George’s Quay

Home › Forums › Ireland › George’s Quay

Viewing 12 posts - 21 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #712978
    john white
    Participant

    Ha ha.

    ‘School Of Design’.

    Yeah. when I was in School we had lego bricks too.

    John

    #712979
    MG
    Participant

    Going , going , gone!

    #712980
    john white
    Participant

    Much as I was worried about the size of that design and about the final reality’s faithfulness to the beatiful model – I’m quite sorry now that it’s gone.

    My disapointment is heightened by the prospect of the corpulent black heaps that may stand in it’s place.

    Woodquay? Compared these black behemoths it’ll seem like a graceful, light and air-filled palace.

    John

    #712981
    Paul Clerkin
    Keymaster

    Personally, I actually liked the SOM development…. they were just rather unfortunate in that the site was lousy.

    #712982
    Hugh Pearman
    Participant

    Seven months after this exchange began, we have a result: sanity has prevailed. Maybe people don’t want Dublin to be like everywhere else after all.

    But of course SOM will now come back with a new plan. Could not Dublin’s architects step forward with a good home-grown alternative, or are the days of professional co-operation now over?

    #712983
    john white
    Participant

    God, I wish this had been proposed on a better site. Maybe then we’d have it.

    The more I look at that model the more I think we’ve lost a new busarus. It had a similar daring, and in it’s organic looking curves I think, correct me if I’m wrong – would have been a totally new style for Ireland. I mean compare those light unexpected curves with a huge sqatty black shiny box with a point on top.

    Point is though on that site – it would have been positively [dare I compliment him with bringing about a new phrase..] Stephenesque in it’s arrogant and supremacist disregard for it’s surroundings.

    Could we get the Architects back for another go – someplace else?

    John

    #712984
    Rory W
    Participant

    Thats the trouble with this city, great buidings for the wrong site (Central Bank). John, I think you may be right there about losing out on another Busaras, no doubt they will find something nice in Brick with a clock tower to replace the planned (interesting) building!

    Rory W

    #712985
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Oh Joy! Do you think so? With PVC Georgian Windows?

    John

    #712986
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ní aontaím leat a Rory. Sé an Banc Ceannanas ceann de na foirgnimh is fearr sa chathair – de mo thuairim ar aon nos. Níl fhios agam cén fath – just, go bhfuil sé chomh direach as an ngnáth san ait sin go reitíonn sé liom. Seafoid, ‘tá fhios agam !

    Rory – for me anyway somehow the Central Bank works. I actually like it and like it more for where it is. I’m not sure why but it’s always appealed to me. Maybe it’s because I’ve grown up looking at it. Perhaps if they tried to build it now I’d be ripping into them on this disc.board.

    #712987
    Jas
    Participant

    I agree with Shane – the Central Bank works because its so strong – creats such a strong horizontal emphasis with the bold stripes of stone and glazing. For the record, one of the best architectural photos I ever saw was of the Central Bank with half demolished Temple Bar buildings in the foreground.

    #712988
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    great building, wrong site. What does this mean. Good architecture is, amongst other things, about working within the site restraints and harnessing the positive.

    #712989
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think that this should be built, but not at that site. It’s a lovely building, and about bloody time that Dublin got a tall building of any description (apart from Ballymun and that disgraceful heap of s*** that they call Liberty hall) It seems that you Dubs are very unwilling to build upwards – or perhaps it’s an bord pleanala’s fault. I don’t think that it’s the Architect’s anyway, most of them just lack a bit of imagination.
    I can imagine the public’s reaction to a large Deconstructivist development instead of the proposed!

    Ideas, anyone?

Viewing 12 posts - 21 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.