developments in cork
- This topic has 2,179 replies, 124 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
brainscan.
- AuthorPosts
- January 18, 2006 at 11:29 am #758873
corcaighboy
ParticipantWell, it would be quite a stretch to compare Cork Airport (or SNN for that matter) to any of the large airports here in Asia. Most of the airports over here are relatively new, well designed (norman foster did the HK one), and have had their development costs underwritten by their respective governments. Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur are all top class airports, complete with rail links to the city center. I can check in at the downtown HK station, hop on the train, and be at the terminal exactly 23 mins later. Hard to beat.
Irish airports (with the exception of DUB) are a mere drop in the ocean with regards to passenger throughput. Given that, you would think that travelling from Cork would be relatively hassle free experience. Instead, I get to experience the wonders of the magic roundabout. Whatever about the architecture of the new terminal (it DOES look good), the airport is simply in the wrong location. We seem to have a habit of that in Ireland…Knock is in a ‘foggy boggy’ no man’s land and Cork is perched on a frequently fog bound hill!January 19, 2006 at 12:15 pm #758874orion
ParticipantIt’s a sad day for archiseek when Thursdays Examiner is the only source of development news in Cork.
Mr Lexington where ever you are come back……..PLEASE……January 19, 2006 at 1:42 pm #758875Radioactiveman
ParticipantLets not knock the Examiner here, todays edition tells us that a planning application is due to be lodged shortly on Eddie Kenneally and Paul Montgomery site at the former Esso station on Western Road.
Apparently Derek Tynan is in talks with senior planners about designs for the site, thought to be 4 or 5 storey apartments. Fans of Tynan’s Victoria Cross student apartments will be pleased. Fans of good taste won’t be!!:D
Derek Tynan’s Victoria Cross Scheme
Ellesmere Properties Limited have withdrawn their appeall from An Bord Pleanala for the construction of a seven storey building incorporating a 125 no bed hotel, retail units, offices, modifications to 16 Lavitts Quay (a
protected structure) and car parking at a site bounded by Lavitts Quay, Half Moon Street & Paul’s Lane, Cork.
The site is now expected to be developed by OCP as part of their plans for the existing Paul Street Shopping Centre and in line with their ‘flagship’ developement across Paul’s Lane on Lavitts Quay.
An earlier proposal for the same site.January 20, 2006 at 2:14 am #758876A-ha
ParticipantI’ll keep it brief, and for lack of a better word…. it’s manky! Even the college students living there think the place is a joke. Although the inside is supposed to be top class.
January 22, 2006 at 8:33 pm #758877A-ha
ParticipantRadioactiveman…. how are those pictures of the County Hall coming along? It’s been so quiet here lately…. just because lex is gone, doesn’t mean we should abandon the place all together. Where is everyone… kite, ewan, anyone?
January 22, 2006 at 9:34 pm #758878ewankennedy
ParticipantI’m still here…:)
Didnt the South infirmary hospital lodge plans for the new Breastcheck extension there recently?? I figure O’Callaghans will lodge Academy street soon cos its the end of January like they had said they would.
January 23, 2006 at 2:00 pm #758879macai
ParticipantHi Guys, not to be taking away from the subject of the thread..
But I wonder did anyone see Joe Duffy’s latest cork bashing in one of the sunday papers yesterday
He was referring to the new airport terminal development and comments from lord mayor Deirdre Clune regarding funding of same
He was more or less stating The CAA should not start debt free, and expect dublin to pick up the tab for the new terminal as “dublin users don’t need to use cork airport” and “dublin airport is struggling to find the funds for a new terminal themselves” so why should we be loaded with the 160m in dublin.
I wonder has Joe forgotten a certain government promise!
Also in the same paper just a few weeks ago, he lashed out at the new county hall development stating it was an “ugly tower” all i’d say is look at liberty hall joe!
January 23, 2006 at 2:21 pm #758880Anonymous
InactiveAnyone see that Flor Griffn appealed that Oyster Developments scheme at Parnell Place but the appeal was thrown out as invalid, supposed to have been a couple of things wrong with the appeal………
January 24, 2006 at 3:56 pm #758881ewankennedy
ParticipantHmmm its very quiet here..
I really hope the Clontarf street project gets the go ahead. Like i said before I think the 9 storey height in this case is suited given the site. Think a decision is set for the end of this month. Also when is there going to be movement on Albert quay? Theres 2 sites there set for offices I think and it will really round off the quays in this area well. Referring back to a few posts by lex i think Ascon and Howards are involved there and construction on Eglington street is beginning at the end of Feb. Looking forward to it. Think Careys are next in line?? Great site but how will the deal with the Sextant pub there on the corner? Is it protected?January 24, 2006 at 4:56 pm #758882lawyer
Participant@ewankennedy wrote:
Hmmm its very quiet here..
I really hope the Clontarf street project gets the go ahead. Like i said before I think the 9 storey height in this case is suited given the site. Think a decision is set for the end of this month. Also when is there going to be movement on Albert quay? Theres 2 sites there set for offices I think and it will really round off the quays in this area well. Referring back to a few posts by lex i think Ascon and Howards are involved there and construction on Eglington street is beginning at the end of Feb. Looking forward to it. Think Careys are next in line?? Great site but how will the deal with the Sextant pub there on the corner? Is it protected?I dont think the Sextant is protected. In any case, Careys bought it some time ago.
January 24, 2006 at 8:13 pm #758883POM
ParticipantLooking forward to see what Howard and Ascon have planned for Albert Quay indeed. I heard Ascon might go in for planning by the summer but I always figured Howard would look to buy their site out…probably not given the price they paid for the Doyle warehouse, might not make sense. I just hope STW don’t give us another grey shocker. Anyone else been tallying up their buildings around Cork? Anglsea Street – grey, School of Pharmacy – grey, Webworks – grey…I think Lapps Quay is the only project of theirs with a bit of colour and life to it. If they pursue that cold grey look again Albert Quay could turn out to be very boring. Maybe another firm are working on thr project, but if its STW I just hope the inject a little life and style into the quay to compliment the fine job across the river at Lapps Quay.
Anyone know who is handling the Ascon design for Albert Qy? Tony Dennehy? Jack Coughlan? Other???
I don’t think the Sextant is protected but it would be nice to see it incorporated in ay new scheme in some sort of novel way.
January 24, 2006 at 10:20 pm #758884kite
ParticipantForgive me for going back to a group I am sure many see as a major pain in the backside but the CSD crowd have posted a letter on their website that they claim they sent to Joe Gavin (Cork City Manager) asking him to explain residents rights under the planning act.
If what they claim is correct it may explain how Victoria Mills (another pet hate of many, and mine) was ever allowed to be built?
Check out the letter on the news update page on http://www.corksouthwest.comJanuary 25, 2006 at 11:06 am #758885-Donnacha-
Participantthat csd website is like something a group of angry teenagers would produce -its pathetic.
i see jerry buttimer is quoted on the examiner again today (who provide him with a platform quite regularly) complaining about the mark kelleher proposals in bishopstown – now I dont know anything about the proposed development or its design but the Councillor’s response is predictable and says an awful lot about standards of public representation-
“Fine Gael Cllr Jerry Buttimer said the planning system was undemocratic and called for a moratorium on major developments in the area” “”The planners and developers are fast turning parts of the city into ghettos. We are creating living space for transient communities, with no emphasis on building community or promoting sustainable living” “How can it be correct that one anonymous person or two makes a decision in relation to an area, and ignores the concerns of local residents”
Jerry Buttimer is part of Cork City Council and understands how the planning system works and as a city councillor played an important part in adopting the city development plan – which is a reserved function of elected councillors – so the planning policies and objectives as detailed in the general land use sections of the city development plan and the specific objectives for the south west suburbs were democratically adopted – as part of those policies + objectives – the principle of sustainable development and proper planning is encouraged ie increasing density, reducing unnecessary travel, maximising land and infrastructure resources. i just think his attempt to remove himself from the system by portraying it as undemocratic is a bit dishonest and what i would describe as public misrepresentation
planning applications will go through the relevant and statutory processes – i assume residents and others submitted objections at local planning level – and can appeal the decision to ABP – that is their democratic right – those objections/appeals have to be considered as part of the decision making process (once they are not vexatious, irrelevant etc) – these planning applications are assessed by various persons who are qualified to make infomed judgements (planners, engineers, architects, etc) – i really dont understand why when an individual or group dont like a decision – its undemocratic + when a decision goes their way -its vindication
January 25, 2006 at 11:22 am #758886Anonymous
Inactive@kite wrote:
Forgive me for going back to a group I am sure many see as a major pain in the backside but the CSD crowd have posted a letter on their website that they claim they sent to Joe Gavin (Cork City Manager) asking him to explain residents rights under the planning act.
If what they claim is correct it may explain how Victoria Mills (another pet hate of many, and mine) was ever allowed to be built?
Check out the letter on the news update page on http://www.corksouthwest.comKite
Read that letter on the CSD webshite and really think that it shows them to up to be the goons that they are….the section of the Planning Act to which they refer and suggest that their “rights” have been ignored relate only to land owners…..they don’t own the lands so they are not entitled to pre-planning consultations. I don’t think having an “interest” in a site in legal terms extends to belonging to a bandwagon group of Councillors all trying to out do each other in the headlines in order to grab the votes of an aging population…..
January 25, 2006 at 5:08 pm #758887kite
Participant@bunch wrote:
that csd website is like something a group of angry teenagers would produce -its pathetic.
i see jerry buttimer is quoted on the examiner again today (who provide him with a platform quite regularly) complaining about the mark kelleher proposals in bishopstown – now I dont know anything about the proposed development or its design but the Councillor’s response is predictable and says an awful lot about standards of public representation-
“Fine Gael Cllr Jerry Buttimer said the planning system was undemocratic and called for a moratorium on major developments in the area” “”The planners and developers are fast turning parts of the city into ghettos. We are creating living space for transient communities, with no emphasis on building community or promoting sustainable living” “How can it be correct that one anonymous person or two makes a decision in relation to an area, and ignores the concerns of local residents”
Jerry Buttimer is part of Cork City Council and understands how the planning system works and as a city councillor played an important part in adopting the city development plan – which is a reserved function of elected councillors – so the planning policies and objectives as detailed in the general land use sections of the city development plan and the specific objectives for the south west suburbs were democratically adopted – as part of those policies + objectives – the principle of sustainable development and proper planning is encouraged ie increasing density, reducing unnecessary travel, maximising land and infrastructure resources. i just think his attempt to remove himself from the system by portraying it as undemocratic is a bit dishonest and what i would describe as public misrepresentation
planning applications will go through the relevant and statutory processes – i assume residents and others submitted objections at local planning level – and can appeal the decision to ABP – that is their democratic right – those objections/appeals have to be considered as part of the decision making process (once they are not vexatious, irrelevant etc) – these planning applications are assessed by various persons who are qualified to make infomed judgements (planners, engineers, architects, etc) – i really dont understand why when an individual or group dont like a decision – its undemocratic + when a decision goes their way -its vindication
Jerry Buttimer, enough said..Berni “wheres me teeth”Murphy, we really can pick them in Cork???
January 25, 2006 at 6:40 pm #758888orion
ParticipantJerry Buttimer in today’s Examiner calls for “a moratorium on major devlopments ” in his ward.
Its a pity his veiws only extent to Bishopstown and not to his GAA buddies Devlopment @Victoria Mills.
Is this guy for real in thinking the planning processes final decision to grant must be a democratic decision imagine that trying to work in todays Celtic Tiger economy.
God help us if this guy every tries for the Dail,what a clown.January 25, 2006 at 7:04 pm #758889Saucy Jack
Participant@orion wrote:
Jerry Buttimer in today’s Examiner calls for “a moratorium on major devlopments ” in his ward.
Its a pity his veiws only extent to Bishopstown and not to his GAA buddies Devlopment @Victoria Mills.
Is this guy for real in thinking the planning processes final decision to grant must be a democratic decision imagine that trying to work in todays Celtic Tiger economy.
God help us if this guy every tries for the Dail,what a clown.Its all political attention seeking and image enhancing behaviour.Total gimp unworthy of any votes – EVER.
We’ll see him go very quiet when Bishopstown G.A.A. and Highfield come up for development in the next few years.Total nonsense as ever in todays Irish Examiner fron Fine Gaels Mr.Buttimer.January 25, 2006 at 9:57 pm #758890ToMuchFreeTime
ParticipantWell i got to say driving around the city these days is quiet Surreal these days with construction sites spring up all around the city it’s great to see cork booming and may i say about time because we didn’t get our fair share of the celtic tiger in the early years. but we are sure catching up fast.:D ๐ ๐
and with the huge amount of space the docklands can afford us the city is going to be almost unreckonisable within 5-15 years and for the best. there is some massive plans in the pipeline such asEglinton Street starting next month and major retails development plans going to be lodged soon for the city centre i.e. Academy Street etc. Also the jobs front looks good with 1,400 new high paid jobs been announced in two days theres huge confidance in the city at the moment. and a very good write up in the lastest loney planet guide about cork. alls looking good
another thing i heard the population of cork city is ment to be down again with a huge amount of people now living outside city boundaries but still within the urban make up of the city. why doesn’t city hall look for a boundry extention which is badly needed, and would help making planning for the city for the future and bring in extra money . limerick , waterford and a few others are activly looking for extentions. in waterfords case i dont know why they are looking for an extention and they have huge sways of green fields within the boundry which isn’t the case with cork.:confused:One last thing just a bit of fun who do you think will put planning into city hall first
1. The retail development on grand parade to incorporate a number of shops and one old shabby cinema
OR
2. The redevelopment of the train station and everything that goes with it (History of draging feet)
Time frames anybody????
January 25, 2006 at 10:48 pm #758891kite
Participant@orion wrote:
Jerry Buttimer in today’s Examiner calls for “a moratorium on major devlopments ” in his ward.
Its a pity his veiws only extent to Bishopstown and not to his GAA buddies Devlopment @Victoria Mills.
Is this guy for real in thinking the planning processes final decision to grant must be a democratic decision imagine that trying to work in todays Celtic Tiger economy.
God help us if this guy every tries for the Dail,what a clown.๐ฎ Every time i see Cllr.Buttimer i expect to see a ring in his nose, thats all he is short,the way the residents and csd seem to lead him on to do their bidding.
January 26, 2006 at 1:42 am #758892POM
Participant@kite wrote:
๐ฎ Every time i see Cllr.Buttimer i expect to see a ring in his nose, thats all he is short (excuse the pun) the way the residents and csd seem to lead him on to do their bidding.
I am of the same frame of mind about our councillors but its not just Jerry Buttimer…and I think people posting such perhaps watch their choice of wording when expressing disappointment at their public representatives.
As for who will have the application in first, Horgans Quay or Grand Parade retail scheme…God knows the former has been ongoing for nearly 9 years. I’ve no faith in CIE or the Government to deliver with their private developer…as far as I’m concerned we’ll probably see the retail scheme under construction before we ever see a crane over Horgans Quay.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

