Listed Buildings List
- This topic has 42 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 21 years, 3 months ago by
.
- Posts
So its good news for the house, right?
Also i didnt know trees can be protected, and if so what is involved. I’ve notices several forests (yes entire forests!) dissapear in my local area over the last few years. I’ve checked OS maps and the area’s are marked as forested- decidious- land. Where have all the trees gone?
Trees are mt own private crusade!
Good work Graham, and it’s good to see that the building may be being looked after – but do we know yet if the house in question is legaly protected at the moment?
It annoys me that it is always so hard to get a clear answer in what should be such a simple matter. Has the conservation office called you back yet?Take one guess.
I should be trying harder, and I will ring them on Monday. To be honest, I don’t know if it’s good news for the house yet but surely the conservation officer can find out. It looks positive anyway.
Yes trees can be listed and bizzarly, views in urban areas can also be protected (& rightly so of course) Looking at the dev plan for Dundalk, hundreds of trees are protected, and there is literally acres of land, streets etc listed as protected views, even if the buildings themselves ar’nt protected.
More bad news for Dundalk though, right at the heart of it’s Georgian core, two 18th century buildings have just been gutted by fire on Earl Street. Everything bar their now blackened facades are utterly lost, and these were also protected buildings. What a blow for a really beautiful area of the town.
But good news in Drogheda as the illegally demolished Grammer School is being rebuild (albeit as part of a shoping scheme)
Originally posted by Aken
Also i didnt know trees can be protectedI remember when taking photos of the LUAS works on the Harcourt Street Line that the cut stone bridges were demolished, but the tress at the top of the cuttings had preservation orders, with dire consequences threatened against contractors if they demolished them.
But then, this is Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council, the same council that sees Liebskind’s vision as positive for Dun Laoghaire.
The Drogheda Grammer School was on St Laurences Street. If you know the town it’s the street leading from West Street – the main shopping street – up the hill towards St Laurences Gate (the sole remaining gate from when Drogheda was a walled town). The site is near the gate on the right hand side.
The saga comes to an end, and a happy one.
It turns out the house has since been listed on the county dev plan and is now officially a ‘Protected Structure’.
An application has also been lodged to refurbish the building with minor alterations to the rear, to begin in a few weeks.I have a print of the house only my scanner is broken. I’ll post it one day, not that its of great interest or anything but anyway, alls well that ends well.
Thanks everyone who helped.
@Graham Hickey wrote:
The saga comes to an end, and a happy one.
It turns out the house has since been listed on the county dev plan and is now officially a ‘Protected Structure’.
An application has also been lodged to refurbish the building with minor alterations to the rear, to begin in a few weeks.I have a print of the house only my scanner is broken. I’ll post it one day, not that its of great interest or anything but anyway, alls well that ends well.
Thanks everyone who helped.
A thread from the past ! (while looking for info on listing trees…)
I was just wondering how the refurbishment went on this building?
Graham?A blast from the past indeed, and in more ways than one :rolleyes: 😮
How much you can learn in the space of two years!It’s very strange you should dredge this up again Lotts, as the restoration/refurbishment has just been completed, with the boards on the new sashes only coming down in the past few days!
I’ve no pictures of the restored house, and perhaps it would be inappropriate now that it is lived in again, but here are those dismal photos ‘promised’ over two years ago. The house is nothing spectacular, but charming nonetheless.
Unfortunately as can be seen, it is reduced to a humble cottage without the fine doorcase and Georgian grid sashes in view:
The grounds are what make the house. It is sited in a slightly elevated position, surrounded by mature trees including some delightful munkeypuzzles :), and approached via a short winding drive:
A large but sympathetic addition was made to the house in the 50s/60s perhaps:
…but this seems to have been demolished in the refurbishment, being replaced with a building mirroring the scale and proportions of the existing house, essentially doubling its size, creating a valley roof between the two.
Unfortunate that the almost minature proportions of the house have been lost, but at least ithe extension is largely sympathetic and all-important sashes have been installed in it too 🙂
It is a lovely little gem alright. It’d be a bit lost without the trees though. Hope they’re still there. It’ll be great to see smoke coming from the wonderfully symetrical chimney stacks in the winter. I know it’s probably due to the angle that the pics are taken but isn’t it lovely to see the lawn come right to the front of the house, rather than a drive and car-park.
Delighted to hear it all ended well.could some one here also explain the different types/grades of conservation to an ignoramus on the subject like myself and also the consequences in terms of applications / building /remodeling on such properties subsequent to listing and the reason for county council(ors/s) apparent hesitence to grant preservation orders.
We don’t have grades here as far as I know. They do in UK though, you ofen hear refernce to grade 1 listed, blah blah.
In Dublin the way it works is a building is protected if it is on the protected structures list, (aka Record of protected structures). Or on the draft list.
If there is a limit to the protection it is stated in the description – for example “facade only”.
That’s it as far as I can tell.Fergus-
See my post on this thread: https://archiseek.com/content/showthread.php?t=4080
Once a building becomes a Protected Structure, the owner can apply to the Local Authority for a Declaration stating what works to the PS require Planning Permission and what words do not require PP, including works to the interior. This last is an important point.
The Declaration is the de facto grading, i.e. sometimes only a facade is protected, sometimes the wallpaper and the Victorian chain pull on the jacks is protected.
(Declarations are my thesis subject.)As far as I know, Preservation Orders are used only very rarely, though I don’t know why. I remember hearing that they are something of a last resort and that they tend to be reserved for structures in imminent danger that are of National significance, but don’t quote me.
Hope this helps.
Technically, it was with the Local Government (Planning and Development) Act 1999, which was incorporated in its entirety into the 2000 Act.
There are mixed views on the wholesale transfer of Listed Buildings onto the Record of Protected Structures, centering on the fact that the PS designation is far more onerous than was the previous listing, i.e. it’s not just the facades any more. This is why Declarations were introduced- to indicate to owners which bits of their PSs are of merit (architectural, historic, archaeological, artistic, cultural, social, scientific and/or technical). (Remembered the categories off the top of my head- wahey! 😎 )John Gore-Grimes wrote an interesting article in the Irish Planning and Environmental Law Journal on the delights and tribulations (his phrase) of PS designation.
See IPELJ, Vol. 10, No. 2, Summer 2003.I always thought the previous grading was a bit of a mess too, what with phrases like ‘It is an objective of the Council to seek the preservation…etc.’ and others. What planning needs is not vague subjective language open to interpretation- remember the Meath Co. Co. vs. An Taisce (or perhaps it was M. Smith- don’t recall) case re. the necessity of a local authority to ‘have regard to’ the Regional Planning Guidelines? MCC argued that they had had regard to the RPGs in drawing up their County Dev Plan but decided that they weren’t compatible with their (ahem) vision for the county.
And so it goes…
That’s interesting about Preservation Orders; I always though they were generalised speak for Protected Structure status, but clearly from what you say they have a different role.
Just checked out http://www.irishstatutebook.ie- from what I can gather Preservation Orders derive from National Monuments legislation rather than Planning legislation. A key point is the involvement of the Houses of the Oireachtas- probably explains why they are rarely used. From the examples I could turn up (from a quick Google), it seems I may have been right after all (whoda thought? :rolleyes: ) about the imminent danger/last resort/National importance aspect.
FROM NAT MONS ACT 1930 (courtesy of our good friends at the Statute Book site)-
8.—(1) Where it appears to the Minister, on a report made by the Advisory Council or otherwise, that a monument which in his opinion is a national monument is in danger of being or is actually being destroyed, injured, or removed, or is falling into decay through neglect, the Minister may by order (in this Act referred to as a preservation order) entrust the preservation of such monument to the Commissioners.
(2) The Minister may at any time, by order made after consultation with the Advisory Council, revoke a preservation order.
(3) Every preservation order and every order revoking a preservation order shall be laid before each House of the Oireachtas as soon as may he after it is made, and if a resolution is passed by either House of the Oireachtas within the next twenty-one days on which such House has sat annulling such order, such order shall be annulled accordingly but without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done thereunder.
(http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/ZZA2Y1930S8.html)
P.S. I presume ‘the Commissioners’ refers to the Commissioners for Public Works.
P.P.S. I presume ‘the Advisory Council’ is the National Monuments Advisory Council.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
