Lansdowne Road Stadium
- This topic has 572 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
GregF.
- AuthorPosts
- January 29, 2010 at 2:25 pm #726241
reddy
Participant@foremanjoe wrote:
What happens when Ronan O’Gara (or Johnny Sexton) kicks a Garryowen in this stadium?
I can see the whole upper tier of spectators suffering whiplash trying to follow the flight of the ball.
Very disappointed with those trusses, there must have been a more discreet method of implementing them but it was probably more expensive and deemed not to be worthwhile.Yep I agree – the top picture in that interior series hints at that alright. The ball will be lost in a mess of struts.
January 29, 2010 at 3:33 pm #726242Anonymous
InactiveI would have thought the obvious spot for the big screen was directly over the goal on the vast blank cladding over the single tier….good spot to drape flags from too.
Overall, its pretty good, love the exterior, but disappointed with the network of clunky trusses inside, and there is no excuse for it if they do obstruct views from the Gods.
January 29, 2010 at 4:58 pm #726243foremanjoe
Participant@Peter Fitz wrote:
I would have thought the obvious spot for the big screen was directly over the goal on the vast blank cladding over the single tier….good spot to drape flags from too.
There’s probably an issue with glare at that end, I’d imagine that’s why there’s no screen down there (yet).
January 30, 2010 at 2:31 pm #726244Anonymous
Inactive@foremanjoe wrote:
There’s probably an issue with glare at that end, I’d imagine that’s why there’s no screen down there (yet).
the black rectangular yoke to the right is a screen though isn’t it?
January 30, 2010 at 4:29 pm #726245foremanjoe
Participant@Peter Fitz wrote:
the black rectangular yoke to the right is a screen though isn’t it?
Aye, ’tis.
That truss will keep it nice and shaded though. 😉January 31, 2010 at 10:59 am #726246EIA340600
ParticipantHow big are those screens…They don’t look overly massive, which is a bit of a shame.God knows we love overly massive…
February 19, 2010 at 4:23 pm #726247wearnicehats
Participantphotographic evidence of sightline restrictions
February 19, 2010 at 4:33 pm #726248murrmurr
Participanthttp://www.lrsdc.ie/gallery/singlecategory.asp?PCID=131
from Wednesday.
February 22, 2010 at 5:04 pm #726249Starch
ParticipantMagnificent!
February 27, 2010 at 11:31 am #726250Anonymous
Inactivehttp://www.lrsdc.ie/gallery/singlecategory.asp?PCID=132
New interior shots, starting to lay the pitch.
February 28, 2010 at 2:33 am #726251Punchbowl
Participant@Peter Fitz wrote:
http://www.lrsdc.ie/gallery/singlecategory.asp?PCID=132
New interior shots, starting to lay the pitch.
Yet again the North end is largely absent from the photos. This ‘U-Shaped stadium’ term is really becoming a very Irish thing
U stands for Unfinished IMO. Why, oh why, can’t we at least have one fully enclosed stadium?
February 28, 2010 at 3:48 pm #726252PaulC
ParticipantHere is a very good video of the stadium, filmed in the last couple of weeks…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl7MQ89VjlAFebruary 28, 2010 at 4:06 pm #726253Anonymous
InactiveI’d rather the seats were a darker shade of green.
March 1, 2010 at 11:19 pm #726254rumpelstiltskin
Participant@kinsella wrote:
I’d rather the seats were a darker shade of green.
Ya you’re right. They should just demolish the place. Is there no end to the moaning of people on this website?
March 2, 2010 at 2:25 pm #726255Starch
Participanthere here 😀
March 2, 2010 at 2:52 pm #726256gunter
ParticipantAh, sure it’ll do, it’s grand. :rolleyes:
March 2, 2010 at 3:00 pm #726257vkid
ParticipantWill wait until its 100% finished but so far I think its poor. The trusses and the low end are awful and ruin what could have been really nice. Wasted opportunity imo and overall looks a bit shiiiite. Don’t care if i’m moaning..its true.
March 2, 2010 at 3:58 pm #726258Global Citizen
ParticipantI don’t think Kinsella was moaning.
He was only expressing an opinion for God’s sake.
Can people not put their views across without being branded.Anyway, regardless of what the stadium looks like the fact remains that the capacity is too small and therein lies the missed opportunity.
March 2, 2010 at 4:13 pm #726259Paul Clerkin
KeymasterI like the look of it externally – but for me, the primary purpose of a stadium is to allow people to watch the game – if there is obstructed view, then it is a fail by the designers. That’s black and white for me, if when it opens, this is proven, then the development team fubared the project.
March 2, 2010 at 5:14 pm #726260Anonymous
Inactive@Paul Clerkin wrote:
I like the look of it externally – but for me, the primary purpose of a stadium is to allow people to watch the game – if there is obstructed view, then it is a fail by the designers. That’s black and white for me, if when it opens, this is proven, then the development team fubared the project.
Would have to agree, restricted sight lines just aren’t acceptable (if that is indeed the case). I find it difficult to make my mind up on it overall, the bulk and crudeness of the truss work, particularly as it handles the sweep down to the single tier, definitely detracts and distracts … though it is the necessity for the single tier that pretty much feeds the design … the jury is still out for me on the interior, love the exterior;)
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

