college green/ o’connell street plaza and pedestrians
- This topic has 683 replies, 83 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 5 months ago by
missarchi.
- AuthorPosts
- October 22, 2004 at 3:54 pm #746072
cod
ParticipantIt is imperative that college green is pedestrianised. People have to make choices every day whether to use the car to make a particular journey. I think that if traffic was restricted into the heart of the city, people will be resourceful and use other forms of transport or not make any unnecessary journeys. I recently cycled through D’olier st and College Green ( I am a car owner) and it proved to be a very scary experience being sandwiched between speeding cars and stretched buses. I also had the same scary experience crossing college green as a pedestrian. The centre of the Dublin should be designed to allow generous unimpeded pedestrian access from Stephens Green all the way to Parnell St. This can only be accomplished through a massive reduction in motor traffic going though college green and a large reduction in lane provision on D’olier/ Westmoreland St. It is a simple and straightforward idea and it requires bravery and innovative thinking by the city authorities. How they go about this ..that is another question but they cannot be heavily influenced by lobby groups with short term aspirations…..
October 22, 2004 at 5:39 pm #746073Devin
ParticipantUnfortunately, cod, heavy influence by lobby groups already resulted in the hideous failure of nerve by the Government in bringing the Luas Green line down Dawson Street and through College Green.
According to that EPA Environment Report released during the summer, dangerous emmissions from vehicle exhausts are now the biggest threat to air quality in the city, and restrictions on cars in the city centre on certain days will be required if we are to meet stringent new EU pollution limits.
Serious traffic-calming (if not complete removal) on College Green could be on the way at last!
October 22, 2004 at 5:45 pm #746074burge_eye
ParticipantOriginally posted by Devin
Well it’s a pity poor burgeye can’t drive from Pearse Street straight into College Green anymore!
It goes without saying that when you close one route it increases congestion somewhere else. The idea of the above banning is that the overall volume of traffic going from Pearse Street to Dame Street is reduced, cos its more hassle to do it than it used to be.
It’s not really a pity because I chose architecture as a career and as a result I’m never away til after 7, so I just drive up it anyway.
Much as I’d like to think it was an idealistic move, I think, however, the real reason for that change in traffic flow was to make it easier for the fire engines to get up Dame street. And to help the Garda get home quicker.
October 27, 2004 at 5:08 pm #746075tommyt
ParticipantOriginally posted by kefu
.
From a personal point of view, it would make my particular drive in the morning from Stoneybatter to Ballsbridge, which I used to go via Stephen’s Green for, an even bigger nightmare.
And please don’t offer me any more route advice, I know practically every single road and shortcut in the north and south city. [/B]wow I can’t believe anyone would even consider using a car for that journey!,On yer bike mate and get about 10 hours a week of your life back from commuterland!that’s my idea of the ultimate car journey from hell!!!
October 27, 2004 at 5:18 pm #746076Frank Taylor
ParticipantOriginally posted by kefu
From a personal point of view, it would make my particular drive in the morning from Stoneybatter to Ballsbridge, which I used to go via Stephen’s Green for, an even bigger nightmare.Have you tried Luas smithfield-connolly then DART connolly-ballsbridge?
October 27, 2004 at 5:29 pm #746077kefu
ParticipantNot when you have to go out during the day on jobs, usually down the country. Only takes twenty minutes because I work slightly off-peak hours.
October 27, 2004 at 7:22 pm #746078tommyt
ParticipantOriginally posted by kefu
Not when you have to go out during the day on jobs, usually down the country. Only takes twenty minutes because I work slightly off-peak hours.ah fair enough,I’d say you’re praying a congestion charge isn’t introduced any time soon though!
October 28, 2004 at 11:42 am #746079kefu
ParticipantI’ve always suspected that any congestion charge introduced in Dublin could not apply to people who are resident inside the border of the Grand Canal and the North/South Circular Roads.
Otherwise, you would have to pay a fee just to visit your own home.October 28, 2004 at 12:05 pm #746080notjim
Participantdo you not live in your own home kefu?
October 28, 2004 at 4:30 pm #746081Frank Taylor
ParticipantOriginally posted by kefu
I’ve always suspected that any congestion charge introduced in Dublin could not apply to people who are resident inside the border of the Grand Canal and the North/South Circular Roads.
Otherwise, you would have to pay a fee just to visit your own home.In London, inner city residents still have to pay the congestion charge but get a 90% discount.
http://www.cclondon.com/downloads/ResidentsLiving.pdfOctober 28, 2004 at 6:01 pm #746082kefu
ParticipantI would certainly feel like a visitor to my own home (and a poverty-stricken one at that) if I had to pay €4 or €5 to get back there every time I drove across the North Circular Road.
October 28, 2004 at 10:33 pm #746083Anonymous
InactiveThey would have to do something for people like Kefu who live in the town or there would be uproar. The result I think is that many people who need motorised transport would buy houses inside the line to get around any charge that came in. Where years ago people got insurnace back home now, country people would use a buddy’s address to get a free congestion pass if a charge was put in.
October 29, 2004 at 8:52 am #746084burge_eye
ParticipantOriginally posted by PVC King
They would have to do something for people like Kefu who live in the town or there would be uproar. The result I think is that many people who need motorised transport would buy houses inside the line to get around any charge that came in. Where years ago people got insurnace back home now, country people would use a buddy’s address to get a free congestion pass if a charge was put in.Similarly, when I worked in singapore they had a rule that only cars with red number plates could enter the city on mon, wed and fri. White number plates enter tues thurs and sat, with either being allowed in on Sunday. It was an easy way for the traffic wardens to police it without the need for charges. Unfortunately the people just bought another car leading to more congestion. It’s a vicious circle.
October 29, 2004 at 11:09 am #746085notjim
Participanthaving people trying to live inside the line to get reduced charges is a plus but making it free would be a mistake.
October 31, 2004 at 1:36 am #746086Jack White
ParticipantLads do you not think that it is a little premature to be discussing road pricing before the need arises. Have you never considered that this change might actually work in the absence of a charge.
The stick works the only problem is that the carrot is called CIEOctober 31, 2004 at 11:03 am #746087notjim
Participanti think the need has arisen and the carrot is dublin bus.
March 23, 2005 at 4:13 pm #746088Anonymous
InactiveStarbucks are finally to arrive in Dublin City Centre according to todays Irish Times they have according to Jack Fagan agreed a deal for the ground floor of number 1 College Green. I noted with interest that the adjoining occupiers are Little Ceasars and Centra and that TCD now appear to have swallowed up most of the College Green / Foster Place / Anglesea St block. Good article a few other interesting stories in it.
March 23, 2005 at 11:26 pm #746089GrahamH
ParticipantYes – they’re paying €220,000 a year for the premises; the comparitively modest rent presumably reflecting its secondary location.
Does it say anything about us that what could be percived in name terms anyway as the central trading pitch in all of Ireland – No 1 College Green – being occupied by Starbucks?April 9, 2005 at 5:24 pm #746090ctesiphon
ParticipantThe argument that one must drive into work because one needs a car for site visits is weak. As things currently stand, maybe not, but it shows a slight lack of imagination. Could companies not keep a car or two (or three…) expressly for this purpose, thus freeing us up to walk or cycle or Luas or bus for the home-to-work journey? Or what about renting a car when needed? Or public transport?
I don’t want to over-simplify the argument, but it is imperative that we attempt to apply some imagination to these problems, rather than just seeing the cards that we already hold in our hands.
I’m currently formulating a thesis topic on this very subject- I hope to post here soon re same, and all opinions would be welcome, especially those of motorists (I can’t drive, and I cycle everywhere, so I have an inherent bias that must be countered 🙂 ). I’ll be in touch.April 10, 2005 at 10:20 pm #746091Anonymous
Inactive@Thomond Park wrote:
Starbucks are finally to arrive in Dublin City Centre according to todays Irish Times they have according to Jack Fagan agreed a deal for the ground floor of number 1 College Green. I noted with interest that the adjoining occupiers are Little Ceasars and Centra and that TCD now appear to have swallowed up most of the College Green / Foster Place / Anglesea St block. Good article a few other interesting stories in it.
The ground floor space that Starbucks are moving into is owned by Treasury. According to the piece I saw in the Times, some deal was done between Starbucks and Treasury Holdings with regards those buildings. I dont really know the details though.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

