me.So the 747 is no longer the yard stick for the description of big/FECKIN HUGE things.Has anyone checked out http://www.niallmclaughlin.com,I think the kid has talent and may bring him leeside.

    • #733669
      phatman
      Participant

      Ok, don’t shoot me down here, but would anyone agree with me when i question the justification of incorporating protected structures into new developments, at the expense of aesthetics and practicality? Fine, there are some great listed buildings around Cork that stand out in their own right and hold their own, and should never even be considered as part of another development, but when it comes to a case like Paul Kenny’s proposal, or say Lavitt’s quay, I question the retention of such ‘protected’ strutures. While they may have certain historical merit, their location,prominance or addition to the streetscape is dubious. Personally i think Mr. Kenny’s proposal looks interesting, i wont get too excited yet, but as Lexington suggested himself, the incorporation of the structures into this scheme add an imbalance to the overall structure, which is a pity, and since they are going to be covered by glass anyway, and surrounded by a totally uncomplementing development, why not knock them?! Again, dont get me wrong here, i just think that the development would stand to benefit from more freedom in it’s design. The whole of St. Patricks quay, and the north quays in general, are a mess anyway, and are hardly of a sensitive nature, so i say allow as much freedom and imagination as possibly to exploit this potential – Im not exactly advocating knocking crawford art gallery out of it (though there are a few buildings i wouldnt mind doing that to haha ;)).
      Opinions/ideas?

    • #733670
      phatman
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Lexington ,in answer to your question a dodgy bloke down the pub told me.So the 747 is no longer the yard stick for the description of big/FECKIN HUGE things.Has anyone checked out http://www.niallmclaughlin.com,I think the kid has talent and may bring him leeside.

      http://www.niallmclaughlin.com 😀

    • #733671
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Doesn’t matter what you think… it won’t get a look in at planning unless these structures are protected.

      These are heritage buildings whose design still looks great over a century after they were built. They represent part of the history of the docklands that contributed to the wealth and growth of Cork City.

      The phrase “thowing out the baby with the bathwater” comes to mind.

      phatman wrote:
      Ok, don’t shoot me down here, but would anyone agree with me when i question the justification of incorporating protected structures into new developments, at the expense of aesthetics and practicality? Fine, there are some great listed buildings around Cork that stand out in their own right and hold their own, and should never even be considered as part of another development, but when it comes to a case like Paul Kenny’s proposal, or say Lavitt’s quay, I question the retention of such ‘protected’ strutures. While they may have certain historical merit, their location,prominance or addition to the streetscape is dubious. Personally i think Mr. Kenny’s proposal looks interesting, i wont get too excited yet, but as Lexington suggested himself, the incorporation of the structures into this scheme add an imbalance to the overall structure, which is a pity, and since they are going to be covered by glass anyway, and surrounded by a totally uncomplementing development, why not knock them?! Again, dont get me wrong here, i just think that the development would stand to benefit from more freedom in it’s design. The whole of St. Patricks quay, and the north quays in general, are a mess anyway, and are hardly of a sensitive nature, so i say allow as much freedom and imagination as possibly to exploit this potential – Im not exactly advocating knocking crawford art gallery out of it (though there are a few buildings i wouldnt mind doing that to haha ]
    • #733672
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      ….. the incorporation of the structures into this scheme add an imbalance to the overall structure, which is a pity, and since they are going to be covered by glass anyway, and surrounded by a totally uncomplementing development, why not knock them?!

      You’ve hit the nail on the head there… ANY new building should compliment its environment and comliment or indeed contrast with adjacent buildings (protected or not).
      I would suggest that a) the new development can work well by sharply contrasting adjacent buildings
      b)in the case of protected buildings, if a new development is going to cause unsightly imbalance or visual “awkwardness” (for want of a better word) then the new building should not be built.
      c)Paul Kenny’s new development i feel works well. There should be no question of altering protected facades to fit in with new designs. It should, of course be vice versa. A good architect will make it work, as they have to a great extent here.

      Lex, is this type of development similar in design to what has been suggested for Deloitte headquarters opposite City Hall?

    • #733673
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Slattery Travel’s Slattery USA division will be commencing charter flights on a 2x weekly basis between Cork and New York JFK using Ryan International (a Chicago-based, predominantly charter, airline). The route will be served by a Boeing 757 (tight!), service will begin on Thursday 27th of October. The service is hoped to kick start further moves by airport and airline industries to push for a scheduled service in the long-term. Despite the announcement, a spokesman for Aer Arann says the move does not disrupt hsis airline’s ongoing investigations in commencing a scheduled service between the 2 cities. However, investment remains the largest obstacle to their plans.

      For a look at the ‘interesting’ airline, take a look at its website (noting that its been ‘Under Construction’ for 2 years now!) -> http://www.flyryan.com/home/



      🙂 Howard Holdings (Fuchsia Investments) have submitted revised plans for its hotel plan in Kinsale. The site is currently being used as a temporary car-park facility between Emmet and Long Quays. The new plans will provide for a 102-bedroom hotel, boardwalk, 7 apartment suites, retail units, boardwalk stalls and a 273 space basement car-park over 2 levels, accessible to the public.



      RM – the Deloitte proposal was to be designed by Tom Couglan (Coughlan de Keyser Architects of No.5/No.6 Lapps Quay fame). The proposal entailled a vertical extension with cantivelered extension over the pavement and a predominantly glass quayside frontage (and PS encasing) rising up to a level pretty much on par with No.5 Lapps Quay. However, I have not yet seen the actual complete design, so I can’t specify anymore than that. Sorry! 😮



      mickeydocs – the only thing I would say about PS issues is that, in some cases, the restrictions regarding incorporation are so prohibitive that they restrict what architects can and cannot do with a new development. I think Wilson made the best of an awkward situation with Paul Kenny’s RC development so kudos is due there, but RORSA really were caught with the Howard Holdings/Comfort Inn development on Lavitts Quay. The integration of No.16 is necessary by policy, but logistically and aesthetically inconvenient. I’m hoping the revised scheme through Significant Further Information, will address the awful design of the original application, and make the No.16 issue work a little better. I don’t deny the difficulty RORSA have in designing a decent structure at this site (which Mr. Arthur totally messed about with too), but the design was still inadequate. The interior of No.16 is most interesting, but the building is almost impossible to incorporate and make the quayside look good if you consider the planning impositions. If Mr. Arthur’s premises at No.15 were out of the picture, the design could be a lot more interesting. For example, if the building commanded a quay frontage, rather than its current retracted position, and arch over No.16 whilst drawing it in closer to the new development, with perhaps some attractive backlighting to illuminate the PS at night from its cave like position??? Some radical northern facade alterations would need to be made – but they need to be made anyway given its current design.

      Interestingly enough, Howard Holdings were granted permission to demolish the Tedcastles premises on Lapps Quay (also a PS) when they applied for City Quarter’s planning. It was pointlessly given that status – and despite planning policy, CCC seem ready to bend the rules a little when it suits them! 😀

    • #733674
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      CCC recently granted permission to AIB to demolish their exisiting bank premises at Watercourse Road, Blackpool, to construct a new two storey bank building with corporate signage, to relocate the ATM facility and to provide 17 no. staff car parking spaces, including all associated works on their site.
      The building was designed by BCG architects and according to CCC report it “meets the challenges of the site in an inventive manner and satisfies the objectives of the Development Plan in relation to high quality design”.
      The proposed building is two-storey stepping down to a single storey element at the corner of O’Connell Street and Watercourse Road. The front (Watercourse Road) elevation is clad in sanded limestone with sections of inset polished limestone creating points of interest. The ATM is located on the front elevation, while the main entrance to the bank is dual aspect with access from both Watercourse Road and O’Connell Street.
      Sadly, I have it on good authority that the CCC decision will be appealled to An Bord Pleanala.

    • #733675
      rodger
      Participant

      I just hope ABP have the resources to deal with all these nasty appeals,people feel that ABP are some kind of prince in shinning armour comming to the aid of the little man,THEY ARE NOT.
      Many appealants have only one goal in mind,to stop the development.I think its about time that interested parties in Cork formed a data base of these people,to use a crude phrase you should not piss in the well you drink from.
      We have actualy found in the past that we have given work to people that objected to our developments!
      The time to object is at the development plan stage not when someone has borrowed millions on the strength of the development plan.Any thoughts ?

    • #733676
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Wow, looks excellent! Where do I sign up 😉

    • #733677
      A-ha
      Participant

      Wow, I love that picture so much. Everytime I see it I go all tingly (if thats a word, lol). Cant wait to see the real thing some day soon!

    • #733678
      Leesider
      Participant

      I have just been reading the Dublin street lighting thread and Washington St. popped into my head. This area has potential as a kind of Temple Bar area (Washinton Village), but does anyone think the area needs a makeover as regards street lighting (and possibly a few other things) and are there any plans?

      Recently I was walking from McCurtain St to Washington St via Patrick St on a Sat night, the atmosphere seemed to get alot more menacing when you reached Washington St, the street seems very drab and dark………maybe that’s just all the muckers outside Reardans!! 😀

    • #733679
      jungle
      Participant

      Street lighting should be improved, but there are other changes needed too. The footpaths should be widened by removing one of the outbound traffic lanes. The business owners themselves need to improve their frontage, particularly between Grand Parade and South Main St. The side wall of St Augustine’s church adds a huge dead area to the street. Somehow, I can’t ever see that changing.

    • #733680
      lexington
      Participant

      For those of you who can’t wait to get a glimpse of the DAT Partnership’s plans for Clontarf Street…here it is! Its perspective is taken from one of the elevational drawings by CdK (Tom & Daniel) and views the project in an east-to-west persepctive. You may remember in an earlier post that I noted it would be a landmark building in the proper sense of the word, and I think you’ll agree, it is. It represents another really excellent design for Cork following on from Paul Kenny’s RC development and OFC’s Eglinton Street development (both by Wilson Architecture – FOM and POM) and shows what a little imagination and money can do. These type of developments are the ones Cork needs more of and to keep working toward. I suppose that’s why the docklands offer so much potential, it provides a unique opportunity to make Cork an architectural goldmine – and I would encourage any architect and developer reading this to let your imagination flourish, you may never get a better time. CdK are also working on 2 other projects near Clontarf Street (apparently to be named ‘Centre Point’ which I must admit I did not know it had been formalised) at Deloitte and No.5/No.6 Lapps Quay – just to the left (south) of the image thumbnail posted (not seen) and with the refurbished bus-station to the right (north).



      :rolleyes: Just regarding the Water Street appeal, with one week left to go before the deadline, I have been talking to someone on the Coranree Dock Road in Limerick, and they have pretty much decided what they are going to do – however, I have promised to keep it quiet as Werdna are anxious to keep ‘the planners guessing’ as it were until the very last moment. I would hope however to make you aware of their plans before it is formally announced. 😎



      🙂 Also, you may recall some time ago, comments I made regarding a new city healthcare facility (not yet announced) – well, just so you know, plans are progressing nicely, talks continue in a positive manner. The design is by a leading practice and nearing completion. Estimated project values are between the 40m to 50m euro region (the upward figure associated with a problematic engineering issue), down from an earlier plan at an alternate location for a 100m euro facility. An application is a few months off yet, but it is looking very promising. I’ll keep you informed closer to the application date.



      😮 Though I am going to have to keep my mouth dun suas on this for a while, I’ll leave it at this – the highrise docklands project I was hinting at previously, has indeed reached pre-planning discussion stages. The final design will be built up around those talks. I believe Mr. Barker made a hint at the location in today’s IE – regarding the ‘period warehousing’ and the ‘quiet’ exchange of hands. If you’ve followed the clues over the course of my recent posts, you’ve probably got the location figured out by now. But then again, perhaps we just have wires crossed on the exact property. Hmmm.



      @Leesider wrote:

      I have just been reading the Dublin street lighting thread and Washington St. popped into my head. This area has potential as a kind of Temple Bar area (Washinton Village), but does anyone think the area needs a makeover as regards street lighting (and possibly a few other things) and are there any plans?

      Recently I was walking from McCurtain St to Washington St via Patrick St on a Sat night, the atmosphere seemed to get alot more menacing when you reached Washington St, the street seems very drab and dark………maybe that’s just all the muckers outside Reardans!! 😀

      I agree, Washington Street is in line for a revamp – it’s a great street. John Mannix’s project, if it passes appeal (praise Allah!), should liven up the street somewhat. Funny though how, as the main centre of Cork nightlife and Cork’s legal district, that most of the late-night drunken offenders end up on trial at the same location as their offence! 😉

    • #733681
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      You may remember in an earlier post that I noted it would be a landmark building in the proper sense of the word, and I think you’ll agree, it is.

      Looks great even from the blurry image. This is really a location where nobody can object to this development. Its a central, ‘landmark’ (must be careful not to overuse that word) site not adjacent or obstructing any buildings of major historic importance, lots of new building going on around it— its ideal for a modern, extravagant design such as that proposed. Fingers crossed!
      @lexington wrote:

      Though I am going to have to keep my mouth dun suas on this for a while, I’ll leave it at this – the highrise docklands project I was hinting at previously, has indeed reach pre-planning discussion stages. The final design will be built up around those talks. I believe Mr. Barker made a hint at the location in today’s IE – regarding the ‘period warehousing’ and the ‘quiet’ exchange of hands. If you’ve followed the clues over the course of my recent posts, you’ve probably got the location figured out by now. But then again, perhaps we just have wires crossed on the exact property. Hmmm.

      If I’ve guessed the location right, taking into account a recent image posted on this thread, I’d be gravely concerned at this news. That is, if i’ve guessed right. Not every protected structure needs the same treatment as the proposed RC development.

      lexington wrote:
      Funny though how, as the main centre of Cork nightlife and Cork’s legal district, that most of the late-night drunken offenders end up on trial at the same location as their offence! ]
      🙂 lol 🙂
    • #733682
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Yeah that Clontarf street design looks pretty good, was worried for a little while. Pity about the image, when will you get a better 1 up Lex?

    • #733683
      pier39
      Participant

      blurry but cool! thats 2 in a row now for cork. other develprs will have a lot to live up 2 if this is the bar being set! nice one. seems coughlan de keyser and wilson are gonna have major say in shaping this area of the city but if they keeping comin up with things like these (i mean the kennys development too) so be it.

    • #733684
      genario
      Participant

      sorry i’m joking. but really cork is a nice city with much possibilities. i am working here for 6 months and would like to see it become more developed. i hope i may be here in the future to see how it becomes. this is a very good internet site but what abouut italy???

      look forward to seeing more designs for cork.

      genario

    • #733685
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      why don’t you tell us more about Turin?

      @genario wrote:

      sorry i’m joking. but really cork is a nice city with much possibilities. i am working here for 6 months and would like to see it become more developed. i hope i may be here in the future to see how it becomes. this is a very good internet site but what abouut italy???

      look forward to seeing more designs for cork.

      genario

    • #733686
      genario
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      why don’t you tell us more about Turin?

      Torino!!! i will tell you more of it in an italian discussion page. i will keep this page for cork. yes/no?

      genario

    • #733687
      who_me
      Participant

      (Long time thread reader de-lurking – would just like to say thanks to lexington and y’all for the photos and info, it’s fascinating to see what’s in the pipeline for Cork – and indeed what obstacles they face!)

      Re: the Kenny Group’s design on Patrick’s Quay, I think it’s a stunning design – easily my favourite of all the recent and upcoming developments in Cork. Even having said that though, if I had to choose between that building, and retaining the old stone facades, I’d opt for the stone facades every time – the RC building could be built elsewhere. As mickeydocs suggested, those old buildings still look great now, and will do in another 50 years, with a basic level of maintenance, while most new developments like the RC building are, for want of a better term, ‘disposable architecture’. It will likely need a complete makeover in 30-40 years (if you don’t believe me, how many new buildings from the mid 60’s in Ireland look good now?) Whereas the retained facades are far more timeless.

      More developments like the new RC building please (but let’s not knock our few remaining ‘gems’ to make way for them!) IMO, of course. 😀

      Re: the Custom House quay, I was really hoping this might be used as a bar/bistro/restaurant complex making full use of the quay areas for outdoor seating. As the docks are (hopefully!) rejuvenated, it would make a great social hub, particularly with the pedestrian bridges (as per the dockland masterplan) to the North and South quays. It also could spur a lot of foot traffic through the rejuvenated city “East End”, and join up nicely with the Lavitt’s Quay boardwalk area.

      Personally, I think it would be a tremendous pity to knock the existing buildings, when so close by (South Docks area) there’s an area ideally suited for truly high rise development: existing tall buildings of little aesthetic appeal, few residents to object, riverside & city centre location.

      Re: Clontarf St. It looks like a very interesting design, but are you sure you have the right picture? That building looks too big to fit in that site (even if that picture is real size! :D), that site is tiny! I’d love to see a picture from another elevation, as the building looks round in your picture, but presumably would be much more wedge shaped in reality. Still, great to see more imaginative designs surfacing recently – hopefully a sign of things to come for future developments.

      Has any interest been announced in purchasing the Beamish & Crawford brewery for redevelopment? Probably No. 1 on my wishlist would see the Counting House retained (obviously) but the rest of the property sympathetically redeveloped, with a ‘green’ public area winding from the South Gate bridge along the riverside onto Hanover St.

      It’s quite a lot of fun watching tourists struggling to frame a picture of St. Finbarr’s Cathedral while cutting out the brewery. It could be a very attractive quarter of the city, with the Counting House, the Elizabethan fort and St. Finbarr’s in close proximity. Of course, if the proposed new hotel across the river (Cross’s Green?) is as bad as it sounds, perhaps not. Is there any news of that development lexington?

    • #733688
      lexington
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      Re: the Kenny Group’s design on Patrick’s Quay, I think it’s a stunning design – easily my favourite of all the recent and upcoming developments in Cork. Even having said that though, if I had to choose between that building, and retaining the old stone facades, I’d opt for the stone facades every time – the RC building could be built elsewhere. As mickeydocs suggested, those old buildings still look great now, and will do in another 50 years, with a basic level of maintenance, while most new developments like the RC building are, for want of a better term, ‘disposable architecture’. It will likely need a complete makeover in 30-40 years (if you don’t believe me, how many new buildings from the mid 60’s in Ireland look good now?) Whereas the retained facades are far more timeless.

      More developments like the new RC building please (but let’s not knock our few remaining ‘gems’ to make way for them!) IMO, of course. 😀

      I always believe in going for the timeless quality. I like the idea of a building that people will look at in 50 years, when all our modern ideas of architecture have gone out the window, and have them saying “That’s a classic!” Paul Kenny’s building has numerous qualities to it, and though I strongly support retaining proverbial ‘gems’, many Protected Structures in Cork, are confusingly given this status. I like the facades on St. Patrick’s Quay, but in order to redeveloped the site and still retain the facades, what constitutes a suitable project??? A mock-style replica? Or a modern take? Quite often these style replicas are disastrous verticals and boring lines which mimic nothing near the intricate detail and blunt building methods that add to the timeless quality of the original building. In the end, they often insult the original facade or building rather than compliment it. The Kenny proposal is assertively modern, but recognises the historical element, which remains distinctive. In 40 or 50 years, if the Kenny development is demolished to make way for some other project, the facades by way of this distinction will remain unique elements rich for preservation.

      @who_me wrote:

      Re: the Custom House quay, I was really hoping this might be used as a bar/bistro/restaurant complex making full use of the quay areas for outdoor seating. As the docks are (hopefully!) rejuvenated, it would make a great social hub, particularly with the pedestrian bridges (as per the dockland masterplan) to the North and South quays. It also could spur a lot of foot traffic through the rejuvenated city “East End”, and join up nicely with the Lavitt’s Quay boardwalk area.

      Personally, I think it would be a tremendous pity to knock the existing buildings, when so close by (South Docks area) there’s an area ideally suited for truly high rise development: existing tall buildings of little aesthetic appeal, few residents to object, riverside & city centre location.

      I never said Custom House Quay (CHQ) – just to put that on the record, uhmm. But lets just say we were talking about that site – I have a very noted interest and understanding of that location for numerous reasons I won’t go into. The site has a fascinating history and its prominence and uniqueness demand only the very finest complements. However, you can take it from me, the warehousing on the site will not be demolished (it would be most unlikely for this to occur). Any plans that would be conceived, would generally be built around the warehousing on the actual quaysides and demolish the Cork Bonded Warehouse facility to the east – where here, development would be acceptable. The problem with construction here is the retention of the wonderful cobbled quaysides. Plans have in the past, been devised for this site, which sought to refurbish and delicately adjust the existing warehouses for leisure usage with boardwalked quaysides. However those plans were forced to move on consequent of a number of factors which will remain undisclosed. The site is a very difficult engineering feat by any standards. Were a high-rise in the conception – you’d be talking pile foundations of approx. 50 feet etc etc. Any design would have to be of impeccable landmark standards. Cough.

      @who_me wrote:

      Has any interest been announced in purchasing the Beamish & Crawford brewery for redevelopment? Probably No. 1 on my wishlist would see the Counting House retained (obviously) but the rest of the property sympathetically redeveloped, with a ‘green’ public area winding from the South Gate bridge along the riverside onto Hanover St.

      It’s quite a lot of fun watching tourists struggling to frame a picture of St. Finbarr’s Cathedral while cutting out the brewery. It could be a very attractive quarter of the city, with the Counting House, the Elizabethan fort and St. Finbarr’s in close proximity. Of course, if the proposed new hotel across the river (Cross’s Green?) is as bad as it sounds, perhaps not. Is there any news of that development lexington?

      I am not aware of any plans regarding Beamish & Crawford other than aspirations and mere informal proposals.

      As for the Charles McCarthy proposal of a 7-storey hotel designed by Derek Tynan & Associates for Crosses Green – can I simply say, it is the ugliest proposal bestowed on Cork in many many years. Quite frankly, its a disgrace. The cladding colouration is most unusual and interesting (black limestone), but the design is bland, boring and detracts substantially from the inspiring (no pun intended) presence of St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral. It represents nothing more than a large black wall. I’ll have a further update and image soon.

    • #733689
      lexington
      Participant

      Clarke’s Bridge Office Development
      🙂 Another Coughlan de Keyser designed project should meet planners at Navigation House in the close future. A circa.35,000sq ft, 6-storey office development at Clarke’s Bridge (Crosses Green) just off Washington Street and within striking distance of the newly refurbished Cork Courthouse. The new building, by developer Adrian Power, will be most attractive to firms (especially legal-based firms) seeking high-quality premises right at the epi-centre of Cork’s Legal District. The site (approx. 6,000sq ft), a former vehicular (Auto Exhausts) work-shop fronting the water’s edge next to Clarke’s Bridge, and facing opposite O’Flynn Construction’s Dean’s Hall student and office facility, is being marketed by DNG Harris. Planning pending, an early 2007 completion date is envisioned. The working design (in 6-storey configuration which may be reduced to 5 subject to planning talks) is seen below (beneath site image). It seeks to maximise the waterfront perspective with extensive utilisation of window space on the southern elevation and a stepped-back upper floor. The gradient of the site and image compression make the project seem a little higher than is actual – plus a comfortable space off the northern elevation reduces any negative impacts on neighbouring buildings to this side. The redevelopment comes in a prime city centre location in much need of rejuvenation.

      <img src="http://img201.echo.cx/img201/2440/cbapd8ff.th.jpg&quot; border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at http://www.ImageShack.us” />



      🙂 It seems Lush (yes, the original ‘bath bomb’ maker!) is seeking to open a store in Cork. The rumours of the store’s opening have long been established but now the wheel’s are in motion, with recruitment in tow.


    • #733690
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 It seems Lush (yes, the original ‘bath bomb’ maker!) is seeking to open a store in Cork. The rumours of the store’s opening have long been established but now the wheel’s are in motion, with recruitment in tow.

      Prepare yourselves for the toxic smell! 😉

    • #733691
      Pug
      Participant

      no more vibes / guesstimates / news on who bought the tesco site in midleton?

    • #733692
      lisam
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      no more vibes / guesstimates / news on who bought the tesco site in midleton?

      No dont think it was Cork Marts though

    • #733693
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Can I just say, about Custom House Quay, NO!!!!

    • #733694
      jojo96
      Participant


      Clontarf street : i agree this building is indeed a landmark, seems an excillent piece of architecture, is it true that this work of architecture is designed by, a lady?
      a foreigner?
      have u got any more pics? love to see few more.
      😎

    • #733695
      phatman
      Participant

      Couldn’t agree with you more who_me, the potential for this is great, and would really serve as a focal point for the docklands if developed correctly, not to mind being a much needed tourist attraction. I gotta agree with you on preserving the existing buildings too, would really make a great cage/bar/retaurant complex, further to my previous post haha.

    • #733696
      lexington
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Couldn’t agree with you more who_me, the potential for this is great, and would really serve as a focal point for the docklands if developed correctly, not to mind being a much needed tourist attraction. I gotta agree with you on preserving the existing buildings too, would really make a great cage/bar/retaurant complex, further to my previous post haha.
      Any plans for this site, anyone?

      First of all, don’t become too sceptical too soon regarding any plans that ‘may’ be in line for CHQ w/o seeing the plans. Second, the warehousing is not an issue. Port of Cork are rigid in their retention. Third, regarding any plans for CHQ in the prospective future, the problem with mere cafe/leisure usage etc., is in part a problem consequent of the PoC’s own doing. Their guide price on the site is substantial given the nature of the premises, and limits the options on development w.r.t. the price. As Brendan Keating (PoC CEO) once said long ago, he was not going to be pressurised by CCC or Joe Gavin to do anything, regardless of what Urban Initiatives had wooed CCC with. Any development will have to get bang-for-its-buck and be economically viable. Let’s just relax and see what occurs. Too much speculation is like wind to a wildfire. Relax.

    • #733697
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Interesting to note that the Office Supplies Centre at 46 Upper John Street in Blackpool has been demolished in recent days. This large site close to Murphy’s Brewery and the proposed Ladyswell development is in line for 12 townhouses and 5 apartments (down from 14 and 6 respectively).
      This comes after much local involvement in the planning process (10 submissions were made in total). Locals now appear to be happy with the design and a submission actually praising the development (after adjustments) was even recieved from local residents.
      Having seen the plans, I would say that the scheme works well in an area consisting of mostly 1 and 2 storey houses in narrow laneways. The facade onto Watercourse road however, is worthy of its prominent position.


      A final word on CHQ. Of course we should be willing to wait and see what designs come up. However, I for one am going to take a hell of a lot of convincing! It’s a gem!

    • #733698
      satanta99
      Participant

      Wats the panic about CHQ, its not like dey are goina develop it ‘willie nillie’ with a bita glass here, bit stainless steel there. I’m sure any project will be completely sympathetic to the area. The only adjustments that are being mooted, are to facilitate viable uses in the warehousing building. It think it was Lex who outlined one problem on a previous occaision, which concerns the size of the doors, or maybe I heard that somewhere else.
      Anyway when it does happen it would really give the area, to the east of the city a focus. It would also facilitate festival retailing in the city, which would contribute greatly to our tourism potential. Its a formula which has been followed all over the world, even the simpsons have the Redeveloped Squid Port! Actually it would propbably become some over-priced tourist trap, like the square in Prague, jesus dey saw me coming in that place!

    • #733699
      who_me
      Participant

      Thanks for the reply lexington. I know you didn’t specify the CHQ, but show me a conclusion, and I’ll be the first to jump on it!

      Glad to hear the owners plan on retaining the man CH buildings, whenever that may be. As you say, the bonded warehouses could be redeveloped or knocked and rebuilt and few would miss them. I’d have thought it would be a very tight (and and as you say, awkward) site to develop just on the quays, but best of luck to them. (They’ll probably need it to get anything through planning.)

      Going back to the proposed new RC building, I actually really like the building as pictured with the facades retained, I think it’s more interesting & eye-catching than it would be without them – even if it is unbalanced.

      Looking forward to any more pictures of the Clontarf St or Crosses Green developments (for differing reasons!). Have any pictures been posted of the Webworks development? Also, I noticed there’s a crane up by County Hall, has work started there already?

    • #733700
      who_me
      Participant

      @satanta99 wrote:

      Anyway when it does happen it would really give the area, to the east of the city a focus. It would also facilitate festival retailing in the city, which would contribute greatly to our tourism potential. Its a formula which has been followed all over the world, even the simpsons have the Redeveloped Squid Port! Actually it would propbably become some over-priced tourist trap, like the square in Prague, jesus dey saw me coming in that place!

      As opposed to.. what part of this city ISN’T overpriced? 😉

      I believe you’re right though, I think the two-channel geography of the city makes it more interesting than most, particularly for pedestrian traffic along the riverside, and the CHQ is an obvious hub for that. If only I had millions to invest…

    • #733701
      lexington
      Participant

      Kyrl’s Quay Architectural Competition

      I’ve been viewing over some of the entries for the CCC/RIAI Kyrl’s Quay Architecture Competition. The competition sought proposals from innovative minds in the field of architecture to redevelop a portion of the Kyrls Quay frontage adjoining the Cornmarket Street junction. CCC possess some of the land in the designated area, with some in private ownership (although talks I’m told a privately on-going). A landmark, innovative and complimentary proposal was sought to provide this quayside with an indentifiable and noteworthy contribution to the city’s skyline. I’m told approx. 80 entries were submitted – I myself have only seen about 12 and glanced over a few more. Generally the standard is high, there are some interesting takes and some, quite plainly, dull – but it will be interesting to see which proposal is appointed come Wednesday 18th. The remaining entries will be on public display, I think in the Vision Centre on North Main Street after the decision is announced. It may be worth submitting a few to the Unbuilt Ireland section of this website thereafter. I’ll bring you more details when I hear them.



      @who_me wrote:

      Looking forward to any more pictures of the Clontarf St or Crosses Green developments (for differing reasons!). Have any pictures been posted of the Webworks development? Also, I noticed there’s a crane up by County (City???) Hall, has work started there already?

      Hope to have drawings of the Clontarf Street building up soon, pending on a number of issues I have yet to wholly resolve, but leave it with me. I will have a Crosses Green image up within the next week or so. As for the WebWorks development, I’ll try and get an image up soon (no promises). The design is by Scott Tallon Walker. It’s nothing to rave about but its inoffensive. The 2 tower cranes on the City Hall site are for the 32m euro, 90,000sq ft + extension of the City Hall itself, being developed and constructed by Cleary Doyle and designed by ABK. There are tower crane sections on the Albert Quay WebWorks site with John Paul Construction as contractors and Howard Holdings as developers, it is expected the crane will be erected tomorrow actually!

    • #733702
      PTB
      Participant

      About two years ago I saw the CHQ site and designed a 20 storey sail shaped building that would sit at the start of the island like a ship breaking the water, in my head.Then I saw the Burj al arab. There went my architechtural masterpiece.But it would look better in that position and cork and be more symbolic of the cities martime past.

    • #733703
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Interesting to note that when the Port Of Cork renovated their offices several years ago, they installed teak window frames rather than horrible PVC ‘faux’ lookalikes. Given that the originals lasted 100 years, and looked great, why replace them with plastic. Those windows still look great and given the architectural merit of the building it was a wise choice.

      Also, anyone got some photos of the ongoing construction of the new airport terminal. Judging by the cost, it must be a local version of the Taj Mahal.

    • #733704
      jungle
      Participant

      @corcaighboy wrote:

      Also, anyone got some photos of the ongoing construction of the new airport terminal. Judging by the cost, it must be a local version of the Taj Mahal.

      corcaighboy, I can’t find any images of the ongoing construction, but here is an airside artist’s picture of the terminal (Notice that there’s one airbridge too many 😀 ). I’ll be flying through Cork Airport next Friday and Monday, so I might see if I can take any pictures if people don’t mind rubbish quality off a mobile phone.

      The cost isn’t just for the terminal. It includes a new dual-carriageway access road, a new airport fire station and control tower, a multi-storey carpark etc. To my mind the money that was spent on the access road could have been better spent on taxiways and a runway extension.

    • #733705
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 John Paul Construction have erected a tower crane over the Howard Holdings’ WebWorks development on Albert Quay (to the rear of Albert House). The development will provide 40,000sq ft + of quality IT/Business incubator office facilities over 4-floors (w/ 5th floor apex) and link up with Albert House, which will include a ground-floor restaurant. Albert House will revert to CCC ownership after 2 years, while remainder of the site has been let to Howard Holdings for 700 years with an initial 2.25m euro downpayment and p.a. payment of 10euros every year thereafter. The project is a joint initiative between Howard Holdings, CCC and Enterprise Ireland. Design is by Scott Tallon Walker – an image will be up in the near future.



      🙂 After many a long protracted delay, Tom McCarthy’s George’s Mill along Father Matthew Quay has finally seen building contractors O’Flynn of Banteer, erect scaffolding around the antiquated and derelict former Mill site – to the rear of the prime Bank of Ireland office facility on South Mall. Mr. McCarthy’s Tumblegate Ltd enlisted architects Murray O’Laoire to design the new project which will entail residential, commercial and linked restaurant facilities (the restaurant will link up with Mr. McCarthy’s Jacob’s on the Mall premises along South Mall – a highly successful culinary enterprise which utilises the former Cork city Turkish Baths facility). The news will be music to the ears of many who have long complained of the eye-sore nature of the Mill.



      😮 Despite the announcement made by Slattery’s regarding the commencement of a Cork – New York JFK airlink – commencing in October 2005. I can tell you that talks are on-going between 3, possibly 4, US-based carriers about commencing scheduled links between Cork and the USA. The Cork Airport Authority, of whom Loretta Burke Glucksman is helping spearhead, have been conducting talks with Continental Airlines (on a possible Cork – New York Newark route), US Airways (unknown, Philadelphia???) and American Airlines, who will commence Shannon – Boston and Dublin – Chicago O’Hare, services this summer.



      Also, news may soon be afoot regarding a development that no doubt City Manager Joe Gavin will be dancing in the aisles about, at the location in and around the below… 😉

    • #733706
      lexington
      Participant

      Extract from Cork: Has It’s Time Come?

      This 1st section concerns moves made by Construction companies in Cork. Future sections will include one of developer moves, and another, on architects.

      “…in assessing the current development trends with Cork city, its suburbs, greater area and associated commuter towns, we may determine a relative understanding as to the nature of development engaging the Cork market at present. However, a more telling sign may be sought in assessing the business moves being made among proverbial ‘key-players’ in the development and construction industries…construction company movements represent calculated projections regarding the manner in which they can strategically maximise welfare…

      …consider the key/big general contractor company players in the Cork region (historically): PJ Hegarty, Bowen, Fleming, Ascon, Sisk – with lesser but important inputs from the likes of Pierse, Murnane & O’Shea and in more specific development related operations. O’Flynn Construction, O’Brien & O’Flynn etc. What have we witnessed recently? We have seen companies like Bowen & Hegarty position themselves into positions capable of facilitating the projected increase in demand they expect from large contracting projects within the Cork region. Bowen in particular have increased their Cork-based capabilities to facilitate this such demand. However, what has been more interesting, has been the highly aggressive competition we’ve witnessed in recent times of firms (historically present but not traditionally ‘big-players’ in the Cork market) like John Paul Construction. JPC have and continue to make major moves into the Cork market, capturing prime building contracts even from established developer/contractor relationships (OCP and Bowen, Howard Holdings and Hegarty etc). JPC have embarked on constructing a new, large purpose built administritive premises on Little Island (currently in appeal) such is there commitment and expectations of the Cork market over the coming years. A spokesperson for JPC has stated, “We see Cork as a prime market for us over the prospective future. Although we have traditionally engaged in activities within the region, we are now actively pursuing a well-recognised and established presence in the city and county, and to facilitate this, we’ve made substantial investments in the market. We are also hoping to play a major part in the redevelopment of the city’s docklands over the years…” So far, JPC’s aggressive approach seems to paying off with major projects at Grand Parade, Albert Quay, Old Blackrock Road, Churchfield (to name a few) all in full swing. This has given the traditional players a bit of a shake-up. They now realise the need to competitively adapt to this new environment, and so far, they seem to be doing so with relative success. Bowen have secured long-term contracts with OCP for the Lancaster Quay/Jurys redevelopment (over 3 to 4 years of work) and Academy Street. Hegarty’s have development plans of their own, but have secured other long-term contracts with the Shipton Group for Blackpool and Carrigaline. Sisk (who have been sliding in market share) are attempting a comeback with major contracts for Union Quay, possibly UCC and their own hotel development at Airport Road. Pierse have embarked on an ambitious joint venture with developers Lyonshall, worth 180m euros, for the former Ursuline Convent in Blackrock – and also with contracts for UCC; Ascon/Rohcon have been very successful with Fota Retail Park, Blackpool, Cork County Hall, Kinsale Road Roundabout Fly-over and Cork Airport contracts.

      …another market entrant, traditionally associated with operations in the midlands and east/Dublin region, has been Michael McNamara & Co. Construction. The company has had some operations in Cork, but has now moved in for the kill. Their expectations of the Cork development market reflect those of JPC. McNamara’s have been successful in securing the contract for Phase 2 of Omnistone’s Cork Airport Business Park (the 1st Phase was constructed by Bowen). McNamara’s are also actively seeking and competing for prominent city centre developments with which to establish themselves as a new force to be reckoned with…

      …but who else is on the horizon? Strabag AG (Austrian Construction firm) say some!…

      …but beyond established national players penetrating the Cork market, another noteworthy response to the flourishing Cork market has been the growth in domestic firms. Cumnor Construction have grown rapidly from a small house-building firm to become a company capable of handling large-scale landmark contracts (such as Hanranka Ltd’s Knapps Square development). Jim Davis & Co. have moved quietly into city centre development with a new 20-unit, 5-storey apartment scheme under construction along Leitrim Street (designed by RORSA); Murnane & O’Shea (also active in development) have taken on sizeable schemes at Blackpool, Pine Street, Ballincollig and Bachelor’s Quay; John F. Supple are working a large schemes at Carrolls Quay, Shandon Street, Upper John Street and Killarney, among others…

      …also of note has been the gradually southward migration of large construction and development companies, usually only ever associated with midland and Dublin projects, particularly P. Elliot & Co. The company recently established a southern office in Nenagh, Co. Tipperary – but has its sights on the Cork market. Informants say the company is currently assessing an option of a grand-entrance into the Cork city development market with plans for a docklands scheme valued at around 30m euros. Although the scheme is very preliminary (with preplanning talks having yet to commence), its indicative of the way in which these companies are thinking – and the confidence with which they have invested in Cork’s future…”

      Lexington © 2005 😀



      NOTE: since the time of writing I have been told P. Elliot and Company have not formalised any prospective plans regarding a docklands development, however, that the city remains on the agenda long-term w/ options on development opportunities. The text shall remain unchanged as it is from a greater bulk and was correct at time of writing based on the available information presented.

    • #733707
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Who are the authors Lex? (Edited: Actually, sorry, I just notided the small ‘c’ symbol beside your name at the bottom)

    • #733708
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Pity the roof doesn’t cantilever out over the apron to give the punters even a small likelihood of escaping the weather, given that only two bridges are being provided, Aer Arann can’t use them and Aer Lingus don’t want to!

    • #733709
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I see Mr. Frank o’mahony of Wilson architects is around UCC today running through Boole library extension plans! Work on dismantling the College road gateway is already going on. From the information session that was held in the college about the extension there recently, i understand the gateway is being rebuilt after construction of the library extension. it’s a protected structure.

    • #733710
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Lex, are you going to put a link to the full version of Cork: Has it’s time come? on this thread?
      Whats going on with the Rhino rooms on the Coal Quay and the building on the Grand Parade side of it?

    • #733711
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 (<- I love that guy!) As we speak, OCP are on tenderhooks – as the Jurys appeal report is with the board (ABP) awaiting a decision for tomorrow. It's not yet known whether an extension will be allocated or whether the decision will be made there and then – so say individuals with ABP. I'll keep you posted. 🙁


      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Lex, are you going to put a link to the full version of Cork: Has it’s time come? on this thread?
      Whats going on with the Rhino rooms on the Coal Quay and the building on the Grand Parade side of it?

      1. Hopefully at some stage in the future I’ll post a link to the full text, but for the time being the text will be extracted concerning various elements (i.) Construction Firms (ii.) Developers (iii.) Architects (iv.) Tourism Strategies (v.) Docklands – Critical Mass of Business and Development Sustainability. Allah bidding they’ll be posted over the course of the next few weeks.



      As regards 93, Grand Parade, William Forde (of the Owenahincha Hotel in Roscarbery) is partially demolishing the building (a former discount store if I’m correct) and reconstructing it for ground-floor retail use and office use on the upper floors.



      😉 May (!!!) make an announcement on an exciting docklands proposal tonight (around 8:30pm-ish) depending (so don’t count on it!) But if you’ve been following the posts, you’ll know what I’m talking about. It’s a premature announcement – still subject to preplanning talks – but I’ll let you know what’s been discussed/proposed so far.


    • #733712
      Radioactiveman
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      ]
      You really know how to keep us all on tenderhooks Lex! 🙂


      A date for everyone’s diary:

      Kyrl’s Quay Design Ideas Competition

      A selection of entries for this competition, including the prizewinners, will be on display at two locations in the near future.

      Bodega Bar on Cornmarket Street 19th and 20th May.

      City Hall, Anglesea Street, 23rd-27th May.

      Entrance is free and the public are encorouged to come along and see some of the exciting possibilities for the future development of this part of the city.

      This competition was orgainised by CCC and RIAI as part of CORK2005.

    • #733713
      genario
      Participant

      I am most looking forward to this. I have visit this area many times and will be most excited to see what visions have been created for this place.

      🙂 also I agree, very excited for the docklands proposal. Hope it can be for tonight!!!

    • #733714
      who_me
      Participant

      I was actually referring to County Hall Lex 😉 I hadn’t been past that direction in quite a while, and didn’t realise work had started there.

      Can’t wait to see the Kyrl’s Quay proposals in the Bodega; a big, riverside site and an incentive to go for height (to hide the multi story car park), plus it’s an excuse to go to the pub.

    • #733715
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Hopefully Friday the 13th won’t represent bad luck (and thankfully I don’t believe any of that) for O’Flynn Construction who lodged their Significant Further Information request for Eglinton Street with CCC on that date. Some alterations of to the scheme have been made. Submissions are open for 10 more days in light of the nature of the information received – with a planning decision date now scheduled for the 7th July 2005. Construction on the project is not likely now until 2006 (as previously mentioned in an earlier post).

      The changes included will seek to alter the development’s perimeter buildings, which generally comprised of between 6 to 8 storeys in height, will now be 5 storeys in shoulder height, w/ a set back of 2-storeys. A feature 6-storey, with set back 2 storey, pod will be located at the end of Albert Street. The landmark 17-storey tower will remain unchanged other than revisions to the upper floors and a height reduction to the parapets along the street frontages of the perimeter buildings. Due to the changes, some residential floor spaces have be rearranged – allowing for the formation of new penthouses recessed above and behind the parapet lines of perimeter buildings. Furthermore, this has allowed for an increase in apartment numbers from 217 (in original application) to 226 in this revised submission. The units will be laid out as follows: 37 1-bedroom units; 160 2-bedroom units, 29 3-bedroom units. An additional retail units of over 2500sq ft will also be provided within the northern perimeter buildings.


    • #733716
      lexington
      Participant

      ( A QUICK NOTE: I’ve retained a degree of hesistancy about posting this information for a number of reasons – among them, the preliminary nature of the dealings, some conflicting reports and a number of other side issues. Though a number of sources close to the project have confirmed the details, as will follow, I would ask those of you reading this particular post to keep in mind that the plans are subject to preplanning discussions. Most information posted (the good majority) has come from reliable individuals attached to the project.)

      It is believed that O’Callaghan Properties have been earmarked as the quiet deal winners in attaining the highly desirable Custom House Quay premises – encompassing Anderson’s Quay (to the north) – in a process that was subject to lengthy negotiations with landowners, the Port of Cork and leaseholders JW Green. Among the plans being devised for the site, with consulting engineers (whom I will name in a later post) already working on early studies, is a mixed-use development which will peak on the eastern head of the site (facing out over the Lee – the very tip of Cork island) with a landmark tower (currently 15-storeys in height). The plan will see the development wrap around the existing period warehousing facilities on both quays – however, it is likely the Cork Bonded Warehouses ageing extension – not part of the historic PoC warehousing – will be demolished to allow for development space.

      JW Green warehousing, which held a lengthy lease on all of the site’s warehousing from the PoC, apparently agreed to sell the lease, following 3-way discussions between OCP, PoC and JW Green themselves who will now be relocating their activities to new premises on Little Island. PoC have remained vehement in the retention of the PoC warehousing – its incorporation into the larger scheme is a touchy point of negotiation among preplanning discussions (on-going). Though it is not confirmed, it is believed the PoC will remain in their current facilities at Custom House. OCP had been persuant of the land for quite some time and represents a trophy catch, valued at just under 7m euros (est’d) – although earlier quotes from PoC (regarding other negotiations on other deals, had quoted 10m euros). The land had also been the subject of a legal dispute between the PoC and Oakeridge Ltd over property rights claims – this would now seem to have been resolved (?). A boardwalk is expected to continue on from the wonderful facility provided by Howard Holdings at City Quarter on Lapps Quay. Catering for ongoing docking activities at the quays is currently unknown. The project has yet to reach the hands of a designated architect, for what one source jokingly described as being for ‘tarting up!’ (although names have been short-listed). It seems that OCP have promised CCC that any development on this prized, but difficult plot of land, will be of the utmost quality and sensitivity with an outstanding architectural design worthy of its location. Plans remain yet to be formalised – may I remind you of that. An announcement however, is expected within the coming weeks – when, I’m not so sure, but I’ll do my best to find out. Materialisation of the plan is not expected until at least late-2007 at the very earliest (likely longer considering design stage, planning, appeal and actual construction).

      The plan, if realised, will provide a landmark entrance into the city from the east along Horgan’s Quay. The height may yet be reduced given the incredible sensitivity of the location.

      That’s what is known so far, I have some other details, but I’ll have to hold back on those for a while until we see what exactly is put down on formal papers. Hang on to your hats – I’ll update and correct any information herein subject to available information. I’ll also try and have some images up of the site when I can.


    • #733717
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I really can’t understand this!
      Did Port of Cork see OCP coming? 10 million Euro seems an enormous sum of money for a site which has extremely limited potential. Despite the original POC warehousing, which could (very sensitively) be turned into some sort of entertainment use (its surely too far distant from City Centre for CCC to allow retail) there is little or no space there for anyhting else.
      A VERY slim tower at the harbour end could be their only hope- but 15 towers, realistically they havent a hope of getting anywhere near that! And none of us would want a squat little block stuck at the end of the CIty Island.
      As for development along the quays, the best they can hope for is a few ‘cubicles’ akin to City Quarter. There’s noway they’ll get permission for anything ‘around’ the warehousing!
      If OCP want to pour money into this one, fine by me, I’d be delighted to see what they come up with as regards plans. But, despite my general willingness to welcome most new plans for the city centre, I doubt whether this will get very far and, though it pains me to say so… I hope it doesn’t.

      I presume I’m going to be shouted down, but I’m nailing my colours to the mast right now on this one.

    • #733718
      sw101
      Participant

      i have to agree. a high-quality and high-impact building can be achieved by means other than high-rise and large square footage. the idea of removing the bonded warehouses is appalling, and it is one of the few things i would ever object to regards development in cork city.

      i can’t imagine a developer-led scheme finding the balance between what makes good business sense on that site (read high rent) and what would be the best solution for the city. the though of driving in along horgans quay and being greeted by a tower at the confluence of the north and south channel is something i wouldn’t be very comfortable with.

    • #733719
      lexington
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      the idea of removing the bonded warehouses is appalling, and it is one of the few things i would ever object to regards development in cork city.

      The Cork Bonded Warehouses do not form part of the Port of Corking warehousing facilities (see image outline the 2 in previous post). They are not PS and are of no architectural or historic value.

      From my own point of view, I personally have a major soft spot for this site. I think its one of the prettiest settings in the city (less the unsightly CBW extension). The patterns on the cobbled quaysides are exceptionally attractive. I will reserve judgement on any proposal until I see it. A little imagination could actually add to the site – such as ‘wave-like’ elevations along the quayside to permit visual contact from the opposing quays of the warehousing. Let’s just wait and see if anything materialises from this. Remember, the 15-storey tower element is not confirmed – and will likely be substantially revised to a lower-rise element.

      RM – previous proposals had been submitted to the PoC about maintaining the warehousing and quaysides for amenity use – with a cantilevered boardwalk wrapping around the site to allow for leisure and docking facilities to be retained. An extension was to be added to the warehousing on the east – post CBW demolition – this would cater for a landmark 2-storey building – from which a 15m sculpture would rise of a ‘maiden’ looking out over the Lee (apparently waiting for her ‘lover’ to return from the sea!!!). The warehousing would have been refurbished and converted to entertainment usage. Quayside stalls would open out onto the boardwalk – allowing a mix of retail and cafes etc. And other details… The problem is, PoC pretty much priced anyone with such pleasant ideas out of it. Brendan Keating (CEO) has remarked that (State backed or not), PoC is still a company and needs to finance its activities – therefore it was obligated to seek the highest price. Unfortunately the highest price makes the aforementioned activities highly restricted in their viability (when you also include development, refurbishment, JW Green lease buyout, insurance, marketing and other costs). The 10m euro price, it would seem, was not achieved by the PoC – but it had been a guide it had been throwing about. So its not as though developers hadn’t been trying. OCP are simply trying to maximise their value. But note that 3 development plans are being assessed, of which the aforementioned is only 1. I’m not clear on the other options – they may be more in line with what you would wish for the site. But let’s just wait and see how this one goes before we all huff and puff.

    • #733720
      pier39
      Participant

      hey there! seems i’ve been missing out on the action!!!!!!! glad eglinton st is back in the picture. even better to see the tower is still there, that woulda been a big loss.

      as for the custom quay thing, i wouldnt be gettin to crazy about it. sure i like the buildings and stuff but liek lets see whats on the offer, eh??? lex said it wasnt a definite anyway so gettin steamy bout it may just be a big waste of energy. thnaks for the heads up there anyway.

      any more pics on clontarf st??? thats the development im really interested in! the clarks bridge offices seem ok – suppose that area could do with a do-up anyway. saw the plans for crosses green nearby! christ almighty are they for real??? does architecture constitute sketching bricks nowadays? what is it, seven storeys??? seven storeys of unflushed toilet.

    • #733721
      genario
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      saw the plans for crosses green nearby! christ almighty are they for real??? does architecture constitute sketching bricks nowadays? what is it, seven storeys??? seven storeys of unflushed toilet.

      :p lol! i agree. this building is most ugly. it detracts (?) from the beauty of the cathedral nearby. it is not style at all. very ugly. what do any other people think of this?

      genario

    • #733722
      jungle
      Participant

      I’m a bit confused about what would be removed from the Custom House Quay site. Is it just the portion outlined in red in my copy of the picture, or is it more than this?

    • #733723
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused:

      Will have details on Riga Ltd (OCP) appeal for the Lancaster Quay/Jurys Hotel redevelopment later today.



      @jungle wrote:

      I’m a bit confused about what would be removed from the Custom House Quay site. Is it just the portion outlined in red in my copy of the picture, or is it more than this?

      Yes jungle, the area you have highlighted there is the existing Cork Bonded Warehouses extension.

    • #733724
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Personally, I’ve no problem with removing the Cork Bonded Warehouse section (outlined in red above). As you said lex, it is of no architectural or historic value and is actually detracting from the historic POC warehouses.
      I’m glad I wasn’t totally devoured for my views on this site, but Pier39 is probably right, I’ll wait and see what is on offer.
      Maiden looking out over the sea- my arse!! What about the head of that serpent St. Finbarr chased down there? Now that would be cool! — I must restrain myself!

    • #733725
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      I remember going to a talk in the RIAI a few years back where a planner was proposing to put pedestrian bridges linking this piece of land to both sides of the river. From a practical point of view it made sense in terms of linking this area to the Railway Staion etc, but I must say the visual power of the land at which the two sections of the Lee rejoin would be severely detracted from by any bridges that are built to close to its very tip. Does anyone know if it is still planned to put pedestrian bridges here?

      Thanks

      Phil

    • #733726
      lexington
      Participant

      The plan for pedestrian bridges here was more a CCC wish than a development reality. Port of Cork were utterly oppose to the idea. However, in this CG Image of Wilson Architecture’s conceptual plans for the redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay (no longer in play) – a’moveable’ pedestrian bridge is clearly evident connecting the new plaza at Horgan’s Quay to Custom House Quay/Anderson’s Quay. If OCP plans do come to fruition, they will likely seek to maximise the development potential of this land section – perhaps the most valuable section in terms of construction ability, unfortunately, it is also the most prominent.

      Beyond that, the Water Street, further down along Horgan’s Quay will likely be the next provision of bridge in this section of the city. PoC are also oppose to this – understandably in this instance I suppose – so the plans for the bridge will involve its ability to tilt and/or part-centre – allowing a regular flow of medium sized vessels up the channel. However, as port activities move further east, the traffic will be mostly limited to recreational, tourist and the odd naval vessel.



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Maiden looking out over the sea- my arse!! What about the head of that serpent St. Finbarr chased down there? Now that would be cool!

      RM – where’s your sense of romance??? 😉

    • #733727
      who_me
      Participant

      I’d have thought having a tall building right on the tip with the lower PoC buildings behind would look a bit unbalanced, but perhaps it depends on the design. Another one I can’t wait to see.

      As an alternative though, would it not be more appealing to build this tower as a vertical extension to the PoC buildings (similar to the proposal for the protected building on Lavitts Quay?), but at the Western side of the site next to the Custom House? The exterior of the PoC buildings – and the Eastern end – would be untouched.

      Then the site would taper more naturally from the tower, to the lower PoC buildings, to the quayside and the water.

    • #733728
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      The plan for pedestrian bridges here was more a CCC wish than a development reality. Port of Cork were utterly oppose to the idea. However, in this CG Image of Wilson Architecture’s conceptual plans for the redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay (no longer in play) – a’moveable’ pedestrian bridge is clearly evident connecting the new plaza at Horgan’s Quay to Custom House Quay/Anderson’s Quay. If OCP plans do come to fruition, they will likely seek to maximise the development potential of this land section – perhaps the most valuable section in terms of construction ability, unfortunately, it is also the most prominent.

      Thanks Lexington

      The one I saw also had a pedestrian bridge linking Custom House Quay to Kennedy Quay.

    • #733729
      jungle
      Participant

      What is the reason for the unbalanced look of the front of the Custom’s House? It looks like it was designed to be symmetrical and they ran out of money.

    • #733730
      GregF
      Participant

      The apex of land (Cork Bonded Warehouse) jutting into the river in the photo is a great location to put up something really eye catching. The apex is a great feature to have in the river which could be really utilized well for a showpiece building. The overall area looks very piecemeal and drab.

    • #733731
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Here’s a craaaazzzzy idea. How about we dispense with the Office tower at the end of CHQ, keep any plans to convert the old Warehousing, knock the shabby Bonded warehouses and place a landmark piece sculpture (a spire, but not a spire) at the point of the island and boardwalk the surrounding quays.
      Just an idea, since i doubt whether a tower development at this location would ever get a go ahead.


      Just a reminder about this:
      Kyrl’s Quay Design Ideas Competition
      A selection of entries for this competition, including the prizewinners, will be on display at two locations in the near future.
      Bodega Bar on Cornmarket Street 19th and 20th May.
      City Hall, Anglesea Street, 23rd-27th May.

      The area covered by this design competition includes some very interesting, but shabby enough buildings. It is directly adjacent to the Bridewell Garda Station – the second most impressive Garda Station in the city (the first being Barrack Street – u cant beat a Garda Station in an actual Fort!!!)
      Next to the Station has to be some of the most impressive gates in the city (Cork Timber Suppliers) and directly across from these is the most impressive public toilets in the City (possibly the country- ok, maybe not)- at least from the outside. With a piece of the original city walls running through the site- its choc-a-bloc with character. Of course I’m not suggesting we keep these bits and pieces in position(except the wall, of course), but it would be nice to think that a few of these quirky little features would be included in the masterplan for the site! 🙂

    • #733732
      Leesider
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Here’s a craaaazzzzy idea. How about we dispense with the Office tower at the end of CHQ, keep any plans to convert the old Warehousing, knock the shabby Bonded warehouses and place a landmark piece sculpture (a spire, but not a spire) at the point of the island and boardwalk the surrounding quays.
      Just an idea, since i doubt whether a tower development at this location would ever get a go ahead.

      With highrises on the quays south and north of this site a landmark piece sculpture might add a certain symmetry to the whole docklands area and as a welcoming focal point to Cork from the east! The picture is in my head……… 😉

    • #733733
      Pug
      Participant

      whats the word Lex my man? did OCP get past ABP or is it all still on the QT? 😎

    • #733734
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      whats the word Lex my man? did OCP get past ABP or is it all still on the QT? 😎

      I’m afraid the decision has been deferred to May 18th 2005 – tomorrow. The report is still with the Bord. Although the decision date has been deferred until tomorrow evening, that still doesn’t guarantee a decision then. Sorry, you’re going to have to keep biting those nails a little longer! 😮

      – obviously I can’t pre-empt what exactly the Bord will decide, but based on available information and with my own understandings of the situation, I’m going to go out on the limb and say I believe the Jurys scheme will be granted. Under what conditions I don’t know – but let’s just hope I’m not wrong! 😮 😉

      Any other bets? 😀

    • #733735
      Pug
      Participant

      @lexington”]you’re going to have to keep biting those nails a little longer! <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/redface.gif" alt= wrote:

      No need to bite the nails Lex, I just moved back to Cork from Dublin and I genuinely am delighted to see all the developments etc going on, long may it continue. I know we can have the odd robust discussion about whether or not something good is being developed but the way this country goes, sometimes I’m grateful that anything gets done at all. I would love to see a few nice tasteful 15 stories popping up here and there

      No fear of OCP anyway I’d say.

    • #733736
      lexington
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      no more vibes / guesstimates / news on who bought the tesco site in midleton?

      You’ll have to excuse me – but I haven’t been keeping an eye on the whole Tesco Midelton unfoldings recently as I’ve been sidelined by city ‘goings-on’. It would seem the town centre Tesco Midelton site was jointly purchased by Gerard Beausang (that of Beausang Construction based in Midelton) and the owners of Cash & Carry Kitchens Ltd (who also have other interests in the area) for a figured est’d at around 5m euros. Mr. Beausang has been involved in a number of developments in and around Midelton/Cloyne area – such as those at Spital Lane, Cloyne and Castleredmond, Midelton. He is also an avid GAA supporter – in fact, I believe he is sponsor of Cloyne GAA (!).

      Apologises for the late reply – but I wasn’t really following the details on this one and I do owe that info to an ‘informant’. So as they say, “a big up” to him for providing those details! 😉 Thanks!

    • #733737
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Carrigaline-based Ruden Homes have been granted planning by Cork County Council (CorkCoCo) for a massive development of 554 new residential units, a creche and a retail unit at Lehenagh More in Togher – not far removed from Cork Airport. The development will consist of 53 detached homes, 170 semi-detached, 300 terraced houses and 31 apartments.



      😎 Meanwhile, Tom Scriven’s plans to redevelop The Brog Maker public house along the Frankfield Road, just of the Kinsale Road Roundabout, have been refused. The plan included the development of a new 2-storey licensed premises with adjoining 3-storey building containing an off-licence, bookmakers, retail shop, restaurant, 5 office units, 4 apartments and a basement car-park.



      😎 Coleman Brothers Developments have had an extension to their ‘Woodfield’ development along the Station Road, Blarney refused also. The extension was to include 21 apartments over two 3-storey blocks. I’m told they will most likely go to appeal. But dare I say it, I agree with the decision in this case.



      😎 I see the IFI plant at Marino Point has been sold by HOK at around 23m euros.



      :confused: And speaking of sales – what about the sale of the Jeannie Johnston to the DDDA for 2.7m euros!!! Handy little profit there, considering the thing cost 15m to construct. :rolleyes:



      Should have news on Jurys decision this evening. The decision is due before office closing hours.

    • #733738
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Couldn’t Cork City COuncil have purchased the Jeanie Johnston if it was going for a measly 2.7m?
      It would have made for a nice little tourist attraction down around CHQ. 20:20 vision i suppose.
      Go Jurys!!!!

    • #733739
      jungle
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Carrigaline-based Ruden Homes have been granted planning by Cork County Council (CorkCoCo) for a massive development of 554 new residential units, a creche and a retail unit at Lehenagh More in Togher – not far removed from Cork Airport. The development will consist of 53 detached homes, 170 semi-detached, 300 terraced houses and 31 apartments.

      Why do Cork Co Co keep allowing more houses to be built at the end of the runway? As the airport gets busier, it’s only a matter of time before the people in these houses start complaining about aircraft noise and looking for restrictions on flying hours.

      It’s not as though it’s a great area for development; access roads are poor and public transport is non-existent.

    • #733740
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      But land is cheap! well, comparitively.

      I agree. CorkCoCo policy toward this type of development at these locations is very poor. it’s simply a way of them maximizing their own welfare by exploiting the locations proximity to the city. By right this land should be city territory now. This type of development does not add well to the cause of proper urban planning. I think CoCO know this and that ultimately this land will have to be hand over to the city council. it’ll leave a right old mess and take away from city development. the city are trying to encourage centre living, this type of thing works against that and encourages urban sprawl. This is why I suppose I would rather encourage some tall developments in the city…so more persons can be accomodated in the city and as lex once said, greenspace can be increased allowing families and others take advantage of recreation and amenity facilities and restricting rotten urban sprawl. Cork should be protecting its greenery and counrtyside which is among the best anywhere. bad move by the county council i think. It wont help if the airport ever want to expand again either. No doubt we’ll be reading residents complaining about air traffic pollution in the Evening echo some time in the future. why what you think?

    • #733741
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Proper order too! Howard Holdings have seen ABP grant permission for the 12m sculpture proposed outside their recently completed City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. Howard Holding’s were brought to appeal by An Taisce member Tomas O’Scannlain, a serial objector to numerous development projects around Cork. His objection was related to a personal preference to see a ‘water feature’ instead of the quill-like sculpture proposed. The Bord unequivocally decided that the sculpture proposed would ” enhance the visual amenities of the area”.



      🙁 Only days after their grant, OFC have been brought to appeal by resident Margaret Walsh regarding their planned development for Maryborough Hill of 45 apartments and 29 mixed housing types. Hogan Associates are responsible for their design.



      😮 On a lighter note, Mr. Keohane is breathing a little easier these days after an appeal, against the recent grant provided to his Grangefield Developments for 226 residencies (houses and apartments) + optional serviced sites at Ballincurra near Midelton, was withdrawn.


    • #733742
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Well the decision has been made! And the winner of the CCC/RIAI sponsored architectural competition for the redevelopment of Kyrl’s Quay has been selected out of 80 entries from all over Ireland, the UK, France, USA, Germany, Australia, Denmark, Greece and even Japan!

      The winning design was submitted by practice partners Robert “Bobby” Conroy and Patrick Little of Conroy Architecture.

      The International Assessment Panel constituted of urban designer Kelvin Campbell (not my flavour of the month following the Water Street decision), Jim Barrett (Dublin City Architect), architects Tom de Paor & T.G. Mitchell and Piers Gough.

      Entrants were briefed to design buildings capable of accommodating a number of uses such as retail, offices, leisure, cultural and residential. A display of all entries will be held in the Bodega from May 19th 2005 to May 20th 2005. I myself didn’t actually see the Conroy entry, but hope to bring you details and images soon.

      Details of the Competition Results will be made available soon at Conroy Architects (under construction) and at Cork City Council websites.

    • #733743
      kite
      Participant

      Anybody got any info on the Community for Sustainable Development spokesperson that spoke at the Green Party annual meeting in Cork on 13-5-05 ?

    • #733744
      The Glass eye
      Participant

      :confused: why oh on earth have CCC let all those 500 * houses up there the airport surely this will interfears with the governments report on the airport public safety excludtion zone. if any body has not scene this. Have attached jpg. below 😮

    • #733745
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 Proper order too! Howard Holdings have seen ABP grant permission for the 12m sculpture proposed outside their recently completed City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. Howard Holding’s were brought to appeal by An Taisce member Tomas O’Scannlain, a serial objector to numerous development projects around Cork. His objection was related to a personal preference to see a ‘water feature’ instead of the quill-like sculpture proposed. The Bord unequivocally decided that the sculpture proposed would ” enhance the visual amenities of the area”.

      Damn right too! Talk about a waste of time and energy!! 😡
      __________________________________________________________________________________

      Whats the news on Jury’s, Western Road ?

    • #733746
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Kyrl’s Quay Design Competition Winners

      First Place:
      Conroy Architecture, Scottish based Bobby Conroy, originally from Bantry, and Patrick Little

      Second Place:
      ChristianCarlsen Arkitekfirma, a Danish architectural firm

      Special Award:
      Donaghy and Dimond Architects (Dublin)

      Highly Commended:
      BRE (in association with MATRIX Partnership) an English based firm.

      Commended:
      Kiosk Architects from Cork
      Magee Creedon Architects from Cork
      Angus Pond Architects from London
      Marie Pierre Avgeri, Theophilus Kizos, Irene Stolidou and Maria Kechrinioti from Greece

    • #733747
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙁 Charles & Helen McCarthy are to be granted permission to develop a hotel at their Mill Business Centre site at Crosses Green. Planner Michael Lynch has recommended that permission be granted subject to the revised drawings. The Derek Tynan & Associates designed proposal is now to be reduced by 2-floors so that it rises to a new 5-storey (4-storey over ground) and 2-storey over-ground height. Still ugly though! Sorry!



      Also more images of the new Clontarf Street office development by DAT Partnerships, designed by Coughlan de Keyser Associates will be up later.


      🙂 Was just about to post the images of the Kyrls Quay Competition there, but you’re ahead today RM! Good show! 😉

      I’m most disappointed by the Conroy Architecture entry. How bland and boring. I reminds me of the Government Buildings on Sullivans Quay.

      I’ll post the Lafferty Architecture entry later on. The design by the Building Design Partnership and Marie Pierre Avgeri, Theophilus Kizos, Irene Stolidou and Maria Kechrinioti were far more interesting and made better public domain provisions. The Greek entry proposes a fabulous boardwalk and timber plaza which wraps around the Bridewell Garda Station – it was one of my preferred entries. Pity – but I’m not surprised I have to say with Urban Initiatives had a say in the result.



      😀 A long long time ago, you may or may not remember (depending on how long you’ve been using the thread) that I put up a post saying “BIG ANNOUNCEMENT SOON!” – but was asked to swiftly remove it? Well, it would now seem the wheels on that project are back in motion. So once again I reiterate the aforementioned posting, but can’t at this stage outline the timeframe – as I don’t frankly know it! But, it would seem, it’s on the way!

    • #733748
      theblimp
      Participant

      re the Kyrls Quay competition, eeeuuuccch – let’s crumple some pieces of cardboard and drop them randomly … see how it looks. I guess it would help to see some more detail, but from the image above it’s nothing near what I had been hoping for. A great opportunity squandered – sadly it’s not like that phrase hasn’t been used here before. What happens with the winning project? Are developers invited to build according to the winning design, or does the competition gather dust somewhere? :confused:

    • #733749
      lexington
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      re the Kyrls Quay competition, eeeuuuccch – let’s crumple some pieces of cardboard and drop them randomly … see how it looks. I guess it would help to see some more detail, but from the image above it’s nothing near what I had been hoping for. A great opportunity squandered – sadly it’s not like that phrase hasn’t been used here before. What happens with the winning project? Are developers invited to build according to the winning design, or does the competition gather dust somewhere? :confused:

      I’ll put up an image, maybe 2 (having trouble with the lighting on the 2nd image) later tonight of 2 of the more ‘imaginative’ proposals (in my opinion) not to have passed the so-called ‘test’. The competition is merely to show what can be done. It means nothing really, but if a developer comes along and decides to roll with one of the entries, it will simply give it an easier ride through planning (theoretically!)

    • #733750
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 A long long time ago, you may or may not remember (depending on how long you’ve been using the thread) that I put up a post saying “BIG ANNOUNCEMENT SOON!” – but was asked to swiftly remove it? Well, it would now seem the wheels on that project are back in motion. So once again I reiterate the aforementioned posting, but can’t at this stage outline the timeframe – as I don’t frankly know it! But, it would seem, it’s on the way!

      Lex, for those relative newcomers (or those who weren’t paying attention) can you let us know what kind of development you’re talking about.

      As regards the Kyrl’s Quay project, I’m not overly impressed with the winner- very boring. Second place I like, but unfortunately these plans will be lost to the atmosphere before we see any movement on the site itself- I think.

    • #733751
      who_me
      Participant

      The winner didn’t really appeal to me either, but anything’s a huge improvement on what’s there at the moment! The second place entry sounds intriguing, would love to find out more. Some more detail is available here.

      Interestingly, in the winner’s design, they talk about a raised riverside walkway – sounds quite unusual.

    • #733752
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Was one of the main items behind this competition to screen the hideous multi-storey car park? Yet I get the feeling that it will be as visible as ever from Popes Qy no matter the winning entry (which the developers have no obligation to follow anyway).

    • #733753
      phatman
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Kyrl’s Quay Design Competition Winners

      First Place:
      Conroy Architecture, Scottish based Bobby Conroy, originally from Bantry, and Patrick Little

      Dont like it. Dont like it at all

    • #733754
      jungle
      Participant

      It seems very low-rise considering the other developments along those quays. It even looks too small to hide the car park.

      I prefer the ChristianCarlsen entry, although the pic makes it hard to work out what exactly is there. The BRE one looks better too.

    • #733755
      genario
      Participant

      Hola. I went today to see the designs of the competition of Kyrls quay. I think the design picked by the judges is very very terrible. this is not good for Cork but it is not for sure. I prefer the designs of lafferty and bdp and of the Greek entry (no Italian entry though! 🙁 ). I would like if developers chose one of the other designs and will make this quay very much more attractive. it needs colour and life! sempre viva!

    • #733756
      pier39
      Participant

      its official! cork city council + urban initiatives + the panel of judges = no imagination. boring! boring! boring! and we can still see the multistorey. at least the other designs were tall enough to cover that brick for cars and they would have integrated better with the height of the new developments emerging on lavitts qy and the existing developments at the gate multiplex and neighbours. for a bunch of architects and planners they dont seem too smart that way. saw the greek entry too genario! dont like the buildings too much but the public space is wow!

    • #733757
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      press release re kyrls quay here
      http://www.irish-architecture.com/news/2005/000097.html

      also

      Cork city manager Joe Gavin said winning the competition did not necessarily mean Conroy Architecture’s design would be implemented but it did provide some interesting ideas.

    • #733758
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      What do you think of the different designs Paul?

      Lex will you have those other design pics up tonight??? :confused:

    • #733759
      Paul Clerkin
      Keymaster

      Hard to tell much from the images that I’ve seen – but ideas competitions by their very nature tend to be vague anyway.

    • #733760
      lexington
      Participant

      The 1st Image was kindly submitted by an involved party, it shows a west-to-east perspective of the Lafferty entry in the Kyrls Quay architectural competition. The design encompasses a tall, bright frontage of unique shape and segmented design (facilitating various units) spanning the Kyrls Quay frontage, sufficiently high as to mask the multi-storey car-park to the south (access to which is provided through an arched entrance opening out onto the trafficked quayside). Behind the frontage exist an arrangement of buildings accommodating various uses and facilitating public space. An elevated walkway extends from the main structure over the quayside roadway to an accessible signature tower representing the former gateway to the city’s older quarter (around North Main Street etc). The frontage and tower are illuminated in varying colours at night bringing a lively and colourful vibrancy to an often wanting quayside.



      A second image of the Greek entry is available, however, it was sent to my e-mail from an individual who had used a digital-camera to photograph a design presentation as it stood. Unfortunately, she failed to consider the impact of light and there exists excessive shadowing and image inconsistency. It is below in thumbnail format and is of poor quality. I’ll try and get a proper quality image in the future.

      However, what is interesting to note is the marvelous elevated public space created in this project, and its relationship to the quayside and Bridewell Garda Station (which it en-wraps). It would provide a spectacular entrance to Cornmarket Street and for anyone travelling west on Lavitts Quay. The design came highly commended. The building elements successfully mask the multi-storey also.



      Clontarf Street “Centre Point” office proposal image

      😮 As promised, a better quality image of the 9-storey office proposal by DAT Partnerships for Clontarf Street. The design is by Couglan de Keyser Associates. Again this image is of the eastern elevation, looking west.

    • #733761
      franClaud Reich
      Participant

      I hope that there is some purpose to the extent to some people went to in producing the amount of work that was displayed last night and something promising becomes of it and congrats to Conroy Architecture. Cutting to the chase – having attended the exhibition last night, I was hoping to come out satisfied in the knowledge that the winners were deserved, and I’d have seen a scheme that picked up on something which I did’nt …..

      Scheme 1.

      ………where this scheme is plausible, pragmatic,ordered, intelligible, it would have appealed to the urban designer and city architect and there is enough for the Goff and the pomme to get their teeth into….. This was an ideas competition and I would have liked to have seen something more in the spirit and ambition of the competition – I guess I would have settled for something a little more novel for the top spot…….I can see the panel stood in front of the presentation thinking….”yeah this ones a safe bet”……I have no problem with the scheme and it seems to reference some elements unique to Cork to good effect, but I’m more in admiration of its successful engagement of the different backgrounds of the jury than the architecture, which is essentially the case for most competition……

      Scheme 2;

      The shopping park…..I think that the diagram of the “shop+park= that amalgm of whatever” did it for me. When you are limited to 200 words there is a lot that goes unexplained and you can get away with quite a lot & maybe, if your lucky, hit the big time…… and when this is judged on its merit of architectural content and integrity and there is an evident development or thought process, I can accept ……..big graphic, random scattering unrelated mis-shaped urban forms and no explanation of strategy, relationships to itself or its surroundings …….and of course the object in the river (this can be forgiven if it was left over piece and it didn’t fit on the site in which case it was right to put it in the river-I would have put it in the bin)…….. all the trappings of…. “let the year out student have a pop at it”

      Scheme 3

      “The assessors considered the urban strategy to be deft, which is facilitated by the removal of the Garda Station. By breaking the rules in this way this architect came up with the interesting scheme.” …………… This is a mockery and I ask myself did the assessors understand the conditions and why even bother making these rules if your going to disgard them so readily….. I would like to hear how the assessors legitimize this decision….On reflection, I have vague recollection of reading the constraints on the brief, which lead entrants to believe the Garda Station was to be kept……..Where is the skill in taking out part of the inherent challenge in creating a scheme that incorporates this building type…By removing the Garda station Donaghy and Diamond produced a strategy was deft, but it failed to address the same conditions as all the other entrants. Had there been the option of removing it, I’m sure a lot more entrants would have played the market sweeping into the building card………I don’t want to be harking on but from the model image the urban strategy is not explained…..THIS IS AN UNFINISHED MODEL IN ISOLATION & WITHOUT CONTEXT …… HOW CAN ANYBODY CITE ITS STRATEGY AS DEFT OR CREDIT THE URBAN SRATEGY WHEN ITS NOT THERE TO BE DECIPHERED……… how does the elevation respond to the urban conditions that it encounters along the extent of the river, ……this was one of a number of entries that broke the building down into3/4 blocks but this was weak and unremarkable considering the advantage of not having to bring the Garda station into play

      Scheme 4:

      Same kind of approach as above but seems to acknowledge the context somewhat….. “The assessors commended the concept of a simple series of layers based on the historic form of the city and praised the quality of the sketches and the presentation.” …… ………….. “simple series of layers based on the historic form of the city” ….contrived, convoluted nonsense….seems the assessors …….this development looks like a generic office development with a weak pedestrian move splitting the building in 2 at which point I ask why….etc……

      Ah what could have been………………………………………………………………………………………………

    • #733762
      The Glass eye
      Participant

      Is the winners entry to the right scale :rolleyes: because I think they are 3 to 4 stories! and copared to the other 2 to 3 story buildings close by, I would think that these biuldings were suited to the little people 😀
      I would have to say I think the jugdes had no imagination too. If some of these people are involed in the what is allowed to be built in cork. Then 🙁

      I am glad that at least the other entries may get a look into, maybe by the developers!!!!

    • #733763
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Well I’m afraid those of you who have been waiting patiently for the decision by ABP are going to have to wait a little longer. The Bord have still not confirmed a decision with the decision date being deferred to an unspecified date. However, a recent rush by architects Henry J. Lyons & Partners to provide additional informations before last Tuesday (17th May 2005) and also by Consulting Engineers Niall Fitzsimons, I’m told, indicates an apparent positive sign. The problem is, the delayed decision sends a mixed one – either the Bord have required more time to assess the new info. or there is decision difficulty. I’m going to be an optimist and go with the former. Thankfully, the Dean of St. Fin Barre’s Cathedral has withdrawn his objection, however, Brigid Healy & Co. remain steadfast – pity really, I would have thought the additional business would have benefit her and colleagues no end. A decision could be today, tomorrow, next week…we’ll just have to sit tight. 😮


    • #733764
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      ????? more drawings?, where is ABP going?

    • #733765
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 McCarthy Developments have been granted their height and unit number extensions to Blocks 5 & 6 at their substantial Jacob’s Island residential development near Mahon Point. The blocks will now rise 2-storeys higher to 8-storeys with 28 extra units. Last month an extension at Blocks 1 & 2 was also granted – bringing the height of those blocks from 4 to 6 storeys. Additional basement parking provision is also to be allocated. The grant was allowed subject to design alterations, concerning finishes and elevational treatments, submitted through Unsolicited Further Information. The development is currently under construction by Ridge Developments. Project Architects are responsible for the development, located on an unrivaled waterfront park-like setting.


    • #733766
      who_me
      Participant

      I see what the fuss was about the Crosses Green hotel, it looks like a cheap 70s office block.

      Hard to fathom how a lump like this could get the go-ahead bang-smack in the middle of such tasteful buildings as St. Finbarr’s Cathedral, the mock-Tudor buildings across the road, the Elizabethan fort, and the Counting House; while the attractive Jury’s re-development needed radical changes in spite of being much further from the cathedral.

    • #733767
      lexington
      Participant

      :p Something struck me whilst driving home tonight from another day of drudgery – and it has completely brightened my day up, even excited me! As I drove down the Western Road, I decided to do a quick tour – down Washington Street (envisioning the Jurys Redevelopment on site and Kino redevelopment opposite), Grand Parade, South Mall, around the City Hall district (the “Green Crane Quarter”), passed City Quarter, along Patrick’s Quay and over to Lavitts Quay. What dumbfounded me was the sheer energy and life of the city. It was approaching 10pm and the streets were full everywhere with a healthy mix of all walks of life – not just mixed race but mixed ages. Young party revellers blended with the occasional group of more senior citizens, sitting on ballards and small park walls chatting. Chairs and tables out on the streets outside bustling cafes. Young children running around playing on St. Patrick’s Street new streetscape as their parents ordered another “latte”. People on the quaysides, groups of people leaving hotels for a night out, the works!

      The City Hall/City Quarter districts are coming on very well – I imagined the new City Hall extension, the WebWorks, Eglinton Street, the 2 developments for Albert Quay – hush-hush 😉 ), the Clontarf Street building, the plans for Parnell Place, Andersons Quay, the Kenny Development on St. Patrick’s Quay etc etc. City Quarter looks superb by night. On Lavitts Quay I could envision the revised plans for the Howard Holdings/Comfort Inn development (significant further information on this project is expected within the coming weeks) next to 21 Lavitts Quay (which looks very well) and in my own head, for fun, I envisioned the Greek or Lafferty Design Kyrls Quay Architectural Competition entries standing proud.

      The energy is palpable. The buzz was intoxicating. Without a shadow of a doubt, Cork continually seems to be gaining a continental feel about it more so than any other Irish city. It’s a great sight to see any city come along the way it is. The city must focus its energies on creating the critical mass of business needed to sustain this wonderful development – and for CCC policies to nurture this input in exchange for high-quality and supreme design standard developments with public provisions like waterfront amenities, parks, public art, afforable housing, plazas etc etc.

      I posit the establishment of a Cork City Business Infastructural and Associated Provisions Committee – details on this at a future date. Cork really is on the up – long may it continue!

    • #733768
      lexington
      Participant

      See post below.

    • #733769
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      @lexington wrote:

      A long long time ago, you may or may not remember (depending on how long you’ve been using the thread) that I put up a post saying “BIG ANNOUNCEMENT SOON!” – but was asked to swiftly remove it? Well, it would now seem the wheels on that project are back in motion. So once again I reiterate the aforementioned posting, but can’t at this stage outline the timeframe – as I don’t frankly know it! But, it would seem, it’s on the way!

      Lex, for those relative newcomers (or those who weren’t paying attention) can you let us know what kind of development you’re talking about.

      Well RM, the plan I intended to announce soon was actually that of the Douglas redevelopment plan involving the Love Family/Shipton Group. I was unaware of the timeframe for announcement etc etc, but since the basic story was, as they say, “made public” in the Irish Examiner today I might as well fill you in on some of the details.

      You will remember the recent refusal of permission imposed against Douglas Central Properties (a Love Family SPV) for the development of an 8-storey 124-bedroom hotel designed by the Hyde Partnership – this in conjunction with the plans permitted in 2004 to Canmount Ltd (another SPV) for the Wilson Architecture designed Douglas Village S.C. redevelopment (to include: demolition, refurbishment and sub-division of part of the existing centre, a new 15,341m gross floor area extension of generally one storey with elements of two and three storey, and is inclusive of new relocated anchor store, retail units, restaurants, bank, library, post office, offices, leisure centre, toilet facilities, malls and storage areas, 3 levels of multi-deck car parking with 963 no. spaces, new and remodelled elevations, new east west link road (N25), relocation of existing Tramore River culvert and Ballybrack Stream and new external plaza areas) – these elements were to be incorporated into the grand plan of a greater redevelopment (considering the hotel’s refusal, I believe, plans have since been reformulated). A ‘skybridge’ connection has been proposed to link the 2 Shipton Group owned shopping centres in the area (in stages) – the centre plans will require alterations to facilitate this (and will be lodged over a number of seperate applications). The Cinema World site was to be cleared to provide a linkage of commercial and residential units with a part-underground cineplex beneath. The height was expected to vary (w/ the hotel element providing the high-point, obviously since, has been reformatted). The east-west link road as proposed in the Douglas Village (or Douglas Central as it is to be renamed) Shopping Centre redevelopment (and visible in the below image) would then be extended east (utilising Douglas Court S.C and Douglas Village car-parking areas and routeways) and linking up with existing road facilities. This would allow for a greater flow of traffic across the suburb and benefit access to the redevelopment project elements as a whole. Obviously Neil Love & Clayton Love Jnr. have been conducting talks with Cork County Council about the project, and I believe Cork City Council are being consulted with also (given the complexity of boundaries – Douglas Village S.C. actually lies in the city, with most of the remaining lands in County Council jurisdication, it ridiculous!).

      Thats a brief of the plan – as I said in the past, plans had been stalled given numerous complexities, but the wheels would now again seem to be back in motion. A press report gave a 4 to 5 year timeframe – I personally haven’t be indicated a precise timeline, but it is understood some elements are bounded by a deadline of 2009 giving existing permissions (these may yet be amended allowing for a deadline extension).


      an image of the redevelopment plan for Douglas Village S.C. element as submitted 2003.

      Further images are a while off, but I’ll look into it for whenever they’re made available.



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Lyonshall Ltd (Kieran Coughlan and Claire Riordan) are to apply for an additional 4-storey over-basement mixed-use development of approx. 80,000sq ft at their Ursuline Convent development project at Blackrock. The building will include a 12,000sq ft discount foodstore (the tenant is already lined up), a library on the 1st floor, 8 office units (totalling nearly 30,000sq ft and with individual terraced areas) and 171 parking spaces (divided between basement and ground levels) – with all ancillary facilities and works.

      Recently, Lyonshall initiated a joint-venture deal with construction firm Pierse Construction on the development of approx. 180 of their massive 550-unit residential development the company has permission existing on.



      😮 Regarding Cork2005 , I have to say that a number of developers around Cork should be noted for their very active and generous contributions to Cork’s European Capital of Culture title. Notably the Shipton Group (as mentioned above) for their 250,000euro contribution (150,000 of which goes into Cork2005 projects, and 100,000 specifically designated for projects related to the Blackpool and Northside communities.

      O’Flynn Construction are sponsoring the the most valuable short-story literature event (I’m told in Europe!), with a prize of 50,000euros attached – and made a sizeable donation to the fund.

      OCP have made sizeable monetary contributions to the Cork2005 fund, engaged in a number of celebrations hosted at its Mahon Point premises and is currently hosting the Pauline Bewick art exhibition at its new HQ in 21 Lavitts Quay.

      Frinailla, Bowen, John F. Supple among others have also contibuted generously. Interesting.



      😀 For those of you needing something to work up to, trust me, there’s another pretty BIG ANNOUNCEMENT due soon for Cork (perhaps among the biggest!) and it’s a lot closer to the city centre too! But my lips are sealed and my ears filled with gauze to any enquiries – but let’s just say, its going to be pretty interesting. No timeframe, so just hang on! There’ll be a few nice revelations besides that too soon.

      -> PLUG: Check out the latest “Where’s Me Culture?” magazine (cough cough 😉 ).

      Now I’m back off to my sick-bed… 😮

    • #733770
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      New Terminal at Cork Airport – was surfing the net and came upon some good photos of the new terminal at Cork Airport. Seems to be taking shape finally. Pics taken from http://www.cork-spotters.com/Development.htm A very good series of photos showing both ramp-side and aerial views over the past year, with the latest photos taken a few weeks ago.

    • #733771
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😮 Regarding Cork2005 , I have to say that a number of developers around Cork should be noted for their very active and generous contributions to Cork’s European Capital of Culture title. Notably the Shipton Group (as mentioned above) for their 250,000euro contribution (150,000 of which goes into Cork2005 projects, and 100,000 specifically designated for projects related to the Blackpool and Northside communities.

      O’Flynn Construction are sponsoring the the most valuable short-story literature event (I’m told in Europe!), with a prize of 50,000euros attached – and made a sizeable donation to the fund.

      OCP have made sizeable monetary contributions to the Cork2005 fund, engaged in a number of celebrations hosted at its Mahon Point premises and is currently hosting the Pauline Bewick art exhibition at its new HQ in 21 Lavitts Quay.

      Frinailla, Bowen, John F. Supple among others have also contibuted generously. Interesting.

      I’d wholeheartedly agree, developers and construction companies are contributing handsomely to CORK2005 events and they are to be applauded for it.

      On a related issue, the Clarion hotel will host Lynes and Lynes’ much heralded Cork Auction on Tuesday afternoon with the jewel in the crown of the Crawford’s collection going under the hammer.

      John Butt’s (previously accredited to Grogan) View of Cork will be sold for in and around the € I million mark. It could be the most expensive painting sold in theese islands this year.

      This painting is of upmost importance to the City of Cork and to the Crawford Gallery. I raise this point here for a number of reasons:

      (1) As a view of 18th century Cork architecture in totality it is second to none – in fact it is the only view of cork from this period. It is, quite frankly beautiful. The taught of it leaving Cork should bring a tear to the eye of any true Cork person and for it to be locked away in some private collection would be an immeasurable loss to the city.

      (2) In the hope that the above modern-day “merchant princes” may read this and decide to do something truly heroic and worthy. Even if its just for the publicity, it would be marvelous to see those so often mentioned on this thread put their hand in their pockets for this piece of Cork’s history.

      The City and her people would be eternally grateful.

    • #733772
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😉 Will have a nice bit of news for you tomorrow evening fingers crossed! Many of you have been waiting on this.



      Images will be up soon for John Mannix’s Washington Street development which was brought to appeal following a revise grant by Arthur Leahy (CGP). The decision is due on Wednesday – although ABP indicated there may be a small delay on that.



      🙂 RM – this is becoming Artiseek.com. But I agree, Nathaniel Grogan’s “View of Cork” is a superb piece, among my favourite in the Crawford Gallery. The Daly Family Trust had been very good in loaning the piece to the Crawford for such an extended period, and I have no doubt that any individual(s) that purchase the work will undoubtedly consider the same – perhaps not on the same basis, but even for periods of time. We’ll see.

    • #733773
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As some of you may know, I’ve been looking for images of the new Cork Archives Institute building in Blackpool for quite a while. That’s why I was delighted to find these on the Archives’ own website. Lex, you may rest easy now 😉

      Located on Great William O’Brien Street, at the rear of the old Fire Station it is currently mid-construction and due to finish later this year. The building will feature exhibition and research facilities and modern strong rooms. It will allow the Archives to vacate Christ Church on South Main Street, allowing this building to be used for more suitable, cultural activities.

      What do people think? A bit shed like?
      For a civic building of reasonable importance its all just a bit underwhelming.

    • #733774
      sw101
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      What do people think? A bit shed like?

      nothing that a massive amount of ivy couldn’t sort out. what’s the story with those big curved roof scoops? random, no thanks.

    • #733775
      genario
      Participant

      I have seen this building under construction. very small no? the roof seems to low for ordinary height people. Very ugly also. It is funny I think how city fathers can constructed ugly buildings but judge other private buildings so strictly – it is the same back home. I heard this building (Archives) was to use grain silos on docklands refurbished once – but this is no more. My company in Cork was working with IAWS for a new development here instead.

    • #733776
      jungle
      Participant

      I see some links to the new terminal construction have been put up, but as I may as well put mine up anyway.


      Taken from the apron at 9pm on Friday, 20th May


      Taken from the short-term (future long-term) car park at 6am on Monday, 23rd May

    • #733777
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 ABP have confirmed that O’Callaghan Properties plans for the redevelopment of Jurys/Lancaster Quay has been given the go-ahead subject to conditions. The decision, made last Friday evening was submitted to interested parties as of Monday.

      It is believed that demolition works will commence on the former InterContinental/Jurys hotel building within the imminent future – following which will be a number of site assessments before Bowen Construction commence the main construction work. Up to 63 units and the 6-storey, 182-bedroom new Jurys hotel will be constructed as part of the 1st of 3 phases which is scheduled for a late 2006 completion. As part of the new development, a new vehicular bridge (post a re-application) and underground car-parking for what will ultimately accommodate 450 parking spaces will all be constructed.

      Conditions imposed include a reduction in height of Block E BY 1-storey and the omission of Block A, the 9-storey centrepiece building (unfortunately). Don’t think OCP can be too delighted with that prospect however, considering Ronnie McDowell’s CCC conditions reduced numbers to only 257. The Lancaster Quay frontage will remain the same. Block A can be seen centre of the image posted below.

      Henry J. Lyons were the architects on the project (Finghin Curraoin), with Niall Fitzsimons acting in a consulting engineers position.

      (:p: Ahhh, letting that out felt good. It’s like knowing your next-door neighbouring is having an affair with the postman and not being able to tell anyone. Except with buildings…cough cough.)

    • #733778
      Mob79
      Participant

      Do you know whats going to be there instead of block A?

    • #733779
      pier39
      Participant

      @Mob79 wrote:

      Do you know whats going to be there instead of block A?

      space – the final frontier…

      …im guessin a public plaza or some landscaping or somethin. i agree block a was prob the nicer of the buildings. the mystery of abp.

      anyone else know??? at least it didnt get refused. 😮

    • #733780
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The ole AnBP gem – omit the biggest part and grant the rest. Is this really the best way to grant planning? How does the project compare having this omitted?

    • #733781
      Mob79
      Participant

      Cork does seem pretty devoid of public spaces looking at those aerial photos though.

    • #733782
      pier39
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      The ole AnBP gem – omit the biggest part and grant the rest. Is this really the best way to grant planning? How does the project compare having this omitted?

      well now when you stand in the middle of the place you can shout your name and hear it echoed back to you. you can see the logic abp had behind that. it’ll produce endless hours of acoustic fun. doesnt cork need something like that? bless them.

      but seriously no this isnt the best way to go about planning i think. mob79 as far as public spaces go thats what the docklands are suppose to help with. but so far the strategy seems to be we need wall to wall linear 6 storey blocks. god forbid a highrise here or there would allow for some green space.

      bravo all round people!

    • #733783
      pier39
      Participant

      jurys pics!!!!!

      hey!!! look what i found! thanks lex! black and white and blurry but you get the idea. now just imagine it without the block a in the middle. still it’ll be a helluva improvement on the existing lump of 1960s architectural misery.


    • #733784
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 The Moran Family (of Waterfall, Cork) have succeeded in gaining a grant for their large residential development at Deanrock in Togher. Originally the development consisted of 71 residential units in a mix of houses, apartments and duplexes, with associated parking. Following Further Information responses to CCC concerns, the plan was revised with a reduction in apartment numbers but overall units increase to 72 units and increases in associated parking to 92 spaces (parking had been an object of concern through the planning process). The mix of units now includes additional housing.

      Planner Evelyn Mitchell noted the architectural quality of the development stating, “The proposed development, as revised, is considered to address the original concerns of the Planning Authority and the development is considered to be of architectural quality and will result in the development of one of the few remaining greenfield sites in this area to a high standard.”

      Architects were Blackrock, Dublin based Design Strategies.



      😮 OCP have also be granted the alterations to their 2nd Phase of retail warehousing at Mahon Point

    • #733785
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Yeah having a new amenity space is great and all – but as the project wasn’t designed to have that in the first place (i.e. a nine storey block in it’s place)… I wonder how effective the appeal process as it stands is. This type of arbitrary mass removal does nothing for a project and it seems AnBP always take the path of least resistance. Remove the most incendiary (i.e. tallest) element to placate the objectors, while actually allowing the whole project through – minus it’s integrity. Example: St John’s Rd near Heuston Station. The whole project wasn’t exactly um… great, but was waved through minus a 12 storey block, which originally gave the overall project some degree of status. In it’s place a gaping hole.

    • #733786
      who_me
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      jurys pics!!!!!

      hey!!! look what i found! thanks lex! black and white and blurry but you get the idea. now just imagine it without the block a in the middle. still it’ll be a helluva improvement on the existing lump of 1960s architectural misery.

      After seeing this picture, I really have to agree with you. Without Block A, the overall design seems a lot more repetitive and bland (and still a huge improvement on what’s there now.)

    • #733787
      indubitably
      Participant

      One interesting fact is that the OCP will have to reapply for the bridge element. Surprisingly the objectors are all relatively in favour of the final product. Work will start on the development in June. OCP wants to ensure the work does not make too much noise when the pupils at the adjoining school are doing their exams,

    • #733788
      indubitably
      Participant

      The cleared block A space is for ‘public open space according to the board. Skateboarders must be licking their lips…

    • #733789
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      Thanks for the pics of the airport Jungle. The terminal looks pretty impressive…let’s just hope they keep the windows clean once it opens! I always get a kick out of the fishtanks near the luggage conveyor belts, with no fish in them! And the cobwebs on the signage above. Still, this new terminal looks mighty good.

    • #733790
      kite
      Participant

      :rolleyes: Re:Lexington post 615, next time you walk the City give me a call, i would love to share the magic mushrooms you must use!! or do you wear rose tinted glasses? last time i walked the city streets i watched my back.

    • #733791
      Jack White
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :rolleyes: Re:Lexington post 615, next time you walk the City give me a call, i would love to share the magic mushrooms you must use!!

      Kite you must be flying yourself if you haven’t noticed that the season finished last October, nuff of the personal stuff

    • #733792
      jungle
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’d wholeheartedly agree, developers and construction companies are contributing handsomely to CORK2005 events and they are to be applauded for it.

      On a related issue, the Clarion hotel will host Lynes and Lynes’ much heralded Cork Auction on Tuesday afternoon with the jewel in the crown of the Crawford’s collection going under the hammer.

      John Butt’s (previously accredited to Grogan) View of Cork will be sold for in and around the € I million mark. It could be the most expensive painting sold in theese islands this year.

      This painting is of upmost importance to the City of Cork and to the Crawford Gallery. I raise this point here for a number of reasons:

      (1) As a view of 18th century Cork architecture in totality it is second to none – in fact it is the only view of cork from this period. It is, quite frankly beautiful. The taught of it leaving Cork should bring a tear to the eye of any true Cork person and for it to be locked away in some private collection would be an immeasurable loss to the city.

      (2) In the hope that the above modern-day “merchant princes” may read this and decide to do something truly heroic and worthy. Even if its just for the publicity, it would be marvelous to see those so often mentioned on this thread put their hand in their pockets for this piece of Cork’s history.

      The City and her people would be eternally grateful.

      It looks like the Crawford Art Gallery bought View of Cork. God knows where they got the money.

      http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2005/0525/1041346200HM3PAINTING.html

    • #733793
      Leesider
      Participant

      anonymous local businessman donated the money……..amy ideas who though??

    • #733794
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      According to a source from the Gallery on the radio this morning it was more than one person came up with the money.
      As you can imagine, i’m over the moon. Well done Cork, I knew you could do it!

      As for KITE : “last time i walked the city streets i watched my back.”
      Why do people continue to propogate the myth that Cork is an unsafe city?? That sort of talk just scares people.

      Now, back to the architecture 🙂 Today is a good day for Cork!

    • #733795
      kesey
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :rolleyes: Re:Lexington post 615, next time you walk the City give me a call, i would love to share the magic mushrooms you must use!! or do you wear rose tinted glasses? last time i walked the city streets i watched my back.

      kite, I suspect that you do not walk the streets of Cork that often. Paranoia can be useful, but my experience shows it to be unwarranted in this city. 🙂

    • #733796
      macai
      Participant

      Whilst walking down south main st today, I once again noticed that most unsightly site that used to be the former liberty bar directly across from the mannix shop and next to the telephone shop if memory serves me correctly this old bar was torn down in ’98 – ’99? when it was deemed unsafe, I believe a couple of years ago planning may have been put in for apartments can anyone correct me on this one? while the area is being rejuvenated with the back of the old queens being re-developed anyone know is there any plans for this site, it has to be a very valuable site with its location

    • #733797
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @macai wrote:

      Whilst walking down south main st today, I once again noticed that most unsightly site that used to be the former liberty bar directly across from the mannix shop and next to the telephone shop if memory serves me correctly this old bar was torn down in ’98 – ’99? when it was deemed unsafe, I believe a couple of years ago planning may have been put in for apartments can anyone correct me on this one? while the area is being rejuvenated with the back of the old queens being re-developed anyone know is there any plans for this site, it has to be a very valuable site with its location

      I miss the Liberty and bottles of cider on tick… helped me get through college 😀

      What’s the latest on the Mannix site btw?

    • #733798
      ISI
      Participant

      @Leesider wrote:

      anonymous local businessman donated the money……..amy ideas who though??

      Peter Barry?

    • #733799
      lexington
      Participant

      John Mannix’s Washington Street Development

      John Mannix’s project for a new 6-storey development at 40 – 42 Washington Street currently awaits a decision with ABP. The appeal was brought by Arthur Leahy, who operates a business from premises on lease from Mr. Mannix, against the project after it received a grant subject to revised drawings from CCC. The original plan sought a 7-storey building, over private basement car-park, which was to include a large retail facility, upper floor offices and 13 apartments (10 2-storey units and 3 roof-top penthouses). Revisions consequent of Further Information reduced the height by 1-storey, in line with neighbouring building heights (also removing the unsightly boxy top to the building), reducing apartment numbers to 12 – and also saw the protruding bay window on the South Main Street/Washington Street corner set back into the building (I kind of liked the way it stood out – it gave a break to an otherwise verticak facade) – design by Dermot Coveney of Coveney & Associates, Monkstown.

      A decision is due sometime tomorrow evening.

      The CCC planning report noted that the design was something of a departure for the area, but that the corner location of the site was suitable for a new ‘gateway’ design. The project has the potential to rejuvinate an area which should be more accessible to pedestrians/shoppers. The absence of any facilities may be in part accountable to the extensively bland church wall which spans the majority of this side of Washington Street. It is hoped the new development will draw life back onto the street.

      Note: The image seen below is a scan of the original development plan and does not represent the much improved revision as granted. See details in post above.



      *UPDATES*

      😀 Michael O’Donoghue’s Rockfell Investments are scheduled to make a move on their Cornmarket Street development within the coming weeks – that’s according to City Manager Joe Gavin and an “informant” 😉 with Rockfell/Munster Joinery. However, the input of OCP, as was speculated and mentioned earlier is not clear – if at all, I’ll keep sussing that one out. It’s thought, that in the longer run – OCP will seek to link Paul Street SC in with the Cornmarket Street project following a refurbishment a some stage in the future.

      A number of site assessments will first have to be made before primary construction work begins however, as part and parcel of the planning grant by CCC.

      The premises are currently being used for storage. Niall Coffey with Frank Ennis & Associates provided the design which will encompass 170,000sq ft of retail space over 9 large units facing an internal mall, 66 basement parking spaces and 65 apartments. The 6-storey development will incorporate the existing Musgrave/Guy & Co. building facade. Meanwhile CCC have launched their action plan, following months of talks, to redevelop the streetscape of Cornmarket Street – it is believed some aspects of this will work in tandem with the building works by Rockfell.



      🙂 BrideView Developments have been granted permission for a large 106-unit apartment development at Monfieldstown in Rochestown. The development consists of a single building ranging in heights of 3 to 5-storeys over a basement car-park. The grant was permitted under a number of conditions including some alterations – of which I will have better details on at a later stage.

      – and on a double day of delight for BrideView, permission was also granted for their 30-unit apartment scheme in Carrigaline, on a small-ish site near the town centre which they reportedly paid a sum of approx. 1m euros for last year.



      🙂 Not too far away, in Douglas (Moneygurney), OSB Group, who are also developing Camden Court along Carroll’s Quay in the city – Phase 2 of which has begun preliminary construction, have been also permitted planning for their 97-unit residential development which was also subject to conditions. The original application sought 45 houses, 28 maisonettes (teach beags) and 24 apartments. James Leahy & Associates again provided the designs – as with Camden Court.



      🙁 Daniel Lordan’s plans for a large development constituent of a 64-bedroom nursing home, 32 apartment units, community hall and 33 cottages for Coolyrahilly near Kinsale have been shot down.



      Some New Eglinton Street Images

      The more I view this project the further down my jaw drops. It gets more and more impressive the more angles you look at it from. Well done Mr. O’Mahony & Wilson team, Arup and well done OFC.

      Images have been substantially compressed.


      View west-to-east down the new streetscape planned linking Eglinton Street with Albert Road. Note the extensive pedestrian element and basement carpark entrance – also, the Howard Holdings WebWorks on Albert Quay can be seen just encroaching on the image to the left.


      View down Albert Road (north-south), Eglinton Street rises like a maze of shape and colour. Impressive. (P.S. Doyle Warehousing seen to the right is set to be redeveloped (7-storeys – undetermined height, based on 1 plan of 1 interested party), this will blend Eglinton Street in much easier.)



      kite, I assume you’re referring to the post I made with reference to the ‘buzz’ I felt around Cork. Well, I’m sorry you don’t feel that way. I don’t think there’s a need to knock a little enthusiasm and appreciation for development progress finally being made after so long. I for one, intend to enjoy it. As with all things, it needs to be approached with cautious, calaculated optimism. Cork has a long way to go in all aspects – social, infastructural (physical and economic) etc. One should never deny the obstacles we face – but it’s better to approach them with a chin up rather than a walk in the opposite direction. Noting achievements is an important part of the ‘confidence boost’ a city needs when facing into such obstacles – it lets people see what can be done with correctly applied efforts. Cork is no utopia, but that doesn’t mean we cannot and should not be aiming high. It’s a pity you don’t see this. I feel safer in Cork than I do in many cities but that doesn’t mean not to take the same careful precautions one should practice in any urban environment – i.e. don’t wander done dark alleys alone, don’t carry your life-savings in your pocket etc etc It’s a sad, but real aspect of life – one we must continue combating. I have no doubt that a great deal of this lesser side to the urban domain stems from those who profit from the sale of goods like your ‘magic mushrooms’ and their associative activities. Perhaps if we ruled those individuals out first, you wouldn’t have to keep looking over your shoulder so regularly.

    • #733800
      who_me
      Participant

      I actually like the Mannix building as in that image. God knows, that part of South Main St. does like pretty decrepit as it is, with the Mannix building, the ex-Liberty site, the rear of the Queen’s Old Castle and a few small run-down shops on it. Fingers crossed that this gets the go-ahead. Washington St and South Main St. badly need it!

      Adding to your previous post about the ‘buzz’ in Cork, the Hugenot quarter (sounds soo much better than “Paul St”, doesn’t it?) is really buzzing these days. Between the excellent job done on resurfacing the area – had to believe the visual impact that alone has – and the new cafes in the area, it really has a lot of character. Funny how a smoking ban has given us a ‘cafe culture’ in one fell swoop!!

      It’d be great to see a similar treatment given to the others streets (Bowling Green St is one?) between Patrick’s St. and Emmet Place. If nothing else – it would add a lot of new store frontage to the city centre!

    • #733801
      lexington
      Participant

      😡

      As previously mentioned, and now confirmed, Werdna Ltd have lodged a 1st party appeal against the ruling made by CCC on the Murray O’Laoire designed project. It’s a risky gamble Mark McMahon & Co. will be taking, risking the loss of their project overall – a real shame, heaven’s forbid, should it happen. The decision to appeal was considered the best option after the architects and developer spent many an intense consideration with regards the path they should take following a harshly and widely criticised ruling by CCC. Other options explored included: proceeding with the development as granted, then later seeking a further application to redevelop the site area designated for the signature tower; a revised overall proposal; and simply ‘walking away’ from the proposal. The appeal decision was weighed up as the best option and initiated on an indication that they may be brought to appeal regardless by the Lower Glanmire Road Residents group. Fingers are tightly crossed that the gamble taken by Werdna will pay off. It’s an important project in an area vitally in need of redevelopment.

      Unfortunately, the Lower Glanmire Road Residents group still seem unhappy with the restrictive decision permitted by CCC and lodged their own appeal. They, it would seem, won’t be happy until there is no development on the site. I personally, and I’m open to criticism, feel this constitutes a selfish move on their behalf. Not happy with the project being more than halved, they now seek its demise. I empathised with their initial concerns, but that empathy is lost on their current actions.



      😡 As if Murray O’Laoire didn’t already face a tough run, McCarthy Developments’ highly welcomed Centre Park Road office development has also been brought to appeal by Patrick Herlihy (who has a business in the vicinity). Planner Evelyn Mitchell granted the application last month. The plan was welcomed as a major positive step forward in the docklands rejuvenation. This represents another reason why I’m pushing for Section 25-style legislation to be imposed on all Cork docklands projects. Centre Park Road provides an exceptional and pleasant opportunity – it is a pity some persons can’t see this also.

    • #733802
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :. This represents another reason why I’m pushing for Section 25-style legislation to be imposed on all Cork docklands projects.

      Section 25 is a disater from an architectural point of view just look at the Dublin docklands, anything decent that has been done down there has been done through DCC and the normal planning system.

    • #733803
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      Section 25 is a disater from an architectural point of view just look at the Dublin docklands, anything decent that has been done down there has been done through DCC and the normal planning system.

      I agree – I suppose that’s why I said “Section 25”-style legislation – in the ABP avoidance way, but permitant of design standards etc.

      Funnily enough the U2-Tower will be going through Section 25 if they get the extra 40metres.

    • #733804
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Funnily enough the U2-Tower will be going through Section 25 if they get the extra 40metres.

      With large sites it can work quite well but the prescriptive 40;40;20 split means that single use projects can’t happen on smaller sites. 😡

    • #733805
      genario
      Participant

      It is my birthday!!! ole! I am feeling very old. 🙂

      The Mannix building here looks very uneven but you say he has revised this so I think it may be a new departure for this Washington Street. It will bring much color, no???

      I like Eglington street. very colorful and unusual.

      What do you think are the 3 best new buildings for Cork? Built or in the planning system.

      I have seen some new ones but i cannot talk for them until they are in planning but they are ok.

      I think 1] st Patricks Quay new building is very good. 2] building for Clonterf (?) street and 3] maybe Eglington street now or maybe Glucksman gallery for UCC.

    • #733806
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      The Mannix design looks great for that spot – except for the boxy top which I know is being removed. It should add a little life to this area. It’s criminal that the property owners were allowed to leave it as it is for so long.



      This image of Eglington Street is amazing. This place keeps getting better. Whats the latest news on planning?


      3 best new buildings in Cork are, in my view: (in no particular order)
      a)Eglington Street
      b)Lavitts Quay (OCP HQ)
      c)Wagamama/Cpt. America’s on South Main Street.


      Does anyone know when we can expect to see that long delayed piece of artwork for City Quarter?


      Finally, can someone please confirm to me whether the block outlined below is Block A in the Jury’s Redevelopment Plans.

    • #733807
      jungle
      Participant

      Recently, there was another thread going around about whether Cork needed its own forum. In that it was suggested that what was really needed was more threads about Cork rather than a new forum. I agree with this. This thread has become so long that it can be very difficult to find desire information in it. Maybe we could start with a separate thread devoted to docklands developments in Cork.

      What do other people think of this idea?

    • #733808
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Does anyone know when we can expect to see that long delayed piece of artwork for City Quarter?


      Finally, can someone please confirm to me whether the block outlined below is Block A in the Jury’s Redevelopment Plans.

      -> Block A is the 9-storey block in the centre of the development – it can be seen peaking behind the outlined Block.

      -> City Quarter sculpture will be erected in June.



      jungle – way back I started a thread called “Cork New Developments” to focus on the new developments aspect of Cork. The Long-Run plan was to leave this thread open to debate on the implications of these developments or existing architecture. However it was merged with the LADSOCL thread as is now – some elements of this thread are from the CND thread. So it’s a matter to Paul I suppose really. With that in mind, when I asked him about the length of the thread, he said when it reaches a point (maybe 100 pages no???) a 2nd part to this thread LADSOCL 2 would perhaps be an option. The problem with that is it would become very difficult to reference back previous info when required. So I don’t know really. How about a link at the beginning of the LADSOCL 2 thread to the 1st part (this existing one) when it is launched, therefore, if anyone ever needs to reference the first thread they can simply click on the link at the beginning of the new thread. This should help with referencing issues.



      😮 Will have the decision on John Mannix’s development up tomorrow. The decision has been made – just trying to clarify something (the details behind it so I can give you a half-decent post).

    • #733809
      who_me
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Not sure I can wrap my head around this view – is that the ‘tower’ in the middle of this view, or is that elsewhere on the site?

      If that is the tower it looks quite different from the previous images posted. In either case, the development looks stunning – very nice contrast of colours and materials used.

    • #733810
      redabbeyredux
      Participant

      I think the key attraction of this thread is its breadth. As an avid reader, I’d throw in my two-cent – please don’t split it up – it’s become prime gossip at any of the recent design-team meetings I’ve attended! Lexington’s suggestion for a part-two thread sounds like a sensible solution.

    • #733811
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Interesting read in today’s Examiner regarding the architectural history of Cork Opera House – celebrating it’s 150th Birthday this year.

      Also of note is today’s Inside Cork which quotes Opera House Bosses as saying that a vertical expansion, along with the replacement of the old North Wall is on the cards for the next phase of renewal at the venue.

      There seems to be a very valid case for building up vertically given the height of the tower at the rear. This would also put it on an even keel with the new OCP LAvitts Quay development just up river.


      How ancient are you? Which one do you remember?

    • #733812
      opus
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      :rolleyes: Re:Lexington post 615, next time you walk the City give me a call, i would love to share the magic mushrooms you must use!! or do you wear rose tinted glasses? last time i walked the city streets i watched my back.

      As someone who lives in city centre and walks around the place at most times of the day & night, I wouldn’t agree. Ok you might want to reconsider exploring the alleys off Washington Street after the clubs have closed but other wise it’s fine.

      For me seeing the scaffolding going on on the warehouse behind BOI on the South Mall shows that things are happening in Cork cause I could never understand how it was left derelict for so long given its central location.

    • #733813
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Sorry about getting back to this late! I waited on posting the decision to allow me time get details on the decision for John Mannix’s 40 – 42 Washington Street development, designed by Dermot Coveney of Coveney & Associates (CA), Monkstown. The plan was to have it up either last night or early this morning, as posted, but the ole illness flaired back up nasty yesterday evening (delightful!) and I’ve not been of the form. But, without further adieu, the project has been given the greenlight as expected.

      An appeal, more so on legal grounds, was brought to Mr. Mannix by business operator Arthur Leahy, who operates from a premises under lease from Mr. Mannix on the site lands. ABP found the appeal not standing and granted the development under conditions including an archaelogical appraisal of the site prior to construction. Mr. Coveney of CA is delighted with the outcome.

      Construction of the development is not earmarked for sure as of yet, details on that will follow in the near future.

      The project will revitalise an eyesore along one of Cork’s most prominent main streets and offer a new ‘gateway’ style building and a new architectural departure for the streetscape.



      *UPDATES*

      :confused: Paul Kenny, whose Ship Street project (St. Patrick’s Quay/Revenue Commissioners development) is generally receiving positive opinions from CCC (Mr. McDowell’s office apparently likes the plans anyway! 😉 – despite 3 objections from Bell Scott Engineering, McLaughlins and An Taisce), has purchased 36.4 acres at Mount Desert in Clogheen, in the green-belt area approx. 2 miles from Cork city. The agricultural land was purchased through Global Properties for 625,000euros earlier this year (125,000euros in excess of the guide price). The land has literally STUNNING views overlooking Cork city is a prime holding. Although Mr. Kenny has applied to CorkCoCo for an entrance to the site – his long-term plans are as yet unclear as any development other than an own dwelling would be complicated in the medium run. The proposed North Cork Ring Road runs through Kerry Pike approx. 2 miles west of the site and may alter the prospects of the preciously protected greenbelt (but hopefully not, the last thing needed is a cluster of urban ‘sprawlites’ engulfing this spectacular green area so close to the city.)



      🙂 Also Quiznos, perhaps the biggest rival to ‘health’ fastfood chain Subway in the US, are seeking to open 10 new stores in Ireland over the next few months (part corporate, part franchise) with a hope to have up to 2 of those stores located in and around Cork city. Since Subway came to Cork it has been a successful enterprise with 3 stores operating in the city, and a possible 4th store opening by next Autumn. Quiznos are banking on their ability to reap from this success. A gentleman involved in Franchise Operations for Ireland was telling me, when I asked about Cork, that Cork looked like an increasingly attractive location for foreign stores to open first – providing a nice test market. This has been evidenced by the likes of fellow US food chain Bennigans opening their first store in Ireland at Mahon Point. Also Bershka and Costa Coffee. However, the gentleman noted Quiznos will hope to have a least 1 store in every major Irish urban area by the end of 2006 with Dublin, Cork and Galway their priority. (?)

    • #733814
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      John Mannix’s Washington Street Development

      yeh is better that wotz there. good that it got the go anyway. hope they get going on it soon. that street corner is rotten!!!


      @lexington wrote:

      😀 Michael O’Donoghue’s Rockfell Investments are scheduled to make a move on their Cornmarket Street development within the coming weeks – that’s according to City Manager Joe Gavin

      finally!!! no more sitting in the bodega staring longfully at the redbrick saying ‘please hurry up!’


      @lexington wrote:

      Some New Eglinton Street Images


      View west-to-east down the new streetscape planned linking Eglinton Street with Albert Road. Note the extensive pedestrian element and basement carpark entrance – also, the Howard Holdings WebWorks on Albert Quay can be seen just encroaching on the image to the left.


      View down Albert Road (north-south), Eglinton Street rises like a maze of shape and colour. Impressive. (P.S. Doyle Warehousing seen to the right is set to be redeveloped (7-storeys – undetermined height, based on 1 plan of 1 interested party), this will blend Eglinton Street in much easier.)


      hey cork may look like a city when this thing is done! the words erotic and architecture spring to mind.



      i rmbr both opera houses. ill never understand how that thing got built but hopefully itll be improved on again.

      – wats the craic on the bishopstown thing by mark kelleher? thats due soon isnt it? 124 objections. eek!!! 😮



      as for the water st and centre park appeals – all i can say is, the buggers!!! but hopefully water st will be as someone said ‘vindicated!’



      oh yeah i forgot – dont break up the thread! believe it or not it has become an important referncing point for many architects and devlopers in cork! trust me! thing redabbeyredux said it had become prime gossip in these circles and i can vouch for that. think lex’s idea bout when it gets to 100 pages then we could have a part 2 or sumthin and have a link on the first page of the new one back to the old one is a good idea!!! itll allow us to keep referencing and accessing this page and stuff. this is a really good thread – prob the best info and discussion source on devlopments in cork. like was said its breadth really is important and stands to it!!! k, i’m done! i’m off to slingshot some rabbits!!!!!

    • #733815
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      I hope the green belt in Clogheen remains untouched!

      Agreed about the views, especially from the Jewish Cemetary/Currakapawn (not sure how you spell that).

    • #733816
      who_me
      Participant

      Without searching through the last 63 pages.. has anyone seen the plans for the development off Anglesea St. next to Copley Hall? It’s at an advanced stage, but with the scaffolding still up, it’s still unclear how it’ll look.

      With the scaffolding coming down from No. 6 Lapp’s Quay, I have to say it’s looking really, really well. Particularly the Clontarf St. elevation. That street really has been re-invented this year. Should the Custom House Quay developments go ahead, the ‘East End’ will be unrecognisable!

    • #733817
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Also Quiznos, perhaps the biggest rival to ‘health’ fastfood chain Subway in the US, are seeking to open 10 new stores in Ireland over the next few months (part corporate, part franchise) with a hope to have up to 2 of those stores located in and around Cork city…..

      Quiznos are set to open in Merchants Quay in the Next few weeks in the space vacated by thet extremely expensive photo shop (Giles Norman, I think???) and previous to that, Kylemore’s Bakery.



      Demolition work seems to have begun at the former Jury’s, Western Road judging by what I’ve seen in the last few days… the sooner the better.
      I notice the developers need to reapply for the Bridge element of the work. Apparently a central abutment (is that a word?) need s to be removed and replaced with a single arch bridge.

    • #733818
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      It’s nice to see the Canty site is finally begun development, after taking an excessive pounding from the Fire Officer!!

    • #733819
      kite
      Participant

      @opus wrote:

      As someone who lives in city centre and walks around the place at most times of the day & night, I wouldn’t agree. Ok you might want to reconsider exploring the alleys off Washington Street after the clubs have closed but other wise it’s fine.

      For me seeing the scaffolding going on on the warehouse behind BOI on the South Mall shows that things are happening in Cork cause I could never understand how it was left derelict for so long given its central location.

      I accept your point re the City Center, as for the warehouse at the rear of the BOI building, i understand there was an issue with raising the ceiling height in the past. Great to see that development is starting now.

    • #733820
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I agree with Lex, Redabbeyredux and pier39 on the way to go when the thread hits page 100. It makes sense.



      Glad to see John mannix’s building is through and Jurys was relatively successful too. Monday should be really interesting day at the planning department with the Capital cinema decision due.

      Also, I thought Frinailla said ages ago that they were going to get started on the Grand parade plaza project? Surely things must be getting on soon? That site has been left static for ages and the closest its come to construction has been the John paul construction barriers around it. Whats the story???

      Hope what Joe Gavin said about Cornmarket st is true. I cant wait to see that thing getting a start on!

    • #733821
      A-ha
      Participant

      I was really delighted to hear that Cork has been finally twinned with Shanghai. If trading and exchanges between the two cities go as expected, it would be no surprise to me if some of Cork’s architects become more and more influenced by Shanghai’s extrordinary landmark buildings. Like Cork, Shanghai is also a constant building site, maybe ideas will pass and designs will be expressed between both of the cities finest architects and hopefully, we will become more influenced by Shanghai’s way of building. I dont expect Cork to copy Shanghai and build some of the tallest buildings in the world, but I do believe that the CCC will calm down about their beloved height restrictions and maybe we can get on with building our city the way God intended (i.e. reaching towards heaven). Well done Cork Twinning Committee!

    • #733822
      Boyler
      Participant

      I wonder if there is anything that Shanghai could learn from Cork?

    • #733823
      genario
      Participant

      I was walking back to office on the day of the twinning ceremony at Cork city Hall and I have seen many peoples protesting outside of this. Human rights?

      I do not like much of the architecture in Shanghai, I think many of these new buildings are the product of a ‘quick solution’ and communist competition with the west. There is not much thought behind design. I like the new World Trade Centre design this is good. And some newer buildings also. In this way i also think it is like Cork – many buildings up until recently were not good designs but newer buildings seem to have much better designs. This is also a link no? I hope that maybe some architecture ideas can be exchanged but the cities should keep their identies. Cork is Cork. Shanghai is Shanghai. A little culture would be nice though. Maybe a big Shanghai company can build European headquarters in Cork and have a unique design of its home ??? But Cork is also twinned with San Francisco and Cologne and I see no remnants of these cities in Cork design. Maybe Shanghai will be different. 🙂

    • #733824
      Jack White
      Participant

      Shanghai and Cork, an obvious fit

    • #733825
      Boyler
      Participant

      Why’s that?

    • #733826
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Tomorrow, May 29th 2005, will see the Sunday Business Post publish its annual Cork Review Supplement. It’s a interesting look at some of the progress and developments being made and/or established throughout the Cork city and county regions and well worth a look for any interested parties.


    • #733827
      PTB
      Participant

      @Boyler wrote:

      I wonder if there is anything that Shanghai could learn from Cork?

      What can shanghai-a city of 20 million-learn from a city of 200 thousand which is at the oppoite end of the eurasian landmass?Not even Dublin learns from us. And how many people in Cork or Shanghai knows or cares about the twinning? To be honest I’m amazed that Shanghai and San Francisco have twinned with a place as globally insignifigant as cork.Or do big cities twin with loads of cities?

    • #733828
      corcaighboy
      Participant

      followng link is to the skyscraperpage.com gallery page for Shanghai…lots of pics of a city with a wide range of arhitectural styles, ranging from european colonial styles to the new and modern. Interestingly, Shanghai takes planning seriously and thankfully unlike many other Chinese cities, they have a good architectural base to begin wtih. Also, they have a full-scale model of the city on display to the public outlining planned future developments. Compared to when I went there first 6 years ago, the place has come on enornously. And thankfully they take public transport seriously too, and would put our friends at CIE group to shame!
      http://skyscraperpage.com/gallery/showgallery.php?cat=570&thumb=1

      As for twinning, it does not harm and who knows, we may actually, god forbid, learn something of use. Am sure our pubic reps might like the centralised planning part, as well as the planning appeals process (there is none!). But I guess that is the trade off when trying to modernise a huge city in to rival that of other great cities such as NY, Paris, London, etc (maybe even Cork!!). In my humble opinion, SH has a lot more charm and vitality than other Asian capitals such as HK or Seoul.

    • #733829
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Though plans were put in motion as far back as 1998, it now seems, following extensive re-engaged talks between CCC, CIE and, as I mentioned many moons ago on this thread, Manor Park Homes (the preferred developer) – an outcome is within reach. CIE’s plans for the redevelopment of Kent Station, which were noted by CIE Chairman Dr. John Lynch as being in the region of €20m (and which were originally due for completion in 2007) will now likely proceed as part of a new plan which has been devised by Manor Park Homes (MPH – whose CEO, Michael O’Driscoll is a UCC graduate and who has been a driving force in the talks) in conjunction with the State-owned transport provider. An application is expected before the year end (but remains subject to the physical initiation of the Midelton/Cork commuter link) and will consist of a full refurbishment of Kent Station (internal and external), the addition of a multi-storey car park, extended platforms to cater for additional Midelton commuter rail traffic and a link to connect with a new bus and rail facility. The new linked-facility will be jointly provided by CIE and MPH (it is believed MPH will construct it and then lease it back to CIE over a number of years). The link facility will also serve new office and residential plans proposed for the quayside by MPH. The facility will open out facing the quayside and hub between it and the newly refurbished bus station at Parnell Place. A new internal road network is expected to serve these plans. In its entirety, a full hub-facility will be provided between the 2 developments allowing a well-integrated bus/rail and pedestrian service. (I am guessing CIE will need DoT authorisation on funding – unless they have it already, which I doubt – but who knows, I could be wrong!) CIE are currently conducting additional studies on their 17-acre Horgan’s Quay lands, with a prominent consulting engineers group and planning consultants, regarding the amount of available space they can officially afford to sign over whilst making considerations for any future expansion of its rail operations.

      -> MPH are believed to be currently drawing up new and revised plans for the site, which will be amended accordingly resultant of CIE studies. The plans are believed to be loosely based on ideas proposed by O’Mahony Pike Architects who were enacted by CIE a few years ago to draw up a masterplan for the lands. I have only heard names on the design-team enacted, one of which was OMP again, but no confirmation is available yet – so I’ll hold off from my own assumptions until I get a confirmation. However, the details of the plans are set to include a number of high-density residential units (many water facing), a new plaza area, numerous commercial facilities (offices and retail) and [I[possibly[/I] some cultural facilities (not confirmed). CIE are expected to retain an equity stake – which had been a major negotiations factor between they and MPH. The redevelopment is being planned by MPH over 3 phases, the first which is set to include the link with Kent Station’s redevelopment.

      -> Also on the Horgan’s Quay, the plans for a 5,000 to 6,000 seater Event Centre (as I promised I would inform you a few posts back), which had been the long-favoured location for such a facility by City Manager Joe Gavin, have (I can confirm) seen a design visualised on a part 3-acre plot of Horgan’s Quay lands and apparently a recently purchased number of plots along Alfred/Railway Street, among which included a former 18,000sq ft warehouse sold last year by Dominic Daly Auctioneers for an est’d €4m. Developer Paul Montgomery has long expressed his ambitions for developing such a centre at this location, given that plans for a site near Black Ash, didn’t trump with CCC (so I’m told!). It is widely speculated that Mr. Montgomery, in conjunction with another prominent city-based developer, has had some involvement with this Horgan’s Quay plot. CIE had been most reluctant to allow the development of such a facility on its lands historically, it was felt that land provision (requested by CCC) would eat into the potential it sought to gain from its preferred development options – as envisioned with MPH. However, a resolution is assumed to be in the air, following the latest rounds of 3-way talks.



      :p As for OCP plans for Academy Street, as reported a long-time back, an application will be lodged later this summer for the development of a 6-storey over dual-basement building in a .6 acre block encompassing the former Irish Examiner/Evening Echo printing press and office facilities, Johnson & Perrott (J&P), the Grand Circle lounge, Taboo/The Jean Scene, Ryans Pharmacy premises etc etc.

      J&P will relocate to new €7m purpose built showrooms at Mahon Point (currently under construction) by December of this year (2005) – in which 3 of the dealerships [incl. Volvo & Honda] will be housed. The Irish Examiner are expected to relocate to new office facilities (approx. 27,000sq ft) at City Quarter on Lapps Quay by mid-to-late 2006. Construction will be facilitated by Bowen Construction, who aim to be on site by December 2006 (planning pending).

      Niall Fitzsimons are the project’s consulting engineers. When complete, the building is expected to hold 3-levels of fashion retail over 200,000sq ft + of accommodation (40+ units) at (upper basement, ground, 1st levels). The Lower Basement is proposed to accommodate car-parking and loading/deliveries etc. The upper 4-floors will home up to circa. 80+ residential units (subject to finalised plans). The project value is believed to be in and around €150m. The design will retain much of the history of the area and is set to be built to a high-standard, which MD Owen O’Callaghan cited as being worthy of its location. A tenant list is already being accumulated.



      🙂 OFC’s Ballincollig Town Centre (BTC) SC is set to provide tenancy for Dunnes Stores (w/ over 60,000sq ft of supermarket and apparel space over 2 units), Easons (who will occupy units 10 & 11 near an entrance to the facility – they were recently permitted conversion of the units to include a cafe by CorkCoCo), Sasha, Hallmark, New Look – and talks are believed to have been enacted between Golden Discs and even HMV (who backed out of Mahon Point) and Virgin about a music store concession, though none have yet been confirmed. Other tenants will be announced soon, subject to legal advice. The centre is planned to open for 18th October 2005.



      :confused: Also, it is believed at least 1 of the Kyrl’s Quay Architectural Competition entrants have been approached by a developer regarding their design for the site. The planned outcome is not yet known, but one may speculate. I am not aware as to whether any landowners have yet been approached. How interesting that could be! I’ll keep an eye on it, but know, that for now – its all just air! 😉



      😉 Possible news soon on Howard Holdings’ and Joe O’Donovan’s plans for Wilton S.C.

    • #733830
      rodger
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I agree with Lex, Redabbeyredux and pier39 on the way to go when the thread hits page 100. It makes sense.



      Glad to see John mannix’s building is through and Jurys was relatively successful too. Monday should be really interesting day at the planning department with the Capital cinema decision due.

      Also, I thought Frinailla said ages ago that they were going to get started on the Grand parade plaza project? Surely things must be getting on soon? That site has been left static for ages and the closest its come to construction has been the John paul construction barriers around it. Whats the story???

      Hope what Joe Gavin said about Cornmarket st is true. I cant wait to see that thing getting a start on!

      I believe Frinailla have been on site now for 12 months,or at least the archeological dept of ucc,any way I think a tower crane is to be errected in four weeks.There is also news of a major retailer in the 4000m2 of retail space.

      So do not panic, I think Frinailla want to get on with this scheme,to make way for their other proposed developments.

      One other thing Shanghai and Cork????

      I was recently in a large city in asia with many very tall buildings,some one I know has an apartment on the 28th floor overlooking the city,it was amazing because of the city skyline.
      I think someday once we have consumed much of our “green belts”,we will look back and say we should have went up giving an interesting skyline by day and more importantly,in Cork by night.
      At the same time keeping our beutiful countryside.

    • #733831
      A-ha
      Participant

      I read in the Times today that Argos plans to increase its stores to 40 in Ireland. Does anyone know if anyone of these are planned for Cork. Also read that Harvey Norman wants to open a few more stores here to, any of those coming to Cork???? I assume if either of them do come to Cork, they will be located in the phase of Mahon Point being built at the moment, please correct me if I’m wrong in my acqusations.

    • #733832
      lexington
      Participant

      Officially decisions are due today on the developments planned by:

      A.) Mount Kennett Investments and John Costello – the Limerick-based developers – and their intentions for the Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade. The proposal is to seek demolition of the Capitol Cineplex and construction of a 7-level development with 18 apartments over a multi-level department store. The design is by Dungarvan-based The e-Project. Planner is Michael Lynch. 5 submissions were lodged w.r.t. the development including An Taisce, Noelle Moriarty (of the next door Post Office), The Vineyard Bar and Vision Cork. Further Info or a decision extension is expected, although it may indeed see a decision made! Hmmmm.

      B.) Mark Kelleher’s plans for a site at Westend near Bishopstown of 73-residential units, designed by Frank Ennis. This revised development and its predecessor is now infamous, having received over 124 objections from local residentss objecting to the ‘highrise’ nature of the 4-STOREY development. 4-storeys not 24!!! :rolleyes:

    • #733833
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      I believe Frinailla have been on site now for 12 months,or at least the archeological dept of ucc,any way I think a tower crane is to be errected in four weeks.There is also news of a major retailer in the 4000m2 of retail space.

      So do not panic, I think Frinailla want to get on with this scheme,to make way for their other proposed developments.

      One other thing Shanghai and Cork????

      I was recently in a large city in asia with many very tall buildings,some one I know has an apartment on the 28th floor overlooking the city,it was amazing because of the city skyline.
      I think someday once we have consumed much of our “green belts”,we will look back and say we should have went up giving an interesting skyline by day and more importantly,in Cork by night.
      At the same time keeping our beutiful countryside.

      Thanks for that rodger. I think so too about high-rise. People keep complaining about how Cork is not suited to high-rise blah blah blah, but in the right places like the docklands I think it would be most complimentary. As a city matures youve got 2 options – up or out. I for one believe up. If a building is designed well and artistically I think it should be encouraged. The backward minds of the old folk would rather see our beautiful countryside engulfed with never ending patterns of boring housing estates and local shops. If we keep that up we’re going to regret it one day with Blarney a suburb, Ballincollig part of an extended city centre and Kinsale a quick sprint from the latest suburban shopping mall. As Yazz once said, the only way is up! Anyone know if there are any other plans for a highrise in the docklands??? Beside the OCP, Water st and Eglinton st ones? And I mean decent, well designed things, not Victoria mills 9-storey bricks. Decent 20-storey-ers???

    • #733834
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Thanks for that rodger. I think so too about high-rise. People keep complaining about how Cork is not suited to high-rise blah blah blah, but in the right places like the docklands I think it would be most complimentary. As a city matures youve got 2 options – up or out. I for one believe up. If a building is designed well and artistically I think it should be encouraged. The backward minds of the old folk would rather see our beautiful countryside engulfed with never ending patterns of boring housing estates and local shops. If we keep that up we’re going to regret it one day with Blarney a suburb, Ballincollig part of an extended city centre and Kinsale a quick sprint from the latest suburban shopping mall. As Yazz once said, the only way is up! Anyone know if there are any other plans for a highrise in the docklands??? Beside the OCP, Water st and Eglinton st ones? And I mean decent, well designed things, not Victoria mills 9-storey bricks. Decent 20-storey-ers???

      Blarney will be a suburb when they build the 5,000 houses in Monard…

      what’s the word on Manor Homes, are they still plannins a 25 storey building?

    • #733835
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Planner Michael Lynch has requested Significant Further Information with respect to the redevelopment of the Capitol Cineplex site on Grand Parade. The proposal by Mount Kennett Investments and John Costello of Limerick, and designed by Dr. Sabine Wittman of The e-Project, has had a request placed for a number of further information dimensions. CCC is unhappy about issues concerning massing, finishes and other related issues. I’ll will have more details on that soon.



      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Blarney will be a suburb when they build the 5,000 houses in Monard…

      what’s the word on Manor Homes, are they still plannins a 25 storey building?

      MPH never had plans for a 25-storey building at Horgan’s Quay (that had been part of an earlier conceptual plan devised to show what could be done with the site. A few of these plans were devised for CIE, but these were more ‘inspirational’). However, it is understood that they do plan high-rise elements to any development they initiate though I’m not sure if they’ll rise as high as 25-storeys. A more realistic number would range between 15 and 19-storeys.

    • #733836
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Planner Michael Lynch has requested Significant Further Information with respect to the redevelopment of the Capitol Cineplex site on Grand Parade. The proposal by Mount Kennett Investments and John Costello of Limerick, and designed by Dr. Sabine Wittman of The e-Project, has had a request placed for a number of further information dimensions. CCC is unhappy about issues concerning massing, finishes and other related issues.

      The proposed building here is truly awful. Im not sure any further information will make that look good. 😡

    • #733837
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The proposed building here is truly awful. Im not sure any further information will make that look good. 😡

      looks like the patricks quay metropole building

    • #733838
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      The developer needs to spend ALOT more money on this project considering it’s vital location. At the same time, other architects have done more with smaller budgets. I am glad to see CCC taking a tough stance on this one. Probably the worst thing I’ve seen since Trinity Court or Camden Wharf.

    • #733839
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:39xfgxa4]Gawd, it's such a vile building. 1960's office block if you ask me or else a prison with a few more windows thrown in![/font:39xfgxa4] 😮

    • #733840
      pier39
      Participant

      this is the one project i genuinely sigh at when I see it – obviously the answer is money, but, other than that how could such a rotten design bestow such a wonderful location??? undoubtedly one of the worst proposals for cork ever. it will need a helluva amount of deeply thought out changes before it becomes even a quarter acceptable.

    • #733841
      rodger
      Participant

      With regard to the Capital cinema property,if my memory serves me right Hose Rodriegez of Jack Coughlan and ass. was drafted in by a Cork city developer to design a building on this site about 12 mnths ago.My advice to Ward, Anderson and Costelloe would be to go and talk to them.

      From the images I saw it was one slick cool proposal,I think the promoters could find them selfs caught between a rock and a hard place on their current proposal.

      Retailers like”land mark “buildings and will pay more,some times you have to go right back to the beginning to move forward.So endth my rant.

    • #733842
      Boyler
      Participant

      What is the most attractive bridge over the Lee in Cork?

    • #733843
      lexington
      Participant

      I think the biggest upset about the Capitol redevelopment is that the location promises the prospect of something really awe-inspiring, and instead, has delivered a dud. Here stood the opportunity for a developer to grab architecture by the nuts and say ‘Make me beautiful!’ But instead we got a second-rate cell-block. I saw 2 other proposals on this site – one involved The Robert Butler Group (at an undisclosed date) and the other by a Cork developer. Both designs they presented were far superior and one at least was deserving of the location, the other wasn’t bad but needed some tweaking. If CCC do grant this, I would be disappointed if it were consequent of anything less than substantially revised drawings that evoke the prestige of the location. Oyster Developments/Mount Kennett Investments have really let Cork down on this one.



      Big news, however, is due this week – early next week!



      Boyler – I suppose it depends on what era you’re looking for! St. Patrick’s Bridge and Parliament Bridge have an antiquated charm about them. However Shadon Bridge (perhaps a little over-hypred) and the new Mardyke Walk Bridge (“Roy Keane”) Bridge is quite the eye-catcher! But what about Daly’s “Shaky” Bridge – fun for all ages! 😉

    • #733844
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      With regard to the Capital cinema property,if my memory serves me right Hose Rodriegez of Jack Coughlan and ass. was drafted in by a Cork city developer to design a building on this site about 12 mnths ago.My advice to Ward, Anderson and Costelloe would be to go and talk to them.

      From the images I saw it was one slick cool proposal,I think the promoters could find them selfs caught between a rock and a hard place on their current proposal.

      Retailers like”land mark “buildings and will pay more,some times you have to go right back to the beginning to move forward.So endth my rant.

      I would be very surprised if that proposal will clear planning it is dreadful, in my experience retailers like buildings in the right locations with a high proportion of glazing, they do not like signing leases heads of terms and then not being able to sign a lease.

      Are e-project or a connected party]https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=3631&page=2&highlight=eden+quay[/url]

    • #733845
      kite
      Participant

      @CITY BOY wrote:

      any news on westend in bishopstown planning decision due today

      St.Francis and Westend have at last been given permission to build despite the crocodile tears from some councillors in Bishopstown.

    • #733846
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Following incalcuable trials and tribulations, 2 designs later, Mark Kelleher (of the Kelleher family, former owners of the Bishopstown Bar [which recently was sold to Mr. Horgan for 8m euros!] among other properties), has been given the greenlight by CCC planner Evelyn Mitchell for 53 of the 73 residential units planned for a collective of adjoining sites off Curraheen Road at Westend near Bishopstown. The project, pleasantly designed by Frank Ennis & Associates, received over 124 seperate objections for residents, groups (like CAHRA) and local councillors – and will be granted subject to the removal of an entire section, the 20-units of Block C.

      I’m very glad that CCC saw through the substantial cock-and-bull in the logic of many of these objections (too often over-lapping – and many more referring to the details of the previous incarnation of the development!) – which objection often on the grounds of the developments ‘high-rise’ nature (of 3/4-storeys – depending on how you see the mansard roof). :rolleyes: This is a positive move. Unfortunately, Jerry Buttimer and posse have informed me that an appeal will be sought, one individual stated that ”high-rise is suitable in other cities, but not Cork”. I take it we should tear down every house and building 4-storeys and over then, right?

      A constructive move by CCC.

      Images sought, and hoping to have some soon.

      Thanks to “himself” up in Dublin and the northern sir for info in light of my absence. You’re help is kindly appreciated.

      P.S. What a ridiculous headline in the IE article today stating ‘High-rise Development Granted’ then continuing to discuss the 3-storey development! :rolleyes:



      Just on a side-note, I find it rich to see councillor Jerry Buttimer object and publicly defame Mr. Kelleher’s project on grounds such as traffic increases and height among other things given that a project, recently lodged by his GAA Club, which he also chairs, represents a far greater threat to the community than that at Westend.

      Bishopstown GAA’s plans for CUH usage of its car-park will cause increased volumes of traffic in an area of dense family housing, throughout which many children – who play in the park’s green areas – may be at risk (God forbid!) to incidents consequent of the increased movements. I’m all for sports clubs trying to rail in the revenue when able to do so – sport is an integral and important part of our society and culture – but this project, given its location, poses a far greater threat to the community than Mr. Kelleher’s proposal ever could. Anyone who knows this area well, will be aware of how one must constantly keep their eyes peeled for children speeding across the road in their tricycles without warning or chasing a ball onto the road from a green. Of course this is the case anywhere, but especially here given that this is essentially a large, maze-like housing estate with strong population of young families. Feel free to object. :rolleyes:

    • #733847
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @Boyler wrote:

      What is the most attractive bridge over the Lee in Cork?

      This is a though one!!
      In terms of most attractive, I think the new Mardyke pedestrian bridge wins hands down.
      Here’s a picture of it during construction. I’ll try to get the finished bridge up soon.

      Of course I’ve got a strong affection for Daly’s (Shakey Bridge) which wins the prize for Cork’s most FUN bridge!!

      And St. Vincents Bridge on the North Mall also deserves an honorable mention.

      This is my 100th post. I hope some of them have been of some use/benefit/amusement*
      *delete where applicable. 🙂

    • #733848
      genario
      Participant

      🙁 The Capital development is such an ugly building. It reminds me of a building near de Marco and was built in the late 1960s. I hope Cork does not become of the same fate as this. I hope a new design will be made. I very much love the vista down Washington street and it is deserving of a beautiful building. It would be nice if the post office to the left of the cinema was included also as this would bring a symmetry to the design and layout.

      *I have to like Clarks Bridge near Washington Street, this bridge always reminds of how I envision old Irish cities.

    • #733849
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As expected, a third party appeal has been lodged against Cork City Council’s grant of permission to AIB for demolition of it’s Watercourse road branch and building of a new, two storey branch building.


      Mr. Dick Roche, T.D., Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government today (30th May) launched his Department’s Survey of the Architectural Heritage of Cork City Centre. “The launch of the Cork City Centre survey represents another milestone in compiling the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage, the national database of our buildings of interest” said the Minister.
      The survey has recorded structures representing a sample of Cork City’s built heritage from the grand design to the simple construction. They highlight a wide variety of structures, spanning the period from 1700 to the present day and illustrate the extensive architectural heritage of Cork City Centre.
      A total of 2,024 structures in Cork are rated of regional importance or higher. The Minister has recommended to the Council the inclusion of these structures in the Record of Protected Structures. The survey is published on the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage website http://www.buildingsofireland.ie .
      The Minister also launched two information leaflets for Areas of Special Character in Cork City namely Wellington Road / St Luke’s and the North Main Street area. “I welcome the fact a third area, Grattan Hill, is also to be designated very much at the request of the residents of the area” said the Minister. Areas of Special Character are areas with a distinctive character derived from a number of elements: their historical or architectural significance, location or residential amenity, or their economic and social history. The Minister stated that Areas of Special Character serve as “a model for community engagement and I welcome the use of a partnership approach”.

      The above is a great resource. Lots of images- everything from the Court House to Post Boxes and water troughs. Although the search facility is a little slow. Also, the extent of the survey seems a little bizarre. I’d have preferred it to extend further north and take in parts of Blackpool, but then thats just a personal view.

    • #733850
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: Interesting to see that Mr. Montgomery has chosen Ridge Developments over Bowen Construction to complete Phase 2 of his Victoria Mills Student Development at Victoria Cross. Bowen, who originally completed the 16m euro contract attached to Phase 1, had been expected to begin work on Phase 2, a dis-assembled tower crane lay on a nearby site in waiting over the months since Phase 1 had been completed – but this has now since been removed and Ridge are set to commence construction imminently, following works by Cain White. The appointment of Ridge perhaps indicates the growing influence in the partnership between Mr. Montgomery and Mr. McCarthy. As you may know, McCarthy Developments have a strong relationship with Ridge (i.e. Harty’s Quay and Jabob’s Island) and Mr. Montgomery has embarked on a number of projects with Mr. McCarthy regarding Douglas and a possible quayside venture.

    • #733851
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :confused: Interesting to see that Mr. Montgomery has chosen Ridge Developments over Bowen Construction to complete Phase 2 of his Victoria Mills Student Development at Victoria Cross. Bowen, who originally completed the 16m euro contract attached to Phase 1, had been expected to begin work on Phase 2, a dis-assembled tower crane lay on a nearby site in waiting over the months since Phase 1 had been completed – but this has now since been removed and Ridge are set to commence construction imminently, following works by Cain White.

      Best to keep contractors on their toes; free market vs complacency and all that.

      Re: The pedestrian bridges Cork must be the pedestrian bridge capital of Ireland both Daly’s and the Mardyke are a little out of the ordinary and it may be a good idea to put them on thier own thead before they get buried. 🙂

    • #733852
      rodger
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      :confused: Interesting to see that Mr. Montgomery has chosen Ridge Developments over Bowen Construction to complete Phase 2 of his Victoria Mills Student Development at Victoria Cross. Bowen, who originally completed the 16m euro contract attached to Phase 1, had been expected to begin work on Phase 2, a dis-assembled tower crane lay on a nearby site in waiting over the months since Phase 1 had been completed – but this has now since been removed and Ridge are set to commence construction imminently, following works by Cain White.

      I think Bowens possibly have a large project to build in the City hall area of Cork,I dont know if any one noticed the bowens crane on no.5 & 6 Lapps Quay some time back,maybe they just gave OFlynns a loan of it !

    • #733853
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      I think Bowens possibly have a large project to build in the City hall area of Cork,I dont know if any one noticed the bowens crane on no.5 & 6 Lapps Quay some time back,maybe they just gave OFlynns a loan of it !

      The reason why the Bowen Crane was there is because Bowen Construction built No.6 Lapps Quay.

      Exams finished with at last-so must really start contributing more to this thread. There really is a wonderful bank of knowledge contained within this thread. Fair play to every1who contributes to this thread. 🙂

    • #733854
      rodger
      Participant

      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      The reason why the Bowen Crane was there is because Bowen Construction built No.6 Lapps Quay.

      Exams finished with at last-so must really start contributing more to this thread. There really is a wonderful bank of knowledge contained within this thread. Fair play to every1who contributes to this thread. 🙂

      Ohhh! thank you,so how did the exams go?

    • #733855
      lexington
      Participant


      🙂 Frinailla have purchased the Goat Broke Loose Bar on Grand Parade for an undisclosed sum. The premises neighbours their Grand Parade Plaza [GPP] development (designed by Richard Rainey & Associates, building contractors are John Paul Construction) which will finally see a move on primary construction works within the coming weeks. The additional 500sq metres of plot space will allow Frinailla seek a extended frontage to the GPP development and allow for additional provision of retail space. Agents Atis Harrington Bannon (since split – with Bannon Commercial acting agents) had been enlisted to secure a retail tenant for the commercial section of the development – this would now seem to have borne fruit with a notable retailler now signed up.

      Further future prospects for the development are also currently under assessment, according to a source, and will – all proceeding well – potentially allow for a complete revitalisation of this quarter of the city in the coming years.

      The prospects for acquisition of Paul Kenny’s site next door now seems more speculatively tantilising than ever – this is despite indications that Mr. Kenny had been recently assessing other options on the Citi Car-Park grounds. The site may provide for an extended retail quarter, with possible riverside amenities, and further residential provision overhead. CCC’s plans to redevelop Cork City Library in the coming years may also be an aspect Frinailla could consider assessing in its plans for the area

    • #733856
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      Ohhh! thank you,so how did the exams go?

      Lets just say, thank god they r over and done with :confused:

      Suppose exams will be exams-annoying… But heres2a summer of fun 😀

    • #733857
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Is Phase 2 of the Victoria Mills Project to share the same wonderfull cladding and detailing….

    • #733858
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Too many forms! wrote:

      Is Phase 2 of the Victoria Mills Project to share the same wonderfull cladding and detailing….

      I know Lex posted this a while back so I’m just refreshing it but it would seem yeah that phase 2 of Victoria mills is just the ugly sister of the first phase. See the pic at link -> http://www.dtarch.com/04current.html

    • #733859
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Tesco Ireland have been refused permission on appeal for the development of a discount petrol station at a site adjoining their Wilton S.C. 24-hour Tesco facility and adjacent to the Sarsfield Dual-Carriageway. Originally CCC had granted planning following a number of appeals incl. that of the Glasheen Road Maxol Petrol Station. It would indeed have been nice to see a little more competition in the area – competition should not be a solely valid excuse for a planning refusal I believe – however, I do agree with the board that the traffic management consequences would have been unsustainable at this location. Tesco have said they intend to revise and reassess their options.



      More updates coming soon.

    • #733860
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      [font=Impact:3984lwzk] **Wanted** [/font:3984lwzk]

      The Marlboro Street Echo Boy Statue

      Last seen about 3 or 4 years ago before being removed for urgent surgery (re-installation of a detached cranium).
      Anybody knowing his whereabouts should post it here. Also, tell the Examiner because they’re always very quiet on the subject 😎

    • #733861
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I know Lex posted this a while back so I’m just refreshing it but it would seem yeah that phase 2 of Victoria mills is just the ugly sister of the first phase. See the pic at link -> http://www.dtarch.com/04current.html

      Ah yes the simplicity of using massing boxes on a 3D site plan, then removing spaces for windows. Anyway it’s hard not to begrudge students of today, when I think of the happy broncial days I spent shivering in the dark dampness of my first bedsit… Happy days, when the hardest decision was another pint or electricity… 🙂

    • #733862
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      By the way…

      A big welcome to the OMP boys who just opened thier Cork office on South Mall, the office is to be headed by Conor Kinsella

    • #733863
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 Following incalcuable trials and tribulations, 2 designs later, Mark Kelleher (of the Kelleher family, former owners of the Bishopstown Bar [which recently was sold to Mr. Horgan for 8m euros!] among other properties), has been given the greenlight by CCC planner Evelyn Mitchell for 53 of the 73 residential units planned for a collective of adjoining sites off Curraheen Road at Westend near Bishopstown. The project, pleasantly designed by Frank Ennis & Associates, received over 124 seperate objections for residents, groups (like CAHRA) and local councillors – and will be granted subject to the removal of an entire section, the 20-units of Block C.

      I’m very glad that CCC saw through the substantial cock-and-bull in the logic of many of these objections (too often over-lapping – and many more referring to the details of the previous incarnation of the development!) – which objection often on the grounds of the developments ‘high-rise’ nature (of 3/4-storeys – depending on how you see the mansard roof). :rolleyes: This is a positive move. Unfortunately, Jerry Buttimer and posse have informed me that an appeal will be sought, one individual stated that ”high-rise is suitable in other cities, but not Cork”. I take it we should tear down every house and building 4-storeys and over then, right?

      A constructive move by CCC.

      Images sought, and hoping to have some soon.

      Thanks to “himself” up in Dublin and the northern sir for info in light of my absence. You’re help is kindly appreciated.

      P.S. What a ridiculous headline in the IE article today stating ‘High-rise Development Granted’ then continuing to discuss the 3-storey development! :rolleyes:



      Just on a side-note, I find it rich to see councillor Jerry Buttimer object and publicly defame Mr. Kelleher’s project on grounds such as traffic increases and height among other things given that a project, recently lodged by his GAA Club, which he also chairs, represents a far greater threat to the community than that at Westend.

      Bishopstown GAA’s plans for CUH usage of its car-park will cause increased volumes of traffic in an area of dense family housing, throughout which many children – who play in the park’s green areas – may be at risk (God forbid!) to incidents consequent of the increased movements. I’m all for sports clubs trying to rail in the revenue when able to do so – sport is an integral and important part of our society and culture – but this project, given its location, poses a far greater threat to the community than Mr. Kelleher’s proposal ever could. Anyone who knows this area well, will be aware of how one must constantly keep their eyes peeled for children speeding across the road in their tricycles without warning or chasing a ball onto the road from a green. Of course this is the case anywhere, but especially here given that this is essentially a large, maze-like housing estate with strong population of young families. Feel free to object. :rolleyes:

      I agree, Cllr.Buttimers backing of a few local cranks and the CSD (CAHRA) lobby group is doing the city no favour. Pity Cllr. Buttimer did not have the same vigour when Mr.Montgomery was planning his Mills development.
      Maybe the GAA connection proved too strong?

    • #733864
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Blackpool Developments (The Shipton Group) have withdrawn their appeal regarding the conditions imposed by CCC on their plans to make changes to their original office and retail building at Blackpool Park, permitted under 03/27555.



      😎 Meanwhile Frinailla have withdrawn their appeal applications on to commence subsurface investigations on their Ladyswell sites – this follows the lodgement made pursuant of a CCC refusal. The Ladyswell development applications are still in appeal.



      Too many forms – indeed a welcome to OMP, it would seem they could have their hands full over the coming years from some of the rumours persistent!



      @ CITY BOY wrote:

      Word on the street today that the deal with Tom Scriven a.k.a rebel bars and redzs
      is in deep trouble.Contracts where sighned but no funds transfered for over 3 months.
      Has Mr Scrivens buying spree come to a dramatic end?

      That compunded with a bad planning run; he seems to have/had a plenty few ideas on some of his existing properties too. Curious. Hmmm. :confused: Is there a possibility of a number of licensed premises coming for sale on the city market soon do you think? Lips must be licking.

    • #733865
      Anonymous
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      [font=Impact:7bai9j19] **Wanted** [/font:7bai9j19]

      The Marlboro Street Echo Boy Statue

      Last seen about 3 or 4 years ago before being removed for urgent surgery (re-installation of a detached cranium).
      Anybody knowing his whereabouts should post it here. Also, tell the Examiner because they’re always very quiet on the subject 😎

      You should stick that post into the Examiner classifieds office as a paid Ad in the Echo and see if they publish it

    • #733866
      phatman
      Participant

      Just noticed, why’s this thread only worthy of four stars? It’s a 5-star in my opinion if ever there was one, cmon people use your vote! 😀

    • #733867
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      As I pointed out above, AIB’s Watercourse Road development has been appealled to ABP. By Kathleen Lynch TD.


    • #733868
      opus
      Participant

      @phatman wrote:

      Just noticed, why’s this thread only worthy of four stars? It’s a 5-star in my opinion if ever there was one, cmon people use your vote! 😀

      Ok ok, just voted! Has that done the trick?

    • #733869
      The Glass eye
      Participant

      ah yes an extra star 😀

    • #733870
      phatman
      Participant

      @opus wrote:

      Ok ok, just voted! Has that done the trick?

      Hey-Hey, just goes to prove every vote counts!

    • #733871
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      [font=Impact:2r1k2rmg]**FOUND**[/font:2r1k2rmg]

      Well, either this thread has powers beyond our wildest dreams or its just a sheer coincedence (most likely the latter 😉 ) but, we’ve located the Echo Boy.

      According to Graham Lynch’s report in today’s INSIDE CORK, the statue has been repaired and is due to be re-erected on Tuesday 7th June or Wednesday 8th of June, this time on St. Patrick Street.
      After talks between CCC and Examiner Publications, it has been decided to erect the bronze statue near the historical enterence to the Examiner Office (located near the new CORK 2005 information office).
      The statue had been repaired in Dublin at a cost of € 7,500. This came after unsuccessful and misguided attempts to repair it in situ using concrete.

      Is this the beginning of the end of the new , clutter free St. Patrick Street?
      Is it a good idea to move this statue from it’s original location?

    • #733872
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I’d make an exception for this one it is a unique piece

    • #733873
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:3b03otd1]I read last week that Cork County Council want 2500 houses built in Midleton over the next few years. They believe Midleton would be more suited as Corks main satellite town over Mallow as the East Cork region is one of the fastest growing area in Ireland. Does anyone know where all of these houses will be put? I cant think of any sites in or around Midleton that would support that number of houses. I also read that Midleton Town Council are trying to get it's bounderies extended so that the town will become the same size as Galway City. Is there any truth in that statement or did someone just get carried away writing??[/font:3b03otd1] :confused:

    • #733874
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      The majority of the new building is to go north of the town, in the area around Broomfield. Not sure about the ‘size of Galway’ line, but the reckoning in the Draft Special Local Area Plan is that the population will be of the order of 23,000 by 2020 – the presence of the rail link being justified by a large, critical mass of housing and services.

      A lot of this is old news, its already set out in the County Development Plan (2003) and the CASP, but the Draft Local Area plan is here;

      http://www.corkcoco.ie/co/pdf/573054653.pdf

    • #733875
      rodger
      Participant

      Yes Midleton is going to see huge growth over the next few years.It is going to be interesting to see how the road network is going to cope.

      All this plan has done is drive prices up in the Western and southern suburbs and create traffic chaos on the N-25.

      I think it is most evident on the recent sale of 6acres of land on the Curraheen Rd. at 1,750,000/acre.Although come to think of it Bride View paid 1,000,000 an acre in Midleton last year,I think we may be looking at another jump in house prices.

      It is starting to get expensive out there!

    • #733876
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:3sq7soxy]Traffic will get worse, but thank god it's all dual carraigeway from Midleton to Cork. I cant even imagine what the main road to Cork would be like for commuters every morning if the dual carraigeway wasn't there. Didn't the old road to Cork go though both Midleton and Carrigtohill??? How dreadful! [/font:3sq7soxy] 😮

    • #733877
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:prs7ts2z]Ohhh, also, I'm so delighted that Cork Airport Authority is in talks with Ryanair about opening up new routes to mainland Europe and Scandinavia. If theres anything that Cork needs it's cheap flights to the continent, not just London.[/font:prs7ts2z] 😀

    • #733878
      Pana01
      Participant

      Living in East Cork (Youghal), and commuting to Ringaskiddy every day can be very stressful.
      I clearly remember driving through Midleton, Carrigtwohill and Glounthuane and even through the city (prior to the tunnel) to get to work.
      The commute isn’t too bad, apart from the nightmare that is the traffic lights at Castlemartyr. It’s a frustrating bottleneck, used to allow a few cars and tractors access from Shanagarry and Mogeely. When the lights are out of action, the traffic flows freely. Every other day, however, traffic is tailed back on both sides of the bridge, because of these hideous lights.
      I read that there is a long term plan to include a dual-carriageway from Midleton to Youghal – anyone else hear of this??

      Back to the architecture – anyone know what will be built in the Beasly Street car park site, backing onto Parnell Place, and when it will commence?

    • #733879
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      If you look in section 5.2.14 (p20) of the original Midleton ED plan, theres an outline of NRA proposals for that section of the N25 – they mention 2010-2015 as a timeframe, which would make sense given the funding time frame – after the major inter urban routes will be completed (not including the Kilcullen to Waterford stretch). The Cork Limerick route and the Northern Ring should also see major developments in that timeframe.

      Theres also plans for two northern roads around Midleton, one is in planning now and will be quite close to the town, the other is mentioned in the Special Local Area plan for Midleton, and will be further out, designed to serve the developments to be constructed in the Broomfield area. The second one is probably 10 years away though, if ever.

      Midleton ED Plan.

      http://www.corkcoco.ie/co/pdf/93560153.pdf

    • #733880
      jungle
      Participant

      @Pana01 wrote:

      I read that there is a long term plan to include a dual-carriageway from Midleton to Youghal – anyone else hear of this??

      In terms of the cost of this, would it not be better to look at reopening the Midleton-Youghal railway line? Dual-carriageway is expensive to build and would require large CPOs, whereas the railway line, although in need of significant repair, is already there and the land is in state hands.

    • #733881
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      In terms of the cost of this, would it not be better to look at reopening the Midleton-Youghal railway line?

      Unfortunately, no. The costs of running the Midleton line to Youghal, at least in the medium term, are a lot higher than you’d expect, and the additional traffic generated would be much less that that required to run a service. Prioblem is that Youghal isn’t that big, it doesn’t have the capacity to generate that much extra critical mass. Midleton is being developed at the pace it is precisely because it does have extant critical mass to require such services, and it already has significant transport infrastructure.

      Additionally, a lot of the traffic on that section of the N25 isn’t local, it isn’t really that much of a commuter route, its a major route for heavy transport (read trucks). Upgrading the road is required anyways, the increase in business in the area is putting the network under severe pressure. Putting a sizeable park n’ride in Midleton, with enough trainsets to run a proper service, in addition to improved roads on the Midleton-Youghal section is the chosen solution for a reason. Whether it works out like that is a different matter.

      In any case, the railway alignment will remain in public hands. Who knows, in 20 years, when Midleton is a city in its own right (!), the maybe extending it will be an option. It isn’t now.

    • #733882
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      In terms of the cost of this, would it not be better to look at reopening the Midleton-Youghal railway line?

      Unfortunately, no. The costs of running the Midleton line to Youghal, at least in the medium term, are a lot higher than you’d expect, and the additional traffic generated would be much less that that required to run a service. Prioblem is that Youghal isn’t that big, it doesn’t have the capacity to generate that much extra critical mass. Midleton is being developed at the pace it is precisely because it does have extant critical mass to require such services, and it already has significant transport infrastructure.

      Additionally, a lot of the traffic on that section of the N25 isn’t local, it isn’t really that much of a commuter route, its a major route for heavy transport (read trucks). Upgrading the road is required anyways, the increase in business in the area is putting the network under severe pressure. Putting a sizeable park n’ride in Midleton, with enough trainsets to run a proper service, in addition to improved roads on the Midleton-Youghal section is the chosen solution for a reason. Whether it works out like that is a different matter.

      In any case, the railway alignment will remain in public hands. Who knows, in 20 years, when Midleton is a city in its own right (!), the maybe extending it will be an option. It isn’t now.

      Isn’t the N25 a designated Euro Route?

    • #733883
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Yes, it is.

    • #733884
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Aldi Stores Developments are to withdraw their multimillion euro development application for the Heiton Buckley site on Tory Top Road, following extensive talks with CCC. A number of objections were lodged against the development by local residents and businesses. The application consisted of the development of 48 duplex apartments over 6, 4-storey blocks, an Aldi Discount Store, a creche and 7 additional retail units. The pleasantly designed development is to be replaced with, what I personally view as a lesser project, in the form of a revised and scaled-down proposal. The new application, to be lodged by next week, will see a reduced floor-space Aldi store (1,560sq m), 2 retail units (one at basement level), a medical centre, creche and 41 residential units consisting of 5 2-bedroom duplex apartments as part of a 3-storey block, 18 2-bedroom terraced dwelling houses as well as 9 1-bedroom apartments and 9 2-bedroom duplexes in a further 3-storey block. Design is again by Carew Kelly Architects.


      Previous incarnation of the development – now to be withdrawn.



      @Pana01 wrote:

      Back to the architecture – anyone know what will be built in the Beasly Street car park site, backing onto Parnell Place, and when it will commence?

      Pitwood Ltd and Michael & Kevin Corbett are currently compiling Further Information on their application to develop a luxury 5-storey, 80,000sq ft 121-bedroom hotel with dual-basement car-park and basement spa. Niall Fitzsimons are the engineers. The original Parnell Place facades are set to be refurbished and incorporated. There has however been some rustling in the bushes about the project – I’ll let you know more soon.

    • #733885
      lexington
      Participant

      :rolleyes: Yes, engineer (among other things), John Paul Lennon is to again lodge a new application, under his wife’s name, Maria, with CCC to develop a new ‘Ponte Vecchio’-style bridge spanning St. Patrick’s Quay to Anderson’s Quay. Mr. Lennon had previously attempted to develop a similar bridge at the same location back in 1998, but was refused on the grounds that it would disrupt the excellent vista enjoyed by Leesiders along the Northern Channel – among other reasons. Last year, Mr. Lennon – through Sean Meehan – withdrew an O.P.P. application to develop a 3-deck multi-storey car-park with commercial units and link bridge at Grenville Place following a prompt by CCC that they would not permit such a development at the location.

      Now, with the help of architect Sam Stephenson, Mr. Lennon is at it again – his application will enter planning in O.P.P. form and request permission for a bridge with a 5-storey structure constructed along its span. The structure will contain a shopping arcade, public pedestrian crossings, 8-apartments on 1st, 2nd and 3rd floors w/ 6 penthouses on the fourth floor.

      Novel as the idea may be, it is unsuited to the location and completely impractical. The massing would be a disruptive hinderance to the river vista and city overall. The project is valued at just under 30m euros.



      🙂 Cork Airport’s new terminal development, which now has 2 air-bridges secured, is expected to receive the remaining 2 air-bridges – to bring the total to the original planned 4 as part of the 1st Phase. The first 2 airbridges will be installed on completion of the terminal, with the other 2 being installed at an unspecified future date – subject to funding. This comes after speculative enquiries. The 4 airbridge links are being constructed as is – anyone who has passed by the new development will see this – however, only 2 actual airbridges themselves have been secured in a ridiculous fiasco concerning cost savings by the DAA (the airbridges by the way are under 475,000euro in value each, versus the 140m euro bill on the terminal).



      😉 Anyone who has passed the OFC Eglinton Street site recently will have noted the erection of 2 faceless ‘billboards’ facing Albert Road and the South City Link. A move of confidence by OFC? Advertising billboards erected in advance of a decision (July 7th 2005)? Frankly, I don’t know what the billboards are being erected for – but what I do know, is that so far, the revised submission for Eglinton Street seems to be meeting planning approval, with a certain Senior Planner hinting that the development will be greenlit. We wait in anticipation!


    • #733886
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:orum7dor]I know we've moved on from the Midleton-Youghal talk, but I really think that re-opening the line would be a very good solution to the road problems. Espeically during the summer months, it's often I've had to wait for an hour to get into the town. The recently opened by-pass took alot of the brunt, thank god. But railway would be good idea for alot of commuters to Little Island. Also, that is really good news about the airport. Would be delighted if we got our original four airbridges, but talk about wasting time, just put the extra two in already, not hanging around waiting for another ten years and then deciding not to spend the money! Good news about Eglington Street too![/font:orum7dor]

    • #733887
      Anonymous
      Participant

      What I don’t understand about the trans-Lee development proposal is how the applicant can display ownership or consent from the superior land-holder to develop the land between the two holdings that would be above a third party holding.

      Re Midleton to Youghal potential extension I understand from the Development plan variation that the alignment is protected and one could potentially speculate that if a quantum of proposals were to emerge that a viable service would be possible. I have to say that the CASP document is a first in planning history in that two juristicitions were able to go beyond local politics to deliver the best solution possible, maybe the fact that you all wear the same county jersey helped? 1990 was a good year 😀

      I’ll post the relevant section from section 5.2 if anyone wants it

    • #733888
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      I would be very surprised if that proposal will clear planning it is dreadful, in my experience retailers like buildings in the right locations with a high proportion of glazing, they do not like signing leases heads of terms and then not being able to sign a lease.

      Are e-project or a connected party]https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=3631&page=2&highlight=eden+quay[/url]

      I was actually looking at the Eden Quay project when I was up in Dublin there last Thursday – the last time I had seen it, Rohcon were still on site. I don’t think The e-Project were involved in its design but I’m open to correction. You can see what the designers were going for, but they missed…horribly. It looks so awkward, blocky and just unsightly. As with the plans for the Capitol Cineplex in Cork, its position is much more prominent given the context. Both developers and architects will need to make MAJOR revisions if the development is to be made even semi-acceptable – w.r.t. to its current design. A truly awful effort – and comfortably joins the leagues of Derek Tynan & Associates’ projects throughout Cork.

    • #733889
      Anonymous
      Participant

      What I didn’t like about the renderings was the angle it was taken from, it would have made it nigh on impossible to assess the effect of the setbacks. The Eden Quay project had a German name and a Waterford Address of that I am sure

    • #733890
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      What I didn’t like about the renderings was the angle it was taken from, it would have made it nigh on impossible to assess the effect of the setbacks. The Eden Quay project had a German name and a Dungarvan Address of that I am sure

      Both the Capitol and Eden Quay projects seem to suffer from the same horrid set backs – and are both former cinema sites. However, as far as I know, Tritschler Tritschler & Associates were involved with Eden Quay. Sabine Wittman is the MD with The e-Project. Clearly, both parties have no accountancy for taste.



      With regards the Lennon ‘Ponte Vecchio’ project, the whole project is really a crazed fantasy. Its impractical, locational, visual and disruptional. CCC have plans to erect a pedestrian bridge at this location in the future (although its further up along Merchants Quay) with the intention of opening up Patrick’s Quay for inclusion in an extended CCRA (Core Commercial Retail Area). It’s a bit altogether, but Mr. Lennon has a history for these types of projects.

    • #733891
      Anonymous
      Participant

      Tritschler Tritschler & Associates. 21 Williams Street Waterford Telephone: 051
      878138 Fax: 051 879955. Activity: Architects. Overall Management: …
      http://www.businessworld.ie/coys/details.htm?u=2934 – 17k

      You are right

      In regard to the Lennon project how do they propose to get landowners consent for the river that they most likely don’t own? as the Dublin Port Tunnel has bourne out ownership is the land below and the sky above.

    • #733892
      lexington
      Participant

      @Thomond Park wrote:

      In regard to the Lennon project how do they propose to get landowners consent for the river that they most likely don’t own? as the Dublin Port Tunnel has bourne out ownership is the land below and the sky above.

      I don’t fully understand the rights issues of the situation – I believe it is subject to negotiation between CCC and Mr. Lennon. It’s funny how the Dublin Port Tunnel brought about numerous new lines of legislation to support its development. Under new guidelines, a land-owner is only subject to ownership no more than 30-feet below their land holding. The same principle is being applied to land/home-owners whose properties stand in the way of the new Cork Northern Ring Road proposal and there is fury over it. Certain parts of the road have proposed tunnel sections to it in order to facilitate various contours. From a surveyance and engineering perspective it is most interesting.

      – by the way, for anyone interested in the Ring Road proposal, route selection is at an advanced stage and I may have some info on the final 2 routings soon.

    • #733893
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Paul Montgomery is to apply to CorkCoCo to develop 169 houses and a childcare facility at Ballyleary in Cobh. The project adds to the list of developments currently associated with Mr. Montgomery, including Victoria Mills Phase 2, the Boreenmanna Road project, his Douglas development in association with Tom McCarthy and delvings in an Event Centre plan.



      🙂 Fleming Construction will erect a tower crane on site within the next week over their site at Victoria Cross for which they will develop 45-student apartments over a number of 4 to 5 storey blocks on behalf of UCC. Already progress on the site is steaming ahead. Directly next-door, Ridge Developments are working away at the Victoria Mills Phase 2 site for which 31 further student apartments are to be constructed over a basement car-park and commercial unit. Pity about the design for such a pretty location.



      😉 And I can confirm that IAWS have been conducting a number of studies on their R&H Hall Weybridge premises along Kennedy Quay. Engineers have recently been on site assessing details regarding silo structures. Hmmm. More details when I get them.

    • #733894
      snoopdog
      Participant

      [QUOTE=lexington]:D Following incalcuable trials and tribulations, 2 designs later, Mark Kelleher (of the Kelleher family, former owners of the Bishopstown Bar [which recently was sold to Mr. Horgan for 8m euros!] among other properties), has been given the greenlight by CCC planner Evelyn Mitchell for 53 of the 73 residential units planned for a collective of adjoining sites off Curraheen Road at Westend near Bishopstown. The project, pleasantly designed by Frank Ennis & Associates, received over 124 seperate objections for residents, groups (like CAHRA) and local councillors – and will be granted subject to the removal of an entire section, the 20-units of Block C.

      I’m very glad that CCC saw through the substantial cock-and-bull in the logic of many of these objections (too often over-lapping – and many more referring to the details of the previous incarnation of the development!) – which objection often on the grounds of the developments ‘high-rise’ nature (of 3/4-storeys – depending on how you see the mansard roof). :rolleyes: This is a positive move. Unfortunately, Jerry Buttimer and posse have informed me that an appeal will be sought, one individual stated that ”high-rise is suitable in other cities, but not Cork”. I take it we should tear down every house and building 4-storeys and over then, right?

      😡 Did you ever wonder what residents would think of this, or were all those complaints and challenges not enough to tip you off? Of course adding so many people to a relitivly quiet area will make traffic volumes soar. Not to mention the eye sore all those buildings will be.Residants who now have view of the countryside will have the inspiring view of a grey wall.How nice. Also, I don’t care about four-storey buildings in the city but this is the suburbs! A place where people live to get away from traffic and huge ugly buildings!

      Of course, I cannot conclude my arguement without mentioning that putting so many apartments and townhouses in that small area will send the property value plummeting.I wonder, will mr. kelleher care what type of people come here? Or will he only care about getting paid?

      I know someone else agreed that this was a good idea but honestly I cant see why anyone could think this is a good idea!Unless of course they are the annoying business people who want to turn the Emerald Isles into the Grey Isles!

    • #733895
      lexington
      Participant

      @snoopdog wrote:

      😡 Did you ever wonder what residents would think of this, or were all those complaints and challenges not enough to tip you off? Of course adding so many people to a relitivly quiet area will make traffic volumes soar. Not to mention the eye sore all those buildings will be.Residants who now have view of the countryside will have the inspiring view of a grey wall.How nice. Also, I don’t care about four-storey buildings in the city but this is the suburbs! A place where people live to get away from traffic and huge ugly buildings!

      Of course, I cannot conclude my arguement without mentioning that putting so many apartments and townhouses in that small area will send the property value plummeting.I wonder, will mr. kelleher care what type of people come here? Or will he only care about getting paid?

      I know someone else agreed that this was a good idea but honestly I cant see why anyone could think this is a good idea!Unless of course they are the annoying business people who want to turn the Emerald Isles into the Grey Isles!

      I’m glad you brought this point to mention – its good to have an alternative perspective, however, I would ask you to address the issues concerning this site (sites!): First of all, the development is predominantly 2-storeys with Block C rising to 3-storeys (w/ mansard roof). This is generally in line with the heights of surrounding buildings and does not constitute ‘high-rise’ as was highlighted by so many of the lodged objections. You may note, that I recognised the validity of many of the objections in earlier posts but believed that they could be addressed through conditions, which they indeed were (such as the balcony issue of overlooking in Block D – now since removed). Consequentially, Block C (the highest element at 3-storeys) was ultimately omitted – reducing unit numbers substantially. If height was an issue – and density – well this condition has certainly reduced the suspect of such concerns. The remaining development falls very much in line with surrounding buildings. My point is this – if 2-storeys is not acceptable in this area, does that mean none of the surrounding housing is valid either? Because that is the logic implied in many of the submissions.

      Even before the block omission, the revised application was deemed well inside the acceptable levels outlined by The Residential Density Guidelines for Planning Authorities issued by the Department of the Environment in September 1999. Quantitative and qualitative public and private open space requirements for residential developments are contained in Paragraphs 11.19 – 25 of the Cork City Development Plan, 2004. The public and private open space standards have been modified in the revised application to reflect the standards set by the aforementioned guidelines. Open space for the scheme is provided in a mix of private, semi private and public open space – the contributive amenity value attributed to the revised scheme is in fact greater than, or equal to, any equivalent amenity space currently provided for by the existing site (were it to be utilised for such), this was a point also noted by senior planner Evelyn Mitchell. In relation to public/semi-private open space is provided at ground level to the rear of the site in excess of 10% of the site area and had also been provided for in a roof terrace within Block C. A condition was passed, in line with developer intentions, so that communal access was to be made available to this open space area.

      As for the argument of the ‘countryside view’ – the site is located within an urban framework with existing structures on most fronts. This is simply an in-fill site and does not represent ‘countryside’ – in fact, the site in its current form is neither safe nor enjoyable as an amenity for any individual to venture, this admittedly, is the responsibility of the land-owner to secure, however, as it remains private property – those who venture through the site for amenity purposes should consider the consequences of their actions. If by countryside views, you mean views facing toward that south of Bishopstown Court – then I should ask you to look at this perspective again and tell me how much of that countryside is truly visible? Then ask, what exactly is visible? Then consider that this perspective is only ‘enjoyed’ from one site elevation and the area in view is subject to a new medical/hospice development by Beacon Court and St. Patrick’s Hospice for the terminally ill.

      I admittedly have not read through all 124 submissions, but have read a great proportion of them – many of the arguments defy logic, I don’t accept farsical arguments that do not apply to the project at heart. It is more than evident, that many submissions were made without any knowledge of the revised scheme – nor had any of the drawings been assessed at the planning offices.

      CCC have responded in part to some of the relevant objections to the scheme but have also filtered out some of the more spurious arguments. As for design and finishings, please indicate to me the concrete ‘grey walls’ areas of the project? The scheme has been very tastefully designed by Frank Ennis & Associates to not only add but build on the quality environment of this suburban location. Frank Ennis & Associates have generally positive track record in Cork – and indeed, Bishopstown (please refer to the scheme by Myraoak Ltd [David Corr and Joe McCarthy et al] at the former Tennis Village – a scheme noted by one member of CAHRA, surprisingly as being of a good aesthetic design – but of course, too high!!! [4 storeys] Frank Ennis also have another Bishopstown design evident in the refurbished Bishopstown Bar – formerly owned by Mr. Kelleher’s family). Have you seen the designs first hand? Associated guide prices on the sale of the development units are pitched at a particular clientele to reflect the existing resident mix. I reject the argument you make about tenants on the grounds that you cannot cherry-pick occupants in the way you seem to prescribe – the house next-door to you could just as easily be purchased by a resident or residents who may not conform to the standards you pitch for your community. A development, such as Mr. Kelleher’s, regardless of a units guide price cannot guarantee the type of occupant – income does not represent integrity – and even without the development, there is no way to guarantee your neighbour. I am all for maintaining a community’s values and traditions – but that doesn’t mean the neighbourhood must close itself from the rest of the world. This is however a protracted social argument.

      As for traffic generation, both the Roads Department and NRA felt no objection was warranted given that Mr. Kelleher and the design team had worked in conjunction with nearby site owners to allow for adjustments to routings that would inhibit any on street back-logging. As a residential development – the majority of traffic will be either based in workplaces or in the underground car-park for the majority of the day. This would be contrary to the proposal made by Bishopstown GAA for example – that in fact, encourages traffic movements in an enclosed residential area.

      Furthermore, historically and evidently, property prices do not generally decline in light of such development – must often the opposite occurs. For example, the development of the Lapps Quay area sent neighbouring property values soaring. The same too for Victoria Cross – residential and site.

      I whole-heartedly agree that we must maintain a standard of development from preventing the formation of this ‘Grey Isle’ you speak of. There have been and unfortunately continue to be a number of unacceptable design standards placed upon the city – Victoria Mills, Crosses Green Hotel, 16 Lavitts Quay and the redevelopment of the Capitol Cineplex are all poor standards of design and ideally should have or will be redesigned. For all the beluga thrown at Victoria Mills – its funny that the residents didn’t bring Phase 1 to ABP, nor did councillor Jerry Buttimer – for all his hugging of resident votes – when, as one poster mentioned, his local GAA clubs biggest supporter went to lodge the development in question, his voice was silent.

      I will support and endorse any objectors where a development is clearly unacceptable, but I think Mr. Kelleher’s development has a lot more to do with petty ideology than genuine cause (with the exception of one or two of the objections).

      Nonetheless snoopdog – your input is welcomed and it is good to hear the otherside of the spectrum. I would however, only ask you to consider some of the facts in place. 🙂

    • #733896
      pier39
      Participant

      i thought this thread was 5 stars eh??? wats goin on lads? hehe. c’mon a little support please!

      a 5 storey bridge? hmmm anyone for the taj mahal on south mall? mr lennon at this crack again, well good luck to him but i agree that this would mess up the views. i was just walking this area today and it would cock up the whole area – why doesnt he try it for a replacement to trinity bridge there near the college of knowledge instead? the river bend here would break up any impacts on the vistas this location provides. just an idea! hey when is the new kino being constructed? really looking forward to that.

    • #733897
      snoopdog
      Participant

      While I am in no means appeased on this issue I will, ahhh, soften my words. I will admit that my main concern was for the future residents, for which I will take your word lexington, will not be a problem. I cannot debate the design of the building because to my knowledge the residents have not been given a design, only a diagram of where the buildings will be. The countryside view I mentioned refers to the two- storey houses that can see the hills and “country” beyond the other houses. In the past some areas were not allowed to build two-storey houses because they would block this view.

      You have made reference to arguments that defy logic and call them farcical. I would very much like to hear one of these “farcical” points. It is obvious to me that you are a businessman because you cannot see why people do not want these buildings in their town. You seem astonished that people do not like the thought of tall buildings(even if they are only 3-4 storeys high)

      Until more detail becomes available to me I will rest my case. I would however ask that you try to see this from the residents’ point of view. A number of apartments have come into this area very recently and still more forces people to wonder how many houses will be left in Bishopstown when this apartment explosion finishes

    • #733898
      lexington
      Participant

      @snoopdog wrote:

      While I am in no means appeased on this issue I will, ahhh, soften my words. I will admit that my main concern was for the future residents, for which I will take your word lexington, will not be a problem. I cannot debate the design of the building because to my knowledge the residents have not been given a design, only a diagram of where the buildings will be. The countryside view I mentioned refers to the two- storey houses that can see the hills and “country” beyond the other houses. In the past some areas were not allowed to build two-storey houses because they would block this view.

      You have made reference to arguments that defy logic and call them farcical. I would very much like to hear one of these “farcical” points. It is obvious to me that you are a businessman because you cannot see why people do not want these buildings in their town. You seem astonished that people do not like the thought of tall buildings(even if they are only 3-4 storeys high)

      Until more detail becomes available to me I will rest my case. I would however ask that you try to see this from the residents’ point of view. A number of apartments have come into this area very recently and still more forces people to wonder how many houses will be left in Bishopstown when this apartment explosion finishes

      Believe you me, I am most sympathetic to this concern. Fear does come attached with the advent of the new – especially in established neighbourhoods. Most often, these neighbourhoods are rippled with horror stories regarding developments in other areas – but quite often, many of these are not warranted. Take the example of some of the residents along the Airport Road who contested the development of Cork Airport Business Park. Omnistone (the park’s primary developer) had been blasted with the condemnations of residents who feared that their small residential area would be destroyed by the impending construction of such a large business facility in their vicinity. Traffic generation, loss of privacy, decreased property values, noise pollution – all of the aforementioned, plus many more, were among the concerns highlighted. After extensive negotiations, Omnistone ultimately offered many of these residents with appeasements such as landscaped gardens, new pavings etc etc. This lowered some of the objectionist voices – but now, years on since the construction of the park – the same residents, when questioned, will reluctantly admit that they have not suffered the disamenities envisioned.

      My own lodging has been threatened by impending developments too in the past – and at the present – but it is a matter of looking at the project in a neutral manner (quite often a difficult task when emotionally involved). You have to step back and say – “Right, there’s this development planned. My best position is a knowledgable one” – so you research the proposals, research related or like developments in similar areas, compare, contrast – and if there are genuinely more downs than ups – you utilise your knowledge gained to lodge a strong objection – supported by the facts and figures. Good, balanced research means a good case against the proposal. Planners pay more attention to these kind of arguments. Re: the Westend development – many of the objections were utterly lost (by the way, I have quoted some of these in previous posts if you’re interested) – others were quite valid. In my own circumstance, in the past – successful objections were made against at least 2 proposals which were quite inappropriate and in one case in legal violation. A more recent proposal made, I will not be objecting to (although many many others nearby will be and are). I have made this decision by weighing up and researching the situation. Some lodging the objections are quite frankly basing their positions solely on the word of mouth and the fear attached to the development – others are valid in their circumstance.

      I suppose labelling businessmen as not understanding ‘human’ concerns is like labelling all Catholics in N.I. as Republicans – it simply isn’t accurate. Businessmen have homes too. They have families; concerns and beliefs.

      I empthatise with your concerns – but don’t be taken in with the tide of fears and assumptions either. Stand up, research and decide for yourself a position on the development. Scare-mongering is a powerful method of persuasion. As you said yourself, you haven’t actually seen the designs in detail. I suggest you take a trip to Navigation House, sit-down and read through the application – it’s free to do so and your entitlement. Assess the drawings – even take a friend or an architect with you – and see whether or not this project genuinely endangers your living and your community in a purely negative way. You may surprise yourself – as I suspect many of the objectors to this case would be if they had done so.

      I don’t believe in the whole apartment trend either – well, not in all cases – but remember that Mr. Kelleher’s proposal consists of a large proportion of traditional housing as well. Now with Block C axed – a near majority of housing. 🙂

    • #733899
      gos24
      Participant

      @snoopdog wrote:

      While I am in no means appeased on this issue I will, ahhh, soften my words. I will admit that my main concern was for the future residents, for which I will take your word lexington, will not be a problem. I cannot debate the design of the building because to my knowledge the residents have not been given a design, only a diagram of where the buildings will be. The countryside view I mentioned refers to the two- storey houses that can see the hills and “country” beyond the other houses. In the past some areas were not allowed to build two-storey houses because they would block this view.

      You have made reference to arguments that defy logic and call them farcical. I would very much like to hear one of these “farcical” points. It is obvious to me that you are a businessman because you cannot see why people do not want these buildings in their town. You seem astonished that people do not like the thought of tall buildings(even if they are only 3-4 storeys high)

      Until more detail becomes available to me I will rest my case. I would however ask that you try to see this from the residents’ point of view. A number of apartments have come into this area very recently and still more forces people to wonder how many houses will be left in Bishopstown when this apartment explosion finishes

      Why is it people think developers should give them their drawings/ proposals when everyone is entitled to go into the Planning Department and view all of the files and drawings for free (as previously stated by Lexington). I know of a resisdent’s association who based their entire objection to ABP on this fact (that they were not provided with any drawings by the developer or architect) and the objection was obviously considered but deemed not of any consequence – the developer is under no obligation what so ever to provide drawings to anyone who wishes to object to a proposal and residents need to get with it and exercise their rigths by visiting the Planning Dept. 😡 So Snoopdog please at least have all the facts and view all the drawings before ranting about something you have only heard about second or maybe third hand from someone with a tainted view!

    • #733900
      lisam
      Participant

      All that is wrong with the residents in Bishopstown is that the students will opt to rent these apartments which are superior over the houses and rooms that they let out. Luckily when I was in college in CIT I lived near the bus route serving the college cos I wouldnt let a dog live in some of the rooms (if you could call them that) that some of my class mates had to. Its about time the greedy houseowners were put in their place

    • #733901
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      Am I right in saying that you have no entitlement to a view wrt to planning, only light?

    • #733902
      lexington
      Participant

      It would seem Minister Cullen has come through earlier than I anticipated with plans I outlined in post #1568 (p63) to redevelop Kent Station. You may also recall I outlined some of the plans in scheme by Manor Park Homes for Horgan’s Quay, as the selected developer. Well I can now tell you that MPH are coming to a settlement on their design plans for the quays redevelopment – which will have its final tweaking resultant of a land study recently concluded by CIE. MPH will hope to lodge a part application for their scheme within the coming months. The plan will include a variety of commercial and residential uses and will be worked to compliment the project at Kent.

      The Kent redevelopment is valued at 20m euros and was cleared by the board of CIE with a planning application to follow within the next 2 weeks thereafter. The Board will also be reviewing the MPH scheme in full.

      As I indicated in the aforementioned post – the MPH/CIE decision has come on the back of the announcement that the 90m euro allocated for the Midelton/Cork rail line has been alloted.

      For more details see (some you may note are currently being adjusted – I will update you on these when I get further info) -> https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=2134&page=63&pp=25

    • #733903
      rodger
      Participant
      snoopdog wrote:
      While I am in no means appeased on this issue I will, ahhh, soften my words. I will admit that my main concern was for the future residents, for which I will take your word lexington, will not be a problem. I cannot debate the design of etc etc….

      One thought comes to mind, There is no progress without struggle.

    • #733904
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      The Echo (7/6/05) has the Kent Station upgrade on the frontpage, along with the news that the bus station is to move to Horgans Quay.

      Nice to see that Cullen is announcing the reopening of the Midleton line for the 3rd(?) time.

      http://www.eveningecho.ie/pdf/front.pdf

    • #733905
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Aidan wrote:

      The Echo (7/6/05) has the Kent Station upgrade on the frontpage, along with the news that the bus station is to move to Horgans Quay.

      Nice to see that Cullen is announcing the reopening of the Midleton line for the 3rd(?) time.

      http://www.eveningecho.ie/pdf/front.pdf

      Let’s just hope it is a little more than words this time.

      BTW, any movement on the School of Music… surely the cost is rising all the time?

    • #733906
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Well, apparently (I haven’t seen this myself) contractors are well advanced in clearing the alignment as far as Midleton of brush etc. The funding was granted at the end of May 2004, with the actual decision taken a long time previous to that.

      http://www.transport.ie/viewitem.asp?id=5563&lang=ENG&loc=1801

    • #733907
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:vmhr47e0]Does this developent mean that Cork will have an additional bus station or will the present one simply fall in to a derelict site???[/font:vmhr47e0] :confused:

    • #733908
      who_me
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      [font=Arial:3vt84z77]Does this developent mean that Cork will have an additional bus station or will the present one simply fall in to a derelict site???[/font:3vt84z77] :confused:

      Derelict? At its current location? Not bloody likely!! 😉 With the rejuvenated Clontarf St, and new developments on Parnell Place (new hotel) and across the river (proposed Revenue building), and a stream of foot traffic going right by from the new bus/train stations the existing Bus Station would be as prime a location as you could wish for!

    • #733909
      lexington
      Participant
      who_me wrote:
      Derelict? At its current location? Not bloody likely!! ]

      The existing bus station will be retained and used as a hub station to compliment the new one on Horgan’s Quay. The goal is to have a grand interlinking system – involving the Midelton/Cobh and Blarney lines w/ the city’s bus routes. The current bus station will ultimately become a more central service centre given the eastern shift of the Core Commercial Area – as is evident by the on-going and prospective developments in the locale.

      The redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay will be a vital instrument in the CCA shift within this parameter of the docklands – MPH, as primary designated developer, will have a big say in how this area of the docklands shapes up. Strong design standards have been pushed for by the likes of CCC within the 3-party talks. The pressure is on MPH to deliver (their current track record is so-so [take Pembroke Wood in Passage West for example – design ranges from the bland to the oh-so-nearly-there], Horgan’s Quay will require a completely new angle). Inevitably, development land in the gap/link between Horgan’s Quay and say, Paul Kenny’s RC development will be demand paramount. This comes at a time when John McCarthy Motorpoint and O’Hea’s Opel Dealership on Patrick’s Quay for example are considering moves to new purpose built premises at Mahon Point and Little Island. This should free up vital and potentially lucrative development land. Design standards have been set high by the Kenny development and anything less will likely suffer strong critique.

      The figure on Horgan’s Quay redevelopment is estimated at 500m euro.

      More details on Horgan’s Quay available at post #1568.

    • #733910
      JPD
      Participant

      Three Questions,

      Firstly how many acres will MPH be acquiring and what price will they be paying in hard currency?

      Secondly what was the last fund valuation per acre put on Water St?

      Thirdly how can Cork be receiving a World Class transport system when the Southside or majority of the population of the metropolis be left yet again without a train system?

      John P Durack

    • #733911
      lexington
      Participant

      Cullen announces major redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay Cork

      7 June 2005
      Minister welcomes upgrade of Cork’s Kent Station

      The Minister for Transport, Martin Cullen T.D. today (7 June 2005) welcomed the decision of the Board of CIE to give the go-ahead to the commercial development of the Company’s 17-acre site at Horgan’s Quay in Cork City. The development is estimated to be valued in the region of €500m.

      Minister Cullen announced the decision on a visit to Cork where he was joined by the Chairman of CIE, Dr John Lynch. The Minister also announced an upgrade of Kent Station in Cork City and that as part of the Horgan’s Quay development, a new Bus Eireann bus station will also be built, thereby providing an integrated travel centre for public transport users in the City.

      The Horgan’s Quay development will be a 17-acre mixed use development, covering residential and commercial and represents a significant step in the on-going regeneration of the city centre in Cork. CIE Board has selected Manor Park Homes at the developer for the project. An application for planning will now proceed.

      He said: “This is a hugely significant announcement for Cork City. The CIE board has demonstrated vision and ambition with the development of its lands on Horgan’s Quay. A regeneration of this scale will transform the area and bring to life a prime location in the City. It will be a significant contribution to the on-going transformation of Cork City into a modern 21st century European city.”

      In tandem with the development of Horgan’s Quay, the Minister welcomed the decision by CIE to significantly upgrade Kent Station. Irish Rail plans the reorientation of Kent Station away from the current entrance on Glanmire Road to a new entrance facing the new development on Horgan’s Quay and the city centre. The Minister said the upgrade will deliver improved access to the city centre and a strong integration of rail and bus services.

      A facility of 3,000 square metres is planned at Kent Station, comparable in size to the main Heuston Station in Dublin. The customer facilities will include:

      New ticket sales office;

      New left luggage area;

      New toilet facilities;

      Improved passenger concourse;

      Mobility impaired facilities

      Improved retail facilities

      Minister Cullen said that Government rail investment in Cork will result in real benefits to the travelling public. “Quality, comfort and frequency of service will be improved. For every cent invested by Government, existing customers will benefit and passenger numbers can grow,” he said.

      In addition to Horgan’s Quay and Kent Station, other rail investment in Cork includes the re-opening of the Cork to Midleton line costing approximately €100m. The re-opening of the Cork to Midleton line will include new stations at Midleton, Carrigtwohill, Dunkettle, Kilbarry and Blarney. Irish Rail intends to apply for a Rail Works Order, the first step in the project, later this year.

      In addition, 67 new intercity carriages are already on order at a cost of nearly €120million. These new carriages will operate services between Kent Station and Heuston and will enable Iarnrod Eireann to give customers an hourly service in each direction with quality, comfort and journey time improvements.

      The delivery of the first of these carriages to Irish Rail from the manufacturer is expected in 2 months time. Following commissioning, all the carriages are expected to be in service by mid-2006. On the Dublin-Cork service, Minister Cullen said: “The arrival of 67 new rail carriages on the Dublin to Cork service will greatly enhance what is one of the busiest routes on the rail network”, he concluded.

      ENDS



      JPD – words like ‘world class’ are mere political spin. The fact is, this will not provide Cork with a world-class public transport system – but it is a major step and it may provide a foundation of sorts for future development of a transport system that works. Indeed the south side of the city is under-serviced – but East Cork is a rapidly growing commuter area of the city and at leat it is being given something of a support for prospective growth.

      The MPH/CIE arrangement is based on a mixed-equity premise – MPH won’t necessarily be handing over ‘hard cash’ as you put it in the traditional sense – they paid approximately IRP20m for the privilege of the site back in 1998 but the arrangement for development is on a shared equity basis with MPH the majority holders obviously. They will be availing of a great proportion of the 17-acres provided at Horgan’s Quay – a final figure is not available yet but I’m told that they have 12.5 acres for sure allocated for their own development, with 3 acres in negotiation with a 3rd party – however their design plans include these 3 acres.

    • #733912
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:1bzh6a1l]I totally agree JPD. London, Paris and New York have world class transportation systems….. not Cork. To know what a world class transport system is, just look at the Underground, DLR, Tramlink, Thameslink and all of the other high speed ELECTRIFIED trains that are in London. It's the only city in the world that is a role model for other cities wanting good transportation links. Cork doesn't even come close to having a “World Class Transportation System”. We had a better transportation system in the 1900's, when we had electrified trams going all over the city. I would so love to tell the Minister for Transport that diesel engines are NOT the way to the future!!! World Class….. what a joke! But never the less, I am utterly delighted that the Cork-Midleton line is reopening and some good investment money is coming in Kent stations way. Baby steps, but it has to count for something.[/font:1bzh6a1l] :rolleyes:

    • #733913
      JPD
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Cullen announces major redevelopment of Horgan’s Quay Cork

      [
      words like ‘world class’ are mere political spin. The fact is, this will not provide Cork with a world-class public transport system – but it is a major step and it may provide a foundation of sorts for future development of a transport system that works. Indeed the south side of the city is under-serviced – but East Cork is a rapidly growing commuter area of the city and at leat it is being given something of a support for prospective growth.

      Granted the well founded vision is Midleton as an urban settelement of national importance with a population in excess of 25,000 and to develop the existing Mallow rail line in a sustainable manner a la CASP. But it is important to acknowledge that this is the third time that the Midleton Rail Line has had a fanfare and that no effort has been made yet again to give to give the Majority of Cork City a proper public transport system be it rail or Luas. I have to keep thinking of Radioactiveman’s biggest thread Cork, Mahon point, etc, etc and I would have to ask what will this do for Cork, Mahon point and at least half the Ect?

      Who gets paid to write Cullen’s press releases?

      Where does this leave Roger Flack’s lecture position of Cork becoming an important European City, these type of decisions make it easy to object to four storey buildings on the basis of no planned transport infrastructure.

      JohnPD

    • #733914
      A-ha
      Participant

      I always thought that a trolleybus connecting the city centre with MP was “part of the plan” obviously I must have been mistaken. If it was up to me I would definetly not go down the Luas type of way. Although trams are extremely popular all over Europe, they take up time and valuable space. A better solution would probably be a Monorail. They are fast and more efficiant than a tram and definetly the way into the 21st century. They are also alot cheaper to install and run and also doesn’t take up road space, allowing buses and cars to roam freely. Monorails exist all over the world, from theme parks to large urban areas and even small country towns. Check out this website http://www.monorails.org it gives a great insight into how they operate etc. Maybe then Cork might have a world class transportation system. This is highly unlikely as our government wont have the plans, the money or the time to give Cork a transportation system that challenges cities around the world. 🙁

    • #733915
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      A better solution would probably be a Monorail. They are fast and more efficiant than a tram and definetly the way into the 21st century. They are also alot cheaper to install and run and also doesn’t take up road space, allowing buses and cars to roam freely. Monorails exist all over the world, from theme parks to large urban areas and even small country towns. Check out this website http://www.monorails.org it gives a great insight into how they operate etc.

      😀 If The Simpson’s have thought us anything it’s that Monorails are a decidedly dodgy notion. I think babysteps are the best course of action- lets get funtioning bus corridors before we try to re-invent the wheel.

      I think, like a lot of us, I was taken aback by CIE’s announcment today. Only a few months ago they were telling us they had no interest in Horgan’s key until 2007 at least.
      I’m very sceptical at the moment. I think I’ll reserve judgement on this one until I see the plans on paper and a few cranes over Kent Station.
      Maybe I’d be more optimistic if the press release hadn’t also contained mention of the serially-launched midleton rail link re-opening. This thing has been launched more times than a toy boat!
      And this big announcemnet comes the day before the whole government turns up on our doorstep to give us all one big collective hug. I think they really do love us after all!!! I’ve got a warm fuzzy feeling inside 😎
      spare me….
      but I live in hope!

      Here’s an image of the site (outlined in red) and where I think the bulk of the MPH development COULD take place (outlined in green). Presumably with some sort of public plaza area linking train and bus stations to the overall development in the centre there. Again, pure speculation on my part. When can we expect any definate plans?

    • #733916
      Angry Rebel
      Participant

      Radioactiveman has put his finger on it….when?!

      No mention in any press release or blurb about timeframes or projected completion dates…

    • #733917
      phatman
      Participant

      Any of ye familiar with MagLevs? or magnetically levitated trains, they operate on the principle of varying magnetic fields in order to move, and actually do levitate or float above the track. i know it sounds a bit “sci-fi” or futuristic, but they’ve already built one between Shanghai airport and city. The advantage is that they contain no working parts – no onboard engine, therefore very lttle maintenance, and are highly sustainable. Diesel trains, obviously, and indirectly trams, aren’t quite so environmentaly conscious, but when it comes down to it that’s the least of the issues when it comes down to it. 😮 Ah well maybe this Shangahai twinning will turn a few heads

    • #733918
      lexington
      Participant

      Just some brief details on the MPH development – I was given a very sparse e-mail today noting that an application was ideally scheduled anytime within the next month to month and a half (?). Residential unit numbers will not accommodate the media speculated 5000 mark, but will equal a more conservative figure which will be spread out over a number of phases (under 2000 max.) – with completion of all these phases scheduled (planning pending) for late 2010. Heights discussed with CCC call for a general level between 6 and 8-storeys, with elements rising higher in specific areas (deemed worthy for such). The e-mail also indicated that we can expect many an objection!!! I’ll let you know more when I can.

      I’ve been pretty busy lately – a number of things are rolling at the moment and I hope to fill you in on them soon. One may, MAY be touched on tomorrow but I’ve no idea whether its for sure yet.

    • #733919
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Objections??? Surely not 😀

      Check out the pictures on this site of the Mercat Santa Caterina in Barcelona, Spain. Down on the right of of this screen somewhere.
      It reminds me of the English Market in Cork. I know, I know, the roof isn’t as fancy but inside looks the same and you never know, with a new roof, the English Market could look even more tasty than it does today!

    • #733920
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: Ann O’Donovan has withdrawn her application to develop 25 apartments and a gym over basement car-park at a site along Cotter Street, between Copley Hall and South Terrace. The vacant lot was set to be developed into a new residential development, however, on-going talks with CCC have seen Ms. O’Donovan withdraw her proposal for revisions rather than face refusal.



      😮 Meanwhile, Anna O’Connor (based at Sandymount in Dublin) awaits a decision on her York Hill/Wellington Road apartment development – her 3rd attempt – this Thursday. MV Cullinan are the architects – earlier this year, Ms. O’Connor’s plans for a 6-storey residential development with offices and open courtyard above a basement car-park for the same site were refused.



      🙂 Paul Kenny’s plans for the redevelop of his St. Patrick’s Quay car-park and surrounding buildings are due a decision on the 14th of June 2005 – the landmark building of 127,000sq ft of offices dedicated for the Revenue Commissioners relocation, designed by Wilson Architecture – is looking generally positive despite 3 objections for An Taisce, the McLaughlin Family and Bell Scott Engineering (both of whom have businesses located on Ship Street adjoining the development).



      🙂 John Cleary Developments has been greenlit on its second-attempt to develop a new industrial park at its lands in Kilnap, adjacent to its existing North Point Business Park development. The original development for a series of individual industrial units was refused earlier this year – the revised application sought to incorpoarate 17 units within a single 3-storey structure. The development stands to create up to 300 new jobs in the area. (See prev. associated post for further details).

    • #733921
      kite
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Just some brief details on the MPH development – I was given a very sparse e-mail today noting that an application was ideally scheduled anytime within the next month to month and a half (?). Residential unit numbers will not accommodate the media speculated 5000 mark, but will equal a more conservative figure which will be spread out over a number of phases (under 2000 max.) – with completion of all these phases scheduled (planning pending) for late 2010. Heights discussed with CCC call for a general level between 6 and 8-storeys, with elements rising higher in specific areas (deemed worthy for such). The e-mail also indicated that we can expect many an objection!!! I’ll let you know more when I can.

      Great to finally have some movement on the Horgan Quay site, any info on the Port of Cork/Bonded warehouse site opp Jurys Inn? Surely there must be some plans in the pipeline for such a prime site?

    • #733922
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      who is lined up for the discount store in the ursaline plans?

    • #733923
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Great to finally have some movement on the Horgan Quay site, any info on the Port of Cork/Bonded warehouse site opp Jurys Inn? Surely there must be some plans in the pipeline for such a prime site?

      Think lexington already outlined plans for Custom house quay – you’ll have to look back a few pages but he did I’m sure.

      Good news bout Horgans quay alright.

    • #733924
      Leesider
      Participant

      Just wondering about a few proposed developments I haven’t heard much about recently.

      First one up is The Showgrounds, has there been any movement on who is eventually going to acquire this and when? I presume the GAA are the frontrunners here, something badly needs to be done with Pairc Ui Chaoimh, it is looking very rundown!

      Next up, is the private hospital going ahead on the Bandon Rd, heard reports a while back it was going in for planning but nothing since, any info??

      Water St., what is the current situation?? Has an appeal been put in to reinstate the original tower element??

      That’s it for now! 😉

      If anyone has any info please throw up a post……….Lex you are always a good man for this type of info, any news??

    • #733925
      jungle
      Participant

      Passing along Tower St over the weekend, I saw a light engineering yard with a ‘For Sale – Development Opportunity’ sign covered by a ‘Sold’ one. Does anyone know what the plans are for this site? It was on the right hand side of the section of Tower St between Friar’s Walk and Barrack St if you are walking towards Barrack St.

    • #733926
      lexington
      Participant


      @Leesider wrote:

      Just wondering about a few proposed developments I haven’t heard much about recently.

      First one up is The Showgrounds, has there been any movement on who is eventually going to acquire this and when? I presume the GAA are the frontrunners here, something badly needs to be done with Pairc Ui Chaoimh, it is looking very rundown!

      There are 2, possibly 3 projects here – however, it is my understanding that the GAA are NOT the forerunners for the Munster Agricultural Showgrounds. As for the GAA, they do have plans – early reports indicated a pitch realignment and rejuvenated stands with a hotel etc – but I haven’t heard much on them lately (thats the possible 3rd). Another plan for a site near the MAS is proceeding well – however a planning date is not yet known.

      @Leesider wrote:

      Next up, is the private hospital going ahead on the Bandon Rd, heard reports a while back it was going in for planning but nothing since, any info??

      The application is still in planning with CorkCoCo.

      @Leesider wrote:

      Water St., what is the current situation?? Has an appeal been put in to reinstate the original tower element??

      The appeal is not long lodged and I haven’t heard anything as of yet back on how planners are viewing it. It’s too early to tell.



      jungle – planning is on that Tower Street site for housing.



      More details and updates later.

    • #733927
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      This morning’s examiner brings up an interesting question. How will the latest announcment by CIE effect the debate on locating a major Conference/Concert venue at the Horgan’s Quay site?
      Will Manor Park Homes be interested in locating such a building there? Or will they do a deal with another developer for the venue?

    • #733928
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      How come we’ve gone back to four stars?

    • #733929
      kite
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Think lexington already outlined plans for Custom house quay – you’ll have to look back a few pages but he did I’m sure.

      Good news bout Horgans quay alright.

      Thanks for that,if lexington did have a posting on Custom House Quay anyone got a post number? (lazy me)

    • #733930
      Leesider
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      This morning’s examiner brings up an interesting question. How will the latest announcment by CIE effect the debate on locating a major Conference/Concert venue at the Horgan’s Quay site?
      Will Manor Park Homes be interested in locating such a building there? Or will they do a deal with another developer for the venue?

      Cheers for the info Lexington and with regard to the above wasn’t one of the plans for an event centre for the MSA?? Seems like the next best option if it’s not to go ahead on the Horgan’s Quay site.

    • #733931
      phatman
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      😀 If The Simpson’s have thought us anything it’s that Monorails are a decidedly dodgy notion.

      Donuts.Is there anything they can’t do? 😀

    • #733932
      indubitably
      Participant

      The city manager is expecting an application from MPH for the 5,000 seater event centre and one would have thought that if he expects it, the likelihood is that it will come.

    • #733933
      phatman
      Participant

      @indubitably wrote:

      The city manager is expecting an application from MPH for the 5,000 seater event centre and one would have thought that if he expects it, the likelihood is that it will come.

      An ol case of “you scratch our back and we’ll scratch yours” eh.

    • #733934
      lexington
      Participant

      @indubitably wrote:

      The city manager is expecting an application from MPH for the 5,000 seater event centre and one would have thought that if he expects it, the likelihood is that it will come.

      Breathe easy on this one for a while – but you can be sure, an event centre is on the way. ]RM[/B] mentioned that already.



      😉 Custom House Quay news on the way soon

      …also…MPH plans for Horgan’s Quay – more details within the coming weeks.

    • #733935
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Anna O’Connor’s residential development destined for the derelict warehousing site at the corner of York Hill and Wellington Road has again been refused at the hands of CCC Planner Noel Riordan, despite substantial revisions to this her latest application. The refusal relate to issues of design, suitability and height. The four-storey development was submitted consequent of a prior refusal for a larger development of 6-storeys and 24-residential units, plus 80sq m of office space and basement car-park. MV Cullinan were architects.

      – More updates soon.

    • #733936
      sw101
      Participant

      there’s a spot in today’s examiner with a bit of spiel about mr. kenny’s big glass thing on the quays and a pretty decent internal render. seems to be designed around sustainability and the requirements of the revenue crew.

      there’s a second render of the quay elevation sneakily stuck into the next page, hiding amonst the ads.

    • #733937
      kite
      Participant

      Thanks for the upcoming info on Custom House Quay..Anyone wondering why is is difficult to convince people that they have nothing to fear regarding high rise buildings should take a look at O. Mitchell FG TDs views on high hise at http://www.corksouthwest.com News page.

    • #733938
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Anyone wondering why is is difficult to convince people that they have nothing to fear regarding high rise buildings should take a look at O. Mitchell FG TDs views on high hise at http://www.corksouthwest.com News page.

      Just take a look at this ridiculous picture I found on the above mentioned website. Now, I had my problems with the Jury’s development too but people should be prosecuted for this sort of scare-mongering.


      I note with a smile that a work crew is on site at Cornmarket Street (The Coal Quay) erecting a considerable amount of scaffolding on buildings adjacent to the Guys building- presumably paving the way for work to get going there soon.
      Does anyone have a pic of what this development will look like when its done?



      As noted by sw101 above, Tommy Barker has an article in today’s examiner relating to impending movement of the Revenue Commisioners and Paul Kenny’s € 100 million office development on St. PAtrick’s Quay. This 156,000 sq ft building is designed by Wilson Architecture and judging by the “exclusive” pictures on todays examiner they did a mighty fine job. Interior image is particularly nice, giving a fine view of the proposed curved front elevation.

      In his article, Barker noted that six sites were in the running for the RC deal. He mentioned one on Watercourse Road. Any ideas what site he’s talking about?



      Echo Boy Update
      Despite reports last week that this statue would be re-instated in St. Patrick’s Street on either tuesday or wednesday of this week, there is no sign of it yet. I would have thought a date with Bertie yesterday would have been encouragement enough for de Paper to get their fingers out but obviously not. The mystery deepens…..

    • #733939
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Work is beginning, as previously reported it would be, a few weeks back, on Rockfell Investments (Michael O’Donoghue) 58m euro Cornmarket Street development. The project designed by Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis & Associates will house 9 retail units over 170,000sq ft, 65 apartments and 66 basement car-parking spaces. The plan will revitalise this area of the city and heed the way for CCC’s 5m euro redevelopment of the long-neglected street. This development is an important steeping stone in the extension of Cork’s Core Retail Area – wingining north from Daunt Square/Patrick’s Street. Primary construction is set to begin after a number of site assessments (as part of the grant conditions) – I am informed that this is not expected to take a considerable length of time. Demolition work is well advanced with large majorities of the site to the rear of the Musgrave Building now removed and scaffolding now being erected on the facades of adjoining buildings scheduled for demolition as part of the development. The site had once been earmarked by Michael O’Donoghue for a 9-storey, 400-bedroom hotel – however this was refused on appeal, despite a CCC grant. Construction is set to take 18 months. The retail mall has received extensive interest with Habitat set to occupy a prime unit. More info and new images soon.



      2nd image = An original design on the development before significant improvements.


      @Radioactiveman wrote:


      I note with a smile that a work crew is on site at Cornmarket Street (The Coal Quay) erecting a considerable amount of scaffolding on buildings adjacent to the Guys building- presumably paving the way for work to get going there soon.
      Does anyone have a pic of what this development will look like when its done?



      As noted by sw101 above, Tommy Barker has an article in today’s examiner relating to impending movement of the Revenue Commisioners and Paul Kenny’s € 100 million office development on St. PAtrick’s Quay. This 156,000 sq ft building is designed by Wilson Architecture and judging by the “exclusive” pictures on todays examiner they did a mighty fine job. Interior image is particularly nice, giving a fine view of the proposed curved front elevation.

      In his article, Barker noted that six sites were in the running for the RC deal. He mentioned one on Watercourse Road. Any ideas what site he’s talking about?

      Re: Cornmarket Street – see above.

      As for the Watercourse Road, it’s a development of 85,000sq ft of office space by Joe Carey and Frank Sheahan. The developers have planning but no progress on the site.

      I can tell you, and you can take my word for it, that 3 locations have been unoffically short-listed by the OPW with a decision due in the not too distant future. The Kenny development is on the 3.

    • #733940
      who_me
      Participant

      I don’t know if anyone else noticed, but Euronews (the ‘magazine style’ repeating Europe-wide news program that shows on several channels) had a lengthy spot about Libeskind and his Eighteen Turns, with several mentions of Cork, the City of Culture celebrations and the upcoming docklands development here. Great publicity for the city.

    • #733941
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Thanks Lex, but any idea whereabouts the site is? I know on Watercourse Road, but I cant think of any site that could accomodate such a sizeable development.

    • #733942
      who_me
      Participant

      Reading from the same site quoted above, this had me in stitches:

      “The 2001 Docklands Stategy states:

      1.16 ‘The City’s successful bid for the European Cultural Capital 2005 seeks to celebrate the obvious qualities of the city and provides a parallel commitment of the Docklands Plan’

      1.21 ‘A clearly defined public realm strategy to instil a distinct new identity to the Docklands area. Critical to this is maintaining a ‘spirit of Cork’ in rebranding the area as a place with the highest quality of architectural and public space design, integrating great buildings, landscape & public art’.

      3 years have elapsed since those statements were made.

      3 years during which there has been much quoted about the Docklands redevelopment east of Custom House Street, but not one project has been started.

      3 years during which the City’s ‘commitment of the Docklands plan’ for urban regeneration apparently includes allowing part of the Bonded Warehouse to deteriorate to such a poor state of repair that it has actually fallen down.

      Nowhere in the area can one see this ‘distinct new identity’

      Nowhere in the area can one see ‘the highest quality of architectural and public space design, integrating great buildings, landscape & public art’”

      So, to paraphrase the site’s message – “Let’s BAN any “high rise” development, and criticise developers where and when possible…and why the hell aren’t there any new developments in the city?”

      Jaysus…

    • #733943
      Mob79
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      .Anyone wondering why is is difficult to convince people that they have nothing to fear regarding high rise buildings should take a look at O. Mitchell FG TDs views on high hise at http://www.corksouthwest.com News page.

      That site is gold, “Show your support for our efforts to end the building
      of High-Rise FLATS
      (Future SLUMS?)”
      and a 4 story slum is ok? He’d be better off looking for solutions than shouting populist slogans.

    • #733944
      kite
      Participant

      @Mob79 wrote:

      That site is gold, “Show your support for our efforts to end the building
      of High-Rise FLATS
      (Future SLUMS?)”
      and a 4 story slum is ok? He’d be better off looking for solutions than shouting populist slogans.

      Im sure most of us would agree with you, had more time to go through this site. What is going on in Cork? According to the CSD site there is a motion before CCC to ban any development over 3 stories in the suburbs from councillor David McCarthy FF!!!
      Tell me this is not true ? check it out on http://www.corksouthwest.com the anti high rise website…

    • #733945
      opus
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Thanks for the upcoming info on Custom House Quay..Anyone wondering why is is difficult to convince people that they have nothing to fear regarding high rise buildings should take a look at O. Mitchell FG TDs views on high hise at http://www.corksouthwest.com News page.

      I’d have to agree with their comment on the Victoria Mills development though 🙂

      If 15 year old students designed these Flats for a Technical Graphics exam, would they FAIL ??

      (Victoria Cross Flats built in 2004.)

    • #733946
      kite
      Participant

      @opus wrote:

      I’d have to agree with their comment on the Victoria Mills development though 🙂

      If 15 year old students designed these Flats for a Technical Graphics exam, would they FAIL ??

      (Victoria Cross Flats built in 2004.)

      Agreed, but to try and ban any development over 3 stories in the suburbs surely cannot suceed??

    • #733947
      rodger
      Participant

      The Cork South West web site is a credit to all involved,what I do not understand is the issue of the loss of 100 hundred jobs in the area,I know some time back there was talk of some form of residential development on this site,does any one know the current position?

    • #733948
      kite
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      The Cork South West web site is a credit to all involved,what I do not understand is the issue of the loss of 100 hundred jobs in the area,I know some time back there was talk of some form of residential development on this site,does any one know the current position?

      Not sure where the 100 jobs mentioned are, i assume they are in the Farm Centre Dennehys Cross, but surely you cannot agree to ban development over 3 floors???? :confused:

    • #733949
      phatman
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      Im sure most of us would agree with you, had more time to go through this site. What is going on in Cork? According to the CSD site there is a motion before CCC to ban any development over 3 stories in the suburbs from councillor David McCarthy FF!!!
      Tell me this is not true ? check it out on http://www.corksouthwest.com the anti high rise website…

      Are these people stupid?!!I mean this is ignorance, pure ignorance. The extract from the website further up just proves it – do they expect the whole docklands to be transformed with the wave of a magic wand or wot??Obviously never heard of the phrase ‘Rome wasn’t built in a day’, and they obviously havent been along Lapp’s Quay lately. haha who are they kidding. ban high rise my arse. Maybe if they try reasoning in a realistic and professional manner, people might try listening, but to be honest i can’t take anybody who considers 3 stories + as highrise seriously, They should really reconsider their campaign, and focus it away from such propaganda and scare tactics. I mean the picture of ‘Jurys’ beats all. I do appreciate their concerns and empatize with them to a certain extent but this is fooling no-one! I hope :o.I do have to agree tho, as im sure most people do, about Victoria Mills. Im pretty sure it would be viewed pretty dimly by any technical graphics teacher alright. I call it duploland myself, u know those big lego blocks?! Now that’s an idea, might set about building a replica, could post the picture up too….

    • #733950
      lexington
      Participant

      Some of the opinions on that website are just riding the populist fear-factor all the way to election. It’s a pity – but these tactics simply compound the uninformed or short-sighted minds of some.

      My disdain for Victoria Mills is well documented but I don’t believe this should be used as a sole cause and justification for anyone to condemn high-rise. I can’t think of one city that hasn’t endured similar architectural disappointments. Lessons should be learned. It stands to be said that the genuine high-rise projects presented to Cork of late, have been generally very positive (I cite Eglinton Street and Water Street in this circumstance) and that should also be recognised. Dave McCarthy’s proposal is simply a tip to his constituents – its popular and we should remember, Dave is ‘the people’s man’ according to the June 11th 2004 run-up. A move such as a ban on highrise is not in the interests of sustainable and logical urban development – is the alternative no countryside lined with linear blocks of boring house after house? Not everyone has the budget to afford a Gaudi-esque mansion. In places like Bishopstown, 3-storeys is cited as highrise (ridiculously!) – this logic is fecious. Were it to be implemented into policy – it would seem extended logic to demolish the hundreds of 3-storey homes in the area, Cork University Hospital (except the A&E and morturary), plans for Wilton S.C., some of CIT and countless other elements. As much as I criticise and disagree with our city’s planners, I don’t believe they are ill-cognitive to adhere to such ideas – they have a great deal more information that many of those that call for such policy.

      The End.

      (P.S. The supposed rendition of Jurys is laughable to those in the know – but it sends a very wrong and unfair message to those who base judgement on such graphics. In this sense, such propaganda is no laughing matter.)

    • #733951
      pier39
      Participant

      that website is a laugh! for all the wrong reasons.

      hey wats tommy barker on about with exclusive pics??? they were up on this website ages ago – but then again not everyone has archiseek i suppose. im feeling all warm and priveleged all of a sudden! lawdeedaw! 😉

      also yay cornmarket st – we’ve been waiting a long time and finally here we go! whoopee!

    • #733952
      ewankennedy
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Work is beginning, as previously reported it would be, a few weeks back, on Rockfell Investments (Michael O’Donoghue) 58m euro Cornmarket Street development. The project designed by Niall Coffey of Frank Ennis & Associates will house 9 retail units over 170,000sq ft, 65 apartments and 66 basement car-parking spaces. The plan will revitalise this area of the city and heed the way for CCC’s 5m euro redevelopment of the long-neglected street. This development is an important steeping stone in the extension of Cork’s Core Retail Area – wingining north from Daunt Square/Patrick’s Street. Primary construction is set to begin after a number of site assessments (as part of the grant conditions) – I am informed that this is not expected to take a considerable length of time. Demolition work is well advanced with large majorities of the site to the rear of the Musgrave Building now removed and scaffolding now being erected on the facades of adjoining buildings scheduled for demolition as part of the development. The site had once been earmarked by Michael O’Donoghue for a 9-storey, 400-bedroom hotel – however this was refused on appeal, despite a CCC grant. Construction is set to take 18 months. The retail mall has received extensive interest with Habitat set to occupy a prime unit. More info and new images soon.



      Was walking passed Cornmarket street tonight and saw the scaffolding, delighted to see this project get a move on. Highly anticipated and from what I hear it’ll be a great city centre addition.

      Also just regarding the CAHRA/CSD crowd and their website – I suspect Frinilla are gonna get a tough time from these beauties when they lodge their plans for Dennehys cross.

    • #733953
      The Glass eye
      Participant

      We need some high rise buildings in cork, probaby in a normal piramid style, tallest in the city center and graduateing towards the subverbs. But If we ever hope to see the docklands a reality in the next century maybe the planning athourites should curb very tall buildings in the rest of the city, After all is it not the CCC plan to rejuvinate the city centre and docklands, I think they might try sticking to there ideas :rolleyes: .
      Would It be wrong of me to say that the only reason why we have not seen much development in the docklands is because the land has rocketed in value since it was earmarked far development, and maybe the only reason the suburbs are getting a lot of atention is because the land is cheaper and easyier to develop.
      I wish we could keep the city centre as quality development zone where new buildings are in keeping with the ones that suround them by
      1. style
      or 2. materials, etc similar to concepts in other city’s, bath, edinburgh, etc I think the crawford art gallery exstention is a geat exsample of a mondern structure working in harmony with its suroundings, Where as that thing that they are sticking on to our city hall is an insult to my pride as a cork person and I can not say this any stronger then I would would like to lamp the people who did this abomination 😡 .

      Does anyboby know of any other buildings in Cork City, Where mondern design works well in complementing the old.

    • #733954
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      A group of investors are apparently looking to build Cork’s first Crematorium on Rocky Island in Cork Harbour. This is the island located between Haulbowline and the mainland at Ringaskiddy. It’s also immediately adjacent to Cork’s envisaged new Toxic waste Incinerator. It will be interesting to see CHASE’s reaction to this.



      What with all the talk of a new bus/train terminal for Cork, here’s an image from CCC’s Cork Dockland’s Development Report which shows one view of such a development. Just something to ponder on!

    • #733955
      lexington
      Participant

      🙁 Declan O’Mahony’s BrideView Developments are to lodge an application soon with CorkCoCo for the development of 429 residential units at a 26-acre site in Castleredmond, Midelton which they purchased last year for 19m euros. The site includes the historic Lakeview House. BrideView’s plans envisage an arrangement of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 bedroom houses and apartments – consistent of 101 dwelling-houses and 328 apartments in a building between 1 and 5-storeys in height. As part of the development, a 3-storey 24-bed nursing home will be constructed, 2 tennis courts, a football pitch and outdoor games facility. Design is by O’Mahony Pike. Hmmm.



      😎 John Keating is set to apply to CCC to develop a residential development at the former Keating Bakery along the Tramore Road. The development will consist of 40 2-bedroom apartments over a 60-space basement car-park along with 4 individual blocks home to 16 2-bedroom ‘garden apartments’, 16 3-bedroom duplexes and associated landscaping.



      The Changing Face of Cork’s Quaysides

      With the completion of No.6 Lapps Quay imminent, Cork’s quaysides are making a gradual, attractive change for the better. Prospective projects by OFC at Eglinton Street and Albert Quay, as well as Howard Holdings on Albert Quay (the WebWorks – under construction) will help complement the new structures pictured below across the river on Lapps Quay. DAT Partnerships plan for Clontarf Street should help provide a nice little addition to this emerging business district, planning pending. Also speculative projects by OCP at Custom House Quay and a possible development on the sprawling Careys Tool Hire premises will help ensure that this area of the city is not only among the newest, but also, the most attractive.



      Mahon Point

      I received some info today regarding Mahon Point S.C. from a individual following an e-mailled enquiry. Anytime I’ve visit Mahon Point S.C. recently, it’s never seemed as busy as one would expect – I acounted this to some of my visiting times (such as Monday noon), however, after sussing out details it would seem the feelings of tenant retaillers are decidely mixed.

      Omniplex – the Ward Anderson 13-screen multiplex – have reported positive trading results and seem most satisfied with their level of business. Similarly, Gasoline Jeanswear, Jack & Jones, Easons, Bershka and most of the food outlets have all reported positive results. According to one source, Debenhams (the anchor department store) have exceeded the turnover projections for the first 4-months of trading by an apparent, but questionable, 3m euros. Tesco, the supermarket anchor, claim business has steadied after stormy start. However, many other retaillers claim that the centre has not reached their expectations in trading – Lacoste (who, one source claims are actively seeking a city centre location(?)), Best Menswear, Ecco, Barratts and Adams all reporting so-so levels of trade.

      Funnily enough, despite retailler claims to the contrary, pedestrian movements within the city centre have grown 9.8% on the same time last year with many businesses reporting healthy and/or above average trading levels. Even stranger, suburban shopping centres such as Douglas Court, Wilton S.C. and Blackpool S.C. have reported no major declinations in business since the opening of Mahon Point (with the exception of minor dips in the centre’s first few weeks of operations).

      It would seem that MP’s apparent woes are based on a number of issues including:

      a.) the traffic congestion consequent of the MP and Jacob’s Island developments would seem to have been turning persons away from venturing to the centre.

      b.) the lack of an adequate public transport service to the centre.

      c.) the mix of retaillers is very much geared toward female tastes – which has turned-off many higher-spending males. With exception of suit stores like Best and Suits You, the established male fashion retaillers have been trading well.

      MP, after an initial burst of curiousity by the public, would now seem to be trying to find its ‘niche’. Whereas Douglas, Wilton and Blackpool shopping centres are established community convenient centres (albeit higher-order ones), MP surroundings don’t immediately compliment the development given the tenant mix. However, it is expected that over the coming months, MP will settle into its nest and trade should even out – especially with the many impending residential and office developments in the area (such as Jacob’s Island, Dunkettle and the Coleman Brothers development nearby) coming on stream – visitation levels should increase to meet projected 140,000 movements per week (currently the figure is believed to be in and around 90,000).

      It would seem, for all the huff and puff, the city centre has come out trumps again – with more people than ever still opting for a day along Patrick’s Street than a trek to Mahon. It is my own belief that the Academy Street retail development will more likely provide a greater success story than that of MP. Retail is booming in Cork, but it’s crown jewels are still at its centre. The large retail developments gearing up at Cornmarket Street, Grand Parade and Grand Parade Plaza can keep licking their lips.

    • #733956
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      😎 BrideView Developments are to lodge an application soon with CorkCoCo for the development of 429 residential units at a 26-acre site in Castleredmond, Midelton which they purchased last year for 19m euros. The site includes the historic Lakeview House. BrideView’s plans envisage an arrangement of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 bedroom houses and apartments – consistent of 101 dwelling-houses and 328 apartments in a building between 1 and 5-storeys in height. As part of the development, a 3-storey 24-bed nursing home will be constructed, 2 tennis courts, a football pitch and outdoor games facility. Hmmm. 🙁

      Lexington, from your top sort of happy face and your bottom unhappy face, it is hard to make out what your thoughts are on this development. Is it that you favour the top and dislike the bottom part of it?

      Edited:
      Your editing of your original post further confuses the question!

    • #733957
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      Lexington, from your top sort of happy face and your bottom unhappy face, it is hard to make out what your thoughts are on this development. Is it that you favour the top and dislike the bottom part of it?

      Edited:
      Your editing of your original post further confuses the question!

      😀 Sorry phil – thought I’d solve the problem by fixing the smile-face but instead it would seem I just made it worse.

      I suppose my feelings regarding the BrideView development are not feelings of overall favour. I have a ‘thing’ against developing estate lands for more boring old housing patterns. In this case Lakeview House/Estate, and the same too goes for Dunkettle House and Tellengana Lodge. I think we should preserve these fine lands and manors for recreational or single-occupany use (the way they were intended) rather than redevelop them into another housing estate. I suppose they’re just so darn attractive to build on from a development perspective – but its just a personal preference. There’s plenty of other vacant land for that sort of development but only a finite few estates such as the aforementioned still in their original state.

    • #733958
      Anonymous
      Participant

      I agree,

      Given the investment being made in extending a high-quality rail connection to Midleton a density of less than 20 per acre is not sustainable. The key to sustainable development is to develop medium density schemes in the right places and preserve amenity lands elsewhere, if its resi land its too low density and if its amenity it should be preserved for neighbouring higher density schemes. 🙁

    • #733959
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 Sorry phil – thought I’d solve the problem by fixing the smile-face but instead it would seem I just made it worse.

      I suppose my feelings regarding the BrideView development are not feelings of overall favour. I have a ‘thing’ against developing estate lands for more boring old housing patterns. In this case Lakeview House/Estate, and the same too goes for Dunkettle House and Tellengana Lodge. I think we should preserve these fine lands and manors for recreational or single-occupany use (the way they were intended) rather than redevelop them into another housing estate. I suppose they’re just so darn attractive to build on from a development perspective – but its just a personal preference. There’s plenty of other vacant land for that sort of development but only a finite few estates such as the aforementioned still in their original state.

      No problem. 🙂 I was just confused by it. I agree also with your latter point. It is a pity to see these lands being redeveloped into more monotonous housing estates (looks like there is one in the area adjacent to that site in the photo). You are also right in saying they are just to attractive to build upon from a develpmental perspective. Interesting to see some of it will be apartments though.

    • #733960
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      Lex, Regarding your MP comments… like Liffey Valley it would not exist if it were not for the tax payer funded infrastrucuture put in place before. It is unrealistic to imagine anyone other than car owner making their way to MP/Liffey Valley. In terms of activity there – do they not chime with similar comments made about Dundrum recently? Are prospective retailers getting overhyped reports on the state of suburban retailing in this country?

    • #733961
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      re. this picture, originally posted by Lexington above, maybe its just the picture, but the development itself looks seriously dodgy. Very blocky and ‘stuck on’ the existing buildings.

    • #733962
      lexington
      Participant

      I think you’ll be happy with the end product RM – you can sigh relief. The 1st image shows part of the revised proposal which was greenlit – including the tasty curve-linear copper canopy and link to the Noddys building across Little Market Street. It’s a good project.

    • #733963
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      I have seen the revised plans for Cornmarket street and I think it will look well too when its done.

      Lex I agree with your point on Brideviews Midelton plan. It would be nice to keep as many of these estates as possible. Hopefully the council will wise up.

      Also…just out of pure curiosity Lex are der any Uk architecture firms youd like to see design buildings in Cork? I only ask cos I’ve been compiling info on international firms who have operated in Ireland and now I’m doing the Uk so I was wondering what firms if you had a choice would you like to see in Corks redevelopment??? 🙂

    • #733964
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Also…just out of pure curiosity Lex are der any Uk architecture firms youd like to see design buildings in Cork? I only ask cos I’ve been compiling info on international firms who have operated in Ireland and now I’m doing the Uk so I was wondering what firms if you had a choice would you like to see in Corks redevelopment??? 🙂

      I think I may have remarked on some of the architectural firms I like in Cork/Ireland – I may update that list soon – but as for the UK?

      There are a number of UK-based firms I find most interesting. The abundance of practices based across the Channel are far to numerous to be familiar in their numerical entirety – however one firm I would very much like to see employed, perhaps in a landmark docklands development, simply based on their design history is EPR Architects. If it was my choice, EPR mixed with Antonio Gaudi would probably produce my kind of project :p .

      Obviously Foster & Partners (on occasion – as far as I’m concerned, Foster comes out with either a gem [Swiss Re Building] or a dodgy affair [eg. Scottish Gas HQ]), Niall McLaughlin (sometimes) and a few of the other noteworthy names are also of interest – but EPR are probably one of the lesser recognised, but equally dynamic practices based in the UK. However, I do believe it would be up to the developer to ask the firm to push themselves when it comes to design. M3 Architects are another interesting bunch – vehemently modern however.

      Below are images of an interesting EPR project at Cardinal Place in London. Probably not everyone’s taste – but at least its willing to explore options beyond the standard 90 degrees.

      I like the extensive and eco-friendly use of greenery – fully-fledged gardens are actually incorporated into office and retails spaces. Some of EPR’s residential stuff is a lot less worth raving about however.

      EPR Architects]Foster & Partners[/URL]; M3 Architects

      Interesting that you should ask that ewankennedy – however, I do believe Ireland and Cork has quite a lot of talent on its own when given the right push and the freedom to do so. Recent flairs by Coughlan de Keyser, Wilson Architecture and Patrick A. Cashman & Associates have shown that for example. But I believe we should still keep pushing the architectural boundaries – especially in Cork now that we have the opportunity to do so, and in many cases, developers with the money to provide such. Clontarf Street perhaps provides one of the most interesting forms – however I would like to see us keep pushing more and more and improve on each proposal. There will always be a few blue notes it would seem – i.e. the Capitol, Victoria Mills etc – but the trick is to outnumber x with y. EPR may be interesting, but their architecture is still not near where I would ultimately like to see our Cork’s future buildings going – that is why I noted EPR blended with Gaudi as an example. Detail and art to architecture. Colour, shape, curve and beauty. I think with the right encouragement, guidance and allowance – our own architects may be able to achieve this.

    • #733965
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 The Reliance Building at 10/11 Andersons Quay has been receiving some interesting glances since its placement on the market back in late May. Reliance will be relocating to new purpose built premises in the near future, allowing them provide this attractive city centre site for a potential large-scale redevelopment. Hamilton Osbourne King have received approx. 10 legitimate offers for the 0.4 acre site, which is guiding in and around 5m euros. Among the bidders, it is believed that interest has been expressed by a Dublin-based group (who have been actively looking for a prime city centre/docklands site in Cork for at least 3 months), supposedly businessman Tommy Maher (who co-owns the adjoining Mahers Sports premises) and another prominent Cork developer (generally associated with residential developments).

      The Maher bid would make sense as it would allow any development there take full scope of the waterfront quayside and allow for a more substantial and prominent development.

      The location is in an area of prime development and situated to the rear of Howard Holdings’ City Quarter development and OFC’s No.5/6 Lapps Quay development. Also, across the road, DAT Partnerships are in planning for a 30,000sq ft, 9-storey landmark office building designed by Coughlan de Keyser (on Clontarf Street); Paul Kenny awaits a decision on his proposal for the new 127,000sq ft Revenue Commissioners offices this coming Tuesday 14th June 2005 on St. Patrick’s Quay (opposite the Reliance Building); OCP have plans on Custom House Quay’s PoC warehousing which they successfully purchased 2 months ago for over 6.75m euros. Also, there are further plans earmarked for nearby Parnell Place, which will also see a new 121-bedroom hotel on the now famous Corbett site (application in planning). Also not far away, Frank Doyle’s 20,000sq ft warehouse sold not so long ago for a final price tipping on 8m euros!!! The successful purchaser is apparently in discussions with the adjoining Twill Ltd warehousing (???).

      Whoever the Reliance Building goes to, any future development at this site will be at the epicentre of a rejuvenated city quarter. Pressure will be on the developer to provide a development equal or higher in design quality to that of its neighbours and prospective neighbours.




      😮 Manor Park Homes plans for Horgan’s Quay are gearing up for planning. It is expected, though yet to be confirmed by CIE or MPH, that the application will be lodged either in sync or in relatively close time proximity so as to allow the developments emerge together. I hope to have some details on the contents of the planning application within the coming weeks.

    • #733966
      A-ha
      Participant

      [font=Arial:39mkz4sb]Does anyone know who else, besides Habitat are interested in Cornmarket Street. I've heard talk about H&M moving in there. Also, when the f**k is IKEA supposed to open in Dublin. Ireland must be the only country in the world that doesn't have a single IKEA. Has the store even been built yet??[/font:39mkz4sb] :confused:

    • #733967
      lexington
      Participant

      Developer and Auctioneer Joe Carey has donated 10,000euros to the prize fund to design a new redevelopment of Cork City Library. An international architectural competition to provide a landmark new design for an enlarged library premises (up to 4,700sq m of space) was launched earlier this year by CCC. A decision on the new design is due for September.

    • #733968
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Wallace’s Jewellery Shop in North Main Street was destroyed totally by a fire yesterday. I believe the building was recently renovated so it is particulrly tough on the store owners.

    • #733969
      genario
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      A good building. Intresting. It would be nice to see maybe 1 or maybe 2 of this buildings in Cork. But it will need some adjustments.

    • #733970
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      If it was my choice, EPR mixed with Antonio Gaudi would probably produce my kind of project :p.

      I think Santiago Calatrava would fall into that category

      Below are images of an interesting EPR project at Cardinal Place in London. Probably not everyone’s taste – but at least its willing to explore options beyond the standard 90 degrees.

      I like the extensive and eco-friendly use of greenery – fully-fledged gardens are actually incorporated into office and retails spaces. Some of EPR’s residential stuff is a lot less worth raving about however.

      EPR Architects]Foster & Partners[/URL]; M3 Architects

      That project is under construction at present

    • #733971
      Freddie
      Participant

      Hope Mark Kelleher has more luck with his planning application at “Caterham”
      than he did at “Westend” see TP 05/29464.
      CAHRA should not have a problem with this application (2 storeys), but with
      that crowd you would never know?
      However the “blue rinse” brigade will proberly be lamenting the loss of
      another quality house in their beloved Bishopstown, sad,sad,sad.
      Maybe it is time to take the advice of another contributor to this website
      and take the pensions off the OAPs that stand in the way of progress.

    • #733972
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Freddie wrote:

      Hope Mark Kelleher has more luck with his planning application at “Caterham”
      than he did at “Westend” see TP 05/29464.
      CAHRA should not have a problem with this application (2 storeys), but with
      that crowd you would never know?
      However the “blue rinse” brigade will proberly be lamenting the loss of
      another quality house in their beloved Bishopstown, sad,sad,sad.
      Maybe it is time to take the advice of another contributor to this website
      and take the pensions off the OAPs that stand in the way of progress.

      Think you’re referring to something lexington said Freddie but it wasnt about the elderly, he said that if objectors are using their childrens allowance to finance appeals – such as with jurys – that they should probably have their childrens allowance taken off them and given to those who genuinely depend on it and cant afford to waste it on sumthing so inappropriate. the childrens allowance is suppose to be money for food, clothes, education and the group involved were flaunting it publically about using it to fund objections!!!

    • #733973
      Pug
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Minihan’s Jewellery Shop in North MAin Street was destroyed totally by a fire yesterday. Apartments overhead were also destroyed. I believe the building was recently renovated so it is particulrly tough on residents and the store owners.
      Will surely lead to an even more gap-toothed apparence for the street.

      do you mean the one on castle street next to the coal quay or is there another one on north main st?

    • #733974
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 You may already know what this is about but…More Later!!! 😉

    • #733975
      dowlingm
      Participant

      Hopefully the entire corner can be developed, not just Reliance. Isn’t the old chandlery (can’t remember what’s there now), the dogs home and a garage? surely all can be relocated. It’s a bit of a mess traffic wise with the bus station across the way.

    • #733976
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Think that was lexington who said that Freddie. But he said that if objectors are using their childrens allowance to finance appeals – such as with jurys – that they should probably have their childrens allowance taken off them and given to those who genuinely depend on it and cant afford to waste it on sumthing so inappropriate. right too!!!

      Is it actually legal to say that you are using your childrens allowance to appeal, surely its for the kids (or at least its supposed to)?

    • #733977
      mickeydocs
      Participant
      lexington wrote:
      😀 You may already know what this is about but…More Later!!! ]

      Eglinton street has received planning?

    • #733978
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Lidl GmbH has gone in for a 3rd time with an application to develop a store in the Churchfield area of Cork. The plan, for Mount Agnes Road will incorporate a single storey discount foodstore and a further 2-storey building containing 5 community units and associated car-parking. Third time lucky for Lidl?



      No mickeydocs , had the post up last night but I’ll have it up again soon. Fingers crossed!

    • #733979
      Leesider
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      No mickeydocs , had the post up last night but I’ll have it up again by mid-day fingers crossed!

      Patrick’s Quay has got planning??

    • #733980
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Lidl GmbH has gone in for a 3rd time with an application to develop a store in the Churchfield area of Cork. The plan, for Mount Agnes Road will incorporate a single storey discount foodstore and a further 2-storey building containing 5 community units and associated car-parking. Third time lucky for Lidl?



      No mickeydocs , had the post up last night but I’ll have it up again by mid-day fingers crossed!

      of course 14th of June = planning date for Patricks Quay

      any news on the everyman palace and their plans for the quay?

      any decision date expected on Eglinton Street?

      Thanks as always

    • #733981
      kite
      Participant

      I almost missed Lex’s brief comments in posting 1704 where he advises that
      ‘OCP have plans on Custom House Quay’s PoC warehousing which they
      successfully purchased 2 months ago for over 6.75m euros’
      Surprising that if all that happened 2 months ago on this site we haven’t
      heard a word or seen OCP’s plans, thought the media circus would be in full
      swing by now.
      Are there any more details or proposed plans available?

    • #733982
      who_me
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      I almost missed Lex’s brief comments in posting 1704 where he advises that
      ‘OCP have plans on Custom House Quay’s PoC warehousing which they
      successfully purchased 2 months ago for over 6.75m euros’
      Surprising that if all that happened 2 months ago on this site we haven’t
      heard a word or seen OCP’s plans, thought the media circus would be in full
      swing by now.
      Are there any more details or proposed plans available?

      You’d have to look back a few pages. Should be easy to find – lots of aerial shots of the Custom House Quay!

      I think the current proposal was to knock the Bonded Warehouses only (the yellow buildings), and build a 15ish story building at the “tip” of the site. You’re right though, I haven’t seen much mention of it. No doubt it faces a rocky road through planning (as opposed to..?)

    • #733983
      lexington
      Participant

      of course 14th of June = planning date for Patricks Quay

      any news on the everyman palace and their plans for the quay?

      any decision date expected on Eglinton Street?

      Thanks as always

      Re: Announcement – I was prematurely informed that Paul Kenny’s RC development was to get the greenlight last night and withdrew the post lest it be found to be inaccurate.

      I have since heard little of it, but I believe, from the last that I heard – the application was looking positive. I will have confirmation of that tomorrow morning (I had expected the info today).

      -> Since last I heard (2 months ago), plans concerning a development for St. Patrick’s Quay, to the rear of the Everyman Palace, had been stalled. I believe it was regarding the lands, but I am honestly not sure. If I hear anything, I’ll let you know.

      -> Eglinton Street is not scheduled for a decision until the 7th of July 2005.



      kite , the only media reference to CHQ that I’m aware of was in the Irish Examiner some weeks back. OCP had been in preplanning discussions about a ‘landmark’ development on the site. Information suggests that the site was sold (under what basis = ?) between 6 and 7m euros, with one gentleman involved quoting around 6.75m euros. I currently do not have any info on what stage the project is at in terms of a plan announcement, however, it is said that they are to be revealed within the prospective future. I will not be posting anymore info in this project until I can confirm all the necessary details regarding the site/development – in the interests of accuracy.


    • #733984
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @kite wrote:

      I almost missed Lex’s brief comments in posting 1704 where he advises that
      ‘OCP have plans on Custom House Quay’s PoC warehousing which they
      successfully purchased 2 months ago for over 6.75m euros’
      Surprising that if all that happened 2 months ago on this site we haven’t
      heard a word or seen OCP’s plans, thought the media circus would be in full
      swing by now.
      Are there any more details or proposed plans available?

      Thing Ive noticed about this website is that the topics mentioned are sometimes very much in advance or just before an announcement or right in line with an annoucement. Ive followed reports in the local media after something goes up on the site and they often but not always seem to run along the lines that have been posted on this website page. I supose thats a recognition to the accuracy of the site. Often I find if a project isnt mentioned straight away it is mentioned later on. I was trying to write a little article for the UCC student newspaper last year based on something I read on this thread and when I contacted the relevant sources they denied denied denied and one guy even laugh at me saying where did you hear that??? Then 2 months later it turned out to be true! I think some timelines may get mixed up but generally the info is pretty good. But i think Corks media do a pretty good job themselves as well even if some figures are overinflated. (One girl in the Examiner wrote that City quarter was 300 million euro and then another reprot said it was 100 million but sure evryone makes mistakes and I still think its pretty good).

      By the way I see demolition is beginning on the old front of the Grand parade hotel on the Frinailla site there, progress finally??? :confused:

      Also what does anyone else think of the EPR building in London posted up this page? I think its looks pretty cool!

    • #733985
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 It would seem that it was a good thing I withdrew the premature information I was issued as Paul Kenny’s RC development of 127,000sq ft of office space, 15,000sq ft (approx) of retail space and a 235 space twin-deck underground car-park – arranged over 2 adjoining buildings ranging from 4 to 7 storeys and designed splendidly by Wilson Architecture – has now had Further Information requested of it. The design has generally received positive appraisal by CCC – however, the delay in planning, plus the possibility of an appeal may damper Mr. Kenny’s prospects somewhat with the OPW when it comes to final RC office selection.

    • #733986
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Is there any better images of that available Lexington? It looks slightly ridiculous to me at present (not your image, but the project itself. I am just hoping that a better quality image might reprieve it)

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Also what does anyone else think of the EPR building in London posted up this page? I think its looks pretty cool!

      Not so sure it is going to be so nice in the flesh, but I am waiting until it is finished to make up my mind fully

    • #733987
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I believe that the new Mardyke Bridge is to be officially opened this Thursday by the Lord Mayor.
      In connection with this, UCC currently have an application in planning for the construction of a a two storey 1675 sq.m. University Outreach and Access Building to include lecture rooms, research areas together with exhibition and cafe area which is linked to Cork City Councils bridge / walkway (Banks of The Lee) and includes the provision of two tennis courts with associated lighting.
      A submission regarding this development has already been submitted by Cork County Cricket Club.
      Anybody have any images of the above mentioned building?

      The bridge will link the Mardyke to UCC/Mercy Hospital owned Distillery Fields (off the North Mall) – one of the locations for Corcadorca’s promenade production of The Merchant of Venice which opened last night. I note that RTE news had a story about a Shakespeare production opening in Dublin last night, yet not a mention of The Merchant of Venice or indeed Victor Frankenstein last week. RTE are to be congratulated for not breaking with tradition and treating Cork like a cultural wasteland. Also, all mention of RTE’s sponsorship of CORK2005 have been removed from RTE’s Website. 😡

      :confused: Dissapointed with St. Patrick’s Quay news.

    • #733988
      theblimp
      Participant

      Anyone got any thoughts on the vertical colour banding of 6 (?) Lapps Quay (that’s the newest one)? Don’t quite know what colour to call it – I guess teracotta would be about the closest – but it just seems so out of place on a reasonably contemporary design.

      As for Paul Kenny’s RC development ’tis a pity that it’s off-centre due to having to protect some of the existing buildings. Just imagine what it could look like without them!! This is a strange one – I like the new design, and I like the aesthetic of the old buildings. However I don’t think they work well together in this execution. Mind you, the proposed Eastern elevation doesn’t appear to be too ground-breaking – could just as easily be one of the sides from the new City Quarter.

      I wonder what we’re all going to think in a decade or so when ‘glass & steel’ becomes old hat

    • #733989
      lexington
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      As for Paul Kenny’s RC development ’tis a pity that it’s off-centre due to having to protect some of the existing buildings. Just imagine what it could look like without them!! This is a strange one – I like the new design, and I like the aesthetic of the old buildings. However I don’t think they work well together in this execution. Mind you, the proposed Eastern elevation doesn’t appear to be too ground-breaking – could just as easily be one of the sides from the new City Quarter.

      I wonder what we’re all going to think in a decade or so when ‘glass & steel’ becomes old hat

      I agree that the design is off-centre, but given the nature of the site and the need to retain the protected structures, I think Wilson did a good job at putting a little imagination into a development that could have otherwise been another God-awful ‘mock’ incarnation with heavy red-brick and boring lines and verticals.

      However, as I have said way back when, I feel the same about ‘glass and steel’ structures, sure they may be the trend nowadays, but good architecture lasts the ages. Few buildings nowadays seem to mix the necessary blend. But that said, some older buildings that – if replicated nowadays would be slammed – retain recognition for their efforts as a representation of that period’s style. Perhaps some of the newer incarnations will, in years to come, be recognised as good examples of the architectural style of today.

    • #733990
      GregF
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      I think I may have remarked on some of the architectural firms I like in Cork/Ireland – I may update that list soon – but as for the UK?

      There are a number of UK-based firms I find most interesting. The abundance of practices based across the Channel are far to numerous to be familiar in their numerical entirety – however one firm I would very much like to see employed, perhaps in a landmark docklands development, simply based on their design history is EPR Architects. If it was my choice, EPR mixed with Antonio Gaudi would probably produce my kind of project :p .

      Obviously Foster & Partners (on occasion – as far as I’m concerned, Foster comes out with either a gem [Swiss Re Building] or a dodgy affair [eg. Scottish Gas HQ]), Niall McLaughlin (sometimes) and a few of the other noteworthy names are also of interest – but EPR are probably one of the lesser recognised, but equally dynamic practices based in the UK. However, I do believe it would be up to the developer to ask the firm to push themselves when it comes to design. M3 Architects are another interesting bunch – vehemently modern however.

      Below are images of an interesting EPR project at Cardinal Place in London. Probably not everyone’s taste – but at least its willing to explore options beyond the standard 90 degrees.

      I like the extensive and eco-friendly use of greenery – fully-fledged gardens are actually incorporated into office and retails spaces. Some of EPR’s residential stuff is a lot less worth raving about however.

      EPR Architects]Foster & Partners[/URL]; M3 Architects

      Interesting that you should ask that ewankennedy – however, I do believe Ireland and Cork has quite a lot of talent on its own when given the right push and the freedom to do so. Recent flairs by Coughlan de Keyser, Wilson Architecture and Patrick A. Cashman & Associates have shown that for example. But I believe we should still keep pushing the architectural boundaries – especially in Cork now that we have the opportunity to do so, and in many cases, developers with the money to provide such. Clontarf Street perhaps provides one of the most interesting forms – however I would like to see us keep pushing more and more and improve on each proposal. There will always be a few blue notes it would seem – i.e. the Capitol, Victoria Mills etc – but the trick is to outnumber x with y. EPR may be interesting, but their architecture is still not near where I would ultimately like to see our Cork’s future buildings going – that is why I noted EPR blended with Gaudi as an example. Detail and art to architecture. Colour, shape, curve and beauty. I think with the right encouragement, guidance and allowance – our own architects may be able to achieve this.

      This complex look s cool! (probably helped to by the good rendered image)

    • #733991
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      In an article in today’s examiner by Ray Ryan, George Jeffery chairman of the Munster Agricultural Society (MAS) points out that an announcement is due soon on the future development of its Showgrounds at Ballintemple.
      The aim apparently being to make Cork Showgrounds a “premier facility for Cork” and a “Resource Centre”.
      The announcement itself was pretty vague but given the size of the site and its position in the Docklands, I’d be expecting something big quite soon.

    • #733992
      Pug
      Participant

      is it true that a 32 storey building was granted permission at hueston in dublin?

    • #733993
      jungle
      Participant

      @Pug wrote:

      is it true that a 32 storey building was granted permission at hueston in dublin?

      https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=3383

    • #733994
      lexington
      Participant

      As promised, I would update you on the revised plans for Howard Holdings’ planned hotel and retail development on the former Thomas Crosbie Holdings lands at and around No.16 Lavitts Quay. The site had once been destined to home the new Irish Examiner and Evening Echo press offices before a deal was struck with Howard Holdings to occupy 27,000sq ft at their new City Quarter office development on Lapps Quay. As part of the deal, Howard Holdings acquired the TCH lands on Lavitts Quay with the intention of developing a 20m euro, 125-bedroom, 7-storey hotel on the site for Choice Hotels, a new Comfort Inn – with some retail space and a new coffee shop in a refurbished No.16 Lavitts Quay premises, a protected structure, scheduled to be incorporated into the development. Carrying over from the TCH office plans, architects Reddy O’Riordan Staehli were enlisted to design the hotel. A proposal was submitted just before Christmas of 2004 – the application received 5 submission/objections, largely criticising the design and bulk of the development. An argument I largely agree with. Michael Lynch, planner, requested Significant Further Information on the development. Today, Howard Holdings submitted those new plans.

      The hotel remains 7-storeys but has seen its parapet reduced to a height fractionally higher than neighbouring 21 Lavitts Quay (the OCP development designed by Patrick A. Cashman & Associates), the bedroom number has been reduced to 114 from 125 – this number was specificed by Choice Hotels as being the minimum viability level it can afford the development. Parking access has been revised also. The site space has been significantly utilised to embrace the spatial area more efficiently – as requested – and greater visual access has been afforded hotel guests. Better material finishings have also been applied. No.16 (a protected structure) has been much better incorporated and looks a great deal better in its refurbished state (as seen in the images) than its existing near derelict state.

      Below are 3 images – the 1st = the original application, the 2nd and 3rd = the new design from different angles.

      1.

      2. 3.

      I’m still not impressed.

      Opinions?

    • #733995
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      When I first saw the revisals I gasped in horror. It was as though ORiordin staheli took an awful project and just made in pink. What is it with all the pink buildings in Cork lately??? Anyway the more I looked at it the more I wonder. It is an improvement on the first proposal but I now cant make up my mind. Notice how the Lavitts quay elevation now seems to break up the bulk and massing by a division of layers. That is clever. And the stand-out box windows are a hark back to the first proposal but still is this really the best they can do? Wheres the imagination? Or am I wrong, could it be that its actually a clever design??? What do ye think? I grows on you I think but it still seems so bland. Ooh Im confused!!!

    • #733996
      theblimp
      Participant

      aarrgghh it’s that feckin terracotta colour again – do Cork Builders Providers have an offer on or something? Seriously though I guess it would have to be pretty good to hold it’s own against it’s new striking neighbour, but even allowing for that it’s pretty lazy.

    • #733997
      GrahamH
      Participant

      That cliff-like massing behind the quay front looks terrible.

    • #733998
      pier39
      Participant

      hmmm, barbie’s new dream-house. charming.

    • #733999
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      I’m reminded of Monty Python’s Meaning of Life with the Insurance Building which moves through the city: The hotel looks like it’s just about to shove the smaller buildings into the river.

      Other than that it looks like one of the cardboard buildings that used be crushed by the Godzilla type monsters in the Power Rangers.

    • #734000
      lexington
      Participant

      :confused: With the final day for submissions being today, regarding DAT Partnerships striking 9-storey office proposal for Clontarf Street, designed by Coughlan de Keyser – only 1 submission has been lodged, that of An Taisce’s Kevin Hurley. The building has been generally met with positive comment thus far – but fingers will be crossed on the July 7th 2005 decision date (the same due date as OFC’s Eglinton Street development). Though every developer claims his/her/their development will be landmark, given its location and design, Centre Point as the IE informs it will be named, can genuinely claim such status.



      :confused: Very early rumours are suggesting that the HSE’s Southern Division, currently stationed at the Cork Farm Centre on the Wilton Road (near Victoria Cross) may be considering a move to new office premises. The HSE would, if found true, be seeking up to 40,000sq ft of quality office space. The move should free up the dire 1960s Cork Farm Centre office block for redevelopment in what is a prime site location, right at the heart of fast growing Victoria Cross and adjacent to the recently sold Dennehy’s Cross garage sites which Frinailla purchased early this year for a figure estimated in and around 20m euros. Frinailla will soon be seeking to lodge an application on the site for a major residential development, with ancillary elements, designed by O’Mahony Pike Architects. The design so far it would seem has been generally positively seen by planning elements and a source claims the developer themselves are most happy with the design.

      I’ll let you know if anything comes of that HSE information. The info was sourced from an involved party within the HSE – and he stresses that it is only at an early consideration period. No plans are firmly on the table, however, if it does proceed, the HSE would be looking to negotiate property rights with any prospective developer as part of the deal. Knowing how the HSE/SHB work (and I do) we could be waiting many a year before we hear anything for sure!!! :rolleyes: However, it could make a nice deal for some developer.



      😮 Also, I must offer a correction, in an earlier post I noted that the ‘Ponte Vecchio’ style bridge being lodged for planning by John Paul Lennon, designed by Sam Stephenson and located between Andersons and Patricks Quays, was lodged in the name of Mr. Lennon’s wife Maria – this was an inaccuracy, Maria is actually Mr. Lennon’s daughter. Apologises for any confusion.

      An image of the lattice design is viewable in this week’s edition of Inside Cork. The current application will have to be resubmitted as it has been marked Invalid by CCC. It’s an interesting, but perhaps a bit of a mad idea.



      😮 Michael McNamara & Company Construction continues its aggressive assault on the Cork market with the commencement of construction on UCC’s 32m euro, 60,000sq ft extension of the Boole Library (which includes refurbishments to the existing Q-1 & Q library levels). McNamara’s also have work on-going at Phase 2 of Cork Airport Business Park and a number of other city projects lined up over the future. The new Postgraduate Research extension of the Boole Library was designed by US-based SBRA (Shepley Bulfinch Richardson and Abbott) Architects in conjunction with Wilson Architecture. The project will take 2 years to complete and will be ready for the 2007 Academic term (October 2007). McNamara intend to have 2 tower cranes on-site within the coming months.



      :confused: It seems Senior Planner Ronnie McDowell has taken the reigns from planner Evelyn Mitchell regarding the Eglinton Street planning application by OFC. Hmmm.

    • #734001
      rodger
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      hmmm, barbie’s new dream-house. charming.

      I know I will probabaly sound like a bit of a loser here but its the bulb off of the Bork ship on startrek,and who says tellys bad for ya. :rolleyes:
      Star trekin across the universe on the starship RORSA.

      In relation to John Lennons plans there is I am told a fine line between genius and madness. 😮

    • #734002
      lexington
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      I know I will probabaly sound like a bit of a loser here but its the bulb off of the Bork ship on startrek,and who says tellys bad for ya. :rolleyes:

      Cough cough (nerd!) cough cough! 😀

      (Archigeek) – sorry rodger, I had to – I spent the last 10mins thinking of that. Aww I’m so proud, I’ll sleep well tonight. :p 😉

    • #734003
      pier39
      Participant

      @rodger wrote:

      In relation to John Lennons plans there is I am told a fine line between genius and madness. 😮

      which side of the line is he on??? 😀

      (by the way maybe its just the sherbet and fizzy cola i just drank through my nose but, isnt john lennon dead??? now that is mad!)

      wait wait wait i got one! re john lennons bridge thing – theres gonna be apartments on it right? well…imagine all the people, living…on that bridge…

      wait that sound much funnier in my head. feck! to think i came all the way back online for that. :confused:

    • #734004
      lisam
      Participant

      @pier39 wrote:

      hmmm, barbie’s new dream-house. charming.

      Even Barbie would have more taste than that!!1 :p

    • #734005
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @rodger wrote:

      I know I will probabaly sound like a bit of a loser here but its the bulb off of the Bork ship on startrek,and who says tellys bad for ya. :rolleyes:
      Star trekin across the universe on the starship RORSA.

      In relation to John Lennons plans there is I am told a fine line between genius and madness. 😮

      Borg ship……I suppose there’s no hope that saying “Resistence is Futile – You will be Assimilated” to the City Council will get them to grant permisison?

    • #734006
      lexington
      Participant

      A firm worth checking out – I’d like to add these individuals to my list of desired UK firms working in Cork, along with EPR. Page/Park show imagination and flair – they could go down very well in Cork given the right project. They were also involved in Maggie’s Centre in Inverness as posted in the article on the main-page of this website.

      Page/Park Architects

      Worth checking out.

    • #734007
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      It’s definately an improvement on the original and just goes to show how good its neighbour is.
      Unlike its neighbour, this development seems to lurk over the shoulder of the retained quay buildings, whereas the OCP building incorporated the old building into the design. The many layers of the OCP building help to break up the bulk, something which this Howard Holdings development cannot be accused of doing 🙁
      It’ll have to be a no from me. Lets not waste the progress that has been made in this area.

    • #734008
      Pug
      Participant

      surely thats an undercoat or something? pretty dreadful colour

    • #734009
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      So do i like it or not??? :confused:

      Cos ya see I’m thinking that it just looks funny cos its a different style of design, so is it unique or just plain bad? Help me decide! :p

    • #734010
      d_d_dallas
      Participant

      What does it look like when viewed from Patrick St at Academy St junction? The OCP development has had a large impact on the view down that street.

    • #734011
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @d_d_dallas wrote:

      What does it look like when viewed from Patrick St at Academy St junction? The OCP development has had a large impact on the view down that street.

      Good point.

      Ok, here’s my plan- one huge air conditioning unit over Cork City Centre (tastefully designed of course) for horrible sticky days like today. We could have some apartments on top, like. 🙂

      Look at all these lovely people:

      they’re tellig us that the Mardyke pedestrian bridge was officially opened today.

    • #734012
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Good point.

      Ok, here’s my plan- one huge air conditioning unit over Cork City Centre (tastefully designed of course) for horrible sticky days like today. We could have some apartments on top, like. 🙂

      Look at all these lovely people:

      they’re tellig us that the Mardyke pedestrian bridge was officially opened today.

      I miss the humidity factor

      Going home in a few weeks and I’m looking forward to checking out this new walk 🙂

    • #734013
      opus
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      I miss the humidity factor

      Going home in a few weeks and I’m looking forward to checking out this new walk 🙂

      Was down for a game of squash in the Mardyke this morning so thought I take a look at the new bridge. Maybe there was some ceremony during the week but unfortunately it’s still very much closed :confused: Unless you fancy climbing the fence that’s been blocking access for the past few months. Hopefully it will really be open in the near future.

    • #734014
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      What does any one think of the new 1billion euro blueprint for the northern docklands the council are proposing? Think there was something of it in the Echo today.

    • #734015
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      What does any one think of the new 1billion euro blueprint for the northern docklands the council are proposing? Think there was something of it in the Echo today.

      Snooze!

      A little pointless. But don’t get me started on the conspiracy theories associated with this plan – it had me livid for a long time and I’m still only coming down after a month of giving out about it. I have a few bits and bobs of the plan I’ll try and get up over the next few days. I’d love if a little imagination had been shown. CCC had run ith by MPH, but MPH had many of their own plans already formulated. I think they took some of it on-board for the sake of peace. Nothing radical. Besides between Paul Kenny’s plans, MPH’s plan and Werdna (God-willing) for Water Street, the docklands are almost covered to the North – so what really is the plan covering? But there’s more to it than that and its long-winded so I’ll save my ramblings for another day (I’ll try and avoid the correlation between this plan and Werdna’s decision!!! 😡 )

      Those expecting taller buildings for Horgan’s Quay in the MPH may be somewhat disappointed (and by tall I mean 12 storeys +) – however there’ll be some more satisfying elements which I’ll outline soon.

    • #734016
      garethace
      Participant

      Doesn’t this photo of Paris tell one a heck of a lot about port towns, in their heighdays, during the 19 and early 20C,… that is before abominations like Ryan Air and Virgin. I mean, I haven’t taken too much interest here in this thread about Cork, but I said I would post this picture here anyhow,… maybe it is sometimes as important to look back and understand where a city is coming from, to envision where it could be going. If you look at the photograph, I a lot of that area around the port would have had both bustling day and night life,… the photo was taken by Sergio Larrain, in Paris in the 1950s. But you can see how a lot of architecture would have sprung up around the sea wall of cities, to support the thriving commerce sustained by sea faring.

      Brian O’ Hanlon.

    • #734017
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Here’s a question for any legal eagles amongst us:
      The space outside the new clarion hotel- is this public or private space? Considering this used to be a roadway, is it still public even though kiosks and fancy paving has been laid? Also, the new boardwalk: public or private?
      I’ll let you know why I want to know this in my next post.



      This next bit of news I’ve taken with a pinch of salt since first hearing it, but i’ve heard it so many times that I thought I’d see has anyone else heard the rumour.
      My sources suggest that a leading tenant at Mahon Point is extremely unhappy with performance and is planning to leave the centre. Obviously I won’t name names, but we’re talking high profile tenant here. Any truth at all to this rumour?



      As we’re on the subject, I dont think I’ve seen as many empty shops on St. Patrick Street in a good many years:
      CIE office, O2 shop, Pound City, adjacent travel shop, adjacent camera shop, etc. all empty and looking particularly shabby. This does not look good and I’ve heard nothing of new tenants being found.



      I must try to get a recent pic of the new red brick development opposite the Opera House. Some genius has decided to erect an unsightly CCTV camera system on the corner of the building on the large column there. All we need now is a few satallite dishes, a few bicycles and some washing lines on the balconies and we’ll be all set 😡

    • #734018
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      i think the space outside the clarion at lapp’s quay is public – also the port may still have some legally established rights of way at the quay walls.

      i too have heard rumours about one of mp’s tenants – i doubt they are true as it would be suprising if a pull-out would be considered after a few months – their investment would surely merit a year’s trading before they would even assess their perfomance – however – perhaps they are unhappy because they have not succeeded in emptying the city centre, which, despite some short-term vacancies on pana, is busier than ever – the store u are talking about should take a long look at their store and their products – which are very poor – despite all of the marketing of the store – i wonder are we talking about the same tenant – english based non-food?

    • #734019
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Here’s a question for any legal eagles amongst us:
      The space outside the new clarion hotel- is this public or private space? Considering this used to be a roadway, is it still public even though kiosks and fancy paving has been laid? Also, the new boardwalk: public or private?
      I’ll let you know why I want to know this in my next post.

      Was it a public roadway before hand? It is more than likely still public if it was public before. However, the council might have let out the space to the hotel? It is also interesting how peoples perception of a space can be influenced by new paving etc etc. So whilst it is more than likely still public the hotel might not be too worried that it looks private. I am speculating on this, as I dont know the area you are referring to, but it just seems to be a trend recently.

    • #734020
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      i think the space outside the clarion at lapp’s quay is public – also the port may still have some legally established rights of way at the quay walls.

      i too have heard rumours about one of mp’s tenants – i doubt they are true as it would be suprising if a pull-out would be considered after a few months – their investment would surely merit a year’s trading before they would even assess their perfomance – however – perhaps they are unhappy because they have not succeeded in emptying the city centre, which, despite some short-term vacancies on pana, is busier than ever – the store u are talking about should take a long look at their store and their products – which are very poor – despite all of the marketing of the store – i wonder are we talking about the same tenant – english based non-food?

      Yes, English based, non-food. Nice enough stuff but hideously over-priced, even for this country!
      As you say, probably just rumour, but there’s no smoke without fire.

      I can honestly say (as a city dweller) I have visited Mahon Pont once and felt absolutely no compulsion to return. There’s nothing to draw me down there, simple as that.



      With regard to Lapp’s Quay, I happened to be passing through the spot one afternoon during the weekend. Its a nice enough spot, will be even nicer when the opposite bank of the river is spruced up a little.
      I happened to witness a very unpleasent incident where two managers (both women) tried to evict a guy from this public (???) area. Now, the day itself was warm so he had his shirt off and I’d say the guy wasnt as sober as he could be, but he wasnt bothering anyone.
      So he was realaxing near the waters edge when he was basically told to F*** off by what I can only assume were managers from the Clarion Hotel. He was treatened with the Gardai on a number of occasions.
      To cut a long story short, I didnt see how the incident ended but was pretty appalled that the Clarion Hotel can now seemingly screen people using this public (??) space and throw them out if they dont meet their exacting standards.
      Perhaps we should take note before we go ahead and hand over more of our quaysides to private developers. Can they be trusted to maintain free and open access for ALL of the public?

    • #734021
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      😎 Tower cranes at UCC’s 20m euro School of Pharmacy site along College Road and Corbett Bros.’ Copley Street development were dismantled over the weekend (Saturday and Sunday respectively) signalling the completing stages of the 2 developments.

      The new School of Pharmacy was designed by STW and constructed by Pierse Construction. The 60,000sq ft, 3-storey building will commence operations in time for the next UCC Academic Term in October of this year (2005).


      School of Pharmacy

      Meanwhile, Corbett Bros. intend to have their development on Copley Street (designed by PRC Architects and built by Coffey Construction) up and running by September 2005 (latest). The development includes 2 linked 5-storey buildings with 60,000sq ft of office space, an under-ground car-park, and 38-residential units. A new student complex of 8 apartments will be constructed by the same developers, designed by James Leahy & Associates, along Stable Lane soon. The new elevational treatments seems a little more modern, but I wonder if it was as pleasant as the original plans?! I’ll wait until the whole thing is complete before judging.



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Here’s a question for any legal eagles amongst us:
      The space outside the new clarion hotel- is this public or private space? Considering this used to be a roadway, is it still public even though kiosks and fancy paving has been laid? Also, the new boardwalk: public or private?
      I’ll let you know why I want to know this in my next post.

      It was and is public space. The nature of the site foundations, plus the construction of underground car-parking required a complete deconstruction of the quayside (I’ll let some engineer handle the technical side here) but as part of planning talks, Howard Holdings signed a M.O.U. with CCC which entails a complexity of ownership rights, money was exhanged. Howard have rights over the kiosks, lift, pontoon and boardwalk etc but with the understanding that it is made available as a public amenity facility.


      This next bit of news I’ve taken with a pinch of salt since first hearing it, but i’ve heard it so many times that I thought I’d see has anyone else heard the rumour.
      My sources suggest that a leading tenant at Mahon Point is extremely unhappy with performance and is planning to leave the centre. Obviously I won’t name names, but we’re talking high profile tenant here. Any truth at all to this rumour?

      The word is conflicting. However, generally, most sources claim the Cork store is perfroming on par with Dublin’s Jervis Street store. Overall, it would seem many new Irish suburban malls, MP and Dundrum included, have been underperforming. However, recent word (within the passed 2 weeks) suggests MP is slowly starting to level out to a more comfortable position. Typing this in a rush so I’ll clarify and update at a later stage. I don’t see Debenhams leaving anytime soon.


      As we’re on the subject, I dont think I’ve seen as many empty shops on St. Patrick Street in a good many years:
      CIE office, O2 shop, Pound City, adjacent travel shop, adjacent camera shop, etc. all empty and looking particularly shabby. This does not look good and I’ve heard nothing of new tenants being found.

      Deals are being finalised on 2 of the stores, the under 2 are still under negotiations with numerous parties. The problem with Patrick Street is rent and space. The Joe Donnellys of this city have helped push rent soaring (2nd in country after Grafton Street) – however, it order to maintain success, it is falling to mostly multinational businesses to pick up the vacanies. The other problematic issues include the availability of sale/floor space given rent. Retaillers can only provide so much given the insufficient retail space on the street. But indeed, trade on Patrick Street has generally been on the up.


      I must try to get a recent pic of the new red brick development opposite the Opera House. Some genius has decided to erect an unsightly CCTV camera system on the corner of the building on the large column there. All we need now is a few satallite dishes, a few bicycles and some washing lines on the balconies and we’ll be all set 😡

      I agree, it looks unpleasant. I’m not sure if the Hornibrooks put it up or CCC were involved. If the latter, they are completely contradicting their own efforts to improve city centre aesthetics by throwing up eye-sores like these on new structures such as Camden Wharf.

      @RM wrote:

      Perhaps we should take note before we go ahead and hand over more of our quaysides to private developers. Can they be trusted to maintain free and open access for ALL of the public?

      I don’t think you can make assumptions about a particular incident without knowing the ins and outs. Are you sure the person in question had not been causing trouble prior to his removal? Personally, I believe that public space should be the entitlement of all members of a community – that means children, the elderly, and every other average Joe in the city – are they not entitled to enjoy that space? But if persons such as the gentleman you describe ruin it for others, what about the right of those other ‘orderlies’ to enjoy such amenities? Should he be allowed swear, spit and cause aggro on those unsuspecting individuals just out for a pleasant stroll or making their way to work?

      If you notice outside Kudos restaurant, part of the Lapps Quay Clarion, there is a cracked window – the result of a stone throwing from an individual who decided to spit at passers-by from his position on the boardwalk. He was intoxicated, but not overly so, just rowdy. Following complaints and no Garda presence, Clarion staff took it on themselves to remove the gentleman from this area where not only customers, but everyday members of the public had been enjoying the weather and location. After the usual ranting and raving, the man in question managed to attain a missile among rubble/debris across the road at No.6 Lapps Quay (under construction), stormed back and fired the stone at the window before running off toward Custom House Quay.

    • #734022
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      With regard to Lapp’s Quay, I happened to be passing through the spot one afternoon during the weekend. Its a nice enough spot, will be even nicer when the opposite bank of the river is spruced up a little.
      I happened to witness a very unpleasent incident where two managers (both women) tried to evict a guy from this public (???) area. Now, the day itself was warm so he had his shirt off and I’d say the guy wasnt as sober as he could be, but he wasnt bothering anyone.
      So he was realaxing near the waters edge when he was basically told to F*** off by what I can only assume were managers from the Clarion Hotel. He was treatened with the Gardai on a number of occasions.
      To cut a long story short, I didnt see how the incident ended but was pretty appalled that the Clarion Hotel can now seemingly screen people using this public (??) space and throw them out if they dont meet their exacting standards.
      Perhaps we should take note before we go ahead and hand over more of our quaysides to private developers. Can they be trusted to maintain free and open access for ALL of the public?

      This is becoming a common issue with ‘public spaces’. If deals (such as the one described by Lexington) are struck between public and private bodies, the publicness of the space can become diluted. The image of the space becomes an issue for the hotel (or another private body), and they therefore start to control it is a manner that is more private than public. I agree with you that it is difficult to trust private developers not to subsume the public realm into their control, and therefore make it more private.

    • #734023
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      This is becoming a common issue with ‘public spaces’. If deals (such as the one described by Lexington) are struck between public and private bodies, the publicness of the space can become diluted. The image of the space becomes an issue for the hotel (or another private body), and they therefore start to control it is a manner that is more private than public. I agree with you that it is difficult to trust private developers not to subsume the public realm into their control, and therefore make it more private.

      Indeed, take for example if we wished to stage some sort of rally ( i dunno, how about “YES TO HIGHRISES!!” 🙂 ). So, we’ve got a 100 or so demonstrators having a peaceful rally with placards and stuff. If this is a public space then we’d be free to congregate there. However I cant see Clarion being happy with that- whatever the cause. Same with skateboarders, engineers and other so-called “undesirables” 🙂
      What I saw at the weekend was a private company exerting control over a public space and it wasnt pretty.

      Anyone fancy a rally??? 🙂

      @Lexington wrote:

      I don’t think you can make assumptions about a particular incident without knowing the ins and outs. Are you sure the person in question had not been causing trouble prior to his removal?

      In fairness to the guy, I watched him arrive and he was quiet and peaceful throughout. Listening to the conversation the managers had with him, it was clear they did not know him and had not seen him do anything wrong except look out of place with their glossy new hotel and try to have a snooze. What else are those benches for??? Im sure if i had had a nap there I would not be bothered.

      As for the developers assuming some sort of duty of care over the area: boohooo. Every business owner needs to protect their own premises. That is a totally different matter to controlling public open spaces.

    • #734024
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Anyone fancy a rally??? 🙂

      Or else:

      http://www.flash-mob.com/eingang.htm

      😀

    • #734025
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 Speaking of ‘Yes to High-rise’ Rallies, you may remember that a while ago I mentioned that there were at least 2 other high-rise plans yet to materialise (not including the speculation on CHQ, I expect/guess plans on that site will be made available within the coming future – photo-montages are currently being compiled from images taken of the site not so long ago, so fingers crossed and we’ll see what happens), but under assessment by private investors in Cork – well I can now confirm these projects have been conceptualised. One of the developments rose in excess of 25-storeys!!! 😮 However, the gentleman involved states that this may have been more an effort to show the developer what could be done with the site in question rather than an actual proposal. Either way, 2 towers are currently at design stage – no details on planning attempts or actual applications are yet known. However, it may be interesting to see if anything does come of these – and even more interesting to see how some developers are thinking when it comes to Cork’s development future. We wait in anticipation. :confused:

    • #734026
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      *UPDATES*

      I don’t think you can make assumptions about a particular incident without knowing the ins and outs. Are you sure the person in question had not been causing trouble prior to his removal? Personally, I believe that public space should be the entitlement of all members of a community – that means children, the elderly, and every other average Joe in the city – are they not entitled to enjoy that space? But if persons such as the gentleman you describe ruin it for others, what about the right of those other ‘orderlies’ to enjoy such amenities? Should he be allowed swear, spit and cause aggro on those unsuspecting individuals just out for a pleasant stroll or making their way to work?

      Lexington,
      you are starting to put George Lucas to shame with your ability to completely alter your posts after people have replied to them. I would not have noticed the extra information you posted if Radioactive man had not quoted you in his response! Editing is a useful tool that I use myself now and again for spelling mistakes etc, but I find it difficult to follow your discussion when you go back and alter your posts so much. I hope I don’t seem narky about this, but I felt I had to mention it.

      With regards to your addition to your post in and of itself, I think you yourself make assumptions about the situation without even being there. For example you state:

      “But if persons such as the gentleman you describe ruin it for others, what about the right of those other ‘orderlies’ to enjoy such amenities? Should he be allowed swear, spit and cause aggro on those unsuspecting individuals just out for a pleasant stroll or making their way to work?”

      There is no mention of the person mentioned by Radioactiveman doing any of the activities you mention here. You also assume that this individual will do the activities you mention. As Radioactiveman said, it is fair for a business to protect their property, but they do not have the right to control public space.

    • #734027
      who_me
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Indeed, take for example if we wished to stage some sort of rally ( i dunno, how about “YES TO HIGHRISES!!” 🙂 ). So, we’ve got a 100 or so demonstrators having a peaceful rally with placards and stuff. If this is a public space then we’d be free to congregate there. However I cant see Clarion being happy with that- whatever the cause. Same with skateboarders, engineers and other so-called “undesirables” 🙂

      I believe they currently have “Skateboarders will be prosecuted” signs up on the quay area.

    • #734028
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Remaining in the same part of the city, Frank McDonald (Environment Editor of the Irish Times) wrote on friday that the Lapps Quay development below is “in my view one of the worst new buildings in Cork “.
      At least, I presume that’s the development he refers to. It’s No.6 Lapps Quay designed by Coughlan DeKeyser for O’Flynn Construction.
      I was in the area recently (as noted above) and I must say I like it. Like it a lot!

      The journalist also brings up the important point that Cork has been without a City Architect since the legendary Neil Hegarty retired two years ago. A city developing at this rate without a city Architect- surely a mistake!

    • #734029
      lisam
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I believe they currently have “Skateboarders will be prosecuted” signs up on the quay area.

      No harm in keeping them out, if the condition of Emmet Place is anything to go by. Graffiti, rubbish and they wont move to let you pass. The City Council should provide a proper facility for them but if they did can you imagine the addtional number of compensation claims against the CCC.

    • #734030
      lexington
      Participant

      @phil wrote:

      Lexington,
      you are starting to put George Lucas to shame with your ability to completely alter your posts after people have replied to them. I would not have noticed the extra information you posted if Radioactive man had not quoted you in his response! Editing is a useful tool that I use myself now and again for spelling mistakes etc, but I find it difficult to follow your discussion when you go back and alter your posts so much. I hope I don’t seem narky about this, but I felt I had to mention it.

      With regards to your addition to your post in and of itself, I think you yourself make assumptions about the situation without even being there. For example you state:

      “But if persons such as the gentleman you describe ruin it for others, what about the right of those other ‘orderlies’ to enjoy such amenities? Should he be allowed swear, spit and cause aggro on those unsuspecting individuals just out for a pleasant stroll or making their way to work?”

      There is no mention of the person mentioned by Radioactiveman doing any of the activities you mention here. You also assume that this individual will do the activities you mention. As Radioactiveman said, it is fair for a business to protect their property, but they do not have the right to control public space.

      phil – I often add extra bits onto previous posts, not so much to confuse people, but so that I don’t blanket a page with my own posts for every minor detail. Sometimes its a little neater and less overwhelming to do so – but I understand how it can be difficult to follow and for that I apologise. I sometimes start to correct a spelling or grammar mistake and then end up remembering some other bit of info I forgot to mention so the post goes on and on. In this case, I had just posted the first half of the post and then saw RM ‘s reply, so rather than post a completely new one, I just added on the extra bit to the existing reply.

      Regarding my making assumptions, I was in a rush typing that up (think I mentioned it whilst typing it) and thus didn’t get the opportunity to phrase my arguments in the way I perhaps intended to. What I think I was getting at is a larger argument regarding what defines public space entitlement – should it be the right of all persons irrespective – or, should it be the entitlement of those who respect it – as in, those who don’t urinate on the paving (for example, as with the examples I mentioned in the previous post like ‘swear, spit and cause aggro’.) And what defines acceptable behaviour? In a space such as City Quarter, you have a number of elements in operation – you have businesses such as the Clarion and the soon to open kiosks and offices, you have an open public element, visiting car-park patrons etc etc – each has a right to its own integrity and own well-being. But rather than City Quarter, take Fitzgerald’s Park – the security guards there quite often restrict the activities of its visitors in this supposed public amenity space. Not so long ago, a bunch of young lads were asked to leave for using a motorised model helicopter by one security staff member (they were on the green area/rose garden area of the park by the river’s edge) – they weren’t causing any hassle, they seemed like a respectable bunch of fellas just having a nice time in the rare lovely weather, and they were asked to leave this public space because the helicopter (according to security) represented a danger to children in the park. I think I was more of a danger as I had been swinging off playground equipment like an oversized child. There was the usual grunting and arguing, but eventually the boys left and head across Daly’s Bridge. I don’t think you can put such governance squarely at the feet of a private business/developer just because it was near their turf. Fitzgerald’s Park is a true-blue public space and yet it is governed. Why are the City Council telling people what to do because they don’t like it??? I think the question should be more empirical – what decides what is acceptable in public space or in an public environment whatsoever and who governs it?

    • #734031
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @lexington wrote:

      phil I don’t think you can put such governance squarely at the feet of a private business/developer just because it was near their turf. Fitzgerald’s Park is a true-blue public space and yet it is governed. Why are the City Council telling people what to do because they don’t like it??? I think the question should be more empirical – what decides what is acceptable in public space or in an public environment whatsoever and who governs it?

      You raise an interesting point here about what is or is not acceptable. It seems that there is a lot of fear with regards to ‘risk’ within public areas at present. I am not sure if there is an official line within councils that is deciding to ban all things that have an element of risk involved or if it is the fear of those employed by the council of things which don’t fit in to the realm of ‘normal’ activity. That helicopter one is an interesting example.

    • #734032
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      The journalist also brings up the important point that Cork has been without a City Architect since the legendary Neil Hegarty retired two years ago. A city developing at this rate without a city Architect- surely a mistake!

      Cork does have a City Architect, Jack Healy.

      See http://www.corkcity.ie/ourservices/architects/index.shtml for more details.

    • #734033
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Hmmm

    • #734034
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Remaining in the same part of the city, Frank McDonald (Environment Editor of the Irish Times) wrote on friday that the Lapps Quay development below is “in my view one of the worst new buildings in Cork “.
      At least, I presume that’s the development he refers to. It’s No.6 Lapps Quay designed by Coughlan DeKeyser for O’Flynn Construction.
      I was in the area recently (as noted above) and I must say I like it. Like it a lot!

      The journalist also brings up the important point that Cork has been without a City Architect since the legendary Neil Hegarty retired two years ago. A city developing at this rate without a city Architect- surely a mistake!

      I didn’t realise that we had a City Architect back then…..if the post was reinvented now I don’t think that they would be anymore successful in preventing the somewhat arbritary approach to planning in the City Council, a little bit off here, a little bit off there, whoops, there goes a block etc…..

      Ultimately, the City Architects would only become another port of call for the planners in their rush to change a scheme / hide behind someone else

    • #734035
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Cork does have a City Architect, Jack Healy.

      See http://www.corkcity.ie/ourservices/architects/index.shtml for more details.

      I stand corrected.

      Graham, cad e sin?

    • #734036
      lexington
      Participant


      Well, after the months of planning, negotiation and talks – OCP are firing ahead with their plans for the former Jurys Cork Hotel site along the Western Road. Demolition is on-going and main construction works are set to begin within the next month to month and a half with Bowen Construction as the main contractors.

      Work on the hotel element will commence first, followed by approx. 80 apartments as part of Phase 1. A further 80 units will follow in Phase 2. With remaining units completing Phase 3.



      However, just across the river – bids on the .65 acre Muskerry Service Station site, being disposed of via CBRE Gunne as part of Esso’s plans to sell off ‘non-core activity’ assets, have reached just under 5m euro – from an original guide price of 1.1m euros. The prime site possesses an exceptional waterfront location, within a stone’s throw of the both the main UCC College Gates and city centre. The site is located along one of Cork’s busiest traffic corridors and will now be of a greater prize with the advent of the new Jurys redevelopment next-door. Not surprisingly, it was believed OCP may have been among the bidders. The acquisition of this site would make sense of OCP are proven successful. As the images below show, the supports for the long-abandoned old rail bridge still stand in the river waters (there for nigh on 70 years) – it once connected the Muskerry Service Station site to the former Rail Terminus on which the former Jurys (former InterContinental Hotel) is now in the process of being demolished (see above). The site could have offered an accommodative traffic management solution for OCP were they to apply to construct the bridge they were denied on appeal at this location, rather than directly onto the Western Road. However, this would perhaps contravene the site layout – and strategically conflict with the proper sustainable development of the Jurys site. Nonetheless, it is not unreasonable to assume the possibility of a footbridge as part of the proposed riverside walk. The successful bidder will be confirmed in the near future – the site currently remains in ‘Reserved’ status – indicating the successful bidder has been selected. High expectations will be held on the nature of any development at this location.

    • #734037
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      Can anyone help, looking for comments on the pros and cons of buying a listed house??? :confused:

    • #734038
      JPD
      Participant

      Competence of OPW called into question
      From:ireland.com
      Tuesday, 21st June, 2005

      There is an emerging lack of confidence about the ability of the Office of Public Works (OPW) to acquire, manage and dispose of property according to the chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Michael Noonan.

      Mr Noonan was speaking at the launch of a report into, among other issues, the effectiveness of the OPW in managing property deals.

      The report says the OPW spent €19 million on five properties to house asylum seekers that were never used.

      It criticises the lack of pre-planning or community consultation before purchasing the five properties which are now worth less than was paid for them. One property in Myshall, Co Carlow was purchased for €1.3 million in 2000 and is now worth just €500,000 on the open market.

      The OPW was obliged to pay more than the market rate for each of the five properties because of significant local opposition to asylum seekers being housed in the area.

      Mr Noonan said the committee was very concerned about the serious waste of taxpayers’ money and stressed the urgency of the OPW getting its “house in order” to avoid the same mistakes being made in the roll-out of the Government’s decentralisation process.

      The OPW is charged with buying and selling property under that process.

      “Skilled professionals are needed in the OPW to deal with buying and selling property. They need to review their resource base to ensure they have the expertise necessary to undertake complex property transactions. And if not, they need to acquire it quickly – on a contract basis if necessary.”

      “It takes exceptional skill to have bought property in this country four years ago and to have made a loss on it,” he added.

      Responding to allegations by Tom Parlon, the Minister with responsibility for the OPW, that the PAC was being “unfair” by focusing on one aspect of the its business, Mr Noonan said: “The Parlon defence that because we don’t lose money every week aren’t we great fellows doesn’t work. That isn’t the kind of defence I’d like to go to the High Court on.”

      The vice-chairman of the PAC, Mr John McGuinness, said if the OPW were a private company it would be closed down.

      “The OPW needs to be dragged into the modern world of property management,” he said.

      The report also criticised the OPW for going €23 million over budget on the refurbishment of the new Cork courthouse. It says it failed to take costs for temporary court accommodation into account and said there was a serious loss of taxpayers’ money in the negotiation of the lease at three times the original rent

    • #734039
      Leesider
      Participant

      was on Washington St 2 weeks ago and was very disappointed to see weeds already being allowed grow on the steps of the refurbished courthouse!! must admit it does look good, but Washington St is still one of my least favourite streets in the city for one that has so much potential!

    • #734040
      sw101
      Participant

      lunched in wagamama (cork) today. food is just as good as dublin, but the atmosphere isn’t the same as the great space under the stephen’s green s.c. pretty building in the flesh from the outside.

    • #734041
      rodger
      Participant

      @sw101 wrote:

      lunched in wagamama (cork) today. food is just as good as dublin, but the atmosphere isn’t the same as the great space under the stephen’s green s.c. pretty building in the flesh from the outside.

      Yes architecture is by those oh so talented gentlemen of Kiosk other works incl.Dennhys cross,Ballincollig TC,
      Ladies Well,to mention a few.

      I was walking on the Lower Road and once again noticed the almost in ruins building at the end of MyrtleHill Tce,Its mid way between Water St.and the scew bridge.Does any one have any details on this house its a gem!

    • #734042
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Read in the echo on Saturday… bout the blueprint for the city worth €1billion—total rubbish… and the way the reporter wrote about the multi storey buildings, that they could be as high as seven stories… i mean, that’s nothing… for the price developers are paying for the land they would want to be at least 7 stories in height… with a maximum height of I dunno… say maybe water st and eglington st… open to speculation and criticism.. but land in the city is so expensive that for developers to recoup the money spent on the land they need massive multi storey buildings.. obviously aslong as it complements the area and all that…

      But as I said my comment is open to criticism.

      Lexington… any news bout da deloittle building and its extension??
      going2dub next mon,flying up so i’ll try2get pictures of da airport… if i remember my camera…

    • #734043
      GrahamH
      Participant

      Shrinktocork – maybe if you post in a dedicated thread you might get some help. If you don’t you’ll probably get lost in the crowd in here 🙂

      The essential piece of advice that owners of listed properties are given is that for any intended structural changes, no matter how minor, seek the counsel of the local authority/conservation officer before doing anything.
      Even if a change you make does not require planning permission, just check first regardless!
      In most cases reasonable alterations will be allowed, as long as they don’t affect the integrity of the building – most of which are pretty obvious as to their impact.

    • #734044
      lexington
      Participant

      As promised, here’s just a brief insight into the recent CCC North Docklands Area Plan (June 2005). The plan encompasses an area spanning from Brian Boru Street in the west to CastleView Terrace in the east, near Water Street. The plan highlights a number of prime sites within this area which are earmarked for substantial development as part of the area regeneration plan. These sites are indicated in the image posted below (click on thumbnail to enlarge).

      As it stands, a number of these sites are already the subject of, have completed or are about to be submitted for planning. Site 1 = Paul Kenny’s The Treasury office development destined for Revenue Commissioner tenancy (however, Donal F. O’Donovan’s DL Safety site is still up for a potential development of its own). Sites 4 + 5 are to be subject to applications by CIE and Manor Park Homes as part of a total 525m euro redevelopment, encompassing a new train station arrangement, residential, commercial etc etc elements (this application is now expected to be a little later than scheduled consequent of recent talks between MPH and CCC; the project will be conducted in 3 Phases with completion mooted for 2010). Site 6 = Werdna Ltd’s plans for Water Street. These plans are currently in appeal following a decision by CCC which effectively obliterated the scheme (interestingly, the NDAP notes that construction on this development is slated for 2006. The problem is, if Werdna do not receive a grant on the development, the developers may threaten to walk away on this site. Such a move would delay the perceived timeframe and development plan as a whole – it continues to be seen that the decision by Navigation House was a poor one, contrary to the insistence of planners). One of the problems with the plan is that it fails to account for a number of variables such as this scenario.

      From a traffic management point of view, a number of proposals are cited. These include the provision of new infastructural utilities such as the link road east-to-west on Horgan’s Quay lands, the Water Street Bridge (a concept of which may be seen below next to the traffic management map image; the Water Street Bridge is set to be installed by 2010, with a feasibility and conceptualisation study to be completed by the end of this month) and Harley Street Pedestrian Bridge. Some existing routes will be improved and in some cases reconfigured to cater for 2-way traffic systems. This quick fix logic is not always the correct solution – one can simply note the disastrous example recently on Lancaster Quay. It makes no sense to cater to increased inputs of traffic flowing into the city versus the healthier system that was in place which quite adequately dispersed and filtered traffic away from the centre (I believe business owners and concerned individuals met at a meeting in Sugar Cafe along Washington Street this evening to discuss the woeful new system).

      One element of the NADP I agree with, and admittedly did not see prior to this recent publication, was the mentioned that City Quarter on Lapps Quay should be seen as the minimum in development quality that can be expected from future docklands developments in the area. Better better and better should be what we strive for thereafter. City Quarter may be seen as the benchmark.

      Talk of City Manager Joe Gavin’s wishes to see an Event Centre at Horgan’s Quay would seem to be established within the Plan – his discussions with MPH seem positive, however, I’m not so sure the realisation of their ideas on an event centre would be in the strategic interests of the city as they seem, so far, limited given alternative options. Though building heights are stated as averaging 7-storeys as a rule, the Plan says it will cater for landmark, architecturally superior towers in appropriate settings – and as Jim O’Donovan once said, ‘height does not necessarily mean landmark’. It would seem, as part of discussions on an event centre, MPH will be shown a degree of leniancy regarding their building heights so long as they serve a strong architectural standard. However, I note many of the examples documented within the plan as being ‘landmark’ are FAR from what I would regard as being acceptable in standard. They seem, quite often, bog basic.

      Of the sites marked, but without any clear development plans in the immediate – the Alfred/Railway Street lands (many of which are set to be available over the coming months), I would seem as becoming ideal sites for development as they set to be the intrinsic link between the city centre and the new quarter at Horgan’s Quay/Water Street. Building heights can be expected to start at the 4 to 5 storey marker set by Unity House, the Siemens Building and The Treasury – but peak no higher than the generalised 7-storey rule. Expect high interest in these potential sites over the coming future.

      I’ll have more tid-bits on the NDAP in the future.

    • #734045
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      lexington – just on traffic management and the north docks local area plan – the provision of a new east west link behind horgan’s quay presents a good opportunity to correct the disaster that is the one-way system in that part of the city – lower glanmire road has suffered since its introduction and has effectively died a slow death due to one way routing – you mention – “the healthier system that was in place which quite adequately dispersed and filtered traffic away from the centre” – but the aim of traffic management in an urban context should not be based on the need to move/encourage as many vehicles as quickly as possible out of , and into the city at the expense of existing streets and businesses, pedestrians and the wider urban environment? surely, any opportunity the city has to re-introduce 2 way routing should be taken – cork’s 1 way system is the most unfortunate outcome of LUTS and has destroyed many parts of the city –

    • #734046
      lexington
      Participant

      @bunch wrote:

      lexington – just on traffic management and the north docks local area plan – the provision of a new east west link behind horgan’s quay presents a good opportunity to correct the disaster that is the one-way system in that part of the city – lower glanmire road has suffered since its introduction and has effectively died a slow death due to one way routing – you mention – “the healthier system that was in place which quite adequately dispersed and filtered traffic away from the centre” – but the aim of traffic management in an urban context should not be based on the need to move/encourage as many vehicles as quickly as possible out of , and into the city at the expense of existing streets and businesses, pedestrians and the wider urban environment? surely, any opportunity the city has to re-introduce 2 way routing should be taken – cork’s 1 way system is the most unfortunate outcome of LUTS and has destroyed many parts of the city –

      I think the business owners, commuters and residents of Lancaster Quay would argue to the contrary. The recent 2-way system in this area has had a clear and dramatic impact on traffic congestion and according to traders in the area, business. I suppose what I was saying above is that 2-way/1-way systems in an area are not always the solution (i.e. “quick fix”) – each area should be evaluated on an individual basis and all management issues should be addressed before an implementation. It would seem the Lancaster Quay issue did not consider the full impact of the system’s introduction. I can’t see how the system has benefited any of the elements you have stated (pedestrians, businesses and the wider urban environment) – it seems have been quite adverse and that is why such a fuss has been kicked-up. I don’t recall the same level of upset created when Merchant’s Quay was reverted to 2-way.

      I believe some of our fellow posters have an insight into the meeting held last night at Sugar Cafe regarding the topic at hand – it would be interesting to see how their persepctive of the situation has been determined. It would also be interesting to hear from any traders, residents or others with affliations to this area.

    • #734047
      lexington
      Participant

      😎 Fleming Construction have submitted Further Information on their plans to develop a 60-berth marina on their lands at Fota House, Fota Island. The marina will form part of a larger leisure/tourism and residential development.

      – also, Fleming Construction have been cleared to develop a mix of 237 residential dwellings at Knockgriffin in Midelton.



      😎 Meanwhile O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd have attained a grant to develop a further 60 units (28 apartments, 28 duplexes and 4 townhouses) at their development in Moneygurney, Douglas. Kieran Barry & Associates handled the design/application.

      Rumours abound that O’Brien & O’Flynn may be seeking to delve into a substantial city centre (perhaps docklands? 😉 ) development in the future – which may encompass a number of commercial elements beyond their traditional main-stay of residential development (which will likely form the central element of any such development). O’Brien & O’Flynn are among Cork’s most successful residential developers.

    • #734048
      theblimp
      Participant

      Super news about the proposed Marina complex at Fota – I know from previous experience that it’s almost impossible to get a berth for a boat in Cork Harbour.

      With one of the finest ‘Bay’ areas in the world we really should have a first-rate leisure infrastructure in place already. Hopefully this Fota project, the plan for Cobh and future docklands development will address this deficit

    • #734049
      Anonymous
      Inactive
      lexington wrote:
      😎 Fleming Construction have submitted Further Information on their plans to develop a 60-berth marina on their lands at Fota House, Fota Island. The marina will form part of a larger leisure/tourism and residential development.

      – also, Fleming Construction have been cleared to develop a mix of 237 residential dwellings at Knockgriffin in Midelton.



      😎 Meanwhile O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd have attained a grant to develop a further 60 units (28 apartments, 28 duplexes and 4 townhouses) at their development in Moneygurney, Douglas. Kieran Barry & Associates handled the design/application.

      Rumours abound that O’Brien & O’Flynn may be seeking to delve into a substantial city centre (perhaps docklands? ]

      You’re not talking about Waterford are you?

    • #734050
      snoopdog
      Participant

      @Freddie wrote:

      Hope Mark Kelleher has more luck with his planning application at “Caterham”
      than he did at “Westend” see TP 05/29464.
      CAHRA should not have a problem with this application (2 storeys), but with
      that crowd you would never know?
      However the “blue rinse” brigade will proberly be lamenting the loss of
      another quality house in their beloved Bishopstown, sad,sad,sad.
      Maybe it is time to take the advice of another contributor to this website
      and take the pensions off the OAPs that stand in the way of progress.

      Sorry, but where’s “Caterham”? :confused:

      I can tell you that no one will be “lamenting” anything but with the way you are referring to the residents is it any wonder why they get angry? Also its not only OAP who are angry at all the development in the area. I’ve teenagers getting annoyed at it. But you have to admit that, for people who have lived in this area for so many years without much change, its understandable they find all the apartments springing up so fast more than a bit hard to take.Especially when there were virtually, if any, there three years ago or less.

    • #734051
      lexington
      Participant

      @yorktown wrote:

      You’re not talking about Waterford are you?

      No, the Waterford City Port sites were indeed purchased by O’Brien & O’Flynn Ltd for 30m euros earlier this year – my understanding is that they have been assessing possibilities of a Cork development – the details of which I remain unaware of myself, but the word has come from 2 sources, 1 who works regularly with OBOF and another from an outside developer. It would make sense for such a prominent Cork firm to take such a step – it may even be a consolation for their failed efforts to develop the 15-storey SilverSprings Tower, designed by Dennehy & Dennehy (which personally, I felt was a high-quality design). OBOF may wish to take advantage of new moves in the docklands. I stated that this was a rumour, as I have not heard anything concrete – but if I do you’ll surely hear about it. 😮

      I think OBOF have major scope to develop a landmark docklands development (my own opinion), it would be interesting to see if they do. They seem to have a lot of potential and a solid foundation which could allow them do so comfortably. I look forward to see if the rumours generate any more solid info.



      @snoopdog wrote:

      I can tell you that no one will be “lamenting” anything but with the way you are referring to the residents is it any wonder why they get angry? Also its not only OAP who are angry at all the development in the area. I’ve teenagers getting annoyed at it. But you have to admit that, for people who have lived in this area for so many years without much change, its understandable they find all the apartments springing up so fast more than a bit hard to take. Especially when there were virtually, if any, there three years ago or less.

      I think much of what you say is understandable snoopdog. It is good that you mention it. I suppose, where frustration arises from the development end of the spectrum (in some part), is quite often the blind stances taken by some of the residents (of all ages). When it comes to development, I don’t ever have a problem with residents making submissions – as long as they’re valid, and what I mean by that is, that the submissions have been made after proper consultation with an application, and realistic context is considered. What CSD have displayed thus far has been far from this balance. I worry that their mentalities will adversely affect the proper and suatainable development of the area (Bishopstown) and Cork should it catch on sufficiently – it is a blind and dangerous line to thread, one which seems very much based on ‘scaremongering’ rather than balanced discussion and analysis. Where a resident notes a relevant problem arising from a development – e.g. a balcony hanging over a resident’s backyard – such issues most be addressed. A developer has many means to adjust such issues – i.e. revised application, unsolicited further info, additional applications/amendments etc. I don’t think any reasonable developer has a problem making such changes – it’s outright refusals based on fecious grounds that crank up the difficulties, many of which can be avoided through proper self-education regarding the prospective development. I believe it is the responsibility of residents to properly inform themselves of any proposal – and the responsibility of the developer to provide sufficient, accurate and balanced information (‘balanced’ :rolleyes: – in an ideal world!) – a good development should stand on its own 2 feet. 🙂

    • #734052
      kite
      Participant

      Will the bridges proposed for the north docks development plan limit the size of the ships currently able to dock in the city docks on custom house ect.?

      A source in ‘The Paper’ tells me that there are serious rumblings within City Hall regarding the recent sale of the Albert Quay House site to Howard Webworks. “heads may roll’,she tells me???

    • #734053
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 News that Donal F. O’Donovan’s DL Safety/DFOD Consultants are to vacate its Clyde House premises at the corner of Brian Boru Street and the Lower Glanmire Road – paves the way for a possible landmark corner redevelopment opportunity. Mr. O’Donovan is seeking to relocate his businesses to new offices at the Shipton Group’s Blackpool Retail Park Office Campus. Clyde House adjoins other small premises such as the Irish Girl Guides building to the east and is located on the western side of the former Clontarf Street rail corridor. Across the corridor, Paul Kenny is in planning (currently in Further Information) to develop The Treasury office development for the Revenue Commissioners. The Clyde House premises comes under the recently published North Area Docklands Development Plan and may offer a prime development space for a small but striking office/retail development facing down MacCurtain Street – availing of a unique, prominent location. Here now exists an opportunity to offer a striking architectural landmark. But who may take up the challenge? Mr. O’Donovan himself? Or would Mr. Kenny even be interested in soaking up the excess land to add to his Treasury development at some future stage?



      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Good to see Howard Holdings have been granted permission by Kinsale Town Council to develop their revised hotel plans for Long and Emmet Quays. The revised plan includes a 101-bedroom hotel, with suites, basement public car-park, retail units and boardwalk. However among those behind the 54 objections lodged against the plans, some are now seeking an appeal.

      😎 Cumnor Construction are to seek the development of 308 housing units in Fermoy.

      😮 Meanwhile Charles & Helen McCarthy’s plans for a hotel on their Crosses Green ‘Mill Business Centre’ site. designed by Derek Tynan, has been brought to appeal by Mary Doran – among the original objectors. CCC had granted permission to the boxy hotel following resubmitted plans by the developers which reduced the hotel from 7 to 5-storeys (4 over-ground).



      @kite wrote:

      A source in ‘The Paper’ tells me that there are serious rumblings within City Hall regarding the recent sale of the Albert Quay House site to Howard Webworks. “heads may roll’,she tells me???

      I think CCC got a good deal – when you consider the knock-on economic and logistical importance of the project. I don’t think they have to answer to anyone on that particular deal. The WebWorks stands to create 300 jobs, encourage new Cork-based enterprise and may the city a more attractive starting point for new business and technologies groups and investments.

    • #734054
      Freddie
      Participant

      I have just had the unbridled pleasure of perusing Cork City Council’s Draft North Docks Local Area Plan – June 2005
      As a datum point I referred to a letter on the corksouthwest.com website entitled ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ and find one can only agree with the last sentence.
      Which puts me in mind that the more things ‘change’ the more they remain the same.
      Congratulations lads ye have us all fooled.

    • #734055
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Freddie wrote:

      I have just had the unbridled pleasure of perusing Cork City Council’s Draft North Docks Local Area Plan – June 2005
      As a datum point I referred to a letter on the corksouthwest.com website entitled ‘A Tale of Two Cities’ and find one can only agree with the last sentence.
      Which puts me in mind that the more things ‘change’ the more they remain the same.
      Congratulations lads ye have us all fooled.

      Freddie what area you involved/interested in? Developer, architect, engineer? You dont seem to like the council much. :p

    • #734056
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Unfortunately, it would seem that Cok City Council does not have the balls to prosecute anybody for the criminal act of demolishing an historic church associated with famous temperance campaigner Fr Mathew. The church located at Blackmore Lane (off Sullivans Quay) was approximately 200 years old.
      The demolition took place for “safety reasons” after the applicant was told by CCC to incorporate the Church into his Section 50 Apartment Complex at the site.
      An application is now lodged to demolish what remains of the church and rebuild with modern materials!!
      Shame on CCC and shame on T & C Partnership.

    • #734057
      lexington
      Participant

      *UPDATES*

      🙂 Fleming Construction have finally erected a tower crane over their student accommodation development at Victoria Cross, designed by Bertie Pope & Associates, being developed on behalf of UCC. 45 student apartments over 5 blocks will be constructed, between 4 and 5 storeys each. Next door, Ridge Developments are ploughing away on Phase 2 of Victoria Mills. A tower crane is expected to be erected there within the next month.



      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Unfortunately, it would seem that Cok City Council does not have the balls to prosecute anybody for the criminal act of demolishing an historic church associated with famous temperance campaigner Fr Mathew. The church located at Blackmore Lane (off Sullivans Quay) was approximately 200 years old.
      The demolition took place for “safety reasons” after the applicant was told by CCC to incorporate the Church into his Section 50 Apartment Complex at the site.
      An application is now lodged to demolish what remains of the church and rebuild with modern materials!!
      Shame on CCC and shame on T & C Partnership.

      I 100% agree that T&C should face some form of penalisation for what is an act of blatant disregard for the law and the historical integrity of the area. The demolished structure is in fact, contrary to many reports, not a listed structure, however – was an interesting historical specimen – among the areas oldest. I am disappointed by the lack of action initiated – however, I was also very disappointed with the write up in the IE. 😡

      If persons start taking legislative policies and interpreting them their own way, it makes a mockery of such a system. Although I do not agree with the system quite often, we must respect the policies in place until such a time we can amend them to be more efficient. The lack of action sends a negative message across the city.

    • #734058
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Does anyone think that if an event centre is to be built it should be based along the lines of the odessy arena in Belfast as a multi purpose centre for sports and entertainment as this would be an ideal and exciting centre point to the commercial aspect of the north docklands(if this is where it will be built). This would also be a far bigger benifit to the city than the bland centre being propsed?I also think building a 5000 seater is unambitious and embarrissing for the countrys second city as there is plans for an 8000 seater in Athlone? :confused:

    • #734059
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      Isn’t the Neptune Stadium already such a stadium?

    • #734060
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Neptune stadium was a great addition to the city when built and still is great for the city for certain things but I can not see how you are compering it to the odessy arena as there is a vast differance in capacity and anyway is a much more modern and up to date facility! I also came about the idea as there was going concern about the viability of the centre being built in cork and the odessy also was built as an entertainment centre with bars,hard rock cafe etc which could also be brought into such a centre for cork to bring in more people and money to the centre? And basically I think such a centre would be much more attractive and worth while for the city, this also comes back to the point of the cc not being ambitious enough in the new developments in the city(high rise). I would also like to say while im on that Cork needs to address its retail problem sooner rather than later as I was in limerick recently and it just came across me that it is better served by the bigger names moving in such as eddie rockets,pizza hut(i know mp has both of these) but they are only food court outlets and my examples but i am really refering to the city centre anyway!Also footlocker has just expanded with a number of outlets in Ireland but none in Cork again!Also Dixons,pc world,currys just popped into my head!

    • #734061
      domosullivan
      Participant

      @daniel_7 wrote:

      Neptune stadium was a great addition to the city when built and still is great for the city for certain things but I can not see how you are compering it to the odessy arena as there is a vast differance in capacity and anyway is a much more modern and up to date facility! I also came about the idea as there was going concern about the viability of the centre being built in cork and the odessy also was built as an entertainment centre with bars,hard rock cafe etc which could also be brought into such a centre for cork to bring in more people and money to the centre? And basically I think such a centre would be much more attractive and worth while for the city, this also comes back to the point of the cc not being ambitious enough in the new developments in the city(high rise). I would also like to say while im on that Cork needs to address its retail problem sooner rather than later as I was in limerick recently and it just came across me that it is better served by the bigger names moving in such as eddie rockets,pizza hut(i know mp has both of these) but they are only food court outlets and my examples but i am really refering to the city centre anyway!Also footlocker has just expanded with a number of outlets in Ireland but none in Cork again!Also Dixons,pc world,currys just popped into my head!

      re: footlocker – What is wrong with Cummins Sports and Finns Corner?
      re: Dixons – Soundstore and Flor Griffin?

      You may have a point but in terms of retail I am not sure I want Cork to become another Leicester/Derby/Belfast/etc. I live in the UK and find the average regional high street to be extremely boring. I love coming home to Cork and see some “retail independence” ,

    • #734062
      lexington
      Participant

      @domosullivan wrote:

      re: footlocker – What is wrong with Cummins Sports and Finns Corner?
      re: Dixons – Soundstore and Flor Griffin?

      You may have a point but in terms of retail I am not sure I want Cork to become another Leicester/Derby/Belfast/etc. I live in the UK and find the average regional high street to be extremely boring. I love coming home to Cork and see some “retail independence” ,

      Though I agree the city centre needs to facilitate more prime city centre retail space – I don’t agree with the logic that to be consider a decent retail centre, you need to have a certain list of names or brands like Footlocker, Dixons or whatever. Indeed, increases in choice are always welcome but I don’t see, how for example, if Dublin has a Starbucks – Cork has to also. To me, that simply makes a city seem less distinctive and among a pattern of replicas. Indeed, fashion retail in Cork – for example – could certainly do with more input as the choice in the city centre can be restrictive at times and the regularity of the same old places with the same old products in themselves become repetitive. A healthy retail area can sufficiently support both big brand names and local enterprises. For those establishments that have become lazy and uninventive, I say bring in the brand names, but it I don’t think they’re a prerequisite to a city’s success. That said, I look forward to seeing increased choice in the form of stores such as H&M, Habitat and believe it or not – in the not too distant future, Abercrombie & Fitch may be landing on our shores! Cornmarket Street, Grand Parade, Academy Street and others should help rectify the restrictive city centre space availabilities. And in time, the docklands areas will assist helpfully too.

    • #734063
      mickeydocs
      Participant
      danielCork needs to address its retail problem sooner rather than later as I was in limerick recently and it just came across me that it is better served by the bigger names moving in such as eddie rockets,pizza hut(i know mp has both of these) but they are only food court outlets and my examples but i am really refering to the city centre anyway!Also footlocker has just expanded with a number of outlets in Ireland but none in Cork again!Also Dixons,pc world,currys just popped into my head![/QUOTE wrote:

      my god daniel but you come across as a really crass anglophile…. one of the things that I love about the centre of Cork is that there is a core of thriving local businesses such as cummins and flor griffin (amongst many others).

      Cork is already full of chain stores from the uk (most of whom charge far more than they do in Manchester, Newcastle, etc).

      As for Pizza hut, why don’t you try il padrino for a decent pizza… Cork’s businessmen continue to buck the national retail trend… look at how Mathews reinvented themselves in the face of competition from Champion and the like!

    • #734064
      richie
      Participant

      anglophile?! How does it make him an anglophile? Eddie Rockets is Irish for a start and globalisation is hardly a solely anglo saxon ideology .

      Point taken about the stores charging more though 🙂

    • #734065
      anto
      Participant

      Speaking of disntintive shops in Cork. It’s a a shame to see Donavan’s butchers closing in Cork. It’s a real Cork landmark as is the English Market there aswell. Footlocker, Pizza hut!!! FFS what about the english market. People up here in dublin are always saying why can’t we have something like that. I hope all you Cork folks do your shopping there and not in Tesco’s and the rest!

    • #734066
      kite
      Participant

      @anto wrote:

      Speaking of disntintive shops in Cork. It’s a a shame to see Donavan’s butchers closing in Cork. It’s a real Cork landmark as is the English Market there aswell. Footlocker, Pizza hut!!! FFS what about the english market. People up here in dublin are always saying why can’t we have something like that. I hope all you Cork folks do your shopping there and not in Tesco’s and the rest!

      Thanks anto,in my rush to fit as many hours into a day!! I never gave a thought for the landmark shops under treat in cork. Donavan’s will be a huge loss to the city.
      To my shame I use the English Market as a short cut from the office to the bank ect. choosing the “convenience” of Tesco Douglas on my way home to shop.
      I will make it my business to shop and support the English Market in the future.

    • #734067
      anto
      Participant

      nothing like this in Tesco!

      http://www.koconnellsfish.com/shop.html

    • #734068
      lisam
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      Cork is already full of chain stores from the uk (most of whom charge far more than they do in Manchester, Newcastle, etc).

      Obviously they charge more because the stuff has to be transported over here

    • #734069
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @lisam wrote:

      Obviously they charge more because the stuff has to be transported over here

      So much for economies of scale.



      @daniel_7 wrote:

      Does anyone think that if an event centre is to be built it should be based along the lines of the odessy arena in Belfast as a multi purpose centre for sports and entertainment as this would be an ideal and exciting centre point to the commercial aspect of the north docklands(if this is where it will be built). This would also be a far bigger benifit to the city than the bland centre being propsed?I also think building a 5000 seater is unambitious and embarrissing for the countrys second city as there is plans for an 8000 seater in Athlone? :confused:

      I think that would be good too daniel. Ive heard all the jazz about Horgans quay too and though it would be a nice location I think its still too small. Anything Manor park propose will be too small and I fear Cork will get a halfassed affair rather than the decent sort it should get. Thing is the council will probably go with it anyway just cos its at Horgans quay. Manor park should really just concentrate on developing the lands for the uses like commercial lesiure and residential and such. I hear the Showgrounds will be a better location in terms of size. Pity its not on the river. What about the Tedcastles site or Ford sites nearby???

      I’d like to see any event centre a week-round, day-round facility like daniel7 said with more than onne use. It should be a continual hub of activity.

    • #734070
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Frinailla Ltd. have withdrawn their applications to demolish buildings on Watercourse Road on the site of their Lady’s Well development. They still have two applications with ABP to demolish and construct a mixed use development including, apartments, retail, gym, health centre.
      Apparently, they have recently informed local residents that they are to proceed with knocking the buildings prior to any decision being made by ABP. They are basing this work on safety grounds.

    • #734071
      pier39
      Participant

      😀 @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Frinailla Ltd. have withdrawn their applications to demolish buildings on Watercourse Road on the site of their Lady’s Well development. They still have two applications with ABP to demolish and construct a mixed use development including, apartments, retail, gym, health centre.
      Apparently, they have recently informed local residents that they are to proceed with knocking the buildings prior to any decision being made by ABP. They are basing this work on safety grounds.


      tawt they just withdrew the appeal for subsurface investigations??? itll allow ’em get straight into the job if granted in september.

      hey hey leave those kids alone! hope they get the 5 storeys. that whole 1 storey reduction thing was a complete joke. any word on the water street appeal? that one is gonna be a major determinant on many future docks decisions i figure. the council carry on was a joke. by the way thats my word of the day ‘joke’. 😀

    • #734072
      lexington
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      I think that would be good too daniel. Ive heard all the jazz about Horgans quay too and though it would be a nice location I think its still too small. Anything Manor park propose will be too small and I fear Cork will get a halfassed affair rather than the decent sort it should get. Thing is the council will probably go with it anyway just cos its at Horgans quay. Manor park should really just concentrate on developing the lands for the uses like commercial lesiure and residential and such. I hear the Showgrounds will be a better location in terms of size. Pity its not on the river. What about the Tedcastles site or Ford sites nearby???

      I’d like to see any event centre a week-round, day-round facility like daniel7 said with more than onne use. It should be a continual hub of activity.

      Speaking of which, the colourful Marquee has been erected for the Live at the Marquee event at the Showgrounds. I believe it was actually visible in the background from the commentary box at yesterday’s Munster Finals match for those of you watching it on television.

      I think MPH would be better focussing on developing the additional ‘event centre’ lands myself for other uses. I would hate to see CCC settle for less simply to satisfy a whim.

      As for the Ford site, plans are already being formalised on that site for a massive redevelopment (will have more details on that in the near future hopefully) – and as for Tedcastles, I believe I posted one of their plans in an earlier post.


    • #734073
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      After the recent architectural competion, those anybody know whether there are any REAL plans for Kyrls Quay?



      Here’s a few images of some developments ongoing/recently completed or planned for UCC.

      The first is the new IT building planned fior the old Greyhound Track on Western Road:

      It got planning in July 2002 and includes a riverside walk with a bridge link to the new Medical building at Brookfield House. The completed building will house Computer Science and Microelectronic engineering Depts. Designed by Scott Tallon Walker, the project is on hold due to funding shortfalls.

      Next is that medical campus at Brookfield:

      Its built around an 1800’s residence which had been vacant for many years. The design team have created a new complex which accommodates the academic needs while conserving the original house. The house although not particularly attractive was identified through the campus Conservation Plan as a regionally significant building. Its significance arises from the uniqueness of the house which was built using techniques more commonly found in industrial building of the time. The previous occupants, the Jennings family had fear of flooding, fire and break in. The house is of very robust construction (steel doors, safes etc.), has large brick-lined tanks at attic level and had an area for a boat at roof level. (Source: UCC, Buildings and Estates).

      Designed by RKD McCarthy Lynch, its under construction and due for completion very shortly.

      Finally for now, some views of the new Postgraduate research Library to be built adjacent to the existing Boole Library. Designed by SBRA and Wilson Associates, prelimanary work has begun with work to be completed by May 2007.

      Some model images:

    • #734074
      jungle
      Participant

      @ewankennedy wrote:

      Ive heard all the jazz about Horgans quay too and though it would be a nice location I think its still too small.

      What benefit Horgan’s Quay has in terms of location would be lessened if/when a bridge is built at Water St. It would be a 5-10 minute walk from the train station to the event centre then.

    • #734075
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 UCC have being granted planning to develop a new 2-storey 1675 sq.m Outreach and Access Building with lecture theatres, ancillary offices, a cafe, exhibition and research areas. CCC approved the Jack Coughlan designed building, to be located on a site at the Mardyke Gardens, beside the new Mardyke Walk Bridge, subject to 11 conditions – of which, permission for the Tennis Court lighting, was refused.



      😎 Killarney-based Oyster Developments (of which Limerick developers John Costello & Paul O’Brien have involvement) are seeking permission to develop 7 2-bedroom apartments and 3 retail units along Church Road in Blackrock. The development is to be designed by The e-Project, who also designed the developers’ other foray into the Cork market with a redevelopment of the Capitol Cineplex on Grand Parade, for use as a department store. That project is currently in Further Information and has received a large degree of criticism over its design. The developers are also currently looking at a number of other large-scale development options around Cork.



      🙁 DAT Partnership have seen the due date on their landmark 9-storey 30,000sq ft office building for Clontarf Street, designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects, pushed back until September 2nd 2005 – the original due date had been scheduled for the 7th of July 2005. Michael Lynch is the planner responsible.



      🙂 The office development for Clarke’s Bridge, being developed by Adrian Power and designed by architects Coughlan de Keyser, looks set to be lodged within the next few days. The building will now be lodged in a revised design stemming 7-storeys in height.



      Apologises for the sporadic posting lately. Been pretty busy, but will return to form hopefully over the next few days. – thanks for the images RM .

    • #734076
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @jungle wrote:

      What benefit Horgan’s Quay has in terms of location would be lessened if/when a bridge is built at Water St. It would be a 5-10 minute walk from the train station to the event centre then.

      Yeah I figure once the council get on with the job for the Water st bridge (by the way thanks for the post with pics lex on that!) the event centre at the showgrounds will only be a hop across the bridge and be just as easily accessible as Horgans quay.

    • #734077
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’m dying to get an image of that outreach building lex. You able to lay your hands on some?

      – having had a look at the report, I see that this project was reccomended for refusal of planning permission by the planner involved. Obviously this was over-ruled. Any details?
      I’ve said it before, this sort of carry on does little to increase my faith in the planning process!

    • #734078
      snoopdog
      Participant

      :confused: Is it true that mr.Kelleher has sent in another planning permission application? Is it also true that he was only allowed 27 town houses after his last application? :confused:

    • #734079
      pier39
      Participant

      @snoopdog wrote:

      :confused: Is it true that mr.Kelleher has sent in another planning permission application? Is it also true that he was only allowed 27 town houses after his last application? :confused:

      nope. if anything he’d appeal it but i havent heard anything. so what was the last really exciting planning application in the city? clontarf street? kennys thing on patricks quay??? im waiting with tantilising anticipation to see the next really interesting proposal. anyone got a heads up???

    • #734080
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’m dying to get an image of that outreach building lex. You able to lay your hands on some?

      – having had a look at the report, I see that this project was reccomended for refusal of planning permission by the planner involved. Obviously this was over-ruled. Any details?
      I’ve said it before, this sort of carry on does little to increase my faith in the planning process!

      I think that UCC are allowed to do anything that they want, granted, some is good, e.g. the Glucksman, but other stuff is a bit grim, e.g. the Environmental Research Building on the Lee Road…….

    • #734081
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 McCarthy Developments have been granted permission to develop a further 50 apartments at their highly popular Harty’s Quay development in Rochestown. The residential complex is designed by Project Architects and under construction by Ridge Developments. The grant allows McCarthy Developments provide 2 new 5-storey blocks with 25 apartments in each.



      😉 Solicitor and developer James G. O’Mahony’s Rosridge Properties have been permitted by Cork County Council to provide a roundabout on the Cork to Bandon N71 Road. Rosridge are seeking to develop a new medical campus and residential complex on lands adjoining the roundabout at Garranedarragh near Bishopstown. The development will be a joint venture with the Sandyford, Dublin-based Beacon Court Group (who are themselves developing a new private hospital at Sandyford Business Park), St. Patrick’s Hospice and Enable Ireland. The development will provide a new 100-bedroom private hospital, new 110-bed hospice, medical campus, care facility (w/ school, training centre and swimming pool) and some residential elements. The permit of this provision may be an indication of the way in which Cork County Council are viewing the aforementioned proposal ahead of any decision (still in Further Information) – Rosridge are counting on a grant for the lands which are not zoned for such development. With full knowledge of the material convention of the Cork County Development Plan that this development posits, Rosridge are counting on an amendment or ‘allowance’ in light of the proposal nature. The roundabout decision, however, is being appealed.



      😮 Lidl GmbH have been granted permission to develop a new discount foodstore on a site at Kilnaglery, Carrigaline – on the main Crosshaven/Carrigaline Road. The development will pave the way for a new Lidl store, 118 parking spaces and all associate ancillary services. Design was handled by Patrick A. Cashman & Associates.

    • #734082
      lexington
      Participant

      Media reports today suggested that the GAA in co-opertaion with CCC and the MAS may seek to expand Pairc Ui Chaoimh into the adjoining Showgrounds site. Indeed discussions had and have been in place about such ideas – the GAA had sought at one stage to realign the pitch at PuC and recalibrate stands to optimise capacities. On the adjoining lands, a new hotel and conference centre was proposed with new hosting facilities, media provision facilities, refurbished structures, seating etc. However, those plans have been gently pushed to one side. Many whispers have been sent down the wind regarding PuC, but it should be noted that nothing has been made concrete yet – they are mostly aspirations rather than proposals. Despite the talk, the Showgrounds site is also the subject of other discussions – from which I understand – are progressing very positively and may solidify within the coming weeks. CCC have been active in these discussions also – and have offered their assurances should these projects bare fruit – their realisation will certainly restrict the free-reign of the GAA but will not limit them – they have many of their own options and stand to lose little in any event.

      The GAA have also addressed other options – and these do not necessarily mean a substantial expansion into the Showgrounds site – the Association has been approached and has approached other parties/developers. Plans have been drawn up for a joint-venture with a developer regarding PuC, but it is not known at what stage these have proceeded, if at all.

      Also, immediately surrounding PuC, at least 4 other sites have been earmarked for substantial development opportunities – these include that of the Ford Motor Co. and Tedcastles Ltd.

      One project nearby, was recently confirmed as being in the process of ‘finalisation’. A planning date has not yet been set, but the proposal is substantial to say the least and should immeasurably enhance the area in which it is situated. As time progresses, I will investigate the possibility of revealing more and may perhaps attain images. Will have to see I suppose.

    • #734083
      Leesider
      Participant

      heard capacity for the Pairc could be down to 35,000 after the match on sunday due to safety restrictions! not worth holding any munster finals there if that is the case. Good to see though that they have definite plans in pipeline.

    • #734084
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      Media reports today suggested that the GAA in co-opertaion with CCC and the MAS may seek to expand Pairc Ui Chaoimh into the adjoining Showgrounds site. Indeed discussions had and have been in place about such ideas – the GAA had sought at one stage to realign the pitch at PuC and recalibrate stands to optimise capacities. On the adjoining lands, a new hotel and conference centre was proposed with new hosting facilities, media provision facilities, refurbished structures, seating etc. However, those plans have been gently pushed to one side. Many whispers have been sent down the wind regarding PuC, but it should be noted that nothing has been made concrete yet – they are mostly aspirations rather than proposals. Despite the talk, the Showgrounds site is also the subject of other discussions – from which I understand – are progressing very positively and may solidify within the coming weeks. CCC have been active in these discussions also – and have offered their assurances should these projects bare fruit – their realisation will certainly restrict the free-reign of the GAA but will not limit them – they have many of their own options and stand to lose little in any event.

      The GAA have also addressed other options – and these do not necessarily mean a substantial expansion into the Showgrounds site – the Association has been approached and has approached other parties/developers. Plans have been drawn up for a joint-venture with a developer regarding PuC, but it is not known at what stage these have proceeded, if at all.

      Also, immediately surrounding PuC, at least 4 other sites have been earmarked for substantial development opportunities – these include that of the Ford Motor Co. and Tedcastles Ltd.

      One project nearby, was recently confirmed as being in the process of ‘finalisation’. A planning date has not yet been set, but the proposal is substantial to say the least and should immeasurably enhance the area in which it is situated. As time progresses, I will investigate the possibility of revealing more and may perhaps attain images. Will have to see I suppose.

      I wish to god they would just demolish Páirc Ui Chaoimh and build a mini Croke Park. I’m sick of the place-and according to my sources the stadium is SINKING!!! Granted at the match on Sunday in Páirc Ui Chaoimh the pitch looked amazing-but Ireland needs a second World/European class stadium. If we had a new stadium it would complement the docklands project-it would really be the icing on the cake for the docklands and Cork. But the approach roads to the stadium will have to improve and they should really look into a multi storey car park at the stadium. And as Leesider pointed out the crowd capacity could be cut down to 35,000 – whcih would be a disaster. How many people wanted tickets for thematch on Sunday? They could easily have sold at least 55,000.

      If they did do a major revamp of the stadium, like Croke Park, conference centres could be built and this would 100% be a welcome addition to the area.

    • #734085
      lexington
      Participant

      @snoopdog wrote:

      :confused: Is it true that mr.Kelleher has sent in another planning permission application? Is it also true that he was only allowed 27 town houses after his last application? :confused:

      No snoopdog, Mr. Kelleher has appealed the CCC decision made. A resident representing the CSD has appealed also on their behalf.



      @iloveCORK2 wrote:

      I wish to god they would just demolish Páirc Ui Chaoimh and build a mini Croke Park. I’m sick of the place-and according to my sources the stadium is SINKING!!! Granted at the match on Sunday in Páirc Ui Chaoimh the pitch looked amazing-but Ireland needs a second World/European class stadium. If we had a new stadium it would complement the docklands project-it would really be the icing on the cake for the docklands and Cork. But the approach roads to the stadium will have to improve and they should really look into a multi storey car park at the stadium. And as Leesider pointed out the crowd capacity could be cut down to 35,000 – whcih would be a disaster. How many people wanted tickets for thematch on Sunday? They could easily have sold at least 55,000.

      I agree a little equilibrium would be welcome. The provision of the Water Street Bridge should aid traffic management issues. Also, CCC are assessing a recalibration of the road network in this area of the docklands to facilitate new development and make it a more attractive location to invest, with a pedestrian & public transport friendly infastructure.

    • #734086
      mickeydocs
      Participant
      iloveCORK2 wrote:
      I wish to god they would just demolish Páirc Ui Chaoimh and build a mini Croke Park. I’m sick of the place-and according to my sources the stadium is SINKING!!! Granted at the match on Sunday in Páirc Ui Chaoimh the pitch looked amazing-but Ireland needs a second World/European class stadium.

      Landsdowne Road will give Ireland a second world class stadium.

      It would great if Cork could host some of the Heineken Cup games, so it would be great to have a multi-purpose sports facility… maybe the GAA should think outside of the box for once and invite IRFU and the FAI into discussions.

    • #734087
      theblimp
      Participant

      “It would great if Cork could host some of the Heineken Cup games, so it would be great to have a multi-purpose sports facility… maybe the GAA should think outside of the box for once and invite IRFU and the FAI into discussions.”

      Mickeydocs – while it would indeed be a great and laudable idea I’ll ask you to cast your mind back to the vote on opening Croke Park. Which county was most opposed to it? With the current crowd running the county board I doubt if there’ll be any discussions with Munster Rugby or Cork City FC in the near future

    • #734088
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      “It would great if Cork could host some of the Heineken Cup games, so it would be great to have a multi-purpose sports facility… maybe the GAA should think outside of the box for once and invite IRFU and the FAI into discussions.”

      Mickeydocs – while it would indeed be a great and laudable idea I’ll ask you to cast your mind back to the vote on opening Croke Park. Which county was most opposed to it? With the current crowd running the county board I doubt if there’ll be any discussions with Munster Rugby or Cork City FC in the near future

      Agreed. There’s a certain member of the Cork County Board deadset against change. He is at odds with the grassroots gaa fan/player/selector.

    • #734089
      securityman
      Participant

      I’ve just started out recently as a rep in the security business and I’m wondering could anybody steer me in the right directions for new developments coming up or just started in the cork area and who is the relevent people to contact. I regularly check the press but as you know they seem to be a bit behind and someone who has the contacts are already doing the job. I’m really enjoying the debates on Cork as I’ve only discovered this site in the last few days.

    • #734090
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I’ve heard that OCP will submit planning applications for their St. Patrick Street/Academy Street development by the end of this month.
      Can anybody confirm this?

    • #734091
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @securityman wrote:

      I’ve just started out recently as a rep in the security business and I’m wondering could anybody steer me in the right directions for new developments coming up or just started in the cork area and who is the relevent people to contact. I regularly check the press but as you know they seem to be a bit behind and someone who has the contacts are already doing the job. I’m really enjoying the debates on Cork as I’ve only discovered this site in the last few days.

      this thread contains information on pretty much all of the sites proposed for the city

      you should also pay attention to the planning department.

    • #734092
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I’ve heard that OCP will submit planning applications for their St. Patrick Street/Academy Street development by the end of this month.
      Can anybody confirm this?

      I believe it is mentioned in one of my previous posts that the application was scheduled for sometime in July but I know there have been delays and it may be a little later. Unfortunately I don’t have any exact date. I’m anxious to see the application proposal. It’s been a while since I saw drawings on the project and I don’t know how much they may have since changed. I wouldn’t expect it to be exceptionally different and if so, you can take it that the design will please some, not please others and be generally controversial (given the location, it always was going to be irrespective of the design). I’ll keep my efforts on-going to see if I can get an early image but it may be a case of waiting nearer or until the lodgement date. I’m anxious to see the VIS and the impact the building has on its neighbours – most importantly those at Emmet Place. There were some elements of the building I drew question marks over/wasn’t happy about, so it’ll be interesting to how or if they have been rectified – overall though its not all that bad considering the scale – but we’ll wait and see what the final pitch is.

      -> Just on a side note, figures for the month ended May 2005 show a satisfactory increase in trade volumes at Mahon Point. As predicted, it seems to be gradually finding its feet. Whatever about MP, Academy Street always seemed like the greater potential given its location – let’s hope it rings true.



      mickeydocs – regarding a 2nd ‘world-class’ stadium, I believe Dublin is too centralised as it is. It would be of no harm for a 2nd stadium of sufficient capacity and stature was developed in somewhere like Cork which has the most capable infastructure and support to facilitate such a facility outside of Dublin – I say that knowing that Cork has a long way yet to go in terms of fine tuning. I believe it would not only be good for Cork and for the rest of the country, but indeed for Dublin in the strategic run of things.

      (By the way, infastructure does not simply mean roads etc etc but hotels, airport, port, rail, population services and so on).

    • #734093
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Adrian Power is now lodging an application for the development of a 7-storey office building with 2134m sq of floor space for Clarke’s Bridge (as reported earlier). The development was designed by Coughlan de Keyser Architects and is being marketed by DNG Harris. The development has and is expected to receive further interest given its prime location along Cork’s legal district.



      😮 CCC in conjunction with Fleming Construction and Coleman Bros. Developments have made public notice of their intent to develop 405 new homes (287 social/affordable and 118 private) on the 24.5-acre lands at Shanakiel (former Convent/Hospital Grounds). The development will consist of 8 4-bedroom dwellings, 195 3-bedroom terraced houses, 16 3-bedroom duplexes, 16 ground floor 2-bedroom apartments – under the affordable category. With 1 2-storey 5 bedroom detached house, 4 4-bedroom houses, 6 3-bedroom, 36 3-bedroom terrace/semi-detached, 5 2-bedroom bungalows and 66 apartments over 10 2-storey blocks in the private element.

      The development will allow for predominantly southern aspect views among most of the homes on this excellent, sloped site. Vehicular access to the development will be permitted for Blarney Road and Shanakiel Hill gateways.

    • #734094
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      mickeydocs – regarding a 2nd ‘world-class’ stadium, I believe Dublin is too centralised as it is. It would be of no harm for a 2nd stadium of sufficient capacity and stature was developed in somewhere like Cork which has the most capable infastructure and support to facilitate such a facility outside of Dublin – I say that knowing that Cork has a long way yet to go in terms of fine tuning. I believe it would not only be good for Cork and for the rest of the country, but indeed for Dublin in the strategic run of things.

      (By the way, infastructure does not simply mean roads etc etc but hotels, airport, port, rail, population services and so on).[/QUOTE]

      Hey Lex, you know that I would like to see such a stadium built in Cork as much as anyone. I reckon 35-40,000 tickets could be sold for Heineken cup games, and it goes without saying that the inter-county team can fill a 40-60K stadium with ease.

      For such a stadium to be viable it would have to be a multi-purpose.

      If the GAA in the North can agree to such a project, I really don’t see why the GAA in Cork can’t agree to something similar (and yes I am very aware of the power of a certain individual who is anti-progress).

    • #734095
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      I notice (with a little bit of sadness) that Fota Island is slowly but surely being eaten up by private development. The island should have been kept as a public amenity, incorporating Fota House and Gardens, Fota Arboretum, Fota Wildlife Park and open recreational spaces for the City and East Cork.

      However, this is not the case and Fleming are on site building a 125 rooom luxury Hotel with Penthouse suites, a raft of ‘lodges’ (aka houses for the obscenely wealthy), an extensive marina and a second – yes, a second 18-hole Golf Course. Why an island that small requires a second course we’ll never know.
      Couldn’t an alternative use been found for this space? Scenic walkways, picnic spots? isn’t one Golf course enough to fill the hotel?

      Below is an arial view of the proposed work on the island, which actually serves (I think) to minimise the deleterious effect it will have on this gem in the harbour. (Remember the Old Head anyone?)

    • #734096
      theblimp
      Participant

      Yup, seems a shame. To be fair Fleming Construction are just maximising their investment – the rot set in when all of that land was sold off many moons ago. I know there was talk of a huge annual family festival to be held on the land in front of Fota House but it needed to use the car parks that were utilised during the Irish Open years. As this is now the location of the proposed new course it looks like it will never happen. There are plans for the Wildlife Park to extend north with an exotic animal section which was to include things like Siberian Tigers. From what little I know the Wildlife park is one of the most respected in Europe so I’m sure they’ll do things properly – just seems a shame that future expansion would appear limited. This entire island could have become a major resource for the people of the region – now it’s just going to be a plaything for the wealthy few. It kind of reminds of the Michael Dougas movie from years back (name anyone??) where he hops over a wall into a golf-course and starts having a go at the players for keeping the beautiful space for themselves.

    • #734097
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      The arboretum and House are open to the public.
      The arboretum is spectacular, and probably the best collection of plants in the country.

      The road to Fota is quite dodgy once you get off the euroroute.

    • #734098
      St Luke
      Participant

      These plans for Fota are another depressing example of the futher shrinkage of public space in Cork and environs. Fota presents classic opportunities to develop public parkland, particularly in the context of the expanding city. With outstanding public transport links, the potential to develop access there for people rather than for golfers is so high. I mean come on, golfers can drive anywhere.There are precious few recreational sites of this quality within the Metropolitian area.

      I see this all pattern all around. The public domain, and important elements of urban life are disappearing – e.g The closure of The Gingerbread House on Paul Street,- whats next there ? Starbucks?? The Lobby nearly gone – nevermind the loss of Sir Henrys, the systematic take-out of pirate radiostations….oi! 🙁

    • #734099
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Frinailla are expected to lodge their plans for Victoria Cross either today or Monday. The plans comprise of a development of 25 apartments over a large commercial unit. The development will range from 6 to 7 storeys over basement car-parking – and will be developed on the site of the former Plumbing Utilities Store across the road from Aras Developments’ new student residence (currently under construction by Heberger Construction, designed by O’Shea Leader) and just north of the HSE’s Cork Farm Centre. I hope to have images soon.

      Frinailla’s plans for Dennehy’s Cross, designed by O’Mahony Pike, are expected to be lodged soon also.

      (Update: Sorry, Frinailla have lodged their plans – a decision date is due for the 24th of August 2005. Expect to hear from CSD on this one!!! – the apartments will consist of 4 1-bedroom apartments and 21 2-bedroom apartments)



      😎 Bernard Crowley & Gerald Paul are to apply for permission to develop 67 apartments w/ gym and creche in a 17m euro project rising between 5 and 7 storeys high at the former Riverside Farm along the Model Farm Road (west of Eden Hall/Tennis Village). The development will be submitted to Cork City Council for deliberation. Previous applications on the site in 2002 and 2001 also exist. Though the 2002 application for 61 apartments, designed by Dennehy & Dennehy (as also with the current application) was granted by CCC, it was refused on appeal. A decision date for this latest attempt is expected for the 28th of August 2005.

    • #734100
      pier39
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Frinailla are expected to lodge their plans for Victoria Cross either today or Monday. The plans comprise of a development of 25 apartments over a large commercial unit. The development will range from 6 to 7 storeys over basement car-parking – and will be developed on the site of the former Plumbing Utilities Store across the road from Aras Developments’ new student residence (currently under construction by Heberger Construction, designed by O’Shea Leader) and just north of the HSE’s Cork Farm Centre. I hope to have images soon.

      Frinailla’s plans for Dennehy’s Cross, designed by O’Mahony Pike, are expected to be lodged soon also.

      (Update: Sorry, Frinailla have lodged their plans – a decision date is due for the 24th of August 2005. Expect to hear from CSD on this one!!! – the apartments will consist of 4 1-bedroom apartments and 21 2-bedroom apartments)

      sooouuundsss interesting! looking forward to seeing the pics on this one. will frinailla get away with 7 storeys? well possibly it will depend on the design. building heights along this road are averaging between 5 and 9 anyway. plus with the possibility of the cork farm centre (ive heard the same talk too lex! 😉 ) going up for a redevelopment in the coming years you can expect a 7-storey scheme (possibly) for that site also – plus dennehys cross. cahra and csd are going to have a baby. 7-storeys is the new 6-storeys.

      also regarding academy street i hear csr are ready to go, think its ocp holding up the application on that for ? reasons. the examiner will prob get the heads up on that given the association of the site but hey chq still awaits us! 😀

    • #734101
      lexington
      Participant

      😮 Following on from news that the application for the 7-storey Clarke’s Bridge office development is to be lodged on Monday (4th July 2005), news also comes that the neighbouring premises to this site is to be developed itself by property-owner John O’Dwyer in a residential project designed by James Leahy & Associates. The development is expected to house a number of apartment units with ground floor units for commercial usage. The proposal is expected to reach 5-storeys and is to be lodged within the next 2 weeks.

    • #734102
      phatman
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      …Fleming are on site building a 125 rooom luxury Hotel with Penthouse suites, a raft of ‘lodges’ (aka houses for the obscenely wealthy), an extensive marina and a second – yes, a second 18-hole Golf Course. Why an island that small requires a second course we’ll never know.
      Couldn’t an alternative use been found for this space? Scenic walkways, picnic spots? isn’t one Golf course enough to fill the hotel?

      Being involved in the project myself, I must correct you – it is a nine hole golf course which is being developed, alongside the old course, and on open space – no destruction of the woodland is involved. The old road to the golfcourse has been realigned around the extension, and alot of effort is going into the landscaping, in order to complement the surrounds as much as possible. As for the hotel, it being contained in the vicinity of the clubhouse, and is of tasteful design. I do admit it is a pity that such scale of development is taking place, in particular the extent of the housing project, i’m surprised this one passed through the planning process, it really shows the lack of policy as regards public amenity space within the council. I do think the marina is a good idea, however im not sure what the story will be as regards access, i can find out, or whether it will even make it through the planning process.

      As for the hotel, will post some pictures up soon, progress is come along nicely, most of the concrete is being poured at the moment. No operator yet, expect an opening of april/may next year.

    • #734103
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      I notice (with a little bit of sadness) that Fota Island is slowly but surely being eaten up by private development. The island should have been kept as a public amenity, incorporating Fota House and Gardens, Fota Arboretum, Fota Wildlife Park and open recreational spaces for the City and East Cork.

      However, this is not the case and Fleming are on site building a 125 rooom luxury Hotel with Penthouse suites, a raft of ‘lodges’ (aka houses for the obscenely wealthy), an extensive marina and a second – yes, a second 18-hole Golf Course. Why an island that small requires a second course we’ll never know.
      Couldn’t an alternative use been found for this space? Scenic walkways, picnic spots? isn’t one Golf course enough to fill the hotel?

      Below is an arial view of the proposed work on the island, which actually serves (I think) to minimise the deleterious effect it will have on this gem in the harbour. (Remember the Old Head anyone?)

      Did a Count in a Rolls-royce drive over and crush your tricycle as a child??? 😀

    • #734104
      lexington
      Participant

      Fleming Construction’s 5-Star Fota Island Hotel. Designed by Hogan & Associates.

      Quite frankly, I’ve no problem with the principle of this development. Indeed, as the metropolitan and commuter belt areas of the city continues to expand at such pace, areas like Fota Island will make valuable recreational and economic contributions – you can’t blame someone for taking advantage of an opportunity – I didn’t see the foresight of Cork County Council and CCC, nor the OPW come into play when these lands came up for sale. For years I used to enjoy the Old Head of Kinsale (many a weekend was spent ab-seiling down by the lighthouse) – and its ‘exclusive designation’ I believe was unwarranted – its a long and complicated topic – but Fota differs in that this estate has historically be restictive in some domain or the other, so ‘exclusivity’ in this respect is not such a big issue I believe; nonetheless the island whole would have made a wonderful national park or something along those lines.

      That aside, the hotel, golf courses and marina are pretty favourable. Golf is one of the bigger sporting contributors to this country and its economy – the development will could become a valuable contributor to the area over the coming years. My problem with this development is the extent of the lodgings – which, like many Fleming Construction residential developments are left somewhat wanting in the design department (though exception’s like Trinity Court – love it or loath it – do exist). That’s no particular dig at Hogan & Associates either – they seem to produce generally good standards of design given the freedom and budget to do so. I appreciate profit maximisation and all but even the most money-lusting businessperson knows sometimes you have to take your face out of the trough. There’s opportunism and then there’s riding an opportunity until its burnt – you have to know when to get off the ride. I just think the density of lodgings at Fota is excessive and their design does not befit the area.


      The Lodges: like every other repetitive housing estate throughout the country.

      By the way, theblimp, that movie was ‘Falling Down’ was it not? 😉



      As for loss of greenspace – I think more serious issues such a the encroachment on our surrounding countryside of more (aforementioned) monotonous housing estates is a bigger threat the isolated and contained elements like Fota. Here I cite BrideView’s LakeView House development, Ruden Homes at Lenaghmore, OFC at Dunkettle House and OCP at Classes Lake too. Its one of the reasons I seriously believe CCC are going to have to demonstrate a little ingenuity and readdress its high-rise policy in zones such as the docklands – but only exceptionally high standards of high-rise (that means more Swiss Re, Eglinton Streets, Burj al Arabs etc etc and less Treasury Holdings-type rubbish at Ballymun and Dublin’s Docklands (i.e. THAT 32-storey Anthony Reddy thing and the other 32 storey yawnful building by Paul Keogh at Heuston Gate). I wholeheartedly accept the diffculty in producing mass housing comprising of varying design types – but surely more can be done with the amount of money being injected into such projects. These sprawling estates are more injurous to our greenspace than anything else – and the one thing that really irritates me is the loss of the fine landscaped urban greenspaces of former estates (like Dunkettle House, LakeView House, Tellenganna Lodge etc) to monotonous estate projects. These fabulous relics and provisions should be protected – they’re vanishing fast and will be near impossible to ever replace.



      :confused: On this topic, I received an e-mail from a gentleman based on an apparent survey he received from a UCC Economics student. It was for a Survey Methods project and related to housing developments in and around Cork city and County. 5 developers were assessed O’Flynn Construction, Frinailla, Fleming, O’Brien & O’Flynn and McInerney. Supposedly 5 customers of projects by each of these developers (25 in total) were sampled and asked to complete a survey. Overall results were tallied and points were awarded based on categories including Design, Value for Money, Location, Covenience, Interaction, Landscaping and so on. The e-mail noted that O’Flynn Construction topped the results but it didn’t specify the positions of the other ‘players’. I’ll e-mail the source and post the full results when I get them.

    • #734105
      PTB
      Participant

      Raidoactiveman, were the lands to belong to the county council, what exactly would you put want them to put there?Forgive my lack of imaginitiveness but all I keep coming up with is golf courses

    • #734106
      kite
      Participant
      pier39 wrote:
      sooouuundsss interesting! looking forward to seeing the pics on this one. will frinailla get away with 7 storeys? well possibly it will depend on the design. building heights along this road are averaging between 5 and 9 anyway. plus with the possibility of the cork farm centre (ive heard the same talk too lex! ]

      😡 Yep, you are right about CSD having a baby on this one, see their post on http://www.corksouthwest.com re. Liverpool’s city of culture year 2008 below.

      Cork City (For Sale)

      The Mayor of Liverpool, Europe’s capital of culture 2008 gave an interview to Sky News on the 26th may 2005 after Liverpool’s victory in the UEFA champions league final…He said:

      Liverpool went through a bad spell some years ago when property developers dictated what was built where and when in the city.

      This unsustainable development caused untold damage to the fabric and pride of our city.

      Things have now changed for the better, now we tell developers what we as a city need and want, and if they don’t like it they can go and destroy some other city. We now tell them Liverpool is NOT FOR SALE.

      When we take over the mantle of Europe’s capital of culture we will be ready to show the world that Liverpool is back, vibrant, and looking forward.

      We have no intentions of going back to the bad old days of inferior development.

      Cork City Planners and Management take note……

      Or is Cork for sale ???

    • #734107
      phatman
      Participant

      I agree with this in theory, just as long as the council’s vision is solid. I mean isn’t this already the case somewhat?ie. various development plans laying down guidelines for areas and even specific sites.
      I take your point though Kite, CSD are again over-reacting and reading way too deep into this statement.

    • #734108
      dave123
      Participant

      It the water street devolpment gets the go-ahead?

    • #734109
      Leigh Teabing
      Participant

      I bet you that the lodge JF has retained for himself looking onto one of the new fairways will get an extra bit of Architectural enhancement

      Looks as if the Dubs are coming to town with the circa €7m purchase of the Reliance Bearing site. I guess Tommy Maher is rubbing his hands at the prospect of a little enquiry to sell his green single storey currently housing a squad of treadmills.

    • #734110
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Fleming Construction are maximising their investment – I would not expect them to do otherwise.
      My argument is that their investment could be maximised without the need to resort to the hugely unimaginitive golf course idea.
      Seeing as there is already one golf course on the island, the space for the 9-hole course (thanks for the correction phatman) could have been given over for public walkways, riding trails, open festival space, parklands, equestrian centre, etc. By the way phatman, I dont think i ever suggested that woodland was being destroyed for the purposes of a golf course. That being said, the majority of courses- most especially Fota island looks like the most sterile form of “natural environment” you can come across.

      I’d agree with Lexington, the “Lodges” (aka housing estate) looks pretty down market for the setting. An open admittance that its catering for the pseudo-rich as opposed to the actual rich perhaps 🙂
      Of course, I would have preferred had the whole estate had been secured for public use. That being said, we should be grateful that Fota Wildlife park, fota House and the Arboretum are public property and have the best public transport system on the island 🙂 Fleming can’t take that away from us 🙂

      To wrap this wrambling text up…. Fleming are free to maximise their investment within limits but they could have come up with something a little more imaginative than phatman and his golf course idea (sorry PH). Surely this would have added to the value of the houses, would prove more of an attraction to the hotel and cover Fleming’s costs very adequately.

    • #734111
      lexington
      Participant

      @Leigh Teabing wrote:

      Looks as if the Dubs are coming to town with the circa €7m purchase of the Reliance Bearing site. I guess Tommy Maher is rubbing his hands at the prospect of a little enquiry to sell his green single storey currently housing a squad of treadmills.

      It makes sense from a logistical and elevational perspective. It’ll be interesting to see how they proceed with this one. Even more interesting will be whether or not Simon are approached – so far, I haven’t heard anything, but if cards are played well, Simon could stand to benefit from a nice cash injection to facilitate the development of a decent, up-to-date centre and allow any development maximise its quay frontage. Frinailla were among the bidders and the Dublin firm I can’t mention for the time beingm (as I previously indicated – sorry! But soon all goodness bidding.)

      Twill Ltd (industrial bag manufacturer) over on Albert Quay are supposedly ‘deep’ in discussions about relocating and freeing up their premises adjoining the former Doyle Warehouse. Note how Twill Ltd did not lodge an objection to the revised Eglinton Street plans – where they had objected to the original plans. 😉 :confused:

      Also, I believe Careys (Tool Hire) may surprise us all in the future. 😉

      Its been interesting to watch the increased Dublin-based developer activity in Cork of late (SHUL, DAT etc) – expect more soon.


    • #734112
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Ralph Riegel reports in todays Irish Independent that:
      PROPOSALS for a multi-million-euro hotel are to come before An Bord Pleanala after the developer confirmed he will challenge the refusal of a town council to sanction the project.

      The €50m-plus hotel and luxury housing project, proposed by the Lawton family, for Fermoy in north Cork has been hailed by its supporters as “an economic godsend” for the town.
      However, Fermoy Town Council rejected the project after a concerted campaign of local opposition to it.
      Opponents claimed the scale of the project and the density of luxury homes involved in its residential element were too great for the proposed location adjacent to Fermoy’s riverside town park. Their main complaints centred on the height of the hotel complex, the inclusion of 73 luxury town houses beside the complex, the visual impact on the area and the possibility of traffic congestion.
      The venture – by Lawton Developments – included a four-storey hotel with a 100-bedroom plus capacity coupled with 73 luxury town houses in an adjacent five acre site.
      Now, the developers confirmed they are to appeal the rejection – warning that they were “very, very disappointed” by the council’s decision.
      Fermoy Enterprise Board (FEB) Chairman, Cllr Michael Hanley, admitted he felt the project’s rejection was like “a body-blow for the town”.

      Ralph Riegel- Irish Independent

    • #734113
      who_me
      Participant

      I don’t know if this has been mentioned previously, but there seems to be an initiative now running to promote Cork city centre (presumably to counter increased competition from Mahon Point and the like). There are ‘Cork City Centre’ posters in many shop windows, and seem to be linked to the cometocork.com website.

      I’m not sure how necessary the move is, the city centre doesn’t appear to be struggling, and the Academy St. and Cornmaket St. developments are only going to improve that, but the website is nicely done. Nice Cork (city centre obviously) map on it too.

      Speaking of maps, Google Maps (http://maps.google.co.uk) seems to have decent quality satellite images of Cork city now, handy if you’re trying to visualise a site. I believe there’s also a software download version which works quicker.

    • #734114
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      I don’t know if this has been mentioned previously, but there seems to be an initiative now running to promote Cork city centre (presumably to counter increased competition from Mahon Point and the like). There are ‘Cork City Centre’ posters in many shop windows, and seem to be linked to the cometocork.com website.

      I’m not sure how necessary the move is, the city centre doesn’t appear to be struggling, and the Academy St. and Cornmaket St. developments are only going to improve that, but the website is nicely done. Nice Cork (city centre obviously) map on it too.

      Speaking of maps, Google Maps (http://maps.google.co.uk) seems to have decent quality satellite images of Cork city now, handy if you’re trying to visualise a site. I believe there’s also a software download version which works quicker.

      what’s the status with the cornmarket developemnt… has work actually started?

    • #734115
      lexington
      Participant

      @mickeydocs wrote:

      what’s the status with the cornmarket developemnt… has work actually started?

      Scaffolding has been erected and the Musgrave Building warehousing has been demolished with excavation works on-going until (it is hoped) early August. Foundations will rapidly proceed thereafter and the Noddys Building will be demolished. Primary construction is anticipated for mid-to-late August/early September (depending on excavation works – which Rockfell Investments have stated that they wish to have complete as soon as humanly possible).

    • #734116
      ewankennedy
      Participant

      Speaking of excavation works. A few weeks back i was walking by the Grand parade plaza site on South main street and I though I saw activity on the site. When I peeped in it was though the basement foundations (???) were completely flooded. i read a media report there about a month ago that said a crane would be erected and all by now but nothing seems to be happening. The activity i saw I thought was John paul construction finally demolioshing the hotel but alas i was wrong. ??? This site has been idle for well over a year – except for excavation works.

      I hope Rockfell are right about Cornmarket street and they dont end up like the above site. As far as I know, I read somewhere, that they had a lot of surveyance already out of the way and investigations shouldnt take more than a month.

    • #734117
      who_me
      Participant

      Any ideas of what’s in store for the old warehouse on Fr. Matthew’s Quay? I presume it’s going to be more or less completely demolished – I can’t see how it could easily be adapted.

    • #734118
      lexington
      Participant

      @who_me wrote:

      Any ideas of what’s in store for the old warehouse on Fr. Matthew’s Quay? I presume it’s going to be more or less completely demolished – I can’t see how it could easily be adapted.

      It’s actually being revamped to some extent – well the facade at least, the interior is to be gutted. Tom McCarthy is redeveloping the former mill as a new residential, office, bar and restaurant facility (extended from his Jacobs on the Mall premises) with 30 car-parking spaces to the rear over 3 levels. The project is designed by Murray O’Laoire and currently under construction by O’Flynns of Banteer,

    • #734119
      dowlingm
      Participant

      on the Fermoy development – I freely admit I haven’t seen it but I suspect it will be an architectural nightmare if Hanley is for it. Fermoy town centre has nothing wrong with it that a bunker buster bomb couldn’t sort out.

    • #734120
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Any news on Greg Coughlan’s 50ft high bronze sculpture for Lapp’s Quay? I presumed it was just a matter of slotting it into place once the appeal to ABP was dealt with. It was due to be unveiled in April 😡

    • #734121
      altuistic
      Participant

      My understanding is that the 12.9m sculpture, which was successful on appeal, is now due to be erected for September. I don’t usually have much opinion on these things but I was most disappointed with the behaviour of the appelant on this occassion.

    • #734122
      theblimp
      Participant

      Oliver Plunkett Street and Pembroke Street – those 4-5 foot poles inserted between footpath and street every few yards. Anyone know is this intended to be the ultimate treatment for these. I had been under the impression that they were only temporary until something more aesthetically pleasing replaced them, but they’ve been there for a quite a while. If they’re intended to stay then someone needs a good kick up the arse. Yes, I know they prevent parking but there are more attractive ways of doing this. On the subject of Pembroke Street, are the Imperial Hotel going to leave that makeshift timber entrance into their new cafe there forever?

    • #734123
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Oliver Plunkett Street and Pembroke Street – those 4-5 foot poles inserted between footpath and street every few yards. Anyone know is this intended to be the ultimate treatment for these. I had been under the impression that they were only temporary until something more aesthetically pleasing replaced them, but they’ve been there for a quite a while. If they’re intended to stay then someone needs a good kick up the arse. Yes, I know they prevent parking but there are more attractive ways of doing this. On the subject of Pembroke Street, are the Imperial Hotel going to leave that makeshift timber entrance into their new cafe there forever?

      My understanding is that they are to be replaced with ‘novel’ lighting fixtures which will change colour and apparently incorporate the light within a bollard type object- sounds strange but I dont know when we’ll get to judge for ourselves since despite all the paving being complete, no sign of said lights yet.

    • #734124
      lexington
      Participant

      The scaffolding is being removed on Haranka Ltd/The Carrolls Quay Development Co. project at John Redmond Street and Knapps Square. In a few months, this perspective will be masked by Phase 2 of OSB Group’s Camden Court (sales on the first phase have been strong), designed by James Leahy & Associates. That development has received much praise in architectural circles for its unique design which comprises of a series of edges & curves comprised to home 44 apartments on a difficult, narrow site. Phase 2 will see an additional 50 apartments added over 6 storeys with a new Pa Johnsons Bar and Cork Arts Theatre constituent. The 2nd Phase has also received praise from the likes of CCC and An Bord Pleanala.

      The image above shows a crane at work on the Camden Court site, with John F. Supple Contractors assigned to the project.

      Back to the Haranka development – it is a 6-storey Section 23 residential project comprising of 90 apartments units (85 in the original application, plus a further 5 at rooftop were permitted thanks to a subsequent application) designed by BOYD BARRETT MURPHY O’CONNOR Architects, built by Cumnor Construction. The design was suppose to blend and even mimic the clusters of old bell towers, church spires and rectories to the west of the development across John Redmond Street. Personally, I don’t think its up to much – but thats up for debate, anyone??? Phase 2 of Camden Court should mask this with a more unusual aesthetic provision.

      The image below was provided by Devin in the architecture of cork city thread and is here to given you a perspective on the Camden Court development.



      Not far away, PJ Hegarty Building Contractors are exploring options on developing their attractively located site adjoining the Cork HQ on Carrolls Quay. The site extends to the north of their office building and is currently used as staff parking.


    • #734125
      lexington
      Participant

      😀 American fashion icons Abercrombie & Fitch are set to roll out an estimated 5 stores across Ireland starting from late 2006/early 2007. In what is expected to be their first move into the European market, the American giants have cited their move into the Irish market given the young affluent population and similarities in ‘style culture’ shared between American and Irish markets. A&F are already an established brand among 16 to 25 year olds (their core market) in Ireland – with many J1 students returning with volumes of the store chain’s products. The source with Hollister, a wholly owned A&F subsidary pointed out that a CFO & CEO had been appointed to the new European division set up last January by A&F and they had identified Ireland as been the ideal first foray into the European market (no news on the UK prospects yet). The first store is set for Dublin, which it is hoped will ultimately house 2 stores over the coming years. Other stores are earmarked for Cork (at least 1) and possibly Limerick.

      It was supposed in a report by The Sunday Business Post last Feburary 2005 that the redeveloped Dundrum Shopping Centre, as part of Castlethorn Construction’s Dundrum Town Centre, would provide an ideal location. In Cork, undoubtedly Academy Street would offer an ideal location – its completion is scheduled in and around the time A&F intend to roll out. Undoubtedly Joe O’Reilly and Owen O’Callaghan would be chasing after such a desirable, status providing and lucrative tenant for the respective projects.

    • #734126
      lexington
      Participant

      🙂 Frinailla have been greenlit for a development of 65 residential units at Springmount in Glanmire. The steep 4 acre site was sold to the developers last year for an undisclosed sum through Global Properties and will house 25 apartment units and 40 duplex units.

      See Frinailla for development images.



      🙂 Tarragona Solutions have also been given the go ahead to develop a new medical centre on the former Bowen Group HQ along the Lee Road. The centre, designed by Deady Gahan Architects, will see the construction of a 2-storey block and 3-storey block housing 17 medical suites and ancillary offices.



      🙂 Heiton Holdings have been cleared to develop a 96-bedroom, 4-storey hotel with multi-storey car-park, leisure facilities, bar, restaurant and conferencing facilities on the site of their Heiton Buckley Building Supplies Centre at the Bandon Roundabout in Ardarostig, Bishopstown (along the South Ring/Ballincollig By-pass). The decision has come early.



      😎 Castlelands Construction have been granted plans for 125 new homes and a creche at Baneshane in Midelton. This follows another addition in a long line of housing developments granted or planned for Midelton. Castlelands are also formulating plans for a significant city development. I’m looking ford to reading their proposal pitch. 😉



      😎 Jerry Keohane has been cleared to construct 24 holiday homes at Lee Valley Gold Club near Farran. As part of his plans to expand the golf resort, a new gym, golf retail unit, conferencing facilities and extended restaurant have also been permitted.



      Just regarding the Clarke’s Bridge office development, I posted (a while back) an image of the original proposed 6-storey design for the site. The new 7-storey design has been altered to include a number of more aesthetically pleasing features by architects Coughlan de Keyser. Copper and brick elements have been added to give more character to the new project and allow it not only be ‘landmark’ but also respectful of its neighbours (see image below of the Southern Elevation – facing onto the river). John Dwyer intends to lodge his plans for the adjoining site soon.

    • #734127
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      After London’s success, what about CORK 2016?
      Sailing in the harbour? Football in Pairc Ui Caoimh, Table Tennis in Neptune? 🙂
      Or am i dreaming? 😀

    • #734128
      jungle
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      😀 American fashion icons Abercrombie & Fitch are set to roll out an estimated 5 stores across Ireland starting from late 2006/early 2007.

      It would be great if someone could look at the retail chains that are likely to open in Ireland in the next few years and try to persuade them to open their Irish admin headquarters in the Cork area. In the near future, I can see companies like Esprit and MediaMarkt establishing a presence in Ireland. Even if they’ll only be providing a handful of jobs, it would be great to see them go to Cork or some other Irish city rather than Dublin.

    • #734129
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      After London’s success, what about CORK 2016?
      Sailing in the harbour? Football in Pairc Ui Caoimh?:D

      That’s if Pairc Ui Chaoimh is still around! 😉

    • #734130
      Radioactiveman
      Participant

      Indeed Lex, from what I hear it won’t be around for much longer (at least in the form we recognise it). The question is, how many of the rumours are true with regard to this tri-partite deal. Anybody got some concrete information?

    • #734131
      lexington
      Participant

      @Radioactiveman wrote:

      Indeed Lex, from what I hear it won’t be around for much longer (at least in the form we recognise it). The question is, how many of the rumours are true with regard to this tri-partite deal. Anybody got some concrete information?

      Or at all! I’ll be updating you all on that soon hopefully (when I don’t know). If all goes many an inevitable objection and dropped jaw will follow. An article on Pairc Ui Chaoimh’s speculative future will be published in tomorrow’s edition of Inside Cork I hear.

    • #734132
      shrink2cork
      Participant

      @theblimp wrote:

      Oliver Plunkett Street and Pembroke Street – those 4-5 foot poles inserted between footpath and street every few yards. Anyone know is this intended to be the ultimate treatment for these. I had been under the impression that they were only temporary until something more aesthetically pleasing replaced them, but they’ve been there for a quite a while. If they’re intended to stay then someone needs a good kick up the arse. Yes, I know they prevent parking but there are more attractive ways of doing this. On the subject of Pembroke Street, are the Imperial Hotel going to leave that makeshift timber entrance into their new cafe there forever?

      Oliver Plunkett 4.5 foot poles were going to be temporary- but the powers that be have run out of funds, so they will be there for some time. :confused:

    • #734133
      dowlingm
      Participant

      The Toronto Star has a very good weekday article called the Fixer, where stupid things like that can be published to shame the City into fixing them. It’s kinda like the People’s Republic of Cork’s “pothole of the month” section. It lists who the responsible person in City government is, how they responded and if it can’t be fixed in a short time they check back a few weeks later to see if anything was done.

    • #734134
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 Frinailla are expected to lodge their plans for Victoria Cross either today or Monday. The plans comprise of a development of 25 apartments over a large commercial unit. The development will range from 6 to 7 storeys over basement car-parking – and will be developed on the site of the former Plumbing Utilities Store across the road from Aras Developments’ new student residence (currently under construction by Heberger Construction, designed by O’Shea Leader) and just north of the HSE’s Cork Farm Centre. I hope to have images soon.

      Any pictures yet of the Victoria Cross development?

    • #734135
      lexington
      Participant

      @Too many forms! wrote:

      Any pictures yet of the Victoria Cross development?

      You will remember earlier a post was issued noting Frinailla had entered planning for a 25-unit residential development over commercial facility and basement car-parking. The development, planned for the former Plumbing Utilities Store bordering Ashbrook apartment complex and Top Car Motor Dealership, was designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates and ranges in height between 6 and 7-storeys. Apartments will range in size between 55m sq for one-bedroom units, 90m sq for 2-bedroom units and a 190m sq duplex penthouse with 4-bedrooms (these scale apartments have been actively encouraged by CCC and its nice to see more of these units come in to circulation). Each apartment will have 2 basement parking spaces and basement storage facilities.

      In my opinion, a generally quality project – its a very difficult site to work with, but I do think that this project will compliment the area in the long-run given prospective and current proposals shaping up nearby.

    • #734136
      Lillie
      Participant

      Hi All
      new to this site as of today. Quick query for all you experts out there – anyone know how academy street got its name? Have done some research in the city library local history reference section to no avail.
      BTW – I’m involved in branding and visual design and particularly interested in how brands for developments/buildings etc can be more meaningful, coherent and sympathetic to the architectural vision and function as well as performing a marketing function. But if we acknowledge that branding is about possessing specific real estate in a consumer’s mind (to slightly misquote one of the brand gurus) does this forum see any successes or failures in this regard in Cork?

    • #734137
      mickeydocs
      Participant

      @Lillie wrote:

      Hi All
      new to this site as of today. Quick query for all you experts out there – anyone know how academy street got its name? Have done some research in the city library local history reference section to no avail.
      BTW – I’m involved in branding and visual design and particularly interested in how brands for developments/buildings etc can be more meaningful, coherent and sympathetic to the architectural vision and function as well as performing a marketing function. But if we acknowledge that branding is about possessing specific real estate in a consumer’s mind (to slightly misquote one of the brand gurus) does this forum see any successes or failures in this regard in Cork?

      Hi Lillie, this thread has moved to the Cork City Architecture Forum.

      I believe the Crawford Art Gallery used to be the Academy of Arts, so the name of the street may well be related.

    • #734138
      lawyer
      Participant

      I thought that the Crawford Gallery was the old Customs House

    • #734139
      opus
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      You will remember earlier a post was issued noting Frinailla had entered planning for a 25-unit residential development over commercial facility and basement car-parking. The development, planned for the former Plumbing Utilities Store bordering Ashbrook apartment complex and Top Car Motor Dealership, was designed by Geraldine McNamara of Richard Rainey & Associates and ranges in height between 6 and 7-storeys. Apartments will range in size between 55m sq for one-bedroom units, 90m sq for 2-bedroom units and a 190m sq duplex penthouse with 4-bedrooms (these scale apartments have been actively encouraged by CCC and its nice to see more of these units come in to circulation). Each apartment will have 2 basement parking spaces and basement storage facilities.

      .

      Nice to finally see the sort of apartment that people get in Europe making its way to Cork 🙂 I helped somebody find a flat in Munich last year and they all had the underground parking & a nice big lockable storage area in the basement.

      As a matter of interest who’s involved in selling the Eglinton St development or is it way too early for that?

    • #734140
      lexington
      Participant

      Sherry Fitzgerald will be handling residential sales on Eglinton Street.

      Agreed about the Victoria Cross apartments.

    • #734141
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      :confused: how come there is no one posting any news or discussions anymore?any news for us lexington?I read in the paper recently that Owen O’Callaghan is still confident on developing an evants centre in Mahon,where does this leave mph on the horgan quay site?Joe Gavin said recently that we should see movement on the docklands very very soon!anyone have an idea what he is talking about?

    • #734142
      lexington
      Participant

      Hi daniel7,

      the news is still on-going. The continuation of this thread can be found at Look at de state of Cork, like! 2: Cork Architecture & Development. A new thread was opened up – I suppose in some ways it was inevitable either way given the size of this thread that a 2nd thread would likely have to be created. There was actually a discussion held about it on this very thread some time ago – a link is provided on the first post of the new thread back to the Look at de state of Cork, like! thread for reasons of referencing. This thread will remain so that none of the information and details it contained are lost.

      Sorry about any confusion.



      This thread is continued – please visit us there. Same contributors, same discussions and hopefully some improvements. There’s plenty of news on-going.

      Look at de state of Cork, like! 2 @ Cork: Achitecture & Development

      P.S. Any votes for the new thread would be welcomed!!! 😀 Contributors were most generous with this thread and I hope it continues! It’s the input that makes it so interesting I think.

    • #734143
      Planogram
      Participant

      @domosullivan wrote:

      re: footlocker – What is wrong with Cummins Sports and Finns Corner?
      re: Dixons – Soundstore and Flor Griffin?

      You may have a point but in terms of retail I am not sure I want Cork to become another Leicester/Derby/Belfast/etc. I live in the UK and find the average regional high street to be extremely boring. I love coming home to Cork and see some “retail independence” ,

      From a retailing perspective, it can be quite difficult for chain stores from outside Cork to establish themselves within the city. This is primarily due to the fact that at least three large chain stores started in Cork: Dunnes Stores, Roches Stores, and Musgraves (Centra Super-Valu). Add in the fact that a large number of specialist mini chains, (Cummins Sports, Mahers Sports, Welsh Sports, Sound Store, FLor Griffin, etc.) and you will quickly gather that any incoming chain will look to establish itself in a location where the competition from indigenous retailers is not as strong, (Galway, Limerick, Waterford, etc.)

      When a company is founded in Cork, it tends to think of the city as it’s home turf and can be quite agressive in fighting off incoming retailers. This is particularly true in the case of Dunnes, and to a lesser extent some of the other retailers mentioned above.

    • #734144
      A-ha
      Participant

      Tell me about it, there are more Dunnes in Cork then there are people in China. Maybe if you posted your message into the Cork:Architecture and Development forum, you might have better luck in getting responses. Nobody really uses this thread anymore. 🙂

    • #734145
      Planogram
      Participant

      @A-ha wrote:

      Tell me about it, there are more Dunnes in Cork then there are people in China. Maybe if you posted your message into the Cork:Architecture and Development forum, you might have better luck in getting responses. Nobody really uses this thread anymore. 🙂

      Well, I’ve been reading it for some months now, and just decided to post a response to it yesterday. The fact that I had been testing a new store locator software package which connects with a retail accountability management system had nothing to do with it.

      Basically if you input all the criteria regarding demographics, competitors, potential competitors, your own existing stores etc., etc, the system will produce an ideal location for you. Right now, Cork is not really coming in very high on the “no competition” side of things.

      And with regard to “nobody reads this thread anymore, don’t put yourself down.

      😉

    • #734146
      Planogram
      Participant

      For those interested, here is a brochure about just one of the many retail locator packages out there. Based on GIS and Census Data, these systems are becoming more and more important. However the great variable is when a retail chain uses the software to identify a good site, and an incumbent retailer outbids them for the site just to keep them out, and then locates there themselves.

      http://www.esri.com/library/brochures/pdfs/gis-for-retail.pdf

      I understand that this happened in Ballincollig, where the anchor tenant is not the one which was originally booked for the new Shopping Centre.

    • #734147
      ShaneP
      Participant

      That’s a fairly interesting sounding product. I gather Starbucks have a strategy whereby they locate 2 coffee shops in close proximity to a successful existing establishment, Knowing the market can’t sustain 3 cafe’s, it’s simply a matter of waiting for the existing business to close down and they can then take over. Is it possible Dunnes Stores are employing similar thinking around the country. Spare a thought for all those proud Cork family businesses, next time you’re sipping a harmlessly nice grande-semi-demi-treble-skimmed-double-iced-frappe-lattecino!

    • #734148
      Boyler
      Participant

      That’s a mouthful….

    • #734149
      dave123
      Participant

      What’s a mouthful?

    • #734150
      ShaneP
      Participant

      This? a harmlessly nice grande-semi-demi-treble-skimmed-double-iced-frappe-lattecino! – served fresh to you in a poisoned chalice!
      I’ll stop now…….. .

    • #734151
      dave123
      Participant

      I stil don’t see what the fuss is about ?
      there is not much wrong with saying that as it has humour and not personal nor relate to a problem.
      Boyler ot you being serious ? lighten up a little!

    • #734152
      A-ha
      Participant

      I’m lost, lol.

    • #734153
      Boyler
      Participant

      I was only making a statement, dave 123. I’m way too young to be bitter and serious and wouldn’t want to be anyway. Maybe you are being a little bit too serious……. Only joking!!!

    • #734154
      speakeasy
      Participant

      WOW! It’s been almost three years since I visited this forum. My only thread was “Look at de state of Cork, like”. I never thought it would grow to over 1,800 replies! I set Corkonians on an architectural expressive rampage! It’s great to see. It’s like leaving two gerbils in a cage with loads of food and water and coming back in a few weeks to find… well… 1,800 gerbils! 😛

      Anyway I was wrong about Lapps quay, it’s actually quite impressive. However I stand over my distain for the Anglo Irish Bank building on Anglesea Street and it’s surrounding new buildings which dwarf The Market Bar. I wonder whats going to be built on the sorting office site. Anyone know?

    • #734155
      MrO50
      Participant

      “It would great if Cork could host some of the Heineken Cup games, so it would be great to have a multi-purpose sports facility… maybe the GAA should think outside of the box for once and invite IRFU and the FAI into discussions.” and various other threads relating to the redevelopment of Pairc Ui Chaoimh……

      Ironic that the GAA is the only one actually leading on this issue at the moment by opening up Croke Park. In Dublin South Dublin Co Co is building a new municipal ‘multi-purpose’ stadium for soccer use (& potentially rugby given the pitch dimensions) but too small for Gaelic Games by order of the Minister for promoting sport and recreation.
      The government is also funding the redevelopment of Lansdowne Road to the tune of €191m as a ‘national stadium’ and it now transpires that the ‘value for money’ is less than originally announced in that the new national stadium won’t host Gaelic Games….the national sports…
      No objection from FAI or IRFU here!
      Looks like the €100m the govt invested in Croke Park was a great deal only €25m per sport (hurling, football, soccer and rugby) with capacity of 82,500 compared to €95.5m per sport with capacity of 55,000.
      Need the government to lead with provision of multi use stadium.

    • #734156
      ronnie
      Participant

      @dowlingm wrote:

      Hopefully the entire corner can be developed, not just Reliance. Isn’t the old chandlery (can’t remember what’s there now), the dogs home and a garage? surely all can be relocated. It’s a bit of a mess traffic wise with the bus station across the way.

      Hi Am from Dublin living in Canada also, Ontario!
      Jus t reading on Cork. Are they going to mess it up like Dublin?:confused:
      Ronnie:)

    • #734157
      Sarah M
      Participant

      hi ya! i was wonderin if anyone could help me? im an interior architecture student and for a project i have to choose a modern/ post modern/ post post modern building in cork city. So basically any buildings from the mid 40s to the 80’s. it would be great if someone could tell me any buildings from this period as i was googlin 4 ages without joy!!

    • #734158
      -Donnacha-
      Participant

      Any type of building in particular?
      Would you try one of the universities/colleges?
      e.g. the science building in U.C.C., much of C.I.T.?
      or a church of some sort? e.g. that church in Turner’s Cross?

    • #734159
      bosco
      Participant

      @lexington wrote:

      🙂 On a far more positive note – for those interested in what the new Kino Cinema development for Washington Street is due to look like (planning pending – the decision is due on Thursday 14th of Oct 2004) – visit http://www.ddesign.ie/projects.htm -> then go to the 3rd button under the title ‘Community’ and click on Load Images.

      I have to say, the development looks superb. Considering the space the new development is due on, it has been well utilised – it falls in line with the same height as other buildings neighbouring it (instead of the existing ground floor only) and brings a dynamic swing to an area undergoing exciting development.

      Bad news for movie-goers in Cork as the Kino arthouse cinema is to be put up for sale immediately following the forthcoming Cork Film Festival.

      Cork’s Kino arthouse cinema to close over debt to architects
      http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/1028/1224257552324.html

Viewing 1,897 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Latest News