Lansdowne Road Stadium
- This topic has 572 replies, 134 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 12 months ago by
GregF.
- AuthorPosts
- May 21, 2003 at 12:17 pm #725841
bluefoam
ParticipantDo you really believe that Athlone can handle 50,000 Celtic supporters, like Seville is doing at the moment. Or do you believe that any state or semi-state company can handle the thousands of people traveling to games. I am sorry but they can’t do that as it is. The stadium has to be in a major city – ie. Dublin, Cork, Galway, Limerick… I believe Landsdown is the ideal spot (which is pretty much proven over the years). Anyway you can’t just leave Landsdown in its current state for club games, its the oldest rugby stadium in the world and needs upgrading.
And by the way the ‘select’ number of people living in Dublin, were not selected by anyone. They choose to live there and represent quite a large proportion of the population. 😉
May 21, 2003 at 12:38 pm #725842FIN
Participanti don’t think that putting it in dublin would be logical for the rest of the population. as for a backwards view of it…well what’s backwards about wanting something away from a city that can’t cater for it’s own population let alone 65,000+ fans..
athlone is an example because it’s in the centre of the country..i would love it in galway because then i woludn’t have to travel and could drink myself senseless here afterwards but it’s not practical to have it in galway. the government is trying to promote the use of the country’s other cities and large towns… Athlone is growing..much i believe is because it’s becomming yet another commuter town for dublin. and the advent of a stadium would rapidly increase it’s capacity to cater for such crowds.i would suggest that you might take the blinker’s off for maybe a minute and think of the country as a whole instead of your little area.
yes lansdowne road does need improvement but really, is that a valid argument for suggesting that the new national stadium be located there????May 21, 2003 at 12:53 pm #725843bluefoam
ParticipantSorry Fin,
Got a bit carried away. Again I will say that the stadium needs to be in a major city. And I don’t understand your perspective. I would see Galway as being a much more practical venue than Athlone. It is equally as central as Dublin (geographically anyway) and is capable of providing transoprt, accomodation and enterainment for hoards of travelling fans, as well as offering plenty of tourist attractions for foreign visitors.However I still believe landsdown is the prime location.
May 21, 2003 at 1:16 pm #725844FIN
Participantwhile having in the cities would of course be my first choice buying the land in a city would be unbelievable. i actually don’t know who owns lansdowne….hmmmm! but i’m thinking that aspect mainly. i do take your point on the transport. mind you all public transport in this country is rubbish so it’s going to be a problem. the reason i don’t take to the lansdowne theory is that it’s land is worth a fortune and if developed could provide a lot of money towards the building of a new one. it’s location and the journey to it is excellent but it wouldn’t capture my imagination like a brand new stadium in a new location would. i basically want a stadium built and in the shortest time possible. anywhere would do and i know you and most of the country would agree with me there. i am also in favour of the 80,000 .. why should we downgrade…it would pay for itself..our national teams are doing very well and so it would attract that size of a crowd…ahhhhh! good auld ireland….
May 21, 2003 at 2:39 pm #725845Rory W
ParticipantOK look at a map of Ireland – where do all the rail lines lead to – Dublin. Where does the main roads in the country run to – Dublin. What is the capital of Ireland and has over 1/3 of its population – you’ve guessed it Dublin. My point is the infrastructure is just not there to support putting the stadium elsewhere in the country.
I suppose that as a rugby fan I have sentimental attachment to Lansdowne – but it really is a very handy place to get to. It takes 20 minutes to walk to from Stephen’s Green. As for building apartments etc on its site – does Dublin really need more souless apartments in D4 that you or I can never afford. No I don’t think so.
Do we need an 80,000 seat venue at Lansdowne – for maybe Ireland V England once every 2 years. But it’s no way near full now for Ireland V Italy (capacity 48,000) another 6 Nations games so I think 65,000 is enough (eircom park was only going to be 45,000 which the FAI were happy with). If you get the chance go to the Millenium Stadium in Cardiff and see what that is like (its practically in the middle of the city) and compare it with out of town stadia elsewhere.
Do you think the GAA would have built their stadium anywhere other than Croke park?
Build it and build it at Lansdowne!
May 21, 2003 at 2:43 pm #725846FIN
Participantsorry but you made no argument why it should be at lansdowne except that you like it!!!
and as for putting it in dublin because it is the only place with the infrastructure….that’s daft…. what about the 2/3 of the population????
May 21, 2003 at 3:11 pm #725847Anonymous
Inactiveall of our “infrastructure” is centred on transporting the population to and from the capital from other major centres around the country…
you saw the chaos last year when dublin supporters attempted to travel in huge numbers to semple stadium in thurles.
May 21, 2003 at 3:26 pm #725848FIN
Participantha,ha… from what i can remember that is because they couldn’t find thurles..athlone is easier to find for you poor unfortunates….imagine having to travel more than a few miles to a match….my god!! the world would stop.
all i’m saying is that instead of crowding an already overcrowded and inadequate infrastructure in dublin because to be fair it’s not great either, somewhere outside might be an option. i have no idea where abbotstown is having not spent much time in dublin but from the talk it’s on the outskirts, that is the logical choice if, and it looks more than likely, we are forced to have it in dublin. i know the arguments of the great walk to lansdowne, and yes i have traveled to matches that way too, but so what…. that is not an intregal part…we need not plan a stadium around it… having the craic is not dependent on where you are but on what you make yourself…..
May 21, 2003 at 4:03 pm #725849Rory W
ParticipantBecause you’ll have great craic sitting in the M50 traffic jam?
May 21, 2003 at 4:16 pm #725850FIN
Participantwelcome to going to a match from anywhere else other than dublin…however in my case it’s the n4/n7 traffic jam……..
what you all don’t see is that people have been doing this for years while you just get the bus in from whatever suburb you live in…and as soon as it becomes a bother for you to get to a match you complain…. wake up and smeel the roses lads…..everyone of these options are going to be greeted with the same problems…just get it built
May 21, 2003 at 5:02 pm #725851d_d_dallas
ParticipantThe Athlone/A City argument is the exact same as Abbotstown/Lansdowne one. Realistically Bertie wouldn’t mind it in Abbottstown as the man has never spent a real day in his life in our fair capital – he knows nothing of what it’s really like trying to get around the place and what it feels like to spend 30 minutes travelling such a small distance. Sitting int he back of a tinted Merc while your driver speedas and the Gardai wave you on is hardly being down with your people.
If any minister actually had to experience transport as we do (instead of the pleasant stroll from Sandymount to Merrion Sq) then there would be a massive increase in spending in that area – and I think the Stadium would be built in Lansdowne.
I don’t think having craic is just what you make of it yourself – the location plays an enormous role. How many people go abroad to other cities for a weekend for a match? Locating it miles away from any airport or rail system would be madness and definitely stop people coming. some hassle just isn’t worth it.As for building in Cork or Limerick… no minister would sanction that, as good an idea as that is (hello – national spatial strategy???) nearly every project ever built in this country has revolved around Dublin – we seem intent onstuffing all four million of us into one little pocket on the east coast.
If the Stadium did go South or West – would that not provide a motivation to actually develop and improve the transport links to these places??? Which would also bring secondary benefits. True one third of the country lives in Dublin – but two thirds do not.May 21, 2003 at 7:59 pm #725852rperse
Participantyeah, but the other two thirds of the country dont live within 20 miles of each other……50% plus of the population live in leinster, building it outside of dublin is at least debateable, building it outside of leinster is just ridiculous.
May 22, 2003 at 8:24 am #725853FIN
Participant50%…… don’t know where you got that stat.
i believe there is 1.5 m in the six counties and as a national stadium would cater for the whole isle then how would define 50% living in leinster… and just as a footnote..last time i checked westmeath was in leinsterMay 22, 2003 at 8:28 am #725854bluefoam
ParticipantThis is an archtectural site and the point has just been made that your environment has no bearing on your state of mind….
….So what does an architect do?
May 22, 2003 at 8:37 am #725855FIN
Participantfair point but all the arguments were about this “famous” walk from dublin centre to lansdowne…and the pubs encountered on the way…in the states people park in the car park and take out cans and drink there…fair enough they may have the weather sometimes but as an example it shows no matter what people are going to enjoy themselves as they are there primarily for the game
and d_d_ made a good point as regards the spacial strategy…limerick has shown albeit to a limited degree that it can cope with major matches with munster playing in thomond …
the idea of having down in one of the regional cities is gone but if it did then the investment in that particular city would be profound…. it’s infrastructure would have to be upgraded and then that in itself would bring more investment etc…. if the were serious about their “big idea” then they would think of locating it elsewhere but as i said it’s never going to happen.how and ever, back to it’s position in dublin, on the outskirts would be preferable i would think to the rest of the country let alone the residents of lansdowne(apart from the publican’s) as we wouldn’t need to go into the centre of dublin at all…this would free up traffic- well a bit anyway- in the centre.
May 22, 2003 at 10:15 am #725856bluefoam
ParticipantHere are my thoughts on using the American model of having stadiums away from the cities…
They have eight lanes of highway going to and from the venue, easily catering for the hoards of fans (Ireland still doesn’t have a completed motorway). They have numerous stadia like hockey, baseball, football, running tracks etc… all in the one area (whereas Ireland might get a watered down version of a second rate stadium designed for a second rate club team in England). Also the Americans remove the fans from built up areas due to the violent clashes during and after the games. Plus I don’t see how drinking ‘Lyndon Village’ in the car park before the game could be seen as a good thing. Anyway leaving behind the issues of travel and traffic and Americans knacker-drinking in car parks.
Lansdowne has a character that will be very difficult to surpass anywhere and I don’t believe this is entirely due to the pubs or drinking etc… I have been going to Lansdowne since I was a nipper (probably 10 or so). Some of it is to do with the layout of the stadium but it is mostly to do with the area and the way the crowd comes together through lanes and side streets and off the dart. Also, the impact on traffic is not horrendous due to the DART.
May 22, 2003 at 10:33 am #725857FIN
Participantthat’s true…and i have been going since about the same age too. has anyone projected what the 65,000 stadium would look like on lansdowne site?
and just cos i think it’s fun, why should we have 2 stadiums of large capacities in the city? seeing that we as tax payer’s are paying for both of them do we not have the right to say( and not the gaa council) what should be played in them…i know it’s totally off the topic but hey…
but speaking of the character of landsdowne… would this character not be lost in regards to the layout of the stadium if it’s taken down and rotated???
and where do we play international’s until the new one is built and in all honesty that could take years..i don’t relish going to england or for that matter scotland for our international games either in rugby or football. we would be the laughing stock of europe…going to a foreign country to play our “home” games…May 22, 2003 at 2:08 pm #725858Rory W
ParticipantDrinking in a car park is (a) illegal and (b) were you at Ireland V Argentina last year? It pissed like a monsoon for the entire game and people were delighted to get indoors to have a few whiskeys after the game. Why have 2 large stadia? Because one of them is a closed shop?
Isn’t it more civilised that we can walk to the game from the centre of our capital city?
May 23, 2003 at 10:50 pm #725859crc
ParticipantFin – the decision about what where to play in coming years is going to have to be made regardless of whether Lansdowne is out of action for rebuilding or not – UEFA very soon won’t be letting the soccer team use temporary seating, thus reducing the capacity of the ground and the FAIs gate revenue dramatically.
There is an argument for saying that the FAI should help either Bohs or Shels complete Dalymount or Tolka to arount 15 – 20,000 and use that for match as a (very) temporary measure while Lansdowne is redevelopped.
The Rugby team is different – but they could atlernate matches between Belfast, Limerick and possibly Cork.
Both of these measure would mean both the IRFU and the FAI would feel the pinch for a while – but if they leave the matter run and run it will come to a head at some point.
I personally think that redeveloping Lansdowne into a 65,000 stadium is the best option. The importance of the rail line cannot be overstated too, and there would be scope for redeveloping the station (to where the current West stand is) along with the stadium.
May 26, 2003 at 4:20 pm #725860FIN
Participant“Why have 2 large stadia? Because one of them is a closed shop?”
yes but why? we all paid for it. discrimination is against the law now as far as i am aware!“Isn’t it more civilised that we can walk to the game from the centre of our capital city?”
i like this one!!! very good. how could you define that as more civilised? what is civilised? going en-masse to a sport where you want to give the other team a good trouncing.
sorry i couldn’t resist… i get your point about it but it still forces fans into the city centre there clogging it up more and then trying to find parking and not get ripped off( by the way your parking charges up there are crazy ). not able to drink because of the whole driving thing. and then fighting to get home through the traffic again. hmmmmm! sounds appealing.if i lived up there i might have the same opinion as that but open your minds too the possibility that maybe this isn’t a great system. i do agree that the dart is brilliant to get to the matches. but isn’t there supposed to be a luas out to the bertie bowl??? as i said earlier i have no idea where abbotstown is so i don’t know if that is better i do think it’s not worse. it’s not going to be our choice anyway so basically it’s going to be to which politican owns the land.
do we all agree that we need a new stadium at least?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

