Look at de state of Cork, like!
- This topic has 1,897 replies, 111 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
bosco.
- AuthorPosts
- November 11, 2004 at 6:20 pm #732862
lexington
ParticipantAs a continuation of my previous post –
It strikes me, that too often developers and planners hear from retaillers that space in Cork city centre for retail development is far too limited – especially along Patrick’s Street. The backlog of retaillers vying for space is substantial – and quite often, when space does become available along the thoroughfare, it’s a blink or you’ll miss situation. Although I back developments like that proposed by O’Callaghan Properties for Academy Street, Rockfell on Cornmarket Street and Frinailla along Grand Parade – much needed projects – I still believe that retail space is not really in short supply as such, its just not being used efficiently.
Patrick’s Street is lined with beautiful old department stores like Grants, Burtons, Munster Arcade, Roches Stores and Brown Thomas. Though BT, Roches and Munster Arcade (Penneys) may be excluded from this discussion – places like Grants and Burtons are often used at ground floor for retail and see their remaining floors for mere storage or run-down offices.

I for one, believe that a substantial area of retail space may be allowed for in the refurbishment of these old department stores and reorganisation of internal layouts. By expanding upward, creating – for example – an open area centre surrounded by upper level balconies to cater for increased retail space – many of those retaillers who complain about the lack of space, may be afforded such gold-dust. Existing tenants stand to lose little if they simply adapt to reorganised layouts which will improve the visual and practical environments for businesses and consumers alike. One only has to look at the unflattering signage adorned on the former Burtons Department Store by Oasis for one to see how existing layouts are unsatisfactory. Grants Dept Store stands to benefit immensely from such redevelopment. Cork now has a world-class pedestrian friendly shopping street in that of Patrick’s Street – can we not afford to make simple alterations to our historical and eye-catching former department store buildings to boost this reputation further? Aesthetics improve, businesses benefit, consumers benefit – what’s there to lose?
I think such redevelopment will compliment further the blend of old and new as Cork city is reborn in the wave of new investment and development.
November 11, 2004 at 6:59 pm #732863mickeydocs
ParticipantYou make some excellent points Lex, and these are your best to date 🙂
@lexington wrote:
As a continuation of my previous post –
It strikes me, that too often developers and planners hear from retaillers that space in Cork city centre for retail development is far too limited – especially along Patrick’s Street. The backlog of retaillers vying for space is substantial – and quite often, when space does become available along the thoroughfare, it’s a blink or you’ll miss situation. Although I back developments like that proposed by O’Callaghan Properties for Academy Street, Rockfell on Cornmarket Street and Frinailla along Grand Parade – much needed projects – I still believe that retail space is not really in short supply as such, its just not being used efficiently.
Patrick’s Street is lined with beautiful old department stores like Grants, Burtons, Munster Arcade, Roches Stores and Brown Thomas. Though BT, Roches and Munster Arcade (Penneys) may be excluded from this discussion – places like Grants and Burtons are often used at ground floor for retail and see their remaining floors for mere storage or run-down offices.

I for one, believe that a substantial area of retail space may be allowed for in the refurbishment of these old department stores and reorganisation of internal layouts. By expanding upward, creating – for example – an open area centre surrounded by upper level balconies to cater for increased retail space – many of those retaillers who complain about the lack of space, may be afforded such gold-dust. Existing tenants stand to lose little if they simply adapt to reorganised layouts which will improve the visual and practical environments for businesses and consumers alike. One only has to look at the unflattering signage adorned on the former Burtons Department Store by Oasis for one to see how existing layouts are unsatisfactory. Grants Dept Store stands to benefit immensely from such redevelopment. Cork now has a world-class pedestrian friendly shopping street in that of Patrick’s Street – can we not afford to make simple alterations to our historical and eye-catching former department store buildings to boost this reputation further? Aesthetics improve, businesses benefit, consumers benefit – what’s there to lose?
I think such redevelopment will compliment further the blend of old and new as Cork city is reborn in the wave of new investment and development.
November 11, 2004 at 8:14 pm #732864jungle
ParticipantWhen I lived in Dublin there was a site at the junction of Capel St and Bolton St that was given planning permission as a new hotel. The original idea for the site had been for apartments. When it was built, the owner applied for a change of use and converted it into apartments. Is there any chance that this could be the thinking on the Jury’s site? Supposedly, it was easier to get planning permission for hotels than for apartments.
November 11, 2004 at 10:13 pm #732865lexington
Participant@mickeydocs wrote:
You make some excellent points Lex, and these are your best to date 🙂
Thank you mickeydocs for your most generous words – they are very kind, I sincerely appreciate them.
In response to jungle, a similar scenario occured in Cork not so long ago. Northgate Investments applied to develop a hostel adjacent to the Gate Multiplex and Apartments on Kyrls Quay. Permission was granted – within a few months of the development’s completion, entitled ‘Northgate House’, an application was submitted to Cork Corp. to change usage of the building from hostel to apartments. Permission was subsequently granted.With relation to O’Callaghan Properties development at Jurys Hotel – I don’t believe the hotel element is intended for apartment usage. A deeply critical cynic may say otherwise, but I believe the hotel element was a focus from day one – if only a focus to the side of a much larger apartment proposal. As part of the deal with Jurys Doyle Group – the hotel element was very much a concern, and subsequently an arrangement was signed to agree to lease back the hotel from O’Callaghan Properties for at least 25 years at 2m euro p.a. A full leisure centre and conference centre are incorporated into the hotel structure. I think the deal works nicely in the fact O’CP get their 277 apartments and a guaranteed annual return of 2m p.a. before even one apartment is sold. While Jurys gain an extra 26 rooms, a brand new hotel, decent parking, adequate conference facilities and 30m from the sale of land to boot. A return of 2m p.a. isn’t a bad deal either. The cost of redeveloping the hotel on their own would have been far more expensive – and probably would not have corresponded to the standard of what is being proposed.
November 11, 2004 at 10:54 pm #732866burge_eye
Participant@lexington wrote:
:rolleyes: Riga Limited (O’Callaghan Properties and Jurys Doyle Group) today submitted a Further Information and Development Revision application to CCC – even though no formal Further Info request was issued. This marks the third unsolicited submission of Further Info from Riga Ltd, but the most significant. The move is a further response by O’Callaghan Properties to ease some of the many troubles the application for Jurys has received – as reported in previous posts.
The new revisions are being made to ease the concerns of many objectors. Among the revisions being made are: a reduction of apartment numbers from 303 to 277. The reduction in height of 3 blocks – two from 6 to 4 storeys and one from 6 to 3 storeys. And the movement of the Jurys Hotel element 6m south,
The 9 storey block, height of Jurys Hotel (6 storeys), access bridges and height of 2 other blocks will remain. Though I acknowledge this move as one designed to address objection concerns – the revisions are another shiny example of how Cork will end up with a reduced quality of development based on petty local outlooks.
The alterations will reduce the architectural consistency of the development – a point An Taisce even made,
.
I had a look at the revised proposal and I suspect the height reductions were made for 3 reasons – to allow a view of the cathedral from 3 points that is at least as good as that at the moment, to reduce overlooking of St Aloysius and to improve the quantity of south light into the apartment courtyards. The hotel hasn’t physically moved, rather a 6m setback from the southern boundary has been requested. There are no “bridges” in the scheme. Although this scheme will undoubtedly still go to appeal, the revisions made are relatively minor given that they effect the “rear” of the development. The impact of the scheme to Lancaster quay remains undiminished. Whilst I share the disappointment that local denizens have effected the scheme, I feel confident that it still represents a strong statement.
November 12, 2004 at 11:07 am #732867Rockflanders
Participantwhere’s cork?
November 12, 2004 at 11:35 am #732868mickeydocs
ParticipantNovember 12, 2004 at 1:58 pm #732869lexington
Participant@Rockflanders wrote:
where’s cork?
Of course, how rude of us. Cork is that city in the South with a greater area home to a quarter-of-a-million people, hub to just under half-a-million people and regional capital to 1.3m people in Ireland. It’s resposnible directly for 72bn euros of Ireland’s 190bn euro economy. The centre of pharmaceautical excellence and development in Ireland. Home and/or birthplace to some of Ireland’s most prominent indigenous businesses (e.g. Musgraves, Roches Stores, Dunnes Stores, Horizon Technologies, Baltimore Technologies, O’Callaghan Properties, the Bowen Group, Dairygold, Golden Vale, etc etc) – and as a result, is responsible for the creation directly and indirectly of over 100,000 Dublin centred jobs (full and part-time).
Even I, who originally hails from Dublin – laughs a Dublin’s inflated image of itself. Dublin based threads dominate this forum, so be it, I have no problem with it – but this is not a Cork versus Dublin thread, it is the one thread (I recognise the other related threads, not forgetting) that allows those with an interest in the progress of Cork as the nation’s second city (and mythical ‘Real Capital’ 🙂 ) discuss and receive information concerning the city. It doesn’t need low-brow cracks from condescending chin-ups staining its discussions. There are plenty of other threads on which to do so. If your comment has made you feel temporarily superior and smart for ‘getting one in’ – well done, but its not welcome here.
I have never gone on a Dublin thread and knocked it for its faults – as the nation’s capital and my hometown I follow those threads with a quiet interest. Perhaps you should do the same – and if you have no interest, don’t insult those that do.
November 12, 2004 at 2:07 pm #732870sw101
ParticipantNovember 13, 2004 at 1:11 pm #732871PaulC
ParticipantGood one Lexington – very funny. I needed a good laugh.
Please explain to me also how Cork is home to Dunnes Stores??????November 13, 2004 at 3:42 pm #732872lexington
ParticipantIn 1944 Ben Dunne Sr, a Cork resident (though born in the North), set up the first Dunnes Stores on Patrick’s Street near Bowling Green Street after working with a number of other retaillers here and abroad The store is still in operation today, though expanded substantially. It is in line for a 35m euro redevelopment and expansion in the near future, If you have ever shopped in Dunnes and purchased one of their brown ‘bag for life’ shopping bags – an image of the original Cork store (Dunnes first) is printed on it. A number of other stores were later opened around Cork – subsequent to that, the business opened its first store in Dublin, where later Ben Dunne Sr. moved his family and a new HQ was established.
”Home and/or birthplace to some of Ireland’s most prominent indigenous businesses ” <- is actually how I phrased it more accurately. Don't believe me, check out the history on their website. http://www.dunnesstores.com/history_opening.ds
See for Roches as well! http://www.roches-stores.ie/corpwww/history.html
CSO projections for 2004 indicate that in dispersal of economic activity generation throughout the island of Ireland, 72bn of the 190bn euro economy can be attributed to activities in or associated with Cork – considering export values from the pharma sector estb’d in Cork Harbour region and city based IT. Indigeneous business activity. Tax receipts. Tourist value (incl. Cork/Kerry Region) – Cork city alone = 441m euro p.a. (based on static fig. carried over from year ended 2003 w/ 341,000 city visits – see CCC, Southwest (Cork/Kerry)Tourist Board and CSO). Development and Investment – (a better example of this is considering [in terms of development] that between the 3 largest Cork-based development companies (O’Flynn Construction, O’Callaghan Properties and Clayton Love – Howard Holdings to a lesser extent w/ offices only in Cork and official base in Dublin) – current development expenditure for Cork City = 500m BTC, 500m MP, 30m Lavitts Quay, 20m Boreenmanna Rd, 100m Blackpool Park, 100m City Quarter, 60m Douglas Village SC, 100m Eglinton Street, 150m Academy Street, 160m Jurys, 300m Dunkettle = 2bn (excess) alone) excl. projects by Treasury, OSB, Corbett, Hanranka, SHUL, Frinailla, Rockfell, Mannix, Victoria Hall, Rathmelton. etc etc and small investors).
If you’re interested in a clearer breakdown of figures, just ask! I’ve about 12 books full of statistics and would be happy to forward you the appropriate addresses where you can attain such briefs for yourself. They on average cost 20euros each except one from CCC (the Development Plan 2004) for which a paperback copy costs 50euros.
Thanks for your interest PaulC.
(P.S. If you want more Cork originated or based company histories – there’s plenty more where that came from. I’d be more than happy to oblige).
November 14, 2004 at 12:09 pm #732873mickeydocs
ParticipantAre Hegartys originally from Cork?
@lexington wrote:
In 1944 Ben Dunne Sr, a Cork resident (though born in the North), set up the first Dunnes Stores on Patrick’s Street near Bowling Green Street after working with a number of other retaillers here and abroad The store is still in operation today, though expanded substantially. It is in line for a 35m euro redevelopment and expansion in the near future, If you have ever shopped in Dunnes and purchased one of their brown ‘bag for life’ shopping bags – an image of the original Cork store (Dunnes first) is printed on it. A number of other stores were later opened around Cork – subsequent to that, the business opened its first store in Dublin, where later Ben Dunne Sr. moved his family and a new HQ was established.
”Home and/or birthplace to some of Ireland’s most prominent indigenous businesses ” <- is actually how I phrased it more accurately. Don't believe me, check out the history on their website. http://www.dunnesstores.com/history_opening.ds
See for Roches as well! http://www.roches-stores.ie/corpwww/history.html
CSO projections for 2004 indicate that in dispersal of economic activity generation throughout the island of Ireland, 72bn of the 190bn euro economy can be attributed to activities in or associated with Cork – considering export values from the pharma sector estb’d in Cork Harbour region and city based IT. Indigeneous business activity. Tax receipts. Tourist value (incl. Cork/Kerry Region) – Cork city alone = 441m euro p.a. (based on static fig. carried over from year ended 2003 w/ 341,000 city visits – see CCC, Southwest (Cork/Kerry)Tourist Board and CSO). Development and Investment – (a better example of this is considering [in terms of development] that between the 3 largest Cork-based development companies (O’Flynn Construction, O’Callaghan Properties and Clayton Love – Howard Holdings to a lesser extent w/ offices only in Cork and official base in Dublin) – current development expenditure for Cork City = 500m BTC, 500m MP, 30m Lavitts Quay, 20m Boreenmanna Rd, 100m Blackpool Park, 100m City Quarter, 60m Douglas Village SC, 100m Eglinton Street, 150m Academy Street, 160m Jurys, 300m Dunkettle = 2bn (excess) alone) excl. projects by Treasury, OSB, Corbett, Hanranka, SHUL, Frinailla, Rockfell, Mannix, Victoria Hall, Rathmelton. etc etc and small investors).
If you’re interested in a clearer breakdown of figures, just ask! I’ve about 12 books full of statistics and would be happy to forward you the appropriate addresses where you can attain such briefs for yourself. They on average cost 20euros each except one from CCC (the Development Plan 2004) for which a paperback copy costs 50euros.
Thanks for your interest PaulC.
(P.S. If you want more Cork originated or based company histories – there’s plenty more where that came from. I’d be more than happy to oblige).
November 15, 2004 at 4:19 pm #732874kingcronin
ParticipantHi ya Lexington…( Knowledgeable One) !!
Regarding the capitol cinema on the grand parade:
Do you know who bought Central Shoes Stores ?? ….I think the same group/person purchased the Oster Bar also, behind the Capitol, for almost twice its value … (Oster was bought by scribben group 2years ago for 3.2 million and recently purchased for a whopping 6 million by someone!!? ) Thus, would you think the purchasing of the surrounding property around the Capitol Cinema means only one thing for the Capitol, the Grand Parade and Cork City.? Any drawings for plans on the grand parade.
Cheers
November 15, 2004 at 5:16 pm #732875Leesider
Participantjust saw this in breakingnews http://www.breakingnews.ie/2004/11/15/story175995.html
Patrick St the best shopping street in the country?? thought that would have gone to Grafton St, good to see though! anyone have any info on this new landmark or even better still any images??
November 15, 2004 at 7:06 pm #732876crc
Participant@lexington wrote:
…Cork as the nation’s second city (and mythical ‘Real Capital’ 🙂 ) …
Lets get something straight here: Cork may be the second largest city in the state, but it is only the third largest city in the nation!!!!
November 16, 2004 at 8:24 am #732877theblimp
ParticipantCRC – without wishing to sound pedantic –
“Nation: A relatively large group of people organized under a single, usually independent government; a country.The territory occupied by such a group of people.The government of a sovereign state.”
Under the above definition Cork is indeed the second largest city in the nation. More importantly it is ‘de real capital’.
…can we get back to the real purpose of the thread now?
November 16, 2004 at 2:08 pm #732878lexington
Participant@Leesider wrote:
just saw this in breakingnews http://www.breakingnews.ie/2004/11/15/story175995.html
Patrick St the best shopping street in the country?? thought that would have gone to Grafton St, good to see though! anyone have any info on this new landmark or even better still any images??
Leesider, if you remember in a post I made a good couple of weeks ago – I mentioned that a number of developers were looking at erecting a statue or monument in the middle of Cork city – well, this is the fruition of those intentions. The developers being Howard Holdings, the middle of Cork city being Lapps Quay and the height (though the original talk was for a 40m statue [as reported initially], this was later proved excessive and unsuitable – the statue is now to be a little over 50ft.)
Greg Coughlan, originally of Ballydehob and CEO of Howard Holdings, is the man pushing this statue. A local Cork artist was commissioned to design the 500,000 euro project – which will be located at the City Quarter development on Lapps Quay. Howard Holdings also confirmed their intention to open 2 more hotels in Cork (in addition to the Clarion at City Quarter) – 1 in Kinsale and 1 in West Cork. On that note, Greg Coughlan is moving back to Cork city after spending a number of years developing Howard Holdings interests in London. Howard Holdings are making this move as a gesture of their confidence in Cork city as a development location – and besides City Quarter and Albert Quay developments – I can tell you, Howard Holdings have a number of large-scale and very intriguing projects in planning for Cork for over the next 10 years. Predominantly focused on the Docklands Area. One gentleman with the company has told me, Howard intend to continue working in the UK and Dublin markets, but have decided the main strategic interests are more suited to being focussed on Cape Town & SA (through Eurocape Investments) and Cork city (as Howard Holdings). It’s a nice boost of confidence for Cork.
Over 70% of the City Quarter office development has been sold and/or pre-let. Howard’s other nearby office development at Anglesea Street (Copley Hall), has seen its remaining office unit come under ‘Deal Agreed’ status – marking a continued up-surge in the Cork office market.

I’ll look into getting images of that statue soon.
John Mannix’s Washington Street project is due it’s decision date this Thursday.November 16, 2004 at 3:30 pm #732879lexington
Participant*UPDATES*
:rolleyes: Thomas Crosbie Holdings have received permission from CCC to forward with the construction of their new printing press facility at Mahon Point – a facility that will be leased out to newly formed company Webprint Concepts – who subsequently will publish all Thomas Crosbie Holdings titles bar the London-centred Irish Post.
The development essentially consists of a new manufacturing building comprising a press hall of 19.5m in height, mail room, newspaper reel storage, ink storage, plate making, control room, maintenance rooms, plant rooms, external plant enclosures, storage areas, offices, staff amenities, lunch room & sprinkler tank pumphouse, all of a total floor area of 4,075 sq. m. and associated development including site roadway, vehicle manoeuvring areas, delivery and dispatch areas, car parking, sprinkler tank, emergency generators, waste compaction and storage, site fencing, gates and vehicle barriers. Site services including water, electrical, gas and telecoms supply, connection to foul sewer and storm water discharge, site lighting, CCTV cameras, site works and mounding, landscaping all on a site of 1.42 hectares.
Design is by RKD McCarthy Lynch.
-> Meanwhile the other prominent TCH development site at 16 Lavitts Quay (new HQ) – though ‘officially’ under offer – has moved on to advanced stages of agreement. A ‘Sale Agreed’ status is expected to be confirmed soon.
:confused: Old Friary Place Developments Ltd. of Blarney have been refused permission to redevelopment a derelict site off Shadon Street. The proposed development consisted of 2 No. 3 storey blocks incorporating ground floor 5 no. one bedroom apartments, first floor 5 no. two bedroom duplex units with 4 no. car parking spaces, turning area and all associated site works at Old Friary Place. CCC Planners cited inappropriate development and reasons contrary to sustainable development of the area for the refusal. They also noted the poor quality and standard of design – the REAL reason for refusal. Although I’m disappointed in seeing development lost to an area so badly needing of it – I have to agree with CCC on this one. Hopefully Old Friary will revise their plans and come back with something of a higher quality. Architects = DFOD Consultants.
😡 And in conflict to my report earlier today, CCC have just this evening requested ‘Clarification’ on John Mannix’s Washington Street development (Further Info was requested in May and received in October) – the decision due date of Nov 18th 2004 will now undoubtedly be pushed back again.November 16, 2004 at 7:16 pm #732880-Donnacha-
ParticipantLexington,
I would just like to defend the Planning Dept. decision on Old Friary Place Development.
Here are one or two of the points of objection:The Drawings submitted were inaccurate and contradictory.
The proposed car parking was incorrect and could not hold the amount of car parking spaces indicated, which was in any case too few for the proposed development.
The development proposed to build 3 storey buildings on its boundary wall with the neighbouring properties – they proposed to build a wall approx. 6m above the finished floor level of the houses to the rear, on the boundary wall between the properties – between 1.5 and 5m away from the rear of these houses.
The developer also sought to unlawfully interefere with a number of easements on site – 2 rights to light (one rendering a house uninhabitable) and a Public Right of Way (though this technically is a legal, not planning issue).
If you would like, I can email you a copy of the objection submission.
November 16, 2004 at 9:15 pm #732881lexington
ParticipantBob (Republican supporter???),
I have objection copies and the full planning report thank you. In the above post, it is unreasonable for me to include full details of the planning report as it takes up a considerable amount of space – which is highly inappropriate, hence, I pick out some main points and post them.
If you read the above post you’ll see I agree with the CCC [Cork City Council] decision too. ( Quote: lexington – “Although I’m disappointed in seeing development lost to an area so badly needing of it – I have to agree with CCC on this one. Hopefully Old Friary will revise their plans and come back with something of a higher quality. ” )
I read the report and had a chat with an individual from Castle Close and I totally agree with the decisions taken. When I cited my disappointment – it’s a disappointment that a potential rejuvenating development for Shadon Street Area has been lost, but clearly, a development such as this under the circumstances it stirred is unacceptable. I would be anxious to see a standard of development at this location which compliments the new renewal of Shadon Street and works well with its fine residents. Hence why I hope Old Friary pull up their socks and get to work on a project of a greater suitability with concern to neighbouring residents and the historic Shandon Street area as a whole. So, there’s no real argument here – I’m 100% behind you on this one.
[P.S. When I refer to quality, I don’t specifically refer to aesthetics – it’s inclusive of how the project affects its neighbours, the quality of life it supports to its residents (of which this project was lacking to say the least) and the quality of the surrounding environment resultant of the development (e.g. traffic management, refuse etc).]
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

