Interconnector aka DART underground
- This topic has 454 replies, 57 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- August 15, 2008 at 3:31 pm #801792
Anonymous
Inactive20 trains an hour opens up huge oportunities. A third Dart line would be a possibility, ie one starting at Heuston, going under the park(possibly an underground stop) and stopping at Blackhorse Avenue, Glasnevin, Drumcondra, Into the docks and through the tunnel back to Heuston, It’d be similar to London’s very succsesful “Circle Line”, and connect with all other modes.Making public transport a much more atractive option
August 15, 2008 at 4:28 pm #801793Anonymous
InactiveIt is hard to see what that adds cgcsb; it takes capacity from both the existing planned routes while only adding journeys that would be less common and would be possible under T21 with one change anyway.
August 19, 2008 at 1:14 pm #801794Anonymous
InactiveIt adds Blackhorse Avenue, Glasnevin and the Pheonix park to the network. Also it alows for better connectivity between modes. There is an oportunity to make better use of liffey jnct. to Heuston track. If the track was extended to north from liffey jnct, in a tunnel or surface track, through the airport and on to Drogheda. This would allow Trains coming from Belfst to stop at Dublin Airport and Dublin Heuston and It would make train journeys from Belfast to Cork, Waterford and Limerick etc. a real possibility. This would have the added benefit of freeing up capacity on the Docklands to Drogheda track for Dart and Commuter services without quadruple tracking. all intercity services Terminating in Dublin puts pressure on our railways as trains have turn and go back very quickly. It is possible for a Rosslare to Belfast Service now, but IÉ seems to lack the will.
August 19, 2008 at 1:54 pm #801795Anonymous
InactiveWon’t Glasnevin be on the Maynooth Dart line and Blackhorse Avenue won’t be so far from the DIT luas.
Running mainline in from Belfast and the airport and on to Cork seems like a better idea, though hardly a short term priority.
August 19, 2008 at 3:06 pm #801796Anonymous
InactiveFirst you suggest a DART line through the Phoenix Park tunnel and on to Docklands, then a mainline to Belfast…
I can see some rationale to using the Phoenix Park tunnel for mainline if it could be joined up with Connolly and wouldn’t disrupt DART services, that would probably require four tracking from Connolly to Howth junction or Malahide and a few new tracks and platforms through Connolly. Major work. Then you could have mainline trains that run to Heuston continuing to Connolly and on to Belfast e.g. Cork-Dublin-Belfast.
Again, not a priority, let’s build what we can first of all.
August 19, 2008 at 3:30 pm #801797Anonymous
InactiveI realise it’s not a short term priority but the main belfast line being re routed to Heuston does make long term sense. As a result, the Balbriggan to Kildare DART line will be completely seperated from inter city services which will offer a huge boost in capacity and having thhe Airport on an intercity line makes a whole lot more sense as people travelling from other parts of the country don’t have to go near the city center. This option does offer a whole lot more then the option to run a circle line DARt service.
September 3, 2008 at 8:13 pm #801798Anonymous
InactiveAll of these plans for the stations look perfect.
I dont see any problems with any of it.
Although Spencer dock is still a puzzle for me, arent they allready building on top of where that station is. In the map i cant tell if there is a building there but its plausable that they would do it.
Also, im not one for all the historical stuff, but i can see their being problems with the high street/Christ church station, its comendable that the station entrances itself are in wood quay, but the vents and amenities at the foot of the city wall could incounter a lot of previously un-excavated archeology, after all it is the city wall.
Heuston’s plan A is looking good and the provision for at least 1 terminal platform is very good planing for both versions of the plan.
Although my only concern is the use of the double tunnel’s. What if one direction is blocked, that whole tunnel will be jammed and by the look of things only 1 track exists in each with no switches at the stations, who will you keep traffic flowing if you’re down to 1 tunnel and only 1 track? Wouldnt a 2 tracks in each tunnel or some sort of switching procedure help alleviate such a problem if it ever occured? Even in the case of terrorism or an accident 1 tunnel could be impeded and we would only have the facilities to send trains 1 direction through the whole tunnel length? That seems dangerous. New york and London have multible switches but the main flaw of some subway’s such as Glasgow’s is their isolation and lack of switching. Even the Channel tunnel has a lot of crossing points due to its traffic.
I guess they have thought about such problems but a serious blockage in one tunnel could seriously slow down the network.
September 8, 2008 at 7:16 pm #801799Anonymous
Inactivefor those of you interested this appears to be the difference between crossrail and the dart underground
September 8, 2008 at 7:19 pm #801800Anonymous
InactiveSomething tells me IE’s tunnel is going to look much better than the RPA’s train set
September 8, 2008 at 7:38 pm #801801Anonymous
Inactive@SunnyDub wrote:
Something tells me IE’s tunnel is going to look much better than the RPA’s train set
I actually think the opposite… currently the RPA designs have much more potential than CIE thats not to say they will look better or function better… it just comes down to a third party taking control
CIE does not appear to be want to cut and cover st stephens green north or some corn market… it is tight but it is possible They are investing all the hard cash in docklands and not grand central… because the land around it has more potential
September 8, 2008 at 8:09 pm #801802Anonymous
InactiveI presume they’re not going to cut and cover at docklands givent that Treasury are currently building over…and originally they had the docklands station under the river
September 15, 2008 at 8:09 pm #801803Anonymous
InactiveI read somewhere that both future DART lines are planned to have double decker trains. I wonder can the tunnel accomidate this or will it be a case of the port tunnel i.e. the trucks for which it was intended can’t fit in
September 15, 2008 at 8:16 pm #801804Anonymous
Inactivethat’s just not true about the port tunnel.
September 16, 2008 at 11:26 am #801805Anonymous
InactiveSuper trucks cannot safely fit in the Port Tunnel
September 16, 2008 at 11:41 am #801806admin
Keymasterbecause it was not intended to accommodate ‘super trucks’.
September 16, 2008 at 11:47 am #801807Anonymous
Inactiveexactly, I mean will it be intended for double decker trains to use the DART tunnel?
April 7, 2009 at 11:33 am #801808Anonymous
InactiveDempsey supports cross city underground
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2009/0406/1224244068221.html
hopefully it’ll happen
April 7, 2009 at 2:50 pm #801809Anonymous
Inactivethere have been geo technical surveys being carried out in Stephen’s Green for the past 2 to 3 weeks for the new DART station
April 7, 2009 at 6:51 pm #801810Anonymous
InactiveThere has been a lot of surveying done on northside of Merrion Square also in the last few weeks
April 8, 2009 at 2:44 pm #801811Anonymous
InactiveIarnród Éireann’s DART underground timeline:
railway application:2009
enabling works: 2010
Construction start:2011
Completion:2015+cost cutting measures including moving tunnel entrance to Inchicore, cutting out additional access points for underground stations and other small alterations
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

