Dublin Eastern Bypass feasibility report
- This topic has 26 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- March 25, 2009 at 9:59 am #806611
Anonymous
InactiveAs far as I’m aware the transport planners in this city, the DTO, are in favour of the eastern bypass. As for planning benefits, it obviously takes cars & trucks out of the city. It will probably have to be much more environmentally sensitive than the images shown. I don’t think it should be a priority but should be built nonetheless if the DTO numbers support. As for reducing car trips in the city, a congestion charge is the way to go.
March 25, 2009 at 11:27 am #806612Anonymous
Inactive@SunnyDub wrote:
As far as I’m aware the transport planners in this city, the DTO, are in favour of the eastern bypass. As for planning benefits, it obviously takes cars & trucks out of the city. It will probably have to be much more environmentally sensitive than the images shown. I don’t think it should be a priority but should be built nonetheless if the DTO numbers support. As for reducing car trips in the city, a congestion charge is the way to go.
it might just do that but until the planners draw a circle around the city and say that’s it you are dealing with an unknown quantity. But that would take a number of authorities to agree and then a party would get elected if they where to break it 😉 that’s planning:D here there and everywhere
March 25, 2009 at 5:37 pm #806613Anonymous
Inactive@Fergal wrote:
While this motorway is stupid, I would take Alonso up on saying that urban motorways are and Anglo-Saxon thing. Britain actually has an extremely sparse motorway network, and there are very few major motorways in city centres, with the exception of Glasgow, and Belfast the only other urban motorways in the UK are fragmentary pieces. Compare London with the M25 as its ring motorway to Paris which has 3 ring motorways, and Madrid which has 4.
I really really get so pissed off when people sprout assertions and opinions as fact. I’m going to be very calm and say you haven’ a fucking clue what your talking about.
Leeds, Coverntry, Birgmingham, Liverpool are just along of many that have inner motorways.
So your very wrong in everything you said.:rolleyes: Building motoways in cities is not a very anglo saxon thing. Lay off the bullshit please.
March 25, 2009 at 6:28 pm #806614Anonymous
InactiveBut it is very destructive and not only of no very obvious benefit, but extremely anti-urban.
March 25, 2009 at 7:37 pm #806615Anonymous
Inactive@dave123 wrote:
I really really get so pissed off when people sprout assertions and opinions as fact. I’m going to be very calm and say you haven’ a fucking clue what your talking about.
Leeds, Coverntry, Birgmingham, Liverpool are just along of many that have inner motorways.
So your very wrong in everything you said.:rolleyes: Building motoways in cities is not a very anglo saxon thing. Lay off the bullshit please.
I am not denying that the UK built urban motorways. I am saying they built less than anyone else. Leeds and Manchester have short stubs of motorway, destructive, but not large, Birmingham has a large number of motorways around it, but only one passes close to the city centre, the A38(M), and does not enter it, Liverpool does not have an urban motorway, although one was planned and later cancelled: the Liverpool Inner motorway, Coventry does not have a motorway, but it does have a highly destructive inner ring road.
Although the UK did indulge in building inner ring roads, so did every other western nation: Paris, for example was quite happy to knock down it’s ancient city walls to build the boulevard peripherique, and now has a larger urban motorway network than any UK city. Same with Madrid, cities in Germany, Portugal, all over the continent. The UK is different in that it never really invested in public transport infrastructure to the same extent, but it certainly did not build more roads.
The USA is king of the urban motorway – it is common to have 10 lane elevated structures meeting at 5 storey interchanges in American downtowns. There is nothing like that in the UK.March 25, 2009 at 8:43 pm #806616Anonymous
InactiveJust to clarify…. when I talk about the “Anglo Saxon Highway Model” i refer to the model of wider prevailing transportation policy and investment – the balance between mass transit and provision for the private car, not merely the location and design of their highways which are very different. Ireland, the UK and the US are far more reliant on the car for daily commuting than those on the continent and we design urban areas around the car more than Europeans. Only now, in these islands, are we beginnning to look at concepts like the Home Zone for example….
March 28, 2009 at 4:51 pm #806617Anonymous
InactiveWell I don’t care what happens as long as they don’t build that “viaduct”.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

