Electronic Voting. . . .

Home Forums Ireland Electronic Voting. . . .

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #707061
      garethace
      Participant

      Depends what kind of paper voting…

      I have a friend that volunteers for Elections Canada. In the last federal election, one, ONE ballot was lost in Alberta (like 3.5 million people, dunno how many voted). The guy ate it. Everyone involved had a lot of crap to deal with as a result. It was unusual for even one ballot to be lost.

      Every ballot that goes out has to come back. Every ballot is examined by an impartial representative, and representatives from all the parties running in that riding, at counting time.

      The error rate is very low, the reliability is very high, and it’s very hard to cheat. And it’s pretty damn cheap too. It’s labor intensive, but the labor is provided by volunteers.

      Is there any compelling reason to replace paper? Not that I can see. It would cost a fortune for very little (or possibly negative) benefit. Doing paper right is the way to go.

      http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/ubb.x?a=dl&s=50009562&f=174096756&x_id=1083344785&x_subject=Ireland+decides+against+e-voting+for+June+elections&x_link=http://arstechnica.com&x_ddp=Y

      Gee those Canadians are real organised aren’t they? I just decided to post this link for those of you particularly interested in the political end of the argument….. as it pertains to an awful lot of things… the built environment included.

      This here is about the closest statement I have seen by anyone, which sums up this whole issue for me in a nutshell:

      As a Democracy, America has flourished through a couple of centuries of humans counting the votes that humans cast. I see no reason why that which works should be considered “broken” and therefore in need of being “fixed.” It is better to dilute power than to concentrate it, and in my view the more *people* involved in the vote-counting proccess the less the likelihood of error or corruption in the process. E-voting it seems to me would greatly diminish the number of people directly involved in the heart of the vote-counting process, and that would be a *bad thing* in my view.

      Considering that a company comprised of only three people wrote the source code for this ‘Powervote’ program… I can quite easily understand and agree with this point of view.

      Any opinions?

    • #742676
      Anonymous
      Inactive

      Originally e-mailed by SPECKMONEY-ALERT

      AccuPoll Holdings Corp. (OTC BB: ACUP.OB)
      Federally Qualified Electronic Voting System
      Produces Auditable Proof of Vote
      Capitalizes on a $4 Billion Market Opportunity

      Current Price @ Close May-14 $1.82
      Short-term speculative target $5.50
      Short-term speculative profit 202%

      Expect ACUP to make noticeable gains in the next few trading days.

      Reacting to systemic problems in manual voting systems, such as “hanging chads” and confusing ballot layouts, President George W. Bush signed the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (“HAVA”) into law, a $3.9 billion initiative that established new requirements for centralized electronic voter registration systems. AccuPoll Holding Corp. (OTCBB:ACUP.OB) a leading developer of patent-pending electronic voting systems, is capitalizing on a $3.9 billion market opportunity by providing the only American made electronic voting system that produces a verifiable and auditable proof of vote. Offering best of breed technology, and having strategic alliances with firms such as Electronic Data Systems, Unisys Corporation and Lexmark International, AccuPoll’s federally-qualified electronic voting system has the potential to become the technology of choice by federal, state and local election administrators.

      On March 26, 2004, AccuPoll announced the federal qualification of its voting system by the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED), the organization that oversees standards established by the Federal Election Commission (FEC). The qualification of AccuPoll’s electronic voting facilitates the potential wide scale implementation and adoption of the company’s e-voting system by federal, state and local electoral administrators. In addition, AccuPoll is the only certified manufacturer that can deliver a paper verification, thereby meeting a significant stipulation regarding the audit capability of the election process.

      Favorable attributes of the company and its products include:

      AccuPoll’s technology is a patent-pending, certified electronic voting system. On October 23, 2002, the Company received confirmation from its IP law firm that the USPTO had issued a Notice of Recordation and Assignment dated September 19, 2002 for patent application no. 10/190,964. Patent application no. 10/190,964 had been on July 5, 2002
      ACUP’s E-voting system has the ability to simultaneously produce two different electronic audit trails, and a paper record or Proof of Vote
      Robust technology that is based on common standards (incorporates `XML’ or Extensible Markup Language, a universal language for describing and exchanging data)
      Strategic alliances with blue chip US based technology companies: Electronic Data Systems, Unisys Corporation, and Lexmark International
      Institutional investment: ABM Amro (Switzerland), Lemanik Funds (Italy) and BCL Bank (Switzerland) have taken equity positions in the Company
      On April 6, 2004, AccuPoll and AmCad, a leader in the implementation of automated technologies and solutions for state and local government agencies, announced a comprehensive agreement to distribute and support AccuPoll’s federally qualified voting system. As a provision of the agreement, AmCad will represent AccuPoll throughout Alabama, Delaware, Kansas, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia. AmCad will also represent AccuPoll in various California counties. AccuPoll’s President, Frank Wiebe noted, “AmCad is an expert in dealing with the intricacies of state and local government agencies. They will be a tremendous asset in the implementation of our recently-qualified electronic voting systems. Both companies are dedicated to providing the best automated solutions for government and to on-going voter education, qualities that will facilitate a smooth transition to our new electronic voting technology.”

      AccuPoll’s DRE Electronic Voting System

      The AccuPoll electronic voting system consists of one or more voting stations that offer an “ATM-like” interface to the voters, and which prepare and print ballots for machine or hand counting. These voting stations are connected via a local area network (“LAN”) to a voting administrative workstation. The LAN is not connected to any network outside the polling place during voting hours. Tampering with voting results is thus minimized, as there is no access to the system other than through the supervised polling place.

      At the same time that the “proof of vote” is printed, the voter’s choice is stored locally on the voting station and also immediately transmitted to the polling place voting administrative workstation. Thus, when the polling place closes, three redundant copies of the anonymous ballots are available:

      The electronic ballots recorded by each voting station.
      The electronic copies of each voting station’s ballots recorded on the voting administrative workstation.
      The voter verifiable printed Proof of Vote that the voter has deposited into the ballot box before leaving the polling place.
      Accordingly, each ballot is securely stored in multiple locations and forms that can be readily cross-audited against each of the other ballot representations.

      AccuPoll’s technology eliminates any possibility of compromise because the electronic ballot count is fully auditable against the paper ballot count and vice-versa. The paper ballots themselves are produced in both machine and human readable form so that an optical scanner can be used to count ballots. If required, a full hand count may also be conducted. Furthermore, after a polling place closing, the local election officials will be asked to insert a blank write-once CDROM into the voting administrative workstation. A copy of the ballots stored on the voting station, or the voting administrative workstation, will be written onto the CDROM thereby creating an indelible and permanent record of the vote. The CDROM will also contain the full XML (Extensible Markup Language, a universal language for describing and exchanging data.) specification that was used to create the ballot, thereby ensuring that the voting data can be correctly interpreted at any time in the future, across a number of platforms.

      Wrap-up

      AccuPoll Holding Corp. offers “best of breed” technology and, as such, represents a tremendous growth opportunity. The Company’s patent-pending technology is superior to anything currently available in the market. Notably, AccuPoll’s DRE electronic voting systems offers more features and flexibility than any of its competitors. AccuPoll has a lead on the competition, because barriers to entry, such as time to test and R & D expenses, are substantial. AccuPoll also has the advantage of being first to market, and as such, has developed brand recognition and a reputation as a leader in the field of electronic voting systems. AccuPoll holds a comprehensive US trademark, and is current in filing US Patent Office applications over key items of its electronic voting system, as it has taken steps to protect both its intellectual property and brand name in the marketplace.

      Strategic alliances with firms such as Electronic Data Systems, Unisys Corporation and Lexmark International, exemplify the quality of the Company’s partnerships and highlight the reliability of AccuPoll’s technology, systems and service capabilities. The Company’s relationship with the National Association of Secretaries of State, and its network of partners, alliances, and government affairs consultants, will help it achieve market penetration in the ten most populous States, that is, the States to first adopt new electronic voting systems. Lastly, AccuPoll’s state-of-the-art technology addresses government’s growing demand for improved voting technology, and meets all criteria, as defined by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (“HAVA”). The fact that the Company has demonstrated its AccuPoll voting system to United States Representatives, Secretaries of State, State legislators and local election officials since September 2001, suggests that the Company is a front runner in contract negotiations to become a supplier to US electorial administrative bodies. The short-term target for ACUP.OB is $5.50. <a href="

      The negative EPS would indicate that it doesn’t work anywhere, well its only taxpayers money after all” class=”bbcode_url”>

      The negative EPS would indicate that it doesn’t work anywhere, well its only taxpayers money after all

    • #742677
      garethace
      Participant

      Worth logging into http://www.augi.com and downloading the PDF magazines bymonthly issues…. there is a guy called David Kingsley, who writes a article on the back pages…. and the early issues in particular contain some very, very funny and interesting articles about early uses of technology.

      Here I have pasted up some for review, by some hardened old mainframe computer admins from the Apollo days… 🙂

      http://www.aceshardware.com/forum?read=115079153

      But the very notion of transporting very large amounts of digital data by traditional means like snail mail, isn’t that weird today all the same…. interview here with Jim Gray….

      http://www.acmqueue.org/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=43

      BTW, I hope you have been watching that very good SKY series called LAS VEGAS… quite strange world we live in…. and Las Vegas is definitely where all the tech stuff and surveillance all happens first.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.