Convention centre
- This topic has 271 replies, 75 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by
a_slight_hitch.
- AuthorPosts
- September 7, 2008 at 8:30 am #713643
shanekeane
Participant@JoePublic wrote:
Spoil-sport: Sorry, I can let all your other spelling mistakes go, but, I-G-N-O-R-A-N-T
What a complete asshole you are. And a hypocritical one at that.
September 7, 2008 at 8:50 am #713644notjim
Participant@spoil_sport wrote:
I’m tired of this “it’s better than what’s there” argument, what is arround it is pretty ugly, granted, but that’s like comparing it to the ugly person who hangs out with uglier pople to make themselves look good. While I cannot think of a good convention centre off the top of my head but it is essentially a place of gathering, like an auditorium, or a stadium, and I’m sure we can muster up a few god examples of those. Again I don’t buy the it’s beter than other version of its type argument, that dosen’t qualify it as good.
“how it fails relative to its function”I think you might have misunderstood me on this point; I wasn’t implying that its function excused ugliness, rather, that ugliness, in the sense of a certain awkwardness and brutality, helped express its function and that there was a virtue in that; further, I don’t think that its surroundings excuse a poor building, but, rather, that a certain corporate monumentality is normal to dockland reclamations and therefore, in this case, help establish a sense of this place. I think, while not beautiful in a lyrical sense, it is impressive, muscular, honest and still playful.
September 7, 2008 at 9:02 am #713645johnny21
ParticipantHeres a render for yous!!!:p
September 7, 2008 at 10:18 am #713646spoil_sport
ParticipantI am but a half man without a spellcheck.
September 7, 2008 at 10:45 am #713647notjim
ParticipantI always find it so sad when people are proud of their spelling, it is such an outdated skill; it is like being proud of knowing Morse code or being good at ballroom dancing.
September 7, 2008 at 11:06 am #713648GregF
ParticipantLooks a very good render of the NCC!
September 7, 2008 at 11:10 am #713649GregF
ParticipantI agree, very good point shanekeane!
September 7, 2008 at 10:22 pm #713650JoePublic
ParticipantSpoil-sport: Sorry for the silly cheap shot.
Carry on folks.
September 7, 2008 at 10:58 pm #713651ihateawake
ParticipantTime to kill in town… lousy camera phone, sorry.
Really does look quite big up close… Should be pretty epic if the hotel gets passed ABP.


AIG needs to burn.


Could be my phone or eyes but this looks pink to me


Dont know what this is behind, the centre or hotel…

The thing beside it…


Excavations beside it for something else, what is it does anyone know?

yeeeahp, lot of time to kill, crap shots sorry… meh
September 7, 2008 at 11:21 pm #713652GregF
ParticipantGood photos Ihateawake!
September 7, 2008 at 11:39 pm #713653johnny21
ParticipantGood photos. ihateawake the building is liam carrolls development. AIB HQ. More renders on architects website. http://www.totarch.ie
September 7, 2008 at 11:54 pm #713654ihateawake
ParticipantCheers, I was under the impression that AIB would be a high rise, no?
September 8, 2008 at 12:03 am #713655johnny21
ParticipantNo i think they have made an agreement with liam at a price they couldnt refuse!!!
September 8, 2008 at 12:16 am #713656shanekeane
Participantthe render of the convention centre above with the lavender sky and the twinkly lights irritates me beyond my ability to express. the river does not look like that, the sky does not look like that, and the surrounding building do not look like that. the whole area looks grey and industrial. maybe if people were honest with these renders then so much unsuitable stuff would not be built in this country. is there no taking account of the light conditions when building in this country? if people took into account the greyness of the climate in dublin, then maybe they wouldn’t be building grey buildings all over the place.
September 8, 2008 at 1:52 am #713657ihateawake
Participant@johnny21 wrote:
No i think they have made an agreement with liam at a price they couldnt refuse!!!
Kewl, more monotony so…
September 8, 2008 at 7:47 am #713658constat
ParticipantCan anyone tell me why they bother putting flags in front of buildings, such as those shown in the ICC render?
If I’m a Portuguese or Chinese national and don’t see my nation’s flag amongst the other six or seven usuals, am I supposed to feel a little less welcome?
Who decides which flag should be hoisted?
Perhaps it has something to do with languages spoken at the reception desk? Always found this flag business a little mysterious!:confused:September 8, 2008 at 8:26 am #713659Anonymous
InactiveThe PWC building really doesn’t work with it at all, particularly when looking west. STW obviously decided to completely ignore the NCC when ‘designing’ their lesson in architectural monotony.

Thanks for pics ihateawake.
September 8, 2008 at 1:36 pm #713660GregF
ParticipantThat PWC building is very ugly. The hoizontal lines looks kinda fussy.
More use of shiny and relective glass instead of dull concrete in the docks please to liven up the place!
September 8, 2008 at 5:40 pm #713661d_d_dallas
ParticipantArghhhhh Citibank and PWC… both STW
September 8, 2008 at 9:27 pm #713662cgcsb
Participant@johnny21 wrote:
Good photos. ihateawake the building is liam carrolls development. AIB HQ. More renders on architects website. http://www.totarch.ie
Do you mean the building in the picture is AIB? if so, why does it say Anglo Irish Bank on the front? Is the building behind it Block G?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

