college green/ o’connell street plaza and pedestrians
- This topic has 683 replies, 83 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 4 months ago by
missarchi.
- AuthorPosts
- September 29, 2004 at 3:51 am #746032
Paul Clerkin
KeymasterOriginally posted by StephenC
The new retail development at the BOI across from Parliament House will surely change the footfall of the area so I think greater pedestrianisation will have to be considered in the future.Retailer sought for former bank linking College Green and Suffolk
Bank Redevelopment
An international campaign has begun to get tenants for the largest city centre retail space to have come on the market for years. Jack Fagan reports
An international marketing campaign has been launched to find retail tenants for the former Bank of Ireland building linking College Green with Suffolk Street in Dublin 2.
White Glory, a consortium led by the owners of Powerscourt Townhouse, is expected to fetch at least €2 million in rent from the retail areas which will have a total floor are of 3,000 sq m (32,291 sq ft). There will be three levels of retail use at the Suffolk Street end, basement, ground and first floor, and mainly one level fronting on to College Green.
Though the owners would ideally like a single user, the odds are that it will be broken up among two or three leading retailers.
Fergus Keane of agent Hamilton Osborne King says the retail space is easily the largest to have come on the market in Dublin city centre in recent years. The building is currently being extended and redeveloped and is expected to be ready for fit-out by the end of the year.
Keane says it is likely to be of interest to fashion retailers targeting Grafton Street who either can’t find suitable premises or are reluctant to pay Grafton Street rents.The Suffolk Street frontage lends itself to being divided into two shop units of 668 sq m (7,190 sq ft) on ground level and 1,530 sq m (16,468 sq ft) over two other levels with back-up space in the basement. Under this arrangement, the College Green end could be let separately with 748.9 sq m (8,061 sq ft) of space available.
Keane expects the building to be of interest to retailers such as Zara, Massimo Durtti Bershkja, Boots and FCUK. Between 20 and 30 retailers are currently seeking representation in Dublin’s south city.
In addition to the retail space, the building will also have about 4,000 sq m (43,055 sq ft) of offices on the top floors
The current owners paid around €22 million for the building, which is composed of two distinctly different structures, one a large 19th century double height banking hall fronting on to College Green and, on Suffolk Street, a 1960s building that is being enlarged.
September 29, 2004 at 9:19 am #746033Anonymous
InactiveFor me the retention of the Scott Tallon Walker bank building facade is one of the most interesting facade retentions in the city at the moment. It seems that most of its interior has been gutted. With all the preservation of 19th and 20th century facades it is unusual to see a 1960s one being retained.
September 29, 2004 at 12:34 pm #746034J. Seerski
ParticipantI thought this facade was really ugly, monotonous and not untypical of any other bland blocks. This area of town really suffers from spectacular banality in parts (Ulster Bank, Kilkenny House, Norwich House, Castle House, Blarney House…..Zzzzzz – such crap
September 29, 2004 at 1:25 pm #746035GrahamH
ParticipantAgreed – I never liked the BOI on Suffolk St and am usually a fan of STW’s buildings from this period. The window clutter and monotony is unfortunate. Norwich House is horrendous, it’s filthy now as well as being ugly – is Blarney House actually called that?! Suits it down to the ground.
September 29, 2004 at 1:57 pm #746036J. Seerski
ParticipantGraham I dont know whether its called Blarney house! But its dire nonetheless.
Saw a montage of the proposed replacement – its just as banal as its predecessor.
Have to also remark that, as I have said before, trees should not dominate exceptional works of architecture. All of the trees on College Green should be removed as they obscure some of Ireland’s best works. Can you think of any similar plaza in Europe so dominated by trees? Imagine the Grand Place in Brussels with these London Plane Trees – no doubt they thought that the fine square looks better without. Clerys and the GPO can at last be well appreciated without those obscuring London Planes.
These trees camofage Foster Place and inhibit uninterrupted views of both Trinity and The Old Parliament, not to mention the fine builings on the south of the street – the detailing on the old Ulster Bank and the Closed Bank of Ireland are particular works of High Victorian skill (and sculpture – note the statue at the top of the closed Bank of Ireland with the lettering ‘Erin go Brath!’)
September 30, 2004 at 12:11 pm #746037urbanisto
ParticipantThe trees are quite overgrown and dominate Foster Place but I think a bit of imaginatioin here could create a feature of them. Some judicious pruning, extension of the pavement and moving the taxi rank and some interesting lighting (in the trees) could creat a really atmospheric place. Ideal for outside dining and drinking. The volume and noise pollution of traffic remain a problem though. Like most areas of Dublin the levels of traffic really dont allow one to enjoy the city. Someone mentioned in the Capel St thread that pedestrainisation has reached its limit in the city and no further schem,es should be considered! Are you mad. More not less is deinfately the answer. Forget congestion charging in the city just reduce the amount of areas that traffic imapcts. Its a small city centre and it is ridiculous that the amount of traffic using it should continue to grow. Westmoreland St is a case in point…its 6 lanes wide! Meanwhile pedestrians jostle for space on the pavements. The Wide Streets Commissioners are turning in their graves.
Good to see my favorite water sculpture back in action. Hopefully the CC do something with the disaster at the top of South Kings St. Either fix it or remove it!
September 30, 2004 at 12:16 pm #746038Anonymous
InactiveI heard that DCC had done some kind of feasibility study based on using glass screens or the likes to close off Foster St from College Green…to look at keeping taxis out of the space…this was about 3 months ago…not sure what the latest is
October 5, 2004 at 11:37 pm #746039Anonymous
InactiveI found DCC Senior Planner Dick Gleeson’s interpretation of the College Green situation highly encouraging.
It sounded like the pedestrainisation of College Green is “agreed”
I hope it comes to pass, Dublin would benefit enormously.
October 6, 2004 at 3:05 pm #746040Frank Taylor
ParticipantOriginally posted by Diaspora
It sounded like the pedestrainisation of College Green is “agreed”I hope it comes to pass, Dublin would benefit enormously.
How would this work? Would the stretch of road passing the Bank of Ireland have to stay open to cars to allow traffic from Dame street on to Westmoreland Street? What about traffic from D’Olier street that goes across college green towards Westmoreland Street?
October 6, 2004 at 3:14 pm #746041Anonymous
InactiveI would say Pearse Street would have to become a two way system again and take over from Nassau Street as the area to get buses from. This would actually help to generate more activity on Pearse Street. It would obviously take a huge amount more than just this, but it is one of my first thoughts on it anyway
October 6, 2004 at 5:08 pm #746042burge_eye
ParticipantNassau street can be discounted as it would become pointless as a route but
Take a look at the volume of traffic that continues from the North Quay to Dame Street via College Green. All of the traffic for Dame Steet, Georges Street and Christchurch would have to be channelled down the quay and up Parliament Street.
Hundreds upon hundreds of people get buses to work which stop at opp. trinity St. via Dame Street. Would all of these be re-routed up Georges Street? Or Suffolk Street?
Take a look at the traffic jams – all day – on Pearse Street with it’s 4 lanes. And only 3 buses serve it. Take 2 lanes away? Insanity
Don’t want to be a wet blanket but the total chaos caused just because we want to walk from Trinity to um, eh, where exactly? To admire the Bank of Ireland’s railings?
It would seem that the only way to acheive the ideal is to build an underpass.
October 6, 2004 at 11:52 pm #746043Anonymous
InactiveOriginally posted by burge_eye
It would seem that the only way to acheive the ideal is to build an underpass.I disagree,
It is possible to acheive a much better public space at College Green without either fully pedestrianising it or building underpasses. The following arrangement would work:
1. Leave College St as it is but have reduced its traffic load by banning the right turn from Bachelors Walk onto O’Connell Bridge and Banning the left turn from Burgh Quay onto D’olier St.
Allow this reduced traffic flow to continue to the base of Grafton St before turning left onto Nassau St thus eliminating the need to change Peasrse St which incidently hasn’t flowed freely since the Luas interfered with Beresford Place.
2. Reduce College Green and Dame St (to City Hall) to one lane in either direction; exclusively reserved for Buses, Taxis, Motorbikes and Bicycles.
3. All Bus stops would be eliminated from the above section with seperated laned bus stops on Westmoreland St, Sth Gt Georges St and Lord Edward St.
4. (Dame Court and) Dame Lane be reopened to traffic to allow access to the Trinity St Car Park via Exchequer St.
5. The taxi rank on College Green be moved to Cope St where taxis could wind their away around the back and sides of the Central Bank as far Blooms Hotel.
The way that the Central Plaza section of O’Connell St works is a pardigm in itself, well done to all concerned in its design if not its execution.
October 7, 2004 at 1:08 am #746044asdasd
ParticipantWhere is all this traffic going? I am used to using my car all the time, as an ex-migrant to the US: here i use it once or twice a week, if that: to shop at a suburban “mall” ( too far to walk), and to leave the city. I never go across the Liffey. Every time I see cars stuck in traffic that are not taxis, I think Why? Make it difficult for traffic to come to town, and the occupients will have to take freer flowing buses.
October 7, 2004 at 11:54 am #746045Frank Taylor
ParticipantOriginally posted by asdasd
Where is all this traffic going?A lot of it is just northside-southside suburban traffic. Cutting through the centre saves paying the Eastlink toll, and the route may be more well known to people than the alternatives further West. I think some people drive through the centre for the view. You’ve got a car and all roads are free so why not drive along the most central important streets?
October 7, 2004 at 2:13 pm #746046GrahamH
ParticipantI think one of the most unappreciated areas of the city centre is the College St/Westmoreland St junction – it’s one of the best places in the whole city, with the House of Lords and Westin and Trinity’s end pavilion all facing onto it, as well as the stock of College St itself.
There is real potential here to improve and extend the island, including the removal of the toilets there. The Moore trees have been cut over the summer so you can see him now, he looks quite well with the shady canopy floating over his head.
I’ve an interesting pic of an effort to improve here in the past with a line of trees planted along the roadside, probably in the 60s – they’re gone now.October 8, 2004 at 8:27 am #746047Anonymous
InactiveImproving College St shouldn’t be too difficult as the traffic load onto right fork going into Westmoreland St has been dramatically reduced by the enforced right turn from Pearse St onto Tara St.
The objective in my opinion must be to extend the O’Connell St model as far as City Hall. It should be possible to give an East-West quality space on the South of the river to imitate what a fusion of Henry St & Middle Abbey St does North of the river.
Foster Place without the Taxis would be a great start along with doing something with the pedestrian margin in College St.
October 8, 2004 at 12:44 pm #746048notjim
Participantits clear that there is a solution: a variety of traffice reduction measures, short of complete pedestrianization, along with pedestrian lights arranged so people to cross at any point.
October 8, 2004 at 12:54 pm #746049Frank Taylor
ParticipantThe crossing between Trinity College and the traffic island facing the Westin has for many years been a pedestrian bottleneck between the Northside and the Southside. It would make a huge difference to change the traffic light sequencing in favour of the pedestrians as Ken did in Trafalgar Square a couple of years back.
October 8, 2004 at 8:10 pm #746050GrahamH
ParticipantDefinitely.
I was wondering why the flow on Pearse St had altered so much – never thought of the Luas. Have to say I welcome it though cause it’s much easier to cross now!Agreed about the linking of ‘The Grand Thoroughfare’ as it’s so often described, from City Hall to O’ Cll St. What a difference it would make to the image of the city centre if nothing else, let alone the lives of those who use it. Traffic should continue to play a part on some city streets, but should not dominate as it currently does.
October 15, 2004 at 6:09 pm #746051Anonymous
InactiveAbsolutely correct,
There are a number of steps to be taken before it happens, I am confident that many of the building blocks are already under way.
Completion of the O’Connell St to City Hall Plaza has the potential to be the most significant development in urbanism since the wide streets commission. As it will provide the first significant East West Axis that isn’t either fully pedestrianised or completely open to traffic.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

