George’s Quay
- This topic has 31 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 26 years, 9 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- August 18, 1999 at 10:25 am #712978
john white
ParticipantHa ha.
‘School Of Design’.
Yeah. when I was in School we had lego bricks too.
John
October 1, 1999 at 9:27 am #712979MG
ParticipantGoing , going , gone!
October 1, 1999 at 10:12 am #712980john white
ParticipantMuch as I was worried about the size of that design and about the final reality’s faithfulness to the beatiful model – I’m quite sorry now that it’s gone.
My disapointment is heightened by the prospect of the corpulent black heaps that may stand in it’s place.
Woodquay? Compared these black behemoths it’ll seem like a graceful, light and air-filled palace.
John
October 1, 1999 at 10:46 am #712981Paul Clerkin
KeymasterPersonally, I actually liked the SOM development…. they were just rather unfortunate in that the site was lousy.
October 1, 1999 at 5:56 pm #712982Hugh Pearman
ParticipantSeven months after this exchange began, we have a result: sanity has prevailed. Maybe people don’t want Dublin to be like everywhere else after all.
But of course SOM will now come back with a new plan. Could not Dublin’s architects step forward with a good home-grown alternative, or are the days of professional co-operation now over?
October 2, 1999 at 3:03 pm #712983john white
ParticipantGod, I wish this had been proposed on a better site. Maybe then we’d have it.
The more I look at that model the more I think we’ve lost a new busarus. It had a similar daring, and in it’s organic looking curves I think, correct me if I’m wrong – would have been a totally new style for Ireland. I mean compare those light unexpected curves with a huge sqatty black shiny box with a point on top.
Point is though on that site – it would have been positively [dare I compliment him with bringing about a new phrase..] Stephenesque in it’s arrogant and supremacist disregard for it’s surroundings.
Could we get the Architects back for another go – someplace else?
John
October 4, 1999 at 2:58 pm #712984Rory W
ParticipantThats the trouble with this city, great buidings for the wrong site (Central Bank). John, I think you may be right there about losing out on another Busaras, no doubt they will find something nice in Brick with a clock tower to replace the planned (interesting) building!
Rory W
October 4, 1999 at 5:24 pm #712985Anonymous
InactiveOh Joy! Do you think so? With PVC Georgian Windows?
John
October 4, 1999 at 5:27 pm #712986Anonymous
InactiveNà aontaÃm leat a Rory. Sé an Banc Ceannanas ceann de na foirgnimh is fearr sa chathair – de mo thuairim ar aon nos. NÃl fhios agam cén fath – just, go bhfuil sé chomh direach as an ngnáth san ait sin go reitÃonn sé liom. Seafoid, ‘tá fhios agam !
Rory – for me anyway somehow the Central Bank works. I actually like it and like it more for where it is. I’m not sure why but it’s always appealed to me. Maybe it’s because I’ve grown up looking at it. Perhaps if they tried to build it now I’d be ripping into them on this disc.board.
October 4, 1999 at 5:47 pm #712987Jas
ParticipantI agree with Shane – the Central Bank works because its so strong – creats such a strong horizontal emphasis with the bold stripes of stone and glazing. For the record, one of the best architectural photos I ever saw was of the Central Bank with half demolished Temple Bar buildings in the foreground.
October 5, 1999 at 9:51 am #712988Anonymous
Inactivegreat building, wrong site. What does this mean. Good architecture is, amongst other things, about working within the site restraints and harnessing the positive.
December 22, 1999 at 11:44 pm #712989Anonymous
InactiveI think that this should be built, but not at that site. It’s a lovely building, and about bloody time that Dublin got a tall building of any description (apart from Ballymun and that disgraceful heap of s*** that they call Liberty hall) It seems that you Dubs are very unwilling to build upwards – or perhaps it’s an bord pleanala’s fault. I don’t think that it’s the Architect’s anyway, most of them just lack a bit of imagination.
I can imagine the public’s reaction to a large Deconstructivist development instead of the proposed!Ideas, anyone?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

