I’ve just received notification that an Enforcement Notice that was served against an unauthorised development in July 2005 is no longer applicable and that the court case has been struck out.
Can anyone explain why the local authority would dismiss these proceedings when the Enforcement was issued against a different file number.
The planning authority states that the development is currently being constructed in accordance with (file number)
There have been four adjournments on the previous case against the unauthoprised development and now I learn that the retention application overrides the proceedings that were issued against the unauthorised development.
Can anyone explain how this is so?