Liffey Cable Cars – Pointless Gimmick or….
- This topic has 124 replies, 52 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 7 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- February 5, 2006 at 2:27 pm #708408
Lorcan
ParticipantWon’t this obstruct many of the buildings along the liffey? and towers taller than liberty hall? i can’t see how this is a good idea?
February 5, 2006 at 2:46 pm #766727kefu
ParticipantHere’s a computerised image of the scheme:-
February 5, 2006 at 2:47 pm #766728kefu
ParticipantAnd the story that goes along with it:
Plan for cable car attraction on Liffey
Frank McDonald and Ruadhan Mac Eoin
Saturday, February 4
A private consortium is proposing to develop a cable car service along the Liffey Quays in Dublin, running between Heuston Station and Docklands.
The cable cars would transport sightseers at heights approaching 80 metres (264ft) above the river from the Guinness Brewery near Heuston to a terminal located near the planned national conference centre at Spencer Dock.
Aimed primarily at the tourism market, the cable cars would give people a birds-eye view of many of Dublin’s landmarks, including the Custom House, the Four Courts, St James’ Gate Brewery and the National Museum at Collins Barracks.
Each of the four cable cars would have capacity for 25 people and the duration of a trip in either direction would be around 20 minutes.
It is anticipated that most passengers would travel by cable car one-way and make their return by other means.
Currently the ticket price is estimated at €15, which the promoters say compares “very favourably” to other attractions such as the London Eye which costs over €17 per visit.
The €52 million project, which is headed by Dublin property developer Barry Boland, would involve erecting four giant steel towers – two of them significantly taller than Liberty Hall and the other two almost as high – along the three kilometre route.
The towers, designed by architects McGarry NFebruary 5, 2006 at 2:53 pm #766729Anonymous
InactiveTotally gaga. It’ll end up like that slimey clock.
February 5, 2006 at 6:03 pm #766730hutton
ParticipantAnd an opinion piece by Frank Mc D on the same –
Daring plan inspired by London Eye
The proposal for cable cars along the Liffey is a sensational example
of lateral thinking, writes Frank McDonaldFor decades, Dublin has been divided by the River Liffey, with the
northside and the southside glowering at each other over its murky
depths. But now there is a daring plan to celebrate the river,
bringing the two sides together in a quite remarkable way.The proposal to run cable cars over the river between Heuston Station
and North Wall Quay, just west of Spencer Dock, is designed as a
tourist attraction rather than a transport service.But like all bright ideas, it is a sensational example of lateral
thinking. Developer Barry Boland, of Beaux Walk Properties Ltd, has
been working on it for a year and earlier this week presented it to
senior Dublin City Council officials, including city manager John
Fitzgerald. Their response, not surprisingly, was enthusiastic.It was inspired by the success of the London Eye, which generated some
£60 million (€88.28 million) in revenue last year, according to Mr
Boland. His cable car project would also be run as a commercial
enterprise, but its thrill-seekers would be “going somewhere”.The plan has its challenging aspects – not least the installation of
four giant “towers” along the river to support the cable lines. But as
conceived by architects McGarry Nà Éanaigh and engineers Roughan
O’Donovan, these are light and elegant structures.Both firms have good track records. McGarry Nà Éanaigh designed the
lighting masts in Smithfield, as well as the highly successful Liffey
Boardwalk, while Roughan O’Donovan designed the Luas bridge in Dundrum
and the Boyne bridge outside Drogheda.One of the principal objectives in the project, fully costed at €52
million by quantity surveyors Bruce Shaw, was to minimise the visual
impact of the support structures. This has been done by limiting them
to four, instead of cluttering up the riverscape.Two of the steel towers – at the end of Marlborough Street and in
front of the Civic Offices at Wood Quay – would be 85m high, while the
other two – west of Watling Street bridge and Custom House Quay –
would rise to a height of 55m.With some 2,000 juggernaut trucks expected to vanish from the quays
after the port tunnel opens later this year, Dublin City Council is
about to start work on a new framework plan for the river – and the
cable car proposal could become its most exciting element.Chief planner Dick Gleeson and city architect Jim Barrett are
certainly enthusiastic about the plan, which they see as a dynamic way
of stitching the city together along the spine of its main river –
though, obviously, it still has to go through the planning process.Mr Boland cites figures showing that Dublin had 5.8 million visitors
last year, with an average stay of 4½ days. But he says all of the
city’s attractions are static, including the Guinness Storehouse,
through which 740,000 trooped up to its Gravity Bar.One of the terminals would be located within the Guinness Brewery on
Victoria Quay, a short walk from Heuston Station; the other just west
of the planned Calatrava bridge, some 50m from the site of the
national conference centre at Spencer Dock.Two new pedestrian bridges are being “thrown in free gratis”, as Mr
Boland says. One would be located on the axis of Marlborough Street
and Hawkins Street, providing an obviously needed link, while the
other would span between Ormond Quay and Wood Quay.Swiss manufacturer Doppelmayr Garaventa, which makes most of the
world’s cable cars, are so enthusiastic about the project that they
are going to invest in it. Mr Boland is banking on the likelihood that
Dubliners and visitors to the city will be equally electrified.(c) The Irish Times
February 5, 2006 at 6:16 pm #766731SeamusOG
ParticipantI find the whole thing very strange and frankly I can’t see the point of it. But if permission were granted for this, it would be an indication that the city planners would be prepared to alter the riverscape for ever by installing towers which would enable four cable cars to carry about 100 people in total along the river. Well if they would be prepared to do that, why not go the whole hog and install a system like the Schwebebahn in Wuppertal, Germany.
http://www.u-bahnen-in-deutschland.de/wu/wuppertal-gallery.htmFebruary 5, 2006 at 7:38 pm #766732Paul Clerkin
KeymasterFrankly I think it’s a terrible idea, visually ugly (using Smithfield’s torches as a good example of McGarry NiEanaigh work is laughable) and I hope it doesn’t go ahead.
February 5, 2006 at 7:46 pm #766733A-ha
ParticipantThe cable car that goes out to Dursey Island in Cork (the only one in Ireland I believe) is used by both locals and tourists, but don’t you think that one every 20 minutes is a bit in-frequent? It would make more sense to have twice as many cable cars capable of carrying ten people every 10 minutes, that way, people wouldn’t have to wait very long on a cold and wet Irish day.
February 6, 2006 at 12:09 am #766734Niall
ParticipantNO NO NO NO
Would clutter the quays, obscuring all architecture……. Will be poorly maintained and financially unviable
No No
Too much money now in the country no sense….
February 6, 2006 at 12:13 am #766735kefu
ParticipantI also think if you go to this extraordinary amount of trouble, it should have some utilitarian aspect and have more than just two stops and two cars. Other cable car systems, for instance New York’s Roosevelt Island system or Barcelona’s, cater for both tourists and local residents.
It’s quite easy to still charge high prices to non-residents (a la the boats in Venice) by having regular users apply for a travel card of some description. I’ve been on both of the cable car systems I mentioned above, and think part of their charm is that ordinary people can use them.
The people behind this have also gone to quite a bit of effort to ensure the pylons are at the most visually uninteresting parts of the quays, which I think is important.
And speaking of gimmicks, what ever happened to the plan to float a balloon above the Liffey. That seems to have sunk without a trace, and like this one, was being endorsed by Frank McDonald.
Anyway, in conclusion, I’d be in favour of the plan but I think the number of trams should be doubled or trebled and there should be at least one more stop.dFebruary 6, 2006 at 1:53 am #766736notjim
Participantand the passangers will be able to look down and see the _spirit of the docklands_ also “reimagining the river in a creative and exciting way”
February 6, 2006 at 2:04 am #766737Devin
ParticipantI was reading this yesterday and going ‘this is a joke, isn’t it?’ Later in the day I thought maybe I was imagining what I’d read – checked the paper again, but no it was true ….
I’ve nothing against imaginative ideas, and the Liffey does need imagination, but sorry I just think you couldn’t do this to a river running through the middle of a old city. Maybe in parts of the Docklands it would be good, but definitely not in the historic area.
February 6, 2006 at 4:46 am #766738Paul Clerkin
KeymasterIn your opinion is the suggested cable car system along the river Liffey in Dublin a pointless gimmick that we don’t need or a good example or how imagination can make Dublin a better place to live?
Plan for cable car attraction on Liffey
The Irish TimesA private consortium is proposing to develop a cable car service along the Liffey Quays in Dublin, running between Heuston Station and Docklands. The cable cars would transport sightseers at heights approaching 80 metres (264ft) above the river from the Guinness Brewery near Heuston to a terminal located near the planned national conference centre at Spencer Dock. Aimed primarily at the tourism market, the cable cars would give people a birds-eye view of many of Dublin’s landmarks, including the Custom House, the Four Courts, St James’ Gate Brewery and the National Museum at Collins Barracks. Each of the four cable cars would have capacity for 25 people and the duration of a trip in either direction would be around 20 minutes.
http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2006/0204/158080939HM3NEWSSTORY.html
February 6, 2006 at 11:41 am #766739Anonymous
InactiveAren’t these the guys who promised the rail spur for Shannon airport as a tool to get a huge retail development in Shannon before the spur evaporated?
February 6, 2006 at 12:08 pm #766740Anonymous
InactiveI had to look at my calendar to check that it was not April 1st. The big difference between the Roosevelt Island cable car and that proposed for the Liffey is that the former traverses the river and is primarily used by residents (cost is a subway token) and the latter is for tourists, will cost $15 and follow the river’s route. Why bother? Why not use boats? I though a boat service had started on the Liffey? Paris has its bateaux mouches, the East River has cruises, and for a while there was a river taxi service; that stopped due to lack of use, but that was due to a mixture of cost ($9 versus $3.50 for the East Side Shuttle or $1.5 for Subway) and only 2 stops (57th St. and 96th St.) which were too limiting. Looking at the roundy cablecar pods I can already hear it being called Dublin’s “pie in the sky.”
KB2February 6, 2006 at 12:54 pm #766741-Donnacha-
ParticipantSurprised at Frank McDonald backing this awful idea. And does he describe everything he likes as ‘sensational’?
February 6, 2006 at 12:58 pm #766742Anonymous
InactiveOne word comes to mind: “Monorail”.
February 6, 2006 at 1:34 pm #766743hutton
Participant@phil wrote:
One word comes to mind: “Monorail”.
Anybody else ever see that Simpsons episode? 😀 😀 😀
February 6, 2006 at 1:53 pm #766744SeamusOG
ParticipantIt’s hard to see the “lateral thinking” angle that Frank McDonald is going on about. The cable cars that I’ve seen have been used to ferry people across a chasm (e.g. Dursey Island was mentioned earlier on) or to carry people up a hill (e.g. somewhere like the Zugspitz in Germany or any ski lift you care to mention). In both of those types of case, the cable car is necessary or at the very least extremely useful.
How does building a totally unnecessary cable car which will only function as a tourist attraction constitute “lateral thinking”:confused:
February 6, 2006 at 2:05 pm #766745Anonymous
Inactive@Seamus O’G wrote:
How does building a totally unnecessary cable car which will only function as a tourist attraction constitute “lateral thinking”:confused:
That is a good question. It seems that the new thing in the DCC is to talk about improving “East – West permeability” in the city centre. The cable car is meant to be part of this plan, but is probably the single worst idea (or at least up there in the top 5) of the last 10 years. What really bothers me about it is that it has no real practical function for the citizens of Dublin, but will be visible from all over the city. I am not against tourism, and understand its importance to urban economies, but to build something that will be so dominant on the skyline, yet of no great benefit to the common good is ridiculous.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

