If Archiseek had awards
- This topic has 26 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 2 months ago by
Devin.
- AuthorPosts
- July 19, 2005 at 12:56 am #707983
Anonymous
InactiveIf Archiseek had awards what categories would be included?
- July 19, 2005 at 11:28 am #759876
d_d_dallas
ParticipantWorst abuse of emoticons ๐
- July 19, 2005 at 11:51 am #759877
Anonymous
InactiveGuilty as charged ๐ฎ
- July 19, 2005 at 12:12 pm #759878
ro_G
Participantand The An Taisce Arguing in the Face of Overwhelimg Opposition Award goes to ….
- July 19, 2005 at 12:57 pm #759879
Anonymous
InactiveWhen I started this thread I was more talking about what polls could be held on completed buildings but seeing as it has taken another direction.
Could I suggest
Best photo’s
Photoshop
Sarcastic Photoshop
Media Intervention
Digging a hole and not stopping - July 19, 2005 at 1:16 pm #759880
notjim
Participantoldest revived thread
- July 19, 2005 at 1:28 pm #759881
Rory W
ParticipantMost threads on the same point award
The Nostodamus award for the least accurate ‘vision of the future’
The handbags at dawn award for best (and probably most petty) online argument - July 19, 2005 at 3:01 pm #759882
Sue
Participantgood categories, guys. now can we have some nominations? ๐
- July 19, 2005 at 3:16 pm #759883
jimg
ParticipantI’d like to see award categories for:
- The most incomprehensible message posted (because of grammar, punctuation and spelling).
- The most gratuitously insulting posting.
- Philistinism.
- Pseudo-intellectualism.
- July 19, 2005 at 3:35 pm #759884
sw101
Participanti nominate myself.
i also nominate myself for the most self-centred and egocentric poster here.
i also propose a best looking archiseeker award. you’ll never guess my nomination.
- July 19, 2005 at 5:42 pm #759885
GrahamH
ParticipantI blame you for this thread sw – you and your Pfortifying (geddit?) influences.
d_d_dallas wrote:Worst abuse of emoticons ]Not to mention best abuse of same ๐
- July 19, 2005 at 7:29 pm #759886
sw101
Participanti did nada. you ain’t seen me, right?
- July 19, 2005 at 10:57 pm #759887
GrahamH
ParticipantDon’t you point that thing at me ๐
Media Intervention
Perhaps not the biggest of all time ;), but thanks must go to Sue for her shocking weekend exposรยฉ.
- July 19, 2005 at 11:05 pm #759888
Anonymous
InactiveI nominate the two above posters as a duo for best thread destroyers ๐
- July 19, 2005 at 11:34 pm #759889
Lotts
ParticipantBest thread title surely goes to
“Citywest : Mansfield’s giant heap of crap”Take a bow Peter
- July 19, 2005 at 11:34 pm #759890
GrahamH
ParticipantSecond that ๐
I nominate the two above posters as a duo for best thread destroyers
Hey! I gingerly linked it back to the thread topic didn’t I?
Anyway he started it.
- July 19, 2005 at 11:42 pm #759891
Anonymous
InactiveIt doesn’t take a lot to get either of you going though ๐
Definitely Peter’s Manfields Giant title I have been itching to get that one out again for a while, I still laugh everytime I see the title for the first time in a while.
- July 20, 2005 at 12:22 am #759892
sw101
Participantcould we do a wolfe tones on it and nominate archiseek for a load of awards? make sure everyone we know votes for it and make it a matter of irish pride that we win.
does the examiner have an award for “best website” or “best source of info for lazy journo’s”?
- July 20, 2005 at 1:02 am #759893
Anonymous
InactiveMe for the best name
Definitely a Wolfe Tones strategy would be possible the only problem is which County jersey would we be appealing to?
- July 20, 2005 at 1:14 am #759894
Anonymous
InactiveBest thread title surely goes to
“Citywest : Mansfield’s giant heap of crap”Take a bow Peter
Thanks lads ! ๐
- July 22, 2005 at 3:50 am #759895
Devin
Participantmost usernames on Archiseek (I know of someone posting under FIVE ๐ฎ )
- July 22, 2005 at 4:23 am #759896
sw101
Participanteh? i can barely think of enough things to say to justify one.
- July 22, 2005 at 4:49 am #759897
Devin
Participant…mmm, bit of a prodigy alright
…and under the combined names has amassed a whopping 2,328 posts
- July 22, 2005 at 4:59 am #759898
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterThe Cork Examiner – “Archiseek home to split personalities”
- July 23, 2005 at 12:51 am #759899
GrahamH
ParticipantAin’t me by the way…as much as some earlier postings feel like they were made by someone else… ๐ฎ
- July 23, 2005 at 1:09 am #759900
sw101
Participantyeah right. you (and you and you and you and you) suck.
- July 28, 2005 at 3:05 am #759901
Devin
ParticipantAs the one who raised the subject of having more than one identity on the forum, let me say that I think it is a relatively rare occurrence and that one identity is more than enough for most of us (though there will always be someone who will take the mick).
And I think I can state with some certainty that the case of one person posting under five different identities (tries to withhold laughter) is most definitely a one off. Now letรขโฌโขs have no more of this!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.