developments in cork
- This topic has 2,179 replies, 124 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by
brainscan.
- AuthorPosts
- November 2, 2005 at 1:49 pm #758373
-Donnacha-
ParticipantIn reality, the percentage of people in the state living in the GDA (were it accurately represented) would be closer to a half. Moreover, it has seen a huge increase in population in the last 15 years, far ahead of what public services could keep pace with. The plan is Dublin centric because (a), the state is, and (b) public transport requires economics of scale and critical mass to be justified. The WRC, on the other hand, has neither, is is included in this plan purely for the optics.
The critical issue ignored in the NSS and Transport 21, but not in the Buchanan Report, is that in a country the size of Ireland, there are a very limited number of urban centres that can hope to generate self sustaining critical mass. In reality, there are two outside of Dublin. Targeting critical infrastructure at these would facilitate the development of these ‘growth poles’ and allow a more sustainable rate of growth for Dublin. Due to the vagaries of PR-STV and our parish pump politics, no competent politician is going to say this however. And instead we are left with a situation whereby Dublin gets the lions share of the funding (because it has been allowed to sprawl unchecked), and everywhere else gets some sweeties too, mainly because they’ve been good little boys and girls. The recent announcement merely contributes to that spiral of centralism.
The problem now is that Dublin (and that boondoggle in the west) is going to suck up funding for the next 10 years, while Cork sits and becomes a very real problem as it grows under its own steam. There are steps that can be taken in the short term, (why does Cork not have its own transport authority or even bus company for example, or higher density development in the city itself) in the longer term, Cork is going to need what is politely known as macro economic transfers. And that is not just for some grand strategic vision (as in the next CASP), but for the basic necessities of getting around. At current rates of growth, Cork County will have a population of over half a million shortly, and will maintain (roughly) its percentage of the population of the state. Where is the matching funding to support that growth?
November 2, 2005 at 5:30 pm #758374Pug
ParticipantQuote:why does Cork not have its own transport authority or even bus company for example/Quote:thats spot on in fairnes, I was just back from Berlin when I heard about the transport plan and laughed in pity at MArtin Cullen as he re announced all the major transport announcements for the last few years. Cant believe we STILL dont have proper transport i.e. no bus after half eleven at night.November 2, 2005 at 5:56 pm #758375Saucy Jack
ParticipantBerlin had its U-Bahn,S-Bahn & Trams destroyed 60 years ago. Here we ripped out Corks & Irelands infrastructure with very little foresight for the future.Even if we had the tram system that we had in 1931 it would be a massive tourist attraction if nothing else similar to San Francisco’s.Cork City Council and County council is full of transport plans,area action plans,development plans,special area plans etc gathering dust in there.Martin Cullens plan is a hospital pass for him – it wont happen,on time or on budget.Remember the voting machine fiasco.You can travel within a few blocks of most destinations in Berlin as a high density city even out to the suburbs.We now are going to have a 3-storey low density city in Cork apart from 2 or 3 areas.
Our elected TD’s,councillors and planners have a lot to answer for.November 2, 2005 at 6:05 pm #758376lexington
Participant
😎 The Bowen Group are to be refused planning on their proposal to develop 55-apartments over a 6-storey block, with 10 townhouses and some community related provisions on a strip of land to the eastern periphery of Musgrave Park Rugby Grounds. The Wilson Architecture designed project – led by Paud O’Mahony, also catered for 93 ground floor parking spaces. The ruling will come following recognition that the permission sought is in contravention with the Cork City Development Plan 2004, concerning loss of recreational grounds to development. This leaves Bowen Construction in a difficult position regarding options, and for Munster Rugby by extension.
November 2, 2005 at 6:13 pm #758377ewankennedy
Participant@Saucy Jack wrote:
You can travel within a few blocks of most destinations in Berlin as a high density city even out to the suburbs.We now are going to have a 3-storey low density city in Cork apart from 2 or 3 areas.
Our elected TD’s,councillors and planners have a lot to answer for.Do you think the councillors realise what theyre doing is wrong and just thinking about the next vote? Or are they so filled up with their own sense of self-righteousness that they cant see they are making a critical mistake??
By the way how does the Transport plan affect Horgans quays redevelopment? Or does it at all?? Is funding now in place to redevelop the station as Mr Cullen promised back in June? He said an application along with the Manor park homes plan would now proceed back then??
November 2, 2005 at 6:21 pm #758378altuistic
Participantlexington wrote:Housing AwardHighly-Commended
Project: Student Housing, Victoria Cross, Cork
Architects: DerekTynan Associates, Dublin
Contractor: Bowen Construction Ltd, Cork

The repetitive and cellular nature of student housing has not been allowed, in this instance, to give rise to a bland and boring project. The “zig-zag†building creates a dynamic series of spaces on a beautiful site between two rivers. The varying building height culminates in a fitting dramatic cantilever at the apex of the site. We admired the rigorous detailing of the exterior wall plane]
Gobsmacked isnt the word!!! ‘Repetitive’, ‘cellular’ not allowed? are we looking at the same building??!!
November 2, 2005 at 7:02 pm #758379phatman
ParticipantI sense Lexington is having a bit of a laugh…well I hope he is..
November 2, 2005 at 7:18 pm #758380kite
Participant@phatman wrote:
I sense Lexington is having a bit of a laugh…well I hope he is..
:confused: Somehow i dont think he is, a story in todays IE by Tom Barker seems to back up what Lex said.
Gives the councillors that voted for the 3 storey cap an excuse to say “we are right ???”November 2, 2005 at 11:40 pm #758381who_me
Participant@lexington wrote:
😎 The Bowen Group are to be refused planning on their proposal to develop 55-apartments over a 6-storey block, with 10 townhouses and some community related provisions on a strip of land to the eastern periphery of Musgrave Park Rugby Grounds. The Wilson Architecture designed project – led by Paud O’Mahony, also catered for 93 ground floor parking spaces. The ruling will come following recognition that the permission sought is in contravention with the Cork City Development Plan 2004, concerning loss of recreational grounds to development. This leaves Bowen Construction in a difficult position regarding options, and for Munster Rugby by extension.
While I’m very much in favour of preserving the green areas in the city, this is a real kick in the teeth for Munster. I’m sure the development of that land would have provided a good deal of cash towards a much needed refurbishment of Musgrave and/or Thomond Park. This must surely decrease the value of the lands significantly.
Incidentally, I just read elsewhere that Nemo Rangers have supposedly just sold their pitches (not very far from Musgrave Park). Do similar restrictions not apply there, or could someone have purchased them for recreational purposes? Highly unlikely, I’d have thought.
November 3, 2005 at 12:17 am #758382pier39
Participant@who_me wrote:
While I’m very much in favour of preserving the green areas in the city, this is a real kick in the teeth for Munster. I’m sure the development of that land would have provided a good deal of cash towards a much needed refurbishment of Musgrave and/or Thomond Park. This must surely decrease the value of the lands significantly.
Incidentally, I just read elsewhere that Nemo Rangers have supposedly just sold their pitches (not very far from Musgrave Park). Do similar restrictions not apply there, or could someone have purchased them for recreational purposes? Highly unlikely, I’d have thought.
point accepted but in fairness its not wilsons best design by any stretch. difficult site yes, loss of the cash for munster rugby yes, but it doesnt suit the site. besides it would have meant a loss of all those nice trees. im very sure munster rugby have a few tricks up their sleeves re musgrave park for us yet. theyre a talented bunch of lads at wilsons and if the issue is addressed again im sure they can come up with a nice lil gem.
and now for a joke why not…
what do you call 2 apples???
a pair!!! (or pear!!!) whichever reads funnier. hmmm it seemed a lot funnier when my friends when my friends were crawling out of the pub over the jazz weekend. 😀
November 3, 2005 at 10:27 am #758383rebel_city
ParticipantI saw a few posts back that there may be development on Clontarf Street. For some reason I can’t remember where that actually is. I’ve tried looking at maps online and still cannot locate it! Can someone let me know, and also what development is planned for there if any? Cheers.
November 3, 2005 at 10:44 am #758384Pug
Participantlook, we all know the transport system is rubbish and it kills me to see a givernment patting themselves on the back for proposing plans (not even implementing them yet) with vague timelines to put in a transport network that is 20 years late. And Noel Dempsey putting up posters of himself pictured in front of an ageing, decrepit rail engine is the epitomy of what FF are proposing. Only way to get rid of them lads is not to vote for them.
Anyhow, lets get this thread back to its purpose before Lex goes off in a huff (lex, if this website ever closes down, I have one waiting for your dazzling info).
ANyw word on Frinailla and their watercourse road? Disgraceful to see those councillors voting against that higher than 3 storey thing as well, would love to see their average age.
Anyone know whats going on with that building on your left next to Fred Zeppelins as you go over the bridge from georges quay to turn left on to South Mall? presume its office.
November 3, 2005 at 11:02 am #758385lexington
Participant😀 When Reliance Bearings Company put their premises of just under 0.5acres at Anderson’s Quay on the market in early summer of this year – much speculation amounted what would become of this prime site at the epicentre of Cork’s emerging and vibrant new office quarter. Up to 4 solid bids were secured by Hamilton Osbourne King who were handling the sale – which guided at approximately €5m. Interest came from as far as Dublin, but in the end, the property was sold for a figure over €2m in excess of the guide to O’Callaghan Properties (OCP).
It has emerged, and which was published in the press today as I understand it, that OCP have enlisted Wilson Architecture to provide the design on a landmark office development of over 100,000sq ft. Reports that OCP had entered discussions with Tommy Maher regarding his adjoining premises to the west (which he purchased from OFC previously), the CSPCA and the proprietors of the Tyre Fitting premises. The possibility that OCP will commence discussions with the Simon Community premises to the east, would open the potential for an impressive development site. The office building is expected to peak at up to 6-storeys and be built of a large basement car-park for between 130 to 150 cars with retail usage on the ground floor.

Perhaps impressed with Wilson Architecture efforts across the river at St. Patrick’s Quay for Paul Kenny, OCP will now seek to replicate a similarly impressive quayside structure. The Anderson’s Quay development will be flanked by new developments at Clontarf Street (revised drawings expected to be submitted soon), Deane Street and Lapps Quay. A planning application on this new proposal is not likely until sometime early in the new year.
:confused: Curiously, it would seem – though it was believed refusal was to be enforced on Bowen Construction plans for 55 apartments & 10 townhouses to the east of Musgrave Park, the company has been permitted a time extension until August of 2006. This extension will allow the developers and their architects (Wilson Architecture) formulate a discussion period with planners and in which options and any revised plans may likely be issued.
@Pug wrote:Anyhow, lets get this thread back to its purpose before Lex goes off in a huff
:p Not an issue – besides transport is an important factor in any area’s development and associated infastructure ultimately has an impact on the type of new structures produced, and by extension, their design.
As for the corner building on South Mall/Parliament Street – Michael Corbett is renovating the premises as far as I’m aware.
@rebel city wrote:I saw a few posts back that there may be development on Clontarf Street. For some reason I can’t remember where that actually is. I’ve tried looking at maps online and still cannot locate it! Can someone let me know, and also what development is planned for there if any? Cheers.
The site is located between Clontarf and Deane Streets, it is the small triangular site visible on one of the images in the first section of this post. DAT Partnerships are seeking a 9-storey office development on the site, designed by Daniel Luxton of Coughlan de Keyser. However a revised design is to be submitted which includes height reductions to the southern elevation.
November 3, 2005 at 1:02 pm #758386POM
Participant@lexington wrote:
You can get a good sense of how the area is developing from the above photo. Factor in the proposed developments, including the O’Callaghan one on Andersens Quay (it is my understanding that it will not include the Simon Community premises), Dean St, Clontarf St., Albert Quay and Eglington St and you can picture how much this area has come on – for the better in my opinion. I know its up for lease but what are the chance Catherin Neville will let you on 4 Lapps Quay and allow for a redevelopment opportunity there? I’d very much like to see the warehousing to the rear facing onto Oliver Plunkett Street Lower redeveloped as part of a larger project including 4 Lapps Quay. An extension to No.5 Lapps Quay to the rear wouldnt go astray either.
November 3, 2005 at 1:23 pm #758387Saucy Jack
ParticipantGreat photo of that area which always had potential for riverside development. If only the custom house buildings could be restored and opened up for bar/cafe/art gallery/restaurant/tourism type retail where the 2 branches of the Lee meet.These buildings are excellent and neglected for so long.Imagine if these were in a prominent location in Dublin ?
Is there or will there be enough demand for all the new office space in this area considering that O’Flynns AnPost site scheme is also due to start next year.November 3, 2005 at 2:38 pm #758388lexington
Participant🙂 Cork City Council have announced a tender for the preparation of an Economic Study for Docklands Development. It will involve the review of strategic planning and development policy along with an economic review and sectoral opportunity analysis including a review of the latest economic information and forecasts, evaluation and identification of potential target markets and assessment of the competitive positioning of the Cork Docklands Development opportunity.
Details of the study tender may be found here.
🙂 Plans to construct two separate two storey commercial blocks incorporating commercial / office units on the existing car-park grounds of Hollyhill S.C. have been granted. Approx. 728 sq m of space will be provided, with the application in the name of Denis Scannell, Clonakility. It should add a much need touch to the existing facility.
@Saucy Jack wrote:Is there or will there be enough demand for all the new office space in this area considering that O’Flynns AnPost site scheme is also due to start next year.
The office element of Eglinton Street is only 30,000sq ft (approx) divided among 7-own door units.
November 3, 2005 at 3:13 pm #758389pier39
Participant@lexington wrote:
😀 When Reliance Bearings Company put their premises of just under 0.5acres at Anderson’s Quay on the market in early summer of this year – much speculation amounted what would become of this prime site at the epicentre of Cork’s emerging and vibrant new office quarter. Up to 4 solid bids were secured by Hamilton Osbourne King who were handling the sale – which guided at approximately €5m. Interest came from as far as Dublin, but in the end, the property was sold for a figure over €2m in excess of the guide to O’Callaghan Properties (OCP).
It has emerged, and which was published in the press today as I understand it, that OCP have enlisted Wilson Architecture to provide the design on a landmark office development of over 100,000sq ft. Reports that OCP had entered discussions with Tommy Maher regarding his adjoining premises to the west (which he purchased from OFC previously), the CSPCA and the proprietors of the Tyre Fitting premises. The possibility that OCP will commence discussions with the Simon Community premises to the east, would open the potential for an impressive development site. The office building is expected to peak at up to 6-storeys and be built of a large basement car-park for between 130 to 150 cars with retail usage on the ground floor.

Perhaps impressed with Wilson Architecture efforts across the river at St. Patrick’s Quay for Paul Kenny, OCP will now seek to replicate a similarly impressive quayside structure. The Anderson’s Quay development will be flanked by new developments at Clontarf Street (revised drawings expected to be submitted soon), Deane Street and Lapps Quay. A planning application on this new proposal is not likely until sometime early in the new year.
would be nice if ocallaghans took in the simon site as well. it may give the simon community the money and opportunity to fund a nice high quality city facility in an alternative location and allow for the quayside at andersons to be revitalised. probably wont happen but who knows mr ocallaghan has surprised us all before!!! it also brings ocallaghans into the frame in a part of the city both howard and oflynns were quick to move on. howard have something of a near monopoly in the district with oflynns not far behind (by the way hear oflynns are taking the unlimited liability path! oooo!) very anxious to see how albert quay turns out. will oflynns and/or ascon get a say or will howard dominate the quayside as they pretty much down at city quarter? i cant wait to find out! the area is finally starting to look like a real city. and whats impressed me most is how it still seems to have managed to maintain its cork character. a credit to the design and development teams. the city should look well this end in a few years. what do careys have up their sleeve back on albert quay??
November 3, 2005 at 3:49 pm #758390Saucy Jack
ParticipantWell if you compare Howards City Quarter and O’Flynns Lapps Quay development there is a massive difference in design and quality of finish in both schemes.City Quarter is OK .City Quarter is poor at the riverfront corners with a glass block drum rising full height in the one area where you would get great views down river. Lapps Quay could be on the beachfront in Miami with the awful colours and curtain walling.Plus the boardwalk should have been extended to City Hall bridge as we still have cars parked head on to the river in 2005.The planners should have got with O’Flynns and the other users there to upgrade this area as a condition of planning etc.
November 3, 2005 at 4:00 pm #758391-Donnacha-
ParticipantLex, is the last report listed in the bibliography of that tender document publicly available? (“The Competitiveness of Cork: An Economic Analysis”)
November 3, 2005 at 5:36 pm #758392ivuernis
Participant@lexington wrote:
Housing Award
Highly-Commended
Project: Student Housing, Victoria Cross, Cork
Architects: DerekTynan Associates, Dublin
Contractor: Bowen Construction Ltd, Cork

The repetitive and cellular nature of student housing has not been allowed, in this instance, to give rise to a bland and boring project. The “zig-zag†building creates a dynamic series of spaces on a beautiful site between two rivers. The varying building height culminates in a fitting dramatic cantilever at the apex of the site. We admired the rigorous detailing of the exterior wall plane]
It’s a travesty that this ever got planning permission. I am at a loss to understand how this ever got the go-ahead in the first place when other smaller developments in the city, i.e. between 3 and 6 stories, routinely get knocked back. It is like something out of a Soviet-bloc communist-era country. If I had my way I’d take a wrecking ball to this blot on the landscape of the city with ferocity and glee. Registered and posted for the first time to get this off my chest as I pass this eyesore nearly everyday and it pains me to have to look at it.
@lexington wrote:
Heritage Award
Award Winner
Project: Lifetime Lab, Former City Waterworks, Cork
Architects: Jack Coughlan Architects, Cork
Contractor: John F Supple Ltd, Cork

New uses for old buildings can create a positive tension whose successful resolution can add rather than subtract from the end result. This is the case in the former Cork City Waterworks where the dilapidated 19th century buildings have been re-invigorated for educational purposes. Cork City Council and UCC deserve full credit for their imagination as clients and design-brief makers. The architect and contractor have matched that imagination with the successful restoration of an important landmark building.
On the other hand, I love what there doing with the old waterworks. Highly commendable indeed. Does anyone think a pedestrian bridge from nearby the waterworks on the Lee Road across to the Lee fields would be a good idea?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


