DCC’s definition of a Sex Shop
- This topic has 11 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by
admin.
- AuthorPosts
- July 20, 2007 at 4:48 pm #709493
Devin
ParticipantMy attention was aroused by the definition of a sex shop given in DCC’s new Special Planning Control Scheme for Grafton Street, which is reproduced here:
‘Sex shop
A retail outlet, which inter alia rents or presents for viewing sexually explicit material or films, including videos, clothing, sex aids and toys.’Now this has left me in the dark, because, as far as I was aware, the primary purpose of these places is to sell the goods in question, with the renting and viewing coming a firm second. If anybody else can penetrate DCC’s thinking in this regard, knock it up here.
And the punctuation is in a state of undress. It says:
‘A retail outlet, which inter alia rents or presents for viewing sexually explicit …..’
But I suggest a new position for the commas:
‘A retail outlet which, inter alia, rents or presents for viewing sexually explicit …..’
They just can’t be arsed doing it properly!
- July 20, 2007 at 5:17 pm #790360
Anonymous
Inactive@Devin wrote:
My attention was aroused by the definition of a sex shop given in DCC’s new Special Planning Control Scheme for Grafton Street, which is reproduced here:
‘Sex shop
A retail outlet, which inter alia rents or presents for viewing sexually explicit material or films, including videos, clothing, sex aids and toys.’Now this has left me in the dark, because, as far as I was aware, the primary purpose of these places is to sell the goods in question, with the renting and viewing coming a firm second. If anybody else can penetrate DCC’s thinking in this regard, knock it up here.
And the punctuation is in a state of undress. It says:
‘A retail outlet, which inter alia rents or presents for viewing sexually explicit …..’
But I suggest a new position for the commas:
‘A retail outlet which, inter alia, rents or presents for viewing sexually explicit …..’
They just can’t be arsed doing it properly!
Did I miss any? 😀 (Please don’t say ‘outlet’!)
Apologies- giddy Friday afternoon frivolity.
- July 20, 2007 at 5:50 pm #790361
Anonymous
InactiveA good score, ctesiphon! – but there are one or two more!!
- July 20, 2007 at 6:01 pm #790362
Anonymous
Inactive@ctesiphon wrote:
Did I miss any? 😀 (Please don’t say ‘outlet’!)
Apologies- giddy Friday afternoon frivolity.
hahaha good one 😀
- July 20, 2007 at 6:31 pm #790363
Anonymous
InactiveGood point. Press office closed. Will investigate next week.
- July 20, 2007 at 8:29 pm #790364
Anonymous
Inactive@Devin wrote:
A good score, ctesiphon! – but there are one or two more!!
I thought I was stretching a bit with ‘Control’ but apparently there’s more?
@Devin wrote:
They just can’t be arsed doing it properly!
That’s the only extra one I can find. Seems obvious in hindsight. 😉
Oh no, I’ve just seen another… 😮
- July 21, 2007 at 11:54 am #790365
admin
KeymasterDevin
This is obscene you should shout your lewd elsewhere
‘Presents’ is tight enough as it covers ‘offer for sale’ as provocative display may lead to expressions of interest which may or not become limp
- July 21, 2007 at 4:39 pm #790366
Anonymous
Inactivectesiphon wrote:That’s the only extra one I can find. Seems obvious in hindsight. ]Hahaha! Well I won’t confirm whether that one was intended or not, as it’s a bit close to the, eh, bone (:o)However in the dark was also (un)intended …
And you also spotted one which I did not (un)intend ………. confused & distracted now ….
- July 21, 2007 at 5:00 pm #790367
Anonymous
InactiveIf your mothers knew what you got up to on the internet…
I’d suggest a good spanking is in order, but fear that may also be misconstrued.
- July 21, 2007 at 7:36 pm #790368
Anonymous
Inactive@PVC King wrote:
‘Presents’ is tight enough as it covers ‘offer for sale’ as provocative display may lead to expressions of interest which may or not become limp
Surely you mean ‘expressions of interest that may be subject to a withering clause’?
I used to think your name referred to the window type, but now I’m not so sure.
- July 21, 2007 at 7:45 pm #790369
Anonymous
InactiveWhen I came across this thread I decided to go down through to see if I could find anything stimulating. My interest proved premature and I couldn’t keep it up. As such I wish to withdraw…
I’ll get me coat.
heh heh “coat” - July 22, 2007 at 2:43 am #790370
admin
KeymasterNow you I didn’t call meself latex lad
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
